Dan Wootton Outspoken - KING CHARLES EASTER OUTRAGE WITH CALLS TO ABDICATE AS HE BACKS ISLAMISTS OVER CHRISTIANS

Episode Date: April 3, 2026

BREAKING THIS EASTER: A growing backlash against King Charles and even calls to abdicate after Buckingham Palace confirms the monarch has REFUSED to issue an Easter message this year, despite multiple such outreaches for major moments on the Islamic calendar like Ramadan. The unfortunately timed Christian snub from the Head of the Church of England has renewed concerns that Charles is more sympathetic to Islamism than Christianity, with Tommy Robinson lashing out and Rudy Giuliani going viral with his Muslim monarch slur. And there’s real reason for concern about the Islamist takeover of the UK, with another call for Christians to be humiliated on our holiest of days. So today we have reunited our priests for a very special Good Friday Superstar Panel: Father Calvin Robinson, Minister Rikki Doolan, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar and Reverend Canon Father Phil Harris. PLUS: Rupert Lowe fights the GB News ban against Restore Britain after Tom Harwood unwittingly reveals the anti-democratic truth. AND: New questions over Jill Dando’s killing as she prepared to expose the BBC before her shooting death. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Anna Wintour bans Meghan Markle from the Met Gala as the Fake Duchess attempts to change the storyline by revealing new holiday videos of Prince Harry and Archie on her Instagram page. All the royal latest with According2Taz. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no sense. This is yet, I'm Dan Wooden. This is a special Easter edition of outspoken episode number 4602. Of course we reflect on the great sacrifice of Christ this good Friday and may you find strength in the promise of the cross. But breaking this Easter, a growing backlash against King Charles and even calls for him to abdicate after Buckingdon Palace confirmed the monarch has refused to issue an Easter message this year. despite multiple such outreaches for major moments on the Islam calendar like Ramadan. Let me recall if I may a passage of the Holy Corral. Salamu alaikum, Ramadan Mubarak.

In Nigerian across the world, I can only wish you and the millions of Muslims in our countries. Eid Mubarak. Islam is part of our past and our present in all fields of human endeavour. It has helped to create. not in Europe. It is part of our own inheritance. The unfortunately timed Christian snub from the head of the Church of England has renewed concerns that Charles is more sympathetic to Islamism than Christianity, with Tommy Robinson lashing out and Rudy Giuliani going viral with his Muslim monarch slur.

And Charles III might be the Muslim monarch of England. I mean, they're taken over, and they want to take over. believe King Charles is a Muslim. Wow. Who told you that? I won't say. It was someone very, very high up. And look, there is a real cause for concern about the Islamist takeover of the UK

with another call today for Christians to be humiliated. Watch. The caravan, when he walks inside the street, he has to wear a red belt around his neck and he has to have his forehead shaved and he has to wear two shoes, two shoes which are different from one another. He's not allowed to walk on the pavement.

He has to walk in the middle of the road and he has to ride on a mule. So this Good Friday, I am delighted that we have reunited our Christian heroes for a very special superstar panel. Joining me for the entire show, Father Kelvin Robinson, Minister Ricky Doolan, Bishop Karen H. Diwa and Reverend Cannon, Father Phil Harris. Also, coming up on the show today, Rupert Lowe fights the GB News ban against Restore Britain after Tom Harwood unwittingly reveals the anti-democratic truth. New questions over Jill Dando's murder, as she prepared to expose the BBC before her shocking death. And there is a new campaign to ban the construction of mosques up and down the country. It is gathering pace. We will speak to the man behind it this good Friday.

Then, in the Royal Uncanceled After Show, over on Substack after the main show, Anna Wintour bans Megynchall from the Met Gala as the fate Duchess attempts to change the storyline by revealing new holiday videos of Prince Harry and Archie on her Instagram page. All the Royal latest with according to Taz. That is after the main show at www.org.org. At the end of the show, Today we will also be revealing the worst Britain in the world this week. This is where we put your union jackass winners from Monday to Thursday head to head. You can vote right now in the posts tab on YouTube. Your options from Monday, Zara Soltana from Tuesday, Ed Balls, from Wednesday, Emily Thornberry and from Thursday the tit whisperer himself, Zach Polanski. Get voting, keep your

feedback coming in. I will share the best at the end of today's episode. But now, Let's go. So what should have been a celebratory and important day for the British royal family has been shockingly overshadowed by the growing King Charles religious scandal. Yesterday, after the monarch stepped out for the Monde Thursday service, continuing a tradition, his mother adored as the head of the Church of England, Buckingham Palace foolishly briefed GB news that the defender of the faith would not be issuing any message for Christmas, for Easter this year. Now that stung, okay?

That stung. While the propagandist defenders of the king, in the Royal Rota and the mainstream media, immediately pointed out that the late Queen didn't issue an Easter message either, that is not the point here. Charles's own long-held sympathies for Islam and his regular celebrations of events like Ramadan have changed the game. An Easter message is the least this struggling Christian nation expects and needs. So the condemnation was universal and immediate,

with Royal commentator Lauren the insider declaring it is no conspiracy. King Charles is not a Christian. King Charles must abdicate. He is a traitor. Watch. Has received huge backlash. He is not releasing an Easter message. Went to the Monde, Thursday service.

That's done. It's done. It's all he's doing. And this is why I say he can't do anything more. Because he's compromised, but it'll also come out in hives. If he says the word Christians, he just cannot do it. Now, look, I understand what Lauren is saying, but I'm just going to be honest with you. I am not there yet in terms of abdication because I am a believer in hereditary monarchy. However, what I have done now over many years is call out King Charles's links to Islam,

and I believe they must be further examined. I mean, as the Prince of Wales, he would regularly quote the Quran. Let me recall if I may a passage of the Holy Quran, which seems but to be a time. particularly appropriate to Islamic relief's work, and which says in verse 32 of Al-Bai Dha Sura, whoever saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for saving and transforming so many lives over the past 25 years. And may there be many blessings, inshallah, on your work during the next quarter of a century. Tommy Robinson is happy to call this out.

He has posted overnight. Buckingham Palace announced that Charles won't be issuing an Easter message this year. Meanwhile, for Ramadan, this. Salamu alaikum, Ramadan Mubarak. Ladies and gentlemen, as Muslims across the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth begin preparations to celebrate Eid after fasting for the Holy Month of Ramadan, I just wanted to convey my heartfelt best wishes to all who celebrate this festival and to tell you just how much my wife and I are thinking of you at this special time of year.

And before 9-11, Charles was even. even suggesting the West should change our values to adopt anti-capitalist tenets of Islam. Islam is part of our past and our present in all fields of human endeavour. It has helped to create Latin Europe. It is part of our own inheritance, not a thing apart. Islam can teach us today a way of understanding and living in the world which Christianity itself is the poorer for having lost. Our judgment,

Islam, has been closely distorted by taking the extremes to be the world. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a serious mistake. It is like judging the quality of life in Dipple by the existence

of verda and rape, child abuse, drug addiction. Extremes do exist and they must be dealt with, but when used as a basis to judge society. They lead to distortion and unfairness. We in the West need also, I think, to understand the Islamic world's view of us. There is nothing to be gained and much harm to be done. Seems to me by refusing to comprehend the extent to which many people in the Islamic world

genuinely fear our own Western materialism and mass culture as a deadly challenge to their Islamic culture and way of life. The fact is that our form of materialism can be offensive to devouch Muslims, and I do not just mean the extremists among them. Now, one of the religious figures joining us on our special Easter superstar panel today, Minister Ricky Doolin, has been very critical of Charles's decision to take Islam inside our palaces. You think King Charles is defending the faith? I think he's abandoned that position of defending the faith, especially when it comes to Islam, where Islam is like the best friend. You know, like he allowed the Iftar, the breaking of the Ramadan fast, inside of the palace.

And Bishop Karen Diwa issued another of his viral open letters overnight, writing, at such a pivotal moment in our nation where many across this United Kingdom feel that our Christian identity is being rapidly stripped away, this silence from the crown is not neutrality, it is absence. Let us not forget that Easter is not merely a footnote in our national story. It is its very foundation. A nation that is untethered from the resurrection of Christ risks forgetting not only who it is, but why it stands at all. Yet, in regards to what Ricky was saying, let me just show you King Charles at the recent Nigerian state.

In Nigeria and across the world, I can only wish you and the millions of Muslims in our countries, Eid Mubarak. And in doing so, let me propose a toast to the president and people of Nigeria. Niger no day carry last.

Then there's Jada Franson who posted Buckingdon Palace say King Charles will not issue an Easter message this year. He is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. Here he is packing dates for Muslims to eat at sunset during Ramadan. Shameful. And that did happen. Watch. Okay. Sorry, I didn't realize the king would be so fast. You are packing days faster than I can see them. Okay, sorry. Okay.

I never realized. This is a speedy couple. Now, after I revealed the news about King Charles's Easter message snub last night, Patriots United. With Alison Pearson posting my digest and adding, it is very concerning if the king isn't issuing an Easter message, there is unhappiness he is neglecting the faith of which he is defender. Kate Hoey, on the left, added, it is true?

Is it true? that the king is not delivering a message for Easter. If this is true, why is he not? We need to have a reason. If he can give messages to Muslims on their special religious days, surely he must send a message to Christians. Mike Graham raged. What's wrong with this idiot?

King of absolute bollocks. And Henry Bolton of the SDP posted, I don't know the reason for this decision, but I very much hope it's not what I can't help suspecting and many people think. Then there was senior London Tory, Susan Hall, who demanded King Charles as the head of the Church of England. An Easter message when us Christians, a failing very sidelined, would have been welcome, and I would have thought for the sake of the monarchy, essential.

Even Reform UK supporter Isabel Okshot, fiancé of Richard Tice joined the chorus, writing, The King is head of the Church of England. He issued Ramadan and Eid messages, but apparently isn't bothering with Easter this year. why the holy F, not okay. Then across the Atlantic, Milo Unopoulos, opined, I think Charles III is Muslim. Now that is a growing feeling in the US. This is what Rudy Giuliani claimed to Piers Morgan earlier in the week.

I have people from Mingwen telling me you're going to be a Muslim country in 10 years. I mean, the Anglican Church, Roman Catholic Church is bigger in England now than the Anglican Church. And Charles III might be the Muslim monarch of England. I mean, they're taken over. And they want to take over. The pushback has been strong, however,

and you know I will always cover both sides here and outspoken. So the British Royalist Society has stated the late Queen issued a single Easter message in the 70 years of her reign, a one-off during the pandemic. There is no break with tradition, and this is the purest example of clickbait. So they went for G.B News there. But as Jonathan Wong countered, her late majesty has never issued a dedicated Ramadan or Eve message from Buckingham Palace across her 70-year reign. And for me, that's the point.

Because by the way, this is not one of those so-called conspiracy theories. Even the late Queen's long-time chaplain Gavin Ashton has spoken out in regards to this. All we can tell is he appears to prefer Islam. So he promotes Islam, he talks about Islam, he appears to be happy in his Islamic company, and there's nothing wrong with being nice to Muslims. Muslims are human beings before there anything else we should love our fellow human beings, but it's about proportion. And so if he's king of the whole country, you would expect his behaviour, his language,

his preferences, to be proportionate. but they're not. They favour one community above all others, and it's Islamic. So it's, we don't know why. We just know that that's how it is. And this moment comes at an unquestionably perilous time for the British royal family, with King Charles uninviting Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, Thurgy, Beatrice and Eugenie from Sunday's Easter service,

after demands from Prince William, who will attend with Catherine and his three children. But the Republican movement is using the moment of weakness, even disrupting the Monde Thursday service yesterday. Now I say all of this as a monarchist and a royalist, and I know there will be some of you watching today asking, why is the king's connection to Islam an issue at all? Well, I would argue it's because of the very obvious Muslim takeover happening here in the UK, a Christian country. As Liz Rosen has uncovered just today,

a Muslim preacher in Britain explains how all British non-Muslims will be punished under Sharia laws in the near future. John Cleese, who has woken up on this issue, added they are living in their own world, aren't they? I think it's very important to remind them of the reality of living in Britain. Unfortunately, Stama isn't going to do this. And I want you to watch what they are referring to and be horrified. The caravan, when he walks inside the street, he has to wear a red belt around his neck, and he has to have his forehead shaved, and he has to wear two shoes,

two shoes which are different from one another. He's not allowed to, and he's not allowed to walk on the pavement. He has to walk in the middle of the road, and you have to ride on a mule. And that's only for the adults, not for the children. And you can see how Islam would make the child become a Muslim. The kaffir, or the child growing up in a state of kufr, he would turn to Islam. Why?

Because the child will be walking along with his dad. They said, dad, yeah? Why are you got your forehead shaved? I don't know whether these Muslims that make me do it. Why are you going to walk? Why can't you ride the animal? Like the Muslims, they walk like ride the animal like this. Why are you walking with both legs dangling on the side of the donkey?

Why is it every time the Muslim comes to you, He asks you for your clothes, you give it. Why is it every time he tells you to get down from the horse, you have to take it? And not only that. He said the Qafar, they can have their churches. They can have their churches, but they're not allowed to ring the bell. It is what they talk about privately. That is how they see the Islamist takeover going.

We can't allow it. As Islam critic Gad Saad argued to the apologist Rory Stewart. Dare Rory Stewart, the most charitable non-partisan database that tracks Islamic terrorism has generated the following estimate. 49,000 plus terror attacks by Muslims since 9-11 alone in nearly 70 countries. Does this cause you concern? Or is 49,000 a very small number compared to 2 billion? So nothing to worry about. What's interesting is that in this climate, religion, once again,

again a major political issue in the UK. This is the new cover of The Spectator magazine this week with Madeline Grant arguing Tony Blair's victory in 1997 was infamous as the start of not doing God. Yet as the political world Blair shaped is swept into the dust spin of history, two things are increasingly clear. Our next national poll will be an existential election and religion will play a bigger role than it has for years. Britain's politics is back, doing God again. Talking of fringes, the Green Party has made religious policy a key part of its electoral offering with a rather retrovow to disestablish the Church of England. The last National Party leader to talk seriously about church state affairs in this vein was David Lloyd George. Un Officially, the mobilisation of a

religious vote played a major role in the Greens' totemic by-election victory in Gorton and Denton, with canvassing and adverts tailored towards the very specific concerns of Islamic voters. More worryingly, the old canards of anti-Semitic blood libel first emerging in English religion just after the Norman Consquest have cropped up in Green activist WhatsApp groups. Despite their policy platforms, in fact the Greens probably prove more than any other party that completely secularised politics isn't really possible at all. As a capital E type, the next election might feature at its centre issues such as the role of public prayer, assisted suicide, blasphemy legislation, and the constitutional

role of church and state. Indeed, in existential terms, it may be closer to the election of 1710 than that of 2010. UK politics is finally for better and worse, realizing that religion is here to stay. The Crown has noticed this too. Despite conspiracist slander from the online, line right, the king's faith, though higher and more eccentric than his mother's low and dry religion, is slow and unfeigned, and his prayers with Pope Leo last year were quietly monumental. More tellingly, the Prince of Wales has made public that he has no plans to rock the boat of church-state relations. Of course, he believes in God, came a statement from Kensington Palace. Ten years ago, that, of course, would not have been so obvious. Like so many institutions, the Church of England

has prioritised all forms of diversity, except diversity of thought, leading to a convergence of opinion that is not only alienating, but leads to myopic decision-making. We do not need a militaristic or persecuting church, but our new political world could benefit from one that at least seems to like itself, and believe in what it can do, namely underpinning the macro and micro-aspects of British life, and seeking to live out the teachings of Christ, which, after all, almost everything that anybody values about life in Britain is based. Now, also in this same Easter edition of The Spectator, Marcus Walker has noticed that Gen Z, the sort of restore Britain voters of the right, are turning to the book of common prayer. He wrote, until now, there is much evidence that young adults and

young men in particular have been returning to church. Most interesting of all is that these young people seem to be craving authenticity and tradition or full fat faith, as many are calling it. I can only speak for my own congregation, but since 2018, we have restored the authorised version of the Bible, introduced new prayer book, even songs, and even seeing numbers skyrocket, especially among those aged between 20 and 35. We have had almost 150 confirmation since COVID, and now a heartening number are considering ordination. And yet, according to the sages of the 1960s, this shouldn't be happening. These young men and women should never have come near a church using these and thous, talking about sin or praying in a register more Shakespeare than Love Island.

But by the way, speaking of ITV, and the latest cultural outrage from the elite woke class, that commercial broadcaster, which should fall, by the way, is making a new drama about Queen Elizabeth First, and they are going to make her trans. Julie Birchall, furious about this, writing Elizabeth First to be portrayed as a transgender man in imminent TV show. I remember people snaring that Mrs Thatcher was a man in drag. Let's just make every tough woman in history a man

and be done with it because women aren't ambitious ever. Talk about erasure. And Sharon Davies fume, that's right, people. Strong women can't possibly just be women. They have to be men. pretending to be women. Who writes this shit? So that is the climate this Easter in the United Kingdom.

And I think King Charles, unfortunately, today has led us down. But now let me bring in our special Good Friday Superstar Panel. Minister Ricky Doolin, Bishop Karen H. Dever, Reverend Cannon, Father Phil Harris, and Father Calvin Robinson all with us. Father Calvin, I want to start with King Charles and this decision not to release an Easter message despite having done so for Ramadan and Eid. Surely at the very least, a PR misstep,

or do you see something more sinister like Lauren the insider does? At the very least, it's weird, isn't it? To promote one religion over another when we have a state religion. We have an established church in Great Britain and the king is the supreme governor of that church. So when he takes the oath to defend the faith, he should stand by it. I've seen critics saying, well, the monarch doesn't usually make an Easter message,

so it's no faux par, which is technically true, but also untrue in Charles's case. Since 2018, Charles then Prince of Wales was releasing Easter statements. He's released one for every year for eight years. So he has set a tradition, whether it's the tradition of the monarchy or his personal tradition. So to break it this year, when he made such a big fuss over Ramadan and Eid and Iftar and all the dates and all that stuff, just shows the wrong message. I get it. I get that he wants to be supportive of people of other faiths than none, but that's not the way to do it. The way to do it is to promote the biggest truth that we have in this country in that at Easter time, we celebrate the passion, death and resurrection of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. and he died for all of us, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, because he wants everyone

to have eternal salvation in him. Therefore, everyone needs to come to Christ. If you are the supreme governor of a church, your one role in life is to bring people into that church. And he's letting down the church, he's letting down Christ, he's letting down the country, unfortunately. Minister Doolan, we saw in the Digest you speaking about your concerns about Charles seemingly bringing Islam into the palaces. Yeah, it is a big concern because the defender of the faith should be defending the Christian faith.

And really that title is a doing title. So it doesn't stand if the action is not being taken. And that action is not being taken by our monarch. I'm a respecter personally of our monarch and the royal family as they are anointed by God. but it would be very good for our king to remember which God he was anointed into his kingship by, and that God is Jesus Christ. It is not, as the Bible would describe it, a foreign God, no, it's Jesus Christ.

And there is a very distinct separation between the God of Christianity and the God of foreign religions. So it would be very good for our king, the king of a Christian nation, to remember that and stop glazing on other religions and gods. odds. And that would be a very good thing for the future of our nation. Bishop Diwa, your open letters have really gone viral around the world, very powerful. And it was this decision by King Charles, confirmed by Buckingham Palace, that prompted your latest missive. Explain why you feel so disappointed today. I think the king has failed to read the public mood, has failed to. to listen to what his subjects are saying, has failed to understand that.

A large percentage of the British people and people around the Commonwealth feel that our Christian culture, our Christian heritage, our Christian identity is being rapidly and acceleratingly eroded deliberately with a view to it being replaced either by secularism or by other religions that are trying to, as we've seen in the Digest, trying to force an Islamic State in the United Kingdom. And I think that the king's absence in speaking at this particular time is really an abdication of his duties as defender of the faith. It really broke my heart that having seen such a viral response

to my first open letter to the king and knowing that Buckingham Palace has received the letter, that our king has just decided. this year to break with a tradition that he created. And as much as people keep saying, well, you know, Queen Elizabeth only ever gave one. That isn't true. Queen Elizabeth gave four Easter addresses, 1955, 1979, 2012 and 2020. That didn't establish a tradition. Prince Charles, now King Charles, is the one that created this tradition, as Father Carving rightly pointed out, of Easter messages and has chosen at a time when the country is immensely divided and immensely

weary over what happened with mass prayer gatherings and the Adan pronounced so boldly in such a dominant way that has direct links to the Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamist prayer book. The fact that His Majesty has decided this Easter now is the best time to stay silent, shows me how completely out of touch our sovereign is with his subjects. And Father Phil Harris, we saw in the digest there the two different points of view on King Charles. So we have Lauren the insider saying she suspects he is Muslim. That was repeated by Rudy Giuliani on Pierce Morgan, close ally of Donald Trump, describing him as the Muslim monarch.

But then Madeline Grant, in the spectator. says that's just unfair conspiracy from the online right. I'm going to throw a third one in, if I may. Please. I am deeply troubled at the state of our nation, full stop right now. Me too. I want to just quote the words of the Adan, if I can, and I'll give you my perspective afterwards.

Aller is the greatest, Alah is the greatest. I bear witness that there is no God but Allah. Now this is a, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. These are words of domination. Now, I'm just wondering, knowing that his majesty is poorly at the moment, and I'm being kind there. But I just wonder whether His Royal Highness has fallen into an elephant trap. And the elephant trap is this, that the narrative of the government is, at all costs, we need to portray Muslims as being good people. And so, Royal Highness, we need you to give greetings to the Muslims across the nation because there's this whole Islamophobia thing going around.

And so the king has done that and has given greetings for Ramadan and Eid. And what that's now done is left him in an atrociously difficult position because it's left Easter out of the equation. And the reason why I'm suspecting that something untoward has happened, and I do not trust this government in the least. and I do not trust the influence that they actually have. And I had conversations with the previous Archbishop of Canterbury around the pressure that's brought to bear on the state church. I wouldn't be surprised if the king has been leaned on because we do have this tradition that he has given a Easter message from 2018.

And so what was it, 2020, the first day, to message as monarch and then he's followed that with 23 24 25. Now, it does worry me the fact that the Adan is being prayed in Windsor. It bothers me that it's been prayed in Westminster. It bothers me it's been prayed in the Speaker's private apartments because it is a prayer of domination. It isn't a prayer of, you know, may we pray for our nation, may we pray for our king. It is purely a prayer of domination and let no one tell you otherwise.

Anybody who studied Islam actually knows what that is about. And the thing is Father Calvin Charles doesn't seem to be understanding the wider context, which is that, for example, we saw there in the Digest, this British, British Muslim preacher, suggesting that Sharia law is going to be used to humiliate Christians. And as a result, young Brits will see their parents being humiliated and convert to Islam. And I mean, he's talking about using Sharia law to turn Christian churches into effectively homeless, well, shelters for Muslim men to be able to sleep in if they don't want to. to go home to their wives and banning churches being able to ring the bells. And why wouldn't they? They believe Islam to be true. Why wouldn't they push for their Sharia,

their Mohammedan laws, to be the laws of the land? Why wouldn't they push for us all to live by them, for us all to submit to their God? Because they believe it to be true. The problem isn't them. The problem is us. First of all, foremost, for letting them in to reach a critical mass, where there are now 25 Mohammedans in the Houses of Parliament. But furthermore, our leaders, and not just our leaders politically, but our faith leaders are succumbing to this idea that Islam needs to be promoted above Christianity for some reason. It seems to come from an old-fashioned political correctness

and or modern wokeism in that the minority needs to be helped, the minority needs to be promoted. Well, in a Christian land, we understand some things to be true and some things to be false. In a Christian land, we understand Jesus Christ to be true, and everyone else to be a false god. We should never promote false gods. And I understand some politicians may be secular liberals. Some politicians may have other faith than none.

But the king, as the supreme governor of the Church of England and the defender of the Christian faith, should never ever promote any other faith, or even atheism, because he should see all of those as falsehoods and therefore leading people to damnation. His job as the supreme governor is not just to lead on govern or rule our country, it's to serve Christ first and foremost. Her Majesty, the late Her Majesty of the Queen Elizabeth the Second understood that as a servant leader she's to serve Christ and then to serve the people

because as we learn yesterday on Monday Thursday when Pontius Pilate wants to wash his hands when he's asking Christ, are you the king of the Jews? And he says, I have the authority to save you if you'll say so. And Christ says you have no authority other than that which my father has given you. That is the same for every king, every prince of the realm. every governor, every politician, they have no authority that the Lord has not given them. And so our king needs to remember that, who he's serving and who is ordained by. On a lighter note, Calvin just have to say, loving the mo. Is it an Easter mo? Or is this here to stay?

Thank you. Very good. Very good. I like it a lot. Breaking today, the propaganda continues with Reform UK revealing that it's not enough. that they effectively have Talk TV and GB News operating as their full-time broadcasters, they are now going to be launching their own podcast in an attempt to bypass journalists. Episodes which released every week starting tomorrow will provide exclusive interviews with Nigel Farage and key party figures. I've been thinking about who might Reform UK get to host their propaganda podcast.

maybe June Slater, she'd be one good choice, or Stephen Barrett, Alex Armstrong. He'd be very good, wouldn't he? I don't think this is going to work. We don't want a propaganda podcast, to be honest. I don't think this is the answer. But of course, it comes at a time when GB News is starting to say the quiet part out loud, with its deputy political leaders to Tom Hardwood, admitting that Rupert Lowe has been banned from the station. meaning that Restore Britain is not getting any type of fair coverage. You remember when I was at G.B. News, Rupert Lowe used to be one of the most popular guests on the channel watch. I always say it's better to be talked about than not talked about. So the fact he's talking about us means he's worried about the fact that we are winning votes. I don't think that's true, Camer.

I mean, as you know, Gawain is one of Nigel's loyal attack dogs. And certainly in Great Yarmouth, I think people generally feel it's damaged and disrupted their local community. Being an MEP, I met some of the civil servants who were supposed to be serving us all. And I was pretty underwhelmed by most of them. And I think what we're now seeing, we're seeing the, you know, do as I say, not as I do culture. official launch of Restore Britain as a political party, Rupert Lowe has not been seen on GB News once. And that is despite the fact that Tom Harwood is now admitting that the polling, which has really changed since the launch of Restore Britain, showing Reform UK down and even he admits others

reaching 5% of the vote, meaning that Restore is right there. Yet he says, still will not interview Rupert Lowe on the channel. So when he did post this new polling, Rupert Lowe responded to him writing, I'd be very happy to come on your show to discuss Restore Britain, Tom. Let's arrange a date. Two other presenters have said they'll have me on and then gone completely cold when I ask for details. They are now both ignoring me entirely. The ban is pathetic. Tom Harwood then tried to say, oh, we can't interview right now. We can't interview right now. Of course we can't because we're in this perdomo before the local elections. But Rupert asked a very smart question. So no MPs will be on GB News between now and the election.

Tom replied, there will be, just governed by strict rules of party representation though. Through the campaign period. Rupert. So you're saying you're not allowed to have one restore Britain MP on during the campaign period once, but other MPs are fine. Really? Harwood, I said it was difficult to have a free hand. Rupert, I am very pleased this conversation has been had. publicly, people can read it and make their own minds up about whether there is a Farage ban on me, appearing live on GB News. And of course there is. Rupert then argued that GB News has actually

censored Restore Britain more than the BBC. And even some Reform UK supporters are not happy about this, with political prisoner Lucy Connolly, a regular guest on the channel, posting, come on now, Tom, good journalists listen to all parties and hold them all accountable. Why should Restore be any different? GB News is a news channel. channel, viewers want to hear from all sides. There is some dissent among the ranks of GB News, however, and I found this very notable. Will Kingston, who is one of the hosts of the channel's Saturday five panel discussion show, posted after that back and forth between Tom Harwood and Rupert Lowe. Restore is obviously now a player in the political landscape. Anyone who ignores this

is unsurious or partisan. The five-party system is dead, almost on arrival. Welcome to six-party politics. And Rupert replied the first serious journalist to acknowledge the obvious truth about restores growth, respect for that will. To my superstar panel, Minister Ricky Doolin, Bishop Karen H.D. Our father Phil Harris and Father Calvin Robinson.

So, Father Calvin, we know how GB News operates. I actually was seated at a table at the Margaret Thatcher Freedom Festival over dinner next to Tom Harwood the other night. And I just said to him, why on earth will you not have Rupert Lowe on? This is nuts. And there were a million excuses. Oh, I don't control who's on the show. And now the latest excuses, oh, it's because of the election period.

That is rubbish. That is rubbish. It's because of Farage. It's because of the fact that he wants to turn GB News into a Reform UK propaganda channel. But clearly he doesn't think GB News is doing enough because now he's launching his own podcast. hilarious isn't it let's not forget that Nigel Farage is one of the main shareholders of GBU

so he has a vested interest it is pretty much the Reform Party Broadcast Network at this point it's fascinating to me that they'll never be transparent about this because they pretend to be the free speech platform or the home of free speech as they call themselves ironically no first hand there is a blacklist

there is a list that the producers will not allow people on I had permission from the CEO himself to get Katie Hopkins on and my producers blackballed her and would not let it happen. I could not get Tommy Robinson on. I couldn't get Carl Benjamin on for goodness sake. They just would not allow it. And so for them to pretend that anyone's welcome is a lie. But Ripper Lowe should be on especially now

because he's gaining such momentum. His party has grown in a matter of weeks to be bigger than the Conservative Party, which is the oldest political party. Yeah, I mean, Reverend Father Phil Harris, just we've lost Calvin briefly there. So I'll get you to come in. But the point is, Restore Britain, Phil, is surging.

We cannot deny that it is not a serious part of our current political landscape, as Will Kingston admitted. Absolutely. And I think Lucy Colliery made a really fair point. I think that was quite an impartial comment to actually make that Lucy made. It's really concerning me that, you know, we've said it time and time again, it doesn't matter what your politics are. If we are truly for free speech, then there should be free speech. And therefore, anybody who is in the fight, so to speak,

should be given time to actually air their views and given time to be scrutinized. And I think that's the bit for me. that is not happening. People are not in a live environment, actually having the opportunity to scrutinise Rupert, and that actually doesn't do anybody any favours whatsoever. And so it is concerning, and I know that you and Father Calvin, Dan, have absolute history. You made a valid point about Nigel being a shareholder, but that does not help the situation. It does not help British politics. It doesn't help integrity. And the thing that I keep punching the whole time is righteousness. The kingdom of God is righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. And we have

to act righteously. And therefore, everybody should be given a voice. And lots of people have made their mind up about Rupert or not. But let's have the opportunity to question Rupert. And let's have the opportunity for journalists and presenters to ask difficult questions and people can see that for themselves. We can't be afraid of opposition or people that don't speak our language unless we're prepared to have a conversation with them and we must be prepared to have conversations. 100%. Because Ricky Doolan, let's look at Unite the Kingdom. For example, an event that you are a big part of, right? And GB News sent a reporter of Form U.K.

Shill, Alex Armstrong, to unite the kingdom. But what they didn't do was show any of what went on stage. So they didn't show you speaking on stage. They didn't even show Tommy Robinson interviewing Elon Musk on stage. So how can you argue that GB News is anything other than controlled containment? Well, United Kingdom is one of the biggest cultural moments in our lifetime in Britain. So to ignore that shows a clear bias and also to ignore such a key cultural political figure like Tommy Robinson also shows the bias. Now, the reason why we are so disappointed with platforms like the BBC and Sky News, etc.

is because they've shown clear bias for decades when it comes to political topics and political figures. And that's why we are moving away from those mainstream channels. But if GB News is going to go down that route as well, then it will only be a matter of time before people move away and go to independent journalists such as yourself and many of the other great up-and-coming journalists around the internet. And that seems to be the way that GB News is deciding to go.

And it's a shame really because we had a lot of hope in them. And of course, as you've said, they're refusing to platform, Rupert Law. They're refusing to platform Ben Habib from advance. They're refusing to platform Tommy Robinson. And that shows the clear bias. And, you know, it's really a time where if G.B. News, if all of these political parties truly believe that Britain and the British people should come first, then the bias and the infight and all the rest of it must end because actions speak louder than words. 100%.

Bishop D. Well, what do you think of this idea of Reform UK launching its own podcast, sort of trying to bypass journalists altogether? Personally, having worked in elections for three decades behind the scenes, I think there's slightly more to it than just launching a podcast. This is one way of circumventing the legally required due weight that is portrayed during an election cycle and something that the, that GB News must bear in consideration when looking at who they will have on, as Tom Harwood suggested, because there is an election cycle going on. There's a legal requirement for broadcast

media to assign due weight to party representation and you can't get away from what Restore is doing. I think that the people at Reform are looking for a way around that, knowing that the restrictions that will be placed on GB News as a broadcast. during the election cycle, which is only a matter of a few weeks away now until it officially begins. And the podcast idea is one way around it. They did exactly the same during the pandemic

when Dr. David Ball hosted their weekly podcast show featuring guests like Richard Tyson and others. And most people will remember what was said by them at the time concerning the vaccination. So to me, this is circumventing legal restrictions that will be placed on reporting and on things that can and cannot be said through regulated broadcast media. Breaking today, new questions over the execution killing of the BBC's then-biggest star, Jill Dando.

Was she preparing to expose the paedophile rings? the shocking underage sex networks at the British Bashing Corporation that had been hidden for so long, I believe so. Let me take you back to that horrifying day, April the 26th, 1999. This was how the BBC opened its 9pm News Bulletin that night. Jill Dando, known and loved by millions, has been brutally murdered. The 37-year-old presenter died in hospital. after being found shot through the head on her own doorstep.

Barry George was set up to take the fall. But of course, he didn't kill Jill, and there has been no examination about her bid to expose BBC bosses for what they knew about the sex deviance and sex pests and sex criminals within the corporation. Now, you can imagine why this week people are talking about it following the host of revelations in regards to the Sacked BBC Radio 2 breakfast host, Scott Mills.

Lawrence Fox, posting very simply on X. Two words. Jill Dando. Rob Boyd, writing Scott Mills, Ralph Harris, Philip Schofield, Stuart Hall, Hugh Edwards. You're not telling me that Jill Dando was randomly murdered, are you? And from Yorkshire last, Jill Dando was going to speak out about a huge trafficking ring within the BBC and the establishment. She knew how filthy and evil the corporation was.

She knew the BBC covered up for the likes of Jimmy Saville, Rolf Harrison, Stuart Hall, and MI5 took her out as they didn't want her to be exposed. Jill had the goods on so many of them, so they had to move in, quick and murder her. The BBC should be taken down and arrests should be made. The BBC is a cesspool of swamp creatures who are involved in murdering, rape, torture of innocent children. Jill Dando wanted to save the children like many others, but if you spoke out against the establishment and tried to expose them, you get disposed of. Never forget Jill Dando. And regular outspoken viewers will know this is a story that I have long covered because I have huge suspicions in regards to the fact that Jill Dando was silenced by the BBC.

And let's just be honest about the fact that even her friends are still too scared to go on the record. But I am very grateful for the Daily Express journalism of more than a decade ago, which did quite clearly reveal that she had raised the alarm about a paedophile ring at the BBC. Let me just take you through what the friend and retirement. BBC worker of Jill Dando had to say. She said that Dando was told DJs, celebrities and other staff were involved in organized abuse. That has since proven to be true, by the way. But the anonymous source, and my goodness, I want this person to come on the record with me.

Please, it's so important. Says no one wanted to know when Ms. Dando raised concerns about the alleged ring and other sexual abuse claims at the BBC. Oh, that's me so angry. She is said to have passed a file to senior management in the mid-1990s, but they never carried out an investigation. The 37-year-old TV presenter was shot dead on April the 26th, 1999, on the doorstep of her home in West London. The crime remains unsolved.

The source said, I don't recall the names of all the stars now and don't want to implicate anyone, but Jill said they were surprisingly big names. I think she was quite shocked when told about images of children and that information on how to join this horrible paedophile ring was freely available. Jill said others had complained to her about sexual matters and that some female workmates also claim they had been groped or assaulted. Nothing had been done and there seemed to be a policy of turning a blind eye. The former colleagues said female BBC staff confided in Jill,

one of the best known TV faces of the day after fronting primetime shows, including holiday and the 6 o'clock news as well as Crime Watch. The source said, I think it was in the mid-90s. She was seen as the face of the BBC and a magnet for women with problems. Ms. Dando compiled a file of complaints but was a television presenter and not really an investigative journalist. The source said she passed the information onto someone else and they gave it back. No one wanted to know. I do remember that she gave a file to senior management. I don't think she heard any more. Other women who complained told Jill they didn't want to risk their careers by making official statements against individuals as they would lose their jobs and that bosses seemed to ignore that. So to my superstar panel now, Father Calvin

Robinson, Minister Ricky Doolin, Bishop Karen H. Deverent Cannon, Father Phil Harris. Calvin Robinson, I am so glad that your co-host on Reclaim the Media's Fox and Father Lawrence Fox actually raised Jill Dando in light of the Scott Mills revelations. Because there has still been no formal investigation as to what she told the BBC in regards to the paedophile networks, which we now know were absolutely going on at her height. It seems to be continuing. Sorry, Father Calvin, we just lost you there. Can you just start again? Yes, no problem. Having storms over here in West Michigan, it's being bad.

But it seems that every... Father Calvin, we'll lose you. So let me bring in Reverend Cannon, Father Phil Harris, on this. Oh, this, you know, I just remember distinctly. In fact, I remember where I was when the news came through of Jill being murdered. And there was just, first of all, shock because we didn't know at that time the context of what was going on in the background. And it was the express, I think in 2014, if I'm correct,

when the express actually raised the alarm that Jill Dando was aware of a paedophile ring. There is something that is drastically wrong with this whole shooting of Jill. It's too clean. it speaks of, you know, an assassination, that the person that was named as, you know, undertaking the killing was just not skilled to do. And the fact that it's been, you know, left unsolved with no clues whatsoever, that isn't something that is random, that is something that's organised. And I think that we should be very, very, very concerned about this. And the time goes on as we, we're going to weeks go by, as years go by, the BBC is showing itself, as I should say, as years go by,

and now we're in weeks and even days. Every single day there's almost something on the BBC. There is something that causes people to question. And of course, we know why they controlled the narrative and they controlled the media. And now we have independent journalism and we have the Dan Witten shows and all other kinds of shows that are highlighting things from proper investigations. We have every reason to be concerned. And as a priest in the Church of God,

I am incredibly concerned that something very dissonist has gone on here with the loss of life of Jill. There is something clearly corrupt and underground and devious and evil that's got on in terms of the BBC. And we only just need to list and catalogue the presenters and people have been a social at high levels within the BBC to realise that. The fact of the way that Jill was killed, you know, if you put two and two together,

you should get four. And I don't think we are getting anything other than four by actually putting the facts together as they are and saying there is something very evil. And the way that Jill was killed was too clean and too organized. And something is very, very, very, very wrong. and again, the BBC is at the heart of it and is the British establishment behind this as well. I am very concerned.

I am very, very concerned. 100%. Because the thing is Veshit Diwa is that if the BBC were a private organisation responsible for this, it would have been shut down decades ago. It would. And most people don't realise I'm by vocational. So for years, I've worked in and around. the TV and media, particularly working on outside broadcast for the BBC.

This entire corporation is infested from the lowest levels to the highest levels with a culture of drink abuse, drug abuse and sexual abuse. As Father Phil rightly pointed out, this assassination was way too clean. No forensic evidence at the site, nothing. That leads to a professional hit. and the British Broadcasting Corporation has used its power and its influence, not only to control the narrative, but to silence its opponents, to force victims into fear and silence as a result of what would happen.

And what we are now seeing is the absolute collapse as more and more comes out. The BBC that was created how many years ago is no longer fitting. for purpose, the entire organization needs flushing out, like a used cesspit being cleaned out to get rid of all the rubbish.

And even today, you have people that have political influence high up in the tree of the BBC, still trying to control the narrative, still using government power and political power to oppress victims, to suppress stories, to control the narratives.

The BBC, in my opinion, shouldn't be defunded. It should be absolutely removed as a national broadcaster. It should be shut down and never brought back. 100%. I couldn't agree more. Minister Doolen, do you think there needs to be more investigation to this? I mean, remember, are we just going to accept that one of the most shocking killings of all time in the United Kingdom remains unsolved with no one being punished? Yeah, I think it needs heavily investigated and opened up. And now in the era of the internet and independent journalists,

I think it's something that can be done now, a lot more freely than probably different eras. And I think you don't have to be a genius to see that it was a hit job. And, you know, if it was covering up pedophilia, then it is something of the most heinous crime and cover up. Because, of course, children are so precious. You know, I've got a 10-year-old and a 3-year-old, and they're so innocent. They're so precious.

So it is the darkest of things to abuse young children. And there's something obviously that we've seen with the Hugh Edwards situation, Philip Schofield situation, where these people were proven to be involved in some level of child abuse. And then it's absolutely brushed under the carpet. So I do think it's the end of the BBC. We need to finish it. And this thing needs to be blown open. and we need to, in the words of Donald Trump, drain the swamp.

Yeah, totally, totally agree. Totally agree. Obviously, just for legal reasons to clarify Phillips Schofield has been accused of grooming the young man, but claims that when they did have sexual relations, he was of age. Sure. It's just to put that clarification across. Let's try once more.

Let's pray this Good Friday. Father Calvin Robinson. Let's give it one more go. Can you hear us? Oh no. Oh, no. You can't. Oh, well, you're looking great with Father Kelvin.

Oh, yeah. The demons don't want us speaking about these issues, but it's important that we do. You know, I've obviously been the defense of the BBC. For like a decade now. The BBC is corrupt. It is hostile to the British interests. It is a state propaganda.

Yeah. No, you have been on this. far to see. But unfortunately, yeah, the devil is with us in terms of your connection today. So we will thank you, Father Calvin Robinson, but everyone else, please do stand by. Because if there's something strange in your neighborhood, who are you going to call? Not the Ghostbusters anymore, because this is brilliant. The Mosk buskers are now in the United Kingdom. Gavin Boddy is the man behind this organisation vigorously fighting Mosk building applications and he's had a lot of success. Concern neighborhoods can approach Gavin's

mosque bus to service to request help to stop a mosque planning application from going through. Gavin has 172 out of 121 cases so far as he aims to empower local communities against the Islamist takeover of Britain. And this Easter I thought it was very appropriate that we have this conversation with Gavin alongside our special religious superstar panel, Minister Rikkiy. Doolin, Bishop Karen H. Dewa, and Reverend Cannon, Father Phil Harris. So this is such a brilliant thing, Gavin, but I imagine the mainstream media don't want to talk about this because, I guess, that throw out accusations of Islamophobia, probably. Hello, Dan. Nice to talk to you. Yes, I mean, insuffires that pay any attention at all,

then they want to say, what a bad guy I am. And so talk to me, Gavin, about how this all came about and how people can try and stop these mosques from being built. Because you know, in a lot of communities now, there are these super mosques being constructed. Yeah, how it came about is, I guess, in the 80s, I traveled in Islamic countries and realized what a terrible thing Islam is. It's a moral inversion. and it's not only the religion, it is the people. It is in the hearts of the people, the population, individuals and collectively, and how that needs to be resisted.

And I think what kicked it off was by about the early, the mid-2000s. I was tired of shouting at the TV, shouting at the radio, so I decided I was going to do something. And I can recommend it because it means you stop feeling so frustrated. even if you're, even if what you're doing doesn't have that much effect. It's gained very little attention to what I do. I think that's because we, the British, as a decadent people, currently as a decadent people, do not, we're not interested in solving this problem.

We are interested in being entertained by it through the entertainment of rage. But I think it is gradually, as the danger, the reality of it is starting to hit us in the face, we in general are starting to do more about it. So I notice I'm getting more attention. Thank you. An example of that is you kindly invite me on your show, Dan, but also people being willing to donate a little bit of money, a little bit of money towards the third-party costs

of fighting these campaigns. Just so people know, none of that goes to me. I don't make a penny out of this. The money goes on fighting the campaigns. So that's how it got going. I think there's quite a lot of demand for it now. Yeah, there is. There absolutely is because Bishop Dewa, I mean, we're obviously speaking on this Easter weekend, this holy weekend in a Christian country. Yet it very often seems like all of the mechanism of the British deep state is pushing us towards this Islamist takeover, pushing us towards demographic control.

And we're almost just meant to accept that mosques are going to replace. churches. Well, I say how no to that. And surely we need to start being much, much more active in terms of trying to stop the takeover before it's too late. I think you're right.

We certainly do. And that's something that I've spoken on many, many occasions. I do think the British public is not doing enough. It's easy to say that we're a Christian country when you don't even bother going to church or fellowshiping or even having

an active faith, which is a real issue within the United Kingdom. You're not a Christian simply because you were born in Great Britain. Christianity is a living religion, a living faith that requires an active relationship with the Christ figure at the very heart of the faith. So we need to be, as a people, far more active in what we're doing, not just in the way that we interact with preventing the expansion of mosques, which is something that was given government financing under Blair and Brown from 97 onwards. Very few people ever talked about the fact that in his first few years,

Tony Blair had authorized 40 million pounds a year to the Muslim Council of Great Britain for the promotion of anti-fundamentalism. And all they did was spend that money on building mosques and building Islamic centers. And those figures are going up. Now we look at Stahm, giving over 100 million a year for the first. protection of mosques while churches are being burnt to the ground in the United Kingdom. Churches are being vandalized, not just by Muslims, but predominantly so. So it appears because there's far too many arson attacks on churches that are still unresolved.

But the British people need to get off there, as we are, coming towards the end of Holy Week, blessed assurance, and we'll go with that term instead of something else, and actually be involved in professing a living faith, professing a living Christ, and being active in the church, to see the church, not only saved but rebuilt all across this land. And the reason there are so many churches

becoming mosques across this land is because those churches are empty. That boils down to two things. It boils down to the woke nonsense of the established church and they're abandoning of the truth of doctrine and the truth of scripture. that is central to the Christian faith, and it also boils down to people not making the effort

to be a part of their community, be a part of their community church, and save those buildings, not because of them being historical monuments, but because they're a thriving, active part of a local community. Totally. I mean, Minister Ricky Doolan, I guess we do see some hope. There is some hope.

this Good Friday. I mean, you've got that spectator cover article this week, which suggests that actually Gen Z is engaging again in Christianity. But I mean, what we've seen, Ricky, is so terrible, isn't it? Like, basically, from the mainstream media I'm talking about, these conversions to Christianity from Tommy Robinson supporters are derided as somehow being bad. And the mainstream media would never dare talk about Islamism in that way, even though it is a clear and present danger. Yeah, it's certainly anti-Christian bias, and that is something that we need to tackle. And just over the pond, Donald Trump, obviously with his team, has got a whole department dedicated to tackle an anti-Christian bias. And that's something that we need to do ourselves in

the UK. And, you know, it's something that we can do certainly. And I know a lot of the right-leaning political parties are now promoting these type of policies, which is a protection of our Christian heritage, a protection of Christianity through that gaze of heritage. And this is something not unusual around the world. This is something, if you look at the United Arab Emirates, they're quite a liberal country in terms of the Islamic world. And they have a lot of protections upon their Islamic heritage. For example, if you try and and build a church in the UAE, it's very difficult to near impossible. And if you want to put up a cross in a public place, you cannot.

If you want to put church bells ringing loudly, you cannot. So there's very strict rules around it. And this is something that we can mirror in the UK when it comes to Christianity. We can put very strict rules on anything that is not Christianity, such as Islam, such as Hinduism or whatever it is, where the tolerance of people choosing to worship in them religious, is there, but the restrictions around that practice must protect our Christian heritage and Christianity. Yeah, totally, totally. I mean, Father Phil Harris, you have found it very hard to be able to build your church.

And yet, there seems to be so much money being funneled into building mosques. Absolutely, Dan. I mean, so I have a, and my clergy team have a thriving Christian community. and we are desperate for a church building. We have a fundraiser still out there for a church building. One of the things that I admire Gavin for is he's actually stopped or he's attempting to stop the cause of the problem, which is actually mosques being actually procured,

buildings turned over to mosques and he's doing a great work where I profoundly disagree with Gavin and I've had conversations with him is that unless we fill the space with Christianity and we need to fill the space with Christianity, we need thriving churches again. Unless people turn back to Christ, we will just create a vacuum.

We cannot just remove people and it will be okay. The problems in our nation is the fact that we've turned away from the message of Jesus Christ. And this Easter, we have a cross, three crosses on a hill and the one in the centre, the person that actually hung on that cross in the centre, hung and died that the people either side might have life. One of them made the choice to actually do that.

And what we actually need is the answer to the ills and praise God the young people are seeing, you know, in the Spectator article, we're seeing lots of people. And I know Marcus Walker and the way that he's been testifying to young people, coming to the beauty of the Book of Common Prayer, coming to actually church and encountering the divine again, that's what's going to heal the ills of our nation. So I applaud Gavin in all that he's doing to stop mosques being built.

And we should not be, you know, if there is a mosque that is preaching hate, it needs to be closed down and the community dispersed. We cannot have that. This is a Christian nation. And we need to be declaring the truth of Jesus Christ again. And that's the only way we're going to heal the ills of this nation. And yes, we've got to be profound and direct and upright and strong in actually saying that Jesus is Lord.

But the only way that we can solve the problems of this nation is it becoming Christian again. And Gavin, you do all of this work using existing law. I use the planning system. Yes. The planning system calls for and requires public consultation, the input of the public. It's designed that way in the late 40s so that it can't function without that. But people need to take it up. We are very passive. We are because of the molly coddling welfare state, we are willing to let, we want everything to be done for us. We won't do anything. I have to say, I'm very grateful for the courteous things that have been said about what I'm doing. Everything that has been said so far, I think, is really wrong, dangerously wrong,

verging on some points, just touching on evil, I would say. First of all, I think if you say that it's, what we have to do is to get these people to integrate, what to recognize this is a Christian country, that is similar to say, that if water is coming into your sinking ship, we have to make sure that the water is at body temperature. No, you have to get that water out of the boat. These people need to be removed. You are not going, there's no point shaking your head. I allowed you to speak. You are not going to reverse this problem whilst you have the numbers of people here. It is simply not going to work and it won't have any effects anyway. So what do you want to see happen, Gavin? If you manage to prune back

just one or two of the twigs of excessive self-expression of their religion. And secondly, I think simply saying, let's go back to church, to go back to my sinking ship analogy, I think that is a bit like saying our response to the fact that the ship is sinking is to attend the ballroom on the cruise more assiduously. It is not going to stop the situation. The situation is demographic. It is in people. It is in us.

And so, Gavin, what is your ideal? How do you ideally want to see it solved? The way that I think, I want to see it. So the way I think it will be solved is I think society will collapse through economic measures. So the debt bubble will collapse society. When that happens, I think we will see very hard ethnic separation. So cultural, but primarily racial separately will be ugly.

racial separation within this country in a lot of different enclaves. And then I think conditions in those foreign enclaves, those self-segregating enclaves, they will become very quickly unlivable, fast. And that is the time when those people will be amenable to a free airplane ticket home. I don't see any other alternatives. So sort of like the re-migration. Father Phil, what do you disagree with? So I think I don't disagree in the main with what Gavin has said.

You know, and some of the analogies that he actually uses are very, very strong. My point is if we, the reason that we've got into the mess that we have is that people stopped being Christian in a Christian country. And so if we do that again, we will be back in 40, 50. Let's just say we solved the problem right now. in 40 or 50 years time will be back in exactly the same place. This is a Christian country founded on Christian values, and unless Christians actually start to stand up for the faith, what happens with, and in this case, Islam, and it's pernicious,

it actually fills the vacuum. We cannot live without, within all of us, is the divine. And God has placed eternity in the hearts of men, and if we don't feel that longing, that spiritual, longing with in our stories with something wholesome, we end up with allowing something in that's not wholesome. And in this, I agree with, in part, with what Gavin is actually saying, we cannot be applauding, you know, the things that are going on in our nation. And we can't be standing by and allowing those to happen. And I don't know how, well, I have some idea,

not anywhere, shall I say, as, you know, I think remigration will organically happen. So I agree with that with Gavin. My concern ultimately is if we were back 40, 50 years ago, we're in the mess we are now because the nation forgot Jesus 40, 50 years ago. Okay. Gavin, how can people get involved in Mosque Busters, especially if they do. do have a mosque coming to their local community and they want to try and stop it. What happens is what already happens is people quite rightly panic, particularly the liberal

lefty people. They're the best panickers of all. And they contact me and say, help me to get rid of this. The only thing, it's ugly. It is an ugly, alienating, unrewarding game. But the only thing people can do is to fund the work that I do. They must also, And how can people do that? Sorry? How can people do that? I do appeals. People can either donate on a monthly basis

or I do individual appeals when individual cases come up. And is this through your Mosquebusters website? No, no, through X, on X. People can find me on X. Gavin Bowie on X. What they should also do, I'm afraid, is resist the false solutions that have been presented to you. Phil Harris, he says he agrees with me, that's nice of him.

I take that with a pinch of salt, I'm afraid I do not agree with him. Simply, if we become more Christian, that will not make Muslims become less Islamic. That is what I say. That is, it will not make Muslims become less Islamic. And at best, it's a bit like saying, had the child eaten more, it wouldn't have stunt, his growth wouldn't have become stunted. So now its growth is stunted, let's feed it more. No, it'll just become obese.

That is not going to work. That is not what to say. If you are being overwhelmed in numbers, you have to reduce those numbers. It is ugly. It is mathematical. But there is no escaping it. And simply because your self-image needs within your religion do not permit it, that is no reason not to address this.

The issue of remigration, of repatriation, that has to be addressed. And the issue is how to do it, humane. How to do it in a re-reactation. And what's interesting is what you're sort of saying. And as long as you're saying what you're saying, no one is going to address that. And then you get bloodbath conditions, which are not rare in history.

That is what I want to avoid. And I do not see any of you turning your minds to that. Well, this is talking about ethnonationalism. This guy is talking about ethno-national, dividing on ethnic lines. Any policies made on ethnic lines or remigration along ethnic lines, or remigration along ethnic lines is the evil thing.

This man is trying to say that what we are saying is evil when we're promoting Christianity and it's not about self-image, it's about salvation. But what he's suggesting is dividing on ethnic lines. This is the real evil. This is the real inhumane thing to do. Nothing should be divided on ethnic lines.

Are you saying, Gavin ethnic, or are you saying religious lines? I'm saying ethnic lines. I think the way it will work is along hard racial lines. If I get run over by a bus tomorrow, nothing to do with me. I think that is going to happen. If, as I think is unavoidable. But, Dan, that means that we should be paired up with Kirstama and Tony Blair.

If, as I thank you, if as I think is unavoidable, we get an economic breakdown, leading then to a breakdown in the welfare state, leading to anger and panic amongst the majority of the population. and a denial of authority to the state authority. If that happens, and I imagine I'm talking over your heads here, this is not where you're used to hearing. But if that happens, yes, I think people, populations will separate out along hard ethnic lines, not because I say it's a good thing

or because I tell them to or anything at all, simply because that is what will happen. And at that point, that is when we can remove populations without blood. And that is the challenge, that is a humane challenge. challenge. The compassionate mind does not talk, nice talk. The compassionate mind thinks through reality the way it is. Well, it's interesting because I contributed to the Restore Britain mass immigration paper. And the way that that paper, which is also authored by Harrison Downs, gets around the remigration issue is not for it to be forced. on racial lines, but more as you suggest, which is that we are going to get to a point where actually we will be able to pay people to leave the country, which isn't necessarily an ideal situation, but is potentially a humane way to do it. So it's a fascinating debate. If I can just, if I can just, that's a very nice idea. coming and then I'll come back to you, Gavin.

Yeah, all I was going to say is the FNo nationalist argument is so stupid because I'd much rather stand with a Baste and Buzi over a Kia Stama any day of the week. Correct. Correct. Yeah, what do you say about someone like Baste and Bougie, Gavin? Bays and Bougy as a foreigner. She may be very nice.

I don't know her. Nice. Are we talking about nice? She might be nice, is it? No idea. I'm going to say about it. Gavin, I've just found that condescending. I will finish.

So I don't know. But in general, I think that foreign populations are going to have to be repatriated. And if you say, well, if you say, because I like this person, I think this person is good, then what I will do is I will go to the most evil, nasty guy. And I'll say, you, you, Abu Hamza, pay me half a million dollars. and I'll give you a recommendation and you can stay in the country. And I'm not the only one he's going to do that. So that is likely to happen.

What a truly obnoxious attitude and approach. Let me explain. My ideology, man. But let me explain something. I happen to be married to an immigrant. And who are you to tell me my wife must leave the country? You're obnoxious little man. All right.

I'll answer. First of all, if we're going to talk, I think you're an Anglican bishop. Is that right? Yes. Yeah. You are a member of a highly treacherous institution. No, you never shut up. And you are, you cannot wash hands of that.

I'm not a member of the Church of England. You cannot watch you. I'm not a bishop in the Church of England. You cannot wash your hands of that simply by saying, well, I don't agree with it. You're bound. No, no, I can because I'm not a part of the Church of England. Never have been. Do not try and.

throw stuff onto me that you cannot attribute to me in any way. All right. It just goes to show how truly obnoxious your arguments are. Well, people can judge for themselves. If you're a bishop in the Church of England, I feel like I just told you, I'm not a bishop in the Church of England. Why don't you listen to what's being said for a change?

My apologies. I thought you nodded your head when I asked you if you were. You asked me if I was an Anglican. You did not ask me if I was a. a bishop in the Church of England. And this is your problem, Gavin. You do not understand how the polity of this country and how the church fits within this country.

I was asked, thank you, thank you. I was asked a question. So, Bishop, do you're an Anglican, but you're not in the Church of England? Correct. There are a lot of Anglican churches in the United Kingdom that are not part of the Church of England. The Church of Scotland being one,

the Church in Wales being another, the Church in Northern Ireland, the Free Church of England, the Confessing Anglican Church. You'd know that. You're the Church of Wales, are you? No. I am the missionary bishop of the confessing Anglican Church.

All right. Well, I will look them. So they have a firm line on immigration, on immigration, do you think. All right. I think I've made my point. I've raised the issue. Gavin, what's, Gavin, out of interest, are you Christian, Gavin?

I'm your point about your wife. I'm not really interested in who your wife is. I'm saying what I think, what is going to be best for the country and what I think is going to happen and how it is likely to play out. And I think it might, it could play out, unfortunately, for your wife, Bishop Dewar. Yes. Nonsense. Okay.

I'll tell you what's best for this country, Gabbyn, is that we get rid of obnoxious little men like you. That's what's best for this country, because you are nothing more than a racist and a big and you're proving that doesn't matter how intellectual an argument you try and present. This is all about getting rid of people you don't like based on the color of their skin. No, it's not about whether I like people. I have known plenty of black people that I've found been very nice to me. That is not the issue. It is the issue of the continuance of the English people as a...

Oh, hang on. We live in the United Kingdom. There's four countries here. one. What about the Welsh people, the Scottish people, the Northern Irish people? Or do you think your English superiority should take preference? You are talking about separating on the lines of race. Islam is not a race. Exactly. I agree with shutting down the growth of mosques. But you are you are separating things on a completely different level altogether. Deal with Islam as a religion. It is not a race. I'm aware of that. I know that. I've been doing this since 2010, so I'm aware of that. So which one are you? Are you against the ideology of Islam or are you against anybody that's not white?

I am against the ideology of Islam. I think this country does need to remove millions, probably tens of millions, of foreign populations from this country. So that the... But even Christians. So that the English nation can continue. But including Christians, Gavin. We are entitled to our own homeland. But Gavin, including Christians? Yes, yes. Oh, yes. Yes. And are you, Gavin, are you Christian?

No. So are you atheist? No. What's your religion? He's Muslim. Well, I don't see it. I'm happy to talk about it, but I don't see it as relevant. The reason I'm not particularly happy to mention it is because I don't.

Well, we're talking about it. I mean, it's clearly relevant. It's Good Friday, and we're talking about your campaign to ban mosques. So I would say your religion is clearly relevant. Oh, in which case, as long as we don't get into a theological discussion, my religion is Buddhism. That is my religion. And I would say that I am, I take it, I would say I am devout.

That's the way I would describe myself. But I don't oppose mosques because of my religion. I oppose mosques because of, two reasons. It propagates the ease. evil Islamic doctrine, and secondly, mosques act as fortresses in the demographic invasion of this country. And so they need to be resisted because it will make it a lot easier to remigrate those populations if their territory is more constricted. The more constricted their territory, the more congested, the stronger we are in relation to them. The stronger we are in relation

to them, the more options we have at our disposal, the more humane options we can choose. And what matters for this generation is to find humane ways to achieve what I think is coming to do it in a reasonably consensual humane way without atrocity. I think that is what is necessary. And that is my main reason. I would like the English nation to save itself. There are things I won't do for. I won't engage in massacre or killing in order to do it. The nation can go down the plug-hold before I will engage in that.

and I think we need to look hard to find ways to do it without atrocity. I think we can. You know one of the most important things for me here on outspoken is that we have these debates, have these conversations, because these conversations are absolutely taking place up and down the country. There is a new divide on the right. And I mean, whether it's the best day to have had the conversation on Good Friday, I don't know. I don't know.

But we've had it. And I think it's very important to have the conversation and have these ideological discussions. Because of course, one thing that is very clearly happening as this Islamist takeover becomes more pronounced is that it is encouraging a lot of people to consider more extreme positions that in the past would have been unthinkable. But I have thought that it has been a thought-provoking debate and I appreciate us all having it. So Gavin Boddy of Mosk Busters, thank you so much. And thank you to our fabulous religious Good Friday Superstar Panel, Minister Ricky Doolan, Bishop Karen H. Deverin H. Deverin, Reverend Cannon, Father Phil Harris. What a show. Didn't expect that at the end of the show today.

But there you go. You never know what is going to happen here on Outspoken. Thank you all for being here on this very, very important day in the Christian. calendar. Now, of course, we're about to reveal the worst Britain in the world this week, as we always do on a Friday, even a good Friday. There are your nominees, though, you're at the union jackasses from across the week. On Monday, it was Zarath Solana on Tuesday, Ed Balls, Wednesday, Emily Thornbury and Thursday. The tit whisperer himself, Zach Polanski, lots of comments from you coming in on this. Tony Smith says, don't forget, Dame, and he's put a laughing emoji in Emily, was the one who took the piss about a working-class man with a transit.

and Union Jack flag. Oh, indeed, I'll never forget. It wasn't a Union Jack, though. It was a St. George's flag, which makes it even worse. John Q L4 says Sultana, arguably calling for violence as my choice. Chat Noir said, I had to forget. It was his last name, Boles that got me. John Doe says, didn't realize you could get someone worse than Starma. Ladies and Gentlemen, I introduced Zach Pawansky. Raffer Jefferson says it's like watching a horror movie. Seeing Zach get support. A drama student who is probably the least qualified person in Britain appealing to all the simile uninformed with big empty promises. It's like when an adult at a kid's Halloween party convinces all the kids there's a monster in the basement. Matt Glendoir says Zach Dave Polansky is as dangerous as

Hitler and Stalin were. Do these young people who think he is cool, realize if his party ever got to power, it would be absolutely horrific for Jews living in the UK. Okay, I'm going to get to your results live. We have already had tens of thousands coming in. Thank you so much for voting. 32,000 votes so far. In fourth position with just 4% of the vote, Ed Balls. In third position with 7% of the vote, Emily Thornbray. The runner-up with 20% of the vote, Zara Solana. But the worst Britain in the world this week with an overwhelming 68% of the voted is, of course, the tit-whisperer Dave, Zach Polanski.

Okay, we're moving over to Substack now for the Royal Uncanceled After Show, Anna Wintour bans. Megan Markle from the Metcala as the fake Duchess attempts to change the storyline by revealing new holiday videos of Prince Harry and Archie

on her Instagram page, all the Royal latest, with according to Taz over on Substack, www. outspoken. Thank you so much for being here on our Good Friday

special edition of Outspoken We will be back with you live 5pm UK time on Easter Monday, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific, actually based in Buzi, who was just mentioned in that debate, is going to be here on Monday alongside Steph the Alternerd. So remember to hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Turn on the notification bell. We are also available as a podcast, which you can subscribe to, excuse me, completely for free on Apple Podcast, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast. Have a wonderful Easter. And most importantly, remember, I promise to always. keep fighting for you.