Dan Wootton Outspoken - KEIR STARMER'S WAR ON WHITE BRITONS EXPOSED AS PM REFUSES TO APOLOGISE OVER EL-FATTAH

Episode Date: January 5, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Slippery Starmer’s official war on white Britons is exposed, as our corrupted Prime Minister refuses to apologise for making importing anti-white racist Alaa Abd El-Fattah from Egypt his failed government’s top priority. But what hope do we have when even so-called conservative podcasters like Andrew Gold are now accepting that white people will become extinct. And with the truly cretinous Good Morning Britain host Adil Ray constantly promoted by Woke ITV despite propagating for the introduction of Sharia Law while now openly joking about hating white people, is it any wonder riots are now being predicted? Dan will expose Starmer’s sick war on whites in his Digest next. And then Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe – the man behind Outspoken’s viral Christmas message – joins us as the first live guest of the year. PLUS: The right wing breakfast war kicks off with Mike Graham going head to head with his former Talk TV BFF Jeremy Kyle and a new offering from the Lotus Eaters. Lauren the Insider will be here with her first day verdict. AND: Outrage as Prince Harry expects the British taxpayer to pay his security bill because he had a female stalker. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Meghan Markle’s Archewell charity scam and As Ever lies have finally been exposed in an astonishing double for the fake Duchess. We’ll team up with the Royal News Network for all the latest. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 397. And breaking right now, Slippery Stama's official war on white Britons is exposed, as our corrupted Prime Minister refuses to apologise for making importing anti-white racist a la Abdul Fata from Egypt, his failed government's top priority. Are you sorry that you wrote you were delighted that a British Egyptian actor? Al-Aabd al-Aubhattah was back in the UK when he'd previously said killing any colonialists, especially Zionists, was heroic. He also said there was no genocide against the Jews by the Nazis. Are you sorry you welcomed him back to the UK?

Those comments are abhorrent, and I condemn them utterly. So let's be really clear about that. As I made clear, I didn't know about those comments at the time of welcoming Al-Fata to this country. But what hope do we have when even so-called conservative podcasters like Andrew Gold? And now accepting that white people will become extinct. At some point, unfortunately, white people, and I count myself among them, will become a minority and will probably go extinct. And with the truly Christianist Good Morning Britain host, Adul Ray, constantly promoted by Wokai TV, despite propagating for the introduction of Sharia law, while now openly joking about hating white people, is it any wonder?

That riots are now being predicted. Sorry to interrupt, I'm from sitting where I'm sitting for 5,000 miles away most of the time. The country looks like a tinderbox, and I think you are one migrant assault, rape, incident away from a town going up in flames. You think that the issue of asylum hotels and all that is still very... It's really does look like it's simmering in a really nasty way.

I'll expose Starmers' six. war on whites in my digest next. And then restore Britain leader, Rupert Lowe, the man behind outspoken's viral Christmas message joins us as the first live guest of the year. Rupert's so great to have you here today. Thank you for the Christmas message. I mean, it went viral all across the world, in part, I think, because you actually delivered a message of hope to white British men who feel under attack. It is white. Well, first of all, good. evening and happy new year down that's the first thing to say um the the christmas message we were we were honored to be invited on by you and um i'm pleased to say we did it on the first take we we didn't

have to redo it so it one take wonder uh i think somebody criticized the christmas tree and said they could they could have done better but um that was that was the best fergolo brian had on office so that's the one we had but no i i i think the war as you talk about on not just white people but predominantly on white men, and it's the white young men, particularly who I've been talking about recently. I think they've had a very bad hand dealt to them. And the Me Too movement got far too powerful. It basically meant that women were put

at the top of every agenda, and men were effectively pushed to the bottom of the agenda. That doesn't matter whether you were young or old. In many ways, you know, I think, even myself, you know, I stopped putting myself up for non-exec directorships on the basis that they were now selected by quotas and you had no chance if there were women up against you. So it's really a war on white men and particularly white young men. And I, that is abhorrent and I think that's got to stop, which is why we've been outing it.

And I hope people who agree with me will echo that. Absolutely. We will speak much more about this Rupert and slippery Stama specifically. after my digest, so do stand by. I should stay, by the way, it is so great to be back live with you. I had an amazing time in New Zealand with my family over Christmas and New Year, of course, as ever the star of the proceedings was my three-year-old niece, my namesake, Ivy Dan, but it is so brilliant to be back because trust me, I've got even more to say than usual. I've been holding up the past fortnight. It's also coming up on today's show. The right-wing

Breakfast War kicks off with Mike Graham going head-to-head with his former Talk TV, BFF, Jeremy Kyle, and a new offering from The Lotus Eaters, Lauren the insider, will be here with her first-day verdict, an outrage, as Prince Harry expects the British taxpayer to pay his security bill because he had a female stalker. Then we're back live for the uncanceled after show, too, on Substack where Megan Markle's Archwell charity scam, and as ever lies have finally been exposed in an astonishing double for the fake Duchess. Royal News Network for all the latest over on Substack after the live show. It's also the first greatest Britain and Union Jackass of the year.

Brilliant nominees coming in from you. Thank you for them. John Soapal, first up, nominated by Real McCas, who says the Trump derangement syndrome in this fella triggered beyond belief and it's gorgeous. Bushra Sheikh, nominated by Scott Fly 23 for calling for Iran to build a nuke. And Femi Olawoli, nominated by Darren Donaldson for Post. Posting a TikTok about Brexit while doing shirtless pull-ups, revolting stuff. Welcome to 2026. This isn't weird at all. I promise you. It actually happened. Watch.

Younger people tend to vote for Remain against Brexit. That means that right now, the Brexit majority is literally dead. And there were 12 million people in poverty in the UK. Four million of them are children. I don't know about you. but I think that poverty now matters more than a dead majority from a decade ago. I'm sorry for putting you through that. I really am. The Brexit Virgin strikes again. If you do want to vote for him, as Union Jackass, I completely understand.

Keep your comments coming in for our first live show with the year. I will read out the best at the end today. But now, let's go. There was a dawning realisation for many over the Christmas break, something I've been telling you for months. There is now an official war on white people in the United Kingdom. The Egyptian, Allah Abdel Fata, calls white Brits dogs and monkeys. They don't suggest we should be killed, yet Sipri Stama makes his re-entry to the UK, his failed Labour government's top priority.

And this is something the MSM doesn't want to. to cover because they are part of this war. What else, explains the truly crissness Good Morning Britain host, Adul Ray, being constantly promoted by Wokai TV despite propagating for the introduction of Sharia law while openly joking about hating white people. This from the Gryft Report, who writes, Good Morning Britain presenter Adel Ray shares a clip of comedian Blank Peng on Channel 4's The Last Leg laughing it's really hard to make friends here because of the racism,

yet because I hate white people. The audience roars with laughter, but social media erupts because if this was reversed and said about any other group, it would be career-ending, hate speech. Critics blast the double standard. Anti-white bigotry, normalized on TV. Enough of the hypocrisy. Take a look at what Channel 4 broadcast. At the first in UK, I find it's really hard for me to make friends here because there are

racism. Yeah, because I hate white people. So, okay. So, of course, that's okay. And Adel Ray loves it, prompting Queen Natalie to write, when will Ray be held accountable? For sharing a clip of a comedian joking, I hate white people right after his sharia law controversy. ITV. Good morning, Britain. He's on your show daily in front of a mostly white audience. If roles were reversed, it would be instant sacking. Double standards and hypocrisy. We're sick of it. But this war on white people is now so widespread and baked in that even shills like Andrew Gold. And by the way, he's a left-wing guy, an ex-BBC guy, pretending to be conservative for money, openly accepting the extinction of white people as inevitable.

But those, that what you've just presented there would not reverse the demographic decline, would still become a minority in our homeland. At some point, unfortunately, white people, and I count myself among them, will become a minority and will probably go extinct. We are a worldwide minority already, which is why I take the radical stance that the English have the right to exist. We have the right to our own homeland. That everyone agrees on that, right? Yeah. That's the basis line.

I think so. I think that's the base. It depends what you mean by English. That's the issue. We already disagree on the meaning of English. So there's that. Okay, but ultimately, with the direction that the country's going, the future of our people is at stake, the most radical stance that we have to take to fix this is okay with me. I don't care what we have to do. I don't care who gets caught in the crossfires.

I don't care how much damage gets done along the way as long as the future of my people is secured. That's my line. This war on white people is why Stama admitted that bringing Allah Abdul Fattar back to the UK has been a top priority for his government. Now given this as a man who, as Adam Sellers pointed out, is a dual national due to his mother, never lived in Britain, allegedly tortures headquarters of political opponents, calls Brits dogs and monkeys, calls for police to be murdered, and wants to kill all Zionists,

it should be, as Sean McGuire argued, a red pill moment for the UK. Come on, it must be. It must be. It is time to wake the fuck up because this is the man Stama has made his top priority. These are his own words. Dear Zionists, please don't ever talk to me.

I'm a violent person who advocated the killing of all Zionists, including civilians. So fuck off. When Sam D asked him, consider killing athletes heroic, he replied, yes, I consider killing any colonialist and specifically Zionist heroic. We need to kill more of them. That was just the beginning. He also posted so the brilliant British dogs and monkeys really think terrorists will reveal their plans on Twitter. Fucking hate white people. They don't understand sharing or community. A blight on the earth they are. thing they stopped breeding. Police are not human. They don't have rights. We should just kill them all. Fuck off. Sounds like you need more fear. Random shooting of white males should convince

them racism cost lives. I'll switch to something else. Advocating killing police. Hating white people. Assassination. Plot. Dear international PhD student, by the way, I'm a racist, I don't like white people, so piss off. I must confess, I want a drone of my own. Promise. to only use it to shoot Zionist weddings? I mean, it goes on and on and on. And Stama is now pretending that he knew about none of this. But that is a lie. As Basil the Great asked, in 2022, Kirstarma literally raised the issue of Al Fata and claimed he was imprisoned for his social media posts. Yet in 2025, Stammer is claiming he knew nothing about his social media poses the Prime Minister lying to everyone again. Yes he is. Yes he is because here he was in

2022 watch. Can I start by raising the case of Allah Abdul Fattar? As the Prime Minister knows and has said, he's a British citizen jailed for the crime of posting on social media and been imprisoned in Egypt for most of the last nine years. He's been on hunger strike for the last six Now, the Prime Minister just said that he raised it with President C.C., could he tell us what progress he made in securing Allah's release? So he knew he was speaking about his social media posts back then. Yet yesterday, when mildly confronted by the British Bashing Corporation in a pathetically softball Laura Coonsberg interview, he refused to apologise. I mean, even just in the last few days, I wonder, are you sorry that you wrote you were delighted that a British Egyptian activist, Allah Abdel Fattah, was back in the UK when he'd previously said killing any colonialists, especially Zionists, was heroic. He also said there was no genocide against the Jews by the Nazis. Are you sorry you welcomed him back to the UK? Those comments are abhorrent, and I condemn them utterly. So let's be really clear.

about that. As I made clear, I didn't know about those comments at the time of welcoming Alfata to this country. But what I would say, just stepping back from it, Laura, is as you know, with consular cases, one of the jobs of the British government, all British governments, not just this British government, where someone is being treated in an improper way

in another country, if they're a British national, is to take action to try to alleviate that situation. And that's why I acted in this case. And actually previous Prime Ministers acted in exactly the same way in the actions they took to try to get him released, because that's what happens in consular cases. But it's almost impossible to understand that no one in the government had bothered to check what he'd said before, and then that the Prime Minister of this country says he's delighted to welcome somebody back who'd expressed those views. Are you sorry you did?

Well, of course I regret that, and your point that somebody in government should have known is one I've made myself to the appropriate team, because I do think I should have been made aware and I wasn't made aware. As Connor Tomlinson put it, this should be a resignation offence. Anyone else worried about the legitimacy of the state or even purely their legacy would recognise there's no salvaging a situation where you campaign for years

to bring a man who wished nuclear annihilation on white people into the country while imprisoning mums for social media posts last summer. The fact that Stama won't go willingly over this shows just how illegitimate, vindictive and detached the British state has become. They hate us and they don't even pretend otherwise any more. No, they don't. The elite class are at war with the British people. As Charlotte Gill uncovered, celebrities including Olivia Coleman, Carrie Mulligan, Mark Ruffalo and Rebecca Hall had actually read a prison essay.

say, by the anti-Semite, anti-white Abdul Fattar. Matt Goodwin retorted, I would like to see all these celebrities doing a sequel video in which they read out his tweets. Good point. Watch. Thousands of miserable creatures in Torah prison. Waiting for months, years sometimes, for judgments that never come. Will our cases never end? Forgotten by the world outside the prison walls. Everyone in the prison is pale and miserable, even the cats. Their movements slow, their eyes spent and broken. I fell asleep, convinced of my fate. How would I bear it? Then came Khalid. The next day I got a message and a photo. Love at first sight. Love at first photo. the prison and its walls and its cats all vanished everything vanished except my love for caled

and my joy at his arrival on the third day Khalid visited me it was a surprise Khalid visited me for half an hour i held him in my arms for ten minutes my god how come he's so beautiful love at first touch In half an hour, he gave me joy enough to fill the prison for a week. Now I understand why I'm in prison. They want to deprive me of joy. Now I understand why I will resist. Prison will not stop my love.

My happiness is resistance. Holding Khaled is continuing the struggle. You fools! suicidal faults. He hates you. He wants you dead. And you're campaigning for him. So no wonder there is now a fury that the MSM and the elite class refused to report what is really going on. A fury represented here by Alex Phillips, whose bag was stolen in Sadiq Khan's London last week. my parents moved here in the 60s to assimilate and to be British yeah they didn't move here for a cough they're in the world oh you're a monster you're a Nazi you're a racist you're a zen never be kind

fuck off be kind I didn't live 41 of my 41 years of my life working hard dragging myself up from a working class family to get where I am to pay this tax and my thanks is to be named called have my car bashed in groped mugged outpriced from the housing market fuck off that's how I That's how a lot of people out there are feeling. Yeah, we do. Yet that asshole Khan went on the BBC to parrot his absolute nonsense about diversity being our strength

without being challenged whatsoever. What tonight is about is togetherness showing that we think diversity is as strength, not a weakness. We think it makes us richer, not poorer. You know, it makes us, city that is the greatest city in the world and if if people have a problem with that that's that's their problem not ours and you'll see tonight along the River Thames

but across the country people celebrating our capital city so Sadiq he said some he described you as a disgusting mayor and it took Downing Street they had to actually say that they weren't slow in supporting you do you getting the type of support that you would hope given that kind of level of commentary I'm incredibly proud to live in a great city of London, but also a city where we don't just tolerate difference, we respect it, we embrace it, and we celebrate it. And the best support that you can ask for is from your fellow citizens. London is no, what it means to be a London. Londoners know that actually when people denigrate our city, when they try and talk down our city, it's because they're jealous.

And we can understand why some people don't like a multicultural, a progressive, a liberal, a successful city that is the most greatest city in the world, but the most successful city in the world as well. And you can understand why those who are maybe unhappy with diversity, maybe a nativist, maybe unilateralist, may want to talk down that great city. But as long as I'm there, we're going to carry them being proud of our diversity and proud of who we are.

No challenge to those disgusting lies. Indeed, the prospect of riots in this country is now so high because of the war on white people being ignored by people like the BBC something that terrified sly news to its core during an extraordinary piece

of television yesterday. Watch this. Really interesting one I want to end with. Actually, this generally surprised me. Here are seven things that people ask they thought were likely to happen. What do you think is the most likely thing? Riots?

Yeah, I think riots. Cyber attack. Hmm? Cyber attack disrupting UK infrastructure. Well, it's very interesting. Let's show. Public agree to you. Riots and cyber attacks.

That's quite gloomy. What do you think would provoke riots, Caroline? Well, I mean, I think that, you know, it takes something often unpredictable, like what we saw in Southport. I mean, you might say something like... From sitting from... Brexit and roll back not sorry to interrupt from sitting where I'm sitting for 5,000 miles away most of the time the country looks like a tinderbox and I think you are one migrant assault rape incident away from a town going up in flames you would you think that the issue of asylum hotels and all of that is still very very it's it is simmering in a really nasty way it is simmering in a really nasty way to rest

spond, Rupert Lowe is back. Rupert Lowe, you can just see those metropolitan elites reacting in horror to the real fury up and down the country, which Harry Cole of the sun, predicts, could lead to one of our towns, one of our cities burning down. But is it a surprise? when you look at those comments from Al-FATAR a million times worse than anything that Lucy Connolly ever posted,

she ended up in jail, he ends up being the prized possession of Stama's government. Well, first of all, Dan, let me say, I love Britain the way it used to be, and like everybody else, I intend to do my damnedest. to make sure that we protect a country which basically has a proud history. It's got the most fantastic people.

It's a high trust society. And it's definitely worth trying to restore, which is why we've set up Restore Britain. I think it's incredible. I find myself even agreeing with Laura Coonsberg that it's incredible that Stama and whoever advises him were unaware of those social media posts. which, as you quite rightly point out, they sent Lucy Conley to prison for less. And she actually deleted hers. Hers were basically done in the heat of the moment and she rescinded them.

I think we all want to try and avoid any form of rioting or physical violence if we can. Of course. But I think it's time now for the British people to actually stand up and make their attitude. make their opinions clear. And I think that is starting to happen. I agree the British establishment have not protected our interests well. You've spoilt at the beginning of my new year

by showing me a picture of the Pakistani Muslim rape gang denier, Sadiq Khan, who ultimately will not be honest with Susan Hall when she asks him questions at the London Assembly. He is completely wrong about London. London is becoming a city which is, very difficult to live in. As you probably know, my wife had her headlights stolen out of a car, which I gather is common now because people are stealing them to grow drugs. We've got people's phones being stolen. Alex Phillips had her bag stolen. I mean, look, it's the tip of the iceberg.

And when you report a crime, you get a crime number and that's the last you hear of it. So there's no incentive for people not to commit crime. So I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, love Britain. I think we've suffered from this progressive post-war view that diversity and multiculturalism are good, which, you know, and I'm not against targeted immigration, limited targeted immigration if it's going to improve the standard of living for the majority of people, but this untargeted mass legal and illegal immigration from countries which don't understand our culture, don't respect our culture as you very elegantly laid out this evening, actually very often hate us and want to do us harm. Unlike many of the Arab countries,

we haven't yet outlawed organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood, and we haven't started to actually deal with radical Islam. I think it's time for members of the Islamic community, who aren't radical to stand up and actually criticize those people who are radical. I don't think enough of that happens, largely because they're frightened of the, whatever it is, 10%, 15% of Muslims who are radicalized. And, you know, when we look at this Egyptian character, he is probably just the tip of the iceberg, Dan. There are many other people like him.

Totally. He is a dual now. remember. And they all fought to bring him back here, having ignored all that hate and vile and bile that he poured out on social media. And my colleague, Connor Tomlinson, is quite right when he, the way he summarized it. So if I was in charge, I would be rescinding his British citizenship. I would be sending him back to Egypt. And I would be basically, informing the Egyptians that if they try to stop in returning, I will be using every lever of power at my fingertips, including rescinding the foreign aid that we spew around the world as if we're still a vibrant economy, rather in the days, like in the days of the Victorians, when actually we're now a defunct welfare economy that is not actually promoting enterprise, it is not growing businesses, it is basically living on its reputation.

So it's time for everybody to stand up and fight for Britain, if they believe in it, and fight for it in a way which basically makes clear to this malign establishment that we've had enough and we're not going to put up with any more. The problem is that the electorate actually, because they have such a limited choice of what I call establishment stooges on the race card, they actually elected Labour and gave them a very big majority. And I couldn't agree with you more on Keir Starmer. I think he's, well, we know he's a Fabian society member. We know he's a Haldane society member.

We know that he's basically a Pabloist. His mother was basically a Trotsky, a lady who's imbued him with all this extreme left-wing nonsense, which we know fails throughout history. It's always failed in the past and it'll fail again. He's not honest with the British people. He is, I think, rapidly. becoming seen for what he is, which is effectively, in my view, a cheap scape liar.

So we need some proper leadership. We need some people who are going to put the British people at the top of the agenda, who aren't frightened of making bold decisions. And whilst I think the decision Trump made on Venezuela is a high-risk play, what it shows you is this is the return of Railpolitik. And Railpolitik, in my view, it's time for a bit of. rail politic after, I think, this post-war sort of human rights, rules-based society, which in my view is just promoted organized crime. It's promoted degeneration, and it's not

actually looked after the interests of the British electorate. And I think, to some extent, the American electorate, too, if you look at what the Democrats have done over there. Totally. And this war on way... So that's my take on it. And I don't think we should be I mean, I don't think we should be in any way frightened of stating what we all think. And the more of us who state it, the more power it's going to have, as I've always said, challenge these wretched knowns who now run local government, local councils. I mean, Parliament, as I've told you before, is dysfunctional. You've got people in Parliament who don't understand the consequence of the rules that they pass every day

on the British people and the licensing and the regulation and all of the people who don't do anything, they try and tell other people how to do things and regulate other people and actually feast on their backs. So I think we've got a state that I've said, as I've said in the past, it is now the enemy of the people when it's supposed to be serving the people.

So it's up to the people now to act in huge numbers and make it clear to everybody that they're not going to put up with it. They are the electorate. And just look at what he's doing with the EU, Dan. We had a majority of British people. Well, I wanted to show you this actually. June 16 voted to leave the EU.

The establishment didn't want that, so it didn't respect the boss's decision. And now we're being slipped back into this failing post-war socialist dung heap, as I call it, which frankly, you know, the British people didn't want. It's not the right place to be. And what we need to do is free ourselves of all this socialism and actually follow what is in the interests of our country

and entreat with those parts of the world that are still growing, that are still investing, that still believe in normality, and actually have a vibrant and growing middle class who want to do better for themselves. Instead, we've got this mature bunch of what I call organized criminals who are feeding on the back of the productive members of society and quietly killing off productive Britain, which in the end will all pay the price for. 100%. And it was made very clear yesterday that Stama is taking us back in. But this war on white people also spreads to the mainstream media. How do you think ITV should deal with this bloke who clearly hates. white people, Rupert. I mean, he reposted I Hate White People, which was an act from this

foreign comedian given a platform on Channel 4. Now, you just know, Rupert, if any white comedian dared included in their act, a line that they hate all black people or hate all Asian people, they would be immediately thrust out, cancelled. When it comes to Adul Ray, He's also someone who has tried to normalize Sharia law. Should ITV continue employing this guy? What does it say about them that they do keep promoting him? Well, we are still a white majority country, Dan, and it is not acceptable to have somebody who clearly hates those people who he's presenting to.

And my advice to him would be to sugar off. to somewhere where he feels happy, where there is Sharia law, and go and actually preach to them, but leave us alone. The last thing we need is people like him spreading bile and vile and hate amongst the majority of British people. We don't need that, and I think, frankly, it's extremely poor of ITN to have him anywhere near them. I mean, why would you?

Why would you? You know, I don't understand it. But then our establishment, as we know, and our mainstream media is riven with people who seem to support this, led by, of course, the British Broadcasting Corporation, which is a malign monopoly, which ultimately, as we've seen on many occasions, is not representing what I call logic, fairness and the interests of the British people. it again it spews that misinformation as we've seen and it's supposed to be acting with integrity and it's supposed to be broadcasting basically supposed to educate educate entertain and and do it with complete and utter impartiality which it just doesn't do we all know that the whole of britain knows that so i i think the answer is no he shouldn't be broadcasting go and broadcast in a Muslim country, if that's what he believes in. Don't do it here.

Then, Rupert, though, you've got Bushra Sheikh. An individual who, again, seems to despise our country, despise Christianity, is an Islamist who wants Britain to become an Islamist country. And yesterday she posted on X, fuck it, build that nuke, Iran. That prompted Lee Harris to write, this is absolutely disgusting. Imagine supporting an evil murderous Islamist regime that kills its own people and wants to destroy us. If she isn't already, this utterly vile woman needs to be on a terrorist watch list. What do you make of that from Bushra Sheikh, Rupert Lowe? Someone who, again, is platformed constantly and consistently in the mainstream media,

including on Channel 4 and Wokai TV. I mean, we've been treated with her, as you can probably imagine, Dan, on X, quite a lot. I mean, she's clearly hugely misguided. And if she really believes what she's talking about, go and live in Iran and try peddling the same nonsense there. And I don't think she'll find she'll last very long. So these people come to our country, as I say, where we have this very high trust, rules-based society, relies on trust. And, you know, then we bring in these people who hate us, who spread all this nonsense. And I, again, over Christmas, you've probably been seeing the fraud that's going on

in Minnesota amongst the Somali population out of that. Absolutely. It's absolutely astounding, Dan. And I think these cultures have a completely different view of life to us. They don't have the same conscience that we have. They don't have the same respect for each other that we have. They're far more brutal towards each other than we are. They treat women in an entirely different way, which again, I've always said, I'm frankly flabbergasted

that the Me Too movement doesn't out and highlight this every day because it's just unacceptable. And I think for these people who try and tell us how to live our lives, I say, do you go and live where you feel you should be? Don't come and put to pollute our country. We don't want this change. We are basically proud of our history. We're

an Anglo-Saxon nation. We've done a hell of a lot throughout the world, even if the Hermers and Starmers and the Human Rights Brigade like to criticize what we've achieved over our history. I'm proud of it. I think Britain, you know, we stop the slave trade. We have a proud history of intervening in wars in Europe to bring peace. Again, I get irritated by the EU who doesn't respect what we've done for them in the past. You know, we've intervened against Napoleon to bring peace to Europe. After Waterloo, we could have invaded Europe. We've never wanted to do that. We're an extremely long-headed, enlightened and decent people. But the problem is, Dan, that if you are too decent and you're too enlightened, people take advantage of you. And that

ultimately is what is happening now. And we have to put our foot down. We have to, we have to start to take note of what Trump is doing. I think there are going to be a lot of these human rights based operators who believe in in these, this rule rules based global society that's become corrupt. Not only has the sort of underlying strata become corrupt. I think a lot of the judiciary in our country is corrupt, probably the judiciary in America, some of them are corrupt. If you start to get corruption amongst your judiciary, you get a spread of really sort of vile dishonesty in the same way that you do in communist countries

where the only quality or qualification you need to survive is to be a very good liar. And I think we're sort of going the same way. You've got examples of the state now growing on the back of the private economy. I had an example today. We've had a state body that's going around offering far higher wages than the private sector on short-term contracts.

It's attracting good staff. So all they're doing effectively is driving up the wages for the private sector and making people struggle more and more to make profit and employ people. And at the same time, they tell us that they're working for the, that they're doing well for the working mammal. They're not. They're actually distorting our economy on a massive scale because the state's got too big. So, look, I mean, there's a lot wrong, and we've all got to do our bit.

A few people are not going to be able to change this, Dan. It's got to be a popular movement of the majority that actually says it's had enough. And that's the only way I can see that we can do this peacefully, which I hope we can. It's far from certain that with so many injustices happening across the country to so many people, there always is a danger that, you know, a spark goes into the firework box and we get a problem. But that doesn't serve any of us well. Well, no. But I do think Parliament's got to lift itself out of this undemocratic mire.

Power's got to be returned to the MPs. They've got to be the ones making the decisions. They've got to be the ones held to account if they make wrong decisions. We've got to stop people hiding behind. Whangos, hiding behind regulators, hiding behind faceless bureaucrats. And if you're going to go into politics, it's time for people to start taking responsibility. If you make good decisions, you are making good decisions for the British people. They will support you.

If you make bad decisions, which we see these people making every day, then they should be fired, like they would be in a private sector business, which actually relies on making money every year in order to employ people and pay its way and pay taxes. So look, let's just get back to a bit of normality. I have the greatest respect to the country. I love it. But I'm worried. And I said to people, we've got to do this down by 29,

and we've got to start doing it right now. It's not a start now. It can't wait. It can't. And especially, Rupert, given the violence is coming from the left. And there was a shocking example of this. over the weekend. So you posted something completely innocuous and positive, happy New Year Patriots, who could have an issue with that, or someone called Khalid did have a massive issue

with that, writing, I hope you get Charlie Kirk. Now, you posted after that threat, let's be honest, death threat. Lucy Connolly went to prison. Let's see what happens to you. Lucy herself responded, we know the answer to that. Basil the Great suggested this was an example of two-tier justice. And Lawrence Fox added, if the CPS do nothing about this but will lock up a white British woman for a tweet, then the CPS is institutionally racist against the very people it is bound by law to protect. Once the great institutions of state are captured and used for political lens,

you might as well leave the civilized world and move to Mogadishu. At least the weather is better there. And I mean, it is a astonishing route, but isn't it? Because we know nothing's going to happen to this guy. We know nothing's going to happen to Khalid, who has just suggested a political assassination against your good self.

Well, I probably had now, and again, this is the problem with standing up for, you know, people in this country. You do get death threats. I think I've had nine or ten of them now. Each time, this is probably the worst one in terms of, you know, what happened to Charlie Kirk is just, was unacceptable. We don't know who killed him. Candice Owens, as you know, has got some strong views on that. It arguably, the story is it wasn't the person they say it was. to wish the same on me that happened to Charlie Kirk on social media. And then I think delete your account, which he did.

We've reported him to Parliament. We've reported him to the police. I've heard nothing more so far. Parliament basically so far has given me no extra security. We've reported it each time. And at the end of the day, MPs are trying to. to, I think, do a good job for the country. And particularly people like me,

I think it's in the interests of Parliament and in the interests of all the people. The issues like this are dealt with and the people who spread this sort of stuff, first of all, aren't treated differently to somebody like Lucy, who's become a very good friend. You probably know we, she'd been in my office.

I did a podcast with her. I think she was very badly treated. Had she had better legal advice, I don't think she would have ever gone to prison and I blame the CPS for that, but we know the CPS is part of the, it's another arm of the state. You know, so I march on.

I think you've got to do what you think is right. If you put yourself, you know, in the firing line in politics, you're always going to get some of this. I got it when I was at Southampton. I got a few death threats. But, you know, there are plenty of people who are bad hats out there. and you've just got to hope that none of them do something stupid, but posting this sort of rubbish and this sort of vileness is unacceptable.

And I honestly hope that police do do something. I'm not holding my breath, Dan. And equally, so far, the only concession parliaments made is, why don't you use taxes rather than the tube? Well, I actually find the tube more convenient, so I'm still continuing at the moment to use the tube. But, you know, I don't really know what else to say. I've reported it.

If they do nothing, I think they're failing in their duty. But they've been doing that now for probably 18 months that I've been in Parliament. Well, we will keep on it. We will keep on it. Rupert Lowe, we absolutely need you. Thank you for being our first live guest of 2026. Thank you, too, for delivering the first annual outspoken Christmas message,

which was viewed by millions across the globe. And let's just say, went down a hell of a lot better than the Christmas message delivered by our king. Happy New Year, Dan, to you and all your listeners and viewers. So it's a pleasure to be here. I'm honored to be on. And let's hope I think 26 is going to be a lively year, actually, after the way in which Donald Trump started it, I, you know, there are downside risks to that. We've got, you know, now rail politique and with rail politic comes sometimes volatility and, and sometimes aggression.

So let's hope again, it all is kept in check and it's done in a sensible way. But the problem is once the cat's out of the bag, that isn't always the case. But it's going to be a lively year, I think. As I said in my post, stay long of precious metals. I think they're going up. Indeed. Rupert Lowe, thank you so much. Happy New Year to you. And by the way, Tommy Robinson will be here on tomorrow's show. But now, Lauren the Insider joins us. Breaking today, Axt Talk TV host Mike Graham has taken the first blood in the right-wing breakfast war between. his new independent venture, the Mike Graham show, Talk TV's new breakfast offering led by Jeremy Kyle, and a rival show for the base of us out there presented by Bo of the Lotus Eaters. All three shows launched this morning. All three shows went head to head. Here's a taster

of how they introduced themselves to viewers. Good morning and welcome to the first ever Mike Graham show. Breakfast at Tiffany's. Actually, it's not at Tiffany's obviously, is it? It's in London. I'm delighted to say that at 7 o'clock, we are live. And this is the first ever live breakfast show for the Mike Graham show. Morning. You're all right? It is Monday a morning, the 5th of January in the year of our Lord, 2006. And it is the inaugural breakfast with Bo. The Bo Show. Very good morning to you. Welcome along.

Yes, it is the brand new Jeremy Cow breakfast show on the Home of Common Sense. And more importantly, my friends, as we enter a new year, it is, of course, as ever the home of alarm clock Britain. This is your show. This is your station. It's where you come to talk. Common Sense prevails. And as ever, happy new year. It's freezing cold. The world is as messed up as it was 14 years ago. Well, look, Talk TV might attempt to put that approach to viewers, but we know after their cancellation of Mike Graham that they are not a free speech channel, that they are not a common sense channel, and viewers in a sign of what is happening in terms of the broader independent media revolution made their choice in their droves, with Mike Graham securing numbers about five times that of his former employer, which is quite astonishing. How did he do it. Well, he did it by mocking Slippery Stama and making it clear that he won't stick to the MSM agenda. Watch. We've got our own little studio here. We've got a little bee-boosy kind of a kitchen

arrangement. You can see some coffee cups. You can see some water. We're going to be talking about a great many things, of course. We're not going to bore you to death about Venezuela because, you know, that story is all very good, all very well, but, you know, it doesn't affect us. Apart from him called Keir Stama, who doesn't have a clue what to do about it. I want to have all the facts before I make a decision. Can you imagine if Starm was in charge

during Second World War trying to organize D-Day, right? You'd be like, yeah, first we must have an inquiry as to whether or not it's safe to go across the channel. I mean, what is completely... It's a knob. I'm sorry.

I think I could say that's not a terrible word. Knob's right, isn't it? Meanwhile, Talk TV was proving that it remains a pro-reform UK, anti-Starmer outlet, but it's very much within a particular space. Its guests were Richard Tice and his fiancé is of a logg's shot watch. To the right to the right from a prime minister who got elected talking quite centrist and is going to the left, to the left, to the left. Right, apparently, a reformed government

will be a right-wing proposition. It will cause toxic division. It will be a disaster. Thank you for bringing common sense. Every bloody day, Keith Stalin, and his party of lying idiots, do something else to destroy democracy in my country. He's doing his best to rejoin the EU,

letting dangerous terrorists in, building council houses for illegal migrants. Rachel Thieves is on about more tax rises to fill another fictitious black hole and Lammy, enough said, the list is endless. We need to get them out now. This country is on life support and Ed Milit Pratt is turning the power off.

That's an unbelievable text message, isn't it? Does that not sum up what we're doing in this? But actually, the most interesting offering for me, by far was Bo, Bo Dade of Lotus Eaters, who I think is going to become a fascinating voice in the morning. He truly represents the alternative space. Watch.

Because it's the first episode, I'll just do a little bit of preamble just to let you know what we're going to do. And this will probably change over the first few days, weeks, even months, probably tweak it here and there. Things that don't really work will drop and start trying new things, see what people like, see what people don't like, see what I'm comfortable with. But to begin with, we'll go through the papers, the front pages of the papers in Britain. we'll have a look at a few different websites, you know, BBC, Channel 4, the mail online, whatever, all those sorts of things. Some days are going to be quite slow news days where there's nothing seismic has particularly happened and all the papers will go with all sorts of different things and the news cycle

will be sort of all over the shop and then some days it's going to be dominated by one thing, you know, if there's one massive thing that happened the previous day, obviously the news cycle in that morning will be dominated by the thing. Oh, absolutely. But that's when you make your money, Beau. And actually, that's when people like you were great, when there is no major mainstream breaking news because we've got a country to save,

and I think you did a very good job. But Lauren, the insider, who is our outspoken media expert, has been casting her eye over all three. shows this morning. Lauren, the viewer's verdict was that Mike Graham came out a clear winner with numbers even higher than his former employer Talk TV. What did you think? So I think it's great there's been a win for independent media, but I just don't trust Mike Graham now. I'm sorry, I'm just going to say it. When Mike Graham left Talk and he was cancelled, I really, really wanted him to do well. And look, I'm sure he will do well. He has a core fan base.

But for me, he doesn't seem like someone who is truly independent. He seems like someone that has been cancelled, has quickly set up a YouTube channel, but is still consuming the mainstream media. And I say this, Dan, because the comments he made regarding Tommy Robinson recently, I found utterly shocking. And I know we'll come on to that later, but I had bigger hopes for Mike Graham, if I'm being honest, and it just didn't offer me anything. I thought the production values were low. ironic that I'm sat here in my spare room with Dunnell and wallpaper saying that, I know, but I expected more. It didn't capture me. It didn't feel riveting or new. I was quite disappointed with it.

Well, before we come to the other two shows, given you have referenced Mike and Tommy Robinson, for those of you who may have missed it, this is what went down over the past few days. Mike went on another independent show and said, Tommy Robinson is a horrible little wanker and I'm never going to change my views, suggesting that he should even be awarded plank of the decade. Now, Maya Tusi of the very successful Tusi TV suggested that Mike Graham's war on Tommy Robinson

is continuing for only egotistical reasons. Mike then responded to Tusi, writing, Hey, Maya, you used to call me the godfather of free speech. You know I gave you your start. Tommy is a complete charlatan, and you know it, happy to discuss with you, but war, it ain't FFS. When Jay Sunshine wrote, you're picking the wrong battles, Mike said, I'm not picking them up. They are.

Jay went on, regardless of I were you, I would stay away from this argument. It will justify your audience. You need your supporters. And then Tommy himself weighed in, writing, you rubbish a sexual assault against an eight-year-old child close to me, which is why I think you are a cunt. It was sick and out of order. And this was the interview with Mike that sparked all of that debate watch. Right.

Last one. Tommy Robinson. Oh, Tommy Robinson. Thank of the decade. Well, I'm sure he'd love me to say something terrible about him because he seems to feed off the fact that, you know, he wants me to apologize to him or debate him or something, you know, and all of his mates are constantly saying, so sorry to Tommy, you know, you've called him names. Well, the last time I saw him on social media talking about, he called me a pedo.

He's called me all sorts of other nasty names. I don't really mind, you know, doesn't bother me. I don't like the guy. I think he's a horrible little wanker. And I'm never going to change my view. You can support the movement without having to a... Well, it's not really a movement. This is the movement appears to exist in order for him to go and live in Spain,

drive around in Bentley's with $13,000 with a cash in his pocket, which he claims he's putting in, you know, he's the guy's a grifter. And, you know, I don't object to what he does, but I object to what he pretends to be, I would say that. He doesn't really tear. He means he talks about being a patriot. He doesn't even live here. Yes.

Neither do is the most loyal supporters. No, most of them all have moved away and lived. somewhere else don't pay tax you know don't do um you know don't do anything which is in any way relatable to to what ordinary people's lives are like in this country and he sort of flies in every now and against her a rally um and he's got a lot of support and you know good luck to him but you know he's quite capable of looking after himself and i'm never going to debate it because what's the point no it's just further divide people anyway but i wouldn't even give him the honor of becoming a plank of a decade to be honest all right well that's a little wild card well Tommy

will be here on outspoken tomorrow to respond. But, Lauren, now that people have seen Mike's comments for themselves, over to you. Okay, so I am not a spokesperson for Tommy, but I feel really adamant to speak out about this because Mike is just parroting the distorted mainstream narrative. I was sat in court. I saw what the reporters were omitting from their copy. the whole Bentley story, the cash story.

This shows me that Mike Graham, he's being cancelled, he's come out, set a YouTube up, and now he's trying to be all like, I'm free speech, I'm one of you. Well, you're not because you're still digesting mainstream bullshit. And to say that, you know, there is no movement, and Tommy's a grifter, why doesn't Mike Graham say that to some of the people

I met at Unite the Kingdom, like the mother who had to rest, her daughter from a grooming gang, where the council had failed and covered it up, or perhaps a young girl who had been taken away from her family and raped. It's disrespectful, it's rude and it's ignorant, and it also is an absolute kick in the face to millions of patriots who truly believe in this movement and we are doing it peacefully and we are doing it together. But for Mike Graham to be so ignorant, to to speak like that.

You know, it sounded like he had his head up Pierce Morgan's ass. What did you make of Jeremy Kyle's debut over on talk? I mean, the figures have tanked, Lauren, completely tanked. Talk viewers have made their choice. And they're not sticking with the station, they're moving to Mike. Yeah. Well, I think Jeremy's viewers tanked because it's nothing new. They claim to be the home of free speech, but evidently they're not because they cancelled Mike Graham.

So you can't truly be claiming to be the home of free speech when you are owned by Rupert Murdoch, who has shaped political agendas for over half a century. So it's not free speech at all. There is a pre-decided news agenda there. And I believe people are rapidly waking up to that. You know, it was a huge mistake for talk losing Mike. And there is not that loyalty with the station. So his viewers have gone with him. And I love that.

Despite the fact not liking, you know, Mike Graham's ignorance, I do love the fact that people have supported him and are championing free speech and independent news broadcasters. Yeah, it's the view. It is absolutely the future and I like to think that here on outspoken, we have provided a blueprint for broadcasters who have the balls to go independent. You can do it. You can break free of your corporate shackles. Be brave. Don't wait to be cancelled. You will. I mean, if you're prepared to tell the truth, you will be cancelled. And this is the problem when you look at all of those presenters, my former colleagues at GB News, who are not prepared to risk their jobs so they don't say a word, for example, about Tommy Robinson, Lauren, I think just have the guts to break free because it's not worth it. It's not worth your silence to keep your corporate job.

And I hope what I have been able to prove on outspoken and what I hope Mike will be able to prove is that you've got a better future ahead, actually, if you do leave the corrupted mainstream media. And I do include my former employers at GB News and Talk TV in that category now. They have changed. They have given it. And you can say it's because of advertiser pressure or whatever or off communist pressure, whatever it is. But they have changed. They are no longer free speech networks. Look at their cancellations of people like Rupert Lowe and Ben Habib. Katie Hopkins. Yeah.

But I do think when you come into the free speech independent arena, grifters can be seen very, very quickly. And I, you know,

I just wonder with Mike, I'm not calling him a grifter, but I have reservations because you have to do the work. If you've come from mainstream media and been part of that toxicity, you have to put the time in

and learn what you have done wrong. And only then, I believe, should you be able to bring unfiltered news to people? Because we know how warped it is, Dan, and how you come from a pre-decided agenda. And the very fact that Mike Graham has not watched silence, does not understand that the kind of foundation of what is going on, that just sets my alarm bells off. And regarding, you know, Jeremy Kyle, saying it's the home of free. speech. Well, when was Katie Hopkins on? When was Rupert Lowe, Ben Habib? Like you said, you either bring

people the news or you bring them propaganda. And this is why, I know I say it, and I'll make you blush, Dan, but this is why, outspoken, for me, is the only channel that brings people the news because you don't filter it. Like, you would even have a lefty on here, you know, you would. 100%. But I was very excited actually by Lotus Eaters getting into this breakfast. TV market. I think they're great. I think they are truly independent. What did you make of the debut of breakfast with Bo, which is the live show? This is going to be new for them. So it will take a while to build. But I thought it was a really interesting launch. And I'm quite excited by it. Yeah, I really loved it. I thought the production values were miles above the other two. But what I loved about it was

the realness. And I think that's what Patriots will really love about it. He was very honest. He said, look, this is the preamble. It might change. Some days there will be slow, there'll be a slow news agenda. Some days it will be busy. And I just love the fact he is speaking to people directly. You know there's no corporate funders pushing a narrative there. And Bo has previously been outspoken, but in a really eloquent and diligent way. This is the one I'm most excited about. And I think it's brilliant to be able to offer people truly independent news at breakfast time. And I really, really wish both all the success

because I think this show, the viewers will grow with this show and it's a really, really exciting addition to the independent landscape. Okay, I am utterly furious about this. I cannot believe it. Prince Harry has been able to, I believe, manipulate his father, manipulate a hard-left labor government and an Islamist home secretary, and he is going to make you, you the British taxpayer, me, the British taxpayer,

pay for his security, and indeed pay for his paranoia. Because that's what it is. Harry wasn't under threat on his last visit as he claims. He had a female fan who had traveled the world to see him. God knows why, especially with those balling locks. God knows why. But for some reason, this female fan travels all over the world to get close to Prince Harry. There she is. A black woman, it seems.

He has many who do travel, including to Africa, to be with him, have never threatened him physically, have never had any weapons on them, have never threatened to shoot him or to bomb him or to do anything like that. But this has now been used by Harry's team in order to secure government funded security, armed security, any time he wants to come here. And by the way, the only reason he wants to come here, and everyone needs to realize this, is because his career has come. collapsed in the United States of America. Megan Markle's dream of becoming a Hollywood billionaire in America has collapsed. It's over.

The staff are leaving. The rats are abandoning this sinking ship. So Prince Harry has now come up with a fake story about a female stalker in order for us to have to cough up for him to visit our country when we don't even want him here. Remember, he accused us all of being racist. Do you remember that? It's an unbelievable situation and we're going to get into what it really means with Lauren the insider imminently. But first, I want to take you through this new reporting from Charlotte Griffiths in recent months. She has become the propagandist in chief for the Sussexes in the mail on Sunday over the weekend, where she revealed that

the stalker scare means he is now nailed on to be given armed police guards for UK visits. It's honestly so infuriating. We're paying for this? Why? But Charlotte Griffiths writes, Prince Harry has won his fight for automatic taxpayer-funded armed police protection when he visits the UK,

according to sources close to the Sussexes. A ruling in the Duke's favour expected to be announced within weeks could allow for a reunion between King Charles and his grandchildren, Archie and Lily, who live in the US. Sources close to the Sussexes told the mail on Sunday that the reinstatement of armed security has been assured after a fresh risk assessment was carried out for the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, Ravik. They said it's now a formality. Sources at the Home Office have indicated that security is now nailed on for Harry.

Harry was provided with police protection for only one day on a trip to the UK for a children's charity event. A female stalker who had previously made threats online, okay, let's see the evidence of that, please, was able to access a secure zone there. Harry was said to have felt abandoned two days later without police protection when the same woman got within a stone's throw of him at another engagement and attempted to approach him. It fell to a member of the Duke's private staff who was ex-army to step in and protect him. Well, protect him from what? Protect him from what exactly? because unless she was armed, I think this was just a crazy fan because you'd have to be goddamn crazy to travel all over the world

to see Prince Harry, so I agree with that. The article goes on, his timely intervention where he managed to body-block the woman was one of several security lapses that were included as evidence to be flagged to the Risk Management Board which advises Ravik. According to sources, Risk Management Board members have now decided that the Duke does meet the threshold for protection, leaving Ravik with little choice but to approve his request. As a source said on Saturday, the only thing that could scup his approval now would be an intervention from the palace. That, however, seems increasingly unlikely given signs of reprosh mon between the Duke and his father.

Charles is said to be very keen to meet his Californian-based grandchildren on home soil again. The king last met Archie and Lily when they visited the UK as part of the late Queen Elizabeth II's Platton Jubilee celebrations in February 22. At that time, Archie was two and Lily was six months old. A source close to the Sussex has said we aren't taking anything for granted. Obviously, given he's the king's son, it's the right thing to do. But it's about everyone being able to save face, and the Risk Management Board is the common sense way to do that. If you knew about the kind of threats Harry and his children have been getting, then you would understand why he doesn't want to bring the kids over until police protection is granted.

Megan is not expected to join Harry on a visit to the UK next month when he is set to give evidence in a court case involving associated newspapers. A spokesman for the Sussex has said we can't comment on security matters, a government spokesman said the UK government's protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals' security. Well, I'm sorry, I'm calling bullshit on this. I'm calling bullshit on this. I don't think the stalker provided any threat to Harry. I don't think there has been any clear and present threat to Harry because if there were, he would have had police protection. That is the reality. When there was a terror threat against Taylor Swift,

she received full armed police protection. The same thing should apply to Prince Harry. He shouldn't have it guaranteed so that he can come to this country and prance around as if he's a royal again when he's made it very clear that he hates everything the royal family is about and he hates everything that this country is about. And as for the stalker, I remember, according to Taz, who posted they never once mentioned a stalker in all of their interviews,

then one miraculously starts turning up only in the UK when his demands for security shut down. It was a set-up, in my opinion, Harry will be given guards for UK, visits insiders claim, well, that's ridiculous. Let's also not forget the Sussex Camp also say a lot of things that doesn't make it true. And the Royal News Network made a very good point here. If Prince Harry does win his taxpayer-funded security back,

He will be even less popular than he already is, along with his wife and kids. There's no appetite for Harry in the UK, nor does Megan want to go back. This will not fix his marriage or his issues within the royal family. It also, again, highlights the overall problem with Harry and Megan, which is royalty versus celebrity. Is the stalking the direct result of the royal family or simply a byproduct of being famous? A lot of famous people and even not famous people or internet famous people have stalkers. Where is the line? Because if the reasoning is just that he has a stalker, I would imagine that every celebrity with the same problem should be afforded the same taxpayer courtesy.

Lauren the insider, I'm absolutely livid about this decision, absolutely livid. I think this is a left-wing government being snookered by Harry. I understand why Prince William will be ropeable about it. They all warned Harry that he would lose his security. what he is unfortunately proving, Lauren, is if he just continues to moan, continues to whine, continues to lie, he'll get what he wants.

And it's so wrong. There are never any repercussions for Harry. He behaves in the most atrocious way. And we're all outworking. And then, oh, there you go. There's our tax money, right. So we'll fund it. Oh, and we'll fund, you know,

all the illegal migrants coming over. And then we'll all probably crash our cars because there's so many potholes, if you live anywhere like me, it's an utter disgrace. But with this piece, Dan, when I read it, my alarm bells went off. Do I think it was leaked to potentially hold King Charles, you know, over a barrel? Yes, but the very fact the mail on Sunday run this, they are in dangerous territory because this steps into denotis territory. And that means that when there is a story about safety or national security or a story involving the home office, media are sometimes issued a denotis so they can't run it.

So the very fact, the mail on Sunday run this story and Harry is suing Associated newspapers who own the mail on Sunday. He is in the high court with them on the 14th of January, which means he will land here at the latest on the 13th of January. which means he will land here at the latest on the 13th of January. To me, I believe that the Sussex's team would have had to show some form of proof to the mail on Sunday. Because the spotlights on the mail on Sunday, yes, we know they run puff pieces. But this, the reason this wasn't a typical puff piece is because it includes the home office, it includes Revec and those kind of things. So for me, I believe Harry has had an early indication because the very fact that he will land in a matter of days in the country, everything will be in place for, you know, his flight, his cars, his travel. So that's why I believe the mail on Sunday on this occasion would have seen some proof.

And I also, I did a live about it. And then afterwards, I thought, well, I'll check because, you know, I'll have a sounding. board. I put a call into a contact within the palace. And they also believe that this was, you know, the mail on Sunday would have had to seen proof of this. Yeah, indeed. I mean, as Evie Clark says, and thank you for the super chat, Evie, we should be paying for Rupert Lowe's protection. But Harry, there's no comparison. And I mean, that is the point. We've got a politician like Rupert Lowe in the United Kingdom who is actually receiving direct threats

suggesting that he should be Charlie Kirk now he's not getting that protection Harry has a stalker and Lauren you just know you just know if this Oh he doesn't have a stalker does he 100% and let's just say that this stalker had been a real threat

had been armed Lauren we would know every detail about it Team Sussex would have leaked every detail about it's actually so desperate that this is all they have. And the rest of it, it's just, oh, we're meant to assume. It's really bad. We're meant to assume. And the point is, Lauren, Harry has security if there is a clear and present threat. He has that. His ego, his ego wants security all the time. And, you know, I've worked with people who have literally worked to just pay for their security. Security is a huge cost. The Kardashians,

spend well over a million pounds a year on security. It's huge. Evidently, Harry just doesn't want to pay for this security. To me, it looks like he knows exactly what he had to do to get the security and, oh, there's the narrative. Because I've said as well, you've seen him go through the official channels. Shabana Mahmood became Home Secretary on the 5th of September. And then in October, we see Harry put in this request. I believe he's been told, go through the official channels, you know, wink, wink, nudge, nudge, this is what you need to do to get it. And I have no faith in the home office. I have no faith in King Charles because I believe that King Charles has been working, you know, behind the scenes with Harry, as we saw in July when the AIDS were

meeting. This has been in the works, I'm afraid, for some time. And the problem that we've got, Lauren, is that this is going to be a deeply, deeply unpopular decision in the United Kingdom. As Brittany from the Royal News Network pointed out, and I'll come to it in just a moment, but there is now a push from the left-wing mainstream media in the United Kingdom for a republic, a very clear and present push. And Prince William knows that one of the ways to protect the British monarchy is to officially thrust Harry out. And the fact that King Charles thinks that it's a good idea for his subjects, his people to have to pay for his wayward son's security, I think shows that Charles

is very out of touch with how the British people feel at the moment. The British people, Lauren, are very pro monarchy on the whole. But they do not like what they're seeing at the moment from their king. We do not like it. We support the institution. Right now, it's pretty difficult to support the individual. And it's going to become even more difficult when it's clear that Charles wants us to pay for Harry's security. I mean, here's an idea, Charles. You could put your hand in your pocket like you did for the first year. If you really believe that Harry deserves security, you pay for it then, privately.

Because I don't believe the British public, Lauren, are going to be happy with the idea that, we have to pay for this guy after everything that he's said and done to us. I agree. It's not just the royal family he's attacked. It's Britain. It's Britain. It's the British people. We do not forget it.

But this is the problem with King Charles all over. King Charles only thinks the world of mainstream media exists that is, you know, brought in from the Royal Rota. He has no idea that there is a world outside of that because the palisades keep it from him. And so the palace are yet against. failing because there is public backlash. We shouldn't have to pay for this. And it makes the job incredibly hard for Catherine Princess of Wales and Prince William, who I believe will be incredible. But my word, Harry and Charles are making it near on impossible for them. They are alienating

so many people. King Charles should pay for this, or better still, Harry should pay for it. He has earn millions and millions and millions of pounds. He's a greedy little grifter. He really is. He really is. And William is aware of the risks facing the British monarchy. And I think Charles really needs to get his head in the game. And I hope that this year he will, as his cancer treatment is reduced. Because let's just look at what the fake news agents are pushing, Lauren. So this is, and I mean, they'll tell you. Terrible people, really terrible people, not patriots. You know, I'm talking about John Sopal, Emily Maitlis and Lewis Goodall,

who is now openly pushing Lauren. And of course he can do this. We're a free country, but I just want to give an idea of where the mainstream media and the left are heading on this. And it is a full-on push for a Republic Watch. Will we ever see King William the 5th, given everything going on? around the world family. Yes. With a bit of luck, hopefully not.

All I want for next Christmas is a republic. Oh, you're so sure to ask. Oh, I'm predictable, right. Okay. No, I'm unpredictable because I'm saying that I think that the royal family with him as king would change quite substantially. It would still be the royal family. But I think a lot of the flummery would go. I think it would become more Scandinavian, more slimmed down as a monarchy.

I mean, what it does with the kind of the Duchy of Lancaster and the Duchy of Cornwall and all that sort of stuff. I mean, those are... When they went around on their Caribbean tour, it looked so colonial. They were being carried around by local people there. I'm not sure... I'm not sure by the idea that they're terribly modern,

those two, the Prince and Princess of Wales. The question from Laurie is, is given everything going on around the royal family. I guess he's talking about the sort of demise of Andrew and the titles and all the rest of it. And the only thing I'd say, Lurie, is I think what happened with Andrew in the last two months was precisely to enable the sort of regrowth

of the royal family in a totally different direction. I think that's what was at the front of the king's mind. I want to do this so that my son doesn't have to deal with it when he comes to the throne. So I don't know if that works, but I think there probably will be a King William V, don't we think? Yes. I don't know if there be a King George the 7th,

as in Prince George whenever, you know, presumably William becomes king and is around for several decades. And we're sort of thinking lucky boy, aren't we? Well, yeah, I hope the lad gets away from that gilded prison sentence, to be perfectly honest, because I think it would be absolutely appalling for him, like it's been for the rest of him. So I think that's a real warning to King Charles, Lauren, of where the mainstream media in the United Kingdom is heading. The left are dangerous. The left and the mainstream media are truly dangerous.

That's a disgusting way for them to speak about. Prince William and Catherine Princess of Wales and they will do amazing work but the problem is King Charles is jealous of them so they're limited as to what they can do and Emily Maitless I believe we're still waiting for her to give her Press Gazette Award back for interview of the year with Andrew

that was full of lies you know I can't stand that woman you know very good point very good point And I do think that this security story is going to be very bad for the British royal family. Charles needs to wake up because what he's also doing, of course, is damning William to having his younger brother running a rival royal court in the United Kingdom. Because what else does he have to do, Lauren, that's the other issue here. Harry has nothing going for him in America. He has no work over there.

He has no meaningful charity over there. His marriage is completely miserable. He is totally miserable. So unfortunately, this security decision means we will be seeing a hell of a lot of Harry in the United Kingdom. That is bad news for Prince William, who is trying to protect the monarchy. Yeah, it's really, really concerning. I have concerns about how this will impact Catherine, because when I interviewed Tom Sykes, he spoke about the very pressure that Harry and Megan and their behaviour had put on Catherine

during her treatment and when she was recovering. And it, you know, drama is everywhere that Harry and Megan go. They can't be trusted. They leak stories left, right and centre, and they don't even always leak, you know, accurate. It's just propaganda. They are like little children that are throwing their toys out of the pram. We have coped just fine without them. And whilst I know America don't want them, we certainly don't want them back.

Sorry, America, but we've got enough stress going on here at the moment. If you could just keep them for a bit, we would be most grateful. It's very true. Very true. Lauren, the insider, thank you so much. And Lauren, I know you have to dash now because you've got a brilliant interview coming up on your Lauren, the insider channel with Ben Habib, which I will be watching later this evening. So congratulations. Can't wait to see it.

And, of course, people can hear to Lauren the insider to check it out. Lauren, thank you so much. And thank you for your company today. We're going to reveal today's greatest Britain union jackass in just one moment. But first, huge amount of feedback from you. Thank you so much for your super chats. And the Crown Chronicles, thank you, Crown Chronicles, thank you, Crown Chronicles. Dan is the only one brave enough to call out what's really happening.

The mainstream media is silent while Stimer ignores the core concerns of British citizens. Thank you for being outspoken. Well, I have to say, it's so good to be back, so good to be back live. I did have a wonderful break with my family, but it's all being boiling up inside me, the rage as I saw what was going on with Stama and Alfata. So I'm relieved to be back. And, of course, we have Tommy Robinson on tomorrow's show. Tom Mockland says Rupert Lowe is waiting to see whether the Tories make a comeback, possibly under Generic. Gerald Fisher says Rupert Lowe is the real deal, much better than conform.

We need radical change. Niall P-85 says, I never thought Bradford could get any worse. There's always people from the hotels carrying on in the city centre while you see more and more tense in town with homeless Brits inside. Just terrible. And then, of course, we were speaking about the Big Breakfast TV war, which has seen Mike Graham emerge victorious versus Jeremy Kyle and talk TV on day one at least.

But you're really divided over this one. Papan forces, Mike smashed it out of the park, Dan, due in no small part to your encouragement. But I have to be honest, loads of you very angry with his point of view on Tommy Robinson. Juliet Johnson says, that's okay, Mike, it's your prerogative on Tommy. I have not and will never watch your independent show, probably sponsored by Reform UK. Fireman Phil says, I refuse to watch or support my. Mike Graham. Lauren is right. Please stop supporting Graham. Jenny Chilton said Mike did too much touting for business this morning and his ignorance about Tommy puts me off big time. Daniel Schofield

says Mike didn't write the Facebook post but his mate Jack Daniels did the old visit. So of course if you want to watch Mike's response to all of that and what Tommy Robinson had to say about him, The only major interview he did after his exit from Talk TV was here on Outspoken and you can watch it in our YouTube archive. But now, let's reveal today's Greatest Britain and Union Jack has a reminder of your nominees for the worst Britain in the world today. John Soaple for the Trump derangement syndrome. Femi Ola Wally, but talking about Brexit on TikTok while doing shirtless pull-ups, revolting. And Bush Rishake, nominated by Scott Fly 23 for, calling for Iran to build a nuke.

In third position with 11% of the vote, John Sopal, the runner-up with 38% of your vote, Femiola Wally. But today's Union Jackass, the first of 2026, is Bushra Sheikh with 51% of your vote. And today's Greatest Britain, nominated by Matt Cass 48, Ant Middleton, who says on Sadiq and grooming gangs for St. what we all think. These children aren't collateral in political games. They're children. And this

cover-up shames us all, but more so the people who knew and could have stopped it. And of course, Aunt Middleton was very happy to make the top 20 in our special countdown of the greatest Britons of 2025, which we broadcast over my little Christmas break. Now, the Uncanceled After Show returns live today as well. Megan Markle's archwell charity scam and as ever lies have finally been exposed in an astonishing double blow for the fake Duchess. We'll team up with the Royal News Network for all of the latest. You can come and watch us right now over on Substack www. www. outspoken.life is the address. A special edition of Outspoken tomorrow at 5pm UK time tomorrow, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific Tommy Robinson speaks out. So hit subscribe right now

on YouTube, turn on your notification bells to be alerted to that episode. Remember, you can also subscribe to us as a podcast on Spotify or Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.