Dan Wootton Outspoken - FURY AS UK MIGRANTS CAUGHT KILLING SEAGULLS & SWANS TO EAT AS TOMMY ROBINSON & RUPERT LOWE EXPLODE

Episode Date: July 9, 2026

UK migrants are now illegally killing swans, cats and rats for food with a shocking case of a gull being caught for dinner in Grimsby going viral across the world. Tommy Robinson has raged: "Invaders catching and killing gulls in broad daylight in "Modern England". Get these backwards people out!." But Reform UK’s Lincolnshire Mayor Dame Andrea Jenkyns has been mocked live on Sly News for trying to blow the whistle on these toxically unhealthy Islamist practices. And with Reform UK mired in scandal and Nigel Farage running against Count Binface, it’s Restore Britain taking the initiative with Rupert Lowe’s sensational Joe Rogan appearance and Charlie Downes destroying leftists over mass deportations. We’ll get into it all today with historian and political commentator Rafe Haydel-Mankoo, fellow at the New Culture Forum. PLUS: Tommy Robinson confronts Nick Lowles of Hope Not Hate in a London hotel lobby. AND: Count Binface is unmasked as a leftist writer for the British Bashing Corporation’s Have I Got News For You. We’ll reveal the truth about the man attempting to beat Nigel Farage in Clacton. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Lady Colin Campbell joins us to reveal the shocking new white pill drug allegation made against Prince Harry by his former friend Charlotte Griffiths, the Editor at Large of the Mail on Sunday who he attempted to destroy in court. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Here we go. Someone's already claiming this is our year. Someone else said that last year too. A round of Jameson, Ginger, and Lime arrives at a table. Smooth enough for kickoff, smooth enough for extra time. New friends pulling up a stool. Debates about whether that was a handball. Cheers rising like a roar around the room.

Because match days are about the shared moments. How did Jameson to your match day lineup? Jameson, it's what you bring. Please enjoy our products responsibly. No, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 535. And breaking right now, UK migrants illegally killing swans, cats and rats for food. With a shocking alleged case of a gull, this is according to a Reform UK counsellor, being caught for dinner in Grimsby going viral around the world.

She's got it. She's got it. Now, there are two sides to this story, of course, with some claiming that the woman was trying to rescue the seagull. But Tommy Robinson raged. Invaders catching and killing gulls in broad daylight in modern England get these backwards people out. Reform UK's Lincolnshire Mayor Dame Andrea Jenkins has been mocked live on sly news

for trying to blow the whistle on these toxicly unhealthy as, There was a serious issue with our ducks on the river with them being stolen and eaten. It is the fact come to Boston as the local people. I mean, I don't know about the case in Boston, but in this case here, there is clearly no evidence. Well, clearly you don't. Would you like to come to Boston? Are you doing yoga there or something? And Restore Britain's national security spokesman Henry Bolton says we now have a massive cultural problem on our shores.

We've got this big problem that we are importing people from other cultures and every single one of them who refuses or fails, or doesn't even understand, the need to integrate, is diluting the society and the behaviour of a country. Yet it's the native population now being aggressively arrested for calling out Islamism. Muhammad and Muslims are nothing but evil ideologies. It is evil. And what you're doing?

Yeah. What are you doing today? I have the right there. I'm not really. You've got to say, Mohammed. Stop it. Stop it. Stop it.

Mohammed. We're all right, man. Don't worry about us. Come on. And with Reform UK Mayerden scandal and Nigel Farage running against Count BinFace, it's Restore Britain taking the initiative with Rupert Lowe, sensational Joe Rogan appearance and Charlie Downs, destroying

leftists over mass deportations. You're choosing that English identity, aren't you? Well, I am English. I don't choose to be English. But where that's come from is this war and chaos that you're describing. Then we shouldn't just be picking up certain issues based on whatever our emotional feelings might be towards Indians or Caribbean people and saying, well, this is the problem we need to solve now, and more

recognizing that why don't we actually take a more holistic approach and look at the cause? I think the issue with that is the hour is incredibly. late. But my children and grandchildren on present trends will grow up as a minority, if not just in their own generation, then in their country. A minority of war? An ethnic minority. Okay. Also breaking today, astonishing new footage as Tommy Robinson confronts Nick Lowell's of Hope Not Hate in a London hotel lobby. What are you doing here, Nicholas? What? Are you trying to, Who's trying to stitch up?

Probably same as you. What's that then? Sit down. Come on, who's trying to stitch up? Can we just start to ask you some honest questions? No. Why not? I'm here.

I absolutely, I destroyed the credibility of hope and I hate, right or wrong. You put a bit of weight on the all, wouldn't you? Put quite a bit of weight on the all, Nick. You want the cocaine still? No, mate. No, really? Gym, mate. Gym, for me.

Really? Gym fitness health. Okay, yeah. Yeah. Are you here? What are you doing? I just. Come here for a coffee?

For a coffee? Who are you interviewing? No one. Who are you meeting? Who are you meeting? Oh, well, I'm going to show you the full footage. It gets better than joining us for the entire show. The historian and political commentator, Rafe Hidal Mancou,

fellow, of course, at the New Culture Forum. Also coming up on the show today, Count Binface is unmasks as a leftist writer for the British Passion Corporations, Have I Got News for you? We'll reveal the truth about the man attempting to beat Nigel Farage in Clacton. And Prince Harry and Meghan Markle accused of leaking private details about a meeting with Buckingham Palace to the Daily Mail in a shocking escalation of tensions

with the royal family as the delusional Duke breaks cover for the first time in Birmingham since his astonishing courtroom humiliation. Then in the Royal Uncanceled After Show on Substack, Lady Colin Campbell joins us to reveal the shocking new white pill drug allegations made against Prince Harry by his former friend Charlotte Griffiths, the editor at large of the mail on Sunday who he attempted to destroy in court. It's also the last greatest Britain and Union Jackass of the week. You can vote right now in the live chat on YouTube. Both myself and Rafe have nominated. Rafe has gone for Lisa Nandie because she is sort of saying that she's going to prioritize the MSM on YouTube and she's quit X2. He's also gone for another one of

faves, Bell Ribeiro Addy, the MP for Clapham, who wants UK to pay reparations to Jamaica and the Caribbean. I have gone for Nick Lowe's as a result of that confrontation with Tommy Robinson. So get voting. Keep your superchats coming in during the show as well. We will bring you the best at the end of the show today. But now, let's go. Okay, so I've been morning here and I've spoken for well over a year now, that migrants to the UK are on the regular illegally killing swans, cats, rats and seagulls. Sorry, it just makes me feel sick, but they're doing it for food. If you raise this issue, right, the elite class and the mainstream media immediately call you a conspiracy theorist. Now, I don't give a damn about that because I know it's their way of shutting

down the story. You'll remember the disgust from the Labour ruling class when my friend Dame Andrea Jenkins, the mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, dropped this truth bomb on sly news. But the problem here's, Andrew, there's no a pattern of reform politicians saying things that, frankly, the people who are actually at the front line of these things go there's no evidence for this. But can I just say, look, I was a counsellor in Boston, and there was a serious issue with our ducks, on the river with them, being stolen and eaten. It is the fact, come to Boston as the local people.

I mean, I don't know about the case in Boston, but in this case here... And that's going back 10 years ago. Clearly, would you like to come to Boston? Are you doing yoga there or something? You know, to try and calm yourself from, you know, speaking on a panel with somebody who's in reform? I mean, very bizarre reaction you have there.

Andrew, but again, there is no evidence for this. You accept that. I mean, the people literally... I've seen evidence in Boston myself 10 years ago of the ducks. We're not talking about Boston. We're talking about swans and Royal Parks. Your leader went on the radio and said he had heard or he... Well, it's heard.

It had. Yeah, but you can't just go around seeing you've heard stuff, can you? Apparently you can. Apparently you can. The Royal Parks, who run the park, said there was absolutely no evidence of this. It is extraordinary. What do you think there's actually want to put that out there? There is evidence.

We have seen the pictures. And good on Dame Andrea for standing her ground, writing it does happen. Come to Boston when I was a counsellor over a decade ago, there were instances then of ducks being stolen and eaten. So overnight, Andrea alerted me to her colleague, the Reform UK counsellor Oliver Freeston, who had posted this on his Facebook. Grimsby in 26,

I would remind all that in the UK all wild gulls are protected by the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. Perhaps Nigel Farage was right. Watch. She's got like a backbox in a man. She's got it. She's got it. What the fuck you do with that's eagle? Okay. Now it looks bad, right? But you know on outspoken, I'm always prepared to listen to both sides of the story. And after Reform UK went public with that video, it is worth mentioning that counterclaims have emerged that the woman was actually trying to rescue a seagull and that she contacted a seagull society for help after she was concerned

it fell off a roof. Currently, there isn't enough concrete evidence to suggest that the woman who contacted the Seagull Society was the woman we saw in the video. I will give her the benefit of the doubt, of course. But it doesn't matter because this is actually happening all the time, all the time. As Tommy Robinson bemoaned, Invaders catching and killing gulls in broad daylight and modern England get these backwards people out. And American Rob Schneider added, which culture eats seagull sandwiches? I'm guessing it's not traditional English cuisine could be wrong. But the Islam I left remained in total denial.

With the Green Party staff, Ahima Muhammad, telling outspoken, I saw the clip too, but I have no idea why someone would capture a seagull. There have been instances of people begging while falsely presenting themselves as belonging to a particular religion or back. background, but there's no evidence that's what happened here. Capturing or eating sea gulls is certainly not part of any Islamic teaching or Muslim practice that I'm aware of. So of course, what we always have from the Islam-Muslim part of society is this is no issue. We're not even going to deal with this because it's just not happening. A bit like the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. We're just not eating your swans. We know you are. It is happening and it is illegal. gulls protected by both US and UK laws, such as the Migratory Birth, Bird Treaty Act or the Wildlife and Countryside Act.

Hunting or killing them without a specialised permit can lead to massive fines. But look at these pictures. The health risks of eating them are off the scale, as Restore Britain's national security spokesman Henry Bolton exclusively told outspoken. Once again, footage has emerged of what's clearly an immigrant woman. catching and killing a seagull by breaking its neck. I presume that wasn't for sport, I presume it was for food, but it's one in a long succession of such videos that have emerged over the years of people killing swans, pigeons, seagulls.

Every single wild bird in the United Kingdom is protected under law. If you kill a wild bird, torture it or steal its eggs, you can face up six months in jail. The other thing about the other thing about the world is, Seagulls in particular is that they've got a concentration of heavy metals, botulism and salmonella in their bodies. You know what they eat. So it's not going to end well for you probably. As James Price posted, why is this not more of a scandal?

All of the most outlandish claims by parties of the right across the West are just proven correct again and again. Is it just considered uncouth and unseemly to admit that migrants are catchy and eating bloody swans and seagulls? sorry, I will not have it. What else is going on in these pictures? Now, Henry Bolton of Restore Britain says this problem is actually a big part of the fact that there is a huge cultural issue now on our shores. We've got this big problem that we are importing people from other cultures And every single one of them who refuses or fails or doesn't even understand the need to integrate is diluting the society and the behaviour of a country, the United Kingdom, Great Britain, England, Scotland and Wales that have countries that have grown up and evolved over the years to be, in we regard to be civilised. If we want to dilute all that, then carry on. But I'm going to do all I can to stop it.

Good. And we must. Because I'm sorry, do you want to live in a country where all of a sudden eating swans, killing cats, eating rats? And trust me, that happened in an area of London pretty close to me very recently is normal. I am sick of it. It is revolting. Why do you think people are getting so sick? But of course, this cultural issue also extends to violence too, with Tommy Robinson revealing shocking new footage, writing, in the same week a Pakistani rape gang leader is freed back onto the streets of Rochdale after serving a tiny sentence for dozens of rapes of British children, fully grown African men are running onto people's properties in the town to slap their children.

I don't care if these kids annoyed him. Take it up with the adults. As Effie responded, if this was the other way round, the Prime Minister would make a statement. BLM would be rioting in cities everywhere and the BBC would be covering at 24-7. But guess what? Total radio silence from those usual suspects. And an extraordinary footage from Leeds during a pro-Palestine march, a counter-protester is brutally arrested by West Yorkshire Police for an aggravated public order offence simply because he criticised the Prophet Muhammad. What?

They're getting raped and murdered. In my own country, it's happening as well. Hey, you stop there smiling. Muhammad and Muslims are nothing but evil ideologies. It is evil. And what are you doing? What are you doing to me? I have the right there, Shad of it.

That's not really sure. Stop with this dude, stop it. We're all right here, men, don't worry about us. Why are you doing? Why are you being told? Why are you being told me? You just swam me into the window? Oh, mate, what's...

Have a nice... How is your racial? Because you called Mohammed? Uh, the vicarious to the killer. Yes, because he is, if you read the Quran? Have you read the Quran? Have you ever read the Quran? It shows you in the Quran, don't it?

That's not him? Speaking facts. No, everything I have them is legal. Everything I have him is legal. Nothing. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Lawrence Fox responded to that footage writing,

Fuck the police, they are your enemy. What an embarrassment these fat little pigs are to our country. And the odious prick here, Stama has the gall to talk about how proud he is of our heritage of free speech. Remember that? We've had free speech for a very, very long time. No, we haven't. No, we haven't. And remember, this is the same notoriously woke police force that arrested a 16-year-old autistic girl after she said one of the police officers looked like her lesbian Nana, which I think you'll agree was true.

You're not anything, she's autistic. She's autistic. She's autistic and she's going to be arrested. I'm telling you, I've got you know, she's going to be arrested tonight. She's autistic, can you stop staring it at a please? She's got autism, can you just stand there? She's in her cupboard. She can't go anywhere. She can't go anywhere. Stand there, yeah. They're going to remove her for what good job on your woman?

She said the word lesbian. Her nana is a lesbian. She's buried to a woman. She's not all on the phone. Look with you clenching your feet. Go away from my teenage daughter. What is up are you right? You.

There is something wrong with you, mate. She didn't aim it at the police officer. It's not a homophobic remarked, she said, I think she's a lesbian like Nana. So it's in this ludicrous climate that Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe is going viral for his brilliant and I believe game-changing interview with Joe Rogan. Because with Reform UK, Myidan scandal and Nigel Farage running against Count Binface and Clacton rather than trying to take on the coronation of the Rack King of the North Andy Burnham, it's Restore that is debating the issues that others, including reform, refused to touch. Case and point reforms potential future deputy leader Charlie Downs, appearing on the next generation podcast. Now, this is hosted by 21-year-old Elliot Bewick, and he debated mass deportations against Noah East, who is the hard leftist founder of North Star Politics, which is an initiative to advance woke ideology. Charlie admitted that his number one concern is his children becoming an ethnic minority in his own country.

then we shouldn't just be picking up certain issues based on whatever our emotional feelings might be towards Indians or Caribbean people and saying well this is the problem we need to solve now and more recognizing that why don't we actually take a more holistic approach and look at the cause I think the issue with that is the hour is incredibly late now mass immigration is in my view the most malignant symptom of this illness it is the one that is most dangerous it is the one that is causing our country to be most volatile. And as I said, the thing, the central issue for me here is the fact that my children and grandchildren on present trends will grow up as a minority, if not just in their own generation, then in their country. A minority of what? An ethnic minority. Okay. But like we took at the start,

in this heralded history of England, you just laid out at every single point, people became ethnic minorities in a country they hadn't recognized at this point, but it's just a difference in color now, which is the apazite characteristic. So that's why I ask a minority of what. You know, you're in a religious minority, I believe. I think you're Catholic. That's right. So you're a religious minority. Your children will grow up a minority in that sense. You know, people in the room who maybe they are, you know, come from India, they've converted to Protestants and Church of England. They will not be in a minority in that sense. But it's interesting you choose that minority of race, of ethnicity. I just don't think that's the

relevant or pertinent characteristic. Well, I suppose the reason that I focus on that is because we have already seen what happens when we do introduce populations from regions like Pakistan into our country. It's different to, you know, for example, other northwestern Christian populations entering the country between the years zero and 2000. What happens is from that region in particular, they form organised child rape criminal trafficking operations. But guess what? Like clockwork, rather than actually debating this important idea, the Leifters just decided to accuse Charlie of picking on Pakistanis. And then he tried to pick on Catholics instead. that you're picking on Pakistanis and Afghans there, but if your problem is with systematized rape,

then you should levy that same critique of native-born Catholics. Well, I would. I think rape is wrong, whoever does it. But when you are, when you are, as a matter of policy, importing people from the, from regions of the world who have a proven track record of frequently engaging this kind of behavior, then that is an error. And once again, it's a problem when they make up a minority of the population. I can't imagine what it would look like if they began to dominate. It does really feel, though, doesn't it? Like all the left has is what about to read?

Because the left has then tried to get Charlie to admit that he had chosen to be English. Another ludicrous concept that can I just say would never be applied to any other ethnic group in the world. You're choosing that English identity, aren't you? Well, I am English. I don't choose to be English. But where that's come from is this war and chaos that you're describing. Yeah, I mean, I think the history of England, yes, it is one of war and chaos, but it is out of that emerged, one of the greatest protagonists of human history. We have historically been defenders of truth, of reason, of faith, and of higher principles than just what is immediately beneficial to us, what is immediately beneficial to our tribe, our kin. We have universal ideals as Western. And these values are not shared by the people that are coming from the regions on tour. I disagree, because like I said, you have ready-made Christians arriving from all points of the globe. But then in that case, maybe then you can,

see it as an improvement the immigration we have today because like you said, England historically, and in antiquity, its immigration was born out of war and chaos and violence, whereas today, you know, people applying for visas and getting planes across as ready mid-Christians speaking English, which the Danes did not. So I'm sure you do see it as an improvement. Well, I think, I mean, there probably is something to be said of the fact that foreign Christians are more assimilable than foreign non-Christians. I'm happy to concede that. But nevertheless, I don't accept that it is moral for the indigenous peoples of this country to become a minority, even if the population coming was Christian. As I said, even if it was the French, it would be a problem.

And then we get back to minority of what? Because like I say, you know, the pertinent characteristic is self-selected. You're saying it's ethnicity. I'm suggesting, well, you don't mind, you're a religious minority. You know, me, I'm a high minority. I'm rather tall. You're rather tall as well. But you know, you haven't really justified why you think ethnicity is such a pertinent, pertinent minoritizing factor. When the lifters then moved on to try and raise the whole Palestine stateless argument. Charlie turned it around beautifully. Why is being made stateless such a bad thing? Do you, you're happy asking that? Because the reason I ask it is because that is the fate that the British people face. But you outlined like the pillars of universal morality of one

of them being the nation. No, no, I'm asking you. I'm sure you can appreciate that. If if my people become a minority in this country, we will be stateless. Minority of war. I've already explained this. It's very, it's very basic to understand. This is why I asked. But why I'm not. But why The white British census category in England is currently about 80%. That was at the 2021 census. On current trends, it will go below 50% within about 40 years. It's already 54% of the birth rate. And so if we do become a minority in our own country,

we lose the ability to decide our own destiny, certainly at the ballot box, because other groups can vote along the lines of their own interests. And we are therefore left essentially stateless. And finally, the leftist's intellectual position collapsed when Charlie posed a direct question to him. So do you deny that the English people are a people? No, I don't. Of course not. So why are you struggling to understand my concern as an English person about becoming an ethnic minority in my own homeland?

Because I don't think that the ethnic minority aspect is the most pertinent aspect or a totalizing or totalizing aspect of what it means to be English. So what if you said that to, for example, a Palestinian who had concerns about Israeli colonialism in that region of the world. Would you say, well, Palestinian identity isn't really real. It's this, you know, this sort of collection of peoples over the course of thousands of years. And you shouldn't worry about becoming a minority here, an oppressed minority. Well, there's two different things, aren't they?

If we're honing on just the minority. You need to tell me out of that. You need to me as that. Because there's two different things. One becoming a minority, two become an oppressed minority. I think you recognize how different those are. Well, the two often go hand in half. Regardless of if they go hand in hand, let's take them one at a time then.

So starting off with a minority, is Charlie's claim that he's worried about being a minority in his own country? Is that inherently wrong? Should he be okay with becoming a minority in his own country? Well, again, we go back to minority of what? Because like you said, he hasn't firmly grounded it because he says minority of ethnicity. I've asked him for why that's important. He's then referenced the mythological supernatomy. What information are you missing?

Right. So I've said becoming an ethnic minority. I think that's quite clear what that means. Because what that carries with it is, as I said, the inability to decide your own destiny using political processes, democratic political processes. But the ability to decide your own destiny, so you think people's perception of their own destiny is intrinsically tied to ethnicity? Well, I think a people has a destiny. So it's so obvious, isn't it? The left will not accept that the English, the white native population are an ethnic group. But of course, if you were to say that about the Nigerians, the Jamaicans, the Jamaicans, the Japanese, you would be considered a racist.

Now, evidence. I like evidence. You know that. I like empirical evidence about what's going on in this country. So guess what? We got some today. The most popular name for boys born in England and Wales last year. Muhammad beat Noah by 6,000 to 4,100. And as Connor Tomlinson of Tomlinson talks put it, Muhammad should not be the most popular baby name in Britain. It should not be a common name in Britain. But it is for a second year in a row. The demographic and cultural vandalism that politicians have inflicted on this country is unforgivable. But it is not irreversible.

Now, Rafe Hadle Manku. Raif, so you look at that table again, and it's like how on earth can anyone claim that there is not a takeover when more Mohammeds are being born than any other English name? Yeah, you're absolutely right. I mean, it has to be said as well that I think almost all Muslim boys are called Muhammad. So there's less of a selection of names there. But the English are going to become a minority within their homeland. Some people say by the 2060s, I'm less optimistic.

I would say by the 2050s. And so the question you then have to ask, and the question Charlie should ask of his interlocutor, is at what point does Britain stop being British? If Britain is only 40% or 30% white British, is it still British? and how can you expect other people to actually integrate and assimilate into a country where the indigenous people are themselves an ethnic minority?

And what are the common bonds going to be that unite the people together? Because this chap against whom Charlie was debating seemed to be deliberately, willfully blind and ignorant. Of course, for any nation state in Europe, ethnicity was the key defining factor that united them together. Yes, perhaps with some larger immigrant communities, but ultimately, ethnicity was the common bond that they shared, what Sir Roger Scruton called the we, the first person plural of a society. So what are the common bonds going to be? I mean, it used to be, of course, we had shared comedy, a shared sense of humor, sports, watching the same television shows, the same pride in our history. But when you've got people there from different countries and different communities, you lose all of that.

And so suddenly we become far less of a cohesive society, far less a United Kingdom and more of a United Nations. And the sort of police response, Rafe, which I think links in actually to the deep state response, is I also believe entirely intellectually dishonest. Because we saw it there in those scenes from Leeds where a man makes a protest against Prophet Muhammad against Islamism, and he is immediately treated Rafe as if he is a racist criminal. Now, he's not racist. He's clearly not a criminal, but he's also not racist, Rafe. Like, when are the police and our ruling class and our politicians going to get it through their head that as it stands, unless they actually do introduce a blasphemy law,

which we know Labour has been contemplating through the back door. Until they do that, Rafe, we can criticise the Prophet Muhammad as much as we, God damn, please. And the fact that this man was arrested for it, and clearly that is what happened, I'm sorry, regardless of what they say, means that I believe now there is an almost formal state conflation between racism and what they call Islamophobia,

which I would actually call common sense. Rafe, by the way, you know, saying that as a gay man, given they want to chuck me off the top of buildings, but you know what I'm saying. Yeah, absolutely correct. I mean, you know, you can state historical facts. The fact is Muhammad kept slaves, perhaps 40 slaves.

Muhammad married Aisha at the age of six, had sexual intercourse with her at the age of nine. These are historical facts. This does not make one an Islamophone for simply stating things which are, true. And the other point is, quite clearly, Islam is not a race. To criticize the religion of, Islam is a religion and an ideology. And no religion, no ideology should be free from criticism. And it is deeply insidious, deeply sinister to see the police acting as if we are living in

the states of which has blasphemy, but blasphemy against only one religion. And it's not a religion that is indigenous to these lands. It is a foreign religion. I mean, just, you know, when you Tell people that I say, for example, that the word Islamophobia is a nonsense term created by the Muslim Brotherhood, deliberately to confuse people and stop people attacking or criticizing the religion of Islam. Anti-Muslim hatred is a terrible thing, but the use of Islamophobia as a term is deliberately designed to confuse matters. And if you attack the religion of Islam, then you'll seem to be Islamophobic and racist. Well, I'm sorry, Catholicism is not a race. It's not racist to attack Catholicism. even though most Catholics aren't white, most communists in the world are Chinese.

Is it racist now to attack communism? Because that's the logic you're getting from these numpties. And I think it's absolutely outrageous that a British person walking the streets of this country cannot criticise a religion without getting his collar felt by the woke police in this land. I mean, the police need full-scale root and branch reform. One of the biggest problems in the disunited kingdom with this is, Lamo takeover coming is the fact that organisations like hacked off, like the byline times, like hope not hate, have been given a lot of acceptance within formal circles, and that times

money from the state too as they are treated like charities or sometimes even formally are charities. And the matter who you just saw Nick Lowell is probably someone who you've never heard of, you should never heard of. He's a completely talentless guy, a very ugly man inside and out. But someone who has made a lot of money by trying to bring down anyone who wants to save our country. His annual hate report includes everyone from me to Tommy Robinson to Ray Fadle Mancoo and the brilliant new culture forum and the late Peter Whistle who set the whole thing up. Really good people across the board. news presenters talk TV presenters, politicians for Reform UK are all included in this report as if we're

terrorists. He is a truly sick man. And thankfully, thanks to a lot of the hard work from Tommy Robinson, he is now being exposed. I mean, you'll remember Nick Lolles was the guy that during the so-called Southport riots spread a piece of fake news. Do you remember this, that acid attacks were taking place on Muslim populations. He was never arrested for that, even though that claim, I believe, was in large part behind much of the violence that was seen. So this is a very bad guy.

But you've also got to see the funny side of the fact that Tommy Robinson arrives at a posh central London hotel. On his own, he's always on his own, but he's recording a podcast with the brilliant Australian politician, the one-nation leader, Pauline Hansen. And then this happened.

Tommy posts, Look who I bumped into in London, trying to hide with his sunglasses on indoors, the sneaky fat rat Nick Lowell's, who lies, smears and tries to ruin the lives of anyone he and his vile commie ilk disagree with. And I have to say, the confrontation that followed all caught on Tommy's camera

is hilariously intense. What are you doing here, Nicholas? What? Are you trying to stitch up? Probably, same as you. What's that then? Sit down. Come on, who are you trying to stitch up?

Who you're here to stitch up and fit up? Who you're lying about? Huh? Do you want to admit that you lied about me? Hey? The people you bump into in London, do you want to admit that you lied about me, Nick? Come on.

For the camera. Can we just talk about you some on this question? No. Why not? I absolutely. I destroyed the credit. of hope not hate, right or wrong. Absolutely fucking ruined job.

I ended you, didn't I? You set out to end me, and your credibility is zero. How many people listen to you now? Really? Yeah. Your credibility's fucked. Everyone knows what. All I have to do is share you a documentary.

That must haunt you. They must want you. It must. You sat out to ruin me, didn't? You set out to lie, ruin me, set me up, and I absolutely pulled the rug from under. Come the camera down, let's chat. Why can't we chat by the camera? Why can't people see your reactions?

Look at him, sitting indoors with his sunglasses on. I think this video proved that Nick Lulz is one of those men we all know them, who is very brave online and a total loser pussy in the real world. You put a bit of weight on the lawn, wouldn't you? Put quite a bit of weight on the whole Nick. You're on the cocaine still? No, mate. No, really? Gym, mate. Gym for me.

Gym fitness health. Do you? Yeah. Come on Nick. What are you doing here? What are you doing it? I just come here for coffee. For a coffee? Yeah. Who are you interviewing?

No one. Who are you meeting? Who are you meeting? Me, Pauline Hanson. Okay. Hopefully the next leader of her. What negative stories have you wrote about her, Nick? Go on.

What have you called her? What words have you used to try and destroy her name? Yeah. Like everyone's. Can't he? Lucky you're sitting there with your glasses. I'm trying to hide. I'm not trying to hide at all.

You should have to try to hide. I called you over, didn't I? So there you go. You should have to hide. So I didn't. I didn't. from anyone. Okay, so just for the record, Nick, what did I do to your credibility?

Fucking ended you. Successfully ended it. Good night, Nick. Good night. Hope not hope. And there is such a change in the air, isn't there? Because Tommy did then post the fact that he had sat down with Pauline Hanson and actually taken her on a walk through Luton.

Watch. I'm in Luton Town Centre with Pauline Hanson, about to take her for a walk through my town. Are you ready, Pauline? Ready? Ready, bullying? I'm in your hands, drummer. We're about taking a strong fruit,

and let's see what happens. And I have to say, my God, I'm looking forward to watching that whole episode. Pauline wasn't just sitting down with Tommy, though. Look at this. Also meeting Restore Britain leader, Rupert Lowe. with Lowe, fresh of his appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast, posting, I love Australia, proper people with a proper country. Good to meet with Pauline Hansen, who is working so hard to protect that.

We certainly share many of the same objectives. And Rave Hedleman Koo of the New Culture Forum, I mean, clearly, like, it's pretty hysterical and I found it very, very funny that Tommy Robinson just ends up in the same hotel lobby with Nick Lowe's. You sort of couldn't make that up. But actually, there is a change happening, Rafe, the fact that this most popular prime minister, sorry, let me say that again, the fact that the most popular politician in Australia, that is a provable fact at the moment, Rafe, Pauline Hanson and her One Nation party is topping

every major poll in Australia, is prepared to not just meet Tommy Robinson, but to spend time with him, to be interviewed by him, for him to take her to Luton. And then she also meets with Rupert Lowe, which I guess is the political side now of this conservative revolution in the UK. To me, that all feels very significant. It does feel like Tommy's right. You know, Nick Lolls has lost and the Patriots are starting to win. I mean, it's going to be hard, right?

But are we looking? I mean, just here's, I know people say I'm crazy, Rafe, but are we looking? at this picture of Pauline Hansen and Rupert Lowe and seeing two future prime ministers. Well, I'm not sure whether Restore, unfortunately, we'll get the votes to take them to power. But with Australia, we just had over here the art conference, and I did an interview with John Anderson,

former Deputy Prime Minister, and with Sky News Australia. And the reason that people like Pauline Hansen are coming over here and wanting to have these meetings is because Britain has been the key. in the coal mine. Britain is about 20 years ahead of Australia in terms of social cultural erosion through mass immigration. To put it this way, they've just had their Bondi Beach massacre, which is their equivalent of our 7-7. And the Muslim population in their country is where we were

20 years ago. Every 20 years, the Muslim population doubles. So what they see happening here today is what they want to try to avoid. So it's almost as if they're sending out mission. to learn from us about what not to do, not what to do because we haven't done what needs to be done yet, but certainly the mistakes to avoid, the pitfalls to avoid. And that's why they want to listen to the soothsayers. I mean, I spoke at CPAC Australia last year

and did deliver a warning, really, to Australia. Don't be like us. And I know Pauline Hanson will be speaking at CPACGB, the first CPACGB, as well I think this time next week. Yeah, next. Next Thursday, the first CPACGB, so I'm looking forward to that. So she's clearly spending quite a long time in the United Kingdom, which is interesting actually because when I last spoke to her, she did say she loves the UK, but given the Islamist takeover of London, she actually does feel quite unsafe here now. There's a really serious point, though, in terms of the hope not hate Nick Lowell's confrontation rave, because I would argue for too long, shadowy men like that have got away. with trying to degrade patriots, seemingly making a lot of money for it. At the same time, Rafe, I mean, we know Reform UK at the moment have made formal complaints about hope not hate and the role of hope not hate as a charity.

And that's why I know some people say, oh, it wasn't fair what Tommy did. No, I'm sorry, this as an organisation, Rafe, I mean, they tried to degrade you. They tried to deride the new culture for them. try to deride G.B. News. I mean, this is a very extreme left-wing organization. They're fascist. Let's just call them out for what they are. There are a far-left fascist organization who smear, who Harris, and who try to destroy anybody who dares to challenge mass immigration, multiculturalism, or any far-left woke ideology. And it's such a disgrace to realize, actually, that this is a person that was embraced by the,

centre was in fact embraced by David Cameron. I don't know if people realise this. Nick Lowell, that person you saw there was awarded an MBE in 2016 when Cameron was in power for his work allegedly battling extremism. Can you imagine that? That just goes to show you how long it's been since we've had any true patriotic right-wing government in power in this country. He is and essentially, he's a, Nick Lowell's as an attack dog for the leftist establishment that have created a post-revolutionary society in here. And they also specialize in guilt by association. If you've met anybody in your life,

you will therefore be tarred with the same brush. And the reports they put out, they're not objective research. They are political hit jobs that are designed to label mainstream concerns and mainstream feelings about integration as somehow far right or extremist. Yeah, I mean, that is astonishing, isn't it, when you do think how accepted they were. I mean, I do also have to point out, thank goodness, Reform UK have realized now, Rafe. But I do have to point out there was a time when Reform UK was even asking Hope Not Hate to vet some of its candidates as well.

And so I do think there has been a change. A lot of people on the right used to think, oh, God, we have to try and work with these people because if we don't try and work with these people, they are going to destroy us. And I actually think the Tommy Robinson approach on hope not hate is right. There's no working with people like this. You just have to destroy them. They hate us. They hate everything we stand for.

They want to silence us because we are the truth tellers. We are the people saying the emperor has no clothes. We are the ones showing that the establishment narrative, that diversity is a strength is completely fictitious. And they have a long track record of a lot. armism and exaggeration. There is no world in which we can cohabit with each other. They are the enemy.

They need to be called out. They need to be resisted. They need to be opposed with every ounce of our energy and strength because they are the enemies of this country. Breaking right now, I can unmask, count binface, the so-called politician trying to beat Nigel Farage in Clacton. And let's just be honest, getting a huge amount of help. for the mainstream media in order to do so, I can unmask him as a leftist wannabe comedian

who writes for the vile Ian Hyslop on the BBC's Have I Got News for you? Let me show you the real Count Binface given he wants to make a big, big play in this by-election. Here he is. John Harvey. This is the dude, this is the leftist behind the mask and given all of a sudden, the BBC thinks that this is a man we should be interviewing. Lots of the left-wing establishment media are trying to push him to beat Nigel Farage. Let's actually talk about who this guy really is. Because at this point, as the Daily Telegraph today reports, Count Binfe faced to be the only major challenger to Nigel Farage. In a series of interviews, Farage has admitted this is not what he expects. and the by-election, I believe, is massively backfiring on Reform UK.

Even the future Prime Minister, Andy Burnham now weighing in, posting, always worth knowing, when Bin Day is. And when Newsnight host Patty O'Connell tried to unmask Count BinFace live on air, he ended up being mocked, and the programme ended up being mocked as a souped-up podcast. Right. Why don't you bin off the bin on Newsnight now? that your name is John and we know really a lot about you. Isn't this time for serious times to bin off the bin?

Oh here we go. I mean, as anyone here seen Return of the Jedi, nobody wants to know what's underneath a recycling. It's disgusting. It's absolutely putifying. No, no, if you want to be serious with me, I'll tell you, you want to talk to Camp BinFace and then you get me on Newsnight and you start

to deconstruct a character, I would say, what are we doing here? a program which used to construct proper investigative journalism and now is a souped up podcast, Paddy. When Nigel Farage posted on X just popped into this cafe in Walton, they still have my leaflets from 2024 on display, Piers Morgan weighed in, six more weeks of campaigning to beat a bin, and get the seat back that he just voluntarily quit. This is tragic. And now, even within GB News, there are growing fears. Wait for it. I don't think it will have happen, but there are growing fears that Count Binface could end up beating Farage, with the political

letter to Christopher Hope, writing, if you add up the votes for the candidates for the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and Greens in the Clacton constituency at the 2024 general election, Nigel Farage would have lost by nearly 3,000 votes. If the major parties can unite behind one candidate, even Count Binface, Farage could lose. And clearly this is a farcical situation given it has also emerged that Count Binface would be unable to attend Parliament in his costume. Because were Count Binface to be elected as Count Binface, your mandate is as Count Binface.

Under current parliamentary rules, you wouldn't be allowed to appear in the chamber like this. And there are MPs right now thinking of writing to the Speaker saying, were you to be elected, that your mandate would have to be respected and you'd have to appear in the common chamber just like this. And let's not beat about the Bush. He actually said that. It's politics in 2026. And I think your viewers are going to be thinking,

my goodness me, did we all just stay up too late watching England, Mexico? We all haven't had enough sleep and it's just one giant fever dream. Maybe this is just a group hallucination. Maybe we're all in one of Christopher Nolan's Inceptions and it's a giant publicity stunt for the Odyssey. Who knows? And mark my words, there is now serious left-wing money behind Count BinFace.

Politics UK reporting that Labour donor Dale Vince has pledged to fund Count BinFace's campaign against Nigel Farage. So let's talk about who Count BinFace really is, okay? The Daily Telegraph lifting the lid on the former comedy writer, writing John Harvey, who wears a large bin-shaped helmet, is expected to target the reform UK leader after taking on heavyweights such as Sadiq Khan and Boris Johnson. After all the main parties pulled out of the Clacted On Sea by-election, it may well be a straight shootout between the two men. So who is? Count Binface. Well,

Harvey is a married father of two who has worked for the past seven years as a comedian and scriptwriter after graduating from Oxford University with a degree in classics. He's a posh boy. He first wore an oddball costume in 2017 against Theresa May, Prime Minister standing as Lord Buckethead, which was inspired by the character of the same name from the 1984 science fiction parody Hyperspace. But after his campaign was picked up in the media, Todd Dernam, the film's American maker contacted Harvey and warned him to stop using the name. So he modified the character to circumvent copyright rules and Count Binface was born. Harvey's credits include work on political comedy shows straight out of central casting folks,

like Have I Got News for You with Ian Heslop? And the Thick of It with Amano Anuccio. Since his inaugural election fight, he has stood against Mr Johnson in 2019, Sunak, in 2024, on both occasions failing to recoup his £500 deposit. He also ran against Siddi Khan in the 21 and 24 London mayor elections. On each occasion, Count Binface presented voters with a novelty manifesto, which contained a mix of comical and semi-serious policies. He raises money to fund his escapades by selling t-shirts, caps and mugs, half of the proceeds from which he gives to shelter the homeless charity.

But here's the key fact. Any donors remain anonymous. And the Count has this week launched a fundraiser to allow supporters to give a £3 donation. As of Wednesday night, more than 8,000 such donations have been made. So this is a big money owner. Some pledges have been consistent throughout his career, including bringing back CFACs, capping the price of a croissant at £1,000, and moving the position of the hand dryer in the men's toilets at the Crown and Treaty Pub.

in Uxbridge. Harvey described writing for Have I Got News for You as a dream come true, having growing up watching it, so he's clearly a saddo. He also wrote a set of bonus episodes of the thick of the award-winning political show which charted the ups and downs of fictional Westminster Powerbrokers. He gets better, spent some time working for Newsnight, according to his website, and he hosts an evening show on Times Radio. Away from politics, he published a column in the Times in May in which he opened up about the pressures of being a father to young children, admitting that he had not slept in his own bed for more than a year. So can we just stop for one second in thinking that Count Binface is anything other than

an establishment leftist sent in to destroy Nigel Farage? But you also know, I'm going to be very honest with you about this, I think this by-election is a disaster. I can't believe Farage is going ahead with this. And I was actually shocked to even see GB news challenging Farage about this, as the reform UK leader admitted that the revelations about him are about to get worse. In politics had nothing to do with anybody else whatsoever. But it would have saved you a huge amount of grief.

And as time's gone on, more stories have come out. It's made you look worse and worse. What else is there still to come out? Is it still going to get worse? Oh, maybe. It would have seemed that every single person. private detail of my life has been accessed illegally and is being put into the public domain. I think it's unfair. Even my family are being harassed. My daughter's being harassed by people.

I think the whole thing is monstrous. If if, and I say if, because it's up to people, we get a resounding big vote and victory here. It sticks two fingers up to the establishment. There's more bad news for Farage this morning, though. Restore Britain and the surge in Restore Britain is now seriously impacting the possibility of Reform UK being able to form a government. So this is because of this megapole that has been released by electoral calculus, and it shows that Labor has actually had a burn and bounce. It could get 217 seats if a national contest was held immediately ahead of the Tories on 151, reform on 127.

Now, what has changed here? significantly changed is lots of people are now supporting Restore Britain. And even though the electoral calculus poll only shows Rupert Lowe winning his seat, it does mean a huge number of Reform UK seats will not be won. So let me bring in the new culture forums, Rafe Hedle, Mancou. Rafe, can we talk about Mr Binface first? Because it doesn't just seem like he's a normal novelty. does he rave?

It's like, this is a novelty being funded by Dale Vince, a writer for Have I Got Newsview and the thick of it, a man who hosts a TV show on Times radio. I mean, this guy's establishment as you can possibly get. Absolutely. You know, growing up, I'm sure most of your viewers like myself used to love those genuine eccentrics you would see up on stage next to the great political heavyweight.

You know, that was the best of Batty Britain, and we all got behind them because they were the man down the pub having a go. But as you say, Binfaces something very different. He's not eccentric. He's a smug establishment troll. And, you know, he resents, and he actually despises the people of Clacton, I would say,

you know, because you've just pointed out. He's straight from, you know, metropolitan elite central casting. Anybody who writes for, have I got news for you, has a sneering condescension towards the working class, towards Brexit voters. He's somebody who clearly believes that democracy shouldn't be left

to the great unwashed, as with the people of Clacton. Just look at his policy manifesto. Like some of the policies there are very funny. Let's bring back C-Fax. Let's rearrange where the hand-dry is in an Uxbridge pub. But then you get the other ones.

No arms deals with repressive regimes. But then also, for it's universal broadband, that, but denying the vote to people over 80 years of age, whilst lowering the vote to 16. I mean, it's quite clear that this is a chap who comes very much from the Labour green side of politics. And it wouldn't be that bad, actually, if he was an amateur with the stuff he's saying, which is quite amusing. For an amateur, it's amusing. But when you realize this is a professional comedy writer, and you see how his performance on Newsnight, well, actually, it's quite painful.

And also, why didn't Newsnight actually reveal that he used to work for him? Exactly. Exactly. Like they all know who this guy is. This is all a set-up, Rave. And it's a set-up designed to destroy Farage. I do think there are serious questions, though, at the moment, Rafe, for Reform and Farage. I just want to read to you part of a substack by Fraser Nelson on this issue. So he said Farage and the BinFace Factor. But he's added Reform UK is starting to look like a plutocratic version of the establishment it rails against, adding Farage. has always been at his best as the mocker, the gesture, the licensed insurrectionist standing outside the castle walls. But in Clacton, he risks becoming the thing he has always mocked. The grand pompous man demanding a plebiscite on his own wounded dignity. He looks like he's assembling not an insurgency, but a rival elite, global, moneyed, in many cases crooked with criminal convictions and outraged at any challenge. He's fired. for the right, not of his constituents, but his own right to trials a huge sums from Sugar Daddies,

the right to spend nights and undeclared Westminster Penthouses, take cash from convicted criminals, and run what's starting to look like a global dirty money operation. I mean, that is a huge call, by the way, from Fraser Nelson. Farage says Reform UK will cover the £350,000 cost, which itself reminds us of the problem. It is literally trying to buy an election. And what kind of part party has that cash to waste on a pointless by-election stunt. The offer to fund is an obvious red flag, a reminder that £3 and every £5 £5 reform spends has been wired from Bangkok by the Crypto King Christopher Harbourn. Now, Rafe, look, you can say, as I know Reform UK are saying, oh, it's Fraser Nelson,

you know, he's working for the times, they hate us. but this by-election to me is just looking like a disaster. I'm sorry, because of questions like this. I think it's actually putting more focus on the issue. And I'm also just like, Rafe, do you know what's happening this time next week? We're getting a new prime minister coronated. There is going to be a coronation of Andy Burnham. What has Nigel Farage allowed all the enemies of him to do?

Not talk about Andy Burnham. No one's talking about him in the mainstream media. No one's talking about this corrupt coronation. What are they talking about, Rafe? What are they obsessing over Farage? So I know people within reform think this is genius and that he was claiming back the initiative. I'm sorry, I just really strongly disagree.

Am I wrong? Yeah, well, look, it's certainly clear what the motive behind, what the strategy was. And when he first came out with this idea of holding a by-election, some of the heavy hitters in the media world thought this was inspired. They thought this was a real way to seize control of the agenda rather than face a recall to call a by-election himself.

But as Nigel has himself admitted, he never expected, actually, that the other parties wouldn't stand any candidates in that, although you just have to look back 18 years to when David Davis, the Conservative heavyweight, tried something similar. There was, of course, a similar decision not to stand candidates in that election. So, of course, I do wonder whether, in hindsight,

They now think perhaps it was a mistake to call this by-election because, of course, as well, it doesn't mean it's doing away with the standards investigation, which is just on pause. And it may well be that there will be a second by-election. And we've had Rupert know that. That's when they're going to stand in election. But right, any time I speak to someone within Reform UK about this, they keep saying to me, Dan, there's not going to be a second by-election.

They're not going to do it. And I'm like, do you not understand the establishment? like they were going to use this committee, this privileges committee to get rid of Boris Johnson, Rafe, no matter what. And in the end, Boris was pretty much pushed, wasn't he, before he could jump? But I'm like, are you serious? Of course they're going to, of course they're going to force a second by-election. Of course they are. What are you thinking?

It's, you know, it's not like they care about people saying, oh, this is a waste of time. because fundamentally what they want to do is chip, chip, chip away at Nigel Farage. Look, the establishment are so rattled by the thought of a reform government that you're seeing exactly the same tactics that you saw against Trump, right? The Russia hoax, all of these allegations come out. There is no trick too dirty that they won't try. And so you've got the media working hand in glove with the political elites to try to do whatever they can to undermine what they see as a threat to their,

to their revolution, their top-down revolution. This is the counter-revolution from the grassroots up to try to regain control of this country. And as you saw with everything that was done by Biden and Kamala Harris, we're seeing a similar thing here. So, of course, they're going to do whatever they can to get a second by-election. It just requires a certain number of signatures

from local constituents on a recall petition, and it will be triggered. And then, of course, the question then becomes, how much can you rely on your core vote to come out time and again, to defend you. Indeed. And you know what?

You should all be talking about Andy Burnham right now. Andy Burnham, who by the way, just today, has apologised for the Labour government response in Gaza, saying, my party didn't get it right. I am sorry we need to do better. What is he doing? He is appealing to the Islamo left. And no one is talking about the coronation of Andy Burnham because, you know, what? They want to talk about Count Binface because they know the more that they talk about

Count Binface, the more that the pressure is on Nigel Farage. And it's not even that they necessarily think Count Binface will actually win. I think it's highly unlikely, but it's not about that. It is about a distraction technique. By the time this by-election is over, Andy Burnham will have been coronated. And unfortunately, that's why I think this was such an own goal by Reform UK. I really do. Speaking today, Prince Harry and Megan Markle accused of leaking highly sensitive information about a private meeting with Buckingham Palace and representatives for King Charles, unbelievably to the Mail on Sundays, editor-at-Large Charlotte Griffith, the same woman who Prince Harry was trying to destroy in court.

Charlotte Griffith has made these revelations in an astonishing new front-page article for Today's Daily Mail, where she also reveals Prince Harry's latest drug shame, which involved pulling out some type of pill. She claims it may have been paracetamol, putting it on her tongue and saying, now I know I can trust you. This, by the way, was within seconds of meeting the then-27-year-old newspaper journalist. So Harry is in deep trouble on a whole load of matters. And he knows because yesterday he tried to blame, and this was the GB News spin, he tried to blame soaring London temperatures and a heat wave as the reason why he snuck into the Chelsea Hospital and was not pictured at all. Today he has broken cover visiting the Birmingham Children's Hospital where he is

patron of the charity Well Child. He looked emotional as he hugged a nurse and engaged with the children. But of course, guess who hasn't showed up to support him that ever-loving wife, Megan Markle, who any time the shit hits the proverbial hits the fan seems to disappear. Of course, the big event happens at the Invictus one year to go countdown. If Megan Markle leaves Prince Harry to do that on his own, I think you'll know there are now even more troubles within this marriage. But let me get to this astonishing revelation from Charlotte Griffiths that this meeting, and it was a highly significant moment

because it was a meeting between Tobin Andre, who is the king's most senior. royal courtier on the communications side of things. Full disclosure, he actually used to be my boss when I worked at the Daily Mail, but he is an old Etonian and very, very close to the King. And he had this secret meeting which was pictured by the mail on Sunday with Prince Harry and Megan Markle's then senior staff members, Meredith Maines and Liam McGuire at a private members club close to Buckingham Palace. And everyone wanted to know how on earth did they get these pictures?

Who was leaking this sensitive information? And given that the information was leaked to Charlotte Griffith. The thinking was, well, it couldn't be from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle because they're suing the woman. But Charlotte in the Daily Mail today has revealed that is indeed what happened. She wrote, what is even more galling, given David Sherbourne, that's Prince Harry's slippery lawyer and his line of attack, is that in the months leading up to my quarter parents, Harry's circle had been very leaky indeed. I can now reveal that during the summer of 2025, a close advisor to Harry and Megan had contacted me out of the blue and invited me to lunch at the Ivy Restaurant in London.

As a result of information given to me at that lunch meeting, I placed a series of stories in the mail on Sunday that portrayed the couple in a positive light. This included a front-page article which ran in July, suggesting that Harry and Megan were attempting to rebuild their relationship with King Charles. It revolved around the fact that Liam Maguire and Meredith Mains, Harry and Megan's USPR chiefs, were to hold clear the air talks with the monarch's aide, Tobin André, in London. I was duly tipped off about the meeting, which was held at the Royal Overseas League near Clarence House. The attendees settled themselves on a balcony plainly visible from the public part. below. The Mail on Sunday arranged for a photographer to capture the cozy but very embarrassing scene. In a development which speaks volumes for their integrity, sources close to the Sussexes

then briefed the Daily Telegraph that they were very frustrated that the pictures of the Royal Overseas League gathering had ended up in the mail on Sunday suggesting quite falsely that the palace was responsible for a grotesque betrayal of trust. Now, just six months later, the prince was impuging my integrity while swearing that his people never leaked and that stories that ended up in my newspaper must have been obtained illegally. Rafe Haidle Manku is a royal historian

and senior fellow at the New Culture Forum. Oh my God, Raif, this is actually so serious now because you know all of the talk all along in terms of this sort of reprosh mon between Harry and King Charles has been based on an understanding that it must stay confidential Rafe that he must not continue to leak information now I have reported Rafe time and again that he can't do that like when he met Charles at Clarence House information was immediately leaked into the US media so I've always said Harry's never going to be able to do that but we now have categorical proof that he leaked this critical meeting, that he and Megan

leaked this critical meeting to the Mail on Sunday and Charlotte Griffiths, a journalist who at the same time they were suing, which is not only totally twisted, it's totally bizarre, but then they lied about it, Rafe, and tried to blame King Charles. So I just put it to you, Rafe, that surely enough is enough now. And if the king, and I know you hate criticizing the king, but he can't go through, Rafe with a meeting with Harry this week. He just cannot. Well, look, I mean, yeah, I think it's quite clear. This is extremely serious. I mean, they once again expose themselves as immense hypocrites.

You wonder whether this is something pathological that Prince Harry simply can't stop himself or is it Megan saying this is what we must do? I mean, I've been to the Royal Overseas League many times. It's the balcony where you sit on there. It's a huge place. That's the only place where you can really be seen by the public. So who was it who decided to sit out? on that tiny balcony when there are so many other places to sit for the first thing. Look, trust has been completely destroyed between Harry and his family.

There was an attempt of very magnanimous gesture by the king to extend an olive branch by inviting him to stay at Buckingham Palace. That, of course, we all know what happened there where Harry replied too late and then he declined and then changed his mind. And all that became public as well, of course, in a very unfair way. with the Sussex claiming that they had their invitation withdrawn, which wasn't true. So it's already been damaged. That attempt at rapprochement has already been set back.

And now you get these revelations. I mean, it seems to me as if they are as far apart as ever. And I wouldn't be surprised at all if certainly the Prince of Wales was advising his father along similar lines and saying, well, look, he clearly, for all of the talk he has about wanting to reconcile with his family, he's actually shown no real true deep down conviction that that's what he wants to do. Well, I couldn't agree more, Rafe. I mean, seriously, the fact that he will actually work with newspapers and leak private information to newspapers who at the same time he is trying to destroy

and trying to make out to the public are so morally reprehensible that they should not even be in business proves to me once again, and you know that I've been very hot on this for a number of years, that Harry and Megan you cannot trust a word that they say because they will say one thing in public, Rafe, when it suits them politically, but then act in a completely different way behind the scenes. What's most extraordinary today, Rafe,

is that we did get the briefings to the newspapers, which I still think give Harry and his team far too much credence in terms of how he is going to cope with this court loss. And I do think it is just worth reminding everyone, Rafe, this is like not just a normal. This is not like, oh, you lost a case. Harry had made this his life's mission, okay? And it wasn't like a split decision.

It was a total thumping by Justice Nicklin. But yet he's briefing to the Daily Telegraph that he just thinks that he can keep calm and carry on and focus on his charity work now, which to me just feels totally, totally delusional. But the Daily Telegraphs, Victoria Ward, who is their deputy royal editor and is the person who gets all of the contact from Harry and Megan's team, says that he does plan to do just that. A bullish Prince Harry has just

pledged to put the defeat behind him and shift his focus to his charity work. They report that the Duke has not discussed whether to appeal the verdict with David Sherbourne, his barrister, and is not expected to have any further contact with him this week. One source said he was determined not to let the ruling further overshadow his charity engagements. He was unlikely to spend any more time accessing his next steps until he returned home. The Duke has 21 days to ask the court for permission to appeal, so there is plenty of time for him to sit down and absorb it all when this week's work is behind him. Plans to deliver a victory statement, which were being thrashed out right up until the ruling was made public, were swiftly shelved. The plan to have both print and

broadcast media at an Invictus engagement that took place at the Royal Hospital Chelsea on Wednesday had already been abandoned. The Duke was originally expected to be joined by his wife, the Duchess of Sussex for private meetings and a reception involving Chelsea pensioners before he decided it was unsafe for her and the children to travel to London without any police protection. The visit was also due to be covered by the media, but at lunchtime on Tuesday, the plan changed. A source insisted it was because of the extreme heat forecast and and the lack of shade in the hospital grounds, which meant the public element of the job meeting veterans had to be shelved. In the event, the Duke attended a series of private meetings before joining a strategy session with former Invictus Games hosts and partners,

there were no reporters present and just an Invictus photographer to capture the moment for posterity. Today, he was back in the public eye, of course, and then on Friday, he will be met with the giggle of photographers and event marking the one-year countdown to next year's Invictus Games. But Rafe, in all seriousness, the only question that I am hearing us now with people involved in the Invictus Games is for how long Prince Harry can actually even be connected to this organisation that yes, he did found, but he founded it when he was a member of the royal family. And his constant, terrible headlines are actually now posing a reputational threat to this charity. Yeah, and of course he's lost association with so many other of the foundations and projects that he launched. They've all fallen around him in tatters and this is all that he has left. And, you know, he's clinging to it as if it's a life boy because it's essentially the only thing keeping him and keeping his reputation afloat. I mean, let's be clear here.

He has suffered the most devastating of defeats and immense humiliation at the hands of the British legal system. he must be gnawing at him he's putting on a brave face because his PR team have told him to put on a brave face but you can bet your bottom dollar that media presence would have been there at the Royal Hospital Chelsea if he had won that case he would have been smiling like a Cheshire cat

Oh yeah Oh yeah And that's why he wanted to stay in Buckingham Palace Rafe I find that so despicable He actually wanted to deliver his victory statement or film something from within Buckingham Palace. I mean, that is just so bad.

Rave, can I ask you what you think about Megan's disappearing act, though? Because the one thing that you will say about Prince Harry is that he is always there for that woman, no matter what terrible thing she does. I mean, I think of the example of her giving, oh, yeah, this moment. Do you remember that when she sort of mocked her curtsy to the late queen, and Harry just had to sit there and shut up? and he was clearly horrified, but it's, you know, he sort of supports his wife through all of these things. And yet, Rave, have you noticed that any time the chips are down and that he's in deep trouble or he's being criticized,

she makes herself scarce? And look, she may well fly in overnight because remember they have to do this Allthorp, filming at Allthorpe for a documentary that they've got planned about Prince, the 30th anniversary of, Princess Diana's death. But I would argue, Rafe, that she needed to be there for him earlier this week because this is a man who has just suffered like, you know, a defeat which is really going to change the course of his life. That is how significant, in my view, the defeat by the Daily Mail was. It was so consequential. And she's just not there, Rafe. What do you think that says about her? Well, she's a fair weather wife, isn't she? She's only there for the good day. She's only there when the sun is shining.

When the clouds form, she rushes off. You know, her California character can't deal with cloudy skies. But just, I'll go back to that in a moment. But can you imagine? Because when he lost that case, he attacked the judges. He attacked his father's judges. It's the king's law. And he undermined the rule of law by calling it a whitewash.

Imagine if he had said that from within Buckingham Palace. Oh, my God, I know. No, no, no, but it's such an important point. I keep thinking about that because it's the king's. court that he and and rife and again just just before we get back to the megan thing that is why i think he can no longer be a counsellor of state i know that you think he should stay in the line of succession but like a councilor of state tell me if i'm wrong raf because you're the expert on this stuff but a councillor of state is there to effectively sign off laws and you know do official

duties on behalf of the king if the king is incapacitated in some way so how on earth can you have someone as a Councillor of State who is criticizing the King's own judiciary? Because he's really not a councillor of state, because you have to be living in the United Kingdom for that to happen, and he's living abroad. So essentially, he's already removed himself from being a councillor of state. So it's nothing more. It's even less than a formality that he's listed as such. But, yes. Sorry, I interrupted your point on Megan. Yes. And, well, we've seen this with Megan before. Do you remember what happened when he went, when Spare was published and when it began to fall around his ears,

when he kept talking about his proven dodger and his trapstick reminding him of his mother when he rubbed it on there, she was nowhere to be seen. You have to remember this. Megan always thinks about herself. She married him in order to advance her own social status and her own social career. She wanted to be a Martha Stewart and she's achieved what she achieved on the back of Prince Harry. This has always been a marriage in which there's the key target, the key beneficiary, was Megan and Harry was simply there to officiate for her to become what she wanted to become. And the proof is in the pudding. And we know full well, of course, all the stories we get about her not wanting to be in the UK because of the security issues and so forth. She could have come here

so many times anonymously. You know, the Queen used to go to the Kentucky Derby to visit her friends who were horse breeders there privately. Prince Charles, Prince Edward used to go to Canada, on Australia on private visits. We were none the wiser. There is no reason Harry, Megan and the kids couldn't have gone on a private jet to bail morrow. William and Catherine go on their private family holidays even now. And Rave, think that's even now in the age of social media where people have smartphones and everything, they still go on these holidays.

They're never pictured. It's totally private. And Harry and Megan don't want to do that because I think they're trying to play the king to force them into giving them security. Rafe, another thing that's been coming up this week is this nickname within the palaces. and the reference to the fact that Harry and Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor,

are now described as the Dukes of Hazard. Indeed, Tom Sykes of the Royalist substack, his new book is actually going to be called the Dukes of Hazard. But Kate Manzi, the assistant editor of the Times reports today, Rafe. Palace Insiders refer to Harry and Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, as the Dukes of Hazard. The only official sounding title still attached to the King's Disgraced Brother, who was stripped of his titles of Prince and Duke of Law last year.

year. Courteers saw the King's patience snap again last weekend over Harry. On Monday morning, breaking news alerts quoted the Prince's spokesman who confirmed that Harry had accepted an offer to stay at Buckingham Palace. Not true, said Palace officials moments later. Any reporters who get updates from the disparate messages on Harry's spokesman's WhatsApp group must have suffered from whiplash. Harry is Captain Chaos, says one bewildered observer. One source even suggested that Harry's spokesman's statement that the Duke would stay at Buckingham Palace may have been a trap designed to force the palace into coming good on the offer for the sake of appearances. But Charles was not for turning. Over the weekend, the suggestion that the Duke would deliver

an on-camera reaction from an undisclosed location set alarm bells through the palace. If Harry, and this is the point that you were making, Rafe, delivered an excoriating attack on the King's courts from under the sovereign's roof, it could prove embasseled. embarrassing for Charles. Now we've discussed that, right, but the thing that I just wanted to point out in this piece, because remember, this is the Times, it's the newspaper of record, Kate Manse, is seeing your figure in the Royal Rota and is briefed a lot by Buckingham Palace. And the thing that really shocked me here, but I think that correct, by the way, I think it's completely true, is that the reason Prince Harry released that public statement on Monday saying, yep,

I'm going to stay at the palace, knowing full well that that visit had already been rejected, was to effectively use the media to pressure King Charles into reversing his decision. Don't you just think, Rave, that is so creditorious? And again, here we have a man who's constantly moaning about the media. But he will use the media to try and shame and bully his own father. I just think it's the lowest of the low. Yeah, you're absolutely right. It's also crass.

And it's so obvious. I mean, these are mind games and attempts that manipulate. which are so easy to see through. I mean, no, you'd have to be, you know, a dunce at the Royal House or not to see what his game is. But, I mean, what is his long game? I mean, it's also such a short-termist thing. If you really want to heal things with your father,

if you want to show that there's trust there and build things back to whatever, who knows, a balcony appearance in 10 years or whatever the long game is, this is not how you achieve it. And let's remember what happened here. He went into a long sulk because Ravek, who decide whether he gets full security or not,

they decided he wouldn't get security during this visit. And so then rather than respond to the kind invitation of his father to stay at Buckingham Palace, rather than respond by the end of last week, as he was told, he went into this long strop. And then a day after the deadline, he then declined the invitation. And then a few hours later, he accepted the invitation, by which point he was told it was too late. But then he releases this statement as well.

I mean, it's absolutely jaw-dropping to think that he thought this strategy would, A, work, and B, that it would somehow wouldn't interrupt a chance of a reconciliation. Rave, I also think Prince Harry is delusional to just believe he can move on from this court case because I think it's really important to point out, Rafe, exactly what he was trying to do, because it was genuinely about shutting down the Daily Mail,

genuinely about ushering in a sort of Levison 2, which would crack down on all of us, you know, censor social media. We've already seen the British government is attempting to do that, you know, take over the algorithm, meaning that channels like outspoken are pushed down in order to give the BBC and Woke ITV and Sly News, this sort of prominence just as people turn off those broadcasters. And by the way, that's why I just beg of everyone, everyone, please do subscribe right now to YouTube. It's too outspoken on YouTube because it's completely free to do so, but we have to try and beat the

algorithm. And please try and join us on Substack 2, which is www.outspoken.com, because that way you get all of our content directly and we're not reliant on an algorithm there. But it's really terrifying what's going on. But Camilla Tominey of the Daily Telegraph rave actually made a very good point that this loss is good news on that front for the British public because it means that it's less likely that this intense regulation of the British media will be able to happen. So I'll get your reaction, but I just want you to watch what she's had to say on this rave. Everyone's understandably focusing on Prince Harry losing this court case against associated newspapers, but we need to look at the bigger picture here. This is also

a great loss for those involved in Hacked Off, the campaign group that is trying to introduce state regulation of the press. We know that was the ultimate aim because Leverson 2.0 was mentioned no less than 55 times by the complainant's lawyer David Sherbourne. So this isn't just a victory for freedom of the press, but also for the British public, because without newspapers reporting, without fear or favour, then there is no accountability for the rich and famous. You have to remember that it was newspapers that broke the story of, say, the expenses scandal, of Angela Rainer, not paying enough stamp duty,

of indeed the recent revelations surrounding Nigel Farage. Raif, do you think she's got a point? Yeah, that's a point. And certainly it's a very bad day for Hacked off. And it certainly doesn't mean we're going to have another Levesant 2. But make no mistake, there are dark days ahead for all of us in the media and all people who like to watch independent media. It's already the case that the telegraph has now been bought by a massive company internationally,

which is far more left-winged centrist than the telegraph has been historically. It's the case now that the spectator of the editor there is now Michael Gove, a man who won't apologize for the Boris Wave, the greatest act of damage to this country, probably in a thousand years. So even the print media here, which you could once rely on, has already been bought up by elements that weren't as traditional as they have been in the past. And then, of course, you've got a government with three years left, which is basically going to try to strangle independent media as much as it can,

by basically thwarting the algorithm. prioritising the legacy media media BBC Channel 4 will now get priority over outspoken over the new culture forum in people's feeds you've got the online safety act you've got every app every and we are there we are again the canary in the coal mine because no other country in the Western world has got a hatred for free speech as you're seeing being exercised by our democratically elected government we've now become the pariah amongst the West for free speech nations which is all the more painful given that free speech was born in England. So yes, this is a minor setback for them, but their

agenda is still clear. The key thing driving all of this is to silence the truth tellers. Absolutely. And, Rafe, in terms of the destruction of the UK, getting so much feedback in from our outspoken audience today, so let me just get to some of it before we reveal today's greatest British and Union Jackass. Flowers in her hair, post-Simon-Florida, I've seen the cat bones on the street after the Haitians have their weird voodoo cat sacrifice and meal. Of course, it is happening. As I said, it's happening here in the UK with a lot of the Islamists now eating swans and seagulls and cats, which is illegal.

But by the way, Paul Andrews, 2743, says, they're not just killing wildlife. They're killing farm animals as well. A friend of mine had two calves killed by immigrants in recent. recent years. Max Hobby 1701 says this country is headed for disaster. Once it starts, there will be no stopping Labour wants war against the British people. They are going to get it. Kilo Foxtrot Delta 6112 says, I lived in Peterborough 16 years ago and the migrants were eating all the ducks on the river and that was 16 years ago. And Drew Lang says, make no mistake. The police, the establishment chose their side after Southport. I think you're right on that actually. Douglas Murray saying this week

and we're going to focus on this on the show tomorrow that he believes that Stama lost it, lost the prime ministership as a result of Southport. And thank you so much to your superchats as well. Abater X says if the invaders eat the gulls, bird flu will get him. Well yeah, but bird flu can spread, kind of. That's the goddamn issue. It's so unhealthy what they're doing. doing. And Liam G5192 says, love your videos. Thanks. Truth is power. Your work is essential to saving the West. Well, thank you, Liam. All I can ask, and I know it's such a bore, but please subscribe here on YouTube and also on substack at www. www. outspoken. Live because they want to get us in the algorithm. So what we have to do is beat the algorithm and the way we can beat the algorithm is if you

subscribe effectively. Okay, a reminder of today's greatest Britain Union jackass, nominations. Rafe went for Lisa Nanny. Actually, for the reason that we've just discussed, because she wants to prioritise the MSM on YouTube and she's also quit X. He also nominated Bell Ribero Addy, the MP for Clapham, who wants the UK to pay reparations to Jamaica and the Caribbean. And I went for Nick Lolls of Hope Not Hate, that terrible organisation, which Rafe earlier today, quite rightly, I'm going to use this, Rafe, thank you, described as a fascist organization after that showdown between him and Tommy Robinson. Okay, the results were, it was actually pretty close today, and the lead changed during the

course of the show, which is interesting to me. And third place with 21% Val-Rabero, Addy, the runner-up with 35% Lisa and Andy, but I'm sorry to say, Rife, I'm the winner today with 44% to the vote. It's Nick Lulbs, but it's probably because you call him a fascist, actually, that got him the vote. Rave, you have a very appropriate Greatest Britain for us today. I do. I have Arthur Ferry, a man who has come from nowhere, young lad, local boy from Wimbledon area, and he's become the first Britain in history to a wildcard player to enter the semi-final. So the best of British luck to him.

Oh, absolutely. And Catherine, the Princess of Wales, is so excited about this, I am told. So she is really going to be going for, and I imagine she's going to be at the finals, especially now that we've got one of ours. in there. Rafe Hidalman Koo, amazing to have you as always. Remember to follow Rafe's incredible work on his own YouTube channel, but also at the new culture forum where he is a fellow. Thank you so much, Rafe. We'll be back with you tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern 9am Pacific. We're heading over to Substack now, though, where Lady Colin Campbell is standing by. You can join us there at www.w.outspoken.live. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.