Dan Wootton Outspoken - BURNHAM’S ANTI-WHITE BRITAIN EXPOSED AS COPS IGNORE ISLAMIST DEATH THREAT AGAINST KELLIE JAY-KEEN

Episode Date: June 30, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Shocking new figures reveal the invasion of the United Kingdom will bankrupt Britain, as new figures show Labour will take over 200 years to even consider deporting the criminals already here. Yet the Rat King of the North Andy Burnham’s so-called visionary speech did not contain a word on the Islamist takeover, mass immigration or anti-white racism. Meanwhile, The Sun has revealed Migrant Street where 83 illegals will move into newbuild £250,000 homes over the native population. All this as Mehdi Hasan reveals this plan is revenge, writing: “Maybe the Europeans should have thought about all that back when they were colonizing Africa in the 19th century.” Meanwhile, our elite class led by Michael Gove still refuses to even acknowledge that mentioning the word white doesn’t make you racist in a GB News clash with Michelle Dewberry. And our police refuse to take seriously an Islamist threat to kill the activist Kellie-Jay Keen, even though it was captured on camera. But Nigel Farage is fighting back after Piers Morgan declared him a politically dead man walking over his £5 million donation… After Dan's Digest the Superstar Panel react: Best-selling author Bernie Spofforth, whose new book A War To Win Back Your World is topping the Amazon chart, and Edward Dutton, host of the brilliant Jolly Heretic channel on YouTube. PLUS: Next Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s record in Manchester is dismantled in shocking detail as he lies about saving the country. AND: Ricky Gervais dramatically ditches the BBC for YouTube for a special to mark 25 years in The Office, in a feud with cast members Mackenzie Crook and Martin Freeman. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s UK U-turn risks turning King Charles into a laughing stock, as Prince William and Queen Camilla are quietly seething at the plans. We’ll have all the latest with our Royal Mastermind Angela Levin. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Twizzlers keep the fun going. Yeah, I know. I just stopped whatever you were listening to to tell you that Twizzlers keep the fun going. Well, irony isn't my forte, but twisty, chewy, yummy Twizzlers sure is. So think of Twislers as a little palate cleanser for whatever's queued up, which, by the way, should be coming very soon. Like any second now. Okay, Twizzlers, time to keep the fun going.

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken in episode number 500. And breaking right now, shocking new figures reveal the invasion of the United Kingdom will bankrupt Britain, with Labour showing that it will take over 200 years to even consider deporting the criminals already here. Yet the Rack King of the North, Andy Burnham's so-called visionary speech did not contain a word on the Islamist takeover, on mass immigration, on anti-eastern. white racism. Meanwhile, the sun has revealed today, Migrant Street, where 83 illegals will move into new build 250,000 pounds over the native population. All this, as Medi Hassan reveals,

this plan is revenge. Saying the quiet part out loud, maybe the Europeans should have thought about all that when they were colonising Africa in the 19th century. Yet our elite class, led by the likes of spectator editor Michael Gove, still refused to even acknowledge that mentioning the word white doesn't make you racist. Talking about white as a term which defines whether or not someone is British, then look at the England football team. Look at the people who've been Prime Minister. No, I think once you start,

Why is that a problem? Michelle, once you start talking about black and white, as what defines British, that is problematic. You're allowed to talk about black people. You're allowed to talk about brown people. You're allowed to talk about every single group under the sun. But the second you mention the word white, all hell breaks loose. And our police refused to take seriously an Islamist threat to kill the activist Kelly J Keene, even though it was captured on camera. shit about Islam in love.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, okay. He's going to keep talking shit about Islam. So I'm going to cut your throat. Which I think is a legitimate threat. Nigel Farage fighting back today after Piers Morgan declared him a politically dead man walking over that five million pound donation.

It's completely outrageous. And if it was any other leader, who would be leading the charge saying they've got to stand down, Nigel Farage. The guy took five million pounds from a guy who lives in Thailand is a crypto tycoon. The Home Office have just snuck out some figures. They'd rather you didn't see. What it shows you in the last year, over 34,000 people were given asylum status in Britain on the basis of Article 8 of the ECHR.

So all of that coming up in the Digest, then today's superstar panel React, best-selling author Bernie Spofforth, whose new book A War to Win. win back your world as topping the Amazon chart. Here it is, very exciting. And Edward Dusson, host of the brilliant jolly heretic channel on YouTube. Also coming up on the show today, next Prime Minister Andy Burnham's record in Manchester is dismantled in shocking detail as he lies about saving the country. Queen Camilla endorses J.K. Rowling during a shock meeting in Scotland today.

and Ricky Jervais dramatically ditches the BBC for YouTube for a special to mark 25 years of the office in a feud with cast members, McKenzie Crook and Marson Freeman. Then in the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow over on Substack, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's UK U-turn risks turning King Charles into a laughing stock as Prince William and Queen Camilla are quietly seething at the plans. We'll have all the latest with our Royal Mastermind Angela Levin

and that's at www.outspoken.com. We're also going to reveal a brand new Greatest Britain and Union Jackass at the end of the show too. So I have nominated along with Edward and Bernie. Here are our choices. You can vote right now in the live chat. Edward has gone for John Major for being completely out of touch

with the British people with his pro-Europe comments. We played them on the show yesterday, of course. Bernie has gone for Michael Gove for his interview with Michelle Jubri. She said, if I go and live in Japan, I'm not Japanese, and then he deliberately conflated citizenship with ethnicity. Being white is not problematic, Mr. Gove, Bernie says. And I've gone for Alistair Campbell. He's going to feature in today's digest,

but it is for defending Burnham dodging questions from the media. Let's expose that rat for the hypocrite that he is, that war criminal who should actually be in jail for the hypocrite that he is. So get voting, keep your comments coming and keep your superchats, Coming in two, I will read out the best at the end today. But now, let's go. The Rack King of the North, Andy Burnham, so-called visionary speech outlining how to save Broken Britain, did not contain one mention of the elephant in the room. I mean, indeed, it did not contain one mention of the three elephants in the room. Not a word on the

Islamist takeover. Not a word on mass immigration or the daily invasion of the channel. Not a word on anti-white racism. And it's this willful blindness that I believe will destroy Burnham's reign because we can all see the destruction of the country we love happening and we're not going to put up with it anymore. The Sun newspaper, which endorsed Slippery Starma to be PM to its internal shame, today unveiled Migrant Street. With the newspaper reporting a total of 83 asylum seekers, I call them illegals, are to be moved into 250,000 pounds on an estate dubbed Migrant Street. 21 smart new build houses have been earmarked for the families, but one local in Stoke Heath Shropshire said, it's bad out of order. It doesn't feel fair that these people

will be living in shiny new homes free of charge, which hardworking local folk could never afford. Outraged villagers claim they have been lied to over plans to move the asylum seekers into the new build homes and have vowed to fight the scheme. But it won't matter because the leftists backing the likes of Islamist Shabana Mahmood, who is throwing open our borders and our homes to even more illegals, have now admitted the quiet part out loud. This is all part of a twisted revenge plot. Zetio's Medi Hassan, a man consistently platformed by the British Bashing Corporation,

wrote, maybe the Europeans should have thought about all that back when they were colonizing Africa in the 19th century. So as Lawrence Fox responded, you've got to hand it to Medi. At least he admits that this is revenge. Colonization. then it's probably worth asking yourself, once the invasion is complete, what other forms of revenge do they have in store for us? Well, we all know, don't we? Because it's happening already with reports like this today. Grooming gang ring leader 73, who has been convicted of 30 child rape offenses cannot be deported and is set to walk free from prison. As our guest, Bernie Spofforth put it, don't dare say cannot be deported.

bloody can. Parliament is sovereign and could change the law. This man has been convicted of 30 child rape offences. Cannot be deported because of legal protections dating back decades. Parliament created those laws. Parliament can repeal those laws. They just don't want to. Ask why. And I believe they don't want to because they actually want to bankrupt us morally and financially. I mean, why else would they let migrants use the ECHR to stay in Britain while costing us 4.9 billion pounds. Indeed, Bernie in her research has even discovered that the government's own best case scenario figures acknowledge that this invasion is permanent. This is chilling. Check it out. Bernie revealed Labor has proudly announced it will remove 45,000 legal migrants and foreign criminals over the next 10 years. Let's do the maths.

Independent estimates say the UK has about 1 million illegal migrants. At a rate of 45,000 removals every decade, it would take more than 200 years to remove them all. And of course, the invasion, the flood of migrants coming to this country continues on a daily basis. And still our suicidal political class, just cry racism. So when Bichelle Jubri raised the issue of white, people coming a minority on GB News when describing the lunacy of the scourge of anti-right racism that has swept our elites, it sparked an infuriating response from the fake conservative editor of the spectator Michael Gove, who was in the cabinet during the Boris wave. People feel that in the not too distant future, they're going to start to become a minority in this country. Well, first of all, it depends on what you mean by minority and who were clans. in that regard, but more broadly...

Let's just pick something out of my, out of Finner. White British people, they might be watching this. Many of them will be watching this and saying, actually, Michelle, we feel in the not too distant decades ahead, we will become a minority in this country. Yeah, but the, well, the first thing I was going to say is, I think once one starts talking about white as a term which defines whether or not someone is British, then look at the England football team. Look at the people who've been Prime Minister.

No, I think once you start talking, Michelle, once you start talking about black and white as what defines British, that is problematic. I'm more to the point. I'm sorry. No, no, more to the point. What is wrong with, A, ending illegal migration, B, dealing with the backlog of people

who are currently here under indefinite leave to remain. What is wrong with that? Well, I'm going to respond to this because I'm not having this. So you see what he's doing there, right? He's effectively live on air, accusing Michelle Jubry of some type of racism simply for using the word white. But Jubes wasn't having it, in fairness to her. And I think she's been watching outspoken, actually, because she finally took my Japanese argument to G.B. News. Do you want to be British?

Are you prepared to subscribe to the core values of Britishness? I know, but what? I mean, if I decided I wanted to be Japanese, I'm not going to be Japanese. I'm not going to be Japanese, am I? But one of the glories about the United Kingdom. Let's just express this point. If I decided to go and get a job in Japan, and I decide I want to be Japanese, nobody's going to take me seriously

if I describe myself as Japanese. Likewise, if I meanded off to China and decided I want to live there. Again, if I describe myself as a Chinese person, nobody's going to really take me seriously. I think one of the differences between the United Kingdom and certainly China, Japan is a more complex case, is that people have come here over time fleeing persecution or seeking a better life, and they've become British.

So if one looks at Britain's Hindu or Sikh or Jewish communities, then I don't think that anyone can say that they're anything other than effectively integrated. I don't think you can look at Rishi Sunak's parents and say they're not British. I mean, the thing is it's not just about integration, is it it's about reality. And Jubes, again, credit to her. She then raised this case I told you about yesterday, but the mainstream media trying to ignore. The British Somalian, according to the police, charged with attempted murder after being accused of ploughing his car into a group of innocent London shoppers and Ealing this weekend. That isn't terror.

Of course, it's not terror. watch. A case at the weekend, and I've got to watch my footing here, because it's a live case, so I can't speculate about the guilt of the person involved. But they were talking about it. It was like a British Somalian or a Somalian British man or something. I was like, what are you talking about? Move Harris.

I know, but what I'm trying to say is, and again, I maybe shouldn't have used this example because it's a live case that I probably can't delve into. It's about when somebody wants to. understand the picture in this country, when you want to understand, for example, crime statistics by ethnicity and all the rest of it, we're constantly getting told there was a guy the other day and he got wheeled out as a Yorkshire man. And I looked at the picture and I looked at the guy and I looked at his background. He's not a Yorkshire man. And I found it deeply insulting that somebody had come to my county, Yorkshire, and is now actively described as a Yorkshire when he absolutely

isn't. And the point that I was raising to you before the break is that when we're talking about these influxes of people and all the rest of it, and I'm saying to you that many white Britons in this country, they do fear that they are going to become a minority in this country. And not only that, there are lots of people from different groups and different communities who are concerned, legal migrants and people whose families came here 10, 20 or 50 years ago who also want migration to be managed effectively as well. And if there are people here who have a laugh, If there are people who come here who are drug dealers, criminals, who make themselves deliberately reliant on the state because they're not going to contribute.

If there are people who seek to lead parallel lives, if there are people who don't respect our principles, our history and our culture, of course that's a problem. I know what Michael. But as soon as you make it about black or white, literally, then I think that is problematic. He is the sort of man who is destroying our country. Bernie Spofforth responded, we're expected to believe complete nonsense and accept lies without questioning them ever. And if you do question the lie, then you're a bad person.

CB News contributor Adam Brooks, raged, oh my God. How was Michael Gove ever a conservative MP? This man is more woke than some Labour MPs. Ridiculous man. And Reform UK supporter Rayal Braverman warned for a brief but revealing look at how the Conservatives failed. this country. Watch this video with Michelle Jubes. Remember, Gove was and is Kemi's mentor. Then there's the Islamist takeover which the police almost proudly choose to ignore. So when activist Kelly J. Keane, as you know, an outspoken regular, someone I respect a lot,

tried to question the Islamist takeover of the UK at Speakers Corner and other aspects of the Muslim religion, In horrifying aspects, she was threatened with having her throat slit. Where were they? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, okay. I will.

You're going to, oh. You're going to what? You're going to what? You're going to what? You're going to what? Where is the police? He just said he's going to cut my throat. Police?

Where are they? Do we have any? Where is he? Where is he? Where's he gone? I'm going to go and tell... Is that police? No. Yeah, yeah, I'm going to...

So there was a very obvious Islamist threat to Kelly J. Keen's life. I saw it. You saw it. The police were in attendance. She calmly approached them. Hello, yeah. So that chap down there just came up to me to tell me he's gonna cut my throat. He's coming. He's coming. He's the guy here with his uh, the thing on it. Yeah, he's got a white t-shirt, grey white t-shirt. He's right.

This lady here is calling my prophet Muhammad's a son-alai. All sorts of words. Never said a word? It's illegal. It's not illegal. I'm never for nobody. I'm never for nobody. She's, she's,

ready out of this for you. Compare that, police reaction to when Henry Novak's murderer, Vikram Digua, lied that the Essex 18-year-old had called him the P-word. He then raised the issue of freedom of speech. I heard him. If we just take to one side. No, no, no, no, if we just get away from a bit, then it's coming. We've got it in video as well. Who's the victim?

I'm not going to smoke drugs. My whole belief. They're fretting me. Can you keep filming that? That's a threat. He just came over and said you're going to keep talking shit about Islam because I'm going to cut your throat.

Which I think is a legitimate threat. Where are these people going? They're very close as well. So I would like to say that's caused me alarm in distress distress and I would like him to prosecute him. Go, go home.

I'm going to get your name. The information. Yeah. I mean, isn't that totally shocking, by the way, that the Islamist believed that his freedom of speech would allow him to threaten to slit the throat of Kelly J. Keen,

but she doesn't have the freedom of speech to criticize the prophet Muhammad. But it gets worse because Kelly later revealed at one point when talking to the police officers yesterday, they explained they may not be able to deal with the threat to cut my throat immediately because they had a specific task that centered around violence against women and girls in Hyde Park and so might need to take a statement later, not even joking. Lawrence Fox responded to the whole incident by saying someone should explain to this invader

after he's deported for threatening to kill someone that we don't do throat-sitting in the civilized world. Why are these people here? I want my country back. But we know that Shabana Mahmoud is not only quietly continuing with the invasion. She is about to put the invasion on steroids, proving her true Islamist colours. Islam, my own religion, like a lot of practising Muslims, my faith is the most important thing in my life. It is the absolute driver of everything that I do. I feel a very strong calling of my own conscience and my conscience calls me to God.

As Nigel Farage asked, has Shabana Mahmood lost her mind? This week, she is set to announce a home for Ukraine-style migrant scheme for conflicts all around the world. For context, that scheme took in over 200,000 Ukrainians. This must not stand. What nations do Labour have in mind?

Sudan? You know who is Sudanese? Deng Meijek, the illegal migrant who murdered Rianne and White stabbing her 23 times with a screwdriver. And Mohamed Harun, a refugee who raped a woman and told the judge sentencing him, Fuck England. In fact, over a third of Sudanese criminals in prison have committed sex offences. Muhammad also wants to prioritize Eritrea.

We've had rapists and attempted murderers from Eritrean these past few years. Eritreans here are more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual offence, convictions than British citizens. No doubt Labor will open the floodgates to thousands of Palestinians too. Nigel then went on to reveal that the ongoing invasion is bankrupting Britain, with the boats alone costing us £5 billion a year. The Home Office, they've just snuck out some figures. They'd rather you didn't see. What it shows you, in the last year, over 34,000 people were given asylum status in Britain on the basis of Article 8

of the ECHR, the right to a family life. Just on last year alone, and bear in mind, these are home office figures. The estimated cost of those 34,000 people over their lifetimes to the British taxpayer

is 5 billion pounds. Can you believe it? Article 8, over the course of the last year alone, will cost the British taxpayer five billion pounds. I wonder if we go back five, ten, fifteen years and work out a total. We'd find something

completely eye-watering. Allowing those boats to cross the channel is bankrupting Britain. Frager's fight back this week with a series of those slick and punchy videos comes as Piers Morgan continues to declare his political career

dead because of the five million pound donation from crypto billionaire Christopher Harbourn. I'm interested in something you said the other day, because Andy Burnham's made a big speech today. He looks set to be our next Prime Minister. But you feel fundamentally that Nigel Farage will never be Prime Minister because of the 5 million gift or whatever you want to call it from the crypto billionaire. Yeah, I just think it's completely outrageous.

And if it was any other leader, who would be leading the charge saying they've got to stand down? Nigel Farage. The guy took 5 million pounds from a guy who lives in Thailand is a crypto tycoon. and his first excuse when he was caught, because he didn't declare it, as he should have done under the rules, and that's why I think he'll be found guilty by the parliamentary investigation and will then be suspended, and that will be it. It's because his stories changed every 10 seconds. One minute it was to pay for his security because of all the death threats he says he has. Then when that wasn't really flying, he flipped it to a reward for Brexit.

Then it was just a personal gift from his friend who likes him, and if I want to spend it on Ferrari, He said, why can't I? Which is not really the man of the people nige. So I'm afraid I think the way he's reacted to this scandal is very damning. It keeps changing his story. But the one thing he can't change is the fact he took five million pounds from a bloke in Thailand who is in the crypto game. And he didn't declare it. And that, I'm afraid, to me, makes him unfit to be leader of a party in his country,

never mind prime minister. And there is a debate at the moment within reform. UK about how to deal with Nigel Farage and his big money bungs. But I have to say the response from Reforms Teenage Mayor George Finch on the Jeremy Vine show this morning was just plain wrong, wrong, wrong. And look, we are doing an amazing job. So I just think that all this negativity should be put to a side. And you know what?

Why are people listening to a husband like Piers Morgan, who's now just a YouTuber? Who is this guy? You know, people have, what has Pearce Morgan done? I bet you we would. Well, he was on Good Morning Britain. Nigel Fras has changed the way this country has for the better. And Peir's Morgan's just sat behind a desk talking. He's got huge numbers on his YouTube.

He's a dismiss you. He's a YouTuber. He's a bit silly. But he gets massive, massive, massive, massive figures. And he's got... So does reform a Nigel Farrow? Okay, George, as you sit behind a desk talking with all due respect, attack Pear's moron for being a moron.

but a teenage mere dismissing YouTube, which is now the biggest broadcaster in the world, is a huge mistake. And unfortunately, this is one of the big problems that I've had with Reform UK over all of these years. It seems to hold the independent media in some form of contempt. And that will backfire in time as the mainstream media turn. And when attacking YouTube didn't work, George, I have to be honest, seem to struggle to justify the actual don't. donation. So why are you attacking, though, then what he's had to say? Because he's just saying

that there are a lot of questions, aren't there, about this £5 million? He still haven't been answered? To say that Nigel Farage is dead in the water. It's completely stupid. It's silly. He's talking about how he's dealing with this situation. Nigel said, Nigel has said what's right in that he's in communication with the Parliamentary Standard Office and that it was an unconditional... On what planet? On what planet, does anyone give anybody five million quid for nothing. Oh, again. Has anyone ever given you five million quid, George? No. And I thought you'd be asking questions and maybe thinking I should probably declare this if they did. Well, look, again, this is the line of question in here.

The public see this as, again, a complete farce from the left. Yes, they do. Yes, they do. Okay, so Starmer, with those stupid glasses and suits that at the time I was like, what did he get those for? Like, it's just sort of going to get slammed. But he declared it, and that's why it then got criticised. Okay. It was glass. and suits to wear to work, but he declared it. So let's, let me just say. It's shady as hell. Now, of course, where there is a major problem is the complete hypocrisy

when it comes to the MSM's obsession with Farage compared to the total softball coverage that Andy Burnham is receiving, especially given he is about to have a coronation as PM. As independent podcaster Peter McCormick put it, Andy Burnham is the new Messiah of the Left. Watch them ditched plight. for a short while and then when it all fails because leftist economics don't work, they'll bounce straight back to Polanski.

Any flavour of leftist unworkable economics will do. And in Manchester yesterday, it was crazy to me that all of the MSM pack like Beth Rigby of Sly News traveled up loyally to Manchester and had no problem with not even having the opportunity to ask Andy Burnham a solitary question. One onlooker captured this interaction. Then we have Sly's lefty Harrod and Beth Rigby plotting with Labour's Lucy Powell. No media bias at Sly News, though, as I say, they're all friends. They're all in this together.

That is the problem. Indeed, Alistair Campbell. Yes, that Alistair Campbell, the war criminal who should be in prison, even advocated Verbenham, ignoring the media altogether. Writing on X, if true that Andy Burnham is not taking media quick, questions after speech today, then good move. Speeches matter. And when important should speak for themselves. A problem with Kirstalmers' communication was that he would make a speech, then take questions, and the broadcast journalist in particular would make it more about them and their take

than him. If and when he becomes PM, Burnham will be answerable to Parliament, not the showbiz-style media coverage of politics. The Blah factory will go into overdrive today with journalists interviewing each other about how they ought to be allowed to ask questions. The speech itself is more important than anything they say before, during or after setting the agenda vital from the off. Now, the aforementioned Pears Moron responded, ah yes, we should definitely go full North Korea where the Supreme Leader make speeches with zero follow-up questions from the media. Campbell hit back. Oh no, Pearce, can't you manage two days in a row being right? You were spot on re-ferrage and his five million bung, but now deliberately missing the point on the very sensible decision to let a speech speak for itself. Full North

Korea. Now stop being silly. How about you stop being silly Campbell. I mean, what a scumbag this guy is. We all remember what he has said about Tory prime ministers. Like this, when Boris Johnson tried to avoid the media. Incredible to think that someone who owes so much to journalism as the first party leader to ban people from election bus because of their views, bottles out of debate, and has so far taken six questions from general media access to this campaign. So much for the freedom of the press. That's six more questions than Andy Burnham has taken, Mr. Campbell. And what about this, about Rishi Sunak, avoiding the media? If he is scared to take a few questions from the media in the middle of an election campaign, I'm not sure he is the guy to

give lectures about how he's best equipped to stand up to Putin. Indeed, Burnham's plan not to live full-time at Downing Street has just been shrugged off. With Julia Hartley-Bruheer rating, this is just getting ridiculous now. Is Andy Burnham planning to be Prime Minister by Zoom? This is because the males pro-Burnum columnist Dan Hodges has confirmed the latest on Burnham's plans, which means as PM, he will spend a minimum of a day a week in No. 10 North. He will not use No. 10 Downing Street as his main residence. His primary home will remain in the North West. Senior advisors have already begun working on establishing the Northern Downing Street.

And as fellow Daily Mail columnist Richard Eden pointed out, We will have a king who won't live in his palace and a prime minister who won't live at his official residence. A depressing picture of Sadiq Khan's lawless land and broken Britain in 2026. Where Burnham will not even speak about mass immigration, anti-white racism or the Islamist takeover, because I believe him and his Labour cohorts actively wanted to happen. And now the Superstar Panel. Bernie Spofforth and Edward Dusson with me today. Edward, wasn't it so fascinating watching that exchange between Michael Gove and Michelle Jubrie on Gbony News?

Because it just feels like the days of the Govite figures being able to hide behind this idea of, oh, we can all become British is ending. Yes, as it happens, I met. Michael Gove when I was in London a few days ago at the beefsteak club and in real life, I find him a very reasonable, intelligent, perceptive and in some ways actually slightly based man. So I'm quite surprised there's only a couple of days later he comes out with this. It is quite clear from the scientific research that we tend to be attracted to and to cooperate more with people that are genetically similar to us, and that two average native English

people are on average 12 cousins, and that is sufficient, and we're all descended from King Edward the Third, and that is sufficient in a time of war for you to lay down your life for your extended genetic family, for your ethnic. That's what soldiers do. So it's clearly the idea of an ethnicity of an extended genetic family is a highly meaningful. and important things. Although there are people on the borders, and there are those where you can say, well, perhaps we can adopt them in, you know, Frank Bruno, is one of us, any Frank, can't send Frank back, he's one of us. In general, that means something to people, and it will be reflected in how they behave and how they want to live and with whom they want to live. So it seems to me to be avoiding

a very important question to try to suppress that way of thinking, that way of feeling among the English population. Yeah, indeed, because Bernie, It was, as you said, a moment where Michael Gove was coming pretty close to, I would say, accusing Michelle Juby of some form of racism. And in full credit to her, she just wasn't having it. And I think, actually, this has become quite a moment because these are the types of arguments that Conservative ministers put forward for years and years and years to shut us up, basically. to make us sort of accept mass immigration

or not speak out about mass immigration, not speak out about the total lack of integration in society. And I do think those arguments are collapsing in real time. Yeah, and I think that Michelle, she's very brave girl. And of course, she has a lot of protection because whether G.B, like it or not, they are considered mainstream media now. So she has a lot of protection to say what she says.

what Michael Gove is trying to do is conflate two issues, ethnicity with British citizenship. And what Michelle says is exactly correct. She couldn't go and work in Japan and say she was Japanese, just like she couldn't go to Nigeria and say she was Nigerian because everyone would laugh at her. We know that's not the case. There's no reason why British ethnicity being white British,

ethnicity shouldn't be allowed. And when you look on the government's website, it has a whole load of ethnic descriptions for what you are. Are you British white? Are you English right? Are you Irish white? Are you an Irish traveller? Are you Somalian British? The whole thing's ridiculous. Your ethnicity is something genetically programmed. It is not your citizenship. And what what we are finding right across nations, particularly in the West, is the suppression of national ethnicity. So that within 100 years, as is written about by the UN, there won't be any national ethnicity. There will only be citizenship. That's it. That's where we're leading.

It's so interesting seeing Andy Burnham, who is about to become Prime Minister totally. Let off the hook in so many ways. Let off the hook in terms of speaking about anti-white racism, the invasion of this country, mass immigration, all of the elephants in the room he is just not speaking about. But also what about his record in Manchester? Well, that has just been destroyed too. I did appreciate this Daily Star Front page today.

Can't be bothered to stand to BPM. Here's your free Andy Burnham. mask. It'll get you straight into number 10 without anyone voting for you. But that's the reason why I think the total lack of scrutiny from the mainstream media over this guy is chilling. He literally released like a funky TikTok yesterday. POV, you're about to give a speech about taking power out of Westminster. Yeah, but at the same time, you're not prepared to take a single question for any journalist. Now, it's not like I think the mainstream. media journalists would even challenge him, but it shows you that this is a campaign to become

Prime Minister that is preordained and no risks will be taken. And what was so interesting, actually, is that after the speech, he proved this new social media strategy, which is all about Andy Burnham, the accessible, nice guy, and nothing about his record. Watch this. The north again, I travelled south again. I was a bit of a smithler there for you, but I'm back in London. After the speech, please with how Number 10 North has gone down. You know, what it will mean in future is that everybody doesn't have to come down here to have a serious conversation with the government. If you think about it, a North Pole to the South Pole,

it'll just make the country feel more balanced. I hope you're excited by it. I'm certainly excited by it. The whole idea is Number 10 North is a conduit to get power out into the country, every single part of it, and get growth going everywhere. So yeah, come on everyone, get on board with it. with it and let's make it happen. Good growth in every postcode, hope and every heart. That's our mission. As Reform UK's Myron sent all Nathan put it, he sounds like he's reading you a bedtime story, but he is about to implement sweeping socialist changes across the country without any mandate.

This is tyranny with a warm smile and a hug. And the other thing that has not been looked into at all by the mainstream media is this overall acceptance that Andy B, Burnham's record in Manchester is one of success. Well, Bernie Spofforth, who is here on the superstar panel today, alongside Edward Dust, author of this brilliant new book, A War to Win Back Your World, has just dismantled Burnham's record in Manchester. Blowing it apart. Let me take you through it.

I've listened to Andy Burnham's 10-year speech, where he looks like Britain's new saviour. Zelensky uniform bragging about what a success Greater Manchester is with my mouth open. You would be forgiven for thinking Greater Manchester was close to perfect. An example to everyone of how his fantastic policies have worked. Does he seriously think most of Greater Manchester is a success or that he contributed to a shiny business sector, two world-class football teams and the largest uni in the country? Because outside that, nearly one in four Greater Manchester,

Manchester neighbourhoods are in the most deprived 10% nationally. Half of Greater Manchester's local authority areas are among England's 30 most deprived. Manchester City is ranked fourth most deprived English local authorities. In 2024, 16.2% of jobs in Greater Manchester workplaces paid below the real living wage, 193,000 low-paid jobs. Temporary accommodation is around 5,915 households with 8,600 children in temporary accommodation. Around 12,700 long-term empty homes were identified across the city region. Four of the 10 highest recorded crime local authorities in England are in Greater Manchester. Educational achievements are below national average. Manchester City area above national unemployment levels. One in eight working age people get pimp above the national

average. The Greater Manchester area has a lower household disposable income than the national average. 34% increase in rough sleeping, violent crime and sexual offences above the national average. Grooming gangs? Or are we still ignoring those? Drug-related death rates in Greater Manchester are significantly above the national average. Oh, and now let's talk about debt. Bravo, Andy, to achieve some of the highest deprivation in the country under his leadership. GMCA now has about 1.4 billion pounds of gross debt and an underlying borrowing need of roughly $2.5 billion. So his speech on hopes and dreams is actually more like no hope and nightmares. His leafy suburbs and shiny city buildings can't really hide the truth.

And I note, not a word about spending, welfare, immigration, deportation, crime, defense or net zero, Welcome to Authority Andy under the same management as Slippery Stama. Bernie, I am so glad you took this deep dive into Andy Burnham's record in Greater Manchester because if you look at the mainstream media at the moment, you would believe that Greater Manchester is the greatest success story in the United Kingdom. And he's just going to usher all of that in to the rest of the disunited kingdom. Whereas actually, when you look at his real record, the record that the mainstream media are covering, up, that he is covering up.

Actually, this is true. A socialist healthscape is coming, as Myron sent to Nathan said. I just couldn't help myself. I'm sorry, I just could not help myself because Manchester is, and I'm really sorry everyone from Manchester, like, and your surrounding areas, which are quite nice. Manchester itself is a shithole. And I purposely moved as far away from Manchester. as I could within commuting distance because I had young children and I could see how appalling it was.

Like, you know, I didn't want my children to have to travel on a train into Manchester with drug dealers being mugged. We've all seen the videos from Manchester of people being stabbed. Now, look, it does have quite a posh, like two or three blocks of really shiny buildings where there are some Venture capitalists and there's some private equity companies and they do their deals and that's all really fabulous right but outside of that it is a complete whole and i know of people who have tried to do fantastic work in manchester of you know housing homeless people for free and they can't get past authority andy never so if the mainstream media aren't going to do the maths then i'll do the maths for them because if you want Manchesterism across the rest of this country,

then the only way we're going, I'm afraid, is even further down than we are now. And also, before I finish this, this whole re-industrialization of the North, what he's talking about are things like data centers, carbon capture machines. none of these projects give work to people because after the construction phase they're largely automated so what is he going to do about the unemployment rate absolutely nothing absolutely nothing because he has no answers whatsoever he's not we cannot allow this person to roll into downing street and this stupid downing number 10 of the North. What a joke. It's an absolute joke. It's not democracy at all.

Edward Dustin, it's so troubling, isn't it though? Because lots of people when Kirstama, Slippery Stama, was on the decline, were admitting, oh yeah, like these are people in the mainstream media like Michael Crick. Oh yeah, maybe we should have done some due diligence on Kirstama. Like maybe it wasn't enough just to hate conservative politicians enough. Yet exactly the same thing has happened now with Burnham. He is being presented as some type of savior. And he is only going to disappoint. Of course it's going to disappoint.

It reminds me of the hysteria of COVID, where basically the government has lost control of the country. They don't know what they're doing. They don't understand what's going on. And so the whole establishment needs to come together behind something to give hope, something to give a sense of order and structure, something to say, this is not chaos and we haven't lost control. And Burnham is that role.

He's that person. And the idea is, oh, it was wishful thinking. Surely, surely it can get a little bit better. Surely there can be a future. Surely we won't just totally collapse into chaos. But as Bernadette said, the Manchesterisation of the UK, what does that actually mean? I've been to Manchester on about five occasions.

On the first occasion, I went there, someone immediately august, I said, oh, you may, you want to buy some hash? Do I look like someone that wants to buy some hash? I don't. And on every other occasion, on every occasion I've been there, I've immediately been offered drugs. I once was interviewed there as a job to be lecturer in theology. Thank God I didn't get it.

I don't know what would have happened if I'd moved my pregnant wife to Manchester at that point. It would have been a disastrous idea. And this idea of the Downing Street of the North, this is just social. This is left-wing resentment. What leftists do, they are very, they're very high-induced. negative feelings. They feel they should have power. They're individualists. They're selfish. And they deal with this by saying, oh, I'm the most unselfish. I'm the most kind. They're scared of a

fair fight and so they virtue signal their way to power. And they're resentful of anything that is symbolic of power. And London is symbolic of power. The traditions, the architecture, all of the great history that's there. So of course, they're going to reject that and make out it's to do with equality. In fact, it's just resentment. And this idea, you're quite right. We have to really, really look into him. This is a kind of hysteria, as I said, that he's no different from Starma. In fact, he's probably worse. Starmor at least doesn't seem to sort of manipulate people in an open way. In 2008, he didn't like the fact that Charbi Chakrabati of Liberty was looking into, was opposing various government legislation saying it was a, it was a anti-freedom. And so he said

that he has, she has had late night, hand-bringing, heart-melting phone calls with David, who was then a shadow home secretary. So he was basically implying that she was having an affair with the shadow home secretary in order to do her down and make her seem non-credible. That's the kind of manipulative, unpleasant piece of work this is.

And she, of course, then threatened to sue for defamation of character and he withdrew what he said. So he's a manipulative kind of guy. He's the kind of guy that will say, oh, we should all not drive cars or drive cars slowly, and he drives a car 80 miles an hour and a 40 mile an hour zone.

He is no different from, in fact, I would say he is worse, because at least with Starma, there's a rigid adherence to the rules. With this guy, I think he's obviously quite a manipulative piece of work who's happy to just break the rules. Totally. It's so good to have those examples, actually, because this is a shapeshifting chameleon, you know, from Blair Eye to Corbinista, this is a man who will do anything to stay in power. But there is almost an acceptance at the moment of the fact that this authoritarianism is normal.

And actually, I wanted to point out this post. I'm going to have to censors up in the language because he uses the C word that Khalid Hassan, a Nigel Farage ally, has made. We don't know what the hell is happening. Andy Bleepin-Bernam is not telling us. He's acting as if he's already prime minister. But he's not even taking questions from the media. So we have no clue whether he'll call a general election or not after his coronation. We're all sat here like a bunch of silly seawords who have no clue.

Who will have a go at destroying our lives next? I lived in an authoritarian hellhole and never experienced anything like this. WTF is happening, Britain. And Bernie, this really did make me think of your book, A War to Win Back Our World, because you have looked in depth at what is happening. And presumably the coronation of, of Andy Burnham is just part of the fact that actually our leaders are not really the ones making the decisions anymore?

Yeah, I think that, you know, if you go back to even the Brexit debates, I think there's a huge proportion of society that really would prefer someone else to be making their rules for them. And I think that our politicians feel that way as well. You know, lots of them have had no jobs outside of the people. the public sector, they've worked for charities, they've done some work in unions, none of them have run a business. They've had no real experience in the private sector at all. And they get these jobs as MPs thinking quite idealistically about all the things they want to do with

no economic experience or knowledge whatsoever and a railroaded over by a civil service. And let's think about it, right? The Cabinet office employs over-election. 11,000 people. So your MP doesn't go into Parliament going, right, I'm in charge now, and these are the things I want to look at. Your MP goes in as a junior, literally as a junior and is told what to do by people who we employed but can't vote for. They are not accountable to us and we can rarely remove them. And I just think that Andy Burnham is another one of those stooges pushed in. Now it's just hand. It is a bit handy that he has a similar type of socialist view. But they did the same with people like Liz Truss. If she wouldn't bend to what they wanted, they just got rid of her, right? And so what the book talks about is power and accountability, where it comes from. It's about understanding why governments all across the world seem to be doing almost exactly the same thing at the same time.

Why are they doing it? Where is it coming from? And that's what the book is about. And it starts a long time ago in the early 70s, and it goes right the way through to the next hundred years, because there are plans for those. Not that anyone has bothered telling you, but not only are their plans, but they're costed.

And there are a forecast for profit in those plans. And nobody will tell you. Do I actually think anyone has told Andy Burnham? No. He's just going to get there and be shuffled around by departments that essentially kind of agree with his ideology anyway. I mean, Edward, do you think we have any real democracy anymore in the United Kingdom? No.

But the question is, have we ever truly had it in the way that we would like to think we have? If you go, what we can say is that the nature of the elite has changed. and if we go back 50 or 60 years, you had an elite that was of a rather different kind from the elite we have now. They were an elite that were the traditional upper class, and they had a sense of nobles oblige. They very strongly believed in God. They very strongly believed that they had been put in this position of nobility and of societal power by God, and therefore it was their duty to do things for.

and listen to, to varying degrees at varying times, it should be emphasized, those that were lower down the pecking order. And they had a belief in certain fundamentals, certain ideas that were backed up by the interpretation of Christianity that they have been inculcated with at public schools and so on. What we have switched to now, and that means that was consistent with a certain degree of accepting democracy and accepting that ordinary people,

should have a say. And this is in a context, of course, of a society where people were probably much more genetically similar than they are now. There was less diversity. There was a sense in which society was much more united and everyone believed the same thing. And so this meditated in favor of listening to other people and all this kind of thing. Now we have a society with a very new elite that is atheistic, that thinks of nothing really beyond money, that is inculcated with a very different ideology, an ideology which holds the ideas of ordinary people and ordinary people in general in contempt, and therefore you would expect it to be anti-democratic. We also have another difference, which is that we have intense cognitive stratification. So it used to be that if you were

very intelligent under a society, it wasn't meritocratic, well, you know, you could only get so far. And so intelligence was distributed quite broadly across the society. The person that was the noble, was probably virtually similar to the person that was the peasant in terms of intelligence. This has now changed. So we have a, we have cognitive stratification. We have people that are very hard intelligence that are pushed to the top and other other cognitive traits as well. And they are very different from most people in the society and see them always as another

world as a problem, as something that needs to be controlled, rather than something that's part of the same society with certain fundamental beliefs about eternity and God and that's all the thing. Well, yeah. Because Bernie, I mean, there was a government attempt really to to shut you down When you had been a very successful businesswoman behind lots of big businesses, they had no problem. But as soon as you started calling out what's really going on in the country, for you, a lot of it came over the COVID pandemic to begin with, or convid, as a lot of people call it now, where you gained huge momentum on what was then Twitter is now X. they started to be concerned and you were a threat. And you write in your book about the true personal cost to you when you were actually one of the people who was arrested for a singular tweet,

singular post on X on the day of the Southport massacre. Yeah, that's true. But before we talk about that, can I just talk to Ed? because he is exactly correct. And I really, honestly, I cannot tell you how important what Ed has just said is. Because even going back to the time of Plato, Plato had plans for society where people would stay in their lane. And of course, every single part of our history has been about making systems to control society. And when we look at what's happening now, for example, we are so much better able to control society.

And isn't that a fantastically handy thing? So in the killing of God, which I describe in detail across the West as money became God, because that's where people were headed. And Ed, again, is completely right in this atheistic type of running of our society, in that all religions are equal, equally unimportant. That is exactly how this plan was formed in that people were just units. And when you talk to me about racism, I would say that the new brainy elites,

exactly as Ed describes, pen pushes, right, perhaps not particularly socially adept, perhaps not particularly emotionally intelligent, but what they are is they are mathematically intelligent, statistically intelligent, and they treat the human race as units. And I would consider them the biggest racist on the planet because when you look at society and you see that, the only increase or growth in population is in Africa,

Southern Asia, some Middle East countries. what has been supposed is that those people will be so grateful to come to our country, they'll just consider us much better than them and they'll just schmooze themselves in. And of course, what we're finding now is, no, they bloody won't. Because culture and belief and religion is deep. It's in here. And it doesn't matter what the spreadsheet tells you, you're going to believe what you grew up with and what you inherently.

believed. It's partly genetic. That's the thing. It could. Look, I'm completely happy to go to research what you're saying genetically, but socially. If we look now at the UK, and I will get back to your point down on this, because I think it's really important, is that we used to run countries on commonality, common law, right, where everybody kind of more or less believed the same things.

We were a Christian country. So, you know, if somebody did something wrong, we kind of. of understood where that rule came from, probably the Ten Commandments, which meant jury service was quite easy, right? Jury service is a problem now. Perhaps that's why they're getting rid of it, not because they want to free up court time, but because the juries now have so little in common. You can't have common law when there is no commonality across your country. Now what you have to do is you have to impose. And I think that going back to the position on me, I work in business, right? I'm not an academic. I am a business person. So I understand

opportunity out of bad news. I understand opportunity out of good news. And throughout the whole of COVID, I obviously understood perhaps more than, I don't know, perhaps more than people weren't thinking about it in a business sense. I understood the cost socially and economically. And that's what I was talking about. And I think what really got me into trouble with the authorities was that I gave my services away completely free when lots of other people were charging for it. So at the beginning of COVID, you might remember, there were lots of consultancy companies, including, you know, the CBI and stuff like that saying, come to us and we'll help you. But every time you went to them, they wanted a thousand pounds for a letter.

So I think what really pissed them off was I said, I'll do it all free. Whatever your problem is, if you need to go through your cash flow, you need to talk to your bank, HMRC, you don't know what to do about your stuff, you don't understand furlough, I'll do it free. And I helped hundreds of companies. And I think it made me a kind of a target. And then, of course, lockdown, which was insane, it was not scientifically based. there was no scientific evidence. Consensus is not evidence, by the way, people, just because loads of people agreed doesn't mean they're right, as we found out now.

It was a massive disaster, and the more I spoke sense, the worse that became. So, of course, when I put a foot wrong and I wrote a post and it was a mistake, I deleted it. Absolutely brilliant because here they had a scapegoat that wasn't a Tommy Robinson. You know, it wasn't someone they could say was a racist. It was a normal businesswoman. And that was an excellent scalp to have, right? And that's what they did. They took me.

And Bernie tells the whole story in a war to win back your world, which is now an Amazon-based. seller and it is an absolutely brilliant read. Breaking today, Queen Camilla's shock endorsement of J.K. Rowling. And I have to be honest with you, after so much bad news for the British Royal Family, after my fury about King Charles giving up on Christianity this week, I feel like this is very, very welcome news. Because this meeting is so significant and it is so rare for a senior royal to make such a political statement. So let me explain what's gone on here. So the king and the queen are currently spending their annual week at the

castle of Holyrood where they are in Scotland after the opening of parliament on Saturday. And they're hosting lots of people, right, like John Swinney's been in with the king today and there's a little garden party. but the moment of total significance which had been kept under complete wraps was this one-on-one meeting between the Queen of the Book World and the Queen of England, which the Royal family announced with this post on. Ironically, Elon Musk's ex, yes they're not holding back. With a shared passion for books and a deep commitment to children reading for pleasure, the Queen and author J.K. Rowling have met at the Palispherson. of Hollywood House in Edinburgh. Her Majesty and Ms. Rowling discussed the importance of ensuring that young

people have access to books and the vital part reading plays in opening doors for future generations. But we all know that this meeting is nothing to do with books. This meeting is to do with the Queen acknowledging that it was completely wrong for J.K. Rowling to be cancelled because she simply stated biological reality about the fact that there are only two sexes, two genders, whatever you want to call it. And you know that J.K. Rowley, despite being the billion dollar author of Harry Potter, has been cancelled by slight society. Hollywood turned her back on her. These little shits, who she made household names, who she made millionaires like Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson and Eddie Redmayne turned there back on her.

She took the risk of losing everything because she knew that it was right to stand up against trans ideology as a woman who had previously been abused. And for Camilla to so publicly, not only be prepared to be pictured with a woman like J.K. Rowling, but to post about that meeting is a clear sign that in this case, she will wade into what is considered

a controversial culture war issue, even though, let's be honest, none of us watching think this is controversial at all. But then you see the nutters like Madman India Willoughby posting today, no surprise. Well, first she posted a picture of Diana, by the way. I mean, how pathetic and nasty is that? So she posted a picture of Diana with an arrow pointing down to. would say, and here's a real queen, and then said, no surprise Camilla is a turf, she's got the look. Diana, on the other hand, would have 100% been on the side of trans people. So, total projection, number one, because for India Willoughby, to be criticising a real woman's look is disgusting. And it actually tells you everything that so-called trans people really are all about.

It's not about what it really means to be a woman. It's about what people think being a woman is about if you're not a woman. And by the way, I've said for a long time, it is a compliment to be described as a turf. Being a trans exclusionary radical feminist is something that Queen Camilla should embrace. As for the idea that Diana, that Princess Diana would have been 100% on the side of trans people. You sound as nussy as Prince Harry and Megan Markle claiming that Princess Diana would be on their side rather than Prince William's side. You have no idea. And I think it is total bullshit. So I 100% J.K. Rowling and Queen Camilla for what they have done today. I think this is a picture that will go around the world. And I actually think the Queen has metaphorically speaking balls of steel. because this is like, and I don't give a shit moment. Let me bring in the superstar panel, Bernie Spofforth and Edward Dutton. Edward, look, I know a lot of people are going to be saying,

oh, but it's just a picture they just met up and spoke about books. No, it's not. It's not. For the royal family, they use imagery to send messages. The imagery of the fact that Queen Camilla chose J.K. Rowling out of any other person in Scotland for a one-on-one meeting, and then the fact that that one-on-one meeting was posted about on Elon Musk's free speech platform which had previously banned so-called turfs like JK Rowling is hugely significant.

And after my criticism of King Charles this week, I think it's quite nice actually to feel like we have a sane member of the royal family. Yes, I love that bit in Gavin and Stacey, where Gavin's mother completely despises Princess Diana and loves Camilla, the true love of Prince Charles's life. And I think that what you talked about with India Willoughby is highly significant. I've read a study which found that I think 80% of male to female transsexuals who actually go through with the operation have personality disorders. And in about half of cases, this is something like narcissism.

And there is a world of a difference between Princess Diana, who seems to have had a lot of the traits of borderline personality disorder, which is when you're highly unstable and you're not sure who you are and you self-harm and you have eating disorder, all kinds of manipulative, all kinds of negative traits. And posting that and saying that's what a real prince or real queen is like is so significant because no, no, a real queen should be someone who is stable and reasonable and who understands that this trans thing went far too,

far. It caused us to have to publicly state things we knew were lies. It was an appalling breakdown in all sort of social norms and it needs to be drawn back. And by doing that, she is giving essentially royal blessing to drawing it back. Of course, this is planned. Of course, there are advisors and of course they have some negotiation with the advisors. But I think this is, yeah, this is a slowly the all-powerful state has to admit that in 2020, whenever it was, George Floyd, whatever, that whole, the whole peak of woke, they made a very serious mistake. They went far too far and they need to do things to reverse it. But it has to be slowly.

It has to be kind of reversed slowly, kind of salami tactics to avoid an outrage and conflict. And I wonder if this is part of what we're seeing with the blessing of J.K. Rowling by the queen. but I think that difference between Diana and the Queen is I think very significant with regard to this trans debate. Someone like Princess Diana was an unstable personality who we would expect to be drawn into all this and perhaps someone like the Queen and that's why she's better for the King

is much more stable and reasonable. Yeah, I mean, it's so interesting because I'm actually a massive fan of Princess Diana, but I do understand the point that you're making. I also think that it's completely crazy for India Willoughby to claim that she has any idea what side of the argument Diana would have taken. But I think one of the things that's most shocking, Bernie, is that India Willoughby is saying, you know, Queen Camilla looks like a turf. It's like, what do you mean by that, India Willoughby?

This is the whole point. Like, a woman doesn't have to look any particular way. And obviously, it's totally ludicrous for India Willoughby. be to be making this judgment anyway? I'm just so much more cynical than both of you. I'd say that J.K. Rowling has bought $4 billion worth of revenue to the UK and pays hundreds of millions of pounds in tax. And she's probably said she's going to piss off and live in

Dora where they only pay 4% tax if someone isn't nice to her. So I'm a big fan of J.K. Rowling. I don't really care about the Royal Family. But two days ago they did come out and say that they were the defender of all. faiths. And of course, I think that we would note that in a number of faiths in this country, the trans ideology is not acceptable at all. So maybe if you're going to be all faiths, then you need to consider that not all faiths go along with this nonsense. And as for India will be criticizing women on their looks. There's one thing, right? There's one thing that I

can't do. And I have never done ever. And that is to criticise. anyone on what they look like because you can't help how you were born, right? And I'm sorry, India. But for you to call any woman ugly, which is basically what you're doing, means you're not a woman because chicks don't do that to chicks, right? Not real chicks. Exactly. Exactly. She doesn't have the sisterhood because she's not a woman. And Queen Tumilla and J.K. Rowling do. Yes, that's right. Certain chicks do do that, but those are the kind of chicks that get excluded from the girl gang and from the parties. Yeah, easily led, easily led and easily bullied.

I honestly believe if your only argument is about how somebody looks, you've lost already, listen to them. Yeah, listen to what they say. I think that's a brilliant point, though, that you made. Do you really think, Bernadette, that the government is in such dire straits financially, that it has to do something to butter up someone who pays a lot of tax and might leave the country because if so, that's frightening. But can't you imagine the news?

Can't you imagine the headlines with all the taxes, the wealth tax, the Labour are talking about Burnham coming in if J.K. Rowling says, that's it, I'm off, you're all nuts. It's not going to go down well. And they will lose that revenue. And we are losing thousands and thousands of very wealthy people who employing,

people and who bring revenue to this country at an alarming rate. And look, let's be very clear. J.K. Rowling is an absolute shining beacon of success for Britain. And losing her would be horrendous. So, yes. That makes a lot more sense. Because what I was, it kind of contradicts. On the one hand, they're saying, okay, he's going to be head of all faiths or whatever it is.

But on the other hand, it looks like he's drawing back. They're drawing back something that created chaos. But no, I like the idea that it's just desperation and she needs to be. You know, that's fascinating. Yeah, I wonder if there's others they'll do the same thing with as well that have weighed in. I'm sure. I'm sure there will be. Yeah, I mean, look, for me, I think this is probably a personal decision that the queen has made.

But I like it. And I think it does show you that there is still such power in the royal family. in terms of the visuals, in terms of the optics, in terms of soft power. And I think effectively, we can very much say. Because remember, the royal family don't like to wade into anything, which is like an ongoing political debate, or at least they claim not to like doing that, King Charles. You know, it has been known to on far, far, far too many occasions.

But I think for Queen Camilla to do this today, what it effectively shows is that the trans debate is over. It's over. It's done. Only psychopaths are still going down that ludicrous route. And for Camilla to be pictured there with J.K. Rowling, a woman who just a few years ago was facing the loss of everything shows that, look, we're still in dire straits, there is still a culture war. woke is something that has to be fought every moment of the day, but sanity is coming back. Breaking today, Ricky Jervais, the legend behind the office has finally ditched the BBC for good,

confirming that the 25th anniversary special of what I believe is the greatest comedy ever made, come and argue with me about this because I seriously do really strongly believe that will be broadcast on YouTube, not the British Bashing Corporation. Yet the BBC, in their wisdom, are going ahead with their own special for the show in somewhat of a feud between the original cast members, Martin Freeman and Mackenzie Crook, who outside of Jervais, you could argue are the two biggest stars. to emerge from the office, have agreed to appear on the BBC show rather than Ricky Javis's version.

And it's no surprise, is it that Ricky, who has become an anti-woke warrior, isn't prepared to do business anymore with the BBC, despite the fact that in so many ways they did really make his career back a quarter of a century ago, these days, they're such nutters. They have even recently introduced trigger warnings on the office. office, everything that Ricky Javis stands against. Now, this story was broken by the Sun, which revealed there is a major rift dividing the office stars on the iconic comedy's 25th birthday. Doesn't that make you feel old, by the way?

They report that Ricky Javis has snubbed the 25-year special documentary. Instead, the actor who co-created the Golden Globe winning series and played central character David Brent is fronting a rival bash. The sun can reveal Jervais has swerved the tribute featuring Freeman and Crook and will be making his own special anniversary show, which he'll broadcast on YouTube. Welcome to the party, Ricky. The move comes after the funny man continues to distance himself from the beep in favour of other networks and streamers who are less risk-averse to his near-the-knuckle brand of comedy.

A TV insider said the BBC making a documentary about the office without getting Ricky on board is a huge blow as it spoils their celebration somewhat. It just sums up his lack of allegiance towards the Beeb, which has been drifting for some time now. Jervais announced last Sunday on his YouTube channel he would be making his own documentary celebrating the office which first aired in 2001. He told fans he will incorporate his latest comedy creation, Ali Cats, an animated series set for release on Netflix. His reps told The Sun the comedian wasn't available to take part in the BBC's version,

but remains in contact with the broadcaster all the time about the offers. But it's unlikely DeVase will work with the Beebe again, despite his other sitcoms, extra and Life's Too Short airing on the channel. The comedian's outspoken views on cancel culture and wokeery-wrecking comedy jars somewhat with the BBC's current philosophy, and he's not shy in pointing that out. During an interview with GQ in 2019, he accused the beep of becoming too obsessed with complaints, which resulted in bosses taking less risks in their comedy commissions. He said, I wish it was braver, I wish it wouldn't bow down to pressure from media or from one complaint.

That has got worse, and the days are gone when people say we're leaving it as it is. Commissioning editors are scared of being fired. In June last year, the son revealed the BBC had slapped trigger warnings on five episodes of The Office on iPly. player over fierce discriminatory language may offend viewers a move that led left fans flabbergasted. Two years ago, the son revealed that Jervais even turned down a role on the BBC's biggest show celebrity traitors, joking the broadcaster couldn't afford me. He then shared a laughing emoji in response to one fan who remarked the BBC, they couldn't afford the lawyers, never mind your fee. So what I love about what Ricky is doing, right, is these days he literally just goes live on YouTube

when he feels like it on his own channel and that's where he announced this news watch. It's the 25 year anniversary of the office. Next month, 9th of July, 2001, it went out. I've got a few little surprises. You know about one of them, the Brent bottle. I've got some t-shirts you can get as well. And I've made a little program.

just for youtube top secret uh i'll tell you about that nearer the time and so yeah office 25 years coming soon uh the alicats trailer's out we're doing a special trailer again a little a little a little well it's not a secret i'm telling you about it but we're doing an alicats trailer for the office 25th it's like a crossover the alicats have done a little trailer for the office 20th 25 years. So look forward to that. I hope we like it. And yeah, subscribe to my YouTube channel. I'm building this up and the special office documentary will be on here. I think around the actual anniversary. Yes, Ricky. I love the fact he's joining the YouTube revolution. I really do. We have no commissioning editors. We have no producers telling us what to say. It's the

perfect place for him to be. And let's be honest, it's no wonder that Jervais doesn't want to work with the BBC again. Do you remember he received this grilling earlier this year by the woke grandpa John Wilson? Listen, do you ever consider that your jokes, though, may give your audiences or people leaving a theatre after a stand-up show, some kind of license to let their own prejudices go unchecked? That was one of the many criticisms that people aim at a comedian when they do a joke that they don't like. Or if you joke about a bad subject, that might make people think

it's okay, right? Which is a nonsense. It's not... So, people joke about dark subjects all the time. I can't wait for the day when someone is in court and the judge says, why did you rape and murder all those people? Well, because I heard a joke about it

and I thought it was probably all right to do. Yeah, but maybe it's not as dramatic as that. No, it isn't. No. What I'm thinking about is the guy who goes down the pub and makes jokes in front of other people about mental disability or some kind of physical disability or something that you have created scenarios about

on a live stage. So you mean... But if they do it in the pub, then they don't have the same comic context that you do. So I should say, don't try this at home, is what you're saying. I assume they do. To the superstar panel,

author Bernie Fawforth and Edward Dutton of the Jolly Heretic Channel on YouTube. I mean, Edward, personally, I think it's amazing that Ricky Jervais is joining the YouTube Revolution. I mean, he's been here for a long time, actually. But increasingly, he just thinks, well, I don't need to work with the bloody BBC to talk about 25 years of the office.

I'm just going to do it myself. And I think increasingly, you're going to see lots and lots of major stars do that, and it will improve their work. Yes, exactly. I've actually done some statistical analysis on this. I haven't published it. But I've statistically proven that the period between the 1970s and about the year 2000 was the golden age of British comedy based on public ratings of how good they are, basically how funny they are. And I suspect the reason for that is that you had a period where you had a conservative ideology and this suppressed what you could say and what you could do and how you could be funny.

And then you had a period where there was a liberal ideology, which was in favour of equality and harbournance. And this suppressed what you could say and what you could do and how you could be funny. and you have a period in between of ultimate freedom, essentially, where there's a united society that has a united set of values, which is still the hangover of the conservative society, where you are united in what you kind of think and what you believe as a society, where you are secure as a society, because you're not being invaded and suppressed and so on,

and so you feel you can poke fun at in a good-natured way yourself. And then once the woke starts to take over, once the runaway virtue signaling by neurotic people that are socially anxious goes too far, then, of course, you now can't be funny, you have new taboos, you have new things you can't challenge. You have no united society because society starts to polarise into mutually warring

microcosms of hatred. So there's no common cause, no common thing you can satirize. And then you're left with this regime comedians, as Nick Dixon calls them, that are satirizing. It's almost like the communist saying, the Tsar's spies are still around the corner in 1960s, Russia. You know, they're satirizing something that's no longer

the power and the new power they don't touch. And I think that period between the 70s, probably about 2000, was therefore the prime period, the golden age. Yes. And then you have this, Gramskine Marx through the institutions, of course, by the left,

and therefore you can't touch these things. You can't be genuinely funny because you can't suspend disbelief. If you know, the comes propaganda, you know you're being got at. And once you're being got at, you can't suspend disbelief. And when people are insecure and neurotic, they don't feel, they don't feel able to just reflect society back at you in a funny way.

They feel that that could, that could, that could mean that you could go over to the other side and you could, and you could, you could, you know, you could cause warfare and you could bring them down. And so therefore, you have to inculcate them with, with the ideas through the comedy. And then ironically, it's just, it's just bad comedy. It doesn't work. It's not funny. And so you can't produce it.

anymore. And to the solution, once those aspects of the regime were overtaken, whether it's universities or whatever, is then a parallel system. And that's what is gradually developing, a breakaway system, a parallel system, like how you had Oxford and Cambridge taken over by the Church of England, so you had dissenting academies. But in terms of comedy, you have that. And he knows, you couldn't make it. I've made some notes, you couldn't make that now. It was reflecting what it was like working in an office with no clear political message. I mean, there was the joke about how, what was I tell? He's a father.

He doesn't have children. He's gay. Well, he shouldn't work with animals then, should he? But that joke, for example, that would be exactly the kind of thing that people would have said in the office at that time. It would be exactly the conversation that would be had, but you couldn't have it now. So what they would do if they made it now is they would be inculg. There'd be a transsexual working in the office, and it would be normal. Half the office, there'd be a black person working in the office, and no one would ever comment.

comment on it to anybody else. It wouldn't be, it couldn't be realistic because it would have to present how they think things should be because they're afraid if they don't, because they're mentally unstable and they've taken over, then you will move away from Big Brother and there may be a revolution. So he's right. Oh my God, you are so right, Ed, Edward. That is absolutely fascinating analysis, but you are completely correct in terms of,

I think that is why the office was so brilliant. You were so right. It was that sweet spot. in society. We hadn't started hating ourselves. The BBC hadn't started lecturing us at that point. But Bernie Edward is also so right to say it would never be made today. Not in a trillion years. And by the way, not just by the BBC, I don't think any mainstream broadcaster today Bernie would make the office. And this is the problem. We're a society now where we never see ourselves reflected on screen as a result. No, but you know what?

You know what? I often say free speech costs, and it depends how much you can afford to pay. So what you'll find is those with nothing to lose because they're very poor will say whatever they think, because so what? Those who are incredibly wealthy, like J.K. Rowling,

who's been so stand up for women, and Ricky Jervais, also can care. less, right? Because what can you do? Elon Musk, take all my money, take everything, I don't care. He's another one. And then you've got the people in the middle, the cancelled. Because the cancelled, now don't care either. So I think what you're getting is as more and more, I call them extremist hunters in the book, you know, like the witch burners, where they're snitching on everyone who's broken the slightest code or laughed at the wrong joke, right? As those refusenics get larger and larger, that group that says, I refuse to do this,

I can't lose everything I've got, I'm too rich, I've got nothing to lose, I'm too poor, and you took everything away from me already in the middle, then those people will make comedy. Will it be on the BBC? No. Will it be on ITV? Doubtful. But they will make comedy and it'll be on YouTube and it'll be hilarious. Yeah. And I think that's why. Ricky Jervais is sort of saying, actually, I'm going to just come to YouTube. Let's try YouTube out. Now, if YouTube stays uncensored, which it didn't used to be, really, let's be honest, but things have changed and it is currently unscensored, then I think Ricky Javase will stay here. But look, stand by you too, because I want to reveal today's Greatest Britain and Union Jackass, which we have nominated. But first, to some of your feedback, and thank you so much to the super chats. Craig Lee, NUFC, says,

are a minority worldwide, 10 to 12%, exactly, which is why so often you have non-white people ethnic minorities talking about themselves as the global majority. So actually, we are a minority and we should be protected, right? And no one should be concerned about us talking about that. Real Thinking Monkey says Michael Gove should go back to comedy. It's about Great Reset Tyranny, says Gove is the snake in the grass. Norah says Burnham is an internationalist. just like Stama, he pretends to care about Manchester while he has sold it off. Stephen Garner 854 says Burnham will do as his globalist masters tell him, just like Stama. April, R4205.

Says people are so stupid now. Burnham is the most obvious fraud in a century. And Gab 8407, very happy about the queen posing with J.K. Rowling. Wow, got to give Camilla this one, good on you, mom. Tim OGB says the office was brilliant, although Stephen disagrees with me and believes that only falls in horses is number one. Sorry, Stephen, you're wrong there.

Honestly, the office. I once was very delighted when Ricky Javais replied to an article I'd written, which did say, The Office is the greatest comedy of all time. I know a lot of people say Fulte Towers, but for me it's not. And Uno Reverse 11 says, I'm not usually a fan of posh people, but I like jolly heretic.

He has proven. He is about it and he is brave to respect. Do you consider yourself posh, Edward? No, not really. I went to state school, but I've inherited a posh accent from my father's side of the family and sort of stuck with it. Well, we like it. We like it a lot. Okay, so Edward has nominated John Major as today's union jackass for being completely out of touch with the British people and his pro-European comments. Bernie Spofforth has gone for Michael Gove after that car crash interview with Michelle Dubry. and I went for Alistair Campbell, the war criminal for defending Burnham dodging questions from the media. I have to say, it was pretty close today. In third position with 27% of the vote, it is Edward and John Major, the runner up with 35% of the vote, is Bernie and Michael Gove. I feel so guilty, guys, because I've won two days in a row.

But it's Alistair Campbell. Today's Union Jack has the worst print in the world today, with 38% of the vote. but Edward, in light of our comedy theme, you have an excellent nomination as today's greatest Britain. Yes, yes, B'elope Keith. Yes, I just feel that she, the kind of comedy, first of all, I think she was an outstanding individual, but secondly, I think the kind of comedies that she was in, which we couldn't make now, are from a different time, a different England, where the purpose of comedy

was to gently poke fun at ourselves and to reflect our own society back to us and unite behind in the communist house of laughter and all relatively united people. And so I was particularly sad that she died. I've had into her once at Waterloo Station and she was very friendly and I was particularly sad that she died and I think she's the greatest Britain

that's been in the papers of late. Brilliant choice. Brilliant choice. Edward Dusson, who is of course a YouTube star in his own right alongside Ricky Jervais on this platform. You can find her. at Jolly Heretic, the excellent, excellent channel. Do make sure you subscribe. And Bernie Sponforth is the author of a war to win back your world.

Do you know this is on the Amazon best-selling list now? And I'm reading it. I am currently reading it. As you can see there, I was reading it in the sun the other day. But no, in all seriousness, it is a brilliant, brilliant book. So thank you both a superb superstar panel today. We're moving over to Substack now. We're leaving YouTube to move to Substack

another free speech platform. Our Royal Mastermind, Angela Levin, is standing by and we have the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow coming up. You can join us at www. outspoken. Live. We'll be back with you tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern 9am Pacific.

Do you know what else is happening at 5pm UK time tomorrow? The England football match. The knockout. But we are live. don't worry we are live there are lots of people who watch around the world lots of people watch on delay and we'll keep you posted of the score as we go i'm sort of dreading what the live numbers are going to be like tomorrow but i do hope you're with us 5 pm uk time non football fans come on please be with me here tomorrow and most importantly i promise to keep fighting for you