Dan Wootton Outspoken - SLIPPERY STARMER'S LAST STAND AS LABOUR TURNS ON COVER UP PM + NIGEL FARAGE WAR WITH ELON MUSK

Episode Date: April 20, 2026

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: The technocratic autocratic scumbag now openly driving the Disunited Kingdom into the gutter is going down in a pathetic whimper, as the world looks on with embarrassment as the man who promised to bring integrity back to Westminster lies, covers up and throws others under Labour’s bus. But Starmer’s last stand proves why he is a dead man walking and the Labour liars who have allowed the deep state to take control of really running the country are trying to gaslight us all by pretending there’s no scandal here and actually we should really all be talking about Richard Tice’s dodgy tax affairs. But is Reform UK really any better, given Nigel Farage has today appeared to advocate for the growing bid by the Westminster class by ludicrously suggesting that Elon Musk’s X is dangerous? The danger for Farage, of course, is that X doesn’t ban his political rivals like Restore Britain. Full analysis from our Superstar Panel coming up: Red pilled former Tory MP Andrew Bridgen, the ex-Labour MP for Rochdale Simon Danczuk, Restore Britain’s Montgomeruy Toms – the founder of Freedom Watch GB, and businesswoman and activist Bernie Spofforth, whose YouTube channel is called If This Is True. PLUS: Tommy Robinson lashes out after a major new row on the right engulfs next month’s Unite the Kingdom rally. That comes as Sharon Osbourne is axed by a homelessness charity after years of support after she announced she would be attending UTK to support Tommy Robinson. AND: Britain’s number one race baiter Dr Shola is questioned by the police under caution as Green party leader and Tit Whisperer Zack Polanski calls for the eradication of right-wing people from the UK. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Meghan Markle is now officially selling her so-called prince and princess children Archie and Lili in an extraordinary new row with the British Royal Family after using the Australian tour to betray the Sandringham agreement with the late Queen. We’ll team up with the Royal News Network for all the latest. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton #DanWoottonOutspoken #news #outspoken #uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Amazon presents Laura versus Fruit Flies. Swarming your fruit and terrorizing your kitchen. These little freaks multiply at a rate that would make a rabbit say, yo. Chill. But Laura shopped on Amazon and saved on cleaning spray, countertop wipes, and fly traps. Hey, fruit flies, your baby boom ends here. Save the Everyday with Amazon. The ride that steals the spotlight every time it hits the road?

That's the Volkswagen Tiguan. Its sleek exterior makes a first impression you can't ignore. Step inside to find available full leather seats and wood accents. Under the hood, the available 201 turbocharged horsepower engine gives it a fun to drive edge. The refined Tigwan, you deserve more style. Visit vw.ca to learn more. SuvW, German engineered for all. No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is outspoken episode number 472. And breaking right now,

the technocratic, autocratic scumbag, now openly driving the disunited kingdom into the gutter, is going down with a pathetic whimper. As the world looks on with embarrassment, as the man who promised to bring integrity back to Westminster lies, covers up and throws others under Labor's bus. But Stammer's last stand in the past hour has just proven why he is already a dead man walking. Mr Speaker, I know many members across the House will find these facts to be incredible. The Prime Minister told me from the dispatch box that the security vetting he had received had revealed Mandelson's relationship with Epstein. How could he say that if he had not seen the security vetting?

But it was Reform UK's Lee Anderson, who spoke for the country today by calling Stama what he is a liar. Thank you, Mr Speaker. The problem the Prime Minister's got is no one believes him. The public don't believe him. The MPs on this side of the House don't believe him. His own gullible backbenchers don't believe him. So does a Prime Minister agree with me? He's been lying. Sorry, we don't use those words, and I'm sure the members withdrawn it. Mr Speaker, I have the greatest respect for you in your office, but I will not withdraw. That man couldn't lie straight in bed.

No, order. Mr Anderson, you'll have to leave. Yet the Labour liars, and I will say it here, the Labour liars who have allowed the deep state to take control of really running the country, are trying to gaslight us all by pretending there's no scandal here, and actually what we should really be talking about is Richard. Dicey Taxes. People are going to work every single day. They're working hard.

They're paying taxes. They're probably rightly unhappy in some respects about the level of tax they're paying. That tax could come down if people elsewhere pay their taxes. And Richard Tice dodged £100,000 of tax payment. He put that as a consequence of an investment company into reform. This is extraordinary water bouchery, Mr Hayes. Honestly, we can discuss. No, this is absolutely.

This is absolutely ridiculous. But I will ask the question about whether Reform UK is really going to be any better, given Nigel Farage in the past few hours has appeared to advocate for the growing bid by the Westminster class to ludicrously ban and censor social media. He's done that by suggesting Elon Musk's ex is dangerous. The online abuse on X that our minority candidates are receiving is unlawful. utterly appalling in every way. And if it was happening to any other candidates

from more established parties in a sense of their age, you would all be in total uproar. And I've not heard a single person comment on it. It really, really is bad. And X is now becoming, X is now becoming a very unpleasant and very dangerous place. We know why Nigel Farage thinks X is a danger because it doesn't ban his political rivals,

like Restore Britain. And Rupert Lowe, which GGB News does these days. Elon Musk's response to that is still to come, then we'll have full analysis from our superstar panel. Red-pilled former Tory MP, Andrew Bridgen, the ex-Labour MP for Rochdale, Simon Dan Shook, Restore Britain's Montgomery Tom's, the founder of Freedom Watch GB, and businesswoman and activist Bernie Spofforth,

whose YouTube channel is if this is true. Also coming up on the show today, Tommy Robinson lashes out after a major new row on the right engulfs next months to unite the kingdom rally. And that comes as Sharon Osborne as axed by a homelessness charity after years of support after she announced, she would be attending UK-TK to support Tommy. And Britain's number one race beta, Dr. Scholar,

questioned by the police under caution. As Green Party leader and tit whisperer at Zach Polanski calls for the eradication of right-wing people from the UK altogether. So we're also covering the madness on the left. Don't worry. Then in the Royal Uncanceled After Show on Substack, she's finally gone and done it. Megan Markle now officially selling her so-called Prince and Princess children, Archie and Lily, in an extraordinary new row with the British Royal Family.

We're going to team up with the Royal News Network. We will do so over at www.outspoken.live after the main show. We'll also reveal a brand new, Greatest Britain and Union Jackass. You can vote for the worst Britain in the world today in the live chat on you. YouTube, the Superstar Panel, are nominating. So for UJ, Montgomery Tombs has nominated Matt Goodwin for coming to Great Yarmouth to support Reform Council candidates and attempting to split the Restore Britain vote, backing parachuted in candidates while fleeing the reform meeting in Great Yarmouth to escape questioning from restore supporters. Simon Dan Shook has gone for Darren Jones,

the Chief Secretary, to the Prime Minister for continually, coming into the airwaves defending the indefensible that is Kirstarmer's performance. And Bernie Spofforth has nominated Rachel Reeves. She says she is an utterly clueless bird who's now about to tax small businesses for shared office space and is incapable of understanding growth or threats to growth. So three brilliant choices. Get voting in the live chat. Andrew Bridgen will reveal today's greatest Britain at the end of the show too. Keep your comments coming in as well. Keep your super chats coming in. But now let's go. Our greatness Prime Minister, a cucked and controlled hypocrite and fool,

spent the weekend cos plain as a war leader, as the world looked on and laughed, laughed at this globalist puppet who the British deep state now control. But he's also a liar, of course. He did cover up the Peter Mandelson vetting scandal. He did know about the Mandelson red flags, as the Daily Telegraph reported Sir Keir's time, was warned about the red flags that led to Lord Mandelson failing his developed vetting security clearance.

Senior Whitehall sources said Sir Kerr had already been alerted to the underlying security concerns and pressed ahead with the appointment regardless. Those concerns centred on Lord Mandelson's links to Russia and China, which led officials from the UK security vetting agency to advise him against giving him the green light. That recommendation was later overruled by Sir Rolly Robbins, the former Foreign Office. chief. The bloke Stama threw under the Labor liar bus. And we know, we all know, we can all admit, the only reason slippery remains in place is because Labor's era parents, Andy Burnham, Red Rain of the Tax Evader, Mad Ed Miliband and Where Streeting aren't ready for a challenge yet. But the noises are

starting with an anonymous Midlands Labor MP telling GB politics overnight that two-tier care needs to go before next month's elections. Labour peer Lord Glassman has also said Stama must go, telling the telegraph, if you can't own your own mistakes, you can't move. All he needed to do was say we made an error, but he's completely stuck in saying he hasn't done anything wrong. So this can't go away. It's as straightforward as that, really.

When asked whether Sir Ker should resign, the peer responded, he cannot conceivably continue as a credible Prime Minister any longer, and that's all because he cannot say, I made a mistake, I'm sorry. So, in the past hour, I have been watching so you don't have to because it was painful. Slippery Stama came to Parliament. And I have to be honest, it was like the whole of the House of Commons had given up. The technocratic, autocratic scumbag, who we know as driving the disunited kingdom into the gutter, went down with a pathetic whimper.

This was the man, of course, who promised to bring integrity. back to Westminster, but his career has been defined by cover-ups and sacking other people to save his own skin. Stama's last stand proves why he is now a political dead man walking. But Mr Speaker, before I go into the details, I want to be very clear with this house, that while this statement will focus on the process surrounding Peter Mantel's and vetting an appointment. At the heart of this, there is also a judgment I made that was wrong. I should not have appointed Peter Mandelson. I take responsibility for that decision, and I apologise again to the victims of the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who were clearly

failed by my decision. Mr. Speaker, last Tuesday evening, the 14th of April, I found out for the first time that on the 29th of January 2025, before Peter Mandelson took up his position as ambassador, the Foreign Office officials granted him developed vetting clearance against the specific recommendation of the United Kingdom security vetting that developed vetting clearance should be denied. I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I know this is painful as Burnside posted. It's like listening to a hard of hearing person reading out the instructions to an air friar. And it is infuriating. What he's actually trying to do is bore us into submission. You know what?

So we just say, oh, just stay so you shut the fuck up. I found this staggering. And therefore, last Tuesday, I immediately instructed officials in Downing Street and the cabinet office to urgently establish the facts on. my authority, I wanted to know who made the decision on what basis, who knew, and Mr. Speaker, I wanted that information for the precise and explicit purpose of updating this House. Because this is information I should have had a long time ago.

And it is information that this House should have had a long time ago. This information that I and the House have the right to know. He knows he is done and his humiliation was soon complete. Mr Speaker, I know many members across the House will find these facts to be incredible. To that, to that, I can only say they are right. It's beggars belief that throughout the whole timeline of events, Officials in the Foreign Office saw fit to withhold this information from the most senior ministers in our system in government. That is not how the vast majority of people in this country expect politics, government or accountability to work.

And I do not think it's how most public servants think it should work either. Tory leader Kemi Badenok, the non-leader of the opposition was uninspiring but tried to play the technocrat at his own game. The Prime Minister says that it was used. usual for this because it was a political appointment. So I will remind him and the rest of the Labour Front Bench who were heckling that Peter Mandelson was a politician who had been sacked twice from government for lying. That meant he should have gone through the full security process. And we also know finally, Mr Speaker, that when Peter Mandelson failed the security vetting, he was allowed to continue in the role with access to top secret intelligence

and security information. This goes beyond propriety and ethics. This is a matter of national security. To what we do not know, we still do not know exactly why Peter Mandelson failed that vetting. We do not know what risks our country was exposed to, and we do not know how it is possible that the Prime Minister said repeatedly

that this was a failure of vetting, went on television and said things that were blatantly incorrect, and not a single advisor or a single official told him that what he was saying wasn't true. At every turn, with every explanation, the government story has become murkier and more contradictory. It is time for the truth. She then announced she had provided slippery starboard with six questions in advance. And I have taken the unprecedented step of providing these questions to the primary. Minister in advance. So he has them in front of him. And I have asked for these questions,

I have asked for these questions to be put online for the public. They and I expect him to answer. Now we knew he wouldn't answer those questions, but it was an interesting technique and I think sometimes it's more important to hear the questions rather than the non-answer. Watch. So first question, does the Prime Minister accept that when he said on the floor of the House that full due process was followed, this was not true? Secondly, on the 11th of September last year, journalists asked his Director of Communications if it was true that Mandelton had failed security vetting. These allegations were on the front page of a national newspaper. And yet, number 10 did not do. deny the story. Why?

Three, will the Prime Minister repeat from the dispatch box his words last week that no one in number 10 was aware before Tuesday that Mandelson had failed his vetting? The Prime Minister says he's furious that he wasn't told the recommendations of the vetting. Yet on the 16th of September, a Foreign Office Minister told Parliament, and I quote, the national security vetting process is rightly independent of ministers, who are not informed of any findings other than the final outcome. This was the government's stated process. So why is the Prime Minister so furious that it was followed?

On the 4th of February 26th, the Prime Minister, fifth question, Mr. Speaker, on the 4th of February 2026, the Prime Minister told me, from the dispatch box, that the security vetting he had received, had revealed Mandelson's relationship with Epstein. How could he say that? if he had not seen the security vetting. And finally, Mr Speaker,

Sistema is a Russian defence company closely linked to the Kremlin and Vladimir Putin's war machine. Was the Prime Minister aware before the appointment that Peter Mandelson had remained a director of that company long after Russia's invasion of Crimea?

Do you think he answered the questions? Do you think he answered the questions? No, look. On the 26th of January, 2022, the right honourable gentleman said to a previous Prime Minister at this dispatch box, if he misled the House, he must resign. Does he stand by those words, or is there one rule for him and another for everyone else? Mr. Speaker, let me respond to those points.

Firstly, when I found out what had happened on, Tuesday evening last, I wanted to have answers to the question, who made the decision to recommend, to give clearance on developed vetting, contrary to the advice, why that was done and who knew about it, so that I could provide the information to the House, Mr Speaker. That is the exercise that's been conducted since Tuesday evening and today, so that I could come here today to give the full account to the House. He just takes the air out of everything, doesn't he? were two damning moments today. First, this from Mother of the House, ex-Labour MP Diane Abbott,

who wanted to know why Slippery Stama never asks any goddamn questions. Peter Pendleton has a history. And what this House wants to know is why, knowing Peter Mountain's history, going back now 30 years, and given what has been known. It's one thing to say, as he insists on saying, nobody told me. Nobody told me anything. Nobody told me. The question is, why didn't the Prime Minister asked? Mr Speaker, in relation to her question, let me be clear, I should not have appointed Peter Mandelson. As soon as the further revelations came to light, I did ask, I asked the cabinet

secretary to review the process so I could be assured about the process. He wrote to me on the 16th of September, setting out the conclusions of that review and assuring me the process have been followed properly. Then we got to the moment of the day and the moment that will go around the world. Because lots of people won't understand the conventions of Westminster politics, which for some reason means that you are unable to call a liar, a liar. In our House of Commons, you are unable to call a spay to spay. I mean, Slip Priest-Tarmes is a liar. We can prove time and time again that this dude is one of the biggest liars in British political history.

But when Reform UK's Chief Whipley Anderson, who knows about parliamentary procedure, did exactly that the Speaker of the House threw him out. Thank you, Mr Speaker. The problem the Prime Minister's got is no one believes in. The public don't believe him. The MPs on this side of the House don't believe him. His own gullible backbenchers don't believe him. So does a Prime Minister agree with me? He's been lying. Sorry, we don't use those words and I'm sure the members withdrawn it. Mr Speaker, I have the greatest respect for you and your office, but I will not withdraw it. I will not withdraw it. that man couldn't lie straight in bed. The order. Mr Anderson, you'll have to leave.

And he was out. So, you cannot call slippery, Stama, a liar. This whole scandal for me shows how the deep stay works hand in hand with the mainstream media, because you know that when it came to Boris Johnson, the MSM would not shut up over a piece of cake. Day after day, after day, after day,

it would lead the news. not so with this story. As Darren Donaldson of the Outspoken Club on X put it, another huge scandal involving the Prime Minister, and the BBC put it as the fourth news story, just behind the sports roundup. Watch this. This live tracker shows very little movement through the strait,

though the cost of crude oil drops sharply on new ships could once again sail. And these new sets reports from inside Iran on the impact of the US and Israel. air strikes. Also tonight, the suspected Irish crime boss, Daniel Kinnahehm, subject of a global manhunt, is arrested in Dubai. And a battle prime minister insists he didn't know Lord Mandelson had failed his security vetting when it was appointed ambassador to Washington. It's just us. It's just us. But none of this is going to work. I was very tickled by Queen

B, who posted earlier, Starma only has two options. Do a Philip Schofield? and come out as gay, number one, number two, do a Gary Lineca and come out as black. Then there was the ludicrous spectacle of Labour MP Tom Hayes, suggesting that reform UK deputy leader Richard Tyson's dodgy taxes are a more important story than the whole scale cover-up of slippery summer pointing Jeffrey Epstein's best mate to be our US ambassador. But if you want to talk about in curiosity, and I think this is really important, I don't know if you saw the breaking news today, really important breaking news. think GBE news is covered, which is that people are going to work every single day, they're

working hard, they're paying taxes, they're probably rightly unhappy in some respects about the level of tax they're paying. That tax could come down if people elsewhere pay their taxes, and Richard Tice dodged £100,000 of tax payment. He put that as a consequence to his investment company into reform. This is extraordinary what aboutery, Mr Hayes, honestly. It's not. If you think it's a water bouch to not cover it. This is absolutely ridiculous. We're talking about the Prime Minister.

No, I'm not talking about Richard Tice right now. I'm talking about the Prime Minister. Part that right now. Part that right now. Part that right now, because I believe that Mr. Tice denies that story and is potentially issuing legal warnings about it. This is extraordinary. I want to talk about the Prime Minister.

First of all, you're wrong. You don't want to talk about Richard Tice not paying his tax. Why don't you want to talk about Richard Tice not paying his tax? Are you for real? Are you seriously trying to make a story about the Prime Minister being on the brink, possibly facing either being sacked or resigning next week? I'm asking TV news to respect its viewers and to cover all stories. Now, those low IQ falls are running our country,

and this is why we're in deep, deep trouble. That car crash actually got even worse. This is an extraordinary attempt to guess like me and the British public. He had the facts on. Tuesday. He knew on Tuesday, Mr Hayes, that Peter Mandelson had failed the vetting. Why on earth didn't he think to mention that to the House of Commons that he is now accused of misleading either knowingly or unknowingly on Wednesday at PMQs? He knew the right before. Let's go in the roundabout again, which is that he had the facts given to him at that point

and he wanted to road test him, assemble all of the facts, and make sure the House of the Commons has all the information that is accurate and that it needs to know on Monday. Is that not what you want. You not want the House of Commons to be told all of the accurate facts, to have everything out in the public domain that could be. It took a couple of days for him to get the Cabinet Secretary to assemble that information. Parliament wasn't sitting on Friday. It is a Monday. He's coming to House of Commons on Monday. So let's get away from these process questions around what he knew, whether he came to the House of Commons. Oh my goodness. This is brilliant. You want me to get away. You're trying to create a critical storm here for party political advantage,

I suspect. You want me to get away from process questions. When the Prime Minister's entire defence to this frargo is, I followed the process. Due process was followed. The process, the process, the process. The truth of the matter, Mr Hayes, and I know it's uncomfortable for you this morning. But everybody watching TV news and listening. This phone shock is incredible. No, everybody listening and watching this thinks that this is a complete and utter disgrace.

Why can't you take responsibility for the fact that if he isn't a knave and if he isn't a fool, then he's a downright hypocrite because we all remember how he treated Boris Johnson during party gates. Say Camilla, he is a liar. He is a liar. That said,

I will also say that GB News and Camilla Tomeney herself are pathetically cucked by suggesting that they couldn't cover Richard Tice's growing tax scandal because he's threatened some type of legal action

that hasn't come. Given his latest statement over the Sunday Times reporting appears to admit that he has, indeed made mistakes in the paying of his taxes. Watch her with Robert Jim. Now, I had the Labour MP for Bournemouth East Tom Hayes on earlier,

who said, stop asking me questions about the Prime Minister. What you should be really covering on GB News is Richard Tice's tax affairs. I found that what about are quite extraordinary. I should say, just in case anyone is wondering why we aren't probing this, is I believe Mr Tice has made a legal complaint about the story in the Sunday Times, and that does rather limit what we can say. But just in terms of the concept of, don't ask me about Kirstama,

instead probe Richard Tice this week. Your reaction? Well, pretty extraordinary distraction tactic. But since you asked, let me just answer. Richard is a hugely successful businessman. He has had a 40-year career, created businesses, created thousands of jobs, paid millions of pounds in tax.

Understandably, you know, newspapers look into people's affairs, particularly when a party is ahead in the polls. But Richard believes that he has paid all the taxes that he is due to pay. And in fact, the last time somebody attacked him for tax affairs, the HMRC investigator found that he'd actually overpaid his tax. Got a rebate. That was a politically motivated attack when he was leading the Brexit campaign. So look, Richard has done the right thing,

and this strikes me as just another political attack on reform. And if Richard Tice wants to come on a future show, I'm sure the audience understands and appreciates that me and Richard like to have very robust interviews and I shall not hold back in asking him about his tax and other affairs. But as the Sunday Times reporter Gabrielle Pogrand post in response, whoever said this to Camilla Tomini is either mistaken or deliberately misleading a respected journalist to deter further scrutiny. We have seen no legal complaint from ties and stand by our reporting. I think Gabrielle has missing the point that GB News just doesn't go there

if there is a scandal involving Reform UK. It effectively operates as a propagandist for that party. That said, there is only one scandal today that matters. Our Prime Minister is a liar. He is a cheat. He is a hypocrite. He is a globalist puppet. He is an empty vessel.

He is a danger. And regardless of what horror might come next, he must go for our country to have any sort of ongoing respect. both for ourselves and from others. I am disgusted that Labor is allowing this fast to continue for even another day. Now, the superstar panel. Big breaking news date, great to have with us, the red-pilled former Tory MP Andrew Bridgen,

ex-Labour MP for Rochdale, now a member of Reform UK, Simon Danchuk, Restore Britain's Montgomery Tom's, the founder of Freedom Watch G.G. and businesswoman and activist Bernie Spofforth, whose YouTube channel is called If This Is True. Simon, great to have you on Outspoken for the first time. Are you disgusted by your former party watching that farce today?

Well, there's no date about it that storm has finished. And if the Labour MPs there had any sense, if they were smart about it, they would give him his marching orders in advance of the local elections. actually could actually give them a little bit of a lift in the local and Scottish and Welsh elections if they were to announce that Storm was going to go and would be replaced with a new leader by autumn annual conference. That would be the smart action to take, but I can't see him doing it. They're just waiting for, as you said earlier, they're waiting for the right

potential leader to come forward, whether that's Andy Byrne and finding a seat, West Street, or even, dare I say, said Milibandor, Angela Ray. Yeah, indeed. Indeed. We're just having a little, you're a little bit quiet, Simon, so we're just going to try and fix that. In the meantime, Andrew Bridgen, what does what happened in Parliament today say about our system? I mean, we've got Liz Tras, the former Prime Minister, saying, actually, this is just proving what she has been saying for years. The Deep State are in total control. Is that where you're at? Oh, yes. And it's clearly a cover-up again. by the government. And the problem is it will raise more questions or go through another round of uncovering more untruths. There's

no doubt that Stama's misleading Parliament yet again. On another couple of points, I mean, he's thrown Olly Robbins, the civil servant, senior civil servant at the front office under the bus, and thinking that's going to get him

out of jail for now. I don't have an awful lot of time for Ollie Robbins. You might remember he was the advisor to Prime Minister Theresa May in the so-called Brexit negotiations that resulted in her non-Brexit vassalage deal that I think myself and 27 other Conservative MPs, the Spartans, voted down three times. And regarding Lee Anderson's, a bit of showboating, really, every member knows that if you call someone a liar in the chamber, you will be named, asked by the Speaker to leave, and you'll lose a day's pay. But he obviously thought it was worth it. Had he thought

thought about it a little more. If he had that sort of skill, he could have made his point without and kept his question in order by saying, clearly, Mr. Speaker, it's against the rules of this House to ever call anyone in this chamber a liar. But it must be clear to the House and the country that the Prime Minister is in fact a stranger to the truth. Oh, yes. But Montgomery, Tom's, don't you think we are sick and fed up of those types of games? Yeah, I mean, the lines keep changing. Every time there's a scandal, you think it's can't get that much worse and then we then discover it can get worse i mean westminster as a whole is just a mess it we know that starma is not in control here he is not the man that is pulling all the strings

he's a puppet and just watching you know what we just all watched myself and the viewers it's it's looking and he's a psychopath i mean he's he's an evil patronizing psychopath who has complete contempt for the british public we don't we need an inquiry fine But we need more than an inquiry. I'm kind of sick and tired of inquiry after inquiry after inquiry if there's never going to be actual justice. Like, this man, Stama, should be in prison. It's not complicated, not just specifically to this,

but for many other things that have happened, including him, even before he was involved in politics. But as a young person, just looking at the political landscape, it's terrifying. It just reminds me why we all do what we do, because it's a mess. and this is my country. And just putting aside anger and putting aside just the details of it, it's just greatly upsetting that this is what Britain has come to and this is the man leading us.

I mean, it's shocking. It is. It really is. And Bernie, obviously, you look a lot at what the deep state do, who is really in control of our country. And slippery Stalmers' argument is sort of fascinating here. Like, I'm the prime minister, yet don't worry, I wasn't responsible for the up because actually it's the deep state that are calling the shots. Oh, and by the way, it was your party, Slippery Stama, under Tony Blair, that completely empowered the deep state to have this level of control. I think it's hilarious. It actually is like watching an episode of, yes, Prime Minister. And I was actually quite impressed with John McDonald. I know, don't all get upset with me. But, no, it's weird, because Abbott as well was okay today.

He said exactly the right thing. He said, in order to make it to the top, Starma became dependent on McSweeney and Mandelson. What did he promise them? Well, one of them got a top job in number 10 and the other got the top job, the top diplomatic job in our entire country. And he still did not answer the question, did he? Why did you appoint Mandelson? You knew he's a liar. He's lied twice. He's been fired twice. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that even Experian would not pass this man for a job, right? Probably even in Sainsbury's.

He can't be trusted, and you did. And it reminds me of the song, Don't pay the ferryman. Don't pay the ferryman until you know the price. And that's the price. Andrew, what do you see happening next? Because surely even the British Deep State now realize they can't keep on with this failure. So are they going to now start backing another candidate within Labor?

Yes, they will. And they need to get another candidate in position. And we'll know when the Deep State have decided to jettison. because the allegations and the stories around the Ukrainian Remboys will reappear and that will sink him. And those trials are beginning next week. Do you think there's any chance of the truth actually coming out? Well, it depends if there's a denotis on the mainstream media. It's been very, very sparsely covered except on social media so far. If that continues, then no. I just have no confidence, Andrew, that we are going to get the truth out of this court case.

I really don't. No, well, they haven't made the link between the Ukrainian distant who was assassinated at in Madrid a couple of weeks after. The Ukrainian rent boys were arrested, but there is a clear link there, but that wasn't made in our mainstream media, I can assure you. And our mainstream media are an absolute embarrassment and they're a big part of the problem. I'm never sure whether when everything comes to light, if it ever all comes to light, who are most guilty, whether it's the politicians,

the weak politicians and the puppets who've played along or the mainstream media who've so gamely let them. I know. I mean, I would argue they're all culpable. They're all culpable.

And they're all destroying the country. as a result. But it is extraordinary that we sit here today, Andrew, and we look at your former leader when you were in the Tories, Boris Johnson. And okay, he had a lot of fault, right? And the Boris wave is unforgivable and it will stop him ever entering frontline politics again. And I think that's right. But if I was actually, I was actually the first MP to call for him to go in January 23. Yes, I remember. both. 22, sorry.

And that was over party gate when it was clear that, you know, they haven't been carrying out the same arduous rules that they placed on the rest of the country. In Northwest, Leshue, my suicide rate had gone up to higher in a month than we normally had in a year during lockdown. And my seat was the happiest place to live in the Midlands. And all that damage was done. I got to a civil servant who was in number 10 at the time. and he said to his boss in an email,

don't you think we ought to really mask and socially distance because what we're doing to the country? And the answer came back. We've checked it out with scientists and none of it works. But when you leave the building, because the cameras are outside, could you please make sure you socially distance and put your mask on?

I mean, that is just appalling. That's unforgivable. It is completely unforgivable. And, you know, I was with you throughout that period. as were Bernie and Montgomery. But I guess the point that I'm making, Andrew, is that every cough and spit of Boris's private life was used by his political opponents and the deep state

to help finish him off. Yet we have a prime minister now where there are so many aspects of his private life, which have actually been actively covered up from the shape of his real family to what went on with the fire bombing. and I've done as much as I can to reveal the truth, but it is extraordinary, Andrew,

that the mainstream media keep on protecting this man. And that's my point. It is. It is. But the Labour Party have always been more tribal than the Conservatives. And they're all in the Unip Party anyway, but that's just the nature of the base. But we knew what we were getting with Stama

before we started. The videos were flying around about how one minute he'd said that Jeremy Corbyn was his story. friend. Then he said that he'd never been his friend. He's gone back on his words so many times. He is a consummate liar, isn't it? He can say it with a straight face. And that is the skill that he was selected to be our prime minister because I'm afraid no matter what rosette, color rosette they've got on, that goes for Nigel Farage as well. Prime ministers in this country are selected, not elected. And the terrifying thought about our lack of democracy is that, as Andrew Bridgen says,

the next Prime Minister is ordained now as Nigel Farage, and everyone is getting behind Reform UK as a result. But what I find shocking is that the more and more the establishment support Farage, the more and more Farage moves away from the guy who we need running the country first. the guy who did used to be a challenger. And probably the most shocking example so far of that has happened today. With Farage at a press conference, actively going to war with Elon Musk's X, suggesting it's becoming a dangerous place,

saying that because people point that out on X, he is now in some way advocating for what seems like a ban. on social media. Now, Basil the Great posted on this, describing it as absolutely pathetic, accusing Nigel of crying to the lefty media, asking them for help. And Elon Musk has responded. I will show you his damning verdict in just one moment. But first, I actually want to hear for yourself how Farage is now speaking like some type of left-wing politician, some type of Labour politician, some type of Liberal Democratic politician. And as far as I am concerned, the reason behind this is because Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain, which is now a serious threat to Nigel Farage's aim of becoming

Prime Minister, is being given space to speak freely and be celebrated and be followed on X, something that, as you well know, does not happen on Farage's other propaganda networks like GB News and Talk TV. But for me, this was a new low. For Farage, I'm sad to say it. He was a friend, he was a colleague. But if anyone watches this and still thinks we're talking about. about the old Farage, the challenger Farage, I think you've got to get your head red. Watch. To those of you who might be tempted to think that we as a party have headed in a nativist or even racial direction, the sheer number, the sheer number of ethnic minority candidates that we're standing in this campaign, especially in London, is remarkable, quite remarkable.

We haven't made a song and dance about it. We don't. We just don't. We don't really care if people that men or women or black or white or whatever they are or what their chosen preferences are. We really want to judge people for who they are and what they can do, such as our belief in meritocracy. But I would add that the online abuse on X, the online abuse on X that our minority candidates are receiving

is utterly appalling in every way. And if it was happening to any other candidates from more established parties in a sense of their age, you would all be in total uproar. And I've not heard a single person comment on it. It really, really is bad. And X is now becoming a very unpleasant and very dangerous place. Well, I think what's dangerous is Nigel Farage clearly joining Cypri Starma, who wants to ban social media, wants to...

introduce age limits doesn't believe that X should operate at all. Elon Musk himself has weighed in replying to Basil the Great's post on X. With these damning words, Farage is the definition of controlled opposition. Former GB News host Nick Dixon added the British people have been abused beyond all measure, but Farage as a new member of the Unip party, sides against Native Brits and also says X is dangerous, which is the kind of crap you hear from Ed Davy. Sad to see reform turn so quickly against the British people. To my superstar panel now, Andrew Bridgen, Bernie Spofforth and Montgomery Tom's. So Montgomery, as a Restore Britain supporter, is your suspicion that Nigel Farage's new position on X is related to the surge, that your party and Rupert Lowe is expected?

scene and the fact that Farage doesn't have control over the X platform in the same way that he does, for example, GV News or the Daily Telegraph or the Daily Mail, etc, etc. Yeah, I mean, it wouldn't shock me in the slightest. I mean, reform are completely rattled. They're terrified of restored. The momentum that we've got, especially online, is incredible. And these are left-wing tactics. I mean, it's racializing the argument and trying to make it about skin color when actually

it's just talking about lineage, ethnicity, all the things that restore bring up, which, you know, Layla Cunningham famously called us neo-Nazis for discussing. But the fact is, what really is the fundamental question is why is reform having foreigners run as candidates? I mean, they have Bengali nationals, for example. I think it's what, running in Portsmouth. I mean, this is just insane. This is the question that we raise. And then we see more and more and more. And then, well, Farage's, this is his response. Then, of course, the broader thing here is just general free speech. I'm a free speech absolutist. If you don't like what's being said on X, guess what? Well, it's about to say it's a free country, but you know what I'm trying to get at. In fact, you can get off X. You don't

need to go on that social media. If you want censorship, then head over to TikTok because, you know, Farage, you'll be fine over there because you can censor whatever you need. But X is a space that actually allows us to say what we think, and they are terrified because it is the biggest opposition to reform for exposing their pro-establishment bullshit, to put it, put it frankly. And every week that goes by, Fraschis gets worse and worse and worse and worse and worse,

and reform get worse and worse and worse. And they're not doing themselves any favours. In fact, it's benefiting restore more than anything, because the momentum, as I say, is extraordinary. And, well, look, I was in Great Yarmouth. over the weekend because I was canvassing and I can tell you no one wants reform like we're door knocking we're speaking to people and the response is no I'm not interested we want rupert low we love rupert low he actually speaks truth we're starting to see what's happening on now you know look

can't wait to see the results uh made the seventh elections in great yarmouth because when we win you know the the council when the councilors win we've got proof of concept and you know assuming elections are in 2020. We've got, you know, three years to take our Twitter game to a ground game, which is what we're doing right now. And I think, you know, reform are absolutely shitting themselves. Sorry to swear, but it's one of those days. Well, it is interesting. And I do want to talk about what is going on in Great Yarmouth, because of course, that is very much the ground game and the test for what Restore Britain wants to do nationally at the general election. But before we get there, Andrew Bridgen. What has happened to Farage? What is your suspicion? How does a man who we always assume to

at least some degree wanted to challenge the establishment, wanted to challenge the status quo, effectively become the establishment, start advocating for the end of free speech? Has Farage been snookered by someone? Is this just about a quest for power? You know, you know him. I mean, you know him very well. What's going on here? I've known Nigel for about 14 years, 12, 14 years. But my dude's asked, Dan, you know when you said Farage hits a new low? Was that a pun or did you intend anything else by it? Nigel loved playing the insurgent for many, many decades, didn't he?

Until he's now become part of the establishment. He's now being hailed as the next Prime Minister by the same mainstream media that won't talk about so many other issues. and certainly will never regard, give Rupert Lowe any positive publicity whatsoever. He's basically come in as the insurgents some decades ago and he wants to pull the ladder up behind him because that's where he is. It's clear that Nigel was captured a very, very long time ago. I think there's an awful lot of compromise, I'm afraid, on Nigel,

which I can't obviously tell you on this programme, but he is completely controlled. And if there was any proof of that was needed, I mean, when he appointed Nadim Zahawi to reform, I mean, Nigel is many things, but he's not politically stupid. And he'd know that Zahari is absolutely toxic as toxic as the COVID jabs. And so that tells you that that wasn't Nigel's decision.

So Nigel is not even running the reform. He's a puppet like the rest. Someone above him has told him you've got to take Zahawi and you've got to suck it up and he did. And what you're saying is you think that someone has compromising material on Farage and he's effectively been threatened. Absolutely. Absolutely.

I think there's a lot of information could come out around what actually happened when Nigel stood the Brexit party down in December 19. and deals that were done, shall we say, Dan, deals that were done. And I think people can hold that over, over people. There's also, you know, what happened to Marine Le Pen in the European Parliament about the use of EU funds, which everybody did for campaigning on the ground in your own country. I mean, I've heard there's an investigation into Nigel, which was frozen a few years ago. I mean, that could be reopened again if he steps out of line.

steps the European Union with our ever closer union again now, which you're not seeing Nigel speak out again. So the basic principles he set his political career on was us leaving the European Union. We've got Starma now taking us back closer again. And what is Nigel Farage saying about him? Indeed. Indeed. Because when I told him about Starmer's plans in 2023,

I told him about Starmer's plans to take us into a European Defence and Securities Union, which would give the EU, ultimately will give the EU full control of our Army-Navy Air Force, MI5, MI6, GCHQ, and our nuclear deterrent, and our local police force. He said to me, Andrew, Brexit's done. We don't talk about that anymore. Yeah, indeed. That sounds to me. He wanted to move on. He wanted to move on. Bernie.

No, his master's wanted him to move on. Yeah, which is very worrying. Bernie, how do you explain Nigel Farage? seeming to move towards censorship. I mean, we can't forget that just, I think, at the beginning of last year, Farage was actually at Mar-a-Lago with Nick Candy, meeting with Elon Musk, prepared to take Musk's money. What has changed? I can't dismiss out of hand everything that Andrew has just said. I don't know Farage personally. From an outsider's point of view, and understanding the frameworks in place,

the international laws in place, and the huge trillions worth of money and 50 years worth of planning that has gone into the position we're now in and the world, I can see that Andrew probably has a point on some of this stuff. But we also have to understand that Nigel has been told that you win from the centre ground. I just think he's missed where the centre ground is

because he's let down a huge proportion of people that saw him as the last hope and those people should be free to speak, right? And what Nigel wants to do is shut them up. Like he tried to shut up Andrew. Don't talk about Brexit, it's done and dusted. It obviously isn't done and dusted and we find ourselves being dragged back in

because that is the framework and that is where the money is. And I think that perhaps This is Nigel's last ditch attempt to be establishment and to be elected. Perhaps he will be. To me, he's just going to bring about, you know, pretty much what Sunak was talking about, which isn't what people want. And Andrew's right, Montgomery is right.

You know, reform stood on this big platform of Britain first. And now he has a whole load of foreign people standing for election. and he will lose swathes of the British population for having that policy. But he says that's racist, even saying that, Bernie, he's saying is racist now. But you see, I don't care about his policy. What I care about is that the British people can choose who they want in government. And if you silence X, then you silence all of those people that don't follow the mainstream narrative. So, of course, that's what he's going to try and do.

because Nigel wants to be mainstream. It's outrageous. That is what democracy has come to. If you criticise a party, if you criticize reform or the Tories or Labour, they all have a big fit, close down X. That's how it is. Maybe Rupert will do that when people start to complain about his policies.

Who knows? Well, no, I do know what it's like because when I was working with Farage at GB News And we thought, well, I thought GV News was meant to be the insurgent, anti-establishment outsider. And they made a decision where they started saying, no, damn, we want to be mainstream. So I have seen how that happens. But look, I do want to speak to you Montgomery about what's going on in Great Yarmouth. It's very, very interesting because Reform UK definitely rattled.

Basil the Great revealed a transcript from a call that reform made to a former activist revealing Matt Goodwin is traveling to Great Yarmouth. to push reform. That was at the weekend because, of course, Restore had its big event planned. And then this morning, Ian Dale of LBC posted this exclusive, or what he claimed was an exclusive, I understand from sources close to Reform UK that senior party bigwigs are planning to parachute and Matthew Goodwin to fight Rupert Lowe in Great Yarmouth at the next election. That would be quite the spectacle to watch. Knowing Great Yarmouth well, I have to say I'm not wholly convinced Goodwin would go down well. will there bring out the popcorn. Now, within a couple of hours, Goodwin had posted, I am fully committed to reform and have no doubt reform will win Great Yarmouth at the next election, along with

a parliamentary majority. But I will not be the candidate. I suggest Ian Dale gets himself some better sources. So Montgomery, what is going on? Our Reform UK rattled, I'm told internal polling for Restore Britain shows Great Yarmouth first smashing both Reform U.S. UK and the Greens. But why is Goodwin all of a sudden at the heart of this? Yeah, I mean, it is true that the Goodwin came down. Obviously, he denies the fact that he's going to be running. I couldn't possibly really speak on that specifically or whether he's going to be doing that, but from what we can tell, clearly not. But he did come down to Great Yarmouth and a few people, including myself, went to see if we could, you know, doorstep them

to put it bluntly and ask him some basic questions. Why are you here? Why did you feel the need to come specifically to Great Yarmouth. I appreciate there's lots of people canvassing up and down the country, especially for reform. But he chose to come to Great Yarmouth. I was going to ask him a simple question if it was possible to do so, which was why are you splitting the vote? Because people don't want you here. And it's very clear that, as I say, the internals of restore and actually being there canvassing and speaking to people, I spent a huge amount of time speaking to locals. people are not interested in reform in the slightest. We're doing incredibly well there.

And as I mentioned previously when I last spoke, it's proof of concept. And they know this. Reform know this. And moreover, just talking about the candidates themselves that Restore have, they're incredible. They're locals. They know the area.

They're businessmen. They're small businesses and ex-police officers that have worked there, understand the streets, understand exactly what Great Yarmouth needs. And yet reformers, parachuted in quite a few candidates that don't know anything about Great Yarmouth and Goodwin is there to you know fight for them and protect them and what's hilarious actually is in his tweet is how he really is so confident still that the reform can be backed all the way and that they're going to succeed it's a joke

it's laughable and he's going to have a proper reality check come May the seventh when we get the results but I would love to have some insight into some reforming group chats and have a look at what is they really think about restore because we're as anti-establishment as they come and you know I hear what Bridgett's saying as well what Andrew's saying which is regarding you know how Farage is compromised again I can't speak on details but I think it's pretty well established that that is the case and Ruper isn't and that's the beauty of Rupert Lowe is they haven't got anything of him which makes Rupert very dangerous to the establishment It makes restore very dangerous to the establishment.

They know that, and that is why I truly believe, as a Christian as well, that truth will prevail. And that is what we've got to hope for. There's growing fears that a split on the right of British politics could undermine Tommy Robinson's Unite the Kingdom Rally next month. Now, this all kicked off over the weekend. Tommy has been very upfront about it, posting on X, why would so-called Patriots, try and throw spanners in the works of the biggest cultural revolution to hit this planet. Every single time that the people start coming together, dark works come into play to try and divide. Good always defeats evil. He then made this video.

So I'd ask questions of anyone who tries to tear down a movement from within. And it's the same we unite the kingdom. As we head towards these next four weeks, I see so many people making videos saying, don't go, don't go. These same people go to every protest. Yet they're telling you not to go to the biggest protests there's ever been. They're telling you they're trying to break the biggest movement and biggest momentum there's ever been for a cultural movement on the streets of the UK. So I would question anyone who's throwing accusations.

And I see the accusations, it's like, he's asking for money. Yeah, we are unapologetically, because we're putting on the biggest fucking event the world's ever seen. So we need money. What do you expect me to fucking pay for it? How can I pay for it? Yeah? I'm actually, and the mad thing is,

all these people haven't got at me, and I'll see some of the accusations, yeah? He works for Israel. I haven't got a monetised YouTube. The owners are YouTube as I this. So essentially, all the people having to go on me do have a monetised YouTube. I'm still banned on Netup, on Facebook and on Instagram. I face 10-year prison sentences in October.

These wankers, which is what they are, face nothing. Have nothing. Now, a lot of this was prompted by a video that had been posted by Danny Tomo. I'll play that for you in just one moment. but Tommy was very, very strong about his reasoning as to why Unite the Kingdom has to take a particular approach. Writing, mate, the reason innocent men were locked up in prison after attending the London protest after Axel Rudigbana's murder spree was because the police could stitch them up as a riot because no one liaise with the police for the event. I don't want our supporters to end up in prison getting terrorised by Muslims.

I know what I'm doing when it comes to organising an event. And to me, I felt that was a very fair comment. He added, bro, if you want to revolt, then organize one. There will be children and women attending May the 16th. We are not there to fight the police. There will be conditions put on this event, as always by the police. If anyone breaks those conditions, it will kick off with police as they enforce the conditions. Unfortunately, after just stop oil protests, they took more of our rights away. If you or Danny want to organize your own event, then please do, because unfortunately it's me they're going to lock up again. I already faced 10 years in prison on October.

over the 26. People are very quick to shout on social media, but why don't they lead their own revolt? And this was as a result of this video posted by Danny Tommy. Now, you'll remember Danny has been doing some great work last week in Epsom after the alleged gang rape of a local woman outside a Methodist church. But this is what he had to say about UTK that prompted some of this outrage. I also need to make one thing extremely clear because I think some are still in in very much in doubt about what is going to be happening on the 16th of May. I do not speak for everyone, but I speak for myself and many that follow me. We are not coming to London to weigh flags. We are not coming to London to walk down roads. We are coming to London for three days to defend our

country, our children, our families, our heritage and the future of this country. We don't care about the moaners. We don't care about the left. We don't care about the infighting. Who thinks they're right and who thinks they're wrong? We know what needs to be done. And they have pushed us to this. So make no mistake.

The 16th of May, things change. That's the fact of it. Accept it. Be involved in it. The quicker you do, the quicker this ends. But despite that video, Tommy Robinson was insistent there is no slip between him and Danny Tomo, adding Danny's not going to, he's fully on board with the objectives to the superstar panel, Bernie Spofforth, Montgomery, Tom's and Andrew Bridget.

Andrew, do you think there's any type of bid from the right or potentially from government agents? I'm hearing a lot of people saying, look, the government agents actually want there to be violence at UTK so that they can use it as an attempt to shut down Tommy Robinson. What do you think is really going on here? Should we be suspicious of this? Neil should always be suspicious of Ajaun provocateurs in the crowd. They've been seen so often in the past. Look, Tommy is a great guy.

I don't even agree with Tommy. And I've spoken at nearly every one of his rallies, even when I was an MP. But he's done great work. on the grooming gangs. He's served time in prison for standing up for those victims. And I visited him in prison. And I saw the conditions he was being kept in and solitary confinement.

And he couldn't even eat any warm food because it was prepared by the other prisoners. And it was the most Muslim prison in the country he was in, which was not by accident. he was living on tinned fish wrapped in tacos seven days a week. And he was getting on with serving his sentence. And you just got to take, I take my hat off to the guy. He's a brave patriot. And getting people, a catalyst to get people to get together to protest against the state of the nation, the state of the government, and indeed uniting the kingdom.

that's a noble, a noble effort. I'm going to be speaking on the 16th, and no one's saying what I can say. I'll say what I want to say to the crowd, and other people will give their message. And at the end, everybody will go to that rally for their own reasons. It won't be all exactly the same reasons, but it is about uniting the kingdom.

And if nothing more, it shows people that, you know, the government like to keep us in silos, and you're the only one in the street that thinks that, well, when you have rallies of million plus people, everybody knows that we're not alone. And there is strength in numbers. And I hope that courage will become contagious. And I think the 16th could be the catalyst for that.

I hope so. We will have full live coverage here on Outspoken, of course. Bernie Spofford, are you concerned at all, though? Were you worried about that Danny Tomo video, which some people would say, or is that maybe trying to create some type of violence at the event? Yeah, I think he sounded like a total prick. I really do.

I don't think that that is what the country needs right now. I think it needs numbers. I think Andrew is right. I think Montgomery is right. There are patriots. They have something to say. They are proud of their flag. They do want to waive their flag.

So they want to be buttoned in the streets, with their kids. No, I don't think we're there. I just don't think we're there. And I think that was a stupid video. It sounds to me like a call to riot. That's what it sounds like. To me, he might have a different opinion.

And I think that is very off-putting for people, and it does split the right, and there are agents in the crowd, and there will be people trying to cause trouble at that fantastic, celebration of Britain. Why can't we do that? We should be able to.

And I think Danny has made a big mistake there, and I think he sounds like a prick. Montgomery, how do you feel about it? Well, look, violent revolutions have historically been awful, and we never, ever, ever really want to be in that position. Obviously, it's crossed every single person's mind that a revolution could well be on the cards one day,

but it's the responsibility especially of men to have a sword, keep it firmly in its sheath and know when to use it. I wouldn't say now's the time to use it. I think we need to push things as far as we can in in terms of being civil, in terms of not playing the games, the left play, which is which like Antifa famously wear masks, they beat people up, they're violent. We don't do that. We have decorum. We are British. We have potentially one would argue too much politeness and we could do with being a little bit more nasty at times. But I think it is cool for a little bit of concern, but it's nothing unsurprising. People are frustrated. People are emotional. People are angry. And I always push the message

of stoicism, especially amongst men. You know, we're very capable of being violent. We shouldn't be. And yeah, I think the last comment I'd make on that is when I went to the last Tommy, the last United Kingdom, I speak to a lot of people. They weren't really there for Tommy. they were there for, as Andrew said, a lot of different reasons, but mainly purely just wanting to be in a space where there are other Englishmen or people who are British. And that really should be the message. It is about unity, as we well know,

and I look forward to the day. And I do get frustrated naturally when you see people drinking. And it is a minority of people that are actually make mistakes, get aggressive. And I'm always trying to sort of calm things down, actually, and withdraw people from those situations because it's exactly, you know, what the media want. It's perfect, right?

And it really wasn't what happened last year. I mean, having been there, having seen it, there was no violence, yet the mainstream media still turned it into a story all about violence. So the problem is if you actually give them some real violence, trust me, they're going to use it. Because have you guys seen what the mainstream are already doing to Sharon Osborne? She literally just posted,

in response to an Instagram about UTK and said, see you at the March. And now, and I despise them for this, I despise them for this, I think it's unforgivable. Centrepoint, the homelessness charity with Royal Connections for many years, has axed them. Has axed Sharon Osborne and Kelly Osport, who, as according to Tas put it,

helped this organisation raise millions. The biggest financial boost you had in a long time. Custing ties with her because she personally wishes to attend a peaceful march in London is disgraceful and a political move. Tommy himself weighed in on this, saying the left is sick and deranged. They'll let homeless people suffer because Sharon supports the United Kingdom. Let that level of depravity sink in. And then it took a weird twist, a weird showbiz twist, because you know those scumbags kneecap. the talentless Irish. What are they? They're band. Are they rappers? I don't know. I've never heard

it. But, you know, they're very anti-Israel. They posted, fuck Mrs. Sharon Osbourne with this metro headline, an opinion piece. Sharon Osbourne attending and Tommy Robinson much proves kneecap right about her. But then Azalea Banks, the American rapper weighed in saying, how do these fat little crackers get off coming for a woman like this? Ozzy Osbourne's wife at that. And in fact, Azalea Banks seems pretty sound to me on these issues lately because she also posted, Black people in the UK are not seeing what is happening. Those Muslims running up in the government, chastising and attacking the Jews, do not like you all black asses. And blacks are definitely next if you all don't wake the fuck up and realize what time it is.

They're going to come for black people next because they don't like us. Every time I say something people say I'm crazy, then it turns out I was right. She said, Kemi Badenok and Rupert Lowe in different ways understand the course of Islamism, and that shit metastasizes from Jew protest into full Sharia. I think Kemi's course of action is more sound, but whoever you guys choose, just make a decision because what the actual fuck has happened to Britain. Now, Montgomery Times, I don't know if you're a fan of Azealia Banks, but this is pretty extraordinary, isn't it? this American rapper

now weighing in on the battle between your party Restore Britain and the Conservatives. It's crazy, but I like that post. I think she's right, actually, on the whole. Not that Chemie is the person to do it, but in terms of the threat of Islamism and the fact that actually black people

should be very concerned about it, I agree with her. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think that it's incredible in times we live in and where things reach. I mean, forgive me, but I'm pretty unfamiliar with this person.

But yeah, the more publicity, the better. And, you know, I've got a good friend who's familiar with Will Coleshill. I know Andrew was also good friends. And he gets attack more than me because he's somebody who comes out and says, look, right, I am British, but I am mixed race. and I stand for lineage. I stand for ethnicity, and I don't believe that, you know,

just having a British passport makes you British. It's more than that. And he will be attacked much more because people look at him as almost a traitor as somebody who, who, a traitor to, you know, the black community. And it's worrying times, actually.

I mean, what more can I really say? I mean, good. And then, and then, Bernie, what do you think of what they're doing? to Sharon Osborne because to me this is sending a warning to all celebrities. If you dare

think about supporting Tommy Robinson, coming to the Unite the Kingdom rally, your career will be ended. You won't even be able to support a charity anymore. It's just so chilling to me, but it is the playbook, Bernie. Charities and NGOs are all part of this.

Yes. Huge funding from globalists to push a narrative and what in particular direction. And we've seen the music industry, we've seen Hollywood, we've seen anybody who lifts their head above the parapet to say anything other than what you're allowed to say, getting battered down. And I just think, as Montgomery said, it's all about the numbers, right?

Just turn away. Just turn away. All the millions that Centrepoint get just don't give them any more money. And this is a charity, don't forget, whose explicit remit is to look after young homeless people. Well, don't forget how many young homeless people aren't getting housing in social accommodation because they're absolutely full of illegal migrants. And that's the whole narrative that Centrepoint have to put across, right? We don't want to talk about anything to do with Britain.

We have to talk about everything to do with in the round the whole. big open borders situation. And Sharon, thank goodness, is big enough, old enough to rise above that. I hope she just, I hope she ignores them. I hope so. And I hope she goes. Andrew Bridgen, as someone who is speaking at Unite the Kingdom, what would your message be to Sharon Osborne now? Because my fear is that she'll think, oh, it's just not worth it. It's just not worth it. No, you can't be intimidated by people who threaten you. You know, if you have you had to We have no free speech, no free expression. We have no freedom at all because every freedom we have hangs from that ability to have that

interaction and say what our views are. And yes, Sharon Osborne may have raised a lot of money for that charity, but if she doubles down, she'll cost them a lot of money. And there's an old adage, which we've seen proven right many times down, which is go woke, go broke. Yes, indeed. Indeed, indeed. Now, this story is a difficult one for me because as a free speech absolutist, I don't think anyone should be interviewed by the police under caution or arrested or thrown in a cell as a result of what they post on X.

And I mean, on our superstar panel today alongside Montgomery Tom's, we have the former Tory MP, Andrew Bridgett, who has been collared for these reasons. Very recently, we have Bernie Spofforth, who was thrown in a police cell, had her business career, ruined. and for these reasons. But I guess if we don't want to live in a world of two-tier justice, the hateful left who have been pushing this type of police abuse, this type of crackdown on free speech against those of us on the right, as we always warned them, as we always warned them, your collar will end up being felt too.

And that's why you've got to be very careful about wanting to go down this path. And that's what happened over the weekend. And as I say, it's a difficult one for me because my God, I'd love to see this woman locked up. I'd actually love to see her deported. I think she is one of the worst, most negative, most destructive forces in the United Kingdom today. I'm talking, of course, about Dr. Scholar, who never again revealed, has been interviewed under cautioned by the Metropolitan Police in connection with her anti-Semitic hate speech. they said the University of Newcastle awarded this vile racist and honorary doctorate in 2023, but the award can and should be withdrawn.

So again, you go down that cancel culture path. I do find it extraordinary, though, that that university decided to reward someone who at the very least is the worst race grifter in the United Kingdom. I think she's much more than that. I think she is a race beta. And yes, I think she is indeed a racist. Now, Dr. Scholar herself confirmed that the interview did take place. She posted on X. The Met Police interrogated me under caution. It has long become the enforcement arm of Zionists to suppress and oppress legitimate opposition, outrage and dissent against Israel's war crimes. Met Police isn't

interrogating and prosecuting over 2,000 British Zionist Jews that serve in IDF killing babies, murdering Palestinians and Lebanese, but I'm the problem. Let me put all you godless human waste of space Zionists on notice. As God is my strength, I will never stop speaking out against the evil God-forsaken terrorist state of Israel and against your execution of complicity and manufacturing consent for its crimes against humanity. That was posted alongside this video. Yeah, people, I have been. interrogated by the MET police under caution.

That's right. Under caution means they read me my rights. You know, you have the right to remain silent and every time I was interrogated for allegations of inciting racial hatred and sending malicious offensive communication. Okay, so Andrew Bridgett, this happened to you recently, didn't it? You were interviewed by police over a post. A couple of weeks ago, yes. What happened? I got a phone call from the local police,

Leicestershire Police, and they asked me to attend a voluntary interview, which would be under caution for alleged offences under the 1988 Malicious Communications Act Section 1 that I had posted on social media, a tweet which I, with intent to cause severe distress and harm, and which was grossly offensive. And I prepared a statement, went into the station,

ready to answer a few questions, pointing out that it was none of those things, and six days later they dropped it. But, you know, it's a lot, the punishment is really the process. They did offer me the duty solicitor, which poor old Lucy Connolly fell for, and then they advise you, did you produce the tweet?

Yes. Well, in that case, you better plead guilty and get off with less. And you just, most people don't have good legal representation. They can't afford it. I'm in a position where I do have access to some good legal minds, and it was easily defended. And as far as Dr Scholar's situation, I'm afraid the left always scream they want equality,

but when we all get equality under a law, however bias that is or unfair, they seem to scream about it. Well, I thought that's what they actually wanted. And I don't agree with probably many of her views, but I would be willing to die for her right to say it. And the only problem is, Dan, I think she'd probably be happy for me to do so. Well, that's the difference, isn't it? That is the fundamental difference between us and between our rivals,

who I actually do think are evil, because you're actually not joking when you say that she would be happy for you to die. I mean, Montgomery Tom's quite recently, Dr. Scholar actually said about your leader, Rupert Lowe, I'm against the death penalty, but for you, Rupert Lowe, I'll gladly make the exception. And she actually, Rupert actually reported Dr. Scholar to the police then, but the police did. nothing about it. Now, just imagine if Rupert Lowe had made

that comment about a black female rival. Yeah, I mean, I'm with Andrew always on not being somebody who says free speech for me and not for thee. I'm a free speech absolutist, so I defend anyone's right to say

anything. I would say if she actively hates this country, she can leave, and I would encourage her to do so. And I think that I'm going to actually start bringing this to the streets a little bit and have these debates that in this country there is far too much racism towards white people. And I hope to maybe one day engage with this woman because it's... Well, I'd love to see that. I'd love to host that. I don't know if she would have the boards.

I'm up for it. Don't worry. Well, we'll ask her. We'll ask it. But I have a feeling she won't have... the balls because I view her as a keyboard warrior who only operates in very safe spaces where she's not going to be challenged for her anti-white racism. Yeah, I mean, I'm in under investigation as we speak for a public order offence. You know, that's the cop's favourite one. I went to a so-called voluntary interview. As people well know, they're not voluntary. If you

don't go, they'll end up knocking on your door anyway. And then you have potentially worse repercussions. And I had to sit opposite this police woman who was smirking at me in this interview while she was trying to explain to me how saying that somebody is mentally if their trans is offensive. Same thing that I was arrested for in 2025. And I said to her, I said, right, well, all of the charges were dropped. Nothing came of it. Surely that's evidence enough to say that, saying that trans equals mental illness isn't a crime. If it was dropped by a police force, that's pretty clear to me that it's fine to do that. Her response to me was, no, different police forces, police differently. So that's news to me. I mean, this is the police force now.

So politically motivated. But nevertheless, as I reiterate, I'll defend her right to say whatever she wants and she wouldn't do the same for us. Instead, she'll call for the death of us. Well, I call for the removal of her from our country. How about that? Well, I actually think that would be a really positive thing. She does hate this country.

She is a destructive force. Bernie Swofforth, I wonder how you feel about this because, I mean, the police didn't treat you in the same way that they treated Dr. Scholar. They wanted to make an example of you. They threw you in a cell. They tried to destroy you. They tried to silence you. At the same time, would you agree that it's not good that they're doing this to Dr. Scholar? It just makes me laugh when she says the process is the punishment.

What process? She got, what, a little bit of a chat and a voluntary interview. It isn't the same thing at all. And I think the charges that she mentioned were quite similar to the ones that I was charged with. Oh, no, I wasn't charged, but they wanted to charge. Arrested.

Yeah, arrested. And thrown in a cell. Yeah, for 36 hours like a terrorist. I mean, that was literally what it was like. But I agree with that. Andrew and Montgomery, you should be allowed to say things because sunlight is the greatest disinfectant. Let people decide if they agree with you and if they don't. And I think in this country, the majority of ordinary, decent people, no matter what color they are or what faith they are,

would decide that they didn't want to listen to what showless said. I just believe that is the case. she is a grifter, she's an extremist in terms of she'll always go out on a limb to say the most outrageous thing because she thinks it gets her clicks and likes and followers. I just don't understand what her end game is. I don't know how you ever bring peace to yourself or your country or you ever grow as a person if you're not prepared to even listen to what anyone else says. She would want me arrested and then has a problem with being arrested herself. It's wrong, but she should be allowed to continue so that we can all watch her downfall.

Yes, indeed, indeed. Look, do stand by you three because we're about to reveal today's greatest Britain and union jackass, but I just want to get to some of your feedback today because we've had a lot of it coming in. First on Stama, slippery Stama in Parliament, Gary JG772 says Stama wanted Mandelson in because he thought he would butter the Americans up over Chagos, yes, and that failed. Against animal abuse said, look at Lammy and Reeves like a pair of nodding donkeys. Sorry, donkeys, that is a massive insult to you. I did think today, God, that's all he's got.

That's all he's got to support him. That's not what you want. Steve Lawson said the game was up with Stama when he opened his defense with the lawyer's ploy. Those in this house will find the following incredible. He nailed himself, and he has to go. then lots of debate over the whole G.B. News X thing, Nigel Farage, saying that X is now dangerous controlling the narrative. Gary says in regards to Camilla Tomeney, her show on Gb News is absolutely shocking. Her noise is the last thing you want with a fry-up and a hangover on a Sunday morning. Anna Kaville says Gb News won't even have live chat on YouTube live streams. They know they would get roasted. J.G. says bring back Mark Stein. He was absolute gold. And Michelle 197-1 says Farage is moaning about X today, only because Rupert Lowe gets far more engagement. Okay, a reminder of your nominations for Union

Jackass today. Matt Goodwin, nominated by Montgomery Tombs, for coming to Great Yarmouth and attempting to split the Restore Britain vote. Darren Jones was nominated by Simon Danchuk, who unfortunately we lost earlier in the show. We got to hear from him once, but we were having some technical issues with his line. But he nominated Darren Jones for continually coming out onto the airwaves defending the indefensible. That is Keir Stama's performance.

And Bernie voted for Rachel Reeves, who she says is an utterly clueless bird who's now about to tax small businesses for shared office space and is incapable of understanding growth or threats to growth. Okay, well, good given he's not here. Simon Danchuk came in third with 19% of the vote for Darren Jones

the runner up with 20% of the vote Montgomery Tom's pick Matt Goodwin but the winner of today's Union Jackass the worst Britain in the world today yeah Bernie you got it you got it with Rachel Reeves

Rachel from accounts 60% of the vote it's got to be here doesn't it Andrew Bridgen you're nominating our greatest Britain today who have you gone for I went for Rupert Lowe

being the only MP in the House of Commons currently who's taking on the establishment and suffering the slings and arrows of the outrageous fortune with the public but the approbation of the establishment and a man who tells the truth and stands up for at least what Britain used to be

and what we would like Britain to be again, I think. Does this mean that you're considering throwing your hat in the room? I joined the restores quite a few weeks ago. When it was a movement? No, I joined a week a week after it became a party. And would you want to return to Parliament?

Well, Rupert asked me to join. So, yeah, I would probably. Amazing news. Never say never say never again, Dan. No, but this is a growing movement, isn't it, Montgomery? Interesting to get someone like Andrew on board? Yeah, I mean, I can't speak on behalf of above my pay grade. but I've known Andrew a good amount of time

and of course have a tremendous amount of respect especially for the COVID days. He was the only one willing to raise a voice that so many needed to hear. Amazing. Excellent. Well, look great to have all three of you here today. Bernie Spofforth, she is behind the YouTube channel if this is true.

Montgomery Tombs, he is the man behind Freedom Watch, G.B. And Andrew Bridgen, Freedom Fighter. Former Conservative MP, now a member of Restore Britain. So maybe, just maybe, at the next election, we'll be back in Parliament representing Rupert Lowe's party. Thank you all so much.

Really appreciate you being here today. I'm going to move over to Substant, for the Royal Uncanceled After Show. We are going to team up with the Royal News Network because it has been a big, big weekend of Royal News. I would love you to join us there at www.w. outspoken.com. but I will be back with you live tomorrow, 5pm UK time, midday Eastern 9am Pacific.

Remember to hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Turn on the notification bell to be alerted to our new episodes. We're also available as a podcast now too so you can subscribe on Apple Podcasts or Spotify or wherever you get your podcast. Please just do remember to rate and review. And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.