Crime Stories with Nancy Grace - SAVANNAH GUTHRIE MOM MISSING: DAY 11 - MAN DETAINED FOR QUESTIONING AND RELEASED

Episode Date: February 11, 2026

A man detained and released      Joining Nancy Grace today: Matt Lopez - Criminal Defense Lawyer and Owner of the Largest Criminal Defense Law Firm in Arizona,  Dr. Bethany Marsha...ll -  Psychoanalyst, Author: "Deal Breaker," and featured in hit show, "Paris in Love" on Peacock; Instagram & TikTok: drbethanymarshall, X: @DrBethanyLive Brian Fitzgibbons - VP of Operations for USPA Nationwide Security, Marine, and Iraq War Veteran (Kingsman Philanthropic's 2022 rescue missions of women and children in Ukraine); Instagram: @uspa_nationwide_security Lee Neubecker  - Cyber Security and Digital Forensics Expert, CEO of Enigma Forensics   Jessica Finn - Senior Investigative Reporter at The U.S. Sun; jessicafinnnyc (X IG) @jessicafinn.bsky.social Dave Mack - 'Crime Stories' Investigative Reporter   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 This is an I-Heart podcast. Guaranteed Human. Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. Breaking news. Savannah Guthrie's mother, Nancy Guthrie, missing day 11. In the last hours, another note to TMZ. This is after last night's disheartening catch and release of a potential suspect. I'm Nancy Grace.
Starting point is 00:00:30 This is Crime Stories. I want to thank you. for being with us. What incentive is left for them to return Nancy Guthrie? The legitimacy of these ransom notes truly come into question more and more. Are there more than one perpetrator here? It's going to be somebody at least connected to her that has something again. Another missive in the Nancy Guthrie's search has been sent to TMZ, short for 30-mile zone surrounding LA. It's not from the kidnapper. It's from someone offering to give up the kidnapper for one Bitcoin, which at this hour is valued at around $66,000, straight out to Crime Stories Investigator,
Starting point is 00:01:14 Dave Matt. What do we know? Well, this new note in the Nancy Guthrie case, Nancy, is, as you mentioned, it doesn't seem to be coming from the actual kidnappers. Instead, this is someone offering to give up information about the kidnappers. Now, this note came in early this morning, 8 a.m. Eastern time. The sender claims they've tried unsuccessfully to reach Savannah Guthrie's brother Cameron and her sister Annie by email and text. The note goes on. If they want the name of the individual involved, then I want one Bitcoin to the following wallet. Time is more than relevant. Now, there is a legitimate Bitcoin address in the note, and it is a different address from the one in the original ransom note that TMZ received and the two Tucson television stations. Right now, it's unclear if the sender of this note is legitimate.
Starting point is 00:02:14 But one Bitcoin worth about $66,000 right now, and they're offering up a $50,000 reward for information leading to Nancy's kidnappers. So this was received earlier today. Maybe not the kidnappers, but offering info on the kidnapper. Wow, that's another bombshell in already a confusing and circuitous route of evidence. Straight out to Jessica Finn joining us. She is the senior investigative reporter at the U.S. Sun. She has been on the Guthrie disappearance from the very beginning hour one. Jessica, give me a recap.
Starting point is 00:02:53 I'm trying to figure this out. We've got a $50,000 reward. on the table. If they send the 66 grand, the one Bitcoin, to this person, and it's legit, that reward would really compensate for the bulk of that. Okay, tell me your understanding of what's happening right now. And why TMZ? I'm glad, you know, it's TMZ because Levin and a lot of people bombard me with this when I say
Starting point is 00:03:22 it. But Levin, unlike a lot of actors, a lot of participants, let me say, would capitalize on the notes they've received. Levin did not publish them. He took them straight to the FBI. He didn't just, let me just say, a technical legal term, whore out for the clicks. Okay? He could have done that. He didn't do that. And he's still refusing to state exactly what was in the missives. So good. I'm glad it went to 11 at TMZ. Five o'clock in the morning, Pacific, tell me what you know. So this is actually going to be the third ransom letter that's been sent out. We had the first one that initially came out, demanding the $60 million that went out to KOLD, Kagan, and TMZ.
Starting point is 00:04:08 Then we had the second letter that just went out to KOLD that came sometime, I want to say, my days are now totally merging together, but sometime I believe towards the end of last week. And that was basically the message that Savannah had, and Savannah and her brother and sister had responded to, where Savannah said, we received your message and we understand, we still want the return of our mother, we will pay, and this is how we'll have peace. So this is now the third letter that's been sent.
Starting point is 00:04:33 It's the second letter that's gone to TMZ. Team Z didn't get the second letter that Savannah responded to last week. And basically, this letter says that they had tried unsuccessfully to reach out to Annie Guthrie and Annie and, Cameron Guthrie, Sabana's brother and sister. And they are saying that they have information to show the authorities who this kidnapper is exactly. And they want the amount of just a bit above the $50,000 FBI reward. They want $60,000, they want one Bitcoin, which equals about $66,000 for that information. A totally terrifying situation. You don't know what is real,
Starting point is 00:05:12 what is fake at this point. And certainly just another to kink in this really awful and long saga about finding Nancy Guthrie. You know, Jessica Finn, I don't know how you can have your ear to the ground. It's seemingly 24-7-365 because the moment this happened, you are all over it. I'm just curious what your take is. Okay, we could talk about Y-T-M-Z, Y-K-O-L-D, Y-K-Gun forever. Obviously, the person is from Tucson or from the Tucson. area that maybe grew up watching K-Gun or K-O-L-D.
Starting point is 00:05:53 But TMZ has a certain demographic, right? I look at it all the time. I have my, that I read every morning and throughout the day. Some are stuffy and stodgy and some are TMZ, where I find out the latest in the world of wrestling and UFC fighters and just all kind of crazy celeb news mixed in. with news like this. So that leads me to ideas on who the PIRP is,
Starting point is 00:06:25 that they have isolated TMZ, K-O-L-D, K-Gun. But I find interesting here, and I want your take on it, Jessica, why the, let me just say, communicator, states that he, she, tried to reach Annie and Cameron and couldn't. What do you make of that? Well, you know, that is actually a really interesting point.
Starting point is 00:06:51 And if you recall, there was that individual, that gentleman, not gentleman, that was arrested during late last week for sending a ransom note to Annie Guthrie specifically. Thank you. To Annie Guthrie and her husband specifically demanding money and that guy got arrested for faking it. And, you know, he had sent there. That letter went straight to the siblings. And so I don't know if maybe this person's been following the case and thought, let me try the siblings first as the quieter route. But TMZ certainly is the way to get the bullhorn on your note. If you really want it reported and you want it reported quickly, it sounds like TMZ has been the way to go
Starting point is 00:07:31 because the local affiliates were a little bit more close to the best and were a little bit more slow to report that they had received those ransom notes, whereas TMZ has a little bit, I probably has a much bigger team of attorneys. people guiding them as to what they can and cannot say. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. You know what I also find interesting? And let me throw this to Matthew Lopez. He is the owner of the largest criminal defense law firm in this jurisdiction, Arizona.
Starting point is 00:08:03 At Matthewelopez.com. Matthew, I noticed that this communicator stated that he tried, he, she tried unsuccessfully to reach Cameron, Guthrie, Sister Annie Guthrie, he didn't mention Savannah. Hello, she's been posting on Insta. Why not reach her on Insta?
Starting point is 00:08:25 Be so easy, right? Yeah, it would be easy, and that kind of leads me to believe that it may not be true. And he wants to get to TMZ because he knows that the masses watch TMZ and they read TMZ. I'm very skeptical
Starting point is 00:08:42 about paying somebody for information. To date, we haven't had any proof of life. We haven't had any follow-up communications about any of the ransom. We have no reason to believe that the original ransom was even true. So why should we even believe that this second demand for one, Bitcoin, there's some legitimacy to it. If I was advised in the family, I would say,
Starting point is 00:09:08 look, let's not start going down this hole, right? This could spiral out of control to one thing leads to another and another and another of just a fictitious hoax of ransoms and requests and demands. And it just does not pass a smell test for me. And Matthew Lopez, guys, give him a hard time because he defends criminals. And he knows the criminals. But he has dealt with so many criminals. He can definitely smell a rat.
Starting point is 00:09:40 to Dr. Bethany Marshall this person wanting 66 grand has the if it's real has the ability fuck okay Brian Fitzgibbens joining us from USPA
Starting point is 00:09:54 nationwide security his team goes all over the world locating missing people what do you make of it this guy has the ability if it's real to save the life
Starting point is 00:10:10 life of Nancy Guthrie. But he's using her. He's bartering his alleged knowledge when he could just save her life and get the 50 grand if it's real. Key phrase if it's real, right? This is with all the media attention 24-7 on this case, I have serious doubts that this new note to TMZ is in fact authentic. You know, $66,000 aligns with the 50K that the FBI is offering. The obvious question would be asked if they had real information, why would they not bring that to the FBI and cash in on the 50K? This will be immediately investigated,
Starting point is 00:10:57 but I believe that this is just yet another distraction in what's turned into a bit of a media circus here. And Brian Fitzgibbons, if it's not real, he can go down, just like Kalella did, for his fake ransom that he texted to the family. He just got charged under 18 USC, and he's facing felony charges by the feds and they don't play. So if this guy's lying, he can go join Kalella for a little tea party. Agree? Yeah, I mean, I would defer to the defense attorney here on that one, but I would, think that the feds would absolutely prosecute this in some way if it turns out that this is
Starting point is 00:11:41 not authentic. Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. For those of you that went to sleep last night thinking, ah, finally a crack in the case, we're going to bring Nancy Guthrie home alive, then woke up to your hopes dashed, This morning, join us. We all feel the same. Overnight there was a flurry of activity when SWAT teams decked with shields and full SWAT tech gear rolled out for the first time since Guthrie goes missing. That was significant, taking off in armored vehicles. They all gathered from two, at least two jurisdictions. The location was key.
Starting point is 00:12:40 kept away from the media. It was not reported. Then they descended a person taken into detainment. This morning, we learn he is released. Joining me an all-star panel to make sense of what we are learning. Straight out to Dave Mac, Crime Stories investigative reporter. Dave, what happened? Minutes, Nancy, minutes after the FBI released the picture. and the video of the suspect at the door. The FBI and the sheriff's department was flooded with tips from everywhere. Within a matter of minutes, the SWAT team gets loaded up and heads straight for Annie Guthrie's house and neighborhood. They're going door to door talking to neighbors.
Starting point is 00:13:33 They're looking through the bushes. They're looking in storage sheds. They were everywhere for hours yesterday. And as you mentioned, Carlos Palazuelas is not necessarily pulled over. He was being followed by a number of law enforcement in Rio Rico, which is about 58 miles south of Tucson, about 15 minutes from the Mexican border. And he's near his home when he stops the car and says, hey, why are you guys following me? They then, they being law enforcement, detained Carlos and began a search of his vehicle. They search his house.
Starting point is 00:14:16 They search his garage. And by the way, Nancy, search warrants. They had search warrant already prepared when they arrived at Carlos house, at his residence. They bashed in the door. They broke a garage door. They looked all over the place. We thought we have a suspect in custody. and two hours later
Starting point is 00:14:36 Carlos was released. Jessica Finn, joining a senior investigative reporter U.S. Sun. Not only that, as the law enforcement was searching the property of Carlos Palazuelos, they had hostage negotiators
Starting point is 00:14:53 on the standby a few blocks away. They really believed that Nancy was somewhere nearby and then hopes dashed. And I don't want to hear one bad word about their efforts. I'm talking to you, Lopez, because they're out there beating the bushes.
Starting point is 00:15:14 They're trying. This guy may have fit a description. There may have been something about him that tipped off law enforcement. But it was a detainment, not an arrest. They questioned him. They searched the location thoroughly, and they let him go.
Starting point is 00:15:32 Okay, hold on, Jessica. Matt Lopez joining us from this jurisdiction, Arizona. He is a veteran criminal defense attorney. He is the owner of the largest criminal defense law firm in Arizona. You can find him at Matthew Lopez.com. Matthew, much was made last night. He was detained. Is that an arrest?
Starting point is 00:15:54 Could he leave? Did he get his Miranda rights? Explain detainment under the U.S. Supreme Court view of it. So he was detained. It's my understanding his Miranda rights were not read for a couple of hours after this stop. If he is, they're not asking, if he's not under arrest and they're not asking questions exactly relating to the incident. So emphasis on under arrest. If he's free to go, they don't have to read the Miranda rights. So he's a person of interest. From my understanding and based off the video that I watched this morning, they were simply just asking him questions about his identity. And what Mr. Pazuelos claimed is they asked him questions about a study for about two hours,
Starting point is 00:16:38 and then they just released him. The vehicle that he was driving in is at his residence right now. And from what I understand, they weren't able to connect any dots relating Carlos to this incident. So I don't know why they pulled him over. I have no idea. That doesn't make any sense to me. But it seems to me like, at least as we stand here today, he's not connected to the incident. Guys, that video of Mr. Palazuelos is from our friends at CBS News.
Starting point is 00:17:05 Let's take another look at him. And I'd like to compare him to the masked intruder at Nancy Guthrie's home. Okay, look at him. He's got a mustache. He's got a goatee. He's got a little bit of a beard. He is light but swarthy. He has dark hair now.
Starting point is 00:17:27 Look at this guy. Let's keep looking at this guy and let's look at the intruder from several different angles. I can see the similarity in the eyes and I want to get that shot of the mask where you can see somewhat of eight moustaches. There you go. There you go. None of these are, you know, this is not taken in a photography studio. Okay.
Starting point is 00:17:52 So we're working with what we've got. It apparently has a little bit of a mustache showing. a little bit of what would appear to be a sole patch or a beard. Now let's look at Palazuelos again. I see why law enforcement was looking at him.
Starting point is 00:18:10 Okay, back to Jessica Finn, joining us senior investigative reporter, the U.S. son who's been on the case since Nancy Guthrie went missing. What is your version of what happened to last night? Because we're getting well, they're not necessarily divergent.
Starting point is 00:18:26 there are just additional facts and different reports. For instance, everything Dave Max said was correct. But yet we know the hostage unit was on standby. A mobile hostage negotiator team was on standby, which means they thought Nancy would be in the vicinity of Palazuelos. Okay, that was not meant to be. What more can you tell us, Jessica Finn?
Starting point is 00:18:51 Yeah, it certainly looked last night like we were going to possibly be bringing Nancy home overnight. And unfortunately, that, of course, didn't happen. From what we understand, Carlos' parents live in Tucson. They live kind of in the vicinity of Nancy Guthrie. So it makes sense that there's a lot of different connections between him and the Tucson area that Nancy is in, including that his parents live there. He is a delivery driver. He drops off packages directly in Nancy Guthrie's neighborhood.
Starting point is 00:19:21 And he, of course, fits physically from what we can see, from what our eyes can tell us. is he fits the similarities in the description of what we see in the perpetrator in that video. So clearly there was a good reason that law enforcement had to connect him to that area. He possibly even dropped off packages to Nancy's home specifically. He was asked to buy the media last night and interviews after he was released. Did you deliver a package to Nancy's home? And he said, look, I don't know. I could have. I may have. But clearly, once law enforcement did a deep dive into his history and his identity and his home that he appears to share with his mother, they eventually decided that he was not the guy, at least not right now, and they decided to release him.
Starting point is 00:20:08 They had sent out the FBI last night had the SWAT team out. They had hostage negotiators out, and it reached a real fever pitch, probably around 11 Eastern, Eastern time, that it seemed. like something was going to happen. And, of course, at the end of the night, by the time we all woke up in the morning, it was determined that he was released. Dave Mack, back to you, crime stories investigative reporter. Dave, you stated something to the effect of, I don't know why they pulled him over. Well, all right, let's examine that. He is in the area where Nancy Guthrie disappeared. He delivers packages to her neighborhood, which is a small name. He is a small neighborhood and a reclusive neighborhood. So it's not like you deliver packages to East 54th Street
Starting point is 00:20:59 in downtown Manhattan where there are thousands and thousands of people on one street. So that there's that. He also loosely fit the description. So what about that, Dave Mack, did you take into account that he had delivered packages routinely to that neighborhood? And wasn't it just in the last 48 hours, we learned that delivery people, yard people, pool people, landscapers, employees were all giving buccal or buckle swabs. That's DNA. Remember that? Absolutely. And maybe I misspoke, but let me point out something, Nancy, that the law enforcement efforts, we have all followed these, and I thought it was amazing how quickly, from the time the video was released to the public and the pictures, that law enforcement was able to get together with a search warrant for the home in Rio Rico.
Starting point is 00:22:00 We're talking about a search warrant that was all inclusive. Both Ms. Carr's research, I mean, they had prepared for this, and it came down very quickly within minutes of the actual video going public. Also, we know that his mother-in-law in Tucson, she said that, you know, officer showed up at her door, and they told her, being law enforcement told Josephina, this is Carlos' mother-in-law, that somebody had given them a tip that the lady, this is what she said, they had somebody give a tip that the lady was in my house. I told them, you can go ahead and search my house. There's nobody here. I have nothing to hide.
Starting point is 00:22:38 So they were, they being law enforcement, were able to really zero in on Carlos for multiple reasons, as you mentioned. He does look similar to what we see in that. video released by the FBI. We are also learning that there has been a huge, huge swell of tips being called in. In fact, the FBI has created a unique website for Nancy Guthrie. And we're going to put that up in just one moment, but I want you to see what I believe, not only the front porch video, but a plea, a heartfelt plea from Savannah Guthrie, directly to us.
Starting point is 00:23:23 Hi there, everybody. I wanted to come on and just share a few thoughts as we enter into another week of this nightmare. I just want to say, first of all, thank you so much for all of the prayers
Starting point is 00:23:48 and the love that we, We have felt my sister and brother and I, and that our mom has felt because we believe that somehow, some way, she is feeling these prayers and that God is lifting her even in this moment and in this darkest place. We believe our mom is still out there. We need your help. Law enforcement is working tirelessly around the clock trying to bring her home, trying to find her. She was taken and we don't know where. and we need your help.
Starting point is 00:24:31 So I'm coming on just to ask you, not just for your prayers, but no matter where you are, even if you're far from Tucson, if you see anything, you hear anything, if there's anything at all that seems strange to you,
Starting point is 00:24:46 that you report to law enforcement, we are at an hour of desperation, and we need your help. She's right. This is the hour of desperation because the ransom, we believe, has been paid. The deadline to pay it has passed. And if it has been paid, there is no incentive left for the kidnapper to hand over Nancy Guthrie.
Starting point is 00:25:13 A lot has been made. What happened? Was this really a kidnapping? Was it a, quote, medical event, such as her having a stroke or a heart attack? Well, her body wasn't there. So that's a pretty good indicator. She didn't fall or have a stroke or a heart attack. Her cane left behind.
Starting point is 00:25:33 Much has been made. Is it a real kidnapping? But when the front porch video emerged, thanks to the FBI cast cellular analysis survey team, all those theories were put to rest. I want to give you that FBI website. It is. And we'll put up a full screen for you to look at. FBI.gov slash wanted slash kidnap slash Nancy dash Guthrie.
Starting point is 00:26:06 FBIGov wanted kidnapped Nancy dash guthrie. There are also tip lines including anonymous tip lines. Okay, what can we learn from this video? Let's take a look at it in full. I would like to also point out to Dr. Bethany Marshall joining us. We're now on psychoanalyst out of Beverly Hills, author of Dealbreaker. You can see her now on Peacock. And you can find her at Dr. Bethanymarshal.com.
Starting point is 00:26:39 Dr. Bethany, after these stills and this video came out, the Guthrie family states, they do not know who the perp is. Now, if we could, I'd like to see the best photo we have, still photo of the perp's face. The best still, there you go. There's that, which to me the eyes look almost effeminate, but yet this is a man based on the way he walks, based on his height, which I'm going to go to Fitzgibbon's on in just a moment about his height, his shoe size, his weight, how that can be determined. But Dr. Bethany, I just don't see an incentive. Everyone is just clamoring to link the family to the kidnap.
Starting point is 00:27:29 Before we do that and heap more pain upon the family, they have stated, according to sources, that they do not recognize this guy. Show me every steal you've got at every angle. Dr. Bethany, what do you make of the family stating? We don't know him. Well, probably they do not know him. What's interesting is that the guy that they pulled over last night, Carlos, the public did respond in the way that Savannah wanted them to respond. Savannah in the video you played earlier pleads for the public's help.
Starting point is 00:28:05 This guy's pulled over because the public helped. They tried to link this photograph to a delivery man who was in the neighborhood. So that gives me hope that there are people and homes in this neighborhood who are trying to solve this crime. Now, this particular picture, I think it's interesting because when I look at the guy's eyelids, it looks like a younger person. You know, his eyelids don't fold over the, like you see with older people. His eyebrows look somewhat like tweezed or thin to me. That's maybe why you think that this picture is effeminate. It could be because the ski mask is sort of over his forehead.
Starting point is 00:28:46 But I would also wonder if this is somebody who engages in the type of grooming where they like to have their eyebrows waxed or thinned, which might give them an effeminate look. Let me see, Bethany. Okay, Bethany, thank you. Because you just crystallized for me why I thought at the very beginning when I just saw the face, I stated, could this be a woman? Because the lashes and the brows, it's just exactly what you said. Let's look at it again. It's the thin nature of the eyebrows. If we could zoom, there you go, thank you, control room. But the reality is that may be because of the ski mask
Starting point is 00:29:34 pulling the eyebrows and the eyes upward. But yes, the lashes, the eyebrows do give an effeminate appearance, but now, control room, if you could give me the video of him walking forward, when he walks forward, it's totally a guy. It's totally a guy. Look at the, yeah, that's not, that's a man. That is a man plus, and Fitzgivens don't explain how, they can measure and they think he is between 5-11 and 6-1 or 6 feet tall. All right. He also looks bulked up like he's got on several layers of clothing under there. So I'm looking at this and look at that stuffed backpack. Once you see him, Dr. Bethany, there's nothing effeminate at all about the way he walks.
Starting point is 00:30:26 Yes, but there are a lot of men out there who don't walk in an effeminate manner, but they like to groom themselves in an effeminate manner. So I would just cast a wider net and think about men who might, you know, match that appearance. Now, this backpack is interesting to me, Nancy, because I've been fascinated from the get-go by the fact that the blood trail stops on the doorstep, which tells me that whoever took her had some kind of a compression cloth, something that they used to stem the bleeding. Otherwise, the blood droplets would continue out to the driveway,
Starting point is 00:31:02 or maybe there was a car waiting. So that has made me think about, you know, who was attending to her medical needs. You know, she couldn't walk more than 50 feet. She has medication that she needs, which I guess from the beginning is blood pressure medication because she has a pacemaker. So who was attending to her medical needs in that house? And would that particular person know to bring some kind of a compression or a cloth or a bandage or something to stem the bleeding? To help me against my wheels, they didn't bring me my rights until two hours later. Okay?
Starting point is 00:31:37 You know, my wrist is off, swollen. From the back of, like, and did you have any idea that this was about? No. No. No. No.
Starting point is 00:31:48 From our friends at CBS. This guy, um, is a driver. He is a delivery person. He was detained last night, Carlos Palazuelos, and he was released. They held me, as somebody has been watching, um,
Starting point is 00:32:04 law and order. They held me again. My will. Yes. And they didn't read me my rights. Okay? Oh, until two hours later. So they did read the rights. My wrist is all effing swollen from the handcuffs. Let's see him on video. I want to see that swelling he's talking about. Did you have any idea? No, okay, hold on. Here comes the hands. I think he's going to hold him up. I think it's going to happen. I think, oh, well, to you, Matthew Lopez, his hands are working. He doesn't seem to have any permanent injury. He can't show me any bruises, any redness, any swelling, any scratches, any anything, but he does know enough to whine. Hello, Nancy Guthrie could be dead. And he's whining?
Starting point is 00:32:53 He didn't get his rights for two hours? Please. Yeah, a lot of people think when they called my office that failure to read Miranda rights are sort of a get-out-of-jail-free card, and they don't understand it's more complex than that. And you're absolutely right. there's got to be two elements. It's called custodial interrogation, but whether or not somebody is under arrest,
Starting point is 00:33:12 and they're interrogated him about questions relating to this incident. Now, I can understand where he's coming from. If he had no involvement and he's getting pulled over or he was being followed, and then he decides to pull over, they have warrant, they execute the warrant, they start his house, they search his car. So, you know, if I was minding my own business, as it were, and the FBI came and approached me and they were accusing me of possibly being connected or asking me questions about being connected with the murder. And in this case,
Starting point is 00:33:38 Carlos said that he's never even heard of Savannah Guthrie. I would be taken aback. And so, you know, he may be whining and I'm sure he's not downplaying the severity of a murder, right? But in his world, he was caught off guard and he doesn't understand why he was pulled over. And this is, and also he's in front of the camera. So this is his opportunity to really, really to project. Bring it home. Okay. And other words, they did everything right. They did nothing wrong. Okay. That's correct. He did not need his Miranda rights read to him because he wasn't under arrest. They ultimately did read his Miranda rights to him. Needlessly, Matthew Lopez, this ain't the writs. This is a kidnapping,
Starting point is 00:34:25 possibly a homicide investigation. So I'll circle back to the pampered federal visitor who is now whining that his wrists hurt, but can't show me any injury. Hold that thought, Lopez, because joining me right now, and he is on his way to a scene, so I want to go to him very quickly. Lee Newbecker, joining us Cybersecurity and Digital Forensic expert, now the CEO of Enigma Forensics. Lee, thank you for being with us. Okay, there's been a lot of speculation, and I was listening to Cash Patel last night.
Starting point is 00:35:04 And he was very circumspect, as he must be, explaining how those images from Nancy Guthrie's front porch were obtained. I'm going to give you my layperson understanding of what happened. What happened is that Nancy did not have a subscription to Nest. She had a Nest security cam. but the FBI was able to go into Google, Nest is the Google product, into their vast, vast network of stored items and mine that, and somehow amazingly cast Cellular Analysis Survey team, found her home and her nest and got,
Starting point is 00:35:59 the images. That's how that happened. Now, I know that you're on your way to a scene. So just tell me, is that correct? Basically, Nancy, remember when Director Comey put a block on his camera
Starting point is 00:36:16 on his laptop, that's a clear indicator we should all assume that any time we're in front of a camera, that those feeds are going somewhere. We may not get access to them, but to assume that our government doesn't get those feeds, no, that's questionable. I can't say with authority on that
Starting point is 00:36:33 because that's all classified information, but it's something that is out there. Right. Hey, Lee, don't move very quickly. Back to Lopez. And to get the information from Google, the parent company of Nest, and you can see very clearly on the video,
Starting point is 00:36:51 it says, nest right at the top. It's not a leap of fate to figure out where it came from. You can either get a warrant for Google, for them to allow the search by the FBI. They can voluntarily allow the search. There can be a court order for the search. So there's many ways for the FBI to have gotten that information from Google. Do you agree or disagree? I agree with that.
Starting point is 00:37:20 And it's unclear right now whether or not Google on its own divulge its own divulge its information or they were ordered by the courts and the FBI to the voltage information. But my thought would be more answers are coming in the days to come. If it took this amount of time to get the recording from this nest doorbell camera, my thought would be the FBI is going to start getting more and more information the same way from the neighborhood cameras. Once they get that information, the pieces are going to start falling together. We're going to see a car in the front.
Starting point is 00:37:52 We're going to see other people around. So I think this is going to be the tip of the iceberg. And within the next week, because of the release of this evidence, we're going to see more, we're going to have a better idea as to what happened that night. We don't know what's going on behind the scenes because there was a nine second phone call made to a family member of the Guthriege. At this point, put yourself into the mind of the kidnapper. I've made a mistake and that I chose a medically fragile person and she died on me when I was getting her out of the house. Yes, there was a setback last night, but all is not lost. All is not lost. There is a huge
Starting point is 00:38:31 misconception that Bitcoin cannot be traced. Nothing could be further from the truth. Lee Newbecker is with us, the CEO of Enigma Forensics, Cybersecurity, Digital Forensics expert. Okay. Block chain analysis. There have been many, many cases, created by the FBI, by DOJ, by the IRS, where Bitcoin has been successfully traced, and billions that be, that's B as in brother, billions of dollars and billions of dollars worth of Bitcoin have been recovered. And one case I like to talk about is Zhang. He, Zhang, I believe it's Z, H. O-U-N-G was defrauding entities on the dark web, specifically Silk Road.
Starting point is 00:39:35 And he was transferring Bitcoin from one wallet to the next. Think of it like this. I'm just a layperson. I'm just a trial lawyer. You're the expert. But I think of it as someone who creates a Shell Corporation, like a LLC, and they funnel money into it and it's a fake name. Okay, let's just pretend it's Lee Newbecker
Starting point is 00:39:57 LLC. And then they transfer that into Matt Lopez LLC. And none of them mean anything. They're just names that they have filed with the Secretary of State. Then it goes to Bethany Marshall, Psycho-Aless LLC, and Brian Fitzgibbon's LLC, and Jessica Fianne, and Dave Matt, and this, and
Starting point is 00:40:14 that. And finally to the end, you've gone through so many, you've lost the trail. Or somebody that creates an email and then another fake email based on that fake email and down and down and down. That's really how Bitcoin is hidden. You just have to follow the block chain analysis. And it's called block chain because the transactions, when you look at it, it looks like it's entered into a block on a like a Google dot, a shared Google Doc is what it looks like. And it looks like. And
Starting point is 00:40:52 and you, the block is a chain, that block to that block to that block to that block. So you do a block chain analysis and you basically follow the money. Now, I'm sure you have a much better way to explain it. Hit it. I think you did a great job. For those of you that research your ancestry or genealogy, it's very much like that. You know, you're tracing the source parent. And you can go back very far, but the way the blockchain works, you have an entity that has a wallet and is authoritative.
Starting point is 00:41:31 They do a transaction. Well, that transaction then gets distributed downstream, much like, you know, going back to the first couple that was born on Earth. And so you have parents and you have to just keep tracing it. Now, the government has an advantage because those of you that think Torr is anonymous network, Well, sitting on the Tor network are many government servers that intercept and collect information along the way. So by identifying the wallet ID and doing tedious tracing, eventually you can go back to a source. And you have an IP address, which is like a telephone number for computers. And taking the energy to follow it all the way back to the initial source, they can find things out.
Starting point is 00:42:19 Now, hold on. You mentioned the Tor network. That is basically a free, it's an open source system that allows anonymous communications, and it routes internet traffic through a global volunteer-operated network. That's what it is. It's kind of like an open network, like onion routing. It's encrypted three times, sent through three random volunteer-operated modes, and it goes on and on and on.
Starting point is 00:42:49 It's designed for privacy. You mentioned the Tor network, correct? Yes. And to think that some of those computers on that network aren't our own governments is being kind of foolish. So, you know, anyone that's in that chain can intercept information because the wallet IDs transferred, the origin, the original IP address, and so on.
Starting point is 00:43:15 So, you know, it makes sense that our government would want to be part of the Tor network and probably very much all over it so that they can intercept and stop crying, prevent terrorism, and trace, you know, counterfeiting, much clothes, and so on. You know, just think of the IRS, Neabacher, all right?
Starting point is 00:43:38 When Al Capone couldn't be caught for murder, the IRS got him. Bam, done. Don't mess with them. You want to tell me if a thief, can figure out how to do Bitcoin and use it for criminal purposes that the IRS can't figure out how to thwart that. Oh, yes, they can. So when people say, oh, it's lost forever, it's not, the trail is not lost forever. The problem is when it is transferred, if it is transferred to another
Starting point is 00:44:12 country that has no or low Bitcoin regulation. Because say we go to that country, and what are we going to subpoena if they haven't kept the records see what I mean but tell me the fly in the ointment is when they try to cash out the Bitcoin explain
Starting point is 00:44:34 well oftentimes people will go to a convenience store Circle K-711 whatever whatever will allow for conversion of the currency and when that happens make no mistake
Starting point is 00:44:47 the cameras within there are recording that Put him up. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Hold on, Ellie. Wait a minute. You think they're going to go run over to the Kroger's to get $6 million worth of Bitcoin at no? But you are right.
Starting point is 00:45:04 There's actually Bitcoin ATMs out there. They're common in the States, not necessarily elsewhere. Where, what will they do with the money if and when they get it, the Bitcoin? What will they transfer it and transfer it? and transfer it, that wallet, that wallet, that wallet, that wallet, and then what? To another country and then try to convert it? Very possibly so. Oftentimes the people cashing out are not the people behind it, but someone connected to them.
Starting point is 00:45:34 So it's the diligent process of finding and they'll find it eventually. If they don't spend the money, it's going to be difficult. But, you know, people have needs for money. And, you know, I think it's just a matter of time. That's when they're going to get caught, I think, is if they try to, and I hope it doesn't take that long, if they try to get to transfer the Bitcoin to money, especially if they do it in the U.S. Agree or disagree. It's much more difficult to trace the activity once it leaves country and goes to a country that doesn't cooperate with, you know, SWIFT or our other. anti-money-markering initiatives that the treasury goes.
Starting point is 00:46:22 I hope to get the suspect because I'm not dead. They're able to do their job and find the suspect that is so they can clear my name. I'm done. CBS News. Catch and release. That's what happened last night. A guy was pulled over thinking he matched a description of a perp on the front porch of Nancy Guthrie's home. It wasn't him.
Starting point is 00:46:43 Straight out to Brian Fitzgibbon's joining us. He is their director of operations. USPA nationwide security. He leads a team of investigators around the world looking for missing people. Let me ask you at this juncture, what do we do now? Yeah, I think what we saw with this catch and release, Nancy, and this relates to what we do now, is that they most likely found that vehicle.
Starting point is 00:47:10 So I think what you probably had is that they saw his vehicle. He's a delivery driver in and out of that neighborhood, in and out of that area. So I think in the coming hours and days, we're going to see more activity from law enforcement because they're narrowing down a list of vehicles that were in and around that area, and they're starting to actually find the people associated with those vehicles. Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. Brian Fitzgibbibbons, I think a major piece of evidence is the clothing. Now, our staff, crime stories, during the night, looked up similar outfits, similar backpacks, similar vests, jackets, specifically the ski mask, all night long.
Starting point is 00:48:13 Let's take a look at what they found. I think this may be very helpful. take a look at the backpack. Now, interesting, if you look, this is an Ozark Trail, and all of these are found at Walmart. So if you look at the reflection, the reflective strips, there you go. The backpack, to me, is easily identifiable. Okay, let's move to the jacket. The jacket has a unique zip up the front. that shines in the dark. I'm not sure if it's a full zip, I think that it is, as is picture to the left.
Starting point is 00:48:58 But I guarantee, and it's got a hood. I guarantee you that the feds are doing exactly what we're doing right now. But most interesting to me is the ski mask, because the ski mask, let's see a close up. There you go. That's a great shot on the right. The ski mask, see the vertical ridges in it.
Starting point is 00:49:19 It's gray and gray. color. It's a balanclava. It's what it is. And you've got the stitching around the eyes. And remember, you've got to take into account that it's nighttime and you've got a light shining on the perk. So how can that be traced? By the way, he's got in his mouth what we believe to be a bite light. It's often used by aviators that need their hands in a cockpit. It's very common. There are multiple types of them. That's the bite that you see with the four orange dots on either side. Brian Fitzgibbons, how can this be done?
Starting point is 00:50:01 How can these items be traced? Yeah, and you've seen other web sleuths, Nancy, in the Internet community, have also identified the type of pants he's wearing the shoes, all of these items. and this is why the FBI has released this video is there may be a person connected to this individual that recognizes these items, that they've seen, you know, an associate or someone they know that's had these items in their possession, that wears these clothes. So that's why this is so valuable in generating leads. Straight back to Jessica Finn.
Starting point is 00:50:42 Jessica, what, if anything, is happening at this hour? You know, one of the things that I don't think that we really got to touch on is specifically the details of what the FBI was doing on the ground, in and around Annie Guthrie's home. From what I'm seeing, there was a lot of door knocking from the FBI agents, and these door knocks included the FBI agents. Of course, asking, have you seen anything? Have you heard anything? That kind of general query. But the other interesting thing they're asking for is they're asking for everybody's surveillance cameras in and around Annie Guthrie's home. And now Annie and Nancy are 10 minutes away from each other. So why they're having this team of about 10 FBI agents going door to door in and around Annie Guthrie's home, asking everybody for their surveillance footage is really, really interesting.
Starting point is 00:51:28 And it brings up a lot of questions as to what they're trying to narrow in on. And it might go back to what we're talking about with Fitzgibbon saying that maybe they're zeroing in on the actual vehicle that the perpetrator was driving. Brian Fitzgibbonn's, I know you heard what Jessica Finn just said, and she's wrong. Right. Last night as the arrest, or excuse me, the detainment of the delivery driver was occurring, a whole team was back out at Annie Guthrie's home, and they were very, very meticulously going through desert brush, the edges of people's yards, really looking in sheds, speaking to people, showing them pictures. but also I want to ask you about that. The family again states they do not recognize the person on Nancy Guthrie's porch.
Starting point is 00:52:22 But the dichotomy, Fitzgivins, I'd like you to address that, this guy bumbling around like, whoa, what, there's a camera? I think I'll put leaves on it. Okay. There's the seemingly idiocy of what he's doing compared to the almost eloquent wording of the ransom note, clearly written by someone with a great command of the English language, and many people are mocking this guy, but he has managed to elude authorities day 11.
Starting point is 00:52:59 So the dichotomy is stunning, which leads me to think, Brian, that there are at least two people involved. Absolutely, and, you know, we assume a certain level of sophistication, based on the reported eloquence of the ransom demand. And that indicates, you know, we can't translate that down to the foot soldier who was actually walking up to Mrs. Guthrie's threshold, right?
Starting point is 00:53:27 So that sophistication could be present for the person doing this. And by the way, I'll say again, the ransom note sent to TMZ and this action may be completely separate. Okay, so we have to keep that in mind. But the sophistication of this individual... Okay, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Back it up. Would you repeat that very slowly?
Starting point is 00:53:51 So we have to, you know, zoom out and keep in mind that the ransom demand sent to TMZ in the local Tucson news stations may be an opportunist trying to cash in on this terrible event. And it may be disconnected from this individual that actually took Nancy from the home. Now, we have to follow that through to where it ends. You can't just throw it out there and accept us to swallow it, hook, line, and sinker.
Starting point is 00:54:23 So you're saying, let's just pretend for the moment that the ransom note is not connected to the porch guy. So then why did the porch guy take Nancy Guthrie? He didn't kill her on the scene like a tip. typical burglar or robber or rapist. They come in, they take what they want, they may rape someone, and then they kill them and leave them and run like hell because they don't want to get caught. So she is kidnapped. She was kidnapped. No question. So you're saying they kidnapped her for nothing? For what? To keep her in their basement? I'm not saying that. In either event,
Starting point is 00:55:04 right? What I'm saying, the position I'm taking is the porch guy is not the one who's responsible for writing the ransom demand. He's either controlled by somebody and he's a foot soldier executing this operation or it's disconnected. But in either event, it's very unlikely that this person who's pulling up weeds to throw him over a ring camera is the one who orchestrated ransom demands being sent to TMZ and local news affiliates in two. on. Understood, but you're not having your cake and eating it too. You can't have it sitting on the plate and in your stomach. No. So you said they're disconnected. And then you said that the porch guy's working at the behest of the author of the ransom note. That means they are connected. If they're working in tandem, then they're connected. I could see that. But I do not see that the porch guy just took her randomly for no reason.
Starting point is 00:56:10 It had to be for ransom. So you're saying the porch guy took her for ransom, but that the note to TMZ could be a fake. Well, then, if the porch guy took her for ransom, then where's the ransom demand? See, you know, you've got to follow this thing through to its logical conclusion. Yeah, and as I was saying, in either way, It's very unlikely that the porch guy himself had anything to do with orchestrating that ransom demand, that this is just merely a foot soldier executing this operation.
Starting point is 00:56:43 If you know or think you know anything about Ms. Guthrie's disappearance, please call the FBI toll-free 800-225-53324. Or if you want to remain anonymous, 520882-7463. remember American Hero Patrol Officer Jonah Hernandez of Los Cruces Police Department killed in the line of duty just 35 years old, leaving behind a wife turned widow
Starting point is 00:57:13 and two boys without a father. American Hero Patrol officer Jonah Hernandez. Nancy Grace signing off. Goodbye, friend.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.