Dan Wootton Outspoken - BBC PLANT ILLEGAL MIGRANT ON QUESTION TIME IN REFORM AMBUSH AS LIZ TRUSS JOINS OUTSPOKEN

Episode Date: December 5, 2025

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: The British Bashing Corporation is an enemy of the people after it planted a number of illegal migrants – one that appears to have been fed information through an earpiece – into the audience of its flagship political show Question Time in an egregious bid to ambush Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf in a coordinated attack with hard left Green party leader Zack Polanki, otherwise known as the tit whisperer. But this is now part of a deep state campaign by the state broadcaster – which we pay for through a despicable poll tax – joining The Guardian to directly link Nigel Farage to Hitler. And after losing his balls the past few weeks, the Reform UK has finally had enough. But all of this is why you can only trust the independent media, not any major broadcasters – and today a former Prime Minister is jumping into our exciting and exploding new media world, with Liz Truss launching her own show. She will join us for her first UK interview to reveal all. PLUS: There’s a growing war on the right over Rupert Lowe’s decision to sit down with Tucker Carlson, while Farage avoided a conversation with the American firebrand broadcaster. We’ll analyse with Connor Tomlinson, host of Tomlinson Talks on YouTube. AND: Ireland is one of a number of countries to boycott Eurovision over the decision to allow Israel to compete in the biggest culture war over the singing contest yet. We’ll have the latest. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: GB News claims live on air that Meghan Markle’s mother Doria Ragland went to jail, as a podcast makes sex tape allegations against the Fake Duchess. We’ll team up with According2Taz for all the latest. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Woodham. This is outspoken episode number 376. And breaking right now, the British Fashion Corporation is an enemy of the people. After it planted a number of illegal migrants, one being fed information through an airpiece, into the audience of its flagship political show Question Time in an egregious bid to ambush Reform UK Zia Yusuf in a coordinated attack with hard left Green Party leaders, Act Polanski, otherwise no one. as the tit whisperer. I had to really process this because I couldn't comprehend what was going on. I couldn't believe that this was happening in such an open and blatant way.

And again, just going back to that point about the guy, the Iranian, who was reading the statement of why Britain should lead the EECA. At one point,

he started talking about the Northern Ireland protocol. And I didn't realize that was something that was such a big issue in Iran. So it was ridiculous.

But trust me, this is now part of a deep state campaign by the state broadcaster, which we pay for through a despicable poll tax, never forget, working with The Guardian newspaper to directly link Nigel Farage to Hitler. You just mentioned the word dictatorial. Let's talk about your leader Nigel Farad's relationship when he was younger with Hitler, shall we? Because 20 people told the Guardian... And after losing his bollocks these past few weeks, the Reform UK leader has finally had enough. I cannot put up for the double standards of the BBC

about what I'm alleged to have said 49 years ago and what you were putting out on mainstream content so I want an apology from the BBC for virtually everything you did throughout the 1970s and 80s and I'm sick to death of the double standards and hypocrisy above all of your organisation and what happened on the today program this morning

was a complete bloody disgrace and all of this is why you can only trust the independent media, of course, not any major broadcaster, including Talk TV and GB News. And that's why today, a former Prime Minister is jumping into our exciting and exploding new media world. We'll take on the deep state. I will tell the truth about what is happening in our country and across the West. Tune in to The Liz Trust Show every Friday. Yes, that is the XPM, now an independent media star, host of the Liz Trust show. She will join us for her first UK interview to reveal all imminently,

I'm going to ask Liz, about this criticism from Pearce Morgan and so much more you do not want to miss it. But meanwhile, there's a growing war on the right over Rupert Lowe's decision to sit down with Tucker Carlson, while Farage, I'm told, avoided a conversation with the American Firebrand broadcaster. We'll analyze with Connor Tomlinson, host of Tomlinson talks, another brilliant independent media show, also available on. YouTube. Also coming up today, Ireland, one of a number of countries to boycott Eurovision

over the decision to allow Israel to compete in the biggest culture war over the singing contest yet. So we're going to have the latest on this developing situation, not the only country to pull out. Then in the uncancled after show on Substack, GB News claims live on air that Megan Markle's mother, Doria Raglan, went to jail as a podcast make sex tape allegations against the fake duchess, we're going to team up with, according to Taz, for all of the royal latest, you can join us, and we have this massive black sale running at the moment, www. www.danwitten outspoken.com slash sale. Plus, at the end of the show, we're going to reveal the worst Britain in the world this week. This is when we take your union jackasses from

across the week. We put them head to head. Your nominees, you can vote in the post tab on YouTube, Pear's Morgan from Monday, Rachel Reeves from Tuesday, and Lenny. Henry from Wednesday. Keep your feedback on those three coming in, too. I'll read some of the best at the end of the show. But now, let's go. The MSM and Regime Media, led by the British Bashing Corporation, which never forget, we pay for through an astronomically high poll tax, otherwise known as the license fee, is now at war with the British people. Last night, in the most astonished act of egregious political bias and suicidal empathy I have ever seen, the BBC's flagship political show, question time, which is meant to be a chance for ordinary Brits to question

senior political figures, planted illegal migrants in the audience. It was an obvious act of political sabotage, especially given one of the illegals, had an earpiece in, most likely to feed him answers as he spouted off about technical issues. like, you know, the ECHR and the Northern Ireland Protocol, despite barely being able to speak English. As Lee Hurst wrote, now mention the Northern Ireland Protocols with, you know, one of those pictures of Anton Deereke in his air.

Now, this show was always going to be a total stitch-up job. I knew it as soon as Green Party leader, the Tit Whisperer himself, Zach Polanski, had boldly announced on X that he was canceling a starring role on another, left BBC show this week, have I got news for you in order to appear on question time instead? Immediately after filming, Reform UKZE, Yusuf, who was on the panel, wrote, so on question time tonight, the BBC asked a question of an Iranian illegal migrant in the audience.

His quote, question was him reading from his phone a list of reasons why British should not withdraw from the ECHR. He even mentioned the Northern Ireland Protocol. Nick Dixon responded he then responded, there were literally, this is more of Zia Yusuf, sorry, there were literally multiple people who arrived in this country illegally by boat, asking questions on tonight's question time. That then prompted Nick Dixon to reply, the BBC's mission is to destroy Britain morally, culturally, spiritually and financially. A stunned Yusuf then immediately went on to GB News to express his horror watch.

Processed this because I couldn't, comprehend what was going on. I couldn't believe that this was happening in such an open and blatant way. And again, just going back to that point about the guy, the Iranian, who was reading the statement of why Britain should lead the Euras, at one point, he started talking about the Northern Ireland protocol. And I didn't realize that was something that was such a big issue in Iran. So it was ridiculous. I think it clearly was set up to try to put reform on the spot. And the evidence for that actually is Fiona asked me directly, well, would you deport? this particular gentleman in that audience,

which is obviously a very emotional appeal. And look, of course, you know, again, these are all human beings. But ultimately, as I said, in my answer, the vast majority of the people coming across the English channel illegally are men. We know that to be true. It's a statistical fact. And if you're entering a war zone, then it's generally men first, is it not?

And if you're fleeing a war zone, then it's women and children first. And that's the most obvious point. So absolutely, they must be. be deported, they will be deported, and by the way, I said exactly as such on the program. But anyone with the immunomodican of sanity could see this transparent political hit job for what it was. Chris Rose posted, what on earth is an illegal migrant doing in the BBC Question Time audience telling law-abiding British citizens why we shouldn't leave the ECHR, a taxpayer, fund a broadcaster, platforming people who should not be in the UK, peak UK.

Reform deputy leader, Richard Tice, asked, did Question Time? give headset and co-chee to this channel illegal migrant? He then has the cheat to tell us British taxpayers that we must not leave the ECHR could not make it up. Alex Phillips raged. What is this? This is a man reading a script. How mental has it become when the question time audience appears

ceded with case studies complete with lines to read? How about an audience member who was harassed or assaulted complete with the script on statistics of crime by nationality? And Graham Archer suggested, if this is true, the BBC inserted illegal immigrants into its flagship political discussion program, then question time must be shut down to use license fee pay money to promote the views of such people and fake news is as normal British discourse. It's disgusting. But of course, Zach Polanski, who by the way, did you see this? He showed who he really was last night by suggesting only migrants. should be care workers in our country because, you know, Brits don't want to wipe the bums of our elderly. He blamed the right-wing media for being outraged

at such a blatantly political and anti-English act by the BBC, an act of sabotage. Yet he argued the express is furious about this, because when you show those who repeat anti-immigration rhetoric, the real human stories, their narrative collapses, the immigrants are people, our friends, colleagues and family. And this nation of neighbors is what. makes Britain great. Oh, piss off, Polanski. Seriously, you've just admitted what you really think.

You want these migrants here so that they can do the jobs that your posh mates and the Green Party don't want to do. Like looking after our elderly people. You revealed your true hand last night. But the BBC is on a growing witch hunt against Nigel Farage and Reform UK, which is what last night was really about. And they are now working directly with the Guardian News. paper to link Nigel Farage to Hitler. You just mentioned the word dictatorial. Let's talk about your leader, Nigel Farad's relationship when he was younger with Hitler, shall we? Because 20 people told the Guardian...

I'm sorry? I'm sorry? Let's 20 people told the Guardian that Nigel Farage behaved in a racist and anti-Semitic way at school with direct quotes from pupils, and some of them named that he was joking about gas chambers, putting a pupil in detention when he was a prefect for the colour of their skin. directly saying to Peter Etterge that Hitler was right, a Jewish pupil. So, yes, talking directly about Hitler. Yep. That is the BBC's flagship news show, the Today program on Radio 4, and it's apparently impartial presenter Emma Barnett, ambushing, reforms deputy leader Richard Tice, regarding those five-decade-old claims about Nigel at school.

It kicked off. He said, have I said things 50 years ago that you could interpret as being banter? in a playground that you can interpret in the modern light of day in some sort of way, yes, but I have never directly, racially abused anybody, no. There's your answer. You were told last week, why are you raising you again when we're talking about counter-council elections?

You've just talked about freedom of speech. You've also talked about how you believe your party should be leading those places. That's exactly why I am, and while I have that freedom of speech, I'll use it, so I'm sure you'll like me to. Do you think saying to a Jewish person, Hitler was right,

is direct racial abuse? Yes, I do, and I'm quite sure that I can't believe anybody would have said that. Including your leader? Yes, this is all made up twaddled by people who don't want Nigel to be Prime Minister of the country. Funny how they didn't remember this three years ago, six years ago, ten years ago, ten years ago, he told Michael Crick some years ago of this. He's a BAFTA and Emmy-winning director of producer whose grandparents came here from Nazi Germany. He has never forgotten it, because let me.

tell you, if you are racially abused, which you won't have been Richard Tice, I suspect. You don't tend to forget it. It gets etched in your memory. Oh, trust me, Emma Barnett. You may not realize it, but we are racially abused as native white people

here in the United Kingdom every damn day by your mates. But this interview wasn't finished. Do you think saying to a Jewish person, gas chambers with a hiss, is banter. Let's go to the other part of his statement from last week. This is made up nonsense by someone who has got a politically biased motive.

And let me tell you, no one has stood up against anti-Semitism more than Nigel and I. We were the ones who immediately after October 7th said we were very worried about the protests, the pro-Palestine protests that were inciting hatred, anti-Semitism and violence. And that's exactly what they did in that weak leadership, not banning those violence. anti-Semitic protest has led us to the very bad place that we are in today. Sorry, you have just said that the Jewish man who said this happened to him at school is a liar in the same breath that you said you stood up for the Jewish communities in this country. And I have stood up for the Jewish communities and I get thanked for that every day.

Sorry, but you've just said that a man who's in his own right, a director and producer, he's not a political operative. You've just said he's lying. Yes. But you don't know that. So you're lying within your lie. potentially. No, no. I just don't think. I think this is made up twaddled by a whole bunch of people

with a political acts. And he has witnesses. I think these people have a political axe to grind. And do you know, every week, the voters are going out in by-elections and they're voting for reform because they're not buying into this sort of left-wing anti- Nigel

narrative. Look at the voters. Richard Tice. Richard Tice, Deputy Leader of Reform. Thank you very much. Isn't that such and insight into the way that the British bashing corporation think. They genuinely believe that the bloke accusing Nigel Farage of racism 49 years ago is completely trustworthy because he's a BAFTA award-winning director. Whereas I look at that, knowing these people who are totally on the hard left

and think that makes him a totally dishonest actor who is trying to bring Farage down. But after losing his bollocks with the MSM over the past few weeks, Farage, after that interview, finally had enough. Launching what I admit is a brilliant broadside against the Beeb during a blockbuster press conference. Watch what went down. Richard Tice said on the radio, he was asked about the comments made by the schoolmates of yours

who have said that comments you made, they viewed as racist and offensive. He said that they were lying. You have said before that you did make comments. It may have been banter, it wasn't directly racially abusing anyone. So Richard Tice is wrong. I thought this morning's performance by one of your lower grade presenters on the today program was utterly disgraceful.

I think to frame a question around the leader of reform's relationship with Hitler, which is how she framed it, was despicable, disgusting, beyond belief. Are you surprised that half a million people every year refuse to pay the license fee? Let me say this to you. The double standards and hypocrisy of the BBC are absolutely astonishing. At the time I was alleged to have made these remarks, one of your most popular weekly shows was the black and white minstrels. The BBC were very happy to use blackface.

Oh, and not just in the black and white minstrels. minstrels, you did it, in it ain't half hot mum as well. And what about Afghani? Do you remember what he called, marigold? Do you remember the word he used to describe marigold? On live, not live, but on primetime national TV, I better not repeat the word, otherwise you'll all use it and say that I used it. Homophobia? It ain't half hot, mum. Are you being served? Oh, and what about Bernard Manning. Perfectly happy at exactly the same time for Bernard Manning to appear on primetime national BBC comedy, telling jokes for which these days you'd probably get a knock at the door from our thought police and perhaps get a 31-month prison sentence. I cannot put up

for the double standards of the BBC about what I'm alleged to have said 49 years ago and what you were putting out on mainstream content. So I want an apology from the BBC for virtually everything you did throughout the 1970s and 80s. And when the British Fashioned Corporation tried to come back at him, Nigel Farage finally went to Donald Trumpy.

And I'm sick to death of the double standards and hypocrisy above all of your organisation. And what happened on the today program this morning was a complete bloody disgrace. Next, Sam Coates from Sky. News. No, I'm done with you. Thank you. My question is he was, he said they were lying and it sounds like I said.

Sam Cote, I'm really, until you apologise for all of your output, you're appalling output at the same time that I'm accused of saying these things which I deny I'm not speaking to you. All right. Sam Cote, Sky News. You should act the rest of the way about the mainstream media Nigel, too. I mean, I think it's time for Nigel to join the Rupert Lowe way of thinking. With the Restore Britain leader explaining overnight, I get told by this person and that person to be careful about what I say,

to moderate, to sanitise, to soften, to appease. I honestly don't give a shit anymore. I am going to tell the truth. I think the country would be in a much better place if more MPs did the same. And that approach is working, by the way. Last night, I was leaked astonishing figures showing that Rupert's newly launched Great Yarmouth Party, remember just announced this week, is already polling at a mammoth 44% in the constituency, more than double the Tories' Labour and Reform UK. As the nationalist said, you won't see this on G.B. News, even though Rupert then did ask Michelle Jubri if he's going to be invited back.

Of course not. Michelle Jubri is a Reform UK shill. She's a Farragist who wants a safe seat in Parliament at the next. election. You're not going back on her show, Rupert Lowe, but do keep calling her out. But look, the whole right has split over this decision for Rupert Lowe to give a highly anticipated interview with Tucker Carlson. That is, I'm told, an opportunity that Nigel Farage, scared of how Tucker has become radioactive in the mainstream media in recent months, rejected. But as Harrison Pitt of Restore Britain posted,

at every turn, Rupert Lowe is acknowledged implicitly or otherwise to be the de facto leader of the right in Britain. That then prompted Reform UK supporter and avowed for Arjist Matt Goodwin to disappointingly respond, if your definition of leader of the right is going on a podcast that has mainstreamed Nazis, he's talking there about Nick Fuentes, then okay. My definition of leader of the right is building a party that's on 32% heading into government and has a shot of saving Britain.

Now that response has inevitably sparked a new civil war on the right, with Rupert Lowe responding directly to Goodwin, Matt, your head is far up Farage's ass so far up that you can barely breathe. Let me know when you come on. up for air. You still owe me lunch. Louis Brackpool then suggested Goodwin has been praising Restore Britain behind the scenes despite his pro-reform public posturing, revealing, ignore and step over every naysayer about this. I see it as an important step considering how big Tucker Carlson's platform is. Rupert doesn't seek approval from his enemies, unlike most politicians, and he certainly wouldn't trade his countryman for a curry. We don't appreciate private praise followed by public counter-signalling,

Matt. This guilt by association game is nonsensical. I should have known where this was heading when you started using terms like online right and Twitter isn't real life. You've made the wrong move. And Connor Tomlinson, who will be here later in the show, added, Matt, if going on a show which is happy to platform ethnocidal socialist is a red line for you, then you might want to decline the next time the BBC invites you on question time or politics live, given they afford so much airtime to Ash Saka. He added unnecessary and bad faith attack. Robert Semenson, the political columnist for Newsmax, added,

It's a damn shame to see Professor Goodwin stooped to the same load. contemptible tactics once directed at him for years by his left globalist academic colleagues towards those who simply refused to stay silent, and watch a 1,000-plus-year-old people tossed into the dustbin of history like worthless trash. We would all consider it wrong if the same fate now threatening Britons, absent a drastic course correction, we're awaiting the Chinese, Indians, Japanese, Malayans, or any other people. Yet when it comes to the Brits, Americans or Europeans, sounding the alarm, is treated as morally reprehensible. This makes no sense.

But of course what's interesting is that Goodwin's past, which he doesn't like to talk about these days, means many on the right already don't trust him, like World by Wolf, who argued Farage has appeared on Takki's show before. So spare us the lecture. I know you don't like talking about your time advising the CIA, Council of Europe, home office, etc., on how to contain the far right, but we all see what you are and why you're shilling for Farage. Now, Goodwin immediately blocked him, but Wolf wasn't finished. He added, every chance you get you need to ask Matt Goodwin

about his links to global intelligence services and his decades-long work writing about how to contain the far right. He isn't one of us. He's a bad actor. But I think all of this, all of this, the actions of the BBC, but also the actions of the Farages at GB News, shows why you can only trust the independent media, not any major broadcasters. And today, former Prime Minister is jumping into our exciting and exploding new media world. Yes, that's Liz Truss, the XPM, now a new media host of the Liz Truss show, who wrote,

They tried to silence her, they failed, it's time to fight for the West. Watch. In 2022, I was deposed from the office of Prime Minister of Great Britain. I tried to save our country from the doom loop it is now in. We set out a vision for a low-tax, high-growth economy that would take advantage of the freedoms of Brexit. I was blamed for a market crisis that was not my fault. The deep state and their allies in the media and politics tried to destroy me because I challenged their decades-long failure. Now I'm back.

I will expose the people who brought me down. I will take on the deep state. I will tell the truth about what is happening in our country and across the West. Tune in to the Liz Trust show every Friday. Tune in to the Counter-Revolution. And Liz Truss joins me now. Liz Truss, welcome to the world of independent media. Oh my goodness, it's looking great.

But you can imagine, Liz, your trailer has brought out all the, can I just be honest about it? All the fucking wankers in the mainstream media. I'm just going to show you one example so you can respond directly on watching your trailer yesterday. as Morgan posted, is this a joke? What would be your response to him, Liz? Well, given that he himself has his own independent media show, it seems slightly bizarre. But the mainstream media are a big part of Britain's problem. And this is the reason I've started my own show and following people like you, Dan, who've reacted to the mainstream media telling lies about what's happening in our country. They told,

lies about the issues I suffered when I was Prime Minister. They've told lies about the grooming gangs. They're telling lies about the free speech crisis. And of course, they're going to react because they do not want to hear the truth. And they don't want the people of Britain hearing the truth about what's going on in our country. So I'm not surprised. Here's Morgan, he pretends to be an independent media person, but he's just another creature of the British establishment.

100% who has done zero research about what actually happened with you. Now, Liz, last night, the BBC, we just saw it in the digest. You know, I call them the British Bashing Corporation, planted an illegal migrant on its flagship political show question time. This dude had an airpiece in. He could barely speak English, but somehow was able to really. off lines about the Northern Ireland protocol and the ECHR. This is why this organisation just needs to be defunded, isn't it? Could you believe that this actually happened?

Of course I could believe it. I mean, we've seen them fake news about President Trump. They're literally being sued by the US president. They were found to be completely anti-Israel and printing all sorts of lies, publishing all sorts of lies about what was going on in Gaza. I mean, on every single issue, They're on the wrong side.

They are proponents of transgender woke ideology. The one sensible newsreader they had got censured for actually saying that men couldn't get pregnant. I mean, the organisation is beyond repair. But what I want to tell people is this is just the tip of the iceberg. The entire British state has been captured by this type of ideology. Those opinions that are openly expressed by the BBC, they're taking place as well. well, in the home office, in the treasury, in the foreign office, in the police force, in the judiciary. And I think we've even got to worry about that more, because at least the BBC is

out in the open and they're blatant. These other parts of the British deep state are operating to undermine elected politicians. They're operating to undermine the public desire, the will of the people, and they do it in a covert fashion. And I think that's even more dangerous. use your show to expose these absolute, well, well, you know, I actually think there are enemies of the state. That are enemies of the British people. Will you expose them? They are

enemies. Of course I am. And my only concern is I don't have enough shows to go through all the people that are busy sabotaging our country. Who hate Britain, whether it's selling off the Chegos Islands, whether

it's undermining us through mass illegal immigration, whether it is covering up the grooming gangs, whether it is the people that have been arrested and jailed for free speech. I'm here in America at the moment. And nobody can actually believe that people are being jailed for what they've posted on X.

And I have to tell them, I'm afraid it's absolutely true. And Liz, we've just seen overnight another massive anti-democratic betrayal about to begin, despite the fact that in their manifesto, Labour said that they would not rejoin the customs union, that they would not rejoin the single market, on the fake newsagents, which, by the way, is not the independent media, Liz. This is Emily Maitlis and Lewis Goodall and John Stoble.

Yeah, we've got a lot of fake independent media out there, haven't we? Yes, because they're owned by global. Or the news agents or whatever else. Yeah, they're owned by Global. They're part of LBC, part of the establishment. So they're not independent. But seven times, Liz, they asked David Lammy, the Deputy Prime Minister, to confirm that the UK would not rejoin the EU. He refused.

And this is the problem, isn't it? Labor is swinging even further to the hard left. And I think we're seeing the cancellation of elections. We're seeing a great budget fraud. But I think we're now going to see a bid to overturn the biggest democratic mandate in British history. What do you think is going on with Labour and Brexit? I mean, the minute that Kier Stama got elected, he started sucking up to the EU desperate to get back into the EU. I think the good news is that I don't think the EU wants us back.

I think it's actually going to be very difficult for Kirstama to get any kind of deal with the EU that is remotely acceptable. And they're already talking about paying money into the EU. They've already caused huge problems in Northern Ireland. with the stopping, essentially, of a lot of trade between the mainland and Northern Ireland. So I think it will be very difficult, but I just think it shows the kind of people they are, which is they are globalists, they don't like the British nation state. They want to give away powers. They've already given powers away to the unelected judges, the unelected police chiefs, the unelected bureaucrats.

they now want to give it away to international law courts, the ECHR and the EU. I just think there will be a limit with the EU as to what they're actually able to do. That's treasonous. Now, Liz, look, you're in the US and obviously you're very tapped into the MAGA movement, very tapped into the Trump administration. It's just so, can I just say it's so good to be in the US? I'm jealous. Feel the energy and the positivity and people that actually believe in their country

and want to make things better. I mean, it's fantastic. No, it is. And I'm very jealous, but I am noting, Liz, a big change within the Trump administration. To begin with, they sort of felt like, okay, we've got to give this dude slippery, stammery go. We've got to try and say, okay, he's a democratically elected leader. Something major has changed overnight, Liz. I don't know if you've seen this yet.

But a guy called Brendan Dilley posted in response to Donald Trump, who said we have two options. deport every single third world migrant, illegal alien, an American hating visa holder, or surrender your nation the way the United Kingdom have and watch your society collapse in the coming years. Liz, Donald Trump posted that on truth social, which is as close as you're going to get, is it not, of an endorsement that Stama is destroying our society. Coming from the US president, that feels extraordinary, of course, being totally ignored by the mainstream media. Has Trump turned on Stama? Does he realise what this guy is about? I think he's always known what Starrma is about.

And if you remember the press conference of Trump Turnbury, where he called Stammer out on free speech, he called him out on the Farmer's Dax, he called him out on migration. J.D. Vance has been very critical of what is going on across your... Europe, a mass migration problem, an Islamism problem, which European leaders aren't acknowledging, including Kirstama. So the US president and vice president are perfectly well aware of what is going on. But they are stepping up pressure on Britain and Europe to change and to actually stand up for the values that we believe in. Free speech. Sarah Rogers has just been over in the UK talking about the massive problems with the Online Safety Act

and the curbing of free speech in Britain. We've had the State Department put out a memo talking about the huge issues of mass migration and how that's anti-human rights. It's not pro-human rights. So I think we're seeing the administration step up the pressure on Europe. And why shouldn't they?

The fact is they have been bailing us out on defence. They've been helping us out on the... economy. The US is a major investor in Britain. The tech companies are major investors. So I think it's perfectly right for the US to use their leverage to say, Britain, you're actually the people that came up with free speech in 1695 that we based our constitution and bill of rights on. What on earth has happened to you? That's the reaction I'm getting here. And does everyone there think Nigel Farage is the next prime minister? And do you think Nigel Farage as the next Prime Minister of the UK?

Well, people are talking about reform and Nigel Farage. They're asking me what I think is going to happen in Britain. I say that Kirst Armour is the most unpopular Prime Minister in British history. He clearly isn't coming back. I think there's a long time until the 29 election. It's going to be 29. Turkeys do not vote for Christmas. Labour MPs are not going to get an early.

election because they know they'll be out on their ear. And my view is, it all depends what the plan is. The reason that the Trump revolution is successful here in America is that they had people ready to serve in the bureaucracy. They had a plan of what to do. They had the executive orders ready drafted. And I think we are several years away from an election. But the question is, is there a British equivalent of the MAGA movement? You know, who is doing this work? Who are the people? Who are the Elon Musks of Britain?

Who are the Scott Bessence? Who are actually going to make things happen in our country? Well, I was going to ask you about a guy who I know you have met with, Liz, Rupert Lowe, who runs Restore Britain, which is this non-party political lobbying organisation. but some new polling has just been released showing that if there was a Rupert Lowe political party, it would immediately get 10% of the vote. He has now launched a political party called Great Yarmouth First in his constituency.

And now, and I want to talk to you about this too, he's just sat down for an interview today with Tucker Carlson. Is Rupert Lowe going to be a player here, or are you in the team of Rupert Lowe just ends up splitting the vote on the right? Well, I think the, it's very hard. I mean, it was a breakthrough for reform at the last election to secure five seats. It's very hard to break through as a political party. I think we've got a long way to go as a country in understanding what's actually wrong, that this is a rotten system. It's not just a rotten political party system.

It's a rotten bureaucracy. It's rotten institutions. it's an absolutely rotten mainstream media. And I think it's very hard to tell what will be the case in three or four years' time. It really is. If you think where we were three years ago, Dan, you know, 20-22, Boris Johnson was prime minister.

For 20 years, Liz. You know, and so, you know, I think what I want to see is I think Rupert Lowe has raised issues. and pushed issues that people have been trying to sweep under the carpet, whether it's the grooming gangs. I think that's good. I think political debate's a good thing. But we now need to move on to why is the country so broken?

Would he be a better leader of the Conservative Party? Rupert Lowe. I honestly don't know, but the Conservative Party itself has not acknowledged what went wrong for 14 years. And you all still remember. Until they do that, until they do that, the Conservative Party isn't going anywhere. That's the reality of the situation. You're still a member, Liz, but there is a growing movement of people within Reform

UK who want you to join and who want Robert Jenrick to join. And the view is that if you two jump ship possibly along with Sualla Braviman, that's just curtains for the Tories. Have you had any discussions? Like, is it something you're even considering? Well, I'm, you know, I like you, Dan, I'm focused on independent media and the Liz Trust show because I think that is where we have to start. I agree. I was a politician. I was an MP for 14 years. I was a government minister for 10 years. I became prime minister.

And what I discovered was the policies that I wanted to enact, which were the right policies of Britain, were sabotaged by the bureaucracy, but also their cheerily. in the mainstream media. And until we deal with the problems we have with the mainstream media, the people of Britain are going to be misinformed. We're not going to have the base for the Trump-style revolution we need in our country. So that's why I'm focused on the media. I don't think you can solve this problem in politics. No, now, Liz, I just want to talk about something that's become a big issue in American politics.

It's this idea that in the independent media, if you platform someone, and that's the term, you know, platform someone. Are you giving them a voice? Is it wrong, for example, for Tucker Carlson to interview Nick Fuentes? And we've had our own example of it this week because the Reform UK Farragists are kicking off about the fact that Rupert Lowe has sat down with Tucker Carlson. I'm told that Nigel was asked to do a face-to-face interview with Tucker Carlson

and turned it down. And Matt Goodwin has posted, and this has really split the right, Liz. if your definition of leader of the right is going on a podcast that has mainstreamed Nazis, then okay. My definition of leader of the right is building a party that's on 32% heading into government and has a shot of saving Britain. Now, I have a view, Liz, and I think it's one that you share that actually we all need to be talking. And I don't agree with Tucker Carlson on lots. I certainly don't agree with his position on Israel, for example. I don't agree with his current position on gay men, for example.

but this idea that like we should all of a sudden try and start blocking out Tucker Coulson, like would you do an interview with him? What do you make of this debate? Well, I'm a free speech absolutist. I would introduce the First Amendment in Britain. I think it's much better to have free speech and have stuff that you find distasteful than arresting people and putting them in prison for posting on social media. I mean, it's obvious the US position on free speech is much better than what we have. in Britain, but certainly on my show, the Liz Trust show, I'll be interviewing people, I'll be talking to people who I share the same core values with. You know, I'm not going to be

interviewing communists. I'm not going to be talking to people that aren't patriots. I'm not going to be talking to people who are trying to undermine Britain. No, and I get that. I get that. I'm really excited about the show. I believe you have Matt Goodwin actually on your first episode. I do. I do. We didn't discuss Tucker Carlson, I'm afraid. Now, Liz Truss, there is a growing view in the UK that Rachel Thieves, Rachel from accounts, should actually face a police investigation. And by the way, even though I say lock her up, I think her fraudulent activity in connection to this budget was so disgusting and egregious. This woman deserves to be sobbing behind bars. I really do believe that. I'm not alone, Liz, and even mainstream media figures, even Dan Hodges, right, who is, let's be honest, a Labour columnist in the mail, says Rachel Reeves shouldn't just face losing her job, she should face losing her liberty after her fraudulent conduct connected to this budget.

Alistair Heath in the Daily Telegraph overnight has said Rachel Reeves is now a threat to British democracy. yet, Liz, the Financial Conduct Authority has said that this, in my opinion, criminal will not be investigated at all. Is this a stitch-up? What's going on? Why is she being protected? Well, of course it's a stitch-up.

And I've been on the other side of these people. They weren't protecting my back. They were doing the opposite. They were sabotaging me and undermining me. And Rachel Reeves is one of them. She worked at the Bank of England. She's part of that economic establishment. They cover for each other, whether it's the OBR, the Bank of England, the Treasury, the Financial Conduct Authority.

And they are the people that have pursued disastrous economic policies for 30 years. Printing money, creating masses of inflation, putting up taxes, huge amounts of government spending, sticking up energy prices, backing net zero. woke, DEI stuff, the whole lot, they're all responsible. And of course, they don't want to investigate each other. And I believe that all of these organizations need to be made properly accountable. The Bank of England, I'm very concerned about the FCA, the OBR needs to be abolished. It's not enough just to sack the head of the OBR, the whole thing needs to go. But this investigation and transparency needs to occur about what actually happened in a run-up to

the budget. I want the British people to understand how deeply broken this process is. Do you think she potentially broke the law? Well, we just don't know. We absolutely don't know what happened. We don't know who said what, when. What I know from having been a Treasury Minister for two years and also going through the budget process as Prime Minister is a lot of information is not shared between these various different bodies. So we don't know who knew what, when. It should be properly investigated. I don't believe the FCA are the right people to investigate it at all. I think it needs to be

independent of the whole economic establishment. They are a big part of Britain's problems. The Bank of England governor was not held to account for what happened in 2022. The Bank of England admitted that two-thirds of all the market movements that took place when I was Prime Minister were actually down to them, but there's been no investigation of it. There's no investigation into what's happened in the run-up to this budget. And as you rightly say, the mainstream media are not interested in really probing these issues and they have to be probed. I mean, this is so serious. I mean, it is a potential fraud against the British people and look at the way that they hounded people like you, people like Boris Johnson, people like Rishi Sunak, not only out of office,

but into, in the case of Sunak and Boris Johnson, into criminal investigations, and this is so much more serious. The other thing is, Liz, I want to ask you personally about Rachel Reeves, because watch this. I mean, this is a woman who could not keep your name out of her damn mouth. Watch. Truss's mini-budget last year set in motion, the economic turmoil and the increases in interest rates, and the ongoing impact of Liz Truss's mini-budget. All of those things have waited. heavily on the UK economy. And their mini-budget left families paying the price

with higher mortgages. It's good to be explained how to do my job by one of the members opposite who crashed our... So Liz, she couldn't stop talking about you. What do you want to say

to Rachel Reeves now? Well, she is kind of obsessed with me, isn't she? She is? She is? She's a liar. She's either very, very stupid or she's a liar.

I think she's both. Because the Bank of England, the Bank of England admitted what happened in 2022 was their fault. They've admitted that. They wrote a report. They said that two-thirds of the market movements were down to the LDI crisis. The day before the mini-budget, they announced the sale of £40 billion worth of government guilt squaring the pitch. Even the new statesman admits that it was the Bank of England who created the crisis.

And if they hadn't done what they'd done, they would not have that. been a problem. That's what the new statesman says. There's been a report in Bloomberg. The Wall Street Journal said this. Lots of credible and not so credible in the case of new statesmen sources have said all this. And Rachel Reeves just completely ignores it and lies about me and what happened. And I think the public are wise to that. That's why she's the most unpopular chancellor in British history. But the problem is she's been aided and abetted by elements of the Conservative Party. People like Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, who deliberately undermined me when I was Prime Minister as chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, Kimmy Badenock has not

admitted that the Bank of England caused the crisis in 2022. She made a speech about it, but she did not mention their role. Michael Gove? And until, well, certainly, certainly also that's the case with him. But the point is that all of these politicians have, rather than taking on the economic establishment that have undermined our country, have kowtowed to them. And until they recognize that that's a failing, the British public are going to vote for an alternative. Well, and I do want to ask you about that, Liz, because is one of the biggest worries that we've got that actually there's a lot of Britain that is moving first. Further to the left, and I don't know if you saw this absolute car crash conference over the weekend, your party, that Islamist hard left mob of Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Solana. But there was an extraordinary interview, Liz. I don't know if you've seen it, but I'm going to play it to you now between Owen Jones and Zara Sultanah suggesting that the entire economy has to be nationalised.

Watch this. They're about kind of policies for the country, and he said nationalize the entire economy. So just what does that look like? That looks like a socialist transformation of the country where we nationalize utilities, we nationalize energy, we nationalize transport, we nationalize communications, including the internet. We also have to broaden our horizons. But not the entire economy, though. So we have to have a socialist economy that includes workers running their workplaces through cooperatives. It means public services run for profit, not need, with, you know, workers and users on the boards of those organisations.

Democratic ownership. And it means the entire economy run by workers, not the billionaires and the corporations that run it today. I'm just interested because I mean like kiosks. Like a little, small little cafe kiosk. Workers' cooperatives? Yeah. So, so I don't know. I'm just interested because it's just trying to.

I think it's fascinating. The entire economy under the control of workers, whether that is nationalisation, workers' co-operations. And when we look at especially things like food, that means looking at the entire food production system and that being under the control of workers. Liz, fascinating or insane? Well, it's obviously insane. But the reason that we've got these insane people is that the mainstream political parties have failed for 30 years. living standards haven't increased, our industry is being decimated by the high cost of energy and the nutty net zero policies. So that's when nutters selling snake oil, you know, can make inroads as we saw in New York as well with Mandami being elected in New York. And it's a failing

of the entire British political system that these people are even given any airtime whatsoever. Liz, I've got to ask you finally about Eurovision. So this is such an upsetting situation for me as a big fan of Eurovision. But of course, the moment that Russia was booted out, it was coming overtly political, this decision has been made for Israel to compete again in the competition next year. I mean, remember, they were the runner up this year, Liz. They were number one amongst British voters. but these woke countries, or at least woke broadcasters in Spain, the Netherlands, Slovenia,

but Ireland as well are now boycotting Eurovision because of Israel. Is this another example of rampant anti-Semitism? What's going on and can Eurovision recover from something like this? What it shows is that the populations of Europe are pro-Israel, but we have an unelected elite who are open. in some cases anti-Semitic, certainly anti-Israel, I'd say that goes along with other attitudes like being pro-environmental zealtery, pro-Islamism, etc., etc. And the problem is the countries of Europe are being governed by elites who don't support the will of the public.

And Eurovision is a kind of micro example of that fallout. And this is why it is so important that we change how we are run. Because there's such a disconnect. There's such a disconnect between most people in Britain and the terrible government we have. And not just the terrible government, the institutions that are out of touch, the Met Police who are arresting people for speaking on Facebook, the BBC who are, I don't even know how to describe just how completely half-touch they are,

but it's getting worse and worse. And that's why we need the Liz Trust show. The Liz Trust show, which is available where, Liz? How can we watch? It's available on YouTube, Rumble X, all the social media platforms. I'm also partnering with John Solomon in the US of Just the News, so it will be on lots of radio stations in the US and audio stations there as well. Well, welcome to this world.

We need your voice. I'm very, very excited about it. The Liz Truss Show available right now, the first episode featuring Matt Goodwin and Alex Phillips, among others. Now, Connor Dominson's here. So look, Connor, this situation, with the British bashing corporation, planting a migrant, with an airpiece in, on question time, seems to me like an extraordinary act of political sabotage,

of dishonesty, of warfare against the British people. Do you think we're ever going to find out the truth about what was really going on here and was this at all appropriate from our state broadcaster that now, decides we want to platform illegals to take on political figures like Zia Yusuf of Reform UK? It's no more appropriate to stick a legal migrant in the audience, Dan, than it is if you did a special show on burglary and you had a wanted man on the run for breaking into people's homes.

Like, this man's broken into our country. I don't care whether or not his daughter speaks Farsi or English. He should be slapped in cuffs and immediately expedited to the nearest airport to be deported. And look, Zia Yusuf, I have my differences with the man on many instances. He handled that correctly. Yeah, it doesn't matter whether or not the person is sitting in front of you or is an abstract figure on a spreadsheet. If they've broken the law, they have to go.

Even if they haven't broken the law, if they weren't wanted by the electorate but were invited in by a treacherous government, they need to be denaturalized and deported. They need to be denied indefinitely to remain. They need to be sent back in the millions. And I actually pointed this out before question time and even aired. I mean, I'm one of these people who doesn't pay the license fee because I don't watch live TV, and I certainly don't want to watch the BBC.

But I did ratio them by suggesting that they platform a advocate for remigration instead, because it's pretty conspicuous that they have four of the major parties, and then Zia Yusuf, who isn't an elected member of parliament, but is a representative of Reform UK, pretty conspicuous that the one guy that Paul Marshall introduced to Nigel Farage is suddenly doing all of their media for them. It's almost like reform exists to get Zia elected rather than Nigel elected. But anyway, but none of them represent actually a sizable portion of the electorate, who, according to UGov, don't just want to see mass deportations for illegals,

but want to see a large number of legal migrants be sent home. That was 45% of voters supported that position when put to them by UGov, which is a left-leaning pollster. Just remember what they did during COVID, for example, constantly supporting the government's lockdown measures. That's more of a share of the electorate than the support for the Greens and the Lib Dems put together. And yet that perspective wasn't represented, either in the audience or on the panel.

And I will say, Dan, I don't think we're going to get to the bottom of this, Because do you remember back when during the election, Nigel Farage and also the green leaders did question time appearance? And during Farage's appearance, the first person to ask a question and insult him for Brexit and call him a racist was a former Doctor Who director, so worked for the BBC, and someone else was a pro-Palestine campaigner who had ran in elections before. So a very conspicuous audience selection that skewed, biased against the likes of reform, despite them being the most popular party in. the country. So clearly they aren't sampling like we used to do for our GCC biology exams and just throwing the net in the field and counting the number of daisies. Instead, they are hand-selecting and pre-screening the questions and the audience members. And this now includes foreign criminals, apparently, which means that the BBC's true constituency is foreign criminals

rather than license fee-paying taxpayers who want to see those criminals ejected from their country. Totally. I mean, I think it is absolutely a stitch-up. What did you think of Nigel Farage's performance at that press conference, given that in the morning, Emma Barnett on the Today program had literally asked about Farage's relationship with Hitler. I think Emma Barnett is the worst person to select for this, given, and I'm not trying to be insulting to her here, she might have a personal angle on this complete, what seems like a fabrication of a story, considering she's born to two Jewish parents. Parents who were actually convicted for running brothels, weirdly enough, so I would think that's more of a sin than saying

some naughty comments as a schoolboy 40-odd years ago that, you know, only a few politically motivated people and outlets can corroborate. Also, it doesn't help that she cites the Guardian for this, because remember, the BBC are the lead buyers of the Guardian newspaper in the country. They're also the lead buyers of the Observer. So if people who are still paying the license fee are wondering where that license fee money is going, it's to keep the Guardian afloat. Fantastic. But I thought Farage's performance at the press conference was solid. The only angle of attack I would have pressed on instead is rather than reaffirming the framing

that these things are offensive, because we should be allowed to make the jokes that we like, and it was a much better country well before I was born when you could make said jokes without the woke skulls of political correctness cancelling your career over it. Instead, rather than go on the attack for, you know, blackface and it ain't half hot mom, he should have just turned around and said, sorry, I won't be taking moral lectures from the BBC, considering they have a habit of hiring and employing paedophiles and defending them, despite lots of whistleblowers coming forward and saying, hey, look, you've got a paedophile working for you, is abusing children.

Yeah, I would rather than reaffirming the framing that everything they find offensive is offensive, I would have said, I don't care, I may, whether or not I made jokes years ago is irrelevant to the fact that the politics that you support have betrayed the country time and time again, led to things like the grooming gangs being covered up, and the fact that you employed Jimmy Saville and Hugh Edwards. So I won't be taking lectures from you, thank you very much, onwards to more independent voices that they should be inviting to their press conferences instead.

Now, Conner, I have been desperate to talk to you about this Matt Goodwin situation. Because quite a big deal, right? Rupert Lowe sitting down with Tucker Carlson. By the way, there's loads lately that I disagree with Tucker Carlson on. But who cares? I mean, who cares? What are we honestly saying?

we can't sit down with someone who we disagree with on particular issues. He is a massive figure in the independent media, one of the biggest in the world. He came to the United Kingdom. He interviewed three people. Pairs Morgan, I couldn't stand it. George Galloway, some interesting points, but I think he completely represented what Galloway really was. And Rupert Lowe. And Farage, I am told, said no. And Farage clearly said no. Because of this point of view that Goodwin is putting out, which is basically that it's wrong now to sit down with Tucker Carlson because Takata Carlson had platformed Nick Fuentes. And to me, I just thought this was such a disappointing position. But it's clearly the position of reform.

And this is why they don't wrap their arms around independent voices like you or independent voices like outspoken either. Well, I'll just wrap around. to actively push away, Dan. Remember, I was recently banned from an event where I was meant to be speaking alongside Matt, funnily enough. And, yeah, I won't say what was disclosed in private conversations, but Matt wasn't happy

about the fact that I was banned, but still retained his faith in reform, nevertheless. Look, there's multiple angles to go on this. First of all, Rupert was right to sit down with Tucker for a few reasons. Firstly, Tucker sits down with guests with whom he disagrees all the time. That was the entire point of the struggle session he had with Pierce Morgan about saying slurs.

By the way, again, I don't agree with Tucker in his Pears Morgan interview, because Peers, despite becoming the new Richard III saying, My Kingdom for a curry and saying demographic replacement is just fine because think of the food, Tucker himself said he would have gotten along with Bangladeshis and Pakistani taxi drivers better than white leftists. Now, look, I don't like white leftists either. I think that they are the enablers of demographic change that we don't want to happen, and all sorts of atrocities they've covered up. But those atrocities are perpetrated by Bangladeshis that have terraformed Whitechapel into a Bengali slum,

or the Pakistani taxi drivers, specifically the taxi drivers, who were the trafficking network for the rape gangs. So I think Tucker is incorrect on that. His softening on Islam has been frustrating, whatever. But it's still fine to sit down with him because he sits down with guests he disagrees with all the time, and so you're allowed to disagree with Tucker, and it's one of the major independent podcasts, as you said.

And so I think it's important that Rupert did this, because there is some disquiet in Washington, D.C., about Nigel Farad. this has been over the course of the year. They've been encouraged about the fact that he's adopted mass deportations, but they weren't happy about the fact he was counter-signal than before, considering it was a key policy platform on which Trump won the 2024 election. And it was made clear to Farage that he shouldn't be counter-signalling the strategic goals of the Trump administration in exchange for their support. So if Rupert Lowe is now doing an interview with Tucker Carlton instead,

is talking about the fact that Zia Yusuf called the police on him and had his shotguns confiscated on a trumpeter up charge, no pun intended, rather than Nigel Farage, the importance of that is that it cements Rupert Lowe as the presumptive heir apparent to the vacated throne of the right in Britain in the minds of Americans. And given the Americans have such an interest in our politics at the moment, the State Department constantly sounding off about the fact that mass migration and demographic displacement and two-tier policing and censorship is persecuting the native left behind white majority of Britain, given they are trying to intervene in our politics on the electorate's behalf against the government, then it's very important considering who the

Americans, who Washington, D.C. might want to liaise with. So it's very important for Rupert to go and do this. Finally, on Matt, so you read out my tweet to him. I would like to point out this self-defeating and stupid idea that there are no enemies to the left. I've heard the term no enemies to the right before. And people take issue with that, not only because it's difficult to define who is actually to our rights. I mean, I think I am to the right of reform. A question, again, whether or not Tucker is to the right of me, because, you know, he has opposition to Israel, but he seems to be embracing Islam at the moment. I think that's misguided even though I like Tucker. But the perception is that all of us are to the right of reform, which means that you're

only allowed to go on outlets who platform people to your left. So that means that Matt is more than happy to do events at unheard or speak to Michael Gove at The Spectator or go on the BBC with Ash Sarkar, when those people are far more dangerous, far more responsible for the horrific state of Britain, the atrocities that they have either enabled or not spoken about, than the likes of Tommy Robinson or Rupert Lowe or Tucker Carlson. I would be, I would have no reservations about going on a platform to challenge those people, like Pierce Morgan, as I have done before, or the likes of Ash Sarkar on the BBC, or the gremlins of Novara Media that I once faced off against famously on Sky News. But then I wouldn't have the same reservations about talking

to the other side of that, especially when the labels are far less applicable to the likes of Tucker Carlson, Nazi, which he isn't, than communist or justifications of terrorism made by the likes of people that work at Novara Media. Those labels aren't much more applicable to the likes of Ash Sarkar and the employees at Novara who get airtime on the BBC. So to be consistent, Matt would then have to renounce his being platformed on the BBC. Zia Yusuf wouldn't be able to go on question time, for example. But they're not going to stick to that standard. So all they're doing instead is shrinking the island of allies, which reform has,

and allowing themselves to be encircled by enemies, and allowing their engagement with said allies to be dictated on enemy terms. Totally. And remember, for the past year, Connor, they have been treating you, and they have been treating me as their true enemy. And I would argue that this week proves categorically that their true enemy is the mainstream media, is the British Bashing Corporation, is Wokai TV.

And now they've basically alienated so many people who really were natural allies in a lot of ways. But we're also going to challenge them, we're also going to keep them honest on the issues that really mattered. think it's a huge mistake. I've got to ask you, too, what do you make of Liz Truss and her new show? And also, by the way, the reaction from the usual suspects in the mainstream media. I mean, I showed her this post from Pearce Morgan because it was probably the most predictable

and the most obvious. He said, is this a joke? And I just thought, Pearz, you're so not researched. You're so undignified. But that was the reaction, Connor, from the typical regime media bonds. Yeah, well, Pierce is just a thick grifter, and he hasn't found a bandwagon. He doesn't like jumping on, and then pretending that he wasn't complicit in, for example, the COVID lockdowns and forced vaccination, supporting BLM, and now he's all for mass migration, despite the obvious horrors that's visiting upon us, so I don't take his opinion on anything very seriously. As far as Liz's show, and the reaction, actually, that's important. So I got invited on Talk TV this morning, because I still am booked by Talk. It's one of the few

things I'm not blacklisted from. And Peter Carbell, who I'm usually very friendly with, had me on the show, and he just wouldn't drop the fact that Liz is unrepentant about her being screwed over by the Bank of England, the OBR, the Treasury. All of these things are well-established facts. The Bank of England have admitted that two-thirds of the bond market crisis was their fault. Like, they lost millions of taxpayer cash from that, and yet again, Andrew Bailey hasn't resigned. The OBR Chiefs only just gone because he made Rachel Reeves look bad, and when the bond market goes higher on Reeves' watch, well, that doesn't cause a massive media meltdown, of course. But Peter Cargwell kept pressing me on, why do we need to hear from Liz Trass?

Hasn't she accepted full? Isn't she literally the devil? It's like, no. Okay. The utility of Liz having a show, and being transparent, Liz is a friend, and I encourage this behind the scenes, the utility of Liz having a show is the same as J.D. Vantz raising to Tucker Carlson before the last election in that interview he did with his dog, the fact that Liz is an example of how the deep state or the financial institutions or the media can bring down. a government that is trying to do things that the establishment doesn't like. And so whether or not you agree with Liz on everything, whether or not you think she went about it in the right way, Liz can essentially serve as our Trump term one, so that reform

can be a Trump term two, or, you know, if Rupert Lowe decides to eat their lunch, Rupert Lowe can be a Trump term two, learning from her mistakes are not being brought down by the bond markets, by financial malfeasance, by the civil service, by their own party, by the media. So we should learn from Liz's example, and I appreciate that she's being so transparent about what she thinks the failings were, what she thinks the problems with the British establishment were, and even if you don't like Liz, if she's saying the same thing as David Starkey, Dominic Cummings, who they can't stand each other. Dominic Cummings is still a friend of Michael Gove. He nicknamed Liz the human hand grenade. And if they're saying

the same thing about the civil service, it's probably worth listening to both of them. And I urge the presumptive next party of government, reform, and of course, Rupert Lowe, the presumptu. of King of the Right, to start listening to what she's saying too, so that their well-natured efforts to reformat the British state on our behalf don't get scuppered like Liz's were. Breaking right now, Eurovision in crisis. After a number of countries boycott the singing contest because of Israel's confirmed participation.

And you will remember that Israel... Last year was actually the runner-up of the entire competition, meaning there was a very real possibility that they would get the right to host the competition. But here's what's now happened. Spain, Ireland and others are quitting in protest, Slovenia too. And Reuters reports that after a meeting in Geneva, the European Broadcasting Union decided not to call a vote on Israel's participation, saying it had instead passed new rules aimed at discouraging governments from influencing the contest.

Right after that announcement, the Dutch, Spanish, Irish and Slovenian broadcasters said they would withdraw, meaning singers from their country would not compete in the contest that draws millions of viewers worldwide. Now, Cona Tomlinson, one of the issues here is that Eurovision itself has become blatantly political in recent years. For example, it was met with total support for deciding to eject Russia from the competition during that country's war with Ukraine. You'll then remember that Ukraine won the competition, even though. it didn't have the best song. Ukraine was unable to host, even though they wanted to, given they were literally proposing to hold it in a war zone. And as a result, the United Kingdom actually got to host the competition because we should have won that year because our song by Sam Ryder was actually the best by

far. So for me, this is why I've always been like, just keep politics out of it all together. Because what we risk now is a situation that, for example, began to impact the Olympics in the 80s because of the Soviet Union and South Africa. But at the same time, I am disgusted by the likes of Ireland who are effectively allowing hard-left broadcasters to make a decision that their populations do not agree with. And what's next, Connor? I mean, are they going to pull out of the Olympic Games? Of course not. Of course not. And Israel will be there. Yeah.

As far as Eurovision goes, Dan, I consider it a bit like Strictly Cun dancing and Royal Gossip News and just say, I'm usually too heterosexual for that. But... Hey, come on, I've seen your Spotify wrapped. I've seen your Spotify wrapped.

I have exceptional. Taylor Swift, Sabrina Carpenter. It was gay than mine. Michael Jackson are there too. So, anyway, I'm very comfortable with my sexuality, Dan. But the point about...

It's newly married, we have to point out. To a woman. Yeah. The point about politics contaminating popular culture, perhaps resonates considering what Sabrina Carpenter said about the White House the other day. But in this instance, I must say it's almost inevitable that politics is going to contaminate an international event, because there's no such thing as a neutral political sphere when differing nations come together. There are always going to be feuds and rifts.

The question is, whether. or not the politics is legitimate. And so, as you discussed in your interview with Liz and in your preface, you don't think that it's legitimate for these countries to be boycotting Eurovision on the grounds of Israel's participation. I would say questions about Israel or Palestine aside, the question of Israel-Palestine should always be responded to with, we're going to take our own side no matter what. And I do note that the countries that are boycotting because of Israel are complaining constantly about the genocide, apparently being committed in Gaza against the Palestinians.

But they don't care about wholesale replacement of their own domestic populations by mass migration. Like this is the Spanish leftist government, this is Ireland, who have notoriously battery-farmed criminal foreigners in record numbers. The population changes, Ireland, is staggering now. And so please spare me all these leftist governments indignant outrage at what Israel is doing

in its neighboring country after the October 7th attacks, when they are basically committing a very, very ostentatious ethnocide, but marketing it as diversity, acceptance, tolerance, inclusion and our strength instead. 100%. Connor Tomlinson, host of Tomlinson talks the brilliant independent YouTube show. Thank you so much, Connor. We will speak next week. But now we're going to reveal today's worst Britain in the world this week.

This is where we put your union jackass winners from across the week head to head. And your nominees this week were Pears Morgan. That revolting tirade against Tommy Robinson, who he said he would trade out of the country for a chicken teakimassala. On Tuesday, Rachel from accounts, Rachel Thieves for her fraudulent budget. And on Wednesday, Lenny Henry, the celebrity love you because he is launching an organization against Tommy Robinson. Here's some of your feedback, Priest 284, says Pairs Morgan says he is not woke. That is a lie. He is one of the wokeest people out there, rudely interrupting other people and not letting them have their say. He was absolutely disgusting

to Tommy Robinson. He's a pathetic little weasel. Deborah Fuge, 7262, said Pairs is a traitor to his own country and his opinion moves with the wind direction all the times he rubbish to other people's points of view. Dobby 996, though, says since Lenny Henry is after 18 billion pounds for reparations, I think that's enough evidence, he sees himself as other than us, Brits. If he sees himself that way, then we should too. And Matt Drumming adds, Lenny Henry makes me laugh.

Pity he didn't do that when he was a comedian. True, I've never laughed. Lenny Henry joke, have to be totally honest with you. Aldian Ravens says the two big mouths we can ignore, Rachel is thieving more than Dick Turpin's gang. And Lazarus Y5W says Reeves not only lied to the people, she lied to the house and the cabinet. Now her and Stammer don't even try to hide it. They just smirk at us. Nellie 9317 says all three are equally despicable. However, my decision is Reeves because she is actually destroying people's lives and the country, wretched woman. Okay, your votes are now in. Goodness me. We've

already had over 65,000 people vote this week. You're just amazing. Thank you so much. In third position with 13% of the vote, Pearce Morgan. The runner up with 15% of the vote, Lenny Henry. But holy mackerel. This one wasn't even close, folks, with 72% of the vote. Rachel, thieves, Rachel from accounts, the worst Britain in the world this week. Thank you for your company all week. It's been a big one. But we're not done quite yet because we're going to move over to Substack now for our uncannselled after show. Huge developments. Unfortunately, Thomas Markle has had his leg amputated. Still nothing from his daughter. So we're going to get into all of the shocking latest details on that.

And if you want to join us, this is actually the last day before the weekend anyway. Well, sorry, before next week, you can do it all through the weekend, but the last day in terms of on a weekday to go for our Black Friday. Mega sale, 35% off, biggest ever discount. And paid monthly and annual subscribers too uncanceled, sorry, too outspoken, get to watch our uncanceled after show every single weekday over on Substack. the address for this special one-off deal. www. Dan Wooten Outspoken.com slash sale. That's www.

d-A-N-W-O-T-O-N-Outspoken.com slash sale. Danwitten-outspoken.com slash sale. I think I mucked that up. But you get it. You get it. I know you get it. It's been a long week. You can also subscribe, by the way,

to our podcast. which is available on Spotify now as a video Apple podcast or wherever you get your podcast all I ask is that you please rate and review we're a totally independent show we've got no big corporations behind us no one funding us which means I can totally tell the truth but your rating and reviewing us massively helps okay at this stage we're going to move off YouTube we're going to head over to continue the uncanceled after show on substack www. www.outspoken.live have a wonderful weekend I'm going to be back with you you live 5pm UK time Monday midday Eastern 9 a.m. Pacific hit subscribe if you're watching

right now on YouTube and most importantly I promise to keep fighting for you.