Dan Wootton Outspoken - NEW ANTI-WHITE POLICE ATTACK IN BIRMINGHAM SPARKS UK FURY AS TOMMY ROBINSON & ROBERT JENRICK UNITE

Episode Date: July 3, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Growing anti-white outrage sweeps the Disunited Kingdom as Tommy Robinson, Laurence Fox, Robert Jenrick and James McMurdock unite to speak out against a shocking example of Two Tier Policing in Birmingham with shadows of the Henry Nowak tragedy becoming all too common. Of course, the police response is to beg for the footage not to be shared, because cover up is now all they’ve got. But Reform’s Shadow Chancellor Jenrick has demanded: "If there's additional footage that explains why the officer acted as she did, it should be shared immediately to clear things up. Otherwise the public will rightly question the clear unequal treatment by your officer. We saw two-tier policing by Hampshire Police when they came to the scene of Henry Nowak. We saw it for decades across the county with the Grooming Gangs that went unpunished. The police have lost the benefit of the doubt in the eyes of many." At the same time the takeover of the Disunited Kingdom continues at pace, with the Somalian flag being raised in Birmingham, as Sadiq Khan’s Islamist London has provably fallen. And as we come on air, vigilantes continue to guard Rochdale after the release of grooming gang leader Shabir Ahmed, leaving victims terrified. Joining us for the entire show today is Connor Tomlinson, the host of the independent media show Tomlinson Talks on YouTube and Substack. PLUS: GB News agitator Tom Harwood purposely attempts to spark a new war within Restore Britain, as Rupert Lowe prepares to be interviewed by Joe Rogan. AND: Andy Burnham’s “normal act” is brutally exposed, as the hard left socialist prepares to destroy the UK as Labour Prime Minister. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Meghan Markle’s secret plot to use next week’s UK visit to merch As Ever is disclosed, just as Woke ITV’s Prince Harry propaganda reaches crazy new levels. We’ll expose it all with YouTube sensation Lauren The Insider. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 529. Happy Friday to you. But breaking right now, growing anti-white outrage sweeps the disunited kingdom as Tommy Robinson, Lawrence Fox, Robert Jenrick and James McMurdoch unite to speak out against a shocking example of two-tier policing in Birmingham with the shadows of the Henry Novak tragedy becoming all too common. So watch, as a young white man is attacked by three non-whites in Birmingham on camera, but then the police only end up arresting the white lad who has now been charged after seemingly lashing out in shock. Two. No, no, wait. Two. Two.

Two. Money. What are you? What? What are you? My name! Hey, aye, aye, aye, aye. Do not fucking punch your hands behind your back.

What the fuck, bro, you're gonna walk the fucking car, you dick. What the fuck, bro, please. That's it. Of course, the police response now is just to beg for that footage not to be shed because cover up seems to be all they've got. However, reforms Shadow Chancellor Robert Generic demanding, if there is additional footage that explains why the officer acted as she did, it should be shared immediately to clear things up.

Otherwise, the public will rightly question the clear, unequal treatment by your officer. We saw two-tier policing by Hampshire Police when they came to the scene of Henry Novak. We saw it for decades across the county with the grooming gangs that went unpunished. The police have lost the benefit of the doubt in the eyes of many. And at the same time, the takeover of the disunited kingdom continues at pace with the Somalian flag being raised in that area of Birmingham, as Siddique Khan's Islamist London has also provably fallen. And as we come on here, vigilantes continue to guard Rochdale,

the release of rape gang leader Shibir Ahmed leaving his victims terrified. One said she's considering moving for the sake of her safety and that of her children. She's described it as her worst nightmare and she is scared. Another said she is fearing for her safety every time she leaves her house. To Shabir Ahmed coming out of prison. This was known in 2012 that it was impossible to deport him. The other two who were meant to be deported. One has absconded.

Ruby bumped into him in the local supermarket, not even knowing you as out of prison. Joining us for the entire show today, Connor Tomlinson, the host of the independent media sensation, Tomlinson talks on YouTube and Substack. Also coming up today, GB News agitator Tom Harwood purposely attempts

to spark a new war within Restore Britain as Rupert Lowe prepares to be interviewed by Joe Rogan. Andy Burnham's normal act, brutally exposed as the hard left socialist prepares to destroy the UK as Labour Prime Minister and the Daily Telegraph bids to cancel Connor and other right-wing commentators in the lightest example of the Conservative MSM losing any sense of morality. Then in the Royal Uncanceled After Show over on Substack after the main show, Megan Markle's secret plot to use next week's UK visit to merch as ever is declosed.

Just as Wokey TV's Prince Harry Propaganda reaches crazy new level. So we're going to expose it all with YouTube sensation. Lauren the insider would love you to watch www.outspoken. Live. Because it is Friday, we're also putting your uni in Jackasses from across the week, head to head to be named the worst Britain in the world this week. You can vote right now in the live tab on YouTube. There you go.

There are your nominees. From Monday, it was Shabana Mahmood. Tuesday, Alistair Campbell. Wednesday, Jess Phillips and Thursday the A4 mentioned Shabir Ahmed. Get voting. We've had 10. tens of thousands already, I will reveal the winner and your comments at the end of the show. But now, let's go.

After the anti-white slaughtering of Henry Novak seemingly enabled by the police, they no longer get the benefit of the doubt from us, the native population. While cops try to cover up footage of two-tier anti-white policing every day, it no longer works with us because we are on edge, and we now know what you are doing. As is so often the case, it was Tommy Robinson, who first brought this shocking new example of two-tier policing in Birmingham to international attention on Elon Musk's ex.

Alongside the footage, he posted another clear example of two-tier policing and anti-white discrimination. Watch as the white lad is attacked by three non-whites in Birmingham. Police run in and detain the white lad. Watch. Now, no, I turn it to you, No, my, geez, Don't want to,

Don't behind you back. Now, Tom, Now, Tomi did further research and added that there is more footage of the aftermath of a white lad being attacked by three non-whites in Birmingham. Police sit the three attackers, and arrested the white lad. After handcuffing him, they tell him, walk to the effing car, you dick. Watch this.

What the fuck, bro. You're going to walk to the fucking car, you dick. What the fuck, bro, please. Please. That's it. Now, there is sweeping outrage across the country as this latest example of anti-white policing goes wide. And, of course, the Brum cops are just trying to play it down. Initially, post you on X, we're aware of footage showing the arrest of a man after a disorder on Broad Street at 1.30am on 21 June.

Officers found a group of men fighting as the incident was dealt with and officer was punched. One man was arrested and charged with assaulting a police officer. But as Lawrence Fox responded, oh, how the police have fallen. Once trust has completely evaporated from police, spoiler alert, it has. It will take decades to earn it back. if at all. So as this has gone viral today, the Birmingham police, as always, just want to cover up the footage. They want to threaten us, okay? Like, oh, you're going to, you know, ruin a court trial, you'll be in contempt of court. It's a threat. And it's that sort of weaponization of the judiciary

that we see all the time. And while the MSM might play that game, it doesn't work with social media, but still they pleaded. Right. And the incident has been reviewed, and we have no concerns over the officer's actions and we are satisfied that they were reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. We would ask that footage is not shared to allow the legal process to take its course. But lips of TikTok, massive ex-account responded, UK police really don't want you to share this video of their officer arresting an assault victim while letting his attackers go free. And this is how the event is being seen across the world. So, dramatic development today. Mainstream politicians noting this chat,

in culture have been prepared to follow Tommy Robinson and weigh in. The most senior thus far, Reform UK, Shadow Chancellor Robert Jenrick, who wrote powerfully, the footage circulating online shows a young white man being attacked and then arrested. It's baffling that he was arrested while the two black men who attacked him weren't. If there's additional footage, that explains why the officer acted as she did, it should be shared immediately to clear things up. Otherwise, the public will rightly question the clear unequal treatment by your office. officer. And why you describe the incident as a fight in your statement when the footage shows only

one person being attacked, this wouldn't be a one-off incident either. We saw two-tier policing by Hampshire police. When they came to the scene of Henry Novak, we saw it for decades across the county with the grooming gangs that went unpunished. The police have lost the benefit of the doubt in the eyes of many. They've had enough. They need a much better explanation than this if they are to trust you again. Also weighing in, the Essex MP, James McMurdoch, who added, I can't let this go unchallenged. That young man was, in my opinion, and based on the video below, the clear victim of an assault. The video shows for reasons that are entirely beyond my comprehension, the officer steaming directly into the victim. The officer made no effort to prevent the attack or apprehend the

men who had just administered the violence. What I see in the video is the officer using speed and aggression at the moment of peak danger and confusion against the victim. The victim then controls himself the moment he realizes it is now a police officer attacking him and not one of the multiple men who were attacking him a fraction of a second later. In my opinion, Birmingham Police should drop the charges against this young man and ask the officer why she went for the victim on the ground and not the attackers. And I mean, it's true, isn't it? Because that young white man, and we don't know anything about him as of yet. I'm very interested to know.

But he was clearly confused because he had just been come at by that gang. And so when the policewoman apprehended him, he didn't go to punch her, as the police statement said, in my opinion, looking at the video, what he was doing was sort of flailing about and his arm sort of flayed about. And the moment he realized, oh my God, this is a police officer. He stopped and he cooperated.

In the meantime, the attackers have absconded. that literally went away. And you didn't see any police officers going after him. But there is a clear change in the culture here in the United Kingdom with Tommy Robinson pointing this out. It is great that members of Parliament are no longer scared to speak out. You, the British public, and your voice on the streets has been the change. And I don't believe this story will go away now because it is part of a wider theme of anti-white Britain. And we've seen proof of it again this week. with white working-class students being excluded from Oxford diversity schemes and Katie Hopkins speaking out.

Whites at universities here in the UK, they are underrepresented at 80 of the 147 universities and are in a minority at 20 of the 147 universities here in the UK. I don't know if you can imagine the kind of DEI contortions you have to go through to exclude bright, white young people, but it is always the case that ethnic minorities are protected just as long as they aren't white. But the problem is, the police and these young white female police officers know that they have lost control of the streets because in Birmingham, there is an Islamist takeover, which is the real issue. Let's just be honest about it. Look at the scenes in the city that Kiyah Dis have revealed. In occupied Birmingham, the Somalia flag was raised above the town hall to celebrate Somali Nemo Week, 2026.

Just one of the many locations across the UK doing the same. You wouldn't see our flag raised in another country, so why are we doing this? Watch. So that's their back news, yeah? So that is Somalia? So that is Birmingham. But let's be honest, the Islam's takeover in London is even more pronounced.

with Starma out, revealing shocking footage while be moaning, go look at any single video of London from 40 or 50 years ago. And tell me how this is a cultural improvement and not a bio weapon. And for those who say, and I heard actually Chris Schip of Wokai TV, trying to justify Prince Harry's security by saying, Oh, actually, the scenes in London are nowhere near as bad as Donald Trump makes out. Seriously, this is London. And I live here.

And this is a normal site. In a lot of different parts of the cities, by the way. We're not only talking about the no-go zones of Whitechapel and East London, but many parts of North London. Actually, in Edgeware Road, just a few seconds walk away from Marble Arch, you will see scenes like this on a regular basis. So this is the horror of what we are now having to live with as a result of the takeover. And those scenes have prompted Reforms London Meryl candidate Layla Cunningham to go and visit the scenes herself.

This is London under Labour. I don't want the rest of my city to look like this. How long have you been in the country? You don't speak English. You work? You don't speak English. Where are you some? Romania.

How long have you been here? We want to help. Three months. Has the police tried to move you along? And you're waiting for universal credit, you said? The results of the takeover mean that we are no longer safe anywhere, including in Bristol. Where four Afghan nationals raped a 17-year-old girl. And as Reform UK's Darren Grimes reported, their response, laughing, joking, and flicking the V sign in the back of a lorry as they try to scurry out of the country.

They despise us. They prey on our young woman. and they treat our laws as an absolute joke. This is the grim reality of the open borders, piety preached by liberal consensus, utterly sickling. Protect the British public and force our borders and throw the book at this scum. Without apology.

Watch what he's talking about. This is the moment Afghan nationals laughed and joked after raping a teenage girl as they fled the UK in the back of a lorry. Merab Safi, 21, 19-year-olds Awal Amazi, and Salman Habib Kyle, and a 17-year-old boy had been found guilty of grooming and raping a 17-year-old girl in Bristol.

The victim was targeted on Snapchat by Safi who lured her to her properly last November. There she was given alcohol before being repeatedly assaulted. Following the attack, the group was captured laughing and joking as they attempted to flee the UK in the back of a lorry.

All four were found guilty of rape with Safi and Habib Kyle also convicted of human trafficking and a madzi convicted of sexual assault they would be sentenced on October 6th. And breaking right now, Nigel Farage has revealed the invasion has now reached his constituency. Illegal migrants, he says, have landed on Holland on sea in Clacton.

The National Crime Agency has launched a full investigation. Farage says nowhere is safe. These men must be kept under detention and deported. The invasion must be stopped. And of course it must be, but it won't. Because look at this, terrorists. Now coming here, knowing what a soft touch we are. This is a horrifying example. A convicted. ISIS terrorist came on a small boat after being told on TikTok that the UK accepts everyone. And by the way, this is not conjected. This is evidence heard in court. Muhammad Yassin decided to come to Britain as a 30-something because he did not like it in France and had seen a viral video on TikTok saying that the UK welcomed asylum seekers.

Yusin had left his desolate life to join ISIS and attended beheadings and public floggings in his home country of Iraq. He later fled to Germany where he was convicted of terrorism because of his links to ISIS. Despite being expelled from the country for 20 years, he was not deported to Iraq and did not want to return there, so made his way to Britain. He was told on TikTok that the UK respects human rights and entered the country on a small boat with around 80 other migrants on December the 13th last year, according to Stephen Malloy for the prosecution. By the way, the hilarious thing is you know what Labour's solution will be to this. It's not to stop the boats. It will be, oh, we've got to ban TikTok. In Rochdale, tensions remain at and. all-time high as we come on air after the release of rape gang leader Shabir Ahmed, with Labor now facing mounting pressure to change immigration laws immediately

so that the child rapists can be deported. The leader of the opposition, Kemi Badenok, trying to come up with a solution to this deportation problem. It's absolutely disgusting that this man has been let out. He should be deported, and we're going to do everything within our power to make sure that he is. but we're going to need the government to get behind us, that is the Labour government, whether it's Kirstama or Andy Burnham,

what I want to see is them agreeing with us so that we can get that amendment through. We need to start talking about what we're doing now for the country, rather than having an argument about who didn't do what in the past. Spending too much time arguing rather than fixing things, I want us to start fixing things. But the Daily Telegraph reported, even if an amendment were to pass,

two senior Pakistani government officials told the telegraph that the country would not accept Ahmed back because he renounced his Pakistani citizenship several decades ago. They added that he posed a danger to Pakistani children. If their claim is correct, it places Ahmed in the same situation as two other freed Pakistani ringle leaders of the Rochdale grooming gang who Pakistan has refused to take back. The pair was stripped of their British citizenship after their convictions, but then renounce their Pakistani citizenship in an attempt to thwart their removal. So this senior Pakistani government source told the telegraph, Pakistan has maintained that

someone who is not a Pakistani national cannot be allowed or accepted inside the country. Ahmed is considered a serious safeguarding risk because of his criminal passed in the UK. How can someone with his criminality be deemed safe in a country like Pakistan? He poses as much danger to children as Pakistan as he would anywhere else. Would the UK allow it if Pakistan sends a foreign criminal to live in the UK community? Shabar Ahmed is a foreigner. The second official, who has been in talks with UK officials about Ahmed, said the convicted child rapist moved to Britain when he was a boy and had spent nearly 95% of his life in the UK. He said it is for the UK government to decide his future. He is not a Pakistani national as far as we know. He revoked his Pakistani citizenship and Pakistan will never allow him inside the country.

Now, a source said this is a government source, said all options remain on the table to put pressure on Pakistan, including the possibility of imposing visa restrictions on its citizens seeking to come to Britain. However, it has understood that this is seen as the nuclear option that would be considered only if other diplomatic efforts failed. My God, they have failed. You know, press the nuclear button now. We should be in a diplomatic war with Pakistan. End of story. I mean, even Left Wing Channel 4 News is speaking to the man, and they're not deriding him actually, running a vigilante operation to protect Native Brits on the streets of Rochdale,

given the police there can't be trusted. it. And survivors are scared he could use his contacts to get to them. Two of the victims of Ahmed's gang have talked of their horror at his release. One said she's considering moving for the sake of her safety and that of her children. She's described it as her worst nightmare and she is scared. Another said she is fearing for her safety every time she leaves her house. She is drastically altering her routines to avoid a potential confrontation. confrontation, but the psychological toll is exhausting.

They've been failed from day one and it continues that failure today. Billy Howeth helps survivors of grooming. He's been trying to reassure two of Ahmed's victims. It's been traumatic for him. Both are in crisis now because they've had it dropped on them days before he's released. Not weeks, not been prepared. They've not been given liaison officers. They've not been giving support officers. They've just been told he's out. End of story. This is his co-exam. this is his conditions and he's out.

It's not good enough, you know. They need more security than that. Billy Howarth says, again, the women have been made to feel as if they don't matter. Rape gang whistleblower and Maggie Oliver, furious, given those and powers, have had 15 years to sort out the deportation. And the victims were told,

remember, that he was going to be deported, so they are currently terrified once more. I'm angry. In fact, I'm enraged that victims have to keep going through these same. traumatic experiences and we never see any progress we hear empty words all the time Iasha promises and you know we get a near-jerk reaction to Shabir Ahmed coming out of prison this was known in 2012 that it was impossible to deport him the other two who were meant to be deported one has absconded and Ruby bumped

into him in the local supermarket not even knowing you was out of prison today I've been in touch with the ACC at GMP to try and put in place some security measures for Ruper who is terrified. She was threatened at gunpoint that if she spoke to the police, they would kill her. So she has got, you know, real fears. And as today's guest, Conor Tomlinson, reminded us, this is the same Rochdale rape gang ringleader who disrupted his own trial by tearing his shirt off and accusing the court of a racist conspiracy against Pakistanis. The supreme race, not these white bastards. That is his. direct quote. He denied all charges, then smiled when he was sentenced. These people believe any

punishment for abusing our children is unjust. They only care about the collective advantage conferred to Pakistani clans. He will not be a pariah. He will be welcomed back into his community when released. He should never have been here in the first place. He should have been deported in 2018 under Home Secretary Sadjad Javid, a Pakistani man born in Rochdale. But he decided not to strip the four perpetrators of their British citizenship and arrange for their removal to Pakistan despite a court ruling it lawful. We shouldn't have to live like this. End all immigration from Pakistan. Deport the communities who produce these predators, know about these crimes and cover them up. Deportation is too good for perpetrators like Ahmed. Whole life sentences should be the minimum,

if not the death penalty. And Connor Tomlinson joins us now. So, Conner, of course the Akhmed situation in Rochdale is just absolutely shocking, but I want to start with these new scenes from Birmingham, Connor, because there is growing outrage about what seems like another example of anti-white two-tier policing. What's your view of the video, Connor? Well, the dynamics of play, Dan, are those of a narco tyranny, where the state will more heavily handedly percolating, the populations that they know are likely to comply with their authority, because if the public are police and the police are the public,

then the police are meant to reflect the British public, and so the British public still think that the police have some moral legitimacy, even though that's on the wane. Whereas they're going to give a slap on the wrist, or in the video that you're showing now, not even pursue perpetrators if they aren't white. And part of the reason is because nobody wants to be accused of institutional racism following the McPherson report after the murder of Stephen Lawrence in the 90s. And this is codified into legislation, thanks to the amendment to the Race Relations Act in the 2000s, which says that the government and all of its organs, including the police, have a positive obligation to manage race relations, which means that, and this is just factual, blacks who

fight in packs, who commit a disproportionate amount, more crime, wherever they are, whichever country they're in, in the UK, they repeat this pattern, and so the police police police them less harshly even though they commit more violent crimes to whites and one another, and they know that because whites, including white men, will comply with their unfair treatment, they will arrest them instead so that they get equal policing outcomes on the balance sheet, and also so that the disproportionately diminutive female officers are not put at risk. And the same dynamics were on display during the Manchester airport attack because the young red-haired officer who got punched in the face, who was reduced to tears,

her nose was broken, bleeding, and that one of the brothers has been convicted for, for two shorter sentence, might I add, he's only in prison for the same length of time that one of the guys pushing a wheelie bin at the police in the Southampton protests just a few months ago, is in prison for, it's only about three years. Anyway, she gave an interview, I think it was to Channel 4 in the last week, and she said, well, policing is about being empathetic, and I just want to know why he did it and why he doesn't take responsibility. The reason young, police women, should be put on the front line, is because thugs like this on screen now will not show them any due regard, do not think the police are immoral authority, because they don't think the police

are policing their community, they think the British state is at best something that hands them money, and at worst something that oppressed their ancestors thousands of years ago and should be toppled and turned into a caliphate, and so they actually will commit violence against these police women, whereas young white British lads, they won't. This lad swung wildly, didn't even realise that he was being apprehended, he thought he was still being attacked by a black gang that they left run off down the street. And instead, because they won't resist, because they won't be violent to the police women,

the police women feel comfortable putting him in cuffs and shouting abuses him as he's being led to the police car. So I agree with James McDurdoch and all the other politicians and commentators calling this out, Dan. The charges should be dropped, and sorry, there shouldn't be, we shouldn't be putting young women as frontline police officers at risk when these violent savages will beat them up.

And also all of the statute book legislation that's on the books that police is white people differently to black people, despite whites committing far less violent crime, should be thrown out, and we should just be policing crimes rather than trying to maintain community cohesion or be anti-racist instead. But, Conner, they immediately leap to censorship, right? So the Birmingham police just say, don't share the footage.

Now, in the past, Connor, I know what it's like in the mainstream media. You get some type of tweet like that if you're in a mainstream newsroom, and the editors just immediately panic because the worst nightmare for an editor is to collapse a trial. And I know examples in the past, like Connor Myler at the Sunday Mirror, when he collapsed a trial, he lost his job. So they will err on the side of caution, right? But that doesn't work in the world of social media, where we have massive accounts like Libs of TikTok based in the United States who say, we don't give a damn about your contempt of court's threat. It is interesting, though, Connor. I do think this is one of the reasons why we've seen the culture secretary Lisa Nandi,

strop off X with the whole Department of Culture, Media and Sport overnight. But it's not going to work anymore, is it? Censorship is no longer possible of this citizen journalism. Well, it's no longer possible in the long term, but in the short term, they're going to give it a damn good go. And I agree with people. Remember, Lisa and Andy was tipped to be Andy Burnham's second in command years ago because she's a northern woman in Wigan,

and she was complaining that Downing Street is a toxic culture, a boys' club that was briefing against her. And we've just had the feminist caucus of the Labour Party, which, you know, is the entire Labour Party, but nevertheless, meet with Andy Burnham and say we want a 50-50 government and more women in Cabinet. So it's probably likely, and I'll say it here, that Lisa Nandy is Burnham's deputy, and I don't know which Cabinet role she'll end up getting,

but I don't think she really enjoys culture, media and sport. She could end up getting science and technology. And they will use this as the pretext to Banix. They will say, well, it's become impossible to have fair trials in this country. We can't prejudice the jury pool. There's too much misinformation. There's too much abuse of politicians online. We don't want another Joe Cox.

And so we have to ban X specifically. Meanwhile, they're using a tightly controlled social media and, of course, the school curriculum, to try and brainwash young kids into voting labor while the rest of the country hate them. As far as citizen journalism goes, though, Dan, it's vital. And they know this, because the moment that they have their narrative, shattered by video footage of the consequences of their ideology, then their ideology cannot withstand criticism. And so that's why they're so desperate to you censor us. And that's why they've created all of these pseudo-independent neutral institutions like

Offcom and Ipso and of course Raikou in the Home Office that even pressures family members into not talking about the threat to collapsing the trial. But funnily enough, they managed to have trials in America while having a press that, well, it's free, it's biased, but it's free. So I don't see why we can't do that in Britain. The only reason we can't do that in Britain, is because the state can't withstand the pressure. 100%. I've always actually said that we need to move towards an American system, which is that anyone can say whatever they want over the course of a trial,

because in reality, in this new world, it is going to be absolutely impossible to control social media. And actually, Connor is right. What they will do is they will just ban full platforms, and it won't work in the long term, but what it will do in the short term is have a chilling effect on businesses like Connor and businesses like Outspoken, which are trying to report the truth to you.

So I've said for a long time that that little weasel at G.B. News, Tom Harwood, is trouble. He's real trouble. He's an agitator. And he's not a true conservative in any way. He's not a true right-winger in any way. And what he wants to do and why he posted this picture with him cavorting with Rupert Lowe at the Spectator's Summer Party this week was to try and increase this civil war within Restore Britain. Now, this is nothing I haven't said to Tom Harwood to his face. I ended up sitting next to him at a dinner at the Margaret Thatcher Freedom Festival,

where I directly challenged him on why he claimed using lies that he couldn't host Rupert Lowe on his TV show. And so Tom Harwood is sort of the perfect propagandist for the spectator. for Reform UK. He wants to cause trouble within Restore Britain, and that is exactly what he succeeded in doing after this Spectator Summer Party event where he posted, I chatted with Rupert Lowe last night at the Spectator Party. Interestingly, he said he detests ethno-nationalism and has had to stamp on the young ethno-nationalist in his party. He's expecting to go on Joe Rogan's podcast in a few days. We might hear more of this then. Now, the first thing is, Tom, you could have Rupert Lowe to hear much more of that on your own show on GB News that you host every single

day. Previously, you claimed that you couldn't do so because there was an election on, a local election. Then there was a by-election. What's stopping you now, mate? So that's the first thing. Secondly, how incredible if Rupert Lowe does get to go on Joe Rogan, that is going to be an amazing moment for him. And that will be something that will be very difficult for Nigel Farage to swallow. But Tom has to be a lot. But Tom has to be a good. stop trying to cause trouble. Because when Ian Dale, the so-called conservative, actually a lefty of LBC, posted how odd his head of Com's Charlie Downs self-identifies as an ethno-nationalist, Tom decided to stir the pot further. When Scott Geats asked any specific individuals mentioned

in regards to the conversation with Rupert Lowe, Howard replied, he implied he had a word with Charlie. So that word implied is doing a lot of hard work there. Because Harwood is admitting that he didn't mention Charlie Downs. Rupert Low didn't mention Charlie Downs. But Tom Harwood is trying to cause trouble within the party and trying to stoke further division between the Rupert Low, wing of the party, maybe the more traditional side of the party, the older side of the party, with the Zuma side of the party,

where Charlie Downs has become the real pin-up. And it worked because when Rupert posted reading how petty rules are going to prevent many pubs and venues staying open for the Mexico-England game, it's the World Cup, let fans enjoy the game, let pubs make some money for once, get out of the way, not complicated. And of course, the government did follow him and do that. The activist Steve Laws, who is a member of Restore Britain, replied, why the fuck are you talking crap about your nationalist base again? If you don't want our support, just say the world will all leave. And there is a split in the party over this because Tag replied saying, I'm starting to think, you should just all leave. You're losing your shit every time the wind blows. They know it and

they're playing you like a cheap fiddle. Either restore policies work for you or they don't. It's that simple. Now, Alla Miniehain, the spokeswoman for the safety of women and girls within Restore Britain, has tried to calm down this backlash again with Anglo-Thule posting update on the Rupert Lose accusations from Harwood, chatting to all a mini-hane right now about the Tom Harwood post. Apparently it's all absolute drivel. Rupert had an argument with Matt Goodwin at the event. Then Tom Harwood kept talking a bunch about ethno-nationalism where Rupert got annoyed.

He was bringing it up. What a knob. Thanks for the update. And there is a picture, actually, of Rupert Lowe talking to Matt Goodwin at the party. And we don't know what was said. But this is what happens if you do decide to go to an event like this. And of course, that is a question that people are asking. Is it right for Rupert at all to turn up at this sort of hobnobbing event with,

I believe, the people who have literally destroyed the country, you know, the Michael Goves of this world? I do think it's a terrible, terrible bunch of people. But Tom Howard said that the reason Farage didn't go was not because he was wary of being papped hobnobbing with Emily Maitliss or Chris Mason, but because he didn't want to run into Rupert. Now, there are lots of sane voices within Restore Britain. who see this for what it is.

Alexandra posting another pathetic attempt from the Farage Corporation of GB News hold the line restore Britain members. Remember, Rupert said there would be attacks and they would be hard and they would try and derail us. On a good note, this absolutely shows panic in the reform team and their lackey's nice try board now. Madeline, Tom Howard is a known attention seeker who loves to stir up drama. Very true.

He has been doing this since he was at university. Also very true. He managed to convert this into a media career. Unbelievably, he did. He could be telling the truth, but it would be wise to wait for confirmation from other sources, especially given this man's character. But on the whole issue of whether Rupert should have been there at all or not, Call Matt said, the saying is you don't wrestle with pigs.

That should apply to politics too. You don't go to champagne parties with your enemies. You especially don't do that then stamp on your base and inner circle while you're at it. Matt Alexander replied, Politics 101 has never abandoned your base and always super serve them. So there is debate about whether Rupert should have been there or not. But Carl Benjamin of the Lotus Eaters, who is a restored Britain supporter, is getting annoyed at a lot of this backbiting. Announcing on X, it's not ideal at all. And I am growing tired of it.

I am growing very wary of flighty anonnes who have this. magic word they're constantly obsessing over. Did Rupert kick anyone out of the party? No. Did he go on a social media witch hunt about anything? No. Did he say he wouldn't deport millions of people? No. Did he use language he is comfortable with in an interview with media? Yes. Meltdown ensues. This gives narrative power to the enemy, weirdly enough, because the I don't care people care very much about a word the liberals gave them. Very strange to dance to the beat of the enemy's drum. Tired of it. I appreciate this is going to get me raped over the coals, but if you can't see how you're being puppeted by this word,

then they'll keep beating you. You're angry, your anger, their agenda. Worth noting that this seems to be the focus of the Twitter crowd too. I check the Facebook account, and nobody is talking about it over there. Just normal patriots using their real names to discuss the issues he raises. And I do think Carl makes a very important point. Actually, the Zoom is online on X, lots of good people there, but they are giving rise to this discussion that there is a civil war

within Restore Britain, which is exactly what helped to destroy Reform UK. And all of those things that saw people like me start criticizing Reform UK, you know, dropping people as candidates because they'd reposted Tommy Robinson years ago, Nigel Farage saying he didn't care about changing demography and that it was impossible to do mass deportations. All of that is so far from where Rupert Lowe now is. And you're not going to agree with him on everything. You never agree with any party leader on everything. But right now I see what is going on as very, very, very much a case of self-sabotage. Connor Tomlinson may well disagree with me though, because he was one of the men who sort of sparked this Zuma Civil War within Restore Britain last week, at least according to the MSM version of events.

So what do you make of this latest stoutch, Connor? Like, Rupit goes to the spectator party with a whole load of bad people, speaks to some of those bad people, bad people you said conversations to so further discord within Restore. Who's in the wrong? First, Dan, just quick proviso for viewers who didn't see our show last week. You should watch it, of course. Yeah, I don't think I sparked a civil war.

I think what happened was the mainstream media tried to duplicitously seize on me saying, well, don't talk about multiculturalism in a positive light, because that's not a good idea, just makes your headaches, nobody likes it. And also just saying, yeah, I don't think the McPhil by-election was a great campaign, even though plenty of great canvases showed up and gave their support. And I don't think we should be, you know, restore Britain should be running in various elections, despite Marlon West being a good guy, just because the party seems to be in permanent campaign mode and it needs to expand laterally with its infrastructure and work on policy. Nevertheless, what do I think about this?

First of all, this is the purpose of the Spectator Party and other such elbow-rubbing drinks events in Westminster. It's a small village. It's to essentially get you in the same compromising position that Farage found himself in last year, laughing at Peter Mandelson's jokes, and then they snap a photo, and it lives in infamy, because they're trying to draw you into an establishment network. They're trying to make you feel compromised by knowing the people who have inflicted horrors on our country, and that you might find them charming or charismatic, or you sort of have to just stand there and smile through their stories

despite knowing that they're false and culpable for all of the horrible things that have happened, like Michael Gove, that you just showed there, and that you feel you have to give in to this sort of knot in your stomach, that you can't say what you really think, or you can't do what everyone wants you to do because you'll upset too many people that you know and have had drinks with. And so it's just not worth going.

Now, that being said, I do know some of the other people that did go, like my friend, James Orr, for example. I would say to them the same thing, but they're their own people. Nevertheless, I did hear from a separate person other than the disreputable Mr. Tom Harwood, who, whether he still supports reform or the Tories, whatever, I think he has a sort of vested interest in liberal snobbishness to look down on some of the harderline immigration policies proposed by Restore Britain, so he does have a motivation to embellish and editorialized. Yes, and before you go old in, can I just remind you for you when Harvard is wrong on every issue, okay? Like, he was absolutely pro-COVID lockdowns. He was a jab Nazi. He believes that there are not too biological sex. Like, he's absolutely pro-trans hysteria.

So to me, this is not a good guy on a whole load of issues. Just wanted to make that point. No, I totally agree on that count, Dan. However, I did hear from someone else who was in the vicinity of the conversation that such a conversation was had. And so, editorializing aside, it would just be wise not to give your enemy any ammunition for such framing. So, like Rupert has spoken before in his interview with David Starkey, when Starkey was trying to admonish Charlie Downs for linking Christianity to British identity because Starkey has always been an atheist. He's got something to do with Quaker up bringing in how he felt like a fish out of water as a young gay man.

Rupert said at the time, look, I've had a word with Charlie. If you don't think I've had a word with Charlie, then, you know, you're wrong. And Charlie didn't exactly get bollicking from Rupert or anything. You know, there were always robust conversations within the party. And I'd say this just because the lads are my friends. They're coming to my house tomorrow to celebrate my West 30th birthday. So there we go. That's my connection with them. Nevertheless, Rupert may have just said something like that, and it has been seized upon by bad faith actors to try and drive a wedge between Restore Britain or the right more broadly,

because frankly, Restore Britain, even though it is a small party, it represents not just a threat to the likes of Reform or the conservatives. I mean, it was Camilla Tomini who said that someone in Reform had told her that if they get above 3%, then Reform think their national chances are scuppered, and Restora currently polling about 3 to 6%. But it's just also that they remind reform of all of the needless self-inflicted wounds that have happened since the 2024 election, and now when they're trying to do some smarter messaging, some more robust policy,

and trying to bring some more credible people aboard to write policy under James Orr, for example. Reform are trying to listen to criticism and recover that loss of faith among thousands of people that are now joined Restore Britain. And they don't want reminders of that, and they don't want Restore to succeed. And so there are people that are sort of media proxies and surrogates, that are trying to foment artificial conflict, either within the party itself or within some of the party's core supporters. And Carl is right to say that some people are falling for this trap.

I would not have put it as Carl has put it, because I don't want to admonish the anons. The anons are good people. There are some of our strongest soldiers, some of of my closest friends, etc., etc. Nevertheless, don't allow the media to use terms to beat you with them, because originally the most empowering, dare I say, piece of rhetoric that came out of Resort Britain, that even reformers taken advantage of and been grateful for, is the mantra, I don't care. So if you turn around and allow the media to use a term like ethno-nationalism, which, I mean, none of the lads actually use, to beat you over the head with it, and to try and say, well, Rupert's disavowed us, so therefore we're going to walk.

It's like, guys, you're just playing into the hands of people who would rather see you sink than succeed. I don't think it's smart for Rupert to try and distance himself from any rhetoric that likes of the Daily Mail. They're going to blast on their front page to try and torpedo his chances. Nevertheless, he actually hasn't ejected anyone from the party. He hasn't disavowed anyone by name. Exactly. And all you have to do is call your jets and wait to see. how it pans out, and if the lads had lost faith in Ruper, if the lads thought this was credible,

that he was disavowing people left and right and trying to undermine his own people, then I could be pretty sure that they would walk away with their integrity intact. Because that hasn't happened, just hold fire. Well, yeah, and if Tom Howard, by the way, actually wanted to do proper journalism on this, he wouldn't do it through a post on X, and, you know, this thing, he implied, he implied that he was talking about Charlie Downs. No, you're on TV for three hours a day and you speak to MPs every single day, including by the way, MPs from enemy parties like Labour and the Lib Dems. If Tom Howard actually wanted to do any proper journalism about what is going on within Restore Britain,

he would invite Rupert Lowe on. All Rupert has said is that the interview would have to be live. And Tom could ask him all of these questions on live television rather than going with dodgy posts on X, but obviously his bosses wouldn't allow him to do that, which is why he had to do it this way. Of course, Connor, it is a difficult week for Nigel Farage. I don't think anyone can really deny that now because even his allies are quite openly saying this, like Calvin McKenzie. I mean, Calvin McKenzie is a big Farage guy, right? G.B. News columnist.

And I was very surprised by this because this was an official column for G.B. News on the G.B. News website where he said, why I urge Nigel Farage to hand back that £5 million, referring to the donation from Christopher Harbourn. And Dan Hodges, of course, he is a male columnist for Labour, pro-Burnum, but he did say Nigel Farage has lost complete control of this issue. Now, it is hard to disagree with that, Connor, because Tim Montgomery, who is, of course, one of the big surrogates for Reform UK, not an official person in the party in terms of, like, taking on a role,

but very often trusted to be a surrogate, for reform across the mainstream media, went on the BBC, and it sort of was a case of like with friends like these. Watch. Well, that wasn't Nigel Farage's best interview performance. Let's put it that way. He cannot hide away from this issue. People do not normally get a five million pound gift. And then we get a box of chocolates.

We get a bottle of champagne. That's the sort of gift most. I think it is entirely legitimate that he has the security concern that is being funded. And I think he may not particularly like the fact that these questions are coming his way, but they are going to keep coming his way because people are puzzled by it. And I think he has to find better answers to these questions. So the party knew it had to fight back,

and the fight back came via Danny Kruger, who does have one of those formal senior positions. He wrote on X, The hounding of Nigel Farage and his family over their personal finances and living arrangements is a transparent attempt by established power in the government and the media to disable reform because of the threat the party poses to their privileges. All these attacks haven't revealed a single instance of wrongdoing. They're playing the man and not the ball. The British public will see that and see it as unfair and it won't work.

Piers Morgan responded, how dare the media ask a party leader why he didn't declare five million pounds from crypto tycoons or homes he bought for cash while telling us he was skint outrageous. So being facetious there, Connor, your take. So a few things on this. When the media try and attack Farage for making money, I don't really care. The only thing that the reform has created a narrative headache for itself with the amount of money that Farage makes because it plays into the perception that he is not a very good constituency MP or doesn't spend time serving the interests of his constituents, even though he's talking about national issues. They also, I don't think, have communicated quite as well as the issue.

should, the sheer amount of security costs the guy faces. Like, I won't say too much, but, you know, having worked previously with I and Herssey-R-Lee, who has a fatwa out on her, and had to literally move country after previously moving country, because her country of origin wants to, wants to kill her. You have to spend, like, millions on this sort of stuff. And so they should probably be clear about the number of threats to life that Farage has. But also, if they do, then, you know, they're probably worried about that they're going to invite more. So again, a bit of sympathy, on that particular issue. As far as the $5 million donation,

yeah, I think it was unwise to accept it. But if they are feeding stories through the media now, well, we've got no evidence that they're feeding stories through. But if Farrow's allies are saying, this might be unwise, you might want to give this back. I don't think that will actually stop the wolves at his door. No, and he's not going to give it back either, Connor. He ain't going to have that.

So it's sort of unwise for Calvin McKenzie if he is trying to urge Nigel to do, say, the right thing. Like, Nigel is not giving that money back. Trust me. An apology will just be a sign of weakness, which they will then use to sink their teeth into you. And if I might, Dan, I mean, just one thought on Tim Montgomery. He is a media surrogate, but much like, as I've said before,

I'm a critical friend. I think maybe that he's more critical than friend a lot these days. First of all, I hope I'm... Obviously, Tim has a health issue, so I hope I'm not saying something out of turn here. But he did not... He seemed inebriated during that interview, and that's just a bit of a liability overall, right? But also... Yeah, it's not, though.

It is because of a health issue. Right, okay. Understood. It's not because of drinking or anything like that. Also, how do I put this? He was suspected to be the source of the leak to the... I think it was the observer. About Zia Yusuf.

Yeah, about Zia Yusuf. So, I mean, there could be internal discord there, so that's not great to allow him to be the representative when you're trying to smooth over this issue. But one final thing. So Farrahals might face a by-election because of this. I saw there was a report from the eye that he said some donors that he was worried about this. And then in response in the Daily Mail, it was quoted that it was Rupert, or someone speaking

on Rupert's behalf, that said, we're going to throw everything at by-election in Clacton, we're going to be ready for it. And that generated the headline of Rupert Lowe tries to ruin Nigel Farage's career. A little bit of free advice. I don't think they should. I think that magnanimity is called for here, even if it isn't reciprocated, from Farage to Rutler. And I think it would be a good idea for a store to say,

you know what, we don't want to play into this standard of essentially a media witch hunt and a storm in a teacup. We don't want to try and look like we're a party of spite to try and ruin Farage's career. And you know, we're going to stand back and allow Farage to win or lose this based on his own merits and whether or not the public actually want him in.

And I think that would go a long way to healing various wounds that people would like to see. Interesting. Again, I can guarantee. to you that ain't going to happen. Yeah, well, that's unfortunate. But also, it would save, restore the trouble of looking like just a we hate Nigel Farrah,

party. And so I think that would be the sensible way to see. I mean, it's not simple. I agree with you. It's not simple for restore, like, strategically what to do with a Clacton by-election. My understanding is they would run and they would run hard, but I guess it would all be to play for because we're not at the point of a by-election. But I said earlier this week it would be the bloodiest by-election.

history. And I still think that would happen. But I hear what you're saying, Connor. The argument, though, was also for them to stand down in Makerfield. And actually, that was so important to get restore national support. So, yeah, my sense is they would run against Farage in Clacton. But who knows, who knows if Farage would even put himself up again. He may go off in a stroke for a little while. As the UK prepares to receive its most left-wing prime minister in history, have you noticed the complete and utter lack of scrutiny on the rat king of the North Andy Burnham? I actually sat through, it was painful, I did it so you didn't have to. I sat through the entire 20 minutes of the only mainstream media interview this guy has done with Andrew Maher on

LBC. Again, he's a Labour propaganda, he's not a journalist. But There was not one moment from that interview that I need to bring you today, not one, because he is getting complete kid glove treatments. Indeed, everything is just trying to present Andy Burnham's this like, nice guy, he's the normal bloke. And the mainstream media are believing it. And this is the biggest mistake that I've ever made, because we all know that the lack of scrutiny about slippery stammer resulted in a failed government,

the same thing will happen. But Burnham's social media strategy for the moment is super clever. Like, did you see him this week talking about let's have a poster competition and releasing this video? The interest number 10 North is generating. Looking at some of the designs for it. Look at this, a northern landscape. These buildings, amazing. The Leivertons offices are in there.

But that sky. Oh my goodness. We're not that menacing, are we? Five out of ten. Now this one, interesting, but maybe global warming coming to the north of England. Feels like that right now, doesn't it? But there's a big plus for this one, yellow train. Where's the B on it? Without that, but still, a good seven out of ten.

Now this looks good. Getting better. Very Manchester scene going on here. Canal, a bit of spinning fields or something like that. building with a new building at the side. Again, maybe a little on the gloomy side with that sky. But this is a solid eight and a half out of ten. I think we have a winner. Look at this. Absolutely brilliant. Manchester. Manchester vibes in the area. Don't look back. Not in anger. Don't look back to Westminster. I'm loving this. Nine and a half. The comedian Russell Kane has this I'm Mr. Normal facade down to a tea. Look.

Hiya, I'm Andy Burnham and what I'm doing right now I'm just making a cup of tea I do loads of really normal things throughout the day and having a cup of tea is just one of them Hey it's Andy Burnham here I'm just about to make some toast with white bread of course I wouldn't even know I was spelled sourdough and wouldn't be interested in it because it's not normal enough I like a nice slice of white thank you toasted on a normal toaster hi yeah Andy Burnam here and I've just put my sock on I've got shoes and socks and sometimes I put a sock on, but that's what life's about, isn't it? Just being normal.

I'm just going in here because I'm going to have a shit. I'm just like you, really. Sometimes I go in the toilet and have a shit. I'm Andy Burnham, and I have an insatiable urge for power. I mean, I like gravy. Eat up. I want to use. And as the Conservative MP Esther McVeigh pointed out,

Burnham is actually hiding his true dangerous side. I sat through the entire Andy Burm. I'm just an ordinary bloke from Manchester monologue yesterday, and I can safely say I have never heard such drivel. His smug, Stom is still hanging around like a bad smell, although really on the PM speech, was a stream of clichés and unsubstantiated, uncosted soundbites like rewiring the country, doing things differently, because I'm anti-establishment, when really he's only ever worked in politics. and he wants Manchesterism everywhere. And when our Andy talks, we all must listen. You can't ask any questions. That's old-fashioned, not kind consensual politics.

Andy just turns up and talks with his renter crowd, cheering his every word, then leaves with his bodyguards in an armoured-plated vehicle, because that's how ordinary he is. And shame on you. And shame on you, if you are thinking he isn't even the Prime Minister yet, but he's acting like a mini-mank dictator. No, he's just our Andy.

Indeed, a mini-mank dictator. Connor Thominson is doing some good work, though, actually proving what a threat Burnham really is, the type of work the mainstream media is not doing. He writes, Burnham's colleagues think he is craven and incompetent. His plan to rescue Britain, more social housing, higher business rates, and a 50% female government. We're cooked. Government by diversity won't deliver the economic recovery and energy security that Britain desperately needs. Neither will the bloated

civil service which the Blair and Brown governments that Burnham served in are responsible for. Immigrants will probably occupy the social housing and letting local authorities raise business rates which dodgy phone and vape shops don't pay, will cause more legitimate businesses to close and tax revenue to fall. Burnham has only added 2% to Labour's polling that will vanish once he's responsible for the intolerable conditions that the permanent state produces.

He is vapid, vapid, performative, and bereft of courage and conviction. The next election is for a patriotic party's taking. That's why sound policy, strong messaging and competent personnel should be our top priority. Now, here, here, Connor, totally agree with all of that. But what is so shocking to me, Connor, is how do they never learn? How does the elite class and mainstream media never learn? They provided absolutely no scrutiny on slippery Starma, on his record, on what he really wanted to do, on coming to government with absolutely no plan, which, by the way, Morgan McSweeney has admitted this week, there was never a plan because the mainstream media and the elite class never forced a plan. And now they are doing exactly the same. same thing. Because, Dan, holding elected office is just a way for them to enact their ideology or preserve

their own power. And so what Andy Burnham represents is the same people remaining in the building, but changing the salesman on the door. Because Burnham doesn't believe anything, well, it doesn't really believe anything, to be honest, other than that he's northern and just doesn't like the south very much. But he doesn't believe anything all that distinct from Starma. He's just got a different flavor to his socialist politics. This is why he was capable of serving in the Blair, Brown, Corbyn Shadow, government, and then now he's just stepped in behind Stama to pick up the Stama Manifesto and probably isn't going to call a general election despite what reform is demanding,

because he wants three years to sit from that poison chalice, and he thinks that if he just sits atop the system, it will do what he says. Someone has compared him before to Labour's version of Theresa May, where he thinks, if I'm just a nice person and I seem personable enough and ditch the running through wheat fields to going to oasis concerts and wearing a bucket hat. If I'm just beloved by the public, then the civil service will do my bidding. We'll get nice things like brand new trains and more urban development, because for some reason the cities aren't already human battery farms from people for the horror of Africa enough.

And we'll just get economic growth and sunshine and rainbows. And what I don't think he realizes, actually, is that the outcomes, the horrors we see in the headlines every day, the economic impoverishment, the confiscation, of our country from us and the fact that the people in the country are feeling this dispossession. These are the inevitable consequences of the system that Burnham has supported all throughout his career. The bloated civil service, the deprivation of our energy security, the desolation of manufacturing, despite him saying, I'm against neoliberalism and Thatcherism. Remember, mate, Tony Blair in 2003 at Labour Party Conference said,

Globalisation is as inevitable as a changing of the seasons, and you're all too happy to glaze him for decades. So I don't think Burnham will do anything substantively different. He'll probably cave to the 50-50 gender parity in Parliament, which is just brilliant. We've already had Rachel Reeves for a couple of years, complaining that people were mansplaining things like adding up a budget to her. So that's really going to do well.

He's probably going to have Ed Miliband as his Chancellor. He's just got done wrecking our energy security, putting in solar panels for a country that gets less sunshine hours than Russia and deciding to well up the remaining oil wells that we've got in the country and ban North Sea oil and gas. He's more than likely going to try and spend, on infrastructure, but then realize that Manchesterism doesn't really work because we've got 134 pound billion black hole in our fiscal headroom, much larger than the one that Rachel

Reeves actually inherited. We're currently destroying farming, and we're also destroying all of the investment that raised revenue in the South that could be redistributed up to the north. So Manchesterism doesn't work without money printing or regional redistribution. And people are going to get really older than the Norvernous schick really quick, because this you played in that really insincere TikTok video, Dan. First of all, I mean, at this is, point, don't look back in anger as just a code word for, I'm on the side of the multicultural regime that kills your children with nail bombs and stabbing sprees by foreigners. But also, it's so insincere that Russell was capable of mocking it there, because people

don't want a sort of happy, chappy to sell them the same managed decline. What they want is someone to step in and almost sees a like, just do something, make the government work properly again. And if you just come out with more personable excuses for why we're being stacked the rafters with violent foreigners, for why our tax burden keeps going up, for why more businesses are shutting in the high streets, but dodgy Bangladesh luggage shops and Turkish barbers seem to be opening all over the place because they're not paying the business rates that you're raising. If you just keep delivering the misery and don't take decisive actions, which Burnham is

incapable of doing because he believes in the ideology that put Stama there, that put Blair there, the put Brown there. If you just keep doing that, then actually your sales pitch doesn't matter, and you're going to inherit all of the hatred that fell upon Stama for both things that Stama did, but more importantly, that the state did without Starmers say at all. The so-called right-wing daily telegraph newspaper is lurching further towards mimicking the left-wing Guardian. As it publishes the most revolting hit piece

on right-wingers, true conservatives to try and get them cancelled from a fundraising app called Buy Me a Coffee. Now, this reprehensible piece of cancelled culture takes aim at figures on the right who have been vocal about their support for Surprise, Surprise, Restore Britain, including the activist Steve Laws and two regulars here are now spoken, Lucy White and Connor Tomlinson, who is, of course, the host of Tomlinson talks and is here with us today. Now, the headline describes all three of these people as far-rightly. extremists who are exploiting the fundraising app. I mean, I guess that means using it to gather

donations and support their campaigns. And the article goes like this. Look, I promise you, by the way, this article when you read it, I promise you, this is in the Daily Telegraph, not the Guardian, but I guess we shouldn't be surprised. Remember last year they called me and Lawrence Fox and Father Calvin Robinson far right broadcasters. So this is what they had to say. raising platform designed to help fans support struggling artists and performers has been exploited by far right activists the Telegraph can reveal. The Buy Mea Coffee platform has been used to raise thousands by white supremacists and campaigners who have thrown their support behind Restore Britain. They include Steve Laws, who campaigns for total remigration of all white people and has posted

on social media that he has signed up and donated to the party. Now remember, this is Steve Laws with that viral interview with Andrew Gold. that what you've just presented there would not reverse the demographic decline would still become a minority in our homeland at some point unfortunately white people and i count myself among them will become a minority and will probably go extinct we are a worldwide minority already which is why i take the radical stance that the english have the right to exist we have the right to our own homeland that everyone agrees on that right yeah that's the basis i think so i think so i I think that's the base.

It depends what you mean by English. That's the issue. We already disagree on the meaning of English. So there's that. Okay, but ultimately, with the direction that the country's going, the future of our people is at stake, the most radical stance that we have to take to fix this is okay with me. I don't care what we have to do.

I don't care who gets caught in the crossfires. I don't care how much damage gets done along the way, as long as the future of my people, is secured. That's my line. Now, Buy Me a Coffee was founded in the UK. This is according to the Daily Telegraph's version. In 2017, to give creators a simple way to get paid and connect with their fans. It is best known for providing freelance content creators, including musicians, podcasters and writers with a podcast with a platform to raise funds from fans and supporters

of their work. But there are now fears, from who, outside the Daily Telegraph, that it has been exploited by a number of far-right extremist influences and organisations as a source of income. And this is what's worse. After being alerted by the telegraph, Buy Me a Coffee has launched an investigation into the use of its site to raise funds for far-right activists in breach of its own rules. Lucy White, one of resource most high-profile activists,

also fundrises on Buy Me a Coffee, with her page stating that she is on a mission to get our country back to normality. Nauty girl, Lucy. Here she was, appearing on outspoken. Do you remember when this race row blew up after she posted on X that no one born in Pakistan should be in the UK House of Commons after the Deputy Speaker Nasgarni, who is from Pakistan, presided over the budget debate last year.

You know, the fact that people are trying to conflate Boris Johnson with Nasrat Ghani is just insane. I mean, as you just mentioned from my post, you know, Boris is ethnically English, ethnically, you know, he's white British. And whether he was born, you know, there or Australia, he's always. going to be a white British man. And, you know, if I, as Lucy, you know, gave birth prematurely in Japan, that doesn't make my child Japan. This sick Daily Telegraph hit piece went on. Another Buy Me a Coffee fundraiser is Connor Dominson, a restore-linked activist and proponent of the Great Replacement conspiracy theory, which posits that shadowy elites are using African and Asian

immigrants to undermine Western society. He has also previously, endorsed a ban on circumcision. Mr. Tomlinson's account has dozens of supporters and an unknown number of monthly subscribers who pay him £4 a month. Now, you remember, Conner was on outspoken earlier this year debating with Catherine Berbill Singh of the Michaela School about whether a Nigerian child could become British. Watch. Are you telling me that that child would not be brought up as a British child? Is that what you were saying? No, no, they would be brought up as a British child. And they would not be British?

But there's, well, they would have, they would have, they would have, they would have possessed British passport, they would, they would, they would be administratively British, but that does not mean that they are indistinguishable from people who have English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish heritage, which is what Robert Tooms had said. So hang on, using your school as hang on, no, no, that child, because that child is black would not be, because that child's because that child's not because they're black. But there is that's not the same thing. You've brought up that child.

Yes, but that doesn't mean they suddenly become English. The Daily Telegraph hit piece went on. Platforms such as YouTube and Facebook have tightened moderation and compliance on crowdfunding, leaving some influences to turn towards smaller sites to raise revenue. They quoted William Alchern, Senior Research Fellow at Anglia Ruskin University's International Policing and Public Protection Research Institute, as saying, what we're seeing here reflects a wider shift in the British far right away from traditional membership or organizations and towards an influencer plus audience funding model. Rather than relying on four ball party structures, activists increasingly use crowdfunding platforms, micro donations, subscriptions and alternative payment systems to generate revenue from supporters. Now what is particularly horrific is buy me a coffee, responded to the telegraph this way. We appreciate you bringing this to our attention. We have forwarded the information provided to our relevant team for

review. They will investigate the matter from our end and take any necessary action in accordance with our policies. Restore Britain rejected any responsibility for the fundraising methods of its activists and supporters. A spokesman for the party said, and I did love this. This was the only thing in the piece that made me smile. This has quite evidently got absolutely sod all to do with Restore Britain, another pathetic hit job from the Telegraph, when it entirely fails to cover Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry disgraceful. Now, I actually believe this piece is disgraceful. The Daily Telegraph has fallen. It gives me no joy to say that. I mean, one of my very good friends, Alison Pearson, is the starts columnist for the Daily Telegraph. I think she's amazing. I enjoy Alistair Heath and some other people who write for

the Telegraph, but this is disgusting. This piece belongs in the Guardian. So I want to bring Connor in now, because Connor, I know you've got a lot to say about this, but the first thing that I just want to check, is given what by me a coffee said to the Daily Telegraph there, have you heard from them at all? Has there been any communication? Has there been any suggestion that your account might be suspended or anything like that as a result of this hit piece? No, they haven't contacted me, Dan. As far as I know, I haven't broken any of the terms and conditions on their website because all I do is set up the page and I think I've only got two posts on there. One relating to the announcement of my kids, and two, responding to their comment to the Telegraph, pointing out that the

Telegraph initially ran the piece and obviously contacted both, buy me a coffee and something that you didn't mention, but it's worth mentioning, Dan, a labour against anti-Semitism activist for condemnation, because of course they're going to condemn someone who isn't their political ally, they ran the piece and went to them for comment, before they ran my comment, refuting their characterisation of me, which is just really shoddy journalism. I had a few people you know, working at the Telegraph or friendly with the editors of Telegraph, reach out and say, well, that's not really cricket, is it? That's a bit dodgy. I'm going to talk to them about this, but the Telegraph stood by it. And I actually posted DMs with myself and Patrick Sawyer,

who contacted me before he ran the piece, and I said, oh, this sounds conspicuously, actually, like the version of events that hope not hate try and smear me with. This doesn't sound right. Here's a direct refutation. Here's actually a screenshot from my substack, explaining what the Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory is, which is just an essay by a French gay Zionist called Renaud Camus, who was actually speaking in 2012 to the Parisian Jewish Forum, what was it like the France-Israel Alliance or something, and he said, The Great Replacement refers to what happens

when you conduct immigration policy, but don't care about culture, and you end up importing things like illiberalism and anti-Semitism from the Muslim world, and so gay men, Jews, feminists are sort of soaring off the branch upon which they sit if they're pro-migration, which is like a point that Constantine Kissin would make. So no, it's not a really scary anti-Semitic conspiracy theory, but that was, of course, the insinuation being made by the Telegraph. They wouldn't have gone to labour against anti-Semitism. They wouldn't have just randomly dropped.

Oh, and he's also against circumcision, which is like, yeah, I am, I'm against child genital mutilation, whether it's male or female. Weird that you would try and put that in there, as if that's either a bad thing or something that should get me my livelihood taken away. So no, buy me a coffee haven't contacted me. I half anticipate that they're just going to follow through it and probably ban me. which would be cowardly. And this is actually why a lot of people, regardless of whether they agree with all the people profiled, of course I don't, you know, Steve Laws' position and my position are not exactly the same.

But lots of people who don't even agree with me came out and said, this article is reprehensible because what you're going to do is you're going to start another censorship wave that cascades across the right, because if you're trying to ban people because you call them Nazis, well, that term has been applied so liberally that it ended up in the death of Charlie Kirk and the de-platforming people for ages between 2016 and 2024, Trump won the last election. Do we really want to go through that censorship, de-platforming, debanking all over again? No. But I have to point out, Dan, that this is conspicuously timed, because the Daily Telegraph has just been acquired by a brand new company.

It has been required by the German media conglomerate Axel Springer, which also owns Politico, and its head is a guy called Matthias Dopfner. And I'm going to just point out a couple of quotes. So he appeared at Arc, interviewed by Freddie Sayers, a couple of days before, which I thought was conspicuous, given my hit piece, came out a couple of days. days after, but there you go. And he said that he wants to turn the publication into a non-neutral activist outlet for, quote, an open society, which is the term invented by Karl Popper in the aftermath of Second World War, which basically makes like national preference or the nuclear family impossible because that is closed society, and that's why George Soros called it the Open Society Foundation. And he says he wants a zero tolerance for anti-Semitism. Now, again,

I've got Jewish friends. I don't think people should be arbitrarily cruel to them. But what he means by anti-Semitism is making the outlet's number one priority, the defense of Israel, and he went to the World Jewish Congress, it was last year, and said, quote, I am a Goyan a Zionist. That's pretty weird, because the word for non-Jews in the Bible is Gentile. That's the non-derogatory term. He used the derogatory term about himself, and he said his number one mission in life, despite not being Jewish himself, he's Germans, he's probably got a bit of complex about it, is to tackle anti-Semitism. So what's being used here in this article is a very liberal definition of anti-Semitism, you know, conflating me with Steve, who did say to Andrew,

you know, I want to deport you to Israel. It's not my position. They're trying to use that to ban censor, de-platform and debank various figures on the right, creating a perverse precedent that will then cause lots of people to lose their livelihood and be unable to speak about certain issues like immigration, because also the chief issues that they listed in the article, were tweets of mine saying, we shouldn't have any more third world migration, we shouldn't have any immigration from India after the Henry Novak case. So what they're trying to do is censor de-platform and take away the livelihoods of people

that don't agree with their very narrow band of globalist liberal politics and for whom Israel is not their number one priority. And I just think it's reprehensible and the Telegraph is going to lose all credibility if it keeps doing this. And Connor, it was interesting this week too to see The Canary,

that hard-left organisation, The Canary, debanked by Lloyds. And as Carl Behn's, Carl Benjamin pointed out about this. First, they debanked Tommy Robinson and the canary said nothing because it's a vile communist shit-heel organization. Then they debanked Nigel Farage and the canary said nothing because it's a vile communist shit-heel organization. Then they debanked the canary and there was nobody willing to speak out because it's a vile communist shit-heel organization.

And Katie Hopkins also made a point on this, writing, Dear Canary, there is no pleasure in watching cowards devanked, but standing with those who risk everything for freedom is far higher ground. God bless the Canadian truckers, we will not forget you. And look at a couple of these pieces, you know, from the Canary. Cancel culture is a myth, they said Connor. So look, I want to be very clear. I think it is absolutely disgusting. that Lloyd's has debanked the Canary. But this is why everyone, everyone should be saying,

buy me a coffee, hold firm, do not cancel these guys. Just like I really hope everyone says to Spotify, don't cancel Tommy Robinson's podcast because of a pathetic hit piece by a little woke, weasily left-wing journalist from the Metro this week. But we know the leftists never speak out for us, Connor ever. They are always leading the charge. Yeah, that's because, Dan, that their principle is power. And so they don't have universal principles. Instead, they just do whatever benefits their side and punishes ours. It's what Herbert Marqueuse called repressive tolerance. You tolerate things to your left and you are intolerant to things to the right. And that actually comes from a modification of the previously mentioned Karl Popper of Open Society's fame, Maxim, which is

we can tolerate everything except non-toleration. And so if you are intolerant, you are intolerant, of being tolerant, then you're the only thing they can't tolerate, which is why they relentlessly call to censor, debank, and even in the case of Charlie Kirk or Donald Trump, assassinate you. And so I'm not going to be crying any tears over the Canary. I think it's, again, not a good precedent, but they were cheerleading for that precedent. And so, if they found themselves on the horns of that dilemma,

perhaps they should reassess their priors on how they got there. And also, again, I must confer with Carl's characterization of the Canary, because they were publishing pieces by Hope Not Hate Contributors, including Harry Shuckman, who decided to try and ruin people's lives by posing with a fake passport and making them the subject of Guardian and hope not hate hit pieces, and a terrible documentary that I'd rather have gouged my eyes out than watch. But hey-ho, you know, it's part of the job, isn't it?

Well, come on, buy him a coffee. Buy Connor Tomlinson a coffee while you still can, but actually probably the best thing to do is subscribe to Tomlinson talks on Substack, I would argue. I mean, YouTube's great too, but the great thing with Substack, Connor, is they are very much focused on free speech So it's probably the best way to support you. But I really hope buy me a coffee do the right thing.

And I'm not going to lie, this just made me just despair, actually, about the state of the Daily Telegraph. But Connor, so good to have you here. Have a brilliant weekend. Thank you very much. And, of course, before we go today, we are going to reveal the worst of Britain in the world this week. This is where your union jackasses from across the week get put up to go head to head. On Monday, it was the Home Secretary Shibana MacMood, Tuesday. the war criminal, Alistair Campbell, Wednesday, the man-hater-in-chief, Jess Phillips,

and Thursday, the rape gang leader now released Shabir Ahmed. Wrong-199 went for Shabana MacMood because she is the one bringing them in and protecting them. We know who you're talking about. And 6040, said Alastair Campbell for as long as I have life in my body. And Paul Kingsbury agreed, actually, he said out of the four, it's Campbell, every day of the week, he should be in prison for crimes against the British nation. Sandra Harris, though, said Jess Phillips, betrayed all public trust. However, there was an overwhelming consensus this week, William Smiler, saying she's born, born in

Pakistan, and doesn't speak English and doesn't have a UK passport. So, and Sean Steed saying police set Shabir Ahmed go free nine times before they finally charged him. And how he's been allowed out well before his 19-year sentence has been served. And there you have the UK. trafficking, rape, torture gang situation encapsulated. Okay, we've had over 40,000 votes today. Let me get to the results. In fourth position with 5% of the vote, Alistair Campbell. In third position with 6% of the vote, Jess Phillips,

the runner-up with 22% of the vote, Shabana MacMood. But the worst Britain in the world this week, with an overwhelming 67% of your vote, is the Rochdale Rape Gang leader Shabir Ahmed We're heading over to Substack now and teaming up with royal YouTube sensation

Lauren the insider You can join us there at www.w. outspoken. But I hope you have a brilliant weekend If you're in the United Kingdom Enjoy the Sun. I will be back with you 5pm UK time live on Monday

That's Midday Eastern, 9am Pacific A couple of things to do before you go. Please hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Turn on the notification bell so that you're alerted to our new episodes. And you can also subscribe to us as a podcast, totally free on Spotify, where we're available on video, Apple Podcasts, or actually wherever you get your podcast. Do it for me, if you can. I'd really appreciate it. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.