Dan Wootton Outspoken - ANDY BURNHAM'S MASONIC COUP TO TAKE OVER UK EXPOSED AS KATIE HOPKINS WARNS DEMOCRACY NOW DEAD

Episode Date: June 23, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Andy Burnham – the King Rat of the North – is engaging in an anti-democratic coup of the Disunited Kingdom, being granted access to secret government documents after being seen engaging in what has been described as an Illuminati masonic handshake with the Speaker as he was sworn in as the MP for Makerfield yesterday. But Katie Hopkins is warning today that Burnham will soon discover the solution to Britain’s problems, in this context, is not at the ballot box. The brutal shifting of power, which has seen Donald Trump dismiss Two Tier Keir and Rachel From Accounts switch sides, means even Kemi Badenoch is now feeling sorry for the outgoing PM. But another member of our new political class is horrifying Britain, after the SNP’s thuggish new MP Lara Bird is accused of being illegally sworn in after crossing her fingers during the ceremony. After Dan's Digest we have analysis from the Superstar Panel: Ex-Tory minister and UKIP leader Neil Hamilton and his glamorous wife, the author and broadcaster Christine Hamilton. PLUS: Slippery Starmer and Lady Victoria unveil their secret son literally the moment the PM announces his departure from Downing Street in the biggest Two Tier hypocrisy yet. AND: Nigel Farage’s TV car crash amidst new revelations of a Reform UK civil war, as he claims he would need protection to be a in a room with Rupert Lowe on GB News while battling with his pals Nick Ferrari on LBC and Julia Hartley Brewer on Talk TV. We’ll show you the most dramatic moments. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Is the King really being emotionally blackmailed by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as his courtiers are claiming or is Prince William correct that he needs to toughen his stance on his exiled youngest son? We’ll have all the latest with our Royal Mastermind Angela Levin. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor,

free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. This episode is brought to you by Activia. You might already be eating yogurt, but not all yogurts are created equal. Activia contains over 1 billion probiotics per serving to survive and reach the gut alive. When it comes to gut health, Activia is the number one family doctor-recommended probiotic yogurt brand. Choose Activia. Feel good from the inside out. Visitactivia.orgia for more details.

No spin, no bias, no sense. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 522. Firstly, go England tonight. Secondly, hope you are coping in the heat. But breaking right now, Andy Burnham, the King Rat of the North, is engaging in an anti-democratic coup of the disunited kingdom being granted access to secret government documents

after being seen engaging in what has been described as an Illuminati Masonic handshake with the Speaker of the House as he was sworn in as the MP for M. Maker Field yesterday. Katie Hopkins is warning today that Burnham will soon discover the solution to Britain's problems in this context is not at the ballot box. There's 7,000 votes out of a possible voting population of 60, 50, 60 million. That seems very democratic indeed, doesn't it? Andy Burnham is the Messiah without a mandate. Our

country's problems are not going to be fixed at the ballot box. It is going to be a truly biblical struggle instead, and I don't think Andy Burnham is prepared for that. The brutal shifting of power, which has seen Donald Trump dismiss two-tier care and Rachel from account switched sides, means even Kimmy Badernock is now feeling sorry for the outgoing PM. He's got two problems. Energy and immigration and crime.

But energy and immigration. You know, he's really hurt himself. Wasn't it a disgrace that Rachel Reeves, who's 50% of the reason why Labour has been terrible, wasn't there. Instead, she was taking selfies with Andy Burnham. But another member of our new political class has shamed Britain. This is the SNP's thuggish new MP, Lara Bird,

accused of being illegally sworn in after crossing her fingers during the ceremony. I take this oath only so that I can serve the people of Arbroath and Broughty Ferry. My first allegiance is and always will be the sovereign people of Scotland. I do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King Charles, his heirs and successors according to the law, so help me God. What a surly little brat. No wonder Americans are looking on what's happening here.

An abject horror! was one tear shed for the 250,000 young girls raped, tortured. What did you say last week? Tongue drilled a hammered to a wall, getting sexually taken advantage of and all the different things with objects. It's like, where's the tier? After my digest analysis from today's superstar panel, the husband and wife dream team, ex-tory minister and UKIP leader Neil Hamilton, and his glamorous lifestyle. I've partnered the author and broadcaster Christine Hamilton.

Also coming up on the show today, Sipri Starma and Lady Victoria unveil their secret son. Literally the moment the PM announces his departure from Downing Street in the biggest two-tier hypocrisy, yet you are not going to believe this. And Nigel Farage's TV car crash amidst new revelations of a Reform UK Civil War as he claims he would need protection to be in a room with Rupert Lowe on GB News, while then going on to battle his pals, Nick Ferrari on LBC and Julia Hartley-Brew on Talk TV.

We will show you the dramatic moments. Then we're moving over to Substack for the Royal Uncanceled After Show. I'm going to ask the question with Angela Levin. As the King really being emotionally blackmailed by Prince Harry, will also vote for a new Greatest Britain and Union Jackass. You can cast your ballot in the live chat on YouTube. Here are today's nominees. Christine Hamilton has gone for Nourindicor for being a staunch supporter of Sadiq.

Khan despite getting her phone nicked on Oxford Street. Neil Hamilton has gone for Andy Burnham, who he describes as a vacuous non-entity, all style and no substance with nothing behind the eyelashes elected for who he wasn't rather than who he was, having been out of Parliament during Starman's disastrous premiership. His election protests, a posters showed the real Andy Burnham, a cartoon character from the Bino. He's already peaked, and from now it's downhill all the way. and I've gone for Lara Bird. Now, you may not know her name, but that's the woman who you just saw from the S&P

giving that awful swearing in in Parliament. More on that in the digest. So now let's go. So are we just going to accept now that democracy is dead in the United Kingdom, that Andy Burnham, the rat king of the north, can be parachuted into power and granted top secret documents ahead of any sort of democratic process

thanks to seemingly an Illuminati Masonic handshake with the speaker of the house that was captured on camera yesterday. You can see it here. So I'm just reporting what the MSM won't. Because look at this, the specific grip in that video does indeed match the Masonic fellow craft handshake. What is undeniable, however, is that number 10 has now granted. Burnham the right to receive government briefings and meetings with the Cabinet Secretary as soon as possible. The man who once parroted general election now really doesn't seem to believe in democracy, does he? As Joey Manorino put it, this was one of the men banned from entering the UK by

Sama for UTK. Andy Burnham wasn't part of the Labour government at the last general election. He was not elected to any national position whatsoever. Now he's going to become the prime minister without anyone even voting on it. And they call that a democracy. The UK is an Islamic joke. Today, Burnham has managed to secure an hour-long secret meeting with Slippery Stama, but it was at an undisclosed location because why do we have a right to know anything about how our PM is going to be chosen? And what other dirty, deals they are doing along the way. Stama did what he was told in the end, and Katie Hopkins summed up the anti-democratic nature of this entire stitch-up. In his life, Kirstama did what he was

told. Now, Andy Burnham wants to be prime minister. Andy Burner was just elected as an MP in a tiny constituency by 9,000 votes, and about 2,000 of those were people who didn't want reform, so were voting tactically, but not actually for labour. So Andy Burnham plans to be Prime Minister based off about 7,000 Labour votes when we have a voting population of about 50 million people here in the UK. 60 million if you include fraudulent labour family voting. So 6,000, 7,000 votes out of a possible voting population of 60, 50, 60 million. That seems very democratic. indeed, doesn't it? Andy Burnham is the Messiah without a mandate. Our country's problems are not going to be fixed at the ballot box. It is going to be a truly biblical struggle instead, and I don't think

Andy Burnham is prepared for that. Not going to be fixed at the ballot box, but a biblical struggle. That is chilling. But we know that what is going on in the UK at the moment is chilling, including, by the way, what's happening to Katie Hopkins, simply when she tried to go to a London pub to watch the football and had to deal with this. Now Katie revealed in Batchitonkers Britain that she has now reported that assault to the police, but chillingly, she expects nothing will be done. And finally tonight, England face off against Ghana. Last time I watched the game due to being in a show just up the road,

I watched it in a pub full of Unix without a... testicle between them, it seems. And I was physically and verbally assaulted by a very angry and ugly landlord, a balding man who spat at me that my wife is Palestinian. Oh, I'm sorry about that, darling. You know, we all have to own our issues. Your issue is probably just a very her sweet one. It seems like you may have integrated a little bit too much into that culture now that you're beating up women as part of your daily routine. I have. have of course reported the incident to the Metropolitan Police. But given the two-tier policing in this country, I may as well just take a piss in the wind.

Tonight I will watch the game surrounded by real men. I mean, we're in crazy times. And it's no surprise, really, is it, given our apparent next Prime Minister with no democratic vote, covered up grooming gangs, just like the last one. This man is complicit. According to Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry. Answering that directly because I want that to be known from my point of view. You were there and you haven't answered the question.

I wasn't the question, Andy. You have not answered the question. But our entire decision, but we're saying. But our entire political class, but our entire political class and how gathering around this man, as if he is a Messiah. To hell with the work that actually needs to be done,

as Lee Anderson of Reform UK put it, a tale of two priorities. The first picture is from last night's debate on the British coal superannuation pension scheme, which shows a lack of interest from the majority of Labour MPs. The second picture was taken a few hours earlier. Makes you wonder, doesn't it? Well, it does, but... All it proves to me is that Labor's politics are completely transactional and based entirely on personal ambition.

I mean, Rachel Reeves, Rachel from accounts, didn't bother to attend Slippri Stama's farewell speech, but was taking selfies soon after with Andy Burnham, a betrayal that has even made Kemi Badernock feel bad for Stama. Wasn't it a disgrace that Rachel Reeves, who's 50% of the reason why Labor has been terrible, wasn't there? Instead, she was taking selfies with Andy Burnham. This is what they're like. They won't do the right thing and they won't take responsibility. And instead, they pretend that they have achievements. Protecting young people from social media and half a million children being lifted out of poverty because of the choices that I made.

Our reputation in the world restored. I felt very sorry for Kirstama, to be honest. But I mean, Labour, so utterly delusional. Do you know what they're doing now? They're trying to keep slippery Stama in Burnham's cabinet. But I would say to Kier Starrma, you'd be a great foreign secretary, you'd be a great Justice Secretary

for various reasons. It has not worked out with you being Prime Minister. But if he could contribute, I think it would be good if he could. I mean, it's a lot to ask, bearing in mind where he is, but I think it'd be very good. Amman, no one wants that. not Burnham, not Starrma, not the population.

Who are you kidding? Who are you talking to? I actually think Donald Trump's verdict on the reign of Slippery Stama was withering in its total dismissal. Sir, you've been quite critical of Prime Minister Starrmer and he's now resigned.

Your thoughts? And who would you like to see as the next Prime Minister? I was critical only from the Senate because I think he's a lovely man, but I said, you're really messing up energy. You have windmills all over the place. In the meantime, you have the North Sea,

oil and they won't let anybody drill. It's one of the great fields in the world. And they haven't even found out. You know that the UK buys much of its energy. You know where? Norway. You know where they get their oil? The North Sea.

The UK has a much better portion of the North Sea. They don't want to do it for environmental purposes, okay? And I told him he's a very nice man. I mean, he's sort of a friend of mine. I mean, he was not good to us with NATO Pete, right? He said, we can't use the island to land. That was the first for a couple of weeks. He said, well, but ultimately I gave it to you know,

that was a bad move. That hurt him badly. But, I mean, I wish him well, but he's got two problems. Energy and immigration and crime. But energy and immigration. I mean, you know, he's really hurt himself very, very badly. Please. I think we should just remember, by the way,

what Andy Burnham apparently on the next Prime Minister has said about the doctor, about the Donald previously, any politician who gave Trump the time of day should be ashamed right now. There's a lot to scrutinise, right? But I want to show you the type of scrutiny that the Rat King is receiving on the British bashing corporation who thinks he looks so handsome. And I was talking to one minister tonight and they said it's quite nice that we're likely to have a leader who looks like a music journalist. That's what we know. At least he doesn't look like a newsnight journalist. What about having a leader who's a woman? I mean, gosh, how radical for the Labour Party that would be. Having a woman is a leader. But also, like, Andy Bannon was accompanied by two women today when he was introduced into Parliament. And look at the team that delivered

his very significant women, make it for them, all women. Still no women. At least Richard Tice is actually testing out some attack lines on Burnham. He's one of the only ones, suggesting that he is the king of the flip-flop after this. anti-democratic coup. What people have voted for is what they voted for in the local elections, which is to get Stama out. And in voting for Andy Burnham, they've reinforced, they want the Prime Minister gone. Interestingly, we had reform voters saying, I'm so determined to get Stama out.

And if Labour is so delusional to think that us patriots believe Burnham is going to be any different to Stama, then all you have to do, is look at these incredible England fans in America chanting this. Yes, lads. That is what we need. Andy Burnham's a wanker. Good. At least someone is attacking this guy. What's amazing, by the way, is that Andy's team are not admitting, are admitting by the way, that he is not even close to being ready as Prime Minister. How terrifying is this? Where is the scrutiny?

Aside from Labor's daily male columnist, Dan Hodges, who reports in fascinating detail. Last week at Ori-MP and his wife were attending a swish Westminster Party when they spotted a figure standing alone and apparently lost in his thoughts. It was Kirstama. I felt sorry for him, the MP told me

there was no one near him. So I went over and said, Hello, Prime Minister, I hope you're bearing up. Stama looked at him for a moment, then responded wistfully, you still call me Prime Minister? Not many people bother to do that anymore. And just over three weeks, no one will.

In the immediate aftermath of his emotional resignation speech in Downing Street, most people thought Starmes had agreed to a lengthy and orderly transition of power. With the final handover to his presumed successor, Andy Burnham, coming at the start of September. But they had misinterpreted his words and his intentions. His agreement to stay in post for another three months was conditional on there being a formal labour leadership contest, and Stama knew full well that this was something Burnham was keen to avoid. As one Stama ally told me, he's not going to sit in number 10 twiddling his thumbs while Burnham gets his robes measured for a coronation. If the party wants him to keep the ship steady through

an election, fine. But if not, he won't be hanging around. Within Labor's deeply divided ranks, there are two interpretations of Stama's decision. To his supporters and even several of his erstwhile opponents, this is the legitimate response for a man who has just been brutally driven from office and can't be expected to have his assassin's best interest at heart. As one Stamer ally told me, Andy's team were desperate for him to wait until September to hand over. They wanted time to properly prepare. Well, tough. You ask for this. You've spent the past month telling everyone that's politics. You don't get to choose when you leave or enter or leave the stage. Fine. Stop crying, suck it up and get on with it. Within Team Burnham, there is a view that Starmor is guilty

of deliberate sabotage. He's tried to kneecap us before we've even started one told me last night. He could have waited till September party conference and we could have had a respectful handover, but he's decided just to walk away. There's also an anonymous source from inside Starmament. number 10, who has revealed this fascinating insight in The Spectator, writing, and because Keir's voice was now so ridiculed and his defenders were so few when he beat Wes Streeting, nobody believed him. Wes' endless campaign to replace him had finally been seen off, but it was too late. Andy Burnham and Josh Simons had panicked, hurrying to Westminster to take over and save the party from Wes without realizing that Wes was bluffing. If Burnham had

seen out his term in Manchester, he could have let Care take the flack and then swear. wept in for the general election. Now he is dangerously ahead of schedule and has already asked for a long delay before taking over to sort his plan out. If we weren't talking about the profound privilege of running this great country, it would be comical. So it's a mess. This anti-democratic takeover, which the MSM is celebrating, is a total mess. By the way, I want to talk about this other moment in Parliament yesterday, which alongside the Masonic handshake also shames' Britain. Now this is when this thug, this vile thug, the SNP's new MP, Lara Bird, was accused of being illegally sworn in after crossing her fingers during the ceremony. Watch what happened.

I take this oath only so that I conserve the people of Arbroath and Brotty Ferry. My first allegiance is and always will be the sovereign people of Scotland. I do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to his majesty, King Charles, his heirs and successors according to the law, so help me God. And the speaker just welcomes her, even though that was an illegal swearing in. By the way, I'd like to see her comment with that same surly teenage attitude about scheming Sturgeon's fake husband, Peter Murrell, who has today been jailed for over five years in the biggest, scandal in Scottish history that virtually no one has bothered to talk about and do we believe

scheming sturgeon? I don't. She should be locked up alongside him too. By the way, this Lara Birdwoman is clearly just an awful person because in her acceptance speech, she spoke about the importance of importance of inclusivity, which I guess she doesn't mean to include the over 50% of Scots who are very, very proud of the Union. Grotty Ferry have rejected the politics of division and hate that some try to serve. We have demonstrated that our community is inclusive, hopeful and proud. This by-election was about the future that we want. for Scotland. And the people of Arbroath and Broughty Ferry have once again made it clear that our future

lies with independence. As Basil the Great put it, it really pisses me off to see politicians doing this. What is the point in swearing an oath if you were literally crossing your fingers in defiance of the oath you're taking? Why do we accept this as if it's fine? These people aren't protectors of the realm, they're traitors to it. Our constitution demands you serve the sovereign. If you're taking political power in this country purposely to undermine the sovereign, that's treason. And if we treated these people as such, our kingdom would be a lot better for it. Chris Rose of Reform UK described it as childish and disrespectful. He is demanding that she be forced to redo her oath. Councilor Lucy Trimble pointed out, why would you stand to represent

Westminster if you only love Scotland? Did she try to be an MSP and not get in? silly, childish woman, like a teenager who has to apologize to a teacher at school. Pathetic. How are our standards so low? But the lawyer Stephen Barrett revealed serious constitutional implications, writing, this oath is invalid. But nothing will be done. Because this woman is part of the new elite class destroying the UK in plain sight and wearing those awful boots to do so.

In America, by the way, they understand why Stama's legacy is one of abject failure, an abject failure which shames our entire country. And then, Pat, you said he was crying right now, and I get it, bro. I get the emotional part, crying about his kids, was one tear shed for the 250,000 young girls raped, tortured. What did you say last week? Tong drilled, hammered to a wall, getting sexually taken advantage of, and all the different things. with objects. It's like, where's the tears? And I said, he said, King Charles called him. Have you, has anybody heard anything about King Charles, Pat? Has he commented anything about any of the

situation? She supposedly is, um, semi public and dealing with cancer treatment. Well, guess what? Supposedly. Yeah, but if you're the king of this great nation of yours, the office of the king can put out a statement. Say something. Condem it, Pat. I think it's just sad to see where the UK brand is. Uh, it's a revolving door of weak leaders. You know the whole story about strong men create good times and weak leaders will create hard times. And that's basically where UK is now. I would say like the poster child to basically show what's going on in the UK is not even the prime ministers. What happened with Harry and Megan?

You're a prince. And I'm saying when he's got his own money, he's got his own money. You're a prince. You're going to basically excommunicate yourself for some B-list American actress, move to America and make a mockery of basically the royal family. That to me signify. These guys have no clue what they're doing over in the UK and Keir Stomrmer is just the latest victim of just weak losers who are coming in in and out the door. Thank you to the Royal Grift for that footage.

Now 10 years on from Brexit, the mess we are in is nothing to celebrate. As Douglas Carswell outlined, British politics for the past decade. One, new prime minister arrives. Two, same policies on immigration, economy, eco-b-b-s, crime as before. Three, same civil service dysfunction and public discontents. Four, forced out. Five, new prime minister arrives. Six, repeat.

Systematic change not soap opera is needed. So while I remain so proud for backing Brexit 10 years ago today, I remain so disgusted. And our political class who have done everything possible to subvert the biggest democratic vote in British history. Shame on them all. And by the way, slippery Stama and Andy Burnham are top of that list. Now, Christina Neal Hamilton. So Neil Hamilton, when you look at the events of the past 48 hours, it really does seem that the political class have just accepted no democracy whatsoever. I mean, this guy who has gone through no democratic process, Andy Burnham, now has all of

the state secrets being delivered to him. There seem to be that Masonic handshaping. shake with the Speaker of the House in Parliament yesterday, and we're all just meant to shut up about it and accept this guy as Prime Minister and be excited. Well, what you've got to understand, Dan, is that Burnham stood explicitly on a programme of change, but there is no change at all. He has no ideas that are any different from Starmers. Yes, there'll be a change of who sleeps in the bed in the flat in number 10, but that's the only change there will be. And, you know, it's talking about state

secrets being given to Starrman to Burnham what's happening is that he's going to get his orders of course from the cabinet secretary and the political establishment who surround the cabinet secretary because Burnham has no idea what to do about any of the big things that matters you know Douglas Carswell very sensibly pointed out in that tweet or whatever it was that you showed on the screen a minute ago and anything he has no policy on migration he has no policy on wokeery he has certainly hemmed in by the markets on financial policy the man who once said who elected the bond markets when he was bigging himself up to trade to a trade union audience well the government is borrowing 120 billion pounds a year that last month alone we

paid 23 we increased the the national debt by 23 billion so so there is no flexibility whatsoever for any change in economic policy if you're a socialist and with his mindset at any rate he doesn't want to reduce taxes or or anything like that he doesn't want to take an axe to an over-regulated economy he is a complete charlatan and you know he's a man he's a celluloid man actually's a hologram you could put your hand right through him and as as i said or you read out in when you were talking about my you need jackass for this week you know there is nothing behind the eyelashes. And that's his principal characteristic as far as I can see the glasses and the eyelashes. So that's what we're getting in a new prime minister. It was not a PM. We've got it as PR.

100%. I mean, this is a guy who never broke the Labor whip and went from serving Tony Blair to Jeremy Corbyn. You know, he is a guy who will do what he was told. But, Christine, there was another astonishing moment in the House yesterday. This new SNP, N.P. N. Lara Bird, who I think sums up the disgraceful new type of leader we had. She was surly, she was rude, she completely disrespected the king, she disrespected the half of her constituents, over half of her constituents who actually don't want Scotland to become independent. Particularly ironic, by the way, that this is all taking place

when Peter Murrell has just been sent down to prison for five years. But it was just something in that display, Christine, which made me despair, actually. It made me despair about the type of political leaders we now have. I think she's someone who should have been consigned to student politics. Now she's in Parliament. I was disgusted by it. I quite agree, Dan. I mean, honestly, where does one begin with all the stuff that's going on at the moment?

I am still locked out of Twitter so I miss quite a lot because I'd never heard of Lara Bird and I didn't see the swearing in No, I had neither, Christine, to be honest. And I've been busy. I've got a busy life doing other things so I was completely unaware of that

but I thought it was the most appalling, outrageous display. She doesn't give her stuff for the history and the should be standing of the House of Commons. It was horrific. And according to, I can't remember his name, that lawyer fellow who's down in Devon somewhere. Oh, Stephen Barrett. Who knows his onions, that that oath was illegal.

I mean, it was horrible. Her supercilious, oh, it was ghastly, you're right, she should be. But, you know, I'm afraid she is all too representative of the standard of MPs that we've got today. I mean, it really, on all sides of her house, to be honest. I mean, you know, the good old days of the big beast. But she was just cocking a snook and giving three fingers. was all tied up to democracy, and which is exactly what the Labour Party is doing.

I mean, I know you elect, you don't elect a Prime Minister, you elect a party, so I don't need any lectures about all that. We all know that. But the idea that Andy Berlham can just swan in and become our Prime Minister, it's absolutely outrageous. If anybody in the Labour Party has got any decency or sense at all, they will find 80 people to back somebody, I can't remember who it is, who they're thinking of Danny,

so that there's at least a contest. I know, I'm desperate for that to happen. It looks like... What does Andy Burnham stand for? On anything, nobody knows him in any minute now. He's going to be our Prime Minister, representing us all on the world stage. Well, thank you, but no thanks.

And this is meant to be the Democratic Party. Exactly. Darren Jones or Al Khan seem to be the only two people, but they're not going to get the numbers. It's insane. So there's going to be a coronation. No democracy. It's absolutely shameful.

It's taking us all. for granted. It really is. It's just cocking a snoop at every average Brit. You don't matter. Your views don't care. We're just doing this. The whole thing was a set-up. The way Josh Simons just moved aside so that Andy could be parachuted

in and here he comes, fluttering down and we're all, what did Neil call him? I can't remember, not Messiah from heaven. But King Rat, that's right, King Rat. It's horrific. It really is. I mean, if it wasn't so serious, it would be. They're treating the British government like a game of

Pass the Parson. It's, I don't know. I despair. I really do. I was absolutely shocked. I was absolutely shocked by something else that happened yesterday outside Downing Street. And this is going to be controversial

and some people will disagree with me talking about this. But regular viewers know that I have long tracked Slippery Stama and his miserable wife, Lady Victoria Stama, who I do have great sympathy for, despite her misery, I have long tracked their hypocrisy over their own family, over the fact that we still do not know the true shape of Slippery Stama's family, and over the fact that he has used his family, including his teenage son, for political expediency when it suits him.

For example, when he was in deep trouble about the fact that we found out he was staying in Mayfair at this very posh apartment owned by Lord Ali. All of a sudden, he was more than happy to hide behind his teenage son. Oh, I had to be there because the teenage son was sitting in the GCSEs. All through this period, when he has been not prepared to name his son, when he has been absolutely defiant about the fact that his children should. should not be pictured whatsoever, Stama, when it suits him politically, has hidden behind his family. And I talk about that from the situation with Lord Ali to the discussion about adolescence. Well, yesterday, you were not going to believe this. Slippery Stama and Lady Victoria Stama positioned said son, Toby Stama, in front of the cameras.

He could be seen watching Stama's speech yesterday. And these are some previous pictures actually, which I will come to. But if you look here, this was the speech yesterday. And there, number nine is Stama's son. I find it utterly extraordinary and quite disgusting that the family have done this, totally taking the piss out of the fact that for the past two years, they have claimed that there has to be a total secrecy shrouded over their family. Well, good on the Daily Mail, who isn't playing ball.

They released this piece, Lady Stama leads team Kieran Downing Street, as PM's family and closest allies gather to watch his tearful resignation, but where was Rachel Reeves? But within that article, they identified number nine, Kier Stama's son. In his resignation speech, Sir Keir paid tribute to both his son and daughter. He said, when I leave the biggest job in the country, I shall spend more time on the most important job. And his son was watching, watching this moment as he burst into tears. And when I leave the biggest job in the country, I shall spend more time on the most important job.

Being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife, Vick, who has been a rock by most. my side through good times and bad, and being the best dad I can, to my beautiful children, who are my pride and my joy. Thank you very much. Now, I'm sorry, I know this is a divisive issue, but Stama has never told us the truth about the true shape of his family. He has never told us the truth about why the Ukrainian fire bombers were targeting his personal property and his personal cars? How did they know the location of said cars and said properties? Instead, just blaming it on a Russian conspiracy without the evidence to back that up. And while I do have great human sympathy for his son, I mean, being Kirstehmah's son, that's got to be tough, right? At the same

time, I find it sickening that for the past two years, there has been a media blackout while Stama and Lady Victoria are prepared to take the piss by positioning their son in the photos outside Downing Street when they are prepared to leave Downing Street. That is fundamentally wrong to me. And I will call it out and I will give credit for the Daily Mail for actually doing the right thing. Now, I have since done a lot of research on Toby Stammer and it turns out that actually Slippery Stammer also allowed his son. to be there. You can see him in the top right when he was going into Downing Street. Their young daughter also attended that public celebration, although I have decided not to name

and show her given she was not in the official lineup outside Downing Street yesterday. Stama has also regularly taken Toby Stama to the football and attended in public with him. Now, I think, I mean, and that shot actually has got a black eye too, which I'm sure was through some type of, you know, football injury or something like that. But look, my point is here. Slippery Stama should not have been able to play this game with the mainstream media. You are the elected leader of this country. You are regularly invoking your children and your wife when it suits you in political decisions. be it from the defense of Lord Ali to the constant talk about why adolescence proves that there's a massive issue with young white boys.

So if you are also prepared to put your 17-year-old son outside of Downing Street to watch your speech, I'm afraid I am not going to join in the mainstream media censorship. I credit with the Daily Mail for doing what they did. They didn't name him I have. But I find it disgusting that there has been this two-year-long. stitch up. I really do. I really do. And it's interesting because a lot of people have celebrated the fact actually that the Stamas are gone. Many royalists online were not happy with the fact that Victoria Stama gave a little nasty side-eye to the Princess of Wales when she was in public

with her young child at a royal event. And we have also, of course, the fact that Stama shed tears in public for his children, for his wife, for what he had lost, rather than what we had lost as a country when he was leader. I give a lot of credit to the UKIP party actually for making this point. Stama did not shed a tear for Henry Novak. Stama did not shed a tear for Riannon Skywhite. Stama did not share to tear for Wayne Broadhurst. Stama did not share a tear for Bibi King. Stama did not shed a tear for Elsie Dot Stancoe. Stama did not share a tear for Alice De Silva Aguerre. Stama did not share to tear for Harvey Wildgous. Stama did not share to tear for Katie Fox. Stamma did not share to tear for Stephanie Irons. Starma did not share

a tear for Lily White House. Stama did not shed a tear for Finn Bar-Sullivan. Starma did not shed a tear for all the victims of mass uncontrolled migration. When he did shed a tear, it was for himself. Let me bring in today's superstar panel, Christine and Neil Hamilton. So, Neil Hamilton, as I say, this is going to be controversial. This is the type of reason why Stama wants to shut down independent media operations like this one because he has constant control over the mainstream media who have protected his secrets about the real shape of his family, about the truth of his children for the past two years. But I'm sorry, Neil, it crosses a line for me when in front of the world's media, he brings out his son to watch his resignation speech, knowing that there are cameras on it,

knowing that it's being broadcast live while expecting the mainstream media to continue with a conspiracy of silence. No, this kid is 17 years old. I wish him the best, but he has made a decision as a young man. By the way, I point out, Neil, that Slippery Starmour wants to give 16-year-olds the vote. Okay, so under Labor's regime, this young man would have the vote as a 17-year-old. For me, I believe he was making a decision to go public in that moment. Yeah, I totally agree with you. It's the hypocrisy which makes it a public issue. And if you keep your family completely hidden from view,

except for some incidental appearance which can't be avoided, then I think if you're using them in some circumstances, even if you're only implicitly as some kind of political weapon in your hands, then you've got to accept the consequences of that, that it's gloves off as far as the media are concerned. And, you know, public life is public. That's what you've got to realise. If you go into it, you can't turn off the cameras.

And if things become a matter of public interest, then they will be exposed and debated. So I think it's entirely fair game, as you rightly say. In Wales, Labour have already given 16-year-olds the vote. And in Scotland, the SNP did, but Labour supported them. So, of course, you can't have the penny and the biscuit. it if 16 year olds are no longer children for the purposes of voting then they're fair game anyway if they're old enough to to vote then i think they're they're old enough to fend for themselves i person am against votes for 16 but but that's not the point if we have it then i think the

the rules of the game have to reflect that of course i mean i do have sympathy for the boy it can't be easy to realize that your dad's a dud and so that's the problem isn't and a him standing there on the gallows and then pulling the lever himself to go through the trap. I mean, that's not something which I would want to put any son of mine through, but that's the reality of the situation that Starmer himself is in as a result of his own uselessness, incompetence and hypocrisy. So I'm afraid I have no sympathy whatsoever. Christine, there are a lot of people who disagree, and I'm always having to be. happy to put both sides of this. I'm just looking in the live chat now. Steffi 810 says leave them alone,

bad form. There will be some people who say as the child of a politician, they should be protected. But unfortunately, Christine, from my point of view, I think this is a very weird place we're going to. And I use the example, and I'm sorry to do so, of Prince Harry and Megan Markle, who seem to have this very odd situation going at the moment where they want to, to some degree, protect their children while when it suits them dragging them out and using them to sell product. I'm sorry, in my view, if you are the prime minister of this country, your children are to an extent public figures. Now, of course, we should treat them with kid kids gloves. And I'm not for one second attacking Toby Stahmer here, but I think the idea that they should be secret is just weird. And I find it so

weird that the mainstream media have been part of this facade for the past two years. I don't think it's something they would have done for Boris Johnson's children, Christine, who I saw constantly slagged off across the newspapers. Well, Boris Johnson had too many children to count who couldn't possibly hide all those children. Well, good. We need the birth rate to be going up. Seriously, good on him. To be honest, Dan, I think your use of the word secret is a little bit too far. He's not said he's got it. It makes it sound as though he's got illegitimate children that he's really hiding. That's why I think the word...

Well, there's a lot of discussion about that too, Christine. Well, of course there is because the media like that, aren't they? They want to push these things all over the place. As far as I do not believe that Starma has an illegitimate child. It's too boring. There you are. I stand to be corrected if one appears. And I think these Ukrainians who tried to firebom his home and everything,

I may be wrong, but I believe that it was discovered in court that this was basically a Russian plot. This was nothing to do with them being loved children or something of Stama. I don't know. I mean, if Stama takes, what's his name, Toby, to a football match, and you've just shown all those photographs of him, I haven't seen any of those before, then he's sort of public property. I mean, leave the lad alone, but if you are photographed with him in public, you can't really complain when people print those photos.

But I really think the use of the word secret is even for you, Dad. I think that's a bit far. I mean, Christine, I totally hear what you're saying, but he made him secret. That's the thing. He created this sort of aura of weirdness in the same way that I think Harry and Megan have done with their children. Like, actually, just be proud of the fact. You've got two kids. At some point, they're going to be known.

People would show them a lot of respect. I honestly do believe that. But to hide your children, that's. That's weird. And he did make them secret. That was his choice. He wasn't hiding them. He's just saying, basically, leave them alone. And what's wrong with that? I mean, Harry and Megan, what really gets me angry? I don't really mind the Stama situation. Sorry to disappoint. No, I want to have the debate because I think there'll be a lot of people who are with you. Yeah, no. I appreciate my view on this as not going to please a lot of people.

I think you're making a bit of a mountain out of a molehill there. But Harry and Megan, what really riles? me and I think around the lot of people is that she's called Lilybet. We all know perfectly well why that was done that was to give her some you know, oh God and the idea she said that the Queen approved

it, well, what is it? Show us the proof of that and actually quite the opposite. Lots of people say the Queen didn't. Look Neil, there's a different Was her little pet name? Yeah, exactly and she's made it public. It's gross. Neil, a lot of people have a different view on the whole firebombing case. People like

George Galloway have said they don't believe the truth has ever come out. I just want to show you what Tommy Robinson had to say about this, Neil, when he appeared hereon outspoken yesterday, because he doesn't believe the official explanation, which is that, oh, this was all a big Russian plot. Watch what Tommy had to say. He's never going to be remembered as one of the greats as a leader of when people list, if you said who are the leaders of Britain in 30, 50, 100 years time.

No one's going to mention Kea Starrman, right? So, yeah, I'm glad he's gone, but I want to know more about the rent boys. Why he didn't pay them? What a story went on with him? Now, he's trying to blame everything on Russia, isn't he? He's trying to blame his rent boys on Russia. This is after the conviction last week. The BBC is reporting that this was a Russian plot,

but obviously we still don't know who the mysterious figure behind the firebombing actually was. And Tommy... I'll tell you, certain people do firebide, you know, certain people do things up. Growing up in the UK, you know, the criminal fraternity, you know, who's up. Rent boys don't go around blowing shit up, right? Tommy, I don't. It's not the sort of people that are hired to go and blow stuff up. Yeah.

People who are hired to go and bomb and, if you look at the arson attacks that are come out that are funded by Iran, there's no rent boys blowing stuff up, right? So it just doesn't add up. Those three rent boys, I bet they have no criminal history. other than their sexual practices. I bet they have no through-werebral history, and there's a lot more to it. Neil, do you think there's more to it?

Well, I haven't got any idea, obviously, but it wouldn't surprise me if this was some kind of undercover operation by the ex-KGB president of Russia. That's to remember the only job that Putin had before he became the mayor of St. Petersburg was a-working for Boris Yeltsin, before that he was a KGB operative and he speaks through in German because he ran a KGB operation in

East Germany and we know that Russia engages in all sorts of destabilizing activities like the Scripals and Novichok murders etc etc this is a different category altogether no doubt but I don't really see what the purpose was actually but but it's perfectly possible that it was some kind of Russian operation and they found some Ukrainians, for example, to try to discredit Ukraine and put the blame on them. I don't have no idea. It's a world of shadowy practices where anything can happen. But nobody's going to be firebombing Stama hereafter so he can be grateful for that. I mean, Christine? Well, I mean, do I understand, are we supposed to believe that the people who were firebombing were in fact rent boys who were

trying to blackmail Stama or something? I mean, where is the proof, apart from what Tommy Robinson says, that Stama has dealt with rent boys? I've heard the gossip and people will say, and you say, well, how do you know that? Oh, somebody told me, well, who told you and who told them? I mean, things go round like that. The problem is, you know, I'm not remotely convinced that there are any rent boys involved as far as Stammer's concerned. He's too boring as Neil said about something else. What was very...

It was a blowing up job. Oh, stop it. What was very... Just moving simply along from that. What was very... What was very concerning to me, I think, in court, is that we were all just meant to accept, okay, there's this Russian mastermind behind it,

but we're never going to be told the identity of this Russian mastermind. We've hit a dead end. Now, the father of one of the Ukrainians involved says that this guy is, a total Ukrainian patriot and would never work for a Russian. So all I'm saying is that I don't think

we've got the full story. But it's also important, I think, that we talk about Stama's overall legacy. This from Alison Pearson really struck me. She said there are so many reasons to rejoice in the humiliation of Stama. His disgusting persecution of veterans preferring our enemies to our heroes

every single time, demonisation and merciless jailing of white Britons after massacre of children in Southport, total lack of empathy, calling decent people far right when it was he who was far left, telling Trump, we have always had a lot of free speech while the sanctimonious Stalinist was ushering in more hard-line censorship, U-turning on the hard choices necessary to save the country like cutting an unsustainable welfare bill just to buy himself popularity with his student backbenchers,

sanctimoniously denying our most important ally the United States permission to simply use the air bases, they had paid for, doing enormous harm to the special relationship and leaving us unprotected just to buy himself popularity with his student backbenchers, see the trend, taking the knee to DEI and poisoning our society, two-tier care, ruining thousands of businesses, putting hundreds of thousands out of work with increased job taxes while claiming absurdity to have, absurdly, sorry, to have restored economic stability, trying to avoid a national inquiry into the rape gangs until shamed into one by Elon Musk. Feel free to add your own. And Tim Shipman certainly did add his own.

This is the political editor of The Spectator, and he came up with 42 reasons why Stama failed. But I just want to share a couple of them with you that really struck me. He said his second foundational error, according to voters and focus groups, was his handling of the Southport killings of three young girls. I've always said this. The mainstream media do not understand how Southport changed this country fundamentally. The PM and his team denied it was a terrorist attack, even though the perpetrator, Axel Rudi Gabbana had been referred to the government's prevent program and had ricin and an al-Qaeda training manual in the house. This created the notion that he would not tell difficult truths on

security and cultural issues again. It still comes up to this day unprompted. Stama supported harsh sentences against those on the far right who rioted while leaving the impression he did not speak out against left-wing protesters, a tendency which left him characterized as to tear care. And of course, the attempt to rewrite history on Stama has already begun in earnest this week. And I want to share this from Daniel Hannan, who said, I sense the political obituaries are preparing to run with the line that Kare Stama was a decent fellow, but ill-suited to politics, honest but naive. Well, have a look at this and then try to tell me he was honest.

The signs were there from the start. Watch. I want to pay tribute to Jeremy Corbyn, who's a friend as well as a colleague. He wouldn't call Jeremy Corbyn a friend. No. We have to make the case for freedom of movement. We don't want open borders. Freedom of movement has gone and it's not coming back. Cutting off power, cutting off water, secure.

I think that Israel does have that right. I was not saying that Israel had the right to cut off water, food, fuel or medicine. wounded by the media. The sun in this city, a hurt for this city. And I certainly won't be giving interviews to the sun during the course of this campaign. Do you write an article for us on newspapers over day? Surely that's not giving you any support across the North West. Would you write for them again, Sir Kear? I would do, yeah. Can you guarantee that under your leadership, the 2019 Labour commitments to nationalise water, energy, rail, the Royal Mail, they'll all be in Labour's next election manifest?

I've made that commitment. Will you nationalise the big six energy companies? Yes or no? No. No, you will not. By the Home Secretary was the wrong decision and I think it was a rushed decision. In 2019 you said stripping her of a British citizenship was the wrong decision. She's lost her appeal to regain it. Should she be allowed to appeal again?

Should she be allowed back here in order to face justice in the UK? I think the court decision yesterday is the right decision. The Labour Party in opposition needs to be the Labour Party in power and a government doesn't go on picket lines. A government tries to resolve disputes. I'm really pleased to be here this morning supporting the staff at McDonald's were on strike. Air quality, climate change is the issue of our time. And as the extinction rebellion protest showed us this week,

the next generation are not going to forgive us if we don't take action. I think they're wrong. I think their action is wrong. I mean, Christine, Daniel Hannah is completely right, isn't he? We cannot allow this rewriting of history in regards to Stama, who lied to such an astonishing degree. He lied to get in power. Now, you can say he thought he was doing that for the greater good, but it's not acceptable because then he lied once he was in power.

We could never trust a word that man said. Well, some might say he lied. Some might just say that he flip-flop, but whatever it is, he does it a hell of a lot. a lot, doesn't it? Of course you're entitled to change your mind, but if you're going to do that, you should then explain. And of course, social media, not to mention recordings of television and radio programs, people can get so quickly hoist on their own potard by what they say, but not if you're a conviction politician, because if you're a conviction politician, you know what you think,

you know what you mean, and you say that, and you don't have the opportunity to flip-flot, because you don't flip-flot, you know what you want. This is the problem. And Burnham, I think, is going to be far worse on all that than Starma. Look at all the stuff that's already come up to surface from his Twitter accounts and social media accounts. You know, when all the Tory prime ministers were chopping and changing, oh, we've got to have an election for every single one. Yes, you were right.

They should have had an election, but so should you, and he's not going to. So, I mean, they're all so shallow, and they don't stand for anything except trying to get into power, and they don't know what to do when they've got, power and Kea Starma has been an absolute example of that. So it's not surprising there are all these examples. You know, by the way, when you were listening slightly off thing, but you were listing all the things that Alison Pearson's list, that's what it was. There was a lady, a rape victim who was on the television, one of the big channels the other day, and she was told in advance,

please don't mention the nationality of your rapist. Yes, Sammy Woodhouse on Good Morning, Sammy Woodhouse, that's right. Thank you. I've forgotten the name. And of course, she ignored that and she did. But I mean, the grotesque. Yeah, but how often does this censorship go on, Christine? Because you know there's a consequence for Sammy Woodhouse. She'll never be asked back again. And so this is the problem. Weren't we told, I think it was Axel Ruddekabana, but you will know. We were told her he was a choir boy from South Wales. Yeah. I mean, what? That was to put us all off the scent. Well, I mean, you know, there he is. Look, wouldn't melt in his mouth, but my God, he changed, didn't he? Breaking today, Nigel Farage, in a series of car crash TV appearances, as Reform UK descends into civil war after the Makerfield by-election disaster.

What's so astonishing about this is that some of the people who are going to toe with Farage include his very good friends, Julia Hartley-Bruhe on Talk TV, Nick Ferrari, on LBC. And now Mike Graham, who I believe you can say as an ally of Nigel Farage, is even suggesting that he could end up standing down

as reform leader because he's been hounded by the MSM. Watch this. If you dumped Nigel, to my mind, you lose. Yeah, they're not going to do that. They're really not going to do that.

I mean, the only thing that might happen is he decides he's had enough of being hounded through every single thing that he does because that's what's happening. You know, he is under far more scrutiny than any other political leader that this country has ever seen. Because, as you say, people don't like what he stands for. I don't know why they don't like it because there's an awful lot of people in the country agree with him. You know? And I think it's quite unfair, actually, the way he's treated. Yeah, it's difficult to use the word unfair in relation to politicians.

True. I'd be honest with it, anybody who would go into politics, you'd have to wonder about their sanity in the first place. So that's what Nigel's allies are saying, but let's get into this car crash run of interviews. Remember Nigel is someone who we expect to be out there, expect to deal with the MSM coverage. But the Christopher Harbourn five million pound donation is causing him more problems than virtually anything else

in his political career. But he started on firm footing during an appearance on GP News, which I think is going to do a lot of damage, because yet again he's turned on Rupert Lowe and suggested Rupert Lowe, who I know very well, you know, as I know Nigel. Rupert Lowe, a jovial old guy, you know, who could be your grandfather, certainly not a threatening man. But Farage suggested that it was impossible to be in a room on his own with him because of what he seems to hint at his violent tendencies. Just crazy, watch. I want to get into a room with Kevin Badock and Rupert Lowe

would just... Well, you can only go into a room with Rupert Lowe if you've got protection. Okay. I mean, it's just rubbish. And this line of attack trying to present Rupert Lowe, someone who has had a very, very long

and respectable career as a violent man, I don't believe it's going to work. But then Nigel Farage went into the mainstream media lion's den, going head to head on the British Bashing Corporation with a very determined Sally Nudshint. Do you think that the defeat in Makerfield was anything to do with your admission

that you were given £5 million by a crypto billionaire? Sorry? No one cares. Apart from the media, no one cares. No one cares at all. The parliamentary standards watchdog care, because they are investigating it. Well, they are, you're right.

There's been a complaint received, complaint from the Conservative Party chairman. they're investigating it, we'll see what they say. I'm absolutely convinced I've done nothing wrong in anywhere at all. I also know that since I was elected as an MP, I've taken zero in personal expenses. I'm very careful and very cautious about these things. I believe it to be a wholly private matter.

The standards commissioner may take a different view. You had already given an interview about the possibility of becoming an MP and then you accepted the gift. Is that right? Yeah. And after that, I said, after that I said I will not stand in this election. And I was pretty clear when a snap election was called that I wasn't going to do it, I did change my mind subsequently. You've said that that £5 million was for lifelong security for you. You've also said it was a gift.

Can you just clarify? No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Let's be clear. Let's be clear. It's an unconditional gift. I can spend it on cars if I want to. It's entirely up to me, right? But, but there is a specific reason for this.

I have been physically the most attack and endangered, politician in Britain for now well over a decade. At every stage during that time, when I've asked the state to help and support, most times they point blank refused. I know because of the division in politics that I will need protection until the day that I die. And that is my intention, that it's what it's for.

And it means, frankly, I can get on my job and not worry about the long term. Peir's Morgan, long-time critic of Nigel, posted squirming Farage knows this is now a scandal that could end his chances of being PM. Everyone, including his own supporters, knows his failure to declare a secret $5 million bung from a Thailand-based crypto-Ka-Koon absolutely stinks. Now, when he was asked about how much money of that donation he had spent by Nugent on BBC breakfast, he got more than a little shirty. So Mr Farage, how much of that money have you spent? Look, literally none of your business.

If I've given it to charity, if I... But the truth is, I haven't. I know what it's down for. You haven't spent any of it? It's none of your business. It's literally none of your... How much of your salary do you spend on beer, on petrol? It's none of your business.

I think it is the public's business to know... No, it's not the public's business. Well, it's being investigated by the parliamentary standards. so it's somebody's business. You're saying you need security, a legitimate point. How much of that money have you spent on security so far? I'm sorry. Well, I know I'm not going to answer that deliberately, willfully.

Do you wish that you had declared this money at the time? It is not your business at the BBC to put me in danger, therefore I will not answer that. I would just like to clarify, do not make any mistake. We are not putting you in any danger at all. If I give you, if I answer that question you are, so I won't. So, but you have already said that you haven't spent it. Fine. Leave it at that then.

Do you wish you declared it at the time? No. You know this is going to keep coming up again and again and again. Well, that's it. Look, you can obsess about it, all right? That's fine. I spent, goodness knows, scores of hours in Makerfield, out talking to people, out knocking on doors, meeting people of all political opinions, and only one person raised it with me.

So, you know, if you want to go on about it for the next three years, you go on about it, that's fine. I'm going to get on with my job. I just wonder, you know, the people that you're talking to this morning, our viewers, the man and woman in the pub tonight watching England play football, I just wonder what they would think about someone who has got five million pounds sitting in a bank account and whether, how they can relate to that. I wonder how they'd relate to your salary, many of them in the pub tonight. My salary is on the public record.

many of them watching this program right now. Okay, so look, that's the British Bashing Corporation, right? We understand they despise Nigel Farage, they want Reform UK to be finished. So you could put that car crash interview down to mainstream media corruption. But what then got very tricky is that Nigel Farage also appeared on the show of his close friend, Julia Hartley Brewer. And they were meant to be celebrating 10 years since the Brexit vote.

but Julia decided, and I give her full credit for this as a journalist, decided at the start of the interview to ask about the dodgy donation, admitting that she knew her friend would get cross about her line of questioning. Watch. You're going to get cross with me, but I'm going to ask you about this. This five million quid that you took as a gift from the crypto millionaire, Christopher Harbourn, who lives in Thailand. You've described it variously as something that would pay for your stuff.

security for years because of the huge physical threats that you do face, and I'm very aware of that. You've also talked about it being a reward for all your work on Brexit. Harbourn has given many millions more to the party, which has been declared. You did not declare this money because you said it was a private gift. You weren't in Parliament. You're now being investigated by the Privileges Committee. This is being thrown around on social media. It has been hugely damaging to you. Do you regret not declaring that money? No. Why not?

Because it's a purely private matter. I have nothing to do with politics whatsoever. Now, Julia then even went on to say, I've got to listen carefully for this, but it's significant, given their friendship. She went on to say that she finds Farage's story absolutely

impossible to believe. Most people think of a gift as, I don't know, bottle of champagne. A box of chocolates. Not five million quid. Do you understand why most of us find it absolutely impossible to believe that someone who lives on the other side of the world,

no matter how much he loves Brexit, and I don't think anyone loves it more than you and me, that they would go, you know what, Nige, love you, here's five million quid, no strings attached. Do you understand why that frankly is not believable? I think you'll find you voted in Hampshire, So I think you'll find that's where home, actually. But whatever.

They may well do. And people inherit vast sums of money and all sorts of things happen in life. He's not your dad. You didn't inherit it. People inherit money. He's a crypto billionaire living on the other side of the planet and he gave you a...

But again, you talked about it. You said, this is an unconditional gift. Is it a gift or a reward or is it for your security? It's an unconditional gift. I can spend it on Ferraris if I wish to. All right? Are you spending it on Ferraris? Or are you spending it on your security?

None of your business. Got even more feisty as Knightell then suggested, Julia was now part of the London media class. Nevertheless, the rules state that you should declare that money. But did you think that Kirstama should have declared his free suits from Lord Ali? Well, they were political. How is the suit political and five million pounds? More money than most people would ever think of or whatever

earn or enjoy in their lives. How can that not be political? This is a hugely successful British business. Good for him. All right, which is a good thing. Yes, good for him. Julia, it's a private thing. It wasn't a political donation.

If you read the rules carefully, I've done absolutely nothing wrong. Then why is there a Standards and Privileges Committee investigation into it? Why has this done so much damage? Because they've, it has to use. you, and it has to be a London media class, but it didn't really... No, I don't think that's fair. When I first heard... No, I don't think that's...

I don't think I am typical of that class, and I understand your security needs. I think you know now that it was a mistake not to declare that money. No, I don't. And I spoke to hundreds of people in Makerfield walking up and down streets, over four days of campaigning, and only one person raised it as an issue. Now, what's interesting to me, though, is that it wasn't only Julie. who became the friend in the MSM to turn on Farage. So too, did his long-term mate Nick Ferrari,

asking him some of the most probing questions over this issue and actually calling him out live on air for having two different stories. Has it, as some newspapers have suggested been used to purchase property? No. Look, they can lie all they like. As I say, if I'm seen buying a round of drinks in a pub, they will say it came from that. It's irrelevant.

So just lastly, it's not board of property. It's not done renovations on property. It will only ever be spent because of the campaigning you did, which resulted in the vote 10 years ago today, you have concerns over your personal security for the rest of your days. I do. And as for the property thing, that was completed. That was agreed and the money was checked well before. But as I say, this is ridiculous.

because you can ask me this for the next 10 years. You know, as I say, you bought a round of drinks. Where did that money come from? It isn't like that, is it? Well, no, but I mean, if you just came out and said, you're saying now that there's nothing to see here as regards purchase of houses, renovations of houses, we can finally put this to bed.

And even if there was, it would be irrelevant. But you did have two stories. No, there are not two stories. One is, I was given the money unconditionally. I believe it was a reward for giving up a quarter of a century of my life, giving up a huge income in the city of London, putting up with lots of abuse, I believe that was the motive. Whether it was or not, that is that side of the equation. The other side of the equation is what I intend to do with that. I've made that perfectly clear.

Okay, now I do think there are questions to be answered about this donation, but I also believe the kretton's on the left are disgusting with their hatred of Farage. I genuinely believe James O'Brien wants to see Farage dead. I genuinely believe that because look at the way he just completely dismisses the threats against him. It's sick. I hate this, all right, I actually hate that line that he spouts about being the most attacked politician in the country

because I imagine Joe Cox's children listening to that or David Amos's daughter listening to that claim. He's had a milkshake thrown at him. They got murdered. and he has the audacity to claim that he's the most attacked politician in the country. The man is a whining coward. It's extraordinary that he would, well, it's not, is it? Because this is the man that heard Henry Novak's grieving father. Explain that his son's death had nothing to do with racism or race and plead with the proponents of public discourse,

not to pretend otherwise, and up-pop Farage to claim. and lie otherwise to claim that poor Henry's ethnicity had anything to do with his death, or indeed his treatment by the police. And so we shouldn't be surprised that he would... I mean, in fact, when Joe Cox was assassinated by a white supremacist terrorist, Farage was out of the block so fast to start attacking the Remain movement.

It's Farage, little prick. O then, oh so predictably, O'Brien also dragged out Carol Vorderman. You know, Carol Fordhamen, who in the most recent ad campaign that she was using to make money, she described herself as a milf. A mother, I'd like to, you know, her own description. But she was dragged out to moan about Robert Kenyon some more. I mean, the guy was beaten.

Can we give him a break? And using Robert Kenyon's previous claims online to suggest that reform is an anti-woman party. I worked on a construction site in Snowdonia underground. Me, the only woman with 2,000 men, nobody ever said those things to me. Nobody. And Nigel Farage is an absolute disgrace. And there when he said, oh, yes, well, you know, it's just loud to banter.

But of course I don't approve. You see, every time he sort of, it just fails. And when he was up in Meagerfield last week, you know, and he was asked the question, again about this online. abuse by Kenyon, he went, so what? Reform is an anti-women part, well, company, let's be honest, it's a company owned by Farage. Keeping on talking about

Rob Kenyon's sexism, including on question time, as you would have seen, led a lot of women to change their vote. And I'm very happy about that. And, you know, Farage saying, oh, she shouldn't be covered and you shouldn't be involved in political campaigning. Well, I've been, well, I'm very happy about that. And I'm very happy about that. And I'm very happy about, and, you know, We'll have news for you, love, if you're listening. I'll carry on doing what I want to do. I mean, they're everywhere, by the way.

When Pippa Carrera of The Guardian, hardly if Guardian, spoke about Nigel Farage, calling Andy Burnham another washed up has been. Kay Burley, do you remember when she claimed that she used to be an impartial journalist at Sly News? replied, a washed up has been who beat your can. candidate hands down, Mr Farage. But look, what is undeniable now is that there is trouble within the Reform UK ranks.

Cheryl Jacobs of the Daily Telegraph, reporting that reform now seem to be potentially looking at becoming the official opposition if an early election is called by Andy Burnham. She writes, one can see the logic. PMQ's isn't just Badenock's strong suit. It's that's the centre of her entire game plan. If Farage replaces her at the dispatch box and the Tory leader is reduced to asking supplementary questions from the second row, that would be disastrous for her. Official opposition status also unlocks public funding, more media airtime and greater access to civil service briefings.

And indeed, the left-wing media also reporting of a civil war within Reform UK after the Makerfield by election, with insiders urging Nigel Farage to sack the problem they call Zia Yusuf after the Makerfield defeat, with insiders St. Vaugh, voters were spooked by the further right Restore Party and should now reassert its leader's red lines on extremism. So to the superstar panel, Christine and Neil Hamilton, Neil Hamilton. You know a lot about trying to work with Nigel Farage, former leader of UKIP, and you've had your own falling out during that time. But where do you stand, Neil, on this whole issue of the five million pound donation?

Who is right? Is it the media class, which is saying this is a big issue? I mean, Pearz Morgan is saying it could even finish him off, stop him becoming Prime Minister, Julia Hartley Brewer, Nick Ferrari had lots of questions today too. Or is Farage right when he just says, no one actually cares about this kneel in the streets? No one cares about this five million pounds in the real world. I don't think many people do, apart from the institutionally suspicious and people have a political interest in bringing Nigel down. But I mean, Nigel has not handled this in the best possible way. I think what he should have said right from the start is there's been a complaint against me.

There is no foundation to it as will come out in the course of the inquiry. I'm not going to say any more about it. You know, the old adages never explain, never apologise. Well, he gave a partial explanation by bringing his security into the picture. And once you do that, I'm afraid you're going to have people, the rats are going to be gnawing away at you. and that's exactly what we've seen in the clips that you have shown. And so he's either said too little or too much. If you start to explain, you've got to carry on explaining

until you have complete transparency to stop this being a political issue. I mean, the big problem is these ridiculous, pettifogging parliamentary rules. On the one hand, you don't have to declare gifts which have no political purpose behind them. And yet, on the other hand, the rule is that if you receive a gift in the 12 months before you become an MP you have to declare it and so the issue then becomes one of process rather than substance and that's the key issue surely is if it is a

personal gift then who cares how much it was like winning a lottery in a way but you know Christopher Harbourn is a billionaire supposing the idea whether it is or isn't but that's the claim nobody seems to dispute it five million quiddish small change Timmy's given vastly more than that to reform and I think possibly even UKIP before that if I remember correctly. And so these sums are of no consequence whatsoever to him. There's big money to Nigel of course because Nigel never made any money out of being a politician quite the opposite. And his security needs are genuine. And I've seen this week. We used to pay quarter million pounds a year for his security when he was the leader of UKIP. So I do know something about this on the inside. Goodness knows what security he needs.

needs now and how much that cost quarter million year goes nowhere actually if you want to in a detail of security people with you for 24 hours a day so five million quid would not be enough to provide a capital sum to fund security of any serious amount just out of the interest that you could earn on five million quid which current rates you know three four percent so you're not talking about huge sums of money for security but you know as he is raised the specter of security and spending some of the money on it or it was given for security, you'd expect some of the money to be spent on it. Then I'm afraid you've opened Pandora's box. I'm sorry about this because I do think this is a complete non-issue actually. And what would be

the payback from Nigel Fash being given five million quid by Christian Holman? What is it that Nigel could possibly do? We've no idea whether Nigel's going to be prime minister in three years time or whenever a general election comes. And even if he does, has become prime. And so what in practice could he do for a crypto billionaire living in Thailand? It's not illegal to deal in cryptocurrencies now. Nigel is a believer in the free market. He's entirely in keeping with everything he believes that he should think that crypto currencies should be available. I personally totally in favor of cryptocurrencies because if they stop the state snooping on you then that's one of the great advantages of

cryptocurrencies. I don't want the state to have fingers in all my financial pies not that i have any cryptocurrencies but it's it's a it's actually a response of of the free world to an overweening state nobody trusts fiat currencies any longer of of governments all around the world so the market has developed an alternative which isn't subject to the predations of inflation or the prying eyes of state authorities want to confiscate your properties so um The key issue here is substance or procedure. Yeah, Nigel was debanked, wasn't it?

But look, what's so interesting there, Christine, with Neil's insight, is that I totally agree political parties do need to pay to protect their leaders. So Neil's talking about UK, having previously paid £250,000 a year. Now, I'm sure the threats have increased, and I'm sure Reform UK is paying more than that. But, Christine, that's the point. Reform UK will be paying for. that. I would be very, very surprised if Nigel is personally paying for it. Now, I guess his argument,

Christine, is that once I'm retired from politics, there's still going to be a threat. That's when I need the five million pounds to pay for my security for the rest of my life. But does that argument add up? Because this is my concern for Nigel. I'm almost certain there will be a lot of people at Reform UK HQ saying, oh my goodness, we're paying for your security. You're not paying for your security. Now, I have no proof of that, Christine, but it's just my understanding and backed up by what Neal's just said in terms of you kept previously funding that security to the tune of £250,000 a year. Well, there are an awful lot of unknowns about this gift. And I think Nigel made a fundamental error right at the beginning by not declaring it, because apparently within a year of being elected,

whatever, you have to declare what happened. He should have declared it, and he's not prepared to say, yes, I should have declared it. If only he'd done that. Then he came out with two stories. First of all, if for his security, then it's a reward for Brexit. Well, it can't be both, not really. It's either one or the other.

It's not credible. He's wriggling about it, and that comes across with all those interviews. And the way Julia, for example, who is a great mate of his and of all sensible people, and she's a great journalist, but she wasn't going to let him get away with it. So I'm afraid he has created a quagmire and it is of his own making. If only he just said,

this was a reward for Brexit. It was given to me. It's my money. Thank you very much, whatever your name is. And as Neil said, this fellow, five million, it's like you or I giving somebody a tenor

or maybe a hundredth pound or something. Oh, to be a billionaire. It is, it is. It is. It is a matter of time, Dan. It's not a matter of a tenor. But people, I guess, still do not give five million if they want nothing. Yes, they do, darling. If they're billionaires, of course they do.

It's not a mistake to give in the money. And to say it's the other thing, of course Nigel didn't mention, and I don't know why he doesn't mention this, he got either a million or a million and a half for appearing on I'm a celebrity to get me out of it. Yes, he did. Now, people say, oh, well, he's just bought a house somewhere. Well, you know, that's a lot of money.

That helps towards a house, doesn't it? So why doesn't he say, you know, that money came from money? media activities or something. He's not helping himself because he set off on the wrong foot and into the quagmire. Well, look, do stand by because we're about to reveal today's gracious British and Union Jackus. But first, I just want to get to a whole load of your feedback today. Mac Attack 14 KT4XP says Andy Burnham wants a land tax on your property,

a World Economic Forum asset tax to steal your property on behalf of Larry Fink and BlackRock, no doubt. No 1, S-U-1-Yule, says Harriet Harmon is totally deluded to try and keep Stama in the cabinet, proof if needed that they are truly crazy. Breddy Mercury 7676 says, due to Burnham, Manchester has no mayor, Makerfield has no MP, and England has no PM. That's the comment of the day. Very, very well put, Brady Mercury.

Love that. The Diabolus 91 says Burnham is seen as king of the north, like the north is still a powerhouse of the old empire. It's currently running in a massive deficit of tens of billions. Tommy Early says we are governed by Fabian Clowns and Charlottons. We need a general election. And Donna W. AT says Stama's wife didn't look so thrilled to stand by him. Okay.

A reminder of your Union Jackass nominees, Narendy Caw, nominated her by Christine Hamilton for being a supporter of Sadiq Khan, even though she got her phone stolen in London. Neil Hamilton has gone for Andy Burnham, who he describes as a vacuous non-entity. And I went for Lara Bird, that S&PMP, for an awful swearing and moment in Parliament. Now, Lara Bird is in third position with 10% of the vote.

The runner-up is Christine, with 21% of the vote. And the winner, with 69% of the vote, Neil Hamilton's choice, Andy Burnham. You're happy with that, Neil. And Christine, who have you gone for as today's greatest Britain? I'm astonished at that. I thought that I was going to come last. Well, there's our greatest Britain.

Larry the cat. He's done it again. He's got rid of the Prime Minister. Let's hear it for Larry. Larry's the only sane one at Downing Street. We are cataphobes in the Hamilton House. No. Cataphyles.

Cataphyles. Sorry. We love cats. Sorry, rewind. Do it again. No, it's live. Can't. Oh, brilliant. Brilliant choice. Okay, Larry the Cat, bringing some sanity to number 10 down in street. Christine Hamilton, Neil Hamilton, bringing some sanity to outspoken. Thank you so much. I don't know about that. We'll speak soon, a little bit of sanity and a little bit of madness too, but we like that.

Okay, we're moving over to Substack now for the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow, Angela Levin, is standing by, but I will be back with you tomorrow, 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9-8. and Pacific, remember to hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Turn on the notification bells so that you're alerted to our new episodes. That's actually a really important thing. And also remember that Outspoken is now available as a podcast on Spotify, Apple, or wherever get your podcast. Please do rain and review.

It really helps an independent show like ours in the algorithm. Most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.