Dan Wootton Outspoken - NIGEL FARAGE OUTRAGE AS PM KEIR STARMER HIDING BIG SECRET GIVES UP UK'S CHAGOS ISLANDS

Episode Date: October 4, 2024

Now scandal hit Starmer – the failed Prime Minister with a big secret the MSM is hiding – is selling off and selling out the UK. His Labour leader’s dodgy deal to give up the Chagos Islands is a “strategic disaster” for the UK, Nigel Farage has raged. But in his Digest, Dan reveals how it will foreshadow the end of the UK as we know it, if Starmer continues on this woke path. Then his special guest James Glancy weighs in on the Uncancelled Interview. PLUS: Humiliation for Ian Hislop, who wasn’t actually shot at in a black cab, and Laura Kuenssberg, who won’t actually get to interview Boris Johnson AND: The sedate to vaccinate scandal with freedom fighting lawyer Stephen Jackson To watch the exclusive Uncancelled After Show for 30-minutes extra content EVERY weekday, sign up at: https://outspoken.live/premium Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It's Truck Month at GMC! Tackle the open road with added confidence in a 2025 Sierra 1500 Pro Graphite at 0% financing for up to 72 months. With an available 5.3 liter V8 engine, 20 inch high gloss black painted aluminum wheels, off road suspension with available 2 inch factory installed lift kit, plus a towing capacity of up to 13,200 pounds, You'll be ready for anything this truck month. Truck month is on now. Ask your GMC dealer for details.

So you're hosting the family barbecue this week, but everyone knows your brother is the grill guy, and it's highly likely he'll be backseat barbecuing all night. So be it. Impress even the toughest of critics with freshly prepared Canadian barbecue favorites from Sobeys. No bias, no censorship, no spin either. I'm Dan Wooten. This is Outspoken Live episode number 65. Please click to subscribe to this brand new independent news source. Turn on the notification

bell, then you'll be alerted to our brand new live shows, uncancelled interviews, and special royal episodes. Big news too this week, Outspoken now available as a podcast. You can listen to the show every weekday on the go wherever you are by subscribing on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcasts. I've put the links in the show notes below this video. Today, the scandal hit PM. With a big secret the MSM is hiding, is selling out the UK. The Labour leader's dodgy deal to give up the Chagos Islands is a strategic disaster, Nigel Farage has raged. But snivel servants are on the attack on the British bashing corporation, accusing the Tory leadership front runners of using this utter betrayal of the UK to score political points. That the negotiators who've been working on this are the same civil

servants all the way through. It's because they are criticising it because they want to try and score points in their desperate attempt to win the leadership. That the negotiators. In my Digest Next, I reveal how the Chagos surrender will foreshadow the end of the UK as we know it if Starmer continues on this woke war path. Then my special guest James Glancy weighs in during the uncancelled interview. Also coming up on the show today, humiliation for Ian Hislop, who wasn't actually shot at in a black cab, and Laura Koonsberg, who won't actually get to interview Boris Johnson. Plus, the sedate-to-vaccinate scandal with freedom-fighting lawyer Stephen Jackson. Then in the uncancelled after show,

Why Have the Beckhams Chosen William and Catherine Over Harry and Meghan? We'll have insight from royal YouTube sensation P. Dina Register right now to watch at www.outspoken.live. That is our safe space free of censorship your support uh i only ask for five pounds a month but it will give you 30 minutes of extra content every single weekday and allow me to keep doing this let's go it won't take long to tell you Neutral's ingredients. Vodka, soda, natural flavors.

So, what should we talk about? No sugar added. Neutral. Refreshingly simple. He really hates this country, doesn't he? Within three months, Starmer has proven to the world he has no belief in Britain remaining a force for good around the globe. Davos over Westminster, remember, they were his words. Today's complete capitulation over the Chagos Islands is indicative of the woke mind virus that now runs through the UK's government and snivel service and the unintended

consequences of letting this sort of man be in power. Although disturbingly today, Number 10 is just relieved that the outrage is over a policy decision, rather than Starmer's increasingly futile bid to cover up the big secrets haunting his troubled personal life. Nigel Farage, who should be Prime Minister, raged at Starmer, giving up the Chagos Islands is a strategic disaster. Our American allies will be furious and Beijing delighted. Labour are making the world a more dangerous place. And I agree. Seeding sovereignty to Mauritius while paying them for the privilege is nuts.

And of course, it's down to woke pressure that we just must surrender the UK's last colony in Africa. Well, you know what that means is next, right? You know it. Demands for reparations that would destroy our economy forever. And for once, the three Tory leadership frontrunners were united. Robert Jenrick fumed, it's taken three months for Starmer to surrender Britain's strategic interests. This is a dangerous capitulation that will hand our territory to an ally of Beijing. James Cleverley ranted, weak, weak, weak. Labour lied to get into office, said they'd be whiter than white, said they wouldn't put up taxes, said they'd stand up

to the EU, said they'd be patriotic. All lies. And Kemi Badenoch scolded, two days after Israel is attacked directly by Iran, Labour have put our vital base in the Indian Ocean at risk. Anyone who has been paying attention to the geopolitical climate will understand the strategic necessity of these islands. Labour has either not been paying attention or doesn't care. Either way, this decision weakens UK influence across the world. But of course, Labour man Jonathan Powell, the special envoy for British Indian Ocean Territory negotiations,

was backing his snivel service cronies on the British Bashing Corporation this afternoon. The Conservative former minister, Robert Jenrick, says it's taken three months for Starmer to surrender Britain's strategic interests. His rival for the leadership of the Conservative Party, James Cleverley, posted on social media, weak, weak, weak. They said they'd stand up to the EU, said they'd be patriotic, all lies. Similarly, another rival, Tom Tugendhat, has described it as shameful. How do you respond to that?

Well, I do think these comments from the Tory leadership candidates are a bit silly. I mean, James Cleverley was leading these negotiations not that many months ago with the Mauritian government. The reason the British government started negotiating with the Mauritians was because of the law cases. We lost a law case in the ICJ and then we lost another one in the Law of the Sea Tribunal. And legal advice was clear that we were not going to be able to sustain our position. So that previous government started a negotiation. What this government has done is been able to conclude it because that government managed to lose the trust of the Mauritian government during the process. So for the people who were involved in that

negotiation to start criticising the outcome, something they couldn't achieve, is absolutely ludicrous. But perhaps it was because they didn't want this form of deal that's been struck. No, it's not because of that. The negotiators who've been working on this are the same civil servants all the way through. It's because they are criticising it,

because they want to try and score points in their desperate attempt to win the leadership. The Conservatives... As if they are. We are trying to protect our United Kingdom and making a decision like this over British sovereignty when Parliament isn't even sitting to debate it is quite frankly revoltingly anti-democratic. And former Northern Ireland First Minister Arlene Foster agreed, writing on X, this has been disgracefully announced when Parliament is not sitting. Those of us who care about the British Overseas Territories, all of them, will be pursuing this appalling lack of accountability. And former Home Secretary Swala Braverman targeted Britain's idiotic Foreign Secretary Looney Lammy, as I call him, posting,

This is a shameful decision. Starmer's reckless capitulation over the Jagos Islands severely undermines UK national security. We all knew Lammy was weak, but now it's official. He's China's useless idiot too. A dark day for our country's sovereignty. Meanwhile, Starmer's government is already collapsing under the weight of its own sleaze, despite claiming they were going to clean the whole damn thing up. Remember those days? Downing Street, triggered by my reports on how the MSM has been covering up Starmer's big secret about the shape of his family and state of his marriage,

with this bombshell revelation from Guido Forks boss Paul Staines on yesterday's outspoken raising the temperature. Or are you under pressure legally not to reveal more? Well you know we've both been in the game a long time you know the rules if you can't stand it up completely you can't run the story so we have a name as do the mail and the telegraph we have a birth certificate and people have been looking into it people being con journalists have uh contacted the family so it's in play and a lot of people do know it lord ali is under investigation starmer is returning six,000 of so-called donations.

And now we learn Angela Rayner's little trip to the Ibiza disco to let her hair down wasn't as innocent as she tried to make out on Sly News. I take my job really seriously and what I do and I work and I'm always in Parliament and I'm always doing what needs to be done and I'll continue to do that. But I also believe as a former trade unionist... What time of the night was this? I mean, how did you keep... I would have been in bed by that time. Oh, Fisher's a really, really great guy.

I've known Fisher for a number of years and I just think, you know, you've got to have downtime. Everybody has to have downtime. But I do take my job really seriously and I like to talk about what I'm doing to help other people. I'm not criticising you. I just wondered what you thought about the opera. At times people like to look at that element or, you know,

yes, I'm working class. I like dance. I like dance music. I got criticised for going to the opera. Oh, isn't she just so innocent? Guess what? Rainer accepted £836 worth of hospitality with a US company paying for that one night in the disco booth,

according to Dame Andrea Jenkins. Can you believe that? Hashtag Labour freeloading andrea says now a real working class hero nadine doris was furious she wrote this line from reina annoys me so much as she took nearly 1 000 pounds worth of freebies she gives working class people a bad name and nadine is right of course there is nothing working class about being a complete and utter champagne socialist freeloader. Meanwhile, the left are now all of a sudden deciding that prime ministers shouldn't be forced out by media hysteria, despite

doing exactly that to both Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. News is the same thing that's happening here. And ultimately, I think it's this idea that we just keep flipping prime ministers and getting people out, which hamstrung the Tories and looks like it could end up hamstringing Labour. And it's a very depressing way of attempting to do politics. Do you think it will end up like that, Rebecca?

Do you think this could literally lead to Sir Keir Starmer having to step down at some point in the next six to 12 months? I hope not. But then Boris Johnson stepped down over basically having a bit of cake. Like this is ridiculous. People seem to think that because they're a bit cross about something that someone has done, they can like derail the progress of the country. And whether you like them or not, this turbulence is disastrous. The same person in charge for more than two years would be a real improvement for whoever the person is at this point so i think people have got this idea that everything has

to be fair and everything has to be and that if they don't like something they can just sort of cancel them in the same way that you wouldn't influence her but you can't just unfollow the prime minister or block the prime minister and i think not liking it doesn't necessarily mean that's wrong. Sorry, Rebecca Reid, you sanctimonious fool. It's too late for that. Your side set the rules. And let me tell you, Labour is hiding more secrets than the BBC's paedophiles safe. And now it's time for today's uncancelled interview. And it is absolutely wonderful to be joined for the first time on Outspoken Today by a brilliant guest who appeared on my former show, the filmmaker, conservationist and former

Royal Marine James Glancy. He recently directed his first feature film, Afghanistan, about the collapse of the country in 2021. It premiered at the Docks Island Festival in 2023, so last year. But it will be available to you later this month on Substack. And James Glancy, great to have you here. Goodness me, James, we're just giving up the Chagos Islands without even a debate. Can you believe it i i can't believe he's done this right before um

with parliament not sitting i mean it just seems like an act of cowardice secondly they didn't put it in their manifesto that they were going to do this they knew it was going to be an issue and so they kind of slept So they snuck this in. But, you know, there is an issue here about what would be the best way of governing these types of territories. Is it handing it over to Mauritius or is it keeping it as a British protectorate or British overseas territory?

I'm going to give you an example which is going to blow the minds of the sort of left-wing government that we have in who talks about being environmentalist about their green about their green credentials. So Mauritius, if you look at the if you look at the waters, the lagoons and the coral reefs, over 50 percent of it is badly damaged. They overfish their waters. They're involved in shark finning. Mauritius is probably one of the worst examples of looking after marine life. We are handing back the world's largest marine protected area to Mauritius. So we created Britain, made the Chagos Islands a marine protected area.

It's one of the largest. Oh, no, we just seem to have we just seem to have lost james glancy we will come back to him hopefully very shortly but my view on this decision of course is that it's indicative of what is going to happen much much more with labor and it's a very slippery slope, you know, because think of the people who were putting the pressure on over this. It's the same people who want us, James.

We just lost you there for a moment. I was just saying, James, the people who have put the pressure on over this decision are the same people who want us to start paying reparations, something that would bankrupt us forever. But did you get my piece there?

I mean, this is beneficial to the Chinese, but they will start fishing those waters heavily. So it's just ironic how Labour goes on about being a sort of Green Party. They're not. This is a disaster for the environment. This is a strategic disaster for Britain. Okay, we get to keep Diego Garcia, the military base there. But ultimately, Mauritius is going to have far more control over that. And Mauritius has trade agreements with China. So this plays massively to the Chinese. I think

fundamentally, it's un-British, it's unpatriotic of the Labour government. And it really, it's sickening to show how bad they've been in three months and to think that we've got five more years of this Labour government. But James, can we just be honest about this? They have no pride in the United Kingdom. Lamy was the same person that compared Brexiteers to the Nazis.

In fact, he said Brexiteers were worse than the Nazis. He's now our foreign secretary. Keir Starmer is the prime minister who said he preferred Davos to Westminster. And isn't this the dangerous, sorry, isn't this the danger when you get dangerous globalists in charge of your country? They do not believe in borders. They do not believe in sovereignty. And people might think this is dramatic, but they do not believe in borders they do not believe in sovereignty and people might think this is dramatic but they do not believe in the united kingdom well when labor came to power in 1997 they outsourced a lot of our decision making to foreign bodies whether that was the european union um whether that was the international Criminal Court, which incidentally the USA didn't join.

And they are allowing a decision made by the ICJ, which I believe was in 2019 or just a few years ago, which was non-binding. So we don't have to follow this, which is part, ICJ is part of the UN, which we know isn't impartial anymore, which is heavily leaned upon by China and a number of nations, a non-binding ruling. And they've implemented it. It's absolutely disgraceful. But Labour, you know, Labour have formed for giving away power to other institutions, taking away power from Parliament, from the elected, the elected members in Parliament and giving it away. And I really fear this is what Keir is going to

be doing, giving power away from Britain and undermining Britain's strength and security. Totally. So look, the big question that I've been speaking about this week, James Glancy, and I know you're just back from Conservative Party conference, I wonder if people are talking about it there. Does Keir Starmer's personal life matter? Is it our business? Should we be concerned about the shape of his family? Should we be concerned if he was using Lord Ali's apartment because of troubles in his marriage? Is there a public interest in this?

Where do you stand? Well, I can tell you I did it every day at the conference. I went to a variety of talks. Lord Ali came up more than any other name. Lord Ali's name came up more than Thatcher. He was the butt of the goats. I think the irony is, first of all, my thoughts at the conference is that there's an overwhelming sense of relief to be out of government, because I think the whole thing, the whole thing had the party become ungovernable, unmanageable. And there's a there was a sense of sort of confidence that they can rebuild.

And everybody is just delighted at how badly Labour are doing. I mean, they seem to be worse than anything that the Conservatives managed when in government. Does it matter of Keir Starmer? I think, look, he started off the first three, first three to five days of his um uh of his leadership as prime minister I thought he looked quite presidential he looked he looked the part and that has literally all fallen apart so yes he has been brought up a lot at the conference but I think no one can believe the hypocrisy of these people how they they've come in say talking about their working class roots,

talking about a new type of government, how they're going to do things differently. And it turns out, unbelievably, they are worse than the Conservatives of the early 90s. The sleaze, the corruption is unbelievable. As for this latest story about his personal life, I think the Conservatives

should probably keep quiet on that one because Boris certainly had an interesting personal life. But I just, but it does play into the fact that Keir Starmer is fundamentally a totally untrustworthy individual and is completely unfit to be our prime minister. Yeah, I mean, the point that Guido Fork's boss boss Paul Staines was making to me yesterday, James, is that if Keir Starmer has been lying to his wife, doesn't that also mean he will lie to the country? And in fact, we have seen lots of evidence that he

lied during the election campaign. I mean, that's a difficult one to say because you know what Westminster's like with affairs. It's a pretty common thing. But does he lie? Is he dishonest? I mean, there is absolutely no doubt this is a dishonest man. But I think what's more frightening is the lack of transparency in the Labour manifesto telling us what they plan to do in government. And that's either because they didn't know, or they've had plans

to do things to Britain that they want to do, but they couldn't face telling the electorate. And that, to me, is the most terrifying aspect of having over four years of a Labour government with a massive majority, with someone that we know we can't trust, that is already surrounded by scandal and is already giving up British interests. I think you are absolutely right, James, to talk about the issue of hypocrisy, because to me, that's what this is all about. And I'll be very clear again, I think I should emphasise it. I actually don't give a damn who Keir Starmer was sleeping with. I don't give a damn if politicians have love childs. That is not of interest to me.

But I do care about hypocrisy and I do care about lies. And the problem is, James, we had these sanctimonious shadow ministers for years describing boris johnson as disgusting because of his personal life going for boris's marriage targeting his wife so i believe they have changed the tenor of politics in this country because to say now like rebecca re, the left wing hardliner, said on GB News today, which I played in my judge yesterday, wasn't it terrible that we got rid of so many prime ministers? And don't we now all of a sudden have to support Keir Starmer even if he does really bad things? I'm sorry, no. No, we don't. You change the rules. You change the game. We are playing by your rules now yeah i mean the the the the the problem

let's just go to this one with angela reyna i think she was unfairly criticized for being an ibiza um having fun doing what people in their personal lives politicians need we need normal people i think it's great to see out there. I love going to Ibiza. I love clubbing. I don't pretend to be working class. She is whatever she is. But at the same time, not many working class get freebies paid for by international organizations to go to Ibiza.

She was probably on a very nice table in a VIP location worth hundreds of pounds, clearly. That isn't what working class people do. So I think the scandal here is the fact that she's taken a freebie and then she's claiming, oh, but I've got working class roots. That's why I like to dance. It's just they are so unstraight. If you're going to go to Ibiza, pay for it. If you want a nice suit and you've had a very well paid job, as Keir Starmer has all his life, pay for it. If you want a nice suit and you've had a very well paid job as Keir Starmer has all his life, pay for it. You don't need your glasses paid for. And that is the rank hypocrisy of people that call themselves working class, say they represent the interests of the worker. They absolutely do not. Well, I just have a little message to Angela Rayner today, James. You ain't working class anymore, honey, if you're taking an £856 freebie to be on an Ibiza nightclub stage.

You're not working class. Stop the act. You're an out-and-out champagne socialist. And what I thought was particularly despicable is she covered up the fact that she had received that for free during all of those interviews where it was woe is me. And the problem is, James, they always go back to identity politics, don't they? So anytime Angela Rayner is criticized for anything, it's because she's working class. Anytime Rachel Thieves is criticized for anything, it's because she's a woman. Anytime David Lammy is criticised for anything, it's because he's black. I'm sick of the identity politics. I really am.

It's one of the most grotesque things to take over Britain. One of my historic heroes is Martin Luther King. And I think he said one of the most important quotes in history that people should be judged on the content, the personality, not the color of their skin. And that has been all thrown away. Everything he's fought for has been thrown away by woke race and identity politics. It is absolutely disgusting. I think, I think what is fair is fair though,

on the sort of Keir Starmer's expenses and freebies scandal is I do think the prime minister of either party should be allowed to attend a box at sporting events. And the reason I say this, you can't have the prime minister in the stands. But I think what's the quantity of freebies is accepted. He's number one in the Commons. It's unbelievable. Look, the thing is, again, to me, it's just the fact that he was constantly attacking the Conservative Party when they were in government for cronyism and for being too close and for being captured.

And let's be honest, that is exactly what this guy is. That is exactly what he is all about. And I think the great thing is, is that it's been exposed so quickly. We see what they like. We see what they're really all about. But look, there's going to be a strong opposition soon because we have Nigel Farage, who I think is doing absolutely brilliant things. I'm interested in your take on him shortly. But first, you have just been at the Conservative conference where there has been this big row breaking out between one of the frontrunners, Robert Jenrick, and the Reform UK leader.

So here's Robert Jenrick's pitch from conference. The country needs a leader. Instead, with Starmer, we've got an undertaker. And what about the cabinet? What about our new cabinet? Well, Rachel Reeves. As wooden as Pinocchio. And only barely more honest.

And then we've got Ed Miliband. Whoever tells you the grown-ups are back in charge, look at Ed Miliband. A Wallace missing his grommet. And then, and then, there's David Lally, our foreign secretary, living proof that there is a more annoying LBC presenter than James O'Brien. Oh, I see. I love this, James. I love this. This is what we need. I'm not in the cleverly camp of, oh, let's go back to being the adults in the room and we've got to fight from the center. No, this is what I want. I think this is where the conservatives can have some success against Reform UK. But Nigel, by the way, has written a new article in the Daily Telegraph. This is what he said. Reform is here to stay.

The Tories had their chance and they blew it. All talk of whether a future deal between me and the Conservatives can be done is irrelevant. It's not even on my agenda. I simply don't trust them. So before I get to the Conservative leadership contest specifically, would you support Nigel Farage as Prime Minister? So Nigel Farage is a friend of mine. He's done a huge, huge service to this country, I believe, in fighting to get our democracy back, our independence back.

You know, this is one of the things that the Labour government gave away with all the acts that came through since Maastricht, all the treaties, that's what I was looking for, Treaty of Lisbon, Treaty of Amsterdam, giving away our sovereignty to the EU. And he's been one of the things, it's almost solely down to him that we've regained our sovereignty.

So I am tremendously supportive of him. And as you know, as a Brexit party MEP, and I served alongside him. So he is a good friend. My concern about having two parties on the right is that splitting the vote, as we saw, has allowed, in the last election, Labour and Lib Dems to gain huge numbers of seats at the expense of good members of Parliament.

Andrew Jenkins, Jacob Rees-Mogg, all of those fell victim to that split. So I'm not supportive of a split on the right. And I don't like to see the animosity breaking out between the Conservatives and reform. Now, I completely understand Nigel Farage's point of just the extent to which the Conservatives wrote manifesto pledges, especially on immigration, which is absolutely disgraceful. But there needs to be conciliation. And I think, look, talk of any deals right now, it's too early. absolutely disgraceful. But there needs to be conciliation.

And I think, look, talk of any deals right now, it's too early. We're in 2024. The next election is not going to be before 2028. But ruling them out now is a mistake by Reform and Farage and it would be a mistake by the Conservative Party. I am a patriot. I served in the British military. I love this country.

And whatever happens, we have to get Labour and Lib Dems, because there could be a Labour-Lib Dem coalition in the future. We have to keep them away. We have to contain them to a four to five year government and never let them back in or keep them out of power for as long as possible. So I'm in favour of any way that the right can get them out of power and get back into power. And that's what I will be saying to Nigel. And it's what I say to the Conservative Party. Don't rule anything out yet. It's too early to do that. Let's fight to reunite.

Let's hold the government account and let's fight to unite the right. I understand that. I do. Okay. Who are you backing then to be Conservative Party leader? Yeah. So look, I am really, really impressed by the Robert Jenrick campaign. You know, I've studied everybody. I'm particularly close friends.

I'm close friends of Tom Tugendhat. I served with him as a soldier in Afghanistan. He's a friend of mine. He asked me to do some work with him. But if I strip this back, friendships aside from a political point of view, I'm very impressed by the generic campaign because he has clearly understood the problem that he had in government

and he recognises the solutions that need to come forward. And what really appealed to me is this concept of a great reform act. I've always said that we need a 1997 commission. We need to look at every single act, every single treaty, every single piece of power that was given away from Parliament

by the Labour government. And we need to look at either repealing it or finding a way of returning sovereignty to Parliament. And that goes right the way up to the Equality Act, which has created a lot of this diversity, DEI problems, that business is over-regulation. And this, as you talked about earlier, devices identity politics. We need to get rid of so much damage done by the Labour government. Robert Jenrick is the one

talking about a great reform act, leaving the ECHR, leaving the Human Rights Act, which is preventing us controlling our borders. You know, he's talking about really difficult questions that most people are shying away from. He's talking about next to net zero immigration or into the low tens of thousands. He's the first person talking about deportations of people that want to do us harm, that are people that are here illegally. These are things that people have been concerned to be afraid to speak about. And it's legitimate to look out to have borders.

It's legitimate to deport people that are here illegally. And he's unafraid to talk about these issues. And I think that's really going to appeal to reform voters. And I think it's going to appeal to a lot of people in the Conservative Party, the Conservative voters that stayed at home or felt let down by the state of immigration in this country. No, I think that's a good call. If I was voting for it, I would be

voting for Jenrick too. And I think the media totally misunderstands the Tory membership. Lots of talk that Bader Nox is going to walk it if she gets down to the final two or that Cleverley has a chance. I would stake my reputation and maybe that's a dangerous thing on saying that whether it's generic versus baden or generally

generic versus cleverly generic wins and becomes the leader of the opposition i think it's down to i think it's going to be down to those two i I mean, I know Cleverley had a good conference. He was very funny, genuinely funny in his speech. And I loved it. I love this joke about being in the territorial army and then being, he thought he was about to be deployed overseas and he got deployed to Luton, of which someone pointed out that Luton is probably more dangerous than Iraq now because so many people have been imported.

Yeah, sad but true it is yeah so but I think you know I was looking I've looked I I have done this I've taken a non-emotional look at this and looked at you know generic's policy that he really genuinely is talking about a much smaller estate lower taxes all conservatives all proper back to basics conservatism which has been completely lost uh on from the last few conservative governments one thing i did know i was looking at the back of jeremy hunt's head and all the cat all the candidates were talking about how disgraceful um the rising corporation tax was and i just i could he just sort of sat there sat there in silence as a yeah exactly and i'm sorry that's why people aren't that interested in this race

that's why i think reform uk with five mps only has the momentum but fascinating insight on it all the same now breaking right now absolute humiliation for private eye editor in his and you know what's so beautiful about this in Ian Hislop is one of those guys who hides behind his publication to pillory and destroy reputations on the right for the most sometimes innocent innocuous acts. Well, did you see this Guardian headline earlier in the week? They were absolutely mortified because Ian Hislop, the great Ian Hislop, editor of Private Eye, had been subjected to some sort of assassination attempt outside his office while in a black cab in London. Whoopsie-daisy. There was no gunshot.

There was no assassin. There was simply a mechanical fault. Cue to mortifying statements that hislop has released via private eye the first in his lot wishes to thank everyone for their concern which is greatly appreciated he can confirm there was an incident in a taxi yesterday in which a rear window shattered and the police were investigating they were initially looking into the possibility of a shot having been fired but have now indicated that there may be another more innocent explanation for what happened their most recent press release is below and the police said that they continue to investigate this incident however now second

statement final statement we're told from his lot the police investigating the incident and the taxi have now advised me that they have completed their forensic tests have found no evidence for firearm discharge and will be concentrating their investigations on indications that a mechanical fault caused the window to shatter don't think we need the police investigating that and you know what i think this says a lot about the arrogance of ian his lot that he's in a taxi, the back window shatters and he immediately thinks, they're trying to shoot me. You're

not that important, mate. I disagree. I think London has become so dangerous with gun and knife crime that it's completely legitimate to think you're being shot at, whoever you are. I do feel I genuinely don't like i don't

like going into london with my young family no no i agree with that because i just wonder whether i'm going to have to get in the way of someone wielding a knife um so i i yes but the the clear look i totally agree in terms of the safety of london i mean i've actually been mugged twice in london right but the point about this is that he's sitting in a black cab and the implication because it was outside the private eye offices right so this wasn't this this wasn't he thought he thought it was a charlie yeah the implication was that this was not a uh that this was not a coincidence and i'm sorry to mock the guy but you know what that's what he does to everyone else including in times of great horror i'll say about his love it's a bit like peter

oborn and back in the day they were sort of journalistic heroes of mine i used to love um uh what's the show not in the nine o'clock news what's it um have i got news for you say say again have i got news for you have i got news for you when Say again? Have I got news for you? Have I got news for you? When Angus Deaton hosted it, you know, they pilloried everybody. But he is definitely

one of those journalists that has just veered off into the left. I mean, Peter Oberon is completely gone. It's crazy. But, you know, they were,

you know, the real standout journalists of their time some time ago. Perhaps not anymore. No, Private Eye is no longer a credible news source. It's no longer a credible news source. They publish lie after lie, week after week.

And it is a great shame. Then there's been another humiliation for a member of the mainstream media elite, Laura Koonsberg, due to be interviewing Boris Johnson tonight on the BBC. If we are to believe her version of events, rather than send her production team her notes preparing for the show, she instead sent them direct to the former Prime Minister. This is what she had to say.

While prepping to interview Boris Johnson tomorrow, by mistake I sent our briefing notes to him and a message meant for my team. That obviously means it's not right for the interview to go ahead. It's very frustrating and there's no point pretending it's anything other than embarrassing and disappointing, as there are plenty of important questions to be asked. But red faces aside, honesty is always the best policy. See you on Sunday. Now look, don't call me a conspiracy theorist like the new statesman decided to do this week, James. But is there a bit of a rat here?

Do you smell a rat? Because I've done a lot of interviews, right? I've never sent my notes to the politician that I'm about to be interviewing. And what it makes me think, again, this is is just a theory i'll put that out there but what it makes me think because you know on whatsapp if you're messaging someone you search for their name i reckon she was having two conversations going on one with boris johnson and one with her production team you know i think she comes across well she's one of those um journalists that's right stuck in the middle with the left hater and the right hater.

And I think it's hard. You know, we know the BBC has its views and it definitely dips left or centre. But I think she's one of the good ones, to be honest. I think it's an honest mistake. mistake but i you know i look look back at boris johnson you know great campaigner but i find it hard to um hard to forgive the fact that he opened this door open the doors of this country to mass migration and i know he's promoting his book now he's going to try and get unleashed but yeah yeah well what he unleashed oh yeah i'm so i'm so torn on boris he haven't held him to account. He's got away with it, Scott. But don't you think that's because, James, he did some incredible things? I mean, I totally agree with you that Nigel Farage is the Brexit hero

and with him, we would never have had the referendum in the first place. Absolutely, I give him credit for that. Likewise, if he hadn't stood aside in the 2019 general election. At the same time, we would have had Theresa May's Brexit deal if it wasn't for Boris Johnson as Prime Minister. So I think he did a lot of good things, but I think he was

captured by the woke left on a lot of others, especially as well on nut zero, on immigration. Yeah, I mean, immigration is the big one because it's one of the hardest things, the harder things to reverse, you know, when so many people come you know so quickly is that it's damaging our society and we can see that but look um you know on boris nigel farrell himself will say that he it was absolutely crucial to the referendum victor that he came along and he's he is a fantastic campaigner he is just a real natural natural uh communicator of people's person but you know in government okay look covid was probably one of the most challenging things to deal with and i'm glad i wasn't in government having to deal with that but ultimately um so many manifesto commitments

were reneged on or completely torn up um so i'll be very interested to see what his book has to say and he's the ultimate spinner but we should never get away from the fact that you know under him the Conservatives have handed and it was him that you know it's his fault that we've got into this position then we had disastrous leaders that the Conservatives have handed a lead a massive majority to the Labour government and now as we were talking about earlier in the show, we've given up the Chagos Islands. You know, the responsibility has to come back to Boris.

You gave away a historic, historic landslide. And now we're facing five years of Labour disaster. I do want to read his book, though. I really do. I think it's going to be a hoot. Do you know what? So I have my phone here just so i can chat to my team and see any breaking news and that sort of thing i am not kidding you so you know i literally just said a minute ago uh the new statesman go to hell because you described me as a conspiracy theory

this week not kidding this moment an email from the new statesman pops into my account dan was in an invitation from the editor of the new statesman nope he can go to hell uh what's the implication i've got no idea i've literally just deleted it i just can't believe that no they wrote a horrible piece i spoke at the together declaration third anniversary event uh must have been a week ago now they're an incredible organization and this was just a revolting nasty hit piece trying to describe people who are anti-lockdown anti-ulay's question nuts arrows conspiracy theorists the laziest type of journalism the new statesman will die just like the rest of the mainstream media is dying and actually on that note i'm

desperate to talk to you about your new film afghanistan because obviously the well the concept is really interesting in terms of what the film is we'll talk about that in one moment what's particularly interesting to me as someone who is on substack and has really embraced this free speech platform you're actually going to be releasing the movie direct via substack later this month is that right yeah so i mean I love that what's clearly Substack has reinvented journalism yes journalism has because it's allowed people to go direct to the consumer and if you want more of that that writer and the way they where they operate you can subscribe to it it's essentially a different version of YouTube now Substack is now

experimenting with video content. And you'll see and I don't agree by the way, with this chap, Mehdi Hassan on many issues, but he's launched CTO. And it's had huge numbers of views and some of the documentaries that they have put on the platform. So essentially, it's direct to the consumer, if you want to watch this, this film that they've they've released, you can you can watch it on substack and substack helps promote it so you know what we're seeing at the moment is a big realignment of the broadcasting industry the numbers the viewership on the likes of itv mainstream media bbc is it's a catastrophe catastrophe for them they can't get the um they can't get the um advertising revenue anymore and people are turned off by broadcasters who have what is essentially a very

woke ideology. And they, they, they, they design films in a certain way. You have to have diversity quotas and all these other rules and regulations and how you make it. Now,

filmmakers have the opportunity to make a film and the way you want it put onto sub stack. And if people enjoy it, I think it's great. I think it's really great because look at this week all of westminster is talking about starman's secret i'm one of the only journalists in the country alongside isabel oakshaw paul stains from guido forks and mike graham on talk we're probably the only journalists in the countries who actually believe that our readers and our viewers have a right to know what all of those folk in Westminster are talking about.

But tell me about the film itself, because is it about the withdrawal? Well, it wasn't. What happened was, you know, I served in Afghanistan. I did three tours. It's because you were a special Marine, right? I was a Royal Marine. Royal Marine, yes. And special boat services. I was in the Royal Marine. Royal Marine, yes. And special boat services?

No, I was in the Royal Marines. Royal Marines, okay. People speculated stuff. I was an officer in the Royal Marines. And so I did all three tours as a combat operator, combat commander, fighting on all three of them. In Afghanistan? Yeah, exactly.

And, you know, lost men. And I, when I, about, exactly. And, you know, lost men. And I, when I, about five or six years later, as I started to grow up as a civilian, because I'd been in the military since 18 years old. So my entire identity was based around being a military, being Royal Marine. And I started to question Afghanistan, British and American foreign policy,

and the good that we had done when I was in the military. So I decided to go back to Afghanistan with a very small film crew, travel around the country, and I start asking the Afghans, is life better or worse than before 2001, which is when 9-11 happened, and Britain, America invaded Afghanistan and got rid of the Taliban. So we were traveling around living with the people, eating their food, wearing their clothing and enjoying their hospitality. Whilst I was there, Biden announced the withdrawal of all US troops by September 11th, 2021. So our film completely changed from being what's life like in Afghanistan after 20 years of war to watching hell unfold as people desperately tried to get away as the Taliban took over. So we were we are the last filmmakers to document life of free free Afghanistan

of what life was like before the Taliban came back. No one else was among was out there filming the lives of people that went skiing with young women who were able to ski a mountain bike went cycling in the mountains. We went out to the front line with the soldiers, went to the Panjshir with the old Northern Alliance, who were with the son of the great commander Massoud, Ahmad Shah Massoud. We witnessed real life in Afghanistan. And so if you want to understand what life was like in Afghanistan compared to what it's like now to the Taliban and see the horrible chain of events of people panicking to leave, we captured that.

And what is a historic documentary? Well, I cannot wait to watch it. James Glancy, I thank you so much for being here today. And Afghanistan released later this month via Substack. Thank you very much. Thank you so much. Standing by, I'm standing by because I'm going to talk in just one minute about this very, very shocking sedate to vaccinate scandal. The freedom fighting lawyer behind what's going on is here.

But first, every day, subtle changes occur in our bodies, often going unnoticed. It's called inflamma gene, a chronic low growth inflammation that deteriorates our health as we get older. And it is more than just a sign of aging. It's a key contributor to health issues like cardiovascular disease, dementia and depression, and physical decline. It continually weakens the body's resistance, turning minor infections into severe and impacting mental health and cognitive function. Now, flamogene significantly diminishes both quality of life and independence. Proper diet, exercise, and sleep can only get you so far. That's why I take CleanBean by Verso.

It contains ingredients targeted to fight off and help prevent flamogene. Research shows that these ingredients clean out damaged cells in the body that affect healthy cells, reduce inflammation, protect against oxidative stress, and improve conditions like cardiovascular diseases and neurological conditions. After taking Clean Bean for some time, on a personal level, I've noticed less joint pain, increased energy, better mood, and clearer skin. I can think better, I don't get as sick as I did before, and these are all benefits of reduced inflammation. Plus, Verso ensures transparency and quality by publishing third-party testing results for each batch they produce so you know you're getting exactly what you pay for. So, click the link in the description on YouTube or Rumble or head on over to

buy.ver.so and use the coupon code outUTSPOKEN at checkout to save 15% on your first order. We'll just repeat the address now, buy.ver.so forward slash OUTSPOKEN. Use the coupon code OUTSPOKEN for a big 15% off discount. The link is in the show notes. But now back to the show and it's time for today's outsider. And this is a real scandal that you're very unlikely to hear about in the mainstream media. Sedate to vaccinate. Now, this is in regards to Adam. He is a man in his 30s who has Down syndrome, moderate learning disabilities and autism. He lives in residential care and he's never been keen on medical treatments. Now the state, the British

state has been attempting to vaccinate him against COVID-19 since 2021. It has caused him great distress. Not only does he object, his mother objects as well. But due to his physical resistance, the court has now given the go-ahead to drug Adam, wait for it, via his food and drink in order to sedate him without his mum being present. This feels like such a scandal when it comes to bodily autonomy and as a result his mother has now launched a fundraising campaign. She writes, Adam's mother, I'm a mother fighting to protect my disabled son from forced medical treatments. Please help me ensure his his rights well-being and dignity are always respected in health care decisions now the man who is very much driving this case is the

freedom fighting lawyer stephen jackson you may know him on x as the account law or fiction and that account is where you can find details for Adam's fundraising campaign but it is also worth knowing that Stephen ran judicial review cases in the UK challenging the administration of COVID jabs to children, vaccine mandates for care workers and for the NHS more widely and also ran a case against masking of children in schools. So Stephen Jackson, great to have you on Outspoken. I had never even heard of the idea of sedate to vaccinate. Is it a new thing? Not exactly.

What's new is that to do this in such an extraordinary circumstance where it's just not needed. So the idea that the courts or that someone can interfere to ensure someone's best interests is not that extraordinary if someone is in dire and urgent danger. So if you have someone who has anaphylactic shock, for example, and momentarily or temporarily incapacitated, then you might think, right, they can't tell us what to do, but what they want to do. And even if they're saying, no, don't touch me, you might say, they really don't know their mind. We're quite clear of that. What they need is to have this injection as soon as possible. And the authorities might then go

ahead and do it. And we might all say fair enough and the individual after it might say thank heavens for not listening to me thanks for doing it but that's an urgent dire situation we're in 2020 2024 we're not during any emergency period of covid so declared by the government uh adam has had covid before that's can't prove it, of course, because he doesn't like any treatment, but he's had sniffs and all the symptoms of COVID, and everyone's had it. So that's the real problem with it. So in itself, it's not something which is necessarily never going to happen, but should it ever happen in relation to something as, I wouldn't say, well, trivial might be the right word, but where the risk is so small? That's the question. And by that I'm aware of any example where it's happened before.

Now, just to clarify, if you were a normal, for want of a better word, 30-year-old man in the UK would you would not be sedated to be vaccinated so is the argument that they can do this to him what because of his down syndrome is is that why if you were a normal 30 year old you would not even be offered one of these covid injections injections. Adam is declared to have a mental incapacity, so he can't understand COVID, he can't understand the risks involved, he can't understand the risks or benefits of the COVID injection. So that's the court's finding. He doesn't have mental capacity and therefore the court decides. But the interesting thing which people probably don't understand is that once you get to the age 18 if you don't have incapacity the court says well you're now an adult and we will offer you the dignity of the autonomy of decision making and you might scratch your head and think how is that possible when someone hasn't had capacity mental capacity since birth uh and autonomy has always been exercised by the family by the parents well there's this

strange routine which the courts have got into whereby effectively the court says well no the family has no right we will listen to the. We'll listen to the mother's wishes. Presumably. So if he'd been, sorry to interrupt, but if he'd been under 18, would the mother have been able to say no? Yes, potentially the parents would have the, we're looking at Gillick competence as such.

There are issues. But if under 18, without mental capacity, essentially the parents will have much more say. But come 18th birthday the family loses all rights the eminence people don't appreciate that but this is that's where we are and in say there was a an example in the did another case it's quite violently impressed upon me when the judge asked the barrister uh surely mr diamond um you wouldn't want your parents to decide the treatment for you and of course the answer would have been yes but in the judge's mind this is and to use his words that is regressive the idea that the family should be deciding for an adult once they reach or someone the offspring wants to reach 18. I mean it's it's quite surprising and by the way that barrister that

you've heard to Paul Diamond uh really brilliant brilliant guy who has uh always taken on these sorts of cases I I know him well and I think he also uh it was a similar case wasn't it where he was he was the barrister in that case now does Adam have any say in this court process have you spoken to him about it you know how does that work no in this

so to be fair to everyone involved including the lawyers for the authorities including the judges everyone is attempting to achieve what is best in Adam's best interests. That's a genuine concern. Whether we achieve that is another matter, but that's the objective. But as far as Adam's concerned, the decision is that he does not have capacity. What the court is obliged to do is to do its best to ascertain what Adam's wishes and feelings would be. The strange thing here is that Adam has made it quite plain what his wishes would be. He doesn't want medication. You show him a picture of a needle, he says no.

If you come close to him with it, then he'll physically object to it. That seems to be being overridden. But he's not without all capacity he's not without all intelligence he's got moderate learning disabilities he's a dance champion enjoys um hugging he likes people he's a he's physically well he enjoys playing the games he likes he goes to church with his mother and he prays so this is not um he's not say completely without ability to express himself but that is being ignored because it's determined in covid he does not have the ability to rationalize or to work out what the covid injection is for or whether he needs it and decision is taken away from him so in theory we listen to him he says no then the

court says actually we know better than you. And we know better than your mother. We take heed of what she says. But in reality, the court says, and the state says, who knows best? The government knows best. And we follow the guidance. So we're looking at NHS guidance through a green book. And that says, for Adam's cohort, people who are at risk, not major risk, but some risk, they are offered.

And therefore, the court says they will have the COVID injection. Absolutely fascinating. When does this get to Adam? Because I know the fundraising is effectively allowing the mum to be able to keep bringing this legal case, when does it get to court again? And you can see there are 4,500 raised so far and they need a few extra

Well I mean that's going to increase the status and I'm hoping that we can promote this and thank you for letting this, for airing this story Dan It's going to be significantly more than that, it's already cost the mother a fair amount of money in legal costs. And where we're at is that we're hoping in November there will be a hearing and we can air all these things.

And one of the issues we'll be airing is to say, and come back to what you asked, what about Adam's feelings? Well, if you can't tell him, if you can't express his personal feelings, we might ask, what do those who do have capacity say? So you might not believe this, but about 20 percent of the British population are defined as being at risk of Covid and are being offered the injectable this season, this autumn and winter. Well, if we go back last year, what happened? And the answer is 50% of doctors who were offered it said, no, thank you. 70% of health workers offered it said, no, thank you. And there's no exception in this local authority, which is insisting on pressing this. And in Adam's particular group, five out of six in his age group said, no, thank you, at risk, said, no, thank you.

So why is it? On what basis can they possibly say that Adam would be the outlier who would say, yes, please, I want this treatment. I want this experiment, even though this product is under trial until 2029. I want it, even though no one knows how long it might stay in my body and how long it might keep on producing spike. No one knows what the effect of multiple injections will be. No one knows what the effect will be on people like me who have Down syndrome and where there's particular concern

as to the ability for the body to react to this gene therapy, because that's what it is. So all these things don't seem to have been considered. And I'm hoping that in November, we might get the chance to actually raise these issues and really force the court to answer, why is it that Adam is being treated differently to the rest of us? Why is it that you can get into his mind and say

he would have it against his mother's wishes against all the other concerns which we might all have indeed we'll look already a big reaction from outspoken viewers about this harry sampson newton has written totally and un totally and utterly unforgivable this story makes me sick to my stomach we must continue to stand up for him and many others against this erosion of tyrannical freedoms and recover our libertarian instincts the meagre competency goes out the window dan i'm so glad you've covered this and of course if you do head to at law or fiction onyx that's where you'll be able to find the details of the campaign. And I will also post this interview

later on today and I'll provide the link there as well. But Stephen Jackson, freedom fighting lawyer. So good to have you on Outspoken. Thank you, Dan. See you soon. See you soon.

Now coming up next in the Uncancelled After Show, why have the Beckhams chosen William and Catherine over Harry and Meghan? We're going to have insight from the YouTube royal sensation P. Dina. And you know, it's very important to me that we have a safe space, not patrolled by big tech where censorship and control runs deep. So that's why I've launched www.outspoken.live. It is our membership section where you will get a half hour of extra content every single day.

So what we do at this stage is we come off YouTube and Rumble. We move to our own platform to continue the conversation in the uncanceled after show. All you have to do is sign up at www.outspoken.live. Do remember too, if you want to listen to us, if you want Outspoken on the go, you can now do so. We are a podcast. I'm so excited about this. Please do hit subscribe on spotify apple podcast or wherever you get your podcasts i've put the link in the show notes if you do i'd be really grateful if you rate and review because that's the way that we get the outspoken world out to a wider audience now a very special show tomorrow actually 5 p. p.m. UK time, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific. Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

She is one of the bravest women in the world. And she is going to be here with a very significant warning to the West. I know this is an interview you don't want to miss. It is the first time that I will get to speak to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, but I have followed her story for so many years. That is going to be a very exciting special edition of Outspoken on Friday. Hit subscribe right now on YouTube and Rumble. Turn on the notification bells and you'll be alerted to it. Most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you. See you on the after show in just one moment.