Consider This from NPR - What’s at stake in President Trump’s showdown with the press?

Episode Date: September 21, 2026

President Trump's battle with the press has escalated. On Friday, he banned three outlets from the White House. Those outlets are suing the Trump administration over the ban. On Monday, the five networks that coordinate television coverage of the president agreed to suspend that coverage.This episode was produced by Elena Burnett and Connor Donevan, with audio engineering by Ted Mebane. Our director is Jonas Adams.It was edited by Mallory Yu and Tinbete Ermyas.Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorning.Support public media with NPR+ and enjoy perks for over 25 podcasts like this one. This show’s perks include bonus episodes and sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

It's considered this where every day we go deep on one big news story. Today, the battle over a White House press ban has escalated. It started with a truth social post from President Trump Friday afternoon. In it, he announced an immediate ban of three news outlets from the White House, CNN, Politico, and MS Now, known until recently as MSNBC. I don't think somebody should be allowed to come in and write fake stories, fake news. Speaking to the press later that day, Trump made it clear this was about coverage he didn't like. It's sick. I mean, there's something wrong with a country that can allow people to write purposely negative shares. Now, if they want to write them, that's fine. But I don't have to let them into the people's house.

By Saturday morning, the ban had gone into effect, and reporters like CNN's Betsy Klein were barred from entry. So I walk in, I tap in my back. and it beeps a couple of different times. It turns red, blue, and green, and it didn't accept my pin number. She delivered that news and a live hit on the sidewalk outside the White House complex. She held up the empty plastic sleeve that used to hold her press pass. She said the Secret Service had confiscated it. This is the latest in a string of attacks on the media during Trump's second term.

And it drew a forceful response. On Monday, the five networks that coordinate television coverage of the president agreed to suspend that coverage. Consider this. The White House and the press corps are fighting about what access precisely is guaranteed by the First Amendment. We will ask a longtime White House correspondent what's at stake. From NPR, I'm Scott Detrow. It's Consider This from NPR. You might not have ever heard of the White House TV pool, but you have probably seen it at work.

It's a coordinated effort between ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox News. And its mission is to ensure that there is a TV camera recording every public presidential event at any hour of day or night, whether the president is in Washington or halfway around the world. NPR and other outlets do the same thing for radio coverage. If you are watching a clip from a Trump press conference on YouTube or Instagram or TikTok, the TV pool probably recorded it. So it is a big deal that as of Monday, that pool coverage has been suspended. To get a sense of what is at stake in this fight, I spoke with Bloomberg's Jeff Mason.

He's a longtime White House correspondent and the former president of the White House Correspondents Association. Let's start with this. What is your response to the White House's arguments today that access to the White House is a privilege, not a right? I would just reflect on the First Amendment and the fact that the founders of the United States put it in the Constitution that there is freedom of the press and freedom of speech. And so the ability of reporters, including my colleagues at CNN and MS Now and Politico, to report on what the president does and says and wants to do is protected. It's protected speech and it's protected in terms of the freedom of the press. And so that's what the founders envisioned. And that's what we do. And that's why we show up. And all of our colleagues should have the ability to do that. I want to talk a little bit about the TV pool situation.

help people listening understand why this matters, why that affects the coverage, what people see of the president? Well, let me explain what a pool is first. The WHOCA created pooling decades ago because the president holds events in spaces that aren't always big enough to get the entire press corps in. So there are 13 journalists that travel with the president wherever he goes on Air Force One and go into the Oval Office when he's holding events there. part of that 13-member press pool is the TV pool, and that's made up of the five big networks. And they rotate which network takes their day or travels with the president. And today it was CNN's day. And instead of putting another network in, say Fox or CBS or NBC, they decided to not put anyone in out of solidarity with CNN. And that is a big deal because it means there wasn't video.

And it also shows solidarity amongst competing networks that work together on the pool, but are also competing with each other for news and for viewers. I cover the White House for a bit. I filled those radio pool seats many times. And I will say when people ask me about covering the White House, one thing people asked a lot is, why don't you all stand up for each other more? When President Trump attacks a reporter, why don't you all defend that reporter? This is your colleague. This is your peer. And there have been calls for years for the White House press for to push back a little bit more and stand up. I'll note, when you were the president of the White House Correspondents Association, you said an attack on any of us, is an attack on all of us. Why do you think a step like this wasn't taken until now? It's a good question. I can tell you because I've been in the leadership of the press corps, that it is hard to rally the entire press corps and all of these organizations together

to make one decision and to back each other. I do think we back each other in practice every day by asking questions, asking follow-ups, for example, if the president is critical of one reporter, I know that I see some people on social media wishing that we would just walk out of the room or retort back to the president. But we show our support by asking a follow-up question and by sticking to our jobs of reporting the news. Any sense from your personal perspective why this step was taken now and not say when the AP, I mean, is down the middle of affairs you could be the Associated Press.

When the AP was blocked from access to parts of the White House, why wasn't something as drastic as this taken? Well, I appreciate you're bringing that up. because not only was AP blocked, but the other wires were kicked out as well of our daily spots in the pool, Reuters and Bloomberg. So it's frustrating, I think, sometimes to not feel that solidarity from the very beginning. But we're feeling and seeing it now, and that's important. And I hope to see that continue. Can you give us a sense of what these conversations were like during the first Trump administration? When you were on the WHOHCA board, you were president. And President Trump tried to make similar movements. He took away CNN reporter Jim Acosta's hard pass, among other steps.

They were ultimately overturned by courts, but the WHCA had a lot of conversations behind the scenes. What were those like? We did, and I can give you a window into that, even starting with the transition in 2016. There were people within Trump's orbit who were talking about or considering moving the press out of the press room entirely and taking the pool off of Air Force One. So I'm proud of those negotiations having led to us staying here. I also think it was reflective of something that people didn't necessarily know around Trump at the beginning, which was he quite likes having the ability to say, hey, bring in the pool. I want this coverage and having these long cabinet meetings, for example, which were covered by the press corps.

Remember, this is a former reality television president or reality television host, rather, who became president. So he's very keen to have cameras around. All of that said, he has maintained his criticism of the president. press and using the term fake news and enemy the people. And that rhetoric is damaging and has been deliberately damaging to the credibility of the press corps. And as I used to say, when I was president of the association, I think the way we stand up against that is just by continuing to do robust and good work. One of the things that Trump has shown is how easy it is to go around the mainstream press. Do you think there's a downside here to this standoff that the answer could

be more people with YouTube streams who aren't professional journalists who don't have journalistic ethics. Look, I've covered the White House for 18 years. I remember at the beginning of the Obama years being outraged as a reporter when the White House first put something out on Twitter instead of sending it to us by email. And of course, that's ludicrous now to think about. So everything changes. But I don't think you can have the same reach with a YouTuber as you can with all of the major media organizations. And so I think that that will end up being something that this White House and this president probably reflect on. One thing I'm pretty aware of, and I'm sure you are as well, and we can just work through this together,

is that a lot of people in the U.S. do not feel too bad for Washington reporters, you know? Yeah. What would you say to a skeptical listener who says, this is just more self-important whining from the media? Well, I'm okay with that, Scott. I'm fine with working this out with you, but my answer to that is, again, to look back at the Constitution, is that this profession and the work that we do is part of a healthy democracy. And it doesn't matter if some people, including the President of the United States, don't like our coverage. What's important is that we have the right to do that coverage and continue to report on the president, the presidency, and the White House, as well as the rest of the administration.

And I would use that also as a moment to just mention that this attack on the press is not limited to just the White House Press Corps. been part of a pattern, including the Pentagon, including the Treasury Department, which just in the last few weeks prevented Bloomberg and the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal from covering a finance minister's meeting. That's Bloomberg's Jeff Mason, longtime White House correspondent. Thank you so much. My pleasure. This episode was produced by Elena Burnett and Connor Donovan with audio engineering by Ted Mebane. Our director is Jonas Adams. It was edited by Mallory U. and Tinbeat Armius. Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorney. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Scott Detrow.