Dan Wootton Outspoken - JOHN CLEESE TARGETED BY ISLAMISTS AMID RUPERT LOWE MUSLIM ATTACK AS DANNY TOMMO LAUNCHES FIGHT

Episode Date: September 22, 2026

BREAKING TODAY: John Cleese targeted by increasingly radical and organised Islamists in Birmingham who want the comedian to be banned, along with Restore Britain’s Rupert Lowe, from cities in the UK with a Muslim population, as he fears a Salman Rushdie attempt on his life and receives backing from those on the right from Tommy Robinson to Andrew Neil but his old leftist friends stay silent. Today the consequences of the Islamist takeover of our country is becoming clear again, with Danny Tommo and his patriot Platform now on the ground in Stanwell following a fresh invader incident as the worst of the suicidal empaths in the MSM Marina Purkiss claims the issue isn’t migrant men but the entire male population. But our elite class want us to go to war with Russia instead of protecting our homeland, with Jacob Rees-Mogg being backed up on GB News with insanely chilling claims they have now deleted from YouTube to lock up those of us who oppose this bonkers idea. But many are producing receipts as to why Rees-Mogg is not the man we should be listening to on this argument. Responding to all of that today is comedian and YouTube social commentator Leo Kearse. PLUS: Nadiya Hussain accuses Ed Sheeran of “white tears” as the former Great British Bake off winner turned Muslim cousin marriage proponent amps up her sickening race war. AND: Piers Morgan SUES Princess Diana’s brother over lies in his bombshell royal book Swan Song, as Prince William is ambushed in public on the day of release and Prince Harry confirms he’ll be cashing in too with his own TV project about his mother. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Princess Olga joins us for all the rest of the day’s royal news, as Prince Harry breaks down in tears at the Wellchild Awards before digging out Prince William, Catherine, the Princess of Wales, Princess Diana and King Charles in a bizarre new interview. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton #DanWoottonOutspoken #news #outspoken #uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No Smith, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Witten. This is outspoken episode number 587. And breaking today, John Cleese, targeted by increasingly radical and organized Islamists in Birmingham, who want the comedian to be banned, along with Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe, from cities in the UK with a Muslim population, as he fares a Salman Rushdie attempt on his life and receives backing from those on the right, from Tommy Robinson to Andrew Neal as, guess what? His old leftist friends, stay mum. John Cleese, we heard that you're coming to Birmingham Town Hall to perform a so-called comedy show. For years, you've used your platforms to attack Islam, spreading dangerous misinformation and creating

hostility towards Muslims. Young Muslims in the UK need to come together. Now, more than ever. Us Muslims are living through some serious times. Arise in hatred towards Muslims. Today, the consequences of the Islamist takeover of our country are becoming clear again, with Danny Tomo and his Patriot platform now on the ground. and in Stanwell, following a fresh invader incident

as the worst of the suicidal empaths in the MSM, like Marina Perkis, claim the issue isn't migrant men, but just the entire male population. Individuals from this hotel have been travelling over the road, which is a kids park, literally. So if you look at the hotel is here, over that road there is a kid park.

Members of migrants from this hotel have been, taking their trousers down, and they have been in decent exposure towards children. Like whether you have a thousand asylum seekers coming in, which, by the way, it's such a shame that they have been, like, there's so much fear-mongering. If you're putting in a thousand British men or you're putting in a thousand men from different cultures, the threat to me is always the same. But our elite class want us to go to war with Russia. Instead of protecting our homeland with Jacob Rees-Mogg, now being backed up on GVee News with insanely chilling claims. they have deleted from YouTube and the internet to lock up those of us who oppose this bonkers idea. It's possible that in the next few years we may face a war.

And if we face a war, we will need people who will join the armed services and who will go out and do their duty. We may even face circumstances where people have to die. I do. I think the British would rise to grain as if they had to. We would have to lock a few people up, by the way. Some of the pro-Russian voices, people say there isn't a threat, don't fight for your country, don't go to war for Burnham. We'll have to lock them up.

But many are producing receipts as to why Rees-Mogg is not the man we should be listening to on this argument. That whenever it comes to rough and tumble with Rees-Mogg, he always had a crumple-up letter from Matron in his pocket. And when it was called upon to do anything dangerous at all, he would whip it out and say, look, look, I'd love to go to the front. I'd love to lead from the front. I'm a roughy-tuffy sort of guy, as everybody can tell just by looking at me,

But I've got a note from Mason. I've got this bloody varuka and this dodgy knee and all the rest of it. But good luck you, you fellow. Responding to all of that today comedian and YouTube social commentator Leo Curse. But we've got a big day of breaking news. So don't go anywhere because Prime Minister Andy Burnham and Donald Trump, due to be meeting imminently in New York City, this is the first time they have come face to face. This was the president addressing the General Assembly in the past few hours where he encouraged the AI revolution, suggesting it should be rebranded super intelligence while also repeating his ultimatum to wipe Iran off the face of the earth. But after the midterms, of course. So we will bring you exactly what goes down when hapless Burnham finally does come face to face with the US president. But also breaking right now.

Two male suspects in their 30s have been arrested by counterterrorism police in Manchester after an attack on the Jewish community was thwarted. The arrest took place on Sunday afternoon in Manchester. And we'll remember it was just last year, of course, that Manchester was met with the Heaton Park Synagogue Terror Attack. Now, I'm not going to prejudge. I'm not going to prejudge. But do you think these people arrested in Manchester were of the war? the far-right variety, or more likely, the Islamist variety. Also coming up on today's show, Nadia Hussein accuses Ed Sharon of white tears,

as the former great British Bakelain winner turned Muslim-Curason marriage proponent amps up her sickening race war. And Pearce Morgan sues Princess Diana's brother over lies in his bombshell royal book Swan Song out today, as Prince William is ambushed in public, and Prince Harry confirms he'll be cashing in two on Diana with his own TV project about his mother. And in the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow, Princess Olga, Real Royalty joins us for the rest of the day's royal news as Prince Harry breaks down in tears at the Whalechild Awards before digging out, Prince William, Catherine the Princess of Wales, Princess Diana and King Charles in a bizarre new interview. We'll also be revealing a new Greatest Britain and Union Jackass at the end of the show. Leo has nominated Nadia Hussein for criticising Sharon and Rachel Marsh. You know, the Pittington village idiot who calls for open borders of multiculturalism

and then when it comes to her doorstep doesn't want it but still calls her neighbours racist. I've gone for Earl Spencer for a whole load of reasons, but let's just say lying about Piers Morgan in the new book, out today, and already in the bargain bin, by the way. So do keep your votes for that coming through. That is in the live chat. We're going to keep you up to date with all of the breaking news. I'd also love to hear from you. Your superchats will be delivered at the end of today's show.

But now, let's go. Nobody is safe from the Islamist takeover of the disunited kingdom. Not even octogenarian can tankerous comedy legends with an equal opportunity policy for taking the piss out of religions from Christianity to Islam. That is why John Glees felt he was taking his life into his own hands as he performed in Birmingham, ground zero of Muslim Britain, fearing he was about to experience the same fate as Salman Rushdie after a despicable campaign by the Islamist Presby Group's five pillars and DN feed. Two groups, by the way, that the mainstream media refused to expose,

despite their increasingly toxic presence and what is meant to still be a Christian country, Dienfied posted a question, which we all know was actually an attempt to terrify Cleese out of performing this via X should John Cleese be banned from coming to Birmingham Town Hall as they claimed Cleese has continually targeted the Muslim community with his posts on X.

But they weren't finished. there. John Cleese, we heard that you're coming to Birmingham Town Hall to perform this so-called comedy show. For years, you've used your platforms to attack Islam, spreading dangerous misinformation and creating hostility towards Muslims. And saying things like Islam's all about killing. This isn't comedy. That's hate speech and you're just a hate preacher. And let's call out the hypocrisy. Free speech has become a convenient shield for anti-Muslim hostility and vilification with no consequences. The moment that anyone uses that same free speech to attack other faith relentlessly like Judaism. They are called out, labelled anti-Semitic and exposed across national media. And when the target is Islam, suddenly it's just all satire.

Free speech in this country is applied selectively. It only seems to extend to the groups that elites deem acceptable to vilify in order to meet their agenda. And to the Birmingham Town Hall for hosting a so-called comedian that actively, promotes prejudice against a major segment of Birmingham's community, which undermines public trust and local cohesion. We ask the Birmingham Town Hall align with the duty of community respect and cancel the show. I think when you see that video and the use of the words like dangerous and use of the words like target, it is absolutely clear that John Cleese has been put under direct threat. I would argue this is the equivalent of a modern-day Islamic social media fatwa.

And five pillars actually posted directly to the faulty towers and Monty Python icon, clearly wanting to scare him. John Cleese, you're not a comedian, you're a hate preacher. Birmingham and its community outright reject your so-called comedy. You aren't welcome here. Muslim activists in Birmingham have released a video condemning British comedian John Cleese ahead of his visit to perform in the city. the activist accused Cleese of promoting anti-Muslim and anti-Islam views pointing to a series of

controversial comments he has made about Islam and Muslim on X. In March, Cleese claimed that the Quran's teaching was all about acquiring power, killing infidels, and opposing Islam on everyone, while arguing that Britain's Christian tradition was superior. Where is he wrong? Cleese has rejected accusations of Islamophobia describing himself instead as Islamosceptic. He is due to perform at Birmingham Town Hall as part of his John Cleese and the Holy Grail Tour, which is visiting 18 venues across England, several of the cities on the tour, including Birmingham, Manchester Leeds and Bedford,

are home to substantial Muslim communities. Now, Cleese himself responded by revealing, I'm told Five Pillars is the PR end of the street gangs. And by the way, if you're thinking for a single second that this new group is sort of community focus, just wanting to bring everyone together, I don't think so. Many believe videos like this are the beginning of preparing for what is now an inevitable civil war.

Young Muslims in the UK need to come together now more than ever. Us Muslims are living through some serious times. Arise in hatred towards Muslims. Mosques and Islamic centres being attacked. People are being silenced and criminalised for speaking out against oppression. And at the same time we're witnessing the ongoing oppression and slaughter of our Ummah in Palestine. The Ummah is hurting and that's why now more than ever young Muslims need unity. Real Brotherhood, not just online, but on the ground, supporting each other and safeguarding each other.

We need to come together, support one another and build communities connected to Islam. That's why we've come to Leicester today to link the brothers Khalid and Zaparia. To connect and understand the issues affecting our communities and to build together as young Muslims trying to make real change for the sake of Allah. Because the solution isn't division, it isn't hatred. The solution is coming back to the dean. Now the right united over the social media fat wire against Cleese, while as is always depressingly the case, his former friends on the hard left stayed noticeably quiet.

Tommy Robinson raged, fuck your feelings. John Cleese is a comedy legend. Go and live in Shariistan if you can't handle facts or opinions based on your theology, culture, behavior or your hurting feelings. There is no special treatment for you, Giza, entitled Wanker. And Andrew Neal added if this bunch of thick Islamist thugs can stop John Cleese from performing then the country is truly finished. The local Reverend Cannon, Father Phil Harris, a regular hair was clear. You do not speak for me, Five Pillars. This is my city and was before mass immigration. I have lived here for 54 years, my family for hundreds of years. You are usurpers. And he copied in the police, arguing you have allowed this by pandering to Islamists. This is Maccabee Tel Aviv all over again. Please get a grip. From Melissa Chen.

Nothing says we're fully integrated into British culture like trying to cancel John Cleese, the living embodiment of British humour and irony for screening Monty Python and the Holy Grail. When Native Brits talk about invasion and colonisation, this is exactly the kind of thing they mean. And the thing is right, Cleese is not an extremist. It's interesting. This was when I interviewed him when we'd become unlikely colleagues, actually, on GB News. And he explained actually how he thought that wokeery, which used to be about kindness,

was now being used for something far more chilling. Argument about wokeery, and some of it springs from a very good idea, which is like to try to be kind of people. But I believe it's become far too dominated by people who are frightened of offending people. And I think you have to allow offence. You say, do you like, do you like, we want people to be shouting racial epithets to people?

The answer is no, but I don't think prison is a correct sanction. Now, Cleese is brave and also 86, with enough money for security. So the good news is that he announced the show and Brum passed off without incident. My thanks to all who posted support, I think that may have changed some minds. A British publisher had asked me to write a book on his life. humor. However, they wanted a first draft by tomorrow. I told them I could do that. So he is continuing the war using humour to call out the truth about Islamism. And he doesn't like me, by the way. And actually, I despise many of his politics. But this is the fight that really matters. And

Cleese gets that and I support him all the way as a result. When Bernie Spofforth wrote, migrants are told girls are deceivers and they need to be careful when approaching them for sex or intimacy, Cleese responded, let's hope there's a seminar about stoning women explaining that it's generally not really acceptable when he was asked about the Church of England's latest disgrace from Sarah Mulally. The picture says it all right. Cleese argued it is extraordinary that clerics and scholars who have been banned in Muslim countries are allowed to preach here. Could it be that the Home Secretary, who is a Muslim, whose religion hinders her attempts to be even handed? 100% correct. Shabana Mahmood is practicing Tikia. How refreshing! To hear someone like Cleese pose a question that is usually only discussed on shows like this.

But Five Pillars will now target any white man of influence, which is why Cleese has become a particular target after he expressed support for Rupert Lowe. who the group has reported as now being investigated by the Parliament's standards watchdog over his repeated rhetoric about Muslims, Islam and Pakistanis in a bid to get him booted as an MP. But Rupert wasn't having that, responding officially. There is evidently an undeniable link between Islam and the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. The Islamification of Britain has also clearly played a large role in creating and hiding these crimes. Politicians from all parties have failed to confront these facts for, decades, and it has led to the mass rape of working-class white girls by predominantly these Muslim gangs.

I won't be apologising, and I stand by every word. And the real world consequences of this takeover are being seen every day. So we now have this arrest by counter-terrorism police in Manchester over another attempted terror attack on the Jewish community. we saw yesterday this out-of-control bus in Telford, which was hijacked by a Yemeni migrant, allegedly, I have to say that, because he has now been charged, who had been here for just a week.

And today, the horrendous details of how the Southport massacre Islamist terrorist, Axel Ruda-Kabana, continues to try and kill even more Brits, despite the fact he is behind bars, has come up for two air, listen. was heard in court today. Well, we heard more details of these alleged assaults carried out by Axel Ruda Cabana on prison officers.

The most serious, as you say, that he threw boiling water mixed with sugar at an officer through a hatch in his cell door. The court heard that this happened in May at Belmarsh Prison, where Ruder Cabana was being held after he was given a life sentence for the murders of three little girls at a dance class in Southport in 20. Well, now 20 years old, Ruder Kibana appeared by VideoLink from Broadmoor High Security Psychiatric Hospital. Sitting with his head resting in his hand, he listened as details of the four charges he's now facing were shared with the court. The prosecution saying the officer, he allegedly threw the boiling water at, only escaped long-lasting injury because of quick medical intervention, adding that Ruder Kabaner,

when questioned shortly after, claimed that prison officers had been poisoning his food. He's also facing two assault charges, the first that he allegedly threw an unknown liquid at another prison officer, but she wasn't injured, the other that he punched another prison officer. And the final charge is possession of an offensive weapon in prison. And this relates to stones, allegedly sharpened by Ruder-Cabana that he'd prized from the floor that were found stuck, underneath shelves in his cell. Now, I wanted to hear that detail, because it really does show you why someone like

Rupert Lowe is right to advocate for Ruda Kibana to be put to death. And after the court hearing, he posted Southport terrorist acts Rudebana has appeared in court, accused of throwing boiling water mixed with sugar at a prison officer. This wouldn't happen if he was in the ground, exactly where he should be. Restore Britain's policy of a referendum on the death penalty is just. But sadly, sadly, our mainstream media class is full of idiots who put woequerie ahead of saving their own people. Case and point, as David Atherton put it, lefty Marina Perkis, proving that the biggest enemy of white working class women are white middle class women. She also proves that being, quote, far right is worse than sexual.

assaults and violence. Now this is because Perkis went on Jeremy Vine, where the host disgracefully allowed her to suggest migrant crime is scaremongering. And that, the only issue of Piddington, is just men. Not migrant men, just men. Her point is we're always at risk. Like whether you have a thousand asylum seekers come in, which by the way, it's such a shame that they have been, like, there's so much fear-mongering, but women are always at risk. And I'm going to tell you now, we are always at risk. But always at risk from all men?

Always at risk from all men. We've got 1.5 women in this country, England and Wales, actually, dying every week, murdered, every week. And the vast majority, over 60%, are killed by their partner or former partner. Also, violence against women and girls is on the rise, up 37%. But don't you think she's adding to the problem here? if you're allowing a thousand more men from a different culture, in addition to what you're saying that women are at risk,

don't you think that that's just adding to the risk? She then used mental arithmetic to make the biggest argument of suicidal empathy I have ever heard. Are you saying, are you saying a thousand men, any men? So you're saying if I put a thousand British men into Piddington, that's also creating an increased risk? Absolutely so, yes. So we're right, no, absolutely.

It doesn't say from a different culture. Yeah, absolutely so. So a thousand extra men in Pittington. Of course they would do that. Even British. That's a big discussion then, right? Of course, but, but, Marina, Marina, let me finish. But we're then having to talk about a thousand men from a completely different culture.

Young men, by the way, who are escaping war, who are escaping all sorts of backgrounds that we don't know about, into a community that has no idea how to do. deal with it. That's even more dangerous. Even more dangerous. That's where you're part of company with Ron. You don't see any special danger in these migrants in that camp. I don't see that there is a, unless tell me if I'm wrong,

prove me with the data, but I don't see that it is specifically. If you're putting in a thousand British men or you're putting in a thousand men from different cultures, the threat to me is always the same. Okay, so you ask anyone saying, Marina, and they will take 1,000 British men over 1,000 imported Islamist invaders any day of the bloody week.

I literally, and I mean this, I want this woman to have to move in with them, with the 1,000 migrant men, because it might be the only thing that changes her mind. Instead, she just uses this to launch new attacks on the one demographic group who she really hates and she really feels is allowed to be attacked every single day of the year, white, straight men.

And for me, as a woman, to get to this age, The threats that I have had from men is always white men. The evidence is all there for us to see. We've seen it all before. Up north in what's the town? Oh, Rotherham. Rochester, Rotherham. We've seen it in Rotherham.

We've seen in many, many cases where a lot of men from Pakistan are being found guilty of doing heinous crimes to young women. I get that. I get that, but I'm just saying here, I think we're kind of agreeing here that the problem. is this epidemic of violence from menful stop. Menful stop. It doesn't matter where you come from. And of course, overwhelmingly in this country, perpetrators are British men. No, well... The perpetrators are partners. But people who are coming...

Proportionate numbers of crimes are committed by migrants, etc. But then you're dealing with very small sample sizes. And I don't know what that means. And then you're bringing a thousand more people here from across different shores into a community that has no idea how to deal with them. Note how Jeremy Vine made the per capita argument before immediately dismissing it as if he's embarrassed with himself for speaking an actual fact. Now perhaps Marina needs to watch the reports from Danny Tomo of the Patriot platform who is now following a fresh invader incident at a hotel in Stanwell. I've travelled down to Stanwell.

So basically what's happened is there's been some reports from the mob of Stanwell. Obviously you know some of you from this area and some will know in the news at the, The migrant has stabbed a worker in the hotel five times and that that guy, that migrant is now being put before a court for attempted murder. But the reason why this is now happening, the reason this is now happening here is. There's various reports, confirmed reports, even after speaking to the police here. And this is the migrant hotel here, Stanwell. So the reason that these guys are here now, and this has happened in a call in an hour, so is that individuals from this hotel have been travelling over the road, which is a kids park, literally.

So if you look at the hotel is here, over that road there is a kid park. Members of migrants from this hotel have been taking their trousers down, and they have been in decent exposure towards children. there are breaking developments right now with Danny Tomo. Actually, he is in the English channel. I'm told he's just managed to tune in to French authorities who are escorting illegal migrants over the channel. Those migrants waiting for an RNLI team to hand them over from the French vessel. And this footage, which I'm about to share with you for the first time, and I haven't seen it yet, is apparently him then slashing that iron ally boat let's watch

get around it there's no migrants on it now go on is it English waters quick quick quick quick quick all right we're in English territory this is England this is not France anymore okay get off get off the boat

get off the boat get off the boat you've got time to get off the boat get off the boat so dramatic this is not France I've come back let's go let's go

Let's go. No more of this. We're taking too much. No more. Now, let's go. So dramatic scenes developing right now in the channel with Danny Tomo directly taking on the RN ally. Tomo's aim very different to the GB News presenter, the arch-conservative Jacob Rees Mogg, who has gone viral for wanting to send your children to fight a foreign war against Vladimir Putin.

It's possible that in the next few years we may face a war. And if we face a war, we will need people who will join the armed services and who will go out and do their duty. We may even face circumstances where people have to die to save their country as they did in the First and Second World Wars and in many other wars before and since. That is something that makes a country survive. If people are not willing to do their duty,

then the country will be taken over. by another country, ultimately, one way or another. This is part of the reason that ancient Rome fell, that people were no longer willing to fight for what they believed in for the system that they had. They paid others to do it. They had mercenaries who fought for them, and eventually the mercenaries decided that they could run it for themselves.

Former Labor Advisor Paul Rich has appeared on ReedsMogg's GBM News show after that, and it got even madder. He called for people who were, refuse to fight for Burnham to be locked up and called for conscription. I do. I think the British would rise to greatness if they had to. We would have to lock a few people up, by the way. Some of the pro-Russian voices, people say there isn't a threat, don't fight for your country, don't go to war for Burnham. We'll have to lock them up. We've suspended Haynes Corpus during the Napoleonic War and under the defence of the realm.

So, you know, we would have to go to those measures and we would have to look at things like conscription as well. who get the numbers up. But the Russian tactic is just to throw people into the media. Now, George Galloway saw that clip, and immediately commented former Fabian Society leader in the Red Tie. It would appear that is true. If you look at his Facebook image,

he wrote, I'm delighted to report that I've been elected unopposed to be treasurer of the Faber in society for a further two years. If you're a fellow Fabian, the online ballot for the rest of the executive is in your inbox. strangely, as Ben who got that clip going viral pointed out, it was entirely cut by GV News online and from their stream on YouTube. He wrote, GB News have cut the clip I took on my phone, free speech, eh?

And Godfrey Bloom, former UKIP boss, explained from personal experience as to why Rees Mogg may not be the man we should be listening to on this argument. Good luck you fellows. Good luck you working class people. Over the top you go and I'll see you at my club.

A number of my subscribers have asked my opinion on the comments of Reese Mogg which of course are now well known they were out yesterday telling us or basically telling the working classes of their duty and they need to actually do the decent thing

join up, lead from the front as Boris of course said a few years ago. It was the same. I've got to actually get stuck in, leave from the front, you know, the old uniform on, polish up the baynet, and remember your days in the school core. Now, I was not a contemporary of Rees-Mogg or Boris Johnson at Eden, but I do know, and I've got it on the grapevine, that whenever it comes to rough and tumble with Rees-Mogg, he always had a crumple-up

letter from Matron in his pocket. And when it was called upon to do anything dangerous at all, he would whip it out and say, look, I'd love to go to the front. I'd love to leave from the front. I'm a roughy-tuffy sort of guy, as everybody can tell just by looking at me, but I've got a note from Mason. I've got this bloody varuka and this dodgy knee and all the rest of it. But good luck you fellows. Good luck you working class people. Over the top you go and I'll see you at my club. And of course, Danny Tomo is doing the opposite of that. He is taking this war to the front line of our borders at the moment. And by the way, I think when I was reacting to the breaking news of him slashing the migrant boat, I accidentally suggested he had slashed the R&LI boat. Of course, that is

not true. What appears to have happened is that the migrants have been safely moved from one of these dinghies, these super dinghies, onto the R&LI boat. Then Danny Tomo has slashed the illegal migrant boat so that it cannot be used again for any further crossings. I just want to look once more at what has just been going down in the English Channel. This is from a different point of view via Scott Lewis, who has said, so Danny Tomo just slashed the migrant boat after the RNLI just picked them up. Watch this. So you can see there. It is quite clearly a boat full of the life jackets, which have now been taken off by the migrants. And it's the RNLI who are moving the life jackets back onto their boat. So, of course, just to clarify, no vandalization of any R&A boat before people get to

excited. Let me bring in Leo Curse. Okay, Leo Curse, so it is all kicking off in terms of the breaking news today. Let's start with what we have just seen in the English channel from Danny Tomo. I mean, absolutely, I would say we should be destroying any of these boats that are being used by human

traffickers to ship invaders into our country. Yeah, absolutely. And isn't it interesting that we pay so much money, so many hundreds of millions of pounds to France to stop the migrants coming here. Then we pay for our border force and everyone else to keep our border secure. And they don't do it. They don't do it at all.

But some motivated men, unfunded by the state with some pointy sticks, can actually achieve it. Can actually stop these rafts from being in the water. So, you know, it's interesting you're showing Reese Mogg and other people saying, that we need to go to war. I think a lot of people would be absolutely happy to go to war if it meant we could also defend our own borders. They'd be happy to sign up to fight Putin if it meant we'd also be fighting to preserve Britain.

I mean, as it stands at the moment, I don't see how being a vassal state of China or something like that would mean that we'd be have any less of a future. for our children. We seem to be already controlled by communists who want to erase the native British population and want to treat Britain not as a nation state,

but as some sort of economic zone that anybody can freely come and go from with no national identity and no national culture and no national ethnicity. So I really don't understand what we'd be fighting for. And I think for people to turn round

to Danny Tomo, literally, you know, a week after they've been saying he should be clapped in chains and put in jail, thrown in jail for daring to enforce our borders, for people to turn around to him and men like him and say, oh, but now you're going to have to go, now you're going to have to go and fight Putin. It's like, come on, come on. What would we even be fighting for? And the leftists are just out to destroy him, though, Leo. Look at this.

Mittens off now saying Danny Tomo has stepped over a line and committed seriously. offense, watch him interfering with a rescue at sea and using a knife to burst a rubber dinghy with a rescuer on board, he needs to be locked up and handed to the French police. But the thing is, these people do not seem to understand that the people who are actually committing crimes are the traffickers who allow dinghies like that to send invaders into the country. And unfortunately, Leo, every single person on board. who is coming from a safe country to France the moment that they step foot on our land, they are criminal. Yet here is the left suggesting that it is Danny Tomo, who should be arrested.

Yeah, yeah, I mean, it's nonsensical. And it's not just the people traffickers who are criminal. These men who are coming across, they know that it's illegal entry of a country. They know that it's a crime. In a lot of countries, that would get you a serious jail sentence. If you tried to enter Saudi Arabia illegally, some Ethiopian men tried to enter Saudi Arabia illegally, and they were machine gunned at the border. So, you know, most other countries recognize that it's a crime. They don't reward the crime by, you know, putting people up in hotels.

The men coming know that it's a crime. Also, the government, our government that sets the laws, knows that it's a crime. You know, we've got the laws in place, put in place by politicians in this country. if you're illegally entering Britain, it's illegal. You're a criminal. Instead of treating it like a crime, the government funds these charities, these NGOs.

I was reading on the Telegraph about Care for Calais, which is one of the big migrant charities, and they get loads and loads, lashings of taxpayers' money. And they've been, according to this Telegraph article, they've been coaching adult male asylum seekers and how to pose as children, how to subvert the migrant system and pretend to be children

so they then get preferential treatment and they're more likely to be allowed to stay. The big issue with that is that that poses an extra risk to British girls because those men are then put in children's care homes. They're put in the school system. We've seen instance of girls in British schools filming these adult men who are clearly, I mean, we're talking male pattern baldness.

The guys have worse skin than me. You know, like, they're clearly, they're clearly not children. And the girls in these classes are filming them saying, why have I got a grown Syrian man in my classroom? So this is putting our children at incredible risk. And it's funded and acquiesced and assisted by the state at every step of the way from, you know, the RNLI going out and escorting the boats. And they pick them in, they pick them in up where they're not in, they're not in danger. They're not struggling. They've just drifted over and turned off the engines.

There's no actual danger there. They're not, you know, it's not a capsized yacht. It's subverting the R&LI's original mission. And then they're brought in in every step of the way, the accommodation, the mobile phones, the clothing, the food, the, the, every help and every assistance they get is, is, you know, is perpetrated by the state. I think we need to look at Nuremberg-style trials for people who are responsible for perpetrating

this mass crime against Britain. You've got to remember the Nazis. The Nazis excuse was always, oh, I was just one small cog in the machine following orders. That's what all these people's excuses are going to be. And don't give me this stuff about, oh, but they're volunteers. Or some of these charities are volunteers that R&LI are volunteers. Volunteers, they're volunteering.

They're volunteering to destroy Britain. I don't care if they're volunteering. Frankly, it makes it worse if they're doing it for nothing. Very, very good point. Very good point. And Leo, we have this other big piece of breaking news today, which I actually think is intrinsically linked to everything that we are discussing. But it's deeply, deeply serious. And it is the fact that another terrorist attack has been foiled in Manchester. We've got a bit more detail about this. But of course, what are we not being told? Leo, we're not being told the names. We're not being told the names of the men. It will inevitably be men in this case. And I would pretty much put money on the fact that it would likely be Islamist

men. But of course, we're hearing nothing on that at this point. They have not said that this is an Islamist plot, but they have said that it is a terror plot to target the Jewish community and that two men have been arrested. So the new report says they were in their 30s, arrested under Section 41 of the Terrorism Act, and it is in relation to a plot to target the Jewish community in the Manchester area. But we now have the Deputy Assistant Commissioner Vicky Evans, the senior national coordinator for counterterrorism police on the record. So I will just tell you what she has said, Leo. This has been a long-running proactive investigation, which has led to the disruption of what we believe to be a plot to target the Jewish community in the Manchester

area. Counterterrorism policing continue to focus our efforts on identifying and disrupting those who wish to cause harm in our communities. We're acutely aware this news will cause further concern to the Jewish community as well as the wider public, especially given the significance of the high holy day period. I want to reassure them we are working incredibly closely with colleagues in Greater Manchester Police and partners to ensure we're doing everything we can to keep them in the wider community safe. And more broadly across the country, CTP is working with local police forces to provide protective security support and advice for areas with Jewish communities, and particularly during the High Holy Day period.

As we have shown with these arrests where we suspect there could be a threat to the public, then we will not hesitate to investigate and take action. Importantly, we do not believe there to be any ongoing threat to the public in relation to this matter. But as ever, we would ask that people remain vigilant in contact police with any concerns. Well, two things. Firstly, there is clearly, clearly an ongoing threat to the public because this is not the first and it will not be the last. But do you notice what is missing from that statement, Leo?

Who planned this attack? Let me tell you, if this was a right-wing, in-cell-related terror attack, we would know, we would know the names. I would put money on the fact that this is an Islamist plot and that is why that word has not been used, the word Muslim has not been used, the word Islamic has not been used, and the names of those arrested have not been used.

How on earth can we trust our authorities when they will not get real about the terror threat? And how are the Jewish community in Manchester meant to go ahead with their celebrations again? Absolutely. And there's even a law, Coulter's Law, it was coined by Anne Coulter, that says the longer you have to wait

after an incident like this to find out who is actually perpetrating it, the more likely it is that they were Muslim. And, you know, maybe it is, maybe it is the far right. I mean, after all, we've been told that they're a huge problem in this country. Maybe it could be the far left. I know there's a lot of anti-Semitism on the far left these days. But yeah, I mean, historically and, you know, with recent trends,

it's likely to follow the same pattern. But it's sad that the police are always foiling these threats. I remember in Manchester last last year the synagogue, the synagogue attack where the guy stabbed people at the synagogue. The guy was called Mr. Jihad. He was shouting Allah Akbar and was dressed in Islamic robes. And the police were like, we're not sure, we don't have any details as to a possible motivation or anything.

Are you joking? The guy's literally called Mr. Jihad. Like you could tell you, a five-year-old kid could tell you the motivation there. So as the population, as we've imported more people from the Middle East, people with an ancient tribal grievance against Jews. And as they've grown in number and in confidence, obviously many of them integrate and become as British as they can. But many don't. Many, many harbour the same tribal grievances that they always have.

So we're seeing an increased threat to Britain's Jewish community. And I think, I think there's going to be, you know, the police are foiling so many of these plots. There's going to be a mass event. I'm going to interrupt because Donald Trump and Andy Burner have come face to face for the first time. I want us to listen in. New York City.

So I think he's – MR. He talked about immigration. What did he talk about? Pretty much like everyone else talked about immigration. It's a worldwide situation to a large extent. But he understands. I'd like to have him maybe discuss whatever he feels.

Immigration is a problem for many countries. I think we've, to a large extent, solved our problem. We have a very powerful border with 18 months now in a row where nobody came in illegally into our country. into our country. They come in legally. They go through a whole testing process, et cetera, but nobody's come in. We've closed up a border that allowed 25 million people in over a four-year period under the previous administration.

But you'd like to say something about him? Yeah, thank you, Mr. President. I mentioned the fact that it was a very big issue at the Maker Field by election and a lot of the British media will know that, and I spoke about it then. Our commitment is to get to a controlled approach. approach. That's what people want to see. They're not against migration overall. They know that people work in the NHS and in the care system. It's a difference though when it's managed or when it's uncontrolled and the small boats is a very big issue for people. But crossings this summer were down 50% there or thereabouts on the number six years ago. So sometimes

people don't hear that the progress is being made, but the progress is being made. And we know We've got further to go. Home Secretary and the Foreign Secretary are working with me on it, and we'll keep working on it. But that's a story that's not always out there, but we will continue to make sure we deal with it. Mr President, Honour Van, in your speech just now, you suggested that he was annihilated around.

Do you expect Britain to help you with that? And can I ask if you have any sympathy for the many allies like the US, in part because of the US action in Iran? Thank you. Well, I think as soon as the war is over, the numbers are going to come way down pricing generally. Because oil is the big thing. When the oil goes up, and we had to do that because we have to stop.

And I think we feel very united than that. We can't let Iran have a nuclear weapon. And people understand that in the United States. And they're paying more than, less than Biden, by the way, less than the Biden administration. And yet he did nothing about the threat of nuclear terror. It's nuclear terror. I can't have it.

So we've stopped them from having a nuclear weapon. We've literally stopped them. They're not going to have a nuclear weapon. And we'll see what happens. I think that a settlement is going to be reached. They want to talk to us. They have been talking to us. Even today, they've been talking to us.

And the relationship is developing, let's say. But we can't let them, they understand that. We can't let them have a nuclear weapon. And there's a price to pay for that. They should have been done by other presidents, or frankly, other countries. You know, some country could have stepped forward, but there aren't too many countries, frankly, that could have handled that. So I think we've done a great job.

They will not have a nuclear weapon. Mr. President. Mr. President, you just built a very strong case for patriotism over global interest. So I would ask your advice in the UK if we were to pursue that same vision. And if I could ask Prime Minister Burnham as well, your predecessor famous, he said you were happier in Davos than Westminster. Are you happier in Manchester or Manhattan? This is a risky question. You want to go first.

Well, I like to remind the President, every known again, to be called the great city of Manchester. You know it so well. Bev's a Mankew. She's great. You once called it some town. And we don't hold it. I don't hold it against you as the former mayor.

But obviously, I'm very much at home. Makerfield, Manchester. But here, here too. I love coming here. But I'm patriotic as well. And I was explaining to the president today, Britain has been in too much turbulence, a sense of just not knowing where we're going.

And I think you responded when I said, we're going to lay out a plan for Britain, a 10-year direction. The country's got so much going for it. And it's time to turn the story about Britain to a positive story, get some hopeful hopefulness going around the country and I think you were saying today that very much is how you see it right and there's you know a great opportunity for us as we go forward well Bev always asks good questions but I think there's a tremendous patriotism in Britain and you go on United Kingdom

Britain they call sometimes England they go back to the old it's got more names than any other place in the world and sometimes after the educated there's a lot but there's great patriotism in the country They want to see great things happen. Tremendous potential. I mean, I see some countries, and I'm with the leaders. I don't say it, but I don't see a lot of potential. They've got a tough road to home. This is a country with great patriot.

They love the country. The people love the country, as much as any other country I can think of. And I think it's just waiting for success, waiting for good leadership, waiting for success. Mr. President. Mr. President, two questions if I could. One way you'd say, and one bled you'd say.

one blake the press issue. If the district court decides against you, would you let the free media outburst back in? Well, it probably will, because this is a judge who's not a particularly fair judge. So you never know. But I'm talking about national security. I think we have a right to clean out fake news.

News is fake. And by the way, they said they were going to be it, but they came. You know, I knew that would happen. What are they not going to be with President Xi tomorrow? So, but they say, we will not cover Trump. This is something you don't have to know about, you don't have, you won't have this problem.

But, you know, we have a lot of fake news. And I think what news is fake, and it's actually dangerous, I think I have a right to clear it out. How is it dangerous? Could you just elaborate, how are these moving out that's dangerous? Oh, when they make statements about the war, when they make false statements, false militias,

and they don't have sources, but they say they do. No, no, it's very dangerous for our country. And I won't stand for it. And then on the UK, so earlier this month, UK sanctioned certain settlement organization in the West Bank. What did you think of that move did you discuss? Well, I don't know about the move. Do you know about the move?

Yes. Obviously, we took that decision, the Foreign Secretary and I, and we did call you just to say why we've taken that. No, I take this view on this issue. We've all spoken over the years about the importance of a two-state solution. If we face a situation where there's a tender to put settlements on the West Bank that, in effect, make a two-state solution non-viable, what do we do? Because if we do nothing, then it further erodes people's trust in politics.

They think, well, you're all talk. When it comes to it, you're not prepared to follow up on that talk and do something. We condemn the Hamas attacks of 7th of October completely, and we will challenge anti-Semitism wherever we see it. Very strong condemnation. Completely. But on that issue, we targeted action the Foreign Secretary proposed on the banning the impulse of goods from the settlements,

because at the end of the day, have to have meaning behind your words, otherwise trust in politics further evaporates. The Cheggles deals, Mr. President. Are you going to support it? The deal to give away the Cheagos Islands from the UK to Mauritius. I don't support it. I think it's terrible. It was a terrible deal.

They all of a sudden say they have ownership. Somebody has ownership that never showed up before after decades and centuries. I think it's ridiculous. No, we were talking about that. It's strategically very important. Very important. You know, we had to send our B-2 bombers when we were. We bombed the Iran nuclear.

We had to said the B-2 bombers back home to Missouri, as opposed to flying for a short period of time, that I'd fly for a long period of time. It's amazing how strategic it is, and I think the Prime Minister is going to be looking at. Yeah. It's a very, very strategic location, amazing. And it's unique.

I said, well, we could get something else. Actually, it's a very unique. It's a very important piece of real estate militarily and strategically. Yes, right behind. Mr. President, relations between the U.S. and the U.K. is being a little bit up and down lately. No, I think you're up.

What sort of state would you say they're in now? Well, they're more apparent than they were with your last prime minister. Let me put it that way. You're getting on well. But even on that, I mean, we took care. We made a deal that nobody else could make with Rolls-Royce. We made sure that Rolls-Royce was being properly taken care. We didn't force them to do things like, you know,

the building Rolls-Royces in Brooklyn, New York. We didn't do it. We didn't do that. We had a – Scott, right, we had a lot of decisions to make with respect to age-old companies with great reputations that were made in your country for years. And, you know, we made – we made a lot of concessions. But, no, I think right now, based on my relationship with your Prime Minister, Andy, I think that – I think we're doing very well. Thank you very much. Thank you, press. Thank you, press. Thank you, press. Thank you, press. All right, guys.

Okay, so there we see Donald Trump and Andy Burnham meeting for the first time. Leo Curse, listening into that too. I mean, Burnham was pathetic, wasn't he? Like a nervous, terrified little schoolboy as Trump sort of schooled him. Praise Bev Turner of G.B. News for her incredible questions. Slammed Starma, slammed the Chagos deal.

He's just sitting there. shaking. He is pathetic. Well, this is a nightmare for Burnham because, I mean, he's put so much effort into winning back, winning back the Muslim bloc and winning back the far left who used to vote Labor in such huge numbers. And the Muslim block as well, I mean, you've got to remember in 2019, 85% of Muslims in Britain voted for Jeremy Corbyn. There used to be huge Labour, labor voters. And now they've drifted away. They've got their own candidates who focus on specific Muslim issues such as the ability to marry your cousin and Gaza.

They seem to be the two big ones that get raised in Parliament. But now he's been, Andy Burnham has been trying to win back the far left, win back the Muslims by putting sanctions on Israel and, you know, taking that tack that Keir Starmour didn't. And now Andy Burnham has been forced into lending military support to Donald Trump, as Donald Trump helps the Saudis in Yemen and also provide, I'm not sure if he's providing support for the actual main Gulf War. But this is terrible, terrible for his image

with the far left, terrible for his image with the Labor Party. They don't want to see him cozying up to Trump. And this is something that Keir Starmour actually did fairly well. Kier Starrmer was quite adept at handling Trump and handling those situations and, you know, charmed for all that he didn't charm anybody. In this country, he charmed Trump and knew how to handle him quite well. I'm not sure if Andy Burnham is going to do the same.

Breaking today, ex-BBC star and race obsis, Nadia Hussein, has shared a video to her one million Instagram followers, accusing Ed Sharon of white tears. Now, you remember this woman found fame on the Great British Bake Off, but is now notorious for getting involved in any opportunity where white people can be slammed. And she took said opportunity after Sharon broke down on stage saying his family had abandoned him

while addressing this Palestine row, which saw him face a huge decision over a huge backlash, sorry, over the decision to remove Macklemore as one of his support acts after he said free Palestine on stage. Now this video claims if the tears of Palestinians and black, Brown and Indigenous communities carried as much gravity, genocide would not happen. White tears is a

political term used by some activists and commentators to describe situations where a white person's emotional response is seen as drawing attention away from racism or oppression. But before we get to that truly horrendous claim, first, I want to show you Ed Sharon breaking down on stage. After being cancelled by the hard-left pro-Pally mob, he always believed he could appease by being vaguely lefty and right on. The world is a scary place right now. America is a scary place right now. This gives hope.

This gives hope. Thank you so much for the goal. Thank you so much. Then in response, the insufferable vote therapist Megan Cooper, who has been endorsed by Hussein, had this to say. But for those of us in white bodies,

we need to understand and educate ourselves on white tears. White tears is a cultural tactic. using emotion consciously or unconsciously to deflect accountability, to gain sympathy and to centre self in conflict and challenge, particularly during discussions around racism and oppression. What happens is we become the victim. Our emotion is now prized above the actual issue, in this case, genocide. What this shines a light on is whose tears get to be seen, listen to and heard in our society and whose don't. Here, for example, not only does emotion meet

whiteness, it also meets patriarchy. So what we have is not just tears, it's power. If the tears of Palestinians and black and brown and indigenous communities carried as much gravity, genocide would not happen. And this isn't just as simple as me saying, Ed, isn't allowed emotions. I am here to make a systemic comment on how we, as people in white bodies, need to educate and inform ourselves so that we don't replicate systems of harm whilst we are trying to dismantle them. Disgusting. I mean, she is one of these people, one of these white people practicing suicidal empathy. And it now does just prove that white racism alongside anti-Semitism really is the only

acceptable form of racism in the world today. And I just want to prove the point, by the way, that Hussein is obsessed with skin color because after she departed from the BBC, which gave her all of her fame, she was a moderate baker, right? But they loved her because she was in, what is it, the hijab, right? Not the full that, but she was like that. That's why they loved her, okay? and yet she claims she was merely a tick box exercise for the broadcaster.

Because up to this point, I didn't think that I was a tick box exercise, but then I look back and I think, ah, I was just, they just needed to look diverse. They needed to look like they had the Muslim tick. They got person of cult, tick. Interesting. So you look back at your career and you begin to think, It was a lie. It was a lie.

I didn't want to look at my career like that but I look back and I think oh my goodness it was all a tick box exercise till they just didn't need me anymore till they just said actually unless you're the version of unless you're the version that we want

you don't get to be the version that's authentic and when you decide that you want to be authentic there's no room for you or maybe there was no room for you Nadiah Hussain because you were obsessed with accusing people of racism left right and centre I filed a complaint with a very big breakfast show that I did.

And they were mocking a recipe out of my book, which I can almost guarantee if a Jamie Oliver or James Martin was on their promoting their book, they would not sit at the end of the show and mock a recipe out of their book. So I filed a complaint and I said, that's not acceptable. was a recipe called chart in a bag. And chart is an Indian recipe, South Asian recipe. But they took that word and changed it. And I didn't understand it.

So I asked my English sister-in-law, what did, why are they laughing at? I don't understand it. And she said, oh, they're mocking it because it's shat in a bag. Interesting. And I found that really distasteful and really hateful. And I said they, they need to apologize for that, because that was really deep. disrespectful and nothing. Nothing.

They refuse to apologise. Do you know what I think is disrespectful, Nadia? Becoming a major proponent of cousin marriage here in the UK. This is because her own parents are cousins and it sparked an inbred clapback from the conservative commentator Esther Krakou. But my parents are cousins. So they all lived in one house. my dad, my mom all lived in one house.

And then they went back to Bangladesh. And that's where my parents got married. And then they moved back and then lived together. It's so odd. This is interesting. Yeah. But I would imagine, though, being cousins, that's not culturally. That's not distinct.

No, no. That's very common. Totally common. Like, really common. Okay, this is gross. She's just basically admitted to being inbred. Can we not normalize this, please? Cousin marriage is gross.

It's not normal. There are 8 billion people on the planet. You don't need to be marrying your cousin. The children of cousin marriages are linked to high levels of congenital illnesses. It's costing the NHS a fortune. It is not British or Western. And it is gross. Stop it.

Stop it now. Okay. So Leo Kirst, we have a situation where Nadi Hussein can cry racism at a drop of a hat. Right? So a joke on breakfast TV, sort of a pun. That's terrible, hateful racism, Leo. yet Ed Sharon breaks down on stage, says he's been abandoned by his friends and his family,

and he is crying white tears, Leo, which means he should be ignored and he should be further vilified. Well, I would argue she is the racist. She is everything she claims everyone else is. Yeah, absolutely. And Ed Shearer, I don't know why he's trying to placate these people. I don't know why he's trying to come out and say, oh, no, I feel sorry for everybody involved.

Just ignore it. Just say you're there, sing your songs, and if anybody doesn't like it, they can F off. You know what I mean? Like, frankly, there'd be less chance of a Manchester Arena-type massacre if he kept his audience British only. So, yeah, I mean, I think Ed Shearan is clearly speaking from the heart.

And when I say speaking from the heart, he's reading a script written by a PR consultant of a teleprompter, but it's still, you know, aligns with what his heart thinks. And for her to then make it about race, about Ed Sheeran's white tears, which apparently don't have as much, they don't count as much as black tears or brown tears.

I just think, you know what, Nadia Hussein, she, I don't know if she came to this country, if she was born here, but, you know, she's been given every opportunity. She was, you know, one of our TV stars for how long? She certainly lasted longer than I did on GB News. She's, you know, she's stayed in the BBC and the public spotlight selling her cookery books for so long. And this is how our best integrated, our figurehead for Muslim integration.

This is how she behaves coming out and spitting on Ed Shearron for being white. I mean, this really is quite revealing. As for the cousin marriage thing, I mean, I've got no problem with these, with our parents marrying each. other of their cousins. I think, you know, if there's going to be some sort of civilizational showdown, if there is going to be a civil war, you know, if these people have webbed feet and low IQs, that's going to play into the British Patriots hands. Speaking of Ed Sheeran, by the way, because I used to know him pretty well when I was in the showbiz world and he was obviously like the mega star. Like when I was editing the bizarre column

in the sun, he was the megastar. I mean, you saw there, he like swept all of our awards year after year. And here's the thing about Ed Sherrin Leo. He is just a normal guy. Okay, he's a normal and he doesn't want to get political. But the problem is, and this is why artists do have to be careful, is that he got political when it was very easy to do so. Okay, so, oh, I'm going to be anti-Brexit. I'm going to be pro-Ukraine. and then what do they do? What do the pro-paly mob do they trap you? And they say, ah, well, you're pro-Ukraine.

So why aren't you pro-os? And that is the issue. And it is why my absolute wholesome recommendation to every single celebrity is to keep your trap shut, stay out of all political debate. No one will thank you for it. No one will want you for it.

And the irony here is Leo is that he basically has now joined the McElmore crew, right? Because he felt that he had to. He felt he had to go full on pro Pally. And they still hate him. They still want him dead. They still want him cancelled. They despise the guy. His band members were all pulling out.

His support acts who he had supported for years and years and years. Who would be total no marks without him all walked away. His cousin was slagging. them off. You will never appease these hard leftists. So all celebrities, if you do not want to go down this path, just keep your trap shut. It might seem easy to slag off Brexit at the time or at the moment Nigel Farage or Restore Brishon or Danny Tom or Tommy Robinson or whoever the mainstream media are trying to get you to attack. Shut up. Shut up and sing unless you want to be sobbing on stage with your family having walked away from you.

That is the advice, because unfortunately, he was political. And I really like the guy. I really liked the guy. It was horrible to see. But you get the point that I'm making, Leo. You can't have it both ways. Absolutely. And also the other side of this is that, you know,

Biogga and McElmore and whoever else is pulling out of his tour and spitting in his face and throwing back the opportunity that he's graciously handed them. You know, because Ed Sheeran is one of the, the nicest guys in pop music is what I've heard from everybody. What all these people don't realize is that this is an industry. This is an industry that's based on selling tickets and putting on the show. The show must go on is the number one aphorism for show business. And they've stopped the show from going on.

And it's not just about Ed Shear and it's all the people who are working as rigors, the drivers, every. There's hundreds of people involved. People with mortgages to pay, families to feed who are working men, working men and women, working on that tour. If that money stops flowing in because McElmore and some Irish pub band decide to have a tantrum, people are going to remember that in the industry. And they might get their moment in the spotlight now, but good luck to them getting on a tour two years from now. Well, look, I personally wish Ed Sharon had got up on stage and sung. We didn't need that.

We didn't need his tears. It helped no one. The most powerful thing Ed Sharon could have done at that concert was get up on stage and sung without anyone. Because, you know, that is his remarkable success as an artist. And I know a lot of people attack Ed Sheeran, but he does this on his own. He doesn't need a band, doesn't need a support act. No one was paying to see God damn Macklemore. They were paying hundreds of pounds or hundreds of dollars to see Ed Shearren. So he should have got up and sung and stuck to his words and not given him. into the mob because you're finished as soon as you give into the mod. Breaking today, Pearce Morgan going ahead with his plans to sue Princess Diana's brother over egregious lies

in his book on Princess Diana, which by the way is already in the bargain bin. Look at this. Spotted by one of our producers today, W.H. Smith already selling Swan Song at half price. So this book shaping up to be a because I think these copies are very soon going to have to go from the bargain bin to the pulper after the so-called historian proved that he hasn't just got his story completely mixed on King Charles, but Pierce Morgan too. I do feel sorry though for Prince William, who is being dragged again and again into this scandal. Now, I was already questioning the credibility of this book. You will know that. I do not believe. the claims. And I say that as someone who can be hypercritical of King Charles when it is deserved.

But Pearce Morgan's bombshell, I think, trashes Spencer's reputation. He posted, I am taking legal action against Earl Spencer and his publishers over demonstrable lies. He has written about me in his new book, which call into question his credibility as a supposed historian. Now, in fairness to Morgan, he brought the receipts. reading directly from Spencer's own book. The Earl Spencer's book contains fabricated inaccuracies, which will strike to the heart of his credibility. Spencer recounts how he personally called round the tabloid newspaper editors

to uninvite them from Princess Dinah's funeral after they had all been invited. I remember this well because I was one of them. He says on the book, they realize they were unable to be rude to the brother of the much more. Princess, the only one who sounded surly as opposed to merely confused or embarrassed, was Piers Morgan of the mirror, who snarled with annoyance before he hung up. Well, Spencer then explained why I may have been surly with him. I assumed Morgan must be feeling particular guilt, he writes,

because four years earlier, he and his Sunday mirror counterpart had published photographs taken with hidden cameras by a gym owner. They were of Diana working out in a leotard. This was such an intolerable invasion of her privacy that Diana instructed lawyers to sue the mirror group and to block further use of the images. Meanwhile, he says, a Dutch newspaper splashed one of the pictures on its front page and an American tabloid brought a selection of them

with which to titillate its readers. The gym owner eventually made 300,000 pounds from his salacious stolen images. Now, I remember that story well. I know the editor responsible he lost his job. Problem is, it wasn't Pierce Morgan. Well, Spencer continues. For a while, it looked as though the Mirror Group would be brazen enough to allow the case to go to court, calculating that whatever their newspapers lost financially at trial would be more than recouped through global publicity.

Despite significant public outrage at the pictures and loss of revenue when some major companies withdrew their advertising from the Mirror Group, Morgan's triumphant spokesman, boasted that sales of his paper and of the Sunday Mirror had each risen by more than 100,000 copies since splashing the Internet. intrusive shots. But after that, public curiosity turned into general revulsion, and both paper circulation dropped significantly. This commercial setback persuaded the Mirror Group to fold. Spencer continues, it agreed to pay Dina's legal costs of around a million pounds and was obliged to further acknowledge its guilt by making donations of £200,000 to her chosen charities. He then says in the immediate aftermath of Dina's death, Morgan was one of four tabloid editors named, shamed and photographed in an article looking at who might be held responsible for the paparazzi's role.

It must have been an extraordinary sensation for this powerful quartet. They were used to dishing out such treatment without ever receiving it in return. Well, this is all pretty extraordinary stuff, isn't it? Very damning, particularly about me. I come across in the most despicable manner imaginable. Okay, yes, Pearce, there's the setup, but I know you're waiting for the mic drop moment. Here it is. There's just one problem.

It's all bullshit and very, very easy bullshit for me to prove it. The photographs which he says that I published were printed by the Sunday Mirror on November the 7th, 1993. I joined the Daily Mirror in October 1995. In fact, at the time of the gym pictures, I was doing a showbiz column on the Mirror's arch rival, The Sun, about as far removed from responsibility for the mirror scoop as I could possibly have been. Well, L. Spencer was estranged from Diana living in South Africa at the time of her death.

As editor of a Daily Mirror, I had lunch with her at Kensington Palace and with Prince William. After that, it wasn't uncommon for her to call my office or for me to run stories by her, which she would then amend to make sure that they were perfectly phrased and accurate. Diana knew how to use the media,

just as we the media absolutely used Diana to sell news. newspapers. Pairs also suggests that by the time of Diana's death, he was actually closer to her than Spencer, whose relationship with his sister had been strained. Ironically, by that time in her life, I think I was probably talking to her more often than he was. My question, though, is this. If Al Spencer can be so incredibly defamatorily wrong about such basic facts involving me, well, why should we believe anything else? else that he puts in this book. He pointedly refers to the cancerous treatment of Harry and

Megan by the press while Shamously using the Harry and Megan playbook of putting their truth before the truth. And apparently not even thinking that using the word cancerous during a lengthy attack on King Charles who has cancer and is 77 years old might not be the cruelest of And then he made the demand that could see the Royal Book sensation of the year pulled off the shelves. In the meantime, Earl Spencer, you'll be hearing and your publishers from my lawyers because I would like the complete lie that you've published about me and those photographs to be removed from your book. And I would like a donation to be made to the King's trust for the damage that you've caused with your lie.

after all, to quote somebody, you can't dish it out without getting it in return, right? So, Earl Spencer has now issued an apology to Morgan. This is after GB News contacted him, resulting in the broadcaster's royal correspondent Cameron Walker revealing this. Earl Spencer's spokesperson has gotten in touch with GB News when we reached out for him's comments. And I'll just read out the whole statement. So from Earl Spencer's spokesperson. Earl Spencer's account of his conversation with Pierce Morgan is accurate. Mr Morgan was surely and annoyed when...

Sirly even and annoyed when Earl Spencer called personally to tell him that he was not welcome at his sister's funeral. All of the editors for context were invited by Buckingham Palace to the funeral and Earl Spencer disinvited the tabloid editors. The book then records Earl Spencer's assumption that Mr Morgan's response was because he was editor of the Daily Mirror when the Mirror group had published highly intrusive photographs of Princess Diana at the gym. The photographs were published by the Sunday Mirror on the 7th of November 1993.

Mr Morgan has pointed out that he did not join the Daily Mirror until October 1995. As a historian, accuracy is important to Earl Spencer. He therefore wishes to clarify that his assumption was incorrect. Earl Spencer apologises to Mr. Morgan for this error. I translate that as damage control. Well, it's not going to work. The damage control isn't going to work. Because Peirce has now posted on X, Earl Spencer has apologized to me for his defamatory lies published in his new book Swan Song published today. But I am pursuing legal action against him and his publisher penguin to have the lies removed and damages paid to the King's trust.

Earl Spencer's account of our phone call is also deeply misleading. I was neither surly nor annoyed, but instead very respectful to him and his family as I wrote in my diaries, The Insider. it would seem that Spencer's recollection of phone calls is very suspect. And in a new interview just released by Woke ITV's Chris Schip, Morgan said that Spencer is about as far removed as a historian that you can possibly be. Well, Earl Spencer wants us to believe every word of his book, and in particular the incendiary claims he's made about phone calls and things that now King Charles is repeated to have said.

but my belief based on what he's written about me, which has turned out to be completely untrue, is that he's about as far removed from a historian as you could possibly be. How could he be claiming to be an historian putting this out for public record for centuries to come when he can't even get a basic story right, involving me within a two-year range?

It's preposterous. And your inference is therefore, what else can we trust in terms of the claims in the book? Well, there's also in his apology to me today in which he admits that he got it completely wrong, in my view, it's defamatorily wrong and we'll be taking legal action against him and his publishers to have this removed from the book and therefore probably have the book removed because he's admitted that it's completely inaccurate. And Pearce says actually that it does prove that Earl Spencer shouldn't be believed about the recollection of the phone call with King Charles. In his apology, the doubling down, where he claims that when he phoned a few tabloid editors after Princess Dana's death to uninvites from her funeral after we've been invited by the Lord Chamberlain's office, he says, I was surly and annoyed in this conversation.

You were editor of the mirror at this point, yes? I was now editor of the Daily Mirror. Right. And this goes to the heart of the veracity of his recollection of phone calls in that week, which is the week when he claims, of course, to have had the conversation with then Prince Charles, which was so incendiary about him, be giddy like a lottery winner.

You weren't surly on that phone call, is he's done it down today. It's an absolute lie to say that I was surly. I could not have been more respectful. In fact, it's not just a case if you're having to take my word for it. Go back and read my own best-selling volume of diaries, the insider, and check the diary entry

about this phone call, and you will see how respectful I was to him and to his family and asking him to pass on my specific condolences to his mother, who I spoke to on a regular basis, as I did his sister, Princess Diana. So he's lied about the tone of our conversation, and he knows he has, and that to me begs the question, well, if he's got that so egregiously wrong, then is he to be believed about his recollection of the tone of the conversations he had with then Prince Charles? I would argue he's not. Now, Leo Kurs, I know that it is very annoying for Pearce Morgan to be proven right,

but in this case, I actually 100% agree with what he is saying. If he has got very, very basic, easily provable facts, completely distorted in this book, then surely it does have to give more credence to King Charles's argument that actually grief clouded his view of events that particular week in 1997, when remember he claims that King Charles made a terrible slur about his late wife, that she would be forgotten soon enough. Yeah, and it does seem to be, this whole book seems to be motivated by that ongoing bitterness and enmity towards the establishment and towards obviously the royal family. And I'm surprised that, you know, with claims that are so clearly provable one way or another that the publisher of the book didn't go through it with a fine tooth comb because obviously, you know, they could be on the hook for any defamation as well.

I mean, I'm not sure. I think that the argument they'd use against, you know, any defamation claim from Pears Morgan would be that, you know, to be defamed, somebody has to have a good reputation. reputation first for it to be produced. And I don't think Pierce Morgan, I don't think Pierce Morgan's reputation could really be worse. But this seems like basic sort of nuts and bolts stuff to go through and fact check.

Yeah, it really does. It really does. But if you think that this circus is going to end any time soon, Leo, Prince Harry, making it very, very clear that is not the case. Overnight, his team have briefed to his favoured media outlets, which are currently People magazine and the Daily Telegraph. But next year, Prince William's nightmare is going to become true. His younger brother is making this dramatic TV series about his mother, which is expected to be sold to Netflix. as part of his first look deal.

Victoria Ward, the Deputy Royal Editor of The Daily Telegraph, who is in direct communication these days with Harry's team reporting that Harry isn't talks to make a Diana documentary sounding out talking heads for the project. She writes, The Daily Telegraph understands the Duke wants to mark the 30th anniversary of her death next year by honouring her legacy and quote the most meaningful way. Well, I would translate that to in the most money-making way

because that's what this is about. He has already approached several friends and relatives of his late mother, including Earl Spencer, to ask whether they would take part in a documentary. However, the Earl writing in his new memoir, Swan Song, Diane and My Sister, which we published today, said he chose to write a book to avoid being a talking head in one of the many upcoming productions about his sister, fearing they would follow a flawed agenda. The Duke's decision to make a personal documentary is likely to infuriate the Prince of Wales,

that's Prince William, who has silently endured. high-profile revelations about his family life from his brother in recent years. A source close to Harry told The Telegraph, the Duke has discussed a number of possible projects to mark the 30th anniversary of his mother Diana Princess of Wales passing. Nothing has been finalised or confirmed, and he is still considering the most meaningful way to honour her legacy to honour her legacy during this important anniversary year. Such a programme would be produced by the Sussex's own Archwell Productions

and would likely be bought by Netflix, which has a first look deal with the company. It will be viewed by some as a power move in the battle for the princess's legacy. Kensington Palace has not confirmed. on how Prince William might mark the anniversary. So, Leo, unfortunately, in my view, this just means that the money-making circus around Diana is going to continue for a whole other year. Harry is leaking out this news at the time of all of the focus being on Earl Spencer's book, because he's wanting it to just become almost like a fatal complete. Oh yeah, of course Harry's making that TV series about Diana.

Well, actually, no, this is not one of those of course situations, Leo, because I remember very clearly 10 years ago when William and Harry made two documentaries to mark the 20th anniversary of Diana's death, one for the BBC, one for ITV. But they were made Leo on the express acknowledgement that that was it, that they were going to let their mother's memory rest at that point.

They were not going to turn the anniversaries into this sort of circus. But of course, a lot has happened in the past decade and all of a sudden, Harry, like his uncle, in great need of fast cash. Yeah, and that's such a clear motivator for this whole circus. What a terrible move, like long term for Harry to do this, to engage in this cynical cash grab

when he's got a real chance with the return to the UK and with the sort of the thawing of relationships between him and his father and the rest of the firm and the rest of the family, he's got a real chance of coming back, to the royal family and possibly playing a meaningful role. And instead, you know, he's still looking at this prize of being, you know, some sort of Hollywood star.

I'm not sure what the long-term plan is. Because, I mean, after this, that's it. That's all the, that's it. Every single bullet in his arsenal used up. You know, he's already written the book where he lays bare all his, all his problems with with his family. Now he's going to be, you know, flogging, flogging this dead donkey of a show. That's it. That's all he's got. Nobody's going to be wanting to watch his documentary about polo or, you know, whatever it is. So this is going to be a last lump of cash and I'm sure

they'll burn through it. And then they're going to be looking around for the next thing. I don't think it'll be there. I don't think people want to watch Megan arrange flowers around a tub of supermarket hummus on a cookery show. No, indeed. Well, do you know who definitely doesn't want to watch that? Your contemporary, Leo, the comedian Sharon Hogan, who had this to say when asked about the couple's move back to the United Kingdom.

As an Irish person, do you give a toss about Harry and Megan moving back to you? No, I couldn't give a buck. I think, Leo, there's probably a lot of people at home agreeing with her. Yeah, well, that cooking show, that cooking show, I mean, it was sort of hypnotic as something to watch. I said, how on earth did this get made? But, you know, this idea that success, I think people in the royal family and pretty girls like Meghan have this idea that, you know, success comes easy and drinks are free. And I've got to tell you, as a not particularly pretty Scotsman, man, Man, if you're not the Royals, you've got work for everything you get,

and the drinks are very expensive, and you've got to queue up to get them. So, yeah, life isn't going to be the bed of roses they want. And I think it's really distasteful for them to, for Harry to still be, still be trying to squeeze the last drops of money out of, you know, the corpse of his relationship with his family. Totally, totally. Well, look, Leo, I've actually nominated Earl Spencer as today's Union Jackass for lying about Pear's Morgan and the new book.

but he's facing stiff competition from your nominees. Rachel Marsh, she was the village idiot, the leftist in Piddington, and Nadia Hussein from the Great British Bakeoff, who criticised Ed Sharon as crying white tears for refusing to take a political stance on Gaza. These results are going to be very interesting. In third position, it is Rachel Marsh with 22% of the vote, but Earl Spencer hasn't won. He's the runner up with 26% of the vote.

of the vote. You're the winner, Leo, 52%. Going for Nadia Hussein as the worst Britain in the world to date. Who have you nominated for our greatest Britain though? So for the greatest Britain, I've nominated Ed Sheeran because I just think he's a nice guy. He might not have, you know, said everything that I would want him to say, mostly because I'd want him to say nothing and just sing the songs, which I think is what he really wants to do. But he's a nice guy. He tries to help his friends out. And, you know, he tries to bring joy into everyone's lives. He, you know, he's happy for everyone of any political background to come to his shows, for it to be a safe space away from, you know, the arguments around politics. And I just feel, you know, it's such a shame he's been

dragged into, dragged into this and forced to confront it when it's, it's not his job. Just let him sing his songs. Leo Kurs, thank you so much for being here today. Do make sure you subscribe to Leo's brilliant channel just by searching Leo Curse on YouTube. But we always love having you on Outspoken Leo. Thank you so much. There is so much more breaking royal news, though. We're heading over to Substack now, www. www.outspoken.com.

We're Princess Olga. Our new Royal Mastermind is standing by. She's got a lot to say about this. I hope to see you there. Otherwise, do hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Subscribe as a podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcast, or on Facebook. where there is exclusive content now, and I will be back with you tomorrow, 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9am Pacific.

Most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.