Dan Wootton Outspoken - RESTORE RACE WAR AS FARAGE ADMITS HE KICKED RUPERT LOWE OUT OF REFORM OVER MASS DEPORTATIONS

Episode Date: February 17, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: A rattled Nigel Farage has finally admitted it – he kicked Rupert Lowe out of Reform UK because of his bold position on mass deportations. That was just the start of an epic Farage freak out today. The reason he is panicked is that his contrasting position on the key issue dividing the British right is set to see Restore Britain become a major force, with even American MAGA superstar reporters realising Rupert’s on the farm launch is the biggest political video of all time. Now Reform’s Gorton and Denton by-election candidate Matt Goodwin has launched a race war against Restore supporters before being exposed by Connor Tomlinson. Dan will track the shocking developments in his Digest. Then the Superstar Panel respond: Leo Kearse, the comedian and commentator behind the hit self-titled YouTube channel, Peter C Barnes, the man behind the brilliant Substack Stranger Views, and Lucy White, public policy commentator and Restore Britain supporter. PLUS: GB News descends into civil war after giving star billing to hated Covid and big pharma lunatic Dr Hilary Jones. In one corner Andrew Pierce and in the other his ex-cohost Bev Turner. AND: A British civil war warning from Colonel Richard Kemp that we should all take seriously. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: A bombshell new book reveals the true feelings of Catherine, the Princess of Wales, towards Meghan Markle. We’ll analyse with our Royal Mastermind Angela Levin. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 428. And breaking right now, a rattled Nigel Farage has finally admitted it. He kicked Rupert Lowe out of Reform UK because of his bold position on mass deportations. But you see, you know, when he stood up and said that we've got to consider the mass deportation of entire communities, including those born and in the United Kingdom, that just moves way beyond a point of reasonableness, of decency, of morality. And that was the moment at which, you know, I realised we just had to get rid of him and get rid of as quickly as we could. And I think in terms of the way we dealt with that, we were probably more brutal than the other parties. But you know what? That's the way it's going to be.

That's the way it's going to be. You reported him to the police. But that was just the start of an epic Farage freak out. Do you think Restore are a racist party? I'm absolutely no idea. There are no interest to me at all. Okay. Thank you. Now, there have been one or two people over the years

who think, well, it's really back to the previous question. Well, if Farage can set up a party and get millions of votes, we can. And you're witnessing that process going on at this very moment in time. And we know where Tommy Robinson's loyalties lie. He's with Ben Habib, or is he with Robbins? Rupert Lowen? Are they getting together or do they hate each other? I don't know. I'm very confused. And the reason Farage's panicked is that his contrasting position on the key issue dividing the British right is set to see Restore become a major force, with even American MAGA superstar

reporters realizing Rupert's on the farm launch is the most viral political video of the past decade as the party hits 60,000 members. Do you support deporting all of those people? is impossible to live. Literally impossible, but is it your ambition? No. If that means millions go, then millions go.

This is Britain, and we will do things our way. It will be difficult, and it will be painful. But I assure you, it is possible. A single most viral political ad in the last 10 years

is right here on your screen right now. A kindly old gentlemanly British man. wandering about his farm, engaging in farm duties, explaining that now is the time for British people to save their once great kingdom. So it's fair to say with all of that, the Farragists on Talk TV are struggling.

If Britain's a people in a nation, well, that to me sounds like saying Britain is being sentimentally attached to the country. Britain is living here. It's being brought up here. What do you mean that's different? different, different to Reform UK. I need to understand this.

Make it clear. Explain it to me like I'm five. It is a tremendous leap of the imagination to think that he could possibly go from where he is now to leading in the polls. And I'm just saying that from all the experience I have of just how difficulty. What you're trying to do is climb Everest, you know, with one leg.

And now reforms Gorton and Denton by-election candidate, Goodwin has launched a race war against resource supporters before being exposed by Connor Tomlinson. I will track the shocking developments in my digest shortly then. My superstar panel are here. Leo Curse, the comedian and commentator behind this hit self-titled YouTube channel, Leo Curse. Peter C. Barnes, the man behind the brilliant substack stranger views. And Lucy White, public policy commentator and Restore Britain supporter. Also coming up on the show today, GB News descends into civil war after giving star billing to hated COVID and big farmer lunatic, Dr Hillary Jones,

in one corner, Andrew Pearce, in the other his ex-cohost, Bev Turner. A British Civil War warning from Colonel Richard Kemp that we should all take seriously. And the British Royal Family Crisis over Ex-Prince Andrew Deepens as William, Prince William, distances himself from the hush money paid to Epstein. accusers. We'll have the latest. Then in the Royal Uncanceled After Show over on Substack after the main show, a bombshell new book reveals the true feelings of Catherine, the Princess of Wales, towards Megan Markle. We'll have all of the latest with our Royal Mastermind, Angela Levin. Of course, our superstar panellists have also nominated for Union Jackass today.

You choose the winner. And you can vote right now in the live chat on YouTube. Here are their nominees. Mizzy, remember him? nominated by Leo Kemp. Hearse, who says Mizzy has returned and is as annoying as ever. Zia Yusuf, nominated by Peter C. Barnes, who says after saying a future reform UK cabinet would not have career politicians in, as generic is due to be announced as Treasury spokesman. That has happened, of course. And Nigel Farage, nominated by Lucy White, who says he said being English is a feeling. It's about how you feel.

And she asked the question, if I feel Japanese, does that make me Japanese? Okay, get your votes coming in. Get your comments coming in. show too. Remember if you go for a super chat, you will immediately be popped up on screen. But now, let's go. The rattled, they are properly rattled. And it's no surprise, really, is it? With Rupert Lowe's farm launch of Restore Britain as a political party, becoming the most viral political video of the past decade, with the party hitting 60,000 members in just three days. But of course, it's on the issue of mass deportations, an actual.

policy where I think Nigel Farage knows he's losing. Do you support deporting all of those people? It's impossible to do it. Literally impossible, but is it your ambition? No. If that means millions go, then millions go. This is Britain and we will do things our way. It will be difficult and it will be painful.

But I assure you it is possible. So what to do with your Farage? Will some reformists who view true conservatives like me as much more of the enemy than leftists or socialists have decided to go on the attack, as they usually do, suggesting that Lowe's policies are somehow racist and anti-Semitic, despite the fact that they really follow Donald Trump's approach to deportations? Look at how the issue was framed to Nigel as he arrived at a rally in Essex last night.

Hi, Nigel. So Rupert Losef, his new party was stored. And since setting it up, since setting it up, there's been lots of Twitter accounts associated with the party that have shown racism and anti-Semitism. Do you think Restore are a racist party? I'm absolutely no idea. There are no interest to me at all. Okay. Thank you. There are 11 of these parties now.

Under our nature system, you need one party to vote for to get the Labour party out. You can't have all these spinter groups. I'm setting our parties hard. I've always thought AB Part of the right solution. Because if you have that top-up, though, you then get significant minority voices and get representation. Nigel is acutely aware of just how massive the restore launch has been, and he is furious with the fact that MAGA

is now quite rightly viewing Rupert Lowe, not Farage, as the British Trump. Here's Benny Johnson's take. What's up, guys? This is Benny. The single most viral political ad in the last 10 years is right here on your screen right now. A kindly old gentlemanly British man wandering about his farm, engaging in farm duties, explaining that now is the time for British people to save their once great kingdom.

His name is Rupert Lowe. He's a member of parliament and he launches a new political party. called Restore Britain in this ad. And I'll play it for you in just a second. You'll see exactly why it's so viral. It's been seen by 20 million people at time of recording. 121,000 likes, 28,000 reposts, and 12,000 saves. This is properly viral. This man says what must be done is going to be incredibly painful, incredibly hard. It is going to require us to deport millions of people who do not assimilate to our culture because immigration without assimilation is an invasion. We are not a Muslim nation. We are a Christian nation. And it's time to get rid of the freeloaders, the parasites, the people who come

here illegally, and the people who are simply here to strip mine our culture. So at a press conference this morning announcing Reform UK's front bench with the hated COVID-Zellate Nadim Sahawi, replaced by Soala Braverman at the last minute. Farage was particularly brittle and prickly when asked about the restore-sized elephant in the room. Douglas Carswell. Douglas Carswell. How long are we got?

Ben, Habib, Rupert Low, you've got to admit, a lot of people who stood on the stage next to you and thought that they were part of the future and very quickly they weren't. Why should these people standing next to you now feel that this is going to change? For people in this room, who've worked for me for 10 years.

The people in Brussels work for me for 20 years. There's one guy working for me now who's worked for me on and off in various things for 30 years. What you will find is that I am very, very loyal and trusting of people who return that courtesy. Now, there have been one or two people over the years who think, well, it's really back to the previous question. Well, if Farage can set up a party and get millions of votes,

can. And you're witnessing that process going on at this very moment in time. Thank you very much indeed. And good luck to them. It won't last long. The idea that Farage is loyal is like saying I'm afraid of saying what I think, but he's rattled. It won't last long. Did you hear that little comment at the end? It really does feel to me like Nigel believes he has a God-given right to do this and can throw his base under the bus because we have no choice. Indeed, At the moment, his best attack line appeared to be that Rupert Lowe is unpopular, despite his launch video having been viewed over 39 million times on X alone. As far as Rupert Lowe is concerned, there will be some polling published later the day

that shows his recognition factor amongst members of the British public. It is not very high at all. And so a push poll that says 10% is utter raw. The party isn't even registered. He won't be on 1% anywhere, not even, probably in Great Yarmouth. Thank you. And here is that polling.

And surprise, surprise! It was commissioned by G.B. News. So I hope that just tells you how this whole ecosystem works. So here you go. Exclusive new polling for GB News reveals that only 8% of the public know who Rupert Lowe is. This compares to 76% who can correctly identify Nigel Farage

and is only my Chilean higher than the 4% who can identify Ben Habib. And this is the way that GB News has decided to cover the story today. It's so obvious that they are just in on all of this together. When asked about Tommy Robinson at the press conference, Farrarge decided to try and throw Lowe and Habib under the bus again.

Mr Farage, your candidate, Matt Goodwin, declined to condemn the endorsement of Tommy Robinson and claim some people born in Britain aren't British. Do you oppose Robinson's support and do you agree with Mr Goodwin about Britishness? I just don't have anything to do with him. And we know where Tommy Robinson's loy lie. He's with Ben Habib or is he with Rupert Low? And are they getting together or do they hate each other? I don't know. I'm very confused. Tommy Robinson can do what he wants to do away from us long as he stays with him a law, which doesn't always do.

And it's just none of our business, nothing to do with us. So I hope you can see Farage rattled and brittle. But now we get to the key moment of the press. And I'm actually going to show this part to you in full, because in my view, it is historically significant. Remember for months, the Farageists have tried to claim that Rupert Loeb is thrown out of Reform UK and reported to the police by Isaiah Yusuf

because of hurty words in an argument. They constantly said that Nigel had nothing to do with it. Now that was obviously always bullshit, but today Nigel admitted it in a fit of peak that should come back to haunt him. The real reason Nigel admitted that Rupert had to go was because of his position on mass deportations. Watch. Your former colleague and friend Rupert Lowe has just launched Restore Britain. Are you feeling threatened at all by Restore Britain and particularly now has had the backing of Elon Musk

and it could split your vote? I don't know about former friend. He sued me in 2019 as he sues everybody. And if you look at the history of Southampton Football Club and then look at the history of W.H. Ireland, which he chaired in the city, of London, you will see he was removed from both of those roles after lawsuits galore and two very dramatic EGM.

So Friend would be stretching it just a little bit. There are, last time we counted, 11 parties that claim to be on the right or centre-right of British politics, from the Heritage Party to goodness knows who else. There is only one proper brand of centre-right politics in this country. It's called reform. And as I'd mentioned earlier, people think, oh, Farage has done it.

We'll just set a party up. It'll be marvellous. We'll sweep the next election. It just isn't as easy as that. Now, does he have a profile on X? Yes, he does. Is Elon going to support him? Probably. But you see, when he stood up and said that we've got to consider the mass deportation of entire communities, including those born in the United Kingdom,

that just moves way beyond a point of reasonableness, of decency, of morality, And that was the moment at which, you know, I realized we just had to get rid of him and get rid of him as quickly as we could. And I think in terms of the way we dealt with that, we were probably more brutal than the other parties. But you know what? That's the way it's going to be. Thank you.

What the fuck are you fools clapping at? He's saying that if one of you, because the other MPs were in the front row, he is saying that if one of you decides to take a policy position harder than he wants, he will report you to the goddamn police. He will try and get you locked up. And there's no apology for that. And you're sitting there, I mean, seriously.

But the genie is out of the bottle now. Rupert Lowe responded, you admitted that you threw me out of party reporting me to the police because I wanted to deport foreign communities of gang rapists and their accomplices. I stand by every single word I said. The British people can now join, restore Britain to make it a reality. And Tommy Robinson added Farage said Rupert Lowe had to go from reform when Lowe mentioned mass deportations. Tory 2.0, on the same day that Farage installed a Muslim who tried to get Lowe jailed to the deputy role. He's, of course, talking about Zia Yusuf, and he posted this video.

Let's say reform when the London mayoral elections, what we then have is a mayor of London that's Muslim, a home secretary that's Muslim. Now, why is this a problem? because if you ask any Muslim, which I'm yet to see, any journalist, ask either of these two people with this question, what comes first to them? Is it democracy? Is it Britain or is it Islam? And any honest Muslim who follows the doctrines of Islam will totally straight. It's Islam first, Islam second, Islam third. That's a problem. But Tommy did have a clarin call to Rupert Lowe and Ben Habib, who was sort of at war at the moment seemingly on X, saying they need to get together, watch. Now, Nigel Friarge, I just watched his speech at the Reform Conference, and he's laughing, saying, to Benabib, are they friends, they hate each other? There's nothing Reform would want, want, that they don't want less or more than advance Benabee joining with Rupert Lowe. They don't want it. They want you warring, they want you clashing, they want you against each other. They want it fragmented and they want it split. Don't give them that. Be adults, lads. Rupert, Ben, sit around the table. Obviously, whatever differences you've got, For the greater good of the country, which is all I really care about, I don't want to be involved in politics. I keep saying that so many times. But I want there to be a political viable option that doesn't demonise, kick out, slander, working class people for being fed up of what's happening with the replacement of their people.

That's what we want. Ben's proven. Look, you both know Nigel inside out. So I know Nigel's not the man to lead this country and bring real change. He's not got the bollocks for it. Now, of course, as we saw, the Reform propaganda networks, Gb News and Talk TV, have to try and counter this restore momentum. So GVee News has its weird little poll saying, oh, no one knows who Ben Habib and Rupert Lowe is. And on Talk TV, they're trying to now suggest that it is in some ways racist if you've been, try and say that being British means effectively being ethnically English or Welsh or Scottish. So Charlie Downs, who is a Restore Britain staffer, one of the top aides to Rupert Lowe,

good guy. He's been on outspoken a lot of times went head to head with Alex Phillips, another good woman, but let's be honest, she is a Farragist on this issue. Watch. If Britain's are people in a nation, but that to me sounds like saying, Britain is being sentimentally attached to the country. Britain is living here. It's being brought up here. What do you mean that's different, different to Reform UK? I need to understand this. Make it clear. Explain it to me like I'm five. Well, Reform's position from their very beginning has been no difference to Blair's position, to Cameron's position, which is that Britishness is defined by adherence to British values. This is a term that I have been hearing for my entire life. It was something that I was taught. when I was in primary and secondary school, that's what it means to be British. And if you look at the

law, British values are defined as democracy, tolerance, the rule of law, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs. Now, that in my view, is nothing at all to do with what it means to be British, because the majority of British people throughout our thousand-year history have not believed in these values. These are a creation of the Blair Wright state over the last So what is it to me? So explain to me, what is it that you're saying makes someone British that is different to what they're saying? Well, it's a far deeper thing than that, Alex. It's about a connection to this land.

It's about an ancestry here. Okay, but connections aren't, isn't that what Matt Goodwin said to you, though? Let me let me finish here. More than anything, it is Christian faith. It is ancestry and is Christian faith. So if you're not a Christian, you can't be British? Well, I mean, you are certainly, I think, less British if you're not a believer in Christian principles. If somebody was Islamic, then they are certainly less British.

So I believe what Alex is trying to do there, really. is push, restore Britain to an ethno-nat position. And she pondered further. And I think you'll understand what I'm getting at. Watch. Restore Britain believe British people are an ethnicity. We are a race. We are a demographic. Every other political party has a nebulous view of Britain and British people. Okay.

So if British people are a race, my step-sister is not British then. I'm sorry, I just don't, I don't understand. I, if you're going to say it, just say, say it, say the quiet part out loud, okay? This is what I'm going to say to Restore Britain. Just say the quiet part out loud so we know. Otherwise, it just sounds like reform, but apparently is not. Now, this is all a bit odd to me, given I'm sure Alex who I like a lot, by the way, would have absolutely no trouble defining what it means to be Japanese.

or Nigerian. Indeed, she has previously written on this issue on her substack. But Charlie Duns would not be pushed down an ethno-nat path while making it very clear that he thought Alex was being intellectually dishonest. I think viewers at home will understand what it is that I'm getting at when I say, but there is a difference between somebody who has come here in the last five years and got themselves a British passport, got themselves indefinitely to remain or a British passport, and somebody whose family has been here for a thousand years. Because what we're talking about there is the polity

that we are seeking to represent and act in favor of when we engage in the political process. Because if you don't know who it is that you're seeking to represent and defend the interests of, then you can't engage in political activity. So please let me finish, Alex. Come on. So reform do not have a clear idea of who the British people are.

Their only definition that they have stuck with since they launched, as I've already said, Tice, Farage, all of them have said this, is the same as what Blair defined the British people as, as what Cameron defined them as, what Gove define them as, which is British values. And it's very clear to me that there is now an attempt by reformers

to try and push, restore Britain into a corner saying, well, you're racist if you think that, because look at this response to Charlie from Constantine Kissen, who has recently come out as a reform supporter. He said the reason she kept asking you was that you didn't say in the interview, what you said here. I was also not clear what it was you meant, but you've clarified it now. So Restore Believe, a British person is someone who is ethnically English, Welsh, Scottish or Irish.

At what threshold of that ethnicity does someone become or stop being British? Now, of course, Constantine quite recently had this argument with Fraser Nelson in terms of what it meant to be English and agreed that ethnicity was a part of that. And I think that makes sense. we've got to divide the difference between being British ethnically and having British citizenship, being a British national. They are clearly two different things. But I credit Alex for having Charlie Downs on. That's important. Of course, having done that, she had to cleanse herself, though. So the reformer Shill Isabel Oak shot was up next. I mean, Isabel is. literally engaged in the party's deputy leader Richard Tice.

And while she did spread some further smears about Rupert Lowe, she did also admit it was a mistake for Reform UK to lose him. Well, reform knows exactly what it is and what it stands for. And I can't see reform suffering any kind of identity crisis as a result of a Rupert Lowe fringe party. And I don't mean that in a disparaging way. I've been quite rude about Rupert Lowe in the past because he has been quite fantastically rude to me privately in the past. And so I happen to know how difficult he is to deal with.

And that is the story about why he's no longer with reform. And he's set up this party because he could not work as a team with the rest of reform. And that is a great shame because he's obviously talented. He's a good communicator. he's clearly passionate about what he stands for, and in my view, that would have been best for the country had he been able to work as a team with the rest of the party. But that wasn't to be, so we are where we are,

and I'm not sure it's in the national interest for him to be doing what he's doing, but he's entitled to do it. And I suppose I might be wrong about this. Maybe he will, against the odds, manage to build up something that really does eat into reforms vote. And I think that would be a great pity because I think it is a tremendous leap of the imagination

to think that he could possibly go from where he is now to leading in the polls. And I'm just saying that from all the experience I have of just how difficulty. What you're trying to do is climb Everest, you know, with one leg. Well, if you listen to people like, Isabel, A few months ago, you would have believed that Rupert Lowe had dementia and was going to be a doddery old fool by now. So now you're saying he's got one leg.

Look, I know she was speaking metaphorically, but you understand what I'm saying, right. Reform is down on the polls, by the way. I actually think it's too early for the polls to even matter. I don't trust the polls, but you know reform have been obsessed about the polls lately. Look at this. New UGov voting intention poll for the Times and sly news reformed down three polls. which means they're leading by just five points over Labour. Is that something to do with the Restore Britain launch? Possibly.

Mike Graham, he's independent now, but he is continuing on the Reform UK path today too, bringing on Ben Habib, which is all good, but suggesting Restore Britain is somehow an irrelevance. I mean, all day yesterday, why aren't you talking about Restore Britain? And I went, well, because what are you going to say? You know, so they've formed a political party. I don't even know if they've actually registered it. I don't really know how many members they've got. They said they've got 50,000.

It may be true. You know, it's kind of like, you know, the very fact that it's happened, people seem to think is worthy of comment. And maybe it is. But, you know, I don't see the emergence of a political party called Restore Britain making any difference whatsoever to anything. Okay. Which is fine.

I am not a member of any political party, right? I just believe that we should have this debate. We're three years out from the election. For me, though, the most interesting exchange over the past day has been between Connor Tomlinson of Tomlinson talks and Matt Goodwin, the Reform UK candidate in Gorton and Denton fighting for his life at the moment against the Greens. Don't let Mad Zach hypnotise you into voting green. They want to legalise all the...

drugs crack cocaine and heroin. They're on open border chaos. Keir Stama looks like a robot. Doesn't understand the British people. Vote reform. Put Gorton and Denton first. A vote for Goodwin. There's a vote for Gorton and Denton. Vote reform. Get Stammer out. It's time to sack Keir Stama. Interesting that he was talking about Stama having a robotic voice. But look, Goodwin is an interesting character, as you know.

X hope not hate lefty apacademic used to take on Tommy Robinson on the BBC, turned right-wing purist. But when it comes to restore, he's actually gone back to his old playbook of crying racist. So when Matt posted on X, British Sikhs have done more than most to take on the grooming gangs. They've also done more to help me win a Labour fiefdom than a lot of so-called patriots who stood rival candidates and enabled the left. I do not like the blatant racism that surrounds pro-restore accounts. Charlie Downs responded, like clockwork. Reform default to regime attack lines when their electoral prospects are threatened by an authentically anti-establishment offering. Wacist. They are no different to the Dories. Unipati in a gaudy turquoise tie. Matt Goodwin then launched a lengthy

the response. I'm going to take you through the key parts now. He said, you and many restore people around you appear to be advocating blatant racism, calling to not just deport illegal migrants and foreign criminals, which is reform policy, but throw out settled Brits who work hard, pay taxes, and play by the rules. I do not want any part in that. That is not my politics. When I said it takes more than a piece of paper to make somebody British, I was referring to the emotional bond to our nation that Islamist, terrorist, grooming gang members and foreign criminals reject. I find your language and the language of people around restore sloppy and ill-defined. I believe based on 20 years of actually talking to voters, that the British people will look

at you and say no thanks in about five seconds. Your ecosystem is riddled with white supremacists, anti-Semites, racists and conspiracy theorists. Path dependency matters in politics from where you start determines your eventual outcome. You are starting from the wrong place. That is obvious to everybody who has a basic understanding of our country's political culture, sitting online and thinking they are changing the world when they are doing no such thing. Nobody in Britain has heard of you. That is the blunt reality. It is also rather sad to watch so many young people waste their time and energy be thrown down rabbit holes by people who I suspect are driven more by their dislike of other leaders than a serious assessment of political reality. From where I am sat, what you were doing

looks like a direct rerun of what the National Front attempt to do in 1979, which your leader will remember 0.6%. I suspect Lowe might hold his seat, but in the end it will be a monumental waste of energy, money and effort that will only serve to enable the left. And that is how you will all in the end be remembered. It is not. The smart move on the contrary, it is very, very dumb. I have to get back to canvassing now rather than sitting on social media thinking clicks matter. This is all I will say on the matter. So there's a lot to pick apart there. But in terms of Goodwin's claim in regards to restores mass deportation policy. It's just a lie. I've read every single word of that document. I contributed and am acknowledged in that document. What Rupert Lowe was referring to

was getting rid of any member of the community complicit in the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. That is a crime. The remigration policy is laid out very clearly. Harrison Pitt of Restorett Restore Britain responded to Goodwin, saying, this is the incoherence we have come to expect from a brittle careerist who deep down shares the left's moral fetishes about the sacred status of minorities. Sucking up to Farage was always the easy option. Charlie Downs, among others, has taken a more hazardous stand on principle. And then Rupert himself added brutally, brutally, Goodwin, you are full of turquoise shit. Restore Britain's position is clear. Alegals gone.

Legals who refuse to work can't speak English, claim benefits, live in social housing, commit crime, hate our way of life. gone. Reform's deportation policy is piss week. Own it. But it was Connor Tomlinson who will be here on Friday with the mic drop moment. Because remember, he has actually long supported Goodwin. He has been on this show saying that he wants Goodwin to win in the by-election and has had a lot of personal communication with him. But he snapped after seeing Goodwin's attack and wrote, OK, Matt, it's unfortunate that we're doing this, but here goes. You don't believe what you're saying. here because you were calling us all privately, very recently saying you wanted us on the front lines of reform. Take my advice. Say nothing because I've had to eat a lot of shit to sit at the head table.

Almost word for word what you said to me. On the phone, on the 7th of November 2025 after Reform HQ banned me from speaking alongside you at a local branch event. Because you said I am someone who should be on the front line of politics in the next five years. Make up your mind, Matt. Other young men you've known for years racist, anti-Semites, and the real far right all of a sudden. You're against us publicly? But privately you agree with everything the lads leading Restore Britain say. Because you've appeared on our podcast, had dinner with us, had us right for your substack, and sort our advice on how to write your social media post for you.

I get it. You've been told to run a moderate safe campaign by cowards in Millbank Tower. Seeks more likely to vote reform because they're sick of the Muslim colony in Gorton putting their kids at risk too, totally understandable. But playing guilt by association and using the language of the enemy, the same language that Labor use to smear young men that you know personally doesn't make you look more moderate or sensible. It's dishonest, dishonorable, unbecoming of a man who I've always respected. You're not just spitting in the eye of reform voters who like Rupert, you're doing it to men who have had your back, helped you climb the political ladder, and have held their tongue when you've

sub-tweeted them in the past. I said before that I hope you win your seat. Just try not to shit on people who helped you from a great height while doing it. Unfortunately, Matt, reform don't get to denounce identity politics, then play identity politics when it suits. You don't get to have Sikhs for reform or reformed Jewish alliance and have the top brass of reform court the moderate Muslim vote, then say you're against identity politics. What you're against is representation exclusively for the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish because for some reason, us taking our own side would be racist, while every other group on both the left and right

can play identity politics effectively at our expense. People notice the inconsistency and refuse to fight the battle with one hand behind our backs. And of course, like clotwork today, as Tommy Robinson mentioned, Farage announced that Yusuf as its shadow home secretary, which, as Connor pointed out, so Reform want another Muslim home secretary presiding over a home office that's been ideologically captured by a 700 plus Islamic network,

controlling migration and counter-terror policy. What are we doing, guys? This is the same Zia Yusuf who left the party when Sarah Poachan proposed we ban the burqa. Promises to deport illegal migrants and tackle radical Islam matter much less than the willingness and ability of those making these promises to deliver. Restore Britain itself added this is Reform's choice for home secretary, their choice to lead the police. This man tried to put Rupert Lowe in prison on false allegations because of his lies. Rupert's family home was raided by armed police.

Yusuf is a disgrace and should be nowhere near power. And indeed, at this event today, Farage would not even let Yusuf answer questions for himself. And then a question to Zia Yusuf. Have you spoken to the man to your left about the Boris Wave, as you call it? And have you two put your differences aside? I don't think Zia's held back on the Boris wave too much, do you?

And from what I can remember, Gen Rick resigned as immigration minister. What more do you want? What more do you want? He resigned. He could see what was going wrong. He tried to put the right things in place. So I don't think we need to answer the question, frankly.

I think it really rather speaks for itself. Gary from Channel 4. And of course, Farage had expressed his brutality earlier, passing over his loyal deputy, Richard Tice, even though Farage says, I'm a very, very loyal man for the Shadow Chancellor brief that he had been working towards four years,

handing it instead to Robert Jenrick. And I want to begin by inviting onto the stage my loyal deputy of the party, Richard Tice, and the man who, if we win the next general election, will be the deputy prime minister, and who is going to take on a very, very important role. The department will be called

business, trade and energy. But taking on the very responsible and important role of shadow chancellor is Robert Jenrick. But as I say, Farage was prickly today. He wasn't even happy when he was asked a relatively tough question by his chums at GB News.

Some quick questions. Why no defence secretary? I can't win, can I? Well, no, but these are the most important issues facing this country, our protection. Why have you chosen these individuals for these jobs, particularly? What about others? Lee Anderson, he's not here. Sarah Pochin, why have you chosen people who aren't MPs for jobs over MPs? And Richard Tice, are you happy you're not shadowed chancellor? Okay, I can't win. This time yesterday, we're a one-man band.

I mean, no, you want a bus full. I mean, what can I do? I've, I've, I've, I've appointed four people that I think are ideally suited to those roles. Very straightforward, very simple. And I think if you listen to me carefully, at the end I said, this is just the beginning. And that's exactly what it is. Perhaps the madness best summed up by this single sentence from Bodeid, who posted,

Restore does not split the right wing vote. Reform are not right wing. And look, something is definitely happening out there. despite all of the hit pieces from TB News and the like, because Restore is already the fifth biggest political party in the UK overtaking the Liberal Democrats that get a huge amount of mainstream media coverage, as Basil the Great put it, amazing, or day three. Let's debate this now with the superstar panel.

Brilliant to have with us today, Restore Britain supporter, Lucy White, Peter C. Barnes, fair to say he is a reform skeptic, but also someone who does work within Talk TV. And Leo curse, a regular face on G.B. News, but also behind his own independent YouTube channel. So, Leo, am I being unfair on Reform UK today? Yeah, I mean, I think Perrage had a point when he said, you know, what are you guys want. Everybody wants the moon on a stick. And I mean, Farage is really in the unenviable position of trying to carry that vase across the floor without dropping it. You know, he's got to appeal to not just the people on the right who, you know, might be distracted by restore or advance or even

a resurgent Tory party. He's got to appeal to people on the left as well. So, you know, he can't alienate his potential voters by appearing to right wing. He's got to pull that rope without breaking it. And so he's in a really tough position. I think the issue for Raj now is not alienating potential voters by appearing to right wing. We might see as the window shifts, because we know we're still a good few years away from an election, as the window shifts and his attitudes change, he might be in a position to be. more, you know, as you'd say, right wing as Connor Tomlinson or Bo Dade would say, properly right wing in a couple of years' time.

Peter C. Barnes, what do you think about this whole restore launch? I mean, you've been very sceptical, of course, about Reform UK, but do you worry about the fact that you've got Restore Britain and Advance UK now, which haven't come to an arrangement? Yeah, I have to admit. They have to admit. those two need to get on the same page very quickly and form a united front to actually take the fight to reform. Because if I was a member of reform, I'd actually welcome a little bit of criticism and actually my feet held to the fire for a change. Because the big problem isn't race. It's credibility that reform are going to be hit on very, very hard. Let's not forget, Nigel Farage doesn't do anything. The man is basically to sits at home all day.

Because if you look at his time in the European Union, he was 748th out of 751 when it came to the most work hard MEPs. he went to what, barely any meetings, his workload in Parliament is pathetic. So when it's actually, when reform, sorry, when restore or when advance want to go after reform, all you basically have to do is, well, what have you been actually doing? Because quite frankly, all they keep doing is how are these little parties because everybody hops across because of the polling numbers,

but they've no policy platform, they've no actual credibility behind them. And that's one thing I'll give it to advance is they have the college behind them. They have an academic and a principal stand behind them. I have to admit, I do find it quite interesting in that entire press conference that, you know, Nigel keeps saying that, you know, he got all these other people. Then the moment they were given an opportunity to speech, he'd suddenly

jumped in and answered the question for them. I mean, I'm not being funny, but there's still somewhat of puppets and he's the marionette kind of puppeteer, isn't he? Because, you know, it's rather ridiculous. But then again, I'm just very happy to say a lot of people wake up to the fact that Nigel Farage is somewhat of a con man, what I've been saying for a very, very long time. Now, Lucy, you were there on Friday night at that historic law. But I've got to ask you what is going on between Rupert Lowe and Ben Habib because there have been these exchange of sort of like passive aggressive posts on X.

And you've got Tommy Robinson saying, just get in a room, you two. But these are the last two, Lucy. So Rupert Lowe replied to Ben saying, as I have said, Ben, you and Advance are very welcome in Restore Britain. We would love to have you on our team. Our party would be stronger with you in it. But Ben replied, I joined Restore on the day you launched your movement 30th of June in 2025. You are also very welcome to join Advance. I await your response to my open offer to merge.

And it's just like, Lucy, come on. Surely these two should be able to sort this out together, offline. So I think this is a separate issue, which of course, Advance UK have a decent amount of voters which could come to restore. But I think most crucially, focusing on just restore Britain, the key part is to realize that we do not have time for a reform government. There is no time. In 2009, this is the last chance to save Britain. If we don't go for a store, the country's lost forever. And why do I say that? Because reform is, of course, not a right-wing party. No right-wing party would fill the party with foreigners, Muslims, and former Tories who betrayed the country. country. So Restore Britain is a party for Britain. Restore Britain is not afraid to make the difficult

decisions. Restore Britain realises that the UK is not, or should I say Britain, it is not an Excel spreadsheet for numbers. The British people are a people. We are here with our ancestry, our lineage and our heritage. You can't just become British with a piece of paper such as a passport that says you're British. And I think the poll. that said only, you know, 14% of people know who Rupert Lowe is. Well, that doesn't matter because what matters is that the overwhelming majority or perhaps every single Brit, native Brit, will look around the country and realise that it's lost, it's wrong. And the only way we can bring our country back is by having a pro-British government and that is exactly what Rupert Lowe

sets out to achieve. He's the only party right now. that has a vision to save the country. And in Restore, no one is afraid to make these tough decisions. We're not going to tip to her around. It's not about, oh, I can't say the truth because I'm going to offend someone. The truth is the truth at the end of the day. Yeah, Peter, I mean, this poll, this poll, I was just a bit like, doesn't this show you?

And I know you're someone that still appears on GB News and Talk TV. And of course, I respect that. but to me it showed the coordination between Reform UK, because this is an exclusive poll commissioned by GB News, yet J.L. Partners, I watched the segment, go on and sort of act as if this was just a poll that came from nowhere. And Nigel Farage had obviously been tipped off about the results, because he raised them in his press conference today. Now, I find it really fascinating that the argument seems to be, oh, Rupert Lowe isn't famous enough.

I mean, no one enters politics unless you're Donald Trump with massive recognition ratings, right? Like Emmanuel Macron was not recognized by over 90% of the French people, yet was able to become president because there was so much discontent in this country within a year, really, since he launched his campaign. But of course, this is sort of a chicken or egg situation, isn't it not, Peter? Because the problem is you're going to have GB News, now do everything possible to keep Rupert Lowe off air because they don't want him to become famous. Neither does the mainstream media. Oh, I couldn't agree more, but the reality is this poll isn't the one

that reform should really be worrying about, because this one is all about whether you're known. The one that they don't particularly want to talk about is whether people actually like reform and whether people actually like Nigel Farage. because when you look at his favourabilities, he's standing at 64% unlikable. That's a huge obstacle to tackle. So they might be leading in the polls.

But when it comes to the actual kind of getting people out to vote for reform and vote for Nigel, they're going to really struggle. The advantage Rupert has here is the fact that he now gets to write his own script at the time that it is very, very important that people know who you are. He gets to be the principled one. He gets to be the one that writes his own story. That is very rare in professional politics. This is actually a very strong position for Rupert and restored to find themselves.

in because he hasn't got the baggage that Nigel Farage has because let's forget, let's not forget, he's missed to Brexit and we only won Brexit by 52-48. There's still a lot of people that hold Brexit very negatively in their minds and they hold Farage responsible for it. So they've got to get over that hurdle. They've got the entire establishment and the blob that's going to throw everything at reform. So yeah, Restore might come up with a, you know, a few hurdles, but they're kind of monumental mountains that reform have got to cross. I'm sorry, I don't see them doing it. And I think This idea of some kind of super majority or anything other coming near to it is just a fantasy. That's why you've already seen that reformers started to flirt with a pact with the Tories very

openly now because they said that they were never going to do it. Yet again, Farage says one thing is action say something else. That is a very strong pattern that, you know, if we're still wanted to attack him on, that's the one I would go for because it's very, very true. Breaking right now, Civil War has broken out at GB News over bosses allowing the lockdown-loving jab pushing, mask shagging Dr. Hillary Jones on its screens in another sign that the channel is moving much closer to Wokai TV, something of course that I have been saying for many months. The ex-Good morning, Brits and Doctor appeared on GB News's breakfast show this morning with

Aymn Hones and Ali Costello to talk about driving Brits towards pharmacists rather than GPs watch. 7% of GPs are saying that it's unusually busy now. It's winter. We see more illness in winter, this year is particularly bad. 77% of GPs are saying this is putting undue pressure on surgeries, and a third of them are saying that they spend up to an hour a day seeing what they call minor illnesses. Now, minor illnesses are, as you say, things like coughs, sinusitis, sore throats, earache. These are things that could much more quickly be seen by a pharmacy,

a pharmacist, a trained pharmacist. So as a pharmacy... I agree with you there, but what I've noticed as an interviewer over the pharmacy... the past few years is that everything, if in doubt, the government approach is always, go to the chemist, go to the chemist. There must be a limit to what the chemists can do. There is, there is. And that's why, as the pharmacy, has introduced a very useful aid memoir,

which is called Issue Is. Now, issue is stands for eye-infected insect bites. These are common. These are things that the pharmacy can easily deal with without you having to wait hours and hours or days or days at the GP. This is nuts. This is seriously nuts. Number one, I feel like I'm watching ITV. I really do. Number two, GB News viewers understand that that man should be on trial. He shouldn't be promoting any health messages to the wider population after the shit he put us all through over COVID. But of course,

GB News is full of establishment shields now like Andrew Pearce, who couldn't help himself but gloat over his employer taking on his old buddy, who remember was recently sacked from GMB and Lorraine Kelly. He wrote, great to see popular TV doctor Hillary Jones, ex-GMB on GB News. More please, he's trusted and loved by viewers. Oh my God, give me a fucking break, Piers. Do you think we are stupid, trusted and loved by viewers? He's not, you are so out of touch. This is the deranged doctor desperately trying to dismiss health concerns linked to the jab, for example. Other people, all the clinical trials, the European Medicines Agency, our own MHRA, the WHO, 17 million people who've been vaccinated in Europe and in the UK, all the data shows that there's no causal link, no evidence at all, that these blood clots are related to the vaccination. Yeah, I wouldn't say links because that suggests that there is a link.

Well, you've got 17 European countries who are saying that there's a link and that's why they're... 17 million jabs given in EU, and you've got reports of incidental blood clots, which happen anyway. They haven't confirmed there's any link yet. No, absolutely. So it's really important to say that the European Medicines Agency, our own regulatory agency, 17 million people who've had jabs, all the clinical trials, the World Health Organisation is saying, we can't see any evidence whatsoever that blood clots that we see all the time anyway are related.

to the AstraZeneca jab or any other jab. And I stand by what I said yesterday that I suspect that by the end of this week, those European countries that have temporarily, as a precaution, halted one batch of astrozenica being given, and in some countries all batches, I think that will be rescinded and lifted, and I think they'll be very grateful to have the astrozenic of accident.

Oh my God, of course he was wrong, so wrong. There have been suggestions by some that Dr. Hillary's own recent health concerns could be linked to the jabs he worshipped. Watch. We don't see any data at all showing there's evidence of a link between the vaccine and blood clots.

I'd like to reassure people that the evidence is that the vaccine is safe. You've had a health diagnosis of your own. It was a real scare, wasn't it, Hillary? Had a little bit of pneumonia and paracarditis, which is an inflammation of the membrane around your heart. The evidence is that the vaccine is safe. Now, look, the problem is

Hillary lost all credibility even before the vaccine thing. He, he, I know this for a fact because he was doing some work at the sun at the time and he was getting calls from like the chief medical officer and everything. So he was like effectively a propaganda parrot.

But it got to the point where he even advocated for people to wear those masks, those face nappies that didn't work while swimming in the sea. If the risk outside is so low, is a mask necessary? I think Spain are worried because of infection rates. They're worried about their health services being overwhelmed. And they want the message to be out there that even on a beach,

if you're looking at those pictures that we've just seen, if you're on a crowded beach, there's a risk of transmission. And in theory, if you go swimming in the sea, you should be wearing a mask. Oh, my God. So let's get to the Civil War now, because if you have followed this show, you will know that there is no love loss between Andrew Pierce and his ex co-presenter on Britain's newsroom, Beverly Turner. She was totally right on all of the COVID stuff right from the start. That's actually how we became friends. And she posted on ex and good

on her for this because she's risking her job, really. News channels build trust over time by listening to viewers and striving for truth, even if that means saying the opposite of all outlets. Some people are now totems have been wrong, bought off by drug companies or too cowardly to report the truth in case it harmed their career. Dr. Hillary Jones was wrong on TV every day for two years. He unnecessarily scared millions of people, breaking up families via fear and causing unto unto unto unto unto unto unto unto unto unto unto health and evidence. Everything he said during that time was based on propaganda rather than scientific evidence. I'd be thrilled to see him behind the B News desk talking about his own recent diagnosis of pericarditis whilst explaining the statistical

link between that condition and the Japs. I'd be thrilled to see him apologize to the nation for the significant role he played during that time. I'd be thrilled to interview him about why he ignored true infection fatality data and the evidence within Pfizer's own 2020 trials. But otherwise, in my view, he should not be welcome in a building which prides itself on freedom and truth. Another Gb News presenter, Ben Leo, posted, not sure he's loved by the viewers. This was a direct reply to Andrew Pearce, who contact me. I remember trying to doorstep Hillary during the height of COVID after I'd just joined GB News. His behavior during that period was questionable to say the least. Does he still think we should wear face masks in the sea? And actually, Ben Leo is

absolutely telling the truth. He was actually working as my producer at that time. And we did. send Ben to ITV to try and ask Dr. Hillary about his scare tactics during the pandemic. That happened. And that shows you, I think, how much the channel has changed over the past couple of years because they are now trusting Dr. Hillary to provide their own audience with health advice. I just think you couldn't make it up. It's not just me who's furious about this from Katie Hopkins. Are you off your meds, Andrew Pearce?

Has your hair starch gotten your frontal load? Hillary Jones is a COVID-Jab monster who has the blood of millions of vaccine injured on his hands. He should be in jail, not a TV sofa. Law or fiction posted he is a disgrace. You can shove your program while he is in it. Dr. Schilleri is the nickname for good reason. Help lockdown the country, destroyed lives. How's your heart monitor going?

Maybe Dr. Schillery can offer you another COVID jab. Clearly, you have learned nothing. And the one that actually meant the most to me personally, was from Alex Mitchell. Alex is such a wonderful Scottish man, and I was the first person to put him on G.B. News. He lost his leg to the AstraZeneca jab. He is such a brave man, an incredible man,

and it's one of the proudest things I did at G.B. News, given the vaccine injured, like him, a voice. He is now the patron for the Association for Vaccine Injury in Scotland, and he wrote this reply to G.B. News, just when you thought GP News couldn't get any less relevant, along comes Hill the Shill. GB News were once the media leader in highlighting the COVID vaccine bereaved and injured, and now they are full-on pro-vaccine. What the fuck actually happened to you?

I was on your channel numerous times, and I will always be eternally grateful to people like Mark Stein, Dan Witten, Patrick Christie's, Dominique Samuels for having me on their shows. Is this what your legacy is going to be now? you made your bed, now lie in it, disgusted with you. To my superstar panel, Peter C. Barnes, Leo, Curse, and Lucy White. Lucy, this has upset a lot of people, and unfortunately, I do think it really does show the decline of GB News. Were you surprised that they would want to have someone like Dr. Schilleri on the channel? Yes, it's definitely surprising given his how unpopular he is.

But I think the fact that G.B. News are quite selective in who they host anyhow. For example, they won't have Rupert Lowe on G.B. Newts. And that just shows you that they are very selective and biased in terms of who they host. But choosing to host Dr. Hillary Jones, I think it is, of course, a mistake. And it's interesting how Bev and Ben, who are both in the worst, Washington, D.C., part of G.B. News studios are more outspoken about this. I think Bebv and Ben are completely right to express their views. And I think a lot of the G.B. News viewers would agree with Bev and Ben. Yeah, I mean, Leo, I don't want to put you in a difficult position because, of course,

I do appreciate you were a former GB News host as well, but you are still a contributor to the station. given that Bev Turner though and Ben Leo have spoken out in that way I think we can credit them because at GB News as you know you have to sign up to this sort of pledge that you don't publicly criticize the station so they're actually putting their jobs on the line to do the right thing I really hope they're not disciplined for it yeah I mean I think I think most broadcasters prefer if their employees don't publicly smear the broadcaster so that's I mean, that's a fairly standard thing. I think this is a sign of GB News' success as it's becoming bigger. It's now the number one, you know, terrestrial news channel in the UK. It's becoming, it's moving maybe a bit more to the mainstream. It's maybe not as esoteric as it was, you know, back in the days when I had a show in there.

It was wild. We were the Wild West and it was fucking brilliant. That was the thing. It was so good fun. It was so good. So, yeah, I mean, that's one thing. And also, I mean, there's two sides to the vaccine thing. I mean, on the one side, you know, I think it's terrible that they were forced on us.

They were forced on us by the government and the establishment. And there's no sort of public questioning or dissent permitted. You know, people, I was having YouTube videos taken down. I was being demonetized. I nearly lost my YouTube channel just for talking about it. And, you know, that happened on Twitter, you know, across. across social media and across broadcasting. And, you know, there's some definite things

that we're proven right on. I mean, the Lancet letter, that was an absolute, you know, that was a conspiracy theory that came true. The lab leak theory, that was another conspiracy theory that came true. And I think the worst thing is the fact that, you know, these were forced on children

and they didn't benefit children. They actually, you know, the studies are still being done, but they think now that they did, more harm than good to children. They were really, you know, the COVID jabs were just there to save, you know, fat and old people. And like, I mean, my dad had the COVID jab. He never got COVID and died.

But, I mean, he died a couple of years later because he was fat and old. And that's just what happens when you're fat and old. Like, why couldn't we have this, you know, I don't think it would have been, I don't know why we threw the younger generation under the bus to save people who were going to die soon anyway. You know, and I know people lost, lost family members and stuff. And obviously, it's tragic. But I just think we could have taken a more, you know, sensible, nuanced approach to it, like Sweden did.

On the other hand, you know, you've got to recognize that COVID jabs, you know, did save lives as well. Well, the thing is Peter C Barnes, though, Dr. Hillary, Dr. Schilleri, I like that. I saw Lucy Connolly actually tweeted that earlier in response to my post on this. he was leading a hysterical overdrive and he terrified people and I think it's a really bizarre decision. Are you surprised? A little bit, I have to admit, but I actually put a lot of this down to the fact

that we never actually, you know, investigated how the media behaved over the COVID period in general. You know, like you said, there was a lot of instances where, you know, YouTube was overstepping. There were certain narratives that you could and couldn't say on the media and all of this kind of. have you had journalists down on lists by the cabinet office, for God's sakes.

I mean, this should have been part of the COVID inquiry, you know, that £200,000 a day inquiry that we had went on and on and on. And yet they got the final report and went, okay, that was it. And it all just ended up on a shelf. This is part of the problem. We never got over COVID. We never held people responsible. We never actually learned anything.

And so yet again, these kind of people keep propping up because they were never held accountable for the role they played in the hysterics. And I do put it down. I think that's a great word. It's the hysterics for it. because, you know, we know now, obviously, that the masks don't wear. We know all of this stuff, but we knew during the period as well. And the media played a big role in us kind of blocking down harder, locking down longer,

and the long-term impacts are because of the media narratives. I mean, we had the death count on the BBC every night at the week. In what world was the government ever going to be able to pull back or, you know, loosen regulations or whatever, where that was how the media was behaving? I mean, we have to start living in reality a little bit. actually say that, you know, institutions like the BBC, GB News, ITV, all of them played a role in the hysterics. And I think, you know, we have just always remember about those who were harmed by the COVID jobs. And let's not forget that the Jabs minister, Nadiav Zaharwe,

is now a member of Reform UK. So I wonder how that's going to go down with that lot. I'm not, I've got to imagine, not well. There are more and more people who we respect, who are openly suggesting that the United Kingdom or the disunited kingdom, as I very unfortunately have to refer to it under Slippery Stama, is heading towards civil war. Now you'll know David Betts, the highly regarded King's college professor who I spoke about last week, has said that when the history books are written, 2026 will actually be considered the start of the civil war. He believes it is already underway. Then I reported on Dominic Cummings, suggesting that it could be inevitable that there is street violence before the next election.

All of this ignored by the mainstream media, of course, because it doesn't fit their narrative. But perhaps the most surprising so far is Colonel Richard Kemp. I mean, this is a guy who is all across the mainstream media on military issues. One of our most respected British Army officers, who of course served from 1977 to 2006, including being in charge of the command of Operation Fingal in Afghanistan, So this is a guy who is absolutely widely respected by the establishment.

But of course, as soon as he goes on American independent media and says that a civil war is coming to the United Kingdom, he is ignored. Well, I'm not going to ignore it. I want you to watch his chilling warning. No government, either the government now or no prospective government of the UK has the guts to stop it. If they want to take strong action to prevent the Islamification of the UK, then it's going to mean big trouble for them. They don't want trouble. They look four years ahead. They will kick the can down the road to somebody else.

And I think the end result of that is very likely to be civil war in Britain, where the indigenous physical civil war. I'm not talking about American Civil War. No, no, no. I'm talking about something more like Northern Ireland, but on a much more intensive scale, where you have the indigenous British and the immigrant,

some of the immigrant population and the British government all on three different sides fighting against each other. And I'd be very surprised if that doesn't happen because there's no prospect of the government, any government today, stopping this from occurring. He is absolutely right, of course.

But it is chilling, and it is so chilling to me that that message is ignored. Seriously, I used to work in the mainstream media. That comment alone from Richard Kemp should be the front page of every single newspaper in the country, not ignored. And just taking what he's saying for a moment. He's saying that the Islamification of this country is so bad, so serious,

but that because governments are thinking in such short-term manner, they just don't want to deal with this because it would damage their electoral prospects and also potentially lead to violence. But that violence is coming anyway. And it's so depressing to me that it's the Americans who truly understand.

Like, I want to give huge credit to Stephen Crowder, you know, massive independent broadcaster in the United States who could so easily look away. But actually, this week has decided to focus very much on the Islamification of our country. Watch. So we've gone through, yep, the demographic changes. Yes, the tax perils or budgetary perils.

And the other one is, many of these immigrants are, in fact, hear this lie all the time that, oh, immigrants are more law abiding than native-born citizen. It's not true. They're menaces to society in the UK. So, MI5 has a terror watch list. 39,000 out of 43 are Muslim. 43,000 total, 39,000 of which are Muslim. Whoops.

Let me give you another number. So you go, well, yeah, but that's not that many people, right, overall. 43,000 is a small sample size. Okay. Let's give you a per capita number. one out of 100 Muslims in the UK are on the terror list. One out of 100. 43,000 is an entire MLB stadium.

Yeah, it's actually more than the entire fighting force of Hamas. Well, they're just transferred to the UK. Just home base there now. So you have those objective stats. If those are hate speech, well, then I'll speak a language that the left can understand. I'll give you the anecdotal. You guys like to go to that. Just this week, there was an Afghan asylum seeker, found guilty, abducting, and raping.

a 12-year-old girl. Now, when you combine that with a government that has a vested interest in hiding the activity of roaming, grooming gangs, how bad do you think it really is? These are the official numbers from a government that we know has been found to be untrustworthy in their bias in trying to present migrants in a positive light. Absolutely, Stephen Crowder. But why is it Stephen Crowder having to do this? Of course the numbers are a joke. Of course there are massive underestimations. I mean, Sidney Khan, London's failed mayor, until recently was unable to even admit that Pakistani Muslim rape gangs were happening and committing terrible crimes up and down the Capitol.

But Stephen Crowder had more watch. You don't need a majority of the population to destroy a country. So let's just, let's use Britain as an example. During British rule of India, there were about 100,000 or 240,000 Brits, depending on the numbers you use. They settled. There were 300 million Indians. The total British population, it never exceeded 0.1.

percent. So colonization can happen with a very, very small percentage of people there. They just have to be more effective. In this case, it's not that they are militarily effective. It's that we have a suicidal society who is silencing those sounding the alarm. And who's left holding the bag? Who's left dealing with the consequences? You, you in the UK. And it will be you here in the United States. I know people will say, oh, this is the same thing that happened with, uh, all generations, the Irish. Well, first off, they had yellow fever. That was a problem. But Italian, no, it's not the same thing. Pre-welfare state, post-welfare state, very different. And an ideology that is based upon the idea of invading, outbreeding, we've shown you clips where they say that quiet part out loud and subjugating a society, period.

Absolutely. To my superstar panel, Leo Kirst, Peter C. Barnes, and Lucy White. Lucy, I mean, Stephen Crowder, absolutely doing brilliant work there. But I think what's most shocking to me is Richard Kemp, actually now saying that Civil War is inevitable, such a mainstream media voice, someone that appears on all of the big news channels, writes for all of the newspapers, that is a clearly newsworthy, massive comment, and it has just been ignored, Lucy. Yeah, I mean, I have a few, about three different points.

to make and dissect from it. Do it. The first one is that in British politics, I would argue that we are already in a civil war of sectarian voting. If you look at London, we already have a Muslim mayor. Reform have selected another Muslim mayor candidate, Layla Cunningham. So they're not even now trying to appease to the white native British population in London. They're just going for the Muslim vote.

which tells you that London is essentially for a Muslim vote and they are ignoring the natives in London. Secondly, we already have 25 Muslim MPs who are mainly voted in because they live in highly Muslim areas, such as Naz Shah being, she lives in the most heavily populated constituency of Muslims. In fact, her constituency of Bradford West is 62% percent Muslim, followed by Tahir Ali. His constituency of Birmingham Hall, Green and Mosley is 57% Muslim. So we're already in a civil war in terms of voting. Now, number two, second

point is that you could already argue that we are in a civil war of these Muslim illegal economic migrants coming into our country and raping our women and girls. That is nothing short of a civil war for me. And now number three, this video of Richard Kemp was made before Rupert Lowe announced Restore Britain as a party. And as we know, Rupert Lowe has pledged to reduce, well, sorry, to resist radical Islam. He has promised to ban halal meat. He has promised to ban the burqa. He has promised to ban first cousin marriage. And so Rupert Lowe in Restore Britain, Restore Britain has announced that he will resist Islam. He is the only party that will do that. So since Richard Kemp's civil war, sort of speech, it's important to recognise that now we do have an actual party that will

stop Islam. And this is why reform cannot be trusted. They want to put a Muslim home secretary empower a Muslim mayor of London. So what exactly are they doing? As I said, we literally do not have time for Reform Britain. Otherwise, the country is lost. The Islam of... Yeah, and a lot can happen in three years. I know a lot of people are saying it's a lot of time, but a lot can happen. Peter C-Bans, why do you think such a shocking statement like that from the Colonel has just been ignored? Because nobody wants to deal with the reality. I mean, that's why they'd rather just stick the fingers in their ears and, you know, hopefully it'll all go away. Unfortunately, we've tried that for the last 30, 40 years and now we're at the situation where we can't afford to ignore it anymore. I mean, we look at the terror case list from the MI5, 75% of Islamic terrorism,

but yet we get stories of yet these kind of video games being played in schools to root out right-wing people. I mean, this is about priorities, and it's about choices, and the government is choosing, and the establishment in general, is choosing to ignore this problem. One of the major problems we have in the United Kingdom is the lack of fairness. People see everything going to one group and everybody else being left to cough up more money time and time and time again.

That builds a resentment that is being ignored. And more importantly, it's also being gaslit. It's being told that what you're seeing is not what you're seeing. And you're a bad person for even thinking about that as well. And then, you know, you get situations where, you know, you get Lucy Connolly, for example, who gets, you know, she gets banged up for 31 months. Yet, you know, a guy implicated in a Yemen terror plot

is about to stand to be a local counsellor in Birmingham. You know, at what point does people realize that, you know, the actions or inactions of our governments have led to this situation because, you know, as long as we're nice to be, whether they won't do anything back. Well, I think history proves that's just not true. Yeah, Leo, because do you think civil war is now inevitable? Yeah, I mean, I think we're, as Lucy said,

we're in the early stages of it with the sectarian voting. I mean, look what happened. Everywhere else that multiculturalism has been tried in Syria, in Lebanon, in the Balkans. I mean, when Lebanon was set up as a majority Christian country and it was stable and it was absolutely fine. It was, you know, the most prosperous part of the Middle East. And then they allowed in hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees.

And what do you know? Completely destabilized, 20 years of civil war, absolute chaos. And we're seeing it happen across Europe now. We've got these sort of low-level terror attacks every once in a while. We've also got the, you know, the mass industrial-scale rape of children and sexual assault of women, that's, you know, reminiscent of the Vikings, except we didn't, we didn't actually help the Vikings in and give them hotels and welfare and all the rest of it. And the government's approach to dealing with the Muslim population is to appease them,

to give them benefits, to give them money, and give them what they want. So you see West Midlands police, when they're approached by the Muslim community, who say, we don't want Jews, we don't want Jews, we don't want. Jewish fans in our area, they're like, okay, absolutely fine. And you know what, to make it to even sweeten the deal a bit more, we're going to blame the Jewish fans. So this can't continue like that. This level of appeasement at some point is going to break. The British natives are starting to really deeply resent it. And we're going to start seeing the, you know, the warfare breaking. We've already seen it with, you know, the Southport riots, with, with, with,

we saw with the flags going up, some of those guys were attacked by Muslim mobs and there was battles breaking out between the two sides. So I mean, I think when there's another Southport type attack, I think all bets, all bets are off. I think we could see the country erupt into absolute chaos and carnage, particularly the city centres.

The royal crisis totally engulfed. theme the British monarchy is growing by the day and what's very interesting to me is seeing Prince William now actively go head to head with his father by insisting that he did not provide any hush money to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor the royal formerly known as Prince Andrew that's as a top royal protection officer says there has now been a cover up over Andrew and he would know. At the same time, damning new emails, I mean, they just get worse for Andrew by the day, now show him appearing to admit that he did have consensual sex with Virginia Dufray, of course, something he completely denied in that now infamous Newsnight interview.

So let's get to these new developments first on Prince William, with Shooter's scoop reporting that he did not give hush money to Uncle Andrew, not a penny towards the settlement. One close friend has revealed. They say not directly, not indirectly, not quietly, nothing. Shooter reports that the clarification comes amid swirling questions about who inside the royal family helped finance the estimated 12 million pound agreement that ended you for a civil sexual abuse lawsuit against Andrew. Andrew, of course, has denied wrongdoing, settled without admitting liability.

But insiders say William refused to be involved financially or strategically. He believes accountability matters. Another source explains he was absolutely clear he would not fund any pay-off, hush money or settlement. The distinction is politically crucial. While Charles' reported contribution ties him directly to resolving the case, about 1.5 million, we're told, from Charles. Williams' allies insist the future king deliberately kept his distance. William understands optics and principle.

He wasn't going to risk his credibility by touching this. Behind Palace walls, the episode has only deepened the generational divide over how to handle Andrew's decision. This was Charles' decision the insider ads. William made sure it was never his. So what you can see here is father and son now openly at war about their own legacies. Because, of course, this looks incredibly bad for Charles. Meanwhile, Di David is now he is a highly respected. Royal Protection Officer, now going for the jugular and saying that there has just been a cover-up

over Andrew. Watch this. Do you think that there has been until this point a deliberate cover-up, and that a lot of these allegations, and he's denied everything, that a lot of these allegations have been known to senior figures in the royal family, senior figures in the Metropolitan Police, senior security people? Well, yes, is the honest answer. As you know, six years ago, I asked the police why they weren't investigating the original allegations. And it seems to me over the years, and I've said it consistently, so it's interesting now that what I've been saying for a number of years, along with Andrew Launey, the author, is actually coming to fruition. And everybody's coming out and I'm saying, oh, you should be investigated

for this, that, and the other. The truth is, this is a serially bad man, in my humble opinion, and the evidence points to it. But it pointed to it six years ago. It's pointed to it if anybody he had bothered to look at it. And one has to ask why he's been allowed. Wasn't there any scrutiny at any level in government in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office through ambassadors? I mean, it requires a multitude of investigations.

And you remember that Andrew told Emily Maitliss he hadn't even met. Virginia Dufray, that infamous picture of them, probably wasn't real and Lady Victoria Harvey still says actually that the picture isn't real. But it's not looking good because emails now appear to show that Andrew acknowledged that he had had consensual sex with Jew Frey. So let me take you through this reporting. The paedophile financier Epstein did not correct a journalist who stated it as a fact that the former prince slept with the trafficking victim who took her own life last year. That's Dufre. Epstein had been warned that he needed to distance himself from the then Duke of York because he had consensual sex with Virginia. So this is from a private email from

January 2015. It's just been uncovered. It's between Epstein and a journalist and it contains the first written corroboration that Andrew did have sex with Dufre, who was then known by her maiden name Roberts. Weeks earlier, and in December 2014 Florida court filing, Dufray described me traffic to Andrew for sex by Epstein and Galane Maxwell at least three times in 2001 when she was 17. And so the New York Times reporter Landon Thomas Jr. appeared to advise Epstein to undermine Andrew because he had sex with Virginia, referred to as VR because her maiden name was Roberts. He said, I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean, in the end, he had consensual sex with VR and VR worked for you. The rest is atmospheric. You have moved on.

People don't know that and can't accept that unless you say as much. I mean, I can see why a statement might help in some way, but it's Andrew, not Clinton and the rest, that is keeping the story alive. The amount of exchange between the two men emerged in December 2020-5. However, at the time, the names were blanked out. But an unredacted version, naming Virginia Roberts, referred to his VR, has now been found in the latest tranche of 3 million Epstein files just released by the Department of Justice in the US. Epstein did not deny the claim that Andrew and Virginia had sex in an exchange on January the 16th, 2015.

He had moaned to Thomas Jr. that his reputation had taken a hit following Dufre's claims that she was trafficked. Two weeks earlier, of course, Buckingham Palace had issued an unprecedented statement that emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts. Epstein did not respond to his advice or the claim that Andrew had considered. essential sex and instead made a point about the currency markets. To my superstar panel, Leo Kersusiwight and Peter C. Barnes. I mean, Peter, when you take this as a whole, none of this, of course, looks good. I don't really think you can blame Prince William, who we now know was advocating for Andrew

to be banished back in 2019 immediately after this. the Newsnight interview. I don't think you can blame him for wanting it to be known. I'm sort of the only senior royal with my hands clean of this scandal because he is the next king. And for the future of the monarchy, Peter, we need to know that he had nothing to do with this. I think you hit the nail on their head. I think it's the future of the monarchy that William is actually most concerned about because I think we're very clearly in abdication territory. If it is actually proven that the king gave money to Andrew as hush money

to cover this up, that is abdication territory. He has no right, he has no moral authority anymore. And I don't like saying that. I'm a royalist myself, but that is how serious this is. This could bring down everything. And I'm surprised, you know, it hasn't already, if I'm being brutally honest.

I think we have to really start to consider whether Charles should remain in the position. Because at what point do we say that we're being led by a person who helped cover this monsters actions up and that's what we're talking about and I hope William is clean of this it looks like he has he I do agree with the statement there

that you know he knows optics he knows the media he knows how to do this he's very very good at it and I know being you dad in the past I've talked about how he's got that razor edge he's got the much harder kind of side to him that Charles doesn't have in terms of dealing with Andrew and dealing with the crisis within his own family you know at some point you also have to start to look at the

legacy of the queen and say well what was she doing, helping Andrew in the way that she was. I understand it's a mother and son situation, but there comes a point where she had to put country above all of this and it started to look like this might have been her one blind spot. And I'm sorry, I do think we have to start asking these questions. That's where I disagree because I reported this very closely at the time. Now, yes, the late queen did not believe that Andrew had broken the law. Let me be clear on that. However, she was 94-95 years old when the settlement was reached. She was battling terminal cancer at the time. The operations of the British royal family had effectively been handed

to King Charles, who was operating as a regent, really. And it was Charles who then after the late Queen's death, because remember, the Queen stripped Andrew of all of his formal role, banished him as a working royal. And it was then Charles after the late Queen's death who decided to bring Andrew and Fergie back into the fold. They attended royal events.

They were at Christmas. So I'm not really liking the whole, oh, let's blame the late Queen thing. But I do understand what you're saying. Lucy, do you think this would potentially put King Charles into abdication territory? First of all, I don't, I think it's possible that

the 12 million pounds for the settlement could have come from any location. I mean, Jeffrey Epstein was incredibly wealthy. They would have had a large connection of wealthy acquaintances. So I think unless there is hard evidence to suggest that the 12 million pound came from the royal family, I think it could just be, you know, rumors that have no credibility. So I'd like to know more about where the money may have actually come, came from. But I think right now I don't think as it stands, this would put King Charles in a position of abdication. What do you think, Leo Curse? How do we not know where that money

came from? I mean, it seems, you know, why doesn't the palace bring out the statements, the bank statements that show, yeah, this is where the money was transferred from and this is who is transferred to. It just seems like an obvious thing to do, because what we've seen with this scandal, which, you know, as Peter says, it could very well bring down the royal family. They're skating on thin ice at the moment. What we've seen is the royal family keep insisting that, you know, oh, that's it. No, this is, that's everything. And then more files are released, more emails are released.

You know, then the photograph that was, Andrew insisted could have been faked. It turns out it was definitely real. this is something that could really continue damaging the royal family unless they've just ripped the band-aid off and bring out everything, everything bad that Andrew did

and, you know, distance themselves as much from him as they possibly can. And if there's some way of exiling him to Siberia or something, some sort of punishment, then, you know, might placate the public somewhat.

Yeah, I mean, it's interesting in answer to your question about the money, the problem is this payment was made from private royal funds. Now, of course, I know you can argue, well, their money is sort of our money, but that isn't officially how it works. Like it didn't actually come from the public purse. It came from their private funding, because of course they are very independently wealthy. But look, do stand by because we're going to get to today's union jackass and see who won in just one

moment, but first to your feedback, I love this from Ethel Stan on the whole topic of whether it's, you know, Rupert Lowe has one leg. And, you know, remember Isabel Oakshot said, you know, he's trying to climb Mount Everest with one leg. And Ethel Stan pointed out several people have in fact climbed Everest with one leg. So yes, very good point. I like that. Kalamazoo says Mr. Farage, Matt Goodwood would not attend hustings to debate with Nick Buckley of advance. Why? Simon Brandy says, I've always thought the Zia Yusufes you had nothing to do with getting rid of Rupert. That was a smokesprime. Fireman Phil, says Farage, if you're watching Dan's show, and I bet you are, we all know what a shithhouse you are and can't be trusted. Trish 4977 says

Zia for Home Secretary is absolutely madness. He's not even an MP. Are they going to shoehorn him in somewhere? Yeah, they are. I mean, he wants to be an MP. He will go for the first sort of safe by-election. Jenny Chilton says Alex Phillips is blinkered when it comes to Nigel. And Jenny Chilton adds Nigel's bit of a Megan Markle, allergic to work, but loves money, fame and status. Okay, a reminder of our superstar panels. Union Jackass nominees, Leo Curse went for Mizzi, who's returned and is as annoying as ever. Peter C. Barnes went for Zia Yusuf. because, of course, you know, he is now the Reform UK Shadow Home Secretary.

And Lucy White went for Nigel Farage because he said being English is about a feeling. So this is very interesting. The results are in. In third place, it's Leo Curse and Missy with 16% of the vote. The runner-up with 18% of the vote is Zia Yusuf, of course nominated by Peter C. Bonson, so today's winner. It's Lucy White, who went for Nigel Farage and, oh my God, 67% of the vote. So you're not liking Nigel today. Congratulations, Lucy. And thank you so much for my wonderful

superstar panel, Peter C. Barnes, Lucy White and Leo Curse. Leo has nominated our greatest Britain today, by the way, Duncan Bannantine, who he says is fearlessly preaching common sense. And I couldn't agree more. Okay, we're moving over to substack now for the Royal Uncanceled aftershow, Angela Levin, standing by as a bomb show. shell new book reveals the true feelings of Catherine, the Princess of Wales towards Megan Markle, we're going to analyse all of that at www. at www. www.

Outspoken. Dot. So at this stage, we move off from YouTube. We head to Substack to continue that conversation. But I will be back with you live tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific. Remember to hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Remember, we're also available as a podcast.

You can subscribe completely for free on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And most importantly, I promise. to keep fighting for you.