Dan Wootton Outspoken - SHOCK AS ILLEGAL MIGRANT CONFRONTS NIGEL FARAGE AS KEMI BADENOCH PREDICTS END OF TORIES

Episode Date: October 16, 2024

The UK has become a global laughing stock as an Afghan illegal migrant with an AK-47 tattoo on his face who is wanted for crimes in Sweden taunts Nigel Farage - and the authorities do nothing.  In his Digest, Dan attacks Kemi Badenoch for predicting the end of the Tories without addressing the urgent need to leave the ECHR and Sly News for continuing to obsess over a far right bogeyman.  Then Father Calvin Robinson weighs in.  PLUS: Talk TV’s Mike Graham asks whether James O’Brien is having a “breakdown” AND: Stateside Royal Mastermind Kinsey Schofield reacts to People Magazine’s brutal snub of Meghan Markle To watch the exclusive Uncancelled After Show for 30-minutes extra content EVERY weekday, sign up at: https://outspoken.live/premium Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

There are very few things that you can be certain of in life. But you can always be sure the sun will rise each morning. You can bet your bottom dollar that you'll always need air to breathe and water to drink. And, of course, you can rest assured that with Public Mobile's 5G subscription phone plans, you'll pay the same thing every month. With all of the mysteries that life has to offer, a few certainties can really go a long way. Subscribe today for the peace of mind you've been searching for. Public Mobile. Different is calling.

The new Mitsubishi Outlander brings out another side of you. Your regular side listens to classical music. Your adventurous side rocks out with the dynamic sound Yamaha. Regular you owns a library card. Adventurous you owns the road with super all-wheel control.

Woo! Regular side, alone time. Adventurous side journeys together with third row seating. The new Outlander. Bring out your adventurous side. Mitsubishi Motors. Drive your ambition. 🎵 We'll be right back. No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wilson. This is Outspoken Live, episode number 74. And Today, the UK has become a global laughing stock, as an Afghan illegal migrant with an AK-47 tattoo on his face who was wanted for crimes in Sweden continues to taunt Nigel Farage.

Now my dick, that's my character. I don't want you to think I'm dangerous, gun. I'm rapper mother passer I have tattoo you must know why I mean this tattoo does not mean ta ta ta ta and still the authorities do nothing so in my digest next

I hit out at Kemi Badenot for predicting the end of the Tories without addressing the urgent need to leave the ECHR because of guys like that. And sly news for continuing to obsess over a far-right bogeyman that doesn't exist when the illegal invasion of criminals like that puts us all at risk every single day. Then Father Calvin Robinson weighs in. Also coming up today, Talk TV's Mike Graham asks whether James O'Brien is having a breakdown. It's about what a no-deal Brexit would mean.

And off it goes. And here we are. And I don't know how to talk about it anymore. It's the strangest thing. It's a bit like Tom Jones forgetting how to sing Delilah. I imagine that, I don't know, Shaking Stevens forgot the words to This Old House. I need a slightly more up-to-date reference.

Imagine if Taylor Swift forgot the words to Shake It Off. Or never, ever, ever, ever getting back what's after that. I'm never, ever, I don ever getting back. What's after that? I'm never, ever. I don't know how to talk about it anymore. And I don't understand why. It's extraordinary. He's losing it.

I've got lots more evidence, by the way. And stateside royal mastermind Kinsey Schofield reacts to People magazine's brutal snub of Meghan Markle. Then, in the uncancelled after show, much more royal news from Kinsey in California. And you can register to watch on our own website right now, www.outspoken.live. It is a safe space, free of censorship. Your support at just £5 a month not only gives you 30 minutes of extra-sync content every single weekday, it allows me to continue making this independent daily news show. But now, let's go! Where I laughing stop?

Zipri Stama said he was going to smash the gangs, which was always a lie. He has no idea how to even start doing that. And with the Rwanda deterrent removed, the invasion of the channel continues at pace. But these criminal scumbags raping your daughters, stabbing your sons and planning terrorist attacks are ta haunting us now. Nigel Farage warned the authorities about this madder passer, an Afghan migrant with an AK-47 tattooed on his face who fled Sweden, where he's alleged to have committed crimes to get here via France and Germany. On his face, a tattoo that looks like a Kalashnikov. I would suggest to you

that's a pretty aggressive symbol. Not the kind of tattoo that most people get. Now you'll notice that the flag at the top of this social media clip that he's posted has France, where he is now, and there's a Union Jack. That tells you where he wants to get to. So they're in a camp

in northern France, partying like crazy in very high spirits and basically this is going out on social media he's telling the world he's about to attempt an illegal crossing of the english channel and it's party time and now he's claimed to actually have arrived on british shores do you think the authorities are doing anything to protect Farage after direct threats to his life from Madapasa? Like hell they are. Instead, he continues to taunt the Reform UK leader via TikTok. I don't want you to think I'm a danger gun.

I'm a rapper, mother fucker. I have a tattoo. You must know why I mean this tattoo. It does not mean ta-ta-ta-ta. Oh yeah, really unthreatening. That buffoon then used a translate tool to provide a direct message to Faraj, insisting he shut up. Here's what I can play you that won't see me banned. Hi, IGEL. You don't know who I am.

I know that someone has given you the wrong information about me, that I am dangerous and that I am on my way to England. But that is not true. I am a TikTok talker who usually broadcasts live and vlogs my everyday life and shows where I am and who I am around. I left Sweden to put my past behind me and start a new good life in England. On my way to England I ended up in a place on the border between France and England where people were armed who were moving people across the border. They asked me to film a video where they also wanted to appear in the video with their weapons. I couldn't say no as I was in a danger zone I have nothing to do with people's guns. Don't spread wrong info about me. I am in England and would be happy to meet you if you want so you can see me in real life and explain to you who I am. The person who has

given you the wrong information about me is my enemy and wants to smear my name as he has Now the MSM is ignoring this story. Completely. It's willful blindness. People like that are being imported into our country on a daily basis by the hundreds, if not thousands. And story selection, let me tell you, from having spent 20 years in that mainstream cesspit is everything but what have sly news been focused on tracking down the uk's non-existent so-called far right so it was mortifying for them very delightful for us when they discovered that the social media activity following last year's southport massacre had had come from, and I could have told them this, I could have told them this, it came from overseas. Sky News has, for the first time, uncovered and mapped the networks on Telegram,

the encrypted messaging app where the flames were fanned and the riots were organized. We've been working with Proz, an open-source intelligence start-up which has a deep penetration of far-right and conspiracist networks on Telegram to find out who is behind the messaging. One interesting thing we can see here, especially considering this is the first day, is that the source of most of the information that people are talking about on Telegram

isn't British English-language communities. The most widely shared content on Telegram during the initial three days of the unrest was primarily authored by non-domestic accounts from the USA and Europe. Now, you might be surprised to know Sly News haven't exactly been trumpeting their findings, but I did on X,

prompting Reform UK Deputy Leader Richard Tice to respond. Summer riots were whipped up by foreign agitators. Even Sky News now admits, apologies please from lefty loons. And the independent journalist, Charlotte Gill, added, and look at this release from last Thursday, nearly 400 people already jailed, already, as in more will be jailed. And isn't it shocking that it's that sort of thing? I mean, there's the press release. It's that sort of thing that the officials want to talk about rather than the invasion of the channel. So what about the Tories? Surely they're taking this seriously. Well, I mean, at least Robert Jenrick is, which is why I believe he'll end up winning.

But the establishment favourite, who today won the backing of Michael Gove's ex-wife Sarah Vine, isn't even contemplating leaving the ECHR. Yet Cammie Badenoch is suggesting that if she fails to win this leadership contest, the Tories will be killed off forever. No, Ms. Badenoff. No, no, no, no, no, Ms. Badenoff. The only thing that will see the Uniparty killed off, Labour and the Tories, is this complete failure to control our borders. Oh, and by the way, in the midst of all this madness, Tuti Akia still hasn't realised he's actually now Prime Minister. By promoting multi-year funding settlements, but ultimately we have to grow our economy. And I'm surprised the Prime Minister didn't welcome the £63 billion of investment that we were able to announce on Monday. Leader of the Liberal Democrats... God help us.

That's the perfect moment to bring in Father Calvin Robinson. Father Calvin, goodness gracious me. I mean, this is extraordinary, isn't it? It's extraordinary that the MSM just continues to ignore this invasion, even when we have a criminal like that directly threatening the life of Nigel Farage. Let's just pretend it's not happening, Calvin. I don't understand what the criminal was saying, what the chap was saying. To be honest, it was very, very weird.

His language is rhetoric. But if he is a viable threat on fraud, then surely someone in the police force should be taking an interest in this. This is a sitting parliamentarian after all. This is someone who is supposed to be representing a number of constituents in our parliament. So, of course, if his life is threatened, it should be taken seriously. But of course, the mainstream media don't want to look at that. The rest of the politicians don't really care. It's Nigel Farage. Who cares? That's the attitude. Well, indeed. And let's talk about what they're actually doing, Calvin. So here's Kate McCann, the mainstream journalist, reporting that the Home Office has put calls out to asylum hotel

providers looking for more space after a spike in illegal channel crossings. Labor promised to end the use of hotels, but they're now looking for more capacity, which could mean, Kelvin, reopening hotels, which have closed, or looking at new hotels. So this was just all talk. They have no intention of stopping the boats. They knew they were never going to be able to stop the boats. And actually, they just hope that no repeat you don't want to miss.

Get your hot honey McCrispy today. Available for a limited time only at McDonald's. It's true, and they're all singing from the same hymn sheet. We had the story come out this week that Boris Johnson was celebrating the fact that he had mass immigration post-COVID.

He said it was needed for the economy. Kimmy Badnock, one of the potential leaders of the Conservative Party, is pro-immigration. She fought to keep those student visas going to her constituency. Robert Jemmick, as far as I know, is the only person who's speaking out against mass immigration at the moment. Even Nigel Farage is going a bit weak on this. That is true. That is true. He is.

And yet, Calvin, what is the mainstream media obsession? The far right. And I don't actually believe that there is any sort of organized far right in the UK anymore. And sly news. And I guess you could argue it's to their credit but actually it's not really because they only did this investigation because they thought they were going to be able to expose a whole load of far-right people in the north of England who they'll then be able to get jailed but actually they found quite the opposite that all of the activity that was being generated on

social media post the Southport massacre was coming from overseas. And there's a brilliant moment, Calvin, which I'll just show you now, which is when the reporter, who really is obsessed with creating this far-right bogeyman, actually had to admit to Kay Burley his findings. More brilliant work by you and the team, this time looking online about who was responsible for stirring up hatred with the riots? Yeah, exactly. We want to take a deep dive and look at especially Telegram, the messaging app where a lot of these riots were sort of talked about and organised. I think what we

were really surprised by is how many of these were not from the UK. So it looks more than 10,000 groups went through all these messages. And it turns out the majority of these were not coming from the UK. They were abroad abroad effectively what you might call foreign interference calvin we knew this and what was so obvious is that the folk in the wake of the southport massacre who were out on the streets and who were posting maybe some inappropriate comments on facebook and X. They were ordinary Brits who are just so fed up, so angry. We saw, Calvin, most of them had no prior criminal records.

This is the problem, isn't it, with research like this. They were trying to back up a belief set that they already have. They were trying to find evidence of something they already thought to be true. Of course, they found the opposite. There is no far right in England. These so-called riots, these protests that turned angry were not far right agitators. There were just many upset, disenfranchised Brits.

But the content of sparing these on was from outside of Britain. It was Europe and America. That's interesting, isn't it? So these far right agitators are actually foreign agitators, in fact. We are seeing the European continent and America meddling with our politics, and then the so-called far-right are getting blamed for it. It's amazing that there is no far-right in this country. If there was, by now we'd be seeing them out on the streets. We have mass immigration at levels like we've never seen before, as a direct result of that. We've got crime rates at a level we've never seen before, particularly in our inner cities. And London is a prime example of this with life crimes at dismal levels. And so if there was a far-right in this

country, they would be doing something about it. But where are they? Indeed. Now, look, you speak about your old mate, Kemi Badenoch, Calvin, and isn't she missing the point by talking about the extinction of the Conservative Party if she's not elected? I mean, don't get me wrong. I think the Conservative Party is in many ways facing extinction, but I think the reason it's facing extinction is because she is refusing to contemplate a policy like leaving the ECHR. So all Kemi seems to want to deliver is more of the same, shrouded in lots of tough culture war talk. And you know I love the tough culture war talk, but I'm sorry, Kelvin, if it's not backed up by strong policies,

it doesn't matter. Because we've heard all of that talk from the Conservative Party and we've seen that in government, they don't actually do anything about it. Right. But where Kemi is strong is she is willing to address these cultural issues. Most other Tories are not willing to address the cultural wars. They see it as beneath them. So I give her credit where it's due there.

Kemi's problem is she's not as strong on immigration. As we've seen, she's fought hard for mass immigration into her constituency as a parliamentarian. So what would she be like as the party leader? And I struggle with this balance of putting all of these issues at the top, because these are what people care about. The culture wars, mass immigration, deportation, and none of them are addressing deportation. And this is the area, of course, where I've been upset with Nigel Farage recently with the Stephen Edgington interview where he said mass deportation is impossible. And so I look for a politician that will address all three of those issues.

I haven't seen one yet. No. Well, I mean, it's Robert Jenner. And that's why I think Calvin, he will win. I mean, what's interesting to me is you have all the establishment, all the mainstream media saying Kemi Badenoch is going to win this. The Tory members love her. Look, I'm prepared to be proven wrong, Calvin, but I think you know I've had a very good relationship with Conservative Party members now for a number of years. I was very involved in the Conservative Democratic Organization, which was about returning true democracy to the party.

Personally, I think Jenick's going to win. I think it will be close, don't get me wrong, but I think he will win because Tory members vote on policy. They vote on policy. That is why Truss beat Sunak, for example. Sure, sure. I'm with you. Policy is important, but so is rhetoric. But both of those have to be followed through.

It doesn't matter how good your policy suggestions are, how good your manifesto is, how good your rhetoric is, if you get into office and don't do anything. The problem the Tories face now is it doesn't matter how strong the leader looks, we want to see action. And it's impossible to see action when the party is in opposition. So we don't actually know. But you're also right in that this is going to be very, very close. I'm still in a group of chats with my former Vote Leave teammates. I headed up a team for Vote Leave back in the referendum days. And a lot of them are Tories, but a lot of them aren't. And the conversations in that group are very much in favour of both candidates.

It's split down the middle. Yeah, I think it's going to be close. The party's done really well to put two center-right candidates forward yeah no that is a good thing we should celebrate that absolutely now breaking right now a major moment in the uk house of commons this afternoon where the so-called terminally ill adults end of life bill was introduced. Now what this is, is a euthanasia bill, an assisted dying bill. It is highly controversial. Keir Starmer will allow British MPs to make a conscience vote. They will not be whipped by the party in any way. And overnight,

the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, staged an intervention against the bill. But what's interesting, if I show you the mainstream media here, the drumbeat for assisted dying in the UK is absolutely incessant. Here's the Daily Express deciding to put Esther Anson at the forefront of the campaign. I'll tell you why that is a very odd decision in just a moment. Equally, the Times seeming to suggest this is a good thing. Only the Daily Mail contains that intervention on their front page from Justin Welby. And here's my issue with this. Keir Starmer says he wants to do it for Esther Anson.

Now, Esther Anson, someone Anson she's someone who I had on my old show GB News a lot I didn't agree with her on anything but I have no issue with her and I think she is a good broadcaster and in lots of ways she's been a very very good woman over a number of years and she absolutely has a right to her own opinion about this given she is currently terminally ill with cancer. The problem that I have is that over the COVID vaccine debate, Esther Ranson proved that she does not believe in the sanctity of human life and that she does not believe in the sanctity of choice and bodily autonomy it all came out on a debate during my former gb news show i just want to play you at one of the critical sections to give you some context

a vaccine or a booster then you can decide not to go to hospital however ill you get and that way that is your right so you would leave the unjabbed at home to die if they had a heart attack, if they suffered from a stroke? That's their choice. If they're unjabbed, if they take the decision, they're not going to use the medical evidence, follow the science, as we say, recognize because what the boosters do is not only protect you, they protect other people because you transmit the infection far less although you can still transmit even if you are triple j so calvin the woman father calvin romanson the woman who kirsten the british prime minister has put at the heart of his clear intention to try and make euthanasia or assisted dying legal in the UK,

is a woman who wanted the unvaccinated during COVID to be killed off. I know, it's awful, isn't it? Esther Ransom's opinions are diabolical, but as with all free speech arguments, I support her right to hold it as you do. Absolutely, so do I. To proclaim the public. What I do not like is our parliamentarians, our Prime Minister saying we're going to have this debate because I promised

Esther Ransom. That's not how a representative democracy works. That's not how a constitutional democracy works. It's very, very bizarre for celebrities to have this much influence over our Prime Minister. And we've seen the same with Taylor Swift as well, as we're seeing with Esther Rance.

This is a weird bubble of lefty celebrities having too much power and influence over our society. But this whole debate is scary because it is about, you're right, it is about the sanctity of life. Every single human life is sacred. And that's not dependent on how healthy we are or how much money it costs to keep us alive. We are just, it's a God-given right to life.

We all deserve that right to life. And the Christians like myself would say that God decides when we are born and when we die. And the moment we try to alter that, whether it's killing babies before they're born or killing old people before they get the chance to die naturally, that is us playing God. And it's a dangerous game because it's a slippery slope. And those of us on the right who've been saying it's a slippery slope for years have been shut down by the left saying, oh, there's no such thing as a slippery slope. But we have seen it in practice. You only have to look at Canada with their MAID service, which set out to offer assisted dying, assisted suicide, assisted killing, whatever you want to call it, to people in the extremities. So people who are suffering with extreme pain. And it quickly, very rapidly progressed into

just a part of their healthcare service. And so we've seen firsthand veterans who are too poor to afford to live being offered death. We've seen people who can't afford a stairlift being offered death instead. This is absolutely disgusting because it's cheaper to kill someone off than it is to properly support them. That's scary. So I think for that reason alone, everybody should be against it. We should help people suffer well. We've also even seen people with depression being offered to die.

And that is heartbreaking. Dan, it's not even... You're right, it's people with depression, but it's not even people at the end of their life. It's not even people who are elderly. These are people who are completely physically healthy. And I'm not exaggerating, by the way. There have been legal deaths in parts of Europe

of completely healthy people because they say that they are clinically depressed. And teenagers, depressed teenagers are being offered death. What teenager hasn't felt depression at some stage or another? It's absolutely terrifying that we're offering a way out, which is just to end it all, rather than to help and support in love, compassion, kindness, empathy, and just helping people through their struggles,

rather than just saying, no, life's too difficult. And it horrifies me more than anything else. It's terrible that we're having a debate about bringing it over here. We've seen how bad it is in Europe and in Canada. We should have the courage to say, no, we are better than this. What about the disabled as well, Calvin?

Because I've been very interested today with the intervention from the Paralympic multi-gold medalist, Baroness Taryn Gray Thompson. She has spoken out against the legalisation of assisted dying because she believes it could actually be used to encourage disabled people who would qualify under some of the measures, for example, to be encouraged to end their lives. Yes, yes, it is a modern new home asia service which leans into eugenics and actually we've seen this around the world look at iceland there are practically zero people with down syndrome in iceland because they screen them out and they kill them and we'd see this is at the start of life so who's to say we wouldn't see this at the

end of life too with with the the assisted dying program if someone has an incurable illness if someone is disabled and in it to a degree that what they will never improve physically they may be offered the option of just ending their life and it's terrible because again their life the value of their life doesn't depend on how well they can walk or how much they can contribute to society just being alive is enough we are all loved we all have dignity and worth in the eyes of god and i think i suppose losing god in a societal a societal level has and it has lost our value of human life too no indeed i mean they say calvin that there are safeguards in place so there would be a sign off from a judge but also two doctors and that's what would be a sign-off from a judge, but also two doctors, and that's what would be required for a patient who desired to die for it to be granted.

They also say that the option would be limited to only the terminally ill with six to 12 months to live. The issue is, though, Calvin, we even saw over the COVID pandemic that there were, and I'm not casting aspersions on everyone on the NHS. Of course I'm not. I know there are lots of great people within the NHS. But, Calvin, we also know that there were some medics who very quickly went down the path of do not resuscitate, even when that was not the wish of the patient and the families weren't there, were they?

So we just have to be careful. Yeah, the vulnerable during COVID were isolated for obvious reasons. And we found that many of them, especially people with disabilities and learning disabilities in particular, were put on these DNRs against their own will and they didn't have consent.

So they were told that they were going to die. And if they were going to die, they would not be resuscitated that is evil there's no other way around that and so we have these safeguards are not enough we have to have protections in place uh there was a clip that went viral last week where uh dr weber was interviewed by uh i think it was ms carr um who has serious health conditions herself she interviewed this this doctor who performs these these acts in Canada. And this doctor was saying, this is the best work of my life. You know, she said, I've brought people into the world.

I've delivered babies, but actually I've helped kill over 400 people. I love it. There's something wicked and demonic about it. Are you happy with the intervention, by the way, from the Archbishop of Canterbury, who I know usually you're at odds with? Yeah, thank you for raising that. I think credit where it's due. The Archbishop of Canterbury is doing his job and speaking out for the sanctity of life. That has its whole purpose. So well done to the Archbishop of Canterbury for speaking out on Christian teachings.

Thank you. More of that, please. Yeah, no, indeed. Couldn't agree more. Now, look, OK, seriously, is it time we start to get concerned for the increasingly red faced and the increasingly unhinged James O'Brien? I have to be honest, I was only half joking yesterday when I said LBC needs to stage some sort of intervention. And overnight, the talk TV host Mike Graham has weighed in on this too. So when a listener wrote to him saying it's actually now becoming sad to see a national commentator who should be at least seen to be intellectually neutral become so wrapped up, believing only he is right, that he continues to disintegrate into rambling, senseless monologues. And Mike Graham replied on X saying, people are now seriously asking whether James O'Brien is actually having a breakdown. Formatory mayoral candidate Susan Hall agreed. She wrote, James O'Brien lost the plot a long time ago. He has never coped with Brexit and he drones on and on according to people that have lost those hours listening to him. At some point, Lc may take a view

and just have less biased people on and i have to say there is certainly a lot of evidence to suggest all is not well with james o'brien he is clearly not psychologically coping with brexit it's about what a no deal brexit would mean and And off it goes. And here we are. And I don't know how to talk about it anymore. It's the strangest thing. It's a bit like Tom Jones forgetting how to sing Delilah. I imagine that, I don't know, Shaking Stevens forgot the words to This Old House.

I need a slightly more up-to-date reference. Imagine if Taylor Swift forgot the words to Shake It Off. Or never, ever, ever, ever getting back what's after that. I'm never, ever, I don't know how to talk about it anymore. And I don't understand why. It's extraordinary.

Extraordinary. See the red feet? What I mean? don't understand why. It's extraordinary. Hmm. See the red feet? What I mean? James O'Brien appeared to joke about an attempt on the life of Donald Trump. So if anyone wants to take a shot at Trump, maybe they should make it.

Not literally, obviously. Although on second thought, we're just coming up to noon. Yesterday there was this. He can't turn around and say, be like Profumo, squared. He can't turn around and accept the disgrace that he deserves any more than Nigel Farage can. They soiled the national bed.

And Wes Streeting says we all have to lie in it. Now lots of people have pointed out the complete hypocrisy in the way that James O'Brien continues to act. Thomas Evans wrote on X a week ago, James O'Brien laughably said on his show that he doesn't resort to personal attacks when speaking to those he disagrees with. He then uses this language within a week condescending and talking down supporters of brexit the guy is unhinged unstable and needs help and here's one example of this i want you to look closely at this video because what you'll see is that when this caller who i give a lot of credit to ends up properly challenging o'brien you see him uh go like that and what he's doing is he's saying to the producers, cut this guy

off. Mate, I thought you were here to tell me the toxicity had diminished. Yeah, I have. You're sounding well toxic, mate. Because you won't allow me to get to... No, I won't allow you to avoid the question. I won't allow you to avoid the question. No, you won't allow

me to speak. You do this all the time. No, I don't. I insist that people answer the question. Are you going to answer the question. I won't allow you to avoid the question. No, you won't allow me to speak. You do this all the time. No, I don't. I insist that people answer the question. Are you going to answer the question? Are you going to answer the question? I've answered the question and now I'm asking you to move on. The CBI

sponsored by Pricewaterhouse and you repeated this after it said that unemployment would... I think we can all agree I'm never going to be Emily Maitland. Father Calvin Robinson, is James O'Brien OK? Or is Mike Graham and Susan Hall, are they on to something here? Mike Graham and Susan Hall are always on to something, bless them. Good commentators.

James O'Brien is losing it and he's been losing it for a long time. I think we should all be concerned because when these people are given a platform like his, it's kind of, they're hoisted upon it get over it even in his own words that is like i don't know how to talk about this anymore because he's been pushed and pushed and pushed to be the voice of remain the anti-trump voice constantly and he can't have a genuine debate anymore he can't have an open conversation with people who disagree with him because he sees them now as evil he sees them as the enemy we're not just people with different opinions to his. And so how can he host a radio show where he has callers call in and have conversations if he's no longer able to have dialogue? I think it's very sad. His book seems to be doing well, though. I've seen his book everywhere I go out and about.

All the lefty shops are putting his book front and centre, as they often do, to support their own. Well, that's the issue, isn't it? But yes, bless him. I hope he makes some money from it and has some time off. That's the issue, isn't it? But yes, bless him. I hope he makes some money from it and has some time off. That's the issue. The establishment will always come to support someone like this. But Calvin, you know how he talks about always being right and how he is able to prove that he's always right. Why do we never hear James O'Brien talk about Kyle Beach? For example, the paedophile fantasist who for many years he decided to elevate for political reasons.

He did the same thing with my cancellation last year as well, Kelvin, deciding to pile on with no facts. So this guy is not a journalist. Can we just be very clear on that? He is an activist. Yeah. But just be honest about that. And then I think people would be less upset with the hypocrisy. You know, that statement he made about Trump was outrageous.

And I didn't see any consequences for that whatsoever. He pretty much asked for people to kill Trump. He said, joking, not joking. That's outrageous. If anyone else did that about someone on the opposite side of politics, they'd be arrested. But again, it's the double standards that really gets people's blood boiling, isn't it? The left can get away with certain rhetoric and do certain things

that if the right ever did, we'd all be banged up. What we want is equality under the law. We want free human speech. We want equality. We want people to be treated the same as each other. And James O'Brien doesn't do that. You're right. He doesn't apologize.

This idea that he's always right is absurd. None us are always right we should have the humility and I've seen you do this since you came onto your new platform and said actually I was wrong about some things and I want to be open about that that's how you talk about it show talk about it exactly uh an example with me is for example uh Johnny Depp which I spoke about right at the start we have never heard james o'brien say i was wrong about carl beach and remember calvin the carl beach thing was so serious because he was actually trying to send people to prison you know there's there's nothing more serious than accusing someone in public life of pedophilia and i just find it extraordinary that he is still working after something like that but not only is he still working he is so sanctimonious but let's

be honest unfortunately calvin lbc is a station that lots of people listen to simply because of a tradition of listening to that station because it used to be a station of the working classes a station of the people a station of the black cabbies in london and i think people need to start waking up this is now an establishment station it is anchored and woke it is anchored in left-wing ideology it is trying to nudge you and please wake up and turn it off charlotte gill has done some incredible work about all of the tentacles that Global, which is the organisation that runs LBC, has with hard left campaigners. It's interesting, isn't it? Because he talks about toxicity, but I think his show is one of the most toxic shows. You know, I don't agree with, for example, the BBC 4, Radio 4, but I can have it on.

I can disagree with it and I can have it on. When James O'Brien comes on LBC, and I don't ever hear this when I'm in a cab, he's so angry, it's impossible to listen to because you can hear his. He's getting irate and just berating people like you and I who have different opinions to him. It's not good radio. It's not good listening. You're right, I think people tune in out of tradition but he's going to start losing lbc uh ratings and when that happens we'll see uh he'll finally be out of there there's lots of weirdness going on though with him at the moment watch this recent uh uh discussion where he starts talking about his confessions as a teenager.

The fact that you're told a lie in confession in order to excuse yourself from the feeling of having wasted the priest's time. Poor old priest. I mean, remember, everyone in my class had to go to confession. You've got 30 ten-year-old boys all queuing up to go to confession. The chances are that we all said more or less exactly the same thing. It's a miracle the fella stayed awake. Should have thrown something into the mix to really, I've murdered someone,

to really just sort of wake the fella up. But you've got that sense of, so I don't know whether it's the way I was raised. Is that rewards are supposed to be a consequence of effort? Do you see what I mean? I'm not entirely sure why I just took you to my teenage confessional either, but I feel it has a certain purpose. I just don't think he's totally in the right place mentally or physically at the moment, Calvin. No, I don't understand that. That was very strange.

On the point of confession, it's nothing to do with the priest. We are there to hear your confession. The moment you leave the confessional, we forget. It's gone. We don't actually care. It's not about us. It's about you repenting of your sins and being absolved by Christ through the priest. So it's not about entertaining the priest or having different sins to confess to the priest in order to keep him awake. It's about your soul.

And so James O'Brien having no concept of soul is pretty much a lost soul. I think we should all pray for him. He doesn't seem very healthy mentally, he doesn't seem very healthy physically. And we saw him on,

was it Newspeak the other day? Bursting out of his suit. Bless him, he needs to take care of himself. He is also completely obsessed with Nigel Farage, Father Calvin. Now, to a point that I think is unhealthy, actually, if I was ever talking about a politician so much, I would say, actually, back off a little bit.

Because the thing with Nigel, he blames him for every single thing that is wrong with the country. And there was quite an extraordinary moment the other day when Nigel was in the studio. He'd just finished his interview with Nick Ferrari, where he had said quite clearly that the rhetoric from James O'Brien calling these so-called riots after the Southport massacre, the Farage riots, was actually putting his personal safety at risk. Now we've seen from the Sly News investigation that the riots were certainly not sparked by Nigel Farage. And I say riots like that, by the way. They were certainly not sparked by Nigel Farage.

And they weren't even sparked by people in the UK. But listen to how James O'Brien responded with Farage sitting there still in the studio. Have you ever had violent race riots named after you or indeed been accused by the head of the Met of emboldening the racist thugs responsible? Has your vile and ignorant rhetoric ever helped instigate attempts to burn people alive in their beds? Have you ever cited a self-described misogynist facing rape and people trafficking charges in Romania as a trustworthy news source for events in the UK? Or described yourself as part of a similar phenomenon to him?

Have you ever helped a convicted woman beater get elected to the UK Parliament? And have any newly elected MPs spent more time in America getting binned off by Donald Trump than they have in their own constituency? And what would you call someone who answers yes to all those questions? Now, Calvin, what's so shocking about that to me, because this is another Carl Beach example or something very similar. He sat there listening to Farage say specifically that the rhetoric from James O'Brien about the so-called riots the so-called Farage riots was directly putting his safety at threat to the point that

he couldn't even host constituency surgeries in Clacton and rather than viewing that as an opportunity to either take a step back change the rhetoric or just say nothing actually just say nothing o'brien doubles down and given what he had said about donald trump it's not hard to think that he actually wants there to be some sort of harm to nigel farad that's a sensible conclusion to come to. If Farage has sat there and said, look, you are putting my life in jeopardy with this extremist rhetoric. And then James O'Brien goes on to double down in that rhetoric with him right there in the studio. I think it's safe to say that James O'Brien wants Nigel Farage dead. And we've seen this dangerous rhetoric in the US with the constant peddling of, you know, Trump will be a tyrant dictator. He will take away your freedoms,

X, Y, Z. He is a threat to democracy. And then, of course, Trump will be a tyrant dictator. He will take away your freedoms. That's why I said he is a threat to democracy. And then, of course, there are three or four potential assassination attempts on his life. And this is what the hard left does. When they do not like someone, they'll paint them as such a monster that they are no longer worthy of being alive so that notters will have a go. That's what James O'Brien is doing. And look, Father Calvin, you know know i'm a free speech absolutist i'm not calling for lbc to sack james o'brien i'm not calling for james o'brien to be investigated by the off communists because that's what our enemies do

but i do think it's very telling calvin isn't it because just imagine if there was a presenter on, for example, GB News spewing and spreading hate like that. They would be off air within days. So we live in a two-tier system where James O'Brien's rhetoric, which is nasty and unhinged, is considered socially acceptable. But I think someone is going to have to stage an intervention soon. You know, LBC might think, oh, it's fine because he's pulling in the viewers. We're making the money. But that guy is destroying your brand. He is destroying your brand. You're a radio station that I think is disgusting now. And I would never choose to listen to you now. And that's because of that man. And you should think about that. But look, stand by Father Calvin Robinson, because in just one minute,

very excited about this, we're going to be joined by our friend Kinsey Schofield stateside. And I have to tell both of you that I'm very, very angry this afternoon about Prince William bestowing a damehood on Jacinda Ardern. I'll tell you why in just one minute. But first, everyday subtle changes occur in our bodies, often going unnoticed. It's called inflamma gene, a chronic low-grade inflammation that deteriorates our health as we get older. It's more than just a sign of aging, it's a key contributor to health issues like cardiovascular diseases, dementia and depression, and physical decline. It continuously weakens the body's resistance, turning minor infections severe and impacting mental health and cognitive function.

Inflamma gene significantly diminishes both quality of life and independence. Proper diet, exercise, and sleep can only get you so far. So that's why I take Clean Bean by Verso. It contains ingredients targeted to fight off and help prevent inflammaging. Research shows that these ingredients clean out damaged cells in the body that affect healthy cells, reduce inflammation, protect against oxidative stress and improve conditions like cardiovascular diseases and neurological disorders. After taking Clean Bean for some time, I've noticed less joint pain, increased energy,

better mood, clearer skin, I can think better, I don't get sick as often. These are all benefits of reducing inflammation. Plus Verso ensures transparency and quality by publishing third-party testing results for each batch they produce so you know you're getting exactly what you pay for. Click on the link in the description in YouTube or Rumble or head on over to buy.ver.so and use the coupon code OUTSPOKEN at checkout to save 15% on your first order. To repeat, that's www.buR dot S-O forward slash Outspoken. Use the coupon code Outspoken.

But now back to the show, and it's time for our Royal Mastermind. And I am delighted to welcome back to the show, the U.S. Royal expert host of Kinsey Schofield unfiltered right here on YouTube. Kinsey Schofield alongside father Calvin Robinson. Great to have you both reunited. And wow, major snub today from the US media. It just gets worse for Meghan Markle in Hollywood by the day. This is People Magazine. Let me show you this. It is celebrating its 50th anniversary. Now, you know, People Magazine has been taking stories from Meghan Markle for a very long time. But look at who they've chosen to put on their 50th anniversary cover. Meghan's friend,

Oprah Winfrey, lots of celebrities like Jennifer Aniston, The the rock this is just the sort of bunch of people that megan markle would absolutely want to be a part of surely surely given she's their number one source they are going to choose to include her in their celebrating 50 years celebration right given they love the royal family so much oh no oh no they've gone for a corgi instead with a crown. Meghan Markle has been rejected by People Magazine, Kinsey Schofield, for a corgi. And I presume that was People Magazine making quite a point. We actually want to stay close to the real royals, not the Montessito royals. Your business doesn't move in a straight line. Some days bring growth, others bring challenges. not the Montessito Royals. Don't let life's challenges stand in the way of your success. Protect what you've built today. Visit CanadaLife.com slash business protection to learn more.

Canada Life. Insurance. Investments. Advice. Or are they resentful that they gave Dan Wakeford, the former editor of People Magazine, now with Us Weekly, the Meghan bullying scoop, because Harry and Meghan had been so generous with People magazine, giving them access to their fake royal tours, giving them access to private information. Like Meghan is disappointed that Harry keeps pursuing these legal issues and she wants to just look forward to the future. They have given People Magazine so much incredible access that I'm sure people felt like they were in it to win it. And then all of a sudden, the rug was pulled out from under them when Megan's employees, I believe it was seven employees, five on the record, two off the record,

spoke to Dan Wakeford and Us Weekly. I believe the connection there is Abigail Spencer, who said on the Netflix series that she had a friend that used to work at People magazine. She had approached him about doing that story about Thomas Markle, how her friends went to defend Megan in People Magazine a few years ago against Thomas Markle. Dan left. He's now at Us Weekly. And I do wonder if People Magazine says, well, you know what? We're going to cut you off. We're going to we're going to punish you for giving that exclusive to Us Weekly, who is just, quite frankly, in the States, not on the same level as People Magazine. You would have expected that story in People Magazine, in Vanity Fair, in somewhere that would have given that Megan is a saint, not a demon angle, more credibility.

Indeed. But it's just the fact that I've used a corgi with a crown, I just can't get over it. Angela Levin wrote on this, very significant, that people didn't want Meghan on their 50 year celebration and the royal youtuber according to Taz wrote what no Meghan despite all the exclusives she and Harry have given them what a bummer even a corgi in a crown made it. Calvin Robinson you've been in America a lot lately do you sense a real change stateside as well in terms of how people feel about Meghan and Harry compared to the rest of the British royal family? It's funny, yes. People often bring this up to me. I don't want to spend much time talking about it in real life, but they do. And they tell me how they are upset and fed up of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. And actually, they'd rather them go home

because they've come over to the States and they've become celebrities. And I think it's a very dangerous game they play because the royal family has always had a relationship with the media. Of course they have. But with Harry and Meghan, it seems that they want to become sources

to the media instead. And as Kinsey just pointed out, flirting with Us Weekly after giving all those exclusives to people, it breeds competition, it breeds resentment, and it's a game they shouldn't actually be in. Perhaps some of their team may be in, but for them directly to become sources of the US media means that they are playing the journalistic game and they're riling people up. And so, of course, now that they're over Us Weekly, people have had enough of them and they've washed their hands of

them. It's beneath them, really, quite frankly frankly it's not very edifying of the royalty but there's nothing edifying is there kinsey about what megan is doing i mean she gets all of that terrible coverage the hollywood press which had been pretty slavishly in favor of her specifically hollywood reporter but even to an extent the daily beast and newsweek turn on her so she thinks oh i'm gonna go out in an awful red dress that looks like my deal or no deal dress and that's gonna be my big return and oh i mean we haven't spoken since all of this has gone down kinsey what what do you make of it that exact same weekend you know talk about people on the cover celebrities on the cover of people's 50th Reese Witherspoon that exact same weekend where we saw

Megan debut the the altered red dress from you know the the deal or deal deal or no deal dress Reese Witherspoon held a hello sunshine event with several of the women that were at the Reese Witherspoon that exact same weekend. If Meghan was really looking for a relaunch after all of the Where Is Meghan whispers with weeks on weeks of Prince Harry solo coverage, I feel like it would have been so much more powerful for her to show up at a Hello Sunshine event with Reese Witherspoon than the carpet that she showed up at. Because you are who you associate with. And no one really wanted to take their picture with her at the Children's Hospital Gala. And she is desperate to associate with people like reese witherspoon who it's my understanding that she reached out to her and asked her to appear on archetypes and reese politely declined

because she wants to stay in in favor of the royal family wow and we know taylor swift also said no so kinsey is it too much i mean look this is my belief but is it your belief that megan is now a pariah in hollywood or is that too far is that going too far their drama and you know i i just you know nacho is their biggest spokesperson nacho is the one that's out there this is this polo guy right you know polo you know polo nacho uh it's you're hard you're gonna be it's gonna be hard to find anybody that's going to defend them publicly maybe abigail spencer still but i do think that they have become a real toxic um toxic brand and people want to be uplifting and kind towards the royal family right now. Two people are

suffering with cancer. We recently, I mean, we really, truly recently still lost the queen. They were, you know, you know, tearing into the royal family while Prince Philip was sick up until his death. And I think that normal people, the common sense thing to think is, wow, that is a family that has had a lot of hurt over the last few years and struggle. I'm going to be compassionate. I'm going to show empathy. I'm sorry that you don't feel like you got to wear the tiara that you wanted to on your wedding day. That was amazing. Your second wedding day. And, you know, I'm going to show a little empathy towards this family that suffered a lot of death and a lot of illness over the last few years. Harry and Meghan's arguments and their whining is so superficial compared to the hurt

that the royal family has felt over the last few years. Indeed. And look, I know how these magazine covers work. All of those celebrities would not have agreed to be on the cover of People magazine until they knew who all of the other celebrities were going to be. And my contention would be if Meghan was part of that mix, there would have been a concern that some of the other celebrities would not appear. But there's a massive scandal raging in the UK called Taylor Swiftgate, which looks like it may well empower Prince Harry in his battle with the British government over security. So let me show you, for example, the cover of the front page, sorry, of the Daily Mail here in the UK today. It shows what a big story this has become. And it's because Taylor Swift's mum negotiated directly with the UK government in order for her to receive a police escort when she held her big errors to a concert in Wembley.

That's something, of course, that Prince Harry has been rejected in the past. But what's so significant is that the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, actually met Taylor Swift backstage, something that he hid from the public when he was asked about his meeting with Taylor Swift at a school. Watch this. Yeah, well, I went to the Taylor Swift concert on Friday at Wembley. It was fantastic. And I went with my wife and my children. And I learned something there. I learned that my 13 and a half year old daughter knows every single word of every single song of every single album of Taylor Swift. And she sung them all throughout the entire three hours that we were there. It was really fantastic. I have to say it was a great concert. And if you get the chance to either go or watch it on the television, it's really worth doing.

It was fantastic. Thank you for your question. And my favourite song is Change. Now, Father Calvin, there's obviously a political side to this because Keir Starmer is just a liar. He's just a complete liar. He took free tickets. he took his kids who he claims that he wants to keep out of the spotlight to meet taylor swift and then lied about it so so that's the political side of this but when it comes to prince harry calvin isn't this now much more difficult and king charles will be furious about this because it's now much more difficult for the government to try and say, we're not going to pay for your security. Because he is immediately going to come back and say, but I have threats against me, just like Taylor Swift does. And you paid for her to have government security and a blue light escort.

Absolutely. First and foremost, we must feel sorry for the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, when he stood there. There's zero charisma, is there? Not one single child was laughing at his petty little jokes. They didn't even smile.

He's like, yeah, I went to see Taylor Swift, like trying to win over the audience. None of them are having any of it. But yeah, what this highlights is the two-tier system, once again,

because they've said no to Prince Harry, quite right, they've said no to Prince harry quite right they said no to prince harry to this uh security scenario but they've bent and given in to taylor swift once again because of the celebrity culture of the labor government and they are in there with all the lefties and back patting and so when taylor swift wants something she speaks to the labor politicians and we have the mayor of mayor of London and the education secretary stepping in and the prime minister making sure that it happens. It's inappropriate, but it's exposed the two-tier system.

And so now, yes, Prince Harry has to have it. Otherwise, the system is corrupt. Kinsey, I mean, this is good news for Prince Harry, I guess, but very bad news for King Charles, who has been insisting to his son for months now. I mean, let's just be honest about it. Harry only gets through to Charles very, very rarely now. Charles is just refusing the calls. But in their previous conversations, Kinsey, his line has always been the government never gets involved in these things. It's a police decision. I can't get involved in these things.

And here's the government directly getting involved in whether Taylor Swift has a blue light escort or not. I know this is unfortunate for the king because this is one of those issues where Prince Harry is absolutely relentless. He has he doesn't see sense when it comes to this. It's his way or the highway. And he is so incredibly difficult when it comes to this. It's his way or the highway. And he is so incredibly difficult when it comes to this particular topic. So I do really sympathize with King Charles here. I mean, I guess labor could justify it by saying if anybody that was going to attempt anything sinister saw this presence, perhaps they would rethink whatever their plans were you know

thinking about back to ariana grande and that horrific incident and we just want to protect these these young girls and these young families that are here for the taylor swift concert maybe that's going to be their justification but he's going to say well well why don't you want to protect megan markle that is literally going to be, well, why don't you want to protect Meghan Markle? That is literally going to be his answer to that. Because she's not doing anything for the economy and she calls everyone racist. I mean, I think that might be the answer. I would love it if that was the answer. No, look, it's a pickle. It's a pickle. Kinsey, you might be a bit annoyed with me now, though, because I'm never angry with Prince William. But today I am so mad with Prince William because he made the decision to personally bestow a damehood on the former prime minister of New Zealand, the disgraced prime minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern.

Here they are together. You know, they're great pals. She's involved in his earth shot prize and Prince William has just made a mistake with Jacinda Ardern because Jacinda Ardern and I know this you know I have dual citizenship a lot of people know this New Zealand born but I'm British my parents were born in Britain and I've spent my adult life in the UK but I'm also a New Zealander and have a huge connection with that country of my birth. And no one woman has done more damage to my home country of New Zealand than Jacinda Ardern. Her policies over the COVID pandemic were nothing short of evil. I mean, I have friends,

I have friends who were police officers, pharmacists, veterinarians, teachers who lost their jobs, who were essentially thrust out of society because of her vaccine mandate. I have close friends who missed their own parents funeral because they were locked in her prisons. That's what they were they were covered prisons and then father i see father calvin i see william laughing along with this woman who he doesn't understand is one of the most controversial figures in new zealand history who has done more damage to new zealand than anyone What, because she's a globalist shill? I just, it just upsets me, Colin, because you know he would never do this

with a right-wing politician. If evil had a face, it would look very similar to Jacinda Ardern. The sneering and the laughter, the grinning as she was telling people that they were going to be locked in their homes or they were going to be forced to take medical interventions.

It sent shivers down my spine every time she came on television. But then how she approached the media as well, when she said, we will tell you what the truth is. We are the arbiters of the truth. She was a tyrannous dictator. It was absolutely horrifying to see her in action. I was so thankful when she got dismissed and great to see that. Well, she left because she knew that she was going to be booted out in an historic election. She didn't even have the balls to face the public.

She saw the cards on the table. But why this is so worrying is because this kind of move could be the end of the monarchy. The monarchy is supposed to be apolitical. They're not supposed to be partisan in this way. Prince William has made friends with the Jewish Sinder Ardern. Inaudisable, but he can make friends. But when he oversteps that mark in offering a dameship to someone who is very clearly of the far-left political persuasion,

very clearly a globalist, very clearly hated by her own people and many people around the world, including ours, to overstep that mark and to provide her with that uh with that honor honorific title shows that he has become political in a way that he should never and so i hope he learns from this lesson and steps away from that much as his father had to do because he is going to be our king he cannot be political in this way kinsey can you step in and defend william? Because, you know, I do really like William. I just don't think he probably understands what Jacinda did to New Zealand. No, I agree with you. Perhaps he is not privy to as much information as you are,

because I think he has his blinders on and he has, you know, he has his own issues that he's dealing with. We were also negatively affected by the way that our countries shut us down. I, you know, a lot of us lost friends that were just became so depressed and lonely because they weren't going outside and they couldn't connect with people in the real world. We are still seeing people that are losing their lives today. And some of them are younger people and the parents will say everything went south during the COVID pandemic when they were locked in the house. So I don't think any of us have really completely understood fully how much that negatively affected us to be without human

interaction for almost years at a time. And hopefully we have a better understanding of that and Prince William will realize the damage that she did. But I will say that when she appeared on Harry and Meghan's Live to Lead Netflix docuseries, She was quick to say, I had no idea that they were associated with it, alluding to the fact that she would have not participated in it had she known Harry and Meghan were associated with it. So that's where I will give her a high five. Yeah, Jacinda Ardern did choose William and Catherine over Harry and Meghan, which was really interesting because Harry and Meghan thought that they had won her over, that they

really bonded on their visit to New Zealand. And they were devastated about that. So yes, I guess you could say that's one decision Jacinda got right. Personally, I just think, look, William has the pick of the world. He has the pick of the world when it comes to who he wants to be involved in Earthshot. And people say Jacinda ardern is very nice personally i was actually speaking to a former national leader of a country recently who said to me that in person and this person doesn't agree with her policies at all said that in person she's very nice but remember william is going to be the head of new zealand one day uh as the king of england and i just think yeah i think he needs to think hard about the company he keeps and jacinda ardern is not the right company to keep but father calvin

robinson we're going to say goodbye now thank you so much i will speak to you next week but kinsey thank you so great to have you guys back together. But Kinsey is going to stick around. So don't go anywhere, Kinsey, because we have much more from our stateside royal mastermind, including why she thinks Meghan was gaslighting us all with her bullying claim. We're also going to talk about these demands for reparations being made to King Charles. And you know, it's very important to me. We have a safe space, not patrolled by big tech where censorship and control runs deep. So head across now to www.outspoken.live. It's our membership section where you get half an hour of extra content every single weekday. Please hit subscribe too, if you're watching on YouTube or Rumble. And remember, I'm back tomorrow live at 5 p.m. UK time, midday Eastern and 9 a.m.

Pacific. Most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you. See you on the after show with Kenzie Schofield in just one moment. We'll be right back.