Dan Wootton Outspoken - REFORM UK RESIGNATIONS & CHAOS AS TORY BOSS KEMI BADENOCH MAKES NIGEL FARAGE BEDROOM JIBE

Episode Date: February 11, 2025

The war between Reform UK - atop another national poll today - and the dying Conservatives has hit a new peak today, with Kemi Badenoch making a bedroom jibe against Nigel Farage in a cosy interview with the MSM to mark 100 days as leader. Meanwhile, Farage has against distanced himself from Tommy Robinson and admitted he could be replaced by a younger leader in a dramatic interview and photo shoot for the Standard. In his Digest, Dan reveals the new Reform chaos as another senior boss quits in protest over Farage and Zia Yusuf. Then we’re joined by the new UKIP leader Nick Tenconi. PLUS: Why we must leave the ECHR after an Albanian criminal avoided deportation because of his child’s aversion to foreign chicken nuggets. AND: LBC brands anyone who believes in two genders as far right in new left wing media outrage. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Prince Harry admits trying to teach his five-year-old about landmines as Meghan Markle proves she knows nothing about children. All the best coverage of a wild 24 hours at the Invictus Games you won’t get from the MSM with Angela Levin. Sign up to watch at www.outspoken.live. To watch the exclusive Uncancelled After Show for 30-minutes extra content EVERY weekday, sign up at: https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day:    / @danwoottonoutspoken   ---------- Today’s Sponsors: GROUND.NEWS - Go to https://ground.news/outspoken to see through media bias and stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month. INCOGNI - Take back your personal data with Incogni! Use code OUTSPOKEN at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: http://incogni.com/outspoken SURFSHARK - Go to https://surfshark.com/outspoken for an extra four months of Surfshark at an unbeatable price VERSO - https://buy.ver.so/outspoken - Use code OUTSPOKEN to save 15% on your first order. MANSCAPED - https://manscaped.com – get 20% off + free shipping with the code Outspoken. ---------- Dan Wootton Outspoken is fan funded through monthly and one-time donations: https://www.outspoken.live ---------- Join Dan's Substack community: https://www.danwoottonoutspoken.com ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast... Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltone... ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan?... Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook:   / danwootton   Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/... #DanWootton #DanWoottonOutspoken #news #outspoken Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wootten. This is Outspoken Live, episode number 160. And goodness me, this war between Reform UK, which is atop another national poll today, by the way, and the dying Conservatives has hit a new peak, with Kemi Badenoch making a bedroom jibe against Nigel Farage in a cosy interview with the MSM to mark 100 days as leader. Nigel Farage has said that he wants to destroy the Conservative Party. I can't just treat it like it's a toy and have packs and mergers. You get into bed with Farage, you know, heaven forbid the image. We are done with your party.

Meanwhile, Farage has distanced himself from Tommy Robinson. Some suggestions, by the way, that he may have said something about Tommy Robinson yesterday, but I can't work out the video, so I'll let you be the judge. We'll watch that later. But also admitted that he could be replaced by a younger leader in that dramatic photo shoot for the standard we just saw. So in my digest next, I'll reveal that another senior reform figure has quit in protest over Farage and Zia Youssef. And then we're joined by the new permanent UKIP leader, Nick Tankoni, to discuss if there's any way the right can unite. Also coming up on the show today,

why we must leave the ECHR after an Albanian criminal avoided deportation because of his child's aversion to foreign chicken nuggets. And can you believe this? LBC has branded anyone who now believes that there are only two genders as far right in the new left-wing media outrage that I will show you. Then in the uncancelled after show on Substack, Prince Harry admits trying to teach his five-year-old about landmines as Meghan Markle proves she knows nothing about children. It has been a wild 24 hours at the Invictus Games. We'll give you the coverage that you won't get from the MSN with our Royal Mastermind, Angela Levin. She's got a big scoop, folks, as well.

So you can sign up to watch the after show www.outspoken.live. Certainly no shortages for our choices for Greatest Britain and Union Jackass today. You know you get to choose the Union Jackass. You can vote live right now in the live chat and we'll announce the winner at the end of the show. But great nominees today. So first up, nominated by Boggy Wood, Ashley Dalton. She's been appointed as a Minister for Health but can't tell the difference between humans and llamas. We're going to talk about that with Nick later too. Nominee two, Kim Ledbeater, nominated by Amanda Hunter. And the reason is for her dishonesty, deception,

and deceit. She knew all along that her judicial safeguard was unworkable and would need to be ditched. Shame on her and all who lied with her. That is, of course, in relation to the assisted dying bill. And nominee three, Peter Mandelson, nominated by Josephine Jarrell. And the reason is that the most degenerate man in Britain has now been appointed as the King's ambassador to the US. What an insult to the US. So three good choices there. Get voting. I will reveal the Union jackass at the end of the show and today's Greatest Britain too. So stay with us right until the end of the show. But now, let's go. So Nigel Farage is loving life at the moment, but does he risk alienating his base after another shock Reform UK boss

resigned today? Nigel certainly doesn't seem worried, this afternoon at least, as he celebrated reform reaching another membership milestone and vowing to next come for Labour as the country's biggest political party. Meanwhile, 50 years since Margaret Thatcher became Tory leader, hopes that Kemi Badenoch could be a second Iron Lady seem far-fetched at best. She's been reduced to making cheap sex slurs against Mr Farage with her few remaining supportive MSM journalists at the Daily T. Nigel Farage has said that he wants to destroy the Conservative Party. I can't just treat it like it's a toy and have packs and mergers. You get into bed with Farage, you know, heaven forbid the image. We are done with your party. But if Kemi had been reading The Telegraph, she'd realise that even its sound star columnists like Tim Stanley now acknowledge the Tories have no God-given right to govern. And her decision to describe a deal with Reform UK as for the birds hasn't gone down

well with that shrewd reader of British Public Mood, former Sun editor Kelvin McKenzie, who posted on X, Kemi Badenoch, has signed her own death warrant when she told the Telegraph, I packed with reform was for the birds. She believed a deal would drive away conservatives who, quote, did not want to get into bed with Farage. She's wrong. Nobody wants a merger, but they do want an accommodation. Kemi won't deliver that. She has to go. And I think Kemi has to go for a whole load of reasons. I mean, even her decision to take a leaf out of Trump's playbook by appearing on new media platforms has failed thus far, because I watched her interview on Trigonometry at the weekend and it was a car crash. So look, I am going to invite Ms. Badenoch to Outspoken and then let's see if she is really prepared to get down and dirty in the

independent media space. I'm doubtful she'll show, but she should. Because at the moment, reform are making all the running on social media like this from its MP, James McMurdoch. I haven't done this before, but I want to show you my reaction to something because it's absolutely killed me. So one of the guys from the team's just come in and said oh Kemi Badnok's just come out with a brand new book have you seen it? So no pass it to me, pass it to me. So he's passed it to me, here it is, I flick through it it's completely blank. There's a lot of talent in the team me there's a lot of there's a lot of talent in in in the team there's a lot

of good spirits i mean we've got a hell of a job to do and 2029 seems like forever away but there is a lot of there's a lot of good humor as well with the uh with the effort and with the desire to improve the country i'd love that i'd share my reaction anyway have a great day and if you aren't already please like like and follow. Cheers. Bye. So, look, they're having fun. They're having fun. And actually, that's the sort of stunt that Kemi Badenoch should be pulling. And the public opinion is clear.

YouGov shows reform polling its highest ever today, prompting calls for the Tories to stand down in all working class areas. Look at that. Reform up 1 to 26, Labour up 1 to 25, and the Conservatives on 21. But there is a but. There is a but. Today saw reform hit by another resignation of a grassroots star, Joe Brest, the chairman for South Derbyshire, over the professionalisation of the party. Watch. My name is Job West, and I'm the Reform UK chairman for South Derbyshire, and I'm going to resign my position. I'm going to do so because I do not have confidence in the leadership of Nigel Farage or the chairmanship of Zia Youssef I don't think either one of them really understands what Reform UK means to an awful lot of people People like myself hoped that Reform UK would be a grassroots people-led party from the bottom up

but as the months have gone by I can see that this professionalization drive really means that Nigel and Zia seem to be intent on turning Reform UK into Conservative Party 2.0. The professionalisation of the party is, as far as I'm concerned, the Toryisation of the party. And then another video today, and I want you to be the judge about this because I actually struggled to believe Nigel has said what he is being accused of. But this is a video of Nigel Farage purported to be in London yesterday, where he was asked about Tommy Robinson's imprisonment and according to onlookers said, I hope he rots. Now, I'm not sure.

I'm not sure. I've watched the video. I think it's possible that he said it's wrong, but I want to show it to you so you can be the judge. So let's take a look at this now. i'm really not sure i think it's more likely that Nigel said it's wrong, because that is what he did say in the Standard interview. But I will ask the question, of course. There were actually three answers from Farage in that Standard interview that I wanted to share with you. So the first was excellent. He was asked, what do the Conservatives stand for now? And he replied, I have no idea. I've no idea what

purpose they serve. They're divided too. Kemi will last a year or 18 months. Her biggest problem is leading a divided party. She's just continuity, Kemi. It's the same old party. What did she do when she was Women and Equalities Minister? Did she mention grooming gangs once? No, not once. But then there were two final questions, which I thought raised some issues. So he was asked, what was the worst aspect of the city, referring to London? And Nigel replied that parts of it are unrecognizable as being English. And the fact we've allowed these enclaves to set up with no interaction with people who have been here for generations. So, so far, so good, right? But Dylan Jones, the interviewer

for The Standard asks, come on, you might be able to stop the influx, but you won't be able to change those communities. And Nigel replied, what's done is done. Now, not everyone is going to agree with that defeatist approach. So on that note, let me bring in UKIP's new leader, Nick Tenkony, for today's uncancelled interview. Nick, firstly, congratulations. The new permanent leader of UKIP, Nigel Farage's former party, of course. I'm sure you're delighted. Hi, Dan. As always, thank you so much for having me on.

I am absolutely delighted. I am truly, truly blessed to be in this position. What a journey it's been over the last four years. And here we are, we're taking our country back. And I'm glad you just mentioned about Nigel's tweet, which I believe was yesterday, what's done is done. You're wrong, Nigel, and you're not fit for purpose. What's done isn't done. We're going to undo it, re-engineer society. We're sending them home. We're taking our country back. Shameful. And this is the big difference, right? This is the fundamental difference, I guess, between your leadership and Nigel Farage's

leadership. So he believes that the demographic change to the country is probably locked in. He believes it's going to be necessary to have a strong Muslim vote for Reform UK. So it doesn't look like he is going to campaign against Islam. And you're saying, actually, that's not good enough. Yeah, so item one is there's a suspected 1.2 million who shouldn't be on British soil. So you've got your foreign nationals in our jails deported. You've got your 100,000 illegals in our hotels deported. You've got your 39,000 Islamists on MI5's terror watch list

out of the 45,000 deported. So you've got your low-hanging fruit, i.e. we know where these people are. You've got your people on visas claiming welfare, deported. Obviously, close the borders, release the armed military into the channel, end immigration, close the borders, start encouraging our grassroots, Gen Alpha, Gen Z, and what's left of the millennials

who are yet to start a family, to actually start having children, to get married and actually live a happy life um so that that's that's part of it um and then of course you've got the wider piece around remigration so let's take what nigel's saying what's done is done so again there's that liberal mindset live and let live don't upset the conservative party too much because we can't go anywhere without them. Reform might have the momentum. They might have the 25% in the polls. We get obsessed and bogged down with polls. Ultimately, the Tories hold the key. In terms of the uni party, they hold the key. They're not in power. Doesn't matter. They still hold the key. Nigel knows that. Nothing can break that unless you return a majority.

Reform aren't going to do that. So we've got this liberal, continual, never ending appeasement and complacency. And what's done is done. I love that. That's brilliant. Why would you ever say that, Nigel? I'm going to use that an awful lot. Pandering to the Islamic vote. Again, what's done is done. These people are our friends. Well, yeah, there are good people from all walks of life and faiths, but to en masse cuck and to bend the knee and to go out of your way to both say that, use that rhetoric and to instill a Muslim chairman. You mentioned the differences. There are many, Dan. We're offering the British people a referendum on the death penalty. We're talking about mass deportations. We all know that it's three to five million, but it probably goes north of 10 million. And we're also going to devolve the Welsh and Scottish and Northern Ireland parliaments.

And then there's just the small issue of the fact that I would never install a Muslim into high command because we're a Christian country and we're putting Christianity back into the heart of government. So huge differences, differentiators and USPs between UKIP and reform. So you've seen in my digest, Joe Rees, the chairman for South Derbyshire Quitty Reform UK. Is he the type of bloke that you would say, come on over, join UKIP? Yeah, certainly.

So in the case of Joe, let's travel back seven months-ish when I'm deputy leader to interim leader. Reform would behave how reform behaves, which is to essentially get rid of people. Now, we don't know that these people are any good. Let's be frank. We don't know that the people they're getting rid of are any good. We are standing 650 candidates at UKIP.'s happening that's happening now our candidate list is growing but you've got to pass vetting and you have to be suitable but these people who take to camera and this is so important like Joe who have taken to camera last night I saw it these are your foot soldiers these are your chairmen or your branch

chair I want to come on speak about that in a minute it's a separate point but they're taking whilst you rise and you've got your 25 percent in the infamous polls etc that may or may not mean something you've got them taking to camera en masse seems like every month this happens denouncing the party calling the party out and saying no and there's consistency across all of the complainants there's consistency it's to do with the professionalisation lie. It's to do with the democratisation or lack thereof piece. It's to do with the Toryisation of reform. It's to do with flip-flopping. It's to do with the complacency and the appeasement and the buckling and the flip-flopping. So it's not like there are constantly different forms or anything vitriolic. It's good people taking to the internet and God bless Elon and Twitter for the space to do so now that it's free and saying,

sorry, everything that that guy said last month and the month before that, it's actually all true. This is hugely problematic. I'm leaving. So going back seven or or eight months I would then contact these people and I would say look have you seen our policies have you seen our graphics have you seen my x my insta whatever you're after have you actually looked into UKIP now things have changed my message remains that my hand is extended to good people who put their hope and faith in reform, who have further been downtrodden, who have further been betrayed.

Once again, we absolutely have to stop this because morale, momentum and will, even though the tide is turning, very true, it is at an all-time low. So my hand remains extended. I'm no longer chasing these people. UKIP is rising. It's time to get in touch with me or with the party. Then there's the other big difference, I guess, is Tommy Robinson. Although there's also a split within Reform UK over this with Rupert Lowe speaking positively about Tommy Robinson, even in mainstream media interviews now. And Rupert is definitely taking, I guess, a more aggressive position. I mean, look at this post from him on X yesterday with that shot of Whitechapel Station and saying, this is London, the station name should be in English and English only. And it feels like he is Elon Musk's choice. So where do you stand on

this split between Rupert Lowe and Nigel Farage? And for example, would you consider some sort of deal if Rupert Lowe was reformed UK leader and if Rupert Lowe was saying actually Tommy Robinson supporters are welcoming the party so what I what I definitely understand about Rupert and all of the Rupert Lowe's of the world is that my understanding is that they're very very rich potentially multi-millionaire I don't know very rich men who dress the same, look the same, and speak the same. Britain has been betrayed so very badly for so many decades. It's time for something new. I'm not going to use words like fresh, different. It's time for something new, something we haven't had before, something that would make Margaret Thatcher look weak and incompetent. We need something radical, brand new. And when I hear Rupert speak, you mentioned about Tommy's, about the support for Tommy and the fractures within reform.

It's just a mess. It's an absolute mess. There are no fractures at UKIP. Problems are going to come up. Of course they do. We'll deal with them. But there are no fractures. It's about ideology and it's about vision from high command. And that vision and that ideology from high command, which is Zia Youssef and Nigel Farage, that's not going anywhere ever. what if it were to change? If it were to change, I say this, no mercy, no diplomacy, and no surrender shown to anyone in high command on the right. They're nowhere near where we are on the right. No mercy, no diplomacy, and no surrender shown to both the establishment and those who are trying to become part of the establishment. Any sign of flip-flopping, any sign of appeasement, any sign of coalescing, any sign of renegading, anything which isn't radical, we are taking our country back from the traitors who have destroyed Britain over

countless decades. Absolutely nothing else will do. So let's say Rupert goes in it's never going to happen but let's discuss it okay does it change anything well if reform become utterly radical and they promise to deliver justice back to the British people then I guess if Rupert want and is instilled as leader then there's a conversation to be had and I'm happy to talk about what I deem to be what is unifying the right and the efforts that I'm taking to do that whereas reform showed last summer no mercy whatsoever to the British public and to good blue-blooded conservatives who didn't deserve to be unseated of course it's the official party line those conversations can happen

and what about conversations with Tommy Robinson? Is there any possibility of him joining UKIP? Yeah, certainly. So that part is far easier to explain. It's important to embellish when it comes to reform. So voters know where they stand. With Tommy, it takes 10 seconds. The hand is extended to Tommy. He is welcome to join the party. I want him to stand in 2029. Tommy Robinson is a hero. Under a UKIP government, he would be knighted for the journalistic work, activist work that he's done in exposing

the paedophile Pakistani grooming gangs. He's a hero. He'd get a knighthood, and we want him to jump on the team for the big win. Does he want it? Is he considering it? That's a separate conversation, which is, again, very easy to explain. I've done all the necessary diligence and put all the necessary work in to say thank you to him, first of all.

Obviously, I've not yet met him, but made sure he understands there's an awful lot of love and harmony there and it's totally understood that he wants to focus on his media career as an activist and as a journalist going forward and I respect that entirely Okay, good good good that is very clear Breaking right now anti-white

racism in the UK has today become legalised. been cleared in court of calling a police officer effing stupid and white because it wasn't considered racist. Now, you just swap white with any other ethnic group and tell me that person would not be behind bars right now? Yeah, right. But this is the breaking story as written by the Daily Mail. Sam Kerr has been cleared of racially aggravated harassment against PC Stephen Lovell at Twickenham Police Station. The 31-year-old Australian football star was filmed drunkenly calling PC Lovell effing stupid and white in the early hours of January the 30th, 2023. The court heard how Kerr and her now-fiancé, Christy Mewers, who is also a

footballer for West Ham and the USA, believe they had been kidnapped by a taxi driver after a night out culminated in Mewers kicking out the taxi window in a bid to escape the vehicle. The driver reportedly told police that the two footballers had refused to cover the cost of the cleanup and damages. At the police station, Kerr was alleged to have become abusive and insulting towards PC Lovell. So let me bring in UKIP leader Nick Tenconi on this. Nick, can I be very clear? Firstly, I don't want anyone going to court for their language, right? I certainly don't want anyone going to prison for their language. However, if you replaced white with black hair, if you replaced white with Asian, or let's be

honest, virtually any other minority group, that celebrity would be locked up. Yet anti-white racism is now just accepted in the UK. It's part of life. It's accepted by the judiciary. It's accepted by the authorities. It's accepted by the politicians. This is so wrong, is it not? Yeah, it's so wrong. And frankly, I quake with rage. We're pledging at UKIP to end racism against whites. We denounce racism. We also denounce racism against white people. Look at the state of it. When we say, which is common on the right, daily you'll hear it, our institutions have been infected. Our institutions have been captured.

We're talking about the blob. We're talking about the justice system. We're talking about the police, the CPS, our schools. It is at the church, the synod. Everything is totally captured and anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-masculinity. There's all sorts of different campaigns. Look at this example that you bring up. Imagine if you replace white with black or any other, as you say, any other ethnicity. And it's being taught in our schools, Dan. It's being taught on our university campuses.

White guilt, hate yourself. You should be paying reparations. You should feel ashamed. So we're producing downtrodden, emasculated, effeminate, cut, bending the knee men, because they are so anxious and depressed and downtrodden. Now, this is obviously not a high profile case, but obviously it's gained an awful lot of notoriety. It sickens me that in reality, a judge has let this go. And we see the two tier justice right

there, something that Kemi Badenoch doesn't believe exists in Britain. It's absolutely disgusting and it's got to end. It's the weaponisation of race. It is divisive. It is corrosive. And it needs to be completely eradicated from Britain. You know how the hard left view this, Nick. But let me show you and you can respond.

So Narendra Kerr, race baiter-in-chief here in the UK, writes, This should never have even gone to court. Sam Kerr simply told the truth. A correct observation in calling the cop white. And then this is the key line, Nick. Part of the white system not known for treating people of colour fairly. Also, Cheryl Cole was cleared of racism after punching a black toilet attendant and calling her a black bitch.

Yes, I keep receipts. How would you respond to Narinda? Well, I've got a rule when I'm training up my candidates, activists and general rule of thumb in life. If it can't be reasoned with, and if it's a psychopath, it's called the 15 second window narinda is a very very dangerous very very unwell human being she doesn't deserve the time of day

she as we call it she grifts she's a she's a media grifter she knows that she's going to get away with she her and bushra can go right up to the edge of what is basically completely unacceptable because of their immutable characteristics. They know they can do that. So they play this game. They team up as well. So it's important for your viewers. I'm not going to spend too long on this, but the viewers need to be aware that these agitators are in place to further disenfranchise us, further depress us, make us anxious. The outrage I felt when you just, I've actually seen that tweet from her, but the outrage I felt, Dan, is sickening. She is a race baiter.

She is not a good person. She is not a virtuous person. She is not a nice human being. She is divisive. She is corrosive. She is utterly toxic. And I'll just bring in one more point because you mentioned about you involve free speech there. We have got to end the freedom

of consequence environment that has been brought about this freedom of consequence environment. Of course, there should be consequences for your actions, but it needs to be sensible. It needs to be common sense and it needs to be fair. So I would say to your viewers, please make sure that you view individuals like Narendra as very, very unwell people. And you can't argue with psychopaths, give them 15 seconds. And when it behaves like that, just walk away from it. The country is mad in so many ways, Nick, not just in our courts, but also because of the ECHR. I wanted to share with you the story, which you probably have seen from the Daily Telegraph. I mean, the headline, honestly, you would think this was April Fool's Day.

Albanian criminals deportation halted over son's distaste for chicken nuggets. No, this is a real story. The Daily Telegraph reports an Albanian criminal was allowed to stay in Britain partly because his son will not eat foreign chicken nuggets. An immigration tribunal ruled that it would be unduly harsh for the 10-year-old boy to be forced to move to Albania with his father owing to his sensitivity around food. And Nick, that was the sole example given to the court. But the judge decided to allow the father's appeal against discrimination as a breach of his right to family life under, you guessed it, the ECHR, the European Convention

on Human Rights. Nuts. Yeah, we're sending them home. We're sending them home. In a first-past-the-post system, in a secular liberal democracy, if you are not a majority in Parliament, you're not writing the laws, you're not changing anything. I need one year in power, Dan.

One year. Day one, you've seen what Trump's done and you've seen the sanctions now Trump's put on Starmer. It's all possible for your viewers. It's all possible. We're just so downtrodden. We can't see the wood from the trees. We're sending them home. That's again, that story. It's so outrageous and egregious. It's time to start converting that that outrage and into the understanding that brings about the action which is if you're not backing a political war machine a political party in britain and that party then returns a majority

unless that dynamic occurs you're going to be outraged and you've got your think tanks and you've got your lobby groups and you've got your street movements and your culture movements and they play such an important blessed wonderful role in in for so many different reasons but unless you're backing a political party and that party wins you are not going to end the madness like what you just described there UKIP government that that individual would be detained and deported and and not only that but there would have to be an agreement with the government, the country that the individual's going to,

that he was never allowed anywhere near his children ever again. There's two different points to this story here. And I mean, this madness, Nick, takes place every single day. There are thousands of these decisions made. But how do you unpick, Nick, a system? I mean, I call it the snivel service. Other people call it the deep state. I genuinely believe now these people are working against us. They hate us.

And it's a really serious charge. But it's true. They work for globalist organisations, and they intend to effectively end the United Kingdom as a sovereign state. So how do you unpick that? I mean, is it necessary, for example, to fire every civil servant and say they will all be politically appointed, for example, more of an American system? Yeah, certainly. So I'm happy to talk through the breakdown. I just want to add something. You mentioned something very important, Dan. For people like you and I, we know about these stories, these outrageous stories where the individual isn't deported. There was another

story when I said that the father shouldn't be allowed near his children again, there's another story. A Pakistani man has been found guilty of paedophilia. It's an incredibly egregious story. And he's not being deported because the judge doesn't think that his children should be apart. They shouldn't be apart from the father. So that's what I meant on the last bit. Certainly with the Albanian criminal deported, family deported, but also in the case of the other story, which you may or may not want to cover, just to clarify. In terms of the breakdown and what this looks like, let me once again reference Trump.

So in one breath, the British public says there's nothing we can do. It's game over. We feel absolutely awful, forever, permanent. We're destitute. In the next breath, oh, look at what Trump's doing. Look at what various different governments do. When we see, when we like what we hear and we like what people are seeing and our governors and our elected officials are doing, it's possible. So which one is it? The answer is it's possible. Now, is there a supranational, tyrannical, communist-inspired globalist agenda? Yes, there is. That takes five seconds to tell.

It's very true. Can we do anything about it? Absolutely, we can. You mentioned the civil service. It's not just the civil service. There is a list. If you do the org chart, FBI style, you've got the Synod, which is your Church of England,

which controls your canon law, which controls the rules and regs, even in the Catholic Church in the United Kingdom. You've also got the Home Office. You've also got the Department for Education. You've also got the Civil Service. You've also got, and the list goes on and on and on. Once an executive is in place in a prime ministerial first-past-the-post system, you and your cabinet have an enormous amount of power to start handing out the executive orders, which we see Trump doing in the US. It doesn't matter that they've got a presidential system. We have the power to do that.

So let me reassure your audience. The power is there to do that. Then item two is that, of course, we're not taking any prisoners, which is the last bit of your question. You know, what do you do? Do you start firing people? Absolutely. It's going to be a hands on deck call to action when we are in government to not only remove these people, but also have them on trial. All of those medical professionals involved in prescribing puberty blockers to under 18 year olds, all those ministers and police detectives, mayors, councillors who are involved in covering up the grooming gangs. So let me be very clear to you in the audience. It's not just is it possible? Yes, it's possible. Can you do it? Yes, you can. How do you do it with the iron fist? And then

lastly, it's justice to the British people and reparations in the case of the rape genocide of native white girls by paedophile Pakistani grooming gang mafias. It's really important to get that point across. Of course it can be done. The madness in the United Kingdom, though, especially under the socialist Labour government, seems to have its tentacles in every aspect of life. And I think The Sun's front page today sums that up best. health minister, an ultra-woketopian fool called Ashley Dalton, who believes that humans can identify as llama. I'm not joking. This is how the Sun put it. Sir Keir Starmer's new health minister has been blasted for absurd comments that people can identify as a llama. Ashley Dalton has also said she doesn't believe in gendered toilets, argues women can have a willy, and described Brexit voters as short-sighted and stupid. Her past comments were

unearthed on social media as she took over from WhatsApp scandal MP Andrew Gwynne. At the weekend, Ms Dalton's new boss at Labour West Streeting blasted the NHS for still harbouring woke views and warned it to get back to basics. So ultra-woke Ms Dalton, right? She was once asked if humans can seriously identify as llama, and she replied yes and added that they should be treated with dignity and respect. Well, good on Lee Anderson, the Chief Whip of Reform UK, who decided to raise this issue in the manner it was deserved to be raised with the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, in Parliament this afternoon. Thank you, Mr Speaker. Now, the new Health Minister has stated that it's okay for a human being to present as a llama. So what I want to know is if I have a family member who presents yn dweud bod hi'n iawn i un dyn dynol ddangos fel llama. Felly, beth dwi am wybod yw, os yw

aelod teulu sy'n ddangos fel llama yn dod yn ddangos fel llama yn ystod y nos, a ydynt yn ei anfon i ddod i'r drosglwydder, i'r gyffredin neu i'r jaquid yn syth? Gwladdwch. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod.

Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. Felly, yn ystod ystod. honourable member that my honourable friend, the Minister for Public Health, believes in treating every human being with the dignity and respect they deserve, even the honourable gentleman. Nick Tenconey, leader of UKIP, we are a laughingstock. Yes, we are, Dan. What a day to come on your show. I'm very, very... All of these mad stories. I'm very, very agitated. You know, we're taking our country back. And I've got that I've got the Teflon shoulders, we're taking our country back. But so you've got

the new health minister, Ashley Dalton, and it turns out that she's insane. So she needs to be arrested in section, right? For what she's saying, in a cabinet position, she needs to be arrested in section. Right. For what she's saying in a cabinet position, she needs to be arrested in section. So let's let's give the British public what they want. She's insane. And she's got a ministerial position. Correct. Correct. This is hugely problematic. And Starmer had over 400 MPs. Right. And he picked her. So this is on him. He is also insane. Well, as ever, you ask all the right good questions. Going back to what you said previously about they hate us,

how are we going to save Britain? Obviously, it's a much longer conversation than just one segment, but they do hate us. So to your point, so Starmer's got hundreds to choose from and he picks this particular individual when it comes to health, which is an incredibly important and broad topic. When it comes to health, she looks nothing like health. She looks nothing like health. That's problem number one. Problem number two is she's insane. Problem number three is why would leader, why would the PM, leader of Labour, Keir Starmer, why would he set, why would he appoint her when he could have just as easily? It's to wind us up. Genuinely, I think, Dan, it is so very easy to help the British public out with their mental health, especially those on the right, and to alleviate some of the anxiety, concerns, and depressions. They're doing it on purpose.

They're doing it to cause outrage. There's no other explanation. Well, indeed. And this social engineering is also spreading through the mainstream media, who are just as culpable, as you know. And one of my jobs, I feel, is to call out this madness to try and turn people off. And that means sometimes showing the most insane moments. And LBC, which is so tragic. I mean, the fall of LBC is a great media tragedy. This used to be the station of the working classes. This used to be the station of the black cab driver. It's now the station of the insane woke brigade. There's a particularly awful woman who hosts at the weekend called Natasha Devon.

And she has now decided that if you believe in two genders, you are far right. Watch this and I'll get you to react off the bat. In the textbook, one of them was male and the other one was female. But Aaron, when you do science, as you know, when you get to A-level, you learn that some of the things you learned at GCSE weren't true or you were taught in a reductive way. When you get to degree, you learn that some of the things that you learn at A-level were reductive or not quite true. We can argue about whether non-binary people are legitimate. I happen to think that they are. But how does it affect your life, their existence? How does it negatively affect you? Because I personally don't want to broaden my language where I don't want to be. I don't want to be inaccurate. I shouldn't be forced to be inaccurate. Do I not have the right to

think that there are two genders? You have the right to think that there were two genders and that you have the right to think that but what i'm hearing aaron is that you've gone far right because pronouns make you sad and i mean this is the woman who appeared on lbc previously nick tenconey with the trans man's pride flag on her cheek so she's an activist she's not a journalist fine you know it's okay for there to be activists who appear on the radio that is fine but what isn't okay is for her to brand a caller who simply believes in biological reality as far right. What do you make of it? Again, another one for the asylum. So you've been very kind and you've said she's an activist and not a journalist.

It's a very clever line, which I've always been quite inspired by because it helps with our mindset and our thinking on the right. In the age of psychological warfare and far-left totalitarian propaganda, it's actually very difficult. The communists are very clever. It's actually very difficult, especially if you're boomer conservative-raised, liberal mindset, live and let live. It's lamb to the slaughter territory.

So I do appreciate that. There's the weaponization. You said that she's an activist. It helps us understand it. Let's actually just call it what it is. She's nuts. And she's deliberately agitating. There are two genders, male XY and female XX. Let's hope i've got that right because i always get them confused there's two and she's now saying not only is that not true but you are far right i.e a neo-nazi pretty much for having common sense belief so actually we live in an extraordinarily fascinating and wonderful time if we seize the opportunity. We are living and breathing like potentially no other time in let the outrage win. Let's look at how psychotic she is and what she's saying and what we can do to better ourselves for it. world where the mainstream media are going to declare everyone who votes for the AFD in Germany, right, as far right. Now, they don't label Reform UK as far right. Well, most don't anyway, but they would certainly brand you far right, Tommy Robinson far right. You know, how do we deal with this far right label like is it necessary to almost reclaim it or do you just say it's rubbish we don't give a damn what you call us

how because this label is now used by the mainstream media and the idea is to try and freak ordinary people out so there will be lots of ordinary people who agree with everything you say but are too scared of being called far right because of the connotations that that still holds. Yeah. So that's a huge topic to me. I'll try and answer as best I can because I don't want to miss anything out. So a lot of people contact me saying, Nick, you're wrong. Start embracing the title. So to your main point, a lot of people contact me saying embrace it. Absolutely not. I will never be called far right. I will never endorse it ever because it's not my ideology. And now I'm leader of a national party. Vision and ideology comes first for the party.

That's what you have to be held to account on. I am not far right and I'll never be called it. Let's delve into what you said. What do we do about it? When we were at school, Dan, and we were called names, that's bullying. Well, we all know what happened to bullies when we hadn't lost our minds and we lived in an ordinary, normal time. You deal with bullies. Once bullies are dealt with, they stop being bullies. So it's a very important question. We need to stand up for ourselves. We need to have some courage.

I wish there was a more sophisticated answer and I could do my little magic wand thing, but there isn't. I didn't want to involve godlessness, but it kind of comes into this. We are paying the price for liberal secular practice, which was always en route to become live and let live, meek and mild, turn the other cheek. It is a lie. It is absolute nonsense. It is time to fight back. So let's take the workplace. Let's take a train journey, a taxi journey. Let's take your children's school teacher. When these vitriolic attacks, direct answer to your question, when these attacks are put on ordinary hardworking citizens, it is time to stand up for yourself. But in my previous point,

I just mentioned, if you don't understand it, how can you stand up for yourself? If you don't understand the mechanism behind the evil, how can you stand up for yourself? It is called far left totalitarian propaganda. It is designed to demotivate you, demoralize you and denigrate you. And it is very cleverly thought out. But it ends when you say it ends. And that means understanding that you are in a position of strength. You are in a position of justice and righteousness. For example, in the mega conference in Europe, in the European Union last week or the week before, I gave my speech and I stood up in a room full of people and I said, it isn't racist to not want your kids

to be murdered and raped. It isn't racist or bigoted to not want migrant terrorism on your shores. Standing ovation. You see, I'm giving some practical examples to your audience here. It's so important and it's a great question. A lot to unpack.

Indeed it is. And I think you did unpack it very, very well. But look, stand by Nick Tencone because in just one minute, two big interesting pieces of news. Firstly, is King Charles siding with the Labour Party? Because in just one minute, two big interesting pieces of news. Firstly, is King Charles siding with the Labour Party? And if so, is this about to plunge the United Kingdom into a constitutional crisis?

Lots of outrage on the right about this. Plus, Eamon Holmes has let loose on Meghan Markle. I'll show you what he had to say and get Nick's response in just one minute. So don't go anywhere. But first, attention, all the proud, the bold, and the beautifully bald. It's time to elevate your grooming game with the Manscaped Dome Shaver Plus. Designed for precision, comfort, and a flawless finish, this shaver is the ultimate tool for keeping your dome as smooth as your best pickup lines. Whether you're maintaining a sleek style or embracing the shine with confidence, the Dome Shaver Plus has you covered. So head on over to manscaped.com and join the over 11 million men worldwide, including me, who trust Manscaped. You

use the code OUTSPOKEN at checkout, you'll receive 20% off your entire order and free shipping. But let me tell you about the Dome Shaver Plus. This is an electric shaver that adapts to your head's contours for a smooth shave without the mess and hassle of traditional shaving. So four stainless steel skin-safe rotary blades reduce nicks and cuts to deliver a perfectly bored look without uneven hair patches. Now, if you're buying for your husband or your boyfriend or your brother or your son, this is perfect because it has flex adjust technology, meaning that every blade stays perfectly close to his scalp for a precise finish. And the powerful 8,000 RPM motor delivers effortless shaving performance with less strokes

and irritation. Plus, a long-lasting rechargeable battery has up to 60 minutes of runtime. When a charge is needed, you can save time with the 10-minute quick change option. Because the Dome Shaver Plus is waterproof, you can enjoy wet or dry operation too. And the Dome Shaver Plus is ergonomically designed to fit comfortably into your hand and effortlessly navigate every curve of your scalp. With a magnetic blade pad and hair chamber, cleanup is a breeze, making sure your Dome Shaver Plus stays fresh and ready to deliver a smooth shave every time you need it. Grab the Dome Shaver Plus by the handle or palm the blade pad and glide it across your head like you're sweeping away last year's regrets. So go to manscaped.com using the code outspoken

for free shipping and a whopping 20% discount on your entire order. Get the Dome Shaver Plus today and experience a shave that is as smooth as you deserve. But now back to the show. Breaking right now, Eamon Holmes has lashed out at Meghan Markle after her extraordinarily appalling appearance at the Invictus Games where she decided to turn an event about wounded soldiers performing at the top of their performance levels into a performance for herself. Watch. Trump said, I don't want to do that, he told the New York Post. I'll leave him alone. He's got enough problems with his wife. She's terrible. Now, that is misogynistic and mean, but it is also... Probably true.

Yeah. I couldn't possibly comment. You know, all this nonsense. He's front of the papers today. I mean, if you just see these pictures here. This is so put on. This is so acted out. All this holding his hand, hugging hugging him acting devoted to him oh god

you think it's fake okay these pictures were taken these pictures were taken in vancouver at the invictus games um and harry and megan were both there and yes i have to agree with you amen she was putting on a very public display of affection like they were on some kind of first date. And you do think that maybe this was a reaction to Trump's comments and Harry's speech also to the disabled athletes, which is an amazing thing that he does. I like the lad. I think the lad has got a lot. I think the country would be...

They would recondition themselves back towards him. I think he'd be welcomed back eventually. But her, no, no, no. I think you're right. And his speech was, he told the veterans, courage, values and humanity at a time where there is no shortage of crisis, no absence or uncertainty, no lack of weak moral character in the world. And I think that was a very, very thinly vowed dig at Trump after what he said about Meghan.

So Nick Tancone, leader of the UKIP party, joins me now. Lots to pick up on here, Nick, because, of course, we did have Trump over the weekend say he's not going to actively try and deport Prince Harry because he's got enough problems with his terrible wife, Meghan Markle. But what do you make of Eamon Holmes' claim that Prince Harry would be welcomed back to the UK? Because I actually don't agree, Nick. I think after the terrible things he put his late grandmother through, Queen Elizabeth II, in her dying days, I believe that relationship between harry and the british public has been forever uh well i'd say forever smashed to be honest but eamon is in the camp that actually if harry were to divorce megan come back cap and hand actually the british people would accept him again i think there's just one point first i'd like to address. The blonde lady who was sat on the left as we saw it. What did Trump say? Because she said it was misogynistic. Do you know what Trump said?

I thought that all he said is that he's got enough to deal with with his wife, who's a terrible person. I agree. How is that misogynistic? It's a fact. Well, then I will happily respond to the question. But first and foremost, we've got to win the I hate men campaign. How is that misogynistic? So I don't know who this lady is with the haircut and the glasses. I don't know. But how dare you call that misogynistic? Because you're undermining misogyny. Same way as if someone, a man said something that was misandrist, which wasn't, you're undermining misandry as well uh some someone a man said something that was misandrist which wasn't you're undermining misandry as well which is a which is a scourge same same as with misogyny so that's the first thing to to Eamon's point there there is no question that he's right I think I'm

not speaking for me but I think the British public probably could be reengineered back towards Harry because, A, they're like that. And some bizarre over sentimentality with regards to the royal family in context of Harry because of what happened to his mother. So I think I know why he said that. It's probably because it's going to happen. In terms of my two cents, I'm on record as saying this. Harry was, both Harry and William have been gifted one of the most special, most privileged, most privileged lucky opportunities a person can have not just in Britain but on

planet earth and he decided to essentially to shun all of that and you're groomed from birth with regards to your responsibilities and the life you're choosing and everything that goes with it he essentially said no I'm turning my back on this for someone who we can all agree has an agenda who has no sense of propriety who is just simply not fit for purpose in that context because you know what you're getting involved in it's a troublemaker and and I find that hugely problematic and that's fairly unforgivable from my perspective on Harry. And you mentioned as well about his behaviour previously with regards to his grandmother,

God rest her soul, passing. Yeah, I think it's completely unforgivable. I just went back to check, by the way, Trump's exact words because I'm with you. I can't see anything misogynistic at all. All he said was in an interview with the New York Post when he was asked if he would deport Harry, if he'd throw him out of the country, he said, I don't want to do that. I'll leave him alone. He's got enough

problems with his wife. She's terrible. And I think you're right. It's so critical that we don't get into a situation where simply stating a fact about a woman is described as misogyny. I mean, I was in the most extraordinary situation, Nick, you might remember when I was thrown under the bus by GB News and the off communists. They claimed that I was misogynistic because I had described a woman as beautiful. So you're actually damned if you do and damned if you don't in this current climate, aren't you? Yeah, I'd certainly like to come back on this. Thank you so much for confirming what Trump, because I wasn't sure. So you've got whoever she is, primetime, GB News. She's probably a regular, you know, pally-pally, chummy-chummy. She is, Dawn Leeson. She hosts every weekend on GB News. Yeah.

So she's comfy she's got it comfy and she dares cool and you know she's it's the way she said it so she she's there to talk about the story she's a pundit i presume she's there to talk about story and again i don't know her age but again that boomer conservative high and mighty virtue signaling madness you you've just you've just got to slip it in there, haven't you? Well, obviously, that's misogynistic. Hang on a minute. You're in a position of prominence. You're on a chat show. You're on a news channel. You don't get to say, imagine if I'd done that. Let's just say the genders were reversed and I slipped in saying, oh, that's misandrist. It's completely undermining. And people should rightly say, no, it's's not that's just you getting in your attack which is disingenuous which is which is of itself would have been misandrist but she gets

away with it and no one calls it out i think that's i'm really glad you brought that up that's um that's incredibly bad form and that that needs to be called out i also wanted to discuss the other big royal political story of the day. And these extraordinary pictures, Nick, made it on the front page of The Times today, The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian. And there's two aspects about it, Angela Rayner is so not fit to be Deputy Prime Minister of this country, given she shows up to a meeting with the King, dressed ludicrously, dressed in embarrassing shoes. I mean, I'm not a fashion guy. I don't get fashion. I don't even know what the shoes are called. Mike Graham, I saw he posted saying, good to see Angela Rayner wearing bovver boots to see the king. And Raelle Braverman of

Reform UK wrote, that's our deputy PM. It's a symbol of this country's decline. So that's the first thing. You've got her appearance and her clothing, which is the first thing. But I would argue, Nick, the more concerning development with this meeting is the fact that King Charles is clearly getting political here. He is hosting a political day with both the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner, who is, of course, responsible for housing. And we know that King Charles has liberal tendencies. We know that he has done everything possible to forge a really close relationship with Keir Starmer, including inviting Keir Starmer and his wife over for a sleepover at Windsor Castle before he became Prime Minister. And before I just get your response, Nick, I'll give you what sort of the political right are saying about this. Christopher Hope of GB News posted,

it is very unusual for the monarch, PM and his deputy to stage a visit together as Sir Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner did today with the King to a housing development in Cornwall. Normally political and royal matters are very separate, yet this week is housing week, with government policy announcement on new homes all week, including one fronted by the PM himself. Today's visit leaves the impression that His Majesty the King endorses the government's policy on new homes and new towns, which both the palace and Number 10 may not object to, but still presents a risk for the monarch. And then Alison Pearson posted, why is the king doing this? I can't remember his mother, our beloved late queen, seeming to lend royal approval

to any political party. Poor judgment. And from Raoul Braverman, of course, recently defected from the Conservative Party to Reform UK, the husband of the former Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, this King is making it way too hard to be a monarchist. So what is King Charles doing here, Nick? And should we be concerned? I mean, you know, I'm a big royalist, a big monarchist, but this worries me. Well, I was a royalist and a monarchist under the late queen elizabeth god rest her soul i am not a royalist under king charles and i have doubts about king charles and his motivations now in the context of affiliation and allegiance to supranational organizations, which is synonymous in my mind with supranational tyranny. I am deeply concerned about his message at Christmas, which was

essentially a, I love all Muslims. And if you want the land, you can have it and please don't hurt us. And we'll happily accept Dimi's status. And here's the jizzier to go with it. I relinquish our green and pleasant land to the Caliphate. It's basically what it was. We all saw it. So I've seen enough now from Charles to know that he's compromised. As with all the discussions about the agenda. We don't know by whom. We don't know the details outside of just inexplicable,

why would you want to burn your country to the ground style rhetoric? No one actually knows why. But we know there's an agenda at play, typically referred to as globalism. So I find what happened with starmer and reina by the way you mentioned a few skeletons in reina's closet her son's a a drag queen uh just fyi i'm 99 sure he's a drag queen you might argue that that's absolutely fine and there's no problem with that and i'd check out the pictures and stuff on instagram it's it's weird but anyway

King Charles I'm going to be very candid with you Dan if I was king I'd say to Starmer release our political prisoners stop trying to kill our elderly stop trying to tax us into oblivion stop waging your war on farmers pull your pants up son otherwise we're going to have problems and instead he's cozying up to them i find it totally unacceptable yeah it's interesting you mentioned the angela rainer thing this is this is my understanding of her son uh he was an only fans star i think with his wife, maybe, rather than being a drag queen himself, but still quite an extraordinary position. Yeah, that was it.

That was it. Yeah. I just, again, it's not necessarily her fault, but equally you're the deputy prime minister and your son's doing that. It's just not taken seriously let's let's say that he'd been caught speeding or or driving without insurance or drunk behind the wheel look that's up that's down to the courts and the police and you know don't do don't do silly things and don't put people's lives in danger certainly but this is when it's when it's perverted

and deviant and degenerate and only fans, thus it's problematic. So, but thank you for clearing that up. Not drag queen story, but porn by the sounds of it. Yeah, well, exactly. Hardcore pornography, which some people would argue is worse. I mean, it's an interesting one, the Angela Rayner conversation, because it was revealed in this new book over the weekend,

Get In, which is all about the secrets of the Labour Party, that she had described Prince Andrew as a paedophile, effectively, and use a word beginning with N to describe him as that. And, oh, it's just, yeah, it's a very odd one, isn't it? Her relationship with the royal family. But it's very clear that King Charles obviously wants to cozy up to her.

Yeah, I think it's hugely problematic. There should be one thing. This goes back to what I said earlier on in the programme. Give me, command me, give me the order, get me into Westminster and you'll see exactly what Trump's done over there. It's a common sense thing to do. And you're also going to sit down with the king and you're going to say, what exactly, where is your allegiance?

Where does your allegiance lie? Because if you want it to be, if you want the public to be to you, it needs to be, it's a two-way street. And at the moment, we're not seeing that. It's the kind of iron fist and tough crackdown that's required. And it goes back to what we were talking about in the beginning. There's going to be changes. When we take our country back, everyone needs to put their seatbelt on, buckle up, buckle in, because there's going to be changes.

We're so far fallen. It's not going to be a very nice time. No different from the fallout from Brexit. This is the price you pay for getting your country back back these tough conversations need to be had with these people king charles is one of them fighting talk from nick tenconi who is the new leader new permanent leader of the yucat party nick you know i always love having you on Outspoken. Please do come back very soon and congratulations again. Thank you, Dan. Now, lots of feedback coming in from you.

So let me get to it, actually, before we reveal today's Union, Jackass and Greatest Britain. On the issue of Kemi Badenoch, which we were discussing at the top of the show, Barry Clayton posted Tory MPs will oust her very soon because they will be toast at every upcoming election, starting with the council elections. I mean, what was hilarious is that yesterday, Kemi Badenoch was just accepting the fact that the Tories are going to lose every single council, which is just nuts. On the issue of reform, though, David Adams writes Farage needs to park his ego, bring back Ben Habib, then make Rupert Lowe leader. Well, I don't think that's going to happen, certainly not in terms of

it being Farage's choice. Obviously, once the party democratises, that could be different. But Heather Ashley writes, remember, Nigel has to tread a fine line, but I definitely believe if he came in tomorrow, Tommy would be out ASAP. Rupert and others do not agree with Tommy as political prisoner. And Alex writes, personally, I think Nigel is establishment, too weak to do what is required, and Musk can see this. Okay, great comments, as always. But now, it's my favourite part of the show, where reveal today's greatest Britain and Union jackass. And as we go to the nominees, let me reveal the results. In third place, with 16% of the vote, nominated by Amanda Hunter, Kim led Beater for her dishonesty, deception and deceit over the assisted dying bill.

In second place, with 27 percent of the vote i'm surprised about this one i think she would have been my pick but it's your choice of course it is uh ashley dalton nominated by boggy wood she's been appointed as a minister for health but can't tell the difference between humans and llamas but it it's official. Today's Union jackass, Peter Mandelson, nominated by Josephine Giroux, who wrote, the most degenerate man in Britain now appointed as the King's ambassador to the US. What an insult to the US. And it is. And a very special Greatest Britain winner today, nominated by Big Mama Booth. Love that name. Big Mama Booth, nominated. And our Greatest Britain is Katie Amess, trying to get justice for her father, David Amess, murdered, of course, in a terror attack by an Islamist extremist.

And a programming announcement, Katie Amess will be here tomorrow reacting for the first time to this bombshell report about the David Amess killing. So tomorrow's show is going to be must watch. Katie Amess is an amazing woman and I'm really looking forward to having her. So do make sure you're with us at 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9am Pacific tomorrow. Very, very important conversation to be had live. But we're not done for the day because we move to Substack now for the uncancelled after show. This is extraordinary. Angela Levin is up to reveal why Prince Harry has admitted to trying to teach his five-year-old about landmines. As Meghan Markle also proved she knows nothing about children. Now, Angela Levin has some big exclusives

to reveal over on Substack, www.outspoken.live. If you are watching on youtube and rumble make sure you hit subscribe most importantly i promise to keep fighting for you but i hope to see you in just a couple of minutes on the after show on substack with angela levin you