Consider This from NPR - What we know about the nuclear deal between the US and Saudi Arabia

Episode Date: July 22, 2026

The Trump administration has reached a nuclear deal with the government of Saudi Arabia.It would allow the Gulf state to develop a nuclear program for civilian purposes. But the deal has already raised questions about nuclear weapons.What do we know about the agreement - and what effect could it have on US the Middle East?For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Email us at [e-mail] episode was produced by Chris Harland-Dunaway and Tyler Bartlam, with audio engineering by Ted Mebane. Our director is Jonas Adams.It was edited by Patrick Jarenwattananon and Tinbete Ermyas.Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorning. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

It's consider this, where every day we go deep on one big news story. Today, a landmark nuclear deal between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, it would allow Saudi Arabia to build a nuclear program for civilian purposes like energy development. The agreement would need approval from Congress, but already, questions about nuclear weapons have come up. Here's Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday. Suffice it to say the U.S. is not going to reach any agreement with any country in the world. That leads to the risk of proliferation. Consider this. The U.S. and Saudi Arabia have reached an agreement about developing a nuclear program.

What do we know about it? And how could it affect the region? From NPR, I'm Juana Summers. It's consider this from NPR. The U.S. and Saudi Arabia have agreed to the development of a nuclear program. The U.S. would provide technology for the Saudis to develop a civilian nuclear program. Matthew Bunn is a former advisor to the White House's Office of Science and Technology, policy in the Clinton administration. He's now a nuclear proliferation expert at Harvard University.

Hi, Matthew. Good to be here. So just start by telling us, if you can, why does Saudi Arabia say it wants a civilian nuclear program? Well, they say that they would like to make nuclear energy to cover their domestic needs so they can export more of their oil and make more money. But they also want to provide the foundation over time for having more options to move toward nuclear weapons should they feel the need. And on the flip side, then, why would the United States want to provide the kingdom with nuclear technology? Well, the United States, first of all, wants a strong relationship with the kingdom,

given its vast oil reserves and role in the global oil market. But secondly, the United States has nuclear companies that would like the business. and would like to see nuclear energy around the world expand to help cope with both energy poverty and climate change. And what kinds of rules or safeguards, perhaps, could be put into a deal that would prevent Saudi Arabia from using this technology to develop weapons versus the goal of developing a civilian nuclear program? Well, unfortunately, the Trump administration dropped an insistence on what the United States has been insisting with many countries that they accept the broader set of international inspections included in what's called the additional protocol. Instead, the Trump administration has worked out a bilateral U.S. Saudi set of inspection arrangements that haven't yet been revealed to the public. exactly what they are, but apply only to what the U.S. would provide, not to the overall nuclear program in Saudi Arabia.

A U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, has said that the U.S. would not sign any deal that would lead to nuclear proliferation. But from what you understand, at this point, are those safeguards included in this deal? So when Secretary Rubio was a senator, he co-sponsored legislation that, would have required before any nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia could go into force that Saudi Arabia confessed to the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, the journalist, and accept the far-reaching inspections called for under what's called the additional protocol and accept a ban on both uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing, the key technologies you can use to make

nuclear weapons material. And Saudi Arabia hasn't agreed to any of that in this deal. What happens if Saudi Arabia were to begin working on a weapon in secret? Is there anything that the United States or anyone else could do to stop them? Well, there is a global effort to stem the spread of nuclear weapons that has been strikingly successful. There's only nine states that have nuclear arms today. and U.S. intelligence and U.S. pressure and U.S. military capabilities have been an important part of that global effort. I think it's very likely that if Saudi Arabia moved in this direction, the United States would have a variety of tools to try to pressure them.

But still, agreeing to this kind of an agreement, especially if it does lead to, selling Saudi Arabia the uranium enrichment technology that would allow them to make bomb material does pose some increased risks. I mean, we're still learning a lot here, but I wonder how you might expect other countries in the region would react to this news. Well, the reality is Iran already has a uranium enrichment program. That's part of the focus of the ongoing war with Iran. And it's part of the reason why Saudi Arabia wants to have comparable capabilities.

So the region is already dealing with Iran's capability. And also, of course, Israel, although it doesn't acknowledge them, has a nuclear weapons capability. And in the short term, do you think this could have an impact on the course of the U.S. war with Iran? I think it may make negotiating a reasonable deal with Iran more difficult. If Saudi Arabia isn't agreeing, for example, to the far-reaching, international inspections called for the additional protocol, it'll be hard to get Iran to agree to accept those. Do you have any sense of the likelihood of the type of support that this agreement would get in Congress, which I believe would have to review it? So the way the deal works under the Atomic Energy Act, it goes to Congress for a review, but if they do nothing, it goes into force. The only way they stop it is if there's a two-thirds majority against it in both

houses of Congress able to override a presidential veto. That seems unlikely. We've been speaking with Matthew Bunn of the Belfour Center at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Thanks so much. Thank you. This episode was produced by Chris Harlan-Dunaway and Tyler Bartlam. It was edited by Patrick Jaron Watananan and Ten Beat Armius. Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dornay. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Juana Summers.