Dan Wootton Outspoken - ITV COVER UP SHABANA MAHMOOD & WES STREETING HOT MIC SHAME AS TOMMY ROBINSON DEMANDS REVOLUTION

Episode Date: July 22, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: The MSM tried to cover up a disgraceful hot mic moment that exposes Andy Burnham’s new government and senior ministers, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Defence Secretary Wes Streeting, for LAUGHING in our faces about the fact they are about to release paedos, rapists, killers and terrorists onto our streets before their sentences are even served. Dan can reveal that footage was captured by a top freelance cameraman who works for Woke ITV News and ITN but was NOT broadcast by Robert Peston on the channel’s news bulletins last night. Yet today Woke ITV has tried to set up Reform UK’s Shadow Chancellor Robert Jenrick with his own hot mic moment on Good Morning Britain. We’ll get into it all with our Superstar Panel: Father Calvin Robinson – host of Common Sense Crusade on YouTube, Reform UK candidate for Soho James Bembridge, Advance UK National Director Richard Thomson, and public policy specialist Lucy White. PLUS: Growing distrust over the Ann Widdecombe assassination story as the police and authorities are accused of a sophisticated cover up, as more leftist violence involving the use of hammers is exposed. AND: Tommy Robinson ally and social media campaigner Danny Tommo has dramatically clashed with the high profile Islamic preacher and YouTube star Ali Dawah, who famously featured his fully covered wife communicating on camera using a billboard. We’ll show you what happened. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Oprah Winfrey attempts an astonishing and humiliating backtrack over her tissue of lies interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. But royal YouTube sensation According2Taz isn’t going to let her get away with it. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton #DanWoottonOutspoken #news #outspoken #uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Recently, our company's softball team lost the big game by one run. Then Dale tried to console us with the quote, winning isn't everything. Well, Dale and I are very different. I get early payout from Bed 365. If my team goes up big, I get paid out instantly, even if they blow the lead later. Sound familiar, Dale?

Thanks, Beth 365. Must be 19 or older Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or the gambling of someone close to you, please go to connectsuntario.c.c.com. There's no shortcut for saving time, but saving money is simple. Just combine your car and home insurance with Bel Air Direct and save. Get a quote at bellair direct.com.

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 544. And breaking right now, the MSM tried to cover up the disgraceful hot mic moment that I believe exposes Andy Burnham's new government and its most senior ministers, Home Secretary Shabana MacMood and Defence Secretary West treating for laughing in our faces about the fact they are about to release

pedos, rapists, killers and terrorists onto the streets before their sentences are even served. No, he's not. No, he's not. It makes me When did you say you're sparing you? It makes me bubble with rage.

No wonder Tommy Robinson decried we need a revolution as the PM was forced into a groveling apology. Is it acceptable for members of your cabinet to be joking about the early release of prisoners at a time when people like the mother of peace, See Harper are desperately worried about the early release of her son's killers. No, it's not.

And certainly that's been acknowledged and apologies have been made. But today, I can reveal the hot mic footage was captured by a top freelance cameraman who works for Wokai TV news and ITN. But it was not broadcast by Tom Bradby or Robert Preston on the channel's news bulletins last night and said this is what their viewers saw. We will meet the fiscal rules. The new cabinet had tea together today, but not everyone in the party is feeling so sunny.

And tough financial decisions can't be put off for long. Romilly Weeks, News at 10. So they had the hot mic footage, and they covered it up. Because we now have an MSM working directly with the government they love. Look at Sly News and Lucy Powell. waving, let's give her a wave back. We're always friendly on Sky News. We love her.

And today, it gets worse. I believe Wokai TV then tried to set up Reform UK shadow chancea Robert Jenrick with his own hot mic moment. Watch. Robert Jemrit, that is very clear. Thank you very much indeed for joining us this morning. 735.

Still to come on Good Morning, Britain. If a young person in your family is about to head off travelling this summer. So I'm going to reveal what this is all about. Oh, and by the way, this anti-white racist is joining Burnham's government too. Every chief executive of every council and every government department, white. Every director of a department in Scotland, white. Every principal of a college or university in Scotland, white.

Every headteacher in Scotland, white. Every chair of a public sector body in Scotland, white. We'll get into it all today with our superstar panel. Father Calvin Robinson, host of Common Sense Crusade on YouTube. Reform UK candidate for Soho, James Bembridge, great British Pact National Director Richard Thompson, author of his new book When My Broths Came Home Again, and Public Policy Specialist and Restore Britain Supporter Lucy White.

Also coming up on the show today, growing distrust over the Anne Whitcomb assassination story as the police and authorities are accused of a sophisticated cover-up as more left as violence involving the use of hammers is exposed. And Tommy Robinson, ally and social media campaigner Danny Tomo has dramatically clashed with the high-profile Islamic preacher and YouTube star Ali Dawa, who famously featured his fully covered wife communicating on camera

using a whiteboard. We'll show you what happened. Then, in the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow over on Substack, an astonishing and humiliating backtrack by Oprah Wimphrey. Royal YouTube sensation, according to Taz. Ain't going to let her get away with that. We'll also reveal a brand new, Greatest Britain and Union Jackass. Here are our superstar panel's nominee to be named the worst Britain in the world today.

You can vote in the live chat over on YouTube. Ed Miliband, nominated by Father Calvin Robinson, who says nothing says hypocrisy, quite like spending years destroying Britain's energy security through his net zero zealotry, only to become Foreign Secretary and rack up tens of thousands of air miles, because of course it was widely reported his appointment was intended to move him out of domestic policy, yet Calvin suspects he'll become an embarrassment on the world stage. Shabana MacMood, nominated by Lucy White for Lafine

at the early release of prisoners, and Wes Streeting, nominated by James Bembridge for a similar reason joking about Labor letting the prisoners out early. What a disgrace it was. I'm going to give you the inside story. Do keep your superchats coming in during the show too. I love to see them on the live chat. We will read out many at the end of the show today. But now, let's go. If one video really sums up how Andy Burnham's shameless and shameful anti-democratic new government really feels about you, it is this hot mic disgraceful video. They are laughing at us.

Laughing at the illegal invasion. Laughing at the danger we now spend our lives facing. Laughing about the fact they intend to release violent rapists, murderers, paedophiles and terrorists back on the streets long before their sentences are up, are laughing. Who are you?

No, he's the enemy now. No, he's not. What are you doing it? What is what? What despicable, Cretton. Just in case you missed it, let me tell you about that conversation

with the new Justice Secretary, Alex Noritz, and Wes Streeteries. who said, you know he's the enemy now. Justice Shabana. MacMood, no, he's not. Streeting, he wants to let them all out. MacMood, you know who's boss. When do you do your swearing-in? A couple of weeks, I guess. Tell me when it is I want to come as they cackle like hyenas. He wants to let them all out. Seven words that will haunt this government forever. As Tommy Robinson raged, we need a revolution. And Gb News star Ben Leo added,

people slam me for pointing out politicians are joking and giggling at the pub. Minutes after being fired, they are literally laughing at you. It's a big joke and you're the punchline. And indeed, on GB News this morning, there was no way. The Transport Secretary Heidi Alexandra could defend this disgrace. Yeah, we understand you're doing more, But this is obfuscation. Shabana Mahmood has not apologised.

I have read her message on X that is remarkably similar to the defence secretaries. It seems almost like their copy and paste, quite frankly. And blaming the conservatives, when she has not apologised, frankly, is disgraceful.

And I think she should actually come out and make a proper apology. Andy Burnham, when he got into office on Monday, says, we haven't been good enough. This to the British public is not good enough, is it? This is not the change they were told it is. This is the same old stuff. It's been 48 hours, less than 48 hours, and there's already a scandal. When is this

government going to grow up? As I said, Wes has apologised, and those remarks do not reflect the seriousness with which I know personally Shabana Mahmood, the now Home Secretary, takes these issues. She's the sort of person who will confront difficult decisions. No one is that the situation in our prisons was an easy one to manage. We have now, you know, we've got to ensure that we are putting the safety of the British people first. There was certainly nothing funny for Conservative London opposition leader and Sadiq Khan's worst nightmare, Susan Hall. Many of you will have seen the video doing the rounds of Shabana McMahon and West Streeting,

both Labour cabinet members laughing yesterday about the early release scheme. We should be getting 10,000 foreign criminals out of our prisons sent back to where they came from and make sure that these vile criminals, the rapists, the grooming gang members, and the people that killed P.C. Harper, remain in prison. prison for the full length of their sentences. It's an utter disgrace that Cabinet members, Labour Cabinet members, should find this in any which way I'm using, because the rest of us are not amused by this. Now, how did this footage get out?

It should have been a major scandal, by the way, from the moment it was filmed. Any newsman or woman worth half the assault would immediately have seen it, thought, well, let's clear the news agenda. Well, at least that's what they would have done a number of years ago, but not in the new MSM. So all day, I've been working out exactly what happened. And I can reveal that this footage was actually filmed by a top male freelance cameraman who works for woke ITV and ITN yesterday lunchtime. So they had the footage yesterday lunchtime and Guess what? They covered it up. It's no surprise, by the way,

when you have sly news admitting it loves government ministers. Waving, let's give her a wave back. We're always friendly on Sky News. We love her. So let me take you through this all day, not a word on the British Passion Corporation about the hot mic footage. Indeed, they celebrated this little lunchtime gathering of the new cabinet. Look.

Lunchtime today in Andy Burnham's new cabinet assembles. Morning, Chancellor, can you make the numbers add up? Congratulations, Minister. Plenty of mugging up to do for the new jobs. A cuppa and a chat in the garden first for the team now running the country. This bit at least probably not a weekly ritual.

Oh, you're just a cuppa and a chat. But what's even more shameful is that it was left to Guido Forks to actually send this... hot mic moment viral after the footage was posted on Instagram by believe it or not, the Metro's social media dude. So the BBC woke ITV sly news who all have access to this footage, they just ignored it. And even once it was exploding on social media last night, woke ITV, who let me remind you,

had their own cameramen behind securing the scoop. still refused to cover it. This is what they broadcast instead. My first observation is that the government, this new government, are going out their way to try and sound positive and optimistic and hopeful about the future. And they draw a contrast between one of Kirstama's first actions

in government cutting winter fuel with what they've done today, giving out money in the form of relief on energy bills, and I expect there'll be more help announced later this week. We will meet the fiscal rules. The new cabinet had tea together today, but not everyone in the party is feeling so sunny. And tough financial decisions can't be put off for long. Romilly Week's news at 10.

So the leftist Tom Brad B and the head of Woke ITV News, Andrew Dagnall, are a disgrace. Because they covered up this footage. And then this morning, and the mainstream media will not report this, this morning then tried to entrap a senior right-wing politician in their own hot mic moment to steal the attention away from Shibana Mahmood and Wes Streeting. So this was Woke ITV's Good Morning Britain, and they left the microphone of Reform Shadow Chancellor Robert Jenrick on even once his interview had ended.

And here's what happened. Robert Jeremy, that is very clear. Thank you very much indeed for joining us this morning. 735. Still to come on Good Morning, Britain. If a young person in your family is about to head off travelling this summer. Well, that is not good enough. That is not good enough because Susanna Reid and Ed Balls went on to actually use that moment to shame.

Robert Jennerick. They said, well, no, it was great that we gave you this time. I believe they did that on purpose. And let me tell you why. Woke ITV's Good Morning Britain is a very experienced TV show. The moment a guest goes off camera, they switch off the feed. And you know why they do that? Because they're off-communist regulated.

And what's to say a guest doesn't say, God, that Susanna Reid is a lefty bitch. They don't want to broadcast that. But this morning, they purposefully left Robert Jenrick's microphone on just hours after the other hot mic moment. No right-wing politician should ever appear on Good Morning Britain again. But what's interesting, and I do find this quite hopeful, actually, because the MSM no longer drives the agenda, actually the hot mic moment from MacMood and Streeting is leading the news, despite the fact it was ignored by the British bashing corporation

Wokai TV Channel 4Sline News. We don't need them to set the agenda anymore. We know what the real news of the day is. And West Streeting had to take to Elon Musk's X to apologize, right? I hope everyone can see there was no ill intent behind this ribbing of the new Justice Secretary. It was a reference to an old May Clark joke, but I appreciate these very serious issues, and I am sorry for any offence inadvertently caused by this moment of levity. Followed in succession by MacMood, who also apologised. I think everyone can see there was no ill intent behind this ribbing of the new Lord Chancellor, a role I once filled, and which comes with immense challenges, thanks to the vandalism inflicted

on our justice system by the last Conservative government. But I appreciate this is an extremely serious issue, and do not want to be a man. anyone to mistake this moment of everty for a lack of serious intent. And the new Prime Minister Andy Burnham admitted today he wasn't happy. Is it acceptable for members of your cabinet to be joking about the early release of prisoners at a time when people like the mother of PC Harper are desperately worried about the early release of her son's killers? No, it's not.

And certainly that's been acknowledged and apologies have been made. on the broader issue. I feel for the family it's an appalling crime that was committed. The main perpetrator will not be subject to any early release. Of course, others involved have potentially been identified. But I've spoken to the new Justice Secretary. We will review the policy together and make further statements in due course. Can me just be very clear here? These crissons are angry that they were caught on hot mic.

Not apologising for the fact that they were laughing about releasing violent criminals on the street. As Baroness Foster responded too late, nobody thinks it's funny, especially the victims and their family. Tory Bob Seeley added, We could all forgive lightheartedly joking, even in bad taste. We tend to be a lot more forgiving about that than sanctimonious lefties. But I suspect this won't look so good.

when your early-released prisoners start killing, stabbing and raping again. And David Betts pointed out the two-tier nature of the apology, explaining, when in the last 10 years has this dispensation to offend and private been extended to normal people? We've got a state apparatus that's relentlessly eroded privacy and practice, and people are regularly punished for saying things in closed WhatsApp groups and the like. I seem to recall a policeman whose career was destroyed for a private comment, and yet here we have the Home Office Minister.

The rules are stupid, but they invented them and have enforced them to the diminishment of the quality of life of everyone for ages. It's not too much to ask for one set of standards applied to all by which logic these two should be pilloried. And by the way, there are specifics of the types of people that David Betz referred to, like TRG, calling out Shabana Mahmood saying, hey, did Lucy Connolly get the same consideration? when she was expressing her emotions. I recall her being jailed for her freedom of expression in her moment. She had every right to be angry for Labour's failure to protect the homeland under Stama's watch. No one finds in your moment of levity joking about the release of jihadi rapists back onto the streets. Funny, you are responsible for the keeping the homeland staff.

Start acting like you give a shit. Unfortunately though, there are still the woke Tory wets who dominate in places like GB News, continuing to excuse the inexcusable. Like Miriam Cates, who actually defended MacMood and Streety. Writing, the joke is not offensive because it was never intended to reach the error of those that could offend. We all say things in private that we would never dream of saying in public.

It's called being a normal human being. What is not normal is to pretend this is somehow outrageous. Well, I'm sorry, you're in the minority today, Miriam. Because the Daily Telegraphs, Alison Pearson, raged, What kind of person jokes about giving early release to rapists when their victims are terrified, repulsive? Lauren, the insider is actually going further calling on Mahmood to resign. Adding next-level sociopath behavior from MacMood, women are being raped by men as well as endless amounts of unmitted male migrants. We have a rape scandal, the establishment have tried to bury and the women running our home office jokes about rapists being let out.

early and Conner Tomlinson summed it up this way. They have let thousands of thieves, sex criminals and violent thugs out of prison and through the borders into our neighbourhoods and they think it's funny. Their contempt for us is bottomless. We should feel the same about them. And can we just be honest about it too? This is an anti-white government. What else would explain the decision by Burnham to parachute the failed Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sawar, into the House of Lords to become a minister, as Tommy Robinson remembered. Listen to the rant of the vile Pakistani. His family the same, his dad wrote a tribute.

Bacamini and wants blasphemy laws for Muhammad. I won't forget this. Every chief executive of every council and every government department, white. Every director of a department in Scotland, white. Every principal of a college or university in Scotland, white. Every headteacher in Scotland, white. Every chair of a public sector body in Scotland, white. Every high court judge in Scotland, white.

Every prison governor in Scotland, white. Every editor of a news organisation in Scotland, white. Why? That is the man who Burnham has just given a free pass to the House of Lords to become a minister. Do not tell me two-tier Britain does not exist. But I think MacMood and Streeteen, laughing about the early release scheme, has really hit a nerve because it feels particularly parasitic given what's in the news today. The Daily Telegraphs front page revealing that two of PC Andrew Harper's killers are set to be released early from jail under the Labor scheme to tackle prison overcrowding.

As Kimmy Badenock, the Conservative Party leader, put it while Andy Burnham's cabinet are joking about letting criminals out of prison early, conservatives are listening to victims and will continue to fight this disgusting policy. That is for vote. I'm going to vote now. I'm doing this for you and all of those victims. This should not be happening. I'm completely against it.

I'm sorry I had to cross off so I don't miss it. But I want you to know that this is something that we care about and we're going to keep fighting. Thank you, ladies. And now, the superstar panel. James Bembridge, Lucy White, Richard Thompson, and Father Calvin Robinson. Father Calvin, can we start by talking about the choreography

of this hot mic moment? Because is it not extraordinary, Father Calvin, that it was footage filmed by an ITV cameraman, yet it was left for hours for Guido Forks to finally release this. They just wanted to pretend this wasn't used, Father C, and can we just imagine for one moment this had been Nigel Farage, caught on hot mic, or this had been Boris Johnson caught on hot mic. They would have immediately cut into their programming,

yet they just wanted to pretend their own footage didn't exist. Personally, I believe this is a cover-up. up. It's amazing, isn't it? The legacy media seems to have a side. They forget their journalists and reporters. They're supposed to pass on the information to us to make our own mind up, but they want to narrate, they want to editorialise. And so if it's someone who they consider to be on their side, they're not bothered about reporting the news. And this should have been news. The fact that is hotmiking the Labour Party, brush it under the carpet. If this was hotmiking reform, reclaim the conservatives, it would be on rinse and repeat all the,

day on the legacy media. It just goes to show that the media is not on our side. But just as an aside, that moment of Angela Raina brushing Ed Miliband's arm, it's, oh, it said shivers down my spine. Oh, all the worst people. All the worst people are now in charge. And it's like, okay, yeah, great, brilliant. Goodbye, slippery stammer, goodbye Rachel from accounts, goodbye Calamity Lammy. I celebrate that. But unfortunately, the new criminals and tax avoiders and grifters who they've bought in are just as bad. Lucy White, do you really believe that it was coincidental that just hours after this hot mic moment, Good Morning Britain decides to leave the microphone of Robert Jenrick on after a Zoom call? I mean, this is a highly experienced production team behind this show. If you do an

interview on a big ITV show, the moment you're off air, they turn your microphone off because who knows what you're going to say. And I felt like they were looking to trap Robert Jenrick into his own hot might moment this morning. Well, great to be back, Dan. The only thing, well, the first thing that came to my mind was perhaps it was some DEI hire intern who didn't know how to work the system and accidentally left Jenric's microphone on because, you know, these DEI hires are not there on.

And they have a lot of them at Wokeyty. trust me. Exactly. So that is what came to mind. But then again, as it was Robert Jenrick, who is of course in reform, anyone to the right of the establishment, as they perceive it to be, is a target. So as the panel, as we've been saying, I think that the mainstream media are there to protect the left wing. And going back to that hot mic moment, I completely agree with Susan Hall. We have 12% of the prison population as foreign nationals, which means they should just be deported. We know that we spend, on average,

£45,000 per year per prisoner. And so why on earth are we spending that on foreign national criminals who shouldn't even be in the country in the first place? So instead of releasing those early releases, we should have just deported many people. Yeah, indeed. Indeed.

And I mean, of course, we do need to talk about the actual mechanics of this early release scheme, why it's happening, how we're being put at risk. I think though what astonished me so much overnight, James Benbridge, was just looking at the lengths that the mainstream media were going to to ensure that this wouldn't become a story. And now it has become a story because actually it proves that the mainstream media are not controlling the narrative anymore. Well, they told us this wasn't a story and we said, no, no, no, no, this is a story.

And Burnham's had to apologise as a result. Yes, yeah, yeah. But also, just to go very quickly back to what you were saying, Dan, about ITV. Yes. I mean, I know what happened with, so my ex, my ex partner, this is the reason why I'm against gay marriage, Dan, because I was in one. Father Calvin's loving you already today. Yeah. So look, look.

I'm just expecting James to start singing the a drumery choir song or something. I don't know what's going on here. And it was on with Lorraine Kelly. Who's your ex? Who's your ex? Is he famous?

Well, I can't name them. Okay. But anyway, he was on with Lorraine Kelly. Of course, he was nicest pie. Oh, you know, I'm just the Rainey and Kelly. Nice as pie. Now, I have heard that backstage, she was the most evil which you could imagine. Wow.

Have you heard, well, have you worked at the ITB as well, done? I couldn't imagine that. People may think that you can possibly comment. No, I mean, look, I always comment. None of these people are real. None of these people are real. They are all fakes. They are all weirdos.

and they are totally politically motivated. All of them. Ed Balls, Susanna Reid, Lorraine, they are all leftists on that show and absolutely they drive a particular narrative. Richard Thompson, can we actually just talk about the Hot Mike moment itself though? Because it's just so crittinous and upsetting to see that when you think about PC Harper's wife,

and PC Harper's mom, who are literally living through hell at the moment on a daily basis. And for this mob, it's a laughing matter. Yeah, no, it is. It's exactly what it is. It's a laughing matter. It was a real mask-off moment for them. You know, they hold the amount of contempt for the British public is off the scale. It really is.

And these are the people that are, you know, making the rules. they are enforcing the rules and driving the agenda. And when the mic's on them and they don't realize it's on them, this is their behaviour. It's atrocious. These people are so performative. They don't know what they believe in until they walk into a room and realise what way the wind's blowing in that room. And this isn't the first time. This is just the latest mic-on moment.

I mean, Wes Streeting had one tail end of 2024 when he was blocking puberty blockers, but then went into a room with LGBT and was saying, saying it's make him feel so uncomfortable and terrible to be doing it. You know, just have a set of beliefs, rather than be performative, be who you are, stand by your principles, and that should be that. If I had my way, and I've thought about this, you know, they should mic up everybody, all 650 of them. If they walk in that building in Westminster, mic them all up, when they realize it's not on them, you'll find out who they are. Obviously, if they're going into rooms where it's national security and confidentiality, fine. But they're all rotten.

a lot of them. And that really highlighted it. As you could imagine, what Debbie Adlam, the PC Andrew Harper's mother would have been thinking, hearing that, you know, it's trocious. And these people come out on early release and they do indeed commit serious violent crimes, again, having been released early. So the prisons are a state themselves. There's no rehabilitation

going on as far as I can see. It's certainly not a deterrent. So what are they achieving, apart from just releasing, you know, violent offenders into the public? It's terrible. Breaking today, Reform UK senior sources posing further questions about the assassination of Anne Whitakim, their immigration spokesperson, as distrust erupts across the UK. major confusion emerging over the suspected killers' appearance. Now, I will just say that if we were always told the truth by the police and the authorities, maybe just maybe we would believe that the way that this case was progressing was being done for a particular operational reason.

yet Reform UK's own senior figures casting serious doubt over the establishment narrative with Darren Grimes, highlighting confusion at the difference between two images of the Whitacom suspect. On release of a court sketch, G.B. News presenter Alex Armstrong wrote, something is not right. And today, elected Reform UK Essex official Russell Quirk added Can someone explain? Even outspoken regular YouTube sensation Leo Curse has doubts, writing, This guy has more faces than Carlos the Jackal. Now it is worth mentioning that there are claims that the image of the suspect outside his house,

which Darren Grimes has highlighted, has been enhanced by AI as the original image released by the sun was blurred. There are also claims that the image of the suspect smiling was a photograph taken some years ago. And of course, my goal is not to add to the lack of trust around this investigation. I don't need to tell you that Anne Whitakam was a friend and a colleague, and of course I want justice to be done. However, is it any wonder that this crime is causing so much confusion, and there is so much speculation arising in terms of the growing distrust of the Devon and Cornwall Police, given they got this wrong from the start. And I will not shy away from reporting what is being discussed behind the scenes.

Like Dr David Starkey, right here on outspoken yesterday, suggesting for the first time publicly that the authorities purposefully with held information about this crime to stop public unrest on the streets. But let's just talk about why we don't trust what we're being told at the moment. Given this was the police force that rushed to tell us, everything was okay, stop your speculation, stop you worry about a madman being out there, potentially killing others, when they arrested the wrong man on the day it was revealed. that Anne had been murdered.

We can confirm that a 26-year-old man was arrested at an address to Newton Abbot this afternoon on suspicion of the murder of Anne Whittaker. The suspect, who is a white British national, remains in police custody whilst inquiries continue. Now, it was Mike Graham, who revealed here and outspoken, that that man who they had arrested at that time was just a delivery driver.

He was a delivery driver who'd happened to deliver something to Anne's house. Yet they told us at that point that they were absolutely certain the incident wasn't terrorism. While we worked closely with our partners and consulted counter-terrorism policing as part of our initial inquiries,

the incident is not being treated as terrorism. And these goons had the cheek, having just spread all of their own misinformation and arrested the wrong bloke, they had the cheek to tell us, not to speculate. While we release further information when we were able to do so, but in the meantime, I would ask people not to speculate about what might have happened, particularly on social media.

That's not only potentially harmful to our investigation, but also deeply distressing to the family and friends of Miss Whitaker. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Let me tell you, as a friend of Anne Whitakam, you were wrong. What was deeply distressing to me is the fact that you arrested the wrong man. And Anne's alleged killer, as a result, remained free for another 24 hours. And how on earth do you square this circle, given we now know that the entire alleged murder? I've got to be careful because of contempt of court laws. You know I'm honest with you about that.

Alleged murder of Anne was captured on CCTV cameras that she had installed in the house. So how did you get it wrong? How did you get at this wrong? And remember too, even though they said they would remain open-minded, immediately they said there's no suggestion that this attack was politically motivated. Is there an indication that the murder was politically motivated? No, at this time again, it's early stages of the investigation,

so we remain open-minded at this time I've got no information to believe that that is a politically motivated crime. And it gets even worse. And again, the reason I'm reminding you of all of this is that this is the reason we don't trust what we're being told. Because the police, that day, said they didn't know of any ongoing risk in regards to our safety, the public safety, when in fact the alleged killer was still out there. Can you tell me about the police presence in the area that's ongoing this evening? Yeah, so police presence will remain high. for a number of reasons. Most of all, we're still evidence gathering within our investigation.

So like I said in a statement, CCTV, etc. But of course, we also want people to feel safe at the moment. I don't know any ongoing risk. Okay, again, because of the ongoing court case, I must be careful. But can we just be honest about that the suspect clearly posed a serious risk? Given the prosecutor revealed yesterday in court that Anne was killed after being hit on their head 21 times with a hammer. And the prosecutor says that the entire crime was captured on camera. We have to talk about left-wing terrorism. Elon Musk, responding directly for the first time to a post about Anne Whittaker with these

words, the lunatic left is horrifically violent. And he's right. Take a look at a violent trans activist group that Andy Noe has recently exposed. This is the so-called Trantifa Bashback. He says it's one of the many leftist groups calling for the end of democracy and the rise of terrorist tactics. They urge their comrades in the UK and around the world to use, wait for it, and I'm not making any link here, hammers to carry out a talbotics.

Look at the imagery there. The recruitment and radicalization is done openly on Instagram. So you can see in this poster from the group, a man in a black mask is wielding a hammer in his hands under the headline smash transphobia. In the corner, you'll notice how it says choose your weapon. And in a deranged Instagram post, the group wrote,

quote, the time for respectability politics is over. We do not have to take it anymore. The Times newspaper reporting that the group told activists to form independent local cells, identify a target, including MPs, organizations, and political party conferences, and ensure your target can be hit repeatedly

until they desist from their transphobic activities. I am not linking the two. I am simply reporting that the prosecutor said my friend Anne Whittaker was hit 21 times over their head with a hammer before her death. And by the way, folk on the left are not safe from this. The militant group has targeted with streeting, with Carl Benjamin of Lotus Eater's writing,

the hammer is an ominous symbol now. So look, people within reform at the most senior levels have been contacting me to raise concerns as to whether Anne's murder suspect may have been influenced by this type of dangerous activism. We cannot report that, even if it were the case. Of course, there is nothing to suggest the trans activist group influenced this murder suspect or had any connection whatsoever to the crime. But it is just worth pointing out that there is. are some really messed up, messed up factions of the left who clearly think violence, who clearly

think the use of hammers are an acceptable method to deal with political opponents. Okay, to the superstar panel, Lucy White, there's a huge issue with this, of course, because left-wing terrorism is becoming a massive issue. and a hammer in the United Kingdom is an easily accessible weapon in a way that say a gun is not. Yes, well, I would say that, again, it's not necessarily just the weapon, it's the individuals. Just as the reports, whenever there's a lunatic with a car driving into a crowd, they always say the crowd drove into, sorry, the car drove into the crowd when it was actually the individual. So I believe that whether it's a car, a gun or a hammer, it's the ideologies that we should be focusing on, not the weapons. And I would also say, given how they knew, Anne was attacked with a hammer 21 times, this was clearly a political, motivated murder. It was not simply a burglary gone wrong as they had tried to paint it. And what I find disturbing is this is extreme... But they're saying we still can't even speculate on that, Lucy. Yes, no, we cannot speculate alleged murder, of course.

But what I find disturbing is if this was Joshua Kerry, as they have reported it to be, not that I know myself, but we do have an issue with far-left terrorism. So, I mean, I've been called myself in the newspapers a far-right extremist, yet what the irony is that those on the so-called far-right, which I just call it common sense, not even far right. We are just normal people trying to analyze some of the problems going wrong in our country, whereas those on the far left, if they like to call it that, are actually very violent. What is also disturbing, another sort of piece to this puzzle is that Anne Widdickham, of course,

had a Hope Not Hate article written about her. Yes, and we know that Matthew McGregor from Hope Not Hate has now been appointed into Burnham's in a sanctum, yeah, director of strategy. And so I do find that very concerning that we know that Hope Not Hate have now scrubbed that article

from their website and we now have Hope Not Hate in Number 10. And I just find this another piece of information that we should really be analysing, to be honest. It's very, I'm in Hope Not Hate reports.

I'm sure many of us on this panel are and what it does is it puts a target on all of our backs. I think we probably all are. I know Father Calvin is. I think Richard Thompson is as part of Advance UK and Ben Habib. I certainly am. And the thing is, if there was no problem with their targeted report about Anne Whittickham, which I believed was stirring up hatred against this wonderful woman now killed, potentially for her political views, although we don't know, then why did they delete it? Father Calvin Robinson, why did they delete the post? It's almost like they got

what they wanted. She's dead so they can delete it now and pretend it never existed. I mean, this is a true sickness, Father Calvin, and Hope Not Hate is a charity that has received government funding for this type of thing. Yeah, leftism is a mental disorder. This whole idea that a man can become a woman and a woman can become a man is disordered and we know it to be wrong. But they cannot face it reasonably. They cannot debate us logically and so they have to destroy or silence us. This whole, they've been telling us for years, we must smash heteronormativity. We must smash this and smash the other. And that eventually leads to them literally smashing us. We saw Charlie Kirk killed over this, potentially another trans individual that is insane, but they cannot reason with us

because we are so different to them. We believe in an ordered universe. We believe in an objective truth, and they think they can create their own reality. It's not the real world. And so if we cannot live in their world, they have to remove us from ours. And so yes, anyone who's pushing these far-left ideologies

needs to be silenced. They need to have their platforms of influence and power removed. They have embraced cancel culture to remove us for speaking the truth. We must remove them for spreading their harmful, dangerous ideology that wants to kill us. You know, January last year, The mainstream, the leftist media are calling me the Nazi priests.

This is them saying, and you're right, I hope not hate, have put out several reports about me and others on the panel. The whole purpose is, this is someone who is not one of us. They need removing. They need silencing. Put their image of the hammer, silence them in whatever way possible. What they're saying is kill us. By calling us these names, they're saying, take us out.

We are the enemy. And it's disgusting. They are a harmful, dangerous ideology, and it needs removing. Yeah, I mean, we saw it with Charlie Kirk, did we not? We literally saw that happen. He was taken out. And then Richard Thompson, do you understand why, given how badly wrong the police got this? Now, when folks see, for example, the images of this guy, they're like, something doesn't add up here.

And probably a few years ago, we would have trusted the police, but we no longer feel like we can. Yeah, well, absolutely. We know that we can't. We know that we can't trust the police. I mean, they tell us things that are not consistent with what we witness around us. I mean, they told us that Axel Ruda-Cabana was a choir singer from Wales. He was a Welshman, you know. Anyone that had seen Axel Ruda-Cabana would have maybe rattled off a number of countries,

but not one of them would have been Wales. So they tell us these things, and then they tell us not to speculate. I mean, the police officer that would have got there on the scene would have seen, would have seen the result of the attack, and it was reported as 21 blows to the head with a hammer. How you can say that that's a burglary gone wrong, and in his home was obviously clippings of other right-of-centred politicians such as Farage and people like that.

So it's all had political motivations written all over it. But if we notice that, if we open our eyes to that, then we've committed the criminal. of realising. So it's terrible to think that we can't trust the police. And if it ends up being that this chap, this monster that's, you know, potentially is, you know, has done it's in court. It turns out to be somebody different than the pictures that the mainstream media and

the police are putting around, then no one would actually be surprised because of how we've been led down the card on the path number of different times, you know, by the mainstream media and the police. Lucy, you wanted to come in? Yeah, I just wanted to add how, you know, the police were telling us not to jump to conclusions. Yet when you look at what happened with Shabana Mahmood recently, she had said that there was a supposed terror attack,

well, a planned terror attack for a Muslim gathering at a, I think it's shrobland. And slippery starma did too. The Prime Minister posted about it too. Yep, so they had said that there was a planned terrorist attack when in fact there was no such terrorist attack. So they jumped to the conclusion, again, citing that we must protect British Muslims. When there was no such things, so they themselves are hypocrites. And again, no one charged.

Yeah, they would like to protect this British Muslim group. When it comes to any other group, they don't show the same reciprocal. They're not reciprocal. So again, just two-tier everything in this government. Indeed. James Bambridge, you're of course our Reform UK star on the pan. And actually, firstly, I just wanted to share a little picture that I actually took of you with Anne. And this was at the launch of the Heartland Institute.

And this was honestly one of my best recent nights with Anne because she was just like the queen, wasn't she? And we were bringing her champagne and sort of bringing people to her so that she didn't have to get up. And she was such a star in that room. But do you understand, James, the fear that your colleagues currently have, that there is some form of cover-up going on with a seeming desire to not talk about what's really going on here and then terrifying everyone with contempt of court laws? Completely so.

And also, I've not shared this with you before that, but you know when I was standing to be the reformed counselor for the West End, you know, for Soho. So one of the conservative councillors in the hostings there, I didn't go to the student, they said, James, it was, you've had five newspapers write about you saying that NHS nurses are fat, probably best you don't go. So I thought, oh, I won't go to the listings in Sohoen. But this conservative counsellor was there and he slandered me in front of about 200 people saying that I'm a racist.

So me and my American friend, Buffer's hair, confronted him on the night of the count. I said, oh, hello. I heard that you've stunted nasal racist. So what's going on? And he said, oh, yeah, well, you know, I was showing this footage of you praising Tommy Robinson. It was like, first of all, I was on comedy show.

And what I said was, okay, I've been missold Tommy Robinson. You know, he was built to me as some kind of racist. And, you know, haulsed out through reams of footage of him. Then finally, I found it. But the brown guy looked like he's finally raising his fist. I think, oh, finally, Tommy. That's the money shot. Go for it, Tommy.

And then he shook the guy's face at hand. So obviously, that was a deal. joke. Obviously I wasn't being racist. Obviously I wasn't, although I would support Tommy Robinson, but obviously I wasn't sporting it. So, you know, these are the depths to which these conservative rats will go down in order to, you know, look, after the animitcum, tragedy, horrible event, you know, now I think like me and other people in uniform thinking, well, do we have a target on our heads? Probably do. Indeed. Indeed. Indeed. Indeed. Breaking right now, Tommy Robinson ally and social media campaigner Danny Tomo has dramatically clashed

with the high-profile Islamic preacher and YouTube star Ali Dawar, who famously featured his fully covered wife communicating on camera with him using a whiteboard because of course the wife couldn't speak. This fight is about Darwara's alleged use of Tomo on a billboard, which he claimed put his life in danger. And it started off with Danny Tallinale that he was a liar. You're a fucking liar. You're a fucking liar. I'm a clown. I'm a clown. I'm a clown. I'm a clown. I'm a clown. You told me,

is you marry off your nine-year-old door with you? Let me talk, man. You don't like it. Most pedophiles look like you. Listen, most pit-of-files are your age and they look like you. Agreed. Thank you. So don't come to you a Peterphilia. You have a pituitary problem. Okay. Do you agree or not? It is the Western problem of being a fiaturian gangs are a fact.

Do you agree or not? Listen to me. Do you agree or that or not? Listen to me. It's a reality. It's a Pakistani problem. Listen to me. Why is it happening?

Okay. Okay. Even if you were new, bro, bro, bro, bro, bro, bro, bro, listen to me. Seriously, don't put your hand. Listen to me. Listen to me. Listen to me.

Ali, Ali, you had no reason to do that. Yes, I did. And I'll tell you why. No, you didn't. No you didn't. Where is your freedom, the United Kingdom March? Where is your protests? Where is your outrage on the street?

About what? When it's white pedophiles? I call out any people. I just shown you. Don't conflate a post with a bloody protest. Where is your protest in Ireland? I'll tell you why. Good.

I'll tell you why, Ali. Then I will not put it out. Let me answer it. Thank you. Okay. Why don't you say? Hold on. Hold on.

The reason, Ali. The difference is. The difference is. Matthew 25. Go. Hold on a second. One 25. You spit in my face.

Matthew, the difference is. Bro, I'm trying to make a point from yourself a second. Bro. Mother, can you get lost? Listen, listen. Listen, the difference is, Ali. You see there are two men that I've put on there. The reason we don't need to protest is because they're now behind bars, Ali.

Do you know the difference between that in the Pakistani gangs? One of all the other people. They're not in jail. They're not in jail. They're not in jail. They should be in jail. They should be executed. Agreed.

Exactly. That's the point. White pedophiles should receive the death penalty in my opinion. There's no institutional cover-up of white pedophiles. The differences, those white teeth are included. You don't know how to deal with them. No, no, no, no. You don't know how to deal with a problem.

You stab them on the hand. We don't deal with it like that. If we had the ability to deal with a problem, good. Why not? Because we can't. Why not? Why not?

No, no, no. I'm not, no, no. I'm not, well, one second. I'm not asking anyone. I said, why can't bring the capital punishment back? I want to bring the cashful punishment back? Perfect. So do we both agree? Do you both?

We've done this for many times. Good. Good. Is the average the same? Is the same? He put my face on the fucking billboard and told him I don't call out the white peterfogs. No, no, no, no, no. I said you guys don't have the same outrage.

Listen, I can... Because they're not in prison, Ali. No. They're not in prison. Listen to me. Name me one peterfow group that's not in prison. How many of Tommy's close EDIL members were caught me in a peterfow? Ali.

Many. Good. There's no such thing as the same energy. Before. Before. Before. Before. Why the hell is he talking about the EDL and organization that hasn't existed for like 13 years?

Bro, I'm going to stop. Seriously, you have you got problems? He has got problems. Stop, just stop, bro, stop. The energy is not the same. So my experiment stands... No, it's irrelevant, my friend. Listen, do you care about the culprit or the victim?

I care about all of it. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. You are the majority of the people people that are walking around the streets of the United Kingdom that have gang raped and murdered, would they be walking, good, yes, and those ones that you're talking about, they're in prison.

That's the different. No, no, no. That's a difference. One second. So one being in prison and the other is not. For example, that is the right reason why you have an outrage. So if they're, listen me, listen. They're not in prison. Listen me, I care about the victim. You guys care about the culprit.

Justice was not done. What you guys do is this. Maybe not as much as you, but Tommy, a pedophile case. Was he a Muslim? Nah. I spoke to Kayne Robertson and Lucy. They said to me, Tommy would get a flipping...

What are you talking about 24? I'm not Tommy. Yeah, you're Danny Tombo. You're Danny Tomo. You're Danny Tomo. You're his right-hand man. You're his right-hand man. If you want to talk about Tommy, bro.

If you want to talk about Tommy, have Tommy here. He's a coward. I mean, Tommy is many things, but he's not a coward. I would happily host a debate between the two men, by the way. The reason we have outrage is because these men are not in prison, Ali. They're walking the street. How many pitophiles are walking the streets? Yes.

But we know that these men have actually done stuff. The kids are going to have sat with the families, Ali. How many more paedophiles? Yes, to me. The groomers, the groomers, the groomers, the groomers, good, good, good. The groomers, your Western system by putting 12-year-old girls in hot pants in movies is what's causing it. You guys are hyper-situizing girls. Listen to me.

Girls want to dress as either. Okay, good. Do you see this now? Perfect. Perfect. I agree with you. I agree with you. I'm saying you guys have not been about problem.

Because your wife covers up and I only get to speak on a whiteboard, Ali. Because you chose this. You made her, Ali. Why would your wife sit there? Completely head to toe cupboard. I don't know. My wife is allowed to talk. Oh, your wife is allowed to talk, is she?

Are you sure? Do you mean this wife? Or is there another one? Watch? I have my wife on my right. Sá'am aikum. I'll be one, inshallah. She's not going to be in the video,

but she's going to have her see with this whiteboard that I bought her. But why is the default that the woman is innocent and the men is always guilty. Okay, there's something my wife wants to say. Salama probably had enough as women give a lot of chances, has zero tolerance now.

Okay, this is why I want you here. It's very important for you to be here. Yeah, sisters take the pastrums of their father or ex-husband, etc., and project it on other people. So, okay, she's saying, she made the video, not him. I don't know his opinion. Well, exactly, there you go.

Okay. There's nothing else I have to say. Anything you like to say? If you do, just let me know, inshallah. The Prophet Peace Prophet of him told us he went to the hellfire. Again, I know you guys are going to be like, oh, it's a reality trick. Okay. And he saw a majority of the women of the hellfire.

Why? He said not because they are ungrateful to Allah. Because they are ungrateful to their husbands. Anything that I said wrong is from Shatan and myself. Anything good is from Allah, so on Allah. There's anything you disagree on? No. Okay.

Are you under any jurors? You can blink twice? No. Okay. that's fine. Salamalam alaqa-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-lis for myself and my dear wife. May I bless you for your contributions. It's a pleasure and their honour.

Oh yeah, she's so free to talk, Ali. So free to talk. Tommy Rom's supporter, based and bougie, after watching the confrontation, argued this rebuttal is always used when the talk of Pakistani rape gangs is brought up. But it is flawed in every way. Firstly, Englishmen make up the majority of this country,

so of course they're going to make up the majority of men, raping kids. Secondly, Pakistani men make up the majority of men gang raping kids. Do you not get me wrong? Rape is horrific, but gang rape is a different level of sinister evil. Thirdly, most of the men who are in jail for the gang rapes were not even born in this country. Britain's prison space should not be wasted on them and they should be deported. Lastly, like Danny Tomo rightfully said, most of the men who took part or helped cover up the rape gangs are not behind bars. This is a clear injustice and symbolic of how our establishment will always choose protecting the image of multiculturalism before their own children, which is the problem.

To the superstar panel, Richard Thompson, Father Calvin Robinson, and Lucy White. Lucy, I actually just found, I know he's got loads of YouTube followers and a wife and a white board, but I actually just found Ali Dawa's arguments there just so dull, like harking back to the EDL, acting as of Tommy Robinson is okay with white paedophiles. It's a joke. But the point is, there has been no systematic, institutional cover-up of white paedophiles like there has with Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. Well, exactly.

And that's why I find it so atrocious that we now have Lord Sadiq Khan, because when he asked, he said, we're a booming gang. operating in London, he lied and said, no, there's no grooming gangs here. And now he's sitting in the House of Lords and that is absolutely disgusting. And what I found interesting is that today there was a poll which showed that 53% of Brits believe that Islam is not compatible with our country. And going back to that comment that this character said that having 12 year old girls wearing hot pants is unacceptable.

I'm sorry, who on earth does he think he is? This is the West and he should probably leave if he doesn't like our way of life. And in Pakistan, there are 255 million people. In England, there are 50 million white Brits. So why is he here? Why is he trying to intervene with our culture? He clearly should not be here and perhaps he should go back to wherever he comes from. And if that's Pakistan, then he should go back there.

And I believe all the Pakistani grooming gangs should also be sent back there if they're not executed. Yeah, I mean, Richard Thompson, look, clearly, I think we on the right or however you want to put us, you know, conservatives or freedom fighters, however you define our group, do actually have a lot of problems with the moral degeneracy that we see a lot across Western society. It's why there's recently been this big debate about pride and why even gay men like me look at pride and are disgusted. And of course, I don't think it's a good idea that you have 12 years. year olds in hot pants dancing like Rihanna. But it's not the point. It's not an excuse for rape gangs. Absolutely it's not. You know, I mean, yeah, every country's got problems, right? Every country has monsters that they need to deal with. But what we're doing now is unprecedented in history. We're importing monsters that we know are statistically a lot higher, they're likely to

commit these sorts of crimes. And, you know, when everyone has a, you know, whenever these people have this argument where, oh, you know, white people do this too, where's the outrage there? Everyone is outraged with every crime that's committed like this, but we're not comparing the same things. It's not like for like. The industrial, you know, grooming and raping of white girls by a group that make up 2% of the population, you know, is not comparable to having someone who has committed a horrific act. And not just that, it's the networks that were up and down the country, the people that colluded and enabled this to happen and covered it up for decades. It is not the same thing. So when they have this outrage, and they try to point somewhere else to

say, oh, look, you know, you should be outraged by this. Everyone's outraged by it, but it's not the same thing. And to me, it absolutely stinks of somebody trying to, you know, essentially play down the severity of it. You know, it's absolutely revolting. And also, I'll just point out from that clip there, if you're in an argument and you need to then reassure the person you're arguing with that your wife is allowed to speak, you're not a good person. Well, I'm almost nervous to ask Father Calvin Robinson about this. Father, please tell me you're not. going to say, oh, it's great that Ali Dawa communicates or allows his wife to communicate with our whiteboard. I think it's disgusting and he should be deported immediately. The fact that you

can't see her, she's completely covered in black and she has to hand him a whiteboard to say what she wants to say. And then he shakes her hand at the end. None of it is Western, none of it is Christian, none of it is our culture. He does not belong in our country. The fact that he uses what about he has all of his arguments. What about in terms of, well, white people, rape children too? Yes, that's not good. We want them to die too. We want to punish them too. But the problem is that such a small minority, a small demographic of Pakistani, Mohammed and men are responsible for such a large proportion of the child sexual abuse. There's clearly a demographic problem there with that particular culture, which again is repatriating, immediately deporting. And the fact that he says,

well, the 12-year-olds on, you know, he's obviously talking about cuties on Netflix. Disgusting. shouldn't be produced, should be removed. The Jews who put it together should be moved to. And that was a French film, by the way. Right, but it's not an excuse to rape these girls, for goodness sake. This is his water boutary is disgusting. People like him should not be anywhere near our girls or our culture or our country. 100%.

100%. And it's like how they always raise, you know, Bonnie Blue and Lily Phillips. Like they take the most extreme example to try and just, horrific crimes against white English girls. And to me, that is a sickness because you cannot justify it ever in any way. Breaking today, Prince William and Catherine, the Princess of Wales, expressing fears for their beloved son, Prince George, on his 13th birthday. Now, this involves security concerns not to do with terrorism or his safety or any. like that, but rather the very modern scourge of smartphones and social media, something that Prince

William didn't have to deal with as a teenager. But we saw there the wonderful official portrait, which was released, and the picture was taken at Kensington Palace by Matt Porteus, one of the couple's favourite and most trusted photographers. This is according to Robert Jobson after trooping the colour last month. We also saw there the wonderful new video, which has been released of some of Prince George's private moments. And this is how William and Catherine have tried to get the public to buy into the approach of,

look, we are going to let you see our kids, but just leave them alone when they're out doing their own thing. And I don't know about you, But I think the vast, vast majority of Brits have signed up to that philosophy. However, the Sunday Times, Royal editor Roya Nika, is reporting that with the glare of social media, there are concerns about what this young royal, who is about to start at Eaton College, in the autumn, may have to put up with. She reports,

Eton seen by many as a bastion of elitism may not be the most modern choice for a modern prince. The hope is that it will give George a tight-knit group of loyal friends and a shield from the public gaze as the school provided for the young William and Harry. But, and this is where the concern from the palace comes from, when George ventures into Windsor in his free time, there will be nothing to stop the public filming and photographing him. As teenagers, William and

Harry got up to all sorts and pubs, bars and nightclubs without smartphones filming their every faux par. That is a freedom George will never have and an intense pressure that will require endless patience and strong shoulders to bear. Photos of a teenage William adorned many girls' bedroom walls in the 1990s. He never enjoyed the adoration of strangers but did get used to it. George is already becoming a pit-up of the Instagram age, every smile, every royal wave, every flick of his hair and joke with his siblings in public prompt thousands of comments online, and try as they might, his parents can only protect him from that for so long. They have given him the building blocks for a happier, freer, less pressured start to a royal career than any prince before him, all being well, it will result in the resilience he will need for a future more scrutinized than any heir to the throne has ever experienced. Happy Birthday Prince George, just don't ask for an iPhone. And we have seen William in recent weeks talk about George and his family and make it clear that this is a really normal type of upbringing.

I know that sounds weird because you're going to think, oh, they're in a palace. But actually, compared to any other prince in recent years, George has got to have a much more normal. upbringing. This is his interview with Amanda Holden and Jamie Thexton on Heart FM. We will come back to that. Time when you're doing the school run. Yeah, I'm hoping that the children are on their way to school. They are listening this morning. Should we give them a shout out? You can definitely give them a shout out. You can give them a message if you like. Charlotte and Louis, because George is boarding last night. So Charlotte and Louis, if you're listening, make sure you're on time, please. Make sure not fighting over who's listening to what this morning. Exactly. Well, hopefully they're only listening to heart breakfast.

Is it chaotic like most people's school runs in the morning? Do they shout and argue? It can be. It depends. There's a guitar lesson or going on in the morning. A music lesson. You've got to get guitar on the car. No, we're not taking the guitar and we sit the bag for school. Are we boarding? No, we're not. We've seen friends. No, we're not. So there's all that going on in the morning. And are they fiends for snacks?

Because my children can't seem to go anywhere without having a snack, even though they've just had their breakfast. Yeah, there's a lot of jam sandwiches taking the car usually. Oh, nice. How are you? He'll leave jam fingerprints through the car, which is really helpful. Now, look, as many of you will know, I spend years and continue to spend years reporting on William and Catherine and their priorities as a future king and queen. And this has caused them to run into a lot of criticism. You'll remember the time when the Duke was given, when the Prince was given the unflattering tabloid title of work-shy wills.

And his point, and it is a point that I think has a lot of validity, is that the most important job that he and Catherine have is to raise their three children in a manner which is going to ensure that George comes to the throne as a balanced guy ready for the challenges of life. And William's point of view is that both his father and his younger brother, didn't have that type of upbringing. You'll remember the late Queen Elizabeth II had huge pressure to go on a royal tour

just after giving birth. I mean, she was away from Charles, her young son, for months and months on end. She regretted that, actually, in later life, but she didn't really have a choice. It was a very different error. And then we've all seen how the divorce and then the death of Princess Diana

definitely led to effing up Prince Harry to the point where the young. idea of Harry on the throne makes us all think of wanting to overthrow the royal family. Like it would just be a total disaster. So I think William is right that he has prioritized being a dad. Of course, he is in a privileged position, which allows him to do things like pick his kids up from school, take them to school. But actually, preparing for these teenage years where George is now going to face the glare of publicity is a big moment. And remember, that's when Harry crumbled because it was in that grief after the death of Princess Diana when at Eton, he turned to drugs.

Hannah Furness, the Royal Editor of the Daily Telegraph, has also been speaking to palace sources. She describes Prince George as the best prepared teenage heir in history and says he has been primed for service. It's quite interesting because it's not often friends of the Royal Family brief about Prince George, but they have to mark his 13th birthday. And we do, want to know a little bit more about this kid who one day will be king. She reports he is incredibly down to earth while inevitably being aware of his future. He is a sporting all-rounder, a surprisingly good artist, and is still getting used to the meeting great walkabouts that will be part of his working life stretching ahead. Most of his weekends are spent at sports pictures

and with friends occasionally interrupted for a carriage ride or Buckingham Palace balcony of bearance on the line of Royal Duty. She writes in some senses Prince George is walking a well-trodden path towards the throne, school, university or the military, a little time to find himself and then on with the same life of duty service and leadership that his ancestors have led. And yet, it is not the same at all. He will be the first heir to navigate his teenage years in an end of, in an era of social media and camera phones. The first whose privacy is at risk of being infringed upon by not just the press, but the public. He is the first growing up with WhatsApp groups rather than handwritten letters, although his parents have a strict policy on mobile phones. And the first with the unwelcome ability

to read appalling conspiracy theories about his own family, the moment he logs onto social media. Where Prince William's face once adorn posters on dormitory walls across Britain's schools, Prince George's, will be seen through the glow of a smartphone screen with all the perils of the AI era. It is fortunate then that he is also arguably the best prepared error in history. The Prince and Princes of Wales, the source says, have been relentlessly focused on how to make it work since the moment they first talked about having children. The source said no one knows better than William what life is like growing up in the royal family.

He is absolutely determined to get it right. Close aides and friends stopped short of criticising previous generations, but the unspoken part is this. Few royal parents have got it right so far. And the Prince and Princes of Wales have had to start from scratch to figure out how to do it. The biggest thing is that it has to be family first, says a friend, they will serve the institution,

but they will also make sure their children are raised with as much normality as possible. Raising the Future King is part of their role, woven through conversations in Kensington Palace strategy meeting since the Princess of Wales announced she was pregnant. Learning from the mistakes of the past, says another source has been absolutely central. Previous generations of the royal family weren't renowned for their parenting skills, says Valentine Lowe, the author of power in the palace. The one sovereign who escaped such parental failures was Elizabeth II, who was brought up in a close, tight-knit family of four. The difference, of course, was that until

she was 10, no one would know she would be queen. When it came to her turn she did her best to be a loving parent to Charles but duty always came first she was often absent once for nearly six months while Philip was a tough and demanding father. Charles a sensitive boy felt lonely and misunderstood and aren't we all punishing for it as a result that's my addition by the way prince William and harry's childhoods was scarred by trauma first of their parents divorced then their mother's death and their father struggled to balance duty in the needs of his sons in a very different era William and Catherine, in other words, have had to write their own parenting rule book. So they wanted to give George space to be a child, but they do not want to hide him away.

When George was small, the telegraph recorded his list of likes as including tractors, thunderstorms, past the Lion King, stickers, dinosaurs, helicopters, the police and noise. He was sweet, happy and obsessed with helicopters, a source who knows the family recalls. Aides who have come and gone from Kensington Palace over the years remember him fondly as a very polite boy sitting on laps in the office and not as shy as he might sometimes seem in public. But it was not a way straightforward by the time he was a toddler, the future king had become a target for the paparazzi to the deep concern of his parents. While the British media stuck with the agreement to allow royal children their privacy, photographs as George on the beach at the farm and in playgrounds were sold in Europe and Australia. Ordinary moments with his parents and his grandparents, the middilterns were captured by photographers who at one point even went to the lens. of building to hide in the boot of a car.

Kensington and Pallis staff in consultation with the then-duke conductors of Cambridge issued a carefully worded statement that was chilling in its detail of incidents of paparazzi harassment. But largely it has worked. They have protected him. And a source says, the way they have lived their lives, getting the kids outside, spending time together,

focusing on the school run. It's just as strategic as any other part of them. public service, preparing their children for the lives they're going to lead. It's central to their roles. It's not something on the side. William and Catherine are determined sources say that their son should be allowed to continue his education at Eton in peace and privacy, and the brick phone policy is integral to ensuring that. They are highly alert to the dangers of social media. The Prince has previously tried to persuade tech giants to do more to protect children and the princess's illness. Of course, she had cancer as they're even more convinced about the need to swap screens for outdoor time.

Prince George reiterates a source who knows the family is a very down-to-earth young man. Mum and dad give really careful consideration as to when and how to introduce all their children to royal work and strike the balance with their normal lives. They have never sat down with him to announce, grandly, that he will one day be. King, but introduced him to his family's role in public life gradually over time. They should be confident about the years ahead, says the source. There are challenges, but they have been absolutely consistent about putting the family at the heart of everything they do, and the public supports them. But now Prince George is turning 13, you can find him on a tennis court, a cricket field,

or up a tree. To the superstar panel, Lucy White, Richard Thompson, and Father Calvin Robinson. Father Calvin, of course, this is a really difficult one. Like, in some ways, isn't it so weird that we're talking about a young man turning 13? But this is a young man who is going to be king and is going to face challenges that no future monarch has ever faced before. And indeed, Father Calvin Robinson, it's going to be so critical if the British royal family wants to survive for him to in some way keep his own generation. on side because that is the generation that we see increasingly turning against the British Royal family. At the same time, of course, there are all of these concerns about privacy,

about smartphones, about Instagram, about WhatsApp groups. You know, I can understand Father Calvin why William and Catherine have these concerns and why they have focused so much time on parenting their children because I think they know that they needed to do that before he became a teenager because now he's at Eton and it's a bit like, okay, the world is going to take over and that's scary. Yeah, it is. I think they're all highnesses, Prince William and Princess Catherine have been a little too normal, a little too ordinary. And I see what they're trying to do in making sure that the royal family is relevant and making sure that the monarchy continues. But I think the monarchy has to be other than. It has to be separate from ordinary folk. It has to be held

upon a pedestal, otherwise it will cease to exist. If we see them as, like we did with Prince Harry before he swaned off to America, just average Joe blogs, then there's no pointing having them. My hopes for the future King George is that he'll be incredibly based, he'll become an emperor king, reform the British Empire, and put us back to our former glory. Much in the same way many Americans feel about Baron Trump. Like, we need someone, we need a strong Christian, patriotic leader, not this Mambi Pambi, yeah, we go to Whole Foods too. You know, we don't need any more of that.

Is he how barren Trump? Yeah, interesting question. I mean, look, Lucy, I mean, he's not normal in any sense of the word, is he? I mean, he lives within the grounds of Windsor Castle and he's going to be attending Eaton. So he's not normal. But Lucy, you're probably, I think, the youngest amongst us today. And you know what it's like when you're out now. everyone has their phones out. This is going to be risky.

Look, my opinion is this. We've seen King Charles enter a mosque, the eco-friendly mosque in Cambridge. I don't want to talk about that actually. We've seen King Charles talk about how we are a multi-faith nation. I don't want any of this. I think Prince George is our last hope. We need an Alfred the Great. We need a king of the Anglo-Saxon.

I completely reject this idea that we are a multi-faith nation, that we are a multicultural nation. No, we are not. We are the land of the Anglo-Saxons. And if anything, I want Prince George to go onto social media and have his own education. I want him to understand his legacy. I want him to understand where he comes from. We need an Alfred the Great. As I say, we need a new king of the Anglo-Saxons.

Prince George, you may be our last hope. Do not give up on us. Yeah, good point. And I will talk about this eco-mosk visit actually. But Richard Thompson, where do you stand on this whole issue of Prince George and William and Catherine navigating his teenage years? I mean it's tough isn't it you know because I mean I'm a dad I look at their their children especially Sharpe and George and they just seem so you know well behaved well presented and I think my children would probably relate more to Louis who's significantly more cheeky but it's tough it's tough as parents because you want to wrap them in cotton wool you want to send them to places that you know they're going to be protected and it was suggested there that

you know, Eaton is the most elitist school. He's second in line to the throne. I think that he is elitist. He should be going to these places. As, you know, Father Robinson has just said, you know, having this sort of, oh, look, we're so late, we go to, you know, this supermarket and we do this, we're just normal people. They're not normal people. They're not. And, you know, if they want to stay relevant, if the monarchy wants to stay relevant, I agree. They should be standing up for this country, the values of this country, rather than trying to have this sort of progressive approach where they're saying we're multi-faith. You know, we're not.

You know, they want to find their place. You know, the flag is already firmly planted in the ground. It's a union flag. And that's what they should be upholding. They should be upholding those values. So, yeah, it's tough. They're doing what they can. You know, I think really since the, you know, the late Queen's passing, we haven't had a

a lot of good, you know, hope for when looking at stories from the Royals, whether that is from Andrew McBatham, Windsor to, you know, Prince Harry and a lot of things that the Kings do. Yeah, things have gone vastly downhill, haven't they? And Father Calvin, I did want to ask you about this visit to this eco mosque by the king. It was to Cambridge. And he actually praised the Eco Mosque as a remarkable example of. integrated faith activities. I mean, Calvin, this obviously comes hot on the heels of the palace changing the definition of the monarch's role to say,

His Majesty is Supreme Governor of the Church of England and protects the space for faith within the multi-faith nation. That changed, remember Calvin, from the description head of the Church of England and defender of the faith. So this is him at Cambridge Central Mosque. And it's sort of like the worst nightmare, Father Kaun, because it's like Islamist, but it's also an eco-mosk. And they, you know, spend all day speaking about not zero. And Islamism. Get me out.

As supreme governor of the Church of England, as the head of state for a Christian nation, the only mosque he should visit is the one he's demolishing. He should demolish every single mosque in the country and say this is a home for the one true living God, Jesus Christ, this is a Christian nation. You can come here, support. You can follow Christ or not, but we will not build any monuments to demons, idols, pagans,

or any other type of heathen. No more mosques in Britain. That's the king that I want. By the way, we had getting so much feedback in on the hot mic video of Shabana MacMood and where's streeting and the fact that the MSM covered it up. But actually, I'm just really picking up the sense that people are disgusted. by the fact that you have these two senior cabinet ministers just laughing in our faces about the early release scheme. Kurz U2K says they run our country to the ground whilst laughing in our faces.

Janine Pearson writes our government a despicable dereliction of duty, protect our women and children. Davy Mania 700 says yes, hilarious, laughing at the plebs putting up with more dangerous people in regular society. I spy the sky, one two forces. If Burnham has seemed to be disciplining his team of goons in the MSN, and will show this as good order and use it as evidence of labour doing good things. Red Black, C4-1, says they were laughing at every victim and their family and friends. Disgraceful. Asperse 595 says we haven't heard much about Siddy Khan lately.

Wonder what evil he's doing behind the scenes. MacMood is in league with Khan to take down the UK from inside. Thank you too for your jewels, Janice Goddess and Caroline Jules. Duffy and welcome to Outspoken Plus, Kai Edwards, Dr. Mum and Michelle Woodman C. Okay, let's reveal today's Union Jack has the nominees, Ed Miliband,

put forward by Father Calvin Robinson, Shabana MacMood, nominated by Lucy White and Wes Streety, nominated by James Bembridge of Reform UK. By the way, we didn't boot James Bembridge out. His tech was terrible, wasn't it? I just couldn't air him. So, sorry about that.

You know, I love having Reform UK people here. So the results are in and in third position, James Bembridge with Wes Streeting the runner up, Ed Miliband with 21% of the vote, nominated by Father C, but the winner with 66% of the vote is Lucy White and Shabana MacMood after that hot mic moment. Okay, Richard, you can nominate our greatest Britain today because we're also celebrating the fact that you have a new book out called When My Brothers Come Home Again to Support Fair Family Justice, an organisation that you founded. So can you nominate Richard and then you can tell us about this book? Yeah, absolutely. Thank you for that. I mean, I nominate Prince George, of course.

you know, happy birthday to him, turning a teenager, carrying the hopes, really, of where we want the monarchy to go. And I think that it's a very difficult time, you know, for his parents seeing him go off as we discussed. But I think that there's a lot of hope there. So I'm going to be nominating him. Lovely, lovely. And the book is the same to kids, Richard?

It is, yeah, thanks, Dan. So, you know, the book is really, anyone with a blended family can really sort of relate to the emotions that their siblings go through when children to and fro from one house to the other. So I wrote this, I suppose, really, as a reflection of the perception my daughter has when the chaotic brothers come for the week and they stay and it's all chaos and then when they go. And it's her navigating those sorts of emotions, really. I thought it was having spoken to a number of different parents, it's something that a lot of people relate to. So I thought I'd put it down. The idea is that,

that this helps to support an organisation that I've started called Fair Family Justice. So having been through the family courts myself, it's terrifying and I have seen firsthand experience of how it's awful. So really, this isn't a father's advocacy group. It's good parents versus bad parents. Good parents don't weaponise the family court system. So really it's looking to move the dial in making it fairer and actually have some deterrence for people that use it in that way. So that's when my brothers come home again. Where can people buy that, It's available on Amazon. You can find on Amazon. There's a landing page, not a full website yet, but it will be coming and you'll be able to find a link there for it as well. But if you search

on under Amazon, you'll find it there. And guess what? After a long wait, look at what has finally arrived, Father Calvin, in the post. Oh, did you get into Lucy? Oh, my God, Richard, you're the God won out. Okay, so Calvin, this is your new book, Calvin. The silent jihad exposing the Islamification of the West. Tell me all. We've all lived through it, right? So this is how Islam took over Britain. It's how we have a king visiting a super, a mega mosque for goodness. How did we get to this point? I try and laid it all out and I try to provide solutions on how we can return to becoming a Christian country again in Great Britain and restoring what was once great. It's also a warning to Americans, too, not to fall down the same path that the whole of Europe seems to be going down.

Islamification is not a good thing. Hold on to Christendom whilst you can with every single element of your lives. And Father C, have you had any issues in terms of it being stocked? Like, is it available everywhere? Well, it's not available everywhere, unfortunately. So the only place to grab this right now is on shop.newchristianright.com. And they've published it. The new Christian right has published it, right? Yeah, we had to because the whole of the infrastructure around books is just woke and liberal and they don't want us talking about the problem.

But we can't address it unless we had talked about it. And so this is the first step really into taking back Britain. I love it. Well, two authors on the super. Lucy, you're going to have to get writing, girl. Seriously. I will. I will definitely have to get writing.

I was just going to say, where was the signature for the Calvin Robinson? When I come over, I'll buy your pints. sign your book. That sounds good. I have to say, but look, no, congratulations to both Richard on the release of when my brothers come home again,

and Father Calvin Robinson on the release of the Silent Jehud. We have very talented authors on our superstar panel. Great to have you all here today. Thank you so much. There's more big royal news, though, so we're going to head over to team up

with, according to Taz, on Substack. Now, you can find us at www. outspoken. You're not going to believe it. Oprah Winfrey has just backtracked on that interview. I've got a lot to say about it, so I do hope you join us on Substack at www.w.com.com. But if not, I will see you back here at 5pm UK time tomorrow, midday Eastern, 9am Pacific. Remember to hit subscribe on YouTube, turn on the notification bell

bell to be alerted to our new episodes. It would really help me out too if you subscribe to the podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get the podcast. It's totally free. by the way, totally free, but what I need you to do is rate and review because it just helps us as an independent show. And remember, most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.