Dan Wootton Outspoken - PLOT TO SHUT DOWN SKY NEWS BY REFORM UK AFTER LIES ABOUT THE HARASSMENT OF NIGEL FARAGE DAUGHTER

Episode Date: July 8, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Reform UK calls for Sly News to be SHUT DOWN after lying about its harassment of Nigel Farage’s daughter in the biggest ever war between a British political party and a broadcaster. The party is refusing to back down, with Reform UK board member revealing a Sky presenter has admitted: "We are in real trouble over doorstepping Nigel's kids." For those dismissing the impact of Sly News’ so-called doorsteps, in his Digest Dan reveals how they have had tragic consequences in the past. But Farage’s decision to call a by-election in Clacton, which Rachel From Accounts has just announced she will approve, is looking increasingly like a massive strategic error with the Reform UK leader set to fight Count Binface and the Monster Raving Loony Party but no serious political parties, including Restore Britain. We'll debate with today’s Superstar Panel: YouTube sensation Stef the Alter Nerd, Reform-aligned independent journalist Jack Hadfield, and the host of Common Sense Crusade Father Calvin Robinson. PLUS: Tommy Robinson is harassed by a fellow Englishman at an airport, but he doesn’t take it lying down. We’ll show you what happened. AND: Ex-Apprentice contestant Bushra Shaikh attends the funeral of Iran’s Supreme Leader as a social media influencer. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Charlotte Griffiths – the Mail on Sunday’s Editor at Large – speaks out over her astonishing win against Prince Harry in his £50 million courtroom defeat. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 534 and breaking right now. Reform UK calls for sly news to be shut down. After lying about its harassment of Nigel Farage's daughter in the biggest ever war between a British political party and a British broadcaster. A mistake not to declare the gifts from George Cotterle, sir. You tell your bosses, you harass my family anymore, and I'll think you'd be serious consequences. That's what your organisation has done this morning. Go away. Sky News has not contacted Mr Farage's family over the story. We acknowledge that Sky News was part of a broadcast pool operation outside a property linked to Mr Farage yesterday. We approached the property off camera on a single occasion, identified ourselves, and the occupant chose not to engage.

The party refusing to back down with Reform UK board member Gwain Toller revealing a Sky News presenter has admitted to him, we are in real trouble over doorstepping Nigel's kids. Sky News have lied. Sky News have said categorically on the record that they did not go to Nigel's daughter's home. But originally, Sky said we didn't approach any property. I knew they were not approaching Nigel's property. They knew they were approaching his daughter's property. That is a breach of the spirit of Leverson.

It's a breach of everything. Let's be clear. We did not approach his daughter. And this is serious. Because for those dismissing the impact of sly news's so-called doorsteps, today I am going to remind you of when they have had tragic consequences. Why are you attacking them so regularly? Look, I'm just going out with a friend.

Okay. But why are you using your Twitter at now to attack? I'm entitled to do it. I have spoken to the family. They don't expect to find her alive. I'm sorry to have to tell you in circumstances like this. Would you like to say anything or would you like to confess? They haven't found my bedroom.

Morning sir. Come on through. How are you? No, no, not at all. Good to see you. You're over here. Good well, it has been like that. So you actually, you saw the phone.

Is that right? Yeah. Yeah, yeah. One of the victims of those sly news doorsteps killed themselves. I'm going to tell you about it in the Digest. But Farage's decision to call a by-election in Clacton, which Rachel from Accounts has just announced she will approve, is looking increasingly like a massive strategic error,

with the Reform UK leader now set to fight Count Binface and the Monster Raving Looney Party, but no serious rivals, including Restore Britain. He says it's the people versus the establishment. It looks like it could just be Nigel Farage versus a man with a bin on his head. That's a bit embarrassing, isn't it? You know, if I get the 10 nominations, because, hey, look, there's no guarantee I'm standing for the election, as I'm sure you know, I'm game, but I have to get the signatures from 10 local inhabitants.

Otherwise, this is a non-starter. If Nigel Farage attempts to go through with this, he will simply become a national laughing stop. And by the way, speaking of national laughing stock, can I just put on the record, this is something I never want to hear again. Is Farage still going to stand? Is this what the live downers are calling a vanity project? Chickens, chickens? Yep, we're a serious country. So much to debate with today's superstar panel. sensation. Steph, the alter nerd, reform-aligned independent journalist star Jack Hadfield,

and the host of Common Sense Crusade, Father Calvin Robinson. Also coming up on today's show, Tommy Robinson, harassed by a fellow Englishman at an airport, but he doesn't take it lying down. I'm going to show you this astonishing footage. Ex-apprentice contestant Bush Rishake attends the funeral of Iran's supreme leader as a social media influencer. And growing calls, for Prince Harry to be stripped from the line of succession after his daily male court case Shalaki. Then I'm looking forward to this. Stand by because in the Royal Uncanceled After Show, we do it over on Substack after the main show. Charlotte Griffiths, the mail on Sunday's editor at large, she, the woman who exchanged those oh so flirty messages with Prince Harry

speaks out about her astonishing win against Prince Harry. You can watch at www.com. reveal a brand new greatest british and union and jackass at the end of the show but it's your job to vote for the uj and you can do so right now in the live chat the superstar panel have all nominated here's who they've gone for father calvin robinson nigel farage for triggering this farce of a by-election steph the alter nerd andy burnham because he told the papers he wants to stop labor's plan to release rapists and pedophiles from prison early he had the chance to vote to stop it last night he didn't even show up Steph says, and Jack Hadfield has gone for the aforementioned Bush Reshate for her anti-West trip to Tehran. Good choices today. Keep your comments coming in throughout the show.

I will read out the best before we go today. But now, let's go. It's time to have a serious discussion about the media organisation I christened a very long time ago on a former life at GB News. Sly News. After my departure from the network, the chief executive and owner actually banned the use of that nickname. So you don't hear it on GV News anymore. But for very good reason, it is widely catching on after being caught red-handed about the left-wing news network's harassment of Reform UK leader Nigel Farage's non-political daughter.

The party's shadowy senior figure Zia Yusuf posted on Elon Musk's ex, given the receipts posted by Nigel Farage, should Sky News formally change its name to sly news? But then he said that far, far more serious action is necessary. Adding Sky News should be taken off air for their lies. Now, a news channel going to war so publicly like this with a major UK political party is unprecedented. But I guess it is no surprise. when you join the dots, okay? Because you've got to think about Comcast war with Donald Trump

in the US via MSNBC, now known as MS Now. Comcast also owns Sly News's parent company, Sky, which has just bought the equally-disficable woke ITV to create a new sort of nightmare leftist media monopoly. So this is now a very full-blown feud between the top polling, political party here in the United Kingdom and a news network. Unprecedented the standoff in many ways. And I am going to get to the political implications for Reform UK after Nigel Farage snapped during that altercation with Sly News before announcing his resignation in a now infamous viral clip. Was it a mistake not to declare the gifts from George Cotrell, sir? You tell your bosses, you harass my family anymore. I'll think you'd be serious consequences.

That's what your organisation has done this morning. Go away. Nigel Farage's reaction to questions about the financial support he received from a convicted criminal. Was it a mistake not to declare the gift, sir? You have broken all the rules. Leverson and everything else. Cut. Sky News has not contacted Mr Farage's family over the story. But before we get to those political ramifications, I just want to talk to you seriously. about sly news has got away with murder during its time on air and why it's finally right that this crooked and corrupt legacy media organisation faces some consequences. Because today I've heard

lots of leftists saying, oh, these doorsteps by sly news, they have no consequences in the real world. I mean, I remember them trespassing on my private property, sly news, harassing my fiancée. make it impossible for me to leave the house after my suspension from GB News. Now look, I never complained about that. It is part of the job, and I do cop it. But the difference here is about ordinary people. Sly news, doorstepping, ordinary people who are not in the public eye, like Farage's daughter.

That can have the most terrible consequences. And if you don't believe me, and if you don't take this seriously, I just want to take you back to one moment to 2014. Watch this. Sorry to body in. Sorry to body in. I'm Martin Brunk from Sky News. Well, I'm just about to go out.

We caught you. Can we talk to you about your Twitter? No. And your attacks on the McCannes? No. Why are you attacking them so regularly? Look, I'm just going out with a friend. Okay.

But why are you using your Twitter account to attack them on that? I'm entitled to do it. You know you've been reported to the police, the Scotland Yard. They're considering a whole file of Twitter accounts. That's fair enough. What supporters say is a campaign of abuse against them accounts. Okay, well, I'm going out. That woman died.

That woman, who you just saw there, been doorstepped by Martin Brunt of sly news because of the fact she had dared to express her opinion about the McCannes on what was then known as Twitter, took her own life. And her family say it was as a direct result of that doorstepping by Sly News. Just like Nigel Farage's daughter, Brenda was not in the public eye.

I just want to read to you now, Sly News' own report on its website about the inquest. Alester Coroner has concluded a woman found dead days after she featured in a Sky News report into online trolling took her own life. Brenda Layland was found dead in a Leicester hotel room in October 2014. An inquest into her death at Leicester's coroner's court heard witness testimony from a toxicologist, two police officers, Mrs. Layland's former psychiatrist and two Sky News employees. A written statement from Mrs. Layland's youngest son, Benjamin, was read to the court. He said, I have no doubt in my mind that the panic and fear that I heard in her voice after the

Sky News interview was the final straw that pushed my mum to do what she did. she was broken, destroyed. So do not tell me that sly news doorsteps do not have a consequence on real people. And this is what sly news does, confronting ordinary heartbroken people on the streets, on TV, for their ratings. It is part of their business model. They wanted to get Farage's daughter on camera. today got you a moment. So he has every reason to be highly concerned about what Sly News is playing at. And by the way, this was not a one-off. I have other receipts. Do you remember when Kay Burley

told the friends of the five-year-old April Jones that the little girl had been discovered dead, and she did so live on TV? They have spoken to the family. They don't expect to find her alive. I'm sorry to have to tell you in circumstances like this. Would you like to say anything or would you like to complain? If they haven't found her, there's a chance. Where there's hope, there's a chance. There's always a chance. We haven't found her yet.

Until we find her, she'll be all right. We'll find her. These have been wrong before, and hopefully this will be one of those sides. There's nobody yet. We'll find her. She'll be alive. She'll be right. I'm sorry.

What do you think we'll have? happen now. We'll keep looking. Yeah. We'll keep looking. Until we bring her home to her mum and dad, we'll keep looking. We'll keep searching day and night until we find her. There's no option but find her. There is no other. How are you feeling? Numb. Just numb.

I'm going to let you go and compose yourselves. If you want to talk to us again later, we're here, but I'll let you get on. Have you got your peak with it? Yeah, I have, yeah. Look after yourselves. Until we're told otherwise, just keep her polite. And what's astonishing is that Burley and Sly News never learned their lesson. There was disgust at her live coverage. Do you remember this of the tragic disappearance of Nicola Bully, where she hounded locals live on air again before she had been found dead?

Morning, sir. Come on through. How are you? No, no, not at all. Good to see you. You'll be it. Well, it has been like that. So you actually, you saw the phone, is that right?

Yeah, yeah, yeah. You saw the phone that Friday morning. Yes. Yeah, and that was around, was it, after half nine? I gave a full statement to the police with the exact time because, excuse me, because my wife's telephone call had the time on it, so. But I've given the full statement to the police. Was it just on the bench?

Was it just on the bench? The phone? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Which brings us now. to this week. Sly News is now run by these two men, David Rhodes and Jonathan Levy, who I believe are on a deranged mission to bring down Nigel Farage by hounding his family.

And there are people within Sly News who know how wrong this is. Reform UK board member, Gwain Toller, revealed I was talking to a Sky News presenter today who said, we are in real trouble. Overdoor stepping Nigel's kids, yes, they are. And Sky has completely changed its story on this. Just listen to the comparison of these two statements. The first, when they approached Farage at the airport yesterday, and then today following his resignation.

Sky News has not contacted Mr Farage's family over the story. We acknowledge that Sky News was part of a broadcast pool operation outside a property linked to Mr Farage yesterday. We approached the property off-camera, on a single occasion identified ourselves and the occupant chose not to engage. But Nigel Farage is bringing the receipts, really seeing CCTV footage of the incident,

yet sly news attempted to discredit it on air, even though it does show their reporter attempting to confront his daughter. And so you're clear what you're seeing here. This is for. footage, which was posted on Nigel Farage's X account earlier. And it appears to be filmed off a screen. You can see the time and date, which shows it was filmed yesterday morning at 741am. It's labelled driveway on the screen as well. And there are two parts to this footage. So this is the first part that you're looking at now. You can see the time at the top,

741. A car appears to be there. 7.41 in the morning. And then there is an edit at some point, a dip to black. And the time changes. There you go. And you can see 10.10 a.m. The light changes as well. And this second section lasts for 30 seconds seconds. seconds. Well, we've since now had a clarification from Sky News. You can see the second clip here, the gentleman walking towards the house with a different time stamp that you can see in the top left corner. What, as I say, we have since had a clarification from Sky News, which I'll read to you now. Sky News was not at the property at 7.41 a.m. as has already been acknowledged. And as shown in the footage from 10.19 a.m., Sky News was outside a property where Mr. Farage

was registered to vote at the last election. Sky News did not interact with Mr Farage's daughter. On a single occasion, we approached the property without a camera operator, identified ourselves as Sky News and the adult occupant chose not to engage. Well, Reforming UK senior figures are laughing at the idea that Sky News did not hound or pursue Mr Farage's daughter. The party posting you told viewers Sky News had not contacted Mr Farage's family. We can see from the CCTV this is clearly false. Shame on you. Farage himself added Sky News should now apologise for telling us they had not contacted my family. I am registered to vote in Clacton.

And the party's shadow treasurer Robert Generic raged. Sky News have been exposed for lying after Nigel Farage published the footage. There is never an excuse for targeting the children of politicians. Their pathetic defence was that Nigel wasn't answering questions when they knew he was out of the country meeting the Vice President of America. They then hosted Adam Bolton to defend Sky's behaviour on air. Who is he? A close friend of Peter Mandelson, whose wife was a senior advisor to Tony Blair,

and who has been made a pair by Kirstama. This is the type of media organisation that Lisa Nandy wants to give privileged status too. It's all a cosy club. Reform MP, Swellabravenman went on Talk TV to demand that the bosses of sly news be held to account. No, there's nothing illegal at all. This is about a procedure and that may or may not be a breach of those things,

but I don't think the average voter in Claxon, the average reform supporter, given perhaps some of the things we've seen over the years. But also the nature of this, I think they will see this as quite a hounding of the reform leader and will be unperturbed by whatever the results are of this parliamentary investigation. Well, I mean, I want Nigel to be re-elected. I will be heading down to Clacton to help.

But I do imagine that the people themselves are incredibly irritated, and disappointed by the kind of establishment and mainstream media pylon that Nigel and Reform indeed has been taking recently. I mean, just to remember this, that Sky News have lied. Sky News have said categorically on the record that they did not go to Nigel's daughter's home. And we've heard today that that is categorically false. Now, who's going to be holding the boss of Sky News to account for mislellan? leading the public, fabricating claims and lying.

Well, exactly. The fake news agent host John Soapel challenged Suella writing, Are You Kidding? Nigel Farage is the son of a stockbroker who went to Dulwich College and then follows his dad into the city, gets gifted millions, promotes crypto and gold bullion, been in politics for decades. He is the establishment, but she hit back,

I'll take no lectures from you, the guy who went out of his way to defend Hugh Edwards, a man embedded in the establishment while he was committing awful sex offences. Shame on. you. But, even though I completely agree with Nigel Farage's war on sly news, there is a much bigger political question building today about whether this decision to call the by-election in Clacton where his only challenges could well be, Count Binface, and the monster raving

loony party is going to be a catastrophic misfire that could even end his political career in humiliation. So the update is that this afternoon, Chancellor Rachel from Accounts, has confirmed the election will go ahead, writing, I will accept Nigel Farage's request to be appointed steward and bailiff of the Manor of Northsted. It is a farce and a desperate distraction and the people of Clacton deserve better. But if he wants to spend the summer arguing with a bin, I won't stop him. And Count Binface is relishing the this challenge, even being interviewed this morning by the British Bashing Corporation. They won't interview restore Britain candidates, but here's Count Binface. As they made clear,

they are going to push this narrative all summer long that this election is a massive forage misfire. Reformer UK leader said that having announced his resignation, he would refight the Essex seat. He's billing it as the people versus the establishment by election. Let's speak live now to Zia Yusuf, who's from Reform UK. Good morning. He says it's the people versus the establishment. It looks like it could just be Nigel Farage versus a man with a bin on his head. That's a bit embarrassing, isn't it? You know, if I get the 10 nominations, because, hey, look, there's no guarantee I'm standing for the election, as I'm sure you know. I'm game, but I have to get the signatures from 10 local inhabitants. Otherwise, this is a non-starter. And then, of course, I

will tailor my manifesto to the local area as always. But most of my national policies will remain, building at least one affordable house, nationalising Adele, bring back CFACs, and of course, moving the hand dryer in the Jens toilet in the Crown and Treaty Pub, Oxbridge, to a more sensible position, because as you know, it's a national issue. Those policies didn't go down too well, did they, with the good people of Makerfield. I believe you got 95. votes at the recent by-election. So how are you hoping to do any better? What a disgracefully scornful tone. How dare you? 95 actual votes. That's a Dolly Parton. 95, just one shy of a reverse 69, which I scored against Boris in an Oxbridge sportshold in 2019.

So I'm cock a hoop. I'm over your moon. I'm over my moon. I'm doing very well. I came seventh out of 14. I mean, what more do you want? What do you say to those other parties who have decided not to field candidates in Clacton? Well, I mean, that's for them, isn't it, mate? That's democracy. I mean, none of this is serious. It's embarrassing. But the MSM abuse of Farage on LBC has continued at pace this morning. With James O'Brien Standon, Labor's truly despicable G.S. Phillips, who is so keen to cry sexism at every moment

being a total hypocrite by saying he just needs to grow some balls. I think one thing we're overlooking here is that the guy has absolutely never had an interest in being prime minister. He doesn't have an interest really in any kind of politics. And he uses his whole circus act. He does pretty much, even, you know, if you remember Brexit was the same thing, you know, waving the Union Jack flag in the European Parliament and so on and so forth. He does it to gain interest and to show that he can actually get his own way.

He managed to persuade an entire country to vote against its own interest. And, you know, he's using this to get private contracts. Does he really want the scrutiny of being a prime minister, some, you know, every single day. Clearly he doesn't and he can't handle it. So why is he even going for the job? He's not. I think you're absolutely right. And like when you say he can't handle it, I think that's really, really interesting. Because what I saw yesterday when Nigel Farage came out and said,

that he was going to cause the by-election. What I saw was a scared man, a man having a tantrum, a hissy-fit. Basically, it reminded me of my children when they don't get to their own way. And I personally think that Nigel Farage might have to grow a pair. Now, obviously, that is the most ludicrous commentary.

But what I will say is that Farage's decision is today making fools out of reform surrogates. So I want to show you the lunacy of Leila Cunningham, Reform UK's London Merrill candidate, going on that same station in LBC, and claiming that Nigel Farage was actually a social media influencer rather than the boss of Reform UK in the sort of mental gymnastics that forever taints one's credibility. Why has the money that he received when he was politically active,

as the chairman of reform, but not elected, why was that not declared? Well, because he wasn't an MP and he didn't. need to declare it. But he was politically active at the time? No, I mean, being the chairman of a political party is like an honorary role. He was not politically active. And you know, he was the chairman of a political party. Yeah, he was a, I mean, he was a social media, uh, influence and he was a GB News presenter. And, and that's why I mean, he was the leader of, uh, the chief executive of a political party. Yeah, but he was not politically active. You know, you could have, there are loads of people that are staffed at reform. I wouldn't call them all politically active. Even though they work for a

political party? Hang on, Tom, we have people working here in the back office who work for a political party, but there is no way anyone would deem them to be politically active. You know, they're doing accounts. It's just there's a separation of wrong. They're not knocking on doors, they're not handing out leaflets, they're not giving speeches.

They're not giving their name out there and asking people to vote for them. But Nigel Farage, as leader of that organisation, before he was an MP, was doing that. He was asking all of those things. He was saying vote reform? No, he was a social media influence. He was a GB News supporter. He was not publicly agitating for people to vote for reform

whilst the chairman of that organisation. I haven't seen all his social media posts. Nigel's convinced, and he's sought legal advice. He has done nothing. Yes. But you would agree, if he had been advocating for reform in that role, he would be being politically active. In the way in which you're absolutely right,

the person who's the accountant would not... I'm not sure. I don't know the exact term of what politically active, and it seems to be quite subjective, depending on who you're talking to. Just stop. And the problem is that Farage's stunt now very likely not to pay off. That became clear, live on BBC's news night, last night,

when the Greens became the last major party to confirm live on air, they weren't standing. Nigel Farage is having a hissy fit, because the first time he's actually having to deal with some real scrutiny. What he needs to do is be honest, about where his fishy five million pounds came from rather than calling a fake by-election to run away from a standards investigation.

We will be standing a candidate in the real by-election because no one is above Parliament. Parliament is bigger than all of us. We all have to follow the same rules. My little Farage, Kenny Badnock says this is a hissy fit. Does she? Well, I think they've had more than their fair share of it. But you've done big gambles in the past.

Isn't this just a stunt? Oh, it's a big gamble. It's a stunt, isn't it? Mr Farage. We won't be standing a candidate and a by election. We won't be. We won't be standing a candidate. Why are you saying, wow, phrasing Nelson?

Because that means, as far as I can work out, only one candidate will face Nigel Farage at a by-election. That will be Count Binface. Okay. So what Nigel Farage has started the day thinking it would be a great test of his democracy will end up literally as a two-horse race between Nigel Farage and Count Binface.

And right now, you know, I have to say with the British public being in the mood that they're in, I wouldn't entirely rule out Count Binfaces chances. Leila Cunningham, is this backfiring already? Not at all. Listen, how is it not if it's Count Binfaced versus Nigel Farage? Political arguments are decided in an election in a democracy. What's clear, too, is that the questions over Farage's finances are not going to go away because of the spy election, with the MSM and political class now uniting to turn the sideshow into a main story. Do you think he should now tell voters in Clacton about the lot? Anything else that there is that he may not have disclosed so voters in Clacton can make a really informed decision when it

comes to this by-election? You know what voters in Clacton really care about? If you could answer that question, do you think they should tell them? Nigel's been very honest. Sorry. Sorry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Are you say, are you saying he has, are you passing judgment on the Parliament of Interstander? I think it's all just not stacking up Like the maths is not. Okay, so you've made your judgment. It's not particularly honest to conceal that from people. He didn't conceal it.

He did not conceal it. He did not know. Who did he mention it to them? It didn't have to be disclosed. It did. The rules are very clear. But I would say that Richard Tice are pairing on sly news, that the channel that they're trying to shut down and making chicken noises

really isn't the genius move he thinks it is. Has this time? turned into a bit of a farce, because if the other parties stand aside, which it looks like Labour, the Conservatives, the Lib Dems are, is Farage still going to stand? Is this what the Lib Dems are calling a vanity project? Chickens, chickens? These other parties, they've been hounding us.

They've been saying that Nigel is guilty and that this may lead to a by-election. Nigel's had enough of it and has said, bring it on, he's bringing it on, and all of a sudden they're now running for the hills. You can't see them for dust. You literally can't make up the hypocrisy and the cowardice of all the other parties. They've been outsmarted and they don't like it. And if this by-election goes ahead, there's going to potentially be another by-election because the investigation could then happen again, because he's an MP again.

So is he going to stand again? Is he going to stand twice in two by-elections? Nigel will stand again and if necessary, he will fight it and win it. But everybody will realise what a ridiculous waste of time. Don't you think people at home are going to be thinking this ridiculous way to time? I think what the standards commissioners should do is get on, finish his inquiries, make his judgment, and everyone can have this by-election, stand, don't be a bunch of chickens, and then let's move on. No, this is just a mess. It is a mess. So Farage started campaigning today, and GB News actually went into a pub and dutifully interviewed their dear leader,

asking him what issues he was going to campaign on. It was clear he had no idea. Dan Hodges, the Labour male columnist, says that if Farage does push ahead, it could end up destroying him. Arguing jokes aside, here's the following scenario. None of the other main party stand. Count Binfaced does. He becomes the magnet for anti-reform votes. We've seen significant tactical voting in the past.

What sort of percentage does the noble count need to get to see Farage embarrassed? Okay, I'm calling it now. Nigel Fargenzi, Yusufant this does. This by-election isn't going to happen. They're going to cut their losses and call it off. Yes, it will be embarrassing, but it's either that or utter national humiliation. Someone's sensible and side reform. And there are sensible people in there, needs to step back, take a moment then say, okay, this is spiraling completely out of control now. Let's call off the by-election. Take a time out and have a serious thing about how we move forward. Watch. this by-election is just not going to happen. I would be amazed if by the end of today or tomorrow, at some point tomorrow, we don't have a further statement from Nigel Farage or his spokespeople saying,

okay, I wanted to take on the establishment. The establishment have run away from me. I am not going to put the voters of Clapton through a meaningless context because if he doesn't do that, I mean, it's already an absolute disaster for him, but what's already a disaster will just become a national catastrophe. The thing is, Nigel Farage is he's a good tactician. He's a very good politician. He's a very good campaign.

Not anymore. He isn't. Well, even his biggest detractors would have to admit the guy could campaign. Do you think it's possible that he genuinely did not think it was an option that the other parties wouldn't stand against him? Even though that's what happened when David Davis did this. I mean, yes, that's obviously what happened. I mean, everything that we've seen has been done in based on emotion, panic. And the reality is, you know, I've been saying this for a couple of weeks now.

The thing about Nigel Farage is he is a politician who up until this point has been able to defy political gravity. Things that would, you know, derail other politicians have just bounced off him. But as I've said, for a variety of reasons, reasons, his force field is now down. And he and the people around him don't know how to deal with it. So we saw yesterday them saying, oh, this is going to be, this by-election will be the people versus the establishment. It won't. It will be Nigel Farage versus a man with a bin on his head. Which I love about British politics, by the way. I remember Theresa May, I would just stand next to him when she was Prime Minister. And if Nigel Farage attempts to go through with this,

he will simply become a national laughing stop. So is there any serious risk that Count BinFace could actually win on the 6th of August, which is when the by-election is expected to be held? Well, Polly Market. Polymarket is the market that I trust on these things, actually, because they have the experts looking at the chances of victory at a particular moment. And as it stands, when you look at their Clacton by-election winner, there is a 93% chance of Nigel Farage winning. But even a 6% chance for Count Binface could terrify the Brexit king.

I mean, it would be one of the biggest upsets of political history, wouldn't it all time? And surely the end of the road. Andrew Bridgett has today predicted that that's what's going to end up. happening to Farage anyway, writing, there will be another by-election in Clacton before Christmas. I also believe there will be further damaging disclosures this summer regarding Farage and reform involved in financial irregularities. The question is not only can reform survive without Farage, but also can reform survive with Farage. Solution, join and support Rupert Lowe and restore Britain. Now the superstar panel. Steph the alter nerd, Father Calvin Robinson, Jack Hatter's

All with me. Jack, you're a form UK guy, so I'm sure you say, look, absolutely not. This is not going to be the end of Farage. But isn't this just fascicle? This was not what you were expecting, Jack, was it? You wanted restore to run. This was going to be the bloodiest by by election of all time. It was going to be this serious fight for who could really win the right wing vote. And all of a sudden, it's as flat as a pancake, a total waste of time. Farage's campaigning literally versus Count BinFace, and I know the mainstream media love this guy. I find it a bit of a joke,

but this is a joke which your party has starsed. I completely disagree with that. I think both options would have been good for reform. Of course. But I think what is this shown? If you look at what Kemi Badenark, and the other people are saying, they're calling this a fake by-election.

There is no such thing, fake by-election. If the other parties thought that they could beat Nard of Raj, they would take him out. They would run and they would take him out. Because obviously then there would be no second by-election because he would be out of parliament. There would be no, he wouldn't be back in. The standard committee wouldn't be called again. And I think this is tactically, I think this is exactly the right thing to do. I mean, now, you know, all of the attention and focus now is on the by-election and the fact that all of these parties aren't standing. You know, it is the uny party in action. And that's what we're seeing right now. It really is, it's just incredible that

they aren't going to stand and put themselves up against Nigel because they know they're going to get absolutely destroyed. And he's going to come in with well over 50% of the vote. I mean, frankly, now there's going to be no other candidates, basically he could get 70, 80% of the vote, something of that nature, even more perhaps. I mean, David Davis got, you know, around that in 2008, when only I think the Green stood against him. And, you know, they didn't even have an MP at the time. So, you know, this is, this, this, this has happened before in British political history. And so he's going to have this massive majority.

And it will come back into the parliament. And then they'll try and force another by-election again. Because, you know, we already know all of the details. Well, yeah. So why are you doing it now? Because, because now. Why are you putting Clacton residents through a second farce? Well, it would be, it would be the parliamentary standards committee that would be,

that would be putting clacted through this. it would be the uny party putting Clacton through this again when it becomes obvious because Farage will come back and say, look, there's no chance of this of you being able to beat me. It's impossible. It's right there. We've had this. And it shows what a complete waste of time it is, especially because, as I believe, it's pretty obvious to me that Nidevaraj has not done anything wrong. You know, usually said maybe you should have declared this just a belt and braces everything, but it's pretty clear that he's taking legal advice and he took legal advice at the time and found that all of it was completely legitimate.

Well, I think that's far from clear, actually. Well, from what people are saying, it's clear that they took legal advice and they're all right to do so. Father Calvin Robinson, our mutual friend, your colleague, Lawrence Fox, is saying he might throw his hat into the ring and run in Clacton. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, Lawrence. Leave it to count bin face. That is the whole point here. people should not get involved in this fast, should they? Lawrence would be making a strategic error.

Oh, Father Calvin, sorry, can you just start again? Oh, we'll come back to you, Father Calvin. Steph, what do you reckon? I think this is an ill-conceived Machiavellian plot on the part of Nigel Farage to try and distract the mainstream media and everyone else from focusing on him being investigated for that five million pound gift.

donation, whatever you want to call it, right? I think that's what he's trying to do. And the mainstream parties aren't falling for it and therefore aren't standing in the Clacton by-election. They don't want any part of that. They want the focus to be on this particular investigation. Now, in defence of reform, which, by the way, I'm totally restored Britain all the way.

but to keep it an even keel here, there's all this focus on Nigel Farage in this five million pound gift and whether he was active or not politically, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, right? Trying to villainise him over this. When the investigation hasn't been done yet, we don't know what's really happened, innocent until proven guilty, that's how it should be in this country, right? However, I'd like to challenge the labour lot out there. where was their transparency? Where was their truth-telling?

When last year it came about that the think tank group, Labor Together, this that and the other, had given Kay Stammer nearly three quarters of a million pounds to help him become Labour leader and they didn't declare it. Where was his declaration in all of that? Why wasn't there much more of an outrage publicly in all of this?

and for him to be investigated by the watchdog, this, that and the other. Yeah, and the fact that Lou Haig, who is one of Andy Burnham's closest advisors and likely to go straight back into the cabinet, is a convicted fraudster or a proven fraudster, just like, wait for it, posh George. Okay, Father C, do we have you? There you are. Can you hear me? So, Lawrence, we've got to talk some sense into Lawrence, do we?

I have. I said, don't do it. There's no need to do this. like don't split the vote. Let Captain Bitt, Count Bint face take it because it just humiliates Farage and shows this up to the... Is he going to listen? I don't know, but it shows this up for the

stupidity that it is really, doesn't it? It is a fake by election. And I think Jack contradicts himself and points out why it's a fake by election, because everyone knew that Andy Burnham was going to win, yet all the parties stood. The parties aren't not standing because they think Farage is going to win. The party stand in every election, even when there is a strong

majority and they know who's going to win. That's not the reason. They're not standing because Farage doesn't get to preempt by-election by the parliamentary commission's inquiry. He has to wait for them to find out whether he is guilty or innocent of this. He doesn't get to say when the by-election is. And so this is why he's trying to manipulate the system. How does this help the people of Clacton? It doesn't help anyone other than him.

Breaking right now, Tommy Robinson has been involved in a shocking clash with an Englishman at a airport after he was showered with C-word abuse. Now, what's so interesting, of course, is there has been a lot of focus lately on security provisions for the likes of Nigel Farage and Prince Harry, yet Tommy is clearly one of the most in danger political figures in this country. Now, apologies for the language, I won't say it, but Tommy posted, don't call me a C-word, I'm hung over from the football at the airport and he then revealed this shocking video. Oh, you're your little wanker.

Hey, you're a little wanker. Hi. Who you calling the cump? What are you saying? Who you called the cump? Who you calling the cump? Yeah, I'm filming you you, you prick. Who you calling the cump?

You wouldn't stay that outside, would you? You fucking little shithouse, would you? What? You fucking little wanker. You fucking little wanker, look at you, your shithouse cun. Come on, where you go and go outside your little trick. Go outside your fucking muck. You fucking little muck. Your fucking little wank.

Your little shit house. Look you up. You're asking of security. Fuck off. You come up for me, your little shit house. Your little wanker. Fucking little crick. Go on.

Let's go big man. Boy, big man. Look at your little shit house. Not so fucking bad now, are you? You shit house. Fucking wanker. Now, Father Calvin Robinson, of course, I would argue

and you would say to Tommy as a friend, take a deep breath, walk away, don't give this guy what he wants, don't encourage violence. But unfortunately, we are living in a society, Father Calvin, when increasingly hard leftists

do believe it is appropriate to approach and abuse figures of them the right. And this is going to happen more and more and more and more. And it shows you, I think, the unhinged nature of the hard lift. Because you look at that guy and you think, you're an Englishman, you should know better, you should understand what Tommy Robinson is talking about the Islamist takeover. But no one, no matter what you think of someone's politics, should approach an individual on their own at an airport and call them the C word. No, I don't excuse Tommy's language, but I think he was in the right, absolutely. I, I,

I think the left have told us for so long that words are violence, language is violence. And so they're perpetuating their own violence by coming up to people and calling them the C word. And so he instigated it. But of course, I don't think Tommy was giving him what he wanted. I think these leftist cowards want to hurt their insults at you and march off. I get it all the time in London, W word, C word, just as they're getting off the train or just as they're getting out of sight. Because they are cowards. What they don't want is a debate.

They don't want conversations. Yeah, he looked terrified. Didn't he? I'm absolutely terrified. I think Tommy should challenge him. Damn right. Steph, it's such a hard judgment call, though, isn't it? What do you do in that situation?

But I definitely think that man at the airport believed that he could just call Tommy Robinson the seawood and there was going to be absolutely no consequence. Absolutely, because the Labour dictatorship and the mainstream media has essentially given lefty loonies like him, licensed to treat Tommy Robinson this way. in public. Now, I absolutely adore Tommy Robinson. I think he's doing an absolute great service for this country. However, I think he needs to be respectfully a little bit careful in terms of how he interacts with these loonies when they do confront him in such an aggressive manner. And what do I mean by this? Very quickly, just to explain, The lefties, the Labour dictatorship, they're trying to paint Tommy Robinson as this right-leaning thug, right?

He's a thug, he's dangerous, he's nasty, this, that and the other, right? And so when you have Tommy Robinson reacting to a member of the public, even though he's a lefty-loony, in this manner, it feeds into that particular narrative where they're trying to demon. Tommy Robinson in the first place. I understand he's caught between a rock and a hard face, but respectfully, I think he needs to be a little bit more cleverer and careful with his interactions with these lunas in the future. Yeah, because the thing is, Jack, we also saw this week,

your leader, Nigel Farage Snap, also at an airport when he was approached by Sly Nebula. news and you do wonder actually if all of this is being used as a provocation from the lift. Yeah, they definitely provoke people. I've had instances before, as Calvin said, you know, if you're sort of a, a rightist personality, you know, people will just abuse you on the street. You know, I had a Lewis Nielsen from a stand-up's racism, social workers party. You know, we call me like a virgin, intel, whatever, multi-times. And so what are you going to do with these people is you've just got to laugh in their face. Because, you know, frankly, they are risible.

Like the left, they have these completely ridiculous ideologies and they abuse you for no reason. And frankly, for most of the time, you should just laugh at them. Record them, laugh at them, you know, show what idiotic people they are. But as has also been said, the left are violent. You know, the left killed Charlie Kirk. You know, it's the left who a violent antifer who will beat people up on the streets. know, this happens all the time. And of course, Tommy has previous in the past defended himself. I think it was a case. It was it might have been St. Prankw's Station, I think it was, last year or so,

where he defended himself and he would found completely, you know, there weren't any charges brought on that because there was an obvious case of self-defense. So I think, I think, you know, there are two things you have to do. If they are, if they're not violent, it's better to laugh in their face, you know, call them idiots, show them as an invisible creature as they are. But also, I think, you know, you do have to be careful and you think, you know, you should defend yourself if somebody comes at you and is about to assault you. And that's completely unacceptable. Lauren, the insider, our friend in the independent media space, has also gone viral for a video with a difference, but also from within an airport. So she's on holiday at the moment. But on her way, she posted England, 2026, where white female toddlers go through more secure. vetting than our invaders. You don't frisk a toddler and reduce her to tears ever. We all know who

the actual security risk is in the UK and it's not her. Watch the video which has been seen by millions across the globe. The insanity of the UK is never to be underestimated. Just gone through security at Heathrow. It's so strict. My daughter who's too in tears being frisked. I don't know. Maybe it's because we flagged up because I've presented to Tommy Robinson. But how can they actually vet people going out to the country more than people coming in the country? I've just recorded a video on the Taliban being in the UK. I've recorded a video on a millionaire migrant smuggler now claiming asylum in the UK. But the authorities didn't know where he was.

Just live in a nice little life in Leicestershire. Fucking hell. You can't make this. shit up in this country. Father government, I mean, she's totally right, isn't she? It's nuts. She is right. People can come over in those rubber

dinghies and literally throw their documentation away on the way into our country. We don't know who they are, where they come from, what their criminal records are. There's no vetting process whatsoever. They've shoved into a tiny community to take it over. Yet on the way out of the country, we're frisking two-year-olds, for goodness

sake, there has to be a level of common sense, even if it is just security theater, which we know it is. It's not really security. It's supposed to make people feel secure rather than actually making them secure. We need to have another look at our situation in this country, honestly. And Jack, do you think Lauren the insider could be targeted because of her previous work presenting for Tommy Robinson's Urban Scoop Organization? Well, it's definitely possible. You know, we know that the government has lists on people. And obviously, Tommy gets targeted and has been targeted when he's cross borders as well. So this, again, it's completely

ridiculous, you know, like MI5, et cetera, you know, the government intelligence services think that the threat to this country is, quote, unquote, far-right extremism. We know that the real threat to this country, of course, you know, an organised terrorist, obviously Islamist terrorism. You know, but of course, to say that is racist. So the government's, you know, focuses too hard on oppressing their citizens instead of actually controlling our borders. It's total anarcho tyranny. Steph, did you have sympathy for Lauren? Absolutely. And this is the thing. Why? I understand that when it comes to airport security, they'll randomly select people just to kind of show that they're doing something, sure that they're not being

racially biased, you know, all that work malarkey. But why a two-year-old? What give them the right, the justification to frisk a two-year-old? I can understand if the two-year-old went through, let's see the barrier, it beeped off, and they were like, okay, we're now going to have to frisk you. But it doesn't even seem like that happened based on Lauren's account. Her two-year-old was just chosen to be frisked. I think there's a duty of care here question that needs to be answered by the security team at Heathrow. because this is a child we're talking about here

and this could be at a level of maybe inappropriate touching if we're going to get down to it. In the past, I would have used to have a huge amount of respect for our security services. Oh, that's keeping our airports safe. But this is the problem. Our trust in institutions, our trust in the police, our trust in all security services has completely evaporated

because we know there is a daily invasion of this country and absolutely nothing has done. so why should we be treated in that way? The despicable hard leftist and former apprentice star Bushra Shake, terrible woman, isn't she? But this takes the cake. She's just flown to Tehran to lick the boots of the Iranian regime at Ayatollah Khamini's funeral.

Yep, the same supreme leader taken out after starting a war with the US and Israel. I mean, look, I know we joke about influences being paid to plug shitty products, but this really takes the cake, doesn't it? The regime invited hundreds of influences from the West to the event in Tehran watch. Right next to one of the five martin individuals who were fascinated by America. I've been told that behind me right now is the body of saying. When would this number of people in the millions come out for somebody like Donald Trump?

It is incomparable. It will never have. Firstly, it would. Secondly, you're a traitor, bitch. The Daily Mail reported that Sheikh a British Pakistani media personality turned mouthpiece for the Iranian government. She had videos of herself at the multi-day event in Tehran, surrounded by mourners waving the regime's flag. In one ex post, she said long-lived the Islamic Republic

won an honour to be reporting this historic moment in Iran. You're not reporting on it, love. If you were, you'd probably have your head chopped off. Earlier this year, she was reported to counter-terror police, of course, after addressing a pro-Ratheem rally in Iran, where to our participants wased Hezbollah flags. Hours after the post went online, a report seen by the mail was sent to the Met,

claiming Sheikh may have breached the Terrorism Act, which bans inviting support for a terror group. The report also alleged that she may have violated the National Security Act, which requires individuals to register with the UK government if they are directed by a foreign power to carry out political influence activities. The Met said in response, any allegations related to possible terrorism or national security-related offences will be passed to officers within counter-terrorism policing. We will assess the details and take any further action as appropriate.

Now, of course, no action was taken, was it? Because, you know, it's only Lucy Connellys that we want to lock up. isn't it? It's only white Christian mothers commenting on Islamist terror who we want to lock up. Sheikh has been pushing this on her ex account, writing during the US-Israel illegal war on Iran. Saeed Ali Khamini was urged to go into hiding in order to save himself from being killed. He said, but can you protect 90 million of my people? These are the words of a true leader, a hero. May he rest in peace. You can't love the people of Iran enough.

Everyone, and I mean everyone here, hates Israel. So based. Okay then, Bushra. Seriously, we'll crowd fund for your one-way ticket. In fact, just don't bother coming back. Bushra has always hated everything about Britain, though. I mean, she has gone down a dark path in recent months. But I do remember having her on my old G.B. News show,

where she actually suggested that old white men should go extinct on television. You know, I mean, when you really think about it, you'll say performance shouldn't matter. Experience shouldn't matter. What matters is that you're young or that you're not white? I mean, Liz, can you believe this? I mean, I think Busher is accurately representing how the BBC thinks, but it's so disturbing, isn't it?

Well, with all respect that's due, the whole premise of what you've just said is based on the false idea that people choose to watch TV or listen to radio, based on the age of the presenter, that young people will select a young presenter to listen to and older people. There's absolutely no evidence of that. In fact, there's evidence to the contrary. People choose an expert or somebody they like. Okay, fine, which is expert, you know, which is fine. But we have to consider the relatability of staff. Young people, I'd probably say between the ages of 30 and 40, like myself, we need to be able to relate to the broadcaster. The people that are concentrating, it's not worth.

Everything these days is made for you young people. Everything these days is made for you youngsters. It should be. Could you not just leave one station, actually, aimed at an older audience? I mean, Steph, the Alternerd, it's fascinating, isn't it, to see how far gone she is. since then, now a propagandist for this Iranian regime. And I'm sorry, whatever you think about Israel, this is not a regime that you can support.

Terrifying. It's absolutely terrifying what she is doing right now. I mean, just on a side note, how the IRGC is still not to this day confirmed as a terrorist organisation here in the UK is absolutely beyond me. because she says that the IRGC love the Iranian people, they're for the Iranian people. Well, hang on a minute. Where was she saying this, let's say, a few months back, when literally hundreds of thousands to millions all over Iran came out on the streets, brave as lions calling for the overthrow of the regime and won in democratic elections?

where was she in her condemnation when her beloved IRGC gunned down those innocent protesters and children and mothers and wives and brothers and sisters all because they dared to speak out against this regime? She is literally idolising a dead leader who did that to his own people who hired mercenary,

from next door in Afghanistan and Iraq to murder his own people because they dared to speak out against him. She is absolutely dangerous. Whether she's deluded because she believes in the propaganda or she's not deluded and she knows the truth, either way she's dangerous. Yeah, I mean, my view is she's probably doing it for the coin. That's actually what this is about.

But Jack Hadfield, what do you make of this woman's decline? I mean, she was an apprentice contestant who was sort of held up as like a great example of, you know, this is a Muslim woman who has really integrated into our society. Isn't it just proof that actually the vast, vast majority never integrate? The vast vast majority are practicing to Kia. Yeah, I mean, certainly there's people. a number of cases of that. And again, like she is, she is a British citizen currently. And I don't know if she's still a Pakistani citizen,

if she still has a Pakistani passport. But certainly, you know, in the old days, they would have called this treason. This is going to enemy country. This is going to a country that hates us, a country that supported terrorists on British soil. You know, you can disagree with, you know, foreign wars than Middle East.

You can be critical to Israel. You know, whatever, that's fine. But you can't stand here and say that Iran is a friendly country to Britain. No, Bushra Sheikh should have her British citizenship completely revoked for, frankly, this is treason. You know, she's gone over there. She's not been a, been a reporter. She's described them as martyrs. She said, you know, she's clearly working with an enemy regime of the West, and she should be treated accordingly. Sound. What did you think, Father Calvin? I think Jack's spot on. Hasbullah Bushra should be deported. Her citizenship should be

taken away. I don't think she's a traitor because I don't think she actually believes in Britain. I think she's... Well, yeah, good point. Mohammedanism first, and she's shown that over the years. I don't think she was ever moderate. I think she's always been an extremist, hard left, uh, Mohammedan, and she shouldn't have been welcomed into the country in the first place. We've been so blind. We had a Christian country with Christian values and we've imported dozens of thousands of people that hate us, hate our way of life and want to see us dead. And now they're showing it explicitly because they've got the critical mass. They think they're comfortable. Now is the time for us to kick them all.

all out. Father Calvin Robinson, Jack Hadfield, thank you very much for being here on today's superstar panel. Steve the alternate, you do hang on because we're bringing in according to TAS now for our royal coverage today. Breaking today, the Daily Mail has cried an overwhelming vindication after the dramatic 50 million pound courtroom win against the daily. Mail as new questions are being asked about the state of Prince Harry's marriage to Megan Markle as she stayed away from his darkest moments with onlookers saying he looked to be a broken man at Chatham House. Let me show you the front page of today's Daily Mail. A historic headline, one word, vindicated. But you can see the front page two of The Daily Star,

which declares that Prince Harry is now hacked off. And that's for sure, isn't he? And Harry Cained is the headline on the front page of the Sun newspaper. But the problem is, Harry can be as defined in defeat as he wants. But his life's work is now in tatters. He tried his best. as the Daily Telegraph reported, to grin and bear it at Chatham House. However, as Hannah Furness, the Royal Editor who was there reported, Harry is not known for his poker face. He is a heart-on-sleeved sort of person for better and for worse.

And the court case result was etched all over his face. And for very good reason, because he can come out and claim as he has that the judge in the case, Justice Nicklin is responsible for a whitewash and that this is all some type of great big conspiracy, but we can all sit here and laugh and poke at him and say, you have turned yourself, mate, into a humiliation. Because the High Court judgment found that Harry gave limited evidence on the issues at the heart of the case and strayed beyond factual evidence while in the witness box. In other words, he lied. The Duke and other claimants were open to criticism for the way they pursued extremely serious allegations that senior associated staff lied to the Leveson Inquiry into press standards. Evidence gathered by the legal research team behind the claims was

unconvincing and inconsistent, perhaps because so many of them were criminals. The evidence of a private detective whose alleged frauds statement led to Harry, Elton John, Dorian Lawrence and Elizabeth Hurley joining the action was comprehensively undermined. So as Richard Eden of the Daily Mail posted, let's be clear here, Prince Harry. is accusing a high court judge who serves the crown of a whitewash, i.e. a cover-up or corruption. How can King Charles allow Harry to remain a councillor of state who is legally entitled to stand him for the monarch? Let me answer that. Richard Eden. He can't. Calvin McKenzie, former son, editor writing,

grateful if Harry would take his unpaid legal bills, his conceit, his hatred of the UK, and his heartlessness to his sick father and F off back to Montecito. Andrew Fox described the situation as remarkable and added importantly, remember in a civil case the burden is 51% more likely rather than not Harry couldn't even prove that. He added it so sad. I remember him at Sandhurst as a lovely bloke

but thicker than multiple planks. I hope whoever is advising him gets a grip. The problem is there's one person advising him. Her name, Megan Markle. And Charlotte Griffiths, the editor at large, of the Daily Mail, says that it is really shocking that Megan Markle chose not to be by Harry's side as the Duke of Delusion suffered through this humiliating loss all on his own. So she wasn't by his side for this really momentous occasion. And at 2pm today, when we found out the results, he was doing a speech at Chatham House. and his voice was shaking, he was all alone,

he was clearly broken by the whole thing. His wife wasn't by his side. But yet we may see her, we don't know for sure, we may see her in Birmingham for the Invictus Games event, which is to mark one year until the Invictus Games. Yet he's saying now that he's going to fight on. I don't exactly know what he means by that. From my understanding, he can't appear.

The impact on these journalists has been utterly horrendous. Like Katie Nicol, now the Royal Editor of Vanity Fair and one of the hosts of Pearz Morgan's new Royal Show, but for a long time, the senior diary editor at the Mail on Sunday, confirmed that Prince Harry had indeed invited her to party with him, something that has been now confirmed in court by Justice Nicklin, no matter what Harry says. I partied. I partied with Prince Harry.

That story came out in the court when, you know, he couldn't remember, but he invited me into the party, into his inner circle. I did things the old-fashioned way, when a knocked-on-doors, curated contacts, got people on side. I remember being told when I was under questioning, but, you know, the Queen's late cousin, Lady Elizabeth Anson, you know, at the time was a woman in her 70s. Why on earth would she speak to you,

this sort of sense of disbelief that these sorts of people would speak to us? Well, they did. And in all of those years I spent at the mill on Sunday. Sunday, I never witnessed anything in terms of what we were accused of doing. And the accusations were despicable. So I feel emotional. I feel vindicated, peers, is how I feel. Well, you've been completely vindicated, as has the male, completely.

So what happens if you're comical ali? If your Prince Harry's Comical Ali and Baghdad, or in this case, your Montecito mansion is collapsing? Well, if you're Chris Ship of Woke ITV, you are my mind. everyone despite this terrible, humiliating, career-defining, reputation-destroying result that Prince Harry has been right in the past. Oh, and by the way, he really likes me. He really likes me. He waved at me. Look at this. And remember for Harry, he's won before against the publishers of the Sun

and the publishers of the Mirror. This is the first time he's lost against a tabloid. And I was there today when he left that event he was at the Invictus Games. I said to him how painful was it to lose against the mail. He stuck his thumbs up at me there, as you can see, got in his car and left. The other issue is, we spoke on this program yesterday, didn't we, about the whole hoo-hahar about who, where is he going to stay, where is he not going to stay? And one of the reasons Buckingham Palace gave for not staying at the palace was, well, if you're going to make a statement after the case,

what might you say, and therefore where does it affect the king in terms of his constiposition? Harry said to think this was a whitewash and he also criticised the judge, Mr Justice Nicklin, a high court judge. Remember, it's the judiciary. They dispensed justice in the name of who? The king. You, sir, are an embarrassment. He is still even now shilling for Harry to get his security. Have a look at these pictures of Harry today leaving.

They had to call some members of the police, the Metropolitan Police. Only two officers, as you can see there. But with the whole debate about his security, his team had to say, excuse me, there's so many press and members of the public here. This could become a public order offence. Let's get the police in. So lots of issues with Prince Harry, as ever, all coming together on one day today. There's no one there?

They're journalists. He even posted this on X, saying, oh, it seems Prince Harry's team. If asked them police to help police the crowds, but it had to admit that it is mostly media. And you can actually see that. very clearly from this video. It's all the time of point as they've been there throughout. It's all the big cabal and these people have all been exposed in the mainstream media. Good work here from Paula M who discovered this video

of Cameron Walker, the Royal Correspondent of G.B. News, who I have been telling you for a long time, is now a shill, a propagandist for Prince Harry and Meghan Malcolm because of his close relationship with Omid Scobie. She writes, look how Cameron Walker exits all shadily the Invictors venue before Prince Harry arrived. I guess he was getting the Sussex briefing. Look at this. And great work from the Royal Grift 2, who posted this real photo. Look close. she writes, Chris Schip is the new Tom Bradby, Cameron Walker is the new Omid Scobie. In terms of the security, though, she's having a laugh for very good reason.

So glad Prince Harry took police off the London streets from fighting crimes to manage this massive, massive crowd. It's journalists, look. And of course, this entire case has exposed Prince Harry's argument, including how he changed. shamefully and disgracefully, continues to invoke the memory of his mother, even though Paul Dacre, and now Pierce Morgan, have said, there's no way Diana would have wanted to pursue the Daily Mail. Remember, those two men actually knew Diana.

Diana used to call me regularly. I used to go around for lunch at Kensington Palace. She'd call me. I'd tape the calls, and she knew I was taping her. I'd send her the copy of the story I was going to run. She would send it back with little amendments. I've got all this, right? So this idea that Prince Harry seems to want the public to buy into

that every story about him and his family has been gained illegally by terrible journalists, you know, it's just not true. Well, it's been knocked out. Every single article was legitimately sourced, is Justice Nicklin's findings. Of course it was. And Prince Harry's visit is going just as, we expected. The bloke is so shamed that he's actually been to the Chelsea Hospital today

without Megan Markle. And guess what? No crowds turned up. There's no pictures. There's no drama. I'm sure they'll be released once they heavily edited and probably they've filled in the top of his head because good Lord this guy is going bored, but that is a whole other issue. Alarmingly bald, you might say. But on a much more serious note, has the time come after this defeat to now remove Prince Harry from the line of succession. I believe absolutely, and I will reveal the results of a major outspoken poll on this in just one moment. But my friend Alison Pearson, who is the star columnist of the Daily Telegraph, remember the Telegraph is the Royal newspaper, is now writing what would previously have been unthinkable, demanding that it is time to remove Harry. She says the Duke's

failed court case and disastrous UK visit prove he remains a petulant boy who choked on his silver spoon. And she added, you can bet the Sussex's will not be getting an invitation to the coronation of King William. My guess is the new monarch will act swiftly to create a smaller royal family, cutting Harry and his two children out of the line of succession altogether. And so say all of us. Archie and Lilybet are essentially Americans. With no knowledge of this nation, frankly, it is in strong. insulting that they carry British titles, which are all about cachet untethered to duty. No wonder Harry is now making a last ditch attempt to re-engratiate himself with Papa, tempting him with access to his own grandchildren to protect his inheritance.

There's only one person to blame for this bitter state of affairs, an angry boy who choked on his silver spoon, deserted his responsibilities, trashed the monarchy and railed against the invasion of his privacy. Yet was perfectly happy to invade the privacy of his nearest, and derrists for money. So that's not fair. Oh, I think you'll find people that it's perfectly fair. The British are no longer wild about Harry. And that is absolutely true because over 40,000 of you have voted in my major poll on YouTube where I asked after today's devastating court loss versus the Daily Mail should Prince Harry now be removed from the line of succession.

93% of you say yes, just 7% of you say no. So let's get. to a very special Royal Superstar Panel on this day of major breaking news, Royal YouTube Sensations, Steph, the Alter Nerd, and according to Taz with me. Tash, look, I believe this is now so serious for King Charles that the line of succession has to be considered, that the Royal website has to be considered, absolutely the Council of State situation has to be considered. I mean, let's just think about the seriousness of what Harry has done overnight, Tash, in some ways it's been missed because of the overwhelming nature of the verdict. But Harry has gone public and effectively suggested that his own father's justice system is crooked,

that he has been subjected to a whitewash. I mean, this is the most serious claim. He is now such a liability to the royal family. And I'm sorry, Tash, more action does need to be taken surely by Charles. Oh, honestly, don't apologise to me over this one. I'm with this 100%. I mean, one thing that the king can absolutely do without the government, without having to get the ball rolling in that department, and let's be honest, our government's a complete shambles at the moment. They can't even get themselves together,

let alone action in something as having Harry removed, having his duped and removed, or removing him for the line of succession. But he can have him taken off the royal family website. This isn't the first time Harry has done this. We know that Harry is hot-headed after he lost his final appeal to do with his security. We know he appeared on that BBC interview. There was no pushback, which was not really that shocking from the BBC. But the accusations that he leveled at his father, the British government. He attacked the government.

He said it was an establishment stitch up. We know that he's been lobbying two home secretaries, and Lord alone knows how many other people that he has been using his title to throw his weight around. And in this instance, I mean, it is really shocking. He's done a public statement attacking the judge, accusing the judge of corruption, of covering up illegal deeds committed by this media organisation. This is absolutely massive that he's done it. And I'm very surprised that Baroness Lawrence went along with it.

But I did note it was only she and Harry that have agreed to do that joint statement together because I think the others have gone, do you know what? That judge is going to decide exactly how much money we've got to. pay out. It's time to maybe pipe down and keep our heads below the parapet here. Whereas Harry, well, I hope his bill gets doubled from this by the judge and contempt of court. Publicly trashing a judge after that is just honestly mind-blowing. Absolutely. And I do want to come to the money implications in one moment, actually. But do you agree, Steph, that actually now is the time? Because I give Charles a huge amount of credit for slamming the doors to Buckingham Palace.

shut and actually locking the gate this week. But it worries me that this was so close to happening, Steph, because just imagine the optics if he had decided to record a video responding to this court case or deliver an interview from within rooms of Buckingham Palace. I mean, I would argue, Steph, that could then have become a constitutional crisis. Well, opinion, conspiracy theory, whatever. I think that. that was Hazard's plan all along because he only wanted to stay in Buckingham Palace for one night on Tuesday night, not the full duration of his trip. Why would that be?

It would be because, as far as I'm concerned, he wanted to then set up another interview, let's see, with the BBC, like he did last year when he lost his case for the security situation, but have it at Buckingham Palace and be like, oh, wow, wow. It didn't go in my favour because the judge is crooked. Wow, wow, wow. I think that's exactly what his plan was that King Charles got onto it. And like you eloquently said, closed the gates, shut the door and was like, hell no, we are not falling for that BS whatsoever.

Now, very quickly, you allude to his statement that he and Dorian Lawrence put out afterwards after the judgment came over yesterday. For me, when I read it, it was all Red Flag City in the sense of, when you read that statement and you read between the lines, for me, I don't think this is over. I think somehow, some way, Prince Harry is going to fight this to the bitter end,

exactly like he did with the security situation. He's going to try some way to try and appeal this. Well, what's interesting is Cameron Walker, who we spoke about earlier, who is now effectively the new Omid Scobie. I mean, I'm just so embarrassed about what GB News has become, but that is a whole other conversation. Imagine when I was at Jimmy News becoming the propagandist for these two. But he actually went on air this morning, live on air, and said that Harry's team have not decided if they are going to appeal or not, which is astonishing. Tash, it very much seems like Charlotte Griffiths is correct on Megan Markle choosing to stay away for this London part of the trip,

not because of security, but because she did not want to be dragged into Harry's courtroom humiliation. I think she very much knew he was going to lose and is doing a bit of, I told you so, because remember, Tash, she was meant to be at Chelsea Hospital today. In the famous operational notes that were sent to all of the little propagandists on the WhatsApp group, that was meant to be Megan's big moment and she wasn't there. And she wasn't there yesterday either, by the way, when he was having some type of breakdown. It's not the first time though, when there was backlash to do with spare, when Harry lost multiple times to do with the security court case when he was in the UK. Whenever Harry has ever needed his wife, probably a good

hug like we saw recently with Catherine coming down that mountain and Prince William being there to give her such a loving embrace, Megan is never ever there to support. Megan is never ever there to support her husband when he needs her. Everybody, including Harry, you know, everybody's got to coddle Megan, but she should have been there. At the very least, even if she didn't want to make an appearance, you think, given that she is supposed to know the fragile state of mind, her husband has been put in by all of this stress, because she often parrots this as well. But there's never any concern for Harry. It's she's the most targeted woman. She's the most bullied woman. She's the biggest victim out of them. And Harry probably could have done with a bit of

support from her because let's be honest, he's not got many other people in his life willing to stick their neck out and to support him because he's destroyed all of his relationships. But for Megan to not be there, even in the background, that to me is not a good marriage. That is not a loving marriage. You know, even if my husband didn't want to go to an event, if he knew there was potential of me being upset at an event or something potentially upsetting me, he would have been waiting in the wings. You know, that's what you do in a marriage,

that Harry is always there for Megan and she is never ever there for him when he needs her. And I think that's very, very telling about the true nature of their marriage. And I don't think it's a happy one. Yeah, Steph, the alternate Charlotte Griffiths telling me that actually the rouse, what she describes as stand-up row,

between Prince Harry and Megan Markle are becoming ever more common. And she says the marriage is now toxic. I'm not surprised. The marriage has been toxic pretty much right from the beginning. The relationship has been toxic right from the start. If you're to believe that Megan Markle actually targeted Prince Harry through her Soho contacts, Marcus Anderson, this, that and the other,

and that she never really married for love. She married for money, status, but then when she found out that Prince Harry wasn't the billionaire that she thought he was going to be, then, whoopsie, we're going to have to leave the royal family and go to pastures new in Hollywood to make our billions there. Well, look how that's turned out, right? For an alleged narcissistic nutbag from hell,

when anything goes wrong in her life, what is she to do? Blame everyone but herself. Now, Harry's on the hook for a large portion to pay over 50 million pounds in court cases, from this court case, apologies. Money which, if you're to believe the reports, Hazarin Megsy really don't have anymore. No, although I do think a large proportion of it will be covered by insurance, but Charlotte Griffith says all of that has been ironed out over the next few weeks.

I do also feel a little bit mean doing this, but... There is a big butt, which is that he started it. Okay, he started it when he spoke about William's alarming baldness in spare. And it was actually Andrew Lawrence, who found the picture. He's a brilliant comedian here in the United Kingdom. And he wrote effing hellmate, Clippers, number one all over. And then this video has been released, showing Harry's very alarming baldness on the way in to Chatham House. And again, I actually don't belittle it really because we know this is something that

very much gets to Harry, Tash, like it is a big, big problem for him. And I think it all is part of this idea that he has unraveled and that the life that he expected to be this sort of young Hollywood heartthrob has not worked out. And I actually do think in all seriousness, once it gets to that point, you should do a William. You know, William just shaved it all off and then he had his renaissance. Yeah, Prince William definitely aging like a fine wine, whereas Harry is more like spilt milk. It's unfortunate for Harry, you know, male baldness is something that affects so many people, people can't help it. But it was Harry, like you said, that started it by trying to be very unkind about Prince William and people in lost houses shouldn't throw stones. Harry and Megan

seem to throw boulders around really with regards to everything. But yes, with Harry's hair lost the amount of stress he's been under since he married Megan. I think it's definitely sped it up because he did have a thicker, a thicker

brillo pad of hair until his wedding. And then everything from Megxit and everything he's given up, everything, you know, the stress of constantly trying to make his wife happy, well, he's definitely lost pretty much all of it. And it's now, it looks worse because he chooses to keep that haircut.

And it reminds me of the hairstyle that monks used to have, where they deliberately shave the bald bit and then keep the thick rim round it. You know, and it's, it is better. I think I've got to agree with the comedian there that he needs to just, just, you know, give it up, Harry. The hair plugs didn't work. It's time to just let it go. Let it go. Let it go.

indeed. Now, the money, the money, we've got to talk about the money. Royal News Network's been doing a bit of work on this. With Britney posting, here's what we know about Prince Harry's potential legal bill after his spectacular loss against daily mail and mail on Sunday associated newspapers. It's less than you might think. The claimants, which include Harry, were collectively insured for 14.1 million pounds for the daily mail's cost. The claimants also had personal insurance policies of 2.35 million pounds. That's a collective 30.5.5. 5 million. But if you lose a court case like this, then you are generally required to not only pay your costs, but the defendant's costs as well. So here are the overall costs of the case in December 2025. We know these details as the court was incredibly concerned with the astronomical costs of the case and wanted to make sure both sides knew the financial impact of proceeding and potentially

losing the case. Claimants cost 18.7 million pounds. A&L costs 19.9 million pounds. Overall, costs 38.6 million pounds. However, after the case was argued over several weeks, the costs are now estimated at an overall 50 million pounds. At this point, there could be an outstanding 22.6 million pounds that's not covered by insurance, and there are potential damages to consider. That will be determined in a hearing scheduled for July 29. The court held an entire hearing to warn the claimants that this case could be a fool's errand, but they proceeded anyway. and now all could face a legal bill of around 3.23 million pounds each, which will probably be easier for some to pay than others. If the damages are significant, that could increase even more.

Now, there is the prospect, Tash, that has been raised to me of Will Elton John bail out Prince Harry. Was there some type of agreement done? Because you remember Tash, the original introduction to the slippery lawyer, David Sherbourne, was done. at the French estate of Elton John, do you think, Tash, that might be something that happens? Because at this stage, even £3 million for Prince Harry is devastating, remembering that's about his security bill per year, which we know he is desperately trying to avoid having to pay, hence the total crave and desire to get the British security. Well, Harry's very entitled anyway, but he and Megan have made a very, very big habit of asking for freebies off of people. I mean, anything from flights to holiday homes, all sorts of things.

You know, they do not like dip in their hands in their own pockets. Whether Harry would have been intelligent enough to maybe get a deal like that puts in the background between him and Elton to say, look, okay, I'll come on board, you can use my name, we can do this together. but you need to guarantee that if we lose, then someone will cover my full bill because I'm sorry, I don't think Harry would ever think I would lose because this is Harry's whole problem. He doesn't think like that.

He believes that he deserves to win and he should win. And he has had some wins with the other media outlets. I mean, he was desperately trying to get the Daily Mail to agree to give him a lump sum payment before the final stages of this, but they refused knowing that they, were obviously innocent and they just basically turn around and said, we're not giving you anything because we're going to win.

Harry didn't believe that. So would Harry have asked Elton? Could he still ask Elton? Well, yes, he's probably hoping that his dad might bail him out. The big difference with Harry and Baroness Lawrence is where do they get their income from? They are not superstars. Elton John will still earn hundreds of thousands of royalties, millions of pounds, because he is a hugely talented iconic singer.

It doesn't matter that he's practically retired now. That will live on forever, you know. And Elizabeth Hurley, whilst I'm not a big fan of her acting skills, she has obviously got a fair amount of money behind her as well, which means she's got a turnover coming in. Harry doesn't. He and Megan do not have any discernible talents or skills whereby they are earning a regular income.

All they know how to do is to spend. And what with Megan's jam business were a matter of months away from officially being announced as going under or bankrupt or something, Harry's going to be very desperate to ask friends. He's got no family left that are willing to speak to him. But yeah, would he have the cheek to ask Elton to help him?

Yes, absolutely. Will Elton help him? Probably not. The fact that he didn't sign up to do this joint statement tells me that perhaps Elton has decided that he's bowing out of this. what a mess what an absolute

mess total chaos look do stand by because we're about to reveal today's greatest Britain and union jackass and get to your feedback although Steph and Tesh

I think you're both going to be very excited about this it has just dropped confirmation that Joe Rogan has sat down with Rupert Lowe Rupert Lowe Rupert Lowe just posting a privilege to join Joe Rogan

and hopefully inform a global audience about what has been happening in Britain mainly the rape abuse and torture of countless young white working class girls. I hope you find our conversation as informative as I did. Now, I can actually tell you I was speaking to Rupert. It must have been two or three days ago. He said, look, don't, don't mention it. You know, don't spoil the surprise. But he said it was an incredible conversation. They sat down for two and a half hours, got on so well. I see that the episode that's gone up online is two hours and four minutes. So I don't know if they edit maybe

some parts of Joe Rogan out. But it's so, so. exciting and Rupert had a brilliant trip and was also looking forward to doing some other meetings over there too. But I think this is a big moment and it's really interesting, isn't it, when you see what's happening to Farage and everything like this is. What a collaboration. Yeah, I know, exactly. Joe Rogan. Being on being on being on is a big deal. It is a big deal. So very much looking forward to that. We'll cover it on tomorrow's show, of course. But let's get to your feedback now. Lots of comments about Farage, deciding to run in this by-election and also Sly News and the sort of terrible way that Sly News is now hounding Nigel Farage's family. I think

that is absolutely true. And Helen O.D. writes Comcast is why we're seen, and that's who owns Sky, by the way, why we're seeing so much of the lefty tactics here because in the US, they are nothing more than the propaganda arm with the Democrat Party. Absolutely Helen. I completely agree. Comcast, the owners of what is now MS now, but what used to be known as MSNBC. Crafty Lars says, now they remember how to do journalism, apart from focusing on the wrong people. They don't doorsteps, Stama or Burnham. Exactly. Exactly.

But a lot of you not convinced about Farage running in Clacton, just like I'm not, Mirro 8,933, saying politicians like Farage take British voters for imbeciles. Now they have a chance to vote for an actual imbecile, Count Binfe. Arch 3144 is another tice moment that will go down in history along with that lot. That was after he did the chicken noises on Sly News, which really gave me the creeps. And 3144 is big miscalculation by Farage, especially when Parliamentary Standards Committee has not yet completed its inquiry. Five million pound donation needs investigation. Okay, a reminder of who are your union jackass nominees? Father Calvin Robinson went for Nigel Farage for Tchiguer.

in the by-election. Steph went for Andy Burnham because he didn't vote in this attempt to stop the release of rapists and paedophiles from prison early, and Jack Hadfield went for Bushra Shake for her anti-Western propaganda trip to Tehran. The results are in, and third place with 18% of the vote, it's Nigel Farage. The runner-up with 22% of the vote is Bushra Shake. But the worst Britain in the world today, with 59% of the vote, you've done. got it, Steph, you're the winner. It's Andy Burnham. So well done there. Congratulations, Steph. And it was actually Jack who went for our greatest Britain, but I'm pretty sure all three of us will agree with this, Harry Kane, because it's a huge, huge night, isn't it? Saturday night. Are you

guys going to be watching the football Saturday night? Absolutely. Absolutely, yeah. Can't wait for it. I'm so super excited. And it's at a reasonable time. Yeah, it's at 10 p.m. rather than what was it? 2 a.m. 2 a.m. 2 a.m. Nearly o'clock in the morning. Yeah. Well, look, Steph the alternate, according to Taz, thank you for all of your coverage of all of the ongoing royal news

and such a pleasure to have you here live with us today. We've got much, much more over on Substack now at www.w.outspoken. Live where Charlotte Griffiths is standing by to speak out on her. role in this Prince Harry court case. What really went on between them? That is going to be fascinating to find out. You can join us at www.w.outspoken.com. But we will be back live with you tomorrow here on YouTube. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific, remember to hit subscribe right now on YouTube because the UK government is trying to take over your algorithm and the only way that you

can guarantee that you're going to keep seeing Outspoken is by subscribing. We're also available as a podcast too on Apple Podcast. Spot. if I wherever you get your podcast. Most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.