Dan Wootton Outspoken - ISLAMIST BLACKMAIL PLOT & CHANNEL 4 NEWS STING EXPOSED AS MSM TRY TO DESTROY FARAGE & RUPERT LOWE

Episode Date: September 2, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: An Islamist plot to blackmail then silence patriotic British MPs intending to expose the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs by procuring compromising material has just been revealed by a close ally of Reform UK leader Maajid Nawaz – and there is total silence from the complicit British mainstream media. Indeed the Labour response is to dismiss the messenger of this disturbing information as a conspiracy theorist. That comes as Channel 4 News is exposed for conducting a new sting operation on Farage’s Reform UK where they have employed an actor pretending to be the son of a wealthy hedge-fund owner. ALSO BREAKING TODAY: A male rising star of GB News has been disgracefully axed by the broadcaster in a new free speech row over the Lindsay Clancy trial after he called out a democratic strategist for seemingly sympathising with the triple child killer in an astonishing on air fight that has gone viral around the world. Thomas Corbett-Dillon is back on the Superstar Panel today alongside Father Calvin Robinson, campaigner Marilyn Hawes and Restore Britain’s Maria Bowtell. PLUS: Predatory behaviour, even amongst females, can run through the bloodline, as Brigitte Macron’s daughter starts a relationship with a student 20 years her junior. Just like her mother did with the French President Emmanuel Macron. We’ll debate. AND: Dan will reveal why GB News has become a pro-Prince Harry and Meghan Markle media outlet and respond to claims from Mark Dolan that I’m not telling the truth about this shocking story. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Sarah Ferguson is accused of secretly conspiring with Meghan Markle to destroy the British Royal Family. We’ll reveal all with Paula Froelich Uncensored. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton #DanWoottonOutspoken #news #outspoken #uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 575. And breaking right now, an Islamist plot to blackmail, then silence patriotic British MPs intending to expose the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs by procuring wait for it, compromising material, has just been revealed by a close ally of Reform UK and its leader, Majid Nawaz, yet there is total silence from the complicit British mainstream. media. For years, the Labour Party has been accusing anybody who speaks out against this as being racist and Islamophobic. When the fact is that there's been an organized cartel operating right under our noses acquiring compromat on politicians. In other words, compromising material of them engaged in illicit activities in order to blackmail them. And we're being told this is all a conspiracy theory. And that has been the Labor response. Shoot the messenger, dismiss the messenger.

Whereas the allegation that there's a deeper desire to cover up is a conspiracy theory. And the reason I said it to you specifically is that you've got form because you said that the elections in the US were rigged. And you also said specifically Italian vaccine rules during COVID were organised by a network of fascist. That comes as Channel 4 News is exposed for conducting a new sting operation. on Farage's Reform UK, where they have employed an actor pretending to be the son of a wealthy hedge fund owner. They have tried this trick before, of course. We've gone undercover inside Nigel Farage's Reform UK campaign in Clacton,

and we recorded extremely offensive language, including this canvasser, saying people seeking asylum should be shot. This thing was the greatest in modern electoral times. And guess who's getting a total pass from the... mainstream media. Andy Burnham, even as the situation financially becomes perilous. To be fair, Andy Burnham's a really nice guy. Nice guys don't always make good prime ministers, but he's a really proper geyser. Also breaking today, a rising star of GB News has been disgracefully axed by the broadcaster in a new free speech row over the Lindsay Clancy trial

after he called out a democratic strategist live on here for seemingly sympathising with the triple child in an astonishing fight that has gone viral across the globe. If this had happened during Woke 1, I probably would have said, hey, let the woman talk, you know, I don't want to mansplain. But you know what? I said, no, I'm going to stick up for these kids that have been killed. And I pushed back, and I'm glad I did because I've been flooded with women, sensible women that are like, thank you, we are sick of these feminists. I know many women that this has happened to.

No, they did not kill their children, but they also, what you fail to make. Well, they should be commended because they didn't. I've had it with you. Oh, my God. They should be commended. They're going to kill their children. She's a murder. I can't.

Okay. Well, we don't cancel men like that on outspoken. So I'm delighted to say that Thomas Corbett Dillon, Fox News contributor, is back on the Superstar panel today. There he is. Alongside Father Calvin Robinson, the campaigner and chief executive of freedom from abuse, Marilyn Hors and Restore Britain's head of local government Maria Baltal. Also coming up on the show today, predatory behaviour even amongst females, can run through the bloodline as Brigitte Macron's daughter starts a relationship with the student 20 years her junior, just like her mother did, with the French

President Emmanuel Macron, while a teacher at the 15-year-old school. And I'll reveal why GGB News has become a pro-Prince-Hare. and Megan Markle media outlet, as I respond directly to claims from Mark Dolan that I'm not telling the truth about this shocking story. Then in the Royal Uncanceled After Show over on Substack, Sarah Ferguson accused of secretly conspiring with Megan Markle to destroy the British Royal Family. We're going to team up with Paula Frolic uncensored for all the latest. Okay, the superstar panel are also nominating today for our greatest Britain and union jackass. But here are the nominees for the worst Britain in the world today. You can vote right now on Substack. Maria has gone for Kay Burley for trying to convince the public that Andy Burnham is a nice man on the BBC today.

Father Calvin Robinson has gone for Joe Powell, the Labour MP for Kensington and Bayswater, who welcomed extra funding so that the Notting Hill Carnival can go ahead in a safe and well-organised manner. How did that go? How did that go? And Thomas Corbett Dillon has nominated Ed Miliband. He says he embarrassed himself in a DC meeting with Marco Rubio. Everyone was calling him Millie Watt since. he is obsessed with wind farms. Okay, get voting, keep your superchats coming in throughout the show as well.

I will read out the best at the end of the show today. But now, let's go. Serious question. Why have so many British MPs ignored the scandal of the century, the cover-up of the century, the systematic rape of hundreds and thousands of white British girls across the country by Pakistani Muslim men? Why? Why?

Is it really simply the fear of being labeled racist? I don't think so. And now we have proof that there is something else at play. An Islamist plot. To blackmail, then silence patriotic British MPs intending to expose the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs by procuring compromising material has just been revealed by a close ally

of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, a Muslim himself, Madjad Nawaz, who told G.B. News, there is an organised cartel operating under our noses, acquiring this material on our politicians in order to blackmail them, in order to shut them up. Now, this is a massive revelation, disgracefully thus far, total silence from a complicit British mainstream media. People are disgusted by the behaviour of labour in government, comes to underage rape gangs. The last thing I'd like to say, I will let you respond because you do seem quite offended. But recently, a map has been revealed, and this is by the

network map. This is a new piece of research, only a couple of days old, and they have mapped every single underage rape gang in the country. And what they've discovered through mapping the data is that this is an organized cartel, organized along familial ties through the ethnic family or brothery system in the British-Pakistani community. For years, the Labour Party has been accusing anybody who speaks out against this as being racist and Islamophobic. When the fact is that there's been an organised cartel operating right under our noses acquiring compromise on politicians, in other words, compromising material of them engaged in illicit activities in order to blackmail them, and we're being told this is all a conspiracy theory.

So if we may keep the discussion in the real world, what I specifically said earlier was... But what's in the fiction world that is saying... Well, I'm just about to tell you, but you just interrupted me and you let him go on. You just let him go on. No, because you're starting off, basically, by making out that he's living in La La Land. Because if I get to the end of the sentence, and I tell you, right, thank you. If you're going to interrupt one guest before they've opened their mouth and you let the other one come out with war and peace. If he started his first sentence that's been rude to you, I would have also interrupted him.

Go on. The point, if you'll let me get it across was, he implied that in the government's attempts, the MOJ, stroke David Lammy, to have some data not published, that there were deep conspiratorial reasons behind that. The actual reasons given in the request for that information not to be released were that the information would be disproportionate to obtain. So that's Labour's Kevin Craig going at it with Michelle Jubbery.

And indeed, he effectively said this is all just a conspiracy theory and then he pointed to previous comments from Madjad Noir's about COVID, which saw him acts from LBC, totally unrelated. The idea that the Labour Party has not been tackling immigration, reducing the use of asylum hotels, those are facts, whereas the allegation that there's a deeper desire to cover up is a conspiracy theory. And the reason I said it to you specifically is that you've got form, because you said that the elections in the US were rigged,

And you also said, specifically, Italian vaccine rules during COVID were organized by a network of fascists who seek a new world order. Did you say that? I did. Right. So that's the level of debate we're dealing with. And that's the context of this discussion. I just love that. I love that from Madjit there.

Yep. I said it. What are you going to do about it? I'm right. I guess the shocking thing is that Madjid is still allowed on GB News at all. But that is, of course, down to his strident support of. Nigel Farage. And now these dark and dodgy deep state practices are being employed by the MSM to try and destroy Reform UK, which is currently slumping in the polls. Step forward Channel 4 News,

which has been exposed for conducting a new sting operation on the party, with X Channel 4 News left as Michael Crick, revealing on X, Channel 4 I hear, have done an interesting sting operation on reform, employing an actor, pretending to be the son of a wealthy hedge fund owner, seeking to make donations. I Zoom Channel 4 will broadcast results this week to coincide with the Reform Conference. Now, as Talk TV's Alex Phillips, a Reform UK supporter wrote, funny, they never do stings on left-wing parties, I added, or Islamist organisations, and Duncan barks added Channel 4, more activists than journalists, time will tell.

Well, no, we already know that. We already know that, Duncan. I mean, this is not the first time Channel 4 has tried an undercover sting on Reform UK. We've gone undercover inside Nigel Farage's Reform UK campaign in Clacton, and we recorded extremely offensive language, including this canvasser, saying people seeking asylum should be shot. Get the animal recruits there with guns on the f***ach big, target practice. Racist language was repeatedly used,

here directed at the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. What's good is it? And homophobia from Farajajani. his inner circle. You see that generate flag on the front bonnet? What the old bill doing for a knowing that's that? Richard Tice was utterly furious about it, vowing action as he told me it was the greatest stitch-up of all time.

Spotted, this was unbelievable. This was an actor who specialises in rough voices and specialises in secret filming. And we now have a written statement, Dan, from someone who was in the car with the filmmaker and this actor. And the two of those people were in deep discussion at the beginning of the rendezvous of the volunteers. So they were there together working out how they were going to do it. This thing was the greatest stitch up in modern electoral times. But of course, the off-communist, our state government regulator of the media sided with Channel 4.

There had been some claims that we or the production company we worked with had met or known Mr Parker before we encountered him at Reforms campaign headquarters in Clacton. We categorically refute these. We also categorically refute the claim that Mr Parker was paid to say or do anything. Tonight, Offcom has released a statement saying we received over 270 complaints about Channel 4 News's undercover inside reforms campaign. Given the election period, we have urgently assessed them against the due accuracy, due impartiality and offence rules under the broadcast.

In Code. For all of these complaints, we have concluded that they do not raise substantive issues warranting further investigation. The design to destroy Frarch is so strong that even an innocuous video he filmed about his return to Parliament has prompted a hysterical daily mirror front page today. Well, it's first day back in Parliament after the by-election, big Ben bonging and have a look at where we are. I mean, this whole building is extraordinary. And yes, it needs a fortune spent on it to keep it up to speed. But it is a magnificent place. I'm pleased to be back with an increased majority and more votes than we got in the general election. And what a day, because it's

going to be Andy Burden's first speech to Parliament as Prime Minister. You never know. I might get a chance to ask him a question. So I want to say a big thank you to all the voters in Clackson who put me back here. I will do my best. And Nigel's trying to be all happy, go lucky now, even though he knows there's nothing he can do to stop the forces coming at him, even if he does intend to spend lots of time away from Parliament. Thank you. What was said to you as an MP for Clacton? What was said to you as you walked up, there were several heckles, actually.

Congratulations till the next one. You know, how's the money and all that? All the things you would expect, you know, but I mean, done in a relatively lighthearted way. You'll structure your time as an MP or will you do things differently. always being frustrated about that you can't get called in the House of Commons, you sit there and sit there and sit there, you're a busy man, they won't call you. How will you spend your time differently now as the MP of Clacton? It'll be exactly the same.

It'll be exactly the same. One of the good things about the by-election is I've now met a vast number of constituents. I bet more than almost any other MP in the country. That's good. I said to all of them, right, if I get re-elected, here's the email address, you want help with something, let me know. So there's going to be a lot of caseload work in a constituency. But that's fine, that's fun.

And by the way, contrary to myth, you know, every other door you knocked on, oh, I saw you in so-and-so, you met my sister or whatever it was. It was. But absolute myth. So obviously, you make connection, you know, even more of a focus in some ways than it was, because there are more personal connections there than the word before. Look, let's be honest about it. You know, we're not a big party in the House of Commons,

and size of party is where precedence comes in the big debate. I'll be here doing my stuff. But really, you know, it'll be Richard Tice and the rest of the gang doing more of the work in here as I travel around the country. And in fact, I'm even planning another tour of the country. Now, look, Reform UK is in deep trouble, but it is not lost on me that there is now far more emphasis put on destroying that party by the MSM

than holding to account Andy Burnham's disastrous new government, which is marching us straight into a financial crisis. Yet this is the extent of the analysis we're getting from axed sly new host, pro-labour-K Burley, who seems now to show up regularly in the studios of the British bashing corporation saying nonsense like this. To be fair, Andy Burnham's a really nice guy. Nice guys don't always make good prime ministers,

but he's a really proper geyser. The children who have taken over from her on sly news have just given up on journalism altogether. That is Angela Raina, Housing Secretary. Good morning, Angela Raina. Angela Rainer, former Deputy Prime Minister, walking in there, Ellie Reeves. Good morning, Ellie Reeves. Ellie Reeves walking in there.

15 minutes. So I'll be watching out on here for some more key cabinet faces going into number 10 for that meeting with Andy Burnham. I was with Jim Spence, who reacted. I thought this was a skit. Why is a growing woman reporter shouting greetings at a politician during a supposedly serious peace? I'll tell you why, because our MSM is corrupted. And I have to say, Kemi Badernault, didn't do much better at Burnham's first PMQ's, beginning by tackling the leader of the opposition with some flirting?

And can I congratulate the Prime Minister on his stamina? Three hours. Yesterday, he faced 125 questions from MPs across the House. Gross, not funny. just gross. She went a bit harder, so to speak. Of course, Labour and the Lib Dems just wanted more government spending as taxpayers' money, but can he name a single spending request to which he answered no? What I can say to the right, Honourable Lady,

is I was quite clear in my statement. about the need to get the welfare bill down. I do not want to be a Prime Minister that sees a situation where we have so many people in their 20s, not in education, employment or training. I can't defend that. And I want to change that by giving more support to young people so that we start investing in their success,

Mr Speaker, rather than paying for failure, as we have done for many years under successive governments. This seems to me, Mr Speaker, to be one area where we can both engage in problem solving rather than point scoring. And I hope the right honourable lady will take up my offer on that point. Oh, please. He then went on to speak about Liz Truss. Mr. Speaker, he avoided the question. He did not say no to a single spending request. And personally, I think it's delightful that he wants to make everyone happy. But a Prime Minister needs to be a leader, not a people pleaser.

I'm sorry, what is going on? Like, Burnham is indeed. deep trouble. The UK is in deep trouble. The bond markets have already turned. Borrowing costs are at their highest in decades. He is facing a 14 billion pound budget shortfall. This is far worse than anything Liz Truss had to face. Fire the Telegraph, he now faces a shortfall of up to 14 billion in his autumn budget following a surgeon guilt yields which will squeeze his plans for higher spending. Lord O'Neill, a former Goldman Sachs economist who turned down an offer to join Mr Burnham's government, said the tone of the PM speech was the last thing investors wanted to hear. And guess who doesn't care?

Guess who doesn't care? And guess who I think is making this country a laughing stock? The eco-loons, the eco-terrorists. I do wonder if Burnham will stand up to my old friends at Just Stop Oil, who announced their return today, by blocking the roads outside Parliament and gluing themselves to said roads so the PM couldn't leave.

After this summer of all, I thought you've been busy with sea wave problems have to all summer. This is our new normal for the whole of the rest of the world's life. Your children have no future. Your grandchildren don't even think about it. This is what we're doing it for.

We don't like it. are here. We don't want to be arrested. You don't want to cause any upset. But we have to do it. So far, 47 people have been arrested. Others remain glued, glued to the road outside Parliament, proving once again we are not a serious country. A change of government has never been needed more. But the split on the right is making that look increasingly unlikely. With the Tories now overtaking Reform UK for the first time in 18 months, a conservative source boasting it's still a long way to go, but it's now clear reformer going backwards, a pointless by-election versus a bin, chronic infighting and still no answers on the 55 million pound personal donation. Farage is floundering

and his party has now slipped to third in the polls. It is surely only a matter of time before Farage decides to throw in the towel. And ahead of Reform UK's conference launch tomorrow, the mails' Labour columnist Dan Hodges believes Restore Britain is the biggest thorn in the side of Farage's party. Writing to be clear, the Tories are not ahead of reform, it's one poll. The average is still good Farage lead over Badenock, but it's part of a trend that shows the Conservatives slowly but surely hunting reform down and again underlines significance of prompting for low and restore. But Restore has been in trouble too, and in a bid to quell a growing civil war within his party after the resignation of all a mini-hain as Restore's spokesperson for

women and children. Lo has today announced a philosophy of national belonging, where he rejects the labels of both ethno-nationalism and civic nationalism. He wrote, A Restore Britain Government will only grant British citizenships through marriage subject to strict fraud checks. That is it. Now the Superstar Panel. Brilliant to have with us today, Father Calvin Robinson, Marilyn Hawes, Thomas Corbett Dillon and Maria Boutel of Restore Britain. So, Maria, obviously the right is in deep trouble in a whole load of ways. And we know that.

And of course, your party, Restore Britain, has reached out to Nigel Farage, tried to do some type of deal. But Maria, one of the problems is, that Restore Britain that so many people have put their faith in, you guys seem to be at each other's throats too. And this is what we were hoping was just going to be different from Restore, that this wasn't going to be like the Tories and Reform UK. But from where I'm sitting, Maria,

there's quite a lot of people within Restore who seem to want to shoot down their colleagues. What's going on? Well, I've not seen anything from colleague to colleague, of anyone shooting anyone down. We've got obviously, as any political party does, have different factions within the party of different arguments and different strengths of argument. And ultimately, they've got some differences. And this document that was published today, which is an excellent document, I would recommend everybody read it. It wasn't a flash in the pan document, actually,

it's something we've been working on for weeks. It just felt like the right time is definitely now to produce it and share it with everybody rather than hold off sharing it. So we've finalised it and we shared it just to clarify exactly where Restore Britain does stand. So there's no confusion. So whether you're slightly to the right or left, even though I hate those labels. And I hate the other labels people decide to use as well. But wherever you call yourself, we've laid out our path of where we are.

Internally, we're not fighting. We've all shared and looked at this document before it was being, you know, published to the public and the membership today. So in terms of internally, we are working together very well. externally, obviously, we've got a broad range of members, and that's okay, and they're allowed to criticise us, and they're allowed to share their thoughts on topics. What is a step too far is obviously harassing people who work within the party and other members for an opinion they don't like. But isn't that why Alla Meneyne has quit? I haven't actually, I'm meant to speak to Alla today, actually.

So we used to speak quite a lot together because we used to work in the Pink Ladies. We did a bit together there, and that's how she got involved with it. Restore Britain. I would still say that friendship is still there, but because we've been busy doing the work, because there is a lot of work involved with a political party, obviously setting up the branches and making sure these branches are running smoothly and helping the organisers be organised. And Ola did a lot of work in terms of those side of things as well. So it's not just what visibly you've seen. There's obviously a whole cohort of work behind that, that she's decided she's rather focused on the pink ladies than I wish her well with that. But yeah, we're meant to speak

today we've not had time to catch up. I mean, Father Calvin Robinson, you are a member of Restore Britain. One of the reasons all a mini Hayne has quit is because of the huge amount of personal incoming that she is facing from people within Restore

Britain. How do you feel about that? I had no idea that was why she'd quit. I get that. There's a lot of attention when you stick your head above the parapet and if it's become too much for her, I think it's good that she's taken a back seat. She's been fighting on different fronts for some time now, so everyone deserves a break. But within all, as Maria just said, within these political movements, there are different factions.

And what we have to do is all try to get along as best we can around the core foundational principles of British values, which are Christian values, not these made up values by Michael Gove and the previous Conservative government. We've got to get back to who we are as a people in our place, a place and a people that mean something and try to fight for what is good, what is true and what is beautiful and stop being distracted by all these other little political issues that they are just distractions that stop us from focusing on what matters. Absolutely. I mean, I guess Tom at Corbett Dillon, though, what we are seeing within Restore Britain, what I am certainly seeing is like a generational

clash, right? It's the boomers versus the Zoomers. But I guess Thomas, one of my messages would be, and obviously you have seen this at close quarters in terms of MAGA in the USA, that it is important that this factionalism doesn't take over altogether. Like, my message to the Zoomers would be, you're going to need some boomers, right? If you actually want to take government,

you need a broad coalition. So it's great that you have your very, very purest position and you are going to fight for that. But personally, I don't think the so-called boomers who want to come in and help and have taken great personal risk to be associated with a party like Restore Britain, knowing full well that it means they're going to be derided as far right and racist in the mainstream media. Just think, just a little bit of grace, just a little bit of grace would be an order?

I mean, let's be honest. Rupert is an older man. Right. I mean, you know, I live in the US and I'm completely out of the loop of what's going on in the UK. and watching your first report, I feel like I've gone back in time. What do you mean? Just stop oil are stuck to the... Oh, don't.

Don't. Is the UK stuck in the past? Yes. I'm completely mind blown by this. They're debating in the comments and she's making the... Like, do they know what's happening in the world? Like, I cannot believe that we are still doing that in the UK. So I'm glad you've informed me because I'm completely...

I just... They're so sad for the UK. But on your restore point, look, I understand what you're... saying, but I'm afraid I'm always going to be on the side of the future and this is the zoomers. You say that the boomers have taken risk of joining this party. I disagree. I think they haven't taking a risk. Fine.

Maybe their telegraph loving friends next door might not like them as much anymore. The young people are the ones that are losing their jobs. They've got no money. These boomers have all got money. They've got lovely houses. The zoomers are the ones taking a real risk. And they are joining this party because. they have nothing else. They have no other option. So I actually think it's a, it shouldn't be a

boomer party. If you're a boomer and you like the right wing, go to reform. If you're a Zuma, this is the party for the young men. And that's what I think Restore has to become. Well, it's interesting that you say that because the thing is, I love those people. I mean, these people have all been given a big platform here on outspoken, right? Like I can name some of those big young male stars within the party, Charlie Downs, or Lewis Brackpool or Harrison Pitt, there's a whole load. And they are great. But, Maria, there is a reality about our electoral system, right?

Like, you must acknowledge you can't just be a party of young men if you hope to win seats under the first past the post system. Like, that is our political reality. Yeah, and that's the argument of having that wide intent to encompass the boomer and the zoomer, but also the millennials and actually all as a Gen X, I'm pretty sure she'd like me to clarify that. But ultimately we cannot weaken, so although we are going to be a slightly broad attempt

and maybe there's some zoomers want us to be, we ultimately are going to keep the ropes tight with policy. And if you like our policy and you like what we've defined today on our actual position and you want to fight with us for that, we are the party for you. Ultimately, if you agree with us on policy, and the structure and our vision join us. We don't care how old you are.

Absolutely. It is such a brilliant policy paper today. I absolutely love it. I probably agree with 95% of it. And I just think certain people have to remember, probably in a political party, you're never going to agree with 100%. Right?

You're never going to agree with 100%. But if you broadly agree with something, you're in a pretty good place. Marilyn, so great to have you on outspoken for the first time. How do you feel about this split on the right? Because obviously you do your incredible campaigning work. And I would say have been quite aligned maybe or at least sharing some of the vision of Reform UK.

But reform at the moment seemed to be under so much pressure, Marilyn, and they're only going down. Well, I think they all are, aren't they? I mean, restore reform. I think there's this thing, isn't there, that there's an election looming. So they've all got the knives out. And they play dirty. Let's be honest.

Politicians, I've been around the world enough times. I didn't think they were called zoomers anymore anymore. I thought they were called snowflakes. Sorry, I do to apologize. But I'm not up with all the names. But I don't like this far right fight left in the middle. I mean, I always say I'm not a lefty. I'm not a righty.

I'm a commonsensy. All the campaigning I have done with child abuse and everything through the years, 20-year-old years, 23 years. No government, no party has ever protected. kids and that's my beef all along always will be. All a many name, I spoke to her today because she's coming on my show on Friday. And the reason she has left is she's overworked. I mean, it is, as Maria said, it's hard work belonging to a political party.

So it's not because of the abuse? No, not at all. I had an email from her. And I didn't even know that she'd resigned. And she just said, I've resigned because I've just, you know, I really do want to focus. My real baby is where I think I can really make a difference is pink ladies. And they are amazing. These women are amazing.

If I had time, I'd join them. I mean, they genuinely care. Okay, well, that is good news. That is very good news then. Marilyn, can I ask about this revelation from Madjad Nawaz? Because this is so, so shocking. He is suggesting, remember, he is very close to Reform UK and Nigel Farage. And he is suggesting that one of the reasons there has been such a cover-up

about the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. That's what I call them, Marlon. I don't know what you call them. I know some people call them grooming gangs, but I call them what they are. They're rape gangs. They're rape gangs. They're big gangs.

And he believes that one of the reasons that there has been so much silence from MPs is that there has been this Islamist plot to gather compromising material. The suggestion was compromising sexual material to stop them speaking out. I think you'll find if you know somebody called Rajamir, Are you familiar with him?

Yes, he's been on the show before, yes. Well, Ar has some stuff sent from him today, and he said they are not being blackmailed. They are partners with these Pakistani gangs. The politicians are partners, and he's written a whole document on it, and that's the reason they don't want to speak out. They're getting this.

All this, oh, violence against women and girls, it's a load of build. They haven't done anything. It's literally transparent. obviously they don't want the truth to come out. And the real victims in this were the victims that are there at the start and they continue to be victims because they're like being used as a ball and a tennis match. Nobody will actually settle down and get this out there for what it really is. There are Labour councillors involved in this. There were policemen involved in it.

It was rotten right the way through. It's the reason why Maggie Oliver lost her job because she stumbled across it when she worked for the Greater Manchester Police. And I know Maggie very well. She's also going to come on my show. The corruption and the filth, the only got to empty the swamp, quite frankly, because this really winds me up. These girls were raped by hundreds of men. How they can call it a grooming inquiry, all child sex abuse is utterly vile.

It's sick making. But this is on an industrial scale. Then these people work, they hunt in packs. work with the families, the Pakistani, the cartels, they're members. They're all family members across the UK. I could have done that map that was out the other day that you showed. I've been saying for ages, these county lines, these gangs come out of different, the railway stations, there's one that goes from Exeter to Liverpool, it's across and up and down the country. If somebody had done something about it 30 years ago when it came to be, you know, knowledge,

and I was banging on about this, too none other than Kay Burley, I say several times on Sky News, but of course they don't like open speech anymore, do they? But I was saying then, this is Pakistani. Yes, it's Orca Bancadeshi. Yes, it's also Afghans. But you can't say it's all the far. You don't get the Chinese doing it. You don't see the Japanese doing it.

This is a particular thing about what they call a culture. It's not a culture. It's barbaric. And honestly, it's interfamily. There's a girl I was trying to help. only four months ago that was taken from a place down to Leeds from the northeast, taken by Pakistani gangs to be passed around their families around Leeds and brought back again. She was made pregnant by them, and it was just awful.

When she came at a hospital, she was sucked back into the gang, and no one now knows where she is. And the numbers of kids in this country, teenagers going missing, is absolutely appalling because of the. these gangs and people are killed. They are brutal. They are absolutely medieval in the way they carry on. And I, it's a pandemic. I don't know how you're ever going to rid it because it runs deep throughout the Labour system, the Labour Party, it runs deep. So I would vote for anyone that wants to get these geysers out because Labor Party have got a go. I'm not saying the Tory

party were any better because, yeah, we have 15 years of that. But look at that thing coming in. It's like a cruise liner. It's ridiculous. Small boats. It's rubbish. I mean, that's why I think, you know, Restore and Reform. I flop between the two. But I just want to know that what worries me about Restore.

I mean, my sons go on about me because they say, oh, he used to be, was it, chairman of Southampton Football Club, which is my football team. And they go, okay, you can't support him. But I like what he's saying, because if you remember, do you know what he reminds me of? he reminds me of a modern day Enoch Powell. Now, my dad accused me of being racist, right? And I had a stand-up row with him. And my dad said to me, when I was, I mean, it's only about 16, 15. And I was saying, oh, Enoch Powell.

And he was going on about it. I said, but I'm talking about my life, Dad, not yours. You'll be dead when this all comes to fruition. But he was prophetic. He was visionary. He was not racist. And if you read that speech that he said, Indeed, and you know what?

The public backed him then. The public backed him then. It has always been the media class and the political establishment who have tried to shut him down. And guess what? The modern day Enoch Powell may well be Rupert Lowe and not trying to shut him down too. Breaking today, a male rising star of GB News

has been disgracefully axed by the broadcaster in a new free speech row over the Lindsay Clancy trial after he called out a Democratic strategist for seemingly sympathizing with the triple child killer. Now, this on-air fight was sensational. It has gone around the world, even sparking a primetime Fox News segment. Watch. If you want to talk about emotion, look at what erupted on television. Look at these two.

They say that Lindsay was in psychosis. I think these women are suffering some from psychosis. They've been watching too many true crimes. Netflix dramas. You know, this was an incredibly privileged woman, incredibly wealthy. She had a nanny, and she's still complaining that she needed help. What you just said was absolutely disgusting, and you should be ashamed of yourself. And you can hear that he's not. Do you know why the woman is in a wheelchair? Did you even notice that she's a wheelchair?

I couldn't care less. She's a murderer. Because she jumped out the window after this happened. So she should have. She didn't even know what she... She quiet, please. I've had it with you. Oh my God.

And you're commended. They didn't kill their children. I hate to tell you, that's happening in a lot of kitchens. Tonight there's probably debates and screaming matches at restaurants. Yeah, I mean, electrifying TV, in my view. The woman there is the Democratic strategist, Lorry Watkins. And I want to show you that clash in its full context with Thomas Corbett Dillon. They should be commended because they didn't.

I've had it with you. Oh, my God. They should be commended. They didn't kill their children. She's a murderer. These are men-hating women that are standing outside. This is what it's about. They think the husband did it.

They're crazy. They've lost their mind. Do you know why the woman is in a wheelchair? Do you know why the woman is in a wheelchair? Did you even notice that she's a wheelchair? I couldn't tell us. She's a murderer. Because she jumped out the window after this.

So she should have. I have pushed her. They say that Lindsay was in psychosis. I think these women are suffering some from psychosis. They've been watching too many true crime, Netflix dramas. You know, this was. an incredibly privileged woman, incredibly wealthy. She had a nanny and she's still complaining that she needed help. She could not have got more help from the system that she already

have received. This is a murderer who strangled her children one by one. One of the boys ran away and she chased him down and killed him. Laurie Watkins. What you just said was absolutely disgusting. Thank you. You should be ashamed of yourself and you can hear that he's not. Okay. Why? Because it's true. You clearly don't care. So pipe down. I don't get. And by the way, Men watching this. If you have a woman sat next to you on the sofa who is defending this murderer. You've got to think deeply about this. I've seen weddings. We need to have some empathy. Talk to your women and find out, what are they thinking? They're defending this woman. It's insane. I don't think anybody's defending what she did, but you can have empathy for what she went through and how she...

I know many women that this has happened to. No, they did not kill their children, but they also, where you fail to... Well, they should be commended because they did. I've had it with you. Oh, my God. And you're commended, they didn't kill their children. She's a murderer. I can't. Okay.

Now, in an illustration of just how popular Thomas's position has been, he was invited on the hit Fox News show Will Kane to explain his position. It was crazy. I was so surprised. You know, she was defending this baby killer. And, you know, and as I thought as this was happening, and as AOC calls it, Woke 1, if this had happened during Woke 1, I probably would have said, hey, let the woman talk.

You know, I don't want a mansplain. But you know what? I said, no, I'm going to stick up for these kids that have been killed. And I pushed back, and I'm glad I did because I've been flooded with women, sensible women that are like, thank you. We are sick of these feminists. So it's worked out well. I think that's why it's gone so viral.

Now, this week, Thomas has been told he has been dropped by G. G.B. News as a result of that exchange. Now he has agreed to be here on outspoken today after I independently obtained a conversation with a GB News producer. Now I stress that Thomas respects GB News. He would never have leaked the conversation, but it is important that I share the contents with you. The GB News producer wrote to Thomas, Hi, Thomas, we'll have to drop the appearance on the late show tonight. Sorry for any inconvenience. We just need to wait a way to wait. week for things to cool down over the fallout from the Clancy segment last week.

Thomas replied Fallout, everyone was on my side. I've been on Fox all week talking about it. I can't find one person that had an issue with what I said. I noticed you had Lorry on last night, who was the one defending a child killer. If anything, she should have been cut. Everyone was complaining about her comments. I saw she claimed it was edited out of context, which is not true at all, Fox have been playing the full unedited clip on air. Very surprised to hear this. And Thomas is on the superstar panel alongside campaigner Marilyn Hors, Restore Britain's Maria Boutel,

and someone who knows all about being axed from GB News for taking very sensible positions, Father Calvin Robinson. Thomas, I mean, this is extraordinary to me. This is absolutely extraordinary to me. the producer from G.B. News has confirmed to you that you have been dropped because you refused to defend and admitted child killer. I mean, I know the jury is still deliberating, but there is no doubt, Thomas, that she killed these three children. The only question is whether she had some type of postpartum psychosis, which means that she won't be found criminally culpable.

This is shocking that you've been to have. taken off air as a result. It's shot. What's more shocking is where on earth you got those messages from that. I didn't know you had those, but that's okay. And I, and I, and I, and I, I, I, I, I just want to stress that you did not provide those messages. Obviously, there has been some consternation.

I didn't send them to anyone outside of GB News. So you've got your spies everywhere. Very impressive from you. Well, what I will say, what I will say, Thomas is there is, I will say there is some, how do I put it, some deep concerns. within GB News that you have been axed. There are people within GB News who are on your side

and are horrified about this decision. That's the point that I would make in terms of how I've received the messages. Yeah, well, I'm glad to hear that. And yeah, impressive journalism from you. That was great. I didn't know you had those, but that's okay. But yeah, you know, because it doesn't quite make sense

because from what I had been understanding, this is the most publicity they've ever got in the United States. We had pride. And, you know, that clip you showed was one. been on every single night and Fox News has been this clip. It was a fantastic debate. It was great television. There's absolutely no off-com concerns in this. As you said, the woman has admitted this murder. What I think this is more about is the woman on the show, the crazy lady, Laurie, has probably complained to them, which I think is completely insane. If anything,

I should have complained. The only reason I didn't is because I was like, hey, I've got a viral clip here. You know, I knew that this was. I mean, this. This has been watched by tens of millions of people now, hasn't it? GbnU should actually be doubling your salary. Right. But the way she screamed at me on a set was extremely unprofessional. And I actually did feel a little bit, you know, because we went to break. She continued screaming.

The crew can confirm all of this. She was completely unhinged. It was not appropriate for a workplace. This continued when the cameras were off. Oh, yeah. What happened? She did not stop. She continued.

you scream, she's saying, how dare you? You can't believe that. I can't believe you say that. I'm like, yeah, I do believe that the baby killer is evil. Like, you know, I'm not going to defend her. So she, but I understand why they have her. They don't have too many Democrat women that want to come on the show in the US. So they keep her around. I guess they've got lots of right wing boys that they don't, you know, her was the priority, I guess. But it just shows you, I think they should have, you know, as I said, it was great. It was great TV. I've been promoting them all week. Father Calvin Robinson, can you believe what has happened to G.B. News? I can, because looking at that panel, there's that crazy woman, Lori.

There's Tom, what's his name, Hardwood, just raising his eyebrows every single time that Thomas speaks. Was that Matthew next to him as well? Matthew Stedlin. Oh, my gosh. The massive lefty who hates G.B. News. I don't know who the woman on the end was, but she was saying, we need to have more empathy, more empathy. He was a conservative minister. It was a panel full of LibTod's. Thomas was the only one speaking. common sense. And what I find fascinating is, they ax him and say, oh, he's got to call down. If things have to call down after that moment of television, both parties should be off

air for the same amount of time. If they're still having Lurion, but not Thomas, that is biased. That's clearly biased against conservative views. Yeah, now this trial, this trial has obviously gripped America, right? And as the presenter on Fox News, Brian Kilmead was saying, these conversations, these debates are taking place in homes up and down the country. I mean, I have close friends who are women who are absolutely convinced that she is not guilty. And there are a whole load of conspiracies about how she's not guilty. And what does seem to have happened. And I want to show this before I actually bring in the women on the panel actually, is that liberal women in particular have lost

their minds a little bit over this case. I just want to show you one particular video of her supporters. Do you stand with her yes or no? I don't think she did it. Yes. We feel she's very sleep deprived. Her job as a labor and delivery nurse working night shifts and three children is a lot. A lot. Do you have children? Yes. Would you ever hurt them? Yes and no. As a mom or as a dad, I think that you are not perfect. So what are the consequences she should face for this? Obviously. she's already in a wheelchair. He should go to jail for negligence. He was, he needs to take care of his kids,

and that was his responsibility. Is this any of your girlfriends? This is your girlfriend? I think you have to do some reflection on that. I just have seen a little bit on TikTok of the case. I'm watching it on TikTok or like the live streams. Where are you getting your news that the defense might not be getting theirs?

I don't, but I... What did you say? TikTok. I mean, Maria, Carolyn, do you understand, at all, ladies, about why women are defending a child killer, Maria? No, not at all. I struggled in my first year with my son. I struggled myself, but the thought of her in my child, insane to me.

And I think even if she did go clinically insane, not that it seems like she actually did, but that's for the jury to decide, I suppose. but even if you are crazy, it doesn't make you free from consequence. I think it was even Jeffrey Dahmer, I saw a quote. He had psychosis and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. You still face the consequences for murder. The victims are dead. There's three beautiful young children who are dead.

Like, where is your empathy for the dead children? Like, this woman deserves to die, in my opinion, for her crimes. I don't care if she was a bit unstable at the time or had a hard life. It doesn't sound like she had a hard life, but I'm not one to judge. she had the worst possible life. She was a single mom. She was struggling. She had mental health issues for years and years and years.

There's no excuse for murdering people, let alone your own children. It is sick. She deserves punishing severely. I mean, Marilyn to me, and I have watched a hell of a lot of this trial and watched the evidence given in court, including by Lindsay Clancy's ex-husband, who did call for. the public to forgive her in the days after these murders took place. But to me, Marilyn, there are three victims, and they are the three children who were strangled to death by her exercise ropes before she gutlessly threw herself out of her window. And she didn't intend to

be alive to face trial. She knew what she had done and she took her own or tried to take her own life as a result. Can you see any other side of this case? I'm afraid I can. When I was 23. No, Thomas, you need to listen to me. I think that woman was atrocious. I thought she was awful, very unprofessional. Let me tell you when I was 23, I was working in a building society and don't shake your head because I'm going to tell you something. How would you feel if you picked up the phone from a friend who was the wife of your boss and said, hi Marilyn. I said, hi Pat, how are you? And she said, I've just killed my children and I've slipped my wrists. I was 23 years old. I know how it feels to receive that information.

You don't have to have sympathy for the baby killer. That's a horrible story. I'm not having sympathy for the baby killer. I'm not having sympathy for the baby killer. I've spent 23 years defending people, children, all 23 years. I had four children under five. I lost. I lost. for as well. I know what it is to lose a baby. I know what it is to have post-nation depression, right? I know what it is to have a child that screams and screams every day, every night with colic for five months. I at that point could understand why some mothers feel like shaking their babies. It is un and at the same time I was going through 19 years of domestic abuse. So don't tell me how it might feel, okay? I don't suppose you've ever been a mother. So in the meantime,

this poor woman, I was all over the, all over the news. I was 23 years old. I just got married. And when it was she was not listened to, I said to her husband, I'm only 23. I've only just got married. I know there's a thing called post-nated depression. I don't know how it manifests itself. Maybe you should take her to the doctor. She won't go. Well, maybe you should make her go in the car and go. Maybe that's what you should do. But she thought this was the way. I have had depression. I know I have had when I knew my four children have been sexually abused by my best friend. Believe me, I wanted to try and take my own life.

But, Marilyn, can I just clarify? So what are you saying in terms of Lindsay Clancy? I would not want to judge. I don't want to say anything. I haven't read. You've seen it. I haven't seen it. I feel very, very, very sad for women who are that depressed.

I don't know. Yes, of course she's killed her children. My friends, she had to go to court and say she killed them. She was then actually sectioned and has been sectioned ever since. You're saying a lot. What I'm not hearing is children. There are three children that are built in here. That's all we should be talking about.

I could not care less about a woman who kills her children. I'm sorry that they had a hard life. Guess what? A lot of people in this world have very hard lives. I agree. In awful areas in Eastern Europe, in Asia. They don't kill their children. I have no sympathy for a baby killer.

And I couldn't care less. I'm sorry your friend had a tough time. I don't care. She killed her children. She's an evil person. I have no time for it. Well, I'm sorry. Clearly you haven't got a Christian,

a Christian bone in your body to think about forgiving and anything else. And I would actually like to see what Father Calvin says about this. Father Calvin? Because you have, there is... Let Father Calvin come in. Okay.

So it's very difficult, but the point is that when someone commits a crime such as this, so grave as this. And Christ talks about harming the innocent children as one of the gravest sins one can commit. In fact, he said it was better for you to throw yourself down into this lake with a millstone tied around your neck than the consequences you're going to face an everlasting life, meaning that to harm a child means you are damned to hell. And so the consequences of that should be punishment. Now, forgiveness and punishment go hand in hand. We can forgive someone for an evil act. That doesn't stop them from needing to be punished.

And so the magistrate should absolutely punish this child killer. And that is justice. And then the forgiveness comes from letting go of that in our hearts and knowing that she has received her judgment and is going to receive eternal judgment unless she repents of this. But I don't see any way out of it. What the problem here is, a lack of accountability. All of these liberal women are finding any excuse to blame the husband,

blame pharmaceuticals, blame postpartum depression, blame whatever other than the woman whose greatest vocation her entire purpose in life is to protect love and nurture her children. She committed an evil act and she deserves to be punished. She will be punished in the eternal life, but I hope she's also punished in this life too. Yes. Yeah, yeah. As my friend was, she was sectioned for the whole of her life

in a mental institution. I mean, I'm going back now. And do you think that's what should happen to Lindsay Clancy rather than jail rather than the death penalty? She should definitely be incarcerated without a doubt. But in the hospital where she currently is, whereas Thomas, your position is no, she should be in jail. Is that correct?

Yes, and we're all agreeing on here, but what these women are saying, the ones that are standing outside the jail. And by the way, women on the trial, this is about to be a mistrial. Two women have now came out and said that they cannot vote for this. There are three men on the jury that are basically, I mean, God bless those men, because good luck to them. They're listening to these liberal women on this jury that are saying she's not guilty. She admitted it.

And they can't even convictor of murder. So the judge has actually allowed them to convict her of manslaughter. He's pleading, just convict her of anything. How about just manslaughter? And the women on the jury are saying, no, I think she's innocent. This is completely insane. And as you saw in my clip, the woman who chined in was a conservative minister. I forget her name, but she did the digital idea.

Michelle Donlon, Michelle Donlan, I believe. It seems to be both parties, left and right. It is a male-female divide. Most men from both sides, even the left wing on the panel, as you said, the guy, I forget is saying, Matthew. Matthew's taking. He was on my side. But the women left and right, they're defending.

There is no defense. All you have to say on this story is, I feel bad. Our prayers are with the three children and I feel sorry for the husband. That's it. There's no but. There's nothing to say about the woman. She's evil. And that's it.

Okay, now this is one of those stories that is initially impossible to believe. But then when you think about it, quite understandable, given that predatory behaviour, even amongst women, even amongst females, can run through the bloodline. So Brigitte Macron, you will know her relationship with the French president, Emmanuel Macron, started when he was just 15. 15 years old and a pupil at the school where the then 39-year-old now first lady was a married teacher. And now it has emerged that Macron's 42-year-old daughter has struck up a romantic relationship with a student 20 years her junior. Now, it's not as bad, and I want to be very clear about that because she's not a teacher at his school. But it's still fascinating. And these are the shocking detail. from the Daily Mail, which argues it is an uncanny echo of her mother's marriage to the French president.

So the daughter is Tafin Azur, and she posted a video on Instagram, showing her and the 22-year-old business student, Antoine Lekineau, looking happy and close while on a trip to Amsterdam. They are said to have met at a glamorous seaside town on France's northwest coast over the summer. He was working as a kite surfing instructor and taught her how to use an e-foil, a type of electric surfboard. A close friend of the president's stepdaughter told the French magazine Gala it was immediately obvious between them. They have a lot in common, a love of thrills, but also travel and entrepreneurship. Now, it's reported that the lawyer and politician has already introduced the much younger man to her two children, 12 and 10. And these similarities are uncanny. They are totally uncanny between Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron who have a 25-year age gap.

You remember Macron was a student when he met Brigitte, however much younger at 15, when Brigitte was a teacher at a private school in which he was going to. At the time, Brigitte was 39 and married to a man by whom she had three children, unless you believe Candice Owens on this, but let's just park that for one moment. Macron's parents removed him from the school once the relationship came to light. His mother, Francois Noge's Macron, told the author of Emmanuel Macron a young perfect man, we just couldn't believe it. What is clear is that when Emmanuel met Brigitte, we couldn't just say that's great.

What mattered to me was not the fact he was having a relationship with Brigitte, but that he was alive and there weren't any problems. Now, the daughter was nine, nine years old when the affair between Emmanuel and her mother began. She said of this in 2018 they were quite smitten and it was quite obvious between them and very difficult. Despite this, she said of their relationship, if I have to give a vision of love, it's Emmanuel and Mummy. When they are together, it is almost as if the world doesn't exist. So now she has her much younger man and of course the entire world is talking about this. So we will debate it too with Father Calvin Robinson.

Thomas Corbett, Dylan, Marilyn, Hawes, and Maria Bautel. So, Thomas, is this predatory behavior? Is this as bad as Brigitte and Emmanuel? Or actually, because there's no schooling involved, it's just something we have to accept as running in the family. Yeah, I mean, he's happy. Let the bro have his older woman. He is happy.

He's enjoying it. It's funny. I think the more interesting angle on this is the double standard, right? Can you imagine if it was the other way around? If she was a man and he was dating, you know, everyone laughs at Leonardo DiCaprio for his young, young lady interests. It doesn't seem to be much of an issue the other way around. I think that's fine.

He's having a good time. He seems to be happy. President Macron is certainly enjoying his lovely, lovely wife. I think, you know, let the guys have fun. If they want to have an older lady, they can have an older lady. Yeah, Father Kaufman Robinson, it is quite interesting, isn't it, that Thomas points out there would have been total uproar if the situation with Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron was reversed. But because he was a

15-year-old boy, it's accepted. Do you accept it? And do you think that this relationship is okay? No, I think what happened between Macron and his and Brigitte was disgusting. I think any teacher taking advantage of their pupil is wrong. And I think he was clearly under 18. So it was also wrong on that regard and it's unhealthy. And likewise, with this relationship we're seeing, it's unhealthy. It's the wrong way around. For a young man to be dating a 42-year-old woman, you know, it's not good for a position to start a family from. The other way around would be completely healthy. A woman who is 25 to 30 is prime for motherhood for the vocation that most women are called to, whereas a woman over 40 is not. It's going to be very difficult for them to raise a family. But then in this modern age of

broken families, she already has a couple of kids around anyway, so it's more complicated than it should be. If I really could get back to the old common sense of wait until you're married to have children. What do you think about these relationships, Marilyn? And is it unfair for me to say that this type of predatory behavior runs in the bloodline? Well, I wouldn't want to call it predatory. You can't help who you meet and you can't help who you fall in love with. I sort of like Even for Brigitte, though, at 39 with her 15-year-old pupil, I mean, that would be illegal. I think that. I do it. I think Brigitte, with, I mean, really, that is the case where you see it time and again in the courts, where that is, as Calvin rightly says, he was at school. He was a school boy. And I've often found with the cases I deal with, you get a lot of, when it's that way round where the boy is at school, you get a lot of men saying, wow, yeah, we're.

he cut his teeth on that one, whoa. And it's not like that because when you talk to those boys who are now men, it's basically destroyed their life because, you know, they were basically abused by an older woman. And that's the nature of the beast. And that I think was absolutely disgusting. But he obviously clearly is besotted with Brigitte, whatever. But I think with the daughter, I still have to think, you know,

if that was my 22-year-old son and I've got three boys and a girl, would I be pleased? 20-year-old son was going out with a woman that old. I don't think so. But you can't do anything about it. You're best keeping your mouth shut. Honestly, someone at that age, I mean, my experience of young boys and young men is they ain't going to listen. And the more you try and split it up, the closer they're going to get.

So I just think it's something that, you know, good luck to her, quite frankly. I mean, it's not the same as her mother. It isn't the same. But, you know, I think if I was having my time again, I'd go 20 years younger as well. Thomas, are you interested? No. You can fight it out. I'm not saying a word.

Maria, what do you think about the fact that, I mean, look, whatever you say about Emmanuel and Brigitte, and clearly I think it was a totally immoral and inappropriate relationship on Brigitte's side, Does Marilyn have a point that it has stood the taste of time? I don't excuse grooming a child into a relationship at all. No, I agree with Father Calvin about 15, you're not mature enough. I think a 22-year-old man deciding to date an attractive, wealthy 40-odd-year-old woman is his prerogative and it's her prerogative. That's up to them.

Obviously, if they decide they want an actual family, it's going to be more difficult. There's a freedom. I agree with the freedom of being able to choose your relationships in that sense. But it's not healthy for society in a sense of that family unit. But that's not my choice to make on their behalf. Yeah, it's not illegal, is it? I guess it's just interesting. It's so interesting seeing how closely those stories have been mirrored.

And especially seeing that she grew up with that, right, and was quite traumatized by it, clearly quite traumatized by it. And now she is choosing to put her own marriage, which is clearly failing and her own children through the same thing. Very odd. I mean, I guess you could say very French. Thomas, very French. They do things differently, don't they, Thomas?

They do things differently in France. That was my first opinion. It's French. What do you expect? Get the white flag out. Don't the French believe that having affairs actually keeps your marriage together. Yes. Yes.

And they believe that drinking a bottle of red wine and I is very healthy. I mean, look. I go with that one. Yeah, they do things differently. They do things differently over on the continent. Look, absolutely fascinating. So great to have it out with you all today, Father Calvin Robinson. Marilyn Hawes, great to have you on outspoken for the first time.

Maria Bouthal and Thomas Corbett Dillon. G.B. News's loss is our gain. The Fox News commentator, but I'm sure you'll be back. I'm sure you'll be back. They won't be able to resist it. Although Father Calvin Robinson and I would never back. I have not been back. Daniel, can I just say, may I just say, Thomas,

I was bounced off GB News because I said to Emily Carver the other day that in 10 years time we'll all be brown if we don't get fit of everybody. That will do it. That'll do it. And what, they cut you off, Maryland. I've gone. Oh, God. Oh, God.

Well, look, brilliant to have you. You're always welcome here. You're always welcome here. Thank you all so much. Thank you. Now, I need to start by saying something very important. It will become clear why. Prince Harry attempted to send me to jail.

He attempted to send me to jail for reporting the truth about what he and Megan Markle, his wife, were doing behind the scenes to destroy the British royal family. And that couple actually succeeded. in having me cancelled from my career and having a completely malicious police investigation launched against me, simply because I'd done journalism about them, which no one in the mainstream media outside of me was prepared to do initially. And after that, I rebuilt from nothing. So I am sitting speaking to you today, right, as an individual, an independent journalist.

I do not work for the mainstream media. I have no investors other than my wonderful substack subscribers who pay me five pounds a month to do this. Rupert Murdoch, Lord Rothermare, Paul Marshall, they cannot control me. They can't dictate who I cover. They can't force me into U-turns. So I guess the reason that I'm saying this to you

is that everything that I report on this show comes from a place of truth. And when it comes to the royal family, when it comes specifically to Prince Harry and Megan Markle, after what that couple did, there is nothing more they can take away from me. I will never appear in the mainstream media again on the British Bashing Corporation or NBC or Talk TV or GB News

or any of those platforms. I don't want to, I have no desire to. And I think it's really important I say that to you because there has been such a rush to cancel people at the people in this space this week. And I am not doing that. But I do think when it comes to me, you have to look at the entirety of my journalistic career, the entirety of the fact that no one would even know about Queen Elizabeth II's reservations in regards to Megan Markle, if it were not me having the bravery to report that story, when no one else would, and when the rest of the mainstream media

was against me. The reason this matters today is because I have a broken, I have broken a story this week in regards to Prince Harry and Megan Markle's close friend Ian Waste and his connections in the UK media, specifically to a man called Paul Marshall, who owns the spectator and is the co-owner of G.B. News. And it has caused a very public feud with Mark Dolan, the comedian, and he is a good comedian, but he is not a journalist, by the way, and he posted this week on X. I'm no Prince Harry fan, but he and his family need 24-7 armed royal security whilst they are in the UK. The cost is irrelevant. The threats they face are shocking and real. Now, I don't think there's any grey area with that post. Mark Dolan is completely able to have that opinion of

he wants to, he's going against 98% of the population. That is fine. But the reason that I am so intrigued about this post is because Mark Dolan previously changed his position on Prince Harry and Megan Markle because of corporate pressures. And there are a lot of people in this space. And remember, I have no one backing me. I have no investors. That is critical because there are a lot of people in the space who pretend to be independent while working for the mainstream media. And I don't mind if they admit it. But when you are in that system, you are pressured. You are constantly pressured. You're constantly pressured by Murdoch or Rotherman or by the chief executives under them like Rebecca Brooks. And I say this from a point of complete knowledge, understanding those pressures

and knowing that I was able to work around those pressures and circumvent those pressures to still break amazing stories, but you do not have the freedom that you have in this space. And certainly, when it came to Ian Waste, who remember page six has reported this week, has helped finance the Duke and Duchess of Sussex UK moves. So it couldn't be more connected. And the fact that he is the founding partner of the chief executive officer, the chief risk officer of Marshall Waste LLP, co-owned by Paul Marshall, the co-owner of GB News, is very important to this story. So that's the setup. And I want to be very fair to Mark Dolan.

So I'm going to show you what he is saying now, but also what he said in the past and why I believe, and why I'm convinced, actually, that my reporting is true. Now, what is interesting is that to begin with, Mark Dolan tried to U-turn on the post on X that I have just showed you his own words and somehow suggested the meaning of his own words had been twisted. Harry, being the son of King Charles, not something that was a decision made by him. He was born into the royal family, born into the gilded cage of the monarchy. and therefore he is a massive target. Now, I'm more than happy for King Charles to foot the bill for this armed royal protection. But the point I was making was not about the cost, as I said, which has been deliberately twisted and misinterpreted.

The cost is irrelevant. The reason why is because the cost is not the story. The cost is not the conversation. Harry and Megan already pay for their own security, and that's a good thing. but what they don't have access to is armed bodyguards. Correct. But the only way for them to get armed bodyguards is if we, the British taxpayer, fund that.

And we'd have to fund that to the tune of millions and millions of pounds a year. And it would mean, as I have been reporting, that we would fund them wherever they went in the world. So if Megan Markle is off to Nigeria for some business project, we are funding it and we are not prepared to fund it. Mark, you are in the 2% of mad people who want to. That is fine. Just own it.

So here's the scenario. If something, God forbid, were to happen to Harry, Megan, Archie or Lily, there would be meltdown. If something, in the context of Harry asking for arm protection, were to happen to him or his family, it has the potential to bring down the monarchy and could potentially be hugely damaging to the reputation of the United Kingdom. Just imagine the headlines. If God forbid, something, for example, happened to Harry after he's been asking for armed cops. You know the headlines already. Blood on their hands. It would be cataclysmic. Well, no, I don't believe that actually. The threats against Harry and Megan are monitored, just like they are for all public figures who also don't receive

full taxpayer-funded security, including some senior royals like Princess Anne and Prince Edward. But rather than stand by his opinions and debate the issue like I am, like I am every single day on this show, Dolan decided to accuse me of misreporting on this, which is offensive actually. I've covered Harry and Megan for 10 years. And yes, I do believe you were snookered by G.B. News. And I am going to produce the receipts about that. But first here is Mark Dolan's claim about me. I think there are lots of people in this space who say things for clicks and they preach to the choir and they tell you stuff you want to hear.

And I think it's cynical and I think it's dishonest. And that's just not how I roll. What you see is what you get. As Dan has devoted two of his most recent shows to yours truly, Dan's obsessed. I'm living rent-free in his head. and actually it's very flattering. And I feature so much in his last two shows that frankly, I should get royalties.

So in his most recent video, Dan has alleged that after he left GB News, somehow the billionaires in control of this TV network decided to become incredibly pro Sussex and talent like myself were got at by these powerful billionaires. What's the scenario? Did I sit down and have afternoon tea with Sir Paul Marshall with scones and plotted cream and jam? And he said, let me explain something to you, Mr. Dolan. We used to dislike Harry and Megan, but I'm friendly with a billionaire who likes them.

So we're going to go pro-Sussix. I respect Dan as a journalist. He's got incredible experience. My God, that guy knows a story and he broke the international scoop of Megxit. So I will never question. Dan's journalistic chops. But if you've got to resort to making things up and alleging that billionaires sat me down in a posh hotel and told me to suddenly love Harry and Megan, then I've got to say, you're desperate. I'm going to say that you've dropped your journalistic standards

and I'm going to say that you're clearly running out of material. Okay, Mark, I've made nothing up. Never have. You don't have a career like mine by making stories up. And I would love to know what stories you have broke it. But you're also being very disingenuous. I never said the meeting took place in a hotel. I never even said there was a meeting. But Mark, I know that this happened because they tried it.

me too. I was the prime time host, okay? I was hosting Monday to Thursday, 9 p.m. till 11 p.m. You were hosting Friday to Sunday, 9 p.m. till 11 p.m. I know they tried it because they tried it with me. And I didn't turn, but you did. And I've produced the receipts of how the G.B. news coverage and your personal coverage of Harry and Megan changed dramatically once Ian Waste, Paul Marshall's business partner was their close friend. And I would be the the wrong person to do that. Because what do you think about these clips? How pro-Sussex do these clips from my time on that show look to you? Woco Mono, Megan Markle. Woco Mono herself, Megan Markle. Woco Mono, Megan Markle. A scheming, cynical, money-grabbing grifter,

this indulgent pair of crybabies. Woco Mono keeps on moaning. Woco Mono. Yoko Mono, Megan Markle. I think meeting this trouble making upstart was the worst thing that ever happened to Harry. The Duke and Duchess of self-pity, this entitled self-indulgent pair. I think it is so interesting that Mark Dolan used those clips, because it's actually completely proving my point. Look at that Mark Dolan and then see how dramatic the U-turn was. And I'm going to show you, because you've just seen what Mark Dolan was like. And he went from that to this. Prince Harry has served his punishment

and now it is time for the king and country to forgive him. I remember watching this and thinking, what the hell? What happened? What changed? Who got to you? Look! In my take at 10, why it's time for the king and the country to forgive Prince Harry. But at this moment in time, I'm beginning to feel protective of Harry himself. I'm deeply shocked that on his visit to the UK this week for a service to celebrate 10 years of the Invictus Games and an inspiring event that he founded, Harry was not granted an audience with his own father.

Now Charles is battling cancer. How must Harry feel not to be able to give his own dad a hug and ask him about his progress? Harry might be old school, wanting to pop round with a bottle of Lucasade and a bag of grapes just to cheer the old man up. For Charles to snub his own son in this way strikes me as a punishment disproportionate to the crime. How ill is Charles? I'm praying for a speedy recovery, but God knows how long they've got left together. None of us have got long, really. Life is short. And in a needless slight to his youngest son, Charles has reportedly reduced Harry to tears by granting a military aviation honour on William, even though it's Harry who famously flew planes in two tours of duty in Afghanistan, talking about kicking a guy when he's down.

And why hasn't Charles stepped in to make sure that his own son is safe and has top-level armed royal war? security when he's in Britain. Do you see what I mean? It's like a different person. So remembering, I know that pressure was being put on presenters to change their reporting on Harry and Megan, I refused, yet Mark Dolan is claiming he just woke up one day and completely changed his view. I worry for Harry's safety and I worry for his sanity too. I think he's. I think he's. I think He's suffered enough and his mental and physical well-being is now a priority. After all, this is the same human being who had to follow his mother's hearse at her own funeral at the age of just 12. I admire the King greatly, but it was wrong not to see Harry this week.

William is consumed with rage, which I fear will never dissipate. That's brothers for you. But Charles, as Harry's father and the head of the head of the day, father and the head of the family should know better. It's time for the king and the country to forgive Prince Harry. The war in Gaza is like a minor scuffle compared to what's happening in the royal family at the moment. My message to Charles is a simple one. Declare a ceasefire. Meet the enemy. Build a future together and give peace a chance. What you don't do is tell your own son to piece off.

Okay, so you're seeing there was the total U-turn. But the problem is it didn't just end there because, okay, you've changed your mind, I believe you've done so under pressure, but whatever. The problem is it then turned nasty

because this is what we always see when the Sussex squad take over. Because it wasn't just about bigging up Prince Harry and Megan Markle. It was about pulling down Catherine. the Princess of Wales and Prince William, even spreading completely disgusting trans rumours about Catherine at the same time, and you can go back and you can look at the receipts. I went on the Megan Kelly show at the same time and openly said people should just shut up with all of this nastiness about where Catherine was because I knew she was in the midst of a shocking health crisis.

But this Photoshop fail was bizarre. Just the scale of it alone. Why are there so many trees outside? in full bloom this early in the year. Part of Princess Charlotte's wrist is missing. In fact, the photograph is thought to contain as many as 16 inconsistencies, including the small matter of Prince George missing a foot, surely a unique physical characteristic that would have come to public attention by now.

And some are even suggesting that Princess Catherine has an Adam's apple, but I seriously doubt that she is the first trans royal. But if the palace have nothing to hide, they should publish the original photograph, which we're told was taken by William. But I doubt they ever will, which is why this story will now enter conspiratorial folklore forevermore. In the end, there is a lesson for the royal family and for all public figures. Be straight with us.

You take a photograph of the family on Mother's Day and you publish it. The very fact that this image has been doctored in any way, even for aesthetic reasons, is a problem for a monarchy that wants to be seen as authentic, real, credible and down to earth. Meanwhile, the questions, where is Kate and what's going on with her health will only get louder. Frankly, I think she should be left in peace to recover and get well. We didn't need this photo and this airbrushed PR nonsense. It's an insult to the public. This saga has been a sorry story for the royal family.

From now on, how can we believe a photograph that's released, a statement that's made. A fake image creates a sense of a fake family and a fake monarchy. They say the Cameron never lies. If only that was true of the royal family. Now today, Dolan ever so modestly claims he stands by those negative monologues specifically backing Harry over the sick King Charles.

The other interesting thing about this long clip that Dan played which enhanced his show and was a great reminder to the world of not just my delivery, my editorial integrity and my writing, but it was a reminder of my consistency too. Well, I stand by that monologue, because although it may not strike the Harry sceptic tone that I've been striking for quite literally the last six years

on the radio and on the telly, the bottom line is that I take the view now and I took the view then that King Charles had literally just been diagnosed with cancer. And at that point, with that diagnosis, for Charles not to meet Harry, I thought was a little harsh, and I think it was the wrong thing to do.

Mark then went even further, claiming that I'm trying to destroy him, criticizing the use of my language, which I admit sometimes goes a bit too far. My dad is definitely not happy about it, but this is a show outspoken is a show for adults. He's been at war with me. And he has sought at every turn to attack me,

to denigrate me, to damage me. In the past, and you know the Mark Dolan show, we don't use any strong language, right? It's something the whole family can watch. Bring the kids in, they might learn something. But Dan, on his own show, his own hit show,

to which I subscribe and which I thorough. enjoy. Dan Wooden called me an asshole. And he called me G.B. News's management bitch. And Dan's attacks on me are personal. And they're not about the debates and not about the arguments. This attack is an attempt to silence me. Well, Mark, come on. I'm a free speech Absolutus. I'm certainly not trying to silence you. Don't be ridiculous. That's like nuts. Look, you were an asshole to Catherine, the Princess of Wales, unfortunately. You were. You were a complete asshole to her. And you were GB News as management speech. Hence why you ran those terrible, terrible monologues, which I'm sure you now regret. And you should probably just admit you regret it.

You are a nice man, you're a nice guy, but you are a comedian, not a journalist. You haven't broken a royal story in your life, Mark. And you do do what your bosses tell you to do, be it at Talk TV or GB News. Now, I want to be very clear, I'm not telling anyone not to watch Mark Dolan, not telling anyone to cancel Mark Dolan. But this is just an important story. it is important that I explain what has happened at G.B. News because the thing is G.B. News has now been taken over. And even today continues to run shocking pro-Sussex propaganda. Now from this guy, Cameron Walker, you know that he used to work for me. So I know a lot about him. And he idolizes Omed Scobie and was

brought in to be the GB News version of Omed Scobie. And today on GB News, he is conducting an interview with the Labor MP, the discredited Labour MP might tap. Why on earth is he doing that? Why on earth is Mike tap on GBM? Because they are pushing hard. This idea that Harry and Megan, just like Mark Dolan, same idea, pushing this idea hard that Harry and Megan

just must get security. Payful by us. This sort of protection is not based on the wealth of an individual. It's based on the risk and threat that they face. And I do seem to remember that he did offer to pay, but that doesn't fit in with the system. You can't be buying state security. It doesn't work like that.

It has to be based on the threat that they are facing. So Mike Tab appearing to suggest that police basically are not for hire. So lots of GB News, viewers and listeners have quite rightly kind of contacted us and contacted me and said he should pay for it himself. He is no longer a working royal. He's not contributing to the states, et cetera, et cetera. The problem is the kind of protection which Harry believes he should get you cannot pay for because that creates a dangerous precedent

that any kind of rich Arab Sheikh or any Russian oligarch can affect me higher the Metropolitan Police for their own gain. So that's why the law says Harry cannot pay for his own protection. So I'm just trying to explain how GB News went from doing the great coverage that held Prince Harry and Meg into account to being a pro-sacist's operation. I thought you had a right to know. I'm a little bit scared about your comments,

but I'm going to dig in. I'm going to dig in. And I don't care. Oh, this is a great. Julia Bordy. You are an asshole, Dan. I thought I was trying to be very fair. I thought I was trying to be very fair. Not paranoid. Just alert says grow up Mark. Gabby Gray 7332 says sorry but I stand behind Dan 100%. Too bad for Mark. Some of his comments towards Dan are quite nasty. Trudy Dwyer 8179 says I watched him in the US going on and on about Harry and Megan and now he's all for

them, I agree. What has made him change completely? And that's all I'm trying to explain. Baroness note to oneself 407.3 says, thank you, Dan, for exposing the truth. Keep up the respect to you. Katie 8100 says, shocking behavior from Mark. Winston says, I don't respect nor trust anyone who blows with the wind and doesn't have a backbone like Mark Dolan. But Uno Reverse 11 says, Dan, this whole segment makes you look petty. Be the bigger man and rise above this crap. Laugh it off. and pick your battles. I of Horace, DW, says Wooten and Dolan on the same TV network, was addictive, to be honest. And yes, I got Mark the job on GBMU, just like I got him the job on Talk TV. He used to be a regular on my show. And you have a god says,

please invite Mark to your show, Dan, and sort it out. Okay. So I just wanted to explain what's going on. As I say, I don't want anyone. to cancel Mark or stop watching his channel, that's not what this is about. And lots of people have criticized me this week as well for daring to have Rob Shooter on as a guest and putting his book cover up on screen. Something I do for anyone who is coming on my show and giving me their time. I had no idea what his book was about. And again, I appreciate lots of you are annoyed about the book. And we can debate that. But I think we've got to be really, really careful about this type of cancel culture. And that is not what I'm doing with Mark Dolan. I am simply pointing out a story in the public interest

about why GB News has changed its position. Okay, a reminder of the nominees for today's greatest Britain and union jackass. Maria Boutal of Restore Britain nominated Kay Burley for trying to convince the public that Andy Burnham is a nice man on the BBC today. Father Calvin Robinson nominated Joe Powell, the Labour MP for Kensington and Bayswater for welcoming extra funding so the Notting Hill Carnival could go ahead in a safe and well-organised manner. And Thomas Corbett Dylan nominated Ed Miliband. He said he embarrassed himself in D.C. meeting with Marco Rubio. Everyone was calling him Millie Watt since he is obsessed with wind farms. And the results they are in. In third position with 6% Joe Powell, the runner up with 31% of the vote, Kay Burley. But the worst

Britain in the world today with 64% of the vote is Ed Miliband. And Marilyn Hors has nominated the great Lucy Connolly. Our political prisoner Freedom Fighter is today's greatest Britain for her resilience and unbrokenness by those who did what they did to her, wrote a book and fought back to shame Lord Herma and Slip Priest Stama. And guess what? Lucy Connolly is now a best selling author and slippery Starma is no longer Prime Minister. Doesn't that tell you something? Much more royal news now with Paula Frolic Uncensored, but we're going to do so over on Substat.

You can join us there at www.org. Dot outspoken.com. But we will be back live tomorrow, 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific. Hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Subscribe to us as a podcast on Apple or Spotify or wherever you get your podcast. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.