Crime Junkie - SCANDAL: Police Explorer Programs
Episode Date: December 22, 2025Law enforcement Explorer programs were created to mentor teens interested in policing. But decades of weak oversight created an environment where officers could manipulate that trust. Some exploited t...heir roles, using their authority to groom, abuse, and silence the very teens they were entrusted to guide.Resources:RAINN – Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network: 24/7 hotline and resources for survivors of sexual assault and abuse. Call 1-800-656-HOPE (4673) or visitrainn.orgNational Sexual Violence Resource Center (NSVRC): Research, education, and tools to support prevention and survivor recovery. Visitnsvrc.orgJoyful Heart Foundation: Works to transform the response to sexual assault, domestic violence, and child abuse, while supporting healing and survivor advocacy. Visitjoyfulheartfoundation.orgChildhelp National Child Abuse Hotline: Confidential support for anyone concerned about child abuse. Call 1-800-4-A-CHILD (1-800-422-4453) or visitchildhelphotline.orgVictimConnect Resource Center: Provides free, confidential support and referrals for people affected by crime, including sexual abuse and misconduct by authority figures. Call 1-855-4-VICTIM (855-484-2846) or visitvictimconnect.orgNational Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN): Expert guidance, therapist locators, and educational tools for families navigating trauma and abuse. Visitnctsn.orgBloom365: Youth-focused organization working to end teen dating abuse, sexual violence, and trauma through prevention, peer advocacy, and healing services. Call or text the Bloom helpline at 1-888-606-HOPE (4673) or visitbloom365.orgCDC – Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Evidence-based strategies and data about child sexual abuse in the U.S. Visit cdc.gov/violenceprevention/childsexualabuseState Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Numbers: Directory to report child abuse to agencies. Visit childwelfare.gov/state-child-abuse-and-neglect-reporting-numbers988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Provides 24/7, free and confidential support for people in distress, prevention and crisis resources. Call 988 or visit988lifeline.orgCrisis Text Line: 24/7 mental health support via text. Text "HOME" to 741741 or visitcrisistextline.orgNational Domestic Violence Hotline: Support for those experiencing abuse or coercive control. Call 1-800-799-SAFE (7233), text "START" to 88788, or visitthehotline.orgLove is Respect: Help for teens and young adults in abusive relationships.Call 1-866-331-9474, text "LOVEIS" to 22522, or visitloveisrespect.orgNational Center for Victims of Crime: Provides advocacy, legal information, and trauma-informed resources for survivors of sexual abuse, harassment, and exploitation. Visitvictimsofcrime.orgMale Survivor: Support for male survivors of sexual abuse and assault, including institutional or authority-based abuse. Visitmalesurvivor.orgStaying Safe in Youth Law Enforcement Programs:If you or your child is involved in a Police Explorer program – or any youth mentorship run by law enforcement – there are steps you can take to reduce risk and create safer boundaries.Ask direct questions. Who runs the program? What are the policies around texting, ride-alongs, and one-on-one interactions? Are there rules that limit contact between adult officers and minors outside of scheduled events?Insist on transparency. Reputable programs should have clear, written guidelines about communication, supervision, and conduct. Ask to see them.Monitor ride-alongs. Know who your child is riding with, how long they're gone, and what the reporting procedures are.Watch the tech. Officers or advisors should never be Snapchatting, DMing, or texting minors privately. Monitor app usage and discuss healthy boundaries.Get involved. Show up to meetings. Get to know the adults running the program. Your presence as a parent or guardian helps make the space safer for everyone.Keep communication open. Let your child know they can talk to you about anything -- especially if something makes them uncomfortable. Make it clear that they won’t be in trouble for speaking up.Getting Help:If you or someone you know has experienced abuse in a Police Explorer or similar youth program, here’s what to do:Believe them. If a child or teen discloses abuse, believe what they say. Stay calm, listen, and affirm that it’s not their fault. Praise them for coming forward.Report it. If the child is in danger, call 911. Otherwise, contact your local police, sheriff's department, or state child protection agency. If you’re concerned local police might have a conflict of interest, contact your state police, state attorney general, or the FBI.Document/preserve everything. Save messages, screenshots, call logs — anything that could help support the report.Seek emotional support: Abuse by a trusted adult is incredibly disorienting. You and/or your child deserve compassionate care from someone trained in trauma -- like a therapist, school counselor, or crisis line advocate.Connect with survivor resources. Many organizations offer specialized support for young people.Consult legal counsel: Some survivors explore civil legal action against individuals or institutions. An attorney familiar with institutional abuse cases can help assess your options.Red Flags: Signs of Grooming or Abuse in Explorer Programs:Abuse by authority figures often begins with grooming -- a gradual, often-subtle process that builds trust before violating it. Here are common warning signs in youth law enforcement programs:“Special” treatment. One teen is singled out for attention, gifts, mentorship, or exclusive opportunities not given to others.Excessive one-on-one contact. Repeated private ride-alongs, late-night messages, or invitations to hang out off-duty.Private communication. The adult uses personal texting apps, Snapchat, Instagram DMs, or other unmonitored channels to talk to a minor.Overstepping/blurring boundaries. Inappropriate compliments, jokes about relationships, or sharing personal details not appropriate for a mentor-mentee dynamic.Isolation. The adult discourages the teen from talking to others about their relationship or makes the teen feel responsible for their secrecy.Gaslighting or guilt. The adult blames the teen for misunderstandings, manipulates their emotions, or makes them feel they’ll “ruin someone’s life” if they speak out.Physical contact. Touch that’s unnecessary, prolonged, or makes the teen uncomfortable -- even if it’s framed as casual or accidental. You can learn more about The Good segment and even submit a story of your own by visiting The Good page on our website! Source materials for this episode cannot be listed here due to character limitations. For a full list of sources, please visit: https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/scandal-police-explorer-programs/Did you know you can listen to this episode ad-free? Join the Fan Club! Visit https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/fanclub/ to view the current membership options and policies.Don’t miss out on all things Crime Junkie!Instagram: @crimejunkiepodcast | @audiochuckTwitter: @CrimeJunkiePod | @audiochuckTikTok: @crimejunkiepodcastFacebook: /CrimeJunkiePodcast | /audiochuckllcCrime Junkie is hosted by Ashley Flowers and Brit Prawat. Instagram: @ashleyflowers | @britprawatTwitter: @Ash_Flowers | @britprawatTikTok: @ashleyflowerscrimejunkieFacebook: /AshleyFlowers.AF Text Ashley at 317-733-7485 to talk all things true crime, get behind the scenes updates, and more! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, crime junkies. I'm your host, Ashley Flowers. And I'm Britt.
And the story I have for you today isn't just one story, but it started that way for me with Sandra Birchmore, which we covered in our last episode.
I was shocked and outraged how she was taken advantage of in the police explorer program.
Because, like, my God, surely parents have to believe that sending their kids to learn from the police has to be the safest place for them. What a betrayal.
But then I began to wonder, was that the exception?
or was this just one example of a system with deep-rooted problems that lets abuse thrive?
And just as I was asking myself this question, literally within like two weeks of Sandra's story breaking,
I saw this local news article.
It said, IMPD officer tied to teen suicide ordered to write weekly journal in rare sentence.
A teen who was part of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department's Explorer Programme,
And as I dug into her story, I realized that we were just scratching the surface of a much,
much bigger problem because the more I looked, the more I found.
And me and our reporter Nina have spent months uncovering a systemic issue within the program
that is required listening for everyone.
Crime junkie or not, this is an episode that must be shared.
Because you will not believe what has been happening right under our noses
for decades.
For Mike Gatliff, time stopped on Monday, November 2, 2015, right around 4.41 p.m.
And now his life is split into before and after.
Before, he was living out the most average day, went to work at the Indianapolis Police Pond Unit,
came home to the house that he shared with his wife, Janice, their 18-year-old daughter Heidi, and their 21-year-old son.
He'd just gotten out of his car and was bringing up some leaf bags from the yard when this familiar face came up to him.
29-year-old IMPD officer Francisco almost, known to him and most as Paco.
Now, even though Mike's a civilian employee for IMPD, the only reason he really knew Francisco was because of Heidi.
She had been a part of the department's explorer program for nearly two years, and he knew that she had done some ride-alongs with Francisco over the past few months.
And Francisco had never just shown up at their house before, unannounced and not in uniform,
but he says that he's there that day to talk to Heidi about a case.
She's an explorer.
What kind of case would you need to talk to, like, explorer part?
They're not working cases.
They're not officers.
Yes, you're right.
They're not.
But Mike isn't even concerned.
Along with working for IMPD, he's also a fire department chaplain.
So, like, their whole family trusts first responders.
And IMPD was Heidi's life, basically.
Everything she's done has been working up to getting on the force.
Maybe she's getting like a little inside peek.
Like any crime junkie would love.
Oh, for sure.
It would be great, whatever.
So he tells Francisco that, you know, he just got home, but Heidi's car is in the driveway.
So she's got to be inside.
So like, come on in.
He invites Francisco in through the garage.
But Francisco stays at the entrance while Mike goes inside to get Heidi.
Now inside, her bedroom door is closed.
Mike knocks, and then he walks in when she doesn't answer.
And this is the moment that time stops.
Because once he opened that door, he would always be living in the after.
After he found Heidi laying in bed where he kissed her goodbye that morning.
Before she was warm and alive, his beautiful daughter was so much potential.
And after, she is still and pale with a gun near her head and her hand close to it.
Now, Mike rushes to Heidi and calls out for Francisco realizing that he hadn't followed him in.
And Francisco comes running.
But even though he's the trained officer, it's Mike who slips into first responder mode.
He's the one that calls 911 at 4.41 p.m.
And he's the one who gives dispatchers what they need while Francisco is just like falling apart.
Medics and IMPD officers arrive within minutes and Heidi is pronounced dead there at the scene.
And the rest of the night is just a blur of chaos.
Mike calls Janice at work, bringing her into the after,
and she remembers the moment that she collapsed and had to be driven home.
There, friends and family gather while police seal off the house.
Officers line the street in a show of respect for Heidi as one of their own.
And everyone is left reeling, trying to make sense of something that makes no sense.
I mean, the day before, everything seemed pretty normal.
The family went to church, like always.
Later, Heidi skipped baking cookies with her mom.
She said she had plans with a friend.
And then when she came home, she seemed a little upset, but nothing major.
She went back out, came home again sometime later.
Mike didn't see her get back, which was like a little odd.
But there was nothing that, like, screamed crisis.
Not even close.
Mike is trained to recognize the warning signs of suicide, and he hadn't noticed any.
Plus, like, Heidi is known for her upbeat personality.
She is bright and bubbly and driven.
She loved helping people.
I mean, that's what drew her to law enforcement.
In middle school, she actually dreamed of the FBI,
but over time, she set her sights on IMPD,
the department that she got to know through the Explorers.
Mike was actually the one who'd first heard about the program
and thought it would be a good fit for her.
And he was right.
Heidi had ADHD.
She struggled with a traditional classroom,
but exploring let her learn by doing.
She worked security at the Indianapolis 500.
She helped on mall patrols.
I mean, her confidence was growing with every single shift.
And her favorite part were the ride-alongs.
Sitting beside an officer following calls, watching arrests unfold,
it felt like the real thing.
And it really cemented her desire to become a cop.
And just days before her death,
she had been promoted to post commander and captain,
something that she was thrilled about.
So for Heidi's parents and her brother,
like, this isn't just grief.
It is whiplash.
But even in that grief and their darkest moments,
her family has never disputed
that Heidi's gunshot wound was self-inflicted.
I mean, she even left a note on Mike's computer,
which they found later.
But there still are so many questions
about what led up to her death and why.
And the note didn't give any explanation.
Not one that they fully understood
or not one that filled in all the gaps
of how things ended up the way they did.
Like in the note,
She apologized to her parents.
She said it wasn't their fault, but that she'd made some mistakes.
She felt like she was hurting people's careers.
It was vague.
It was a little confusing for them.
And there was nothing in recent memory that they could call back to that made this make sense.
And listen, credit where credit is due for IMPD, because they are going to get their fair share of heat in this episode, too.
They did the thing that you're supposed to do.
Every death should be treated as suspicious until you definitely rule that it's not.
And even though everyone was in agreement that this was a suicide, there was still a mystery surrounding it.
And it quickly becomes obvious that what led up to it might involve one of their own.
Now, Brett, I know you have a teenager.
What is the one thing that can give you insight into their life, the portal into their internal world?
Their phone.
Correct.
Hidden in Heidi's calls and texts might be all the answers that her family is looking for.
And that phone, still playing music, was near her head when her dad found her.
So police collected it and asked her parents for the passcode.
But Mike and Janice are kind of taken back, like passcode.
Heidi's not supposed to have a passcode.
They have a house rule against it.
But detectives tell them the phone's locked.
And listen, it's not like Heidi couldn't have broken that rule if there were things that she didn't want her parents to see or know after she was gone.
So they like toss out some guesses.
police try them, but nothing works, and eventually the phone disables completely.
And there's just something that feels wrong about this.
You see, after Mike found his daughter, Francisco had asked Mike to use Heidi's phone
so that he could call the advisor who ran her explorer post.
Call them for what?
And also use your own phone?
Mike didn't know why he was asking.
I mean, he had in that moment zero brain space to even consider.
the weirdness of the request.
A thousand percent. Yeah, he just found his daughter.
But Francisco was able to place that call, presumably without having a passcode to open the phone,
which means...
Francisco locked the phone.
Yeah, and there is only one reason that you would need to do that.
And that is if you don't want anyone to see what's on it.
Everything around Francisco is starting to stink.
He came to talk to Heidi about a case.
which makes no sense now that the blinders are off.
He froze and freaked out in a moment of crisis
and had her dad be the one to call 911.
And then he used her phone to make a call after they found her
and now no one can get into the phone.
Like, come on.
So for all those reasons, detectives have a conversation
with Francisco pretty quickly,
like the next day, Tuesday, November 3rd.
And he tells them that he met Heidi
when she was on a ride-along with an ambulance crew.
That was back in January just after her 18th birthday.
And Janice told us it was actually maybe even earlier at a charity boxing event when Heidi was still 17.
But either way, they started talking and Francisco encouraged her to join him on patrol.
He worked a high crime area known as the swamp where something was always happening and Heidi jumped at the chance.
So this was after she joined the explorers.
Right. She'd actually already been in the program for over a year by that point.
And Francisco had no official explorer role, but it like,
kept them in each other's orbit, basically.
So he says they grew close, about 15 ride-alongs, working out together a couple times a week,
and talking almost daily through text and Snapchat.
That doesn't sound normal, right?
It shouldn't be.
Okay.
I mean, like many explorer posts across the country, IMPD's program operates under Learning for Life,
which is an affiliate of Scouting America.
Okay.
And that organization forbids close social relationships between leaders and participants.
no matter their age.
But Francisco doesn't work with the post, so that rule technically wouldn't apply to him.
And at the time, IMPD didn't have a policy barring officers from getting involved with explorers.
Like that was only added this year, 2025.
Now, technically, since Heidi was 18, if something was going on between them, it wouldn't have been illegal.
But, come on.
Yeah, it's a different story, ethically.
He is a uniformed officer in a position of authority hanging out with a teenager who clearly looked up to him.
So even if you take Francisco at his word, which is that nothing sexual happened, it still feels wrong to me.
But anyways, Francisco tells police that Heidi seemed fine Sunday night.
They'd even made plans to work out that week.
But by Monday afternoon, something had changed.
He said that she called him out of the blue at around 1 o'clock, told him she couldn't talk to him anymore.
but that she loved him, and it wasn't his fault.
She thanked him for everything and then hung up,
which rattled him.
And he tried calling back and then finally drove to her house.
And ultimately, he admits that he lied to Mike.
He didn't want to alarm him if this turned out to be nothing.
So he made up the whole thing about having to talk to her about a case.
Yeah.
So then he hangs back and lets her dad find her.
Zero spine.
Yeah.
And lots of ick feelings about this for me.
But still, nothing illegal that we know.
of. Where he crossed a hard line in the sand was even touching her phone. I mean, this dude's been
a cop for 10 years. He knows not to touch evidence in an active death investigation. And if he
really needed to contact the Explorer advisor, he could have asked responding officers to reach out.
Or use his own phone. Or like you said before, use his own phone. Yeah. Like it does not sit
right. So this is when the case is bumped to IMPD's special investigations unit.
And while they get their ducks in a row, a digital forensic expert is trying to get into Heidi's phone.
And Mike and Janet are just trying to survive each day.
And they are left in kind of an unclear position.
Like, they know that there is an ongoing investigation, something involving Francisco and Heidi's phone,
but they're not getting any real details and they don't fully understand why this is happening for a clear-cut suicide.
So one of the people that they lean on during this time is 32-year-old Daniel Bowman.
He was Heidi's explorer advisor, her mentor, the cop running the meetings and taking her ambition seriously.
And now that Heidi's gone, he really steps up for the Gatlifts personally.
The Explorers help with funeral arrangements.
Daniel carries Heidi's urn and gives a speech.
And he doesn't just forget about the family once those big moments are over.
He keeps checking in.
He keeps sharing stories about Heidi.
And for Janice especially, he becomes a lifeline.
Because Mike and their son grieve in a different way.
Like they're very private.
They're very quiet.
But Janice needs to talk about her daughter.
And Daniel is always available to listen.
By the end of 2015, I mean, he is practically family.
He seems like a steady source of support, someone who cared about Heidi's future and shares their pain and their questions.
But he also said that he feels guilty because.
of how everything went down.
According to Daniel, sometime the morning of November 2nd, or like in the early afternoon,
Heidi sent him a Snapchat saying that he was a great guy and she loved him, which wasn't like her.
And then she sent another, and he replied asking what was going on, but she never answered.
Court records show that he sent her 16 messages over the next few hours and none of them were even read.
And then later that day, his phone rang and it was Heidi's number call.
but the voice on the line was a man yelling that she was dead.
Now, Daniel says he didn't even recognize the voice as Francisco's.
And he didn't even know him super well.
Like Daniel might have seen him around, but they'd never spoken.
He didn't really even know his name.
He said that he didn't even connect the voice to him until they met at the Gatlif's that evening.
So if they didn't even know each other, then why did Francisco even reach out to him?
Daniel says he doesn't know.
But Francisco was obviously aware of him.
Because that night, he pulled Daniel.
aside and asked if they could talk privately in Daniel's car, even asked him to turn off his
police radio. Daniel says Francisco told him that Heidi really cared about him, like him being
Daniel, and then immediately asked, had she ever talked about Francisco or said anything about
their relationship? And Daniel's like, no, like I don't remember her mentioning anything.
Now, eventually, Francisco got out of the car. Daniel says that he watched him go into the
Gatliff's house, which struck him as odd because it was still an active crime scene.
And then when he came out, he stood in the driveway and in full view of officers and mourners
urinated in the yard.
I'm sorry, what?
I know.
It's like, it's just weird behavior.
Yeah.
Now, Daniel says that he feels awful because he didn't realize how much Heidi was struggling.
And he also tells Janice that he thinks Heidi and Francisco were involved in some way.
Now, when we recently spoke to Daniel, he said that he didn't realize what was happening at the time,
that all the ride-alongs and contact Heidi had with Francisco went beyond what he had believed he approved.
Like, he'd been running the post for a couple of years and says that he only ever authorized a handful of ride-alongs, including one for Heidi.
And the way that he tells it, they were tightly controlled.
For 18 and Up, Explorers only paired with another student and assigned to a short list of approved officers.
But there was an earlier incident that stuck out.
Daniel says that sometime around the spring of 2015,
another explorer mentioned that Heidi went on a ride-along
that he hadn't approved, out of uniform and outside of the normal process.
As post-advisor, Daniel should have filed a report,
but he says that it didn't seem like a concern or a complaint,
more like a misunderstanding.
So instead of documenting it, he talked to his supervisors,
gave the group a refresher on the policy
and pulled the 18-and-overs aside to remind them.
He wanted all ride-alongs to have his approval,
and anyone using a police radio had to be logged with dispatch
so that the department could know who was where.
But he also told us that it felt complicated to him,
like Heidi was technically an adult,
and he didn't think that he could dictate what she did on her own.
So maybe out of all of this guilt he's feeling or his own grief,
whatever, he says that he's trying to be there for her family and for the Explorers.
And on November 3rd, again, this is the day after Heidi's death, Daniel brought a counselor in
for an emergency explorers meeting.
Now, he told us the department didn't help with this.
Like, there wasn't protocol for handling something traumatic like this.
But there was a surprise guest that showed up, Francisco.
And it didn't seem like he was there for the counseling.
Daniel says that he was like asking around, trying to find.
out more about what had happened. And while the explorers were gathered with Daniel, there was
this other group that was meeting at the home of one of Heidi's close friends named Corbin Myers.
He invited their circle over so that they could try to process what happened. And while they
were all together, one of the girls got an Instagram message from Francisco who wanted her to
call him. And that's when Corbyn's radar started like going off. He knew that there had been some
shady stuff happening over the past few months.
So Corbyn, being in the beautiful one-party state of Indiana, decided to record their
conversation.
On the call, Francisco repeated much of what he told detectives, but he also talked about his
last call with Heidi.
He said that she told him her life was a mess and that she'd been hurting people and lying to
them.
And while he downplayed their relationship to police,
With her friends, he leaned into it, fishing, trying to find out what they knew.
Horbin actually gave those recordings to police, and he also shared them with us.
I don't know how much of everything you knew about her.
You know everything?
For the most part, yeah.
Okay.
Well, what I didn't know about three weeks ago, since we've been hanging out and stuff,
And she told, we never stopped,
but she never said anything about liking me.
She never said anything about that.
We were just hanging out.
She told me that she was staying two other guys besides me,
like just hanging out with two other guys.
What was your reaction to that?
Um, I was pretty upset in the beginning.
I told her that we should not probably see each other.
And she got really upset.
Yeah.
And then she told me that she spoke to another guy, which, do you know the two names?
I don't know if I should.
Do you know them?
We know who they are, yeah.
Francisco seemed especially fixated on one of those men.
She told me about him, and she said that she thought she was hurting him.
And I'm not really sure what the relationship was.
prior to this, but she said she was hurting him.
He said he'd already compared notes with this other guy.
According to what he told me is that she was telling him that they, she loves him.
But unfortunately, she never said those things to me except for the day that she called me.
I wish you guys could tell me more.
I know that's all I was hoping that maybe you had some answers to help me.
Hang on.
So Francisco admitted there was something going on between them?
Well, after they hung up, he called back.
Like, what did she say about me?
Like, she considered what we had in relationship.
I heard you guys say that, but I want to know why she thought that.
It wasn't something like a romantic relationship.
We never, it wasn't like that.
We just hung out.
As Francisco started backtracking, Heidi's friends followed his lead.
And I never said that to you guys, and I was more.
than just just that?
Um, not as far as we know, no.
Because I wanted to know if she ever said that to you, because
if she ever thought that we were more than just that,
and it's not that I would be mad on anything,
but she just never ever said anything to me like that.
Like, hey, she never even told me she liked me with nothing like that.
So, you know, I wish she told you guys what she felt about me,
but I guess not.
Okay.
She didn't ever say anything about me like that to you guys?
Not that we can, not that we are aware of.
No.
It's not, it's not, it's not a big deal, but the reason I ask is because I'm not really sure why she called me.
I spoke to the other guy that she said she's romantically involved with.
I actually spoke to him yesterday and kind of talked.
I don't really know what she was telling him and what she was telling me.
But I just wanted to make sure that I wanted me to see if that's what she meant.
When you said relationship, if she thought that I was more than just her friend,
like someone she hangs out with.
Now, obviously, Corbyn goes to Heidi's parents with these calls.
And, by the way, just a side note, I love these kids.
Corbyn and his friends sounded better on those calls than some,
season investigators that I've heard.
I know.
I will send you the whole call because honestly, like, these guys are chef's kiss.
Like, they sound like crime junkies who have been taking notes since birth and they do not come to play.
So anyways, Heidi's parents, like, get these recorded calls.
They already have Daniel in their ear talking about Francisco, but they didn't need him to turn
them against the guy.
Between the way he unraveled the day that Heidi died, his whole demeanor, and now Corbin
telling them about the calls, like they are sure.
something is up.
So during this time, is Francisco in contact with Mike and Janus?
Tries to be at first, but he's not admitting to any inappropriate relationship with Heidi.
And actually, while you have Daniel bad-mouthing Francisco, Francisco is bad-mouthing Daniel,
telling Janus that the Explorer program should have been shut down, that under Daniel's leadership,
the teens were barely supervised.
And someone must have agreed with Francisco on that point, at least, because Daniel says that within a couple of weeks of Heidi's death,
he was moved to a new role.
Officially, on paper, it's a promotion,
but to him it felt like a punishment,
even though he was told he could stay involved
with the explorers if he wanted to.
But regardless of the explorers,
he still stays close with Heidi's family,
even staying with them for a little bit
while he and his wife are going through a divorce.
He vacations with them that spring.
So imagine the shock and the betrayal that they feel
when they learn who the other guy in Heidi's life really was.
He's another IMPD officer.
And not just any officer, it was the man who ran the Explorer program.
The man who lived with them and vacationed with them, Daniel Bowman.
In January 2016, Daniel's wife filed for divorce.
That's when he was staying with Heidi's family.
But this was no amicable divorce.
In May, he ends up getting arrested on more than a dozen charges tied to domestic abuse
against his soon-to-be ex and family.
Some stemming from incidents that happened years earlier.
She tells police that he had been violent and controlling,
forcing her to bark like a dog,
punching her, shoving her into walls,
threatening her with his service weapon,
even pointing it at their sleeping daughter.
And she says it got worse after Heidi died,
that Daniel admitted that they had been involved,
and he just spiraled.
She left because she feared what,
he would do next.
So in the time between Heidi's death in November and then his arrest in May, dude had been
unraveling.
He moved to that different position, which again, he saw as a punishment.
Then his wife left him, and word was starting to spread around the station that he had a
relationship with Heidi, too.
Now, according to Daniel, those were just rumors.
He says started by Francisco and a couple of other officers.
He told Nina that they were the ones who contacted his then-wife and place.
planted this idea in her head.
He says that he never implied that he and Heidi were involved to his ex or to anyone else.
But based on what we know Heidi told friends,
they believed that she and Daniel were involved,
which again, Daniel denies.
He told us he cared about Heidi as a friend and mentor,
but insists that nothing between them was romantic or sexual.
Okay, but why is a grown man friends with a teenage girl in his program?
I mean, she would have been like 16 when they?
met? Right, which in Indiana, 16 is the age of consent. But like, who cares? Yeah, like,
still a minor. He's still in a place of authority. Like, I'm sorry. And he's saying nothing
happened. So, like, I agree. Like, he should not be friends with a 16 year old, especially when,
like you're saying, he's in a position of power. But Daniel says that he felt close to all of the
older explorers. And he swears that he and Heidi were only alone twice, briefly, like, as they
left meetings. So why is Heidi telling her friends things to make them believe that he and Heidi
you're dating. Daniel told us that he's not sure what gave her that impression. Maybe she
misread his goofing around, something he says he did with everyone. But if you're goofing around
as a supervisory officer gives a minor in your care the impression that she has a relationship with
you? That's like the bigger problem, right? Yeah. Yeah, you're the problem. Preach. And I guarantee that
the goofing around that's happening is highly inappropriate. Either way, Daniel basically,
basically blames Francisco and the other cops for all of this.
He says he documented what was happening and when he learned that one of the initial
detectives working Heidi's case might have ties to Francisco, he like sends this memo
up the chain.
He saw himself as the good guy.
And we know that because of text messages that he sent his wife, text that would later
become part of the probable cause affidavit for his domestic violence arrest.
On April 6, 2016, he texted her, quote,
I'll be a hero, a whistleblower, fighting police corruption.
And if not, I have nothing to lose.
You've taken everything I've ever worked for.
He took my only friend.
And then on May 9th, 2016, he says, quote,
right now I'm only interested in going to,
there's like, he says another cop's name that I'm not going to say,
and almost, and putting a bullet in their heads.
I'm furious.
This department failed.
This city needs more dead cops.
end quote. Those messages are a big reason that his wife contacted police, like his communications
were becoming more threatening. And those, I got straight from a legal document, but Daniel
told us that he didn't write them. Of course. Then please, Daniel. Who did? He blames his now
ex or like someone close to her says that she had access to his IMAC and like she could have sent
them. That's his story. Okay.
Anyway, after Daniel's arrest, he post-bond and goes home on electric monitoring to await trial for the domestic violence charges.
And still, at this point, nothing had happened with Heidi's case or with Francisco or the Explorer program.
Because they still have not been able to get into Heidi's phone.
It isn't until fall 2017 when new technology becomes available that they can finally crack it.
And what they find makes it clear why,
Francisco wouldn't want them to see their communications.
It shows just how manipulative he had been and how much they had been in contact.
All told, they exchanged over 300 calls in the month and a half, just the month and a half before her death,
and 177 texts in the final three days.
Now, I haven't seen most of them.
This is a closed case with IMPD, but they're still withholding most of the records,
including a lot of the texts.
And listen, we've worked with a lot of agencies over the years.
IMPD has consistently been one of the hardest to get records from.
And when I say hardest, I do mean impossible,
which I hate to say about the agency that's in my own backyard.
But I have way better relationships with other agencies.
Like why the F doesn't need to be so hard here?
Like, are we hiding something?
Right.
Like my mind goes to like, why not?
But of the messages I can see, including some from a probable
cause affidavit. Francisco's tone goes from like flirty to furious. He berates her for lying and gaslights
her about this other officer and demands to know where they stand. They end up talking three
times on the day that she died and after the last call he flooded her with messages, texting
things like, you can't do this to me. You can. I'm headed to your house right now. And you're going
to make me look so stupid in front of your family. You make me feel like this is really all my fault.
And the one thing that's more interesting than the texts is the data showing that all of those messages between Francisco and Heidi were deleted around the time that he used her phone to call Daniel.
And after the messages were wiped, that is when the phone was locked.
So that November, more than two years after Heidi's death, Francisco is arrested for felony obstruction of justice and misdemeanor computer trials.
trespass. Both him and Daniel are off the force, suspended without pay, facing termination as
their cases begin to crawl through the court system. So I'm kind of getting lost on like what
the truth is or was. Like was Heidi involved with Daniel or Francisco or both? So based on
everything that we've learned from court records, from everyone we spoke to who had direct knowledge
of the situation, it appears that Heidi was involved with both men. And then,
And that kind of dynamic, like one teen, multiple officers, is sadly not unusual.
I mean, it really underscores how predatory some of the adults in these programs can be.
And did police find any texts between Heidi and Daniel when they got into her phone?
So here's what's interesting.
I don't know where they find them.
His phone, her phone, whatever.
But I know that they find texts.
However, they don't actually charge him with anything related to Heidi.
And those texts never make it into any record that we have access to.
And IMPD won't share records.
Yeah, right.
So in August of 2018, that is when Daniel goes to trial for his domestic violence charges.
Now, he gets found guilty on eight of the 13 counts.
But that's all involving his then wife, not Heidi.
So the only way I know that there were messages.
between him and Heidi that seems suspicious
is because of what happens next.
So in February of 2019,
he gets deposed for Francisco's case.
And the prosecutor presses him on Heidi,
reading their texts aloud
and basically saying that she thinks he's lying
about the nature of their relationship.
But his attorney jumps in and shuts it down
arguing that it could expose him to new charges
and that that is not relevant to Francisco's case.
Okay.
Okay. If those texts could open him up to new charges, and the prosecutor has those texts, I hate to ask this question, but what are we doing here?
Dude, I don't know. I like, I don't, because I don't know what's in them.
I mean, maybe they knew they could only prove the DV charges and figured he'd get like a long enough sentence for those that they wouldn't have to work.
Yeah, no, about that. So according to Indianapolis Star,
reporter Mark Alicia. At Daniel's sentencing, the judge says that she thinks he has this dark side,
but also says that his police background makes prison more dangerous for him. So the judge considered
it an extenuating circumstance, but still sentences him to eight years plus four years probation.
That's something at least. Hang on. He wasn't in prison long before his lawyer asked for
home detention, arguing that he wasn't safe behind bars. I guess the defense,
Fence did some research, found out that the judge had the option to offer home detention, and that Daniel basically they're like, he has a job, he has a house, he has a baby on the way with his new wife.
Oh, by the way, he has a new wife. He has older kids who depend on his paycheck. Prosecutors obviously objected. But a different judge okayed it. And after less than four months, Daniel was released on electronic monitoring. So he finishes the sentence.
in 2022, and since then, he has rebuilt his image in academia, branding himself as an advocate
for justice-impacted students working in a university lab that studies criminal, legal, and social
systems, and he's pursuing a PhD. To this day, Daniel insists that the judge got it wrong.
He denies everything, the abuse, the text, the threats, any inappropriate relationship with Heidi.
I mean, people don't usually get parole.
without admitting guilt.
And Daniel clearly hasn't.
So I know it's not quite parole,
but like, why did he get to sit at home through all that?
Dude, I wish I knew.
The Marion County Prosecutor's Office told us that the lenient outcome was unusual.
And they don't seem to know why he got it.
And what happened to Francisco?
Oh, so in 2022, Francisco almost pleaded guilty to a reduced misdemeanor obstruction of justice.
He gets a year of probation, 240 hours of communities,
and is ordered to submit weekly journal entries to the court.
Hold on.
There are no police officers in trouble for having a relationship with a minor in the police
explorer program.
Well, since we couldn't get records from IMPD, I don't know if they even explored that
angle.
Heidi was a minor when she entered the program, but she was 18 when she died.
And the only text that we've seen are from when she was 18.
So what are we supposed to take that to mean?
Like, IMPD is just cool with allegations of officers grooming minors.
They're cool with the power dynamic of an officer having a relationship with someone in their program as long as they're 18.
I mean, there were at least internal affairs investigations in the Sandra Birchmore case.
Like, that's something.
Well, I mean, remember, IMPD did add a policy this year, 2025.
But Heidi happened in 2015, 10 years later, they added a policy this year saying they weren't cool with it.
Oh, good.
But what is maddening to me is that more than a decade after Heidi's death, so much is still unclear.
What did IMPD know and when?
Right.
It's obvious that someone in leadership saw something, at least with Francisco, because Janis told us that apparently in the spring of 2015, so this is months before Heidi died, a high-ranking official pulled her aside and said that they were.
were concerned, Heidi was riding with the same male officer a little too often.
He suggested that she, like, you know, maybe mix it up, ride with some different officers.
Now, Janice doesn't remember if he named Francisco specifically, but she knew that's who he
meant since Heidi often did ride-alongs with him.
So she and Mike told Heidi switch it up.
They assumed she did.
So they were worried enough to tell her mom, but not to actually do anything themselves.
We don't know what they did.
Right.
Meanwhile, despite what Daniel told us that he was in the dark about Heidi's frequently tagging along with Francisco on patrol,
after she died, he told her mom that everyone knew that they were going on too many ride-alongs.
Mike and Janice still don't feel like they got the full story, and they feel betrayed,
knowing that two men who were supposed to protect Heidi failed her.
And those guys walked away with barely any consequences.
Now, our team has spent the better part of a year.
trying to find out more.
We filed multiple requests with IMPD.
And we got back a few records and, like, vague assurances that they're working on getting us more.
And at the same time, they claim that they're withholding some under an investigatory exemption.
But they haven't said what or why considering both criminal cases are closed.
And they also declined an interview saying that the answers are, wait for it, in the records.
The records that they won't give us.
Them the ones.
Okay.
So we're just, like, in this little circle.
Yeah. Now, we couldn't reach Francisco, and neither he nor Daniel has ever publicly admitted to anything beyond a friendship with Heidi.
But the general feeling from people we spoke to, family, friends, people in the mix is that both crossed a line and they put Heidi in the middle pressuring her to choose between them.
And that toxic triangle dynamic isn't just our interpretation either.
We spoke to John Moore, who is a former sergeant with the special investigations unit at IMPD.
he worked the case against Daniel.
He told us that investigators' broader takeaway
was that Heidi was in an inappropriate relationship
involving both men
and that they both groomed her
using their authority and access as officers
to build her trust and blur the boundaries.
Court files have some details
but not enough to show how closely investigators
looked at either of them.
We don't know how seriously
they checked out Daniel's relationship with Heidi
or how deeply they dug into Francisco
beyond the obstruction case.
Between the delays and the denials and the no comments,
IMPD has made it nearly impossible to understand what really happened.
And instead of answers, we got stonewalled.
We don't even know how IMPD supervised the Explorer Post.
But if Daniel's account is accurate, he ran it mostly on his own.
There were about 30 teens on the roster, maybe 10 regulars,
and he was the only sworn officer directly involved.
There was a sergeant who offered light oversight and a few adult
volunteers that helped out, including former explorers. And when Daniel took over, he was a patrol
officer with zero youth experience. He basically says that he was handed the post with a here you go and
no manual, just Learning for Life handouts and IMPD's general orders, which he kind of cobbled together
into a rule book. And by the way, just as a reminder, Learning for Life is the organization that
most explorer programs in the country run through. And as I mentioned, Learning for Life is an affiliate
of scouting America.
Yeah, aka the Boy Scouts.
I don't know if you've ever heard of any abuse problems with them.
Right, right.
But quick download.
In 2020, the Boy Scouts filed for bankruptcy after being hit with over, wait for
it, 82,000 sexual abuse claims, one of the largest abuse scandals in U.S. history.
The organization had known about the abuse for decades, keeping internal records
commonly known as the perversion files, but often failing to report abuser.
to authorities.
So all that to say, I bet you would be surprised to know that in 2015,
Learning for Life still had no guidance on adult communication with teens outside of meetings.
No policy on texting.
Now, that same year, the Boy Scouts adopted a digital version of what they call
too deep leadership, meaning that no one-on-one contact between, like, adults and minors,
including through texting, DMs or gaming.
But Learning for Life has its own handbook, and the digital contact rule,
wasn't included that year. And we couldn't find it in there until 2017. So to me, this isn't
just an Indianapolis problem. These programs seem to be built in a way that makes them prime for
grooming. And the failures we're seeing here are happening in agencies all over the country.
And there's no national public database for explorer misconduct. I mean, we know sexual abuse
in general is notoriously underreported. But there have been reporters and researchers who
tried to pin down how widespread this problem is.
A recent investigation by Lakejira Travis of the Marshall Project identified at least
217 abuse and misconduct allegations in law enforcement explorer programs going back to
the 1970s when girls were first allowed in, spanning more than 100 agencies with officers
grooming or sexually abusing victims as young as 13 or 14.
A 2003 study by criminologist Samuel Walker and Don Erlberg found that nearly half of all
reported cases of officer sexual misconduct with teenagers happen in explorer posts.
So even though these programs are just one way that cops interact with teens, they account
for a disproportionate share of the known abuse. And while girls are more often targeted,
boys and young men have been victimized too. Now, supporters of the programs point out that
these cases are rare, a small fraction of the tens of thousands of teens who have participated since
1959 when a California sheriff's department started the very first post. And listen, for sure,
when operated properly, explorer programs can offer real value. Participants usually 14 to 20 get
early exposure to police work while building leadership, discipline, confidence, a sense of
belonging. Agencies get a recruitment pipeline, a way to connect with the community. It should be a
win-win. So how do we get the good without putting children at risk?
The answer is oversight.
For post-under Learning for Life, the organization is supposed to set and enforce protection rules with a five-point safety plan.
Screen out abusers, educate youth, parents, and volunteers about warning signs, set boundaries, encourage reporting, remove offenders.
In practice, every safeguard lives or dies at the local level.
And as then a freelance journalist Jonathan Kaminsky found, historically, Learning for Life has mostly left agencies to,
police themselves.
And inside that shaky setup is a glaring vulnerability.
Ride-alongs, the program's most popular feature and its riskiest.
California-based attorney Anthony DeMarco, who has spent years litigating explore abuse cases,
told us that ride-alongs are a perfect setup for exploitation,
hours alone with a powerful adult,
with no one else able to see or hear what's happening.
and almost no real oversight from the department.
But doesn't that too deep leadership rule apply?
Everywhere except Ritalons.
At least they were the exception until just this past June
when Learning for Life finally started requiring two adults in the car
if the Explorer is under 18.
Before that, the loophole was wide open.
And the Marshall Project concluded that Rydalongs factored into about a quarter of abuse cases.
But ride-alongs are only part of it.
These programs are a perfect storm because they stack all these risk factors together.
Officers get access to teens.
Oversight is often thin.
And the kids want to be there.
They're ambitious.
They want to impress.
A lot of them see this at their future.
And the structure can make it hard to tell where normal training ends and something sketchy begins.
So when an officer singles them out with extra attention.
It can feel important.
It's their big break instead of feeling like a red flag.
That's how grooming usually starts here, not with threats, but with connection.
An officer becomes a confidant, builds trust, maybe gets close to the family.
And that's just as true when the teen is legally an adult like Heidi.
A birthday does not erase the power imbalance.
And from there, things can escalate, right?
It's a ride home, a private hangout, late night messages.
By the time that it's clearly sexual or coercive,
The team might actually feel like they went along with it or that speaking up would ruin everything.
Their reputation, their shot at the job, their future.
Anthony says that there is often this unspoken deal.
Stay quiet and the doors stay open.
Speak up and it slams shut.
And victims might also be afraid, by the way.
They're cops.
These are cops.
Yes, they carry weapons.
They can arrest you.
A lot of victims worry that they'll be targeted or that no one is going to believe them.
So many of them never even tell.
Some of them come forward years later.
And even when they do, there's no guarantee that they're going to get justice.
And this isn't just a stat.
So I did a bit of a call out about the Explorer program, if you remember, in our episode on Peggy Hedress.
And not too long ago, I posted TikTok asking people to share their stories with me if they were in the program.
Didn't say what kind of stories, just left it open.
And the number of messages I got from people was,
Wild. So many of them had stories from their past where either they had friends that were
in intimate relationships with officers or they themselves were groomed. And tons of them still
didn't want to come forward even now. So the problem is so much bigger than we think it is.
But there were some people who decided to share their story in hopes that it could save
even one more young person from abuse. And one of those people was a 43-year-old woman
who I'll call Kate.
In 1998, then 15-year-old Kate
joined the Boscoen Police Explorer program in New Hampshire.
She'd grown up admiring a dare officer
and knew that she wanted to be a cop.
And the post seemed like a perfect first step.
A small group of teens led by officer John LaRosh,
who was in his late 20s.
And John's mom had been a teacher of Kate,
so he, like, already felt safe.
And he knew how badly she wanted this career.
And he knew that she was vulnerable.
As a preteen, she'd questioned her sexuality.
Her parents eventually came around, but for a while, they restricted what she could do.
She felt really cut off.
And John acted like the one adult who accepted her no matter what.
As the Explorer advisor, he controlled everything.
The program included regular ride-along, sometimes overnight shifts,
and Kate was often paired with him.
And her parents were fine with it.
They trusted him and supported her goals.
But it didn't take long for him to start just like pushing boundaries.
Within months, she said that he was steering conversations toward sex, making crude jokes,
asking her about her experiences, and oversharing his own, including that he cheated on his wife.
Now, at first, Kate didn't see it as wrong.
It felt like he was treating her like an equal.
She actually felt special.
But sometime around early 2000, Kate says that he assaulted her.
It happened in this dark secluded lot near the county jail,
this boat launch that he routinely checked while on patrol.
And she tells us that one night he drove there,
made a comment about people having sex there,
and then told her to get out of the car and perform oral sex on him.
And she said she didn't feel like she had a choice.
She was a teenage girl alone with an armed officer,
afraid of his reaction, afraid of ruining her future, so she complied.
Kate told us that there were more assaults in the months that followed, all while he was on duty.
At one point, she says that Johnny even showed her a news article about another cop getting arrested for assaulting an explorer.
He then pulled out the New Hampshire Criminal Code and read her the exact statute,
the one that described what he was doing as felonious sexual assault.
Like, Kate didn't want to anger him, so she, like, tried to reassure.
sure him. Like she was over 16, the age of consent in New Hampshire. But he corrected her.
If the adult is in a position of authority, the law is actually 18. So he absolutely knew what he
was doing. And he made sure Kate knew too. And after that, she changed. She became this shadow of the
fun-loving kid that her friends knew. She tried to tell another explore what was happening, but instead
of support, she got shamed. So she stayed in the post for a couple more years. It did open
indoors for her, like she graduated high school early, she got into a criminal justice program,
even landed a civilian job with another police department. But the trauma followed her.
She was convinced that she led him on, that she didn't deserve happiness. And eventually
she gave up her dream of becoming a cop. Now years past, Kate got married. And in 2013,
she had a daughter. And there was something about becoming a parent that made her finally see things
differently. And she knew that she'd want someone to be held accountable if they did this to her child.
So in September of 2014, after a lot of soul searching, she actually reported John. He was long gone from
Boscoen by then. He was chief of police and nearby Canterbury by that time. But since he and the
Boscoen chief had worked together, the case was handed over to the New Hampshire Attorney General's
office. Investigators asked Kate to wear a wire and confront him. And listen, she didn't see him
ages and the prospect of this was like overwhelming, but she agreed and she goes to meet him at
the Canterbury station. And on tape, they have this guy admitting to the sexual activity,
even apologizing, though he was like insisting it was consensual. And later, when investigators
confronted him again, he repeated the confession. And according to WMUR's Heather Hamill,
he even said that he thought it was, quote, fun to flirt with a 16-year-old under his
control. What? In August 2015, John was arrested for aggravated felonious sexual assault and
placed on unpaid leave. And news coverage shows that he was indicted on a slew of felony
and misdemeanor sexual assault charges a couple of months later. Then he resigned the following
January. By summer of 2016, the case went to trial. He actually took the stand where again
he admits to the sexual encounters with Kate, but is still claiming they were consensual.
How can he call it consensual when the law literally says it wasn't?
And also, he pointed out that law.
Literally, that's what prosecutors argued, that, like, the whole thing was grooming and coercion.
They brought in an expert on trauma and pressed him on his changing stories.
But John's defense painted him as, like, this, like, fumbling and harmless guy and suggested that Kate had financial motive to go after him.
Two former explorers testified that she had, quote, bragged.
about the relationship.
And so after seven days of testimony, the jury deliberated for just two hours, and they found
him not guilty on all charges.
I know.
In what world was he not in a position of authority?
It's baffling.
This is unreal.
According to Kate, prosecutors later asked jurors what shaped their decision.
And, you know, they said they just couldn't picture John being a violent guy.
And they questioned why she would stay in the program.
Some people thought she cried too much.
Some people thought she didn't cry enough or that she seemed just too strong.
So it didn't matter what she did or was going to do.
It was the wrong reaction.
She was never going to make herself the perfect victim for them.
Which is like what we see all the time, right?
Like survivors are held to impossible standards.
They're expected to fit this narrow script, like be composed but not too composed.
Remember every detail, even though trauma distorts memory.
And if they don't match what people think a real victim, quote unquote, looks like, they're not believed.
Kate was crushed.
The Attorney General's office encouraged her to file a civil suit.
Like, some survivors pursue that even when criminal charges don't stick.
But she just couldn't stomach another courtroom.
Like, the public backlash was already intense,
and she worried that suing would make people dismiss her story.
Like, think it was just about money, so she decided against it.
The upside is that John LaRash is no longer a cop.
And after he was suspended, locals raised broader concerns about Canterbury,
PD. So the sheriff's office reviewed the department, and they actually found over a decade of
mismanagement and dysfunction under his leadership. Now, we reached out to John via text he told us that
there was nothing to discuss since he was found not guilty. And when we noted that he still
admitted to sexual contact with a minor explorer and asked if he had anything to say now,
nearly a decade later, he said that he'd already answered for it at trial and told us to lose his
number. No one at Bosco and PD today was around during John's time or the Explorer era,
but the chief told us that the program was shut down long before John's arrest and that no other
complaints were ever reported. Speaking out even now still feels risky to Kate emotionally
and legally. Like we're using a pseudonym, but that's not going to hide her identity from him or
the community. But she decided it was worth it. Silence hadn't protected her.
her. It only protected him and she wants people to know what happened. And she hopes that her
story helps someone else get justice even though she didn't. And Kate's not alone in that hope
or even that outcome. For many survivors, justice stays just out of reach. The Marshall Project found
that only about half of the explore-related cases that they tracked led to any time behind bars.
And a big reason is because of plea deals. Charges just get like reduced to misdemeanors or
to non-sex offenses.
Beyond Explorer Post,
a Washington Post investigation
found that nearly 40% of officers
convicted of sex crimes
involving children
from 2005 to 2022
never served a day in prison.
And when there is punishment,
there is no real standard of what that is.
Charges fall under this, like,
mix of state and federal laws,
statutory rape, abuse of power,
civil rights violations.
Prosecutors don't always use the same playbook,
even when the behavior looks similar,
And so sentencing is all over the place.
Inside agencies, discipline is just as inconsistent.
Some officers are fired, some resign, others stay on the job with reprimand or short suspension, or sometimes nothing at all.
And that's what happened in Jennifer's case.
In the late 80s, Jennifer joined the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Explorer program in California after hearing about it at school.
She was 15 and already set on a career in law enforcement.
And this post was smaller, like fewer than 10 teens, and run entirely by one deputy who we're going to call Bill.
Bill, who was in his mid to late 30s, started inviting Jennifer on overnight ride-alongs a couple of times a week.
Her parents were fine with it.
She was with a cop, like what could be safer?
And over the next couple of years, he slowly introduced her to inappropriate behavior, things like telling her how beautiful that she was going to be when she grew up.
She trusted him, believed what he said, and valued his opinion.
She idolized this man.
So when one night he turned around in the patrol car and kissed her, she was stunned, but also flattered.
A month later, he took her to his house while his wife was away and pressured her to have sex.
She said no, and he stopped.
Now, soon after, her family moved to Florida.
And before leaving, she confided in another explorer, not as like a cry for help,
like Kate, more like she was mourning the end of something that she thought was real.
Like in her mind, what they had had been a relationship.
That explorer told the sheriff's office.
And to their credit, they opened an investigation.
But by then, Jennifer was across the country.
So everything was happening over the phone with her, but only with her.
What do you mean only her?
They didn't talk to her parents?
Mm-mm.
They had no idea that they were calling.
still a minor. Yeah, it's wild. And like, in that moment, since Jennifer was like so embarrassed,
she minimized it. But she did at least confirm that they kissed and that the relationship
was inappropriate. The sheriff's office didn't respond to our interview request. But as far as
we know, the investigation went nowhere. Bill didn't lose his badge. Records show that he did step
down as explorer advisor in 1991, but he stayed on the job for nearly two more decades. Jennifer
join another explorer post in Florida, this one larger and more structured. But the same
problems persisted. She remembers the comments like the lingering attention from male cops of all
ages. At the time when she's young, it didn't feel predatory. It felt like being noticed.
She went through the academy, worked as a dispatcher, and became a reserve officer. But the
steady boundary pushing wore her down. And eventually she realized these
are not superheroes. They are just human men in uniforms, some good, some not. So when she got
pregnant, she left the field. Last year, while flipping through an old photo album, Jennifer
decided that she actually wanted to confront Bill. That's when she found out that he died. So there
would be no reckoning, no chance to look him in the eye and tell him what he'd done to her.
And she carried shame for years, blaming herself. And only later did she understand how
how vulnerable teens are and how men like Bill take advantage of that.
Heidi, Kate, Jennifer, and so many others, they did what adults told them to do.
They trusted the people in charge.
And so did their parents.
I mean, go back to Heidi.
Take Mike and Janice Gatliff.
They were so involved.
It's not like they just dropped Heidi off and hoped for the best.
Mike went to her first meeting.
They showed up to events.
But they were also trusting the system and thought that Heidi was surrounded by honorable cops
worthy of their powerful positions.
You know, they still believe the law enforcement
explorer programs can work.
If there's real oversight and accountability,
but they don't think Heidi got that.
And they have to live with the ache of knowing
that they'll never see her huge smile
or hear her contagious laugh again.
She'll never wear the badge
that she worked so hard for,
pouring nearly 2,000 hours into the explorers.
So what they hold on to now is their faith and their memories.
The way that Heidi could turn out,
everything into a joke. The moment that she made a quiet child in Haiti smile during a
mission's trip just by refusing to give up. They know that Heidi changed lives simply by being
who she was. And her compassion and her drive and her goofy sense of humor all came from one
place, a heart that was wired to show up for others. So in all of this, I have to ask,
does IMPD still have its program? When Detective Christine Manina took over after Dan
She told us that it was basically a free-for-all.
Like teens tried to out-rank her and like boss her around.
So back then she came in.
She set new rules, tightened boundaries.
Some of the kids left.
Most of them stayed.
And she ran the program for like five years before she retired.
And to answer your question, no, they don't have an explore program now.
They have something called junior cadets.
But as of late October, IMPD told us no one was enrolled in that.
So whether that's a fresh start or just.
A rebrand remains to be seen.
Because a new name doesn't mean new safeguards.
And those safeguards are what's necessary because this isn't just about a few bad apples.
This is, I keep saying it, about a system that allowed them to operate, policies that left massive gaps,
higher ups that looked the other way or downplayed allegations, and a culture that protected the institution first and the kids last.
And girl, this isn't even a new problem.
Like, F the stats, this has been a systemic issue for.
for decades. Like, I don't know if you knew this, but in the 70s, the Los Angeles Police Department
found itself under investigation after some officers were discovered taking overnight camping
trips with teenage girls from the department's all-female explorer post. And one of the girls
described these camping trips as, quote, little more than orgies. According to Jonathan
Cominsey's reporting, it had been happening for a couple of years before the explorer sounded
the alarm. In that case, some officers were charged, but news coverage shows that most of the cases
just collapsed. Prosecutors cited a lack of evidence and victim cooperation. In some cases,
they say they couldn't prove that the officers knew that the girls were underage. I guess it was
too much detective work for them to figure out that the girls in a youth program were youths.
Yeah. And department discipline was also weak. Like a few resign, a few were suspended. One was
fired. One got a disability pension for injuries and emotional stress. Others were cleared.
And then like by the late 70s, the whole thing just like fizzles.
out in the media. It doesn't have to be this way. Some groups are doing it right, like the
Duchess County Sheriff's Office Law Enforcement Youth Cadet Program in New York. Their advisor,
Sergeant Alonzo Montania, has built guardrails into every part of it. Communication runs through
tracked group platforms. Parents are looped in early and often, and historically, they haven't even
allowed ride-alongs at all. When Nina spoke with Sergeant Montana earlier this year, they were just
starting to phase them in with very strict rules. And we spoke to a woman named
Don Bowley in Wisconsin.
She says that she joined her local explorer post in the early 1980s when she was a freshman in high school.
She learned skills like convict resolution, emergency response, even firearms training.
She loved her program leaders and says that they changed her life and the lives of others in the program.
For Dawn, it wasn't just a resume builder.
It was formative.
It showed her how to stay calm under pressure and that being a cop wasn't the path for her at all.
So it's not the explorers that need to stop.
Yes.
As usual, it's just the abuse.
Yes.
But any meaningful change has to start with the agencies running these programs.
They're the ones with the power and the obligation to enforce the rules.
The responsibility.
Yeah.
And my God, be thoughtful about who you put in charge.
Don't just grab whoever's free and hand them a group of teenagers.
I mean, like, right now, the qualifications are pretty minimal.
advisors have to be at least 21, pass a background check, and get agency approval, and then be signed off by the local exploring council.
And do they go through any, like, serious safety training?
Not really. So beyond the background check, the, like, training they have to do is pretty much just online webinars.
And actually, Nina, when she was doing all the reporting on this, she took them and earned the same safety certification that advisors get while sitting on her couch in one night.
Salute to Nina.
Salute to Nina. Now, the recent ride-along policy change by learning for life, which, by the way, never responded to our interview requests, is a step in the right direction. But rules on paper are the easy part. We still don't know how or how often that policy is enforced or what actually happens to agencies that ignore it. That attorney I mentioned, Anthony DeMarco, sees the problem as systemic. Officers are given unsupervised access to minors, then protected by a culture and union congress.
contracts that often shield them from serious consequences, even when there is misconduct.
His view is, don't just slap a Band-Aid on the problem.
Make it as transparent and accountable from the ground up, starting with ride-alongs.
So, what can we do?
Here you go.
I love to leave you with a good takeaway.
So if you're a parent, an agency, or a teenager in the program, I got you covered.
Starting with agencies.
Define inappropriate contact clearly.
Things like shoulder rubs or oversharing.
and act early with serious discipline or termination before it escalates.
Make ride-along assignments random so officers can't quietly hand-pick the same teen over and over.
Use tech, interior audio, and video in patrol cars.
GPS tracking, maybe even like an Uber-style recording that kicks on for every ride-along.
Anthony thinks that there'd be a lot of pushback on this idea from cops and explorers,
which like, effing why, but like if it protects...
Okay.
Yeah, you're welcome to push back.
I'm still going to put the camera in because if it protects even one kid, it is worth it.
Yeah, I don't care if you're uncomfortable.
And meanwhile, explorers need to be told straight up that reporting something won't tank their careers.
Right.
And the adults who brush off or hide concerns should be held accountable for that.
So the opposite of the whole thin blue line mentality.
Yeah.
And Anthony says that it is up to leadership to flip that script.
In California, even a rumor can trigger a legal duty to report.
So agencies need to normalize speaking up and not punish it.
And they should use the very real risk of lawsuits as leverage and pushback
when union protections keep repeat offenders in positions of trust around teens.
Now, for parents, if your child wants to join an explorer or cadet program,
don't assume a uniform means it's safe.
Treat it the way you would any new school or like a daycare when your kids were little.
Like ask who runs the post.
What are the rules?
How do ride-alongs get track?
What's the policy on texting in social media and how are complaints handled?
Stay involved, show up, talk to advisors, connect with other parents.
The more visible you are, the easier it is for your kid to speak up if something feels off.
And keep the conversations going at home.
Talk about boundaries.
Make sure your kids know that they can come to you if an adult, even if an adult in uniform.
Especially someone in uniform in this case.
Right. If they make them uncomfortable.
Remind them that abuse is never their fault.
and if they disclose it, go straight to authorities.
And if local law enforcement shrugs you off or you're concerned about a conflict of interest,
go above them and go to state or federal agencies.
And finally, for my youths listening.
Explorers are no explorers.
Like, you guys are faced with some crazy shit all the time.
I wanted to be 20 when I was 8 and I was, like, dying for someone to look at me like I was
older and mature.
And some people will do that with respect.
They will give you responsibility and, like, room to come into your own.
Others will take advantage of that.
I didn't know what the signs were when I was young.
And so let me just talk to you like you're the grown-up you are.
You are not an idiot.
If you feel like a line is being crossed, you get that, like, tingle in your spine, that jelly in your belly.
Like, you know something is off.
You don't have to justify it.
You don't have to excuse it away.
It is not your responsibility to make adults feel comfortable.
And you do not have to protect them from their own actions.
And if you realize it too late, no, you didn't.
It is never too late to draw that line and stop unwanted behavior.
And it is never your fault.
Doesn't matter if it's a cop.
Doesn't matter if it's your pastor or a teacher or a coach.
Whether it's an explorer program or somewhere else,
you do not owe anyone your time, attention, or access.
So if an officer asks him meet alone or sends flirty or.
or secretive messages or just gives you a bad feeling.
Tell someone you trust.
And if something has already happened, you are not to blame.
Even if you didn't or couldn't say no in the moment,
even if it felt like something you agreed to,
power dynamics can twist what feels like a choice
and you deserve support no matter what.
So crime junkies, if any part of this episode hits home,
if you know someone who has been affected by abuse
in any youth setting, or you just want those spaces to be safer,
talk about it, share this episode.
We can do better.
We have to.
For Heidi and Kate and Jennifer,
and for the next teenager who walks into an explorer post
with dreams of one day wearing a badge.
If you or someone you know is struggling or has experienced abuse, help is available.
We'll link to resources in our show notes, including hotlines for sexual assault, child abuse, domestic violence, and suicide prevention.
Please reach out if you need to or share them with someone who might.
As always, you can find all the source material for this episode on our website, crime junkie.com.
And if you want to listen to more episodes like this and all of our episodes completely ad-free, be sure to join our fan club.
You'll also get early access to new episodes every week and bonus content every month.
And you can follow us on Instagram at Crime Junkie Podcast.
We'll see you next episode.
But stick around because we have some good.
Okay, Ashley, it's the last good of the year.
Is it really?
Yeah.
Oh, wow.
I've loved doing this every month.
It's like my favorite thing.
So this one is a submission from our website.
I've been a listener since 2020 when a friend got me hooked and I needed something to distract me from the craziness of working in health care during COVID.
God bless.
Long story short, the more I listened, the more I saw cracks in our social justice and welfare systems.
I decided to pursue a degree.
in social work in an effort to advocate for all those whose lives could have been saved
in so many ways if the system and those who operate within it had the resources and collaboration
they needed. Now, I'm almost in my last semester to earn my BSW, and I'm about to start an internship
with the office of the ME. Fun fact, Utah has one Emmy for the entire state, giving the unique
opportunity to provide outreach and education to the community.
I did not know that.
Because of your podcast, I also applied for and was accepted into a justice advocacy
fellowship where interns are placed in local nonprofits in an effort to learn more about the
needs of our communities and how to best support each other.
I'm the first social work student to be in the program, and I'm hoping to not be the last.
I want to spread the work on the importance of community and looking out for one another.
While this has always been something I've been passionate about,
Crime junkie showed me what an amazing community it has fostered and pushed me to do my part.
I'm also pushing for a national DCFS database so that abusers cannot simply move around unnoticed.
Yes, ma'am.
I'm trying to push for policy change that requires more collaborative work between law enforcement and other agencies
working to prevent people from becoming another crime junkie case.
You're going to love this last line.
It takes a village, right?
I hope to make you guys proud by expanding your village.
That was, like, perfect for this episode, too, you guys.
We need more good people.
And this listener had a whole other career in health care before they were like, no, I need, I could do more.
I'm going to do more.
Welcome to the village.
Welcome to the village.
Don't make me start a call.
I will.
Crime junkie is an audio chuck production.
I think Chuck would approve.
