Dan Wootton Outspoken - MSM & COPS COVER UP ANOTHER UK MIGRANT TERROR ATTACK AS SOMALIAN SLAMS CARS INTO LONDON SHOPPERS

Episode Date: June 29, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: The police and MSM conspire to cover up another migrant terror attack in Islamist Mayor Sadiq Khan’s Lawless London as a Somalian driver ploughs his car into weekend shoppers in Ealing Broadway. But within hours the police insist the man is a British Somalian and there’s no terror involved. Cue silence from the legacy media. It’s a cycle that is repeated far too often. Meanwhile, GB News describes an African migrant charged with the rape and murder of a two-year-old girl in Surrey as a French man, prompting fury from Katie Hopkins. But now the Islamist Home Secretary wants to bring even more migrants in. Dan will outline the real emergency we are facing in the Digest next and then get analysis from the great Leo Kearse. PLUS: Adam Brooks finally calls out a GB News leftist live on air as a t*** in an astonishing on air clash over Islamism the channel has tried to delete from the internet. Don’t worry, I’ll show you what happened. AND: King Charles accused of betraying Christianity to support Islamism as a historic change to the monarchy is introduced without any public debate. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Prince Harry collapses in tears on holiday in Portugal as he melts down over the correct decision by the King not to intervene in his security loss, as he threatens to stop Meghan Markle, Archie and Lili from coming to the UK next week. We’ll team up with the Royal News Network for all the breaking developments. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Witten. This is outspoken episode number 525. And breaking right now, the police and MSN, conspire to cover up another migrant terror attack in Islamist Mascar Khan's lawless London as a Somalian driver plows his car into weekend shoppers in my former home suburb of Eileen Broadway. There's a car with some damage to the rear bumper. There's three people who lie. One person would be picked up. with ambulance and there's two people lying on the floor. Police told me they wouldn't tell me what's happening. But within hours, the police insisted to the man is actually a British Somalian and there's no terror involved. Cue silence from the legacy media, this is a cycle that is repeated far too often.

Meanwhile, GB News describes an African migrant charged with the rape and murder of a two-year-old girl in Surrey as a Frenchman, prompting fury from Katie Hopkins. And the decline of London continued all weekend with pandemonium spreading from the capital out to Margate Beach Watch. But now the Islamist Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood wants to bring even more migrants. I did warn you that you couldn't trust this woman. Islam, my own religion, like a lot of practising Muslims, my faith is the most important thing in my life. It is the absolute driver of everything that I do. I feel a very strong calling of my own conscience

and my conscience calls me to God. I'll outline the real emergency we are facing in the Digest next. Then, analysis from the great Leo Curse. Also coming up on the show today, Adam Brooks finally calls out a GB News leftist live on air as a twat in an astonishing on-air clash over Islamism. The channel has tried to delete from the internet. Don't worry though. I've got the receipts and we'll show you what happened.

And King Charles accused to betraying Christianity to support Islam as a historic change to the monarchy is introduced without any public debate. Then, in the Royal Uncanceled after show on Substack, Prince Harry collapses in tears on holiday in Portugal as he mounts down over the correct decision in my view by King Charles not to intervene in his security loss as he threatens to stop Megan Markle, Archie and Lily coming to the UK next week. So we're going to team up with the Royal News. News Network for all the breaking developments on that at www.outspoken.com. Live. It's also the first greatest Britain and union jackass of the week.

I've nominated Shibana MacMood for this plot to invade the country with an unbearable wave of immigration that I think will see Britain destroyed for good. Leo has gone for Andy Burnham for pushing devolution, which is a disastrous idea that creates corrupt satellite governments with little oversight and no incentive to do their job properly. who just fight back against central government. And he's also gone for Sadiq Khan because it's been revealed that 12,000 grooming gang incidents have been reported to the Met Police since 2010,

but Sadiq feigned ignorance when quizzed on the issue. So three big nominees, they're Shabana versus Burnham versus Khan. You can vote right now in the live chat on YouTube. Keep your feedback coming in throughout the show. Keep your superchats coming in too. I'm going to read them at the end. But now let's go. This weekend, a Somalian migrant to the UK plowed his car into innocent London weekend shoppers in an obvious act of terror.

And I bet you probably haven't even heard about it, given the mainstream media and police bid to cover up this truly horrendous crime. In a total act of coincidence, the excellent independent journalist David Atherton was on the scene and was able to report what he saw on. Elon Musk's ex, writing just seen a major incident at Eileen Broadway. Three men have been hospitalized. The police refused to answer my question as to the cause. The only clue was a silver grey car with the right hand side towards the back damaged. Did it plow into them? He questioned and then posted this disturbing video. Well, this is serious. There's a car with some damage the rear bumper. There's three people who lie, one person picked up about putting in an ambulance, and there's two people lying on the floor. Police told me they wouldn't tell me what's happening.

These scenes were truly horrific victims being stretched away. Eventually, the mainstream media followed up, David's reporting with the Daily Telegraph writing that bystanders tried to smash the windows of said car in an attempt to... get to the driver after it plowed into a group of pedestrians in London. Tamir Ahmed Mohammed, 34, has been charged with five counts of attempted murder after five people were injured in the incident. The Somali-born British National, that's the telegraph's description, is also charged with dangerous driving, failing to stop, failing to provide a specimen of breath for analysis and criminal damage, and will appear before Williston magistrates court today.

CCTV footage showed the white SEAC crashing into pedestrians on Eileen Broadway, West London, at 2.29pm on Saturday before reversing and driving away. Witnesses recorded people kicking the vehicle and shouting for police as sped off. Muhammad was arrested in Grange Park around half a mile away a short time later. Three people were taken to hospital. One to a major trauma centre while the two others were treated at the sea. none are believed to have suffered life-threatening or life-changing injuries. But speaking to the telegraph, a local shopkeeper said it was pure chaos.

We think it was two women victims. It's a miracle nobody was killed. The whole situation was insane. People were trying to smash the car's windows. I saw it all. We just wanted to stop him. People were using anything. Video from the scene shows some of the injured receiving first aid from police officers and members of the public.

One man uses a handheld fan to help keep one of the women. and cool during the hot weather, while others give water to a male victim. Another injured woman is seen on the road receiving treatment from police and firefighters. Emergency vehicles in attendance included a fire truck with one victim seen being carried into an ambulance on a stretcher. Another witness, Shaleaf 26, said the traffic light was red and people were waiting to cross. One white car was going fast towards them and hit them. I saw one old lady and one old guy being hit. Shaleef, who runs a burger van near the spot, added,

The white car hit two other cars coming in the opposite direction. There were about 10 or 15 people who tried to stop him. They threw bottles of water at the car and anything they could to lay their hands on him, but he accelerated away. A man was arrested on a quiet residential street. Video obtained by the telegraph shows police pulling a man from the vehicle and holding him on the ground as members of the public watch on. A Metropolitan Police spokesman said that while they were keeping an open mind on motive,

it was not being treated as terror. But Lawrence Fox responded in rage London today. Declare a state of emergency. Get these savages out of our country. This is not normal, of course, and it is terror. But the MSM cover-up was immediately on. With the BBC headline on what I've just told you, this. Man arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after car hits shoppers, prompting lips of

TikTok to ask, hey, BBC News, who was driving the car? It was a Somali migrant, by the way. The police statement was of course designed to make us all think nothing to see here. Here we go. The driver, a 34-year-old Somalia-born British man was arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving due to the nature of the incident, local officers were in contact with officers from counter-terrorism policing London as they conducted their initial inquiries. While investigators are keeping an open mind as to any potential motive, the incident is not being treated as terrorism. Mental health then, I guess, right? We can already write the script. This happens so many times, rinse and repeat. As Steve Lotus pointed out, you can't be a Somali. and born British man. At least reformed UK chairman Le Anderson was prepared to address the elephant

in the room after the incident posting, I don't want these animals in our country. Meanwhile, the Home Secretary is opening up more routes for people from backward cultures to enter our country. We have had enough. And we have. Because the weekend's barbarism did not stop there. With Basil the Great reporting an African migrant has been charged with rape and murder, after the body of a two-year-old girl was found at a property in Surrey. When G.B. News disgustingly reported Frenchman, charged with murder of girl two, and rape of child under 13 in Surrey, Katie Hopkins had had enough, posting, fuck right off, G.B. News, and if you work for the station, be bold, and call this out. He is an African illegal.

Of course, none of the G.B. News presenters did call it out, because if you challenge the increasingly mainstream narrative there, you lose your job. And the effects of the continued erosion of English identity as a result of mass migration were laid bare for all to see in London this weekend. Here was Regent Street. As Donna Louise bemoaned, Piccadilly Circus, London, completely overrun. This is Kirstama's new face of Britain. King Charles now vows to protect the multi-faith nation. The UK has fallen watch. The London is. The London is who make their way to nostalgic coastal towns for peace and tranquility in order to escape the hellhole capital are only met with disappointment, as Margate was the scene of absolute chaos on the weekend with Kierodis, reporting there was pandemonian in Margate this weekend,

as fights broke out and dozens of police were needed to tackle the situation. Another British summer staple destroyed watch. So is there anywhere nice left? We could just soak up British culture without being reminded of our rapid societal decline. It looks like things are only about to get worse, as Steve Miller pointed out. Angela Rainer is today proud to announce that sleeping rough on the streets is no longer a crime. She is happy for Britain to look like this. It's just horrifying.

London looks like the new San Francisco, a once great city, an almost permanent decline. Yet the answer for this Labour government, which will continue, by the way, with Shabana Mahmood, as Home Secretary under Andy Burnham, the answer is to, facilitate a further invasion. Yep, MacMood is outlining safe immigration routes in a plan to win over the Labor left. So Harriet Sargent was right to say, just when Nigel Farage and Reform were running out of road, Labor builds them a motorway. Look, I've said it. I've said it for a long time. This woman is a traitor. She is an Islamist traitor. And the idea that has sort of been

perpetuated in the mainstream media that she's tough on migrants is a joke. She's going to start paying the public £350 a month to house migrants. She's going to start getting members of the public to replace judges in deciding appeals from failed asylum seekers. This is unbelievable. It is almost as if it is an attempt to destroy the country. And as I have long reported, Mahmoud has never hidden her real priorities. my own religion. Like a lot of practising Muslims, my faith is the most important thing in my life.

It is the absolute driver of everything that I do. I feel a very strong calling of my own conscience and my conscience calls me to God. Before she was in government, she literally went to the Greek islands to usher in the invasion. Lesbos, where boats have been coming in all day, around 30 boats have arrived already today. There's a couple of charitable organisations on the ground here, one of whom is offering immediate medical assistance. Many of the people are coming off for obviously very cold, very wet, and some are in shop. And there's also another organisation here who are offering food and water to the people coming off the bus before they make their way up, a little way up the road from here to a camp where they can start with processing registration process.

And she protested like the worst sort of student politician. She's been marching and campaigning over the past few weeks has been utterly incredible to see. But just as powerful as our passion and the feelings that we have for our present and system in Gaza and in Palestine is the practical action that we can all take as British citizens to make our governments and governments around the world sit up and take notice.

ways in which I think we should all try our very best to make a difference. And the first of those, and we heard very much about it in South, and you were ready, is about boycotting and getting involved with the boycott and wing. Last week, I was with 200 activists outside Staines Street in the centre of Birmingham. And we lay down in the street and we lay down inside Sainscreen to say that we object to Sainsweed stocking goods from the illegal settlement and that they must stop. We managed to close down that store for time.

hours at Pied Crows on a Saturday. This is how we to make the difference. So please educate yourselves about the different point out campaigns and get involved in the... That is the real Shabana Mahmood. MacMood's mission is to destroy Britain. MacMood's plot is to invade the UK. This weekend, she has proven it. As the Tory Katie Lamb raged,

so Shabana's plan to stop illegal migration is to just let everybody in. This mad plan will. community groups, sponsor migrants, meaning more chain migration. And if people can't get in legally, they'll cross the channel anyway. They'll do anything but secure the border. And that's before you get to the economic calamity that is coming and that I believe is now an actual emergency. So I was digging into the polymarket figures yesterday. And this is truly scary. Ed Miliband, the Nut Zero, brother-betraying, failed hard leftist labour leader is at 64% now, a 64% chance of becoming the UK's next chancellor. So for Polymarket, that's up 19%. And the problem is, Polymarket is so good on this

stuff because it works in real time to work out what traders are effectively thinking about this. And no one else is even close. So Burnham can be as, as a. affable as he likes, but the decision to make Ed Miliband as Chancellor will bankrupt us. We will be finished. And have you noticed, Burnham is being treated like the Pied Piper. Like the left have turned on the tit whisperer Zach Polansky. They know he's damaged goods. And now Burnham is the man that they are going to get behind.

Come what may. They're happy for this to be a coronation. They're happy for him not to take any questions. And he didn't today. Not one single question from the journalist clapping along like seals today as he admitted in his major speech, which was meant to outline his future for the disunited kingdom, yet he admitted that actually his party, his government, has broken the country.

After 10 years of political turbulence since Brexit and 20 years of falling living standards since the 2008, financial crash, Westminster hasn't been working for people and it hasn't been working for a very long time. In fact, it is broken. And as a result, the country isn't where it should be. It is stuck in a rut and clearly we can't go on like this. But he did it. Burnham did it. Can we not forget he He was part of the Labour governments that ushered this in. So it's like you're literally choosing the murderer to investigate the murder. And I'm sick of it.

I'm completely sick of believing that Anding Burden will change anything. I sat through that whole speech today and it was mumbo jumbo. The idea of creating a number 10 in the north, but without any meat in the bones. What he did have time to do, though, was make crap jokes about his dodgy running shorts, planning that he plans to secure power based on his personality cult alone. It's been such a wrench to leave that I've had to get special permission from what people in Westminster call my Manchester clothes. I've had to get special permission to wear them this morning.

Sorry, Kemi, about that. However, I have back. out to public pressure on one front, I have bought some new running shorts. It was either do that or change the decency laws, and I opted for, I opted for the former. Oh, your little nice Andy, you're just little running shorts. He's going to save the country. Seriously, you are delusional. Indeed, maybe this Burnham coronation is going to give Nigel. Farage the opportunity to get his mojo back as he dubbed him Open Borders Andy Watch. So the big Andy Burnham speech today, he's going to rebalance power in Britain.

What it means, of course, is more and more devolution, as if by magic, that's going to solve everything. We just ask yourself a question. Has devolution in London with Mayor Sadiq Khan made London Street safer? No. Has devolution in Wales? Give them a better NHS or education? No, the worst in the country. And as devolution in Scotland, cleaned up Scottish politics, well, I think the recent jailing of one of the former bosses of the SMP would say no, just to give more and more powers, indeed including tax-raising powers, to mayors all over the country of itself, won't stop the boats, won't deal with the national debt. And frankly, I think what you're seeing from Andy Burnham is what he thinks is the big idea. But it's not going to work because he says

it'll take 10 years to lift Britain back up to where it needs to be. I would suggest those of us that believe that Britain is broken would say we haven't got 10 years. The country, we're totally unrecognizable in 10 years. What the country wants is immediate action. And I tell you what, they're not going to get it from Mr. Burnham. Or should I say, open borders, Andy. Of course we don't.

I have 10 years. Of course we don't. Nigel is completely right about that. and it absolutely horrified me that I sat through that whole speech today and there was not one mention of mass migration. Of course, Nigel is fighting back, though, and had to be seen today because yesterday, and you know the mainstream media follow up on everything this guy says,

Peir's moron declared him over. Watch. Nigel Farage, I think, is dead in the water. I think this five million pound bung he took from this crypto tycoon in Thailand. He describes it as a personal gift. I described it as a bum. And he took this money. He still can't get his story straight about why.

Originally it was for personal security. Then it was a reward for Brexit. Now he says it's just a gift and he can spend it on Ferraris, like all men of the people would say. I think you can see how rattled he is by the questions he's getting. They're not going to go away. I think he will be found guilty by the... Parliament investigation.

We've no idea what the commission is. Sure, fair enough. I want to come back to the election point. My point is this. So his main opponent, who he's just beaten in this by-election, reform, I think are in real trouble. I think the leader's going to have to go. I also think reform and restore,

as we've already seen each other alive. I think with the Conservatives, Kemi Badenock is becoming much more popular very quickly, but the party is not. So right now, if you're Andy Burnham, I would say, Snap election. You're a fresh pair of eyes with a fresh vision.

Tell us what the vision is. Let the public vote. And then you might get a five-year mandate to deliver. Okay. Reformer on the program next week so they can answer some of the things that you've just... Is Farage going to come on? Because he keeps bottling it, doesn't it? I've no idea who it will be.

Well, he keeps saying no to this show, doesn't it? Shout. So that is the line that you were going to see from the left. Of course, because the hard left know that Burnham is stealing their baker, They're actually even going further. So this weekend the Greens news star, terrifying woman actually, because she's just completely wrapped up

and suicidal empathy. Hannah Spencer, blamed rich people, not the criminals, not the illegal migrants, not the terrorists, but rich people for the catastrophe facing the UK. Elon Musk, Tommy Robinson, all the rest of it, they like to push this message that there are a group of people in society who are sponging, who are taking whilst everybody else works, they're breaking the system,

they're getting away with things that nobody else can, and I nod in absolute agreement because I think there is undoubtedly a group of people who've seen to get away with things that the rest of us can't. And those people are migrants, they're not trans people, they're not whichever other group is the current scapegoat, they're not Muslims, they're not people who've come here fleeing war and persecution and whatever else they need to come to to get safety. They're not people who've moved here for economic reasons, to work in our NHS, to do those absolutely vital roles that we need doing. The people who've broken our country are the billionaires and the super, super rich.

She doesn't get it. It's terrifying. But actually, this is a view. that is spreading across our political class. Like, did you see the treacherous ex-prime minister, John Major, now just dismissing political opposition to what is happening to our country as being some type of dislike of Muslims? What is reform? It's a ragbag, really. What's his philosophy?

What's his purpose? What are its convictions? I don't know. Nobody knows. Nobody talks about it. I don't hear lectures about convictions and for lots of you're getting the votes. Let me come to that point.

He's got nothing good to offer. Why is he getting so many votes? There are wholly negative votes that the other parties have failed, which to a certain extent is true. They've had very difficult circumstances, both Labour and Tory governments, and they've got things wrong,

and in some cases, badly wrong. But they know that. And I think they know how to begin to put them right. But what positivity is there about reform? What is their unique selling brand? It's that they are opposed to Muslims and migrants. That's their unique selling brand.

And when that wears out, because that is the way they operate, they'll find somebody else in order to be a scapegoat. They are certainly narrow in concept, nationalist in instinct, and hostile to those in a quite crude way who don't actually agree. But as Leo Curse responded, John Major lives in a 92% white ethnic enclave with only 27 residents from the Middle East Asia and Africa. Of course he thinks immigration is wonderful. It only exists to him as a concept, not a reality.

And Leo Curse joins me now. Leo, it is a reality, isn't it? To the people of London, who now can be doing the shopping on a Saturday. then all of a sudden a car emerges with a British man, a British man, who just happens to have been in Somalia and happens to have the last name Muhammad. But, you know, he's a British man, Leo, comes through the traffic light and plows them down. But immediately, Leo, we are quite rightly told, don't be stupid. This is not terrorism. This is just a British man who probably has a mental health issue.

And you know what, Leo? No one talks about it. the mainstream media just moves the hell on. Absolutely. And to think that if a supermarket imported beef from Somalia and said, this is British beef, this is British beef, reared in Britain from British herds, they would be prosecuted by the government.

But the government can bring a man from Somalia and stick a label on him saying, this is a British man. And we've all got to go along with it. Or we get accused of being racist and Islamophobic and all those other. supposedly terrible things is an absolute nonsense.

And you have noticed, with people like John Major, the former Prime Minister, I've noticed a lot of people who speak out earnestly about how positive migration is and how despicable and racist, anybody opposed to immigration is,

I've noticed they tend to live in these white enclaves because they're wealthy, they're powerful. They've got the money and the resources to not live in Luton and to not live in Birmingham and to not live in places where, you know, other people might not have the means to move out of. And I really think we need to do, we need to do more work to make people suffer the consequences of their opinions and suffer the consequences of their own policies.

I mean, at CPAC Australia last year, I did a speech about how, you know, asylum seekers, migrants, legal migrants should be housed in the areas that vote for illegal migrants and, you know, reform have now implemented that as a policy. I don't know if they got the idea from me, but I'm absolutely delighted that they're implementing it because it is a great idea. I'd go further. I'd go further.

For people like John Major who say that mass immigration is a wonderful thing and reform are despicable for complaining about it and they're just pursuing dog whistle politics, I would say, okay, you get a shipping container full of 12 eretrain men, some of whom are Islamist militants. You get that in your garden. And we're going to take your back door off

It's hinges and we can see how enriched you feel after a few weeks of this. And I really think that's the right way to do it. Instead of sticking these men who are brought here from the Horn of Africa, instead of sticking them in communities that haven't asked for them that don't have the resources to escape from them, you know, next to girls who are stuck there, let's stick them next to the people who want them. Well, I want to see them all. Leo, taking advantage now of this Shabana-McMood plan.

She needs the money. Nurenda Kour surely will want the 350 quid a month. She can come and have one of these Somalian men in her home. Seriously, Gary Linneka, okay, he doesn't need the money, but there's now an option to do it. All of these people should surely be totally behind Mahmood's plan and showing us that they actually want to be taking these migrants. Yeah, I mean, the trouble is with this policy is, I mean, you mentioned it in your excellent monroe, So chain migration is one of the biggest, biggest ways people come to this country. You know, the vast majority of immigration into this country isn't illegal. It's not people coming across in small boats or hidden in trucks.

It's people coming over through family connections. And so you do chain migration. If you've got, you know, if your cousin or whoever is in Bradford, you can then apply as a family, as a relative, as a dependence. or whatever it is. And this is now just going to incentivize that with even more money. So now you can bring your cousin over from wherever it is, from Pakistan, Afghanistan, wherever you can bring anybody in. You can say that they're your wife, one of your wives.

Nobody's going to check. You can say, you know, whatever reason. I mean, we see people pretending to be gay, pretending to be Christian, you know, pretending to be children. There's so much fraud and pretend. tense in the system. So this is just going to exacerbate that chain migration. We're going to see an even greater uptick in that. We're going to see these communities getting even more overwhelmed with numbers of really quite alien people from barbarous medieval regimes. And all this means is

now we're going to be subsidizing it as well. So they're going to be getting money from the government to bring in their family members because nobody in the home office is going to check. You know, they let guys come in from Pakistan. They say, oh, people say, oh, I need to claim asylum from Pakistan. And they're just, they're just waved in from Afghanistan as well. These aren't people fleeing. These aren't people fleeing the terrible culture there. These are people who are the terrible culture there.

These are adult men. You know, they're not the ones being persecuted. I'd understand if it was all girls and women, it's not. Do you trust Mahmood at all, Leo, given that, previously she had admitted, this is all, of course, before she was in cabinet, but she had admitted every decision that she makes in her life, every decision that she makes is driven by Islamism, given that she had literally gone to Lesbos, which is the Greek island, being invaded by African migrants. And she went, Leo, not to send them home, but to welcome them in.

Yeah. Well, when you said you had a clip of a female politician going to Lesbos, I got excited then I saw what it actually was. But yeah, I mean, I do have a certain amount of certain amount of sort of, not sympathy, but, you know, I think people's, people's attitudes can change. I mean, 10 years ago, maybe 12 years ago, I was, I took part of, I collected clothes for refugees at Calais. I didn't understand. I didn't really understand what it was. I believe that, you know, these guys are refugees fleeing war zones. They're coming here. They're going to contribute. I didn't really interrogate. I hadn't thought it through properly. I was wrong. You know, I believed all this stuff that I'd been told. Obviously, since then, you know, I've done a lot of research and realized that, you know, younger me was an idiot. But, you know, people do change their minds. The thing is, I mean, Shabana Mahmood, she's, she has, she has, she has, she has. been quite effective as a home secretary in terms of, you know, shutting down migrant hotels in terms of actually deporting people and restricting immigration. Obviously, we don't have the results we'd like to see. There's still, you know, insanely high levels of immigration.

There's still a huge number of undesirable people in the country. But, you know, considering the constraints around her, she's actually been quite effective in getting that done. She's certainly been much more effective than the Tory party who actually saw it mass immigration spike to those insane unprecedented levels. Well, it's interesting though, because if you speak to most, I mean, I agree with you about the Conservative Party, of course, under Boris Johnson, although actually if you speak to James Cleverly, he will be able to prove that all of the recent migration drops are as a result of policies that his sort of last Tory government brought in, even though it was too little too late rather than her.

I understand what you're saying. People do change. And in some ways, we should embrace change. But the difference between you and Shabana MacMood is that I don't think you are practicing Tikia. And I think she is. You know, you hadn't previously gone around saying that every decision that you make in life is driven by your Islamist faith.

So, unfortunately, I don't give Shabana MacMood that sort of, I guess, a free ride. I don't give it that free ride. I don't trust her as far as I can throw her. It's interesting to see how these debates over Islamism are now erupting in the mainstream media when people are actually allowed to talk. And one of the most fascinating exchanges actually happened on GB News when my friend Adam Brooks, the public's, the public. was accused live on air by a right little weasel, revolting little bloke called Sebastian Salick, who was apparently a regular left-wing commentator on GBN, who was previously a Labour counsellor and political journalist.

And Adam just wasn't going to have it. When Sebastian Salick decided, I'm just going to say that you hate Muslims, Adam Brooks just finally said it. And it's what people want to say, right, when they're sitting next to these awful people on G.B. News, you know, the Matthew Stadlands of this world, he just said, you were a twat. You were an awful twat. But of course, because we have GV News having to deal with the huge amount of censorship that they face, this desire to sort of become mainstream, to stay out of trouble with the off-communists, certainly since my sacking in the Lawrence Fox

incident, not only did the presenter immediately have to step in and apologize, but this exchange has been completely scrubbed from the internet, or at least GB News thought it had been. The great news is I've got the receipts and can show you exactly what went down. So I'm going to set up firstly how the fight kicked off. This was on a show hosted by Alex Armstrong. And in-person child sexual abuse. so you can't make a direct comparison. There are two different atrocities we're talking about here.

All right, Adam. There's no way with quite a large Pakistani community within London that these sort of crimes that we've seen prevalent up north and in many towns around the country are not happening in the capital. And that's what he alluded to, basically, when he was trying to skirt around the question with Susan Hall. So why the story here tells us that this is from a range of religions

are you zooming in on one in particular? Well, because no disrespect. It's one of the biggest scandals that this country has ever seen. Pakistani rape gangs that were covered up, not just by their own community, by police, by councillors, by social services, by MPs. Specifically saying, this is from a range of religions. Yes, you are choosing to focus on one. Yes, that stinks to me.

No, it doesn't stinks because it's the biggest scandal of our lifetime. Okay, so that was the setup. So you can see what type of rat Sebastian Salick is. He clearly looks down on someone like Adam. Brooks, he thinks that he is intellectually superior, and he thinks that the way that he can get away from talking about the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs and the fact that they have been covered up disgracefully by his party, by Labor, still being covered up in the UK capital, by his hero, the Islamist mayor, Sadiq Khan, he thinks the way that he can get around that is by simply

telling Adam Brooks, you just hate Muslims, don't you? You just hate all Muslims. Watch. There is no problem with Muslims. I've got problems with grooming and rape gang, Sebastian. But this story is saying this is a range of religions and you say I've got problems with Muslims. Muslims, when up north, that is the most... We're not talking about up north. This is a London story. Where there's 9 million people. So the odds are, with large Pakistani communities within London, we've still got that problem as well.

And my question, do you, why are you making this about Muslims? I'm not making it about Muslims. Well, I'm talking... Why are you making it about Pakistanis? I'm talking about the biggest scandal that we've ever seen... Oh my God Adam, we're going around in circles now. No, we're not. I'm telling you. You're trying to deflect Sebastian. I know exactly what you're doing. And now you're trying to make the audience think I've got a problem with Muslims. Which you do? I've got a problem with Muslims. Yeah. Well, listen to the way you're talking.

Listen to what you're saying. I've got a problem with Muslims. I've got Muslim friends. How dare you say that? Did you really just say that? Yes, I did say that. Yes, I did say that. You are one arrogant lefty twat. I've got to say for saying this, for saying I'm going to, are we going to take that? Come on, let's not. For saying that I'm against Muslims, live on out. Hang on, stop. Can you both of you stop? Apologies for the strong language. I understand that Adam feels insulted. Very insulted, Alex. Very insulted. So they have wiped that from the internet.

I have found it. Leo Curse, you obviously are a former presenter at GB News. You're still a contributor there. So I appreciate that you'll be limited in some ways. But what is it like, Leo, when you have to go on? Because these people were not there when I was there. someone like Sebastian Selleck or that guy Jonathan Liss, who I think is just repulsive. And they almost on air try and suggest that you are racist or that you hate Muslims.

How do you deal with that? Because is it, Bill Rammell, he's the other one that seems to fight with Adam Brooks all the time. Like, is it friendly off air or is this actually very real? because to me, I know Adam pretty well, like he wasn't putting that on. That felt very genuine. No, Adam's a very honest person, a very honest and open person. That's his honest and open reaction in that moment. Maybe slightly too honest and open.

I mean, you know, as an off-com regulated channels, there's certain words that you're not supposed to use. I mean, as I'm sure you know yourself, from your many years of broadcasting, but it's so infuriating when somebody like Sebastian employs these rhetorical tricks to try and win the argument,

because they're not actually arguing the argument. The point is that Pakistani Muslim men are vastly overrepresented as perpetrators of this type of crime. So to then deflect away from that, away from that point, to make it about the motives of Adam, oh, you're just bringing this up.

You're just bringing this up. You're talking about this, because you're racist, because you're Islamophobic, that's a despicable thing to do. That's like a footballer kicking the player instead of kicking the ball. And it's a really cheap device. I think it says, you know, it's a posh boy debating club device to try and win an argument.

But it's so, it's so illegitimate. It's so, it's so wrong. And when it's something like this, when it's something as serious as children, British girls being raped in their ten, of thousands by grooming gangs, which are predominantly Pakistani Muslim. Not even, I mean, you can even narrow it down from there. It's Beridari clans from the Mirpur Valley in the Kashmir region of Pakistan.

You know, we took in, what, 60, 70,000 of these people from this area in the 60s and 70s, and then there's chain migration since then. So now we've got, you know, a huge community. They're very insular. And they see, a lot of them see people outside. the clan as sort of infidels and you're less worthy. So in fact, it's them that are committing the racist hate crime when they're targeting British girls. And for somebody to deflect away from that, to try and cover it up, to try and almost defend it by deflecting away and

accusing people of racism to silence them. That's, man, that's disgusting. And I can totally understand why Adam was so incensed in that moment. You actually also came for Pearz Morgan for similar reasons, Leo, when he posted disgusting story of a sickening rape gang, yet it's receiving hardly any attention from those who've led rightful outrage over the grooming rape gang scandal. I wonder why. And you posted, Piers always has to have the cynically sea word-earest angle on anything. People get so annoyed when I say that. So that's why I'm just going to, I'm just going to, people can read it. People can read it. angle on anything to get rage clicks. Also, he is fat, which made me giggle. But what point was he trying to make there, Leo, because he was talking about a grooming gang that in this case was not Pakistani Muslim? Yeah, and it wasn't a grooming gang in the sense that we understand grooming gang. So this was a husband. It was like Giselle Pelicott, a husband who drugged his wife and then had random men, I don't exactly know how he met them,

come around and rape his wife while she was drugged. So, I mean, it's despicable and it's horrific. And not all the men in this group were Muslim. So I think peers is saying, well, why aren't people making a fuss about this group, this rape gang? But the answer is transparently obvious. wasn't covered up by the establishment. The men have been arrested.

The woman was believed it's being taken seriously. It hasn't continued on an industrial scale because left-wing politicians are receiving votes from these communities. It's not emblematic of an imported culture that's completely alien and antithetical to our values and is treating British girls as less than human. They openly call them, you know, fight. slags, say, despicable, dehumanizing things about them. And it's not happening to children.

So, I mean, there are a number of reasons that it's, it's not received, I mean, we say it's not received the same attention. It's received vastly more attention than most grooming gang cases receive individually. But Pierce knows what he's doing. He knows all this, unless he really is fat as well, stupid as well as fat. He knows all this. He's deliberately saying this to inflame a reaction, to get people like me angry. You know, like Adam Brooks sitting there to just think, you know, what a stupid twat. This is what peers is doing. And he's very, he's very good at it. I'd say it's his only, it's his only talent. And we really do need to talk about how fat he is. He's, he's fat and he's unhealthy. He slipped on a step and broke his leg or his hip or something. Somebody

his age shouldn't be doing that. He needs to be weight training. He needs to be eating nutritious food. I don't know what he eats, but I assume it all fits in an air fryer and he's got a family sized air friar just for him. This is probably why his wife is carrying on behind his back, talking about getting pumped by other guys. Leo, I actually wanted to speak about one of Pierce Morgan's nemesis, too, and horrible man called Hugh Grant because the worrying thing about Andy Byrne becoming Prime Minister is that Hugh Grant, who really is one of the worst cretons in the country, so determined Leo to shut down you, to shut down me, but also to shut down GB News and talk TV and anything that's even

moderately right-wing, shut down the Murdoch Empire, simply because he can't get over the fact that he was quite literally caught with his pants down with a prostitute in the 90s. And it has led this sort of craven, bizarre campaign that has taken the shine off any work that he has done in his career. And he's tight with Andy Burnham. And the Daily Telegraph has actually gone inside, hacked off Hughes push for Burnham to curb free speech. And we already know, Leo, that the last. Labor government under Slippery Stama is going super far with this.

Like they are banning social media for under 16s, but that is effectively going to usher in digital ID for all of us, whether you like it or not. They are in a battle with the social media companies to effectively fix the algorithm, to stop shows like this being a success, and to boost the British Bashing Corporation, Wokai TV, Channel 4 News, Sly News,

which shows that no one actually wants to watch. watch on YouTube. And they spoke about it. They went inside this event that Hugh Grant was hosting. And they wrote in a sweltering Westminster basement at the peak of last week's heatwave, Hugh Grant, looking relaxed in shorts and loafers, was in an optimistic mood. As we switch leadership of the Labour Party, switch prime ministers, there's a chance finally to get something done. The actor and press regulation campaign are told a gathering of like-minded activists. All I say to whoever is the new Prime Minister is when you're weighing up whether to do the right thing for the people against a massive corporation or to cozy up to those giant corporations for your own political career, bear this in mind. Those media organisations are going to pour a bucket of shit over you whatever you do, whether you support them or whether you don't.

And they write, the scene is set for an almighty free speech clash under Burnham, in which the British News Publishing business is a relative minor concern after the Southport riots in 2024, offcom raised concerns about the crucial role social media played in spreading and amplifying misleading and divisive material. Now, again, I just always like to step in here. It wasn't misinformation that caused the so-called riots after Southport. It was a fact that a homegrown terrorist called Axel Rudigbana who shouldn't be here because his parents came over from Rwanda for absolutely no reason, went to a Taylor Swift dance class and stabbed three beautiful young girls to death.

That happened, okay? That's what caused the so-called riots. It wasn't a few posts by Lucy Connolly. So let me just be very clear on that, because I find it really terrible that people even suggest that it was anything to do with misinformation that caused Southport. It was Southport. It was the terrorist attack.

That's what caused the issue. Anyway, they went on to say officials have also highlighted its role in recent unrest in Belfast. Again, you know, that happened because Stephen Ogilvy was nearly beheaded by a migrant and in clashes between Hindus and Muslims in Leicester in 2022. In each case, the suspected influence of malign foreign forces has compounded concern in Whitehall. Now, Labour has a plan to fight back. Lisa Nandi, the Culture Secretary, another close ally of Burnham, published plans this week to force tech giants such as YouTube, Facebook and X to prominently

display news from public service broadcasters, including the BBC ITV and Channel 4. Predictably, platforms which build their advertising businesses on serving up whatever is most likely to keep users engaged are ready to oppose the plans. The UK's creator economy is a global success story because of one simple idea. On YouTube, viewers decide what they want to watch, says David Weald and YouTube's head of public policy for Europe. Videos become popular because they connect with their audience. not because we're required to prioritize them.

Prominence rules seek to distort that, forcing YouTube to prioritize government-picked channels over whatever viewers actually came to watch. That's not fair on users, creators, or the wider journalism ecosystem. And America is deeply concerned about this, the Trump administration with a spokesman for the Majority Republican House Judiciary Committee telling the Telegraph this weekend, for years we have warned that UK and European tech regulators working to censor American speech.

The UK's Online Safety Act empowers the government to pressure American social media platforms into suppressing so-called disinformation, misinformation and hate speech. Now regulators have gone even further deciding what news outlets people see. Big government will never be satisfied and its censorship efforts will keep expanding. And Leo, I hate even talking about this, because in some ways you just want to believe that we are going to be able to continue to broadcast independently and that people will be able to watch.

But unfortunately, the government are going to step in here. It's very obvious that they are. And the fact that Hugh Grant was actually on the campaign trail with Andy Burnham, I think is a very worrying sign. Yeah, and these plans are, I mean, they're not just bad for democracy. Democracy flourishes when information is democratized and people can produce their own information. You get independent journalists and outlets reporting on things.

You know, when the information is just controlled in one central broadcaster, as we saw in the Soviet Union, as we see in North Korea, that's when you don't get democracy, you don't get the scrutiny and oversight of government and its processes and its ideas that are quite often terrible. I mean, this idea that we should bring people from Rwanda to Britain is obviously a terrible idea. We've seen this emblemified in the actual Ruder-Cabana attack. And like you say, people aren't taking to the streets because of something they've seen that's false.

They're taking to the streets because of something they've seen that's true. They've seen a horrific stabbing or they've seen. they've seen horrific rapes of children, and they're taken to the streets because of that. The government wants to hide that truth. That's what this is going to be used for. But on the other hand, this might be great for the right, because the right are going to take power in a couple of years, because I can't see Burnham lasting very long. I think Labour are going to cycle through leaders quite quickly and then implode. So when the right take power, they're going to have this tool to silence any dissenting views, to silence the Guardian, to silence the BBC,

to silence anybody who doesn't push a right-wing agenda. And why wouldn't the right use those tools if they've been created by the left? I don't think we should just do away with those tools. I think any weapon the left invents should be used against it. But yeah, as somebody points out, this is going to be terrible for Britain's AI and tech. industries, which Britain's trying to desperately stay relevant and scrambling to get a place and the new technology. If people are going to be constrained by regulation, if companies are going to be constrained by regulation, they're not going to come here and they're not going to be regulated here. They're not going to do business here. People need to be, business needs to be

free and not, you know, ruled by a micromanaging despot, which is which is what the Labor Party are. I think the Labor Party should put more effort into to stopping, stopping fake refugees from coming here, stopping violent men from coming here, into stopping grooming gangs, and then people won't take to the streets. And people won't get angry about it. People won't riot.

People are rioting because they don't want this stuff. You can't just make them want this stuff by making them read BBC articles. That's nonsensical. Yeah, indeed it is. And the thing is, you are completely right. at the end of the day, if this Burnham government decides we are going to pick a war with the Trump administration, with big tech, they are crazy because that will send us back to the technological dark cages.

And remember with Slippery Stama, he had a very different technique. It was to always say this, wasn't it? We've had free speech for a very, very long time here. And we didn't. And we all knew we didn't. We knew he was lying. And so that's going to be a very difficult path for Burnham to navigate. And personally, I hope that he just says, F you, Hugh Grant, back to acting.

Thank you very much. Breaking today, Fury over King Charles revising a definition of monarchy that orders protection of a multi-faith nation. Now, you know, Brits have been labeled crazy things like far right or conspiracy theorists for being concerned about the erosion, the very obvious erosion of this country's Christian heritage. But you certainly can't accuse those people have been paranoid anymore. Because under this new revised definition of the monarchy, that was slipped out last week, virtually it's. ignored by the mainstream media, King Charles's official role will be to protect the multi-faith nation. Protect the multi-faith nation. Oh yes, okay. An Islamic nation. Sir, is that what you mean?

As G.B. News reported, the king will protect the space for faith within the multi-faith nation. that is the new definition of his official role. Buckingham Palace unveiled this significant revision with the newly released Sovereign Grant Report, describing his majesty as the protector of faith across Britain's diverse religious landscape. I thought he was the head of the Church of England. I thought he was the defender of Christianity.

But the annual financial review of the royal household contains fresh terminology, positioning the moniker's someone who, who safeguards religion throughout the nation. According to the document, His Majesty is Supreme Governor of the Church of England and protects the space for faith within the multi-faith nation. This reform represents a notable evolution

in how the palace formally characterises the Soviet's constitutional and spiritual responsibilities. The previous year's report, so this has been an actual change, characterized the king under his head of nation duties as the head of the Church of England and defender of the faith. Now the king's titles date back to the reign of Henry VIII after he was granted the title Defender of the Faith in 1521 by Pope Leo the 10th.

And rightly there is outrage about this with the Royal Grift asking, how is everyone feeling about this? As an Anglican, this doesn't sit right with me. Christians should not be forced to accept Islamic faith, woth an end to the foundation of Western society. This is too far. It is in comparison. compatible. This multi-faith acceptance messaging will spread to the United States and enter my Anglican church because he is still the head of the Church of England. Only king we should be worshipping is Jesus. Mary Harrington argued that if Charles's faith is not Christianity but global replaces him, he should be disposed. And G.B News host Emma Tremble doubled down, saying that this is now a bona fide constitutional crisis.

Independent media sensation, Winston Marshall, the ex-Mumford and Sun star, said, hard to understate just how radical a departure this is from the 1,100-year tradition of our nation, and antithetical to our founding. Anti-Islam activist Kelly J. Keen raged, the King is not defender of all faiths. He is supreme governor of the Church of England and defender of the faith. He does not have the right to quietly rewrite the job description of the crown to suit modern fashion. This country's institutions should mean something. Indeed, legally, it does seem that there are issues with how this has been introduced, how this has just been slipped in without any public debate whatsoever. Top lawyer, Stephen Barrett explained. You can't change the constitution by some words in the sovereign grant. He is the defender of the

faith and head of the Church of England. Those are his obligations. His duty, a king who will not do his duty is no king. And Lauren the insider was in particular despair writing, I'm absolutely heartbroken. It is now not safe to raise my daughters in England. Our last remaining protection was it being a constitutionally Christian country. I am speechless. But once she recovered her speech, and thank goodness she did, Lauren the insider gave us the lowdown on what this change actually means. Watch. How does this impact our safety? There is a lot of protection within our constitutionally Christian country, but we all know we're in the middle of an Islamic takeover. I've got the Bish here, I've got the receipts, and by the end of this episode, you will understand

exactly what has just happened to the Church of England and why nobody will talk about this in an unfiltered way within the mainstream media. Okay, let's be precise about what has changed because precision matters here. The Sovereign Grant Report is the Royal Households annual financial and operational document. It is not tabloid gossip, it's not a leak, it is the official palace description. of what the monarch does and what his role is. Last year's report described the king under his head of nation duties as head of the Church of England and defender of the faith.

The new report published late last week reads, His Majesty is Supreme Governor of the Church of England and protects the space for faith within the multi-faith nation. Same document, different language. And of course, Lauren believes there is even a chance King Charles has converted to Islam. Because if he cannot put Christianity front and centre, then what he is doing is over-amplifying an ideology that many people feel does not want to assimilate and does not want to integrate as a political ideology.

And critically, don't forget, before his coronation, there was a significant public debate about whether Charles would change defender of the faith to defender of faiths, the plural form encompassing all religions. He chose at the coronation to keep the traditional wording. He kept his oath publicly in Westminster Abbey. What changed? Not the legal title, but the palace's own own. operational definition of what that title means in practice. And that is a very different kind of move. And Bishop Karen H. Dwa, who has been desperately calling on the king to affirm his 100% support for

Christianity is not happy. I can tell you exactly why they did it this way. They buried it, They released it and hoped that people wouldn't notice. What they wanted was for this news to go under the regime. Jaria law has no place in our society. There are no other religious bodies that have their own courts. The Church of England is bound by canon law. The Church of Wales is bound by canon law. We don't have canon courts as a result of that,

that are actively operating in direct opposition to the government's legislated laws and the law of this land. You don't see that from the Jewish community or the Sikh community, the Buddhist community, Hindu community. It is only the Islamic community and it is completely unacceptable. And the problem is that this news has now been overshadowed, of course, by all. all of the will they won't they drama about where the Prince Harry and Megan Markle are going to come to the UK. Lauren thinks that's a plan. I can tell you exactly why they did it this way. They buried it, they released it and hoped that people wouldn't notice. What they wanted was for this news to go under the radar. And then the minute the telegraph picked it up, you now see stories coming out.

Megan Markle isn't coming to the UK. Will she, won't she? This is all done to distract you. So you don't pay attention. Blink and you miss it. Leo Curse, I mean, there have been huge concerns over whether Charles is actually committed to Christianity. And what I think is most disturbing about this

is that there's been no debate. It was just slipped out. And obviously all of the talk was about Buckingham Palace and the fact that Charles and William are ever going to reside there. Then all of the talk was about Harry and Meghan are going to be lent Buckingdon Palace. And obviously that is important. That matters. But this one is so fundamental, Leo.

And actually, there deserves to be a real discussion. And there deserves to be scrutiny on what King Charles is actually suggesting here. Is he saying, as our monarch, that the UK is no longer a Christian country? because that is terrifying and chilly to many of us. Yeah, I know for some people in Britain these days, they might think that Christianity is an anachronism and it doesn't have any bearing on our lives. But, I mean, a couple hundred years ago,

this would have been, you know, people would have been beheaded and heads put on spikes for this kind of radical departure. I mean, you remember how much of a radical departure was when the monarch left the Catholic Church. So this is a huge, I mean, this is momentous. It feels like a submission, a submission to a more aggressive, dominating culture that's rapidly expanding and is taking over not just the Middle East,

but swathes of Africa and Asia and now Europe as well. And we can see when Islam reaches, you know, around about 10, 15, 20 percent in a country, then you start getting real problems. So we're not at that level yet, but we're not too far off it. And also with the amount of appeasement and acquiescence, you know, we don't approach Islamism the same way that somewhere like Israel approaches Islamism. So 20% of Israel is Muslim. And obviously, you know, Israel is surrounded by Muslim countries that keep trying to wipe it out every, you know, decade or so, they all get together and try to wipe Israel out.

So Israel has had to become very tough at managing the threat from Islamism, not just from outside its borders, but also the 20% of its population that are Muslims. You know, they've had bus bombings, terror attacks, armed insurrections, all the rest of it. And we're not at that point yet. we've taken the path of acquiescence and appeasement every step of the way, step of the way. But we are getting to that point. It's not going to be, I don't think there's going to be many more attempted beheadings or,

or terror attacks that we're going to put up with. And to see our king turn around and be like, oh, I'm not, I'm not Christian anymore. I'm not the Christian leader. Oh, no, this is for all faiths. This is for everyone. Let's just roll over and let anybody who wants it. Everybody has claimed to this.

man, this is disgusting. King Arthur must be spinning in his grave. We used to have proper English king's lion hearts that went over and fought against the spread of Islamism, fought in the Crusades, which everybody is taught were a despicable aggression. They were actually defensive wars. I know for a fact that our current king, he's not going to get on a horse with armor and a big sword and the English flag. No, he's, he's, he'd be, if he goes over there, it won't be to, to, to fight the spread of Islamism. It'll be as a fluffer for them. Yeah, I mean, the problem is, Leo, this weakness does seem to typify his reign because while I do understand he is battling terminal cancer, the idea that he is giving Prince Harry and Meghan Markle the opportunity

to have the keys to Buckingham Palace. I mean, I know it's not as serious as what we're discussing in terms of no longer defending Christianity, but it's like, come on, the optics of that. I don't want these two staying in Buckingham Palace for God's sake. I want them staying at a travel lodge. Do you know what I mean? And all of this just plays into this idea, Leo, that Charles is weak. He is weak. Yeah, absolutely. You know, for him to roll over in front of them after how they've treated him.

I mean, one of the things, you know, I'm not a huge, I'm not a huge royalist. I'd be much more of a royalist of the royal family where like a royal family used to be, you know, but that's by the by. they've just become another institution that's become so woke and so so wishy-washy and just perpetuating and pushing all these communist ideologies to destroy Britain. But to roll over, on a personal level, to roll over and count out to Harry and Megan, after how they've treated the royal family, I think they've done more damage to the royal family than Prince Andrew has. publishing secrets, you know, breaking that sort of contract that the public has with the royal family. The queen understood so well.

Never complain, never explain. And they've done the opposite. They've just been absolutely emotionally incontinent. And, you know, I'm pretty sure they've lied and made stuff up as well. You know, all these claims of racism in the royal family. And, you know, when you see these examples of racism, like when Mgozy Philan, an African woman. She turned up to Buckingham Palace

and well, she's born in Hackney, lives in Hackney or whatever. She turned up to Buckingham Palace and somebody has to, where are you from? She's like, how racist. It's like, did you see how she was dressed? She was literally dressed like Fred Flintstone. She was dressed like, you know,

a character from the middle of the Congolese jungle in a carry-on film. She looked absolutely nonsensical. I wouldn't have been surprised if she'd ridden in on a hippo like firing blood. low darts at people. Of course people are going to ask where you're from if you're wearing, you know, a leopard print miniskirt and, you know, scary spices beads. So, you know, I think if somebody,

if they're complaining about racism and it's the same sort of baseless, baseless complaints, you know, I think that's such a disgusting attack on the royal family. So for King Charles to just roll over and be like, oh, well, let's let bygones be bygones. I mean, come on. Yeah, travel. A travel lodge is too good for them. I stay in travel lodges when I'm on tour. They're brilliant. It's like 25 quid a night and you even get like a kettle and some coffee. Yeah, I mean, I don't want them here at all, to be totally honest. And I don't think there's any public demand for it. I mean, Harry's like, oh, I should get security because Taylor Swift once got security. No, no one wants you here. There's no demand for it. You were warned. Stay away is my view.

But yeah, I agree, Leo. It's the idea that the royal family thinks someone is going to call them racist or Islamophobic when actually the subjects are all sitting back thinking, no, no, no, no, you are far too woke. That is the issue. We all actually knew that Ngozy Falani was just a race-bator. She was like an orinda, you know, who walked into that situation, I believe, secretly recording the lady in waiting. And immediately the royal family turned on her and it was just so awful.

But something interesting happened over the weekend, Leo, in your home nation. And what's interesting is you actually think that maybe the king wanted this. So he was made, apparently, made according to the Daily Telegraph, to sit through an anti-British play at the Scottish Parliament. So the Telegraph reported that the king should not have been made to sit through this performance. That is according to opposition leaders. So young actors performed a section of a play that appeared to suggest that the British Empire was racist. The excerpt from through a shortbread tin satirised the myth of Scottish exceptionalism,

but contained what some interpreted to be anti-British attitudes. Opposition MSPs described the performance as historically illiterate and divisive and said it should not have been performed in front of the king. So let's take a look at some of this gross display. Imagine that, eh? Go all over the world and you'll meet a Scot. How's that, eh? Always on the right side of history we were.

Oh yeah. You mean the British Empire? Not that side of history, the other side of history. Oh. You mean the plantations? No, not that side of history, the other side of history. Oh, right. The racism. Uh, no. not that side of history the other side of history

oh you mean Darian the new world the shipbuilding I the shipbuilding for the slaves no not that side of history the other side of history it's not what I meant you're twisting my words

suiting yourself telling your own version not the right version well what is the right version those days are past now and in the past Now Leo, you actually argued that the king may have actually taken to the anti-British performance riding on X. Betty loved it. Betty loved it.

But Leo, here's the thing. Doesn't this just, again, play into the weakness of the king and the weakness of his reign? Because do not tell me for a single second that the late Queen Elizabeth II would ever have sat through that, would ever have been made to sit through that. And unfortunately, without knowing the details, my belief is that probably the king's team did nod it through, did probably think he was going to like it, because I'm sorry, he would not, he's the king, right?

His team get a rundown. This is what's going to happen at the opening of Parliament. If he kicks up a stink or his team kick up a stink, said play doesn't happen. And it happened without any complaint. And I again think it is part of this suicidal empathy that has seen him walk away from Christianity too. Yeah, and this sort of self-loading for himself

and his own culture and his own country, it seems to be. I mean, you're completely right. I'm sure Queen Elizabeth II wouldn't have stood for it. If that play appeared in front of her in the Scottish Parliament, she would have stood up, pulled out a massive sword and beheaded the nearest S&P politician. And that is the right. That is the right thing for a monarch to do.

And also, I mean, what a sort of despicable sneering at Scotland's proud history, you know, for all the Scottish people say, oh, we were colonised by England. Well, we weren't colonised by England. It was a mutual agreement. It was something we entered into willingly. And we made the most of it. Scotland ran the empire. We built the bridges.

We built the ships. We ran the bureaucracy. we dealt with the money and that's how Scotland became rich. How Glasgow and Edinburgh became rich. So we should be immensely proud of our role in the empire, especially, you know, Scottish shipbuilding, you know, in Glasgow. And for Queen Elizabeth II, a woman who is named after a ship, I just think it's disgusting for them to sneer at Scottish shipbuilding like that.

But yeah, King Charles, I'm sure he absolutely loved it. He probably gave them some pointers. He probably gave him some point. Oh, here's how you can hate on England more. It's despicable. So I just want a monarch who's going to stand up, you know, with a bit of hellfire, with a bit of fire in their belly. And, you know, pick up that sword and stand.

Let me show you some of his speech, Leo, and you can judge whether you thought he did a decent job. Watch this. This was at the Scottish opening of Parliament. First Minister, members of the Scottish Parliament, the Queen and I offer you are, warmest good wishes for the session to come. One we shall follow with close

and abiding interest. As you take up your great responsibilities, we share every hope for the continued contribution of this Parliament to the well-being, confidence and prosperity of Scotland, its land and

all its people. I mean, look, not exactly inspiring stuff, but I have to be honestly, there's nothing inspiring to me about Holyrood whatsoever. You know, I think devolution has just been a bit of a disaster. Maybe the king knows that. Oh, devolution is a calamity, especially for Scotland. This is why I was amazed to see Andy Burnham,

you know, put it as a sort of marquee pledge. He's going to devolve government. Because if you get devolved governments, you just get these satellite parliaments that fight back against the center. There's not enough oversight on them because they're, you know, way out in the sticks. So there's more corruption, there's more inefficiency. And yeah, it's just been appalling for Scotland. Yes, indeed, indeed. Okay, Leo, let's take a look at our feedback before we get to revealing today's greatest Britain and Union Jackass, because we have had a lot

of comments coming in. Real Thinking Monkey has a sort of backhanded compliment, so I'll take it. And they say, I do think your channel is sometimes a bit of an echo chamber, but this Shabana MacMood stuff is truly scary as if. Well, yes, Real Thinking Monkey, this isn't an echo chamber. The problem is the rest of the mainstream media is a total echo chamber, which is why you need to come here to actually realize what Shabana MacMood has planned, because I have been telling you for months and months and months. Shava 2 UK-150, who's number one today, the number one supporter, which is incredible.

It is painfully obvious that GB News was set up to bring free speakers under control. Those they can't control, get the boot. I look forward to Father Calvin Robinson testing this in court. Leigh, 1962, says, Hi, Dan, please look into the lawsuit with Palantir. While we are all fighting over the shit, they have orchestrated data centers, water, personal autonomy, brain data. And Chaos UK, 26, says Charles will put a gold helmet on Buckingham Palace next. It's embarrassing and disgusting, Dan. Private note says please don't let England fall like San Francisco and Los Angeles have an America.

You'll never get it back. To be honest, private notes, I worry. It is too late for that. Bobabooey says the Islamic Caliphate of the United Kingdom is almost complete. Labor's rushing it in. We don't have time to wait till the next election. We need them out. Elizabeth Seawalt 7144. On Shibada MacMamud says, yes, she is a traitor. They are all. destroying Britain, but that was the plan all along. Wake up, Brits, you are being replaced. And Ginger 1, 2, 3, 4 and Andy Burnham says, very likely PM in three weeks will not take any questions. I see he's continuing the dictatorship from Kier Stalin. And on my terrifying prediction from Polymarket that Ed Miller Band is heading to become the Chancellor of the United Kingdom,

Joyce Martin 649 says, to be honest, I am praying Miller Brain. I love. like that. I use that. Gets to be Chancellor. The financial markets will explode and crash. It truly has to be so bad before it gets better. And there is a school of thought about that at the moment. Okay. A reminder of your nominees to be named the worst Britain in the world today. Our union jackass. So I went for Shabana Mahmood for her plot to invade the country with an unbearable wave of immigration that would see Britain destroyed for good. Leo Curse went for. Brandy Burnham for pushing devolution, which is a disastrous idea that creates corrupt satellite governments with little oversight and no incentive to do their job properly, who just

fight back against the central government. We just discussed that. And he also went for Siddeek Khan, because it's been revealed that 12,000 grooming gang incidents have been reported to the Met Police since 2010, but Sadiq feigned ignorance when quizzed on the issue. So three really good nominees, I have to say, but do I have the win? Oh my goodness, it was close. In third place, and I struggle to believe this actually, trust me, he's going to be winning every single day very soon. But in third place with 31% of the vote is Andy Burnham. The runner up with 33% of the voter is Sadiq Khan. But I convinced you.

I convinced you because she wasn't winning actually before the digest. But Shabana Mahmood, our treacherous home secretary, is the worst Britain in the world today, our union jackass. So, Leahy curse, I guess I better let you reveal and nominate today's greatest. Britain, who have you gone for? So my greatest Britain is Kate Middleton, who has been obviously she's not the only royal who's dealing with

cancer, but she's certainly younger, and I think when you're younger, it's, you know, it's often a more serious illness and she's dealt with it with poise and style and I think her completing the three peaks challenge is

incredible and inspirational. And her openness and honest around it has been much needed. I mean, she shows how the royals can modernise without, without, you know, becoming this sort of disgusting, sort of woke, sloppy communist mess. So, yeah, I think she's, I think she's great. And I think her and Wells should really be in charge.

I think it'd be better for the country, if they were. Yeah, Leo, she was so incredible on this Three Peaks challenge. Remember what I love about it is that, you know, because Harry and Megan, they're always, shouting, aren't they, about something? Security! And I'm launching this. She just went and did it. She went and trained. Remember, she's a woman who was going through serious cancer treatment, chemotherapy. Two years ago, she just went and trained, and she just did it without any song or dance.

And she was just up on the Three Peaks with literally a couple of people with her, and she was having brilliant interactions with people, which I actually found quite emotional. And I just want to show you some of what happened. How are you doing it? You're not too close. It's not great weather, isn't. No, it's spectacular. So if you've been on their t-shirts?

Why don't you know? You've said, you've got any? Have you got any? Fantastic. Fantastic. And have you been up here before? It's your first time. When it's possible saying you can't see you in the news or anything you said.

Yeah? You're in a cloud, Ted, aren't you? Yeah, exactly. Isn't that? I'm so impressed. You're moving. We'll be cheering you on. So we'll see you on snow-down.

Thank you. Isn't that just amazingly? As the Ant-Man channel just said in the live chat, that's the next queen. And she just did it, Leo, without any drama. And she's chatting to people during, I mean, I just thought it was wonderful, actually. Yeah, absolutely, absolutely.

And, you know, obviously, you know, I'm sure she's got professionals helping her with public relations and all the rest of it. But it just came across, you know, so natural. She came across so natural. And, yeah, I think she's a credit to the nation. I think her and Wells understand how to be monarchs in the 21st century. Are we in the 21st century? Can I remember.

That's the same century as Buck Rogers. So, yeah, this is, I mean, this is what we want to see from the royal family, not, you know, not salivating over over Islamism. Indeed. Now, make sure you subscribe to Leo Kersen's brilliant channel. Thank you, Leah. And I believe, I was very excited to hear this. You're actually teaming up with Andrew Lawrence, the very, very funny comedian for a couple of double act shows. Is that right?

Yeah, yeah. So we're not going to be on stage at the same time, but basically, you know, it's like a double bill. I like that. We get to see both of you. We're going to be working out new material. So we're down in Southampton this Thursday. I think tickets might have all gone for that, but there might be some available.

We're also coming to Roderham with that. And I've got my own tour shows. There's just me. I'm coming to Cambridge. I'm coming to Southampton for that as well. And I'm going to be extending the tour and coming to Scotland as well, as soon as I can find some venues

that will have me in Scotland. And is that Leo curse.com for tickets? That's right. Yeah, that's the one. Amazing. Great stuff. Andrew Lawrence is very funny guy, so I thought that was a great little double act double combination. So you can get two for the price of one for those couple of nights only. Leo Kirst, so great to have you on outspoken. We will speak very soon. Thank you so much. And actually, we are moving across now to substact because the Royal News Network is standing by. We haven't discussed it just now, but a lot has gone down over the past few hours in terms of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. disastrous trip to the UK next week. I would love you to join us there at www. outspoken.com.

That's where you get all of our royal coverage. But we are back live with you tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9am Pacific. Please do hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Turn on the notification bell. We're also available as a podcast on Apple, podcast, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.