Dan Wootton Outspoken - PROTESTS SPARKED BY COPS BLAMING HENRY NOWAK AFTER HIS DEATH AS TOMMY ROBINSON DEMANDS CHARGES

Episode Date: June 8, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Fresh flash protests from patriots in Southampton after the sickening revelation that Hampshire Police attempted to paint Henry Nowak as the aggressor in his anti-white slaughtering by Vickrum Digwa three days after his death when they already had categorical evidence to the contrary. British mums and dads are now saying they don’t trust the police with their own children and Tommy Robinson is now calling on the Crown Prosecution Service and the Home Secretary to consider criminal charges against the officers, while the entire MSM and political class instead choose to focus on JD Vance weighing in on the scandal, resulting in the Deputy Prime Minister being humiliated on live TV. Yet the MSM is also ignoring new threats of violence by the Sikh community to instead make this all about them like Cathy Newman of Sly News. Then the Superstar Panel: Two of my favourite commentators in the whole world. Lauren The Insider, whose YouTube channel is must watch, and Peter C Barnes of The Outsider on Substack. So it’s The Insider and The Outsider united today. PLUS: Nigel Farage blames Zia Yusuf for reporting Rupert Lowe to the police, but the Restore Britain leader is hitting back in no uncertain terms. We’ll reveal his explosive new claim about the Reform UK cancellation. AND: Lorraine Kelly threatens to leave Woke ITV for the British Bashing Corporation or YouTube as the recently demoted daytime legend fights for a new contract. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Tension bubbles over at the only royal wedding of the year between Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling as King Charles forces Prince William and Catherine into an uncomfortable reunion with the princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. We’ll team up with the Royal News Network. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor,

free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. Staples' preferred business membership. built for busy business owners because you've got bigger things to think about. With Staples Preferred, get free delivery. No minimums. Staples Preferred unlocks up to 3% back.

Plus 10% savings on print and exclusive wireless offers. One less thing on your plate. Actually, a lot less. Visit staples.ca. slash preferred. That was easy. No submit, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Morton.

This is outspoken episode number 5007. Hope you had a really good weekend. Now, breaking right now, fresh flash protests from Patriots in Southampton after the sickening revelation that Hampshire police attempted to paint Henry Novak as the aggressor. In his anti-white slaughtering by Vikram Digwa three days after his death, when they already had categorical evidence. to the contrary. Have you seen the footage? What did you think? But you think it's right.

Yeah, get it. We must not forget that. We must not allow the fox in charge of the hen house, IOPC, to claim that there was no wrongdoing. But after these horrifying new revelations, is it any wonder that British moms and dads are now saying they don't trust the police with their own children?

I wouldn't trust him. I teach my own son. You don't phone police, you phone ambulance or fire engine. If you're out in public, you call mum. Shilling. Tommy Robinson now calling on the Crown Prosecution Service and the Home Secretary to consider criminal charges against the officers involved, while the entire MSM and political class instead choose to focus on J.D. Vance, weighing in on the scandal, resulting in the Deputy Prime Minister Calamity Lammy being humiliated on live national television. Why is it okay for Stama, and by the way, your colleagues, Shibana Mahmoud,

Saddam Khan, all to express views about a death in the American city, even before the trial took place, by the way, whilst dead events, you get ticked off by you. I looked up what you said about death of George Floyd. we have to find a way to transform this righteous anger into meaningful reform. But it gets worse. The MSM is also ignoring new threats of violence by the Sikh community to instead make this all about themselves,

like Cathy Newman of Sly News. I've been deluge with misogynistic abuse and death threats on X, but also on Instagram. And I just wanted to show you some of them. So this one's on X. It says, suck my big white, you dumb, ugly, unfripped broad. You touch shit, you get banged, bro. Oh, yeah, oh.

You know, we come for your daddy milk. We're going to come for your Tinder surprise and we're going to crack that egg, bro. We're going to take the toy. So after my digest, two of my favorite commentators in the whole world on the superstar panel, Lauren the insider,

whose YouTube channel is Must Watch and Peter C. Barnes, who's outside. on Substack is must read. So today we have the insider and the outsider United. Also coming up on today's show, Nigel Farage blames the year Yusuf for reporting Rupert Lowe to the police, but the Restore Britain leader is sitting back in no uncertain terms. We'll reveal his explosive new claim about the reform UK cancellation. Prince William is urged to back a new Henry Novak World Cup campaign.

I'll tell you all about that. And Lorraine Kelly threatens to leave Wokey TV for the British Bashing Corporation, or YouTube as the recently demoted daytime legend fights for a new contract. We'll give you the inside story. Then in the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow on Substack Tension, bubbles over at the only Royal Wedding of the year between Peter Phillips and Harriet Spurling as King Charles forces Prince William and Catherine into an uncomfortable reunion with the Princess's Betras and Eugenie. So we're teaming him up with the Royal News Network today. We'll show you all the lovely footage from the wedding too.

Plus, brand new Greatest Britain Union Jackhouse revealed at the end of the end of the the show, you can vote right now for the worst Britain in the world today. Lauren the insider has nominated David Lammy. She says he is a man who divides without saying a word. His handling of Henry Novak's brutal murder, the deflection, the gaslighting, the flat-out denial of facts is nothing short of pure evil. Two-tier justice, white lives matter. Peter C. Barnes has nominated Ambembollah Johnson.

The police racism watchdog said efforts to tackle race. have not gone far enough. Whereas I've gone for Kathy Newman of Sly News for making the Henry Novak tragedy all about her. Get voting. Keep your superchats coming in throughout the show. I will read some of the best before we go today. But now let's go. The police plotted to lie to you about Henry Novak. They wanted you to believe this 18-year-old innocent, slaughtered in an anti-white attack, was the aggressor against the Sikh murderer. They had the footage. They knew that was complete bollocks.

But to manage the public to stop you and me getting angry, they intended to lie anyway. It's just like how politicians have been lying about how Henry Novak's family really feel in order to shut down any debate about this case. even if that debate is coming from the Vice President of the United States of America. I am disgusted by these new revelations over the weekend just like you, and proud that the flash protests in Southampton last night full of patriots were entirely peaceful,

meaning the scum media is virtually ignoring them. Well, I won't. As the American independent journalist Jack Pesobioch posted, Vigils and memorials are for Henry Novak and they are being held all over Europe, from the north to the west and the east, never seen anything like it. The people are unifying.

So just outside, the Southampton Police Station minutes from where Henry Novak was killed, there were shouts of icons, can't breathe as locals spoke out. We must not forget that. We must not allow the fox in charge of the henhouse, IOPC, to claim that there was no wrongdoing.

And until we get... Patriots also paused for a beautiful three minutes silence. And amidst the fury, the cold, dark rage, British patriots are revealing they no longer trust their own police forces. and they are revealing that to the foreign media because the mainstream media is ignoring this wider story. A tragic state of affairs outlined by this patriotic mum

whose footage of her at the vigil for Henry has gone viral around the world while still being ignored by TV channels here in the UK. The fact they're still trying to sweep this under the rug, they're not doing anything for 15 months now regarding the police. It's a clear-cut case. There's no need to investigate. It's just their way of trying to say no blame, you know,

and they are part of the blame. Do you think that you have been a burdened by the police? I wouldn't trust him. I teach my own son. You don't phone police, you phone ambulance or fire engine. If you're out in public, you call mum or fire, you know, because I don't ever want my son when he grows if he gets that chance to be in a position like that.

And I think that's what scares a lot of parents, you know, is that fear that it could happen any day to our children too. And I think it is important we rally together, especially for Henry and his memory, and we give him the justice he deserves. What a brave, articulate mother. Of course, there are good police officers. We must never forget that. Have you seen the cottage? What did you make for you? I think it's right. I get it.

Thank you, man. You get it. You're angry. I made you too. I know. God, good. Back. Do you guys get by everyone.

I do my job. I'm to keep me to everyone safe. That's all I'm doing. But after the new information emerged at the weekend, Tommy Robinson weighed in with a petition demanding justice for Henry. He revealed, I'm calling on the Crown Prosecution Service and the Home Secretary to consider criminal charges against the officers

and to publish the full independent office for police conduct report when it is complete. Now, all this anger is because, because of this bombshell, dropped by the Sunday Times about the Hampshire police attempting to blame Henry after his death. Ironically, they claimed to fight disinformation. The report by the newspaper's chief news correspondent, Rosamon Erwin, DePesh Gada, the Home Affairs correspondent, and the reporter Izzy Lyons should be leading every news bulletin in the country. But it has been largely ignored thus far, so let me take you through it. They write the police force at the

centre of the Henry Novak scandal tried to intervene during his murderer's trial in a highly unusual move. The Hampshire and Isle of White Constabulary sought to release a public statement to address what it described as disinformation circulating online while court proceedings were at a critical point against Vikram Digwa. However, the Crown Prosecution Service advised the force that such a step could risk jeopardising the integrity of the case. The revelation about the planned intervention is likely to put further pressure on the beleaguered force and its chief constable, Alexis Boone, because the conduct of its own officers was under scrutiny during the trial. But here's the kicker. The Sunday Times can also reveal that the force wanted to portray Novak as the aggressor.

in an official statement three days after his death, but changed their wording after outrage from his grieving family. Novak died in the early hours of December 4, after being stabbed multiple times by Degwa, who is Sikh and had falsely claimed to police that he had been racially abused. An initial police statement later that morning said it was reported two men had been assaulted by an unknown man. Who are they talking about him?

Henry? The Novak family, raw with grief, became concerned that a false narrative was being pushed about their son, and it clearly was. It is understood that police told the family the next update they planned to publish, which would include the Novak's tribute, would again imply that he was the initial aggressor. Officers dropped that section of the statement, which only referred to an altercation when published. By that point, police had ample. evidence that Digwa was a liar. Hampshire's attempt to issue a public statement after Digwa's trial had already started, is understood to have been motivated in part over concerns about online commentary and the threat of civil unrest. In other words, people like me telling

you the truth. However, warnings about the potential risk of contempt are normally issued by the Attorney General's office. This weekend, Hampshire Police sought to defend their attempted intervention? A spokeswoman said following the opening of the trial and the media reporting that followed, a significant amount of mis and disinformation was circulating online. This included requests for information to be shared that had not been fully to examine as part of the murder trial. The intention of the statement was to remind the public that there were ongoing legal proceedings and that the law is clear that nothing could be published which could prejudice the trial. The decision not to publish was taken following advice from the CPS. The CPS said that they hired

highlighted to police that protecting the integrity of the trial was essential. It added, it was made clear that whether a statement was released was ultimately a police operational decision. I'm raging. I cannot explain to you how sick this makes me feel. Imagine the pain from Henry's family, that the police having seen the footage of him dying. The footage from Digwald's phone from Henry's own phone. The police saw all of that and still wanted to make out that their 18-year-old son was the aggressor. Well, we know from the judge that he wasn't.

This is so wrong. Now, is it any surprise that Brits up and down the country have started taking the knee for Henry Novak? These scenes are going viral on social media. You can see it here. as another way to honour the memory of Henry. But it's also to contrast the complete difference in approach from our law enforcement with an innocent young white lad is killed

compared to a drug-addicted black criminal half a world away. So they have all taken a knee. It's interesting, isn't it, the British police no longer want to take the knee? What would you have done in that situation with Henry Novak? Sorry. So have you not forgot what you needed now? No, not really. I'd like you three to take me and say Henry Novak's name.

I'm not going to do that. You're not going to do that? No. Why would you not do that? I don't want to and I don't need to. You don't want to and you don't need to. No. Oh, that was a bit of a sharp stab on it.

Why would you not want to? He died at the hands of a police officer. I'm not getting into that debate either. It's not a debate. The evidence is out there. The evidence is out there. Okay. The police have put the evidence.

out there. His force have put the evidence out there. He did not do his job properly. And now you refuse to. Your own opinion, your personal opinion. You refused to take a name for Henry Novo. You don't want to. That was your first response. You don't want to. So as a person, you don't want to. Okay, there is still so much, though, that is being covered up about this case. There's so much footage we still do not have. But I do want to talk now about a key part of the 999 call. Now, this call was made by DIGWA's brother. And I believe that the call handler seems to be encouraging the DIGWAS to go forward with their racism lie.

And what you'll notice here, and I want you to listen carefully, is that when the murderer, Vikram finally does lie about Henry calling him the P-word, that never happened. The call handler immediately says that's all I needed to know, as if that is what mattered in this crime. He said this and he said that. What did he specifically say? So he said to my brother, your whatever, like, obviously, racial... Vic, did he... Vic? Sorry, let me just ask him. Vic. Vic! Did he racially say anything to you?

Huh? Did he racially say anything to you? He called me a . Okay. That's what I needed to say. know. Thank you. See, at that point, the call handler is just like, yep, that's what I needed to know. And doesn't that tell you everything about our law enforcement authorities? He called me the P-Witt, nothing else matters. Nothing else matters. That was it. As I say, the cover-up over this footage goes on. Angloid, posting over the weekend, there is a lot more footage from the Henry Novak murder that they are not releasing for a reason. They have released only three minutes of body cam

footage, Vikram Degwa filmed Henry Novak after stabbing him for five minutes before the police arrived to the scene. Release it all. The MSM is also ignoring new threats of violence from the Sikh community, including from this disgusting online chat where a group of scumbags threatened to damage Henry Novak's grave and then said this. Just hope this resonates with the wider UK audience that just, you know, don't mess with a Sikh in the future, just leave them alone. The message has been set out on. Goodbye.

fine. Leave them alone. With everyone in it, don't mess around. You chat shit, you get banged, brother. Oh,

I, oh, yeah. You know, we come for your daddy milk. We're going to come for your Tinder surprise and

we're going to crack that egg, bro. We're going to take the toy. Okay, that's from the non-violency community.

Why is there no anger about that? Indeed, have you noticed the most anger from the MSA all weekend has been

reserved for the right of American politics or American figures who are daring to speak out about Henry Novak at all. MSM shills like Kay Burley were more comfortable discussing J.D. Vance than two-tier policing on Loura Coonsberg's disgraceful BBC show where Coonsberg was more concerned about scolding British politicians for being irresponsible.

I think the question isn't whether two-tier policing exists. It's why so many people think it does. I feel very uncomfortable with the vice president of the United States of America intervening. You know, he's correct, isn't he, that trust in institutions is failing. But I think in his comments yesterday, he is conflating several issues. And let's remember at the heart of all this is a young lad. It was dark. Just before Christmas, he'd been on a night out, and the police arrived and he thought he was safe. And now, as you say, the Vice President of America has said online, he said very controversially, Jacob,

that Henry's death was down to a mass invasion of migrants. I mean, do you think that politicians have been handling this story with the care and sensitivity that it requires? Well, I think politicians have to reflect the real anger that there is in the country. And I think Nigel Farage has done that. During a softball interview that followed between Coonsberg and Deputy Prime Minister that scumbag calamity Lammy, Coonsberg made her feelings known.

She thinks it's bizarre that J.D. Vance cares about Henry Novak. Listen. One of the things that I think some viewers might find bizarre about this is that the American Vice President J.D. Vance, who's a friend of yours, I think we can see one of your holiday snaps when you went fishing together when he was. over in the UK last year. He wrote online on Friday that Henry should still be alive today

if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and a mass invasion of migrants. Now Henry's killer was born in this country. Have you spoken to your friend, Jay-Vans, about this? I have spoken to J.D. Vance. I spoke to him yesterday, and I told him he was wrong. This has got nothing to do with mass migration. One, let's be clear that obviously since the early 2000s and post-Brexit, migration has come down, but murder has come down too, actually, in our country. And two, the young man who perpetrated this crime was a Brit, born and raised, in this country. So what did you say to him? What did you say to him?

I told him he was wrong. Now, we had an agreeable conversation, but we disagreed. We've disagreed before on his perspective on Western civil. Now, of course, there's so much wrong in what Lammy just said, but Coonsberg just gave him total free reign. She's on his side. It actually, interestingly, took Trevor Phillips over on sly news to humiliate Lammy over the phrase, righteous anger. He used a really interesting phrase, and it's an unusual phrase. Here's what he said. Each time a life like his is lost, The proper response, the only response, is righteous anger.

I looked up what you said about death of George Floyd. We have to find a way to transform this righteous anger into meaningful reform. I think this is quite interesting because righteous anger is a phrase that you and I understand. And I wondered if J.D. Vance had actually been taking some advice from you. I do understand that phrase. And of course, a sort of deep, deep pain and anger as a result of the death. But let me just give you an example of this. You say that, it's fine.

And then you tell, you know, Mr Farage, who's apparently now beyond the pale, for saying he didn't call for people to go and do things. He said that response that he would like to see, is rage. Not that different from righteous anger. Let's qualify this. Nigel Farage was speaking in to the protest and the despicable acts of criminal damage and violence directed at the police in Southampton. It was not a responsible thing to do. No, Lammy, no. That is a literal lie. Nigel spoke before the protests. And if you use that argument, then Lammy's a little lie.

own words were responsible for the BLM riots in 2020. Or what about the words of, for example, Sadiq Khan that year? The brutal killing of George Floyd has rightly ignited fury, not just in America, but around the world. I completely understand the depth of anger it's caused. I feel it too. Lami has proven he is a national embassed. It's very interesting because actually you're basically telling the Vice President of the United States, we're friends, but you don't really know what you're talking about when it comes to our country. Well, let me play you something. This is the Prime Minister in 2020.

Can I start by expressing shock and anger at the death of George Floyd? I do hope that next time he speaks to President Trump, he will convey to him the UK's abhorrents. about his response to the events. Why is it okay for Stama, and by the way, your colleagues, Shibana Mahmoud, Saddam Khan, or to express views about a death in the American city, even before the trial took place, by the way, whilst dead events, you get ticked off by you

for commenting on a very similar tragedy here in the UK. A couple of things. overwhelmingly the response to George Floyd was horror right across the globe. I remember we were all at home during the pandemic. It was horror.

But that's not the question I'm asking. I'm just, I've explained to the context. That's the first context. The second context, of course, is that we are in government. The J.D. Vance is in government. When you're on the backbenchers are in opposition, you're free, frankly, to reflect on anything. But I think there is

It's okay for the opposition to be irresponsible. No case is exactly the same, but here we have a family who've asked for a specific response. Perhaps the only biggest scumbag over Henry Novak has been Cathy Newman of Sly News, who has decided that this tragedy is all about her, because Kathy received some mean tweets. She posted in the last 24 hours I've been deluged with hundreds of vile misogynistic tweets and death threats. Why for doing my job? Asking to your use of questions about claims by Nigel Farage of two-tier policing, I spoke about this on tonight's show enough is enough.

Prompting Lauren the insider to reply, you are so irrelevant. Not only irrelevant, but I would argue a truly dangerous woman to be sat broadcasting national news. Don't worry though, Poppet. Anyone with a functioning brain cell knows mainstream, media are the enemy, but Kathy wasn't finished there. Now let's not forget, this is about one family's tragedy and grief, the horrendous murder of Henry Novak. And Eamost first posted about this last month.

But because of the way he boosts far-right accounts on his platform, he's now accused by the PM of whipping up division. And the things as a journalist, you cover these stories and you end up becoming embroiled in it all. So ever since Tuesday when I interviewed Reform UK, Zia Yusuf, about this whole story, I've been deluged with misogynistic abuse and death threats on X, but also on Instagram. And I just wanted to show you some of them. So this one's on X.

It says, suck my big white, you dumb, ugly, unfri-bred. This one says you're a racist that needs to be eliminated in capital letters. This one's a pretty sinister. You need something between the eyes with a target sign. Another one from the same poster saying, time to retire, she should be hunted down for her racist feeling towards her own kind. Make her an example for the sake. Someone called...

Just watched your interview with Zia. You're a vile, rotten... As Leo curse put it, never mind that the police helped kill an 18-year-old boy because they're trained to hate white people, Someone was mean to me online. And Lauren added on this all eyes on mainstream media. Let's see who reports the facts. Thank you, Elon for X.

Without this platform, the media would continue to amplify lies. We see you, Hampshire police rot in hell. And Lauren joins us now on the superstar panel alongside Peter C. Barnes. Lauren, it was an extraordinary revelation, wasn't it? The Hampshire police, three days after the murder, having all of the footage available to them, still attempting to make out that Henry Novak was the aggressor. And to me, that is unforgivable.

Tommy Robinson is right. There must now be resignations and there must be criminal charges. The entire establishment is rotten. there is so much corruption within it. I go back to the point, of course, there are good police, not all police are bad, but they're constantly trying to spin a narrative. They jumped straight into damage limitation mode,

and it's never, ever the truth. What has happened to Henry is absolutely sickening, but it will happen again and again and again. The news we see stabbings, murders, rapes. White people are being attacked and the police are not on our side. They really are not. And so instead of being, you know, an institution whereby we would tell our children, if they're in trouble, call the police. Now, many of us that are mothers are sat going, do not call the police. These are some of the same police that have raped grooming gang survivors. And they've also

they let him die. They let him die. They were trying to craft a narrative while his body was dead. I just think it's absolutely revolting. I don't want my taxes going towards them. I hate the police. I hate what they've done. But what I hate most of all is this is the institution.

This is not just, oh, it's just Hampshire. No, Keistama was head of the CPS. The entire establishment needs to go. We need to rebuild it because these people do not care about our children. If you have a white child, they don't care. Peter, it is absolutely astonishing to me that the police were going ahead with this.

Using words, Peter, like disinformation, misinformation. What was the disinformation? They were the ones that were turning Henry Novak into the aggressor. They were pumping out the misinformation and disinformation. Without a doubt, it's absolutely back on. It was damaged limitation. That's what they wanted

to do. They had a narrative. They wanted to stick to it. And that was it. What is interesting, even with the facts, even with everything that they had, they still reach for the idea that Henry was the bad guy. They still wanted to paint the white guy as the problem. What I find very

concerning is that the police, I think Lawrence is right here, is not just the kind of the law and order. It is the physical and kind of the extension of the state. They are the people with the weapons. They're the people with the power. And when those people start to abuse it

in this way, again and again and again, refuse accountability, try to walk away from it. They don't want to reside. I want people to be fired, then put it handcuffs, then thrown in a deep hole somewhere, and forgotten about.

That's what we need. Because I look at the grooming gangs. I look at the situation in Southpour. Let's not forget there was an actual terrorist incident there. With Rison, we were told nothing about it. We've had people wandering the streets of London with acid. We're told to stay away from them. The police won't tell us what they look like,

but yet they say they're a threat to our safety. In what world are we living in? Where this is a sensible place. Well, this is the people who are supposed to protect us are actually doing that job, because fundamentally they aren't. They say disinformation. What it is is they don't want to have to admit that they kill them. a guy. That's what they did. Because their actions in handcuffing him by not helping him in the way that they should have exacerbated his injuries and therefore led to his death. That is undeniable. He may not have stabbed him, but they did not help the situation. I cannot imagine how heartbreaking and terrifying it must have been. When you see the police turn up in Henry's situation, you think, thank God, I'm going to be okay. And then that happened. That can only be one of the worst things I couldn't ever

imagine, and I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy. That guy needed help. The British state said no. It's one of the worst things that has ever happened in this country. And the problem is, this happens all the time. And it's covered up. It's covered up by the authorities. It's covered up by the mainstream media. And you heard, even with the call handler, oh, he's called me the P word, that's all I need to know. That's all I need to know. Actually, no, that was the least important thing you needed to know about this entire story. And then, Lauren, we have, as you put it, truly dangerous people operating in the mainstream media now, like Cathy Newman, who has decided on sly news that this story, Lauren, it's about her. She is pathetic. The fact she calls herself a journalist, she's a

propaganda puppet with no eyes. And that's even below the belt for me to say that. But this woman ignites fury in me like no one else. Her whole interview and her approach to covering this is absolutely toxic. This is the same woman that's more outraged by reform than the fact that Henry's dead. These people are really and truly dangerous. They should not have a platform. And then they want to blame Elon Musk, don't they? So all of a sudden, it's not the establishment's fault.

it's Elon Musk and Nigel Farage's fault. It's absolutely crazy. And she should be taken off air. It's funny that we always get, you know, painted on the right, that we're the racists, we're the bad people by people like Cathy, who's given a propaganda script to follow, but their smears and the way that she tries to approach this. It no longer works. We've all had death threats. We've all. had trolls come for us. Every day. What we don't do. Every day. I've had a troll.

And guess what? The police approached her about it. They don't approach you, Lauren. Trust me, when you're getting a death threat. They don't approach me when I'm getting a death threat. And we don't moan about it. Peter, then there was that absolute car crash on sly news. And I mean, in this case, I don't say it all the time.

But thank God for Trevor Phillips. I mean, sly news is a terrible. terrible corrupted outlet. But you saw what happened when Lami went on Laura Coonsberg and was given a total free ride. She absolutely did not perform as a journalist. It was a dereliction of duty. And actually, Trevor Phillips, and all power to him, quite rightly, just produced Lammy's own words, Stama's own words.

You said exactly the same thing about a black drug dealer. in America. Why are you so angry about Nigel Farage saying it about an 18 year old white kid in the UK? And it was a tour of force of broadcasting. Actually, you know I'm not a fan of Sly News, not always a fan of Trevor Phillips. But thank God, someone needed to expose Lammy. And Phillips did. He was the only one. I couldn't not agree more. I get, I'm not Trevor's biggest friend. I'm certainly, I can't tell you the last time I, you know, chose to watch Sky News. I know I hate myself that much. but I will say that Trevor actually, I look back at his reporting on Restore.

He's actually the only person that's willing to bother to tell the truth anymore, which I think is such a rarity. But what I've found interesting is the fact that these people ran around for the last week, as I was saying, Nigel Farage and the right were politicising this. I'm sorry, Cathy Newman has done more to politicise this

than anybody else. She's weaponised it for her own ends. Or more important, to even a worse extent, she's used it to bash people who ideologically she thinks that, evil. She thinks she's doing the right thing, which I find even more perverse when it comes to these people. They think they're somehow morally superior and they're not. They're the worst people. They should not have the platform because what they're doing is they're taking the power

of very influential and important institutions, perverting it and using it against the public. Journalism is one of the few occupations that is actually mentioned outside of politics in every kind of constitution around the world because it is about holding people to account. It is the job of a journalist to probe and to ask that uncomfortable question to make sure that those who are in power are held accountable for the decisions that they make. I'm sorry, Cathy Newman and Laura Cuthbert failed that day, and they are failing for a very, very long time. I am very happy to see the decline of Cathy Newman. I thought Jordan Peters had rather finished her off with a lobster dinner, but there you go. She's always still hanging around.

You know, you just they look after each other. They look after each other. They look after That is the other big point. They all look after each other. They all protect you. They all go on their own podcasts. They all do their own circuit things and they all agree with each other. And then suddenly somebody reasonable comes along and says, well, wait a minute, what about this or that?

And they suddenly break down and they can't stand it. And like you say, thank God for Trevor Phillips because he does the best thing you can ever do. Show them their own words and ask them to defend their hypocrisy and they never can do. It's the easiest thing to do against these people. You don't have to make up rumors. They're very good at being corrupt and incompetent. to show it to everybody.

The Henry Novak tragedy has changed everything in the most important by-election in British history, Makerfield. With Restore Britain said to be surging by the day, indeed Sasha Lord has been spending time in the constituency recently. Look at this. He says, I was in Makerfield yesterday. anyone who thinks this is a two-horse race is wrong. It's a three-horse race, Labor, Reform and Restore.

Which is potentially why Nigel Farage is getting even morgistery in the electorate when he was finally asked by a member of the mainstream media, why on earth did you report Rupert Lowe to the police? And his answer was to chuck Muhammad Zia Yusuf right under the bus, watch. Do you regret they're referring into the police? I didn't do that, Zia did that. But he didn't physically threaten me.

But he physically threatened Zia more than once. Well, Rupert Lowe isn't taking that lying down, responding directly. I am unsurprised to see Farage attacking me in the media again. Here's my response. He stated that I physically threatened Yusuf more than once. At the time I was 67, Zia was 38. Physically threatened, really?

all reported to police months after the supposed event. The day after I made mild criticisms of Farage, right. The British people are not stupid. Farage and Reform tried to put me in prison. Away from my wife, my children, my family. I had armed police raid my home late at night and seized my property. If Farage had his way, I would be in prison today. Considering the Islamist takeover of our prison network,

I could very well be dead. The authorities soon dropped everything, obviously. Reform and Farage weaponised the power. of the state to silence a political opponent. He is now trying to blame Yusuf. It will not work. Farage has admitted himself why they really did it. He stated on national television, it was when I spoke about deporting entire communities of Pakistani child rapists and their complicit Pakistani wives that it was when he realized he had to get rid of me. The evidence is in the clip below. Watch for yourself. And yes, I did say that. Okay, so I'm just going to

pause and show you what Rupert posted here. Do you think maybe in any way the handling of was in some way responsible for what's happened with the risk? He's a very vengeful man. I mean, it's simple as that. Do you regret, though, referring him to the police? I didn't do that, Zia did that. But he didn't physically threaten me. But he physically threatened Zia more than once.

You know, when he stood up and said that we've got to consider the mass deportation of entire communities, including those born in the United Kingdom, That just moves way beyond a point of reasonableness, of decency, of morality. And that was the moment at which, you know, I realised we just had to get rid of him and get rid of him as quickly as we could. And I think in terms of the way we dealt with that, we were probably more brutal than the other parties. But you know what?

That's the way it's going to be. Thank you. So which Nigel Farage are we to believe? Rupert went on. Zero apologies from me to Farage at all. If I ever get a sniff of power, trust me, invest in deportation flight providers to Pakistan. There are just not enough runways in Britain for what we have planned. It is my view that the reform leadership chose Ziyyus to make the false allegation because he is a Muslim man.

And reform knew that the Met Police would be far more likely to side with a Muslim than a white British man, who is seen to have right-wing views, all giving for our sufficient distance to as he has done to do. today, avoid blame. Weaponising our wicked system of two-tier policing for their own vile ends. A year has passed since I was cleared, and no journalist has ever asked Sir Yusuf about his false allegations against me, not one despite his daily interviews. Ask yourselves why that is for a moment. I am very proud to lead Restore Britain, a political party that will deport Pakistani child rapists and the foreign communities who protected them for so long. I'll say it again for Farage's benefit. If that means entire communities go, that means

entire communities go. Good. I cannot wait. Now, even in the mainstream media, there is becoming an increasing acknowledgement that reform is not the only game in town now. On the right, Kay Burley actually brought up Restore Britain on the BBC yesterday, despite the BBC having banned restore from their question time special in an anti-democratic outrage last week. Watch. Now, Kay, this is your turf. This is my. It is. The good people of Ashton and Makerfield, Inns in Makerfield, Platbridge, where my dad was born, you know, don't underestimate them. I don't think they've necessarily made up their minds yet.

I think Restore may be a big problem for reform. They may split the vote, and as a result, Andy Burnham may find himself in poll position. And there is more evidence of the Reform UK freakout. Zia Yusuf refused to go on GB News yesterday with Camilla Tomine, which is nuts, given GV News as widely regarded as a Reform UK propaganda channel. Watch this. By the way, guys, in tribute to reform, we were going to have Zia Yusuf on.

He's pulled out. He doesn't want to do my show, a little bit like David Lammy. I don't know why. They're running scared. These two tough guys of the political scene. I mean, I appreciate, I don't ever give politicians a sponge bath. I mean, no one wants to see that. I'm only asking questions on behalf.

of GB News listeners and viewers because, hey, it's journalism. It's called my job. I suppose if you want to go off onto other shows and be soft-soaked, that's fine. But if you're somebody like Yusuf and you claim that you're able to run the country, I'd suggest you probably do need to handle Atominee grilling first. Yes, it's odd, isn't it? Because he isn't one to normally pull away from a really good ding-dong, is he? He's not afraid, usually, of a good indom.

interview? Yeah, I think it's all a little odd. I can't quite. Also, I kind of think, I really hope reform aren't taking the GB News audience for granted right now. Oh, interesting. Because, you know, they could vote for anyone, couldn't they at any point? And I just think hubris is a very dangerous thing in politics. But let's see, we hope to invite a reformer. The invitation is open to all political parties. There's nothing to be afraid of. If you know what you're talking about and you've got strong ideological efforts. then you don't need to be afraid of scrutiny. I'm baffled. She's like, it's not open to all political parties. Rupert Lowe has been begging you, Camilla Tomine, to interview him live on your channel. So as soon as you've pulled out, actually, you know, the ultimate revenge on reform

would have been giving restore that platform. Now, there's also weird stuff going on the ground in Makerfield. This canvasser for Reform UK, who I really struggled to understand. I mean, he looks like an Indian guy to me, sounds like an Indian guy to me, making horrible claims about Tommy Robinson and Rupert Lowe,

apparently on behalf of Nigel Farage's party. Watch this. Sorry, hi, I just talked to me, but I'll give it a toddler off to you. How are you looking for support? No, no, no, no support from this household, my friends. I'm surprised you're supporting report. That's the...

But they don't want you. No. It's only about illegal people who are continuing to be illegal. They cannot do without us. We are more than 25% collectively. That's what they want you to think. No, no, no. You are, look, I'll tell you something.

You're part of the image for them to not look racist. When you're racist and you bring colored people, people of color, you don't look racist. No. But you are doing what they want to do. Two or four ministers. One second. Who is your... It's an anjofaraj, the king of racism from before.

It's known. This is grossly misunderstood. He is keeping distance from the research party. Robert Dropper Law was removed from the party because of that. Tommy Robinson, he didn't tire. They are on the extreme right side. And he has gone. His home minister, one of two ministers is J.

He is a Muslim for Sri Lanka. I know. Suela Bredman is one of the ministers. This is not a Rupon household. That's okay. Good luck on your side. We respect you what I'm just thankful. Yeah, please think about it. He's a Muslim from Sri Lanka. Yes, indeed he is. Yes, indeed he is.

Ben Habib now, though, joining the fray, having folded Advance UK, he has just denounced it is right and proper that Restore Britain stands in the Makerfield by election. It is a political party and it exists to fight elections. It will not make a blind bit of difference who from the Labour Party leads that party. They are all awful. If Restore can poll well in Makerfield, it will overnight become a threat to reform and the Tories. In that event, those parties have a choice. Up their game to see off the threat from restore or risk being wiped out.

That pressure is good for politics and good for the country. Rupert Lowe has invited me to campaign with him and Rebecca Shepard and Makerfield on the 13th of June. I'm delighted to accept that invitation. I hope to see lots of Restore and Advance members on that day. Let's get up to Makerfield and win this for the country. Now, Dan Hodges, are posting today that there is some movement in the Makerfield betting markets. Andy Burnham now is short as 1 to 20 with some bookies, but moving across the board for Restore. Restore sources pointing out it coincides with postal vote verification, which is

taking place today. Now, I've been looking at Polly Market because you know I really trust Polymarket. It lets you follow real-time prediction markets on politics and culture and everything, but it's not a focus group. It's not a panel of Westminster's Insight. It's like a live snapshot of where traders think events may be heading. And look at this. Very, very interesting stuff, right, a big change. And it is a big boost to Andy Burnham, up 26%. Now an 83% likelihood of the win. Reform down 17% to 15%. Restore down 2% to 2%. So let me bring in my superstar panel on this Peter C. Barnes, the outsider and Lauren the insider. Peter, you have really been one of the first journalists in the country, I like to say alongside myself, pointing out the collective meltdown, the hysteria that's going on inside of Reform UK. You've known this has been going on for much, much longer than the mainstream media finally picking up on it today.

Why are they so threatened by Restore Britain? Why are they so threatened about what's going on and make a field? First of all, I'd like to apologise for Kate Burley coming from the same constituency. that I'm from which you speak, feel I'd like to apologise for everybody for the state of her. But I will say that, yes, I've been delighted to watch all of this finally happen

because I hate to say it, but I do look to say, I told you this was going to happen, because fundamentally, the problem of Reform UK is that they were very arrogant. As Camilla Tolley said, the hubris is very strong. They felt entitled.

They basically did. Well, the Labour Party did. They thought they were better people. They thought they could literally just point at something and say, that's terrible, and that was enough. I'm sorry, that's a child's approach to professional politics. And this is what happens, where you all want to play little ego games,

you want to take down the Tories, and not actually win an election. Because the reason that I think Andy Bernabal now win and is actually shot massively ahead, it's not really a restore. It's the fact that the reform UK have offered nothing to the people at make a feel. They had one gimmicky policy, and that was about it. And I will say that actually, Restore not being invited to question time, It was the greatest thing that could have happened because of that car crash that was Robert Kenyon. I mean, let's be real.

That was somewhat of an awkward watch. But I actually think what's going on, particularly with Zia Yusuf, is he's making a move for the throne. He's going for Nigel. He wants to take over the leadership. He's been going into the background for quite some time. He doesn't, Nigel is strong enough. He doesn't think he doesn't think he does. A big kind of consensus that many of us have in Westminster at the moment.

that, you know, Nigel is slowing down. There's a lot of mistakes happening. A lot of chairmen chips to keep changing. A lot of mistakes here and everywhere. And I think that's why you've got this one last big donor amount coming in. And I think that might be the end of the money tap if they're not careful. I will say that Z has got a bit of a target on his back. That might be why he dodged out of that interview.

But he is literally going for Nigel's job. And it'll be interesting to see because I go back to Matthew Goodwin's tweet just the other week, where he said it's the OG reformers and the Tory reformers. That split is already there. And I hate to say it, I told you this was going to happen. Civil war, exactly, full on civil war, raging behind the scenes in that party. But I mean, Lauren, it's not really going to work, is it, Farage now saying,

oh, no, it was Al-Zey Yusuf, who reported Rupert Loader to the police. That was nothing to do with me, given he is quoted on video, seen saying that the real reason that Rupert was booted out of the party was because of his position on mass deportations. It's like, Nigel, you can't rewrite history. Nigel is as bad as everyone that's got us into this mess. He's no better. He's establishment.

He's doing the word salad. He's doing the lies. He's gaslighting. They forget. We're not stupid. And we have something called the internet. where we can pull up their old words. And like you've showed the clips, Dan, he's lying.

This is not the man to lead us. He is so establishment. It's unbelievable. And thank goodness for Rupert Lowe, because he is such a promising option for us all. Nigel is just, you know, they're all part of the same boys club, aren't they? privately educated, and it's exactly what's got us in this problem.

Rupert Lowe is actually giving patriots, good, hardworking people, a shot at a different future for our children and for our grandchildren. Nigel is just peddling, excuse my French, the same old shit and packaging it up differently. I just don't understand how anyone can look at him and think, He's our next prime minister. I look at him and I think you look like you're in panto. I can't take the man seriously. And the longer this goes on, the more establishment he becomes as well.

And just to touch upon the Camilla interview with GB News, not only was it deeply unprofessional how she handled that, but evidently it's a very clear industry warning from GB News to reform. and I'm just going to sit back with my popcorn and watch it all explained. Absolutely, absolutely, because that's what Nigel also has to remember. There is an alternative, and that alternative is Rupert Lowe. They could interview him. At the moment, though, I would say no one has been covering this Makerfield by-election, honestly,

because unless you are prepared to speak to Rupert Lowe, to properly cover the phenomenon that is Restore Britain, that doesn't mean by the way you have to be a Restore Britain supporter. It just means you have to honestly cover them, just like we cover the Green Party or the Conservative Party, then you're not properly covering the by-election. And so I've been thinking a lot about this in regards to this by-election, because of course it is the most important by-election in British history. It probably will decide the Prime Minister,

but I think it will also help determine the future of the right, because if Restore Britain has this monumental, night, and by monumental actually, it really only needs to secure six or seven or eight percent of the vote, even though they say it could go much higher. Actually, politics is going to change in Britain. And I've been thinking, you can't trust the mainstream media for coverage of that night. You can't trust talk TV. You can't trust G.B News. You can't trust the Daily Telegraph. They won't even have Rupert Lowe on. They won't even cover a store Britain in an honest manner. So I've decided, along with the help of Lauren and Peter, that we are going to be hosting the first ever outspoken election night coverage.

This is a real undertaking. We're going to be on air from 10pm on Thursday, June the 18th. I'm delighted that Lauren will be in Makerfield for us. Connor Thominson will be providing live analysis in the studio all evening. And then we have an incredible superstar panel featuring the lights of Mike Graham, all a mini Hain of Restore, Russell Quirk, of Reform, and for independent commentary, Peter C. Barnes. So Lauren, we're doing this, okay? You're going to have to go side by side with the mainstream up and make a field and get us the inside story of the night.

Dan, I love it. And outspoken viewers, I can promise you the bow will be in my hair, the sass will be there. because the mainstream media are lying, their narratives are written already. Rupert Lowe will be the bad guy and I'm just not having that. I will give you unfiltered commentary on the ground. Our script isn't written. The, you know, the event hasn't taken place. And what I think is so amazing as well is this really marks a moment in time

where so many people haven't been interested in politics before and Rupert Lowe has ignited. something in people across the country. And it's a really, really exciting time. And also, I just can't wait. It's my favourite thing to watch the mainstream media make absolute tits of themselves and be able to get it all on camera for viewers.

So it's going to be awesome. Yeah, I'm so excited, Peter. I'm so excited to have you in the studio on the night. I think it's really important now because Restore Britain is a force in this election, But we have seen the mainstream media do not want to properly cover them. And so that's what actually made me decide, you know what? Got to put my money where my mouth is.

And we have to provide an alternative on election night now. I can't agree more. I'm very happy to be involved. I think it's a great idea. And Lauren, look out for my mother. She'll have a gin. I'm doing a ginotonic ready for when you get there. I can promise you that.

I don't drink. I will say that. Oh, fine. She'll drink the ginotonic. But that's not a problem. Trust me, in my family, that is not a problem. But I will say that I think this is one of the most important by-elections because it will decide the fate of the Prime Minister, whether we get a new one, whether Nigel Farage sticks around, whether Reform sticks around, whether Restore sticks around. You know, this is one of those elections, really, where we will look back in 50, 60 years and say, this is the moment.

This is the one election when everything changes. I've always been one of those people where you don't put too much into a by-election. They're usually a weather vaid. Not this one. There's too much writing on it. And this is why it's so important. And I'm really happy that you've decided to do this, to actually have an honest commentary about this

with lots of different people from across the right where we can actually talk about it, honestly, without being cut off by the mainstream or being called racist or whatever. Because, you know what, I've been called it that many times these days. It doesn't really bother me anymore. I'm so excited. The outspoken election night,

the first outspoken election night will be live on Thursday. day, June the 18th when polls close at 10pm until we get that result. Do join us. Breaking today, growing pressure on Prince William as the president of the FA to host a one-minute silence for Henry Novak at the Football World Cup. This campaign, which is fast-gathering momentum, has been proposed by Jeff Banks. You'll remember he is the form. BBC legend ex-host of the Clothes Show, who has now written directly to his Royal Highness, the Prince of Wales, in his role as the patron of the PFA. He writes in part to Wills, Your Royal Highness, you will have no doubt been aware of the untimely death of Henry Novak.

This has caused a great deal of upset to members of the British public across the very often expressing itself in an anger and frustration in the manner of his demise. This has been caused by the desire of the public to show their respect to an 18-year-old young man whose life was terminated far too young. My suggestion is that the England team representing our fine country at the World Cup in Dallas, Texas, pay a one-minute silence of respect prior to their first game on June the 17th. This would enable the whole nation to come together as a mark of respect and enable a peaceful demonstration of love and empathy for this young man. In your position as patron of the Professional Footballers Association, I would ask you to invite both players and

management to join in this mark of respect. Now, of course, that moment of respect would actually take place at 5am British time on the morning of June the 18th, but how powerful would that be? And given the Novak family desire to, as we're constantly reminded by the likes of slippery Stama to keep Henry Novak's tragic death non-political, what better way would there be to raise awareness of what happened? And I am also calling on Prince William to consider making a public statement about the Henry Novak tragedy. Jeff Banks has now released this video explaining why the royal family must get on board. My suggestion and proposal is that an opportunity exists for the England football team representing this country in Los Angeles and their first match is on June 17, that they actually pay one minute silence in memory of Henry.

It's something that the whole nation could actually join in, watching that game in pubs, clubs, from their home. and fans that are actually in LA. It would be a great memory. It's something that has been done before, and we could certainly do it for this. The match takes place on June 17. It takes place at 9 o'clock at night, which will be at 5 o'clock in the morning here on June 18th in Great Britain.

Me, I will be getting up, getting dressed, and paying my final respect to Henry. I'm today going to write to Prince William, who is the patron of the Professional Footballers Association, suggesting that he invites the players to do that. I'm also going to be writing to Thomas Tuchel, the new coach and general manager. I think it's something that the team should do. After all, they're representing our nation. It's something that we either pay for directly or indirectly, and it would not be a good.

great deal to ask. So I would ask all of you to follow me in writing to Prince William, writing to the FA and actually making this suggestion. It's something we could do, and I'm sure it would pay Henry the respect and love that he was lacking in his final hours. Something that we could all do together and respect him a brilliant young man. to our superstar panel, Peter C. Barnes, the outsider and Lauren, the insider. Lauren, isn't this something Prince William should consider getting on board with that the family say they don't want a political response? Well, then the royal family can get involved in the England football team certainly can,

given they were all over taking the knee for that guy, George Floyd. Well, I think we need to remember Prince William. I really do like Prince William, but he didn't do anything in Birmingham when Israeli and Jewish fans were told to stay away from Aston Villa for their safety. We shouldn't be in this position, Dan, where the public are coming up with these, you know, initiatives and ideas. We're meant to be led by leaders in this kind of activity. I am really disappointed that we haven't heard from Prince William at all regarding the brutal murder of Henry Novak. I just, how is a white boy's life political?

It's not. But if you want to zoom out, the royal family have never spoken in support regarding any of the child victims of the grooming gangs. So do I have hope that Prince William will do this. I don't know. I think it depends how much public pressure is there. But we shouldn't be in a position where it's taking an artist to come up with this idea. You know, I really, really hope that Prince William does something about this. But I recorded a show on this earlier. His team have made a

huge mistake. He had a real chance to show us he was different with everything that happened with Henry. And he stayed silent and we're just constantly told they can't be political. No one will ever convince me that a white child's life being taken from them is political and just on the family's statement as well. This was written by the government. The language that's being used about, you know, his death not being politicised and it not causing division. The words echo everything that Sadiq Khan says, everything that Kier Stama says, I do not believe that that statement was written by the family and that they are happy with it. Yes, this is my professional opinion, but the wording is absolutely from the Labour playbook of crafting a narrative that suits what they want to go with. So look,

I would love to see Prince William come out and back this, but moving forwards, I really think he needs to be leading the way and are not reacting. We want a proactive approach from our future king when it comes to white children's lives. Because for too long, it's been focused on minorities. And just as a reminder to those in the back of the room, white children's lives matter. Indeed. And Lauren, that is so powerfully put. That's why I think this Peter is the perfect suggestion.

and hear me out on this because it is difficult for a future king to speak out on an issue that is so clearly political. See, I do think that the Henry Novak story is a political one. I don't think that you can avoid that. But I went back and I researched, okay, what did Prince William and Catherine do around Black Lives Matter? Because of course, they did speak out, but they did. did so in an indirect, non-political way. They didn't release a statement about George Floyd directly, but on June the 2nd, 2020, which was a horrible day, by the way, it was, do you remember it? It was that blackout Tuesday, where everyone was bullied and pressured into just posting a black square on their Instagram page. I refused. It was really gaslighting of white people to say, we're bad. All around the world, we're bad and we've been bad for years, and it was so horrible to see people who I previously respected by into it. But anyway, on that day, Prince Williams heads together mental health charity. You know, the one that he's very passionate about and works with Catherine on, posted, heads together, stands with the black community today and every day. This is a reminder to all that your mental health matters. Now, it was careful. crafted, of course. It didn't directly mention George Floyd, but the fact that it was posted on that day was evidence of the fact that they knew they had to say something about that case.

So wouldn't a simple tribute at a Football World Cup that was not political, because I think what people are also missing in all of this, Peter, is that Henry Novak loved football. He had just played football before he was tragically killed. his parents raised his love of football in the meeting with the Prime Minister. This would be a non-political way for Prince William to show all of those things that Lauren is suggesting he needs to prove to us matters to him. I could agree with everything that you've just said more. I think absolutely spot on.

I think this was also a great moment for William to draw a line under his father. And as she said that this is the new monarchy. is a new way of doing things. I agree with Lauren, that we're actually going to leave. We're going to give a little bit of hope. We're going to be a hope for everybody. I also think, Laurie, you're absolutely banged on.

That entire wording from the family's speech and letter is literally written by a person like me. I know it because it's exactly what I would write if I was in that situation. You know, it is word for word, exactly saying something without saying it. And also very conveniently, it could be used as a weapon to beat down

anybody that dares ask an unfortunate question. That's exactly what it was. And it's nice to say that I'm not the only person that noticed it. But I will say, though, the British science is great. Do not take the knee. Taking the knee is performative. It's pantomime. Stand next to each other.

Make a wall. Make a barricade. Be next to each other. We're not subservient to a different anybody else. We're a people. We're a community. Stand next to each other side to side. That's strength.

That's unity. This whole diversity is fed with it. that's taking the knee for me. I think you actually make it different by standing up, standing together, linking arms, doing whatever you like, that kind of thing, and showing a united front to show that there is a change,

that there is a different way of thinking, that there is a little bit of hope out there. Because this is an awful story. It's hit everybody in the country, no matter what anybody says. And I tell you now, I think this would be a great unity moment. It would be a good moment for Will.

It would be a good moment for a very struggling royal family for some good press at the moment, but also it would just allow everybody just to breathe, calm down, and actually have a moment to remember what this is actually about, and that's about Henry. You know, this is wandering off into other little issues, wanting off into people like Cathy Newman and Farage and all the rest of it. This is about an 18-year-old kid that died in a way he didn't have to die,

and nobody should ever die again. And that's why I love the way Jif Banks proposed it, because I think that's exactly what he was doing. he was reminding everyone of what actually this is about and why he is going to have this personal moment. I thought it was beautiful, actually. Speaking of that... Dan, can I just add as well?

Prince William's team are very reactive. So when there's, you know, the narrative is about to turn. They're quick to issue, you know, statements and source quotes to the press. So you would hope that Prince William would maybe have. written to the family. The problem is there's no mainstream media demand, is there? And so often that is based on demand. What are you doing, William? What are you doing? And so then they put their heads together and say, oh, shoot, we should do that. But you're totally right. William should at the very least be writing to the family. But Lauren, I did want to ask quickly,

because you're not happy with William after the weekend as well, because we had this lovely royal winning, but unfortunately a picture was relieved. And people always used to say to me, are you on Prince William's payroll? You never say a bad bad bad against him. up this weekend. You're not happy because he was pictured at the royal wedding. So let me just explain the story. This is Peter Phillips, who was the late Queen's favourite grandson, the child

of Princess Anne, his second wedding to the NHS nurse, Harriet Spurley. It was an absolutely lovely event attended by most members of the royal family outside of the outcasts, Prince Harry and Megan Markle, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and Sarah Ferguson who were not invited. But quite

controversially, princesses, Beatrice and Eugenie did show up. This was against Prince William's wishes, but it was very much the wishes of Princess Anne and King Charles, who both believed they should be there for this family gathering. William was pictured. I did feel a little bit sorry for him, though, Lauren, because I think he thought it was an area where he wouldn't be snapped. But anyway, he was pictured kissing Princess Beatrice, and that has not gone down well in some quarters, including with Al Lauren the insider, who posted, Not a good look for Prince William to be chummy with Beatrice and Eugenie at the wedding.

These two little grifters have fleeced the taxpayer. Prince William's team need to keep him as far away from Royals that have no respect for the public. There won't be second chances for many people if they think William will be weak like Charles. People want an air that displays consistent actions, not an opposing narrative. He's furious with Beatrice and Eugenie, the aid say, come on now, Poppets. This doesn't wash with the public. There are many stories coming out via Palace League saying Prince William, will consider tightening the rules on royal property. This is not strong enough. Prince William has a

chance to modernise the monarchy, but trust is at an all-time low. This is what he needs to do. One, cut ties with free-loading royals. The narrative being spun by his team evidently doesn't match pictures from yesterday. Two, get into the church. Three, stay away from Islam. Four, pull out of the WEF. Five stand by Patriots. Six, acknowledge the grooming gangs and use your voice to stand with Survivors. Seven, comment on Henry Novak. Now, this is crunch time. And look, I actually completely agree, Lauren, with all of those sort of points that you hope William takes on. I just would wonder, is it a little bit unfair that he's being criticized for this picture? Because what is he meant to do, not acknowledge Beatrice? I get it. He would be considered so rude. He didn't want them there.

The king overruled him. I feel like he had to be polite. He's like, polite man, you know? I get it and he is polite and he's dutiful and I understand all of that. But I don't believe that they all just arrived just by accident at the same time. This is curated. This is orchestrated. This was a really big event for Pointless Princess One and Pointless Princess Two. And so they then managed to arrive at the same time and the photographers captured.

him kissing her on the cheek. I understand, look, Prince William is polite and everything like that. But I would like the PR and comms team to make a decision. Is he furious with them? Is he banishing them? Is he stripping them of his titles? Is he going to be strong when it comes to leases and subletting? Because what I'm seeing from his team briefing is lots of word salad,

but actually things that are quite non-committal. So he will review this. He will look into this. I go back to the point, Dan, I want a royal family, but we need them to get our trust back now. If we go through the entire family, we have been let down time and time again. So I just really hope that we're not being spun a narrative by the comms team

because Prince William has previously asked to look into Beatrice and Eugenie's finances, and they've said no. Well, out you go then, Poppits. You know, they shouldn't be getting any perks at all. They're non-working royals that spend their life over in the Middle East, in my opinion, grifting. Peter, what do you reckon? I actually think if you wanted to, I don't disagree, but what I would do is bring them into the fold and make them pay off the debt.

You put them to work. But, I mean, they've literally taken on the taxpayers' money. Well, you know, I'd like something. What's my real? return, please. You know, I think that's only fair, you know, put them to work. If they wanted to be part of the royal family, they want to have all the privileges, earn it, you know, and I think that's a great way of earning the trust back of the public. I also happen to think this photograph may also have been a little bit of a sign to the former and disgraced former Prince Andrew saying

they're on my side, not yours. In other words, you can back off as well. You can't use your daughters as a port like you had done in previous times. They had been caught between the palace and the former Duke of York and I think that might have been a little bit of what was going on because obviously they can't do the big war of words because it's not, you know, Coronation Street although it feels like it at times.

Well, I will say that this is how they kind of do it. They do it through signals, do it to little messages, but yeah, I have to admit, Will has to clamp down at this. But he is not yet the king, to be fair. So I think it's all about the positioning, the mood music, making sure he's making the right noises now. But I'll judge him the first day of what he actually does. But for me, those two, I'd agree, grifters, get to work.

Breaking today, Lorraine Kelly is making a serious bid to stop woke ITV bosses from sacking her. There has been a real crisis at the struggling former TV giant over plummeting ad revenue, plummeting ratings. And as part of that move, Lorraine's show was effectively axed for half the year. year and cut down to just 22-minute segments. Now, you know, I work with Lorraine for 10 years. I know her very well, but I also know the personalities involved in this, including the new head of ITV news, Andrew Dagnall, who despises Lorraine because she was so rude to him when he was a producer back on daybreak that he has made it his life's mission to sack her. Now, Lorraine doesn't have a new contract secured with Wokai TV as of yet. It expires at the end of the year. And so what's going on

is that Lorraine and her team are planting lots of stories in the newspapers to try and secure a new deal. It's quite transparent and I don't necessarily blame her for doing this, but what I wish, and if I could speak personally to Lorraine, it's like, don't hang on too long. You are legend of daytime television, whether people love you or loathe you. But ITV don't want you anymore. They have cut your show down to 22 minutes, Lorraine. Please go out on a high because this is embarrassing me. For you, you deserve better. The bastards. You know the bastards. Just walk. We're going to get analysis on this with Peter C. Barnes and Lauren the insider in just one moment. But first I want to show you the two pieces of propaganda.

which are being leaked out to try and force ITV into signing this new deal. So firstly, Katie Hind in the mail swallowed this idea that the BBC is going to swoop in and poach Lorraine Kelly. Now, again, Katie should do her research. Lorraine actually did a big Saturday night show for the BBC just a few years ago. I think it was called Wedding Crashes or something I went and I filmed there behind the scenes. It didn't work. It wasn't a ratings hit.

So I don't believe this story, if I'm completely honest. But Hind said Insiders at the Corporation say they are developing a show for Lorraine, a team formulating options. It all seems quite vague. But a BBC source that said there was a real buzz around the development team, adding she stayed loyal to ITV for more than four decades. But the BBC know the time is right to finally get her. They are currently creating different shows to present to her. There is no better way to get her revenge than to start working for this. BBC. I don't know. I don't know. I think it's very obvious when you look at Lorraine with

that awful Brianie Gordon that she is just determined not to leave the sofa. Watch. I'm only on for 30 weeks a year and only on for half an hour instead of an hour. I still feel that I've got something to say and I want to be there. And just be in a place where you can talk about anything. And I don't care how rich you are, how poor you are, what your religion is, you know, your status or anything like that, everybody that comes on that show gets treated exactly the same. I always think it's all about the person you're interviewing, never you. And you know that there are some presenters who that's not true.

You all know who they are. Do we? Oh, yes, we do. Oh, I love this. But Lorraine, you're talking about all of your awful colleagues at ITV. Why do you want to be in a stable with those terrible people? Why do you want to be in a stable? at a company that has cut your show down to 22 minutes.

That is not the way to treat a legend. Do you think Oprah Winfrey would have put up with that? No, of course not. She would have walked. So then I bring you the next exhibit, which is actually in the Sun newspaper. Again, I believe this is Lorraine's team, leaking this, suggesting that actually she's going to move to YouTube.

With a source telling the newspaper, Lorraine has been secretly planning her next big project away from ITV for ages. She's seen the incredible success of YouTube interview series. All the big names are doing them, like her pal Piers Morgan, whose uncensored series is global and reaches far more people than he did on ITV. Even former ITV daytime favorite Holly Willoughby is rumored to be launching a magazine show on YouTube. Lorraine has huge ambitions and has been and talks about new ideas with some of her former team who she remains extremely close to. She's also being getting advice from peers. Lorraine loves how she can be her own boss. She can film with herself at home and her.

own time and she gets to work with her old team again too. Lorraine is older now, but she's far from retirement. She would just like more time to spend at home with daughter Rosie and granddaughter, Billy, without the pressure and commitment of travelling to London for just half an hour on screen. Secretly, she would love to take her format and turn it into an online interview format, whether that's a video, podcast or a YouTube series where her fans can tune in wherever they are. Well, just do it, Lorraine. Just do it, seriously. The insider went on. Lorraine's ITV contract is coming to an end and she hasn't signed a new one. It's no secret. She was appalled by TV bosses who acts to her team and the show hadn't been the same since.

Lorraine won't burn any bridges if she does eventually decide to leave, but she's building the foundations now for life after ITV. Now again, I don't buy this. And I'm going to tell you why. When I was at GV News, I had written into my contract that my team were part of my deal. okay, because it mattered to me. I wanted to have the best people around me to make the best content. And if the bosses had said, we're sacking all of them, well, I would have gone too. So there's been something quite undignified about sort of clinging on for their life when you are not wanted. So Lorraine, you've got a walk now.

You've got to say I've had an incredible career there and I'm going to go and do different stuff. And yeah, try and launch a YouTube show. Absolutely. Try and get a deal with the BBC. But I believe, and Lauren the insider, you're the expert on this because you were a celebrity PR behind the scenes for years and years. Did you? Oh, amazing.

And so you know how this works. You know how this game works. Do you agree with me that this is actually Lorraine's team trying to scare ITV into, oh, God, the BBC want her? Oh, God, she's going to launch you. YouTube show. We should give her a new deal because we don't want to lose her. Do you think that's what's going on here? 100%. Go back to the point, the mainstream media is a for-profit corporation that thrives on bad news. Whenever it's too positive, it is a leak. All of that

puff, she wants to spend more time with her granddaughter. That is not how tabloid journalists speak. And so what the agent will be doing is trying to wet the appetite of other broadcasters. The problem is Lorraine, and look, I thought she was really nice. I worked with her for several years, but Lorraine's saying, I can talk about anything on my show. You can't pop it because you are signed to ITV. Your show is 22 minutes and is woke. It is so unbelievably woke. Now, what's interesting is, you know, we've seen Vanessa Feltz and everyone, haven't we? Go on to YouTube and start podcasts. They haven't got a clue what they're doing because, you know, we've seen Vanessa Feltz and everyone, haven't we? Go on to YouTube and start podcasts. They haven't got a clue what they're doing because, YouTube is very much representative of real people. Dan, I'm sat in my spare room. I don't have, like you. You know, neither of us have backers. We self-fund our journalism.

Lorraine is going to have to do a real U-turn if she wants to connect with people because we're all over mass propaganda. No one wants to hear it. If she wants to set up a YouTube that will only attract a very small, amount of crazy leftists, you know, and get 12 views. Maybe it will work. But the future is on the right. And also, people are disengaging with the toxic mainstream media rapidly. And I don't think

Lorraine looks at the mainstream as the enemy at all. I think she's been so indoctrinated and so groomed by these corporations to be so scared to say anything that would offend people. I mean, could you imagine her saying white lives matter. No, I couldn't. I couldn't, actually. Peter Zeebans, what do you think she should do, Lorraine? I actually think that she's gone native.

I don't think she could survive on the YouTube, so the independent scene. I think she doesn't have that edge anymore. I think this is actually, really, she needs to kind of take ITV and kind of tease them so she doesn't have to do any of the hard work. Although it doesn't know how much work you would Lauren actually do just to get through, you know, every episode that you do and all that work.

I don't think she's got that in her. She's used to people doing most of that stuff for her. Also, the idea that the BBC would go after her is a little nonsense because that would make common sense and probably good businesses. So therefore the BBC would never do it. So I think that one's rather cut off. But I will say, it wouldn't surprise me if she did try and go independent, but she's been living in captivity a bit too long

and she couldn't survive in the wild, I'm afraid. I like Lorraine. I remember watching her when I was a kid growing up. But, you know, she's just kind of like, you know, a mum that won't keep her opinions to herself at this point. So she's not really for my audience or anything I would ever be interested in,

but I understand why people like her and all the rest of it. But if you're going to go independent, go independent, what you need to do, be filmed, be you have one photograph outside some kind of studios, a one photograph having lunch with some kind of executive producer who happens to have a little bit of cash. That, then the ITB will run right back to you.

That's how you do it. If you mean it, do it. If not, just move on. But imagine having all, Also, your manager allegedly leak a story about the BBC thinking that's something good. When I was advising clients before I left mainstream, even way back then, you know, the BBC to me was so toxic. And we've come on several years now. And this is the problem. They think the BBC is some kind of win. I would be mortified if my name were ever attached to the BBC.

Defund it. So if Lorraine does want to go independent, she really needs to learn what's going on in the world. Because evidently, she hasn't got a Scooby-Doo. And I'm not being nasty saying that. I'm just looking at the facts. Yeah, I mean. I have to agree. I had a good 10 years with Lorraine.

I think she is a good person. But I do think you're right, Lauren. She doesn't know about this world. And all I would say is that team was very loyal to her. and if they get rid of your entire team, they're trying to get rid of you. And sometimes, I mean, imagine, I think Lorraine, imagine the respect she would have had.

If she had announced, ITV are trying to sack my entire team and cut my show down. I'm not having that. I've been here for 40 years. This is a disgraceful way to treat me. I'm out. I actually think she would have had a huge amount of respect. I actually find it so sad seeing her show up.

for a 22 minute shot. I mean, 22 minutes. What can you even do in 22 minutes? But look, I don't know. It's going to be interesting. We will watch this one closely. But do stand by Lauren and Peter, because we're about to reveal the worst Britain in the world today. But first, I want to get to the feedback about Henry Novak because we've had a lot of good stuff coming through. The unhappy Brit wrote, right, I don't trust any of our police. I will not ever engage with the police. And I would not call the police for anything. The UK police don't get it. But we, the British public, no longer consent. And isn't that terrifying, but I so understand where you're coming from. Spaniel says, 1966, says police trying to blame an innocent dead young man to keep the footage

of their disgusting treatment of him buried forever. Oki 5286 says George Floyd was a horrible criminal who was old enough to know better. Henry Novak was completely the opposite. Jack Spring says, I grew up always respecting the police. My own uncle was a senior detective, but today I won't lift a finger to help a policeman for as long as these corrupt killers are in the police. Dylan Hughes. This Novak family have carried themselves so gracefully. One day Mr. Novak will tell his son's tale in full. I really hope so he's very welcome here. The Blue Fairy said I fear the UK is at a critical turning point. If there are not serious real changes to the policing policies, you may have a civil war stama needs to wake up. Tim OGB says Zia Yusuf is putting on an act,

which is easily exposed by scrutiny. Oh sorry, Zia Yusuf. Did I say that? Yeah, Zia Yusuf of Reform UK. Rupert Lowe speaks the truth, which passes the scrutiny test every time. And Helen O.D. 7866, who has been an outspoken member for one year. Thank you so much, Helen. Says Zia Yusuf was afraid Camilla Tomini might ask him about Rupert Lowe and all the shenanigans by reform. Very good point. I think he was worried about that.

Okay, a reminder of your Union Jackass nominees. Calamity Lammy for his two-tier handling of Henry Novak nominated by Lauren. Mola Johnson, nominated by Peter for running the police racism watchdog, and I went for Kathy Newman of Sly News. I have to be honest with you guys, it wasn't a close result. Peters, in third place, with 3%. I'm the runner up with 15%. But the worst Britain in the world today, meaning it is a win for Lauren the insider, Calamity Lammy. Eighty-one percent of the vote. It wasn't even close. And Peter, on a related note, and this is quite nice, actually.

Who have you gone for as an honorary greatest Britain today? I've gone for the US Vice President, J.D. Vans, for being one of the few people around the world to have the bravery to say the truth and actually, you know, try to save Britain. And why does it always take an American to remind the British what we're supposed to believe in?

I hope we actually get something good out of this. And yes, he might have done it in a sloppy way, but he's American and we can forgive it for that. But what he said was true and important and we should listen to it. And just because you don't like his politics doesn't mean he doesn't care. And that's what we have to start to remember.

Beautifully put Peter C. Barnes, who is the man behind the brilliant substack, the outsider. I so recommend it. I absolutely love your work. Peter and I cannot wait to see you next week. Lauren, the incident, I'm loving your new studio, by the way, Lauren.

I know you say it's in your spare bedroom, but goodness me, it's looking very swanky, very, very swanky. Well, my husband built it all for me, so I now have proper lights. a proper camera, I thought if I'm going to potentially get arrested for, you know, having an opinion in the UK, I'll do it in style. We'll do it in style.

Well, look, we're getting you out of that studio, though, because a reminder, next week, Peter C. Barnes and Lauren the Insider both joining me for the first ever outspoken election night. Our coverage begins on Thursday, June the 18th from 10pm. Peter C. Barnes will be with me alongside other patriots like Mike Graham and Connor Tomlinson in the studio, Lauren the insider, will be on the ground in Makerfield. Cannot wait to see you both that night. Thank you both so much. Have an amazing week.

And do remember to join us then. Just hit subscribe on YouTube, turn on the notification bell so you'll be alerted to all of our new episodes. We're heading over to Substack now, though, where we're teaming up with the Royal News Network for today's Royal Uncanceled After Show. Please remember you can also subscribe to us as a podcast too. So you can find us on Substack. www.outspoken. Live or on the podcast, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, wherever you get your podcast,

actually just search for Dan Woodson, Outspoken. Please do rate and review as it really helps us as an independent show in the algorithm. I'll see you tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.