Crime Fix with Angenette Levy - Bryan Kohberger Alibi Revealed: 3 Surprising Details
Episode Date: April 18, 2024Bryan Kohberger has provided more information to the court about where he was the night four University of Idaho students were murdered. The notice of alibi disputes the prosecution theory th...at Kohberger left his apartment in Pullman, Washington and drove 10 minutes to Moscow, Idaho and stabbed killed Maddie Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Ethan Chapin and Xana Kernodle. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy breaks down three surprising details from the filing with former prosecutor Andy Wilson in this episode of Crime Fix — a daily show that delves into the biggest stories in crime.Get 50% off of confidential background reports at https://www.truthfinder.com/lccrimefix and access information about almost anyone!Host: Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Guest: Andy Wilson https://www.linkedin.com/in/andy-wilson-ab9823296/CRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoAudio Editing - Brad MaybeGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@LawandCrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Wondery Plus subscribers can binge all episodes of this Law and Crimes series ad-free right now.
Join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.
Brian Koberger out stargazing and driving the night four University of Idaho students were
murdered. That's part of the alibi he's offering to the court. I have three surprising details of
what he's claiming and what it could mean for his
defense. Thanks for joining me for Crime Fix. I'm Anjanette Levy. We've known for a while now that
Brian Koberger claimed he was out driving the night the four students were murdered in that
house on King Road. But now we have a little more detail about where Brian Koberger claimed he went
and why. Koberger maintains he didn't murder Maddie Mogan,
Kaylee Gonsalves, Ethan Chapin, and Zanna Kernodle on November 13th, 2022,
so he says he certainly wasn't at that house. Instead, his lawyers write,
Mr. Koberger was out driving in the early morning hours of November 13th, 2022,
as he often did, to hike and run and or see the moon and stars. He drove throughout
the area south of Pullman, Washington, west of Moscow, Idaho, including Hawaii Park.
In Idaho, if a defendant is going to claim they have an alibi, they have to tell the prosecutor
about a specific place or places where they were when a crime took place, and they have to identify
a witness or
witnesses who can vouch for them. Here's what Judge John Judge told the defense about that last summer.
Well, the way I understand this is, and this is in the so-called alibi, not really an alibi, but quote, he was out driving during the late night and
early morning hours of November 12th, 2013. So interestingly enough, Koberger didn't identify
any witnesses who can say, I saw Brian in that filing. So Koberger has kind of offered an alibi. This is what I would call alibi-ish.
The filing also seeks to cast doubt on claims made by the prosecution in its probable cause
affidavit. For instance, police had said Brian Koberger's cell phone was moving south through
Pullman at 2.27 a.m. the morning of the murders, but then stopped reporting to cell networks until 4.48 a.m.
That covers the time the murders are believed to have occurred. But Koberger claims his expert,
Cy Ray, analyzed cell records and will testify that Brian Koberger's mobile device was south
of Pullman, Washington and west of Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022, and that Brian Koberger's mobile device did not travel
east on the Moscow-Polman Highway in the early morning hours of November 13th, and thus could
not be the vehicle captured on the video along the Moscow-Polman Highway near Floyd's Cannabis Shop.
Now, in this notice of alibi, Koberger explains how he moved to Washington from Pennsylvania
in June of 2022 and was an avid runner and hiker, so he'd often explore the area, often
late at night.
One place he frequented was Wawee Park near Pullman, where he was a student at Washington
State University.
So what does all of this mean for Brian Koberger's case?
With me to discuss that is Andy Wilson. He is a former prosecutor. He has prosecuted death penalty cases in the past. Andy, this alibi, I call it alibi-ish because Brian Koberger's not naming any witnesses who can actually vouch for him. So what does that mean for this filing? Well, first of all, the Idaho Criminal Code requires that if you're going to use an alibi defense, you have to file notice of it.
This is part of that process.
And the whole idea is to put the prosecution really kind of on notice of what it is you're going to try to say so they can prepare to present rebuttal evidence to deal with whatever that defense is going to be.
So typically, from a prosecution point of view, what you'd like to see with an alibi is,
or with a notice of alibi, is some level of specificity. And what I see here is,
this is just kind of a general plea. Hey, the defendant was out in the country in the middle
of the night, looking at the moon, looking at stars.
Again, from a prosecutor point of view, I certainly would respond and ask for more specificity.
I would ask for specific witnesses who may be able to prove his comings and goings.
They did list a witness that they're going to try to use to show where he was
through phone records. But I just don't think that that's probably general enough to do what
you have to do with respect to the alibi. Yeah. I mean, I think they're going to want
a specific person who can actually testify to this. That's what I'm guessing they mean by
a witness, a person that can put you there.
I'm also here seeing that they say he was at this favorite spot of his.
It's Hawaii Park.
And that this became a favorite spot of his as he moved from Pennsylvania to Washington in June of 2022.
This is somewhere he frequented.
He was a night owl, so he would frequently go on these drives. And he actually had photos, including in November of 2022. This is somewhere he frequented. He was a night owl, so he would frequently go on these
drives. And he actually had photos, including in November of 2022, at the same month of the
murders, of the sky and of the moon and the stars. So this guy's out and about at night,
late at night in the early morning hours, according to the defense, taking pictures of
the stars and the moon at this park.
So does that help him that this is somebody who is out and about at times in the middle of the night?
So I don't think it does. Again, it doesn't provide enough specificity to actually prove that he was somewhere else at the time of the murders. As a matter of fact, when I prosecute cases,
I like the notice of an alibi
because it kind of tips the defense hands.
It kind of shows me what they may or may not do
with respect to the case.
And there's a couple of different things I look for.
Number one is you can get a notice of alibi
that shows that your defense is going to be, you're just going to throw anything
you can against the wall. So, and again, that's kind of what you see here. It's just kind of an
absurd story. This guy likes to just go out in the middle of the night and take pictures of the moon
and the sky. And look, I'm not saying he does that, but you also have to deal with the fact that
his DNA is in the scene. You've got to deal with the fact that his DNA is in the scene.
You've got to deal with the fact that he drives the exact same car that we know is over in the area of the murders.
And just to say that he was out the exact same night of the murders and he's out just driving around the countryside. It's just absurd. The other thing that I look for with respect to a notice of alibi is a lot of times it can kind of indicate whether or not the defendant's ultimately stand. And what you're seeing here is they put this expert
that they're going to try to use to show the phone records
that indicates to me that, again,
I don't think this defendant's going to testify.
I want to take a short break from this update
on Brian Koberger's case to tell you about something
that can help you learn more about the people in your life.
It's a great website and it's called truthfinder.com.
Truthfinder is one of the world's
largest public record search services. Truthfinder has just one goal. It's to help you and me learn
the truth about the people that we meet. Here's how it works. Log on to truthfinder.com and simply
put in a name. Within minutes, maybe even seconds if you're lucky, you'll get a report that includes
phone numbers, addresses, friends, family, criminal records, and more. It will also show you sex offender statuses for the people who
live in your neighborhood. The cases I cover make it clear that you have to do everything you can
to keep you and your loved ones safe. So right now, Crime Fix viewers can get 50% off of confidential
background reports at truthfinder.com. So just log on to
truthfinder.com slash lccrimefix and start accessing information about almost anyone.
Again, that's truthfinder.com slash lccrimefix. I think that you're right that they are going to
use experts because they've kind of said that in the past, that they plan to kind of pick things apart
through expert testimony. And this is certainly one of them. And they're really, though, Andy,
trying to pick apart the probable cause affidavit and what the police have said in the past. They're
saying basically the cops were wrong, that his vehicle, according to their expert, the Cy Ray,
was not moving east toward Moscow from Pullman
on that road that connects the two towns, that he was over there in Whitman County in
Washington State where he lived.
He was at the park looking at the stars and that this is something he did all the time.
He would go out driving at night.
And I can tell you for one, when I interviewed one of his neighbors, a downstairs neighbor, she actually said he was up late at night all the time. And they were kind
of annoyed by it because he would be up late at night vacuuming and stuff like that. So he's
certainly a night owl. And I think that they're going to play that up big time, that this is
somebody who is up at all hours all the time. This is just who he was.
Look, as a defensive team assigned to this kind of case or
fighting this kind of case, you have to do the best with the hand that you're dealt. And that's
what the defense team is doing in this case. That again, they still have, even though they're going
to try to use this expert to show that he wasn't eased over by Moscow, you still have to deal with the fact that
his phone goes dead. He turned his phone off at the time of the murders. So again, how do you
even begin to explain that as a defense attorney? The exact time that these murders are happening,
your client's phone is off, a car that is basically the exact same as his
is over in the murder scenes, and your client's DNA is in that scene. Again, you're going to do
the best with what you have. You're going to try to argue things like, oh, he was always up late.
He was always a night owl. He liked these parks. You're going to play the hand that you're dealt.
But ultimately, that is a tall
mountain to climb to overcome some of this evidence. We'll see what they end up doing with
it. So do you see Judge Judge allowing them to submit further information? They say that they're
still waiting for additional discovery from the state before their expert can complete his analysis
so they can finish filling out this alibi. So do you see
the judge allowing that? Or do you see the judge saying, you know what, this isn't good enough.
We're not going to allow an alibi defense at trial. So if you actually look at the Idaho
Criminal Code that governs notice of alibis, it's section 19-519. There's a subsection 5 that basically allows for good cause shown.
The judge can make exceptions to the time requirements, to the notice requirements.
I do believe that ultimately the judge would probably allow this that are of this high profile, you're going to see the judge make decisions that certainly are in favor of the defendant being able to present his defense.
So I think that both the statute would allow it, and I think the facts and circumstances are probably going to allow this alibi to come in.
We shall see. Andy Wilson, thanks so much.
Thank you very much.
And that's it for this episode of Crime Fix. I'm Anjanette Levy. Thanks so much for being with us.
We'll see you back here next time.