Dan Wootton Outspoken - KING CHARLES CRISIS AS WILLIAM & CATHERINE BRIEF ABOUT HEALTH AMID ANDREW & MANDELSON ARREST

Episode Date: February 24, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: The unprecedented crisis engulfing the British establishment has reached a shocking new low, with the arrests in quick succession of the ex-UK ambassador to the USA and mastermind of New Labour Peter Mandelson and ex-Prince and the monarch’s brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor for misconduct in public office put the jobs of both the Prime Minister Slippery Starmer and King Charles on the line. To say what the UK is currently living through is unprecedented is an understatement. So nobody knows what happens next. But today, the UK’s parliament debated the downfall of ex-Prince Andrew – a situation that would have been unthinkable even weeks ago. And now sources close to Prince William and Catherine, the Princess of Wales are briefing about how the Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor scandal is impacting King Charles’s health, which could eventually pave the way for a potential abdication… There are also new questions for King Charles about what he knew when, with a growing nightmare possibility that Andrew may have traded military secrets. Buckingham Palace has moved to keep calm and carry on with the Queen meeting French rape survivor Giselle Pelicot, but the King remaining invisible for another day. In his Digest, Dan says that one thing is certain: Starmer cannot survive the growing shame of this scandal. Then analysis from the Superstar Panel: YouTube star Stef the Alter Nerd and conservative social commentator Based and Bougie. PLUS: Katie Hopkins destroys woke students during a show stopping appearance at the Cambridge Union that you won’t see in the mainstream media but every young Brit should watch. AND: Shamima Begum’s sickening plot to use people smugglers to return to the UK. We’ll be joined by the journalist and former Shamima confidante who has exposed that shocking news. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Lauren the Insider joins us with her analysis and research about the scandal engulfing the British Royal Family, including how William and Catherine are dealing with the succession drama as well as shocking new allegations against Andrew. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton #DanWoottonOutspoken #news #outspoken #uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Searchlight Pictures presents in the blink of an eye on Hulu on Disney Plus, a sweeping science fiction drama spanning the Stone Age, the present day, and the distant future, about the essence of what it means to be human, regardless of our place in history. The film is directed by Oscar-winning filmmaker Andrew Stanton and stars Rashida Jones, Kate McKinnon, and David Diggs. Stream in the blink of an eye now only on Hulu on Disney Plus. Sign up at Disneyplus.com. No spit, no bias, no sin.

I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 433. And breaking right now, the unprecedented crisis engulfing the British establishment has reached a shocking new low with the arrests in quick succession of the ex-Uk ambassador to the USA and mastermind of new Labour, Peter Mandelson, an ex-Prince and the monarch's brother, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, for misconduct in public office, putting the jobs of both the Prime Minister. himself, Slippery Stama, and even King Charles, on the line. To say what the UK is currently living through is unprecedented is an understatement. So nobody knows what is going to happen next. Today, the UK's Parliament debated the downfall of ex-Prince Andrew, a situation that would have been unthinkable even weeks ago. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor shamed our country and the royal family. But for too long, members of Parliament were barred from even raising

criticisms of him, let alone properly scrutinising his role as trade envoy. It could be a moment where they and we decide that this is the time when cultural change happens. And the changes that we think are necessary would indeed protect the royal family and strengthen the monarchy. And now sources close to Prince William and And Catherine, the Princess of Wales, a briefing about how the Andrew Mountbatten-Winzance scandal is impacting on King Charles's health. I think that could eventually pave the way given off-ramp for a potential abdication. The king is in a much worse health and much worse shape than he appears to be. All of this has had a devastating effect upon his health.

There are also new questions for King Charles about what he knew when, with a growing nightmare possibility that Andrew could have traded military secrets. I certainly think the king is much more involved in this than he's letting on and he wants to let on because clearly it's very damaging. The Sun's story, I believe, is true. It supports what my sources have been saying. and I know people feel Pallas has been lying to journalists about some of these issues. I've got quite a lot of material from intelligence officials

with reports on Andrew corruption dated in fact January this year talking about his involvement and how he's been compromised by Russian intelligence. Now Buckingham Palace has moved to keep calm and carry on with the Queen meeting French rape survivor Gisal Palakot, but the King remaining invisible. for yet another day. One thing here in the United Kingdom is certain. Slippery Stama cannot survive.

The growing shame of this scandal. I think the fact that a police investigation has been opened into misconducts in public office shows that this is a very serious scandal and the Prime Minister's fingerprints are all over it. So we've got all the latest in my digest next as King Charles and Kyrs Stama remain on the brief. Then analysis from the superstar panel, YouTube star Steph the Alternerd and Conservative social commentator based and bougie. Also coming up on the show today, Britain on the edge. As police struggle to contain Islamists in London's Whitechapel and Manchester, as a remigration movement takes hold.

Now ex-BBC presenter Jeff Banks has visited the scene. We'll show you what he has to say. Katie Hopkins destroys woke students during a show-stopping appearance. at the Cambridge Union that you won't see in the mainstream media, but every young Brit should watch. And Shemima Begham's sickening plot to use people smugglers to return to the UK will be joined by the journalist and former Shemima Confidant who has exposed that shocking news. Then, in the Royal Uncanceled After Show on Substack, Lauren the insider joins us with her analysis and research about more shocking revelations potentially involving Andrew in the end.

Epstein files. You can sign up to watch at www.outspoken.com. Now, we've also nominated for our Union Jackass today. We will reveal the worst Britain in the world today and our greatest Britain at the end of the show. Here are the nominees. Shamima Begham. Now, I've gone for Shamima Begham for plotting to pay people, smugglers to help her get back to Britain. Bob Villain has been nominated by Baste and Bougie. Now, this is for using a disability to race bait. You would have heard me speaking on the story yesterday, I am absolutely disgusted by the hard leftists and the wokeists who are shaming John Davidson, who inspired the movie, I swear, for his vocal tick which saw him shout out the N-word at the Bafters. But for Bob villain, Bob villain, that race-bater,

who the BBC actually allowed to broadcast all of that hate live on air at Glastonbury to weigh in, that's another level. Watch what he had to say. Now, I'm aware of the symptoms of Tourette's syndrome. So what I'm really concerned with is not the actions of a man with a very complicated neurological condition, but the decision by a broadcasting company embroiled in scandals to leave that racial slur in the final edit, but remove a call for freedom, which means even after all of their preemptive planning for censorship, a decision was made to leave one and remove the other. Now, Could it be that they left it in with the desire to highlight the complex nature and reality of living with Tourette syndrome in daily life?

Doubtful. Could it be another BBC blunder? Could it be that black people are just fair game to the BBC? Oh my God. Is he kidding? Is he kidding? So that's based in Bougie's nominee. But Stiff the alternate has actually gone for Nigel Farage today for his failed Chegos island stunts.

So three very different characters there. Who knows who will win? You can vote right now in the live chat on YouTube. Keep your feedback coming in during the show. But now, let's go. To say what the UK is currently living through is unprecedented is an understatement. So despite what the mainstream media might say,

nobody knows what's going to happen next. Because the British establishment and deep state is collapsing at the same time as our beloved royal family faces an existential threat that could result. in the generational change required to save it. In fact, I'm going to get to shortly how the pro-William and Catherine briefing has begun in the past 24 hours, with concerns now being expressed out of the palace about how the Andrew Mountbatten Windsor scandal is impacting the King's health.

It's spent much more of this in the days and weeks ahead as the path is cleared for a possible abdication. We're not there yet. Let me be clear we are not there yet. But what last night's truly historic arrest of Andrew's close friend, Peter Mandelson, the UK ambassador in the USA, a matter of months ago for the same crime of misconduct and public office shows is that both the king and our crooked and corrupted Prime Minister Slippery Stama are on the brink hanging onto their jobs, by a thread. Peter Mandelson has been arrested by police. Police have arrested Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. It's an extraordinary, extraordinary revelation. British police arresting the former UK ambassador to the United States, Peter Mandelson, on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

Breaking news to bring you now. Thames Valley Police say that Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct. in public office. We understand that Peter Manderson has been led away from his London home. ...newsing news about Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. The BBC understands that he has been arrested

on suspicion of misconduct in public office. Now for Charles, one of the massive problems is that the Commonwealth countries are now publicly demanding action on removing his younger brother from the line of succession, which piles pressure on the monarch to take action. I keep using the word historic, but that's because it really

is. Yesterday's public letter to To Tehr Care from Australian PM Anthony Albanese demanding action has now been followed up by an official statement from New Zealand's Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon. That's more interesting because Luxon is a conservative politician, not a hard left wotopian like the Aussie leader. Yet his spokesperson messaged New Zealand's mainstream media this yesterday. Hi all. On Andrew Mountbatten wins a here as a comment, a tribute to the spokesperson for the Prime Minister. If the UK government proposes to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Winzer from the Order of Succession, New Zealand would support it.

The UK government has said any proposals would come after the police investigation concludes. Then we get to the most significant new briefing of the day. As Prince William and Catherine expressed their concern that Charles's health simply won't be able to cope with much more of this tumult. But intriguingly, the couple also admit their frustration at not being able to speak out themselves. Now that was clearly behind Williams' admittance that he doesn't agree with Charles' keep calm and carry-on approach being adopted by his father with this very coded language at the BAFTA's. So let me take you're going to take you through the bombshell. So let me take you through this bombshell reporting from The Daily Mail, which writes Prince William's diplomatic outburst about his own mental health at the BAFTA's was a sign of his deep frustration over Andrew Mountbatten Windsor's arrest, fares for his father's health and his desire to say, more. The Prince and Princess of Wales are clearly itching to further publicly distance themselves

more from the future king's errant uncle a royal source has said. The couple are also concerned about the impact Andrew's arrest is having on the king's health as he continues to fight cancer, another well-placed source claimed. He is exhausted and it's draining for him, they said. Their glamorous appearance signalled a determination to put the royal family's difficulties to one side, but it appeared that issues around Andrew Mountbatten Winds were not far from William's mind, William is frustrated because it's still likely to be a problem on his plate when he eventually becomes king, a royal insider has told the Daily Mail today. I'm sure the Prince and Princess of Wales have been itching to say something publicly to distance themselves, but they have to be

cautious because of the police investigation. I think William and Kate are acutely aware that this is a scandal that won't be going away for a long time. It's a mess left by Andrew and the late Queen, and although His Majesty is very much in charge, William is frustrated. The princess looked so elegant, but you can see that this is all causing strain, and that's the last thing she needs, the male source said. And while the princess remains silent on the ongoing issues involving Andrew, royal sources have said the couple's main concerns surround the health of the king, who is still battling cancer. So this is where things I think get pretty significant, okay? Listen to this source quote. Obviously, William is not feeling calm, and he would have spoken on behalf of

of them both. It's a terrible situation and they are very concerned about the health of the king and the impact this will be having on him. He is exhausted and it's draining for him. Also as parents of young children to be reading all of this is pretty awful and they are clearly concerned. William let this slip out last during a conversation and he would have done that on purpose. That is very clear but Catherine has kept very quiet. Now this is really significant. In the royal family, things are done subtly. But for sources close to William and Catherine, to start saying that the king is just exhausted and that this is draining him, clearly suggests that they believe he is incapable of seeing the monarchy through this crisis.

And it is impossible to die that the king's health is a great concern, as I have reported in a sensitive manner. His cancer is incurable and terminal and clearly being worsened by stress. Indeed, outspoken contributor, Lady C., Lady Colin Campbell, revealed last week that senior royals are expressing growing concerns about how the current predicament is causing a serious deterioration. But I'm going to tell you something that a member of the royal family, a senior member of the royal family said day before yesterday, First of all, the king is in a much worse health and much worse shape than he appears to be. All of this has had a devastating effect upon his health. The rest of the family are distressed beyond measure by the turn things have taken. they had no inkling whatsoever of what was going to come as a result of the drop of the Epstein

Fowls. None. Now, I have very real sympathy for Charles, human sympathy. But what I'm noting today is that the decision for sources close to William and Catherine to start briefing about the King's health is likely going to give him a potential off-ramp as this scandal deepens. Entitled author Andrew Launy has told Lauren the insider that there is worse to come for Charles. King Charles had overseen the payment to Virginia Jufre and also contributed to the finances of this. You don't pay £12 million to someone in a settlement when you are totally innocent, I would argue.

What do you make of that? I certainly think the King is much more involved in this than he's letting on and he wants to let on because clearly it's very damaging. The Sun's story I believe is true. It supports what my sources have been saying. And I know people feel Palace has been lying to journalists about some of these issues. So I think we just have to see how it pans out over the next few days. But certainly my source is very credible on this issue. I think we probably do need some sort of statement. need some sort of statement of explanation about what was known at the palace when they knew it

and what they did about it. Do you think the king has gone far enough releasing a statement, or do you think we should hear him in person address what is going on? Because we have been taken for fools as well, haven't we? Well, I think, you know, this style isn't with rare exceptions to broadcast to the nation, that we did have it during COVID. We had it really after Diner's death. I think there have been several other occasions. using more of that. I think we might perhaps get a statement through social media. We might get a story leaked to the press that they can't control that so well. But I think, yes, I think people are expecting some sort of explanation of exactly what was known. But the problem is if you say

nothing, then you can't be held up. If you say something it's found not to be true, like Andrew did in the news night to you, then you're in big trouble. So again, the old policy of never talking might be their safest one. Additionally, Launy also told Pearce Morgan that the Palace's worst nightmare might soon come true in regards to Andrew leaking military secrets, a dire development that would pile further pressure on the monarch about what he knew. I've got quite a lot of material from intelligence officials with reports on Andrew corruption dated in fact January this year talking about his involvement and how he's been compromised by Russian intelligence. And we've always had these Chinese spies around him, the alleged

by Tenbo Yang. So I think this is the way the thing is going. I'm getting more and more information about military secrets and other secrets which seem to have been devolved as well as the commercial ones. Now, speaking of dire and unpredictable situations for the monarchy, the UK's Liberal Democrats. They're awful people.

Today opened an opposition debate in the House of Commons all about Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. That is a break from convention, allowing British MPs to attack a member of the royal family, indeed it would have been unheard of even just a few weeks ago. This debate doesn't have that much credibility, though, because it was led by the clown prince of British politics, that attention seeker in Chief Ed Davy.

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor shamed our country and the royal family. But for too long, members of Parliament were barred from even raising criticism of people. him, let alone properly scrutinising his role as trade envoy. Because of the outdated tradition that mentions of any member of the Royal Family in this House must, in the words of the previous Speaker, be, and I quotes, very rare, very sparing and very respectful. I was struck by the words of Amanda Roberts, Virginia Dufray's sister-in-law, after Andrew was arrested last week. She said this could be a stain on the royal family for the rest of our history or quote

it could be a moment where they and we decide that this is the time when cultural change happens and as a staunch supporter of his royal highness the king and the royal family I believe we must help to bring about that cultural change now but I have to be honest there was also a lot of love on display for our royal family as Jim Shannon from the Democratic Unionist Party asked this. And we're all greatly shocked what has taken place, but does he agree as well? King Charles, Queen Camilla, Edward, Sophie, William, Kate,

are members of the Royal family at this time who also need our support. And does he agree that perhaps maybe now, it's a time to tell them that we in this house love them, that this nation loves them, and that we understand the pain that they're suffering. and our support is with those members of the Royal Family who are above this and above this report. I'm grateful for the honourable gentleman's intervention,

I think he fully speaks for the whole House. Indeed, the intention of this debate is to bring this House together and the changes that we think are necessary would indeed protect the Royal Family and strengthen the monarchy, which in some places are being criticised and I think it's important and that's why we need these reforms. Oh, shut up, Hedgis.

you disingenuous clown, but I thought that was a lovely moment from Jim Shannon. What is most concerning, though, to King Charles today, is the conclusion of that debate resulted in the UK Parliament backing to release the papers relating to Andrew's trade-envoy appointment, with MPs unanimously agreed. It didn't even need to go to a vote. So there is more information being released here. Labor's trade minister, Chris Bryant, said the government will release the files as soon as it is practical and possible within the law, another nightmare or the king. And you know that one of my big problems is that we still haven't seen the king. Haven't seen him since he appeared at Fashion Week in the hours after Andrew's arrest.

I think that is an untenable situation. Buckingham Palace did yesterday arrange a high-profile meeting between the king, sorry, between the queen and Giselle Palico at Clarence. House. Now, she is the French woman, of course, awarded the Legion of Honor in 2025 following the incredible courage, grace and dignity, with which she waived her right to anonymity in that country's largest rape trial. Buckingham Palace tellingly added, the Queen has worked to support survivors of sexual and domestic abuse for many decades. And she has, she has, and she has done great work on that front. But of course, what about the victims of Jeffrey Epstein? What about the victims of the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs for that matter? And as former

Prime Minister Gordon Brown tells the police that Andrew may have used RAF jets to meet Epstein, you're naive to think that this scandal is anywhere close to over. Tony Diveries. Tony Dye. reports for that newspaper, Brown's five-page letter was sent individually to police in London, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley, Norfolk and Bedfisher. The telegraph can now reveal that they show his deep concern that Mr. Mountbatten Windsor used chartered RAF flights to transport him to personal engagements

that could have involved Epstein and that the former prince might have leaked confidential information from the trips in a wholly unacceptable. use of public money. The former Prime Minister is also understood to be concerned about a flight the convicted paedophile took on a Gulfstream jet that landed at RAF Marum Air Base in Norfolk in December 2000, which the newspaper had revealed more than a decade ago. And this is another one of the big issues here. This stuff has been hiding in plain sight for 15 years and there was a cover-up. And that is why Launey is arguing that this is just the start of the Crown's moment of peril. Writing the public anger and

growing awareness of how institutions didn't just turn a blind eye, but actually enabled Mountbatten Windsor to act with impunity takes us in a direction that is hard to predict. Indeed, there was much that I could not put into entitled that was deemed too risky by lawyers. Many of these stories have now been directly borne out by the Epstein Files and will be included in the paperback edition. The good news for supporters of the monarchy is that the prince and princes of Wales are relatively untainted by the scandal popular with the public and genuinely represent more than a step change in the direction of the monarchy. The combination of the public goodwill they have and the hunger for a different kind of monarchy gives them a clear opportunity to make necessary reforms,

the long list of which needs to begin with a comprehensive register of royal interests. Someone most certainly not untainted is the British Prime Minister Slippery Stama, whose appointment of Mandelson, whose arrest adorns every single British newspaper front page today in damning reading for Tudair Keir makes even the idea of him staying as Prime Minister just impossible to comprehend. The dude is an out and out paedophile apologist with the type of judgment that has stained the reputation of Great Britain. The arrogance of his government is sickening every single day. I mean, did you see the Labour Home Secretary, by the way? Jackie Smith being perturbed by the fact that Sly News had opted to ask her about Mandelson's arrest rather than Labor's education reforms.

Remember, Smith is a women and equalities minister, as Gido Forks said, they do not care. Watch. He sacked him in the middle of the night, actually. So, you know, I think that's an important area of judgment. But, you know, yeah, of course, to be frank, I mean, I'm here today to talk about a really important set of reforms that the government is undertaking for children in our schools with special educational needs. That's what I'd rather be talking about. Well, isn't this the issue here that here we are, Peter Mandelson, is on the left of your screen, and we're not going to move away from this story. I mean, isn't it the, you know, isn't that the problem about the way that Peter Mandelson behaved?

We don't know whether he's, you know, guilty of misconduct in public office or not, but it is dominating the news and you're not getting in what you want to talk about, which is schools. Well, it is at this moment, and I think I've been pretty clear about our responsibility as public servants to allow the police to get on with their investigation. But for years to come, what will make a real difference to our children is whether or not we've got an education system that allows them to achieve their full potential. Now, you're not getting away with that, Jackie Smith.

Compare the way Kemi Badenok, the leader of the British opposition, talks about the King's handling of this crisis with that of the Prime Minister. Kimmy Bevanar, welcome back to Edinburgh. Let's start with the guest, the biggest news of the week. Andrew Mainbatten, Windsor, his arrest was arguably the biggest story in the world yesterday. Do you think the monarchy can survive this? Can you get through this unscathed? Of course, I think the King's response was absolutely spot on.

He has shown that no one is above the law and has said that the law must run its course. I think that's absolutely right. And actually provides a very strong contrast to our Prime Minister who had Peter Mandelson embroiled in the Epstein scandal and instead was covering it up and telling everyone what a great guy Peter Mandelson was. I think the fact that a police investigation has been open into misconducts and public office shows that this is a very serious scandal. And the Prime Minister's fingerprints are all over it. He's going to pretend now that he knew nothing about it. And this is all news to him.

But we knew back in September when he was expressing full confidence in Peter Mandelson. I asked him at Prime Minister's questions. He knew then, he knew before, and now he may be trying to run away. or distract people from what's gone on, but the fact of the matter is that the Prime Minister has a lot of serious questions to answer. This is not just about Peter Mandelson. It is not just about his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. It is also about him. Perhaps the best way to try and save King Charles would be for Slippery Stammer to take responsibility for this entire disgrace and resign. But he is a morally repellent, revolting man who will cling on to power to hell with the damage. It causes our country, and that puts King Charles in a very, very difficult position.

Now, the superstar panel. Join now by social commentator-based and bougie and YouTube sensation, Steph, the Alternerd. Now, we're obviously going to cover the political and the royal dynamics on this, but Steph, you do have a channel dedicated to royal issues. What do you make of this new briefing from William and Catherine today, or at least from sources close to William and Catherine, I should be clear, not directly from the prince and princess themselves, which does seem to raise the prospect, Steph,

of King Charles's health, becoming a bigger issue by the day. Is this to try and allow the king the potential at some point in the months ahead to abdicate blaming his health? Potentially, but it's a very high bar that has to be reached for the monarch and his advisors to all agree that because of his health issues, he is now unable to conduct his daily duties.

It's a very, very high, high bar to me. Now, one thing I do want to mention in terms of this whole kind of discussion about abdication is that people have to realize the, what they're asking for in the first place, what they're actually demanding for, to demand or ask or state that they think that the king should abdicate, that is no small ask.

That is no small demand at all. And at the moment, from what I can see, respectfully, people are asking for his abdication. People are asking for him to step aside or consider it this, that and the other. based on a lot of innuendo at the moment, until there is hardcore evidence that's out there, a smoking gun that really is like, yeah, okay,

he definitely needs to abdicate. At this point, I don't think there should be any discussion on that. If anything, I think there should be more discussion about how we can actually help support the royal family as they are going through this. how we can support our Ealing King whilst is going through this, whilst we can support our Prince and Princess of Wales whilst they're going through this as well. That to me should be the focus.

And Ed Davy, clown prince of fricking politics, is an absolute freaking doofus. Now it's one thing to achieve a vote going through where Parliament agrees, yes, okay, let's release the five. on Prince Andrew, the formerly known as Prince at that point, and the documents concerning to his time as being the envoy, this, that and the other, fair enough. But why didn't he go one step further and also try and call for a vote to go through to get him removed from the line of succession?

It's like he's gone halfway, but not all the way. I wonder why that is. Dude is spineless and has no balls. Yeah, Bast and Boogie, what do you make of this growing pressure on King Charles? Do you agree with Steph the Alternerd that actually there should be more attempt to sort of rally around the king at this point? Yeah, I have to disagree with Steph the nerd because there's a lot of evidence to show that King Charles is not in the right state world. It's not in good health. We see many photos.

We saw photos of his fingers. We saw photos of his leg. it's very, very evident to tell that this person is not in good health. Now, in terms of us rallying around him and supporting him, not being funny, that's not really realistic because we're only the public, there's only so much we can do to support King Charles. And I hate to say this. Anyone who knows me knows I absolutely love the monarchy,

but whether he's sick or not, King Charles doesn't really have long. I know that sounds horrible, but he's quite old. I really don't want to sound offensive when I say this. but it's very, very evident not only that he hasn't even been coming, we haven't been seeing him publicly either, so it's very evident that he's unwell, and of course the royal family is not going to tell us as soon as possible.

So I just think that, you know, it's time for him to go and we should give the spot to the next line. I'm sorry. And a huge amount of people, Steph, are now really advocating for abdication, in part for that reason, because it's sort of, wrong, I think, that we haven't seen Charles since the hours after Andrew's wrist. Now, yes,

he is undergoing cancer treatment, but I just don't believe that silence and a lack of transparency is going to hold in this situation, stiff. Okay, the king has a keep calm and carry on type approach, but we haven't seen him. We literally haven't seen him since London Fashion Week. well firstly i love you and respect your best and boogey as always hon thank you so much for always being honest and direct i respect you for that hon the thing is like the kings between a rock and a hard place right um if he goes out and he says further on the subject then that's going to be open to more more like investigation,

more looking into it deeper, this, that and the other which could actually worsen the situation. Sometimes, in a scenario like this, saying nothing and at all, keep calm, carry on, kind of like that whole British credo that we've got is the way forward.

He made that statement when Andrew was arrested, unprecedented. He's already taken away his title, he's already kicked him out of Royal Lodge, he's already taken direct action against Andrew that is absolutely unprecedented that hasn't been done before in recent times. So at this point, what more do you really expect him to do? I'm slightly confused on that.

It's like for me, you're trying to get blood out of a stone. He's done everything that he can and more. than even I would have expected the king to do at this point. Now, again, you can turn around and say, well, we haven't seen him since the fashion week and he's being silent. And, you know, this indicates that he's not fit to rule this country anymore and govern it as the king, this, that and the other.

No disrespect. But to me, that is speculation. It's like, where's the smoking gun where, yes, he cannot do it. we do need to see a historic statement from King Charles. I mean, look, this is going to be a short reign compared to his mother's reign. And you think about some of those seminal moments for Queen Elizabeth II. There was obviously that national television address during COVID, when my God, we needed to be brought together because we hated our politicians.

And do you remember, we will meet again. It was so significant. But then there was also the week in 1997. I know you two are too young to remember. but I certainly remember those days after the death of Princess Diana when the public were turning on the monarch really for the first time in her reign and she made that national television address from Buckingham Palace under the pressure of Tony Blair and Alistair Campbell

and it was a pitch perfect moment where she spoke to the public based in Bougie not just as a queen but as a grandmother. And I need that moment. from Charles. I'm sorry, I know there's lots of monarchists like Steph who are saying, no, you're putting too much pressure on Charles, but I need that moment from him based in Bougie. We need to hear the king speak. And I actually want to hear the king speak as a king and as a grandfather. You know, as a grandfather of two young girls, let's hear you speak up actually about why you believe what has happened is wrong. And you can do that based in bougie, I believe, without any type of contempt of court issues.

Yeah. Well, I think that people forget that the royal family is a family, but at the same time, it is an institution. So I kind of, well, I agree with Dan Wooden when he says that he does need to come out and do his job. He does need to come out and show phase. He does need to come out and let us know what's going on with his health. And I somewhat agree with Steph as well when she says that he's already done what he can for Andrew. what more can he do is he supposed to hang him from Buckingman Palace? You know what I mean?

But going back to my point of the royal family being an institution, I just feel like if someone is sick and can't do their job, and not only that, we know they have a short ring, we know they're on this six-month contract, and we have someone else who is more, sorry, best suited and healthier for the job, I'm so sorry, it's going to sound harsh, but we kind of do need to, you know, let go of Charles

and allow William Kate to do their job. It sounds very, very harsh, but this is an institution. I know we're so used to using the term royal family that the term family just rolls off our tongue, but it's an institution. And going back to what Dan said, we need those moments where the king can come out

and make statements and basically just show us that he's present. And the fact that he's not, barely is present, I don't see the difference between him not being king at the moment and what's happening right now because we barely see him. So it sounds harsh, but it's an institution, guys. We're forgetting that. Yeah, and what I keep reminding people, is if we just go back, cast our mind back. I know none of us were there, but if you think back to

what happened 90 years ago with Edward VIII, who was on the throne, and he was a Nazi sympathiser, he had a very bad woman in the divorcee, Wallace Simpson, and he had to go, and everyone knew he had to go. And people say, well, could the monarchy survive, a king actually abdicating? And not only did it survive, it thrived because obviously we had the late Queen Elizabeth II's father on the throne and he did a good job, but then it ushered in the second Elizabethan era because, of course, he died when he was just in his mid-50s. So I believe there is an opportunity for reinvention here and Charles would be seen historically as doing a very positive thing. Although I'm not at the point yet to call on Charles to abdicate. I am, however, at the point of calling on Charles to give a national address.

I think hiding away is currently unsustainable. Britain is very clearly on the edge. At the moment, we see it all over the country. As no-go areas in our biggest cities are taken over by Islamist mobs, but the native indigenous population start to fight back. I'm going to take you to these extraordinary scenes in Whitechapel, East London, where the ex-BBC presenter Jeff Banks actually visited to talk about just what we've lost as a country in one moment. But first I want to kick off in Manchester where we saw these incredible scenes of a re-migration protest.

Yet, according to Britain as broken, Muslim thugs attacked patriots at that march. They were antagonizing and pulling flags off the Patriots, but they soon began. backed off when literally thousands of people were chasing them. The police were frantically trying to protect the Muslims. And maybe this is where we are going to see the true breakdown of British civil society. Lawrence Fox on that incident said the police think that they can control what is coming. This will only get worse. This is our home. We have nowhere else to go. This is what he was referring to. Watch. He's going off over here.

Get back. Get back. Oh, he's got a bat. Oh, he's got a bat drawn out. He's just pulled the flag. He's just grabbed hold on that flag. Ricked it off. He just ripped hold that flag. Horses coming across. They're going to grab him. They're going to grab him.

They're going to grab him. They're gonna grab him. Oh, he's having a swingers with him. He's got a helmet on this, lad. He ain't getting nowhere, mate. How's he not been nicked? How's he not been nicked? Has he not been nicked yet?

It's not got your eyes to tell, isn't you? All these, police. Let's do it. Let's do it. How have they not been nixed? I don't know. I don't know. I've been a lot less than that. I'm going to go. You're talking up with me. You're your fucking up with this. Uh-oh. We've got a whole load of people coming down here. These are in trouble now. They're in trouble now. They're in a lot of trouble now and he knows it. It's written all over his face. It's written all over his face at the moment. He is right in trouble. So sometimes I think we can admit the police get it very wrong.

But there are other incidents where they get it completely right. And it was a lone anti-woke metropolitan police officer in Whitechapel who has attracted national attention as she stood up to a group of Islamist thugs who were advocating for. for the fact that in Whitechapel, which they view as a Muslim area, there should be no such thing as Christianity. She stood up to them. My God, I hope they don't sack her as a result. Watch what went down.

Listen, I hear what you're saying. In this country, we have freedom of speech, the same way you guys have your freedom of speech. Now, you guys don't need to see eye to us, and you don't need to agree, and you're all warm and welcome to stand here and have conversations with them, but they're not being aggressive.

They're not. I told you about, some people come here, they just, you never know, he made that's much trouble. That's their risk. That's their risk. I call the police because on the way I heard them say an offensive word about their religion. When they told it, I went and came back on the way he was talking about a prophet, then he's like a donkey. So he terrified with your friend, what he says. Yeah, no, no, no. I could misunderstand the word, but when hundreds of people are stopping, because what he's saying, there must be something more.

It's a contentious, though. Yeah, yeah. So why is he doing that? Yeah. He has been, I've worked to do it. What's the law of the story? Is he allowed to do whatever he's doing? Yes.

But you see there's a difference between hate and the freedom of speech. What he's doing is hate. That's not. He's not. He's going fully against another religion. I'm not saying. We're not very bad. You are not.

We don't have control. And this is Islam. This is Rakhapur, Bungari. Muslim. Muslim. I understand that you guys don't want to hear it. So I would recommend that you just move away and don't listen to him.

Can't do that. Yeah, but we can't do that. You're going to stand here and be out. Excuse me, Mr. We live here. So if we came outside, he's not in your home? No, by the end of the day, this is our community. You don't see any of what, you don't see Muslims looking around insulting other faiths. But he's doing that in talk.

preach about your religion. But he's not preaching. He's inside nature by saying food. He did. He was cool in her property, don't you? No, that's not what he said. And you and here, now he's quoting that. Multiple of other people have told me what he said.

Did you hear what some of those Islamists said to that very sane police officer? This is White Chapel East London. Muslim area. We live here. But it's not your country. We are a Christian country, regardless of what Reform UK's Leyla Cunningham might say. And Richard Little John,

in the Daily Mail has absolutely championed that female officer. We don't know the identity of the officer who faced down a group of Muslim men and reminded them in Britain we have a tradition of free speech, but she deserves a medal. He went on, hallelujah, all hail the female police officer who faced down a gang of Muslim men objecting to a Christian street preacher in London's East End. The confrontation took place in White Chapel, close to one of the biggest mosques in Europe with a capacity for 7,000 worshippers. The preacher may have been full-hardy, deliberately provocative perhaps, but he wasn't doing anything illegal,

something the policewoman pointed out in no uncertain terms. She was filmed on social media, being approached by a man in a black mask, insisting, this is Whitechapel, this is a Muslim area, another man accuses the preacher of spreading hate. But she stood firm. And of course, you hear people like Sid Khan and Pear's Morgan, sort of fake patriots who want to pretend that everything's okay, saying, oh, there's no no-go areas in a city like London. But Jeff Banks, former star of the BBC Clothes Show, who has become an unlikely pin-up for those of us

who believe the elite class have to start talking out about what is being unleashed on our great country, actually decided to visit Whitechapel and talk about what's changed in his lifetime. Watch this. A couple of weeks ago, Jim Ratcliffe of Ineos made a very provocative statement that we were actually being caught. Maybe it was a clumsy choice of words. What he was saying in essence was that there were large parts of Britain, but of being taken over.

Quite people from the world. To me, I thought I'd come to Whitechaple, one of my old stomping grounds, to see what it was like it. Now, back in the day when I was a young lad growing up in. South London in Catford. We used to come over to Whitechaple Road because some of the best pups in London for live jazz were here in the Whitechap Road, like the angel, places like that. Fantastic. We used to get booted and suited, so English cut suit. In fact, my tailor was a guy called Alf Harley. That actually made the suits for the Kray brothers. Things have changed and they certainly are different as I stroll through some of the old side streets.

used to get up. In fact, in those days, I used to buy a lot of my fabric for people at them watch up a boat by a sat boss. It was just a brilliant tech signage. Loads of the factories that I used to use were here in the East End. And they were all Greeks, Turkish, Jewish, and we all got on famously together, fully interplating. My times have changed. And they have changed. And we see it every single day, even though the mainstream media and the elite class don't want to admit it. So to my superstar panel, Steph the Alternerd, and based and bougie, based, I mean, we saw one example there of the police getting it right. We saw another example of the police getting it very, very wrong. You have been on the ground reporting from a lot of these sorts of remigration

protests. Do you get the sense that what David Betts is saying is correct? I mean, he, He predicts that actually what we're seeing on the streets at the moment is very much the start of a British Civil War. Yeah. Honestly, Dan, seeing this footage is actually really hard for me. It generally like crushes my soul because I've been in situations like this where I've gone to, for example, pro-Palestine match, March, sorry, with my union, Jack, and I was attacked. And although you do try to stand your ground, you do have these moments where your heart almost sinks and you come to this realization that, wait, this country has been colonised. Now, although this may not be my indigenous country, this is still my home. And the way this country has changed is absolutely heartbreaking, even just my area.

My area used to be a nice, friendly, clean area. Now there's rubbish everywhere. All of the nice shops and all of the customer service assistants, I've known they've all been fired. And all these stores have been replaced with kebab shops and halal and shisha. Like, the change, it's heartbreaking. And this is not even my indigenous land. So I can't even imagine how people who are actually indigenous. to this country.

And like Lawrence Fox said, have nowhere to go. I can't imagine how they feel. So yeah, the country is changing. The country is being colonized. And I feel like us, especially the younger generation, have a duty to ensure that we protect the country

and ensure that this colonization doesn't go too far. Steph, the alternate. I mean, it's hard to dispute the fact that it has gone too far when you see the entitlement of that Islamist mob. questioning the police officer in Whitechapel,

they think it's their area now. They do believe they've colonized us, and I think that's because they have. You can't be a white Christian operating out of Whitechapel in London. And by the way, that's just one area. There are many others, Steph. That police officer deserves a medal. Yep.

And commendation, she was there on her own in front of an Islamist mob and she's a female and she stood up to her. That in of itself, the courage that she showed there, I'm absolutely in awe of her. Now, I'm pissed off.

Absolutely pissed off. I am sick to my back freaking teeth of people being polite about all of this. Oh, you know, we're not being colonised. We're so inclusive, this that and the other. Fricking Sadiq Khan, I won't even address him by his title because that shouldn't have even been given to him in the first place. Turning round and saying London's inclusive, this, that and the other.

He needs to watch that clip right now because London ain't inclusive. His own Muslim brethren are turning round and saying this is a Muslim area. How are you, what, that's supposed to be the definition of inclusivity now? Piss freaking right off. I don't think so. At the end of the day, I'm an atheist, but I recognise that I, live in a Christian country. And therefore, everyone has the right, especially Christians, to be on any street corner whatsoever and go on with their Christianity and spout it off this, that and

the other. And even if, right, that Christian preacher, he didn't, but even if in another alternate reality turned round and said that their prophet was a donkey, okay, so what? We don't have blasphemy laws in this country, you freaking morons. We can say whatever the frick we want, no matter how are they trying to approach it on us. Other than that, I'd turn around and say, do you know what, when I go shopping in Leeds, right, more often than not, I see, right, a group of Islamist gentlemen with the store, they're giving out free Qurans, they're espousing their religion, this, that and the other. What, am I supposed to turn around and say, you know what? No, no, no, no. you're in a Christian area, you're offending me,

I'm going to call the police to get you remove this, that and me other. How do you think that would work out for someone like me doing it against them? No, no, no, no, no. I'm sick to tired of this. Yeah, no, I think so many people share that frustration. And actually, it's interesting to see, if you've nominated Nigel Farage to be Union Jackass today, and a lot of people are really now accusing Farage of being,

like a containment agent. And I want to show you this video from earlier in the week that a lot of people say proves that. Watch this. To provide a proper democratic antidote to this, then I fear that we will see a rise of a really worrying, dangerous form of extreme right ethno-nationalism. And I think we're beginning over the last couple of weeks already to see some specimens of it.

Nobody, nobody over the last quarter of a century has done more to defeat the genuine, intolerant, abhorrent, extreme far right than me. We did it with the British National Party and will do it with whoever else follows. But it's important we get a grip on this because there is no issue other than legal and illegal immigration that has broken the bond of trust between the voters, and those that govern us more than this issue. And I have spoken out consistently on it for now nearly 25 years.

But I repeat the point I made at the conference last week. This is no longer a one-man band. Not that it ever was with all you lovely people. And the biggest membership of any party in the country. But I will leave the rest of this debate. and the solutions we're offering to Zia. But of course, he then came back and answered the difficult questions. But Nick Dixon posted on that, Farage admits his role has always been to contain the right.

Despite the scary terms he uses, it's really not extreme to want to preserve one's own people and culture against the genuinely extreme onslaught of insane immigration policy. So, Steph, is this one of the things that has been annoying you about Farage? Yes, amongst all the things. things. If he classes me as the extreme far right, then do you know what? When I fart, rainbows and freaking unicorns and butterfly shoe out of my backside, are you shizzing me here? I don't think it's unreasonable to turn round and say, stop the freaking boats. I don't think

it's unreasonable and extreme far right to turn around and say deport every single illegal immigrant that's here, that's literally bleeding us dry financially. They have financial vampires at this point. We don't have the money. Get rid. I don't think it's extreme far right to turn around and say that everyone that was involved and that have been monsters in the despicable rape gang epidemic that is infecting our country at the moment, which wouldn't you have it, predominantly is Muslim. All then that's extreme far right to turn around and say get rid. and everyone that knew that were accomplices, family members, the old lot, get rid. Nigel Farage is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

And I'll freely admit, I drank the collade. I fell for his stick. Not anymore. And I think a lot of people are feeling that way. And the thing is based in Bougie. And I know you've had a lot of personal hatred, of course, from genuine ethno-nationalists. But I do believe that Nigel Farage is actually trying to brand a lot of people who are not and who are not racist. And I include a lot of people representing Restore Britain in that way for political purposes.

And that's dangerous to me too. Yeah. Well, I've definitely had my reservations about Nigel Farage. There's a lot of things he's done and said that I do not agree with. But when it comes to that speech that he's done, I didn't see any lies. there's no lies told there is definitely a rise on ethno nationalism

now some people they may think ethno nationalism is okay and I'm so happy for you if you think ethnic nationalism is okay but for people like myself and a lot of my non-English friends

who go against ethno nationalism because maybe they have friends who are non-white or they have children who are mixed race or whatnot there is a rise and I think sometimes people have a tendency to just put words into

Nigel Farage's mouth like I'm not being funny he didn't say everyone who protested in Manchester He didn't say anyone who waved a flag. He didn't say Tommy Robinson. He specifically specified. No, but what we have seen based.

But what we have seen based in terms of specifics is, for example, Layla Cunningham, who is his London Merrill candidate, you know, a Muslim woman, describing me as far right to the sun, describing Charlie Downs as a neo-Nazi on G. So I think there is a lot of it. I do think there's a lot of it. I think the risk that reform are going to fall into is they are now using the same tactics against a lot of us on the right that the left have used against them for years. Yeah, well, definitely. We have situations where I feel like members of reform have definitely reached and they've definitely, you know, branded people to be something that they're not.

We saw it with the way Nigel treated Tommy Robinson. He was just, you know, being so mean towards Tommy Robinson. Who is anything but an ethno-known at? And this is what I'm talking about, though, base, because Danny Kruger, a very senior guy in Reform UK, went on TV recently and literally described Tommy Robinson as an ethno-knat. And this is what I mean. Do you see what I mean? If Reform UK basically tries to say, anyone to the right of us are racist, ethno-nationalist,

far-right neo-Nazis, I'm sorry, they are doing something very, very, very bad, very, very bad and very disingenuous. I mean, they'll be calling you an ethno-nat next. But that's the thing, though, he didn't say that in that speech. He said the F, no nationalist. You know what I mean? He didn't say Tommy Robinson. He didn't say Rupert Lowe. He didn't say restore supporters.

No, but I think that's what he was very clearly hinting at. And I think if you can see what his operatives, what they're putting out into the world, I would argue that's what he was hinting at. But no, it is a fair point. In that speech, he didn't specifically. specifically say, Restore Britain, Tommy Robinson, Rupert Lowe. But personally, I believe that's what he was getting at. And I think it is really dangerous. I do. Katie Hopkins has just destroyed a whole load of woke students at Cambridge University. And this is the video that I think all youngsters

desperately need to watch to wake up and realize that actually there is a way to deal with your feelings without always running and saying that you are. offended. And of course, this appearance sparked huge outrage so much so that Katie actually posted on X. Important update, Cambridge Union have printed grossly defamatory remarks about me claiming that during my speech at the Union, I offended one weak students who only got in for DEI reasons, two, the president who doctored my CV, three, the low IQ opposing speakers, ill-prepared and still writing notes, and four, the moronic kids who say, wasist every five minutes, five myself, by using.

the term spaz and Nazi Elvis. Now, she then made this video. Watch. Cambridge Union are all up in a hoo-ha because they say that on speaking at the Cambridge Union, I offended everybody. I offended the audience. I offended the president. I offended the other speakers.

And I offended myself by calling myself a Nazi Elvis. Frankly, my darling, it's given the motion in front of the house was, this house defends the right to offend. I think I am something of a genius. Yes, you were. And look, this was actually brilliant to watch. So I'm going to bring you the best bits. First up, a student accuses Katie of having a violent agenda.

This is how I like to go about the place. Yes. I think the police were interested in a little bit more out of the solution. I understand you're a humorous drunk at the moment, and I'm going to offend you by saying that. But your statements. are beyond just causing frivolous offence, aren't they? They're to mask an extremely nefarious and actually violent agenda. Say that again. They're to mask

an extremely nefarious and violent agenda. Would you say calling myself a spas is a violent agenda? Pardon? No what I said? What did you say? I said you called for a final solution against Muslim. That's not true either.

I called for a final solution to Islamist terror. in this country. And there are things that you might not want to hear, but those things are absolutely true. So Jim Ratcliffe, what he said was completely right. And to the point of our individual over here, who said, why not refute the point? Why not go to the point instead of just asking people to apologize? Apologising doesn't deal with the facts of the matter, and it's never the facts that people go to. Then a student attack Katie for her view on linking emotions with being weak. But what was really interesting here, I want you to look out for it, is Katie, open up for the first time about that humiliation she suffered on an international scale when she was tricked into accepting a fake award. Now, this award, do you remember it?

It was called the Campaign to Unify the Nation Trophy. Yeah, C-U-N-T Award. Agreed. 100%. Yeah. No, I agree with you entirely, actually. I think the ability to feel the emotion of being offended is so important in order to be able to understand why it upsets you, in order to be able to recover from it. And I speak this as someone who has been offended probably more than most.

I was tricked into receiving award. No, and the way that you deal with that, humiliation on an international scale. And the only way you can deal with that is to know that you turned up like you said you would. You did what you said you would. You were nice to all the staff there and you went home. There are sometimes you have to leave the uncomfortable bits with the people that did them to you. But you have to know yourself. So don't misunderstand me in terms of...

No back and forth. I'm sorry. Oh, I'll see you at the bar. She knows how to deal with things well, didn't she? Now, a student did attempt to offend Katie and soon learned that wasn't a good idea. Yes. Yes. Would it be okay with you if I could use my right to offend you? Of course. Go for it.

I have to say... Could you do less hand-wiggling and do the talking? Okay. So... Order, please. Order. Order. Thank you. We can let the speaker continue. I don't think that went so well for you.

No, I encourage points of order from the floor, and I don't want to humiliate you further than you've already humiliated yourself. So I think it's important that I move on. And you posted after darling young people, allow yourselves to be offended. Know yourself. Know why it hurts. And allow your sine news to be strengthened.

You may loathe the idea of me, but I am your strongest advocate and your firmest friend. Katie did say that students are now pre-programmed to be offended, and that is because young people are no longer being raised strong. If we were to measure offence and then we find someone, the weakest person, to measure how much is a permissible, some of you come pre-programmed with your offence already written into you. Someone in here, some pro-Palestine, pro-LGBQ, pro-bisexual, queer, curious ally with a nut allergy, is pre-programmed, and probably freaking gluten-free as well. It's pre-programmed to be offended.

And that is precisely the issue. Why are we not? No, Teddy. Why are we not? I'll see you after. Why are we not raising people strong? Why are we not challenging people and offending them to build them strong? When I went through the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst,

the point is that your sinews are tested and made strong by being tested. And the reason that people are offended in truth is because you touch upon something that hurts them. And it hurts them because when we don't know ourselves well, we can be offended because we are not strong enough. I urge you good young people of the Cambridge Union. Do allow yourself to be offended. Do know yourself because when you know yourself, you can rise above it.

And I urge you to let your life be full of all the feelings, all the dirty lot of it, including the ability to feel what it's like to be offended. Now, my superstar panel, Steph the Alternerd and Baste and Boogey with me, based is one of those young people. But she says she wasn't offended, writing, they can never make me hate Katie Hopkins. Young people today are being indoctrinated to believe that sensitivity is a strength. It is not being scrutinized, judged, mocked, creates a bulletproof individual who is able to remain tunnel vision on their mission. This is why I never sense a posts or

comments. You cannot be a free speech absolutist while trying to prevent people's right to offend, scrutinize, judge or question. Embrace offense. Laugh it off and get on with your day. And based, honestly, I loved that post from you because number one, I thought if only other young people thought like that, we would have a much stronger society, a better society. And also, to be honest, because it's a philosophy that I've always shared, right? Like, I have never brought into a victim narrative of my life whatsoever, even though I have had so much thrown at me from a very, very young age. Sticks and stones can break your bones, but names will never hurt me. And I always believe that. And actually, it just made me stronger as I went into the world where,

thank God I have that strength, given what I have to put up with from the radical left on a daily basis. So do you think the tone at universities and amongst young people might be changing just a little bit? Because even the fact that Katie Hopkins is addressing the Cambridge Union, I think, is progress. Yeah, no, I definitely feel like young people have become way too sensitive to me, for me, sorry. I don't know if it's because I grew up with five sisters and we all used to pick on each other, but I'm like the least sensitive person on the planet. And I feel like a lot of people... Where are you in the birth in order based? I'm the second oldest. The second order. Yeah. So, and I'm seeing a lot of this actually on the right. I feel like people

on the right who built their platforms on freedom of speech and democracy and just free speech are now becoming so sensitive to everything. Like, for instance, I made a post saying I'm going to start a new party called Reload. It was literally just a joke. to all the parties that are restore, reform or whatnot. And do you know how many people were so sensitive crying in the comments section? It's just like, you can't even make jokes no more these days. And I just think people need to understand that offence and jokes and people mocking you, it's not that deep, you know, it builds a strength, it builds character, it builds resilience.

Even sometimes I get a lot of hate online and sometimes my friends, they will call me up and they'll be like, are you okay? Is everything okay? I'm like, I'm okay, guys. It's not the end of the world. And I just think a lot of people need to be able to embrace offence. Like when people offend you and they are tapping at something that could be true. And sometimes you can use that to even improve yourself. We'll just laugh it off and get on with your day, honestly.

Steph, the alternate, do you agree with what Katie Hopkins was saying at Cambridge? Absolutely. Do you know what? We are in a reality here. and I think this is something that Russell Howard coined the phrase on one of his stand-ups, the professionally offended. We are now in a reality where there is this society, the professional offended, they'll see offence in any which way they can.

They'll see offence in freaking my little pony at this point to try and prove their point. It's absolutely insane. And do you know what? It's sick how, for example, we now live in a country where it's offensive to literally hoist our flag high in public spaces. We now live in a country where that's considered offensive. Get freaking Ben. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. If that's offensive to you, absolutely fair enough.

But do you know what? I've got the right to have that flag flying high in every single public space imaginable and that is it. So to you and your offence, you can lay it on a cactus with a little bit of chili oil and shove it up your backside

because I am sick and tired of having to think, oh, well, if I do this, is this going to be offensive? If I do this, is this going to be offensive? No, we live in a classroom. country where there's no blasphemy laws and where we're supposed to have free speech. So I've got the freedom to say what I want to say just as much as you've got the freedom to be offensive. But if you being offended does not then give you the right to shut me the hell up.

Very well put, stiff. Very well put it. I don't think anyone can shut you the hell up. Now look, we've got more breaking news just in. Peter Mandelson has issued an extraordinary statement claiming that he was arrested by the police, and obviously we will always remember those iconic scenes outside his house in North London yesterday, after claims that he was planning to flee the country. Now, this really does make sense because remember Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, according to Andrew Launy, was arrested after suggestions he might feel the country too. But this is a very bold statement issued by Peter Mandelson's law firm Mishkan Dorea in the past few minutes. I want to read it out to you because it really is quite something.

So this is what Mandelson's lawyers have just said. Peter Mandelson was arrested yesterday, despite an agreement with the police, that he would attend an interview next month on a voluntary basis. The arrest was prompted by a baseless suggestion that he was planning to leave the country and take up permanent residents abroad. There is absolutely no truth whatsoever in any such suggestion. We have asked the Metropolitan Police for the evidence relied upon to justify the arrest. Peter Mandelson's overriding priority is to cooperate with the police investigation, as he has done throughout this process and to clear his name. His lawyers have also said that his passport was confiscated

over these fears that he was about to leave the country. So Basin Buzi, that is quite a bold statement coming from Peter Mandelson and the fact that he was arrested by the police in the same way that Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor was arrested by the police, does suggest, and whether it's people, who are trying to cause the arrest or not does suggest that the police were at least concerned based that both of these men may have been planning to flee Britain.

Obviously, that is something that Mandelson, at least, has now denied. Listen, at the end of the day, I believe in law and order. So if you've committed misconduct, you need to go. You need to go. What people need to understand is that this is not even the first time this Peter Manderson guy was arrested. He was arrested in 1998 over some personal known. He was also arrested again in 2001 off of improper intervention.

And now this is the third time. Like, how much more grace are we going to continue to give this guy? So because I believe in law and order, and if I believe someone has committed misconduct or committed a crime, he needs to go. All of these long statements, I don't know what they're for. Just lock him up. That's just my personal opinion.

Well, the police seem to be standing by what they have done, Stiff, the alter nerd, saying, that the arrest on Monday, this is according to a source, a police source, followed new intelligence that had been received and it was done for, quote, clear operational reasons. So the police seemed to be standing by this idea that there was the possibility that Mandelson may have actually been preparing to flee the country and he's now not allowed to leave the country without permission. Paging Captain Obvious on this one, really, in the grand scheme of things? Because when you look at characters such as Mandelson and Andrew, well, duh, they are people of still enormous wealth, power and contacts. So they have, compared to someone like me, a gobb of Yorkshire, right?

they've got tremendous access and means to disappear. Of course they're going to be high risk when it comes to, you know, flying away and disappearing and trying to escape justice. So for me it's like, well, to die. Interesting though that Mandelson is turning round through his solicitors breaking news and saying, no, I'm not a flight risk, this, that and the other. What's more interesting is what he's not denying, what he's not saying. Why is he focusing so much on this potential allegation that he's a flight risk?

Why hasn't he said anything else on the matter in terms of the wider scope of the situation? Well, it's interesting because I imagine his lawyers will have advised against that. But of course, the end of their statement did say that his overriding priorities to cooperate with the police investigation, as he has done throughout this process and to clear his name. I imagine that the statement will have also been released because what his lawyers will be hoping to prove is that in some way the police were attempting to make an example out of him or attempting to get headlines as a result of this. And what that could mean, of course, is that maybe in the future they will be able to argue if he were charged, if he was to be put on trial, at some point they would be able to argue that he was. unable to receive a fair trial. So I would imagine this is part of a wider game plan,

but just repeating that breaking news, Peter Mandelson has had his passport confiscated, but denied suggestions that he is preparing to flee the country. He has said that the police arrested him yesterday, despite having agreed to attend a voluntary interview next month. Breaking today, that scumbag, I see, Bride, Shemima Begham, is planning to illegally re-enter the United Kingdom in a shocking new development over a woman who I think shames our country and should be made an example of.

And for all of those bleeding hearts who said, oh, Shemima was a little child, she didn't know what she was doing. Here's 15 seconds that you should always watch just to remind you, remind yourself about the true woman we are dealing with here. Did you know what Islamic State were doing when you left for Syria? Because they had beheaded people. There were executions. Yeah, I knew about those things and I was okay with it. She knew about those things and she was okay about it.

Now the journalist who knows Shemima Begham best, Andrew Jury, who will be with us momentarily, has revealed shocking new text messages that show that there is a plot for Shemima Begham to return to the United Kingdom. Let me take you through Andrew's astonishing reporting. And by the way, I don't trust the Labor government with this, because remember Stama, Slippery Stama originally, said that Shemima should be allowed to return. So this is the reporting from jury in today's Daily Express newspaper. Shemima Begham could be plotting to pay people smugglers to help her get back to Britain, astonishing text from inside her camp claim. The nation's most famous former ISIS Bride has been held an Alaraj detention facility in Syria since 2019

after the murderous Islamic State she joined as a schoolgirl a decade ago were defeated. Shemima was stripped of her British citizenship for signing up to the death cult and all her bids in the UK to overturn that decision have failed. But now filmmaker Andrew Jury, who has risked his life. interviewing Shemima Begham six times, has revealed he has been contacted over the past weeks from inside the camp with a plot to smuggle her out alongside an American, former jihadi. Mr Jury has received a flurry of text from Hoda Matana, Shemima's best friend in the camp, who has also had her citizenship stripped for joining ISIS.

Apparing to act as Shemima's fixer, Hoda has asked for thousands of US dollars using the code word gummies and brink. British pounds referred to as mints to help pay people smugglers to get the pair out. Hoda has also outlined a plan for the ex-ISIS brides to cross the border into nearby Turkey, to get to our embassies, and that they believe the UK will be forced to take Shemima back once Turkey deports her. In one message, Hoda writes, bring 5,000 gummy bears with you, the American brand is better. Shemima also likes mince about the same amount, but better you come and give it, so half the bag isn't taken. When Mr. Jury replied,

saying he had doubted UK authorities would allow Shemima back into the country, Hoda replied they eventually will, once Turkey deports her, which is what they will do. Astonishingly, the two former jihadi bris also admit to planning interviews with unnamed media networks, with Hoda adding Shemima Begham already promised certain networks to be the first to interview her outside the camp, and in the UK, when she finally gets repatriated. The Daily Express has received exclusive information that Shemima is already receiving money from unknown benefactors. A source telling the newspaper she currently has plans to escape from the camp, particularly in light of the prevailing circumstances in the region. Furthermore,

she has been receiving financial transfers from unknown sources in the last installment at the end of January 2026. She received an amount of 162 US. So this is truly sickening to me. And Andrew Jury, the story, the journalist behind this extraordinary story, joins me. me now alongside my superstar panelist based and Bucci and Steph the alternate. Andrew's so great to see you again. This is such a disturbing story though. And Andrew, I can actually imagine some type of scenario where Shemima Begham escapes that camp, gets to France, gets on a dingy, a small boat to the United Kingdom and then she can't be booted out. She seems determined Andrew to get back here come hell or high water. Do you agree?

Well, most definitely. These messages started coming to me back in September. They started as the normal. I mean, we've spoken so many times, Dan, over this. I almost feel I shared the story with you. You have. Two years ago. So I think it's as much mine as it is yours. I know her so well after spending, I would

say, probably three or four years. I'm in contact with her now. But the messages came, and it was just normal. normal fishing messages, how are you, how are things? I know there's always more to her when I get these messages. But then it didn't take long for what you're reading now to come out. She started grooming me, kind of expressing that if I, so she could trust me again. If I didn't reveal these messages, she would give me the big interview.

She at first asked for 35,000. And then I questioned the ethics. I said, you ethically, this can't happen. and then she sort of dumbed it down a little bit and I think all what you've seen I mean you wouldn't believe it She wanted you to raise $35,000 so that you could be the first to interview her outside the camp

Yeah she said it'd be exclusive As soon as you get to Turkey You've got me We'll have a destination And then when I wasn't playing ball She reduced it And then she said we can drop half of it Outside the camps

So basically that would be to her people smuggler And that would guarantee getting out But I had these in September but I kind of sent you a message and I was kind of reaching out to most people then and I contacted, I don't ever can mention his name but he's my MP, Jeremy Hunt.

Of course you can. What did he say about that? So I contacted Jeremy, I sent him an email and said, look, basically what's gone on? I've got people smuggler trying to get people out of the camp inside Syria. He only had to research my name. He would see that it's legitimate what I'm saying.

He got back to me and said, contact Surrey Police Commissioner. Gee, man, this is in Syria. What's the Surrey police commissioner going to do with a prisoner trying to get out of Syria? I gave up that. So then I moved on to our intelligence.

Jeremy Hunt. Not surprised. Sorry, keep going. It's not I knew his name rhymes with something. Anyway, so I contacted the intelligence service. I thought, this must be the way out. Let's contact intelligence. So I made the phone call. They would know who I am. Let's be clear about that. But they have an answer phone service, so I left a message for them

to get back to me because I really felt the weight and pressure of having this information. And I didn't want to write a story. I didn't want it to be in the papers. I just wanted to get rid of her. I've had enough of her story. Nothing. They didn't bother contact me back. So I spoke to Richard, who's got, he's a journalist with Express. He had contact straight to the parliament. He had interviewed MP, so he relied on them. So he contacted his MP. these, not interested. So out of the frustration of our government, not just Labor Party government,

but obviously they're key, the Conservative government, everybody contacted, aren't interested in people smugglers taking excises out of a prison camp. So that's why I'm here now, appealing to you, Dan, appealing to people that listen to my story.

This is real. People are leaving that camp. Not only that, these mobile phones they have, my friend inside the prison camp, who's in charge of it, she is, as reliably informed us, that the phones they've been confiscating off these prisoners are talking to ISIS spin to cells now. So these get women that we declare have been radicalized

or whatever are talking to ISIS. There's even been averages by phone. So this is where we are at the moment. And Andrew, how easy would it be for her to get from that camp in Syria to Turkey? Or how difficult? Well, first. Obviously, Roche Camp is on the Turkish border almost. She can walk there within a day's walk or two days walk and she'd be there. So it's quite simple. And you've got to realise with the new regime that's come in, the new Syrian government aligns herself of al-Qaeda,

although today ISIS have said that he's a Western puppet. But now they took over a whole camp already and 150 escaped. So the changeover of camp from SDF, which control it now, to the new Syrian forces, the gates got over. And you could see from the news it was like liberation. So she could walk out them gates. It's only one gate that can open and she could go amongst the crowd. So I think we have got a real issue.

Unless we control the handover or do something about it, in my view, the best thing could happen is she gets moved into non-Kurdistan Iraq, where she'll face trial and we know what can happen there. Wow. I mean, the problem is, and let me be. bring Steph the alternate on this. The problem is Steph, I actually think most of the British establishment, most of the Deep State, even Slippery Stama himself, because they're so obsessed with the whole human rights law thing, I actually think they believe that she should be back

here. So I don't think they're going to do too much to stop it, do you? No. And there's so much more that they could do to actually stop this from happening. And they haven't. We as taxpayers have already poured millions into the new Syrian government under the guise of to strengthen the security over there, this, that and me over. Well, a clear example of strengthening security is to ensure that Shemima Begham does not come back to the UK. Where is the Syrian government in all of this? Why aren't they going into the camps arresting these people and putting them on trial for their involvement with ISIS and other various affiliated terrorist organizations. It baffles me on that score. Although on a side note, I kind of wonder why it's taken Shemima Bergam in a sense this long

to kind of devise this plan of just come in illegally to UK like the rest of the illegal immigrants are doing. Although in that sense, I suppose on a dingy across the English channel, There will at least now be one lass that we could then potentially identify on one of those dinghies coming across. So, you know, there is that. Based on Bougie, it's quite sick, isn't it, just how sophisticated she is, trying to negotiate media deals? I mean, this woman wants to be famous. She's a slimy one.

Honestly, she's such a slimy little devious girl, and she needs to stay exactly where she is. She made her bed and she can lay in it, okay? And I also want to say, I think that the case of Shemima Bagu should be an example to all the stand up to racism, Antifa, hope not hate. People who advocate for mass migration, advocate for ideologies that are incompatible with the West. Because here we have someone who stood there and said that she wants to be the wife of an ISIS pride. And now she's coming back and saying she wants to make her way back to the UK. That should be an example to everyone to be more grateful for what this country has to offer. but she needs to stay exactly there.

Andrew, what do you think is going to happen now that you have made this revelation? Has there been any update today? Do you get the sense that the authorities of the British government are almost going to be shamed into action? There you are with Shemima, by the way, in the camp. Listen, I think you know the answer to that. Shame on this government? What shame do they hold? Listen, equally, we've also, I understand, under this government, under Kear,

I interviewed two other prisoners there. One was called the Terror Twin and another girl from Richmond I interviewed. Both of them are back in the UK. I put this out in many interviews. I mean, we don't even know where they were. All I know they were were repatriated. Prison Gamper said they're no longer there.

The Terror Twin was probably far more dangerous than Shamima. Where is she? She's not in the camp. There's a possibility she's in Holland, but we believe that she's home here with another friend and another inmate. None of us know where they are. None of us have been told.

So you don't think it's our right to know where these prisoners are, I do. Absolutely. Absolutely. Well, look, thank you for your absolutely brilliant work, Andrew Dury, an incredible independent reporter who has always been all over this Shemima Begham's story and very much has a read of this woman.

But I just worry. I honestly just worry. I have this horrible feeling eventually the deep state, the British establishment are going to find a way to bring this woman back so we've got to keep across this. Andrew, please keep us posted. Come back to out to outspoken soon. Thank you so much and thank you to today's incredible superstar panel. Steph, the ultimate, The Old Town, Nerd, and Based and Bougy. We'll find out who's won, our union jackass in just one moment.

But first of all, I want to get to your comments today. Del Mar says, I don't think Mandelson will make it to the courts. He knows too much and he could be in someone's crosshairs. John says, Dan, if he has found guilty, I agree, trial by press or public opinion is not a good thing, keep up the brilliant work. Devonshire Dumpleen says our monarch is the only one that can stand up to the Fabian Society. Why do you think they're going after Andrew harder than Mandelson? This is deliberate to try and bring down the monarchy. Haunted Bear Child says the king needs to, and they are a new member, so thank you so much for joining out of Spoken Plus, by the way.

But they say the king needs to speak to his people, period, not just keep issuing statements. Queen Elizabeth will be horrified. Well, you know I agree with that, but it's a controversial one. And Galactic Guru says we've been taken over in England without a single bullet fired. A reminder of our nominees for Union Jackass today. I nominated Shemina Mebekum for the reasons we've just discussed. Based in Bougie went for Bob Villain for using a disability to race bait. And Nigel Farage was nominated by Steph the alternate for Phelene in his Chegos Island stunt.

and the results are in. In third place, with 26% of your vote, Bob Villan, the runner up with 31% of the vote, Nigel Farage. But today's Union Jackass with 43% of the vote for very obvious reasons. It's Shemima Begham. And today's Greatest Britain, nominated by Steph the Alternerd, is the as-yet-unnamed female police officer, but there she is in Whitechapel who stood up to a group of Muslims over the right to free speech. Now, we're moving over to Substack now. much more royal news with Lauren the insider. You can come and join us there at www.

outspoken.com. Shocking developments actually emerging from the Epstein files. We're going to get into all of that. But I will be back with you live tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9am Pacific. So make sure you hit subscribe right here on YouTube. Turn on the notification bell. You can also subscribe to us as a podcast at Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. And please remember to rate and review five stars if you may. Most importantly, most important, Importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.