Dan Wootton Outspoken - SHOCK NEW PICS OF EX-PRINCE ANDREW WITH TODDLER AMID DEMANDS FOR KING CHARLES TO SPEAK OUT

Episode Date: February 20, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Shocking new images emerge of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor playing with a breast ball and a toddler just hours after the now infamous and iconic picture following his 12 hours in custody as a result of his Sandringham arrest stunned the world. The British Royal Family is struggling to deal with its biggest crisis in modern history and, as police continue to search Royal Lodge in Windsor with suggestions Buckingham Palace might be next, it's naive to think this is even close to over. In his Digest Dan speaks his mind and from the heart: King Charles must learn from the late Queen in 1997 and deliver a national TV address and then swiftly ask the UK government to legislate to remove Andrew from the line of succession. Then reaction from Connor Tomlinson, the host of Tomlinson Talks on YouTube. PLUS: A new war between Restore Britain and Reform UK, as Rupert Lowe accuses GB News of being complicit with Nigel Farage as Douglas Murray weighs in on the war dividing the British right. AND: Aliens are real – well of course they are – but what does the battle raging between Donald Trump and Barack Obama mean we are about to discover about extraterrestrial life. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle hypocritically use the Andrew scandal to taunt the British Royal Family in a sick new low. We’ll have all the latest from the US with Rob Shuter of Naughty But Nice on Substack. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 431. And breaking right now. Shocking new images. A merge of Andrew, Mountbatten, Windsor, playing with a breast ball and a toddler just hours after the infamous and iconic picture following his 12 hours in custody as a result of his Sandrine him arrest stunned the world. Now, the British royal family is struggling to deal with its biggest crisis in modern history. And as police continue to search Royal Lodge in Windsor, with suggestions Buckingham Palace might be next, the Met Police are also now talking to Andrew's ex-protection officers. I'm a breaking news now. We have an update from Thames Valley Police who have confirmed that searches in Berkshire will continue until Monday. that follows Andrew Mountbatten Windsor's release from custody last night.

So the very latest there coming from Thames Valley Police that the searches which are taking place right now. They started yesterday around 8 o'clock in the morning, we believe, and they will continue through the weekend until Monday. Plenty more on that when we have it. Now I say from the off, as you know, I'm a royalist, I'm a monarchist, but I am sorry. With Donald Trump now weighing in,

it is so naive to think this is even close to a... I think it's a shame. I think it's very sad. I think it's so bad for the royal family. It's a very, very sad. To me, it's a very sad thing. When I see that, it's a very sad thing. And then I did a big thing in the Daily Mail saying that I believed that. And then I found out it was mine. I was so pissed. No home was, I was wondering. So in my Digest next, I speak my mind and I speak from my heart. my heart. King Charles must learn from the late Queen in 1997 and deliver a national TV address

where he announces that he is going to swiftly ask the UK government to legislate to remove Andrew from the line of succession. We'll then get reaction from Connor Tomlinson, the host of Tomlinson talks on YouTube. Also coming up on the show today, a new war between Restore Britain and Reform UK, as Rupert Lowe accuses. G.B. News are being complicit with Nigel Farage. Douglas Murray has weighed in on this too. His view might surprise you, we will discuss. And aliens are real. Well, of course they are. I've always known that. But what does this battle raging between Donald Trump and Barack Obama mean we are about to discover about extraterrestrial life? Then a very important one in the Royal Uncanceled

After Show over on Substack today, Prince Harry and Megan Markle are hypocritically using this Andrew scandal to taunt the British royal family. It is a sick new low for them. The mainstream media are ignoring it. I won't. So I'm going to team up from the US with Rob Schuster of Nauty but nice on substack for all of that. Of course, we will also reveal the worst Britain in the world this week at the end of the show. And you can vote in that in our YouTube post section, as well as our mega poll today about whether you believe that Andrew should be removed from the line of succession. So two major polls running today. The results later. But now let's go. Sadly, this biggest crisis facing the British royal family in modern history

has the potential to get worse, far worse. Which is why today I am demanding from the heart that we must hear directly from King Charles and that Andrew Mountbatten-Wins and must be removed from the line of succession. But before we get there, for those who say a keep calm and carry-on approach is possible, let's just look at the latest. Police are scouring Royal Lodge on the Windsor Royal Estate for a second day. With sex crime accusations mounting and suggestions cops may even end up demanding to search Buckingham Palace as the Metropolitan Police announced they will start interviews with Andrew's former royalty protection officers. And the colour of what went down yesterday remains astonishing.

The former prince we learn was processed like a common criminal suspect after being arrested at Sandrydom. He was fingerprinted. He had his mugshot taken. He was taken aside and read his rights at home before being allowed to get ready while being shadowed by one of the arresting officers. His two private bodyguards, former met police officers remained by his side as the search team rifled through cupboards and drawers at Wood Farm.

Andrew was not handcuffed, but he did have a DNA saliva swab taken along with his prints and a photograph. A photograph, otherwise no one's a mugshot. It was a shot for the man who woke up planning to spend his 66th birthday alone, with two corgis who used to belong to his mum, the late Queen Elizabeth and five Norfolk Terriers. A friend said the plan was to spend a quiet and lonely 66th birthday at Wood Farm as no one was coming around to celebrate with him, not even Fergie or their two children, Beatrice and Eugenie. He was expecting to spend the day with seven dogs. Instead, he had 15 coppers at his door. Now, remarkably, what is now an infamous and iconic photograph, representing what the Daily Mail described as ex-Prince-Prince-Andrew's downfall after his release following 12 hours questioning

by cops, wasn't the most worrying photo release for the disgraced Duke overnight. TMZ published truly creepy new pictures from 2011 of the D. Duke with a young boy toddler as they played with a ball which is actually a breast. The US website reported these picks of Andrew taken back in 2011 show the then Duke of York kneeling across from a young boy and rolling a ball back and forth with him. Just clean, wholesome fun. Until you realise, the ball is painted like a breast, complete with a pale pink nipple protruding from it. The young boy appears to be horsing around with the boob ball while Andrew crawls around on a rug,

across from him, and several of the snaps. A later pick shows them sitting together on a couch. So I repeat, this is going to get worse. And silence from the king is simply not tenable. The parallels to 1997 are in my opinion now impossible to ignore. So I ask again, again, Again, where is our king? We may have seen him yesterday, briefly looking gravely ill at a London Fashion Week event, but he didn't speak to us. And after the catastrophe of his handling of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor's Geoffrey Epstein scandal, that, I am afraid, is the least we deserve. The 104-word statement released by Buckingham Palace and said to be personally authored by Charles, I'm sorry, wasn't good enough.

We need more specifics. The disgrace duke must be removed from the line of succession via an act of parliament. Now, I'm not stupid. I understand this is unprecedented. And I understand that many of you will say, I'm being a hypocrite as a believer in the hereditary monarchy. And I admit, in so many ways, it goes against everything I would usually think is right. But in unprecedented times, unprecedented decisions are sometimes called for.

That is how tradition is updated. And I'm afraid, after the 15-year cover-up of Andrews alleged crimes by the British Deep State, dramatic and drastic action has now been necessitated. Because at the moment, the situation that we have is allowing the Republicans and allowing the radical left to win. And that's what takes me back to that week in 1997. I will never forget it. I'm sure many of you, if you're older than me, will never forget it either.

after the death of Princess Diana, the late Queen Elizabeth II, who completely understandably from a family perspective made looking after the grieving princes William and Harry at Balmoral, her priority, failed to understand the real simmering anger of her subjects. Just a couple of days. But the Queen soon realized what was required. And it was this front page

By my former newspaper The Sun Which was speaking its mind that helped her change course That now iconic headline Where is our queen? Where is her flag? Well within the course of 48 hours She was back at Buckingham Palace And she addressed her subjects

So what I see to you now As your queen and as a grandmother I say from my heart. First, I want to pay tribute to Diana myself. She was an exceptional and gifted human being. In good times and bad, she never lost her capacity to smile and laugh, nor to inspire others with her warmth and kindness.

I admired and respected her for her energy and commitment to others, and especially for her devotion to her two boys. The king needs to learn from his mother, which is why today I'm speaking my mind. I am demanding that we must hear from our king, and he must demand action. Surely you don't want constant scenes like this, Your Majesty, which ongoing silence creates. Good afternoon, Your Majesty. What's your reaction to your rest of your brothers are? Your Majesty, how are you feeling after your brother's arrest?

Your Majesty, how are you feeling after your brother's arrest? Have you spoken to your brother, Your Majesty? Are you concerned about Andrew's arrest, Your Majesty? The only royal we have seen today is the great Princess Anne, but I want to show you what she faced when visiting a crisp factory in Yorkshire. So of course I agree with the King that the law must take its course. But Andrew has been charged with no crime at this stage. The Wales of Justice and the disunited kingdom can take years to turn, if at all.

And you don't have that time, sir. Especially given your visit, your state visit to the USA is coming up, where Trump has, in fairness to him, long been public about Andrew's connection to Epstein. You raised the question of Jeffrey Epstein in your remarks about... in the Q&A. Well, I think he's got a problem. Why don't you think the problem will be? I don't know, but that island was really a cesspool.

There's no question about it. Just ask Prince Andrew. He'll tell you about it. Over a decade ago, this was Trump's take on Air Force One after the arrest news. It was not a good one, Peter. What do you think? I got a question about something big overseas today. The former Prince Andrew, arrested by the police there,

related to something with Jeffrey Epstein. Do you think people in this? people in this country at some point, associates of Jeffrey Epstein will wind up in handcuffs too. Well, you know, I'm the expert in a way because I've been totally exonerated. That's very nice. I can actually speak about it very nicely. I think it's a shame. I think it's very sad. I think it's so bad for the royal family. It's a very, very sad. To me, it's a very sad thing. When I see that, it's a very sad thing to see it and to see what's going on with his brother who's obviously coming to our country very soon. And he's

A fantastic man, the king. So I think it's a very sad thing. It's really interesting because nobody used to speak about Epstein when he was alive, but now they speak. But I'm the one that can talk about it because I've been totally exonerated. I did nothing. In fact, the opposite. He was against me. He was fighting me in the election, which I just found out through the last three million pages of documents. Yeah, please. Again, I repeat, this story has a long way to go. Undercover footage has recently emerged online, which was first exposed last year of John Bryan, a former financial advisor to Sarah Ferguson and crisis consultant to Prince Andrew, then Prince Andrew, claiming that he lied to him

about Epstein and, quote, screwing underage girls. Watch. Prince Andrew, it was in the Navy. It was 250 days in the scene. I was off the same. I was really pissed because he arrived. And then I did a big thing in the Daily Mail saying that I believed in. And then I found out he was mine. I was so expensive. No way he was wondering.

Turtle. In the interest of fairness, Brian did go on Piers Morgan to backtrack on those claims. Watch. I think that part of the reason that I was I was saying these things is I was I had quite a lot to drink and I just was not speaking the truth and I have to admit it and I regret very much what I said and none of it

reflects what I actually believe and what I was saying was stuff that was basically you could Google anywhere in the world and I regret it sincerely and deeply. Was someone pointing a gun at him off camera? But what I'm trying to tell you today is with all of this swirling, a public address from Charles, removing Andrew from the line of succession,

that can only be the start. Prince William's modernization project of the British royal family must begin immediately. The princesses, Beatrice and Eugenie, who I believe are corrupted by Epstein, in this process must have their titles stripped as well. So too must Prince Harry and Megan Markle. Given the question marks that remain over their births, Archie and Lily must be removed

from the line of succession as well. The Sussexes are the New Yorks. William and Catherine, who is a steely and important strength for her husband, the heir to the throne, know they provide the same sort of risk to the monarchy in the future. So deal with it now. The out of the out of outspoken audience are on the whole, royalists and very much pro monarchy. But the two polls I have run this week show that they are overwhelmingly, you are overwhelmingly in support of removing Andrew from the line of succession. Currently, 95% of you want that to happen. He remains eighth in line to the throne. Perhaps more worrying for Charles is the fact that most of you also agree that it would be a good thing for the king to abdicate in favour of William. Now, I don't say any of this to be cruel.

Indeed, I'm trying to help the royal family survive. I understand the king is battling terminal cancer. He looked a physically broken man yesterday while attempting to keep calm and carry on alongside Stella McCartney at London Fashion Week. The human tragedy of his failed reign because of Andrew Harry is palpable, yet I have still not called on Charles to abdicate. However, his actions in the days and weeks ahead will determine whether remaining on the throne is tenable. And all of this is before we even get to the disaster of Andrew potentially being charged with a crime, that he would likely try to defend in the king's own court, potentially by invoking the monarch, who we have to remember, signed off and contributed £1.5 million to the

hush money paid to Virginia Joufrey. Now, what's interesting is how toothless the British newspapers now are compared to 1997. Fleet Street are controlled by the corrupted Royal Rota. But at least in the Daily Mail, their star columnist Sarah Vine did agree with me. me. She wrote, I fear the king now finds himself in an analogous situation, because yes, he has stripped Andrew of his titles, and yes, he has issued a written statement, but it is all rather too formal, and at one removed. Just as his mother came to realize that the moment required something more, so the king, who found himself being heckled during an engagement at London Fashion Week, must see that growing public anger requires him to engage on a personal lever.

Until and unless the king addresses the nation directly on this issue, it will eat away at his legacy, his reputation, and very likely his sanity. There is no time to waste. But by far the most interesting to me was Robert Jobson in the Sun. Now, you know, I always like to give you the background on these things, how the media works. Well, the Sun is the most pro-Charles newspaper. It's editor of Victoria Newton has numerous private meetings. with the king. Jobson is the journalist who has been closest to the king for many decades. When the king wanted to announce his engagement to Camilla, he went to Jobo. But Jobo has now

turned, writing in the sun. Here is the hard truth the palace needs to hear. Protocol is finished as a defense. All that difference is over. The old framework is gone. People need transparency and accountability. There can be no more hiding behind the Official Secrets Act, or blocks on royal questions with a Freedom of Information Act that doesn't apply to them. Such protection needs complacency. When Diana died and the flag would not fly at half-mast over Buckingham Palace, the public fury was immediate and overwhelming, and the palace blinked.

Protocol went out the window because it had to. The monarchy's survival demanded it. The same logic applies now, with greater force and higher stakes. Andrew must be removed from the line of succession. Don't argue why it is difficult. Just do it. The argument that it requires acts of parliament,

that is constitutionally complicated. There is a process. But that argument is the sound of an institution still believing it can choreograph its way through a crisis that has moved beyond choreography. More than that, the king must speak. when the dust settles and when he can do so legally like the queen did after Diana's death, not a palace statement, the people need him to hear him say the words,

not a few lines on a page, a televised address. The British public has earned that much. They have watched this institution manage and deflect and delay for the better part of three decades, and their patience is not merely exhausted. They need to know that procedures will change and that every member of the royal family will be held accountable. that needs to be said out loud.

Trust fractured at this scale does not repair itself through silence. It requires a voice. And the only voice that carries sufficient weight belongs to the man on the throne. Removing Andrew from the line of succession requires acts of parliament here and across the Commonwealth rames. Realms, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, every one of them. It is complicated. It is politically inconvenient. It is without modern precedent. Do it anyway.

The flag came down in 1997 to show Diana the respect she deserved. There is no version of this story that ends well, with Andrews name still on the list. Remove him now. Now what's very interesting to me is that Richard Palmer, a well-connected Royal Rota reporter in the eye newspaper, has today said that Buckingham Palace is opening its eyes to the desperate action that is required. He revealed that royal sources have now suggested that Charles is open to Parliament, bringing in legislation to remove Andrew from the line of succession and his position as a councillor of state ready to stand in for the monarch.

Whereas before Charles, perhaps fearing, opening up the possibility of other royals such as Harry and Megan facing the Acts, argued that legislation would be a waste of Parliament's time. He is now said to be open to it. Of course, there is a split on the right of British politics over what is the best course of action. Some patriots like Kate Hoey disagree with me. She has suggested those who say the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten as a crisis for the royal family are mostly already anti-monarchy. Most families have a bad egg in their history. The king and Prince William are right.

The law should take its course. But I'm sorry, Kate, this is more than a bad egg. 12 million pounds of royal money went into this hush money payoff. Others on the right are going further than me. Chris Davies of true conservative media argued, I'm a royalist and a monarchist. In the best interest of the institution, it is time for King Charles to abdicate immediately.

His position is untenable. When Dr. Charlotte Proudman criticized the police for not moving on Andrew in regards to sex trafficking allegations yet, the businessman, Duncan Bannentine, responded, Don't be daft. They did a great job arresting him on anything. The crime alleged could get him 30 years in prison. He probably won't get that if he pleads guilty and tells the whole story of what happened, which might cause others to be arrested. That is a win for the people. But all of this ignores the perilous position the king may well be put in. If Andrew is charged and pleads guilty. As Calvin McKenzie outlined, the prosecution case against Paul

Burrell collapsed because Diana's butler said he had told the queen he had kept her gifts for safekeeping. The queen couldn't give evidence in her own court. What if Andrew pulls the same trick with Charles? And so this is the quagmire that we are now in. I want the monarchy to survive. I think Britain is in deep trouble. The idea of a constitutional overhaul, changing our tradition, bringing in an elected president who would probably end up being God damn Tony Blair is not something that I can comprehend or contemplate.

And I don't think you should either. But that's why I am demanding that Charles goes further, because I want the monarchy to survive. And there is inspiration here. There is real inspiration here. Let's just think of the abdication crisis of nearly 90 years ago, which reinvented the British royal family, which ushered in the glorious second Elizabethan era. But that only happened because serious change was forced. upon them. That change is now demanded from King Charles III. Now, Conor Thomanson. Connor, what does King Charles need to do in your opinion? I think you might well be right, Dan, because the King hasn't exactly been the best leadership figure. It's obviously not his fault that he suffered from a great illness at the start of his reign, but there were clouds of doubt

over him from the coronation as to whether or not he would be a defender of the faith or defender of the faiths. There is, of course, we've discussed plenty of times before, problems with him seeming to praise Islam far more than the culture and traditions of our own country. And he, when he was Prince of Wales, was part as an actor, swanning it about the World Economic Forum and talking about climate. So he's not been a very unifying monarch. And this is exactly the time I mean, you've got the baying mobs like Zara Saltona and the rest of the Republicans, as you said, who want a presidential system, and we would end up with one of Blair's cronies, if not Blair himself.

And so I think what Charles should probably do is take your advice and take to the airwaves and give a strong denunciation of his brother's activities, regardless of whether or not things are as nefarious as the payment to Virginia Dufreie, has some people suggesting. At the very least, the email correspondence that Andrew kept with Jeffrey Epstein shows that he was abusing his position as a trade envoy by potentially passing secrets

to a sordid international financier and being willing to go into business with him after he already had a conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. This is unbecoming of the station that he was in for a very long time. It has unfortunately contaminated the brand, of the Windsors and the monarchy more broadly because our education system fails to inform people

about how important monarchy is to the history of Britain and our political and constitutional settlement. And so if Charles wants to keep the waning trust of the public and restore some faith in the institution of monarchy, I think he could do worse than take your advice. Connor, a couple of breaking developments. So let's start with these pictures from TMZ because it would be easy to dismiss them in a way if Andrew didn't have this close relationship with the paedophile Epstein, if Andrew wasn't sending pictures of his own daughters to Epstein. And I was thinking about this in my own world, Connor, and thinking of my niece, Ivy Dan, and if there was any way I would ever play with her, use a, you know, with a toy that

is designed as a private part. And of course not. You just, like, you've got to be quite sick and twisted in my view, given the age of that child. But am I wrong? I think it's ill-advised. It's very crass. I think someone, and I'm not defending any of Prince Andrew

or Jeffrey Epstein's actions here, and I'm a herd contributor. But I think you could, someone could try to excuse this as, well, he's a child, he doesn't know what it is, and he's only just been breastfed. I'm not saying that's a good thing, but I'm saying that's what people could excuse it as as a bit of a bawdy joke. The other thing as well is that, and again, I am in no way trying to downplay Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, because again, I'm not a member of the establishment

that helped cover them up. But judging by even the trawl of emails we've been getting and people are still going through them, it doesn't seem that that was the profile of one of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. There are all sorts of outlandish claims about him, you know, shape-shifting into a lizard or doing ritualistic sacrifice. Those are all unsubstantiated. What we do know is he was a sex trafficker who is at the very least interested in girls around the age of 13 years.

I'm not claiming that there's anything sexual here for a single second. It just feels grim and gross and shows you, I think, that the type of depraved world that Andrew was operable. parading in, and it was certainly not becoming for a member of the royal family, which indeed he did admit himself, well, maybe one of the only revelations that was true that he admitted himself in the BBC Newsnight interview. Then I want to come to this statement from the Metropolitan Police, Connor, because this is potentially most interesting. I mean, we've now got nine police forces investigating or at least looking into it, at the stage before investigating,

assessing information in regards to the Epstein files. This from the Met in the past hour, who say separately the Metas identifying and contacting former and serving officers who may have worked closely in a protection capacity with Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. They have been asked to consider carefully whether anything they saw or heard during that period of service may be relevant to our ongoing reviews and to share any information that could assist us. While we are aware of the extensive media reporting and commentary about this matter,

as of today, no new criminal allegations have been made to the Met regarding sexual offences said to have occurred within our jurisdiction. And for people who don't understand how the UK criminal system works, police forces investigate based on their area, which is why we obviously see the Thames Valley Police investigating in regards to claims of sex trafficking within Royal Lodge. But I would argue, Connor, the mayor, are desperately playing catch-up here. I mean, why on earth have they not spoken to Andrew's Royal Protection Officers in the past 15 years? And unfortunately, Connor, what this does is very much play into the idea that,

that there has been two-tier justice operating and that the entire British deep state, including the police, were doing everything possible not to investigate Andrew. Absolutely, Dan, I agree. I mean, given Andrew kept correspondence with Epstein after his conviction, you would think that one of the police officers in his inner circle would have thought, well, hang on a minute, isn't this a bit sorted? Shouldn't I be flagging this, especially considering he, he is a trade-onboy, you know, he's got a senior position, not just in the royal family, but in the broader state.

And so one must wonder, and one must wonder where this is going to come out, if any of the officers tried to blow the whistle covertly at the time and was suppressed. We know this has happened with the Pakistani rape gangs. We know this has happened with the Taverstock Clinic. Time and time again, we know this happened with the Royal Mail scandal. The British state just constantly cries to cover its own ass and suppresses people that do speak up and try to do the right. thing. So we must wonder here if any Royal Protection Officer over the over the lifespan of those that worked for him was raising this with high command and was told, well, don't say anything because it'll look bad on the royal

family, it'll look bad on the state, it'll look bad on the police, or there were further nodes of the Epstein network that were worried about being pressed in conjunction with Prince Andrew because of course we know Peter Mandelson's extensive connections to the sitting Labor government was the reason why lots of them didn't want to talk about his previous relationship with the deceased Jeffrey Epstein. So it will be interesting to see if there was a whistleblower at any point and whether or not that comes out. And then, Connor, we come to this issue of the line of succession. And of course, it's a difficult one, because if you believe in hereditary monarchy,

then you play with the line of succession at your peril. But sometimes there is just such public demand for something that the royal family does have to change. And it's not just my outspoken polling, which is overwhelming. There has been a snap, you gov poll on this. But the sample size Connor was actually massive in terms of polling. I mean, 7,242 people. That is a big sample size, right? And it's not even close. I mean, it's overwhelming. 82%. of the British public saying that Andrew should be removed from the Royal Line of Succession, just 6% saying he should not be removed, 12% saying they don't know. Now, that's the type of poll, Connor, that a prime minister, that a government,

and certainly that a royal family cannot ignore. And over the past few months, we've had this ludicrous situation where the royal family says, well, this is a matter for the government, where the government says, we don't comment on royal issues, again, I don't think that's going to hold. Because even if Andrew is not charged, is it really tenable for him to remain in the line of succession? No, done. And I would agree with the poll and with yourself. It's not like we don't have precedent for either siblings or entire families to be swapped out regarding the British monarchy. I mean, for example, we have just the glorious revolution. I don't know if glorious is quite the right word, as I'm a Catholic,

but it did give rise to the 1689 Bill of Rights and restabilize the monarchy under William of Orange, and they brought him over from the Netherlands. So it's not like this is beyond the bounds, or even the worst instance of doing this. And as far as, you know, the cloud of doubt that hangs over the Andrew formerly known as Prince, I think that whether or not the more sordid accusations of Epstein's broader network are true. The very fact that he was emailing Epstein with business information that he was forwarding onto other people means that he isn't trustworthy.

And he didn't act with the interests of the Crown, the people, the British state, the nation in mind. And so I think King Charles would be well within his rights to just say, look, we're just going to have to cut him loose to not just restore public trust in the monarchy, but to ensure the line of succession can never be compromised. compromised, even eight degrees down the road. Now, Conner, something else is going on here from the left, and I knew it was coming,

and I'm very much prepared for it. There is an attempt to rewrite the Prince Harry and Meghan Markle narrative using Andrew as the way to do so. And there's almost like, I mean, I don't use the term conspiracy theory because I think most conspiracy theories come true. So there's just a straight out lie that has been put. propagated that effectively people were covering up for Andrew and purposefully pushing forward negative stories about Harry and Megan in order to do so. Total rubbish. Of course, I was in a senior position at News of the World in 2011 when we published the picture of Epstein and Andrew in Central

Park. Without that image, this story would never have been in the public domain, stop. The mail group, just a couple of weeks later, procured the picture of Virginia Dufray, Andrews' accuser taken by Jeffrey Epstein in that flat in London alongside Galane Maxwell, the image that people like him and Lady Victoria Harvey, you've been saying for a long time, is not genuine. That was an image procured by a newspaper. So literally, people can go and look at my byline. I've spent 15 years writing about this story. This story would have been covered up by the deep state if it were not for... people like me and lots of other people in the media.

So I don't buy the argument at all. But the other argument that I don't buy Connor is that Harry and Megan are such good people and that because Andrew is so bad, we shouldn't really keep the heat on them because the difference between Harry and Megan and Andrew is that Harry and Megan are actually trying to bring down the British royal family to this day. But anyway, what I want to show you, Connor, is James O'Brien, who is the worst of these people who on LBC this morning was putting forward this new talking point,

and it is a Sussex Squad talking point, and it makes me sick. So let's watch together. I often think of Harry when I'm reflecting upon how vile British newspapers are, and the fact that they have and can successfully turn the British public against someone so obviously deserving of both support and admiration. It's not a very flattering picture of the British public, is it? but the effort put into for various reasons, all of them pretty unpleasant, turning the British public against that little boy,

who went off, of course, to serve Queen and Country in potentially fatal circumstances in Afghanistan. And if you ever doubt the power that British journalism has to destroy the reputations of good people or to malign the reputations of decent men and women, then just have a little look at the Duke of Sussex. Until relatively recently, he would appear in newspaper articles as part of a set of problems that also contained his uncle, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. And even at the time I found myself thinking that this is beyond bonkers.

I mean, someone who, for many members of the UK establishments, greatest offence was simply to fall in love with a woman of colour. How on earth you can put him on the same page as somebody who retained contact with a convicted peterophile long after the paedophile was convicted and misled. pretty much anyone who asked about it for years subsequently. It's extraordinary, isn't it? I mean, there is just so much wrong with that argument because he's completely ignoring the fact that it is British newspapers who exposed Andrew in the first place. So he's completely ignoring that. He's trying to turn this into a race issue regarding Megan Markle when remember she was actually embraced by the British public, Connor, until she accused the British public. Conner, until she accused the British royal family of racism, which Harry has now admitted was a big fat lie.

Yeah, there's a very nice pub in Windsor, Dan, that renamed itself the Prince Harry after the wedding. So, and that hasn't, strangely, hasn't had any bricks to the windows, hasn't been vandalised by a bunch of skinheads. Really odd that. As regards to James O'Brien, I mean, he is truly the midwit's philosopher king. He has this sort of air of arrogance, sitting there with his, you know, I want to talk about ears, but his rather distended ear with the half-half-headphone on speaking in this very sort of lullaby, very slow tone, and using every emotional manipulation and woke shibble of possible to shame you into agreeing with him. But my opinion on the royal family, and this is, I think, why either the king needs to come out and say something decisive, or, well, he's not exactly had the best conduct in the 90s either.

and so I fear for the institution. My opinion on the royal family is at this point, vicious behaviour has compounded like interest. And so whether it's Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, whether it's Harry and Megan and get everyone being sick of having them and they're winging in this behaviour in the headlines, or whether it's the king himself regarding Islam

or Diana or his silence on this particular issue, the monarchy is starting to look immoral and rudderless, and that's because of the people in the institution, not necessarily because of the structure of the institution, but that will give ammunition to those who would like to abolish the institution because they want to live in some like John Lennon's imagine, egalitarian commune or something. And so in order to save the legitimacy of the institution and Britain's traditions and what's left of our constitutional settlement after Tony Blair vandalized it and Keir Stama is back to finish the job, you need to come out and

give some moral clarity on the issue. And so again, Dan, I think you're correct on this. The other piece of breaking news, Connor, is involving Epstein's constant attempts to make money for Andrew. This from the Daily Telegraph in the past hour, which has reported that Epstein plotted to secure one million pounds in cash for Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, as part of a lucrative business deal with an American investment giant. The former Prince's company would have received a $1 million advance from the proposed partnership with Cantafetz Gerald and his aide David Stern, which was brokered with the help of Epstein. Epstein also wanted Mountbat and Windsor to have a 40% cut of future profits, the email suggests. The aim was to use the Royal's connections to introduce clients to the asset manager. The plan was discussed in autumn 2013, nearly three years. After Mr Mountbatten Windsor claimed he had cut off contact with the disgrace billionaire,

in negotiations, the disgraced royal appears to have been referred to as Mr. T. Had the deal gone ahead under the terms Epstein wanted, 40% of the proceeds would have gone to Andrew with the same amount for Cantor Fitzgerald and only 20% to Mr Stern, according to emails published by the DOJ. I mean, Connor, this is what makes people feel sick. the idea that he was using his royal connections to make this money. But unfortunately, Connor, that's why there's such a risk of allowing Harry and Megan to keep using their titles too.

Yeah, I've also seen The Telegraph reporting that he was attempting to go into business with Epstein in China. This is also something that Peter Mandelson was doing with his venture capital firm very recently, which then puts a big cloud of doubt over Kirstama's recent supplication of China you know, trying to install a mega embassy in Royal Mint property which has access to telecommunications lines, could allow them to spy, all these sorts of nefarious things. And then he was also forwarding official reports when he was a trade envoy in October 2010 of visits to Singapore, Vietnam, Hong Kong and China. Again, written by his assistant Amit Patel to Epstein five minutes after he received them from his assistant.

So I don't know why formerly Prince Andrew would want Jeffrey Epstein to know his personal travel schedule forwarded to him as a trade envoy by his assistant. But one could suggest that it was something to do with Jeffrey Epstein's own business ventures that, of course, in China, Andrew was suggesting he might want to partner with himself on. So partnering with a sordid financier who has already been. convicted for soliciting sexual favours from a minor. It doesn't exactly show great prudence and judgment. And he was doing that while, again, as you said, using his royal titles and his position of seniority in the state. So you're right, abuse of peerages, abuse of privileges, abuse of royal titles is a serious concern, and it throws all over institutions into disrepute and doubt. And so that needs to be cleared up. Connor, just a final word on the relatives. So

lots of suggestion that Sarah Ferguson may have to speak to the police, Andrew Launy saying that Beatrice and Eugenie could even be questioned under caution. Now, Tom Sykes of the Royalist Substack is reporting that Beatrice is close to a nervous breakdown over these revelations. Things don't seem so bad for Eugenie, though, as it's just been revealed, she was on a skiing holiday in a Swiss resort when her father was arrested. How do you feel about these two princesses, Connor, sympathy, or were they complicit?

Well, I'll refrain from suggesting any complicity because we don't know what they could have known or if they knew anything. I am loath to attribute the sins of the father to the children, Dan. I think it only ever works the other way round. and so I'm not going to judge her for being on a skiing holiday with her husband and her kids, especially if she didn't know what her dad was doing, and if she found out the extent to his involvement with Epstein,

like everyone else, reading it as the emails have now been published. I mean, one final remark on this. Who could have predicted that the greatest political fallout, the publication of the Epstein files, would have been in Britain instead of America? And it's funny, I've been seeing lots of posts from the Americans in the last few days saying, how come that they can arrest formerly Prince Andrew over in Britain, but we haven't persecuted any of our corrupt or perverted elites?

And one must wonder, is Prince Andrew, a former Prince Andrew, the not unjustified sacrificial lamb for the rest of the elite class who are presently evading accountability by also having plenty of business dealings with Jeffrey Epstein, you know, Les Wexner, Peter Thiel, etc. All very shady. Indeed, Connor. A quick update on our mega poll. Should Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor be removed from the line of succession where he remains eighth in line to the throne? Already we have had 35,000 votes. You're incredible. Thank you for your passion on this issue. And it's not even close. 95% of you saying yes, just 5% of you saying no.

Now, make sure that you stay with us because coming up in the Royal Uncanceled After Show over on Substack, I will be speaking to Rob Shooter of Nauty But Nice, who has major royal revelations. You can sign up to watch at www.outspoken.com. A lot of this is going to be connected to the twisted way that Prince Harry and Megan Markle are using this Andrew arrest to further. try to plot to destroy the British Royal Family. So that's after the main show over on Substack. You can sign up to watch at www.outspoken.

Live. Rupert Lowe's outspoken Christmas message is going viral yet again as the war between his new national political party, Restore Britain, which he says will soon have 80,000 members and Reform UK, Farage's party, which is increasingly looking like the type of of establishment outfit I have warned you about for months. I mean, we're going to get to very shortly the fact that Robert Jenrick is now using George Osborne as some type of goddamn advisor. And this battle is getting a lot deeper and a lot more twisted. But Elon Musk actually has gone viral for posting a key section of our outspoken Christmas message where Rupert addressed

young white men. And Musk said this next. needs to be said as there has been unrelenting hate and poisonous propaganda in the West against anyone white, straight or male over the past decade or more. It went way too far, no more guilt trips enough. And it is just worth me reminding you what Rupert said in our exclusive Christmas message watch. To the young white men who feel ignored and insulted. I want to speak directly to you. For too long, young white men in this country have been treated as if your concerns don't matter. Your struggles don't count.

And your identity is something to apologize for. That your love of your country is somehow racist and wrong. You've been told to stay quiet, to step aside, to accept being blamed for things you never did, and problems that you didn't create. Let me be clear. There is nothing wrong with being white. There is nothing wrong with being man. There is nothing wrong with being straight.

You are not the problem. The system is the problem. The cancer of DEI, along with the Blairite legacy, must be eradicated and erased from our society. Britain needs strong, grounded, responsible men. Men and women who work hard, protect their communities, build their families and stand firm in their values. And despite what some might tell you, there's nothing shameful about wanting to be that person. We should be unapologetic in our promotion of those ideals.

I say to you today, keep going. It will get better. Now, of course, that, according to Leila Cunningham, the Muslim mayoral candidate for reform UK in London, that makes you a neo-Nazi. Remember this? I mean, they're talking about, if you're not white and Christian in this country,

you're not British. Right? They're going back to some kind of like neo-Nazi Aryan race. If you're not white, I mean, I've heard their spokesperson on talk TV and on TV saying, if you are not white and Christian, then you're not deemed to be British. And you know, that flies in the face of wanting integration and assimilation, because no matter how much you integrate or assimilate, according to them, you will never be British. Well, look, I mean, they're not here to defend themselves right now,

but the bottom line is there might be people in their party who say one thing who don't, but that might not be the party line. Oh yeah, and by the way, the reason they're not there to defend them. themselves, as Rupert Lowe posted, or even invite me on, I've been blacklisted by Ghibi News. Thou let guests insult and attack me, yet won't allow me on the channel to defend myself, because Farage is a coward, pathetic. He spoke further about this in a brilliant new interview with The Lotus Eaters and Carl Benjamin. Watch.

The media, as you know, black me out. Of course. GB News, who set themselves up as a sort of an impartial broadcaster, haven't had me on since Nigel Politically assassinated me. But Elon Musk is actually going much further now in his criticism of Reform UK. He has said it is best to go on the offensive against them

as they are English extinctionists who want white eradication. That means they are the racists, they are the Nazis. Yes, that was him responding directly to what Layla Cunningham said. And what was interesting is that last night May Mask

Elon's mom came out as a big supporter of Restore Britain saying my English grandparents on my mother's side immigrated to Canada. I met them a few times in Montreal. Below is a photo of my parents when they visited our English family in the 50s. I still have relatives in England. I sure they now see hope in Great Britain with Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain feel proud to be distantly related to Elon Musk. And Elon himself reposted that saying our ancestral land of Britain must not fall. Of course, this is the reason why there is so much worry amongst Reform UK about this buzz and this momentum that Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain are receiving. And also the fact that we just feel like we can't trust reform. And there's so much evidence of that. And it's interesting.

to me, I mean, I was maybe a bit ahead of the curve on this, but I've got lots of friends now coming to me and say, oh gosh, you were right about reform. And there's lots of different things that are worrying them. But one of the main ones, actually, is the fact that Robert Jenrick has come in and he was obviously doing a very good job, sort of shape-shifting and being a bit of a chameleon when he was in the Conservative Party and trying to be to the right of reform. Yet now he is getting policy approved by George Osborne. Yes, George Osborne. Yes, George Osborne. I'm not even joking. This is the segment where George Osborne reveals live on air on his podcast with Ed Balls.

No, I don't listen either, but this has been clipped everywhere. Live on air receives a text message from a crawling generic saying, did you like my boring speech? Watch. Promise you, Ed, that literally while you were saying that, I just received a message from Robert Jenrick, a WhatsApp message. And I don't think you'll mind. Normally I wouldn't want to publish my WhatsApp messages.

I'm not like Downing Street. But I don't think he'd mind. He said, George, trust you well. Here's a copy of the speech I gave today on the economy. It commits to the Obeon to fiscal responsibility, which I hope you will approve of. And I say, yes, I do. I'm not sure I approve of. Maya Tusi said, Reform UK Shadow Chancellor asked George Osborne to approve speech on the economy.

you can't make this stuff up. Liz Truss, ex-Prime Minister, Waden. Righty, now we know why he doesn't want to abolish the OBR. And there was rare agreement between Carl Benjamin and Aaron Bustani of Navarra Media, who said Robert Jenrick says reform back the triple lock and the OBR. This is what elite capture of a populist right-wing party looks like, prompting Carl Benjamin to simply reply, saying spot on. Connor Tomlinson of Tomlinson talks with me now.

Connor, I mean, it's quite extraordinary. Seeing Reform UK just capitulate constantly. And all of their rhetoric at the moment, I've seen them post today, you know, we want every illegal deported. So clearly they are picking up on this vibe shift as a result of Restore Britain. But then you see the real reform.

UK, right? Because the real Reform UK is Leila Cunningham calling me far right, Leila Cunningham, calling Restore Britain supporters neo-Nazi, and is Robert Jenrick secretly messaging George Osborne for

approval and advice? That's the real Reform UK. We now see examples of this every single day. Yes, Dan. It's almost predictable that if a party were to arise and challenge reform from its right to actually be the party that reforms supporters, me included

who voted for them at the last election, thought they were and wanted them to be, they would either try to occupy that formerly vacant space on the right and compete in a right-wing arms race to really galvanize, stay-at-home sofa voters who voted for Brexit and Boris, who felt betrayed in 2024, who thought that voting reform was a wasted vote and would hopefully show up in 2029, or they would revert to type and become Tony Blair in Teal and start calling everyone racist and sexist and Islamophobic and far right and Nazi, and you name the slur and ism. And it's actually been very disappointing, Dan, I must say, and I've been vocal about this on Twitter, to have mutual friends and people in the reform camp

come out swinging with the party line on this, which I can only assume has been dispensed from the total cowards over at Millbank Tower. Not everyone, there are still good people, working in reform that I, even I still correspond with, despite being banned. But, look, I hate to make this personal, but, you know, I've travelled abroad with Alex Phillips. She was invited to my wedding. I've known Matt Goodwin for years. I've written for his sub-stack. And to have him and Alex come out and say that our friends are anti-Semites or the National Front or dark little in cells, when they know these lads, they know these lads are friends with me, they know that I'm helping them out, It shows that there's...

When Downing Street is on offer, when a safe seat is on offer, when peerages and patronage networks are on offer, it shows that decency and honesty and loyalty goes out the window. And that's why I've never stooped the level of insults. I've just pointed out, look, guys, I know that you know that this isn't true. I know that you know you agree with us behind the scenes. And that's why when I've said that,

lots of people said, yeah, you know what? You're right. Fair comment. Well done for saying that. And fair enough for you to be willing to... not as if you burn a bridge, but to be honest about their bad faith tactics. And that's why now, being frank Dan, Matt Goodwin's turning off his comments underneath his posts. A week ago, that was not feasible.

But again, these people were shot first. A week ago, he was slamming the Labour Party for doing it. Do you remember that? And they're actually now totally embarrassing him by saying, you've now turned your replies off. I mean, this is what happens, I think, when you're not honest. And of course, there's loads of dishonesty, too, isn't there going on? So Farage, firstly, is being exposed for all of his U-turns. Watch this.

We believe lifting the two-child cap is the right thing to do. There seem to have been several misunderstandings as to where reform stands on the two child cap. but what I said was we should remove the two child cap for British working couples. Reform is changing our policy on the two child cap for universal credit. We just can't afford to do so with welfare. So it has to go. We believe lifting the two child cap is the right thing to do.

And then the other big thing that they've been going at over the past few days is, oh, like, no one knows who Rupert Lowe is at all. And what I'm loving is all of the young Restore Britain influences proving that ain't true. Watch this from Montgomery Tom. What would your message be to people who have the opportunity to vote for Restor Britain? I'd say, go for it. I think it's our only hope. He's standing up for this country. Get behind Rupert and support a good honest man.

If we had a rupert low, as every MP, we'd have been in a lot better place. He doesn't want to see it giving away. He'd definitely get my vote, and I think everybody else in Britain should get out there and vote if they want to keep this country great. Open your eyes and see reform for what it is. It's something for us to stand up for ourselves at last. If this doesn't work, I think the country's screwed. We want to put the great not back only in Yarmouth, but really in Britain. I've got a new party to look forward to.

Someone gives me a bit of hope, and we'll take it from now. See how we go. And then we had this piece of MSM propaganda from Tim Stanley of the Daily Tea. I have to say the response in the room to him slapping down Rupert Lowe was pretty positive. As long as if people were sitting on the hands or going, I'm not comfortable about this. Because there are some reform supporters who buy Lowe's criticism that reform has become a dumping ground for failed Tories.

If you just let people like Jenric and Suella Braidman in, you're just another establishment party. and who also feel Nigel is not strong enough on the race issue. Yes. So there are some people who do feel that way and may well join this new party. But I didn't see any of them in the room. No. The race issue, these awful people, those awful right-wing scumbags.

Nick Dixon replied saying, Tim finds it noteworthy that Farage was chaired at a reform event. He then associates restore with what he calls the race issue. I'm not asking Tim to show Rupertlo the same passionate love he extends to communist Ash Sarka, but some fairness would be nice. But the thing is Connor, I actually think what's happening is not only are people waking up to why Reform UK probably isn't going to be the answer and is going to betray us. They're also waking up to, unfortunately, why media organisations like GB News, like Talk TV, like Daily Telegraph are just now client organisations that can't be trusted because the coverage of Restore Britain has been so unfair. Quite. Interesting, Dan. I actually sent Tim Stanley that clip when Nick Dixon posted it.

Because I've spoken to Tim before. He's always been very courteous to me when we've run into each other in Westminster. And I just said, this seems a trifle uncharitable. Do you fancy having anyone from a store on to talk about it? He has yet to have seen and responded to it, though he's usually pretty snappy. So, well, I suppose we'll see how that goes. On Robert Jenrick, quite importantly, I think people are missing a trick here when they're talking about the talk. defactions because Farrell has always said it's about professionalising the party it's about having experience right Robert Gemrick is a lawyer you wouldn't put the goalie in your star striker position why is he playing everyone out of place okay so

there's a couple of reasons we can theorise one it's the most senior job right and Gemrick is now being supported by figures like Michael Gove and has the backing of some other people in the party and And it's being put forward as the heir apparent successor to Nigel Farage, because they know that the base doesn't like Zia Yusuf very much because they don't like Islam. And he won't win a leadership vote if Farage decides to disappear because, you know, he's done five years in Downing Street. He's got his security now.

He can get through the Q&A airports much quicker, and he's had his fun, and he wants to go do speeches and crypto conferences and whatever. But the other reason Jemrick's been put in that position is the same reason that Mzaharwe has been put in a senior position, but it hasn't been announced yet, which is Shadow Foreign Secretary. and I think they didn't announce it because they knew it would just dominate the headlines. Nidimsa Hawley, by the way, who celebrated Antonio Romero's appointment as the Cabinet Secretary and head of the Civil Service. The Queen of Woke herself, he thinks that's an absolutely great idea.

The reason they've been appointed is because of business interests. So, for example, Robert Jenrick has affiliations with Peter Deals' Palantir, who is currently battling to be the operating software of the British government against Larry Ellison's Oracle, and Larry Ellison's Oracle, is a heavy investor in the Tony Blair Institute. He helped staff the Blair Institute, which then helped staff Kier Starmer's administration, and they've been brought in repeatedly as consultants for things like digital IDs. There's a big battle over software.

Who gets to run the operating software of the British government? Very lucrative contracts there. Rick Jemrick also being friends of George Osborne. George Osborne is now on the board of Open AI. We keep hearing, of course, Nigel Farage talk about the need for net zero to be scrapped to fund, data centres, cryptocurrency and AI. So they're already making inroads with the industries of the future. And the reason Nigel Farage keeps flying out to Dubai, well, there's multiple reasons, of course,

is the reason that he got flown out by the UAE government to attend the F1 and is now against the Muslim Brotherhood, because they think it's going to be a much more attractive investment environment. If we ban the Muslim Brotherhood here, that's actually the thing, apparently, according to someone I spoke to, that won Nadim Zahawi over to joining Reform UK is because he has so many business interests in the Middle East. If they ban the Muslim Brotherhood, unlike any other party, it makes it easy for him to do business. But don't forget, Nadimsa Hary was the brokerage on behalf of the UK. the Barclay family for selling the Telegraph to Redbird Capital. Redbird Capital being the UAE based investment firm that bought the Spectator and gave it to G.B. News

Paul Marshall. So they want the Telegraph in their corner, just like they already have talk, G.B. News, arc, etc. This is about expanding the Marshall Media Empire. This is about expanding the amount of mouthpieces that will deliver Nigel Farage, Downing Street. And it's about ensuring that Nigel Farage's successor plays nice with the business ventures of the future. And sorry, I just don't want a government that's interested in lining its own pockets, and I certainly don't want Nigel Farrow to Downing Street now that he thinks it's acceptable to call the police on Rupert Lowe because he wanted to deport gang rapists and those that cover up for him. Things are moving extraordinarily fast today on the Andrew Mountbatten-Winsert story.

So I want to return to our top story because breaking right now, it appears that government sources are briefing the mainstream media, that slippery storm of the UK Prime Minister is now indeed considering removing Andrew Mountbatten Windsor from the line of succession. Fascinating, isn't it, that I looked at that UGov poll earlier and just said, these numbers are unsustainable for any government, for any organisation, even for the royal family to keep Andrew there. What's interesting, though, is that this seems to be more a PR tactic

to buy the government and King Charles some time because government sources are saying that no legislation would be introduced to remove Andrew from the line of succession until after the police investigation was concluded. I mean, if he were to be charged and go to trial, that could take years. But this is the reporting from the Daily Telegraph in the past few minutes.

Sir Kea Stama will consider passing a law To remove Andrew Mountbat and Windsor from the line of succession, it has understood that any change to legislation would take place after the police investigation into the disgraced former prince is concluded. The change requires an act of Parliament and Downing Street will consult with other Commonwealth realms before any change is made. Now, Connor, it's extraordinary to me just how fast this story is moving. It does very much feel like those days after Diana's death in 1997 where there had to be moving

and where actually it was the government and politicians that sometimes had to take the lead. Yeah, Dan, that was a slight bit before my time. Unfortunately, I've never known a pre- Blair world. You poor thing. Yeah, quite. Well, hopefully we'll build a post-Blare one very soon. But I do think that the reason the government are moving so speedless. on this is because they had such egg on their face

after involving themselves of Epstein's broader network with Peter Mandelson that now they're trying to prevent further bad headlines by association with the Royals. Because if the Epstein saga and the scandal becomes protracted, then it means that they're going to continue losing control of the narrative. And if there are any other nodes on the Epstein network that are still

proximate to government or the royal family, then it incriminates them by association. And so I wouldn't be shocked if Stama himself in the Stama bunker, you know, moving his phantom tank divisions around thinking he's going to win Gorton and Denton and is very eager to get back to doing that, living in that delusion, is demanding, Hitlerian table banging that the press are informed that the government is going to get a handle on this and force the royals' hand. Though what it does speak to Dan as well is if the government are telling the royals to do this and the king hasn't taken this decisive action, is that much like the replacement of His Majesty's government with UK government on websites and official documents now,

the royals no longer have the seat of power in the country. The government is basically the de facto entity that truly runs the state. There's no longer a reciprocal relationship between the monarch. He really is just a symbolic figurehead. And that's not how our constitutional settlement is meant to be enacted. We're meant to be enacted. to have a virtuous king who is considerate of his subjects and whose leisure, the government serves, elected as a representative on behalf of the people, to petition the king for redress and he's meant to listen and hear them out. We shouldn't be in the position where the government is telling the king, you know, get rid of your brother, restore legitimacy to the line of succession, and save Kyrstan, with the most unpopular prime minister on record, a political

headache. I think it's just rotten from the top down now. So just repeating that breaking news, the government is considering introducing legislation to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Winzer from the line of succession where he remains eighth in line to the throne, despite a criminal investigation involving misconduct in public office claims. However, I think this is about buying the royal family and the government some time because they say no legislation would be introduced until after. any police investigation has concluded, given there are currently about nine into Epstein and Andrew related things. That could be years away, potentially. Now, what's very interesting to me is seeing the mainstream media bods and the establishment bods so desperately try and paint Restore Britain as being racist in some way. And Douglas Murray, who is always a sage voice on these things, I think has, even though he's not totally where I'm at on this,

has brought some rationality to the debate today. And I want to get to that in one moment, but I want to show you the example of what's happening on the hysterical other side. So you've got Daniel Finkelstein tweeting, I wonder if Restore Britain might assist Nigel Farage. Their insistence that Britain should not be for second generation migrants born here like myself,

or so he is and will strike most people as being in an extreme position that allows Farage to position himself against it. And Mike Graham, who's been very negative about Restore Britain, Wade in saying, correctamondo. And you've also seen this from Matt Goodwin, campaigning in Gorton and Denton, who I think, again, is moving himself away from prior positions,

this from trigonometry. The British people think of themselves as very tolerant, very welcoming. They're not up for, like, let's just round up. everybody who knew anything about the reg gangs, let's just round them up and put them in another country. Now, Douglas Murray, I would not say in any way in the spectator this week, he was supporting Restore Britain. And indeed, what he was doing was attacking the British right for falling into the same trap as the left, effectively all attacking each other. He also doesn't really personally go too hard on Nigel Farage. He does say that his position on Mass.

deportation seems to be changing and he gives them some credit for that. However, I do want to share with you some of the article because I think people who are so immediately moving to attack restore Britain supporters and claim that restore Britain supporters are just trying to introduce race hate or something into this country would be wise to listen to the words of Douglas Murray, who wrote, following the divide over whether illegal migrants should be deported, there is another over whether or not people who are technically British, but have no love for this country who are involved with child rape gangs, for instance, should be deportable. This, in turn, has opened up a schism over who counts as being British.

And this is where a significant fork in the ideological road occurs, because on the one hand, this issue risks descending into a racial purity game, something which it is hardly desirable to open up. On the other hand, it is frustrating to many people, to continue to be told by parties of the political right, that they have the same definition of Britishness, as those concocted in the 2000s by the Blairite left. This is the definition that anybody is British,

so long as they sign up to British values, a set of values which defines Britishness as, for instance, mutual respect and tolerance for those with different faiths and beliefs. The problem with such definitions is that they present Britain as little more than a sort of international airport terminal, where so long as you promise not to blow up the terminal, everyone can get along. And if you do try and blow up the terminal, then you get to stay too.

Yet Britain was until quite recently something rather more specific and unique than that. We had a distinctive culture of our own. It was different from other cultures. You don't need to think that it is better than all other cultures, but it was a culture which we loved because it was ours. Reducing this culture to nothing, pretending it never existed or was not created by a specific group of people, it was in fact created by all cultures, is not a polite fiction. It is in fact a very impolite fiction, not least because it is impolite to the people who did build this country. There is never an easy way to heal personal differences between people who have personally fallen out.

But there is a way to resolve these ideological differences that persist on the right. The first would be to agree that things that have been done to the country which are harmful can be undone. The second would be to agree that culture and background are important but cannot become. absolutely everything. Anyone who is interested can take these observations copyright free. Anyone who wants to continue the infighting can of course equally freely ignore them. Connor Tomlinson, your thoughts on Douglas Murray weighing in on Restore versus Reform. Well, I thought it was an excellent and very level-headed article. Very rare that I praise the spectator, but Douglas is basically the only person worth reading there these days.

And I think people should bear his advice in mind as a neutral observer, especially because when Nigel did expel Rupert, Douglas wrote an article in his defence saying, Nigel should listen to Rupert. And it's not like Nigel and Douglas don't speak. So, Douglas really does, I think, have the, regardless of what one thinks of his foreign policy opinions, because that is still contested on the right. Douglas really does have the nation's interests at heart. and therefore he has the health of the right at heart, and he doesn't want to see anyone become Tories 2.0 or a right-wing version of your party. And so, I think that's very sensible.

And so I didn't read that, actually, as a counter-signal. I didn't read that as him being too unduly harsh on Rupert Lowe. I actually read him writing there, a chastisement of Reform UK to get its house in order to say, sorry, you can't say we're going to do mass deportations, but then draw the line at people who knew about the industrial, scale, rape, torture, abuse, drugging, trafficking, and in some cases murder of English children, and say, well, they've got the paperwork, they're as British as you and me, and we can't

possibly think about getting rid of them. I mean, really? If there are no consequences to betraying British values, or as Nigel said about being English, about how you feel, then what is the point of the values in the first place? If you don't uphold the values and you still get to be considered British and afforded all the rights and privileges of living in this country, then what's the point of the values? It's totally incoherent. So, credit to the value, Douglas on that. I would like to say though, Dan, if I may, and I'm sure this will get clipped. And I want to be clear, I'm not speaking on behalf of the party, just as a member and someone whose friends do run the party. You know, Restore Britain is not answering to

anyone else at Restore Britain's own positions. There has been a protracted effort by people in other parties, the establishment, to pin statements made by unverifiable ex-accounts, and members of the public who haven't broken the law but are perhaps inconsiderate, impolite, are not acting in the same gentlemanly fashion that Rupert Lowe himself does, and I think we should all aspire to. They have tried to pin that to Restore Britain and try to make members of Restore Britain answer for that conduct on social media. Now that is a guilt by association tactic that we expect from the establishment. However, I will just say to some of the more rambunctious supporters, or, of course, some anonymous accounts, potential bots, agent provocateurs, saboteurs, and even, and I suspect this,

because it happened to UKIP and not that we are anything like this party, we've already been denounced by Nick Griffin, for example, but it happened to the National Front of the BMP. There were intelligence agency efforts to sabotage parties that they thought were contrary to the national interest on issues like immigration and membership of the European Union. be careful not to give the enemy ammunition when they want to smear us by association. Be careful not to amplify any of those people posing as our supporters trying to divide the base. I've already spotted a few accounts, so it is happening. And also be careful not to engage in such unbecoming conduct that makes it difficult for the people that you do support,

like Rupert, like Charlie, like Lewis, make it so that they don't have to sit there their entire time and bat away and try and defend themselves against things that they haven't said, but the people have said online. Remember, we've got a country to fix. All the other parties aren't determined on doing it. They've already made that very clear. We want to spend our time talking about the issues. Restore Britain's position on these issues is very clear, by the way.

It is every illegal migrant deported, every foreign criminal deported. Welfare, benefits, social housing for foreign nationals banned. They will not be able to stand in elections. They will not be eligible to vote. the burqa, halal slaughter, cousin marriage, sharia courts, all of these things will be banned if you don't like it, go and live somewhere else. Any position other than that is not our position. We will not be made to answer for those positions. Restore Britain is doing things only based on behaviour and the preservation of our culture and anyone suggesting otherwise is lying. And all of that

is to say, the party will answer for those positions, they will answer for nothing but those positions. and to its supporters who are very eager and are very angry about things that are going on in the country right now, and believe me, I share that anger, should aspire to the same level of gentlemanly conduct, no insults, just the facts are on our side, you can be calm, the same level of gentlemanly conduct that Rupert does himself. And it will be all the easier for it,

and we will be able to just bat away all the smears with a very simple, we don't care. It is hard, though, because everyone who I can see within Reform UK at the moment seem to be operating on this basis, of let's try and talk about Restore Britain as the new BNP, and they know what they're doing, they know what they're doing. But look, there's some levity with this, because a clip has gone viral,

and I think it sums up why anyone who is suggesting that the Restore Britain position is in some way extreme, is so, so intellectually dishonest. Watch this. Okay, I think we can all agree. Everything here is a little bit, two Chinese. All the restaurants and cafes and that for a start, way too many noodles. I don't eat noodles. You know, we're going to need pie and mash, ham egg and chips. I mean,

you need the cater to me, yeah? No? I don't think you understand. I'm not from here. Okay, I left the UK because I didn't like it, all right? So I need you to change everything to make it feel like it's the UK. Yeah? Still know, is it? Right. Okay, well, also, I can't really work at the minute, anxiety. Yeah, so when do I get my money? Obviously, got a few kids at home and also they're going to need to come here. That's a no-brainer. Why do you keep saying no? I've noticed as well, there's a lot of Chinese people here as well, isn't it? So I was thinking we could get loads of me over here and we have our own little area and then you lot can just fuck off. Does that sound good? It doesn't. Well, no, hear me out, because I was thinking if we get loads of me,

me over here then we can vote in you know one of me to be in charge and then we can all start telling you lot out of live and after that i was going to organize some marches where we go through the streets chanting anti-chinese sentiments so obviously you'll need to protect us while we do that that's a no as well is it oh and finally i am here illegally um yeah didn't respect the rules on that one so uh do i just choose any hotel or have you got certain prison. Oh, I did like that, Connor. Yeah, it does show how mad we are. I mean, pretty much every other country in the world would not allow foreigners to stand in its parliament making laws over its people. They wouldn't allow people who aren't even citizens,

not naturalized citizens, just literal guests in the country, like here on a work or a study or a visitor visa, to vote in their elections. They wouldn't put invaders, people who ahead of time telegraph their intent to pray on our wives, sisters, daughters, mothers, friends. They wouldn't put them up in five-star accommodation, give them phones and DJ lessons and trips to the seaside, and not ankle-tag them and expect to monitor their whereabouts when they're near a school or a residential neighborhood. The entire thing that we're living through right now is a historical anachronism, and it is a result of the self-hatred, the, the, the, the, the the delusional egalitarian ideology that has infected the brains of our leadership class.

And this will be looked back on with a great degree of confusion and shame. If and when, frankly, Dan, we win. And given I've given up despair for Lent, because it is a sin, but me and my cynical mood I'm prone to it, I do feel hopeful. And I must say, look, Rupert's announcement, hope is not an emotion that Gen Z feel very often. But Rupert's announcement has given me a bit of hope. And I think that if we are just sensible, and we do frame things in the way that that chap did in that comedic video, just saying, no, this is our country. We're entitled to the primary consideration in our own country.

We're just not giving foreigners who hate us any money. If you are committing crimes or taking our welfare, no matter what legal fiction brought you in and allowed you to stay here, we will get rid of it. And that's just what we're going to do. And it's going to be difficult, but it's going to be necessary. And hopefully we'll be living in peace at the end of it. If we just maintain cool heads and frame things in that way, I think we have a chance. Very well put. Very well put.

Now, breaking today, President Trump set to release files on the existence of aliens and UFOs following Barack Obama's claims on a podcast that they exist. And I mean, they do exist, right? I'm fully a believer of you. This is Obama confirming what many have suspected, including me on the Brian Tyler Cohen podcast just days ago. Are aliens real? They're real, but I haven't seen them, and they're not being kept in, what is it? Area 51.

There's no underground facility, unless there's this enormous conspiracy, and they hit it from the president of the United States. What was the first question you wanted answered when you became president? Where are the aliens? Where are the aliens? But then Obama, Clinton. clarified his comments, posting a statement on Instagram. I was trying to stick with the spirit of the speed realm, but since it's got attention, let me clarify. Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there's life out there, but the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances we've been visited by aliens is low, and I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have really made contact with us, really. But Nick Pope, who worked for the Ministry of Defence for 21 years, in an article he wrote with the Telegraph,

claiming that aliens are real, but having looked at this issue from inside the government, I think extraterrestrial visitation is a distinct possibility. I suspect Obama knows more than he's saying, oh God, yes he does, but Fowdy went too far on the record. In a situation where presidents are used to fastball from broadcasting A-list, as walking back comments made in a YouTube podcast seems bizarre and suspicious. President Trump was then asked about this.

Watch. Ron Obama said that aliens are real. Have you seen any evidence of non-human visitors to Earth? Well, he gave classified information. He's not supposed to be doing that. So aliens are real. Well, I don't know if they're real or not, I can tell you. He gave classified information.

He's not supposed to be doing that. He made a big mistake. He took it out of class of right information. No, I don't have an opinion. and I never talk about it. A lot of people do. A lot of people believe it. Do you believe it, Peter?

Well, the president can declassify anything that he wants to. So if you want to make an announcement. I may get him out of trouble by declassified. We know illegal aliens, really. Yeah, illegal. Only illegals. What else? Then Trump posted on truth social,

based on the tremendous interest show, and I will be directing the Secretary of War and other relevant departments and agencies to begin the process of identifying and releasing government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena, and unidentified flying objects, and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important matters. God bless America. So Connor Thominson, are you a believer like me?

It's not that I'm ruling out the prospect, Dan. If I'm going to be cynical and put on my purely scientific materialist hat on, which is not something I wear very often, I would probably, and this is the first time in my life I'm going to say this, I'll probably agree with former President Obama, that the distance between our galaxies and perhaps technology we haven't discovered yet, albeit, but the technology that we know might be able to exist according to the laws of physics would make it very difficult

for any even advanced life form to come and visit us. But my concern is, Dan, and I've noticed this sort of trend, anytime something significant happens in American politics, the corpse of the Roswell Gray Man is thrown on the table like a dead cat distraction strategy. And look, you know me. I was jubilant when President Trump won the 2024 election. We were going to put all the liberals and the crystals. I was out there at the inauguration, you know, celebrating at various parties. things aren't going great. Admittedly, they're not going great. Mass deportations are not at the numbers that have been touted. That was based on extrapolated data from some modelling, from some population surveys. They're winding down ice operations. Now Tom Homan's gone into Minnesota and basically omitted defeat. They're now doing the Obama era strategy. They're only going to deport criminal illegal aliens.

Basically, you're relying on various states who themselves have an incentive to shelter illegal immigrants to hand them over, once they've already been convicted of another crime. So that means deportation is going to grind to a halt. The tariffs haven't gone very well, they haven't been able to fight against lawfare. And frankly, the way the administration has handed the Epstein files has been perplexing, a needless error, because Trump doesn't come out of the files looking bad. He looks like he was blowing the whistle and trying to do the right thing in elite circles. So whether or not he was hoping to protect the reputation of someone else, or he just got

bad advice from incompetent people in his cabinet. like Pam Bondi and Cash Patel. One can only speculate, but things aren't going well for Republicans approaching the midterms. They are losing favorability. They are probably going to lose the House. And at this rate, they're probably going to lose 2028, and not only God knows what state America will be in, but right now, having spoken to some people in the State Department, you know, we're very reliant on the life draft being floated our way by Marco Rubio and his team to try and stop us from being from being censored. You know, Sarah Rogers firing off tweets anytime Kirstama refuses to ban cousin marriage and making headlines, putting pressure on our government.

If there's a Democrat government in 2028 because the Republicans haven't gotten a handle on things and instead busy declassifying files about aliens so that Tucker Carlson can, you know, do another three-hour podcast on ancient civilizations. I'm sorry, this just comes across profoundly unsirious. We need to get a move on here. See, I want to see them, though. I want to see them. And I think where your theory falls apart a little bit there is that it was Obama who started this. So I think, Trump felt like, oh God, I've got to do this because there's a demand, but he didn't start it. So I don't think you can say that he's really going for the distraction technique.

But look, I want to see them. I want to see these files. I am convinced that Obama new head said too much, was worried about exactly what happened with Trump saying, you've revealed classified information. I really want to see these files. But yeah, let's hope it's not like a botched release like the Epstein files. We need to see all of these at once. But Connor Tomlinson, host of Tomlinson talks on YouTube. Thank you so much for being here today.

But we are going to reveal now the worst Britain in the world this week. This is where we put your union jackasses from Monday to Thursday head to head. A reminder of your nominees from Monday, it was Abdul Halim Khan. He is the Amman now found guilty of sexual offenses. On Tuesday, Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader for his attack on. on Rupert Lowe. Wednesday, City Khan, that was over the rape gang cover-up. And on Thursday, the day he was arrested, his 66th birthday, Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. Lots of feedback from you here.

Thank you for your super chat, Laura Jane, who says the Queen absolutely did the right thing. I absolutely understand she wanted to care and protect for her grandsons, but she did the right thing and spoke to her people. Charles must learn from his mother and do the same. Rob Pierce says Farage is fortunate. Windsor has been nicked. He would win it by a landslide otherwise. Von Ryan's Express says Abdel takes it hand down from Nobody H. Sadiq is far worse than Andrew. Just look at what he's done to London. Victoria Brooks says Sadiq all the way Andrew is getting what's coming while that thing gets to declare ignorance. He makes me sick. Lee Charles says would have said Andrew, but the one I voted for is yet to be convicted in the cover up of the same crimes in London.

Rusty Brown says Queen Elizabeth 2nd truly was the glue that held her family together. And from Sally B1P, not going to lie, Andrew, slinked down in that seat, looks cowardly. He's a slime ball. Sam Tyler on that picture says, not exactly Andy Panney's best photo is it? I've seen corpses with more character. Almost looks like he's died of shocked. Oh well, hope he had a super day. Lots of fun.

And Teddy 66 was it? Okay, let me get to your results. Over 60,000 of you have voted, thank you so much for that. In fourth position with 5% of the vote, Nigel Farage. In third position with 11% of the vote, Abdul Halim Khan, the runner-up with 34% of the vote, Sadiq Khan. But the worst Britain in the world this week, with 50% of your vote, Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. Now we're moving over to Substack now for the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow where Prince Harry and Megan Markle have hypocritically used the Andrew scandal to taunt the British Royal family in a sick new low. So we're going to have all of the latest on that from the US with Rob Shooter of Nauty but nice on Substack. So at this stage, we come off YouTube.

We move over to Substack to continue the conversation. Please do subscribe though. If you were watching here on YouTube, just hit that that subscribe button that's completely free. turn on the notification bells to you're alerted to our new episodes and I will be back with you live 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9am Pacific on Monday.

Remember 2, we are now available as a podcast too. You can subscribe for free on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcast. But I do hope you'll come over to Substack now for the Royal Uncanceled After Show. Huge Royal Revelations to come from Rob Shooter. You can sign up at www. outspoken.com.

I hope to see you there. Have a wonderful weekend. and most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.