Dan Wootton Outspoken - FURY AS SADIQ KHAN THREATENS TO JAIL RIVALS LIKE TOMMY ROBINSON FOR EXPOSING ISLAMIST TAKEOVER

Episode Date: April 10, 2026

BREAKING TODAY: The Disunited Kingdom’s Islamist leader Sadiq Khan chillingly threatens to JAIL patriots exposing the horror crimewave in Lawless London, while BANNING social media companies that allow people to post the truth. But Dan says the Islamist takeover of the UK capital is real and that he has overseen turning the greatest city in the world into a violent hellhole that has already descended into full blown societal collapse. Meanwhile, Labour’s lurch to the Islamo/trans hard left will continue as the Green Party continues to surge in the polls, even as its candidates are exposed for privately advocating for the Death of England and the MSM give the Tit Whisperer Zack Dave Polanski the easiest ride. So what is the answer? Restore Britain supporter and host of Tomlinson Talks on YouTube Connor Tomlinson joins Dan after his Digest. PLUS: Rupert Lowe challenges GB News Political Editor Christopher Hope after his Labour snub meltdown in a growing war between Restore Britain and the Reform UK propaganda channel. AND: Melania and Ivanka Trump accused of diversion from the Iran conflict after two astonishing public interventions, as The Donald finally hits out publicly at Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Alex Jones and Candace Owens. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have just been exposed for lying about the security costs on next week’s Australian tour, causing a new firestorm Down Under for the couple. We’ll reveal all the scandal from the controversial trip with royal YouTube sensation According2Taz. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor,

free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. No spin, no bias. No censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is Outspoken episode number 466. Happy Friday to you. Breaking today, the disunited kingdoms, Islamist, Leader, Khan chillingly threatens to jail patriots exposing the horror crime wave in Lawless London while attempting to ban social media companies that allow people to post the truth. So Mr. Khan, you absolute freak. It's not disinformation, or illegal to say the Islam's takeover of the UK capital is real

and that you have overseen turning the greatest city in the world into a violent hellhole that has already descended into full-blown societal collapse. London has become the European capital for phone snatching. There has been fury today about Khan's dystopian plot on both sides of the Atlantic. He's not worried about misinformation. He's worried that people can actually really see what's going on.

Those governments then go to American social media companies and say, you must censor the citizens of your own country because we don't want to hear them. They've imported in mass numbers people who don't want to be British. But Labor's lurched to the Islamo-trans hardlift will continue as the Green Party keeps on surgeon in the polls, even as its candidates are exposed for privately advocating for the death of England,

and the MSM give the tit-whisperer Zach Dave Polanski the easiest ride. There is absolutely no evidence that the people who are sexually assaulting people are people seeking asylum. This is a migrant who's been touching up 14-year-old girls. Stand against misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, any form of ableism,

anti-Semitism, Islamophobia and indeed any form of hate crime. So, what is the answer? Restore Britain support a host of Tomlinson Talks on YouTube. Donna Tomlinson joins me straight after the digest. Also coming up on the show today, Rupert Lowe challenges GB News political editor to Christopher Hope after his Labour snub meltdown in a growing war between Restore Britain and the Reform UK Propagangta Channel.

Melania and Ivanka Trump, accused of diversion from the Iran conflict after two astonishing public interventions as the Donald finally hits out publicly at Tucker Carlson, Megan Kelly, Alex Jones and Candice Owens, four of his former biggest supporters. And breaking today, the sick king to address the nation later this month in a dramatic televised speech. So what does this really mean? Then in the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow over on Substack, Prince Harry and Megan Markle have just been exposed for lying about the security costs on next week's Australian tour, causing a new firestorm down under for the couple. we'll reveal all about the scandal from the controversial trip with Royal YouTube Sensation according to Tads.

You can sign up to watch at www.outspoken.com. This is also your last chance to vote on the YouTube posts tab for the worst Britain in the world this week. We put your Union Jackass winners from Monday to Thursday head to head to find out who you have really despised over the past seven days. From Monday, it was King Charles, Tuesday, Sadiq Khan, Wednesday, Prince William, Thursday, David Lammy. Get voting, keep your feedback coming in. I will read some of the best before we go today. But now, let's go. This is one of the most dangerous things I have ever seen.

And the fact there is not widespread outrage about it in the MSM illustrates what trouble we are now in. The disunited Kingdom's Islamist Mers-Sid-Ek Khan is now threatening to lock up social media users. who reveal the shocking truth about the surging crime in lawless London. Chris Rose of Reform UK revealed overnight, Sadiq Khan has called on ministers to take stronger action against social media companies that spreads what he calls disinformation about London's crime rates. Clapham looting, constant shoplifting, multiple stabbings and shootings, but you posting about it is the problem.

And this morning, Khan himself confirmed the news, ironically, in a post on Elon Musk's ex, where he wrote disinformation about London has become a global industry. The new outrage economy is growing, and it's eating away at the bonds that hold our society together. That's why I'm calling for urgent action from social media companies and government. Of course, Kahn didn't deliver this speech to Londoners, but rather in front of a group of globalists in Cambridge, where he said we're right to expect big tech to do better,

but we should not rely on it. If platforms fail to act, the state must have the tools to make them. That's why I'll continue lobbying the government publicly and privately to take a much tougher approach. We need a new central body with the agility and authority to protect our democracy from disinformation and deal with the scale and speed of this crisis. And we need more aggressive enforcement of the rules we already have, because unless regulators like offcom have the power to hit companies where it hurts, they'll keep on getting away with it.

The Guardian added disingenuously to its report, the Labour mayor, has long been a target for Islamophobic and other abusive social media posts, particularly when he has spared with Donald Trump. More recently, this has expanded into masses of content describing London, as in Khan's words in the speech, a fallen city overtaken by Islamist immigrants where crime goes unpunished,

and basic decency has all but disappeared. So, I'm sorry, this is actually fucked up. Khan, you are a dangerous, lying, evil man who has destroyed the capital city where I have lived for over two decades. So there is no outrage economy or disinformation coming from me. This show, Outspoken, broadcast live from London every day for now at least, but soon it probably won't be safe for us to keep doing so. Let me just spell it out for you, okay? The Islamist takeover is real. I have been mugged twice. My family members have been mugged multiple times. My neighbors have had

their homes invaded in broad daylight by Islamist gangs. And yes, the police, the metropolitan police, do, do nothing. My friends are too scared to walk the streets. So you can try and censor us all you want, but you will never shut down the truth. And I want to show you now the proof as to why Kahn doesn't want you to see London for what it is today. And I say this with no pleasure, a violent hellhole that has already descended into full-blown societal collapse. This week, a 21-year-old middle-class white man stabbed to death on Primrose Hill in broad daylight. Feral youths terrorising innocent M&S shop workers and the British public. Bus drivers having to defend themselves from completely out-of-control yobbs.

Deranged street violence in South London's beckoning. Religious rivals trying to tear each other's throats out in central London. Stabathons, another one this week in South or West London. And you're more likely to get your phone snatched in London than anywhere else in Europe. London has become the European capital for phone snatching. Thieves using electric motorbikes or scooters to swoop on unsuspecting victims. Around 100,000 phones are recorded stolen by police here each year. Shopkeepers are unable to stop thieves because if they do, they might get sacked or worst, stabbed.

Londoners threatened with acid being thrown in our faces. There'd be a gang of people coming in and they would literally threaten the members of staff and if they ever come near us we'd have substance thrown in their face, be threatened after work. There was, you know, members of a multinational store who were threatened with acid. Robbery in broad daylight. What's the police? Call the police. What more evidence of Siddeek Khan's London do you need?

This is why he wants to lock you up for social media posts. This is why he wants to shut down social media companies for social media posts. There is more, though, from Seoul Sadkhan. this morning. You can actually tell that this is central London and not San Francisco because the cars drive on the left. Well done to Sadiq Khan, the Metropolitan Police and all the other geniuses who made this dream a reality. Watch. Tent cities in Sadiq Khan's London. As Reform UK's Lee Nalingham put it responding to Kahn's free speech crackdown, Sadiq Khan is the only one spreading misinformation about crime in London. Here are the facts from the Metropolitan Police. In the 12 months to

February 26, sexual offences up 6.1%, rape, up 8.4%, violence up 6.3%. Drug offences up 22.9%. Weapons possession, up 23.7%. When he became mayor in 2016, there were 750,000 crimes reported In 2025, there were over 910,000 crimes reported. Even accounting for population growth, crime is up over the last decade. This isn't misinformation, it's fact. He has failed on crime. And let me just tell you there, most crime in London is no longer reported. Londoners don't even bother.

Actually, we really only report a crime if we need a crime reference number for insurance purposes. Star comedian Leo Curse added, I moved out of London last year. It wasn't because of disinformation on social media. It was because I saw London become a third world shithole whole of sketchy Deliveroo Mongolians. I want my kids to be able to go to the park on their own without being harassed, filmed, assaulted by some government sponsored Jangerweed Turbulokos squad. Sadiq has done this to London to bring in people who vote for him, creating an electoral dictatorship. Like any dictator, he now wants to suppress any dissent. this is the left's blueprint for the whole country.

The disinformation is Sadiq pretending that London is fine. And Festus Akhenbusio added, This is completely outrageous and totally out of touch with reality. There have been about five murders and eight days in London so far in April. That's more than half of murders for April 2025. We see kids running rampant through high street, and residential areas. Residents are witnessing these traumatic events

and our mayor says we should pipe down. This is just insensitive. Of course, the irony is that before Kahn's speech this week, Jady Vance warned of exactly the threat to shut down our ability to speak out. Watch.

If you look at the cost of electricity in the United Kingdom, which is way underinvested in their energy resources, is, you know, UK families are paying four times, five times, six times what United States citizens are paying for electricity. Now, obviously, I care most about America's citizens. That's who I'm elected to represent. But isn't it a scandal that middle-class Brits, that people who are working hard and playing by the rules,

can't afford to heat their home, can't afford to transport themselves to work because their leadership has made energy so expensive? Isn't it a scandal that when normal people on the European continent try to talk about what's going on in their governments, they try to criticize their governments, they try to exercise their rights of free speech, those governments then go to American social media companies and say, you must censor the citizens of your own country because we don't want to hear them. We don't want to hear their free expression. We don't want to hear their free speech. There's just so much wrong with the political leadership.

and I would particularly say the bureaucratic leadership in Brussels, right? People who aren't elected, who are not responsive to the democratic will, and I think have made the European continent less secure, less free, and less prosperous. The reason why we make criticism of European political capitals is because we want Europe to thrive and we think they're making a lot of mistakes. The U.S. Vice President has now been backed up by the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis. Well, they've really shot themselves in the foot. I mean, you look at like the United Kingdom.

That has been our best ally historically. We obviously came from there. Our culture grew out of English culture, our constitution and laws, all this stuff. Very tight bond. But I think what they've done and other European countries have done, they've imported in mass numbers people who don't want to be British, don't want to be French. They want to take where they came from,

want to change those countries to reflect things like Sharia. So if the reason why we have been allied with them for so long is because we have strong political and cultural bonds, well, those have eroded because of decisions that they have made. So I think what they've done, particularly on mass immigration, has been suicidal. We can't make those mistakes in the United States. And you know, when I sign this legislation, some people are like, oh, well, that's not happening in Florida or whatever. First of all, they said the same thing. thing 10, 15 years ago in Britain. They said, oh, don't worry about this. And then now you've seen what's ended up happening. So we're ahead of the curve here. It's the right thing to do. But yes,

Europe's made a huge mistake. And the fact that if you don't want to join a military conflict, you know, that's one thing. But to not allow us to use bases when we're not only your top ally, but have funded your defense for decades, I think a lot of people in the United States have taken note of those actions. For all his talk of caring about Londoners, Khan is actually obsessed with bringing the American political divide to Britain by demonising an invisible far right to cover up for his total failure. My analysis is, you know, we are a progressive city, a liberal city, a diverse city,

a successful city. We've shown diversity as a strength that are weakness. is richer, not poorer. It makes us stronger, not weaker. And that's why I think people like President Trump, Vice President Vance, and other politicians and commentators hate us. Things President Trump has said and done lead me to believe he's a president who is racist, who is misogynistic and who is Islamophobic. And I'd go further. I think he's somebody who is anti-Muslim as well. You know, if we were talking about somebody talking about, you know, destroying a civilization or mocking a religion like Islam.

We'd normally be talking about members of the far right. Londoners know that actually when people denigrate our city, where they try and talk down our city, it's because they're jealous. We can understand why some people don't like a multicultural, a progressive, a liberal, a successful city that is the most greatest city in the world, but the most successful city in the world.

British people love having diversity. Londoners love having diversity. Londoners have chosen me not once and twice, but three times to be there men. They're going to cow us and scare us to be less Muslim, to be less Islamic, to make us scared, to put a head above the parapet. So that is his priority, okay? He is the one spreading, I don't use the term disinformation or misinformation. I can't bear it. He is the one spreading downright lies. Khan's Reform UK Challenger, Laila Cunningham hit back today.

Rape is reported every hour. Only 6% end up in a charge. Shoplifting has reached an all-time high, theft, robbery, sexual offences, knife crime has gone up by over 70% in the past decade. And what's really, you know, because he doesn't highlight every stabbing or he doesn't talk about every robbery,

he's not worried about misinformation. He's worried that people can actually really see what's going on. People are not relying on the police anymore. Of course, if it's a big, dangerous crime, I spoke to a lady, a young girl who was raped, and she said that the police told her, we will not investigate your rape because you happen to be smiling on the CCTV

before you went up to his flat. I wrote to the Met, and I said, how dare you almost, you know, obviously in more professional terms, not investigate this rape? And you know what they said? No. I've got the email. said we cannot be sure that a judge or jury would convict.

They are acting like judge or jury. You and I know that's a trial matter because rape case often fall on how convincing either party is. But that's what's happening. That's why only 6% ends up in a charge. But you're closer to this than I am, Councillor. I thought it was down to the CPS, by the way, to decide whether or not we press charges, not down to the police.

So did I. But, you know, it's the CPS end up charging it, but a lot of times they don't send it to the CPS. But is Islam supporting CPS? really the answer. She's been criticized today too, by the way, with Basil the Great Revealing, Layla Cunningham prepares kosher meat in Butchers. Reform UK will not ban non-stun, slaughter. Animals deserve better than this. Palal and kosher are unnecessarily cruel. Watch the video. Here I am in Monacham, a world-renowned butcher, and I'm helping and prepare the meat to pass over.

Kosha meat. Now I know that you're supposed to cut against the grain. Am I correct, sir? Yes. Is that right? It's nice and tender this. It is, yeah. What cut is this then?

It's a fine order. Just more identity politics bullshit from reform, unfortunately. Britain has now been overrun by divisive Islamist politicians to back Khan like Humza useless, the failed First Minister of Scotland who boasted over the Iran peace talks. Pakistan is owed a huge debt of gratitude for its mediation efforts. The world was collectively holding its breath as President Trump's deadline loomed with threats to wipe out an entire civilization. Another sign that the center of mediation has moved from Europe eastwards.

When Tommy Robinson responded, Make Pakistan India again, I don't trust a country that hid and gave refuge to Osama bin Laden. useless fired back, make Tommy Robinson Stephen Yaxley-Lennon again. Imagine a convicted fraudster lecturing anyone about trust, wind your neck in. That prompted a one-word graphic from Tommy in response, deport. But as Leo Kirst put it, imagine being more concerned about concocted mortgage fraud than the industrial-scale rape and torture of British girls. I have to say, and I don't know if you've seen this too, but I feel there's now a great rewriting of history going on about the Pakistan

Muslim rape gang cover up from the hard left MPs like Labour's Nas Shah. We remember we did a sermon, Friday sermon for all the mosques. And we still, at the time, we think it was the first time it was ever done in the history of Islam. But I know it was the first time it was ever done in the UK, where we campaigned to get every mosque to condemn grooming, to talk about it and talk about child sexual exploitation. This was before the Robinsons and the Lachlanans and Rupert Laws talked about grooming. So we stood by the victims

and the community stood by the victims and what happened was it then got you had the selective outrage for victims from people like Toma Robinson and others who then the first there were campaign this idea about Muslims that haven't stood up against this that is one for the birds and the bees because we have got a track record

but that never makes the press we've got a track record I remember being on TV talking about this before my political career so if there is absolutely it is not racist to say there is a pertinent model of abuse, of grooming, of street grooming, where the abuser is of Pakistani heritage. That is not racist to say, right? What is not right is to say every Pakistani is like that.

That's not okay. So what do you do? When we do the drink-driving campaign, we didn't go to the churches on a Sunday to talk to people about not drinking on a Saturday night and getting driving home. We went to the pubs and the clubs and a public health campaign to try and shift a culture and a mindset. And that's the same, you don't go to the right-wing press to talk about the issues, you'd go to work with those communities. And where I think we failed is we've not talked to them communities and we've allowed the banging of the noise to drown out what the actual communities is. As Basil the Great responded, Nas Shah rewrites history on camera about grooming gangs. She claims she campaigned to get every mosque in the UK to condemn grooming. She says Muslims

stand up against this. Where is this campaign? Has anyone seen it? Or is this just more lies? We all remember what Naz did. But the pandering to Islamists is actually only going to get worse, as the left is now openly predicting that the tit whisperer, Zach Dave Polanski, will be the next Prime Minister of Britain, thanks to the Sikh coalition between the Islamists and trans mob. Reform have finally realized that threat, that threat, excuse me, ahead of election day next month. There is absolutely no evidence that the people who are sexually assaulting people are people seeking asylum. This is a migrant who's been touching up 14-year-old girls. These are children.

That's when he comes up to me and he grabs me by my face, starts touching my boobs, unbuttoned my jeans. There he goes. He's trying to kidnap that poor girl. Went on within months of arriving here to abduct and rape this 15-year-old girl. Police finally tracked down the man responsible for raping a 12-year-old. This is the depraved dance of a murderer, seemingly excited after stabbing 27-year-old Rianne and White, all than 23 times with a screwdriver. Her little boy's been left without a mom, and I've lost my daughter.

For these scumbags that are allowed into this country. It's all too real. Thank you for doing that. Very brave. Yet the MSM look away with the nutters inside the Greens, as the independent journalist Charlie Simpson has just reported. Alfie J. Reese, a Green Party member and candidate in this year's local election standing in Thurrock, has called for death to Israel, death to America, and death to England.

But listen to how the leftist Channel 4 news gave Dave, yeah, Polansky's real name, let's start using it, such an easy ride on the issue. Are you sure, you know, they haven't been making anti-Semitic comments or doing anything absurd or illegal, You know, how good is your vetting? Well, it'd be disingenuous to claim that I know what thousands of candidates have all said ever in their past. What I would say more widely, though, is I've been really clear about what the values of the Green Party are. We stand against misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, any form of ableism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and indeed any form of hate crime.

So you would hope, first of all, that when I'm very clear about the values, our MPs are clear with the values, our council leaders and councillors, you would attract people to the party who share those values. More widely, it's about making sure where people don't, share those values that they're not a candidate for the party and there's a robust disciplinary process. I think even more important than the disciplinary process is about prevention and education. The final thing I'd say, though, is I'm really proud of the amount of people who have joined the Green Party. We've over-tripled our membership and actually what I'm experiencing every

single day right around the country, both in England and Wales, are people who have never been involved with politics before who tell me that they'd written off politics, they thought it could never do any good, and what they've seen in the Green Party is a moment that they want to get involved with. But the Sunday did reveal a hit of the Grand National weekend that Polanski wants to ban horse racing all together. I actually liked these tables breaking down what the party wants to embrace and what it wants to get rid of.

So the Greens want to legalise all drugs, including heroin and crack cocaine, prostitution, freedom to work for all asylum seekers, I call them illegal. A new tax on dog owners. They want to ban dogs. Let's just be honest about it for Islam's purposes. Net zero 2040 national rent controls. Meanwhile, the Greens want to ban Britain's nuclear deterrent Trident,

migrant detention centres, 70 mile per hour motorway speed limit for 55 miles per hour, North Sea drilling, zoos and the private collection of animals. But with a new poll showing two-thirds of voters want slippery,

Stama out, there could be hope that Patriots are waking up. I want to show you this Green Party voter who says she is now considering supporting Rupert Lowe of Restore Britain. Watch. Did anybody else used to be so left-winging these days you're just more right-wing? Like back in the day, if you asked me who would I vote for, I would have told your Green Party all day long. And if you're not from the UK, the Green Party is essentially your high school art teachers' version of a political party, right? And now I just don't feel like, way at all. The left wing used to be let's save the planet, let's fund the education system,

everyone be nice to each other, if someone's in a tough spot, we'll help them out and that's it. Now the left wing is like, right, we'll let everybody in, doesn't matter if you're coming a fucking boat and you've just married 20 people, you can come out of the country and we'll give you fucking benefits. And by the way, the education system doesn't teach you anything anymore. It will teach your little boy though that if he decides he wants to be a girl at the age of five years old, we can chop his William off and nobody will question it. And by the way, every, you remember the math questions used to have? John had five apples, minus three apples.

How many apples does John have? Now John has got five testicles and he has three chopped off. Does that make him a boy or a girl? It's like, that's the education system. It's just entirely fucked up. You can identify as a cat. Did you know that? Did everyone know you can identify as a cat and the school support it?

I've heard from three separate children. It'll go to three separate secondary schools that they have got fairies, children who identify as cats in their school. And I've never been a person who said we need to bully children. I got bullied severely and affected my life. But I'm thinking, why don't we bring bullying back? I'm not like, right wing. I'm right wing. I'm like, do you know what? Let's fucking have it then.

Let's have it then. Close the fucking borders. Let's not let anybody in. You can't be any fucking colour of the flag. I don't, colour of the pride flag. I don't give a shit. Fuck off. Fuck off. I'm not bothered. let's all try and get married and have children and actually bring a fucking productive society about like it used to be back in the 1960s except let's keep the women's rights

that's where my political stance is I can't give a fuck about anything else Now Connor Tomlinson is here So Connor this is the problem I guess With Sidette Khan Going down this path of banning the truth And trying to lock up dissidents and trying to shut down social media companies.

Actually, is it going to work, given there does seem to be this revolution happening out there amongst the British public? Well, it didn't work in the Soviet Union down when you were hauled off in the middle of the night and thrown in prison. It didn't make anyone feel any less hungry or cold or resentful of the party that had pried their family away from them. You can't stop people noticing reality. You can just punish them for doing so, but then the punishment itself makes people more resentful of the regime that is punishing them for noticing reality. And so what Sadi Khan's doing is twofold. He, as he said, he's a progressive liberal. In the fashion, they believe that literally everyone is exactly the same.

The only thing that's dividing us in terms of our behaviour is economic inequality, differences in education, a lack of youth clubs, which is now rolling out to solve all those problems in clap and Notting Hill and all of the other conspicuously black areas of London, they believe that we're all exactly the same. All you've got to do is just give us more money, give us better education, and sense of the people that say we aren't exactly the same, and then the scale shall fall from our eyes, and we will all live in utopia, singing in John Lennon's imagine. And conveniently, that gives him the pretext to silence his critics, who call him a poisonous little dwarf, who is very subversive and is trying to simultaneously achieve the goals of Fabian social, and probably appoint himself Caliph at some point down the line. But the interesting thing that I'm seeing, Dan, is just the number of people that are just sick to the back teeth of it.

Like, unfortunately, I had a funeral on Wednesday, and I was just speaking to people who still live in East London, some of my family members, you know, they're still in Newham. They're the last sort of like East Enders in the East End that have been ethnic cleansed out of places like Poplar. And they have, without engaging with politics all the time, they have come to the same conclusions as me. Like, they realise that there are people in this country that never needed to be here in the first place. We never voted to bring them in. We never voted to give them social housing or benefits. Or an anti-racist policing system that allows them to do everything from busting through the tube barriers to raiding away, to stabbing each other in Hyde Park in the middle of the day,

and get away with it, despite, you know, when we have our phone snatched, there's no follow-up. If we put out a tweet on said phone, then we get on the knock on the door. They just want all these people gone. But they are just at the point now, where... they recognise that this small minority of people within the people that were brought here in the first place just make life hell for the rest of us. They just commit inordinate amounts of crime. And so the only two solutions are a Naïbe Bakele-style mass incarceration program for people that we can't get rid of, that just stick them in prison for ages, stick the 1% of permanent troublemakers in prison,

and leave the rest of us be. And for the rest of the people that aren't committing violent crimes, but are just turning our country into a coarser, unfamiliar place, a third world hellhole, frankly, they can just be made to leave. And all of this, but we can't be nice to them, but human rights, but, but, well, everyone's just going, at this point, the more you insist they have to stay, the more of them I actually want to go.

And I agree with Robinson's reply to Humza-Yusuf, if the deport button is in front of me, I'm just pressing it. Yes. Do you think, Connor, that there is going to be enough scrutiny on the Green Party? Because actually, when you show people what the Green Party is really about, they immediately say, we're not going to vote for these absolute nutters. But they are getting, of course, a completely free ride in the mainstream media. Yeah, in the mainstream media, there won't be any scrutiny.

I think at various election time candidates, they will start attacking the Green Party. But the problem that other parties restore Britain aside have with trying to attack the Green Party. And I think this is why Dan, actually, the Greens are just going to win the next election. If you look at the forecast, I mean, reform are on the dip. The Greens are on the upsurge. And there's probably going to be some sort of green. 100% I've been mourning of this. Yeah.

The problem that they have is they can complain about the ex-examine. excesses of green policy, like, you know, legalizing prostitution or legalizing all drugs. But when reformer accepting endorsements from Bonnie Blue, when they're all falling over themselves, reform, Lib Dem, Tory, Labor, to not get called racist, then they're fighting on the same terms as the Greens, and the Greens can just say, well, you already agree with most of our premises. You already agree we should be a diverse, pluralistic country. You already agree that we should be prosperous. You already agree that we shouldn't be intervening in people's private lives. regarding their sexuality or whether they smoke and drink.

So, you guys are just like only going halfway. We're going to go the whole way, and we're actually going to promise a massive cohort of young anti-white minorities who just want to take stuff from white people and young women and some young men who have never been given anything, mainly due to expensive house prices, a terrible job market, mismanaged economy,

and the triple lock that reform had just promised. We're going to promise all of them the world. And what do they have to lose by voting for us? And so what the Greens actually stand to gain from is even though they're not anti-establishment, they're now just establishment proximate. The thing that we have a real issue with, though, is that Restore Britain are not able to get a fair ride in the mainstream media, specifically with GB News, which is increasingly becoming a propaganda channel. And Rupert Lowe has taken the fight directly to that broadcaster's police.

article editor this week. After he threw an absolute hissy fit, a very hypocritical hissifit, I would argue, about the fact that Labor is now avoiding GB News like the plague. He posted on X there is a ceasefire in the Middle East after a five-week war. Gb News viewers are very worried about the impact of rising bills and what does our foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper do? She refuses to come on the GB News Breakfast Show to speak to them. He then went on air and said this. But before we get stuck into this debate on this, I just wanted to say something as the channel's political editor now. GB News viewers are worrying about the threat of Russia as well as a conflict in the Middle East and its effect on day-to-day life here. And so it is hugely disappointing to our viewers that our Foreign Secretary of Vecuper

refused to come on the channel this morning for our breakfast show. And hours later, that man there, John Healy refused to take a question from a GB news reporter in the room. in the briefing at 9 Downing Street. This really is, frankly, an insult to our viewers and listeners. And I want to remind them through this broadcast that all government ministers are always welcome on our channel and will always get a fair hearing. But of course, while he is desperately trying to appease

the left-wing Labour Party, Rupert Lowe makes the point that there is another Sergene party totally banned from GB News at the moment. Oh, and by the way, they happen to have more members. than the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats. Rupert Lowe replied directly to Hope, saying, you right, we offer a platform where all voices are heard. Really? When will I be allowed back on live GB News, Chris? Or as Farage's ban still ongoing.

These are pathetic words whilst your channel continues to censor and ban Restore Britain. And look, this is going to become increasingly problematic for GB News, given that we saw the UGGV poll this week where, by the way, Restore Britain is not even prompted yet. It is already registry. And Rupert added that the bookies now have Restore Britain down as a 10% implied probability of winning the most seats at the next January election. He added three weeks ago, we weren't even registered as a political party. A bloody good start, I'd say. Restore Britain has also provided an update overnight, saying that membership numbers are now at well over 120. and the party boldly predicting that it could take over reform within a year.

So Connor Tomlinson, a Restore Britain supporter, but of course the host of Tomlinson talks on YouTube is with me now. Connor, this is a real vulnerability, I think, for G.B News. I was reading a discussion earlier between the podcasters Peter McCormack and Carl Benjamin. And they were sort of saying, CB News almost backed the wrong horse with Reform UK. It's almost too late for them to turn around and start backing Restore Britain too, even though I think they don't need to back anyone. They just need to give everyone a fair crack of the whip. But they're not going down that path because they want Farage to be Prime Minister.

And it just makes Christopher Hope look completely hypocritical when he is slamming labour for not going on GB News. Yes, Dan. I mean, beyond some of the ex-clips that are put out, mainly from Stephen Edgington's amusing interviews, though, of course, an increasing number of politicians will refuse to be subjected to those interviews because he's the only one that asks tough questions on that channel. I just don't watch anything from GB anymore. And it's because they've purged all of the interesting people. Because on live TV, people like, you know, Ben Briscoe say that I'm a liability for off-com, which means everyone to liabilities. senior executives at GV. News, by the way. Yes, yeah. You know, they blacklisted me at Stella Creasy's request. And then, of course, they sat you, they said Calvin, they sat Lawrence Fox and Mark Stein. And, you know, they just booted off most of the people that people actually want to watch. Farage doesn't even present his own show frequently anymore, though, you know, he still has shares and he's swanning about in the Middle East in Dubai with GV News is back

as Paul Marshall and the head of the Legatum Investment Fund, ensuring the UAE, government that he will be, you know, basically enacting policies that make it easier for the UAE to invest there. So it seems increasingly like GB News is less of a space to have authentic discussions about the issues that viewers and the electorate, specifically reform and restore supporters are, are interested in. And more like another hand on the Ming Vaz that's trying to shepherd reform into Downing Street, not as a political vehicle that is going to break up the unipartian address the issues that we're concerned about, but more as a secure investment for people like Paul Marshall, for people like Michael Farrell's to make quite a lot of money

from, for people like Peter Thiel. And so it is perceptive of McCormack and Carl Benjamin and yourself to say that they seem to have peaked early, that GB News now has too many sunk costs to pivot because they've thrown millions into ensuring that reform, GB News is basically reform TV at this point. They've got a loyal viewer base of reformed. supporters, but also plenty of restore supporters that would like to see Rupert Lowe return to his regular and popular guest spot on Jubes and Khyb, but they're not going to because they're paranoid that it might make reform look less like the automatic choice, the only person to the right of the Conservatives, for example. And so now they're going to increasingly lose some of

their viewers who are going to bleed away to the alternative media revolution online, which is what GB News is meant to be doing in the mainstream in the first place. And it's a long time, it's just a suicidal strategy. Like, I, I, I don't think that they can sustain this. And I don't think that any enterprise which is less interested in representing the truth than it is in securing a guaranteed outcome, because it will return some sort of profit for the people that bought in early, are going to be able to recognize that they've got these sunk costs. And so they're just going to get increasingly censorious and increasingly paranoid that they're not going to be able to deliver a victory for reform. And finally, if I may, Dan, um, as soon as soon as,

As soon as reform dips below 20% and stays there, I don't think Farrell sticks around, because I think he wants a shore victory. I think he wants permanent taxpayer-funded security rather than paying for his own for the rest of his life to breeze through airports, to go around the speaking circuit after doing a couple of years in Downing Street and make some money. And if that isn't guaranteed for him by Gb News, by reform itself, I think he just leaves. It's interesting. I mean, there's certainly talk at the moment, Connor, that these stunts are taking Reform UK in the wrong direction too. There's just one I want to specifically point out.

So do you remember they ran this competition to give away the energy bills to an entire street somewhere in the United Kingdom? And last night, Nigel Farage and the party shadow chancellor Robert Jenrich show up at, I have to say quite a plush house to announce that this couple have won. this. You are the winner. And everyone on your street. I give you flowers, but Robert Generates and give you half the end. Here we go. Your energy bill. Eight whole year and everyone on your streets too. Woo!

Fantastic. June, thank you. Turns out, though, those two punters, Connor, were actually known to Nigel Farage, Don McGowan, revealing, well, I never. Would you believe that Ray and June, who won the Reform UK Energy Bill's Prize, go back all the way to the Brexit Party with Farage? Here they are with Farage, Wittickham and Bull. What a coincidence, he says, increasingly unlikely.

And these images are taken from a Brexit Party rally on the 4th of May 2019. So let me just show you to them, Connor, because the... These are the two winners of the prize with Farage and Bull and Whitty. Now, Reform UK sources, Connor, are briefing the mainstream media. That isn't a big surprise because, of course, it was always likely. Look at this from Kevin Schofield. Reform sources say many of the parties, 270,000 members entered the competition. Is it a shocker member one?

No. However, Rupert Lowe thinks the whole thing stinks, and he posted, Restoring Britain will not involve giant checks or T-shirt cannons or indoor pyrotechnic displays. It will require a series of very difficult decisions that a great number of people will not appreciate. That process will last many years. That's just the honest truth. It will mean removing millions of people who should not be in our country. It will mean removing endless financial help from the government for healthy individuals who simply cannot be bothered to work. It will mean vast cuts to the parasitic state that so many have become accustomed to enjoying. That will be unpopular. That will all be challenged. That will all be

uncomfortable. I'm not promising you anything different. If you want an easy ride, vote for someone else because Restore Britain is not going to provide that for you. We are going to strip back the state in order to allow hardworking men and women to flourish. That is the only way out. It is very possible that I will not even live to see the full benefits of these decisions. So be it. Restoring Britain is not an overnight job. It will take years, possibly decades, to reverse the damage inflicted on us all. Politicians need to start finally being honest about the scale of what needs to happen. There is a vast, vast mountain to climb, but it can and must be done. Does this win votes for a store Britain? I don't know. Probably not, but it's the truth and people need to hear it.

So, Connor, Rupert quite specifically, using that competition to try and set a very clear, between reform and restore. Yeah, I think this is one. The only times you're going to think that you're going to hear me say that Rupert's wrong on something, Dan, I think that is going to win votes restore. Because I think circumstances are going to conspire to render the Bruce Forsyth this morning Britain's got talent style politics that reform are doing, the fundamentally unsurious Carnival Barker tour of care homes with

like a mix of P&O cruises and buttlins, I think it's going to render it irrelevant, as reform do things like refuse to reverse the demographic dire straits that we're in, as reform run foreign nationals as candidates in local council elections, not just, you know, naturalized immigrants, but actual foreign nationals from Zimbabwe, Nigeria, India, and Bangladesh, as, for example, reform have to reverse ferret on supporting Trump's war war in in Iran because they then realize it's not going to go quite as smoothly as Israel had promised even Trump. Trump is now trying to dial that down. And then when all of the impacts on Britain's energy bills start hitting, you know, the very thing they're promising to pay

or doing these stunts at petrol stations and promising to cut little bits off the end of petrol bills, when inevitably those energy bills rise as a direct consequence of the war that they're supporting, people are going to be put off them. And frankly, as well done, there's no like demographic constituency for this. Reform don't understand their own voter base. I mean, we saw this with Matt Goodwin in Gorton and Denton, hugging a Sikh and Farage saying they're going to win the moderate Muslim vote. At the expense of the white working class in that seat,

and the voter turnout was less than 50%, they got blown out by 5,000 votes. Turns out the white working class who want to take their country back your actual constituency, but, you know, representing them would be identity politics. But if you have, you know, a Jewish division and a Sikh division and you want to win the Muslim vote, apparently that's not identity politics, whatever. But Matt was very open on Peter McCormack's show. when he was saying that what the young people want, and he was mainly speaking about, you know, me, Harrison, Charlie Downs,

and the increasing number of young white men, young Englishmen, going over to restore Britain, what they want is too extreme, which includes mass deportation, which is kind of confusing because apparently reform we're all in on that now, so I don't think we can believe them. And Peter's son, 20-year-old, Connor, good name, piped up and said, so a reform alienating the 20-year-olds to win the 55-year-olds?

And Matt just went, no. But the real answer is yes, because none of the aesthetics of reform appeal to young men who are in dire straits economically, demographically, culturally, or at the bottom of the pile for jobs and at the back of the queue for candidate selection even in reform, it seems, they're going to do, they don't have any young spokespeople, they've actively alienated all of the online right, which is where a lot of young people engage with politics from Instagram and influencers and podcasts, and regarding the constituency that they're appealing to now, which is the boomers with the Triple Lock Pentium,

with, it's almost got memetic value. They're handling, handling this giant check in a very fancy house to an older couple that look like they can actually afford their bills rather than someone who's quite hard up and having to pay for the consequences of the war that they've supported. That demographic is dying off, sadly. And I say that with sympathy, because, you know, I've had two of my grandparents pass away in the last few months. And I spoke to a Rishi-Soonak advisor last year, and he said that the Conservatives called the election six months earlier because they had calculated that if they'd waited until the deadline for the 2024 election, then 0.5% of their voter base would have just died of old age.

And so if you're going to run to the boomer vote at the exclusion of the white working class of all ages and specifically the youth vote, then you're alienating all of the potential constituencies you can actually grow, and you're actually going to cost yourself a majority at the next election. And so this fundamentally unsurious showman politics is inappropriate for the situation we find ourselves in and has a diminishing and no natural constituency. I think it's just really stupid. Are we all about to get nuked? Now, I only ask that question

because there is a real bizarre theory, but it's one that I think is at least worth exploring that there is a lot of diversion happening in the White House right now. Initially, people were saying, oh, Trump has launched the, Iran conflict to try and deflect from the Epstein files. But then last night, Melania walks out completely unexpected, gives this bombshell statement raising a whole load of questions about

her and Epstein that many of us were not asking and frankly had never asked. And all of a sudden people are saying, well, actually, are the Epstein files now being used by the Trump White House to divert from the Iran conflict, which maybe is not quite going to plan. At the same time, Ivanka Trump gave an incredibly emotional interview with Stephen Barrett talking about the attempted assassination on her father at the same time. And Donald Trump launched the most extraordinary attack on four of his previously biggest supporters, Tucker Carlson, Megan Kelly, Alex Jones and Candice Owens. Now this literally all came within a three-hour period,

whereas Bridget Fetasy put it, we're about to get nuked, aren't we? And I do understand the point that she was making. Melania's statement was one of those true draw-droppers. Watch. The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today. The individuals lying about me are devoid of ethical standards, humility and respect.

I do not object to their ignorance, but rather I reject their mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation. She then got into specific, saying she had never been friends with Epstein at all, or even Galane Maxwell, who she did email, of course, watch. I never been friends with Epstein. Donald and I were invited to the same parties as Epstein from time to time, since overlapping in social circles is common in New York City and Palm Beach. To be clear, I never had a relationship with Epstein

or his accomplice, Maxwell. My email, applied to Maxwell cannot be catarized as anything more than casual correspondence. Then there was what we in Britain describe as the real marmalade dropper. Melania insisted that she was no victim of Epstein herself and that the pedophile sex trafficker had nothing to do with her meeting the now president. I am not Epstein's victim. Epstein did not. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump. I met my husband by chance at the New York City Party in 1998. This initial encounter with my husband is documented in a detail in my

book Melania. The first time I crossed paths with Epstein was in the year 2000 at an event Donald and I attended together. At the time, I had never met Epstein and had no knowledge of his criminal undertakings. But, Malani, we know that. Like, what was this about? Your husband has been saying for months that he doesn't want the world to be obsessing over Epstein. And immediately after your speech, there were mixed reports as to whether he even knew that you'd gone out and delivered that statement, truly.

odd. So in another attempt to deflect, Donald Trump then issued this truth social, and it's one that those people following the war on the US right have been waiting for. He finally didn't hold back against four people who have been brilliant allies of his in the past. And for me, I'm not going to lie, I find this really sad. The whole breakdown is really sad to see. But still going to read out to you what he said because it was quite something. Trump wrote on Truth Social, I know why Tucker, Megan Kelly, Candice Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting for me,

fighting me for years, especially by the fact that they think it is wonderful for Iran, the number one state sponsor of terror to have a nuclear weapon, because they have one thing in common, low IQs. Thus, stupid people, they know it, their family know it, and everyone else knows it too. Look at their past, look at their record, they don't have what it takes,

They've all been thrown off television, lost their shows and aren't invited on TV anymore because nobody cares about them. They're not jobs, troublemakers, and will say anything necessary for some free and cheap publicity. Now they think that they get some clicks because they have third-rate podcasts. But nobody's talking about them and their views are the opposite of MAGA, or I wouldn't have won the presidential election in a landslide. Maga agrees with me and just gave CNN a 100% approval rating of Trump, not hand-flailing fools like Tucker Carlson, who couldn't even finish calls. college. He was a broken man when he got fired from Fox and he's never been the same. Perhaps he should

see a good psychiatrist. Or Megan Kelly, who asked me the now famous only Rosie O'Donnell question. Or crazy Candice Owens who accuses the highly respected First Lady of France of being a man when she is not and will hopefully win lots of money in the ongoing lawsuit. Actually, to me, the First Lady of France is a far more beautiful woman than Candace. In fact, it's not even close or bankrupt Alex Jones, who says some of the dumbest things and lost his entire fortune, as he should have, for his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims ridiculously claiming it was a hoax. Those so-called pundits are losers, and they always will be. Now, fake news CNN, the failing New York Times,

and all of the other radical left news organizations are hailing them and giving them positive press for the first time in their lives. They're not Maga, they're losers. They're just trying to latch on to Maga. As president, I could get them on my side anytime I want to, but when they call, I don't return their calls because I'm too busy on world and country affairs, and after a few times, they go nasty, just like Marjorie Chaita Brown. But I no longer care about that stuff.

I only care about doing right for our country. MAGA is about winning and strength in not allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons. Maga is about making America great again, and these people have no idea how to do that, but I do, because the United States is now the hottest country anywhere in the world, President Donald J. Trump. Alex Jones responded this way. done. But at the end of the day, I just feel sorry for him and pray that God touch his heart and soul and free him from the demonic influences that he's under. I mean, it's just that simple. This is a nightmare. We know the Democrats, the left are absolutely terrible, but when Trump's calling for wiping out whole civilization and acting like a super villain, I have to come out and say I don't support it. It's that simple. So again, Trump's own wife came out in an unannounced press conference today and said the Epstein crimes are real and that she wants to the victims be in front of Congress to cover-up to end. That's the opposite of what Trump's saying.

Looks to me like she's breaking with Trump because she knows the ship's sinking has found out the truth. Elon left eight months ago saying he's in the files as a cover-up. I never saw any evidence of it, but he's acting like it's guilty. We know he's protecting Howard Ludnik who said he didn't know Epstein to go to the aisle and he did. So all I can say is this is terrible day and it's a nightmare for America in the world, but I'm going to tell the truth, reporting the facts, no matter what it is. Tandis was a bit more streamlined, simply posting the statement alongside these words, it may be time to put Grandpa up in a home. So as I say, this is all very sad to see. But all of this went down over the course of three hours when Ivanka Trump, who has been

very private of late, decided to give an interview to Stephen Bartlett, emotionally recalling for the first time how she witnessed her father being shot along. alongside two of her children. I was in Bedminster, New Jersey, and there was a lot of commotion and the televisions were on, so I saw it almost immediately, not in my house, I actually don't love watching television,

but out by the pool and the bistro. And it was almost real time. It was before he had stood back up that I had seen what was transpiring and two of my children were there. So, you know, my first reaction was to turn them away. But it was incredibly difficult. Interestingly, I knew real time in that moment that he was fine. Like I had, I just knew that like it wasn't his time.

So I was horrified and I was scared and I was protective of my children. But I also, I didn't believe like the worst possible outcome had transpired. Connor Tomlinson, what the hell is going on? Seriously, what the hell is going on? Those three things happened in the course of three hours in what did feel like a deliberate attempt to try and get the entire world to stop talking about Iran? Or am I just being a conspiracy theorist here? No, I don't think of being a conspiracy theorist, Dan.

I think regarding Melania's statement, there's potential that they're trying to get out ahead of the full spectrum news coverage that's going to come from Democrat control of Congress, potentially even the Senate, and therefore Democrat majorities on the House oversight committees when they start doing hearings about the Epstein. files. Because the Trump administration, despite promising to release them, has consistently lied about

the files. Pam Bondi, now sacked, was perennially incompetent when she had invited a bunch of influencers to the White House, foisted the Epstein files on them unannounced, got them to take photos, and then it wasn't until those photos have been released that the influences themselves realized that there was just stuff that had already been printed in there. Then she said they didn't exist. Then she said they were on her desk. Then she said the FBI destroyed them. And now we've got like six million emails, one of which was, of course, correspondence between Melania and Gillian Maxwell. And so what I think is happening is the Trump family are coming out and trying to get control of the narrative ahead of probably losing the midterms over the Iran war.

And this is why Trump lashing out at, let's say, the podcast sphere, who all voted for Trump in 2024. I mean, Alex Jones... I mean, Megyn Kelly did that major campaign. Do you remember the day before the election, Connor? Yeah, Alex Jones sort of threw his entire life away back in 2016 supporting Trump, supporting him through the 2020 election loss. Again, supporting up to 2024. Candice, I mean, you can think whatever about her output at the moment, but again, she's been a personal friend of Trump's for years and was, again, has said some strange things since Charlie Kirk's death, but they've both grieved the loss of their friend. And then Tucker continues to be charitable

to Trump, even though he profoundly disagrees with him on his policy with Israel. So Trump lashing out at them and denouncing them and saying they're not MAGA, meanwhile saying Mark Levine and Ben Shapiro and Ted Cruz and Lindsay Graham, who were all never-Trumpers, have never held the foreign policy of America first, have always championed brand-new wars to, you know, expand Israel's territory, something that we were told was a conspiracy theory, but now finance minister Smotrich came out the other day and said, yeah, we're going to expand into Gaza and Syria and Lebanon.

It's like, oh, really, the conspiracy theory is true, is it? Apparently they're America first. Trump goes on a tirade or true social defending Mark Levine, who's show nobody watches and he just throws insults out at everyone he can, including Megyn Kelly and Tucker. Those people are apparently MAGA, but the original MAGA, or not MAGA? At this point, it's just quite sad to watch.

And I don't know, Dan, if you got the opportunity to read a New York Times piece that came out a couple of days ago. Not that we usually do. But it was inside the situation room when Netanyahu and the head of Mossad pitched to Trump the Iran War, basically. And they convinced Trump that he could get in Bomaya-Tollah Khomeini dot-dot revolution, and it would just go fine. And apparently J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio, General Kane, a couple of other people said, this is a terrible idea. It was only Pete Hegsef that was all gung-ho for it. And, you know, he's apparently his faction in the Pentagon had been threatening the Pope in the last couple of days because they're like crazy presbyterians who hate Rome or something. I genuinely think that

Trump has so much emotional investment in Israel and in the figures that surround him that have been worm-tonged-style pouring poison in his ear that he's now a bit like a guy who's chosen the wrong girlfriend and like drifted away from his friendship group is now blaming them for his unhappiness rather than realizing the people around him actually don't have his or the nation's best interests at heart. And so what he just needs to do is just cut loose. this like barnacle sphere that have encrusted themselves onto Maga, and have tried to turn it back into Bush-era neo-conservatism, and get back to the domestic agenda of mass deportations,

and try to make up with some of the people who, yeah, I've said some weird things, again, don't agree with everything Candace and Tucker have been saying recently, but who ultimately are more Maga than the likes of Shapiro-Lavin, who just want to derail America first and make it Israel first. Yeah, and certainly for me, what was just a little bit sad, I guess, to see was Trump trying to suggest that just because someone isn't on mainstream television that their view is not relevant, given that we all acknowledge that one of the reasons that Trump won the election was because he rejected the mainstream media.

He did appear on those podcasts, be it Theo Vaughan or Joe Rogan. And that was obviously Baron Trump who recommended him to do that. And the point is Trump, you know the mainstream media is against you. And so the fact that they won't have Tucker Carlson or Megan Kelly or Candice Owens on their air anymore doesn't, I think, make their voice any less valuable. So that was a little hard to see. But at the same time, Trump is an older guy and we do know that he likes the old remote. You know, he's a man of his TiVo and that's how he likes to consume the media. But it is sad to see.

Personally, I hope there is going to be some type of resolution. Breaking today, a very sick King Charles is to address the British nation on TV later this month in what will be a landmark speech for the monarch who has been shrouded in controversy and sickness for most of his reign. Of course, the announcement of his cancer, which I have previously revealed is sadly terminal. and of course the arrest of his brother Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. But this address is all about trying to stabilise the British royal family and in some way link Charles's so far, and I'm going to be brutally honest about this highly unsuccessful reign,

to the very successful reign of his mother. So he will make the speech on what would have been her 100th birthday. This news revealed by The Daily Mirror, who says that the April 21st address will commemorate the life and legacy of Queen Elizabeth II. Russell Myers, the Mirror's royal editor, also reporting that the monarch will alongside Queen Camilla host a special reception at Buckingham Palace for dozens of representatives from organisations and charities with a deep connection to our late Queen. They say Charles has spent months handpicking the guest list from hundreds of patronages that Queen Elizabeth had throughout her life. Royal Insiders have revealed that Charles' personally penned emotional tribute will celebrate his beloved late mother's achievements and her dedication to duty. The King and Queen who are currently residing at their Berk Hall home in Scotland on the Barramarital Estate will return to London on April 21st when the sovereign speech will be broadcast to the nation and the Commonwealth. Charles, who is 77, is expected to convey what an inspiration his mother was, not only to himself

personally, but the rest of the royal family. Senior members of the royal family are also expected to accompany the King and Queen at Buckingham Palace for the special reception, the Prince and and Princess of Wales, so William and Catherine, as well as the Princess Royal Anne and Duke Conduct of Edinburgh, Edward and Sophie, are also hoping to attend. A royal source said the 100th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth I's birth will not only be a poignant moment of reflection, for His Majesty, it will be a cause for celebration of an incredible life well lived and a life dedicated to duty to her country. It is both the king and queen's sincere witch that the commemorations honour the late Queen's profound devotion to service and celebrate how much she was respected and admired

around the world. And look, that is all well and good, but I have to be honest about it. This is not enough. And the mainstream media are lying to you. The reason while Charles is in Scotland is because he is undergoing brutal treatment for his terminal cancer that is going to be paused in order for him to deliver this address and then travel to the US for the state visit with Donald Trump. But as his health deteriorates, this silence around the very obvious crisis engulfing the Royals given the police investigation, not to mention all of the trouble with Prince Harry and Megan Markle, I don't believe, serves the monarchy well. And of course, Charles's own biographer,

Robert Jobson, has revealed this week that his health is now so bad that Charles is actually falling asleep during official engagements while standing up. And again, my heart goes out to Charles, but I just feel like this strategy isn't working. Watch. I mean, what he's going through and what he's doing. I've seen it at events, but stood not that far from him, and he's almost falling asleep and standing up. And this is the man who believes wholeheartedly in his duty, and he's a courageous man.

But I would say this. I think that if he felt that he could not carry out his duty because of the ill health, and he felt that his health was in any way affecting his position, then he would actually not necessarily look to stand down, but he would probably say, I can't continue with the treatment I've got and I'll let it and take his action

because I know that he does alter and he's at his treatment. So you'll probably be doing the same ahead of this Washington visit to make sure he's got enough energy to give it his best shot. And that's what he's about really. You know, he knows he's not, he's a man in his late 70s. He knows that nobody lives forever. But luckily modern science has given us, medical science has given us a chance to live longer than say, you know, his grandfather who died

of cancer in 56 and his great-grandfather who died of cancer, I think, was who had 70. So, you know, at this moment in time, you know, he's given it his best. But unfortunately, King Charles and Parkingham Palace continue to waste valuable energy, trying to rehabilitate Andrew, a man that the public just will never. accept a rehabilitation as possible. And Prince William is rightly furious about the latest bid this week, which started when three mainstream media publications were briefed that Prince Edward had visited Andrew over the Easter weekend. And this was very much pushing the idea that Andrew could kill himself. Let's just be frank about it, that Andrew's mental health is significantly suffering.

So, for example, the Daily Mail quoted sources saying Edward and Sophie had dinner with Andrew one night over the weekend and they talk things through. It's true to say they both feel sorry for Andrew and how far he has fallen and they are worried about his fragile state of mind. They do feel for him. But of course, that doesn't excuse his behaviour. It's a difficult balancing act supporting him or not condoning what he has got involved with. Andrew still maintains he has not done anything wrong and thinks he will be vindicated one day. But I think Edward will have to try to talk some sense into him and make it clear his days as a working royal order. over it. It's like, are you kidding me? No one's even discussing the prospect of Andrew returning to

Royal Duties. What the public wants to know is, was he guilty of any crime? And is there going to be justice? That's what the public cares about. Yet the British Royal family are continuing to waste valuable real estate to try and make people feel sorry for Andrew. And even though the mainstream media won't admit it, Prince Edward basically admitted on stage earlier this year that Andrew is actually one of the victims in the Epstein scandal. Here's a reminder. And it's super important because, you know, it's been dominating headlines. We all know the last few days have been very interesting, very difficult, and I'm sure for you, sir, as well. This is an important question to ask, and I want to ask it in the context.

of what we've seen from their majesties and their response, and they're saying that we should be focused specifically on the experience of the victims. The palace has been very, very clear on that. We've just heard some commentary from Prime Minister Kiri Stama as well, and bearing that in mind, and he's saying that there needs to be assistance for the victims. And I wonder what you think of this, because it is so close to home, clearly very difficult, and I know you've put in various plans in place to move the institution forward, but how are you coping with that?

Well, with the best will in the world, I'm not sure this is the audience that is probably the least bit interested in that. So they all came here to listen to my education solving the future. But no, I think it's all really important always to remember the victims. And who are the victims in all this? And who are the victims in all of this? He was talking about the fact that Andrew was one of the victims.

Meanwhile, we've got to also talk about missing Fergie. because is she cooperating with the police? I think that's a very serious question. And we now learn from the Daily Mail this week that Sarah Ferguson has three burner phones, looks a mess and is moaning that she is broke. Remember, we have not seen Sarah Ferguson since the 12th of December

when she made an appearance at her granddaughter's christening in London. Alison Boshoff, the editor at large of The Daily Mail, reports described as being on a secret sofa surfing world tour. Fergie has apparently been staying at the homes of a succession of discreet, wealthy friends and remains in contact with a number of close allies through FaceTime calls. And the word they used to describe her is dishevelled. She hasn't been taking care of her roots or keeping up with her Botox, says one, with a grimace. We meant to feel so, her. Sightings have been made in several countries, but Fergie is dogged in her wish to stand to the radar. is low. She seems nervy,

says a friend. The friend adds that she has three different mobile phones and is switching between them to try to evade detection. She has three phones and she goes cycling through them because she's afraid that she might be being tracked. She's convinced that a lot of people wish her harm. There seems to be no in-person contact at all with daughters,

betrish and eugeny, who according to Vogue writer Plum Sikes appeared looking glossy and glowing at a Cotswold party last month, telling the assembled company that they were doing fine. There is, as you would expect, but a regret from Sarah who believes that she was a gullible fool rather than more culpably involved, even though some of their contact, as in the contact with Jeffrey Epstein,

postdates his conviction and jailing for sex offences involving an underage girl. A friend said she has been asking, how am I going to get through this? She complains a lot about being broke, although I don't know if that is broke in the sense that you or I would understand it. Her friends have been joking that they wouldn't be surprised to find her selling her old handbags on Vinted. However, another friend hears differently. He tells me she was in Devon at first.

I don't know with who. Then she went to Dubai. That was in February. Then she went to Austria and Switzerland. She's staying in some place which is like a castle now and apparently there is an Italian count looking after her. Perhaps though the period of Perda is coming to an end. After all, as anyone who knows the former Duchess can attest, Fergie is happiest when in the spotlight. My source said she says she will come back soon. Those who have for decades witnessed her Chatspa would not be surprised at all. Whether her return would be welcomed by anyone but her oldest friends is another.

matter entirely. So to Connor Tomlinson, the host of Tomlinson talks on YouTube. Connor, I say this with no pleasure, but the British royal family, the monarchy, really is in crisis at the moment, and I feel like the only person within the royal family who understands that is Prince William. And he is pulling his hair out or what little remains of his hair constantly with Charles's missteps, like this latest misstep to try and in some way make us feel sorry for Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, when he's in the midst of police investigation. But I just want to kick off talking about this TV address, Connor. Is it really enough for Charles to get up in front of the nation, in front of the Commonwealth, and talk about his late mother? Yes, we absolutely should be

celebrating Queen Elizabeth II on what would have been her 100th birthday. But personally, I just don't feel like this silence from Charles about what is the elephant in the room is sustainable. Where are you on this? I agree, Dan, and it's because the demographic that are going to be wistful

for Queen Elizabeth II compared to the terrible circumstances our countries in and who are displeased with, as you said, Charles' unsuccessful reign, are again vanishing from the earth. I mean, you can only sort of rattle

the nostalgia bells so often to distract people from just how nothing's working, nothing's getting better, it's all pretty dire. And to an extent, there's some criticism of the monarchy from the right, not just the left, you know, the Green Party that want to disestablish it, and basically Charles III is doing all he can to be like a walking advertising campaign to young people for why that should be the case. But from the right, which says that to an extent, Queen Elizabeth the 2nd, but certainly King Charles III, is pretty... presiding over the complete destruction of the country, the dispossession of the people whose well-being he is meant to be chiefly concerned with, of their own country.

And so what is the purpose of the monarchy if it's just another brick in the building of the great organ of state that is trying to destroy everything that we love and hold dear? So I don't think that, you know, a pre-recorded, scripted speech delivered by every, man who is in ill health and has never looked particularly authoritative when he wasn't, is going to spare his legacy, the current poor esteem he's held in by the public, or the institution of the monarchy from the growing Republican sentiment that's in the country. I know, and the problem is, Connor, that the Andrew disaster is really so terribly timed because you've got a monarch who is not really able to work full-time.

And I do think we have to take that into consideration too. His cancer treatment is grueling, right? Like, again, the mainstream media don't talk about it in this country, but I do believe it's in the public interest. And obviously, I haven't revealed what type of cancer Charles has or what type of treatment he is undergoing. but I think the fact that it is terminal cancer, and this is something that he has to factor into everything he does,

is extremely relevant in all of this. But my problem is, Connor, why does he not listen more to William, who does have his finger much more on the pulse of where the public is at and how to save the British Royal Family's reputation? So, for example, I'll give you two examples, Connor. He thinks the king should have been much, much tougher on Andrew Ruff.

right at the start. He thinks that even now, Andrew and Beatrice and Eugenie should be removed from the line of succession. And he's also advocating for much tougher action against Prince Harry and Meghan Markle too, because it's almost like that's the other unexploded bomb, which at some point is going to go off. I think it's because Dan, Charles doesn't make good judgment calls because he's not a man of good character. And I realize it's going to be contentious to people who are royalists rather the monarchists. But back when he was Prince of Wales, I mean, setting aside his infidelity and treatment of Princess Diana, but his obsession with the World Economic Forum, his worship of the climate cult, his constant glazing of Islam to the extent to where he

hijacked his Christmas message to talk about how it's brilliant. The Christianity allows interfaith dialogue, basically the promotion of Islam, and then so it will skip the Easter one, which I'm sure is in part to do with his ill health, but also, you know, nobody would be shocked if, given his cancer as terminal, soon we find out he has a Muslim burial. And regarding the timeliness of the Epstein scandal, I've gotten very disillusioned with politics, and I think a lot of people have, and it's because there seems to be no accountability for anything. It's like the Epstein scandal breaks. Like, for years, we've known that there's just this, this conspiratorial, international financial cabal, seemingly run according to some of the emails on

ethnic lines, but that encompasses non-Jewish elites, including many Americans, and it turns out members of the British royal family. And we have photographs, we have email chains. We know that someone like Peter Mandelson was basically trading state secrets to his best friend, Jeffrey Epstein, was staying at his apartment, even after he was a convicted sex offender. And in Mandelson's case, you know, he's just been charged for peeing in public outside George Osborne's flat. That's it? Like, really? In Andrew's case, he's meant to like... Yeah, he's meant to like skulk off into obscurity, I guess.

Sorry, are there no consequences for the entire ruling class being at least connected with one of the worst reprobates in Western history? Apparently not. And so this is why the speech won't solve anything. You know, even I think removing Andrew and that from the line of succession won't really solve much. This is a full spectrum. All of our institutions, our political class... our financial system, it's entirely captured by the worst people possible who do not care about us and are just lining their own pockets and in some cases laughing at our misery.

And so unless there is a total clear-out, unless there is accountability for all of these people, I don't see the kind of revolutionary fervor that is being directed, yes, the abolition of the monarchy, but politics, at society more broadly, going away anytime soon. But, Conner, as a sort of Christian religious man, a Catholic man, how do you deal with the family issue here, though? Because can you understand from particularly Prince Edward and Princess Anne's point of view, they feel that it's wrong to just walk away from their brother, to cut off contact from their brother, who remember they do believe as innocent, like. the late Queen Elizabeth the second always believed he's innocent. Now, they think he was stupid. Don't get me wrong, they think he was stupid, but they think he is innocent of any crime. And of course, even though there has been this terrible police and deep state cover-up, which really does make the

situation much more murky, Andrew, in the true letter of the law, maybe under police investigation at the moment, but he hasn't been charged with the crime, and he certainly hasn't been found guilty of any crime. So you have Anne and Edward saying, well, no, he remains our brother. We think you've been too tough on him. We are going to continue contact. Yet you have William, who's viewing this from like a PR point of view in terms of how to save the British royal family, saying, well, no serving working member of the royal family can be pictured with Andrew or Beatrice or Eugionie or you're out. So where do you stand on that? Because for me on a personal basis, even though I think the royal family have

mishandled this so badly, I would always stand by my family member. Well, considering you mentioned Catholicism, I mean, the injunction in the Bible is given by Christ is repent, go forth and sin no more. And I don't think there's been much repentance from Andrew from the royal family, but broadly. Well, none from Andrew. I think you can say that Charles and William have released statements now which do make clear that they have

huge regrets, but none from Andrew. Yes, but even if he didn't do something illegal, I mean, he was still cavorting with, again,

a cabal of the worst reprobates imaginable, you know. For audio listeners, Dan is nodding furiously. I think we all agree with that. And so people, people's immorality must have consequences.

Otherwise, and let's make it purely sort of like secular and just based on how to have healthy relationships here. if you allow someone to be in your life who is either exploitative or just like one step removed from the worst sort of exploitative people possible, they will bring those people into your life or they will continue doing exploitative things if you allow them to get away with it. And so, yes, they may be your family member, but if they are like contaminating your life, your broader social sphere with at the very least in, let's say at the very least in Andrew's case, his unrepentant and, awful,

inability to judge good characters, then just don't have them around you. And sometimes the best way to have people learn their lesson is for them to lose your company, if they value it, and then they have to reassess their own behaviours as to why they're no longer in your life. And then maybe they can come to you,

apologize, repent, make restitution. But by sort of hanging around and not punishing him for what he's done wrong, not legally, sure, fine, but morally, I just don't think that's going to produce a healthy monarchy. I don't think it's going to produce a healthy family. I don't think it's a good thing to model for society broadly. Very well put, Conner Tomlinson, the host of Tomlinson talks on YouTube.

Thank you so much for being here. Connett really, really appreciate it. Have an amazing weekend. But we are about to reveal the worst Britain in the world this week. And King Charles and Prince William were both nominated. Now, a lot of people are saying, what on earth is Prince William nominated for? It's not up to me. My guests choose the nominations each day, who is going to be named the Union Jackass during our live show. And then outspoken live viewers vote in the live chat. So that's how we get the Union Jackasses from across the week.

And then the worst British in the world puts those nominees from Monday to Thursday head to head in a megapole. We've already had 58,000 votes this week already. It's utterly incredible. And a reminder of your nominees. On Monday, it was King Charles. So this was for a very specific reason. It was because it was Easter Monday. And remember, he had refused to release that Easter message. On Tuesday, it was Sadiq Khan.

And this is just so appalling. He is effectively trying to lock people up for criticizing life in London. On Wednesday, it was for Prince William. Now, this nominee came from Sarah White of the Advance UK Party. It was because of a speech that's going viral, but one that William gave a number of years ago after the Christchurch massacre where he described Islam as being the religion of peace. And on Thursday, it was David Lamy,

the British Deputy Prime Minister who is encouraging reparations payments, which is just nuts, isn't it? Just completely nuts for a whole load of reasons. I've had so much feedback from you. Boris Gove, Albion, said, everyone. Lammy makes Neil from the in-betweeners look like Einstein. Oh my God, that made me laugh. If you've seen the in-betweeners, the British comedy, you'll understand why. Mary Ann Morgan wrote, I expect the rest to be complete numpties, but what Prince William said this week has put him in the number one spot,

plonker. Okay, see, I've just got to be fair to him. He didn't say it this week. He said it numerous years ago, and this is the problem. And when I did make Alvidi on this, I did contextualize and explain why he was saying it as he did. The Douglas of Murray says Charles, as king he was entrusted with a singular duty to uphold the faith and to stand as protector of his people and betraying both. He has not merely failed in judgment. He has sold out the very foundations of crown, country and belief. Paul Smith wrote Charles is the worst Britain for failing in his duty as head of the Church of England and ignoring the Christians in this land yet chomping at the bit to praise Islam. Fess built, 753 said, you know damn wild, Khan wouldn't have pulled that Trafalgar Square stunt

if Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth was still alive. Our so-called leaders have repeatedly taken the piss since her passing. And I do feel that. I do feel that. And sorry, P4D says too many young people killed a knife attacks and carnage has done nothing to stop this. He hasn't even sent his condolences to the bereaved families. It's disgraceful. So lots and lots of brilliant comments. from you coming in, but now let me reveal the winners. In fourth position, with just 3% of the vote, is Prince William. And I was happy about that, because I did feel, I'm not going to lie, I felt a bit uncomfortable with Prince William being there, but of course I've said to you, it wasn't my choice.

In third position, with 6% of the vote, David Lammy, the deputy prime minister. The runner-up with 28% of the vote, King Charles. But the worst Britain in the world this week with an overwhelming 63% of the vote, it's London's failed Islamist mayor, Sadiq Khan. Thank you so much for your company all week here and Outspoken, but we're going to move over to Substack now as the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow kicks off with according to Taz. So at this stage, we come off YouTube, we move to our own platform to continue the conversation in the Uncanceled Aftershow. All you have to do is sign up at www.org.org.org.

I hope you have an amazing weekend. back with you live this Monday 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific. Remember to hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Turn on the notification bell so you'll be alerted to our new episodes. We're available as a podcast now too so you can find us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts. In fact, wherever you get your podcast, but on Spotify you can watch the video version, which many of you do love. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.