Dan Wootton Outspoken - DANNY TOMMO HITS BACK LIVE FROM PIDDINGTON AS LABOUR TRIES TO MAKE PATRIOT PLATFORM A TERROR GROUP

Episode Date: September 17, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: A senior Labour peer has started the process of attempting to BAN Danny Tommo’s the Patriot Platform by turning the peaceful people’s army into a terror group. This despicable deep state over-reach to criminalise honest, non-violent and completely lawful working class folks trying to save Britain comes as Danny Tommo visits the Oxfordshire village of Piddington, which has just voted to leave the Disunited Kingdom over a shocking invasion of illegal migrants. Danny will be joining Dan live to reveal what’s happened today and respond to this shocking new government threat. Then joining us on the Superstar Panel: Kathy Gyngell, the Conservative Woman founder who is now behind the brilliant and must subscribe Substack Right Times with Kathy Gyngell, and independent broadcaster Tom Sullivan whose interview with former Zelenskyy aide now turned critic Iuliia Mendel drops today on his brand new YouTube channel. PLUS: The Putney Pusher suspect is dead, as his family blame the Metropolitan Police after he was shopped to the cops, possibly by his ex-partner. We’ll unravel this shocking story. AND: Shocking new revelations from the royal book of the year, as King Charles publicly goes to war with Princess Diana’s brother Earl Spencer. Royal commentator Lee Cohen joins us to analyse the brand new extracts. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Lady Colin Campbell joins us for her explosive take on the breaking royal news. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Visit BetMGM casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor,

free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. No spin, no bias, no. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 584. And breaking right now, a senior Labour peer has started the process of attempting to ban Danny Tomo's Patriot Platform by turning the peaceful people's army into a terror group. I mean, Shakrabati, who also served as Labor's shadow attorney general between 2016 and 2020 to 2020. She's accused the group of appearing to incite violence and intimidation.

while describing its uniforms as a sign of a private army. This despicable deep state overreach to criminalise honest, non-violent and completely lawful working class folks trying to save Britain comes as Danny Tomo visits the Oxfordshire Village of Piddington, which has just voted to leave the disunited kingdom over a shocking invasion of illegal migrants. So Danny is going to be joining us live imminently to reveal what has happened today, but also hit back at this shocking. new threat from the Labor government. Then joining us on the superstar panel, Cathy Gingell, the conservative woman founder who is now behind the brilliant and must-subscribe substack right times with Kathy Gingell, and the independent broadcaster Tom Sullivan, whose interview with former Zelensky aide now turned critic, Uliam Andell, drops today on his brand new

YouTube channel. Also coming up on the show, the Putney Pusher suspect is dead, and his family blame the Metropolitan Police for what they believe is a suicide after he was shocked to the cops, possibly by his ex-wife. This is a shocking story. We're going to unravel it. And stand by for major new revelations from the Royal Book of the Year as King Charles publicly goes to war with Princess Diana's brother Earl Spencer. Royal commentator Lee Cohen is going to join us later to analyze extracts, which are just about to drop. We'll have more on that with the latest. Lady Colin Campbell over on Substack 2. Union Jackass time. I am nominating Shammie Chakrabati for wanting to turn the Patriot platform into a terror group. Tom has gone for Michelle O'Neill,

Sinn Fame's First Minister of Northern Ireland, who has been trying to break up the UK this week when her party's MPs don't even sit in Westminster. He asked, does she want to break up over text? And Cathy Gingell has gone for Sarah Malalley for subversion for desecrating the Christian faith. she is meant to shepherd. This award ceremony, and look at it, is her most recent in a Christian of anti-Christian act, to give a man an award who upholds Islamic blasphemy laws and the death penalty that comes up with them. And here is the meeting between Malali. You saw it there and Hafiz to hear Ashrafi, who she gave this award to. The lady next to him, completely covered up, is apparently his wife. Do keep your superchats coming in.

Stand by for Danny Tomo. Let's go. The Deep State and MSM attempts to continue the Islamist takeover and daily invasion of the disunited kingdom grow sicker and more twisted by the day. Because one of the Labour Party's favourite leftist lunatics, Shami Chakrabati, or should I say, Baroness Chakrabati since she's been deployed to the House of Lords to oversee the destruction of Britain, has today called for Danny Tomo's Patriot platform to be banned. Yep, Shakurati, urging her mate. in Westminster to outlaw Patriot platform as a terror group. This from the Independent,

Labor's shadow attorney general between 2016 and 2020 hit out at the group, she says, appears explicitly to intend and incite violence and intimidation and whose uniforms signify a private army. Chakrabati was a high-profile critic of minister's controversial decision to ban Palestine action, under terror legislation, which she suggested had led to the prosecution of many peaceful protesters. But she added, it's perhaps understandable that we choose to forget. But we have been here before in the 1930s, with gangs of well-organized black shirts and citing violence and seeking to intimidate. Freedom of expression and association is precious but not without limits. Surely this is exactly the sort of case that prescription under the Terrorism Act was designed for. Meanwhile, over at

GB News, GB News, which up until now has been completely quiet about the Patriot platform, Well, they've used this negative news to finally decide that they are a national topic of conversation. Well, Shami Chakrabati in other news is calling for Patriot Platform to be prescribed potentially as a terrorist group. She says that Palestine action has been. And she says, you know, on that basis, Patriot Platform should be too. Did you notice anything there? Not one mention of the People's Army leader Danny Thomas. Indeed, when mentioning the group again, Tom Howard and Emily Carver, the hosts, failed to mention the group's boss.

And the former leader of the campaign group Liberty has urged the government to consider banning the Patriot Platform Group behind those anti-migrant protests in Dover and Portsmouth, where masked men took to the streets. Yes, this is Shami Shakrabati, who also served as Labour's shadow attorney general between 2016 and 2020 to 2020. She's accused the group of appearing to incite violence and intimidation while describing its uniforms as a sign of a private army. Let's face it, these hysterical calls to label these men as terrorists are all a result of trying to stop courageous Brits rising up just like the village of Piddington has. Piddington, which sent a message to the establishment

that they are willing to leave the disunited kingdom in order to stop the invasion of illegals in their area. Now, this was highly significant. Pittington's population, only 300, but overwhelmingly voting yesterday to succeed the UK and pursue self-determination. And the results are as follows. We had 285 yes votes.

And let's be honest, the courageous women of Pinnettys, and just did some simple maths. They just used their brain, realizing that if you import, well over 1,000, I mean, some people say it's going to be 3,000 illegal men who are rapists, who are murderers, who are terrorists, who are sent here to pillage us, to destroy us.

If you send them into their area, that poses a serious risk to their safety as they are totally outnumbered. To the women of Parliament. We are the women of Piddington. We are mothers. We are grandmothers. We are widows.

We are workers. We are worried. We will be outnumbered. And that's why, despite a deranged campaign by the BBC and Victoria Derbyshire, Danny Tomoe has stuck with his pledge today to travel to Pittington to speak to these residents. He wrote, the media went to Pittington to turn this situation into a circus. The politicians went there to score political points. I am going there because the Patriot Platform are the only ones who can actually help. If the authorities and the government refuse to step in and protect women and children,

the Patriot Platform through lawful, non-violent, non-intimidating mass resistance will give the communities of this country hope, hope that they can make a call, and we will come. This is happening in every major city and town in the country. We are building an infrastructure so that every community can have a local resistance, movement ready to step in if needed. That movement will become the biggest voting bloc this country has ever seen in three years' time. Millions upon millions of working class men and women do not vote. They do not trust politicians. They do not even bother with politics. All of that is about to change.

I look forward to meeting the residents later this afternoon. And Danny Tomo has just had those meetings and he joins us now live from Pittington. Danny, so brilliant to have you back on outspoken live from Pittington today. And of course we've got to speak about Pittington and we will speak about Pittington in depth. But I have to start, Danny, with this chilling piece of breaking news today. You probably knew that they were about to come for you. But are you surprised that this very high profile labour individual, Shackri, Shami Chakrabati, has started the process of attempting to designate Patriot Platform your organisation.

as a terrorist group? Not surprised in one bit, so it's always going to come. When you do things with integrity, you maintain the absolute discipline of how you wanted to do things. They're legally, their hands are tied in terms of you have to commit the violence.

You have to commit the intimidating actions to be able to be arrested, to be able to be convicted, to be prescribed. Now, when we've read it, refer back to other organisations that have been prescribed. I mean, we're talking about organisations that are ramming, you know, lorries into buildings and hitting police officers over the back with sledgehammers. By the way, they got away with that. Palestine action, you're talking about.

Palestine action. So we will expect this to happen. And those at the top of the organisation have spoken about this, they will come at every angle. They have attempted to do that with my personal life with my mother and my family, my being pulled over dramatically in the car the other day. And, you know, it's going to get worse. But the thing is, Dan, is that we will stick to our rules. We will stick to our discipline because we're not doing this for hate. We're doing this because we love the country. We see what's happening.

We all know what's happening. And the men and women of the Patriot platform are preparing. Because you remember, Dover was a test run. It was a dummy run. It was to see if it could be done. especially with the lawyers in the background speaking to the police. And, you know, everything was done on the basis of maintaining, you know, a level of complete and utter discipline.

So they can talk about us all they want. They can say with this. They can say with that. But they have something that we have something, sorry, that they will never have. And that is the public support. We have the grassroots public support. Let me put it this way. Since Saturday we went to Dover, we've had 26,000 sign-ups.

Wow. people actually joining the platform. Joining the platform. And let me make it very clear. Change the website so that you actually have to verify your details. So before we had a few thousand lefties that had basically put some details in. That system's now changed so that now you have to actually verify who you are. So those are credible members now and we're going through that least.

And Dan, let me put it very clear. I'm sat in Pinton at the moment. I'm actually sat probably a two-minute walk from the main entrance of the camp. Let me make something very clear. The last couple of days, the mainstream media have attempted to paint these people as lefties that deserve it. They've tried to use individuals. They've found the most loony lefty one they can find, which we know about. And they've attempted to paint these individuals, these people, this community here, as left.

They deserve it. Let him get on with it. Danny, don't bother. Don't you're wasting your time. Let me be very clear that this community here, the outcome. of that election was only 30% of a turnout 20,000 of these individuals here didn't vote. And let me tell you, the ones that I, there are 15 residents through that door. I've spoken to three. I've spoken to three.

Excuse me a second. Let me just register that phone. I've spoken to three and we're now going to be going on. We've been to the camp. We've managed to show the front of the camp and what that's like. And let me tell you, the people we're meeting are just normal mothers, normal grandmothers, normal men that see what's happened around the country, they see the reports, and they're rightly worried. But I need to make it very clear as to why I'm here and not other places. And that is for the reason alone, is that we have to start somewhere. Right now, there are no men in that camp. And what we are going to do is we are going to put a plan in place, legal, lawfully plan, to help this community in a way that has never been done before

because the people that have come here, the media have come here for a circus, the politicians are coming here for political points, the Patriot Platform has come in here to help. And when they go down the legal route that they're currently going down, we know where that's going to end, when all of the options have been exhausted,

you know, and I've asked the question to every single person I've spoken to, would you welcome the help from the Patriot platform? And there'll be a video that's going out tonight on my YouTube channel, which will show you those interviews and you'll see how they feel about us, how they view us, and what we will do for them,

and what we'll do for the rest of the country. That is the most important point. We have to start somewhere, and I believe this is where it's shown what can be done. Yeah, it's ground zero of the coming civil war, isn't it? Danny, a couple of things before I get to the specifics of Pittington. So even on yesterday's show when we were talking about the vote, and the Patriot Platform was a big part of it,

we had Dr David Starkey here, very recently. expected guy. And he was totally opposed. And I tried to explain the rationale to him. He got very angry as a result. He was totally opposed to the idea of you in balaclavas. Can you explain to people like him, to people like Nigel Farage, to people like Richard Tice, why the balaclavas are necessary. Yeah. So it was, I was actually the view of as to why it's so important. I mean, I was the only one that they know and they can come for at this point because I was in turn, wasn't wearing a balaclav in some of the stages they could identify who I was. What then happened was a targeted government henchmen attack, not just on me, but every member of my family.

The reason that they did this is to intimidate me and said, like Tommy said in the interview is so that every member of your family is crying and every member of your family is asking you to stop and what they've done to my mother is just one of the you know is unforgivable my mom will never be able to return back to her house you know and this is because the daily mail docks to yeah they they allow a child to connect the dots to get the address that they could they they're the reason that's why they put them the business name out now dan let me put it this way if the if the if the journalist hadn't gone to my house the day before,

spoken to my mother, my mother explained she lives on her own, she's a grieving widow, who is still very, very depressed due to my father's death. The fact that they went there and spoke to her, she confirmed that it's not my address, confirmed she lives there alone, and we've got to think of Van Wittaker, we've got to think that that would have been,

a meeting would have been had to say, look, do you need to include that they could have set, they did it, they knew that when someone types in that business into Google, it's going to come up with a mother's address. They knew that. So they knew that the individuals that want to harm me and intern my family would go to that address. And then in the space of six hours, we had a credible threat that was taken to the highest level of the CID in West Sussex Police, where I spoke to direct to, of a credible threat to my mother's life

and that they advised her and continued to talk to her. She can never return to her home. That's me. that's what they did to me. Now, if these men are unmasked, these bricklayers, scaffolders, you know, working class men, I've said this before, the roads that you drive on and built by them, the houses you sleep in, every aspect of it is built by them, they are the backbone of this country, if they show their faces, they will be picked off, they will have their work, they'll lose their jobs, their families will suffer, their whole life, they may have to leave their homes. you know, we were clapped by every member of the Dover community in Dover, apart from the lefties that didn't even after the legal letters were given to them,

they didn't believe that migrants were committing crimes. They were telling us that it's a conspiracy that migrants are committing crimes and that white men do it too. And if I have to keep saying, we understand that this country has a prolific issue with white men committing crimes against women and children. I agree with that. So why the hell would you import more? And, you know, so we're at a situation at the moment where you have to cover your face.

If you don't cover your face in some respects, you will be targeted. And as long as we're not committing any crimes, we're not being intimidating in an action sense, in any actions that we're doing, we're not committing any criminal offences. That's why no one's not my door, because they have nothing on us. They have not done anything. And you have been absolutely categorical on that, that you will. not commit any crimes. So how did you feel... They, listen, it's the MO of the organisation. Number one, as I've told you before, no alcohol, no drugs, no violent, no thuggery, no intimidation, no fighting. We've dealt with a few

members, not that were there and doing, that we felt we're going, you know, someone was drinking the night before, before this went off. They were thrown out very, let's put it this way, very forcefully, and they were told to never return. We will not just not accept racism. We were not accept violence, we're not accepting. Because this is too important for the future of this country. We're doing something, Dan, I told you. We're doing something different in a way that's never been done before to get results that we've never had before. So, Danny, how did you feel when you've had this very successful day of action in Dover with no arrests, no violence? How did you feel, I don't know where you were, I don't know who told you, how did you feel when you saw the video of the

reform UK leader Nigel Farage describing you and your men as disgusting. When I saw it, it just took me back to when he called us knuckle drivers when we were walking down. The guy doesn't understand that the working class have the power to turn this around. The end goal for the Patriot platform, which I've made very, very clear, is we are going to make it absolutely fashionable by all of the members and their families to prove. Remember the Ukrainian flag was put on everyone's profile in the support of Ukraine or even when the COVID jabs, everyone put a cut. We're going to make sure that everyone proves on social media

from our members and the public that they are registered to vote and we're going to have lines and lines and lines of working class, women and men standing at voting booths when the time comes to take hold of this country politically. My message to Zia Yusip was very clear. You carry on talking about. us in that way, then you will not get the vote and you will not win. Because listen, other parties and other individuals who have come out in our defence, but as I said, I maintain our

neutrality on this. We're not, we're not, we're not, one way or the other. But we can turn, the 12 million working class men and women in this country, we can turn, activate them at the point we need them. We can take, we can put anyone, even if they're a new party and they've they've only been going for a month. We can put whoever we believe at the time is the right candidate, the right party locally or nationally, it doesn't have to be reform or restore.

It can be something that we believe that we'll put together in 15 months' time. You know, because, Tan, when you have the voting bloc, and you have that many voting, 12 million, you sway every local election, you sway every national election,

and you take hold of the country politically. And so that's how you think you will end up with political power because you will be able to effectively say to your millions of patriots, okay, in this particular seat, we're going to back this particular candidate rather than actually going all in on one political party. It's very simple done. We hold the power. We just don't use it. It's crazy that we have to use what they're doing against them. You know, they've put a political system in place, which is first past the post and all this stuff. We're going to make. the system. So they lose. They're going anyway. And I said this to Zia Yusuf. I say, you know,

they have, you're going, you're going out. You're going out. You're going out. So anyway, so go out with the bank. Stop the boats. Now, it's not just about the boats, Dan. It's about the lorries. You know, I've got, I've, I've been contacted by numerous lorry drivers who used to transport stuff from France into England. They're saying, mate, mate, they hardly check any lorries. 100%. And they are, they are in the back of, these lorries crowded and, you know. Thousands, thousands, thousands a day. 100%.

It's like they can't cover up the boats. That's the issue. They can cover up the lorries. Not to mention, by the way, Danny, all of the people who come on the planes perfectly legally and then never leave. But then have you heard of Manchester Airport? I mean, we're, we're going to be,

we are, see us as the union for this country. I have people contact to me from every corner of this country that works for different organizations, different companies that are sending me stuff that I can't release, which is proving that they are bringing them on mass on planes. And I'm talking plane after plane. And they don't go through the terminals. They go off the planes, straight into the coaches, straight to the facilities like Manston. So they're coming. You've got the planes. You've got the boats. You've got the lorries. Then you've got to come in the front door. It's insanity. But I will say this. The reason our

concentration so heavily is on the boats is. because I do understand from the research I've done that when you come on the planes, when you come on the planes, you do have to prove who you are, you are allowed to do some checks. The men that are coming through the boats, that we have no idea who they are, what their criminal records are, where they've come from, what their intentions are. So, you know, there's a huge part of this that isn't being spoken about more, you know, and we're going to go into that as this progresses. But right now, I am from next week traveling the United Kingdom.

I believe, as I said before, and I've said to Tommy, within six months, we will be able to activate between 5,000 and 10,000 people with one text message and within a couple of hours, those individuals will land wherever we need them to land. Not for violence, not for intimidation, not for threats, but for pure patriotism and love for their country. Simple. Danny, you are in Pettington today and it's incredibly important that you are there because the BBC, the British Bashing Corporation, as I call it, tried to make your presence. the story. So the story wasn't Piddington voting in record numbers to stop this migrant invasion. The issue was that you were going to visit. And you were described as the far right by Victoria Derbyshire. I just want to show you, Danny, what happened on this episode of Newsnight.

... from some about the far right exploiting villages like Piddington. Have you heard of a guy called Daniel Thomas? He's a hard right anti-immigration activist. I'm thankful for him that he's going to come by himself to start with. Why? Can I ask you, have you heard of a man called Daniel Thomas or Danny Tomo? Yeah. What do you know about him? Have you heard of Daniel Thomas, Danny Tomo?

Yeah. Okay, so he's an anti-immigration far-right activist. So what did you make, Vicky Spratt, of the real fears from some of those residents that they could be exploited by members of the far right? Right. Denny, they introduced that woman, Rachel Marge, who seemed to be... I mean, Tommy Robinson described her a village idiot.

Watch this. Right. Do you mean people from outside? Yeah, I mean, more worryingly, people from outside. I've also... Like who? The Patriot platform. Yeah, he... So that's Daniel Thomas's.

Yeah, Daniel Thomas is obviously quite vocally in many outlets expressed his wish to make this his ground zero. Many of the members of his battalion are convicted for violence and I would say that that is extremely concerning. He doesn't know the people of this village. He doesn't know my children who are mixed heritage and I don't think he's welcome here and I think that the parish council have also maintained that so I am wondering why he feels entitled to come here now. What's your response to Victoria Derbyshire and the village idiot Rachel Marsh? What a sausage.

Listen, it was always going to happen. You get the village idiot and you put them in front of a camera and you tell them basically this is what we kind of want you to say. That's why she was prompted to make the questions and the answers that she was giving. Anyone, and this is what they did, Dan, they tried to use this to paint a picture of Pittington and all these local communities here that they're left. wing, they voted for it, they deserve it, let them go on with it. Well, let me tell you now. There are 15 people outside that door and I've spoken to a few already and the love they have for what we're doing and what we potentially will do for this community. I mean, it speaks for itself and you'll see that this evening on the interview, the interview

programming I do with the video. So you've had a positive response today? I've had no negative. All I've done is that news reporters follow me in cars and then I've done done a few Ui's and then I've made them come this way and then gone that way and all this. And do you know what is funny, Dan, because I'll be honest, I travelled for two hours to get here and I needed a week really badly. So I've gone to the local sports hall. I'm not sorry, sorry, sorry, village hall. I just popped to, I'll spoil the toilet quickly. And I went to the toilet, came out, and they're all there with their cameras, you know, take, you. And yeah, so it was, it was just, they're the circus here.

These people have genuine concerns. Please, please, please believe me that this is, We're not here just because what about the rest of the country? Absolutely. Totally understand that the rest of the country needs the same help. Nees the same help. Sorry, one second. Now that's fine. Danny, just while you're sorting that, let me ask you,

why do you think GB News, which has covered the protests or your action in Dover and Portsmouth, for a long time decided not to talk about the Patriot Platform at all? And even today when they finally did decide to mention the Patriot Platform because of these calls from Shami Shakrabati for you to become a terror organization, have militantly decided not to name you. The name Danny Tomo has not appeared on GB News. What's going on? Yeah. I mean, I picked this up with some of the lads in Patriot Platform. I think it's weird that you've got the GB, you know, that was supposed to be our savior of the media.

in this country and the people that were supposed to give us the real news and the way, you know, the way that we want to see it. And every other out there, every other media out there, every news channel, everyone was talking, mentioned, this isn't about me and I don't want to make it about me. I'm just someone that's trying to make it work. But they were very hesitant to talk about it at all, the picture platform. They made a few comments about it. And listen, I think it's something to do with Nigel. I think they see how powerful Tommy is. and they understand that imagine what it would be what's like a type of cup of team that me and Tommy would be

and I think that's probably coming to take this to the level it needs to go to and they're scared, they're worried that we'll hold the power of the voters we have to stop blindly giving these these parties are absolute votes just on the fact that they're saying good things they've been saying good things for years stay neutral let these let them beg for your vote

don't give it to them you know and that's what we're going to do the break shut platform is going to say neutral And then when that safe opens in three years' time, you know, it'll be up to them to convince us that they're the right candidates. And that's why I think maybe something to do in Nigel, don't talk about him too much. You know, don't make him into, you know, a figure like Tommy. Because then, yeah, because imagine the power.

When Tommy, you know, finishes what he's doing at the moment, you know, you know, things are going to be made very clear. I can't say any more than that. But it's about to get real for them. It's, let me tell you, it's about to get very real for them. They think I'm their problem. You're waiting until Tommy gets involved. Danny, it was ironic yesterday

because at the same time that Shami Chakrabati was preparing to suggest that you were a terror organisation. The Patriot platform, I think, was proving what a positive force you can be when you are needed. And of course, there was a tragic end to this story. But you immediately garnered your troops to help the police search for Little Baby Nower. Now, unfortunately, while you were helping do that,

his body was discovered at the bottom of the lake, and it was absolutely tragic ending. But I just thought it was quite a shocking moment where you actually have like a split screen. You've got the mainstream media saying terrorists and you're gathering your troops to actually support the police in a search for a young boy. And I only did that.

I only did that. I spoke directly to the father and he asked for us, but let me make it very clear. Before that even happened, that boy's same age as my son. Exactly the same age as my son. And the night before,

I was doing everything I can to get everyone to put it everywhere because I knew if it'd been taken, maybe we could get to a point where the person wouldn't be out of the area. So I did everything I could. And then when I then got the word from the police, that they would be happy for us to come.

And then the dad contacted us. You know, we had hundreds of lads turn up all over the place. And we were, we were about 150 feet from where he was found when we actually found out. So, yeah, we were, we just, we just sort of crumbled, really. But you had spoken to his dad. So again, that's really misinformation. isn't it when people are trying to say, oh, why are they turning up?

He messaged me and he said, he said, I know you've been trying to highlight this, Danny. He said, and I know you want to help. He said, we need all the help we can get. And it's such a positive difference. That's the thing. It's a positive difference. And that's why when people criticize the Patriot platform, it's like, what are you doing?

Sitting on your ass. And this has been the point that you've made for a long time, Daddy. You think a lot of people are talking too much. I mean, sometimes we've had cross words about it because obviously I do believe talking is very important as well. But why on earth are you going to criticize people who are actually getting off their ass to do something? Yeah, yeah, absolutely.

Yeah, I mean, like I've said, we've become too normalised and to digitalise to think that everything, all we can do is just talk. You know, and we've got to take it back to the times of our grandfathers, you know, what they did for us compared to what we're asking our men to do. I mean, I mean, the contrary,

they went to war, bullets, you know, landing craft doors. Everyone's, my grandfather saw three, four, his best friends die in front of them. We're just saying right now that we have a plan, lawful plan, that has been put together by ex-military, ex-SAS lawyers,

and they are saying, as long as you stick to the principles of what you're, what we've all agreed here, There's nothing they can do. All they can do is make your brakes not work and you have a car crash. That's probably what I believe is coming potentially down the road for me. You think I'm going to try and take you out. Yeah, I don't want to be confused, but I think if they can't change it

by subscribing you because they can't because there's no legal basis, no violence. You know, we know what happened to Diana. I'm not saying I'm anywhere near that, but they need a problem gone. And when the problem gets too loud and when it's not, because there's a, they take me out that the platform isn't about me Dan yeah I might be the spokesman and might be the top at the moment but we've I've made sure in the last few weeks that if I go this carries on it's happening right now there's me I went to a meeting the other day there was 50 new lads into that meeting there's a meeting happening at half past seven tonight there's another 80 lads

up north it's and they all understand the MO they all understand they all understand how this needs to be done and Dan, anyone steps out of line, anyone tries to take it a different room. I mean, listen, we had hundreds and hundreds of men, but we have the right men. That's the difference. These are not football hoodigans, these are not far right thugs,

these are dads, these are husbands, these are, you know, they understand the importance of doing this right. And we will build this. Dan, we'll be doing this for two and a half months. Imagine what it's going to be like in the year's time. You know, we will have control of the United Kingdom in a legal sense in a way where...

And you think, Tommy Robinson will join after his court cases. No, no, I can't explain what I mean by that. No, no, I don't think the platform. What I mean is Tommy will be doing something very soon, which will take this an asset to the Patriot platform that is currently missing. But I'll become apparent

what that is very, very soon. And then it's a game changer. I mean, the connections as well, we have the ability to make sure that the narrative, which is the right narrative, which is the truth, which is under Jesus Christ, and the reason why we do what we do as Christian men, the narrative will maintain, will be maintained and we'll make sure

that as we know, Dan, I mean, until I apologize to you, because obviously I thought you were mainstream until I really worked into him, Tommy said, no, Dan wouldn't. He's one of us. Get on there now and speak to him. But what Tommy's going to bring to the table will bring an element of this that we have full control, like we did in Dover, and that will become very apparent very soon. Yeah, I mean, I think the mainstream media is the enemy now. Yeah, 100%. And it's interesting for me, because of course, I used to be part of it. And it was very different. No, no, no, but it was very different.

When we set up GB News, it was a very, very different proposition to what it has become today, which is a mainstream PR vehicle for Reform UK. And they want to be mainstream. They want to be part of the establishment. It has changed. The Daily Mail, the Sun, it is absolutely disgusting to see these news. I mean, the Daily Mail was meant to represent Middle Britain. The Sun was meant to represent working class Britain,

yet they write about you and Tommy Robinson as if you are the enemy. And I think that is why these mainstream media organisations are dying off. And I think they deserve to die. I think they have to die. And obviously, I'm not talking about dying in anything other than a business sense. But I really, really do believe now that mainstream media is an enemy of the people. You can't go onto an independent website. why, you know, the independent,

without them trying to sign you up for a monthly thing because they're losing so much support. And they understand that, you know, the slander, the labels, the lives they've ruined. You know, they will never be trusted again. And this goes back to what's going to be coming down the line. You know, we're going to be taking every element of the destruction of our country and taking control back from them and giving it back to the people.

And that's going to be very, very interested here. And I'm about to, like I said, in about five minutes, I'm about to interview this other lady from... Pington. And make it very clear, the other ones I'm talking to today are also from the scatter, very close to where the entrance of this facility is here. You know, they're going to be walking down the main road to go to the shop, which isn't in Pettington. It's in another village, which is down that way. So, you know, to think this is just about one little village. It's not. Exactly. And it's going to be impossible to avoid these men who, let's be honest, are in large part. And I know no one in the mainstream will say this, but in large part they are criminals. I mean, my view, Danny, is they're criminals simply for being here anyway, but that's before we get to the evidence of the rapes and the murders and the terrorism they are conducted.

Speak to the mother of Riannon White, Chauvonne, if you really want to understand what these men can and will do. So look, Danny, I'm going to let you go. I know you've got your work to do in Pittington, but let me just remind everyone. Danny Tomo is now available on YouTube, and this is where you are broadcasting a lot of what you do, unedited, unfiltered. It's been brilliant for me because it means that we have this raw resource where we can actually take what's going on without any type of filter from the mainstream media and people can subscribe directly to you there, can't they? Can I just say thank you to you, Dan, because out of everyone, you know, I don't speak to any media

and when Tommy told me to, you know, that you were different and I just want to say a big thank you to you to you because you've woken a lot of people up yourself and with what's going on on the Patriot platform, you know, you've been a big help in getting the message out. So just a big thank you to everything you're doing, Dan. Thank you so much. Well, look, the outspoken audience very, very much behind the Patriot platform. So it is brilliant to have you here today. Danny Tomo, live from Pittington.

Thank you so much. Let me bring in my superstar panel. Of course, no mainstream media here, totally independent. Tom Sullivan. He is behind the brilliant new Tom Sullivan YouTube channel. And Kathy Gingiel Alfay. from Conservative women who has now joined the Substack Revolution and has launched her very own page. Now, Cathy, you have been a long time Tommy Robinson supporter, and it was something that saw you very much

marginalized, I guess, in the mainstream media. How do you feel about Danny Tomo and what he's doing with the Patriot Army in this pushed by Shammy Chakrabati to try and get them designated as a terror organisation? Gosh, how am I going to get it out? First of all, huge congratulations on an extraordinary interview. I hope David Starkey watches it, and I hope Michael Farage watches it. I had a row with David yesterday about this. Yeah, I know, but they don't know. They're so scared still of the far right meme.

It's extraordinary. They are so scared of being totally outside establishment approval, and both of them with the greatest respect in the world, keep a foot in there in the way I certainly do. because I dissented on lockdown and COVID from the start. And, you know, you either are going to slightly seek establishment approval or you're not, and that is their fundamental weakness. So they're not listening and they're not understanding.

So for Farage, the worst thing that can happen to him is still to be called an Islamophobe. Well, I'm out and proud as an Islamophobe. You know, we've got to begin to walk towards the far. But I thought the interview was extraordinary. I thought what an inspiring young man. I thought every, I think there are a lot of middle class people who are behind him just as much as the working class if they get to see him and hear him

and see his commitment, his patriotism. These are not Mosleyites. Mosleyites were anti-Semites. Oh, and my only criticism of you, Dan, is for heaven's sake, introduced Shammie Chakrabati as hard left. Every time you give her name, call her hard left. Because she is a hard left nuttons.

What did I call it? I think I called her a leftist lunatic. But yes, a hard leftist lunatic. When we don't say she's Lady Duda from the House of Lords, say hard left lady from the House of Lords who got there on the back of being in Corbyn's shadow cabinet government and in charge of their appalling attempted cover up on an anti-Semitic investigation into the Labour Party.

She has no credibility, zero credibility. Don't give her any. And this is one of the things about the mainstream media. They always give these people credibility. And they either ignore people like Danny Tomo or Tommy Robinson or they label them. We have to do the reverse game on them. And you do, you do. So it's not really a criticism. But she is a quite appalling woman with no credibility at all in this game.

No, indeed. And you're completely right, Kathy, because she is treated by the British bashing corporal. as if she is some sort of moderate figure. This is the extraordinary thing. And they would never interview you or me or Tom. Not that we'd want to go on, but you understand what I'm saying. Tom Sullivan,

your take on what Danny Tomo is doing? Can I just say I think it should be far left, not hard left, because I've recently quit a reasonably promising career in what I would say is traditional media to take quite a big risk to myself and just try and go it alone online on YouTube, on X, whatever it is. And one of the things which drives me crazy is the amount of times a day I hear from, don't want to talk about my colleagues, but it's true. I don't really care anymore. The phrase far right, far right, far right, far right, far right, far right, far right, this.

And I try to explain to people, if you look at the political spectrum, you have the centre, the left, the right, and then you have the fringes, right? So if a position is held by the majority of the population, if all the parties are saying, in theory, they're against, you know, they want to get a hold on illegal immigration and bring migration down, but then never do it. If you have working class people like Danny and then you have people, middle class, very middle class people, in Piddington, all screaming at the top of their lungs, we don't want this. Why, you're not on the far or the fringe of the political spectrum, are you?

So the meaning of words are just lost. So just on the protest, ideally, I don't want to live in a society where people cover their faces. However, until very recently, until I quit my job, I lived and worked in London. and every single day I would see very dodgy looking men on illegal electric bikes, bombing down 100 miles an hour, God knows doing what or going where, with their faces covered. In COVID, I thought I was going to go insane because I was told to cover my face, which I didn't to the best of my ability, and everyone else had to cover their face.

And another thing I saw or see on a daily basis are, women with their entire faces covered. So this is all fine. It's even fine for our supposed patriotic right-wing parties like Reform and Richard Tice. But when it's Danny and his group protesting against the state-sanctioned invasion, let's call it what it is. The state is sponsoring its own invasion. They go crazy. And the reason they wore masks, as he explained, is because his whole family were doxed. And these are normal people who, you know, I'm quite fortunate. I was able to quit my job because I'm a middle class journalist and I have savings and I have contacts and I said, right, I can do this. I've got a bit of a cushion. I'll see if I can make it work.

a lot of people who are part of the Patriot platform probably don't have that option. If they get docs, if they get fired, that's going to be very bad for them. And, you know, in London, you have things like the Ashura, Shia annual protest, and you have the Al-Quds March. You know, why are any of these not banned? Why is the Berker not banned? And I just want to read a journalist friend, a British journalist friend of mine, told me today, he said, he dreads being caught up in one of those marches I just mentioned,

because the last time he went near them in Trafalgar Square, of all places, he was surrounded, they demanded he hand over his phone, which he was using to film them. And he said they were being extremely aggressive, loud, exclusionary and intimidating. Why don't they go march in a field instead of cutting up a main London artery during rush hour? So I bet most of your views, Dan, heard of the Ashera protest or Al-Quds Day, but they've all heard of Tommy's protest, sorry, Danny's protest, and the Patriot platform and Portsmouth and Dover, because I remember it was the top story on sly news and other channels for days. So like everything in this country, it's two-tier. And yeah, I don't know what to say to Shammie Shackabadi, you describe them as a

terror organization for what it's insane. And for her to say that they look like an armed group when we are literally importing thousands of armed men from war zones, which she would presumably defend and say they're victims. It's just insane. This is a crazy story. And it is a difficult story. But I want to talk about it honestly.

The Putney Pusher has killed himself. Or at least the Putney Pusher suspect has killed himself. And you probably remember this story from over a decade ago. An unidentified man nearly pushes a young woman into the line of fire on a bus. And of course, she could have been killed. It was an absolutely horrendous situation. But it now emerges that after the suspected man who had been arrested by police in recent months broke up from who is believed to be his ex-wife, she shopped him to the police.

At least that is the claim. And now he's dead. Was any of this really necessary? Watch. A 44-year-old private banker arrested on suspicion of police. being the infamous Putney Puscher has been found dead. Nicholas Brandram was detained at his home in Chiswick, southwest London, in June, on suspicion of attempted grievous bodily harm.

The arrest was linked to a notorious 2017 incident in which a jogger shoved a female pedestrian into the path of an oncoming double-decker bus on Putney Bridge. A traffic coming on the right-hand side, so it was really quick. If you think about it, life and death was just a couple of inches. I would be a victim now, so this woman was a victim too. Earlier this month, he was released under investigation

while police continued their inquiries. His family have now spoken out blaming the police. This story revealed by the son, the details are extraordinary. It is worth me just taking you through them. They broke overnight that the prime suspect in the Putney Puscher investigation, has been found dead at his home.

The wealthy banker Nicholas Brandrim, who was 44, and his body was discovered at his home in Shizik. Now, this guy is a descendant of Queen Victoria, who came from European royalty. He had served in the army too. Police described his death as unexpected, but not suspicious. We all agree that it is most likely that he took his own life, even though there has not yet been official confirmation of that. The son reported the former army officer was under investigation by police over the Putney Bridge incident in which a jogger pushed a woman into the path of an oncoming bus on the 5th of May 2017.

No charges were broad. Shocking CCTV images showed the 12-ton bus narrowly missing the. woman on the bridge spanning the River Thames in southwest London. Detectives interviewed 50 men and arrested three suspects, including an American investment banker who wasn't in the country at the time. The investigation was wound down the following year over a lack of any viable leads. His arrest followed his separation from his second wife, with whom he had a young son. The family is believed to have lived in Fulham, not far from Putney Bridge. It is understood police were contacted by someone close to his estranged wife about information about the Putney

Puscher. The banker was held on suspicion of attempted grievous bodily harm. While in custody, he was further arrested on suspicion of possessing class A and B drugs, believed to be cocaine and cannabis. Now, that is something that often happens, isn't it? If you're arrested for a particular crime, the police search your house, they find drugs, you're then going to be charged for that. His bail was cancelled last week, but detectives informed him he was being kept under investigation, though without any conditions or length of time. So this was just going to go on and on and on and on. He was going to live this nightmare waiting to be revealed to the public forever.

One source said he felt like he had become a hate figure for the entire world. He was a brilliant man with many talents but was also very human. It is a tragedy. Brandrum was a decorated former British Army captain who served in Iraq, Bosnia and Afghanistan during his eight years service between 2004 and 2012. He was awarded a Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal during his distant relative celebrations in 2012. After leaving the army, he went into the city

and became an investment banker at leading stockbrokers' killkick and co. He later became a senior advisor in HSBC's private finance branch, handling funds totaling tens of millions of pounds. The wealth management expert received rave reviews from clients and colleagues. So just think about this for a moment. A guy who served his country, who developed a great career, made one mistake which resulted in the deaths of no one. And it is not a mistake that I can defend. But let's just think about this for a moment. He divorces and the family believe that the ex-wife shopped into the police. I hope she is taking a good, long thing about that decision today. But the family are actually blaming the Metropolitan Police, claiming as well that he was innocent. This new statement is pretty damning.

They say, this is the family, say that Brandram killed himself after months of immense pressure caused by the Met Police investigation. These are the exact words from the family. The Met Police knew he was not the part of the police. Putney Puscher. And yet when Nick died, they had still failed formally to clear his name. That is a source of profound grief and anger for our family. There was no forensic evidence linking Nick to it, no evidence placing him on Putney Bridge at that time, and no credible evidence that he was the man shown in the footage. In fact, the evidence proved the opposite. Despite that, the police chose to arrest Nick

rather than invite him to attend an interview. And after that criticism in the last hour, Sly News has just reported a news statement from a clearly worried metropolitan police. We've now had a statement from the metropolitan police themselves. They say our thoughts are with Mr. Brandram's family and friends at this deeply distressing time. We recognise the significant impact his death will have on those who knew and loved him.

We also understand the strain that being subject to a police investigation can place on individuals and their families. The investigation remains ongoing. Following Mr. Bramden's release under investigation, it was made clear that inquiries would continue while officers progressed, outstanding lines of inquiry and forensic examinations. This remains the position,

and further investigative work is ongoing. Investigations of this nature, particularly those involving complex evidential and forensic work, can take a number of months to complete as officers gather and assess all available evidence. as is required whenever a person dies following previous contact with police, a mandatory referral was made to the Independent Office for Police Conduct, and that is today.

Now look, I am very clear on this. It is hugely important when someone takes their own life that there is not a blame game because it can happen for a whole multitude of reasons. and this man was clearly going through difficult divorce, clearly using drugs. But I do sometimes think, and trust me, I know all about this, when deranged ex-partners go on vindictive campaigns to destroy someone's life, maybe just maybe sometimes the police should just tell him to rack off.

And what the police shouldn't do is drag people. through years and years of unnecessary investigations, because this can be the result. And I appreciate its difficult story because, yep, the woman could have died. And then there would have been a murder or at least a manslaughter investigation. But she didn't. And now the suspect is dead. I want to bring my superstar panel in on this, the independent journalist time.

Tom Sullivan and Kathy Gingell. Kathy, this is a really difficult story, isn't it? Because no one is saying for a single second that the actions of the Putney pusher on the bridge that day were excusable, that they were not. But as far as you've told the story, we don't have any proof it was finally here. And the family say it wasn't. The family say it absolutely was not. So I think what's happened in this country to innocent until proved guilty?

Well, it's gone. The MET police seem to have an extraordinary ability to decide what to investigate and what not to investigate. I mean, if you look back, I know we're going to be talking about Princess Diana soon, but why did the MET police choose not to investigate on the Dyson inquiry about Panorama and the BBC? That was extraordinary. They would have been better spending their time doing that, frankly. But the other thing, the point that you raised at the end very quickly, because I know we don't have enough time, will be the feminization of the police force

and the feminization of the legal profession in which the sort of white toxic male, the bad husband, the woman's always the victim, is getting a huge amount of force and being almost built in and institutionalised into the family court system and into the legal processes by very aggressive, again, extreme feminists.

And I think the police have probably, I don't say it in this case, I don't know. We just don't know. But in certain cases, as the police will have also been infected by this. And the thing is, Tom, it does look like it may have been an ex-partner, potentially an ex-wife who shopped him to the police. And I just think people really sometimes need to have a good hard look

at the lengths they go to following breakups. I mean, I just think my first thought is this one. what the police spend their time with, an accident which could have happened to anyone. How many times, on a daily basis, does someone driving an illegal bike in London, which goes 100 miles an hour, which police do nothing about,

almost kills someone, and it's on CCTV, but it's never looked into. My phone was grabbed out of my hands in a posh part of central London on a very short walk that I do every day a few months ago. My interaction with the police was outrageous. A few months before that,

I was so angry at them because they're so useless. A few months before that, I was literally detained by a migrant of sorts, most likely illegal, aggressively, in the middle of just in the view of Parliament. And I called the police and the police started accusing me of racism because when I described him, I said that he was shouting at me and had a foreign accent. She said, oh, why does it matter? He has a foreign accent. I have a foreign accent.

I said, yeah, well, I speak free languages fluently. Like, what are you talking about? I called you here. The police, Dan, are a joke. And the fact that with the amount of crime going on in this country, I think there's a feminization of the police themselves, probably. They focus on this. You know, even the media framing, they say that he was a banker.

Well, he was also a veteran that, you know, was in Iraq and Afghanistan and Bosnia. So, yeah, it doesn't surprise me. It's a sad story. But as you said, no one died. It's an accident that happens all the time. It fits a kind of. a story and narrative. Once again, the media are a joke and the police are joke. And it's one of the

reasons why I've actually decided to leave the country and go move in Cyprus, which I'm doing next week, because I just don't want to live in this city anymore because I don't trust the state to respond to crimes that they should and ignore crimes that they should ignore and to not import people who pose a danger to us, but then make law-abiding people who, you know, have a dodgy X, vindictive X, or may or may not have done something which was an accident and nothing bad happened of it, make them the enemy. Okay, this is extraordinary stuff. Breaking right now, Princess Diana's brother, Charles Spencer, has in his new autobiography,

not only claimed that the then Prince of Wales sounded giddily elated on the night of Diana's death, but he has recounted a conversation with the then-princess when she told him that she was about to divorce the future king, that Charles was in love with his valet. His valet is a man. Michael Fawcett. This is a long, widely discredited rumor trying to suggest that our king is gay. I mean, I think anyone who listened to the Squidgeygate tapes

between him and Camilla knows that this is a man who has a great love of female anatomy. Let me put it that way. But what this does is take this growing war between Charles Spencer as he releases this new book and our king to an extraordinary new level. So all of these revelations have just dropped in the new extract, the first extract, actually of this bombshell royal book, which has been serialized by the Daily Mail. So what we're going to do is take you through it all, then get analysis from our superstar panel, the Royal Commentator Lee Cohen of Tea with Lee, Kathy Gingell of the Right Times on Substack, and the independent broadcaster Tom Sullivan.

But brace yourself, guys, because this is shocking stuff, which I'm just trying to get my head around at the moment. So first of this reporting from Tom Sykes of the Royalist, who has summed up exactly what Charles Spencer is trying to do. Charles Spencer is trying to now put out a rumor into the public domain that the king was indeed gay. He writes, Charles Spencer says Princess Diana demanded a divorce after she discovered the existence of a love affair between Charles and his valet and has said that the future king sounded like a lottery winner on the night that she died. Swan Song, my sister has been serialised in the Daily Mail ahead of publication next week. And in the first excerpt Spencer describes being asked to lunch at a fancy London restaurant by Diana, who told him she was going to seek a divorce. He warned her against it.

And she replied, but Carlos, that's the nickname, just to complicate things. That is the nickname that they called each other. So she called him Carlos and Earl Spencer called Diana Dutch. and Diana says, but Carlos, my husband is in love with his valet. The valet is a man, okay? Michael Fawcett. Sikes report Spencer does not name the valet. He does not need to anyone who followed the collapse of the Paul Burrell trial in 2002 will know exactly which door Spencer is kicking down here, Michael Fawcett's.

The rumor that Charles had a sexual relationship with Fawcett was the great rumor of the early 2000s. It was originated with George Smith, a former Welsh guardsman, and valetian. in the prince's household who alleged in 1996 while in the throes of a mental breakdown, that he had been raped by a senior aide to the prince, and separately that he had witnessed an incident involving a member of the royal family and a servant. Diana Smith said taped his account. That tape was said to have been kept in a locked mahogany box that Burrell told the old Bailey he had seen in her apartment and the contents of which vanished after her death.

What was in it has become a central mystery of the Burrell affair, and Royal Watchers will know that case comes. collapsed because the late Queen Elizabeth II personally intervened. In November 2003, Smith's allegation of a sexual relationship between the Prince of Wales and Michael Fawcett was repeated in a legal statement given to the mail on Sunday. Fawcett took out a high court injunction to stop its publication and the Guardian went to court to win the right to name him as the man behind it. The Prince's private secretary, Sir Michael Pete, then issued a statement denying the allegations

and questioning the trustworthiness of the unnamed Smith as a seat. source. Forcett was Charles's valet. He famously squeezed the toothpaste when his master's arm was broken playing polo, but when bullying complaints in 1998 forced him to resign, he was reinstated and actually promoted. Pete's inquiry published in 2003 found no evidence to support the rape claim or a cover-up, and Forcett was cleared of the most serious accusations, though the report faltered how the complaints had been handled in the 1990s. Clarence House stated publicly that the allegations were entirely without foundation. Now, of course, we know that he went on to run the Prince's Foundation before resigning in 2021 over a cash for honour's scandal. Smith died in 2005. Nothing was ever proven,

but here's the key line from Sykes. Now Diana's brother has put her alleged own words on the record. The reason she wanted out was that her husband was in love with his valet. A man. I mean, we're going to get to all of these revelations about what apparently happened on the night that Diana died. But Lee Cohen, this is pretty contemptible stuff. Because as far as I'm now concerned, Earl Spencer, who I believe is a malign force, remember, he's had three of his own divorces, a huge amount of accusations about his own behavior towards his former wives, desperate for money to pay for a new divorce, hates King Charles, hates Prince William, aligned with Prince Harry, and he is throwing some of the most despicable mud at King Charles,

including this claim that there was some type of an affair with Michael Fawcett, which really doesn't add up, does it? Because if we look at everything that Diana was deeply concerned about, for example, in Andrew Morton's tale of her life, it was all about Camilla and Charles's deep love of Camilla. And as I said, we heard in the Squidgey Gate tapes just how physically attracted Charles was to Camilla. So how do you feel, Lee, about the fact

not only that Charles Spencer is effectively claiming that the King had a gay relationship, but the fact that he now seems to almost want to destroy Charles's reign? Well, Dan, you summed all of that up so well, where to begin. First of all, a man on his fourth marriage with a trail of very public divorces and contemporary reports of affairs during his first one is in no position to lecture anyone on family loyalty or moral fiber. I mean, it's so unbelievable. But let me start by saying that I am so sick to death of people like Earl Spencer and his name. nephew and niece-in-law using the royal family as a soft target when they're just trying to get on

with it and do their jobs. You know, Spencer, first of all, what he's reporting, you said alleged her, Diana's alleged words. Those are certainly alleged words and we weren't in the room and we'll never know the truth. But to me, it seems like he's just as just as Harry did, In his autobiography spare, I believe that Earl Spencer is trying to throw every salacious piece of gossip into the mix here to shock and to sell books. And it is so disgraceful to his supposedly beloved sister's memory that he is doing this. It is ghoulish and despicable. Yeah, indeed. Indeed, Kathy Gingell, I just want to read you the extract because I don't want to be accused of taking anything out of context here.

Of course, he hasn't named Michael Fawcett, but to me it's very clear what he's saying. So this is the actual wording from the book, which has now just been published by the Daily Mail in the serialization. So, Earl Spencer writes, this Diana's brother. one day Diana asked me at very short notice to join her for lunch at San Lorenzo, her favourite London restaurant. She looked down at the table and said, Carlos, I'm going to get divorced. I was silent for a moment. I had known things were bad, but not this bad. Well Dutch, I carefully replied, you of course have my full support. I know you'll have thought this through. But my main worry is the public. I fear they won't forgive you.

they've brought into a fairy tale and I reckon they may well wrongly blame you for destroying their family. When members of our family were questioned, they were adamant that Diana, oh sorry, I've actually just gone to the wrong part of the extra and let me just go to the next part. She looked up at me,

we've literally just got this in, she looked up at me, nodded and said quietly, but Carlos, my husband is in love with his valet. I gulped, well, I guess in that case, you really don't have a choice. She did not name the member of staff, and I never asked her who it was, or why she would believe such an improbable thing. It was not important the end of her marriage and of her dreams was. Well, I'm sorry, Kathy, if it wasn't important and it wasn't probable,

why the hell have you just included it in your book, you scumbag? He knows exactly what he's doing. I suppose he does. And I suppose he's after money. I looked him up and he certainly doesn't live all the time at the big, all-thought-house and everything. And it seems like he's done a sort of good job doing all that up. But my take on all this, and I've never been a Royal Watch,

is that they're also deeply dysfunctional. These are all awful, selfish people. I'm afraid I would take that into parts of the Royal Family too, or the ex-royal family. And they don't know how to behave. and his Spencer's, Charles Spencer's finest moment, in a way, of course, was his amazing speech at Diana's funeral that the younger ones in this audience won't remember,

but it was truly Shakespearean. And it was an impassioned speech on behalf of what he felt to be his wrong. Well, do you know what, Kathy, let me interrupt, because actually you're completely right in saying there will be a lot of people who do not remember that speech. And I did actually prepare a little bit of it because this is why he became famous. And what's very interesting when you listen to this part of the speech,

is that he actually always hated King Charles, then Prince Charles and the British Royal Family, because he made this dig during the speech that it was the blood relatives. The blood relatives were going to be the ones to look after Prince William and Prince Harry. And the point that he was making is basically the royal family won't do a proper job. We will. Watch this. She would want us today to pledge ourselves to protecting her beloved boys, William and Harry, from a similar fate. and I do this here, Diana, on your behalf.

We will not allow them to suffer the anguish that used regularly to drive you to tearful despair. And beyond that, on behalf of your mother and sisters, I pledge that we, your blood family, will do all we can to continue the imaginative and loving way in which you are steering these two exceptional young men so that their souls are not simply immersed by duty and tradition but can sing openly as you planned.

We fully respect the heritage into which they have both been born and will always respect and encourage them in their royal role. But we, like you, recognise the need for them to experience as many different aspects of life as possible to arm them spiritually and emotionally for the years ahead. I know you would have expected nothing less from us. Okay, so you would have thought at that point, right, watching that speech, oh, well, he must have been someone who was incredibly close to Princess Diana.

They must have been BFFs. Absolutely not. Absolutely not. They were estranged at the time of her death. Look at this, for example, from a report published in the Evening Standard in 2012, Diana's brother had written to her in April 1996, saying that after years of neglect on both sides, their relationship was the weakest he had with any of his sisters, and that he had become a peripheral part of her life. Worse, Spencer accused Diana of being a fickle friend who was manipulative and deceitful. And Victoria Arbiter has also actually produced receipts

to show that this claim that there was some type of clash between Earl Spencer and then Prince Charles in regards to Diana's funeral was denied on the record, at the time, by, wait for it, Earl Spencer. himself, who said in a statement, this is in, of course, September 1997, those crazy months, we were united in the aim of giving Diana a suitable funeral and all arrangements up to, and including the service were agreed amicably between the Lord Chamberlain's office and myself, the Lord Chamberlain is a Buckingham Palace official.

So Tom Sullivan, my argument here is that we're not really, we're not really getting the truth. because Diana's relationship with Charles Spencer had collapsed by the time she died. Well, in that clip, Dan, that you just showed, he promised that he would protect the boys, right, Harry and William from the same type of, I assume he's talking about media circus that she suffered from and that caused her so much agitation, among other things. But by doing this salacious book,

and serialising here and basically making money of it, I assume, so many decades later, is he, and bringing up, you know, what will be painful memories and discussions, which will not be pleasant for anyone, is he doing what he promised, which was to protect them? Doesn't sound like it. Of course he's not. William is absolutely opposed to this, Prince William.

And this is going to be hurtful and painful to him. one of those boys who he claimed that he wanted to protect. But guess who is on though, Tom? Prince Harry. Confirmation today via the mainstream media, two outlets, well, one outlet, which has close ties with the Sussex's page six in the New York Post. Confirmation from them that during Prince Harry's visit to Allthorpe over the summer, he was made aware of the contents of this book. Now the Daily Mail says he didn't read the book. Harry doesn't really read, does he?

So that's not a surprise. But the point is, he knew about it. So he knew that his uncle was about to slag off his father. I mean, it's just nuts to me. But look, I want to actually get into these damning new extracts about what happened on the night that Diana died. But as I say, I'm putting it out there from the off. I do not trust Charles Spencer. I do not trust his motivations.

but we do have to listen to what he's written, because obviously this is ricocheting around the world today. So he writes, I was at my home in Cape Town, alone with my four children, when I learned that my sister had been killed. Interesting language, isn't it? Had been killed.

The phone next to my bed rang in the middle of the night. It was my sister Jane calling to let me know that Diana, whom we called by her childhood family nickname Dutch, short for Dutchess, had been involved in a car crash in Paris. She apparently had an injury. It might possibly be a broken leg, but nothing more than that. Jane's husband, Robert Fellows, was the Queen's private secretary,

so I felt confident that he would have access to accurate information. Despite the reassurance, I padded quietly downstairs and turned on the kitchen TV. The gravity of the crash had yet to sink in. The tone was, as had somehow become normal since her divorce a year earlier, patronising, misogynistic and dismissive. Such constant carping criticism had long been encouraged by Diana's enemies in the palace. There was no compassion for a human who must be in distress. And then on perhaps our fifth or sixth call that night when escalating dread had us both floundering a bit for words, I heard my brother-in-law Robert talking in the background on the workline in their home. Oh no,

he half-ballowed half-side in disbelief. And Jane, witnessing the complete, of her shot relayed to me in a soft voice, that's it. It's curtains. Dutch is dead. To many, the death of an icon who had become a backdrop to their lives might have been too bewildering to comprehend that morning. But to me, awake for hours, it was immediately clear that the paparazzi had recklessly endangered, then snuffed out Diana's life, claiming the driver and Dode as clashable damage. The phone rang constantly. Prince Charles caught me as I cross-landing upstairs. Unlike my other callers who was stunned, barely able to articulate their condolences and offers of help, he sounded giddily elated. Like a lottery winner, I remember thinking at the time.

He let me know he had informed William and Harry of their mother's death first thing that morning in their bedrooms at Balmoral. It all sounded strangely matter of fact given the enormity of the disaster. Looking back now, I suspect the prince's first reaction must have been to think more of how this event might free him to marry the woman he loved, rather than appreciating the loss of one, he did not. It can be hard to feel too much sympathy for an ex-spouse or those who care for them profoundly after a bitter divorce. My sisters knew that Diana had always wanted Mozart's Requiem to be played for her after her death. But when I passed this on, it was rejected as a possibility. No part of a requiem can be played at a Church of England funeral, I was told.

I later found out that was not the case, the first of several untruths that the authorities would push my way at that time. Against this backdrop, there was no thought of anyone in the royal family talking to me directly about the funeral arrangements. As was usual, such a delicate and personal interaction was farmed out to a courtier. Lieutenant Colonel Malcolm Ross proved to be a classic clip voice old Etonian guard's officer whose role at Buckingham Palestine was controller of the Lord Chamberlain's office. this placed him in charge of ceremonial and official events that the Queen was to attend. He always treated me with extreme courtesy. When during our first conversation he passed on his condolences, Diana's loss,

he clearly meant it. There were others in the palace I already knew who were relieved, indeed pleased that she had gone. During one of our phone calls, Colonel Ross seemed about to ring off when he added, oh, another thing, it's been decided that the two young princes will walk behind the princess's coffin. Well, that's not going to happen, I said in a matter-of-fact tone.

It was a suggestion that struck me as utterly barbaric and quite out of the question. By this stage, I had learned that Diana had left me as her son's guardian. This was a role without legal function while the other parent lived, but it made me feel empowered to speak on Diana's behalf with William and Harry in mind. I knew that she would never have wanted her boys to have to undertake such a a public ordeal. Well, the Prince of Wales says it is, Ross repeated, assuming that would end the matter. No, I said. I'm afraid it's not happening. Diana would never have wanted to put them through anything so ghastly. A few minutes later, my direct line rang again. It was Prince Charles,

sounding markedly less upbeat than when he had last spoken on the morning of Diana's death. I gather you've got a problem with the funeral arrangements, he said testily. No, I don't think so, I said. My mind on the structure of the service as it was coming together. But I gather you've said you don't want William and Harry to walk behind Diana's coffin. Well, of course not, sir. Diana would never have wanted that. But I did it at Lord Mountbatten's funeral.

That's Charles's response, Spencer. But you were 30, sir, and he wasn't your mother. And Spencer claims that Charles went nuts. that's the problem with your family. I've got no bloody sense of duty, he started before descending into a general rage. Prince Charles continued his stream of anger without me interrupting. Then he stopped. I assumed the pause signalled an effort to bring himself under control,

but then he unleashed down the phone what I have always taken to be his pent-up contempt for Diana and his horror that the world was so bold over by her death. Rest assured he hissed, we'll forget her soon enough. I was so stunned that it took me a few seconds to reply. I can't believe you just said that. I said flatly before hanging up. And of course, that was the line that went around the world yesterday. Rest assured, we'll forget her soon enough.

I later found out from a friend in Downing Street that among the senior figures in the Queens and Prince Charles's households, there had been a lot of discussion about who should walk behind the coffin. Prince Charles was insisting that he wanted to do so. It is hard to see why, given his feelings for Diana. Also an ex is never expected to act as Chief Mourner at their former spouse's funeral, but he was adamant. Sir Robin Janvran, the Queen's deputy private secretary, told the committee planning the funeral that if Charles went ahead, then I must be persuaded to walk with him. This was out of fear that if Prince Charles walked alone, members of the public might shout abuse at him.

The committee realised that if they could persuade William and Harry to be there too, that would surely guarantee against insults flying. he then talks about the day of Diana's wedding. Okay, so we're going right back now. And he says, I woke up early and went to Clarence's house where I found her already in her wedding dress, sitting quietly in front of a mirror. Only much later would I discover that as she confided to a close friend, her husband to be had told her the previous day,

that she needed to know he was very happy to marry her, but he was not actually in love with her. Diana had to absorb that hammer blow while also feeling certain that Charles was entering the marriage with his heart elsewhere. I mean, look, we do know. Charles was in love with Camilla. This is sort of irrelevant, though. She didn't say it to him.

It's just reported speech to someone else. They then also spoke about this very, very famous incident. When Diana found this bracelet that Charles had bought for Camilla. and he says that the catalyst was Prince Andrew's 21st birthday party. He was also a guest there. And he says that Charles had shown next to no interest in her. And she deeply hurt, confused and increasingly concerned, dance with others, including me.

Immediately after that evening of escalating heartbreak, Diana went to see my father. She told him she could not go through with the marriage to a man who clearly did not love her. my father was appalled and said it was impossible to pull out of such an enormous commitment at that point. She would later tell me, so this is him directly claiming that Diana told him this, that on the day of her wedding she had been in the throes of her eating disorder for five months. She had recoiled from her engagement day photographs, feeling that at 10 and a half stone, her 5 foot 10 inch frame looked heavier than she wanted to.

And he claims that Charles squeezed her waist and said, oh, a bit, chubby here, aren't we? And he then talks about how her weight loss returned with vengeance after the birth of William. And this is when her mental health crisis really, really began. And he says he is convinced that Diana had ADHD and that as part of that condition she suffered from rejection-sensitive dysphoria as do I. This is an intense emotional pain in the face of mother's rejection or criticism. Diana told me there were even talks of a temporary separation early on in the marriage. And this was because of concern at Diana having explosive outbursts when she was at her

unhappiness. When members of our family were questioned, they were adamant that Diana never exhibited any such behavior before the wedding. And then a shocking, shocking revelation that. Diana came close to throwing herself off a seacliff in England. We obviously know through Diana her true story that she had thrown herself down the stairs before, but this is new. He writes, it is a sad fact that in her later years, Diana drove herself more than once to beechy head the highest chalk seacliff in England while contemplating ending it all. Her love for her sons

stopped her from going further. Wow. Well, well, well, wow. So he has gone near Lee Cohen in a whole load of ways. Your reaction? Well, my first reaction is this is such a litany of vile things that come off sounding like gossip. I think it's not unreasonable to imagine that he had the same ghost writer as his nephew in his book's bear. And, you know, of course, no one was in the room. No one knows what allegedly was said to him. However, I still maintain that he's such a discredited and hypocritical source. I mean, if you go back to the speech that you played saying that he was going to protect these boys, it didn't seem like he played a very active role in their upbringing. He was back off to South Africa. And, you know, it seemed like in addition to his father that

the queen and the late Duke of Edinburgh played a large role in raising those boys and thank heaven for that. Also, if his main motivation is to spare them any pain, then why on earth? On earth these vile anecdotes at this time, a very sensitive time, that coincide strangely with Prince Harry's return and visit to Allthorpe. To me, none of this adds up, and I'm not convinced by any of it. In fact, I'm repelled, and I feel even more strongly that morally the Earl is, is just beyond repute. I mean, Cathy Gingell, Royal Watchers around the world are picking up on

the claim in regards to Michael Fawcett. You won't be surprised to know even though the mail has sort of buried it within the serialisation. They haven't led with it, but I just want to show you this from Pearce Morgan. My God! He writes, these two lines from Earl Spencer's book on Diana,

hard to imagine more incendiary claims or ones more deliberately aimed to harm King Charles's reputation. This is open royal war now. It's a bit like the Duchess of Malfi. I don't know whether you know the restoration tragedy. Everyone ends up dead on the stage. And metaphorically, everyone is ending up dead on the stage here because everybody's reputations being killed, including his own.

But they were already, all of them had damaged reputations. King Charles sadly too. I mean, there was the terrible scene again. Younger people won't remember of when their engagement interview. And Charles does it himself. He says it himself. And the interviewer says, are you in love? And Diana looks terribly hopeful and anxious and being in love.

And Charles says, in his clip voice, whatever that means. Now, the cruelty was there. I mean, nobody can deny that the cruelty was there for that girl from the start. and I'm not saying she was not a strong enough and mature enough girl to go into that type of arranged marriage. But there are a lot of, I know you said we don't play the blame game, but there are a lot of people who can take the blame for what happened. And certainly in my view always,

I don't particularly enjoy any of this all being re-rehearsed and extra bits of scandal and tit bits added in. but she was what, 2021 and again came, you know, a very dysfunctional background. Charles was considerably older and had been having this affair and really showed not that much maturity or understanding. I mean, it was a terrible, terrible way to begin a marriage. And one that was so much in the public eye. So I think people of my generation all know, though we knew Diana was deeply flawed,

had a huge, huge sympathy with her. And then the terrible thing was Tony Blair exploiting it. Everybody's exploited it. It's sort of grim. It's become a political, sort of an emotional kickball. Indeed. But Tom Sullivan, I mean, these revelations are going to be desperate for Prince William, who I never forget Tom 10 years ago, or nine years ago, sorry,

after the 20th anniversary of her death, after making two TV documentaries following a lot of Prince William, following a lot of pressure, said that he was desperate, just desperate for his mother's memory to be left alone. And certainly it's the fact that relatives, blood relatives, Tom, first Prince Harry, now Earl Spencer. Then next year it's going to be Prince Harry again, because you know he's got his documentary coming. It's just very, this is just going to be very, very painful for Prince William to be reading these things about his mother. I do feel sorry for William.

I have to say like Kathy, I'm not a seasoned Royal Watcher, but, you know, whether it's Harry and Megan and their antics or whether it's Charles, maybe not in his personal decorum, but in his political, the things that he does get involved in politically

and the things that he signals, which he shouldn't. And then likewise, the opposite, the things that he should speak out on, like the invasion of his own country, which he never does. Between the lot of them, I just wish he would abdicate

and William would become a king. We might have a bit of a fresh start and a new generation. But I think that's a theme of our discussion today, Dan, that all of the institutions in our country, whether it's the politicians, the media, the police, all are all family. I've just become a bit of a big joke,

and that's quite sad. Indeed. look, let's just get to some feedback actually about the show that we've been talking about. Lots of you really backing Danny Tomo, who we had on at the start of the show. Helen O.D. 786 says Danny Tomo's right there, hell bent on provoking violence. And she says, Danny and Tommy Rompson doing so much good for this country. I trust them compared to our present and previous governments. And Colch's Pot M2G says,

Shammie Chakrabati has been a troublemaker since her 20s, 20 years have passed, and she's in the Lords, but still stinking up the TV. Thank you for your super chats too. Baroness Note 2 says, I blooming love Danny Tomo. He is a true patriot and hero. We need more and more good men like him to leave the charge in taking our country back.

Puds 5102 says I'm a paid sub for Danny's page. I believe in him 100%. And Haley Who 4447 says she wants to see Danny Tomo as PM. Theresa Houlton, who has been an outspoken plus member for 11 months on this royal news. Those says, I believe that the Diana documentary Harry and Megan are doing is going to be based on Charles Spencer's book. King Charles III needs to take action now. So I nominated Chammy Chakrabati, actually, for wanting to make the Patriot Platform a terror group. Tom Sullivan went for Michelle O'Neill, the First Minister of Northern Ireland, Sinn Féin, of course,

and Cathy Gingiel went for Sarah Malawi for that terrible. picture of her with an Osama's woman and, you know, is it even a woman? Who could tell? Who could tell? Your results are in. 9% have gone for Michelle O'Neill, 37% have gone for Bishop Sarah Malawi. I feel so bad winning when, you know, my superstar panel is so brilliant, but come on, it had to be Shammy Chakravati today, didn't it? You can agree with that. You can agree with that. And Tom Sullivan, given you've just launched your YouTube channel today, you get the honour of revealing who you want to be our greatest Britain. Well, I've chosen Reubit Lowe as my greatest Britain

because he was down at the Piddington Independence referendum. And I think that's actually a much better reason than Michelle O'Neill's reasons for wanting to leave the UK. So he's my greatest Britain because he's being basically whether it's going down to Danny Tomo's protest at Portsmouth where he also went or going down to Pittington. He's going to the middle class uproar,

he's going to the working class upcrawl, and he's not hiding away from how real people feel. Brilliant stuff, and you can subscribe to Tom's new YouTube channel. You actually just have to type in Sullivan, Tom. That is where you will find it on YouTube. You've also got to subscribe to the brilliant right time. with Kathy Gingell. This is the reinvention of conservative women on sub-sac. Do you know what, Kathy?

You're going to hate me for saying this. But I actually prefer it because the great thing about substack is I now get your emails as a subscriber directly into my inbox. So I don't even have to visit the website. I actually prefer it, to be honest. I know. I don't know why I didn't do it earlier. And it's so good, isn't it? It's not losing me money. And it's all so much easier to do. I just want to get more great writers writing on it. It's a platform. Well, I love it. I'm subscribed. I think I was one of your first subscribers. You want you. I've got so much to thank you for because you've recommended me. Yes, I have.

I have really am I follow us. Thank you. I love it. I absolutely love it. And it's so great to have you back on Outspoken. And of course, Lee Cohen, you must follow him. He is T with Lee on X for all the brilliant royal commentary. He is, of course, a columnist on the Royals, the Daily Telegraph, the Spectator, GV News, among others. and with us for this big breaking royal news today. Fabulous superstar panel. Thank you all so much and thank you for your company today. But guess what? If you are a royal lover, you're going to love this.

Lady Colin Campbell is standing by. Oh my goodness, she hates Earl Spencer and she has the receipts and the tea to reveal why he cannot be trusted. So if you do want to hear from Lady Colin Campbell on The Truth About Earl Spencer, Join us right now over on Substack, the address, www. outspoken.com. Otherwise, can I just ask you to please subscribe to this page? Please subscribe to us as a podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast.

Please subscribe to the Dan Wooden channel on Facebook as well, where you've got lots of exclusive content. But I will be back with you tomorrow here on YouTube 5pm UK time, midday Eastern 9 a.m. Pacific. Until then, most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.