Dan Wootton Outspoken - RUPERT LOWE FURIOUSLY FIGHTS BACK IN RESTORE WAR AS HE ADMITS MULTICULTURALISM HAS DESTROYED UK

Episode Date: June 26, 2026

BREAKING TODAY: More proof that multiculturalism in the Disunited Kingdom is a disastrous failure, with a migrant crime epidemic as police hunt two Middle Eastern men in Scotland as Linton-On-Ouse, a small village of just 800 people in North Yorkshire is set to receive 3,750 illegal migrants, outnumbering the population by over four to one. But it’s in our day to day life too, with this video of an 80-year-old woman being blocked on the stairs at a train station hitting home. In this context, the rise of Restore Britain is understandable, with Rupert Lowe now the preferred Prime Minister among Sun readers, even as a civil war tears through the party over his comments over multiculturalism. Connor Tomlinson’s decision to seemingly withdraw support from the party has caused an MSM sensation, leaped on by Reform UK. But today Rupert Lowe is fighting back in a no holds barred video of his own. We'll hear from him in the Digest and then Connor will respond. PLUS: Horrifying new police bodycam footage of the night Henry Nowak was killed in an anti-white slaughtering, reveals cops giving soft touch treatment to the Sikh murderer Vikrum Digwa. We’ll show you much more of what happened. AND: Slippery Starmer’s anti-free speech government attempts to ban podcasts like this one in favour of content from the discredited British Bashing Corporation. We’ll reveal the chilling threat to independent media. THEN IN THE ROYAL UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle plot to secure Buckingham Palace for themselves, after King Charles and Prince William confirm they’ll never reside at the London landmark. All the latest as we team up with the Royal News Network. To watch in full, please subscribe at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton #DanWoottonOutspoken #news #outspoken #uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Visit BetMGM Casino and check out the newest exclusive. The Price is Right Fortune Pick. BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact connects Ontario at 1-866-531-2,600 to speak to an advisor.

Free of charge. BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with Eye Gaming Ontario. No spend, no bias, no sense. censorship, I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 524. If you're in the United Kingdom, I hope you're enjoying the scorcher today. Are we sick of this yet? No, not quite. Not quite. The weekend is just around the corner, but it is steaming hot in here, so let's get on with it breaking today. More proof that multiculturalism in the disunited kingdom is a disastrous failure with a migrant rape epidemic as police hunt two Middle Eastern men in Scotland,

as Linton-on-Ouse, a small village of just 800 people in North Yorkshire, is set to receive 3,750 illegals outnumbering the population by over 4 to 1. But it's in our day to life too, with this video of an 80-year-old woman being blocked on the stairs at a train station really hitting home. You know, I'm recording you. Don't touch me. I'm here relaxing. You can go around. I can't.

You can. You've got legs. I'm 80. Okay. In this context, the rise of Restore Britain has been totally understandable. With Rupert Lowe, now the preferred Prime Minister among Sun-Readers, even as a civil war tears through the party over these comments. I mean, he's certainly very keen to propagate a multicultural society, which, again, I have no problem with if people integrate. And they accept the prevailing laws and culture of the people they come and live amongst.

Connor Tomlinson's decision to seemingly withdraw support from the party has caused an MSM sensation leaped upon by Reform UK. So Connor will be here to respond shortly live, but today Rupert Lowe is fighting back. I think we offer people the best opportunity to responsibly return to a British nation state which represents and puts above all else the interests of the British people. Yes. But what we can't do is be unfair or illegal towards people who, through no, of their own have been encouraged in a thoroughly underhand, devious and misguided way to come and settle here.

But I think one of the questions you've got to ask is whether the Reform UK alternative is going to do the job required. You at once said about that lot, do you still consider that lot to be the same group of people? We're a great competition. We think we're leading in all the national polls. Competition is a good thing. It keeps everybody on their toes. We are not fighting enemies. We are fighting mass migration and the surrender of our horrors and the unasked transformation

of our talented citizens. Also breaking today, horrifying new police body cam footage of the night Henry Novak was killed in an anti-white slaughtering reveals cops giving soft touch treatment to the Sikh murderer Vikram Degwa.

Especially in that moment. She turned the flashes off. Sorry, we can't remember them to fright. So I move over here then, so it's not too much in my eyesight. So this is when he got me in the face of a few good times as well. This is going to upset you. This is going to make you angry. We will show you the full video.

Also coming up today, a leftist bid to ban Katie Hopkins from the English city of Leicester. Spectacularly fails. And Slippery Stama's anti-free speech government attempts to ban podcasts like this one in favour of content from the discredited British Bashing Corporation will reveal the chilling threat to independent media. Then in the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow on Substack, Prince Harry and Meg and Mark will plot to secure Buckingham Palace for themselves. After King Charles and Prince William confirm,

they will never reside at the London landmark, all the latest as we team up with the Royal News Network at www. outspoken.live. And we're also going to reveal the worst Britain in the world this week. This really is a champion of champions edition. So far, we've had over 50,000 votes. You can vote in the post tab. on YouTube. Here are your nominees. From Monday, outgoing Prime Minister Kirstama, from Tuesday,

incoming Prime Minister Andy Burnham, from Wednesday, London's Islamis, Mercedee Khan, from Thursday, the UK's Deputy Prime Minister still can't believe that. Calamity Lammy. Get voting. It is a clash of the losers, as I say, and the results will be very, very interesting. We will bring them to you at the end of the show. But now, let's go. Repeat after me. Multiculturalism has failed spectacularly. Tragically in the disunited kingdom, we see evidence of it every day. The native population is raped and murdered because of it. And as we come on air, Police Scotland are hunting two men of Middle Eastern origin after a woman was raped in Woods and Oban, Scotland. Basil the Great says it shows the UK is going through a migrant rape epidemic.

This comes as the government inflicts cultural vandalism on so many gorgeous English towns, with Linton Onoos, a small village of just 800 people in North Yorkshire, set to receive 3,750 illegal migrants outnumbering the population by over 4 to 1. As I've always said, with the migrant invasion continuing at pace, this treacherous labour government is simply spreading these criminal invaders from hotels to everywhere in our communities, nowhere is safe. But sometimes don't you think it is a more mundane, a more day-to-day interaction that reveals the real hell that multiculturalism has unleashed? Case in point, the shocking moment,

a man blocked an 80-year-old pensioner in London, trying to go up the stairs to a tube platform, he refused to move as he told her, you've got legs. The confrontation which has gone viral all around the world is believed to have taken place at Harrow and Weldstone Station in Sadiq Khan's Lawless Capitol on Wednesday. The video showed the man refusing to move out of the elderly woman's way as he filmed her on the stairs. Watch. What did you say? I wanted to stop the street. Can you? Can you not touch me please? Can you not? I'm recording you. Don't touch me. I'm fine. I'm here relaxing. You can go around. I can't. You can. You got legs. 80.

Okay, so? I'm recording you? I don't give a damn what you're doing. You're extremely rude and arrogance. I'm recording. It breaks my heart. Patriots. She could be your mother.

She could be your grandmother. She could be your wife. She's lived here for eight decades and she's having to put up with that. It breaks my heart. As Mario Norfolk, put it, this is multicultural London. They promised the British people that letting in the whole world with zero screening mechanisms would create a utopia of cultural progress. Having 80-year-old women blocked on stairwells is what they ended up getting. And I do believe it is this feeling

that has explained the searching popularity of Restore Britain and its Uber popular leader, Rupert Lowe, whose sun readers now overwhelmingly back to be the next Prime Minister. And as the Make a Field by-election campaign showed, Reform UK are panicked about this and so are their allies in the Reform Propaganda MSM like GB News and Talk TV, which had been on a campaign to deride restore as neo-Nazis. We saw the Daily Mail leading the charge, didn't we? So when Rupert Lowe tried to respond to that line of attack, and this is always the risk of listening to your critics, the reform haters got what they wanted. by seeming to open up a civil war within Restore's base.

So watch what Rupert said to cause this fallout. Very keen to propagate a multicultural society, which again I have no problem with if people integrate. And they accept the prevailing laws and culture of the people they come and live amongst. And I detest far right sort of, you know, ethno-nationalist or neo-Nazism. I've never been driven by that. Now, Connor Thomanson, who will be here shortly, after those comments went viral,

seemed to suggest that Restore could have peaked. And almost immediately, after those comments went viral, both the Reform UK base and the MSM went mad for it. Jack Hadfield posted, Restore, is done. It's finished. You'll see more high-profile support and start disavowing the party in the coming days. that's for sure. Remember that all of this was avoidable and which of us warned about it from the

start. Michael de LaBrock added, my skepticism has been vindicated. I came close to joining and endorsing them after the locals, but almost immediately I started seeing major warning signs. Restore got so far off of vibes alone, but the rubber couldn't survive hitting the road when it came to it. There is only one viable right-wing option in town. The Farage remains unbarrageable. Rae Braverman, husband of Suella, added, Restore Britain's shift from pressure movement to political party has been a clear misstep. What had initial hype has rapidly collapsed under weak candidates, disorganized structure, incompetent and divisive leadership.

Any early goodwill is evaporating, leaving it as little more than a distraction that fragments focus on the right at the worst possible time. Now, even though this won't please the Steve Laws wing of Restore Britain, and Tommy Robinson has actually fully backed Rupert's position, with the United Kingdom activist writing I 100% agree with Rupert Lowe. A multicultural, multi-ethnic society is fine, as long as it doesn't head towards demographic replacement,

which it currently is. And the condition for those who come here is assimilation. There can be no other way. They must respect our laws and accept the primacy of our culture in our country. There can be no compromise on this point. There should be no place or space for those who do not meet these basic conditions. Indeed, Tommy told me earlier this week, he does want to see a union on the right. I think in the recent election that there should have been a conservative effort

between Restore and Reform and everyone else to try and stop Andy Burnham. Because Andy Burnham is going to be a much better leader for Labour than Keir Starmor's. But what the right really wants in the mainstream media is for Restore to be destroyed. That is their narrative. So we've seen immediately Gido Forks claiming prominent restore supporters turn on Rupertlo because he's not nativist enough. And in the Daily Mail, their reform-aligned new signing, Christian Calgi, breathlessly reported the hard right Restore Britain Party descended into open warfare today, as one of its most prominent backers said it had served its purpose. The party's anti-T emigration fan base reacted with outrage after an interview clip emerged of its leader Rupert Lowe defending multiculturalism.

The Great Yarmouth MP was seen defending the King's invitation of Muslim worshippers to Windsor, adding, he's certainly very keen to propagate a multicultural society, which again I have no problem with if people integrate. The statement sparked immediate backlash with prominent supporter and activist Connor Tomlinson blasting. Multiculturalism has not worked, will never work and was never wanted. Steve Law is a far-right supporter of Restore who said Jews should be deported en masse from Britain joined the chorus of outrage as he demanded an immediate apology from Mr Lowe for his comments. Lowe set out other steps he wants to see, including a commitment to remigration, the mass deportation of foreigners from the country, adding that's the bare minimum we expect from Lowe. If he won't do it,

then we'll need a new vehicle. The online squabbling prompted delight within Reform UK, which has repeatedly warned that Restore risks splitting the vote and handing Britain over to a hard left government at the next election. A source told the mail, Restore are already tearing themselves apart as they've found out exactly what we knew. Rupert is a Tory to his core. Nigel has been calling out multiculturalism for over a decade. Rupert should do everyone a favour and join the Tories already. Mr Farage said as far back as 2011 that multiculturalism isn't working a message he has repeated since. So that is the context where today we come to Rupert Lowe's fight back. He's not giving up, he's not backing down, and he is pointing to his already published mass deportation document

where he personally wrote, and this is the line that he has repeated today, oil and water do not mix. He says that is his total repudiation of multicultural Britain. And in an interview with Restore's own Charlie Downs, Rupert also made it clear that far from supporting multiculturalism, he believes it has actually undermined the nation state. Well, I've made it very clear, and I've made it very clear on various interviews and podcasts that I've done, that multiculturalism was the way in which I think post-war Europe decided it was going to undermine the nation-state and undermine the cohesion that created the high-trust societies that we have developed over many thousands of years and they don't develop overnight. So I think it's meant that it's brought in people

who don't understand how we operate. Rupert even invoked Enoch Powell to emphasize why he believes multiculturalism doesn't work while clarifying what, clarifying, excuse me, what restored British would do to deal with the problem. I think multiculturalism, as Enoch Powell said in 69, is undesirable, and it has palpably failed. Yes. But in dealing with the issue, I think what we've always said, and it's in our mass deportations document,

we've actually produced a document so people can read what our plan is to try and restore the British Constitution and Britain for the tax... paying honorable, decent law-abiding British people. And that starts, as we know, with detaining and deporting people arriving illegally, then finding and deporting people living here illegally, then deporting the 10,500 foreign criminals in our prisons, and then we turn our attention in the same way that Sweden and Denmark have

to sorting out people who are living here on benefits, who've never contributed to Britain. And we do it by basically dealing, with the welfareism, so we reduce welfareism, we create a hostile environment and we encourage people to go home naturally, and at the same time, if necessary, we incentivise them to leave. But what we can't do is be unfair or illegal towards people who, through no fault of their own, have been encouraged in a thoroughly underhand, devious and misguided way to come and settle here. He then made it clear that he feels this criticism of him at the moment is deeply unfair.

I think we offer people the best opportunity to responsibly return to a British nation state which represents and puts above all else the interests of the British people. Yes. And I don't think I need to say it any more clearly than that. I wrote that introduction and I wrote it because I believe it. After the interview was published, Restore's Aaron Gonzalez argued what Rupert and the team have put forward is without precedent in modern British politics. Alegal, seriously, serious and sequence plan to actually undo what 50 years of willful negligence has done to this country. The vision has not changed. The plan has not changed.

And there are now claims of a coordinated reform-driven attack on Restore to take attention away from the publication of the rape gang inquiry with Zoe Pike writing. So Rupert said some things which have been clipped out of context and now no one is talking about the rape gang report. Coincidence. Furious Lauren the insider thinks it is not a coincidence, the independent media sensation wrote, it would be lovely if people on the right could refocus their energy back onto amplifying the horrors of the rape gangs where children as young as four were targeted. Looking at the highly coordinated execution of today's smear campaign against Rupert Lowe tells me one thing, this is not driven by one person. I worked in PR for 20 years and this has all the markings of people high up with a clear goal, create doubt in restore supporters. There is a

top-level strategy that has been someone's brainchild and no doubt taking considerable planning, time and energy. Key right-wing voices, all dropping things simultaneously in creating a wave of doubt and synergy. Evidently, some of these voices are far from the truth-tellers they tell you they are. Focus. Back to the rape gang inquiry. If restore, get in great. If they don't, they've already done more work on child exploitation and fighting for justice than the entire Labor and Conservative government put together. As I said earlier, the coordinated attack on Rupert from some right voices today is by design. This has been orchestrated from deep state minds at a high level, always a shame in establishment voices expose themselves now back to the rape gang inquiry

focus. Now, you know where I come at from this? I'm not party political. I'm open to all conservative voices on outspoken who want real change. But I guess what I have done that others haven't is question whether reform are genuinely prepared to make that change, especially given Richard Tyson's rejection of Tommy Robinson supporters as that lot. And Urban Scoops, John Han, has put him on the spot over that characterization. Richard, can I have a very quick word? Because I don't think you're alive yet. So Andy Burnham coming into power, as it looks like, is that going to change reforms approach to politics or approach to Parliament anyway? No, he's still a dreadful socialist. He's going to ruin our economy. It won't stop the boats.

He won't scrap net stupid zero. He wants to get closer to the dreadful bungling EU. No, we need a general election. I mean, he's got no mandate. And who is he? Who is Andy Burnham? Do you think there'll be a burn and bounce? Do you think this will damage your chances? Or you think you'll take some votes off the sort of hypnotists in the Green Party.

And so that's probably inevitable. Let's have a general election and then we'll see. Do you think if there is a burn and bounce? You think he'll go to the country early? Do you think there will be an early one? Hope so, because then we can win and we can save Britain and fix Britain. Marvelous. Are you guys ready to go if happens in the next few months?

We'll be ready. Absolutely. Interesting that no one else is calling for it. And politics on the right is becoming increasingly fractured. You've got yourselves, you've got restore. You at once said about that lot. Do you still consider that lot to be the same group of people? We're not a great in competition.

We think we're leading in all the national polls. Competition's a good thing. It keeps everybody on their toes and onwards and upwards. So Tyson back away from his criticism of Tommy Robinson, as you saw. So John Hammann tried again. And are you still very anti people like Tommy Robinson and the people on the right along the streets? We just focus on our policies. what we do, what we do well, and we're pushing on. The fact that we're doing so well in the polls

is because we're obviously doing something right. Like everybody, like everybody, no one's perfect, even us, even Steve here, is not perfect. Thanks for a much of this time, Richard. Cheers. Don't cut yet. There were no boats before Brexit. But there are a lot of concerns that something is wrong within Reform UK. So we saw today David Bull, sacked chairman, emerge from his his hibernation and remarkably went on the Jeremy Vine show and suggested that Nigel Farage does need to, in his words, take a break. Look at this. Yeah, I mean, I think one of the other things is that politics is a ruthless business and I think also one of the other things I would say to him as a friend and a colleague is he needs to take some time out and have a bit of a break.

Really? Well, I think we've been on such a roller coaster. But what does that mean? How can a party leader take a break? There's also the claim that reformatories 2.0 with the infiltration of the party of Nadim Zahawi, Nadine Doris and Danny Krueger and many more, as you see here in this logo. Kruger interestingly outlined a vision for reform at the ARC conference yesterday. Now, this was actually designed this speech to assuage fears of British Muslims. We are not fighting enemies. We are fighting mass migration and the surrender of our borders. and the unasked for transformation of our town and cities.

We are not fighting trans people, but the doctrine of personal self-creation, a doctrine of power, and the abuse of reality whose principal victims are the people who believe in it. We are not fighting for Muslims. But the version of Islam that recognizes no allegiance to the King in Parliament, that marches for Gaza and sees no said the subjection of women and the rape to us. Of course, the AI author and Reform's very own Alan Partridge, Matt Goodwin, has been fast to jump onto Connor Tomlinson's criticism. Posting, I Have Good Instincts, says the man who took 12 months to realize what was instantly obvious to anybody who isn't terminally online. Welcome back to reality. Connor responded to Goodwin,

I have made substantive criticisms of reform intended to improve its chances at governing effectively, which senior figures in the party have acknowledged a valid. You ran an embarrassing campaign, used AI to write a book, and are now crashing out in my replies about being terminally online when you post far more often than I do, Matt. This continues to reflect poorly on you. And now, Conner Tomlinson is here. So, Connor, your post has caused quite the firestorm.

I'm not sure if that's what you expected. but I think this is the first time that you can really explain exactly what you mean. So can you just clarify to begin with? Are you withdrawing support from Restore Britain? You've previously said on the show that you were a member of the party, but you're not paid for by the party and you remain an independent commentator. Has that changed? Are you going to quit your membership?

Are you withdrawing support from the party? Well then. I don't think there's a quit your membership button on the website anyway, so I've just sort of left it. I'm still supportive of the efforts that my friends are doing. I mean, again, I've always been pretty clear that I'm independent insofar as I don't really care who fixes the problems. I just want to see them fixed. Because, again, I've got two kids on the way.

I found out it's two girls this morning, so I'm going to be outnumbered in my own household. So please pray for me. It's going to be a nightmare. You're buying those Barbie dolls. Yeah, yeah, there you go. So I only care about who fixes the problems. And I provide a vote of confidence in the people that I think are going to fix the problems. And that's why I have friends in both camps.

I mean, everyone knows that I'm friends with Charlie, Harrison, Lewis, and the people that were saying that I've somehow let them down. I mean, they're coming to my wife's birthday at my house next week. So you don't really know what you're talking about, I'm afraid. And the same goes for people in reform. You know, I'm still friends for James or both those guys, you know, that group of guys and James came to my wedding. So I remain friendly with both. I remain supportive of efforts I like. and then I will provide critical feedback from a friendly disposition, critical friend, if you were,

for the stuff that I don't like, because I'm in the business of making political parties do what we want. The only side I'm going to take is my own. I encourage everyone to do the same. And so that might upset people if I am considered an inadequate cheerleader for one side of the other, but I'm not a particularly tribal person. And also, when you say, I don't know if that's what you expected, Dan, I got up, had a coffee, sat on my sofa, waited for my wife to get up and ready to get ready to go to Arc, because she slept in a bit.

and I just thought, oh, this has come to mind. I'm just going to type this out without even proofreading it and just throw it up. And it turns out hundreds of thousands of views later. Finally, the Daily Mail Guido Forks and the Spectator think I have something authoritative to say? It's quite conspicuous that it was only when they could contort what I said into attacking Restore. And they didn't quote any of the criticisms of reform, which again, I had people in reform speak to me after that post and say, those criticisms are valid, actually. We're going to take them on board, which is nice to hear.

proof will be in the pudding as to whether or not they implement that, but it's good that they're listening. So it is conspicuous to me that I'm being drawn into like a faction war when I'm not playing a part in that. I'm just providing what I think is constructive criticism to both sides. And I watched your show yesterday, Dan. Aula, who is a spokesperson for Restor Britain, picked up on that, and she said that plenty of my criticism were valid. So if both Reform and Restore were saying my criticisms are valid, and instead the sort of people on Twitter are just sort of bickering between each other trying to score points, well, I don't care what they say. I care what the senior people are listening to the criticisms and actually adapting to them say instead,

and they seem to think I was correct. And so does this mean, though, that you are softening your position towards Reform UK, that you could see a situation where you would vote or support Reform UK? I mean, they would have to make some substantial changes for that to happen. I've been honest saying that they've lost a lot of public support because people feel they have a credibility deficit because anytime they now release a video like Nigel Farrell just done recently and these don't some very good ones basically on anti-white racism especially as response to Henry Novak, I said to some senior people in reform, look, if you really make that kind of video, because

it's put side by side, you're old, your new video and people are just going to go, well, which one do I believe? So unless you fully address those problems, if you essentially do like the Stephen Edgington interview, but you answer the questions correctly this time, until you do that, people aren't going to believe you. And there are also quite a few people in reform who don't inspire confidence because not all the Tory defectors have been received the same. I think Suella can plausibly say that she tried her best in the home office and didn't succeed. But Jenric still hasn't addressed the fact he was immigration minister when that Sudanese guy or Safi DeWu, the Afghan that murdered William Broadhurst in broad daylight, was not just brought in under his supervision, but Jenrick was celebrating it in Parliament and in the Telegraph. And so he doesn't have much credibility until he addresses that. Again, I think people in reform know that that's a problem.

until they rectify that, it's not that they won't necessarily convince me, it's that they won't convince quite a few people in the country they're going to need to win if, as Toys is predicting, a snap election gets called. Because if you're trying to win over the red wall, for example, and you've got Andy Burnham trying to reform the Labour Party, as it were, trying to say, we're going to become the patronage party of the North again rather than the Human Rights Party of the South under Kyr-Sama, then you're going to have to convince a bunch of Labour voters

who might have been in favour of reform before, to suddenly vote for a party that is comprised of quite a few Tories. And so the credibility issue is for reform to solve, and me pointing that out doesn't change that fact, and it also doesn't mean that me pointing out shortcomings in Restore and mean that reform supporters can take a victory lax. One final thing if I made down on this, one of the things that has lost reform some support,

and again, I'm sure reform would also admit this, is that some of their mid-level surrogates that the party doesn't keep a very long leash on, people that I get along with person, you know, I know Jack Hadfield, I've spoken to Rail Bravenman before, but they're hardcore reformed pastors on Twitter. They can be quite vindictive. They're not as vindictive as, you know, Matt Goodwin is,

who has beclowned himself. He's like a national embarrassment at this point. But they are almost looking for an opportunity to go, I was right at the expense of, I mean, pushing reform towards the policies that I think Jack and I both want them to adopt on immigration, scrapping ILR, stripping citizenship, ensuring demographic security. And so I would just suggest to those. guys that if you're trying to persuade people, not necessarily me, but voters,

trying to persuade people, be less vitriolic, because I don't think I've returned it in kind to them. I don't think any of the restore guys have returned it in kind to them. And I think when they attack restore people, it sounds like they're attacking the kinds of voters that they should try to be persuading to join reform if they're in the business of doing so. Connor, I think that's right. The issue is that during the mega field by election campaign, everything that was coming from either the restore surrogates or the party was negative. And I've always said when it comes to my position, I am also not supporting a party. I'm supporting people who are going to get this done.

But if you simply just attack and attack for people who are either flirting with restorers, supporting restore or giving a platform to Rupert Lowe or giving a platform to Patriots like Charlie Downs and treating us like we're the enemy, then I don't think that's winning strategy. And I do wonder if Reform UK realising that because 7% is enough to cost them any chance of government. I do think they realize it, Dan. I mean, Camilla Tomine said about a month or so ago

that she had heard from Reform HQ that if they get anything as high as 3%, it could cost them a majority, let alone a few seats. And I'm sure Reform have war game that out. And I'm sure that's why they've strengthened some of their rhetoric and policy, even though plenty of people need to see more detail, or they need to see a more consistent pattern of messaging to believe them. Because yet again, if you contrast Nigel Faraharad saying,

you know, we're an institutionally anti-white racist country. And you contrastsia Yusuf saying, we want mass deportations, with Danny Kruger saying, oh, I'm a liberal and I don't want to offend Islam, then there's an inconsistent message to say the least. But I want to say two quick things if I made them. First of all, I do find it interesting. Maybe this is just me being an autist, genuinely, and not realizing that me saying things online

have quite a large political effect than I realize, even if I'm just tweeting for my sofa. But it's not like Dominic Cummings who's worked in the Conservative government and has had chats with reformed people. It's not like any time he releases a substatic, people pronounce the death of one party or another when he says, oh, their civil service plan

isn't quite ready, or the candidates are a bit crap, or this person's a bit stupid. You know, I'm saying that Restore have internal issues in terms of the capacity they're currently operating at, given the membership size, and given that they did achieve almost 7% by-election, which is less than they could have got, but is more than many parties when they're just a few months old.

So they do need to expand. They need more spokespeople. They need a more formal structure. They need a bit message discipline. I think that's something that's emerged over the last couple of days when Rupert said some things which are a bit softer than some of the lads liked. And also, here's two criticisms, if I may. And again, this will rub people up the wrong way, but I can only be honest,

and I can only hope that constructive criticism makes all people better in the pitch that they offer to the electorate. I don't think it's sensible to stand in the Manchester mayoral election. I don't think it's sensible to stand this policing crime commissioner election, just because you're in constant campaign mode. You don't have time to catch your breath to actually expand the table. team to focus on more than one thing at a time to ensure that the policy team has enough time to breathe and put things out. And the other thing with publishing things that don't have enough time to breathe, the Rate Gang Inquiry Report obviously has had quite an impact

in the United States and it had an impact here. But then over the course of a couple of days, it was picked apart for questions about the modelling of the 250,000 number and it wasn't by people that are like bad faith. It was like Adam Wren from Open Justice, who is a credible person on this. You know, Adam's a good guy. There were questions about some of the details contained therein, some of the analysis, some of the testimonies. And it was also, I think, and I did say this to one of the people who helped compile it after the barrister provided the notes. I do think it was strange to put an Nietzsche and a possibly misallocated Einstein quote at the start of the report about something so grave. And so I think the insistence to get it out the door before the make of

your by election was probably unwise. And I think the party just needs to take its time, grow, make use of the talent that it has at the top of its table, and hopefully capitalize on some of the criticisms that well-meaning critical friends are making. Well, it certainly doesn't sound like Connor Tomlinson is saying there is no hope whatsoever. And this has been a mainstream media beat up, but it is going to be very interesting to see how Restore Britain do respond. Breaking right now, shocking new police body cam footage from the night of Henry Novak's anti-white slaughtering has finally been released, bizarrely to the BBC. Now, this is going to make you angry, it's going to make you upset, but regular viewers know that I am determined that this

story and the name Henry Novak is not forgotten. So what you're going to see is, is going to see, is outrageous video showing the Sikh murderer Vikram Degwa lying repeatedly to the police, even when a now dead Henry is receiving CPR on the gravel. And the new footage has emerged just hours after a transcript of the officers realizing Henry wasn't breathing was exposed yesterday, which we heard outspoken provided an AI recreation of, giving you a taste of the panic, and horror from the cops who seemed to quickly regret rushing to presumptions that Henry was some type of evil racist and somehow deserved to be treated with sinister contempt. Watch. I'm not sure he's breathing. He's not breathing. Right, let's get the handcuffs off. Let them know he's not breathing. Huh, yeah, from four to eight, we don't think he's breathing. Could we get another unit here, please?

got no pulse. Medic or anything. ARV. A.R.V. towards us if we've got them with a defeat. He's not unconscious, mate. He's not breathing. Come on, mate. That's it. That's it. Keep breathing. Come on. No. But of course one of the big questions is what was happening with his murderer as the police realized that Henry

Novak had indeed been stabbed to death. Well, we now know. And it shouldn't come as a surprise that Degroa continued with the vicious lies, now completely discredited, that Henry had racially attacked him. Watch this new footage. It's been assaulted where in terms of... The gentleman that's on the floor with my son. Push my turban off my head Started grabbing my arm and he started grabbing on my hair So on the seat

And he started grabbing on my hair Started dragging me around And obviously from there Then obviously All the case has happened My brother's then seen him It stopped it And that's when he then started stumbling around

Started climbing around All these sort of bits and bobs and stuff like that So literally I saw him from there From the get-go from there I saw look You clearly are obviously drunk I said to him carry on with your day He said that

And then he started Just escalating the situation Call me up and all this sort of stuff And this isn't the first time Just had something like this happening. Now just to remind you, this was recorded while Henry suffocating in his own blood was receiving CPR just a couple of metres away. And other than spouting that utter horseshit, Degwa, a truly repulsive character, had another major concern, the blue flashing lights complaining that it was hurting his eyes. Watch.

Especially in that moment. I'm... She turned the flashes off, sorry. We can't remember I'm afraid. Is it over here then so it's not too much in my eyes, sorry. This is when he got me in the face of a few good times as well. We do not give a damn if your eyes hurt, you evil bastard. But I think what is so shocking with this video is it shows the very different manner in which Deguil was treated with a huge amount of respect despite being the murderer, while he was treated with a huge amount of respect despite being the murderer, while he was.

Henry had been treated like he was subhuman despite being the victim. Degroo continued with his sick lies, never mentioning, of course, that he stabbed Henry, even when asked about the wound that had finally been discovered by officers. Watch. So you've had an altercation with this guy? Yeah. This isn't the first time. We've had altercation during, not even altercations. We've had people racially attack us during the night. morning, which my hair, started grabbing my hair or something and all this sort of stuff.

Okay. And then, I'll do you know how he's got that wound then? How has he got that wound? What room? Sorry. Or how he's got, you said he's got blood on him? How has he? It must have been where he punched him, but he just fell over here. So he was climbing all over these bins and stuff like that. And then he fell over and then landed onto that car. Okay. Now, at that point in the recording, Henry had stopped breathing 13 minutes earlier.

which finally led the policeman, remember, who had said, I don't think you have mate when Henry was begging and pleading with him, telling him he had been stabbed. That same police officer finally made the decision to arrest, using the word mate, but in a very different manner. Watch. Okay, mate, right. This is really important.

Okay. The time now is 11, 15,000. Okay, it's important, mate. All right. At this time, I'm arresting you on suspicion of attack murder. Okay. Do you want to say anything? The main harm your defence. If you don't mention when questioned, something which you may later write at court. Anything you do so may be given evidence. Okay, the necessities are for a prompt and effective investigation, okay, and for any further harm and injury. You've got your story, mate. We don't know what's got on here. Okay. So we need to find out, okay. starting sure what's gone on here I've gone nine for a tent murder with the gentleman that I've

run through. Have we got a van at all that I can get him down to Central? Okay, and we'll get it all sorted alright? I'm not saying you done anything mate, but we need to find out what's happened, okay? I've been really... I know, I know. Okay, I know. But we don't know what's going on, mate. He's...

He's not prepared to bring himself to say he's dead. But by that point, he is dead. And it's almost like the officer is apologetic to Degwa for arresting him as if he's juggling with panic about doing the right thing, doing what he knows he should do, but also the fear that he could be accused of being racist in the future. Because this is where we are now at. I genuinely believe these institutions that our MSM think racism is equally bad, if not worse, than murder. And did you notice that DIGWA wasn't handcuffed at all? Even though he was arrested for attempted murder

while Paul Henry was arrested and handcuffed for apparently racially attacking Degwa not true. Just look at the contrast here. You've been stabbed? Whereabouts? I don't think you have, mate. Hand? Put the hand in the cuff, mate. That's right.

That's right. Handcuffed when he was screaming that he can't breathe, literally dying. But Deguah, who's accused of attempted murder, is treated with a decency that Henry never received. And when the police van did show up, Deguah. still wasn't handcuffed. Indeed, it was confirmed by Hampshire police that Degwa was never handcuffed. As Henry's father, Mark Novak, said outside Southampton, Crown Court earlier this month on the day of sentencing, the contrast is unbearable. Henry should not have died on the streets of Southampton in police custody. The way he was treated

was inhumane and degrading. His murderer, however, was afforded decent. He was believed. He was not handcuffed when arrested. He was not handcuffed when transported to the police station. As far as we understand, he was never handcuffed at all. And, as Vikram Digwer himself told the court, whilst under arrest for Henry's murder, police even took him to the kitchen so he could choose his food. The contrast is unbearable. Connor Thominson of Tomlinson talks on YouTube with me now, Connor. The footage is horrifying on so many levels. But what is so chilling, I believe, about the new body cam footage filmed after Henry's death is to show that the police were seemingly treating Digua in a completely different manner because he had falsely claimed he had been subjected to racism. Yeah, they were actually accommodating to his discomfort for, you know, looking in the vague direction of flashing police lights, which would never have been on scene if he hadn't decided to stab Henry to death in the first place.

But when Henry was on the ground protesting that he couldn't breathe, needed medical attention, they decided to drag his body across the gravel, perhaps exacerbating his wounds and causing him to die. and when they arrested Digwa on suspicion of attempted murder, they decided not to cuff him, but of course they cuffed Henry, as Henry's father said. And it's even more insidious when you hear in Henry's father's statements those words, because of course we know full well that the governments don't look back in Anger Department, Raiku, situated in the home office, which controls the front pages of newspapers and buses imams to the sites of terror attacks to control community cohesion and prevent racial tensions and riots. They fed their inclusive, anti-extremist language through the community layers and officers of Hampshire Police, who helped draft his statement, who convinces families, that unless they play ball with the state, there will be riots and that will disrupt the trial and their children's killer or rapists will never see justice. And so the entire state is to blame for this. It is because we live in a state that is more concerned with the hurt-feeling. of violent tribal minorities than it is with the safety of the children of the native population. And they treated Henry with de facto suspicion.

Even on the 999 call, which I believe you played on your show before Dan, the police spent about six minutes interrogating DIGWA's brother, who is not going to be charged for assisting murder, by the way, which is crazy. Hampshire Police didn't bother to bring charges forward, even though they were in the back of the police car in Punjabi discussing how to fabricate a story to cover up the crime. nevertheless six minutes were spent from the police operator trying to coax the magic words out of Digwood's brother and as soon as he says oh he calls me a slur for Pakistani

they go that's all we needed to hear that was the activation button to marshal the forces of the state that were just around the quarter who if they acted faster could have saved Henry's life to come around and treat him as the criminal and his killers and his family as the victims instead and so the only solution to this is to rip the legislative gut out of the police, the judiciary, to ensure that no other son can be treated like Henry Novak again. And that means more than just abolishing the Equality Act. It means more than just abolishing the College of Policing

and sacking many of the superintendents and sergeants that have enforced things like non-crime hate incidents and hate speech laws. It means getting rid of racially aggravated public order offences entirely. That was a great mistake brought in by the Fasher government in the 80s. It means throwing out the findings of the McPherson report, which was essentially an exercise in anti-racist mind-reading It means removing all of the race relations acts from the statute books so that once the Equality Act has bended off, Fabian lawyers can't just fall back on it as a matter of common law precedent to continue treating us as second-class citizens in our own country. It's especially important, by the way, Dan, because in 2000, there was an update to the Race Relations Act that ensured that the findings of the McPherson report imposed upon the state a statutory obligation to maintain good race relations. So the state's equality duty that is in the equality, Act that, you know, likes of reform want to throw out, it will still remain in place for the police if you don't get rid of the Race Relations Act, especially the 2000s version. And until we do that, our children will be at risk, and it's just another matter of time until we get another Henry Novak.

Connor, the other problem that I have with this is that, for some reason, the footage is being released via the BBC. Now, in some ways, you can say, great, that they haven't just moved on from this story in a way that they tend to. And in their reporting, they're saying that this has been released with the family's permission. But I don't trust the BBC when it comes to this story. And with all due respect, Connor, really, we need to see it all.

And while I completely support the Novak family, it shouldn't really be their decision either. But I certainly don't trust the BBC reporting around this. Why are we seeing drip, drip, drip, drip. know, we had a transcript yesterday, we had to do the AI recreation of it. Then today, we see a section of the video. No, let's see it all. And let's not release this via the state propagandist. I'm really concerned about what's going on here. Yeah, the framing is conspicuous because, of course, Kirstama used Mark Novak's statement to turn the family into a human shield,

to say, oh, you can't politicize this murder, even though the entire reason Henry Novak is dead is because his killers were in the country in the first place than they didn't need to be, because they had a special exemption to carry the dagger around they used to kill him. Even if it wasn't the specific dagger, the Sikh wouldn't have been stopped carrying around a whopping great sword because the police didn't want to get called racist, and because they uttered the magic word racist, which caused Henry to be treated as a criminal, which is as a result of political decisions taken by the state. So all of this is political. And so if the BBC are releasing the footage saying, we have the permission of the family, it's still playing into the narrative of, well, the family are the only

arbiter of what is proper here. And I would understand that if it were further footage involving Henry, for example, if it were the footage of the police officers that you've used some AI to narrate, who realized that Henry's dead. Like, I would understand if they don't want their son's lifeless corpse on the internet and the transcripts might be more suitable. But if it's just Digworth standing there lying to police and Henry isn't involved, then I don't think they should have a say. I think it's instead very important that we get to see that. I think it's important as well that we get a transcript of the interview or if there's footage of it, as we do in many American cases, as it goes. And also, I think it's conspicuous that the BBC

are the ones doing this, because then they can control the narrative around the release of the further footage, because if you notice, the BBC aren't outraged, the brother isn't being tried. Instead, they're releasing this footage, which almost makes it look like, oh, Vikram Degwell was just a lone actor, this was just one man. And, of... obviously his mum who hit the blade, and they lied to the police, and the police couldn't have possibly known any better. No commentary on the anti-racism that caused the police to be biased in Degu's favour against Henry. No commentary about the clannishness from the Indian subcontinent that caused the family to ban together and try to cover up the crime. No commentary on whether or not there should be a special exemption for minority groups to do practices such as carry around lethal weapons without supervision or scrutiny.

So the BBC are, by being the ushers of the footage out to the public, they're trying to contain public outrage and control the narrative again. And so we should be asking these questions. We should be demanding more transparency. And it should be a national outrage that the brother and the father haven't been tried when the father was holding Henry down on scene, was therefore, you know, complicit. And the brother lied to the police over the phone and helped his brother concoct a narrative in the back of a police car to try to deflect blame for me. killing him. And the final question I will ask Dan is the police officer attending noticed that Henry had the wound to his face and neck that was sustained from Vikram Diggwa's dagger. We were asking this, right, the start, how did the police not see the blood on his face when he was propped up and they were turning him over? So the police officers themselves have

questions to answer and they still haven't been held accountable. So it's infuriating across the board and again, if nothing gets done, all of our children risk becoming the next victim. Breaking today, Lester leftists tried to ban Katie Hopkins from their city, but they failed. So these are the losers at stand up to racism who released a poster saying that Katie Hopkins, a racist and frequent supporter of Tommy Robinson brings her hate speech to the Athena Theatre. she has referred to migrants as cockroaches and suggested using gunships on small boats crossing the channel. Hopkins referred to Palestinians as filthy rodents burrowing beneath Israel and tweeted calls for the final solution regarding Muslims. Hopkins is now trying to masquerade as a comedian. She is a racist liar

and a friend to fascist worldwide. We want to tell her she is not welcome here in multicultural Lester. So as Adam Brooks pointed out, the tolerant left are indirectly threatening voices they want silence. They are what they accuse other of. They are the fascists. Vile people funded via vile people. And sure enough, the protesters did show up. Watch. I tell you, I've noticed, time and time again,

you never see them standing there holding placards of immigrants offenders, do you? You ever see that? Oh, no, because they were good boys and girls, aren't they? You know, the ones that actually stab and rape people off the boats. But guess who won? The local patriots who decided to brave those losers and insisted there would be no racism going on inside the venue.

How do you all foot up? I'm going to sit there. Thank you. So you never got tickets then, I gather. I've got fucking tickets and I'll tell you now there's no racist going off. Yeah, no, we're here for you. We're here for you.

We're here for you. We're here for you. Sorry. She's turned on the wrong people. Bloody old, Kate should be loving this video. Patriot, I love it. But Katie did not tone down her rhetoric inside the Leicester venue.

Here she is on Sadiq Khan. Sadiq Cunt, who's just been slagged off by Trumpy Trump, looks very unwell. I mean, usually he's a very curious sort of colour, like a little greenish tinge, but now he's very green. indeed, and increasingly thin and very worn looking. He looks like he might be very, very sick.

And I really hope that that isn't the case, because that would be very, very sad indeed. That's it, my darlings. That shit bonkers Britain. See you later, Lester. And sure enough, Lister showed up in their droves, with Katie revealing a response from my sold-out Lester crowd to the 10 fat white birds protesting outside.

get a fucking hobby loves. Look at this, Standing O. So what I can see is lights, but people will get the sense of this. So I thought, for the 10 fucking fat, white birds out sky,

I'm seeing in you, feel like that. So Connor Tomlinson of Tomlinson talks, I think at this case, we can say stand up to racism, nil, Katie Hopkins one. They're rather impotent, Dan. I mean, there was a pathetic demonstration

outside the Lotus's live event a couple of months ago. Oh, yes. Where a creature, that like some sort of amorphous Pokemon who got on out the wrong side of the bed decided to show up with like bright green hair and these people are an embarrassment. The only infuriating thing about this is I know my tax money is being spent on this because some of the heads of the Socialist Workers Party and stand up to racism

because they're the same entity. They've got it printed on their placards that they've recycled ever since 2020. Maybe the taxpayers' budget's been cut because they can't get new signs. Anyway, they are on teaching unions. part of the transport unions and some of the largest unions in the country and they receive, obviously, government funding. And we know for a fact that previously the Home Office of funded various charities like the Paul Hamlin Foundation and Hope Not Hate to establish networks of activists and young migrant leaders all across the country to act as like rapid response units to people

having a good time with opinions that they don't like. And so we know this is a product of government grants and we know that the police have escorted them to protests and picket lines to cause agitation as they did outside the Bell Hotel Hopes, Bell Hotel protests down in Epping last year. So we just know that this is a state taking the side of a socialist, communist, anti-racist, but actually anti-white, activist group who have resorted to protesting comedy nights by former reality TV. So, I mean, the only thing we can celebrate is the fact that it's so pathetic and that hopefully if the government that they fear most comes into power that they'll be defunded and reduced to begging, destitute or busking in Bristol.

Connor, there is a new breed though on the left. And I don't know if you've seen this, but I want to show you this video that has gone viral. It is one of these women, there she is, so sort of like very much a straight from central casting, stand up to races, bisexual, you know, queer leftist, that sort of woman. And she has gone viral for making a video of leaving a date with a young man who she claims without any evidence might be following her on the street. And her only issue was the fact that she found out said man had voted for Reform UK. Watch this.

I had a date at 7pm. It is now 7.20 and I'm on the way home because they are a reform voter. It took me about 10 minutes to figure it out but once I did, I wasn't saying. He was offended when I was checking if he was straight. As a bisexual, I was making sure. And he was also referred to me as a female who, and just checking, he's not following me. He said that originally reform had good intentions and now they just had the rejects mother parties. So they're the ones that have ruined reform. When before it had good intentions, I pointed out that it had always been bigoted and racist

and misogynistic and homophobic. And he said no. And I said, yes. Wanted me to be more tolerant. And that I should be more tolerant and I should be open to a discussion. I said it was not open to a discussion on racism, homophobia, with someone who sits on the wrong side of that. And that there is a right and wrong in this situation and he was wrong.

Didn't need to be tolerant to homophobia, racism. misogyny, etc. And I knit my pint on the left. So he did also start the conversation by seeing he only ever ends upon dates with weird weird, not like kooky weird, weird, which is always the first red flag. And apparently his ex is a narcissist. Don't think so, honey. I think you're the narcissist. Well, not even, because I think you've got to be smart to be one of those. Unfortunately, the bar was very close to where I live. So I feel a bit concerned. But yeah, I've left Aunt Breeze make people disclose their politics

because it is actually dangerous to not do that. As a queer person, I cannot date someone who is reform. I mean, so sinister at the end, Connor, because of course, there was no danger to her. There was absolutely no suggestion of violence or anything like that. But don't you think that video sums up this new breed of leftist woman? Well, if you were following, I don't trust that she'd be able to get away too fast, and I shouldn't run very quickly.

Anyway, Dan, I would just say to the bloc in question that's being put on blast here, thank her for doing your vetting for you. Also, get some better taste mate, because that should have been a hard left swipe from the off. But what we are seeing is a political bifurcation between men and women. The new statesman actually had a couple of really great pieces by Scarl and Emily recently. That showed that the majority of young men have a positive opinion of young women, but the majority of young women have either a negative or apathetic opinion towards men in their own age. And so it's making coupling and relationships really difficult.

And it's because there's been a runaway progressive preference cascade among young women. They're more concerned about Gaza than Great Britain. They're doggedly in favour of abortion. they are finding identity in queer and social justice subcultures that are actually making them miserable, that are causing them to have full-body convulsions because they feel such sorrow that communism hasn't come around yet, whereas young men are a bit more in touch with reality and pragmatic. And again, consider me a critical friend of reform. Reform hardly an extremist party.

I keep criticising them for not being hardline enough, frankly. And that's why quite a few young men don't support them yet. I did say to them, you've lost quite a lot of Gen Z support because you don't touch demographics, and it's an issue you need to get onto, whether you like it or not. But it is conspicuous that this woman decided to say that, oh, this guy has said his ex was a narcissist. I don't think so, mate, insinuating that he was a narcissist. The bitter irony of a woman walking down the street doing a confessional video, feigning victimhood, insinuating that she might be being followed.

If you were really that worried, you wouldn't pull out your phone and film yourself and do a TikTok, you'd be trying to get home as fast as possible. or you would be on the phone to the nearest relative, or maybe even the police to show up, maybe claim that the guy was racist and then they might teleport there to keep you safe. And the entire point of this video is to raise her social status

within a set of politics that grants her prestige because she is the most ideologically wedded to the current paradigm. She's not particularly intelligent, it's not particularly attractive, she doesn't seem very virtuous, she seems quite spiteful and self-obsessed actually, but so that she can compete socially with her female peers,

she keeps this politics in place, which allows her to have the most social currency because she can claim to be a victim. And all I would say to young women is, do you want to listen to this woman who seems spiteful, resentful, overweight, and ultimately is advancing politics as making you and her miserable? Or would you prefer to go on a date with a nice young lad

that's going to make you happy? Would you prefer female friends that didn't tear you down? Would you prefer to feel safe in your own country and not preyed upon by the kinds of men that that woman treats as a baby? while accusing, presumably, a young white English lad, who just wants to fix his country, of being the real predator. If that's the case, I would sooner vote for the furthest right possible party available in your area

and go on a date with said nice young lad to vote for said right-wing party, then listen to that woman who looks like she's only ever mounted to working as a cashier in lush. But, Conner, in all seriousness, though, I mean, you're now so lucky because you've found the woman of your dreams and she's expecting twins, as you have revealed today, twin girls, which is so exciting. But this is actually such a difficult time for young men trying to find a partner. Because how on earth could you trust a woman like that not to, for example, make a completely ludicrous untrue allegation against you for political reasons?

It's really difficult, isn't it? Like, obviously there's a funny side to this. but navigating the new world of love if you are a patriotic young man is really tough. Absolutely. And if she's willing to make these accusations for social clout when she's not in a relationship with you, then she'll be willing to make one about you if you get into an argument. So again, if these sorts of women are so vicious about politics, just don't go near them.

Because the last thing you want is not just a custody battle. if she decides to just leave you over your own children. But you also don't want to be at war with your own household. You want a relatively peaceful life or a life when it's not peaceful. You want someone who unquestionably has your back, who supports you, sustains you. And you can act as the rock upon which her emotional waves break as well. You want reciprocity. Without reciprocity, it's just exploitation.

And getting into a relationship with that kind of person would be disastrous for any enterprising a man. And I say this as someone who did not have the greatest dating history before. Save yourself the headache, lads. Trust me. It is very difficult, though, and I'm very sympathetic, Dan, because over half of young men now haven't approached a woman in the last year. And this is why, you know, films like obsession are resonating with my generation. I'm putting out a review soon.

It's because the guardrails around modern dating have been totally obliterated. We don't have our elders looking out for us. It's been outsourced to dating apps with perverse commercial incentives, to ration your ability to find. someone who suits you. I met my wife on Hinge, fortunately, but because they want to sell you a subscription or more adverts. And so instead, what ends up happening is people are at desperation, they feel they can't be honest, they feel they have to hide their politics or the true intentions. Men are shy about being forthcoming to women, and some women will take advantage of men not being so

forthcoming because they're fearing false accusations, and they will like love bombing from the off to hide their personality flaws, and then, hey, presto, they turn out to have BPD and try and ruin your life later on. So all I can say is be discerning out there, lads. If a woman doesn't share your politics to the extent where she's been radicalised like that woman there, don't risk it. And put yourself out there, but just be discerning when you do. Breaking right now, British YouTubers, considering leaving the disunited kingdom under Slippery Stama and the Labour government, as they attempt to usher in shocking new regulations that will effectively, sensor platforms like YouTube and TikTok by boosting crooked mainstream media organizations

like the British Batching Corporation and woke ITV in the algorithm. Now this is really chilling and one of our good friends, Maya Tusi of Tusi TV, has already made the decision to relocate from Sadiq Khan's Lawless London to the US with his lovely wife, Danielle. And look, I totally understand. I know why he's doing this. Obviously, he runs a geopolitics channel, but he will not have to deal with the same dystopian, authoritarian censorship that is now being quite realistically uttered in by this government to try and shut down channels like this one, like outspoken. So let me take you through exactly what's going on. The mainstream Times newspaper here in London today, the London Times, reporting that London's trusted news plans

may lead to a left-wing bias. Well, I mean, no sugar, Sherlock. They report government proposals to give prominence to trusted news outlets on social media has raised fears that they could be forced to promote woke or lefty stories. This week, Labour published the plans in a green paper titled, Watch the Space and use strategic direction for UK media, and said that the volume of fake news circulating on social media represented an existential threat to society. It wants tech giants to counter this by boosting news from public service media providers, including BBC ITV and Channel 4 and national and local newspaper publishers. But Nigel Huddleston, the shadow culture secretary, said that this could lead to biased outcomes and questioned how it would be decided which publicers were trustworthy. He

attacked the BBC for previous errors. And of course, of course, because what you've got to think about here is that they are wanting to boost the organisations. that have lied to the British public and lied to the international public for decades. That's before you get to the concept of social media companies like YouTube and TikTok and X and Facebook and Instagram saying, hang on a moment, you're going to completely screw up our algorithm, which puts the power to the people. And let's just remember for a moment. So the Labor government under Slippri Stama says that the British Bashing Corporation is a trusted. organization. Well, I would trust Maya Toosy over the BBC any day, given the BBC's history,

like covering up the worst paedophile in British history. Watch. Who's your best pal? You as a pal. Get up alive that side. Hey? I beg your pardon. Inprinciage of your money, but I'm going to say. Goodness gracious. Although the context is unclear against the backdrop of what's happening, it is a at the very least, enlightening. At number three, a raft of former BBC presenters

and producers have come out of the woodwork to say his behaviour was an open secret. But did those further up the corporate food chain know? In the 70s, Radio One controller, the late Douglas Moggeridge, asked a press officer to find out whether the tabloids were looking into the rumours.

He was told they weren't, and it ended there. Or like they're fake reporting on the Gaza conflict. The Israeli military has been contacted for comment, and they have said that they are investigating. But, you know, it is hard to see what else this could be, really, given the size of the explosion, other than an Israeli airstrike or several air strikes. Well, of course, it wasn't an Israeli air strike, but the BBC got it wrong. What about their dodgy editing of President Donald Trump, which is meaning he is suing them? at the moment in Florida. We're going to walk down to the capital,

and I'll be there with you, and we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. We're going to walk down to the capital, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.

And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, You're not going to have a country. What about their third apology to Nigel Farage in its many years? Before we start tonight, we want to apologize for an error we made on last night's program. In an interview about the murder of 18-year-old Henry Novak, we mistakenly quoted the Reform UK leader Nigel Farage as saying people should respond to his death with a white, cold rage.

To be clear, Mr. Farage actually said pure cold rage, as had been stated earlier in the program. I apologise to him for this mistake. Last night's news night has been removed from IPlayer and BBC sounds. But these new censorship guidelines are chilling. Indeed, Alistair Heath in the Daily Telegraph, claiming that it is a sinister plot to re-educate the British public and a chilling threat to free expression. And remember, I never forget.

We've had free speech for a very, very long time here. No, we don't. No, we don't. Slippree Stama. So Alastair Heath said the elites concede, their delusion is off the chance again. They cannot fathom why Middle England is so preoccupied with what from their rarefied technocratic vantage point are exaggerated device of dangerous issues such as migration, Islamist extremism, social decay or elevated energy prices.

Wouldn't it be safer just to ignore inconvenient truths such as the rape gangs, the failure of nut zero and our looming national quasi-bankruptcy? What did our establishment do to deserve such a stubborn, uncooperative public? It can proffer only one explanation for voters. otherwise inexplicable refusal to embrace progressive dogma, bereft of agency and critical faculties, the masses are being brainwashed by misinformation and disinformation. There is no battle of ideas, no agreeing to disagree. If you reject the leftist worldview, you must have been indoctrinated by malicious propaganda. The guilty parties, private media, including

newspapers, independent podcasters and social media. In 1992, the left blamed the sun's splash. If Kinnick wins today, you'll be the last person to leave Britain, turn out the lights. 2016, they blamed right-wing newspapers. Today, they blame the internet and believe they have a historic opportunity to get their own back against all of their enemies at once. Their solution nudged people into watching the BBC channel for another public service broadcasters, presumably to be told which facts are valid and which conclusions are to be drawn. The mechanism, dreamt up as a parting gift by Stama, force social media and video sharing firms to promote these broadcasters' content above everybody else's better to re-educated the popular.

Bad luck for newspapers, text, video and audio output for GB News or for independent podcasters such as trigonometry. Just as the BBC is fading, here comes Labor to prop it up and perhaps in time justify handing it even more taxpayers' cash. The government is consulting on these proposals. There would be interventions and this plan could lead to state regulation of journalists through the back. door. Conner Tomlinson, one of those independent podcasters of Tomlinson talks, this is such a genuine threat. Can you blame someone like Maya Tusi saying, you know what? I am going to be much safer, much more protected if I am broadcasting from Florida than London. I am not surprised that people have decided to move over and enjoy the full protections of the American First Amendment.

Being candid, Dan, I've spoken to my friend and the Trump administration, and they have only half-jokingly said, well, our long-term project is to bring you out and make you one of ours. And I've said to them, you know, flattery or get you everywhere. But I couldn't leave my family behind. You know, my parents and my surviving grandparents live just around the corner from me, and I'd be depriving them of their grandchildren and great-grandchildren. and also if we all leave, then nobody's here to fix the problem. It just becomes the ruins of a great civilization occupied

by a series of merchants with no frame of reference for why it once mattered. And so unless my little area of London is quite literally put to the torch and I'm forced out, and only then it would be a temporary exile, I think I'm staying. Though I'm not surprised that they're trying to do this because we've had Liberal Democrat MPs agitating

for a very long time to ban X because Elon Musk is a bogeyman living rent-free in there. head and Labour MPs who blame social media for all of the world's ills because they genuinely believe that if we weren't on the internet talking about these problems, the problems wouldn't happen because we are the origin point of division because we are malevolent, far-right agitators, this is all the same boring old tired language they use. They believe that us talking about the problem causes the problem rather than us talking about the problem being a symptom of the problem itself, which comes from the perpetrators of the problem, because of course, you could never

blame the minorities, communities, you keep committing disproportionate of violence for the violence. It's always the far right, just talking about it. And so I wouldn't be shocked if, on the way out the door, or ahead of the next election, especially, they try to make OTHCOM more muscular, they try to make content creators responsible for the things that are said in their comments, and they try to charge you for, under the malicious communications act, the Online Safety Act, for things that other people say under your Substack posts or in your YouTube comments or they place an extra burden of

monitoring or moderation rather on platforms like YouTube X and Substack and they try to kill off independent journalism or more accurately criticism of the state and all we could hope is for that to be scrapped, repealed and off-com to be torn down brick by brick the online safety act to be crumpled up into a little ball and thrown in a waste paper basket

and in the meantime for those of us who are staying in great room, for the American State Department to be leaning on the UK government to uphold their end of the bargain, because these are American companies, and Americans do not want to be censored by the new terms of service that these platforms will ultimately enforce across their platform, because it's easier to comply with one blanket censorship ban than it is for different laws for the EU, the UK, Australia, and then the First Amendment of the US. And so the US do not want us to do this, not only because it affects their citizens, because they deeply care about the fate of our country.

They are trying their best to force our politicians to be better, both in opposition and currently in government. And so they won't be standing for this either. And so we can only hope that they, the State Department, Sarah Rogers and Marco Rubio, intervene on our behalf. Connor Tomlinson of Tomlinson talks. Thank you so much, Connor. Go and enjoy the heat.

And congratulations on the news that you've got your two little girls arriving. Little girls. That's very, very good news. Thank you, Connor. Thank you. weekend. Now, we're about to reveal the worst Britain in the world this week, and this is really a battle of the Titans for all the wrong reasons. Remember, this is when we put your union jackass winners from across the week head to hit, but it was quite a week because on Monday we had the

outgoing Prime Minister, Slippery Stama, on Tuesday. The incoming Prime Minister, not official yet, but we know it's going to happen, Andy Burnham. On Wednesday, London's failed Islamist Mayor Sidney Khan and on Thursday Calamity Lammy, the deputy prime minister well. Lots of comments coming in. Binky 1612 says this week it's the new Star Trek villain Sadiq the wrath of Can. Sublime Sounds 147 says why does Khan suddenly look 100 years old? That's something that Katie Hopkins has been talking about this week too. Side Control 1-2334 says David Men can grow a cervix lambie will be etched on his tombstone. Stumble in 597 says I like to think. that David Lammy isn't actually a bad person. He's just like the male version of Diane Abbott,

where he's just too incompetent to actually know what's going on most of the time. Vista Great 9994 says Andy, our future Prime Minister, will surpass Kare's terribleness in the next year. JD Media says, get ready for Andy to start winning all these polls. But IMDN says, remember that Kirstama wrote warning letters to members of you know what gangs instead of actually taking any sort of action. and DW McKay 6907 says Stama is the worst amongst that lot, at least the most damaging, if not most treacherous. So the results, let me get to them.

We've had so many votes this week, and I just love how engaged our community on YouTubers. I love your comments. I read as many of them as I possibly can. And remember, do subscribe and make sure you get involved in our comments, because, well, 57,000 votes. incredible, 57,000 votes thus far. And in fourth position, with 4% of the vote, is David Lammy. In third position, and this is interesting, well, 22% of the vote, given the predictions

that he's going to become the most hated man in the UK very, very shortly, Andy Burnham. But the runner-up with 31% of the vote is Sadiq Khan. However, even on the week that he resigned, The worst Britain in the world remains our corrupted Prime Minister, slippery stammer. What a week. It has been thank you for your company here on Outspoken, but we're not done yet because we're moving over to Substack to team up with the Royal News Network in the uncanceled aftershow. You can join us there at www.outspoken.com. But I do hope you have a wonderful couple of days. The weather is looking spicy if you're in the United States. Kingdom, try and enjoy it, try and not let the mainstream media make you just despise the fact

that it's hot because I am a big fan. Let's be honest, for the vast majority of the year, it is not. We will see you live 5pm UK time on Monday. That's midday Eastern, 9am Pacific. Do hit subscribe on YouTube, turn on the notification bell, but do remember too. We're still a podcast available on Apple Podcast, Spotify. Wherever you get your podcast, actually, all I ask is that you rate and review as it really helps us in the algorithm. Have a wonderful weekend and most importantly I promise to keep fighting for you.