Dan Wootton Outspoken - NIGEL FARAGE & RUPERT LOWE FURY AS RACHEL FROM ACCOUNTS DESTROYS UK WITH EMERGENCY BUDGET

Episode Date: March 27, 2025

Go to https://surfshark.com/outspoken for an extra 4 months of Surfshark at an unbeatable price! BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Britain under Rachel from Accounts and doesn’t Slippery Starmer know it. Looking like a man who slept with Bonnie Blue while drunk on his stag do, the Prime Minister now realises he can’t disassociate himself. Regrets, he has a few. Labour is finished. But what about the country? In his Digest Dan says all the Labour liggers care about is their precious freebies while screwing the rest of us. Then analysis from Father Calvin Robinson. PLUS: The Reform UK civil war grows with Rupert Lowe’s team reporting the party to the police in the latest bombshell development. AND: Prince Harry is accused in a charity race scandal. The delusional Duke has finally met his match and it’s brilliant to see. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: The truth about Gwyneth Paltrow and Meghan Markle with Royal YouTube sensation P-Dina. Sign up to watch at www.outspoken.live. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When does fast grocery delivery through Instacart matter most? When your famous grainy mustard potato salad isn't so famous without the grainy mustard. When the barbecue's lit, but there's nothing to grill. When the in-laws decide that, actually, they will stay for dinner. Instacart has all your groceries covered this summer. So download the app and get delivery in as fast as 60 minutes. Plus enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees fees exclusions

and terms apply instacart groceries that over deliver no spin no bias no censorship i'm dan this is outspoken live episode number 191 breaking right now britain under rachel from accounts Rachel from Accounts and doesn't Slippery Starmer know it? Oh, my goodness. Regrets? He has a few. Labour is finished under this mess. But what about the country? Given this imbecile is now in charge of our money. If this was a budget, then it would be the leader of the opposition responding.

Now, I'm glad that she's still in her place. I know that she'll want to get back to her office for a lunchtime steak soon. But the right honourable gentleman, he talks about... They are taking the piss. No wonder Nigel Farage was damning in his response. Not 10 months in, they are making a complete and utter horlicks of the whole thing. Rachel from Accounts, as she was dubbed by Lee Anderson. But all the Labour Liggers care about is their precious freebies while screwing the rest of us.

Who was going to pay for the personal safari holiday that you asked to go on as part of the trip there was no personal safari holiday tom i went to i went to ethiopia i met the prime minister of ethiopia i did diplomatic conversations i went and visited some of the schemes that we had that was yes but she tried to take a private safari until the civil servants told her she couldn't. The lows and lows of the emergency budget in my digest next, then analysis from Father Calvin Robinson. Also coming up on the show today, the Reform UK civil war grows with Rupert Lowe's team reporting the party to the police in a new bombshell development. Prince Harry is accused in a charity racism scandal. The delusional duke, I think, has finally met his match. This is brilliant to see. I'll tell you all about it. And a disturbing look inside scheming Sturgeon's midlife crisis, be warned. It's not that pretty. Then in the uncancelled

after show on Substack, the truth about Gwyneth Paltrow and Meghan Markle with Royal YouTube sensation P. Diner. You can sign up to watch right now www.outspoken.live on Substack. Of course, you can vote right now for our union jackass, the nominees today. Rachel from Accounts, nominated by RealMcCass, who says the dreadful outlook for Britain's finances and she sounded like mindless automation. Starmer needs to get rid. Anna Island has nominated India Willoughby for saying it's an insane witch hunt. Trans women have never dominated any sport. JK Rowling has of course called out that lie today, saying 900 medals since October the 24th have been taken by males in women's sport categories.

And Kim Ledbetter, nominated by Amanda Hunter, and that is because she continues to campaign for this assisted dying bill, which clearly, clearly simply isn't ready. Get voting now. Let me know your comments throughout the show. We will also announce Greatest Britain at the end of today's action. But now, let's go. So I have stayed in the United Kingdom to fight. To fight despite a sustained attempt to first cancel me and second drive me out. And like so many others, at times when I see what this corrupt, socialist,

failed Labour government is doing, it is tempting to just flee. I won't. I won't. Don't worry about that. But look at these scenes. Now that, that, can you believe it, is Paddington. Paddington in central London, where I used to travel every night to present my GB News show. We are in deep trouble. And there's a reason that Slippery Starman looks so despondent today during his government's desperate emergency budget as its big spending tax hiking policies tank the economy. Look at his face. I actually think he looks like a man who slept with Bonnie Blue while drunk on his stagnant because he knows that Rachel from Accounts is destroying the British economy. He knows he's

attached to this woman forever and there's nothing he can do about it. Regrets? Slippery Starma sure has a few. Labour is finished. But under this ignoramus, breaking every fiscal policy for growth, I worry that the country could be finished too. Mr Speaker, this Labour government was elected to bring change to our country, to provide security for working people and to deliver a decade of national renewal. That work began in July and I am proud of what we have delivered in just nine months,

restoring stability to our public finances. Let me now set out the steps that the government has taken. a'n ariannu cyhoeddus. Rwyf nawr yn cyflawni'r camau y mae Llywodraeth wedi'u cymryd. Ar y cyllid, fe wnaethon ni ddiogelu pobl gwaith gan gadw ein hymddygiad i beidio â cynyddu eu cyfrifoedd o fynediad cyhoeddus, taxa cyflog neu BAT. Ar yr un tro, fe ddechreuom adeiladu ein gwasanaethau cyhoeddus, ar ôl bod y rhan gyda'r rhan At the same time, we began to rebuild our public services after the party opposite left a £22 billion black hole in our public services. Ours were the right choices, the right choices for stability and the right choices for renewal, funded by the decisions that we took on tax. Now, Starmer has chosen to surround himself with two incompetent women who care more about feathering their own pockets to live luxurious lives on our money than doing the job. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Reynard, she is an embarrassment. She keeps on going off to see the world using taxpayers' money,

most recently on a totally unnecessary jolly to Ethiopia, where she wanted to try and go on an African safari. Who was going to pay for the personal safari holiday that you asked to go on as part of the trip? There was no personal safari holiday, Tom. I went to Ethiopia. I met the Prime Minister of Ethiopia. I did diplomatic conversations.

I went and visited some of the schemes that we had that was humanitarian. My schedule was absolutely rampant, full of work that I was doing on behalf of the UK government. There was no safari. I was working and it's completely appropriate. Did you ask to go on one? The Times says that you did. No, we were working.

I was working that whole time. You didn't make a request to go on safari? It was never part of the programme. Sure it wasn't. Because you weren't allowed. But you asked because you are shameless. Meanwhile, Rachel from Accounts, while taking money away from all of us, refuses to stop accepting free theatre tickets and even corporate boxes

to go and see Sabrina Carpenter at London's O2 Arena. Many viewers will remember, and many viewers were very, very cross, when you had just moved into office, it emerged that the Prime Minister and other Labour politicians and you had accepted donations of clothes. In the last few days, it's also emerged that you accepted free tickets for a corporate box to see the singer Sabrina Carpenter at London's O2 Arena this month. Is that what happened? And if you did, why are free clothes a no-no, but free concert tickets is a yes, please?

I went with a member of my family to see a concert a couple of weeks ago. I do now have security, which means it's not as easy as it would have been in the past to just sit in a concert, although that would probably be a lot easier for everyone concerned. So, look, I took those tickets to go with a member of my family. I thought that was the right thing to do from a security perspective. Did you pay for them? Because you could pay for them. Well, these weren't tickets that you could pay for.

So there wasn't a price to those tickets. Obviously, I will declare the value of them, but they weren't tickets that you were able to buy. You are shameless, but you're not just shameless, you are also incompetent, Rachel from Accounts. So incompetent that at the end of her dire spring statement, she actually issued a threat which was designed to stop any criticism. And I say to the parties opposite, the British people will be watching.

Because if the parties opposite don't support these reforms, let us be clear about what that means. They are opposing economic growth. They are opposing more homes for families. They are opposing good jobs across our country. We on this side are clear about whose side we are on. The parties opposite must decide too. Absolutely desperate. It didn't work. It didn't work. Indeed, Rachel from Accounts was roasted by Shadow Chancellor Malstride. I was impressed by this, I have to say, because he's hardly been a dynamic performer at the best of times. This emergency budget, Mr Speaker,

has brought the Right Honourable Lady to a cold, hard reckoning. She has become very fond recently to talk about the world having changed. Well, indeed it has, Mr Speaker. This country was growing at the fastest rate in the G7 only about a year ago. And just as the OECD and the Bank of England and other forecasters and now we learn today, the OBR have stated. Growth has been halved in this year, cut in two as a consequence of the decisions and the choices that the Right Honourable Lady made on her watch. We've gone from incompetence Mr. Speaker to chaos.

There have been more changes in this policy than there were at the last minute to the profile of the Right Honourable Lady on LinkedIn. The result is the worst of all worlds. And when he really went for it, really went for it, accusing Rachel from accounts, quite correctly, of fiddling the government's target, the deep state, immediately sprung into action. Yes, the Speaker, the Speaker of the House, who has just commissioned a £51,000 portrait of himself, stepped in to save her.

And it's not the truth that whilst the Right Honourable Lady said at the last Budget that that was a once in a Parliament reset, she rolled the dice on a wafer-thin margin and she lost, reckless with her fingers crossed. She fiddled the targets and she missed them. I'm not sure about the language we use. I think there are better words and more constructive words the Shadow Chancellor would prefer to use. Can I just point out, thank you, Mr. Mayor, can I just point out that all of her fiscal headroom disappeared,

not just some of it. I mean, that was quite a performance. And you know, I will always give credit where credit is due. And he had a lot of source material, but good on him. Now, after such an important performance, can you believe that all Rachel from accounts could offer in return was a shit joke about steak. OK, well, I know that the Chancellor hasn't been in this role, Sarah Chancellor hasn't been in this role for very long, but I mean, this is not misquoting Shakespeare today.

If this was a budget, then it would be the leader of the opposition responding. Now, I'm glad that with that woman in charge. Even the hard left know it. No matter how much the MSN protect their friends in government. Aaron Bastani, not a man I ever agree with. But the sentiments here are correct. He posted, this is the Navarra media boss, he posted, Serious question.

How does the country's liberal intelligentsia and much of the legacy media recover credibility with the public after droning on for years about how Reeves and Starmer are competent. I've never seen politicians burn through their own brand so quickly. The real opposition, as ever, has come from Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader who lambasted Rachel from accounts. Not 10 months in, they are making a complete and utter horlicks of the whole thing. Rachel from Accounts, as she was dubbed by Lee Anderson, will get up tomorrow and give the spring statement, and we all know that over the course of this summer,

there'll be very large numbers of people working in hospitality, and indeed in retail, who will lose their jobs. We know that we're getting poorer. Gross domestic product per capita has fallen for six of the last eight courses. And all of this goes on as mass migration reaches levels never seen before in the history of our country. And we learn that the last 3 million people that came in from outside Europe under a Conservative government, of the last 3 million, only 22% are working and we're paying for the rest and it's making us poorer, it's madness and

only we have got the courage and the guts to stand up and call it out and to say we're not against anybody. We're a non-sectarian, non-racist party. But the population explosion has devalued the quality of life of everybody in this country. And we, if we win the next general election, will end this in its tracks. Be clear. There was also strong opposition from the newly independent Rupert Lowe, who is a new flag bearer of the right. He posted after the disastrous emergency budget, as someone who passionately wants Britain to succeed, I am sad to say that Reeves is simply not up to the job. I have deep fears about the economy over the next year or so. Radical, fundamental and decisive changes needed the time for half measures has finished. But how much worse can things get before Slippery Starmer finally takes action. To respond now, Father Calvin Robinson.

Father Calvin, what an absolute disaster this lot are. Funny, isn't it? They've spent the last 10 to 15 years commenting on how corrupt the Conservative Party is and how they're just in it for themselves. They're there with their mates, their lobbyists, making a buck off the UK taxpayer. The Labour Party, exactly the same.

All about what they can get for themselves, abusing the power that they've been put into to represent the British constituents for their own personal gain. It's a great shame, but it seems the entire establishment is selfish at the moment. We need to drain the swamp, as they say out here in America. I'm not sure entirely how we do that when even the opposition are offering the same problem as the incumbents. Indeed. Sorry, Calvin, we're just struggling a little bit to see you. We will try and sort that while we're doing that. Let me just tell you the

response from Dan Hodges, the columnist from the Mail on Sunday, who said, we're now getting clear signs of a negative reaction to Labour's welfare announcement. And given what we're expecting to hear tomorrow, I'd be very concerned if I was a Labour strategist about what's coming down the track. And the point is, Father Governor, there you are. There you are. So good to see you. The point is, this is also going to completely divide the left as well. Well, I hope so, because the right have been constantly divided. We can't seem to get our act together. Back when my common sense crusade was on our old platform, I had UKIP, the SDP, Reclaim, Reform, and Heritage and all these centre-right parties together to say, can you unite? Can you combine the right of British politics needs one entity to vote for to get rid of Labour and the Conservatives? Unfortunately for the last few years Labour has seemed to be more united than ever and even when they've got the far left extremists with Jeremy Corbyn, which is their equivalent of Bernie Sanders and all the way to the

centrists and the bearites Somehow the left is always know where to vote and who to vote for, whereas we on the right don't have that. It would be lovely to see some unity in British politics, on the right of British politics. But the Conservatives have been Conservative for a long, long time.

Reform were coming up over the last few months, but they've managed to implode themselves with unforced errors. And so now we have, of course, we do have UKIP, we still do have the SDP and Heritage and a number of other smaller parties, but we don't have a big Goliath, we don't have a big David to take on the Goliath, rather. No, I know. And there's a lot of talk about whether the Conservative Party are taking the right approach. I mean, I thought Mal Stride did a good job today. But there's a lot of

criticism about this post, Kelvin. And the Conservatives posted earlier today, breaking, we got added to Rachel Reeves' emergency budget WhatsApp chat. And then when you go through the WhatsApp chat, it's Rachel Reeves saying, right, you lot, this is getting serious. The tax rises I promised not to do when we won have completely destroyed UK growth. This stuff is so much more difficult than it looks on TV. Any big ideas? And the big ideas include Angela Rayner saying, anyone seen my vape? Then Darren Jones from the Treasury says, we've already taxed cold grannies, farmers, family businesses, even hospitals looking after dying kids.

What's next? And Rachel Reeves says, OMG, these figures are shocking, guys. Public are going to know we screwed them over. Really nervous now. And I don't know, Calvin, is that working? Is it really working?

That cannot be real. That cannot be the people that are in charge of governing our country. For goodness sake, we don't know what we're doing. We lied. We broke the trust of the British politics. Where's my vape? Oh my goodness, we are done. We are so cooked. I don't see a way out of this, Dan. I really don't. It's like even if we manage to get the Labour Party out, the rubbish Conservative Party is going to be in and they're just the same. No one wants to fix the economy. We had all those years of austerity measures, which brought down the interest rates of our national debt. And then what did we do with Covid? We found that magic money tree that the Conservatives were saying that Labour were all

about. And the Conservative Party splashed out so much money over the woe flu that we didn't need to, that the country's in a much, much worse state than it was to begin with. And now Labour are in, who always make the tank the economy, they make things a lot worse. I don't know how we fix it. I suppose one solution might be to stop obsessing over the GDP. It seems that every government, every successive government for the last at least five decades has been obsessed with the GDP. And this is one of the reasons we have such mass numbers of migration, because they're trying to set balance these books rather than looking at how to create a successful company where people feel productive and can contribute and people care. How do we form patriots and people that love their homeland

and want to see it become a better place rather than how do we balance the sheet and make the money look good on paper, which is what they're essentially doing. Of course, it's doomed to fail if that's the objective. Breaking right now, the Reform UK civil war is getting even more dirty than yesterday, and that is quite something. Let me take you through the new developments, which include absolutely furious responses from Rupert Lowe's team, who have now reported Reform UK itself to the police. Now, you know, usually I would say, do not waste police time on this type of thing. The slight issue here is that it was Zia Youssef and the Reform UK chairman, Zia Youssef, who actually started this tit for tat by reporting Rupert Lowe to the police for hurty words in the first place.

And there's an investigation going on to that regard. So here's what Rupert Lowe revealed on X. He said, and this is in regards to the release of the Casey's report yesterday into the so-called bullying and toxic environment in his parliamentary and constituency office. Rupert Lowe wrote, I've just spoken to parliamentary authorities about the disgraceful harassment and intimidation of my innocent staff through this reform report. Their names and the report were released without the KC's permission today. My staff have also spoken to the police tonight, having been invited to express their understandable worries. Reports have been made. Parliamentary security are concerned and are now involved with my staff. None of this is acceptable. Dragging my staff into this mess to smear my name is desperate and disgusting. In 67 years,

I have never seen such unprofessional and vile behaviour. Now, the KC, Jacqueline Perry, I have done my own reporting on this over the past 24 hours, and I can confirm that she was not giving her permission to Reform UK for the report to be published. And what's so worrying about that is it means she didn't have the opportunity to speak to Rupert or Rupert's staff, who have been named publicly, which is why they have gone to the police, potentially claiming malicious communications and harassment. Now, there are consequences to this. I have learned today that one of Rupert Lowe's staff is so devastated by being named publicly that they have now had to take a leave of absence because of stress. So all of this is getting incredibly messy, incredibly dirty, and I think we do have to realise there are human beings involved in all of this. Nigel Farage, however, he just wants to move on and he's decided to focus his fight back

on the protesters yesterday at the reform rally by saying that it means that there is a real worrying decline in the country's education. Reaction from Father Calvin Robinson in just a moment. But first, this is what Nigel had to say. The National Education Union are going to tell people at school, don't vote for reform. It's dangerous. They're a mad, bad, far right, racist party. This is left wing indoctrination of young people coming from, frankly, people who hate this country and everything it's all about. TikTokers, if you're at school and being told this nonsense by your teachers,

and by the way, I meet you in the street every week and you tell me that, object. Don't be difficult, don't be awkward, but object. And make sure you back reform every inch of the way because we're the only people that will stand up for you and stand up for this country. to hell with left-wing teachers quite good messaging but as carl benjamin of the lotus eaters retweeted that video saying the replies are just faraj getting roasted because the problem is father calvin robinson look, I admit there is a real split on the right over this issue.

There's a split even within the outspoken audience, Father Calvin. There are people who say I shouldn't speak about it at all, that I should do some sort of GB News style cover up and just pretend everything is fine and dandy and that Rupert Lowe hasn't been reported to the police. And let's just pretend as if Rupert Lowe has disappeared off the face of the earth. I can't do that, honestly, as an independent journalist. But there are likewise the other side who say, we'll never trust Nigel Farage again. Good. We've come to the conclusion that I came to working with the man.

I will never trust him. I don't think he's trustworthy. I think he's centred on himself. He has no care for the country other than what he can get out of it, unfortunately. As with most politicians, we know this. People have been saying for years, they're all the same as each other. But yet somehow they put Nigel Farage on a pedestal. I think it's because we're looking for an alternative. We're looking for someone to help us. And he was the rising star for a number of years, but he has proven himself to be disloyal to his party members. I mean, not even his party members.

There are no members. There are subscribers who pay into the Ponzi scheme, the pyramid scheme. There is no membership. People have been saying, we're cancelling our membership. Reform haven't cancelled it. There is no membership to cancel other than your direct debit that you pay in to Mohammed and Farage. So, you know, make of that what you will. But his statement there was right. His statement was good in that, yes, the lefty teachers are indoctrinating our children. They have been for a long time. It's the reason I'm a commentator, because I started out from talking about this as a teacher, seeing how much left wing indoctrination goes on in the classrooms. And it's every day, in every school across the country, pretty much.

And my advice to parents at this moment is homeschool, home educate. You are responsible for your children and their education, not the state. And the state seems to want to take ownership and indoctrinate them with values that go against most British people's values. But we've reached a point in the UK, at least, where people think that actually the school is a childcare service and we're supposed to hand kids over so they can go to work and get things done not the case and over here in America thankfully most conservatives and most Christians are now

coming to the realization that if there isn't a parochial school then they need to home educate their children because it's the only way that their children can be guaranteed a good solid education that doesn't undermine them their country and their way of life. Anyway, Barrage's point was good on that in that yes, the lefty teachers are doing this. And he was right that they will call him far right and all these words. The problem is he isn't. It would be nice if he was on the right of British politics. He's moved gradually further and further to the left under the patronage of his backer, Mohammed, it seems. And it's all just so petty. This, we filed a court case, we filed a report,

we filed, like, stop it. Grow up, be men, stop falling down to this petty playground politics of we're reporting you, we're reporting you back, we're going to leak your names. It's sad. Is this really what we've come to on the right of British politics,

where we can't even have five people in a party without them losing their heads? Well, indeed, and I agree with that. Again, I guess all I would say in that case, and this is not, can I just be clear, me saying that I'm on a particular team. But all of this was started by Zia Youssef when he reported Rupert Lowe to the police for and released a statement designed to destroy him. Interesting. I was looking at this tweet earlier or this post on X earlier from Connor Tomlinson, our friend Calvin, and he agreed with a lot of what you were saying. This was his response to Farage.

And he said, this is very effective messaging, which shows that reform has real potential to reach young men who, like me, were sick of being patronised by progressive teachers. And he gives some advice about how reform can make the most of that potential, clarify and strengthen its policies, especially on immigration, but crucially, resolve this bitter dispute with Rupert Lowe. At the moment, Reform codes as the only anti-woke party which is tough on migration. Mistakes have been made. It is not an attack on the party to observe that. Reform now needs to live up to the space it occupies in the public consciousness to have credibility. There's still time to do that. But it doesn't seem like there is any, I guess, desire, shall I say, within Reform UK to settle things with Rupert Lowe. I want to show you Alex Wilson, who is their only

London Assembly member, breaking his silence after the release of the report on GB News yesterday. I've approached this with an open mind. I've now read the report and I've seen his conduct since the investigation was launched. My mind is now very much made up. This vindicates the party, it vindicates Nigel, it vindicates Zia, it vindicates Lee. But you say he chose not to.

Yes, he said last Thursday, I won't cooperate, but the KC had given him until tomorrow to reply and the reformers put this report out today. He's very clearly said he wasn't going to reply. He'd been given until tomorrow to reply. Perhaps, but he very clearly made it very, very obvious in his comments, and he's been conducting this through the platform of social media, which doesn't help anyone to go tit for tat on Twitter.

Maybe, but surely it also doesn't help anyone to release a report before you've heard from both sides of the argument, Father Galvin. It doesn't. And this is the problem. It's been a quite clear smear campaign against Rupert Lowe since the beginning, since Mohammed made it public

that he was unhappy with Rupert Lowe. And Farage took his side, kicked him out, and they made it very clear they don't want him back in, regardless of what he does or says next. That's sad, because people are pinning their hopes on reform. Conor Tomlinson is the best of British. He is right. Absolutely. This is what they need to do. They need to fix this situation. It is redeemable. They have another few years before the election. People can and will forget about what's happening now if reform take the right

approach. But I don't think they're capable of doing so because the two people involved are so rigid on this. Mohammed Ziauddin Yusuf is so ardent that he doesn't like Rupert Lowe. He's going to do whatever he can to keep Rupert out of the party. Nigel Farage is so, he will do anything to back Mohammed because he wants his money. He wants the support, the financial support that Mohammed brings to reform. And so as long as those two people are against Rupert, there's no way for Rupert to get back into the party. And the problem is the vast majority of reform supporters or sponsors, if you like, would have preferred Rupert Lowe as the leader of reform, which might have something to do with why all this drama is going on. Well, of course it is. Of course it is.

But Father Calvin, I'm just looking at our live chat right now on YouTube, and Paul Dyess has said, Dan, you are so biased against Nigel. Shame on you. Now, Father Calvin, I'm sure you totally disagree with that because you probably have been telling me for quite some time, Dan, go harder on Nigel Farage. Go harder on Nigel Farage.

I actually think I've been completely fair on Nigel and I don't have a bad personal relationship with him at all. Not at all. This is the problem with our politics. Everyone is so polarised. You cannot even criticise reform or Nigel Farage, otherwise you're against him. It's like, actually, you've been one of the biggest supporters of reform. You've been saying consistently since day one that Nigel Farage could become the next prime minister of the United Kingdom. You and I have many debates on this where I've said I don't think it's likely and I don't particularly want to see him become the next prime minister. And so people like Paul, they're upset that you're picking faults in what is quite clearly a faulty party, a faulty leadership system. But if they want it to get better, if they want it to win, these faults have to be fixed, not plastered over, not ignored. We can't have blinkers on and have blind faith in Nigel Farage as the supreme messiah of reform. That would be a mistake.

That would be silly. And so people need to find the nuance. People need to grow up and stop pretending it's black versus white and you're either on our side of reform or you're against the country and stuff like that. It's a nonsense. If you're on the side of the British people in the British country, then you want the best person to lead the opposition party so that you have the best chance of taking over from the two party system. It's as simple as that. Indeed. And the thing is, Father Kelvin, as you know, I've always described myself as a critical friend of reform. I think the problem is they don't want any criticism whatsoever, even from people who want them to do well. And look at this latest poll, Father Coven,

it does show that it looks like their support may have been dented by the Rupert Lowe situation. Certainly their momentum in terms of building the membership base, which had been flying, has been seriously harmed, thus stuck at around the 219,000 mark. And I'm told that over 10,000 people are trying to quit the party. So that matters. This is not some small issue. At the same time, as you know, I am very, very happy to say what I think Nigel is doing a great job. And one of the things that Nigel does so well is his retail campaigning out on the ground. And I loved this moment that was captured by the Daily Express of him visiting a closed down conservative club. Watch this. There we are. The club's closed. The party's closing down.

And we're going in! The Conservative Club is owned by my son. It finished as a club more than 12 months ago, and my son, who owns the dental practice, Main Street Dental, has bought it to convert it into his new dental practice. And how long was it the Conservative Club for, roughly? Don't be stupid. Yeah. Yeah, don't be stupid. As long as I can remember. Yay!

He's beaten us to it, because I was thinking of putting a bid in and making it the reform club. It's too late. It's too late. He won't be concerned. And honestly, Father Calvin, this is one of the things that annoys me most. Farage is an amazing campaigner. He is great with people. It's what he loves. He's off all of his media work for the next six weeks all around the world so that he can focus on campaigning.

Just imagine if he had harnessed the intellectual heft of a man like Rupert Lowe to do the policy work, to prepare for government, to become the shadow Home Secretary for reform. That's what needed to happen. It is exactly what needed to happen. He is a fantastic campaigner, always has been, but he has never, ever supported anyone that is more intelligent than him or has any other expertise that he doesn't have. He's not good at promoting other people. He can only promote himself and drag others down in order to make sure he shines the brightest. We saw this over not just UKIP and the Brexit party, but also over Vote Leave, over the referendum. It's

consistently been the case. I'm willing to be proven wrong if people in the comments can point me to an example where Farage has highlighted anyone over himself at any cost, at any time. It's just not a thing he's capable of. And you're right, if he could look at his own strengths and say, yeah, I'm good at campaigning, I'll be out on the street. Oh, sorry, Father Calvin, we just lost you. Finish your point, please. Oh, we've lost Father Calvin's microphone. So what we'll do is we'll try and sort that out while I move on to the next topic. So we'll try and get your sound back, Father Calvin. As you know, I promise you, you were not censored on this show. That was a true technical difficulty. I think your microphone has just died. Breaking right now, an extraordinary charity race row has developed with Prince Harry accused

by the boss of the Santa Bali Foundation. Now, this is absolutely fascinating because for so long, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have tried to weaponize the issue of race against others. But now Sophie Chandoka, a very wonderful woman who Meghan Markle hates, no doubt because she is beautiful and intelligent, is hitting back in the most brilliant way. Let me read her statement in response to Prince Harry. She says, there are people in this world who behave as though they are above the law and mistreat people and then play the victim card and use the very press they disdain to harm people who have the courage to challenge their conduct. Beneath all the victim

narrative and fiction that has been syndicated to the press is the story of a woman, me, who dared to blow the whistle about issues of poor governments, weak executive management, abuse of power, bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir, and the cover-up that ensued. Finally, finally, we have a serious and accomplished black woman saying to Prince Harry, I have had enough of your bullshit. And I need to give you a little bit of background because watch this video between Meghan and Sophie Chandoka. And it's actually worth listening to it with the sound as well. So we'll get that in just a moment. Let's just watch it from the start because it shows a fallout between these two women. So you can see there, Meghan Markle can't stand this woman, despite the fact that she claims to boost others. This is a real female founder with an incredible CV who she hates, no doubt,

because she didn't want her getting close to Prince Harry. And we saw there that she wasn't even prepared to let her stand next to her husband. I should just say two. And actually, I want to show you a post on X from Salty Duchess who said, looks like we've found the real royal races. Because I should just say that even though Prince Harry might be dating a mixed race woman, he has a real history when it comes to issues of racism. Harry the Nazi. Prince Harry called a fellow soldier his little P word friend. Harry told me you don't sound black, claims comic. And so this holier than thou approach from the duplicitous Duke, who has actually decided for some time to put his own financial gain ahead of his charity projects, has just come back to bite him. And Father Calvin Robinson, the thing is,

he's messed with the wrong woman when it comes to Sophie Chandoka. What do you make of this extraordinary row? Yeah, I'm not convinced it's all Prince Harry. I think a lot of this is Meghan Markle. We've seen various instances where she's very controlling. And that scene just played, for example, where she wouldn't let Sophia stand next to Prince Harry. We've seen that many times.

Whenever actually he's receiving an award, either Meghan Markle is trying to edge herself in to somehow claim the award, or she's edging other people out. There's a very controlling Machiavellian kind of attitude going on there that I think has a lot to do with this fallout. I don't know what goes on in the boardroom, but it seems that Meghan Markle clearly had a different view to the previous incumbent. Well, indeed, because as Harry's grey suit, who does some great work on pointed out, the woman that Markle is giving orders to in this video is Dr. Sophie Chandoka.

She is the whistleblower exposing Harry's Centre Bali charity of allegedly covering up abuse of power, bullying, harassment and misogyny. Big thank you to this brave woman and honestly father colvin when you look at this woman's cv it's the type of thing only megan markle could drink megan markle could only dream of i mean she is the executive chair and co-founder of nandy life sciences a u.s based company creation vehicle with a portfolio of companies that have collectively raised over $50 million since October 2023. She supports scientific founders in emerging biotech. She is a corporate finance attorney with a 20-year global executive career. She has held senior corporate roles and she has received numerous industry awards and been featured across a whole range of publications. Indeed, in 2021, Sophie was honoured by Harry's own grandmother, Her Majesty

the late Queen Elizabeth II, and awarded an MBE for extraordinary services to business. So who are we going to trust? That woman or Prince Harry, Thicco and Meghan Markle, who cannot even properly apply for a patent for a brand. So she has to change the name. I'm sorry. I trust this woman. It seems going by her record that Dr. Sophie is a philanthropist and genuinely out there to make a difference in the world. And it seems from what we've seen so far of the Markles, as I call them, that they are in it for their own ends. It seems that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry want to make a celebrity of themselves through this appearance of philanthropy. And they're all about making money and making more fame and fortune. And so it seems that when they see someone who's a competitor to themselves, they have to bring that person down. I don't think Dr. Sophie would see

herself as a competitor. I think she's out there for the good of the interests of the people that she's operating a charity for at any given time. And so there's a very different perspective, different worldview between the two parties here. Indeed. And you know, Father Calvin, that Prince Harry set the Santa Barley charity up in 2006, and he did so to pay tribute to his late mother, Princess Diana. Can I be very honest here? And some people might think this is harsh, but I refuse to hold back. Princess Diana would be ashamed by the conduct of Prince Harry, which is all about putting himself and his own needs over the charity causes that he once claimed to support. And the fact that he's been hijacked by Meghan Markle over this provides no excuse for it. At the end of the day, he hasn't focused on

Santa Barley at all. He has allowed this to spiral out of control because all of his focus has been on making money. And I found it fascinating that Graydon Carter, who is the former editor of Vanity Fair, in fact, you know, we just saw that amazing video of Princess Diana in the LBD, the little black dress. That dress, do you remember? She went out in public that night when her then estranged husband, Prince Charles, now King Charles, was admitting on national television that he had cheated on her with now Queen Camilla. And Diana knew that if she went out in that dress, she would steal all of the headlines and be on all of the front pages. Of course, that is what happened. And the man who she met that night was Graydon Carter, the then editor of Vanity Fair. So they were very close. They attended events together,

but they spoke personally as well. And Father Calvin, he has in recent days, because he's promoting a book, spoken out about the cover he did with Meghan Markle on Vanity Fair. It was the famous cover with the headline, Wild About Harry. And he said, Father Calvin, that she was just so withdrawn from all reality. She was just a mad woman who didn't even think she should have to say anything about Prince Harry, only wanted to talk about her non-existent philanthropy. But he then went on, Father Calvin, to say that Diana, who he knew very well, would be so despondent, so disappointed, and would have so much sorrow, great sorrow, about the fact that this woman had come between that very crucial relationship between her two sons, Prince William and Prince

Harry. It is a great shame. It's not just the siblings, is it? It's father and son as well. We know it was grandmother and grandson as well that Meghan came between. It's horrible to see a family break down in that way, especially when that family is the institution

that is the royal family that's supposed to be the ultimate family on the pedestal, really, of embodiment of what it means to be British. So it's incredibly sad that one self-centred American actress could get in between all of these people and break them down in that way. But again, it's career, it's ambitions. It's very telling that she was

trying to paint a picture of her own philanthropy and obsessing over herself when she was supposed to be having a cover about how wild she was about Prince Harry. I think wild was the appropriate word there, really. Santa Barley have released a statement this afternoon, and again, I think this is scathing of Prince Harry, even though it doesn't name him. It's headlined, Led by the Mission, and it reads,

It's the incredible teams on the ground, our staff and local partners who bring our mission to life every day, walking alongside the children and young people we serve. While trustees are key for governance and regulation and patrons, especially founders, are an honour to have, it's the people in the field who are advancing the work no matter what. Our commitment to supporting youth in Southern Africa with better health, stronger livelihoods, and climate resilience remains as strong as ever. The work continues because they deserve nothing less. And I'm sorry, Father Calvin, I think it's time for all charities who have an association with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to cut loose like Santa Bali has

done, because Harry and Meghan only care about their bank like Santa Barley has done because Harry and Meghan only care about their bank balance. I'm sorry, again, some people might say that's harsh, but I've reported on this story for so many years. Father Calvin, when they filed the charity accounts for Archewell, do you know how long Prince Harry and Meghan Markle revealed that they spend every week working for Archewell, their charity foundation, one hour. One hour a week. That's all they believe their charities are worth. And so actually, I believe that having an association with this couple is now toxic for these charities. You are better cutting loose. I am sorry to agree with you on that. It is a great shame because they could provide a lot by being patrons if they were actively involved.

I think that message you just displayed was scathing. It's like, wow, we on the ground, the ones doing the work, the founders and the patrons, if they're undermining our work, we don't need them, pretty much is what they're saying there. And it is true. It's nice to have patrons if they're supporting your cause and and working towards the same goals that you are but if they're not and it's about themselves then actually it's better to cut them loose and that seems to be what Santa Marley have done and it seems to be yeah absolutely what the other charities associated with uh Harry and Meghan should do really. The Sun have just released this report about the situation Father Calvin let's have a look. The boss of Prince Harry's charity has hit out with The Sun have just released this report about the situation.

Father Calvin, let pair have now revealed they are siding with the charity's trustees after they unanimously resigned following a row with board chair Sophie Chandoka. Dr Chandoka, a Zimbabwe-born lawyer, was selected to be chair of the trustees last year, but it is understood the trustees strongly disagreed with the decision and wanted her to step down, which has since seen her sue. The bitter feud appeared to be triggered by the move to transfer the charity's fundraising operation to Africa, which caused several key figures to quit the organization. In an explosive statement given to the Mail, Dr Chandalkar claimed there had been a cover-up at the charity. She alleged there was weak executive management, abuse of power, bullying, harassment, misogyny, and misogynoir. Misogynoir is the term used for describing discrimination against black Now, the thing is, Father Calvin,

if this charity is meant to be doing good for people in Africa, surely it should be based in Africa. If Harry really was woke, isn't that actually what he would want? It probably would be. That term, misogynonoir sounds quite woke. You're absolutely right. If they want to help people in Africa, of course the charity should be based in Africa.

I don't see a problem with that. But I'd like to know what was going on. I'd like to be a fly on the walls in those boardroom discussions. It seems like there's a lot going on there that we're not privy to. There seems a deep history of resentment building up on the two sides.

It does seem that certain parties may have been using this to build their own public platform, whereas other parties just want to get involved with the job at hand. But I suppose we'll never know what those conversations were. Well, I don't know. I reckon there's much more to come on this. I mean, Rebecca English, the Daily Mail's royal editor, who actually first travelled to Lesotho with Prince Harry in 2006. So she's followed the story. Her expose on this is headline, Sentebali was Harry's way to prove he was more than a playboy prince, as I saw when I visited with him.

But there were clues things weren't right. This will be a humiliating setback. And within her article, she reveals that Harry was actually more concerned when she was writing her piece about what people were saying about him. He actually came up and tapped her on her shoulder. And she said, sad but not entirely surprising, although he last visited Lesotho in October 2024, it was actually the first time the prince had been there in six years. And even his regular fundraising events for the charity, mostly involving polo, had notably slowed down. She's also reported that he had never taken his wife, Megan, to visit.

Instead, they have focused their efforts since quitting royal duties on high-profile joint tours to Colombia and Nigeria, as well as their lives as professional victims of the royal family. It's interesting, isn't it? Because it just feels like Harry almost got bored of this charity. Yeah, that's very sad.

I mean, these charities do very important work and they do need high profile patrons to help them in that work and raise awareness and raise funds uh to get the job done but if they're literally just obsessed with how it makes them look they're not going to have much help it's very sad that he's fallen to this narcissistic kind of approach to life i don't think it's how he was raised i don't think it's what he was like as a young man. It seems to be something he's kind of taken on board or been formed in or trained in since marrying that Z-list celebrity, unfortunately.

Well, of course, and Father Calvin, it's all about her. Brand new magazine cover, Stateside just released Us Weekly, a special report. Can Meghan ever win over the world? No matter what Meghan does, even making jams, she's met with intense public scrutiny. Experts and friends weigh in on why the Duchess remains one of the world's most polarizing figures. friend, her staff to speak to this article. They're trying to completely erase the public

perception of what Meghan used to be. What do you sense is the feeling states are? Because it feels to me, Father Calvin, like Americans have finally woken up to who she really is. I think it took them a while to catch up. They probably did think to begin with, oh, maybe the Brits were just a little bit harsh on her because she's an American. But actually, now they're in exactly the same place as we are here. But saying that, there was another big cover over the last couple of weeks. It was everywhere I looked. I think it was actually titled That Meghan Cover. I can't remember what magazine it was on now, but it was everywhere. So she's still getting a lot of attention out here a lot of profile but the response to the chum making was not positive

the most positive review i could find was it was shallow and and that pretty much encapsulates everything that megan markle does at the moment in this it's about controlling her i think that's why she'll she'll in answer to the question will can she ever win over everyone no she can't because she's obsessed with controlling that image obsessed with what other people think of her rather than the work that she's supposed to be doing and so we see through that quite a lot of people see through that and increasingly so in america that people see that she's she's hungry for success and fame and fortune and celebrity and to be liked i don't think that's an appropriate way to be liked, to be honest with you. She could be liked for the work that she does, if she does good work.

But she's not doing any work. It's all about reflecting her self-image. Who cares? It's weird. Father Calvin Robinson, do stand by because in just one minute, oh my goodness, Nicola Sturgeon, scheming Sturgeon, is having an almighty midlife crisis. She's dumped the hubby as he faces court and is now hanging out with a very, very famous lesbian. I will show you the pictures and reveal Nicola

Sturgeon's first public comments. It's quite something. So do stand by for that in just one minute. But first, the reason you're watching this show is that it's becoming increasingly difficult to trust mainstream media or the so-called fact checkers who claim to determine which facts are true. And there's good reason for that, given the debate over free speech, the controversy surrounding Brexit and how Trump and other politicians challenging the status quo are portrayed. But I have the solution for you. It is called Ground News, and it politicians challenging the status quo are portrayed. But I have the solution for you. It is called Ground News, and it is absolutely the best way to stay informed and cut through media bias and narratives so you can get the facts for yourself. Go to ground.news forward slash

outspoken to check it out. But what I want to do now is show you this incredible website and app. It's got an amazing app, which I have loaded on my phone, in action. So let's look at that speech quite recently by the US Vice President J.D. Vance to the Munich Security Conference. My God, it was amazing. He tore into European governments. He tore into the UK for a despicable retraction of free speech. And what Ground News does is instantly collate the 361 sources covering the story in one place. It then shows how that story is being covered, broken down by whether those media organisations lean to the left or the right. It is called the Bias Distribution Service. And if you scroll down, you can see every article about this topic broken down by the political

position and ownership of the publication. So in this case, quite clearly, Newsmax and GB News gave fair and accurate coverage, which you could read, focusing on how Vance finally had the guts to point out uncomfortable truths to European leaders. By stark contrast, absolutely dishonest coverage from the likes of the HuffPost and The Independent, which you could avoid. What's more, Ground News gets to know you personally, providing you with news stories you're interested in, while also analysing your own biases. So I'm going to tell you about my favourite feature. It is called the Blind Spot feed. And every day, it will surface upwards of 20 stories that you might not be hearing about because of the corruption of the mainstream media. Now look, I know because you're watching Outspoken, you love the news, but for very good

reason, you don't trust the legacy media. So Ground News gives you the tools to understand the truth about what is really going on. It's the only way I read the news now. It allows me to see through media bias and manipulative narratives without having to rely on the corrupt and captured MSM. So go to ground.news forward slash outspoken to check it out. I have an incredible discount at my link today, 40% off the Vantage plan, which is what I use for unlimited access. Ground News, I should say, is subscriber funded, supporting my sponsors, supports my work. And for less than a Netflix subscription, you can get all the world's news in one place and think for yourself. So this is a game changer for a news junkie like me. That's ground.news forward slash outspoken.

But now back to the show. Should we ever celebrate a woman having a midlife crisis, dumping her husband because he's facing a charge of embezzlement and running off with a very famous lesbian? Usually I'd say not. But when that woman is a politician as evil as scheming Sturgeon, perhaps I think differently. Take a look at Sturge, who certainly is not looking her best after everything that she has been through. Of course, the police are no longer investigating this woman. That was always predictable. She is letting her husband take the fall. So on stage with this lesbian comedian and author Val McDurd, I think her name is, I will check that, Sturgeon decided to tell

the crowd, we have to apologise in advance because this has come about because Val and me, when we have some red wine, which we occasionally do, yeah, I'm sure you do, Sturge. We make each other laugh and we think we're funny. Joe, my pal, Val's wife. Okay, Val has a wife. Just putting it out there, everyone. Val does have a wife, according to Sturgeon isn't so sure. So then she went on to say, so tonight is basically just a live experience. McDermid, sorry, that's Val's last name, also said Sturgeon's up and coming memoir would have been funnier if she had written it as it lacked jokes. But Sturgeon added, I am a politician. Boris Johnson is in it. You can take the girl out of politics, but you can't

take the politician out the girl. So when Val showed me what she was planning to say about certain events this week, I had to put my spin doctor hat on. She added, the last couple of years have been interesting. The last couple of weeks have been interesting. I wouldn't have got through the last few years without some very good pals, but also without so many of you, people I've met who come along to things like this and send me messages of support from the bottom of my heart. Thank you. Thank you for all the support. So this is Oddfather C. What do we think is going on with Scheming Sturgeon and her new best mate Val and their little comedy act? I don't know.

It's very strange. Well, I can tell you what it's not. It's not for better or for worse. She's not standing by the man that she said she would live with for the rest of her life and be insolently combined with when two become one. She's not sticking by her wording vows, is she? That's a great shame to see. I don't know what's going on with her and her new best friend, lesbian friend. Is she becoming a stand-up comedian now? Is this a new career path for Nicola Sturgeon? I mean, all of her policies were hilarious, but not in the way that I think she would acknowledge. But it is a good point, isn't it, Father Calvin? Like, how sort of grim is the fact that her husband was only of any use to her

when she was in politics? They ran the SNP with an iron fist. Do you remember that video of her saying, don't talk about the finances, just don't talk about the finances, just trust us. And they were a power couple and he was helpful to her. As soon as he was no longer helpful to her, he's dumped and she's off with her lesbian friends. Now that's fine. But do we really know the real Nicola Sturgeon? A lot of people, let's be honest, do cover up who they really are in order to get a head start in politics. Now, I think that's really unfortunate. I've obviously always been honest about who I am and maybe Sturgeon has too. But the timing does just feel very odd.

It almost seemed like her husband was her beard and she's covered up who she really is until she's no longer in politics, which shows her to be a fraud all along, if it's true. It would be a shame, but I mean, I wouldn't put it past her because I didn't trust her as far as I could throw her and I probably couldn't throw her very far. But all she did is destroy that country. Scotland is a great shell of what it used to be before she got into power. And I'm interested to know what's going to happen with her husband, because it does seem like if you are married and you're both the power couple and you're both running this party

and one of you is found guilty of embezzlement, how much did the other know? And of course you can't be compelled to testify against your spouse so perhaps we'll never know. But did she have some part to play in the fraudulent activities? Well, she obviously denies it. And she is releasing her book, her autobiography, Frankly. And what I think is quite intriguing, Father Calvin, is the fact that I guess she's saying, no, no, no, it was all down to Harvey.

Now, of course, he might be completely innocent, too. I should point out, because, you know, I'm always honest about these things, the contempt laws in Scotland make it virtually impossible to talk about a case, which means there was silence around these whole issues for two years. scheming Sturgeon the details about what she knew when, but again, she's able to hide behind the court case that her husband, Peter Murrell, is facing because, of course, he does deserve a fair trial. I mean, personally, I think that all of these contempt of court laws just have to go because what it means, Father Calvin, is that people are able to escape necessary scrutiny. Absolutely. It's used as a gagging order or a non-disclosure agreement. It's not really used to prevent any jury or judges

becoming biased against the case. And when a case is as high profile as this, it doesn't matter who's talking about it anyway because everyone is talking about it. And so you can't say, oh, we can't let people be persuaded by public conversations because the public conversations are going on. It's just we're not able to have them professionally as independent media or even on legacy media. So yes, you're right, we should get rid of the contempt of court cases, charges,

and especially when they're used to persecute and prosecute political prisoners like Tommy Robinson. Indeed. And Father Coven, she has only made one public statement since being cleared. I do want to show you it because I was advised earlier today that after a very thorough investigation of all of the evidence there will be no action taken against me. In other words I am completely in the clear and that is the outcome I would always have expected. As I have said to all of you many times I have done nothing wrong so I was confident of reaching at this point and getting to i chi i gyd ambell amser. Dwi wedi gwneud dim o wneud yn anghywir, felly roeddwn i'n ymddiriedol o ddod at y pwynt hwn a chael at y canlyniad hwn, ond yn amlwg mae'n ffurfio nawr cael hynny'n cael ei gyfathrebu. Ar gyfer gydol ddwy flwyddyn, mae gen i'r clwydr o ymchwil yn dal arnaf. Dwi'n credu na fyddai'n rhywun yn ei ddiddordeb i'r rhan o ddweud nad yw hynny wedi bod yn brofiad haws. Felly, i ddod at y pwynt hwn

heddiw, mae'n amlwg yn rhywbeth rwy'n ffurfio amdano. Rwyf wedi bod yn ceisio mynd i fyny â'r bywyd a anybody to hear me say that's not been an easy experience so to reach this point today is obviously something I am relieved about I've been trying to get on with my life and I now intend to do that oh we know you are Sturge we know you are I mean look I'm sorry just hearing her voice gives me hives it's like I've got steaming Sturgeon PTSD because I think back to those times when we were locked up in our homes, Father Calvin, and she constantly tried to create a fake border between England and Scotland, and she tried to blame English people for somehow bringing COVID to Scotland. I mean, this is an evil woman. And I know people just want to forget about her. I understand that. But I think she deserves scrutiny. I worry that her book will be a complete whitewash because she won't talk about the SNP finances because she'll be able to say, oh, well, there's

this ongoing court case. And then I worry that she'll only do soft interviews with her mates in the media like Lorraine Kelly, who never asks her a difficult question. And at some point, I want people like Nicola Sturgeon to face justice for what they did to us during COVID. Just put the SNP finances to one side. This woman has so much to answer for. She and those types of leaders are the reason that we are in so much trouble today. Absolutely. Nicola Sturgeon, Matthew Hancock, Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, We must never forget what these people did to us. And we must seek justice, not vengeance, but justice. But the only thing I took away from that video you just played is that after pushing all that net zero climate crisis agenda stuff for all these years,

she nearly fell to her death on the extension cable, plugging her electric car in outside of her house. The irony. Well, if that's the reason not to have an electric car, I don't know what is. Oh, Father Calvin, we've lost you. But I was about to say goodbye anyway. The technology is against us today. Thank you so much for your company.

Oh, there you are. I can hear you. I can't see you, but thank you, Father Calvin. Thank you, Dan. We will speak next week. Now, lots of comments coming in from you, of course, on Rachel Reeves and the emergency budget. Pom writes, anyone with a math A-level would have done a better job

than hair by Lego Reeves. I like that. The Lady Ryan, or the Lady Rin, sorry, 47, I love this, says, Dan, just a little correction. This is not a socialist government. It's a communist dictatorship. Yep. I love that, Lady Wren. I'm totally with you. I got it wrong. And that is the type of language I use. On the Reform UK Civil War, Jack says, so making a report on Rupert Lowe, an MP, especially within your own party, was that really the best course of action, especially before council elections? Did reform risk to compromise their stability? And that's the thing.

Nigel Farage is blaming Rupert Lowe entirely on potentially destroying the party's local election campaign. But I would argue that it was the police report that did that. There are two sides to this. Jane Fisher writes, Rupert Lowe saying he had put migrants on a Scottish island and leave them to the midges is not a wise move. Definitely not Home Secretary speak, is it? And that was language contained in that interview with Andrew Pearce, Tory boy Pearce, horrible man in the Daily Mail that kicked this whole thing off. Yum Yum Chow posted, I think Farage did say after Elon Musk didn't want him to be leader that Musk was a heroic figure still. You could argue he supported Elon and promoted him over himself. Yes, that is true.

I guess I would just argue that Farage was hoping he was going to be able to turn Elon Musk around. I mean, that was all extraordinary what happened in the early weeks of January. I remember I was on holiday, but in December, I'd seen Farage and Nick Candy after I'd had that meeting with Elon Musk at Mar-a-Lago. They were on such a high, and I really do think they thought this was a start of a new era for the party. Then, of course, it was over Tommy Robinson. It was over the grooming gangs. It was over the fact, as I call them, by the way, Muslim rape gangs. Let me just be clear on that. It was over all of that where Elon Musk decided, no, Farage isn't actually the guy. And it's resulted in all of this.

I really do think it has. I think there was a lot of concern within the party. Some would call it jealousy. However you want to frame it that Elon Musk was backing Rupert Lowe to lead the party okay Union Jackass time now your nominees Rachel Reeves nominated by real Mick Cass for her dreadful dreadful emergency budget. Mick says she sounded mindless, like mindless automation. Starmer needs to get rid. India Willoughby, nominated by Anna Island.

He said it's an insane witch hunt. Trans women have never dominated any sport. But J.K. Rowling was able to call that out as a lie today and revealed that 900 medals have been taken since October 2024 by males in women's sports category. And Kim Ledbetter, nominated by Amanda Hunter for campaigning for this assisted dying bill, and she was again in PMQs today putting pressure on Keir Starmer to bring this bill in quickly. And goodness gracious me, I think that's a crazy decision. We actually have a tie for runner-up today.

Both have 5% of the vote, which I think tells you where this is going. The runner-up with 5% of the vote, India Willoughby and Kim led better, but the far away winner as today's union jackass, it is quite deservably Rachel from Accounts. Our greatest person today, and I love this, nominated by at JDFDTA, Alison Pearson, my friend, the Daily Telegraph columnist for fearless reporting on the important issues of the day. And you know what? I was with Alison at the weekend at the Margaret Thatcher Freedom Festival, and I thought you would love to see a little bit of her speech because she gave such a powerful speech about everything that was going on with her. Do you remember there was a police investigation into her as a result of a tweet that she sent? It was just insane. But in her speech, she gave a very

powerful update about the shocking case. And I know many of you will be aware of this case. I've spoken about it a lot here on Outspoken of Lucy Connolly, the wife of the Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, who remains behind bars after two years. Listen to what Alison Pearson had to say. Lucy, by the way, had lost her own child aged 19 months and was very traumatised by that. And her husband, Ray, got home that day at the Southport massacre and Lucy was locked in the house with the six little children she looks after as a child. Nevertheless, as she posted this burial advised thing, she deleted it within two hours. Let's remember

that Labour MP Mike Amesbury, who physically punched a man in the street, knocking him down and could have killed him, recently got a 10-week suspended sentence. We are here today in the civilised purlieus of the University of Buckingham. Mrs Connolly, Lucy Connolly, is in a jail, surrounded by women who have knifed their partners to death. She is being denied her legitimate days out of prison to see her child because the governor claims

her case is too controversial and commands too much media attention, Lucy. You're not allowed out to see your 12-year-old child who is so traumatised and acting out she's just been suspended from her school for speech. For speech. Two years and nine months in jail alongside killers and thieves for nasty, offensive, stupid, racist, emotionally regrettable, swiftly deleted speech. I would go as far to say, ladies and

gentlemen, that Lucy Connolly is a political prisoner. We are seeing... I'm really sorry if that was quiet. I hope you could hear it. That was filmed by me, by the way, so be impressed. I was at the back of the auditorium. I was at the University of Buckingham, by the way, an incredible university, one of the only educational institutes in the UK that under the leadership of the Vice-Chancellor, James Toole, actually believes in free speech. And I had a wonderful weekend, but I just wanted to show you that of Alison Pearson, given that she was today's greatest Briton. She actually won an award though, at the event and received a standing ovation. Watch this. I don't know if we have it actually,

but she won the Courage Under Fire Award. I think we've got it. Let's have a watch. Thank you. I told her she should stay and come down again. She should be going. I just want to thank everyone. I was going to cry, but Daniel just said Margaret Thatcher wouldn't have cried. Sorry, I'm just looking in the live chat. Some of you said you could hear it.

Some of you said it was very quiet. But the point that Alison Pearson was making is just that there's been so much impact on Lucy Connolly from being behind bars, including the fact that her daughter has now been suspended from school. It's just like, let that mother be back with her child, seriously. Thank you for your company today. It's been a big one, but we are back tomorrow as ever at uh 5 p.m uk time 1 p.m eastern 10 a.m pacific right now though we are moving to substack to continue with the uncancelled after show on substack royal youtube sensation p dina will reveal the truth about what's really going on with gwyneth paltrow and megan mark. www.outspoken.live is the address. Hit subscribe right now on YouTube and Rumble.

Most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you, and I will see you on the after show on Substack in just one moment.