Dan Wootton Outspoken - PRINCE WILLIAM SEIZES CONTROL OF MONARCHY FROM DYING CHARLES + BOMBSHELL PALACE ANDREW MEMO

Episode Date: October 31, 2025

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Prince William seizes control of the crisis-hit British monarchy from the politically weak and physically dying King Charles after a fortnight-long extraordinary power struggle which the corrupted MSM have agreed not to report. But at 7pm last night, the heir to the throne proved he was now in control, as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor was finally banished, effectively now a commoner like you or me, after 15 years of unnecessary scandal. This mess isn’t over, with more revelations to come and a growing attempt to usher in republicanism on the British left, via Islamists like Zarah Sultana. In his Digest, Dan reveals how Prince William is trying to save the British Monarchy as he reveals the contents of a historic Buckingham Palace memo to the MSM that they have not reported. Then analysis from Connor Tomlinson, host of Tomlinson Talks on YouTube. PLUS: Lawbreaker Rachel from Accounts lies AGAIN about her rental arrangements, prompting a late night meltdown from Slippery Starmer who still doesn’t have the balls to actually fire the tax riser in chief. AND: Narinder Kaur’s Halloween white face scandal, as the elite class continue to ignore the growing tide of anger amongst ordinary Brits. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are gripped with panic in Montecito as William shows his hand by revealing the path to strip them and their children Archie and Lili of their royal titles. All the latest with royal YouTube sensation According2Taz To watch the Uncancelled After Show for exclusive extra content EVERY weekday, sign up at: https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 350. And breaking right now, Prince William seizes control of the crisis-hit British monarchy from the politically weak and physically dying King Charles after a fortnight long extraordinary power struggle, which the corrupted MSM have agreed not to report. Well, I think we're very difficult for him to say in Windsor because I think very much the force behind this has come from Prince of Wales, William. and his wife, Kate. I think they just didn't want to be neighbours to Andrew. That his son wants a completely different monarchy. He wants to modernise it. He wants to reduce it. He wants to strip it of a lot of the chivalry and traditions,

which Charles has done his best to nurture. But at 7pm last night, the heir to the throne proved he was now in control. As Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, the artist formerly known as Prince, was finally banished, effectively now a commoner like you or me after 15 years of unnecessary scandal. Breaking news right now, Prince Andrew is losing his royal titles and being evicted from his royal

residence. Look, I've got to stop me right there because I've got some breaking news. I want to get this right. The king has initiated a formal process to remove the style, titles and honours of Prince Andrew. news that we're hearing this morning from Buckingham Palace, which has confirmed Prince Andrew will lose his royal prince title. The statement says he will also be forced out of the royal law. But this mess isn't over, with more revelations to come and a growing attempt to usher in republicanism on the British left via Islamists like Zara Sultanah. I tell you right now that the palace did call at least one of the two papers I work with and ask what is Daphne has more and what's coming more and we do have much more but we need to take it

one more step further he needs to be behind bars period he he denies what's alleged against him and nothing's been proved against him and I believe that the presumption of innocence is one of the glorious of our civilization and I don't think it's being observed terribly dangerous precedent to set either titles pass on by the bloodline or they don't. I think this could be the end of the monarchy. The end of the monarchy, says G.B. News. So in my digest next, I'll reveal how Prince William is trying to save the monarchy,

as I reveal the contents of a historic Buckingham Palace memo to the MSM that they have not reported. Then analysis from Connor Tomlinson, host of Tomlinson talks on YouTube. Also coming up on the show today, Lawbreaker Rachel from accounts lies again about her rental arrangements prompting a light night meltdown from Slippery Stama who still doesn't have the balls to actually fire the tax riser in chief. Narenda Kaur's Halloween whiteface boast as the elite class continue to ignore the growing tide of anger amongst ordinary Brits and why the Southport massacre terrorist Axel Ruda Gabana's

parents must be deported after a host of shocking new revelations about their demon son. Then, in the Uncanceled After Show on Substack, Prince Harry and Megan Markle, are gripped with panic in Montecito, as William Haars shows his hand by revealing the path to strip them and their children, Archie and Lily, of their royal titles. All the latest with Royal YouTube Sensation, according to Taz. You can sign up to watch at www. outspoken.live. And, of course, because it is Friday, we're also revealing the worst Britain in the world this week. This is when we put your union jackassers from Monday to Thursday head to head. And here are your nominees.

From Monday, it was David Lammy. For that appalling performance in Parliament, look at the way that he just laughed in the face of all of us over the Hadush Kabatu. On Tuesday, Sid Khan for the Pakistani Muslim Rape Gang cover-up. He hasn't won yet, though. Don't worry about that. On Wednesday, Dr. Scholler, what does she do? She did something absolutely crazy.

And on Thursday, Rachel from Accounts, promise you, there's no winning yet so you can get voting. We had over 100,000 votes last week. So just head to the posts tab on YouTube. Cast your votes. Let me know why you want your particular union jackass to win. I will reveal your comments and the winner, the worst Britain in the world at the end of the show. So you can make sure you stay with us. But now, let's go.

The MSN will not tell you what's really going on, because they are so enthralled with Buckingham Palace courtiers and gatekeepers. But when I launched Outspoken, this independent platform, I promised to reveal the royal exclusives, the Royal Rota and Regime media refused to. And that couldn't be more important. After last night's historic announcement, stripping Prince Andrew and banishing the commoner to Sandringham

as humble Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, after 15 years of unnecessary scandal thanks to his despicable friendship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. So, here goes. Prince William has in the past fortnight seized control of the British monarchy from a weak and dying King Charles. And while I do have huge sympathy for the monarch on a personal level, his fundamental failure on Andrew, not to mention the duplicitous duo Prince Harry and Meghan Markler Montecito, has clearly imperiled the future of the monarchy itself. William used this stark realization which actually senior courtiers at Buckingham Palace shared to effectively take over. He knew the weak source statement released by Andrew two weeks ago today, relinquishing the use of the Duke of York

title, while remaining Prince Andrew in Royal Lodge, would not be enough. So he staged a palace coup, a palace coup that he has been wanting to happen for a long time, as his father continued to bring Andrew back into the royal fold, not to mention his decision to open his arms up to that traitor Harry, who William believes must be exiled, must be gone, forevermore, alongside his wife Megan and Children, Archie and Lily. Now, thanks to William's new power, A precedent has been said. A monarch can now remove a dupe title and even a princely title. So Harry and Megan should be afraid. Very afraid. Because trust me, it is now a matter of when, not if the same thing happens to them. William knew when it came to Andrew that extraordinary

and unprecedented action was required. I mean, think about this. The last time a man was deprinted, was actually Ernest Augustus back in 1919 for backing the Germans during World War I. So this was major breaking news that ricocheted around the world last night. Breaking right now, Prince Andrew loses everything. In a bombshell statement in the last hour, King Charles has stripped his brother of his time. title of Prince, booted him out of Royal Lodge, and effectively ended any hopes he had of a public rehabilitation. Hingham Palace released a statement saying that Prince Andrew will be stripped of his Prince

title. He'll be the artist formerly known as Prince. He is also being forced to move out of Royal Lodge, his home he was allowed to live in until 2078. So if you are just joining, he has been dislodged at last. Andrew stripped of Prince title and is forced to quit Royal Lodge after being served notice following Rao with Charles. To some breaking news right now, Prince Andrew is losing his royal titles and being evicted from his royal residence. Look, I've got to stop me right there because I've got some breaking news. I want to get this right.

The king has initiated a formal process to remove the style, titles and honours. of Prince Andrew. A breaking news that we're hearing this morning from Buckingham Palace, which has confirmed Prince Andrew will lose his royal prince title. The statement says he will also be forced out of the Royal Lodge.

Some breaking news are coming to us from Buckingham Palace. They have released a statement saying that his majesty king has today initiated a formal process to remove the style, titles and honours of Prince Andrew.

Charles has finally done it. He has stripped Prince Andrew of all his titles. In fact, he's no longer Prince Andrew. He is simply now Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. This is huge. Let's bring you some breaking news that has come to us in the last minute or so from Buckingham Palace. His Majesty, the King has today initiated a formal process

to remove the style, titles and honors of Prince Andrew. Now, I have obtained a bombshell Buckingham Palace memo sent to the complicit royal rotor that confirms how William took control while trying to spin the announcement for the king unsuccessfully, I would argue. Now, the palace asks that this document is not shared and says it's not for direct quoting. This is a ludicrous cover-up of the truth in a new media age. It also suggests, by the way, that the media should not attempt to ask members of the royal family either about the historic statement or even try to take their picture. But I don't believe in these types of cover-ups and these types of secret deals. So today I have released the document in full on my substack at www.

outspoken.com. But the key sections, which include the palace effectively admitting the king only made the decision after this pressure from William, I'm going to share with you now. So they say, these decisions have been the kings, given the serious lapses of judgment which his brother has shown. His majesty has the support of the wider family, including the Prince of Wales. Okay, fine, so there's the acknowledgement that this was down to William. But in an attempt to rewrite history, the palace also claims that the king always planned to take further steps, which simply isn't true. They write, His Majesty acted swiftly following recent developments which led to his brother relinquishing the use of

his titles and honours in the most immediate and effective way possible. A long-term solution to all of the aligned issues was always going to take a little longer to enact due to the complexities of the legal and constitutional position, but the necessity of further action was never in doubt. These developments have required time, legal and constitutional expertise and support from the wider family to bring about. It has always been hoped they could be achieved without the need to impose on parliamentary time. But look, that's just not true. For the past two weeks, we've had the palace briefing that Charles had done everything that was possible, that he didn't want to waste parliamentary time, that he didn't need to take away the titles as long as Andrew agreed not to

use them. What's more in this secret memo, they admit the king will pay for Prince Andrew, but more significantly agree that he is allowed to make his own income, opening up the possibilities for more unsavory dealings. And perhaps most importantly, because I do want to be humane about this, they suggest the mental health of Andrew Fergie and his two daughters, Princess Petrus and Eugenie, has seriously suffered, writing it has obviously been a period of high media scrutiny and intense pressure on individuals. Private factors, including welfare, have formed a critical part of all family considerations. Please be mindful that there remains a duty of care for the well-being and welfare of all family members. We would ask for you to be alive to this consideration

in all your reporting and commentary. Now, you know I've been very clear on this. Prince Andrew is a psychiatric risk and everyone does need to be careful about that. But it doesn't mean we go into these unusual behind-closed doors dealings between the mainstream media and the royal family. That's wrong. It's not journalism. Honest Royal commentators not tied up in that system know that Prince William is now in charge.

Watch. One of the great problems has been for Charles, the king, that his son wants a completely different monarchy. He wants to modernise it, he wants to reduce it, He wants to strip into a lot of the chivalry and traditions, which Charles has done his best to nurture. So I think there's a great clash there.

But the one thing, which is unfortunately always an uppermost in our mind, is the fact the king is ill. And we don't know exactly the fate of the monarchy. Prince Harry gave an indication in his remarks last year. And that was a pretty heartless thing to do. Yes, it was. Exactly. But that is the reality.

And Prince William comes to the monarchy, a different sort of background than his father. Yes. In all sorts of ways. So I think that what's really happening is that William and Kate have forced the pace on this. The king had no choice. They want very much to be free of scandal. I think they'll do the same to Harry and Megan.

They'll probably strip them of their titles. They want a clean, untrammeled, impeccable monarchy. Well, I think we're very difficult for him to say in Windsor. because I think very much the force behind this has come from Prince of Wales, William, and his wife, Kate. I think they just didn't want to be neighbours to Andrew. Because they're moving nearby up there from their house. They're moving near to Forest Lodge, and they didn't want to bump into him.

And therefore, that was terribly important to get him out of the way. I mean, the natural thing for him to do would be to exile him to an island in Scotland into some terrible castle and make sure he couldn't leave. Tom's likes of the Royalist on Substack has written William is king in all but name after masterminding Andrew's disgrace. He reported earlier today, friends of William have told the Royalist that the heir to the throne masterminded the operation to evict Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor from Royal Lodge, and the teeth of what he saw as his father's weakness and vacillation on the matter. One said Charles has been trying and failing to get Andrew out of Royal Lodge for the past three years.

William did it in two weeks. William is king in all but name now. Charles announced in 2024 that he had cancer. The Royalist has reported, as have we here outspoken, that it is incurable. And we have also covered in detail how fears about the king's demise have led to a flow of power from Charles to William. A friend of the Prince of Wales said that William stepped in after being left dismayed by the deal announced two weeks ago, which saw Andrew lose the use of the Duke of York title, but crucially keep Royal Lodge and continue as a prince. The King's team has now attempted to retroactively present that as an interim step, with yesterday's briefing documents stating that the necessity of further action was

never in doubt. The notion that this is his father's mess refers to deep unhappiness within William's circle about the way Charles tried not only to rehabilitate Andrew, but to co-opt William and Kate into the effort by forcing them to drive Andrew to church in Balmoral in the summer of 2003, having invited Andrew to join the family's Christmas Day photo call at Sandronum in 2022. At Christmas 2020, both Andrew and Sarah were in the festive photo call. William, furious, boycotted Christmas lunch at Sandrine in response. In February 2024, Andrew was permitted to lead the family to church for the memorial service of King Constantine of Greece. He was seated in the front row alongside Princess Anne and the Queen. And there are fears within the royal family that there could be more

to come as the journalist Daphne Barak, who has Epstein's emails, confirmed on on GB News last night. I tell you right now that the palace did call at least one of the two papers I work with and ask what is Daphne has more and what's coming more and we do have much more and I think they thought if they just do what they did today it will not be published or aired but I can tell you already that one of your networks at least is working on a very big special the downfall of the york so it's not going to stop the story the story is big but i think as but i think it's high time yeah when i spoke to you last time definitely you alluded to the idea

that there was more to come of these emails you've seen them you know what's coming down the line do the royal family know what you know and could that be the reason why they are distancing himself so abruptly and so brutally at this time i don't know if they know exactly what he is although some of the emails were on under the royal email right royal lord emails so the palace should have an access uh my sources are very high end but the palace should have an access they do know that much more coming uh and very damaging um and um i mean they know it from my paper uh i was asked personally, it's bad. It was a very, very tight relationship.

The traffic between Sarah, Andrew, and Jeffrey Epstein was not one email, not two emails. There were more than 100 emails that we saw. And it was not about sex. I mean, Andrew might have loved sex. I mean, Sarah loves sex, but it was about money. It's all look for the money best. But I have tried to report this scandal without hysteria because there are also massive risks about what?

what Charles has just done. Here's the other side, as Henry Bolton argued, Prince Andrews showed extremely bad judgment. It's a mistake he'll pay for the rest of his days. To remove the title of Prince, I think, is going too far. By all means remove his other titles, but this weakens not strengthens the monarchy. It sets a precedent that undermines the institution.

It's unwise, unnecessary, and unfair. And there was a disagreement about this between Miriam, Kate and Alex Armstrong on G.B. News. Now, obviously, he's not been in favour for a very long time, and he's not taken any part in royal life, and neither should he. But I think this is a terribly dangerous precedent to set. Either titles pass on by the bloodline or they don't. I think this could be the end of the monarchy. No, I think it being very dramatic, Miriam. I think this is exactly what we need to see. And I think this has got Prince William written all over it. He is the future king of this country. And the royals have just been going wild lately, haven't there?

We've got Harry and Megan on this tirade against the royal. I'm trying to bring the whole establishment down. Andrew's bringing the whole thing into disrepute. And I'm glad to see that actually we've got some leadership in our monarchy again. And I think Prince William, when he ascends the throne, is going to be a radical king. Well, I'm more with Alex on this, but I do understand the worries and the fears on the other side. Like Harvey Proctor. who thinks that it sets the most awful example in terms of the stripping away of one of the most fundamental of British values, arguing in stripping Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor of his titles, the establishment including the monarchy and parliament,

has shredded the golden thread of our justice system innocent until proven guilty. While the settlement of 12 million to Virginia Jew Frey remains an enigma, we may never know the reasoning, Andrew has never faced trial, yet is treated as guilty until proven innocent. If there is evidence he is guilty of a crime, it should face the scrutiny of due process. Until then, the media is fueling a witch hunt, baying for a scalp and dragging the public with it, pressuring the royal family to act. I despair. My sympathies lie with the true victims of Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal associates. Peter Hitchens had an important take too.

I've never been very happy about joining in with any general. outrage on any subject. I always feel uncomfortable with it. I wrote in the mail on Sunday last weekend that I concede quite happily that Andrew is probably quite thick, that his financial dealings don't bear probably much scrutiny, that he's made some extremely unwise friends, and all these things true. But I'm worried about this sort of chorus which has developed in which no one can even say actually he denies what's alleged against him

and nothing's been proved against him. And I believe that the presumption of innocence is one of the glories of our civilization and I don't think it's being observed. In this occasion, I don't think it's being observed by the monarch himself. I find that distressing. I'll be accused for,

because I say this, of defending Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, as we must now call him in French revolutionary style. I think Mariantoinette ended up being called the Widow Capet in the same fashion. I don't, I'm not defending him. I have never met him. I don't know him. I have no brief for him. I don't think highly of him. But I am disturbed by the way in which this is developing. And I actually, I don't think that anything that the king does of this nature will save the monarchy from the effect of it. As William sees it, though, there has been 15 years, where Andrews allies have failed to win the public narrative against the now deceased Virginia Dufray. It was in the bath, and it started there, and then it led into the bedroom, and it didn't last very long. the whole entire procedure it was disgusting he wasn't mean or anything but he got up

and he said thanks walked out and I sat there in bed just horrified and ashamed and felt dirty and I had to get up and go out a shower and you know the next day Yiquelyan tells me I did a really good job you know she papped me on the back and said you made him really happy her memories are not quite correct. And I think that throws everything out the window really as far as people are actually believing her. But let's be honest, that Newsnight interview with Emily Maitless

became pretty much unrecoverable, even though I revealed the next day when I was executive editor of the son that Andrew had told his mum the queen that it was a great success. We all knew it really wasn't. You threw a birthday party for Epstein's girlfriend, Gulenne Maxwell, at Sandringham.

No, it was a shooting weekend. A shooting weekend. Just a straightforward shooting weekend. But during these times that he was a guest at Windsor Castle at Sandringham, the shooting weekend, we now know that he was and had been procured. procuring young girls for sex trafficking? We now know that.

At the time, there was no indication to me or anybody else that that was what he was doing. For the record, is there any way you could have had sex with that young woman or any young woman trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein in any of his residences? No. And without putting too final point on it, if you're a man, it is a positive act to have sex with somebody.

You have to take some sort of positive action. And so therefore, if you try to forget, it's very difficult to try and forget positive action. And I do not remember anything. I was at home. I was with the children. I'd taken Beatrice to a pizza express in Woking for a party at a, I suppose, sort of four or five in the afternoon. Why would you remember that so specifically? Why would you remember a Pizza Express birthday and being at home? Because going to Pizza Express in Woking is an unusual thing for me to do. So you're absolutely sure that you're at home on the 10th of March. She was very specific about that night.

she described dancing with you and you profusely sweating and that she went on to have bath possibly... There's a slight problem with the sweating because I have a peculiar medical condition which is that I don't sweat or I didn't sweat at the time and that was... oh actually yes I didn't sweat at the time So Virginia now haunts Andrew, with her brother calling for a criminal prosecution again on the BBC last night, even though, and I am prepared to say this, even though the rest of the mainstream media isn't,

even though much of Dufre's story never added up. Watch. Do you think that in writing this book, she hoped that her life's account would be heard at the top of the royal family in the United States? Kingdom, was that one of the reasons she took to making her account public, Sky? I think it's very much a reason she put to make her account public, but I also think it was for justice and accountability for all survivors out there. It wasn't just about reaching the royal family. It was about holding anybody that's been implicated to account. And I think the king is setting a precedent for the rest of the world leaders out there to actually come

forward and say, you know what, even if it is my brother, I'm going to hold him to account because I believe survivors. I saw it in the statement earlier today of, you know, survivors are front of mind. And we have to continue to keep that front of mind. But it's not enough. It's not enough. We have to have some sort of investigation that goes further into this. I mean, he's still walking around a free man. I commend the king. I think he's doing an amazing job as a world leader, setting a precedent. But we need to take it one more step further. He needs to be behind bars. period. So even though I have my doubts about Dufre's account, here was Andrew at Epstein's New York Pussy Palace, greeting women, young women, at the door after Epstein had been convicted

of paedophilia. That alone was enough to end. up where we are today. There are still issues, of course, because Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne as plain old Andrew. Harry's also in that list. So is Archie and Lilibet, even though there are very legitimate questions about their births. That cannot stand. And the left-wing media continues to circle two. Look at the cover of the new statesman this week, for example, as hardcore Republicans, like the group Republic, have their moment in the sun alongside left-wing Islamists like Zara Sultana. Now, Connor Thominson is here.

So Connor Tomlinson, given the seriousness for the British monarchy with even hardcore royalists and monarchists saying that its very future is at stake, surely this was the right decision for Prince William to step in and just say enough, papa, enough. You've got to do what I'm telling you to do here. It was the sensible decision procedurally, Dan, but I think they're on borrowed time. It almost seems like history is repeating itself

with periods of political tumult coinciding with the reign of a King Charles. And so Charles... So the monarchy is on Borough Time altogether? Or this particular reign? This particular reign and probably the Windsor family. So I was going to bring up, actually, that piece by Will Lloyd in The New Statesman.

Not usually an outlet I read, Dan, because the New Statesman once treated Roger Scruton a bit like The Spectator, ironically now treating me. They're a left-wing rag. However, Will has written some very good, form pieces with some solid interviews. And in that, he points out that Charles in 1981 said that he believes monarchy has been the most consistent stabilising force as a form of government throughout the ages. But Charles' problem is, not that he sees himself as a leader of a particular

nation and custodian of a particular tradition, a kind of private form of inherited government as Hans Herman Hopper would articulate in democracy the god that failed. But instead, as someone who sits atop all politics as a great unifier. And so what he's doing by hosting these community cohesion events or saying he's the defender of all faiths or trying to launder politics through international institutions and laws is paper over the deep cracks of division within British society. And he thinks the politics itself causes division when instead politics is the only way that groups with different visions of the good can redress their grievances and one can win out over the other. This was Karl Schmidt's observation that all power is an exercise in

sovereignty, he who decides. And if the Windsors are unwilling to act as sovereigns, then they're both incapable of appeasing the growing wellspring of Republican sentiment, either with the left-wing radicals in our country, the liberal ideologues who want to level all hierarchy and institute egalitarianism, or the growing constituency of these descendants of immigrants who, well, well, would only identify with a caliphate regarding a monarch, but do not identify with the House of Windsor. And so if they're not going to appease that constituency, and they're also not going to take sovereign decision-making capacity, like the likes of philosophers like Joseph de Maestra, would urge them to, then they're trying to serve both masters and actually winning over no support.

And so I think eventually the House of Windsor may have to step down for the British monarchy to survive as an institution. What's interesting, Connor, about that new statesman piece is that it is completely targeting William. There's an acknowledgement even amongst the enemies of the British monarchy that William is a very popular figure, right? And so I find it pretty despicable the way that they have targeted him. I mean, look at this from Will Lloyd, who's the deputy editor of the magazine, the author of this piece, claiming that William is functionally illiterate, which is something that he got into further on this interview of the New Statesman podcast. Watch this.

All about Prince William. We're told he likes Aston Villa, he cares about mental health, he's got the mental health. But then I think the royal stenographers have accidentally let the daylight in. We're told that William is unable to name a favourite author, but he is a box set guy who does love

Batman-related superhero movies quote William is not a great reader he prefers an oral briefing now I'm reading between the lines a little bit here but are we going to have a monarch who basically either can't or doesn't want to read bro are you telling me that if you were the monarch you'd be reading books I would be I would be reading books

it's very important poor the other one it's incredibly important good for him he knows he knows the Ashton philippe team like he's tinkering with his fbl team he likes watching box set what would you so connor i think you can go for william on lots of issues that we can debate so for example there's big issues around how he feels in terms of the church of england uh for example but to suggest that william is some type of stupid guy who can't even read is massively

underestimating him. Trust me, Connett. There is a real intelligence to this guy. He knows how the system works and he knows what he thinks has to be done in order to save the monarchy. So I'm not really sure that this tactic is going to work because, of course, what the new statesman is advocating for, by the way, is for the monarchy to end with the death of King Charles. Yes, and I don't think the argument's going to come across well for a couple of reasons. Number one, because, well, particularly Bugman Olly Dugmore just seethes with resentment. I mean, he said he wanted 100% wealth confiscation tax on LBC the other day, and even Ian Dale, who is a demented Lib Dem masquerading as Tory,

laughed in his face saying that was insane. However, I must point out, not just trying to defend my own interests here, considering, you know, Will goes to Taylor Swift concerts and enjoys the Dark Night, which I also happen to do, but also just in historical, Precedent, Olli's accidentally right in saying that monarchs wouldn't sit there reading long books all of the time, not just because prior to the printing press it was not widely available, but also because the monarch would have a lot of his time occupied by court and stately business. And so what he would get is verbal briefings by his trusted court of advisors

who would do the reading of the laws of the philosophy, relay it to him, hold court with him, and then he, as a sovereign decision maker, takes all of the guidance and acts upon it. This is kind of what Donald Trump does. Donald Trump doesn't sit around listening to Audible or reading through tomes on post-liberalism. He just sort of goes with his instincts, and his advisors like Stephen Miller, who are very well-read, will aggregate information and feed it back to him, and so he can make good decisions based on that. My concern with William is not his lack of reading Atlas shrugged on his nightstand or something. My concern is that with, as Will actually put in the piece,

his preoccupation with modern political concerns, like climate. change or mental health, a kind of soft-edged version of the weeping and opus sofa that his brother is doing. He is too distracted by things like social media trends or too concessionary to the bleeding heart left who don't want the monarchy to exist in the first place, that when eventually, if we're judging by polling in the Financial Times, the British public flip and go hardcore nationalist and traditionalist, and the government that comes in to represent them has to act on that. Will William have the stomach to give royal assent to all of the policies they want to pass through, or will he feel squishy and reluctant, and will either the House of

Windsor need to be replaced to pass those policies, or will he stand in the way of the restoration of Britain? Truly, we're at a crossroads, and it'll be interesting to see what happens. We are at a crossroads. We absolutely are. It was a major moment last night. But even though I have certain doubts about aspects of Williams, shall we say, woke worldview, When it comes to the restoration of the monarchy, I think he's our best bit. I really, really do. And what we're going to see now is him starting to run the show. This is exactly what King Charles did in the last couple of years of the late Queen Elizabeth

the Second's life after he had managed to get rid of Christopher Gite, the Queen's top advisor. He ran the show for her. William will now be running the show behind. the scenes. There is a significant shift of power and do just remember that Charles's health is very significant in all of this. This is a very, very unwell man who doesn't really have the physical capability to take on a lot of these issues anymore. Breaking today, Rachel from accounts lies again. This lawbreaker, this liar who couldn't even tell the truth about her damn CV, doesn't know how to properly rent out her house. But perhaps what's most significant

is she doesn't even know how to be honest and transparent with the Prime Minister when her job is on the line. But the problem is, Slippery Stama isn't going to get rid of the tax riser-in-chief, meaning that even though she has been humiliated again for admitting she did know she needed a license after the Daily Mail revealed the Chancellor broke the rental law. Stama can't put this woman exactly where she should be, the political graveyard. As Adam Brooks posted, how can she continue? She should have been sacked. Worst way, she should resign. But this is Labor, a party that makes the Tories look like saints. This government is so corrupt. So for the second day in a row,

late last night, completely overshadowed by the news of Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, being thrust into royal exile, there was another mortifying exchange of letters between Reeves and Stama, where Stama made it very clear he was unhappy with his chancellor. He wrote, Dear Rachel, thank you for your further letter updating me regarding the correspondence between your husband and the estate agents. The correspondence you shared shows that the oversight regarding the license occurred after your husband had been told by the estate agents that they would be happy to apply for a license on his behalf. In the event, however, this application did not occur. It is clearly regrettable that the information in this correspondence was not shared with me

when you wrote to me last night. But I fully accept that you were not aware at that stage of these emails. I understand that the relevant emails were only unearthed by your husband this morning and that you have updated me as soon as possible. I accept that you were acting in good faith when you wrote to me last night. However, it would clearly have been better of you and your husband had conducted a full trawl through all email correspondence with the estate agency before writing to me yesterday. Based on the information you have provided to me, I still regard this as a case of an inadvertent failure to secure the appropriate licence, which you have apologised for and are now rectifying, having consulted the independent advisor on ministerial standards and received

his clear and swift guidance with which I concur, I see no need for any further action. But this is an extraordinary state of affairs, given that the Labour Party, during all of their time in opposition, collaborated with the mainstream media to drive out cabinet ministers and even a prime minister for far less. So while there's lots of people taking the high road at this point, that's not where I'm at in regards to this, because Reeves was one of those witch-hunter-in-chiefs.

Even James O'Brien is now saying, oh, no, there's nothing to see here. Chris Rose posted James O'Brien claims that he doesn't understand the outrage at Rachel he's failing to obtain a rental license. It's the hypocrisy after years of preaching about being whiter than white. This same guy banged on about Boris and Cake for months. Watch. It could be that you're listening to the same words that I'm listening to and you are hearing evidence of an appalling and egregious breach. You may even have persuaded yourself that £900 is a significantly large sum of money for the Chancellor of the Exchequer to have jeopardised her career

in order to avoid paying. If you believe that, you should probably give your head a wobble. I don't know that anybody can meaningfully argue that this is anything other than a genuine mistake. A lot of people on the right of British media and British politics are very exercised by today, while they were supremely unconcerned when their hero Boris Johnson saw two, ethics advisors resign in disgust at his contempt for ethics. That's what footballification looks like.

This is outrageous. This is outrageous. She's the Chancellor of D.X. Jacker. How can this happen? Oh, you remember when Boris Johnson's ethics advisors resigned twice? Because he was such a he was, yeah, that was great. That was funny, wasn't it? He's such a lad. He's such a top bloke. I love him. Yeah, we go for lunch tomorrow.

That was really funny when Boris Johnson's ethics advisors resigned two of them, not just one, two of them because he was, you know, doing up his flat and lying about it, pretending he lost the phone. I can't even remember what the other was. Scandal after scandal after scandal. Well, none of it mattered because I love Boris. Connor Tomlinson, host of Tomlinson Talks, your reaction. Oh, I'm sick to death of healing, hearing from Squealer from Animal Farm there,

who will happily apologise for any egregious action or hypocrisy or atrocity caused or ignored by the state until he's quite literally red in the face. So that might be all the booze, Dan. Yeah, James O'Brien doesn't understand the right at all. And of course, he's just a a sort of pantomime villain, so he's not meant to. He's just a pay propagandist. But those of us on the actual right, those of us with consistency and standards, who care about the health of our country, yeah, we wanted Boris Johnson gone. Not because we were outraged about his breach of COVID laws because the COVID laws were legitimate, but because he put us under house arrest for two years, suggested we take mandatory vaccines in December 2021, and all the

time he and his staff were having a piss up at our expense. So I'm happy Boris Johnson went. I'm not happy about the media circus that was confected around it, because that itself was hypocritical because when Kirstama had a beer and a curry under the same restrictions, as photographed by the lovely Fleur Meston, or now power, they didn't call Blue Bloody Murder and have him ousted. Instead, he's now Prime Minister, unfortunately. So, as regards to Rachel Reeves, yeah, she violated the restrictions that she championed being brought in via Leeds Council in 2020. And whether or or not this was an oversight by her estate agent according to the emails given to Downing Street by her husband, or whether or not this was her skirting the law, as some people have suggested,

despite the emails being provided, it doesn't matter. Because if it was you or me, Dan, we would be treated as if we had skirted the law even if we had made an honest mistake. And it's because these punitive laws are designed to extract every penny possible from hardworking Brits like you and me to then redistribute to, labor's various welfare-dependent client blocks because they would like to keep safe seats forever and also build an egalitarian utopia where literally any Somalian can be given social housing and he can become as British as you and me. Point being, we wouldn't be given the same grace if we fell afoul of the laws that Rachel Reeves herself has supported and

wanted to introduce. I think this is actually a disastrous move politically for Starma as well because we're days away from a budget where he can't commit to not raising taxes as was promised in their manifesto, and we know manifestos aren't worth the paper they're written on these days. He could have used this as an instance to throw Rachel Reeves under the bus, replace her with a better chancellor, or at least someone more able to sell their ideas in less of a monotone and less looking like Lord Farquod, and delay the date at which the budget had to be delivered, giving them more time to cook the books. Instead, because Starma is a robot with no internal monologue, he didn't decide to take the opportunity. More for him.

Yeah, these two are in this together now. That is the reality. They are in this together. the economy is going to come crashing down, the budget is going to be absolutely disastrous. But I think you make a really good point because actually, Conner, they have now lost their two, well, lost one of their most senior women, the other one under threat,

I'm talking about Angela Rainer as well, because of the shocking systems and red tape, they expect all of us to follow, right? Like if there is ever an illustration of how difficult, life is in the United Kingdom. It's because of these types of regulations, but Labor have absolutely no intention of cutting any of the red tape, of getting rid of any of this, of making life any easier for us. And so I do think that's another fascinating point here.

I'm sorry, if Angela Rainer and Rachel Reeves, with all of the support they have, all of the advisors they have, all of the money that they have, cannot follow the systems that are required to either buy a house or rent out a house. What hope do any of us have? I think it really is an illustration of how difficult it is to live in the UK just day to day now. But I have zero sympathy. Zero sympathy. She is a liar. She was a liar. Look at the litany of scandals, Connor, ever since she has entered the job. Not to mention the fact she's useless at the job. I repeat, if this were a Tory, she would be gone because the mainstream media would not, have let us forget these stories day after day after day. Instead, it's not just James O'Brien

who's been an apologist, Connor, so-called, you know, and they're obviously not, but so-called unbiased reporters like Robert Peston and Beth Rigby. They've all been running to her defence too. Yeah, well, the purpose of the system is what it does down. And what the British political system does is build a increasing nexus, a kind of Japanese knotweed, of selectively applied laws and restrictions, be it financial, be it tax, be it regulatory, be it hate speech legislations or even just prosecution of actual violent crimes, where violent criminals are let out early or given less sentencing time, like a chap who tried to strangle a railway worker the other week because she asked to see his ticket, his name is Muhammad, of course, and actually tried to assault

a railway worker, only got 16 months in prison. Meanwhile, Lucy Connolly gets 31 months for an ill-advised, but deleted tweet. So, turns out what the system does is protect the reputations of inadequate midwit politicians because they have the correct ideology. For example, Rachel Reeves putting up a photo of Red Ellen, the co-founder of the Communist Party in Number 11 Downing Street. So despite lying on her CV, despite crashing the economy, despite sending guilt rates higher than they were under Truss's premiership and then blaming Liz Trust for crashing the economy when it's the Bank of England's fault, but when the economy's in the doldrums because of their tax policies and tax rises, it's never their fault, and at the same time ensnare us in a

widely cast and nebulous net of censorship laws and financial restrictions. So the point is, Dan, it's much like the Soviet Union, where the inner party could preach communism all it likes, but practice what Robert Conquest called Carr and Haram syndrome. Living it up at our expense, and the moment you criticise the state, you find yourself in a gulag. The leftist hypocrites strike again. At a time when this country, and especially white native Britons, are in mourning over the slaying of Wayne Broadhurst with an Afghan illegal who arrived in this country on the back of a lorry in 2020 and then given leave to remain, charged with his murder. Do you know what the hard leftist have decided to do? A bit like David Lamia earlier in the week.

They've decided to laugh in our face. Let me show you Narenda Kaur's Halloween costume. Where she is practicing as the biggest hypocrite in the country, the art of white face. So she's decided to mock us all posting, in case you missed it, Happy Halloween, flag raises. Stop being so sensitive. I'm paying homage to you.

It's a compliment there. She then claimed to me online that she's absolutely fine to do white face because, of course, zombies can only be white. But we know exactly what she's doing. She is baiting us all at a time when our sensitivity, because of the complete MSM and elite class ignorance over what happened to Wayne, is upsetting so many folk. And in fact, I'm going to show you what Katie Hopkins said about it in just one moment. But first, Connor Tomlinson, your reaction to Narinda's hypocrisy boasting in our face about the fact that she's just done a white face where you know full world.

If any of us were to do the opposite, she would be calling for our heads. And in fact, she'd be calling for our arrest. Well, first of all, and this shouldn't shock anyone, given Narindica's subterranean IQ and disingenuous activity online. Yeah, zombies are from African traditions. They're from voodoo. So no, they're not just white. In every single zombie property, when there's a global zombie apocalypse, do you think only the white people get infected? Like, what a moronic comment?

But yeah, I'm not one to whine about insensitivity, but when this vindictive race communist and detention-seeking grifter in question decides to dress up as someone, one, in white face, doing literal racial cosplay, therefore conceding the idea that national identity is based on ethnicity and that you need to be white in order to be English, good one there, Narenda, but two, at the time where natives are getting stabbed by people who do not need to belong here in the first place. So she dresses up as someone in white face, in an England flag, with massive gashes across her face. Yet, it seems a little bit like rubbing in the vindictive colonising of our country that we voted against in every election since 1974, which has resulted in violent consequences for the natives and their children, Narinda. And therefore, you wonder why. And she wants to debate with my friend Carl Benjamin on the lotus seats. And she complained that she'd been told to go back to India, that she's not British. And it's like, okay, you do realize that the people who are nice in this country that have good

relationships with the natives who people want here, because they consider them to be their friends and family members, aren't told that. And so perhaps if you weren't trying to make money, gloating about the atrocities inflicted upon us by people that never need to be in our country in the first place, most people wouldn't be very mean to you. You might get the odd, ridiculous skinhead, who's just rude and indulges in complexion-based bigotry. But you wouldn't get people saying maybe you would be happier in India because you seem to hate white people quite a lot.

So maybe if you stopped practicing this humiliation ritual of our country at a time where things are really serious and people are dying, people would be less mean to you. Indeed, Connor, I'm not sure if you saw Lilani Dowdy, our friend Llani's Halloween costume. It's better you see it, probably. but you remember the famous incident, the upskirt picture of Narenda Kaur, which she has taken Lawrence Fox to court over. Lalani says, happy Halloween, one of the scariest outfits you'll see. Skims were out of their new hairy thong, so I made my own more realistic one. My American friends, you were fortunate.

You don't know what this is about. But on to the more serious matter of why we are all so upset, this slain of Wayne Broadhurst. Here was Katie Hopkins take. Now, remember the mainstream media have ignored the story, but Katie actually cancelled her broadcasts of Batchit Bonkers Britain because she's just so devastated watch. For a couple of days, out of respect for Wayne Broadhurst and his family and all the people who loved him.

And in fact, all the people were hurting with the stabbing to death of a lovely man in the place where he worked, just trying to walk his dog by an illegal Afghan. Just feels like tonally, Batship Bonkers Britain and me leaping around in Lycra with a high sock is a bit off.

I've been keeping my head down, writing the books that I promised to you, personalising them, leaving a message in each one, and those will be coming out to you in the post. And Batshiponkers, Britain, will be back tomorrow. And I totally get that tonally right now, it doesn't feel right. And then equally, I see that it's exactly what we need.

To hold the line, to stick together, to keep laughter as our strongest weapon in our armoury. and for everybody to know and to remember that you are not alone, we are many, we are stronger together, and in the end, we will win. And as Peter Lloyd pointed out, it's been 72 hours. Sadiq Khan has posted three times about Jamaica's Hurricane Melissa, but nothing about the murder of Wayne Broadhurst in London. Connor, the ability of our elite class and mainstream media to ignore a story this horrific is for me a new low. Well, it's the inevitable consequence of their replacement migration policy, Dan.

Either they displaced the natives from their areas like East London or in the quiet, leafy suburbs of West London, when a beloved binman is just walking his dog in the middle of the day, He heroically intervenes in a spat between two foreigners, by the way, one attempting to stab a 14-year-old child after breaking into the country on the back of the lorry, I think it was, in 2020 and being given right to remain in 2022, in Boris Johnson's former constituency as it happened, and the other another victim himself, Shazad Farouk, and only the Brit dies. And this is a microcosm of what mass migration has done to our country.

There are disputes between foreigners on ethnic, religious or personal lines, basically recreating Middle Eastern PVP servers in our major cities, and either forcing the native population to move out of their historic lands and set up enclaves on the outskirts. I mean, my Halloween costume is I'm the last white guy in London at this point, or they're violently murdered by people who never needed to bring their blood feuds to our country in the first place. And this is just the latest in a long line of atrocities committed. I mean, I'm taken back to the Hartlepool stabbing, for example, when the illegal migrant was shouting, Allahabad, this is for Gaza. After stabbing, yes, first, another illegal migrant is accommodation, and then going and butchering a pensioner in broad daylight and saying, if I had an AK-47, I'd kill a bunch of children for Gaza too.

I'm put to mind of the Pakistani rape gang scandal. The Labour government has continued to cover up because they're either trading children's lives for votes or because, as Dennis McShane, the former Rovroom MP, said, as a guardian reading liberal lefty, doesn't want to rock the multicultural boat. These people are killing our people. And they see it that way. Even if we, as sort of individualistic, take us as you meet us, people,

don't want to see things in the lens of race or ethnicity or religion, but they do. And so all we can do to protect our people is ensure none of these low IQ backward savages, are in our country to stab us in the first place. And politicians need to start saying this. It doesn't matter what names you are. People are dying, and that is more important.

And of course, we see the takeover becoming more and more obvious by the day. Look at this from Basil the Great. Islamist put out call-to-arms in Birmingham. Notorious Islamist Ahmed Yakub, a friend of a Yub-Kahn MP, has put out a call from Muslims across the UK. to descend on Birmingham for the Aston Villa versus Tel Aviv football match. These people are not peaceful.

They want to conquer. Connor, watch this. Activists are planning to do a complete shutdown of Birmingham on November 6th. I've heard activists from all over the country are going to be present in Birmingham on November 6th because they want to show solidarity with the Palestinians and they also want to show the far right that we as a community can unite against racism, can unite against fascism. And hopefully the numbers that I am getting

or predictions of people coming is over 300,000 people at this moment in time. And I'm sure more people will join the movement and more people will join the cause closer to the game. West Midland, please need to take some action because violence is something that we do. do not want, but we do have a right to protest, to do static protests all over Birmingham and we will exercise that right. And I will support all the activists that are involved in these

protests. Oh no, Conner, they don't want violence. Of course they don't. Yeah, this is the same man who went on G.B. News with one of his colleagues when they were starting a new political movement and had dressed his colleague up in an England shirt ahead of time like some kind of minstrel show and then said, as you can see, brother, my colleague here is wearing an English shirt, therefore he stands for British values. But all he's doing is wrote learning the talking points that have been fed to him, by the way, by naive and treacherous liberals in the likes of the Conservative Party, the Liberal Democrats and Labour, that allow him to cosplay as a legitimate political candidate or a community leader, when instead he's only using terms like

racism or fascism or Islamophobia as thought-stopping cliches to inflame the immune system. of said liberals, so that when he flexes his Islamic muscles, they feel compelled to retreat. No, this person shouldn't be given any quarter in our country. He shouldn't be in our country. If not, because he has an annoying accent and can't speak without a jump cut alone. He's fundamentally stupid. Everything he believes will turn my country into a third world basket case. And I don't think that a sane and just society would tolerate this, would tolerate the likes of Mothin Ali, constantly complaining about Islamophobia and racism from the native. population, I think that they would relocate these people to a country which already practices

their demented ideology and politics and leave us alone. And then there's more shocking scenes on social media overnight. The Gryft Report explains that this way, Connor, an auditor came across Derby Station Migrant Hotel and caught them stuffing their faces at the taxpayer's expense. All men know women and children. Take a look this Connor. Here look, Margaret Hotel in Derby. Look at this like, look. Wow.

All the meals are getting. It looks healthy food that does. It's better like this. It's better like this. Salad bread. Peas, chips, like fish and chips today. You know what I'm saying? All sitting in the food court.

This is the station hotel at Derby. Derby. Some guy here, put his hand up. Put some of their foods. Securities there now. Closing the curtains. How's your food? Is it nice and warm in there?

Is it warm, is it? People outside on the streets, yeah? You're all sitting here having your food, you know what I mean? Look at them. Close your curtains then. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, fuck you as well. What are the studio selling garbage.

Stationing her, all right with the news. What are you eating? Security there, locking us down. Security here, closing the curtains. Yeah. All right, buddy. You enjoy it, yeah? You're all right, mate.

You well. But of course, our elite class failed to understand the anger so many a feeling so that when Elon Musk warned that Civil War in Britain is inevitable, Rory Stewart replied, no, it isn't. Even though you and your friends are eagerly trying to make your prediction come true, the Britain you see on your phone and that you are making other people see on their phones is not Britain come and visit. And Connor, I would argue that actually Rory Stewart has no idea about the Britain that people like us are seeing because we're living with these migrants in our community. He's not.

Yeah, Rory Stewart is practicing what I would like to coin as Schrodinger's diversity. So division only exists once you observe it. So actually, it's not a problem that Whitechapel is entirely dominated by Bangladeshi Islamists or Bradford, Luton, Birmingham, areas of Manchester, Leeds, etc. are dominated by the Biradiri clans of Pakistan raping white girls because they're Kaffir, and because they have a particular predilection for children based on what. what they believe about their prophet Muhammad. No, it's only a problem if Elon Musk or Tommy Robinson or Rupert Lowe

or you and me, Dan, happen to fire off a tweet about it, bringing people's attention to the video evidence and trial transcripts we have of this stuff. So, and I think also, Roy Stewart, given that his wife's livelihood was dependent on USAID, given he co-hosts a podcast with Alistair Campbell, the man who embroiled us in the Iraq War, just as he embroiled us himself in the bottom of a bottle,

I don't think that Rory Stewart is actually actually that blind to the goings on in this country. I think he just profits from its continued demise and making the sale pitch for its managed decline. But he knows what he's doing and he's just lying to us. Much like Fraser Nelson is. I mean, remember, back in 2017, Fraser Nelson gave an interview to a European news outlet where he said that the then conservative government don't actually have to do anything about immigration because voters are concerned about it. Instead, you can just sit people down and gaslight them by sympathetically saying, I hear your concerns. And then after the election, you just continue doing what you're always going to do anyway. And so people might express outrage about the rise of alternative media figures like yourself or me or Robinson or Musk even, but they only exist because the state and the media with whom they have worked hand in glove as their PR department for decades for these unwanted policies of mass migration and Islamic appeasement. The fact that they have failed the public means that is given rise to independent reporters who have more credibility

and who can give voice to people's discontent about this stuff. And so civil conflict will come if they keep censoring and suppressing voices that are calling out the problem, and if they refuse to do anything about it. Breaking today, a call for Axel Ruda-Kabana, the despicable Southport Islamist terrorist, for his parents to be deported. This after shocking revelations in the inquiry over exactly how Rudikvana was radicalised, leading him you will remember to stab to death three beautiful young girls at a Taylor Swift dance class and ruin the lives of countless others.

Now, there's been a cover-up when it comes to this story right from day one. You still won't see the mainstream media or the elite class referring to this man as an Islamist, despite the fact that he had an al-Qaeda manual in his bedroom, was producing ricin, and is a practicing Muslim behind bars, according to Tommy Robinson, who was on the floor below him at Belmarsh.

Now, this call from Connor Domlinson of Tomlinson talks, who writes on his substack, we should deport Axel Rudigabana's parents. Whether through Malfizan or neglect, Alfonsoe and Letitia repaid the generosity of our country by raising an anti-white child killer, they should be sent to Rwanda. Now, Connor is going to be here to explain exactly why very shortly, but first let me just get into the key parts of his thesis. Conner writes, Axel Rudipana's parents repaid our country's kindness and the generosity of the Southport community whose rotary clubs raise money for their son Dion's wheelchair by raising an anti-white child killer. They should be made to answer for their

failures as parents and deported back to Rwanda. They knew their son was remorseless, sadistic and violent. But when he broke into the school he was excluded from for carrying a knife and broke a student's wrist with a hockey stick, his father Alfonso tried to hide it from the authorities. In a WhatsApp message to Lancashire Council social worker, Alfonze said he expected a high degree of confidentiality and sensitivity and not to record or share some information with us that can turn our family upside down with the authorities in charge of punishing Axel. He asked why the council's youth offending team. We're writing an assessment for Axel and said, please don't involve them anymore.

Alfonze said it's not to say that there is something sinister because it is not necessary. The head teacher of Acorn's school, from which Axel was expelled, Joanne Hodson, did think there was something sinister, but was told to remove that word and that he is cold and calculating from her report on him because social work is accused her of racially profiling, a black boy with a knife. If we were more racist by these failed institutional standards, then B.B. King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alex DeSilva Aguil, would still be alive. At At every stage, Axel's family resisted interventions by the state. They tried to hide his evil nature from the public and the authorities.

Connor Tomlinson, I am so glad you are highlighting what we are discovering from this inquiry, but isn't it so typical of everything connected to the British deep state, to the elite class, to the regime media? It's like, we can push this authority back months and months and months on where the outrage has died down, where people start to move on, and we must not. Yes, definitely, Dan. And we're in a weird moral age where we have to pretend that the actions of parents are in no way responsible for the child that they have raised. We are in a period where parents don't have to be responsible to stay together. and raise that child, and we know that, for example, when parents split up, the overwhelming majority of prisoners have either not had their father in the home

or about quarter of them have been in foster care. So we know that parents have an influence on the criminality of their children. And in this case, in particular, we have to pretend, or we have to assume, according to the details that we've had in the lead up to this inquiry, that Axel Ruda-Cabana was so obsessed with dictatorship, with anti-white genocide, with the mass murders across history, with ISIS car bombings, with terror attacks, that he brought it up to his classmates, telling some in a football match he wanted white genocide,

to his teachers, who said to the Guardian, he could list all of the crimes of Hitler, Pol Pot, etc., off the top of his head, but that he never brought it up at the dinner table with his family, that he never mentioned it to anyone that he was close with, that for some reason the tablet, where the Al-Qaeda training manual had been found to be downloaded in his bedroom, just materialised out of thin air and wasn't bought by his parents, that they didn't pay for the broadband that he used to research this stuff, that they took no interest in their son's life after he had been excluded from school for bringing a knife in, or breaking back into the school in December 2019 with a hockey stick,

shattering the wrist of one of his former classmates before being tackled to the ground by a brave teacher who broke the school lockdown to go and apprehend Ruder-Kabana. But for some reason, his father knew a week before the Southport murders, that his son was going to do something horrible because he was about to get in a taxi ordered to his old school, probably to commit another copycat attack, because he was wearing the same outfit that he wore when he killed those three lovely girls.

And his father brought him inside saying, not today, Axel, but did not have him sectioned or handed over to the authorities. that his father knew that Axel was ordering suspicious packages, including ricin making materials and the knife that he would use to go on to commit the murders to a neighbor's house because the neighbor texted his discontent saying, stop ordering packages to my home, and he said, I'll talk to Axel about it. Presumably, he was using the family Amazon account and at least one of his parents' credit card because Axel was 17, not an old enough to buy the knife, and did not have a job,

so where did he get the money from it for the weapons itself? And now we found out from the trial that the young offenders team set on to Axel's case by Lancashire Council after he was excluded from school and after he was tackled to the ground because he broke back into the school in 2019 were being blocked from having information by Alphonse who was telling one of Axel social workers, please don't give them information that could be damaging to my family and please don't tell them about his sinister nature. Sinister, by the way, being the word that the former head teacher of his school had also used in a report about Axel bringing an eye. to school, but she had been censored because she had been told not to racially profile a black boy with a knife. Well, if we did more racial profiling in that fashion, considering black boys, especially in London, make up the overwhelming percentage of cases, joining gangs, stabbing one another, and actually murdering both black boys and white boys, then more people would be alive, including these three girls. And so the only punishment we can do now is retribution. Axel Ruda-Cabana should not be living, getting Harabo sweets, and

working a job within Belmarch. He should be given capital punishment. And his parents who raised him, for the ingratitude they've shown our country, for being given asylum for no discernible reason, by the way, eight years after Rwandan genocide finished, despite being related to the sitting government and his father serving in the military that put down the genocide, so should be greeted as a war hero. They should be deported back to Rwanda, where they should have always been, in the Horn of Africa, never to cause us any harm in the first place. And Conner, why is it that in this country we have such a peculiar sensitivity when it comes to really looking into the parents and the family members of people who have committed these types of egregious crimes? I mean, in the US, for example, if you go and commit a school shooting, your family is going to be pictured and is going to be pictured and is going to be.

examined, you're not necessarily going to be blamed. But we haven't seen anything of Ruder Cabana's parents. Is that because they are in some type of state protection? Or is it because there's a squeamishness from the mainstream media? It's both. Ruder Cabanah's parents at all stages of their stay in the UK have been protected and funded by the state. So they were brought over on an asylum claim that we still don't know the reason why it was the UK or why that decision was granted, by the way. That is of public interest. but it has been sealed. They then bought a property on a social housing plot in Southport, so they benefited from taxpayer subsidised housing, despite Alphonse's business, a Brickerbrack

business named after Harry Rednap, for some reason, was only making a couple of thousand pounds a year, so it was well in the red in terms of taking more in taxes out than he contributed. And then they're now in witness protection, presumably with new identities, in an unknown place in the country. So we are footing the bill for their presence in our country, despite what they have done to us by raising Axel. But then more to your broader point down, the reason we don't blame them is because of the delusional blank slate anthropology that our ruling liberal ideology demands we believe in. We have to believe that everyone is absolutely free of any social influence. That is the natural state of mankind. And that if someone else has influenced you, they have violated your

freedom. And so we must work to remove all sorts of limits on your individual will. And that everyone is deep down equal. And so somehow the state failed Axe Ruda-Cabana rather than him being a murderer psychopath who went and killed three girls with premeditated delight that he killed a six-year-old, as he told the police. And so if we then judge the parents for raising him,

we admit that no, not everyone is equal. Yes, culture matters, yes, heritage matters, yes, morality matters. And this is especially taboo in Britain because ever since the murder of, Stephen Lawrence, the police and all the criminal justice institutions have had to acquit themselves with the charge from the McPherson report that says they are institutionally racist. This is why we have anti-racist policing policies that

allow black criminals lighter treatment than white criminals. This is why we have non-crime hate incidents in the 2014 hate crime operational guidance. The MEP police wanted to prove that they weren't racist and so they needed to police the private thoughts and offensive statements of members of the public even if it didn't meet a criminal threshold. Basically, Dan, we live in an ideologically anti-racist society, which means that in order for the institutions to prove the anti-racist bona fides, they have to pretend that black criminals are not responsible for their actions. Meanwhile, the only reason they commit crime is because of prejudice by the native population.

We need to invert that morality on its head in order to save lives. Indeed, we do, and it's brilliant work, Connor, from you. And of course, for much more of it, do make sure you subscribe to Tomlinson Talks, Conner's brilliant show on YouTube and you can also subscribe to Connor Tomlinson on Substack where he has written much more about this Connor. Thank you so much. Have an amazing weekend. And of course, we are about to reveal the worst Britain in the world this week. A reminder, this is where we put your union jackasses from Monday to Friday head to head. On Monday, it was David Lammy for his appalling performance in Parliament where he just laughed in the faces of all of us. It really felt

like. On Tuesday, Sadie Khan for his ongoing cover-up of the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs and so much else more. On Wednesday, it was Dr. Scholar, who claimed that effectively white people should be executed before black ones and even suggested the death of the serving MP Rupert Lowe. And on Thursday, it was Rachel Reeves, Rachel From accounts for her despicable law-breaking, but of course not dealing with any of the consequences of that law-breaking. Let me get to your comments before I reveal the results. Let's just say there is a theme. There is a theme coming through today from Mark C.F. 83.

Had Britain's biggest race-bater not been nominated, presumably speaking about Dr. Scholar there, I definitely have voted for Mr. Kahn. But Scholar Ramabang ding-dong getting shortlisted gave me number. option. James Kenneth Flynn writes, Sadiq Khan is the most undeserving night in modern history and one of the worst leaders our country has ever had. The day he leaves office will be a day of national celebration. Ben, sorry, Lee, Lee Smith 3346 said, born and bred, an east end of London and proud of it. Well, when it was proper East End, not the shithole it is now. Hate it when

Khan says us Londoners, he will never ever be a Londoner. Asian fusion pet says, I'm voting for Sadistic Khan for worst Britain because he represents everything that has made us all so frightened to live in our own country. And Oscar Perez says all of them, but Sadiq Khan is the worst of the week. 9,000 potential grooming gangs. I don't need to say any more. No, you do not. Let me now reveal these results. In fourth position with 8% of your vote, it's Dr. Scholar. In third position, with 10% of the vote, the Deputy Prime Minister, David Lammy. The runner-up with 15% of your vote, Rachel from accounts. But the worst Britain in the world this week, by an overwhelming majority, Saddik Khan, with 67% of your vote.

Now we're moving over to Substack for the uncanceled after show where Prince Harry and Megan Markle are gripped with Panic and Montecito as William shows his hand by revealing the path to strip them and their children, Archie and Lily, of their royal title. So we're going to have all the latest with the Royal YouTube Sensation. You can sign up, according to Taz, that is, and you can sign up at www. dot outspoken. Dot live are paid monthly and annual subscribers get first access

to our Royal Uncanceled Aftershow over on Subset with no advertising whatsoever. Substack's an important platform for me where I've posted this big Royal exclusive today, but it's also a place where I'm protected from big tech cancellation, from lawfare,

from censorship, and if you would like, basically the best way you can support Outspoken is supporting me on Substack. that's how I explain it really. There is another way to support me though completely for free and that is subscribing to the Dan Wharton Outspoken podcast, which is now available wherever you get your podcast, Spotify, Apple Podcasts. The big thing there is that I need you if you can to rate and review us five stars if you may because it helps us in the algorithm. So that's all of my requests

to end what has been a snother seismic week. Thank you so. much for your company. I hope you have a very restful and peaceful weekend. At this stage, of course, we do come off YouTube. We're going to move to Substack for the uncanceled after show. A remind of that address, www. www.

outspoken.org. But we are back with you live on Monday at 5pm UK time. I am informed that daylight saving changes do happen in the US, so we will be going back to midday eastern 9am Pacific. Hit subscribe if you're watching right now

on YouTube. Just click that little notification bell that alerts you to our new episodes at the moment that they become available and most importantly i promise to keep fighting for you