Dan Wootton Outspoken - MAHYAR TOUSI REVEALS BID TO QUIT UK AS STARMER GOVT PLANS TO BAN YOUTUBE SHOWS LIKE OUTSPOKEN

Episode Date: July 6, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Slippery Starmer and Andy Burnham’s corrupt Labour government is attempting to ban Outspoken (just as we hit our second anniversary as the biggest independent news show in Britain) and other YouTube favourites from Mahyar Tousi, the Lotus Eaters and Mike Graham as the British state’s despicable crack down on free speech reaches authoritarian levels. Independent geopolitics YouTube megastar Mahyar Tousi has revealed publicly his plans to broadcast out of Britain to stop his channel "falling apart" as a result of the deep state threat, which we first revealed last week. The government wants you to rely on the British Bashing Corporation, Woke ITV and Sly News to regurgitate the official narrative – especially in so-called vulnerable times like pandemics, elections, terror attacks and social unrest – while stopping you watching independent voices you trust. Two of those independent media stars – the activist Kellie-Jay Keen and the journalist behind Freedom Watch UK Montgomery Toms – will be here today to respond to Starmer and Burnham’s state censorship on speed. PLUS: A GB News star quits after an on air war of words with Nigel Farage as there is a new bloodbath at the so-called People’s Channel, with a THIRD of staff to be brutally axed. We’ll reveal the inside story as Steven Edginton speaks out. AND: Woke ITV in crisis as bosses allow Ed Balls to continue hosting Good Morning Britain alongside Susanna Reid, even as he enters talks to enter an Andy Burnham Labour government. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: King Charles moves to protect the British Royal Family as he BANS Prince Harry from staying at Buckingham Palace as the royal war with the Sussexes explodes in public. We’ll team up with the Royal News Network for all the latest breaking news. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is Outspoken episode number 530. And breaking right now. Slippery Stama and Andy Burnham's corrupt Labour government is attempting to ban outspoken as we hit our second anniversary as the biggest independent news show in Britain. But not just us, other YouTube favourites too. Like My Atusi, like the Lotus Eaters, like Mike Graham, as the British states dispelior. crackdown on free speech reaches scary authoritarian levels. The UK government is trying to essentially gain control of all of YouTube via the algorithm in order to make sure the information you can receive is heavily curated. Only consume what they say you need to consume because they know best for you. Don't worry about all the other independent creators or companies or journalists.

journalists just ours. We're going to bury them so you'd have to really go out of your way and the fucking sticks and mud to find anything that isn't approved. The authoritarian UK government is coming for YouTube, aggressively seeking to regulate its content and turn it into just another tool of propaganda against the British people. So today, independent geopolitics YouTube Megastarmeya Tusi has publicly revealed his plans to broadcast out of Britain to stop his channel falling apart as a result of the deep state threat. We revealed this first tier on the show last week, but watch Meyer.

A lot of restrictions on free speech, on free press, and with everything else being going on, we made a decision, as I've been hinting before, to expand in the US, to be safer, to be able to operate and to be able to grow and be better than what we even are now. So let me just be very clear about what's happening here. They want you to rely on the British bashing corporation, woke ITV and sly news to regurgitate the official narrative, especially in so-called vulnerable times, like pandemics, like elections, like terror attacks, like social unrest, while stopping you from watching independent voices like this. Apparently not very happy that everyone seems to be stabbing him in the back.

Well, what did he think would happen when he became the world? world's most unpopular Prime Minister and the world's most useless leader of any political party that there has ever been. Get your breast cut off between 7.5 and 12 and 1⁄2,000 pounds. And for the vaginoplasty between 30 and 35,000. And for vulvaplasty, it's about 20 grand. That's how much it costs the NHS. Why do immigrants have a right to be in the country? Why immigrants? Why you come to our country? Puts you all. Cheers, mate. Good contribution.

Cheers, mate. I'm an immigrant. I'm a cigarette, bitch. I'll be here. Well, he's going home. Put it that way. Well, two of the independent media stars you just saw there, the activist Kelly J. Keene,

and the independent journalist behind Freedom Watch UK, Montgomery Tom, will be here today to respond to Stama and Burnham state censorship on speed. Also coming up. on today's show. A G.B. News star quits after an on-air war of words with Nigel Farage, as there is a new bloodbath that the so-called people's channel with a third of staff to be brutally axed will reveal the inside story as Stephen Edgington speaks out.

Wokai TV is in crisis as bosses allow Ed Balls to continue hosting Good Morning Britain alongside Susanna Reid, even as he enters talks to enter an Andy Burnham Labor government. And Kelly J has been threatened with dead. death for speaking out against Islam and the latest of a series attacks on the women's rights champion. So how and why does she keep going with her life at risk? She is going to reveal all the latest today. Then in the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow on Substack, King Charles moves to protect the British royal family as he bans Prince Harry from staying at Buckingham Palace. This royal war with the Sussexes explodes in public. So we're going to team up with the Royal

News Network. We'll do so over. on Substack at www. www. outspoken. It's the first greatest Britain and union jackass of the week too. For now, you can still vote for who you think is the worst Britain in the world today. I've nominated Ed Balls. That's because he is keeping this job on Wokai TV when talking about going back into government. Monty has gone for Siddique Khan.

He says, for littering our streets with pride flags and endorsing a protest that allowed perverted men to walk around naked in front of children. and Kelly J has gone for Lord Timpson for releasing dangerous prisoners onto the streets. So three great choices. Who are you going to go for? Get voting. Keep your super chats coming in. And remember, subscribe, subscribe, subscribe.

That is the way to try and protect us. I'll explain why now. Let's go. So the end of the show on Friday should have been a celebration for outspoken because after exactly two years on air, broadcasting. largely on YouTube and the free speech membership platform substack, we have achieved so much more than I ever thought was possible. And it is thanks to you and to you alone. Because against the most vicious cancellation campaign in British MSM history and constant deep state government threats

to our business model, and that's in part, I believe, because of my refusal not to tow the line and report the brutal truth on Slippery Stama instead right down to his failed marriage, we have been subjected to legal threats and censorship threats, but have prevailed. After 500 episodes, we now have over 500 million views on YouTube alone. That's half a billion views in two years. And remember, outspoken, it's a tiny operation and we run entirely. independently. We work for no one. We have no big tech investment. We have no billionaires pulling our strings. And there are other brilliant independent success stories too, from Myatusi to Mike Graham.

Yet today we have confirmation that the truly evil Labour government of the UK wants to shut us all down. not just Cypri Starma, who lied to the president time and again when he said this. We've had free speech for a very, very long time here. But the next Prime Minister too, the rat king of the North and Deep Burnham. So thankfully, the Google-owned YouTube is backing us in this case, knowing that the UK Deep State threat to take control of its algorithm, using the law to shut down free speech, provides an existential threat to its business model too. So you know I'm always fully transparent

with you. I don't hide things. So I actually want to read from the note that YouTube sent me on Friday night as I settled down to what I hope would be a quiet weekend. You need to know what's happening because you are as important to outspoken and this independent media revolution as I am. So this is what I was sent by YouTube. Keep YouTube. yours, your channel, your say. YouTube is yours because you built it, view by view, subscriber by subscriber, on the merit of your ideas and your connection with your audience.

However, proposed new rules could fundamentally change how your content is discovered, recommended and viewed in the UK. The UK government is running a public consultation called Watch This Space, a new strategic direction for UK media. The proposals include mandatory changes to how content is delivered on YouTube. This could direct audiences away from your channel. As a UK creator, this directly impacts your future. Digital content discovery works best when driven by user choice, not legal requirements.

This is a vital window for you to share your perspective before the consultation closes on the 31st of August. Then we come to the impact of the proposed rules. And the proposed new rules include a mandatory prominence regime. This could require digital platforms like YouTube to prioritize and give a privileged position to traditional broadcasters. We know who are talking about British Bashian Corporation, Wokai TV, Channel 4 News, Sly News. And they would have to this privileged position on user interfaces and recommendation feeds, potentially pushing your content out of sight. Mandating prominence to traditional institutions will impact all other independent digital creators, production companies and media companies, including through your

content being downranked. Pushing this group forward means pushing everyone else downward. mandatory prioritisation of broadcasters would affect how your content reaches your audience, regardless of what your audience actually wants to see. Reducing user exposure to diverse content and independent creators. Mandating prominence for established media networks would push the UK's diverse mix of independent journalist educators and digital first businesses down the line. It's a threat to reach and channel growth here at outspoken because YouTube says your ability to organically grow your community, generate views and

revenue and build a sustainable business is compromised if your content is hard to be discovered. Undermining the creator audience bond, the consultation repeatedly emphasizes trust in the context of legacy broadcasters implying that digital first voices are less credible, damaging the foundational trust that sustains the creator economy. And we know, we know that after the past few years, we know that after the past few years, we're years, there is no trust. With the BBC, with ITV, with sly news, with Channel 4, they lie to you. And what's worse is that these draconian measures will be put on speed during what the

government is calling vulnerable times, during vulnerable times. So can we just think about what they mean by vulnerable times? Like when they were subverting democracy to overturn Brexit? Like when they were shutting down the economy and our lives. lives for two years. Like when they wanted to jab us all to death. Like when they didn't want us to realize an Islamist whose family had been imported from Rwanda to the UK were responsible for the stabbing of three beautiful young girls at a Taylor Swift dance class. Like when Belfast was erupting in flames after an illegal migrant nearly beheaded a local on the street. Yes, it's these vulnerable times in which they

want to shut us all down. At those times, that's when they want the British Bashing Corporation, Wokai TV, Sly News Channel for, you know who I mean to regurgitate the official narrative. So today, I tell you that I stand by the sad reality that like my Atusi atuci at some point, and I'm praying this isn't the case, but I'm just being honest with you because I have to be honest with you. You've been here for me through everything. At. some point, these rules mean that it may become necessary. I hope and pray not, but it may become necessary to broadcast outside of the UK to be able to report honestly on what is happening within the UK. Just think about that for a moment. Think how chilling that is.

Maya himself has weighed in writing YouTube fought the British government on this, but unfortunately it's been a losing battle. New media is getting killed off in the UK. Now, that is truly crazy and dystopian, but it is at times the way to deal with authoritarian tyranny. Just leave, get out. And as I first revealed, here on outspoken, that is what Maya Tusi is doing. Fleeing the UK to the US in order to stop his surging geopolitics channel Tusi TV. Now, so much more successful than many major mainstream US outlets from in his words, and I want you to hear his words, but I do appreciate there has been a lot of conjecture over this falling apart. Problem is that the United Kingdom and the British government started to create some problems.

A lot of problems. On a business level, a lot of restrictions and red tape and high taxes are more in terms of media. Obviously, we now have off-com. who haven't been really good at it, but they have been given... Ofcom is the broadcast regulated. They usually just regulate the TV channels, but they've been given extra powers to regulate the internet. They gave them a list of new media channels on YouTube, for example.

I think the list has been growing. It started with about 200 or something. So not all channels, but larger channels. But they haven't actually been that good at policing. But a lot of restrictions on free speech, on free press, And with everything else been going on, we made a decision, as I've been hinting before, to expand in the US. You know that. Some of you.

We then moved our base there. The company is technically based in Florida. We then invested hundreds of thousands. We moved our funds. And the plan was to move the TTCTV business. And of course, we have our also team in the US and we're going to grow the team, create jobs in America to be safer, to be able to operate

and to be able to grow and be better than what we even are now. Because if we stay here, then the whole thing's going to fall apart. But Tusi said that he believes he now personally has to be based in the US. Yeah, if he's... If we wanted to continue this, this whole operation, obviously you have to be somewhere that actually appreciates free speech, and that is, of course, the United States of America.

And we have already been actually doing things from the US. But without me being there, obviously, it's not going to be possible to continue. The problem is the whole business and the face and the product is this stupid face. And as creators, we are united on this, like Carl Benjamin, who has created Lotus Eaters, a giant in right-wing politics that is now a brilliant. in small business employing so many in Swindon. He agrees that these new rules mean we're in trouble.

I've got some pretty bad news, actually. This is not good news at all. And we collectively are in a bit of trouble, I think. The UK government is trying to essentially gain control of all of YouTube via the algorithm in order to make sure the information you can receive is heavily curated. And of course that means, and this is not just about me or Lodzietas or anything like this, anything that is not official state-controlled or approved media is going to get completely shadow band in the algorithm, completely. So, and this is a YouTube problem.

I assume that YouTube would be able to silo this just for the UK. And I've seen so many of you in the live chat say, well, what about VPNs just by a VPN? Honestly, the government are talking about banning them too. I'm not joking. That's how serious this is. And the huge risk, I think, like what we've seen with the ban for under 16s in social media, is that very soon this won't be confined to the United Kingdom

but will spread across the anti-free speech Western world. If the British government do it successfully, I guarantee you the European Union will do it. I guarantee you the Australian and Canadian governments, New Zealand governments will do it. I don't see why non-English-speaking countries will also do this. There's no particular reason to think that the governments can't just put pressure on you,

YouTube and just say, no, you've got to do this. And so this is a bit of a concern, right? And why are they doing this? Because they're losing. Potentially pushing your content out of sight. The game has to be rigged because they are losing. And again, not just me or not just Lotus Eaters, this is the entire alternative media landscape that they are losing to

and they are concerned that they are concerned that The market is deciding against them. And so what's the answer? Well, the managerial regime only has one answer. Censorship. Rig it. Make sure we just keep by force the things that we're used to having. Okay, that's great, but that's not democratic, is it? And trust me, this is not a UK issue alone.

One of the world's biggest YouTubers has already weighed in. That is Penguinso, who is apolitical, calling the UK government, vampires in response to their crackdown on non-government-approved media on the platform watch. That heat wave blasting through the UK must have melted neurons. I mean just torched frontal lobes in the UK government. Vampires at the top of the food chain and the government over there have put forth a proposal that they're now going to be going to consultation over around YouTube and how it is urging the platform to prioritize the official trusted UK sources over others so they can drown out voices they don't like.

Yeah, that is pretty much exactly what the UK government asked for. YouTube, would you be open to the idea of artificially boosting the sources we deem trustworthy that gobble our cock and drowning out all of the other voices, please? Yeah, we'd like to really silence them and only amplify ours. Yeah, we're kind of looking to take control of the algorithm itself and we'd really appreciate it if you guys didn't put up a stink about it. And believe it or not, YouTube's on the right side of history with this one. They are putting up a stink about it. Their response has actually been pretty strong. They are urging creators to push back themselves against this.

They're putting the information in front of the creator's face about like the potential ramifications for something like this going through. And that's the thing. This isn't about individual creators and it's not even about trust big tech because most individual creators don't trust big tech for a reason. But we've got to do something here because the prospect of what's coming is genuinely frightening. Being exposed to what they approve. They're right. They know what's best. Don't question them. Only consume what they say you need to consume because they know best for you. Don't worry about all the other independent creators or companies or journalists, just ours.

We're going to bury them so you'd have to really go out of your way in the fucking sticks and mud to find anything that isn't approved. That's the idea. And that shit is concerning, that shit is alarming. It should be a frightening prospect for anyone. And as is always the case with things like this, the scapegoat, the boogeyman they all like to point to for why they need to act now. And your best interest to save you is because of dangerous misinformation that people are being exposed to or, like, really, unsavory, bad actors doing degenerate things and scoundrels, that kind of shit. So we have to drown them out.

We have to put them six feet under with official trusted sources floating to the top, increasing their visibility so you can't find the other stuff. And this isn't about left or right either because left-wing creators will be just as badly impacted by this change. Bernie Spofforth raged, okay, let's be clear. Labor wants to decide what is misinformation and disinformation, so that. They can ensure you only read the news they approve of. The threat to democracy is them.

Khaled Harsin, adding, as I've been warning for years, Britain is no longer a democracy. Britain is an authoritarian hellhole. The government telling YouTube which content to promote makes us worse than many third world shitholes. We need to take to the streets and not leave until this government is gone. It is our legal right to protest peacefully and legally we need to bring the government down. US free speech champion Preston Byrne argued the UK wants to force American platforms to silence American voices to favour its own state broadcaster America should definitely stop this.

But Kat Turd and the US took a different approach writing on Elon Musk's ex. The UK is now a full-blown communist country. We should consider their tyrannical government and enemy of the USA cut off all times. with them. Finally, there's some political backlash, too. It's taken a long time. But Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has weighed in writing this. Look at this appalling state censorship. Labor now want to seize control of YouTube's algorithm. They want YouTube to artificially boost the BBC and Channel 4's content and suffocate independent journalists and producers. The BBC has been biased to pro-mass migration, open borders and net zero views these past few decades. It's

of the reason we're in a mess. The BBC's own internal reports admit and document some of this bias. People have moved to X and YouTube in part as a response to it. And now, Labor will want to control what they see there. Reform will scrap this heavy-handed lunacy. But the question is, will that be too late? Comedian Andrew Lawrence, now independent, makes the point that so many of us have found a true home on YouTube after being thrust out of the legacy media for refusing to parrot narratives. It's one of the few places left for free expression. One of the few places where creative people can operate with honesty and integrity.

One of the only places where you don't have to parrot globalist government-approved propaganda to be heard, where you can speak about things and explore ideas that are banned from legacy media platforms. Thousands of talented people have found a home here after having been professionally and personally. attacked, often cast out of traditional legacy media organisations, because they didn't tick any DEI boxes, or because they expressed views outside of the rigid, woke orthodoxy. It's a massive economic success story all over the world, providing income for millions, bolstering economies everywhere. But now, inevitably, the authoritarian UK government is coming for YouTube, aggressively seeking to regulate its content and turn it into just a

another tool of propaganda against the British people. And so many great people could lose their businesses as a result of this. Rising Independent, superstar, Lauren the insider rage. Stama trying to censor YouTube, do F off you, Cretton. Rupert Lowe is on Joe Rogan. And the dictator that is Stama is having a meltdown, that the public reject legacy media and the class won't listen to him. The best interview slots Stama can get is with pre-approved questions.

from BF Rigby. If you value independent news, independent voices and journalists, please make sure you are supporting them. Reject mainstream media. You deserve the truth, not propaganda from a government that have enabled the mass rape of our children. Lauren believes Prince Harry is part of this powerful cabal trying to end our free speech online and I agree. Make no mistake.

We're in a situation in the UK now whereby the government are clamping. down on YouTube. They want people like me gone. And this, I actually blame Harry for this, Harry and Megan. It is their censorship drive, their ridiculous crusade on misinformation that has led to the government doing this. But folks, this gets worse. As we come on air today, Labour has now confirmed it wants to censor all social media, including what you post to your own friends online during election campaigns. This confirmation comes from Lucy Powell. You know, she's the deputy leader of Labor, also a close ally of Andy Burnham, who told the mirror, today millions of people get their news from social media, yet our laws haven't kept pace. The biggest

influence on what many voters see during election campaigns is not a TV news bulletin at social media feeds decided by opaque algorithms, where falsehoods, deep fakes, and coordinated mis and disinformed can spread at alarming speed with real world consequences. Freedom of expression is fundamental to our democracy. These proposals are not about policing political opinions or censoring legitimate political debate. They're about asking how we can make sure the public can make informed choices based on accurate information. Bullshit, by the way, total bullshit. Because you, Lucy Powell, didn't think a debate on the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs was legitimate.

You described it as a racist dog whistle. They're even trying to fix the consultation, by the way. This is truly twisted. Look at what Ben Graham has revealed. It's the Department Culture of Media and Sport and they're manipulative, manipulative document on this. So the option to say no, I don't agree with the proposal simply isn't there. Instead, you're only asked how government-backed news should be promoted, not whether it should be promoted at all. As he says, what's the point of? consultation of the most obvious answer isn't even an option. A rigged survey isn't consultation. It's manufacturing consent. So what are they afraid of? What is the Labour government trying to stop you from seeing? Let's show you some examples. Like the jihad-tinged humour of Lawrence, Fox and Father Calvin Robinson. Do you think the British government should have on their checklist of whether we allow people to come in the country, don't allow people to come in called jihad? starts, but maybe just don't allow people to come in.

But if you're going to allow people to come in, which they are, because they are, until it starts, which you will, do you think that Jihad should be on a watch list of names that we maybe just go, you know what, you can come in, Suleiman, but your brother Jihad, son of the guy, sort of death to Britain. Yeah, you are not coming in. Like Leo Curse, pointing out how the government is jailing ordinary Brits for their social media posts. Well, politicians and celebrities were praising Mr. Elfata. British people were getting jailed for saying things like, love your nation and it's okay to be white. Oh, so despicable.

Why do British politicians and celebrities always fall over themselves on behalf of some guy called Abu Jihad ISIS terror who's jailed in the Middle East for calling for Brits and Jews to be burnt in a cage and their daughters raped? But if you're a white British person and you say you like bacon within 300 miles of a national lottery-funded jihadi militant training camp, the same politicians will throw you in jail forever. Leo has reacted to this news by saying the government says it wants to develop its tech and AI industries. But how can any tech company have a secure footing here when the government turns around and regulates against their commercial interests? And does the government not

understand the precedent its setting for the future? A future right-wing government can order tech companies to suppress left-wing messaging and promote right-wing messaging. And none of this will stop people from being furious that the government is importing jihadis and child rapists to attack British natives. If people can't express themselves peacefully, and if they aren't listened to democratically, the government isn't leaving them with many non-violent options. Like Conor Tomlinson, of Tomlinson talks reporting on the migrant crime epidemic that the MSM keeps covering up. Three fake asylum seekers from Iran and Egypt were convicted of raping a woman on Brighton Beach.

One of them from Egypt was already convicted of murder. This was the guy that was already convicted in Egypt for murder. He looks like the mouth of Sauron. He's basically the trickster from the Sarah Jane adventures. He is remorseless. He enjoys what he's done. He doesn't care about the consequences. He looks like an actual demon.

These are the kind of people that are being brought into our country and housed at our expense. They just shouldn't be here. If they weren't here, that woman's life wouldn't have been ruined. Connor has responded to the news by writing, even YouTube is opposed. There is a public consultation, but as usual, the government will likely ignore the negative responses and tick the box for performing mandatory stakeholder engagement. I wonder what the US State Department will make of this pressure put on an American company to censor British people. Like Mike Graham, exposing Brits waking up to the competency of our leaders. Keir Starr was spent the weekend at Chequers, wondering what to do with the rest of his life,

apparently not very happy that everyone seems to be stabbing him in the back. Well, what did you think would happen when he became the world's most unpopular Prime Minister and the world's most useless leader of any political party that there has ever been? Worse than Michael Foote, worse than Jeremy Corbyn, worse than Jim Callahan, worse than almost any, worse than Ed Miliband, believe it or not. Like Constantine Kisson. of trigonometry finally discussing Britain's changing and worryingly dangerous ethnicity. At the time of the first census to record ethnicity, which was conducted in 1991,

white British people made up well over 90% of the population. You need only walk around any major British city to see how much this has changed and what is a very short period of time. No amount of lecturing about diversity being our strength can overcome the fact that it is difficult for people from different backgrounds who increasingly don't even speak the same language to have a sense of community and common purpose. We need to have a serious conversation in this country about how we develop an overarching identity that we can all buy into. Pretending we're all English isn't going to cut it. Like the Lotus Eaters and their brilliant coverage of Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry, which was entirely ignored by the BBC.

So for clarity, out of all of the rape gangs or gangs that are coordinated activity to commit sexual violence against children and young women, 86% are comprised of Muslim men. 87% of the convicted perpetrators have Muslim names. Yes. And of course, we know that some of the ringleaders have been prosecuted, but we know there are hundreds, possibly thousands of perpetrators. We don't even need to do the whole per capita thing here. That is an 87% the vast majority full stop. Yes. Like Kelly J Keene, revealing the true cost of trans extremism. You don't have to pay anything for this. A phalloplasty about, say, £60,000 per patient.

It could easily go up to $100,000 because it's a really high fail rate surgery, loads of corrections. So we're talking about $100,000. Metaudeoplasti, you're looking about $25,000 to get your breast cut off between $7.5,000 and $12,500,000. And for the vaginoplasti, between you're looking about $25,000. 30 and 35,000 and for vulvaplasty, it's about 20 grand. That's how much it costs the NHS.

Like Montgomery, Tom's hammering leftist arguments through open public debate. If I, so if I believe in deportations, I'm racist. Is that what you think? Do they have a right to be in the country? No. Why do immigrants have a right to be in the country? Why immigrants? Why you come to our country? Cheers, mate.

Good fortune, me, shit. Cheers, mate. I'm an immigrant. I'm a cigarette, bitch. I'm a cigarette, bitch. Well, he's going home. Put it that way. So what can you do?

Well, the first thing is to subscribe now, not just clicking the button for free on YouTube, but Substack 2, which is a free speech platform. That means I can have a direct relationship with you. Go on. Do it now, please. It's www.outspoken.org. Then joined this fixed consultation. Tell the Labour government why free speech matters.

And let's shout about this. Because free speech is now under serious attack for good. Now, Montgomery, Tom's and Kelly J Keen here on the superstar panel. So we knew that the Labour government, was going to try to censor the independent media but I don't think anyone really believed

that using the law to take control of the YouTube algorithm was even a possibility logistically. Can you hear me Monty? I can. I don't know if you were speaking to me or you were speaking to Talley so I was being British and polite and waiting

to someone else to jump in. Don't be polite. Don't be British. We're at war. Come on, Monty. Sorry. No, absolutely. I mean, I must say I'm not shocked. When it comes to YouTube, rolling the clock back to the COVID days as well, I didn't really regard it as a free speech platform, which really tells you how desperate we are in modern climate to yearn for a space where we can actually have open conversations

like we're having now. You can tell, obviously, the kind of rhetoric and the language that YouTube's using when it put their notification out to those that use the platform, clearly they're reluctant to even go along with it because they know the amount of people that have come over to their platform because they wholly reject the BBC or any mainstream media. They are thriving of this. In fact, I would actually love to see if they had any form of these metrics, some kind of statistics to see how many people use their platform for alternative media. Because I'd be absolutely fascinated, especially those

that live within Britain. I mean, it's an absolute necessity for so many people. And I'm not like a here jumping for joy over YouTube because I actually think it's behaved appallingly, especially in the lockdown days. It was atrocious. She would get struck off if you spoke out against anything regarding COVID. So, but nevertheless, we're in this pathetic sort of pantomime where even YouTube is a safe haven for us when we've got the likes of Starma and obviously now Burnham doing everything they can to push through authoritarian measures to protect their own arses because they know that should we have to. have full access to what the public thinks and to alternative journalism, that people will understand

what happened to thousands upon thousands of white working class girls up and down the country regarding the rape gang queries. They know that we are there to expose them and that we have a culture in this country of not wielding to authoritarian's and we will use any means necessary to push back. So yes, they will weaponise anything they can and use the full force of the law to take on our ability to express ourselves in order to try and win the next general election. But Kelly, Jay, they're not just talking about YouTube, are they? I mean, it's particularly relevant to this show, because of course it's where we broadcast live every day. But they are talking about taking control of every algorithm.

They're talking about taking control of the Facebook algorithm, of the Instagram algorithm, of the TikTok algorithm, of the X algorithm. My imagination here is that Elon Musk will refuse and they'll probably even try and shut down X altogether. I mean, this is truly wide. spread and it doesn't matter where you get your information, the UK government wants to take control of it. Yeah, I think I have a little bit of hope because they're attacking both the left and the right so there'll be quite a few people on the left will also be punished for this particular measure that maybe there will be a bigger backlash because I think one of the one of the things that right have often done very, very badly is we've remained polite and rule abiding

when we're being sort of bashed repeatedly over the head with a mallet. And, you know, the Chinese have the great firewall. This is no different, is it? You know, in China, you can't search up the letters, the numbers, six, four and eighty-nine. I have no doubt that if the UK government can do something like that to stop us searching certain terms or certain names, it will be very, very difficult to search them up. So, you know, the gloves have to be off at some point where everyone says, right, whatever happens, we are going to get these bag of authoritarian cult member communists out of government.

By hook or by crook, we will join forces and we will make that happen. And that has to be an absolute priority. But yeah, for all of your audiences, everyone just has to go to a model. where they can find you, whatever. But that's not really the, that's not going to save us, is it? It's the new people that won't find you. That's going to be the ultimate damage. Exactly.

And the people who just happened to be looking through their YouTube recommended page, see a Kelly J Keene video, see a Freedom Watch video, see an outspoken video, take a listen, maybe because they like the thumbnail, and are actually like, wow, this is not what I'm hearing on the BBC. Kelly J is completely right. You are all awake because you're here, but it's about us getting to the people who need to be told what is really happening.

As the British government attempts this massive crackdown on the mainstream media, it's really interesting to see some of those controlled mainstream media organisations which present themselves as being freedom fighters, also in deep trouble. And trust me, despite what I know what some of you, will say, I don't actually talk about G.B. News collapsing with a third of its staff about to be sacked in a new bloodbath with any joy. But what I will say is that this is a very obvious response

to the channel becoming a propaganda vehicle for one political party, which is never what it was set up for. And it's why increasingly people are moving to the independent media and away from the mainstream controlled narrative. Now, GB News has suffered a massive loss over the weekend with Stephen Edgington, a man who many consider to be their best journalist, certainly a man to the right of every presenter on GB News, quitting the station, fascinatingly despite the UK government attempt to rig the algorithm in order to join the independent media. Now, this comes after a long back and forth within the channel over Stephen Edgington's role,

because you'll remember he had words on air with both Nigel Farage and Richard Tice, which made him persona on Grata Arunx Management, which I think is really shocking given the brilliant, brilliant work that I'm sure you agree he has done. But the announcement came yesterday. He posted on Elon Musk's ex, personal news. After two years in DC for GBM News, I am leaving this. channel and returning to London to report on migration, the Home Office and Whitehall. I will be producing documentaries, interviews and podcasts on YouTube as well as written reports. I plan to hold our political

class to account and report on uncomfortable but important stories. At GB News, I challenge leading politicians including Nigel Farage, also a host on the station, Liz Truss, Simon Clark, Richard Tice, Chris Phil, Dan Crenshaw and others. I produced documentaries around the US on the rise of radical Islam, illegal migration and replacement migration in the tech sector. I look forward to continuing this work independently in Britain. If you wish to support my work, please subscribe. And I have already subscribed and I genuinely believe that Stephen Engington will become a force in the independent media. But I will also be honest with you and say, this is a total indictment of the management of GB News that they are letting this guy go. To become an independent sensation, simply

because he challenged Nigel Farage. That is what is about. You will remember this very famous interview. It has gone viral. We have played it many times, but it is worth looking at knowing that Stephen Edgington is now out of the station where he got Nigel Farage to admit on camera

that it was, in his mind, literally impossible to mass deport hundreds of thousands of people from the country watch. But just back to the issue of deportations specifically, do you support that mass deportations? Trump says in America that he wants mass deportations. We're talking about hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants are in Britain at the moment. Some estimates say the number could even be in, you know, a million plus. So do you support deporting all of those people?

It's impossible to do. Literally impossible to do. But do we have to begin the process? Yes. Look, we're told that we can't send people back to Afghanistan, right? That's impossible. Well, Germany, two weeks ago, did. Germany sent a plane load of people back to Afghanistan.

You know, if the Germans can do it, I'm certainly sure we can. But if the Americans can do it, for example, you know, in America, they are able to deport a lot of people. I know they haven't under this administration, but Trump was able to. It's not totally impossible. Edginton's questioning was so lazy sharp in that interview. He totally boxed Nigel in. For us, at the moment, it's a political impossibility. But is it your ambition?

No. No. I'm not going to get dragged down the route. of mass deportations or anything like that. Indeed, as the interview went on, Nigel admitted on camera that he's not even concerned about the takeover of the white British population. Do you think that immigration represents a major threat to Britain from a demographic perspective?

So in the last 20 years, the white British population has declined from 87% to 74%. Is that a concern of yours? No. Someone unbelievably, after that Eddington, then got Reform's deputy leader, Richard Tice, to agree to sit down to a grilling from him too. And it was another car crash. And he predicts that by 2063, Britain will be minority white British.

Is that a concern of yours at all? Yeah, I don't think that's a... I mean, I haven't seen those predictions in 2063. It's a long way off. It's a few decades. It's a few decades. Well, I'm trying to do the mask quickly in my head. But, in most people, I'll be long gone, but all that. I think that, you know, the UK is a, we are a Christian nation.

We should stand up and be proud of that. And, you know, let's see what happens. But at the end of the day, what we should be focusing on is getting our own people back into work, training up our own people, having, in a sense, Nigel's talk. quite recently about families. We need more British-born people so that we need to be less reliant on immigration. And that's the issue.

And on we go. It will be a huge moment, though, in British history, for the first time ever in this nation's more than a thousand years of proud history, the country will be minority white British. And men... Well, sorry, wait, you're obsessed with this stuff. So I'll be long gone.

It's a line that will go down an infamy for Richard Tice, a bit like the that lot slur against Tommy Robinson supporters. But Egington at GB News also helped the Tories to account for their record, shaming Simon Clark into admitting he had no idea who Rannan White was, and getting Chris Philp to concede that his government deported no one to Rwanda. Do you know who these individuals? are? The short answer is, I'm afraid I don't. Okay. Well, just you can, you can hold on time. I suspect they may well be the victims of crime. They are. Paul Rianan White, the 27-year-old, who was murdered

by an illegal migrant with a screwdriver in 2024. Again, he laughed and danced after he murdered her. James Furlong, the other person I met, I so did a picture of, again, murdered in 2020 by an Libyan illegal migrant, silent seeker, in a terror attack. These are the people who have suffered, in fact, not the suffered, they've lost their lives as a result of government failure, as a result of your government's failure, systemic failure. How do you respond to that? Do you feel any shame, any guilt, any remorse over this? I think how many migrants, illegal migrants, were deported to Rwanda during the period in which

you were in government. This start in 2018, you had six years. do it. So how many migrants were... So basically zero? It was zero. Not basically zero, it was zero. It was zero. Well, the four people weren't voluntarily, but let's just say zero. And here's the thing. Because Egington was not a propagandist, he became a target. When he challenged Boris Johnson, the former UK Prime Minister made it clear he didn't expect a tough approach from GB News.

This was at a press conference. Why do you say that those who are skeptical of funding Ukraine in Congress, those people on Foxx? do's people like Tucker Carlson are Kremlin and Putin propagandists, as you just mentioned. Are they not simply concerned about the invasion on the sub-morder in America of millions of illegal migrants? Obviously, in the UK, we face a very similar issue. And they believe that that priority is far more important. Their own border security is far more important. It's surely the view of GB news, is it? And the second question is, hang on. Do you believe that? Do you agree with certain people?

criticism, do you believe, do you agree that Putin is laughing at the West in many ways because of our adoption of so-called woke policies? I know when you were prime minister, you said there was nothing wrong with being woke. We shouldn't discriminate against the woke. Okay, and you also support. We should. If people want to be woke, that is up to them. Do you think you are woke? What? Are you woke? I'm told that I'm not. There was no formal response from G.B. News about the departure of Stephen Edgington. Fellow presenters like Bev Turner did post publicly writing, great to work with you in DC, Stevie. You will ace this new venture. You know where I am if I can ever help. She's a great woman. Ben Leo posted you'll be missed in America, but you have a country to save

back home. Good luck, mate. John James, writing best of luck, Stephen, and a huge loss to GBN. It's refreshing to see someone not afraid to ask the difficult questions. The audience love you for it. Look forward to following your next chapter. And Nate H, another independent broadcasting star, posting good luck. You were by far the singularly greatest journalist at GB News and the best interviewer they ever had. And this loss of Stephen Edgington from GB News comes at a very difficult time for the channel, with the Establishment Times newspaper revealing today that they are cutting more than a third of their staff. swinging cuts to the workforce, the newspaper reports. The Channel understood to be shedding a

significant number of roles in as many as 90 jobs at risk, which is more than a third of its 260 strong headcount. The cuts which are expected to affect several areas of the business, including editorial technology and HR, saw with the Channel's fifth anniversary party held last month. The celebrations went down like a cold of cups sick, with HR handing out cupcakes and merchandise despite begging not to, but no one knowing if they were on the hit list yet, one former staffer said. It is the second significant round of cuts the channel is made after it removed 40 rolls in 2024, prompting concerns that its on-screen coverage would become wobbly and error-proned. It is already very, very lean, although it had fattened slightly after the last round of redundancies

because that's the natural way of things the former staffer said. Output was affected last time, and it will be again, but newsrooms just absorb it. Fewer stories done less. well. Despite its high weekly average viewing figures, Gb News attracts a smaller audience and its rivals, which reach around twice as many people in total. It suggests that GB News is watched more consistently by a smaller, loyal

audience. To the superstar panel, Independent Media Superstars, Kelly J. Keene and Montgomery Tom's of Freedom Watch UK. So, Monty, Stephen Edgington, I believe, is a huge loss to the channel. And if you were running GB News,

and Edgington says, look, I want to come back from the US to the UK because there's a country to save here and I've got reporting to do. Surely you do whatever you can to make sure this guy stays with you. But my understanding and my reporting, Monty, is that there has been significant backlash amongst the management over Stephen Edgington's tough approach to figures on the right, especially Nigel Farage and that as a result they let him go. Yeah, I mean, that may well be the case. I mean, I can only talk purely correlation more than causation, but as soon as I became a part of Restore Britain as a political party

in terms of the core team, I haven't had a GB News appearance since. I can't say that's because I'm in Restore Britain, but as we know, they don't take too kindly to our party are very much a mouthpiece for Nigel Farage. And I think that the two interviews that you play, the one of Tice and the one of Farage, are some of the most significant blows that reformers ever had.

And I think that they really resemble, well, they represent a severe kind of backlash against reform in terms of our membership at Restore Britain. They will reference these videos. They screwed up massively. And G.B. News know that if they, are to be on the side of Reform UK, then they will need to let the people go that they know

deep down are actually Restore Britain supporters. And I hear things down grapevines. I hear that it's actually a decent amount of people at GB News that are involved, maybe not presenting, but within their team behind the scenes and maybe some presenters that do quite like Restore Britain, but no, if they say that publicly, it's going to trash their careers. And I know that you know, potentially there are seats promised to certain presenters elsewhere. And that just shows that it's a real shame, actually, it's kind of poor timing, isn't it? If someone's going to go and move over to YouTube rather than be part of the mainstream media,

it's kind of very sad day to do it, considering the recent news we've had around YouTube. But nevertheless, of course, I wish him all the best. And I think that independence away from legacy media is probably the best thing for most journalists. As you well know, Dan, you've done. Yeah, and the thing is, what's interesting, you don't have to be a restore supporter, but you have to accept that restore a part of the ecosystem of British politics and that Rupert Lowe deserves a seat at the table. I mean, come on.

I know we're not going to confirm anything, Monty, today. But, you know, if Joe Rogan thinks Rupert Lowe deserves a seat at the table, then surely G.B. News needs to. And Kelly J, it makes me sad. I mean, I think back to the early days of the station, you were a regular guest on my show. there would be a lot of people who would push back against that. And I would say, I don't care.

Like, of course I'm going to have Kelly J Keen or just like I had a whole load of people on. And they will not have most of those people on these days. I mean, Rupert Lowe was a regular guest of mine at GB News. That was obviously long before Restore Britain. But there's a whole load of other people who I can think of, from Robert Kennedy to Robert Malone, you know, people who would now just be considered unpalatable to be interviewed by G.B. News. And that's sad to me. And it's not a surprise that as a result of this censorship, they do seem to be struggling by having to cut staff. You're damned if you

do and you're damned if you don't if you're GB News. And I just think, what would the landscape of news look like if there was no GB News? Well, I don't think it would be very good. I think it'd be pretty poor, actually. I'm a massive fan of Ben Leo and Patrick Christie. I think they're both amazing. And I kind of think, look, G.B. News it's very similar to how I feel about Farage and Rupert Lowe.

But GB News in particular, it's the gateway to finding the truth. So people will start watching GB News and eventually they'll end up in this beautiful place called the Dan Witten Show, right? But maybe they're not finding you unless they do the gateway kind of lukewarm

version of the truth, which is at GB News. I'm sure we'd all, as an activist, I wish they'd said years ago, you know, no woman has a penis, trans women are men. I wish they'd done that a long time ago. Maybe it would all look different for me.

But actually, they are trying to tread the line with off-com authoritarianism, the Labour government, and I think this is possibly the only way that they can do it. I think the staff redundancies is always very sad. but I don't know that they're getting the advertising funding because they're so badly attacked. I think us on the right, we have to accept that the enemy of the good is perfection. So I'd rather they were as they were, and it's not perfect, but it's better than nothing.

Yeah, and look, I mean, obviously I was part of launching GB News. It was so important that it was here as a sort of significant voice in the British EcoSever. system, which in broadcasting had been dominated so long by solely left-wing voices. So I hear all of that. And there are brilliant presenters there. I mean, I would add like Bev Turner and Nana are queer to the list. I think Will Kingston is really good. He's been very open to restore Britain. And I'm sure there are people there are who I'm forgetting, who I'll feel terrible about later. It is not to say, G.B. News is bad. All presenters are controlled. But there is a but and I'll bring you in this on Monty. Like to not allow Rupert Lowe

to be interviewed live on air when he is so clearly such a significant part of the debate on the right now, that's to me something that's inexcusable because that is an editorial decision backing one individual party over another party. And that's never what G.B. news was meant to be about. When I was there at launch, it was fundamentally clear that we were a channel of the right, of the centre right, but we did not support one political party. You remember at the time, the Conservatives were in power, but many presenters like myself were massively opposed to Boris Johnson's lockdown measures and called him out every single night. So I do think it's pretty inexcus-even though I sort of fundamentally agree with what Kelly's saying, it's inexcusable to say. And I do think it's pretty inexcusable to

say, well, we're just not going to interview Rupert Lowe. Yeah, yeah, well, of course, I agree with you, Dan. I mean, I've got to say as well, I think that Patrick Christie did cover, for example, our rate-gay inquiry report. Yeah, which was great. Very methodically, I thought he did a great job there. So I'm not here, you know, slating GV news presenters. Some I agree with some of them I don't.

But that's the beauty of having public discourse. But I think there is a line. I agree with Kelly and so far as it is a gateway. Like, you'll never catch my nan watching Dan Woodson because she couldn't even work out what YouTube is. So I do appreciate how it is an important space for certain people as much of a just, it's better than nothing. But that's not to say we can't scrutinize when it comes to some really big things. And obviously not having Rupert on and also not broaching several topics, which I think are vital parts of public discourse like, you know, demographic replacement,

becoming a minority in our own country, rhetoric around remigration as a term is apparently really scary, which all it means is to reverse migration. You know, it's very clear that when you're watching GB News, there's a nervous sort of energy around many of the presenters when they have some guests on, and they don't want to have certain people on, but unless it's sort of a slightly controlled environment, because they know that someone like myself is not going to compromise on some core details and core facts. And that is not a free speech platform. Now, I have to remember that GB News isn't, you know, dressed up like BBC, where it's there

to be impartial. but at the same time, they also pride themselves on being the free speech platform. So if you're going to have that title, then you better own it. And I don't think they do. And I think that they will lose a lot of support and backing from a lot of people as time goes on. You know, how far do you bend the knee? I appreciate you have to compromise in order to make things work, like with offcom, which are an evil, you know, entity, as we all know.

But nevertheless, where do you draw the line on that? Where do you draw the line? For me, for example, you know, when you can't talk about demographic replacement, I would draw the line there. Or when you can't talk about COVID lockdowns and COVID jabs harming people, I'll draw the line there. You know, that is my line. And that's why I'm very disappointed in where GB News has gone. Yeah, and I think we can all agree losing a journalist like Stephen Edgington is a huge loss. But personally, I welcome it because what does the independent sector need to grow in this country?

It needs journalists like him. So I'm like, go for it. Make sure you subscribe to Stephen Edgington on Substack. I've already done so. Make sure you subscribe to Stephen Edgington on YouTube. I think he's going to be a huge force in this independent space and he'll have the shackles off and it will actually be a beautiful thing to see. The most disturbing thing is that the off-communists who control the British media, totally obsessed with cracking down on shows like this, totally obsessed with cracking down on GB News and talk TV. Do not give a damn that they currently have the

main host of the government-regulated Good Morning Britain show. And by the way, I'm talking about this morning, like I'm talking about this morning, Ed Balls, hosting alongside fellow left winger Susanna Reid, there they were, celebrating England's brilliant victory, while reported to be in negotiations to join Andy Burnham's new, new Labor government. I mean, this is nuts. Susanna Reid is a massive lefty. Trust me, I used to work with her. So there's no balance in that presenting line-up.

But the idea that Ed Balls can hold this government to account, while literally being in talks to join the next government, is lunacy. So here's the reporting from the Daily Telegraph, headlined, the Blairite band is back together. And this is Annabald Denham, but it has been widely reported. In a pokey borrowed office on the fifth floor of Port Cullough's house, Andy Burnham is preparing for government. For the Labour MPs who are about to hand him the keys to number 10, the decisions that matter most involve personnel. Every appointment will indulge one ambition but bruise half a dozen other egos.

It's why the corridor outside that parliamentary office has become a beauty parade. The MP's frustration could be compounded by the political resurrection of another Blair figure. It balls. More than a decade after losing his seat in one of the defining moments of the 2015 election. Remember Andrea Jenkins, name Andrew Jenkins beat him. There are rumors he could play a central role in the heart of a Burnham administration. Since Balls was ejected from Parliament in 2015 by shared tribute act, Jenkins, I think she's much better than that. He has built a successful career as a broadcaster, podcaster and master of the Pasadoblo, while his wife. wife, Yvette Cooper, has carried the family's political mantle. Yet there is mounting speculation

he could return in an economic advisory role or possibly something even more substantial. He would not be the only comeback kid. Burnham has already appointed James Pernal, the former work and pension secretary as his chief of staff. As David Miller Band has declined to rule out a return to frontline politics, it's not entirely beyond the realm of possibility that the four great office of state could soon be occupied by members of two families. Before you scoff at the band getting back together again like Burnham's favourite oasis, it's worth noting that all three of these veterans are several years younger than Kirstama. In a more leisure age, they would only just be beginning their senior political careers. So, I mean, look, Labour can screw itself if it wants

by putting the two millibands who are vile men who despise each other and this weird husband and wife duo in the jobs, okay? If they want to do that, they can do that. But Kelly J., what I am absolutely stunned about, is that Woke ITV, which is constantly going after GB News and independent journalists and claims that it's a paragon of virtue and that it's totally a balanced operation, is allowing this fast to continue.

This is a news show. Good Morning Britain is a new show. It is now produced by ITN, the people behind ITV news. And here he is this morning, apparently hosting political debate when there are widespread mainstream reports that he is in negotiation to enter government.

Surely Kelly J, at the very least, he either has to rule that out entirely or take a leave of absence while these negotiations go on. Or just leave. Why can't he just leave? Please. Why can't he just say I was thinking about leaving? I might get a better job, so I'm just going to leave.

Or better still, why don't they just get rid of him? It's absolutely preposterous. Like, you know, all bets are off now. We have to fight relatively dirty, I think, on the right. And we have to start, you know, I would have taken a principal position maybe even a year ago and said, you know, it shouldn't matter what his wife does. He's all independent. Now I just think, just, you know, I don't want to commit any incitement actually,

so I better be mindful of what I say. Just. The rest you soon enough, Kelly J, as you well know. Let's just say it like that. Yeah, absolutely, thanks. But it's quite insane that he's been allowed to carry on. And I think just reflecting on the last discussion about GB News, this is why I really do have, you know, a lot more patience and love for GB News

and what they're doing, because this is, this is what's happening, this authoritarian control, what is it, the, the great firewall like they have in China. It's, it's all just so dystopian and frightening that whatever it takes, we have to just take every single opportunity on the right to try and just stop this inevitable doom that's happening to this country. I mean, Monty, Montgomery Tom's of Freedom Watch UK, Kelly Jays completely right, isn't she? If this situation were on G.B. News, where the husband or wife of a serving cabinet minister who was in negotiations to join government was presenting the flagship breakfast show without declaring a political interest. I mean, it would be leading news bulletins. There would be calls for the channel to be.

shut down, yet when it comes to Wokai TV, no one is talking about this. Like, no one, no one is even talking about this being an issue. Yeah, well, this is how the establishment operates, right? It's handshakes, it's weird donations of five million pounds popping up now and again and things like that. You know, this is exactly what kind of people of my generation are kind of exhausted and sick by and quite unsurprised by. This is how government works. Politics is just a mess, a messy, chaotic world of who do you know, not how you're qualified, not what you're going to contribute, but who's going to tow the line, who is going to make sure they keep their head down, and who's got what on whom, what blackmail is there out there?

You know, we see this even expanding, looking at the US, the Epstein files. Who knows what happens behind the scenes in politics? And I'm not surprised by this at all. It's like, I mean, What words are there, Dan? I mean, are you surprised by this? I'm kind of not bored of having the conversation about, oh my gosh, the Labour government's done another mad thing. It's like, it's really regular. Ed Balls interview.

This is ITV. And the off-communists had no problem with it. They literally let Ed Balls. This was the moment interview his own wife. They discussed their pillow talk. Genuinely, they discussed what they had spoken about in bed. The off-communists did not investigate, yet they are currently investigating Bev Turner for her, I thought, brilliant interview with Donald Trump on GB News. So, I mean, Kelly Jay, how can you say that is not two-tier regulation?

Well, it totally is. And that's because off-com is a totally captured leftist organisation. pretty much like all regulators. They have no teeth anyway. Even if they wanted to do something, they can't really do it unless they do it to powerless people, which they seem to pick on powerless people all the time. I would just like to say, just because Mr Farage isn't here,

but I don't think Farage is establishment. I know that's the accusation that's very fashionable at the moment, but I do feel like I have to defend him. So that's going to him at the moment, Kelly J., do you think this is part of a plot because there is a huge amount of sort of mainstream media push to almost make life so unbearable for Nigel Farage at the moment that he just quits, that he just thinks, I just cannot do this,

it's becoming unbearable, I just want to quit. He is a man that's three decades in of railing against this authoritarian globalist agenda. And I think it's naive to think that there is anybody else actually in this country, that could possibly get to number 10 Downing Street and halt this madness before Armageddon of this, this lovely nation that we all love very much. So, yeah, I do. It's from all sides as well.

It's a bit scripted, isn't it? It just, you know, it's the $5 million, and then they unearthed something else, and then all of a sudden he's a patsy, and I just want to win. I just, I want my kids to have a future in this country. I don't want my children not to be able to look up something on social media without like a knock at the door.

So, Monty, come on, come on. Surely even as a Restore Britain guy, you should be having some sympathy for Nigel Farage today. I'm an Englishman, therefore I believe in the idea of innocence until proven guilty. So I shan't comment any further. We will see what the courts, you know, spit out. But in terms of, you know, a future... But what about the media, though?

This is actually about the media. Yeah, okay. I'm not here to try and point score. There is clearly, you know, the media is very good at being coordinated, especially the mainstream. And I can't deny that there clearly is on all sides and attempts to push, you know, back against Farage and reform. You know, I'm not possibly going to argue against that.

But, you know, Farage is incredibly prevalent. You could put it down to purely the fact that, you know, the media just generally hates him because they think that he's some far-right figure. You wait till they really latch on to Ruper as things get louder and louder, which we did see, you know, make a film. We saw endless articles. It was just monotonous. But Monty, you're saying, well, according to reports that I've read over the weekend,

legitimate reports, and actually based on my own reporting within Restore Britain, it's very, very clear that Restore Britain, if there is to be a recall by election in Clacton and Farage runs for Reform UK, Restore Britain will run against him. Now, we've had people on this show who are more reform aligned. I'd be interested to know if Kelly Jay agrees with this, who says, actually, no, that would be the moment for Restore Britain to actually say there is an establishment which hunt against Nigel Farage. We're not going to run in Clactam.

We're just going to let him win this. Is this a question for me or Kelly? Both. You go first. Yeah, sure. Well, I've got to say, you know, I'm not going to talk on what our position is, whether we're going to run, whether we're not going to run. because these are internal conversations, and then we'll announce our position on that. But I would say, you know, say if we're going to be pushing this split-the-vote narrative,

which I don't know if that's what you're saying, Dan, but I imagine that's the argument we're going to get from many people. You know, parties are designed to run in elections. If you claim to. I'm not saying it. I actually think. I know you're not, but I'm addressing one. But I know most, well, I know a lot of people on the right want to see a magnanimous

approach from Restore Britain when it comes to Clacton specifically if Farage has to run again. But Restore, I'm told Kelly is saying, no, no, no, we're fighting hard. We want to bring Nigel down. Do you agree with that approach, Kelly, Jay? I'm just going to say categorically, without Farage, there's no Rupert Lowe, without reform, there's no restore. I just don't get it. What do we want? Do we want to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory here? What the left do is they all gather together and they say, do you know what, we

hate those people over there, come and join us, we'll do whatever it takes to make sure that's people... Well, we saw it and make a few. Didn't we? That's because the left don't have morals and principles. Okay, well then we need to lose ours because we're not going to get into Ten Downing Street. So I'd rather have people in power and

forego my principles for the next couple of years than what to Labour have another government after this one that will be infinitely worse and will totally kill our country. Well, you know, that is the dividing line, right? It's a huge amount of people that back, restore Britain, coming in it from a huge case of principle.

The fact is, you know, I do want to see reform lose the next election and have Restore Britain when, of course, I would say that. Because, you know, I think that I know you've spoken about your children. I don't have children, of course, you know, but I can speak as someone who's going to inherit a country once, you know, people of older generations that are pioneering the future. this country are dead. And I don't think, as a young man, that Farage is going to be the person to fix that, the person that's going to forge the future. We've just seen two interviews

from previous regarding his position on migration, including Tice. Stephen Agenton. And if there is an opportunity, what could he say? When somebody says, are you going to deport hundreds of thousands of people? A man that wants liberal Democrats to vote for him. He wants to still Labour Party. He wants to still conservatives. He can't go, well, yeah, actually, what I'd like to do is get rid of them all. we'll have a nice big boat and we'll send them off to Rwanda. He can't say that. I think it would be so popular though, actually.

Well, I would say to answer that, number one, you know, famously millions must go. And if millions don't go and we have the continuation of what we've got, then we are going to be a minority in our own country. So I'd quite like to hear that. But ultimately, what people need to understand, and you hear this with the split-the-vote rhetoric as well, is Rassau-Briton isn't pulling in old Tories, funnily enough, or Lib Dem voters.

We're pulling in 40% of the population that are completely disenfranchised. That's interesting. And what's so fascinating about that is that was obviously Farger's game during the Brexit referendum campaign. I think it's interesting. When you actually look at the polling specifically on that issue of mass deportation, it's honestly popular, even amongst left-wing supporting parties voters. So personally, what would I want Nigel Farage to say and answer that question? And do you know what?

I think he'd say it now. And it's probably because of the Restore Britain threat. do you want to see hundreds of thousands to be deported? Yes. Yes, I do. I think he would answer that now. And I think in some ways that shows you how that Stephen Edgington interview has moved things, how the Restore Britain Emergence has moved things. Breaking today, women's rights and anti-Islam activist Kelly J. Keene,

increasingly under threat in the disunited kingdom and around the world, as she risked her own safety in order to speak out on the world, the growing Islamization of the West and the vicious and resentful, and let me just say it to violent trans mob. Now, I think what Kelly J has gone through would make most of me immortals walk away, like when she was surrounded by rabid trans activists, the worst of the worst in New Zealand in 2023, and got a tin of tomato soup poured over her by this loon. Watch. If that wasn't bad enough, Kelly Jay was then nearly crushed to death by these animals and terrifying scenes. But unfortunately, those risks for Kelly Jay now very, very clear in her home country.

Because at Speaker's Corner, in Hyde Park, meant to be ground zero of the need for free speech in the Western world. When Kelly Jay was speaking out against Islamism, you may remember that she was threatened. to have her throat cut. Where were they? That fateful day, where were they? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Yeah, okay. I will. You're going to, oh, you're going to what? You're going to what? You're going to what? Where's the police? He just said he's going to cut my throat. Police, where are they?

Now, the police were there. And I'm just thinking about what we've seen from the police in recent, weeks right in Birmingham when you know the young white lad is getting beaten up oh my goodness Henry Nova the police were there do you think they responded with any urgency look yeah so that chap down there just came up to me to tell me he's going to cut my throat he's coming he's a guy here with his uh coming the thing on it's got a white t-shirt gray white t-shirt he's right This lady here is calling my prophet Mohammed's a lot of telling me all sorts of words.

It's not illegal. And Kelly J joins us now with some breaking news on that incident. And Kelly J joins us now with some breaking news on that incident alongside Montgomery Tom's also under regular threat of physical violence from the hard left in his role at Freedom Watch UK. So Kelly J, we covered this on the show, and my response was that the police really didn't seem to give a damn. But can you explain what has happened because you have pursued this? And thank God we actually do have some good news for once. Oh, sorry, Kelly J.

Can you just start again, Kelly J? Sorry, we lost that. When one of them jumped down out of the van and the other guy sort of got out, I had to insist to these two female officers who took me to the side that I wanted to pursue it and they said, oh, we don't know because we're here as a unit to protect women and girls from violence. And I was like, oh, okay, I seem like maybe the right sort of person

then. And they thought they might have to wait for another team but I was quite insistent and so they had a word with him, arrested him and he was charged and he's pleaded guilty to, I believe, I don't want to miss, I don't want to be mistaken in, but it's threats to kill is the words that were used when I was told about it over the phone. And so sentencing is a bit later.

But yeah, he's been convicted because he pleaded guilty. Good. I am so glad. But it was so shocking to me, Kelly J, that to begin with, that they were even trying to say to you, oh, we're not going to be immediately able to take a report because there's some other women's event on in another facility. I mean, it's like you're literally there as a women's rights activist

being directly threatened. Do you know what really annoyed, what's really annoyed me, and I've been a victim of men who want to shut me up, I think this is a fourth or fifth person that's been charged. And it's always this. How did you feel? And I just feel like saying, why does it matter how I feel towards a violent threat

or to being sent something like disgusting? Why does it matter how I feel about it? Why is it more of a crime? If you commit a crime, it's a crime. If I come and rob your favourite jacket down and you're like, oh, I didn't really mind, have I not committed the crime of stealing your jacket? It makes no sense. It makes me very, very angry.

that all of this is subjective nonsense and it needs to be extracted out of our legal system. It really does. I mean, Monty, what's your reaction to seeing the sort of, I guess, lack of interest from the police as someone who, as we've covered on the show before, regularly puts yourself out there just like Kelly J does, really, I guess, puts yourself out there to be attacked at times by leftists.

I mean, we saw this earlier. Yeah, I mean, first of all, party politics to one side, because that's a different matter, have a huge amount of admiration for you do, Kelly, and have done for a while. In fact, when I was younger, and before I got into all of this, it was my dad that was forwarding me your stuff,

and he's a huge fan as well, should I'm sure to appreciate me mentioning that. But anyway, yeah, I think that the fact that you actually got someone to plead guilty is a massive win. So well done on that. I actually yesterday, or the day before yesterday at Prize 2026, I returned with the same placard that I had a year before that, to which I was arrested for, which stated that trans equals mental illness. And I went back as a point of principle to say, look, I was never charged,

everything was thrown out. You were, this is anti-free speech. And Kelly, I'm sure you're familiar with the Public Order Act and how that's just weaponized against people like ourselves constantly. It's completely subjective. But a win on my end, and the footage is actually going to be coming out. I need to edit it up after I come off this. Is that the police, I was mobbed, not as bad as what Kelly just went through there, but I was mobbed by a bunch of lefties, which could have got much worse. And I signalled to a police officer to get me out. Interestingly, Dan, it was the same police officer that pushed the arrest last year, by coincidence. That's who I signalled to to actually get me out of it. So he pulled me out the situation and we walked away and very

briskly I wanted to get away from not just the lefties but also the police. So I went down an alleyway with Will. They chased us down and they held us under caution and they went to their superiors to see if we were going to be arrested for, you know, for public order offence. Now, the reason I'm saying this is, is actually a win because what happened was after I relayed the fact that I discovered it was the same officer from last year and he knew and he realized the public outcry from the arrest last year, he went to his superiors. He relayed that, explain the situation, explain what happened last year, and they actually let us go. Still seized my sign, but they let us go, which I see as a massive win. So the fact that that happened to me, and I managed to get that lifted and

get away from that a year later, and the fact that you've actually managed to get a confession and the police dealt with it to some extent, whilst, of course, it's bollocks, and we should have to do this stuff. I think it's actually a positive end to the show to say that we've got some kind of movement. And can I just ask you both personally? Because, look, Monty, you've spoken about your dad, Kelly. We know you're a mom and you have a lovely husband. What do your loved ones think about this ongoing threat? I mean, obviously, they love the fact that you're passionate and that you want to change this country.

And you are changing this country. I mean, your work, both of your work is absolutely. incredible and I have so much respect for what you do. But are there times, Kelly, when sometimes you just think, well, it's, it's not worth it because I am a mum, because I am a wife? I think it actually compels me to do it. So the day before I went to White Chapel, I'll be very brief, I went to White Chapel. And we were given Section 14 conditions, public order conditions about these mid-aged women, where we could meet, what time and what time we had to finish. And the people stand up for,

um, stand up for racists or whatever they're called. Stand up for racism. Yeah. Stand up for something. Well, what is it? Stand up for us. Yeah. We know who you mean.

We know who you mean. Yeah, right. So, um, I call them something else, but you'reuratively. And so I got to be careful. Um, and they, they were in contact with the police, but they were subjected to no conditions whatsoever. So anyway, knowing that I live in that sort of, uh, two-tier police country, I feel it's absolutely my duty to ensure that my children don't inherit this.

And, you know, Tom doesn't inherit this absolute nightmare. Let's face it, it's probably my generation that have somewhat caused. But my kids have never seen any of the attacks. They don't want to watch any of it. They don't want to hear about any of it. And my husband's often nearby. Yeah. Yeah.

And Monty, what about your dad? does he sometimes think, oh gosh, like, why you're pulling yourself at risk? Certainly. I mean, my dad's, I think, also has this sort of uncomfortable, he's sort of proud, but also feels responsible because he radicalized me so much through COVID when I was 1415, that I hated the state so much that it compelled me to do what I'm doing now. I don't tell my parents everything that I do, and I know eventually they discover certain things. unfortunately my mum and dad are useless on social media so they don't access or see much of what I put out.

But similar to what Kelly just said, there's a sense of duty. You know, moms used to waive their 16-year-old sons off to war. I'm not even doing 5% of what they were doing in trenches. So to sit at the age of 21 years old and look upon my generation and feel that, you know, I should just sit at home on my ass whilst, you know, over a thousand years of lineage in this country, is literally being broken apart bit by bit. I couldn't sleep at night. And there's so much that my life is consumed by politics.

I often say that, you know, I am enslaved to the idea of wanting to be free, which is, you know, an oxymoron in itself, right? But that really is the case. I dedicate my life to this. I don't necessarily want to do it. It's an act of duty. It's an act of stoicism. And I encourage other young men to do the same.

Brilliant. Well, you're both absolute legends. Great Britons. but let's reveal now today's greatest Britain and union jackass. First though, to your superchats. So much coming in, 14 barbers says time to leave YouTube to websites, rumble and substack. Real Thinking Monkey says your first topic I can sum it up in four numbers. 1984.

Chaos UK 2026 says Dan Business won't let VPNs to be banned. It won't be safe for corporates to send information over the internet without VPNs. Well, look, I pray you're wrong. all I know is that this crazy, mad-ass government are admitting that they want to do it. Fidel Defensive U.K says, hey, Labor, why not just ban the internet? And Arbiter says, care, the traitor, Stama, won't get rid of me. Okay, a reminder of our union jackass nominees. I went for Ed Balls because he is continuing to present on Good Morning Britain,

despite the fact that he's in negotiations to join the next. Labor administration. Montgomery Thoms went for Sadiq Khan for literary in our streets with pride flags and endorsing a protest that allowed perverted men to walk around naked in front of children and Kelly J Keene went for Lord Timpson for releasing dangerous prisoners onto the street. And I have to say, it wasn't close. Today, I'm in third place with 8% of the vote. The runner up with 9% of the vote, Kelly J. Keene and Lord Timson. But the overwhelming win with 84% after what was just a total debacle, this weekend, Sadiq Khan, and I'm sure both myself and Kelly J. Keene will be very happy with that one.

But Kelly J, you can nominate, and look, there is only one guy for this today. You can nominate our greatest Britain. Who are you going for? Harry Kane. It was amazing, wasn't it? Yeah. Did you stay up? Oh, I tried to stay up. I did watch the last half an hour, but yeah, I just couldn't get out of bed because I decided to do it was try and go to bed.

Well, if I'm looking rough, it's because I stand up. What about you, Monty? No, give them bread and give them circuses and never revolt. I was literally like, I was so wired at 5 a.m. and it was light outside. But I have to be honest, it was probably the best football match I've ever watched. Like, it was totally, because it had everything. It wasn't just about what was happening on the pitch.

It was all of the stuff that had happened beforehand. You know, the fireworks, the covering the, the England team bus in foam, the playing loud music. It just had everything. So actually, I don't regret the fact that maybe I'm a little bit tired today. But yes, Harry Kane, most definitely, today's gracious British. Great choice and you two as well. Thank you so much to Kelly Jay Keene.

A great show. And Montgomery, Tom. And of course, you can support Montgomery on Freedom Watch UK, which is available on YouTube. And Kelly J. Keen has her YouTube channel. And you will also find her on X. and across social media to subscribe for outspoken because you know the government are trying to stop you watching us through the algorithm. So I'm sorry because I know it annoys some of you,

but I'm going to push the subscription thing because it is one of the only ways to get around it. Because basically if you subscribe and you turn on the notification bell, that's that little button that you press and you say all notifications, then you get alerted automatically to our shows. Now you can do that completely for free. If you do want to support the show outside of YouTube where there isn't this algorithmic threat, you can do so by signing up to Substack. The address is www.w.w.orgate.

I really do urge you to do that. You can do it completely for free, by the way, but it just means that we're outside of that algorithmic censorship realm. You can also watch the Royal Uncanceled After Show there, and we're about to team up with the Royal News Network. We will do so at Substack. I hope to see you there. but most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.