Dan Wootton Outspoken - STARMER IS OVER AFTER 1 YEAR AS LABOUR SPLITS WITH NEW CORBYN PARTY & FARAGE CELEBRATES
Episode Date: July 4, 2025DESCRIPTION: Go to https://surfshark.com/outspoken for an extra 4 months of Surfshark at an unbeatable price! BREAKING TODAY: Slippery Starmer’s first year anniversary as the Prime Minister fast de...stroying our United Kingdom just got even more catastrophic: The Labour left has split from the dying party of government. The MSM don’t want to talk up the significance of Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn launching a breakaway group – which Tommy Robinson has declared the Islamist party – because they support the status quo of maintaining this corrupt uniparty system. But this is a political earthquake that also significantly increases the possibility of Nigel Farage becoming PM. Wired Owen Jones is of course supporting this revolution but has just been humiliated live on air by Piers Morgan… Dan will reveal why the end of Labour is now in sight in his Digest next and then get analysis from Connor Tomlinson. PLUS: Tommy Robinson backs Rupert Lowe and attacks Nigel Farage as the Reform UK leader launching his most stinging attack yet on his ex-MP, describing the Restore Britain boss as a “nutter” for backing mass deportations. AND: After Lily Allen jokes about forgetting about the number of abortions she’s had and Charlize Theron boasts about sleeping with a 26-year-old, why are female celebrities in a race to the bottom? THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: The Royal Family’s position on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle is hardening after shocking beyond the grave revelations about how the late Queen really felt about the Sussexes. We’ll reveal why King Charles has given permission Prince William the opportunity to do something dramatic with our Royal Mastermind Angela Levin. Sign up to watch at www.outspoken.live. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
No Frills delivers. Get groceries delivered to your door from No Frills with PC Express.
Shop online and get $15 in PC Optimum Points on your first five orders. Shop now at NoFriills.ca.
No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wood and this is Outspoken Live, episode number
263 and breaking today. Slippery summers, first year anniversary as
the Prime Minister fast destroying our United Kingdom just got even more catastrophic. The
Labour left has split from the dying party of government. Now the MASM don't want to
talk up the significance of Zahra Sultana and Jeremy
Corbyn launching a breakaway group which Tommy Robinson has declared as the Islamist party
because they support the status quo.
They support maintaining this corrupt uniparty system.
But trust me, what we are seeing is a political earthquake. And it's a political earthquake on the left
that also significantly increases the possibility of Nigel Farage becoming Prime Minister. But
at the same time, UK politics just got a hell of a lot darker.
It will be my pleasure and my honour to host an event in Parliament where our friends from
Hesburgh will be speaking and I've also invited friends from Alaska to come and speak.
The blood soaked hands of this government trying to silence us, so I say this loudly
and proudly on Wednesday the 2nd of July 2025, we are all Palestine. Order!
Wyatt Owen Jones is of course supporting this revolution, even though he's just been humiliated
live on air by Piers Morgan.
I haven't exterminated the Vassmode or either Hagen.
I prefer to wait.
Sorry.
You're right.
I'm getting excited.
You're getting nervous aren't you?
Very excited.
But look.
Hmm, very twitchy what was going on there? I'll tell you later.
And we'll also reveal why the end of Labour is now in sight in my digest.
Then brilliant analysis from Connor Tomlinson, the host of Tomlinson Talks on YouTube.
Also coming up on the show today, Tommy Robinson backs Rupert Lowe and attacks Nigel Farage
as the Reform UK leader launches his most stinging attack yet on him. Also coming up on the show today, Tommy Robinson backs Rupert Lowe and attacks Nigel Farage
as the Reform UK leader launches his most stinging attack yet on his ex-MP, describing
the Restore Britain boss as a nutter for backing mass deportations.
After Lily Allen jokes about forgetting about the number of abortions she's had and Charlize
Theron boasts about sleeping with a 26 year old. Why am
a female celebrity seemingly in a race to the bottom of the culture wars? And
then in the uncancelled after show on the substack the royal family's position on
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle is hardening after shocking beyond the
grave revelations about how the late Queen really felt about the Sussexes
will reveal why King Charles, listen to this, King Charles has given
permission to Prince William, a future King William, to do something dramatic to the fake
royals. Our royal mastermind, Angela Levin, here with all of that. And of course, at the end of
the show too, we will also be revealing the worst Britain in the world this week.
This is when we take your Union Jackass winners from Monday to Thursday and put them head
to head in a megapoll.
We've had tens of thousands of votes already.
You can vote right now in the posts or community tab on YouTube.
But just a reminder of who's up for this.
Monday it was Bob Villain, Tuesday Femi Olawali, Wednesday Carol Vorderman and Thursday Rachel
from Accounts. Four great choices. Who are you going to go for? Don't go anywhere folks
because the winner of the worst Britain in the world this week will be announced at the
end of the show. But now, let's go.
In just one year, Slippery Starmer and his bunch of socialists never had a real job in
competence at driving once Great Britain and our once United Kingdom into the bloody ground.
We all know it.
We all know it.
Even those who promoted two-tier care pre-election, I'm looking at you, Carol Vorderman. Can't defend this shower of shit. Any suggestion that we were entering
into an era without personality politics, without factional splits, without constant
U-turns, without more lies than a Meghan Markle interview? Well, that has been blown out of
the water. And then we have to listen to rubbish like this.
I'll keep on punching through. I'm a hard enough bastard to find out who it was who
said that, so I can have a discussion with him.
Bastard? Well, yes. Yes, you are. That's why Lucy Connolly remains in prison for a
post on X. Hard, though? You've've got to be kidding mate. You couldn't even
face down Angela Reyna. You're nothing but a pathetic coward.
But Samara's about to get what's been coming for a very long time, because breaking today,
the Labour Party is splitting up. The hard left going it alone under a banner with leaders Jeremy Corbyn and
Zara Sultana. And that finally means the uni party in the UK is over, I believe for good,
and I believe not before time. Now the mainstream media doesn't understand this. And they certainly
don't want to promote it. They believe in the status quo. They believe in protecting
their precious two party system.
I mean, remember, they were ignoring Reform UK altogether until Nigel Farage was actually ahead
in the polls. And they still believe Rupert Low and Tommy Robinson are extremists.
But this mob truly is. Now, apparently this new party, this new Corbyn-Sultana party,
Now apparently this new party, this new Corbyn-Sultana party, might be called real change or collective or the peace and justice project. But can I suggest with those two in charge, Saria
Solidarity or Jihad of Justice is actually far more appropriate?
It will be my pleasure and my honour to host an event in Parliament where our friends from more appropriate. group yes or no you won't like it when someone pushes back on you what I've said is I've asked you two questions should a mass stay in power and are they a terror group you're
refusing to answer either of them that is very telling and you wonder why people think
you had a problem with Jewish people.
Thank you.
So yes or no, you condemn these attacks? It's Corbyn. Do you think it's called trouble journey Corbyn?
Mr Corbyn, it's a yes or no question.
Do you think it's called trouble journey Corbyn?
Yes guys, thank you very much.
Do you think that Hamas has some responsibility for this?
Mr Corbyn.
Thank you, I've finished.
Do you think that Hamas has some responsibility for this?
The blood soaked hands of this government trying to silence us.
So I say this loudly and proudly on Wednesday the 2nd of July 2025 we are all Palestine order!
This is the racist far-right fascist violence that they had to deal with
growing up and now we are seeing violence descend upon towns and cities
across the country and we need to call this racist and we need to call it
Islamophobic because if we don't we fail to really address what's going on.
It picked language from Enoch Powell and actually for me that was a foghorn to the far right to say
actually all of this rhetoric around immigration where a migrant is responsible for the fact that
you can't get a doctor's appointment, your child can't get a school space, there aren't enough
council houses, that's what that feeds into. And for me, that's incredibly dangerous.
Now this group of ne'er do wells already feuding about Sultana jumping the gun with her announcement
on X last night, claiming Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party with other
independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country. But Corbyn has confirmed this
afternoon discussions are indeed taking place and let's be
honest he's made no secret of his desire to enter frontline politics this from Peston just this week.
Jeremy one of the things that there's been a lot of talk about is whether you will turn your
alliance of MPs into a formal party and whether you're thinking of contesting the next election as a formal party. Where are you on that? The Alliance Group of
MPs, five of us, have worked very hard and very well together over the past year in
Parliament and we're coming up to our first anniversary. But there's some data that shows that if you did
launch a party you might do rather well. Well exactly, so next time you ask
questions ask about the alternative of a left independent
party of a socialist view that's being put.
So are you going to create one?
Let me finish, you're so excited, you just want it to start don't you?
The reason I'm pushing is we haven't got long to the end of the party.
That's what it is, there's a lot of people all around the country in different independent
groups, look in Birmingham, look in Liverpool you look in Southport and so on.
There is a thirst for an alternative view to be put.
I'm working with all of those people.
That grouping will come together.
There will be an alternative view and there will be an alternative put there, which is
about a society that deals with poverty, inequality and a foreign policy that's based on peace
rather than war.
And would you like to lead that group?
I'm here to work. I'm here to serve the people in the way I've always tried to do.
And by the way, for anyone dismissing Corbyn as yesterday's man, well, of course,
you're absolutely right.
But what matters here is how pollsters have him immediately taking 10% of the
national vote and immediately wiping 3% of Labour.
Now with the potential next Green leader hoping to work with this mob too, it could be about
to get even worse for Stammer. So no wonder, the reaction from the right has been so immediate.
Tommy Robinson posted,
Labour MP Zara Sultana has quit the party to start a new party with Jeremy Corbyn. Islamist
party of Britain is coming.
Nigel Farage said,
If you thought Keir Starmer was having a bad week, it just got a whole lot worse.
Anzia Youssef added,
Lol. got a whole lot worse. And Zia Youssef added, lol, odds of Nigel Farage being PM just narrowed
further.
Corbyn won more votes than Stammer did, both times that he ran. He has awful policies but
is a vastly superior politician to Stammer. His new party will be enough to lose Labour many, many seats in 2029.
Likelihood of a reform majority thus improve nicely.
Although I still have my suspicions, more than suspicions actually,
that it's Youssef who intends to become the UK's first Islamist PM.
I mean, look at that, Britain needs a real leader with a picture of himself.
We know what he's getting at.
And by the way, Stammer, you're right not to celebrate your one year anniversary of
destroying the country tomorrow.
Because when more in common ask for Labour's biggest achievement in government, the answer,
and look at this, it is utterly resounding nothing. What about the biggest failure? And
you won't be surprised to learn it's the winter fuel allowance, but they're the only other
word you can actually read. Immigration. This is a shocking record for a horrible man who will go down in history as one of our worst
prime ministers ever and he may well be responsible for the end of the Labour
Party too. Now, Conor Tomlinson.
Connor, what do you make of the launch of this new left-wing party? The split in labour is finally here.
Yeah, it's both a good and a bad thing, actually. And it's a good thing in that it will eventually
lift the veil on just how bad things have become in this country as a consequence of mass immigration and a Chamberlain-esque internal multicultural appeasement strategy
that allows these hostile foreign diasporas and Islamic enclaves to take root
in cities like Leicester Leeds, Birmingham and London.
And I was looking at the people that voted against prescribing Palestine Action, Dan,
and the same names cropped up.
It's the four independent Islamic MPs,
like Shukat Adam and Adnan Hussein,
and of course, Jeremy Corbyn,
as their kind of Hamas and Hezbollah cheerleader ringleader.
But then you've also got people that were chucked out
of the Labour Party for previously rebelling
against a government whip like Asparna Bagan, depicted
in that photo that you keep showing with Corbyn and Zara Sultana that looks a bit like two
care workers taking a photo with a nursing home pageant, but there you go. And then John
MacDonald as well, Corbyn's Marxist former Chancellor who has a bit of an appetite for
endorsing political violence. So I reckon if you look at the electoral map where you're seeing not just a handful of Labour cabinet members like Angela Rayner or Lucy Powell
losing their seats to reform, but if you look at the likes of Wes Streeting, Jess Phillips
and Shabana Mahmood also losing to what was formerly pro-Gaza independent candidate, but
if they can galvanise the Islamic and Marxist vote
into one party, whatever engine,
Sultana and Corbyn launch,
you're gonna see likely, and this is the bad point,
at least about 30 Islamo-leftist MPs
occupying the UK parliament next time around.
And the great problem with this is that there is,
as of yet, no political force which is content to stop this from growing.
Because this is growing from immigration, the accommodation of these sectarian Islamic communities in our cities,
that hijack liberal individualistic parliamentary democracy by voting along ethnic and religious lines in big clannish groups,
and they might be confined to certain areas in cities which means they can never win an overall majority
but they are guaranteed to have representation and so the head of this Hydra must be severed
permanently. We need to make it a completely hostile environment in this country for all
of these Islamists to practice their faith and to establish these colonial outposts and
if they want political representation
on behalf of Islam, they can go live elsewhere.
And of course, this is good news, I think, for the right. And obviously, look, you can
look at it in two ways. But this Islamist representation in parliament is coming, regardless,
right? As you point out, it's coming. Like at the
next election, Streeting's gone, Phillips has gone. In fact, a whole load more of them will lose their
seats to Islamists. The fact that it's probably going to be under a party political banner now
with Corbyn at its head, I think is a good thing for the right, because it makes the chances of an alternative to labor being able to win much greater.
Yes, I mean we currently have, for all the people that were joking on Monday,
the excessive proliferation of right-wing movements with advance and reform and restore and reduce and reuse and recycle. We have a hell of a lot of competition on the left-foot flank with half the Tory party and the Lib Dems and Labour and the
Greens and now this sort of independent alliance that will just be the Islamo-Leftist party,
chasing increasingly what is only ever about 8% of the vote, which is radical progressivism,
and a diminishing share of complacent English liberals in the Shias who, when confronted
with the uncomfortable realities of mass demographic and cultural change, will flip to being immigration
restrictions overnight. We're already seeing moves among the Lib Dem saying that they would
vote for mass deportations of foreign criminals, despite many of their MPs saying that there's
no such thing as a legal migrant. One sort of bellwether for this though, that I'm watching out for,
is Diane Abbott, because she's the mother of the house, she's a Labour loyalist, she's
Jeremy Corbyn's ex-girlfriend, and would have been Home Secretary if Corbyn hadn't have
lost two elections on the trot. The moment she defects to this party, and she is likely
to, that will be a very symbolic death now.
It will be huge.
It will be huge. Do you think she's likely to though? Because I think at the moment she's
going to remain in the John McDonnell camp because there is now serious hope amongst the Labour left,
Connor, that they will not have to go into the election under Slippery Starmer,
that Reiner will remain,
that Reyna will end up being Prime Minister?
I do, but I think that Reyna is gonna have to make
a series of concessions in order to do that.
I mean, before she was a kind of free radical
and she was put second fiddle to Starmer
because one Starmer knew that she was kind,
he knew because she was saying that she was kind... he knew because she was saying
that she was kind of too stupid to handle the job herself and I've heard
that directly from a close friend and Labour advisor that told me that off the
cuff about a year ago. She was unexpected to stay in this job actually as long as
she has. So what she's done behind the scenes is been meeting with Blair which
means that she's being brought to heel and Blair is very annoyed with Keir Starmer in how he has non-tactically handled the Southport crisis,
how he has fumbled the bag on immigration,
how he hasn't given him digital IDs
and how he hasn't invested as much in AI as he wanted to.
And when Starmer's poll numbers started to dip,
you saw a bit of a reverse ferret on some of those issues,
but now he's throwing Morgan McSweeney under the bus. And so things aren't all well in the Labour camp. And so I think what Reyna will
do if she does end up taking over from Keir One, she'll have to fight Wes Streeting for
the ability to plunge that blade in his shoulder blades. But secondly, she'll make a series
of concessions to the Blairite paradigm, which itself is dying, which is putting off actual
Labour-based members, and it will then put
off more MPs who are more likely to defect to Corbyn's project, including long-time
loyalist Diane Abbott, who, by the way, I mean, I'm shocked that we even allow her
in politics after quite a few years ago she said on the BBC that Chairman Mao, genocidal
communist dictator Chairman Mao, did more good than harm. These are the kinds of people
that will be joining Corbyn's front. And yes, for all the infighting on the right,
it will make us look a hell of a lot better.
It's also really interesting, by the way, that the other person who has come to support
Reiner behind the scenes in recent months is the King of England, Charles III. But that's
a whole other story. I'm really interested though Connor that you mentioned Southport
because we're of course coming up to the one year anniversary but for me the day that Stammer lost
the nation was not actually tomorrow, wasn't July the 5th when he entered Downing Street,
it was July the 30th and this moment I remember watching it just
before we came on air and I posted this at 3.55 p.m. how many more children are
going to die. Prime Minister Keir Starmer heckled in Southport. He was there for
just 19 seconds and interestingly Annabel Denham in the Daily Telegraph has agreed that that
was the moment that Stama lost the country. So have a look at this and then I'll get
your reaction, Connor.
Seconds for Keir Stama to kill his premiership. Every prime minister has a defining moment,
a decision, a crisis or a blunder that etches itself in the public mind and shapes their legacy.
Stalmers came not at 7 o'clock last night during the welfare vote, bruising though that will have been.
No, it came on July 30th last year, less than a month after he entered number 10.
As he lay flowers in Southport, he was heckled by members of the public and at that moment it was painfully clear
Stalmer was the wrong leader members of the public. And at that moment, it was painfully clear
Starmer was the wrong leader at the wrong time.
How many more children? Is it mine now?
What's the other stand up for our children?
Bye bye.
You've got your photos, off you go.
Make a real change.
Make a real change!
Make it, yes!
Our children! Try as he might, the words wouldn't come.
And they've never come since, as successive problems have unfolded.
The riots in Lucy Connolly, Israel, the winter fuel allowance U-turn, somehow the words never
flow.
In the aftermath of July 4th, his approval rating was plus 10.
By mid-August, it was plus three.
And by mid-September, it had dropped to negative 26,
and it hasn't recovered, nor will it.
Britain is now more divided, not less, than it was last year.
Public frustration at the establishment's failure
to repair the fraying fabric of our society is mounting.
Starmer has had the year from hell.
His premiership is in a tailspin.
The pack is turning on him, and even he must realise there's no way back.
Conor Tomlinson said to me those 19 seconds were the moment that the country realised
this is not a guy who is on our side.
Yeah, well he obviously has no internal monologue as he's admitted before, he has no favourite
book or film and he doesn't dream
So it's no wonder the thoughts didn't come to him and the words failed him at the time
But part of the reason is for years
He hasn't habituated himself to actually caring about the people of this country
Can't even define who the people of this country is. He as a human rights lawyer thinks his constituency is as
former cabinet secretary under Blair and Brown Gus O'Donnell once told David Goodhart
former cabinet secretary under Blair and Brown Gus O'Donnell once told David Goodhart, global welfare. And so a man who tries to be friends to everyone has
loyalties to nobody and when those loyalties are tested in moments where the
entire country's blood turned to steam because those poor young girls were
murdered, words failed him. And so even though Jeremy Corbyn is a demented
terror apologist who hasn't met an enemy of Britain that he doesn't want to give
a hug and even said Southport is likely to vote for him on Peston Show which I thought was
bloody vital frankly. He is more likely to snap up a lot of those going astray from Labour for
lefty reasons because he has clear leadership, it's demented, it's ideological but it's clear,
and then the rest of the country especially the Wall, who are sick to death of starmer
and labour, will probably go to reform.
We can only hope that they decide to make the best of that opportunity if it's afforded
to them.
If UK politics on the left looks divided with the launch of Jeremy Corbyn and Zara Sultana's new party which has split labour, then it has to be said the
civil war on the right just gets more bitter and more complicated by the day.
Tommy Robinson has in the past 24 hours come out and reversed his previous endorsement
at the last election of Nigel Farage and said that only
Rupert Lowe can be Prime Minister. Meanwhile, Rupert Lowe, who has just this week launched
his new group, Restore Britain, has been attacked as a nutter by Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform
UK, in a set piece interview with The Sun newspaper to mark one year
as an MP. Let me tell you what he said because this is really important. The context is important.
It's about mass deportations. And The Sun writes, Sun's political editor Jack Elson writes,
in recent months, his friend turned foe, Rupert L Lowe has accused him of going soft on his pledge to
deport all illegal immigrants after conceding it would be impossible. Farage irritatedly
waves him away. I'm really sorry, but you know, you get the odd nutter in politics.
Now speaking to sources close to Restore Britain, I am told that Farage, while he may not be
as worried about Advance UK and Ben Habeib, is increasingly concerned about the momentum
behind Lowe's movement.
But again, I would argue, in the same way that I said the arrogance of Sarah Poach in
dismissing Ben Habeib so revoltingly on GB News earlier in the week of Sarah Poach in dismissing Ben Habib so revoltingly on GB News earlier in the week that Farage dismissing Lowe,
someone who was an MP for his party who was elected under the Reform UK banner
with him as leader and who most Reform UK supporters think is a great man, is not
only arrogant, it's politically deadly. Here's how Farage dealt with the situation when
he was asked about both Lowe and Habib on the Labour broadcasting company LBC earlier this week.
Pat in Worcester Park who points out that some of your former colleagues have launched new
parties Rupert Lowe, Restore Britain, Ben Habib, Advance UK, how concerned are you, asks Pat.
I think there are now 15 centre-right political parties,
all one-man bands, all led by people whose egos
are much bigger than the reality of the empathic.
But I think to dismiss what Rupert Lowe is doing
with Restore Britain as a one-man band
is intellectually dishonest.
I mean, you've seen in the past
week Susan Hall, the head of the Conservatives in London joining Restore
Britain. So too the storied historian David Starkey and also Tommy Robinson
now throwing his weight behind low. Posting this man is literally the only MP fighting
for the British people. That came after Rupert had declared Palestinian migrants. I have
just one question to the MPs pushing for an asylum resettlement scheme. Are you mad? Dozens
of MPs have asked Dharma to urgently establish a Ukraine style visa system to allow Gazans
to come to Britain. The pro-Palestine lobby is attempting to further hijack our politics.
I have tabled a motion in Parliament to hopefully counter that insane narrative. It is so important
that like-minded MPs come together to back this motion. We have seen just how weak Starmer
is and sadly I fear the suggestion to establishment a Gaza migrant
scheme may gather momentum. Many of these people are those that chair the murderous
Hamas through the streets. Let's show some resistance. Please ask your MP to sign my
motion. We must not have a single Palestinian being allowed to claim asylum in Britain. Now the other weak spot for Nigel Farage, which has been pointed out
by Tommy Robinson this week, came when there was a reminder that it's now been 70 days
since Farage said he would reveal his deportation plan in three to four weeks' time. That reminder
prompted Tommy to very specifically say to his millions of
United Kingdom supporters, Nigel is not the answer Rupert Lowe is. A reminder by the way,
this was the declaration made by Nigel Farage before those local elections.
We will in three to four weeks time announce more detailed policy on how we will actually carry out those deportations.
Conor Tomlinson, we've obviously had nada on that. Absolute silence.
So is Nigel Farage correct when he just dismisses Habib, dismisses L, or do you actually sense what I do, which
is that there is some form of momentum behind Restore Britain. It's almost like what happened
in the early days with the Tea Party in the US, which would of course end up creating
the MAGA movement and taking over the Republican party. So on two separate issues there, Dan.
The first is that reforms promised to provide a robust deportations plan.
Well, first of all, they could have just partnered with plenty of people
that have been speaking about this on the policy front for ages now,
like Mike Jones or Centre for Migration Control. But instead instead reform seemed determined to leave a lot of talent on the table because they basically can't bring them
under the reform umbrella and control of their output. There's a lot of mistrust despite a thriving right-wing ecosystem, which actually
picks a lot more meritoriously because they were gate-kept out of traditional institutions like the Conservative Party and the left for ages. So if they just listen to people like that, it might
be easier. But instead, Farrell just retreated from not just the policy to deport every single
legal immigrant, which he tweeted out on election day on July the 4th. So it was an electoral
promise that they've now rode back on. But he's also retreated from that promise made right before
the local election. I'm seeing a pattern here that, you know, telling the people that you'll do exactly what
they want you to do right before the election comes due, but then backing away from in the interim.
He since backed away from it when talking to Fraser Nelson in Fraser Nelson's odious Channel
4 documentary, because Fraser Nelson himself is quite odious. He said that mass deportations is
just an ambition. So there isn't a clear plan.
It isn't a principle.
It isn't a promise.
It's just some sort of vague commitment
that he knows that reform voters and the public at large
want and expect, but they're not really sure on if they want to
or how to deliver it yet.
As far as Restore Britain and comparisons to the Tea Party,
I mean, I know people that are running this.
Charlie Downs is a very dear friend of mine, and I've gotten to know Rupert decently over the last few months. He's a
real gentleman. So I really hope it succeeds. I've spoken to them behind the scenes and look
forward to participating in their polls and policy proposals in future. And they've got some really
good talent on board like David Starkey, as you mentioned. The comparisons in the Tea Party is important
because Restore has been adamant that it is not a political party and that's because enough
political parties already exist. I wish Ben Habib all the best with his enterprise, I've said that
to him. However, what the moment needs right now is not another political party springing up from
the arid soil. Instead, Rupert understands
that he can act as a kind of one-man opposition, a pressure group, to do one of, I think, three
things. First, that we can bring Parliament to a standstill. Constant petitions that get
over 100,000 signatures in one day, proposing policies that the parties themselves feel
pressure to commit to. Even Labour adopted his migrants must speak English mandate. So they've raced to catch up to Rupert Lowe. Number two, he can force
reform in a kind of right wing arms race to actually catch up to his positions, even if
they don't credit him for it. And that benefits everyone, right? Because if reform, as they
are still dominating the polls, are the presumptive government of 2029, I don't care what colour
rosette anyone wears, I just care
what policies they implement. This is why I've always been able to criticise reform.
Yeah, and this is why I've remained independent despite speaking at Reform's conference before.
If Rupert Lowe can force his old party to adopt his policies, which the public wants,
brilliant news the country will be fixed and we'll have nothing to moan about. The third thing that
they could do is, as some have suggested, force the hand of the Conservative Party,
given that Badenock is radioactively unpopular and even Tim Shipman moving from the Times to
the Spectator, the Spectator having made Badenock's career quite literally and then, you know,
helped her ascend to the front of the Tory Party without much merit, frankly. Even he's saying
Badenock's on a sinking ship right now and she's going to be replaced very very soon. Now I like
Robert Jemrick, I've met him, nice fella, seems to be a sincere convert but he
hasn't necessarily got the star power of Rupert Lowe and so bringing Lowe into
the fold, having him in the shadow cabinet, letting him do the ministerial
rounds for four years and allowing him to be the policy nexus and a sort of emblem of the true transformation of the Conservative Party while
also kicking Priti Patel out on day one, I might advise, that would also allow for another
existing vehicle to actually enact the right-wing policies that Restore Britain is putting to
the forefront.
Absolutely, I completely agree with you. This is about opening the Overton window,
shifting it all together. And that's why when people say to me, oh, but you're, you're, you're
potentially risking dividing the vote, right. We are four years out from an election. Right now,
Reform UK, and let me just be very blunt about this, Reform UK, as it stands today does not have the policy prescription required to save this
country, to even come close. I mean remember they're still going on a net zero immigration policy at
the moment without mass deportation so I'm totally with you on that Connor and that's why I think
Rupert actually got it right by saying this isn't a party. Maybe in the future it will be, but it's not a party right now
it's a movement because I think that's why so many more people have been open to joining and
Supporting because that's what the desire is for and actually Rupert has made a very good video actually
Just summing up exactly what his aims are. Have a watch of this and I'll get you to react off the bat Connor
Britain is in decline brutal relentless decline his aims are. Have a watch of this and I'll get you to react off the bat, Connor. conservative-minded majority can rally, organise and exert influence.
Many have tried to fill this gap, but the British system is all but impervious to true
political insurgency.
Now is not the time for another party.
What the country needs is a mouthpiece.
Organisation is power, and Britain's elites, however detached they are, cannot ignore the
united voice of the British people. That is why we're launching Restore Britain.
We're an independent, non-partisan group of British citizens concerned with the
political, economic, cultural and social condition of our country. We will build a
policy platform together. A movement will be created together. A path will be forged together. Being in
Parliament I am uniquely positioned to hold the government to account. Our
independent Rape Gang Inquiry is the most successful crowdfunding effort in
British political history and in less than 24 hours our parliamentary
petition to release Lucy Connolly received over a hundred thousand
signatures. Just think what we could achieve if we were doing that every
week and I need your help. As a member of Restore Britain you will have the
opportunity to vote on the policies and principles that you believe in. With this data, we will put pressure on the government and other political parties
to recognise and act on the will of the British people.
We will set the agenda in Westminster.
I look forward to joining you all on this journey.
We must now come together to restore Britain.
Do you know what I love? We must now come together to restore Britain.
Do you know what I love?
It's the opposite of a lot of the hype around Reform UK
and don't get me wrong, so much of what Reform UK is doing
is very slick and very clever
and looks like it's come out of some posh ad agency
but I just don't necessarily know
if it always has that same sort of authenticity.
And another reason by the way, Connor, that
I think it's proof that Rupert is doing the right thing. Hope, not hate are worried because
look at this post. I've said Connor, everyone's watching Nigel Farage, but it's also worth
keeping an eye on the man he forced out of reform UK, Rupert Lowe. Lowe is positioning
himself as a leading voice on the far right,
launching his own rival Restore Britain movement this week. So Conor, I put it to you that Reform
UK is worried and Hope Not Hate are worried, which means that dismissing this in the way that Nigel
Farage did on LBC is probably a little bit naive. Yes, well, it seems that Richard Tice allows hope not hate to vet Reform UK's
candidates, whereas Rupert Lowe allows hope not hate to write his endorsements.
So that's the pretty big dividing line between both men.
Also, that background where Rupert Lowe shooting the thing looks mightily familiar.
You might be able to see that in Tomlinson Talks sometime.
As far as...
You're giving away your secrets, Connor.
I'm not giving them the address.
I'm just saying we happened to share a decor for where we decided to film.
As far as Rupert's initiative and his enterprise, yeah, this is the difference between, I think...
So I know Nigel's denounced the term populism, but this is the difference between a kind of gauche conception
of populism versus what populism actually should be.
Populism is not racing to catch up to where you think public opinion already is, because
if you're in politics, you're in a bubble, and your perception of public opinion is usually
set by how good your pollsters are and at the moment Reform's
internal pollsters as I've spoken to some former Brexit loyalists who really want for odds to
succeed have told me their polling is not great internally as in they aren't in touch with the
issues that people actually want because their methodology isn't as good as it used to be and
it's set by the media if you're constantly speaking to them. Now if you're speaking to
independent media like you Dan you might be a bit more in touch with what people the media if you're constantly speaking to them. Now, if you're speaking to independent media, like you, Dan, you might be a bit more in
touch with what people want.
But if you're only speaking to the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Fraser Nelson and Sly News, then
you're not going to get a sufficient barometer of what the person wants.
And Conor, really interesting point, and it relates to a video I want to show you, actually,
because I would argue as well also LBC, because there used to be this idea that
the callers into LBC had their finger on the pulse of the nation. And it's actually the
opposite now, because these are the types of callers that look up to someone like James
O'Brien. And I think we actually got a really good example of that with Farage on this phone
in with Nick Ferrari this week, watch. It was a disaster. You don't have any policies. You don't show
us an MP. Last summer, you incited race rights on our
streets. You know, gay marriage and women's rights.
To lead the country.
Don't vote for me. Please don't vote for me. Thank you. I'm not
here to please everybody. I am here to stand up for what I think are the right courses of action.
Some would say you did that over Brexit and I think had Dan been able to enter into conversation
with you he'd have said, and Brexit has been a disaster Mr Farage.
Well he probably got poisoned at university or something like that.
But you think Brexit has not been a disaster?
No of course it's not been.
How is getting back the right to govern your own country?
How can that... And Connor, it's just so depressing, isn't it?
Farage only wants to play the old media game.
Yes, and if you want to do that, you've got to have a...
The kind of constitution that JD Vance has where you actually thrive under that spotlight
and you enjoy being a pugilist and dismantling their narratives to their face.
I quite enjoy
that frankly as people have seen when I argue with a room full of boomers. But this is the
difference between that brand of populism with it tries to meet the people where they
are and it gets perceptions distorted and Rupert Lowe's brand of populism which is acting
as a kind of minesweeper creating permission for the public who don't have parliamentary
privilege to voice their concerns all reasonable popular, on issues that have been rendered verboten by that exact kind of sclerotic,
highly controlled media class that, unfortunately, reform seem wedded to. I think they should
move into the thriving alternative media space, they should take a few more risks, and they
should listen to their advisors like Matt Goodwin and now my friend James Orr and take a bit of courage and make the most of the opportunities being given
them by the electorate. Breaking today, that little left-wing goblin Owen Jones, very wired looking has been completely humiliated by Piers Morgan over his defense of the Glastonbury
anti-semi Bob villain. Now it's very obvious to me something wasn't quite right with Mr Jones,
the hard left Guardian columnist in this interview. Watch.
interview watch. I haven't exterminated the vast majority of the Rehengars.
I prefer to wait.
Sorry.
You're right.
I'm getting excited.
You're getting nervous, aren't you?
Very excited.
Very wide and twitchy, perhaps because Morgan was able to completely expose him on air over his support of Bob Villain,
who you remember caused carnage for the British Bashing Corporation
and Glastonbury with his chants on stage of Death, Death to the IDF.
Watch what went down.
When people say the NHS will die, literally they say the NHS will die
without reform, are they saying that they're going to be the mass
murder of doctors and patients? To be clear, when you watch that rapper
at Glastonbury chanting and leading a chant with thousands joining in
of death to the IDF, you instinctively believe... He said it himself.
He said it since. So you accept then that the rapper was talking about soldiers No, people people call for the death of the Russian army all the do you believe him 100%?
Yes, when he said death to the idea he didn't mean well individuals. Did you believe that well?
He's actually unlike and this is the irony do what the irony is well just answer my question first
Yes, I do because new footage has emerged
new footage has emerged. And death to every single IDF soldier out there as an agent of terror.
I've known you a long time, I have a lot of respect for you.
You just have to admit when you hear that you were wrong to defend him
in the way you defended him. He didn't mean IDF... People I was
defending... He didn't mean IDF. But do you accept now that you were
wrong? He didn't mean that. We both... I didn't hear. I've only heard
for the first time. You've heard that. Now you've heard that, do you still say he only meant
the entity? Obviously now he's made clear what he meant. You accept you
were wrong? Obviously... I know. I'm not saying you should have known.
I'm just saying that I found the defence very disingenuous by
everybody and I felt what he'd done, and this has now been proven, I
think, he'd gone on social media, he'd seen people coming up with this
ludicrous... But this is what...
..that he only meant the entity, and then, knowing what he'd said
on stage, so knowing what he said on stage, he issues a statement
saying the complete opposite that he's written for people like you,
defending him. Well, I still...
Now he's made all of you look like complete...
Total humiliation.
Connor Thompson, do you think everything's okay with Owen Jones?
When I saw him about two years ago, prowling around Conservative Party
Conference, trying to argue with students about trans and then getting
utterly trounced on camera, he was quite twitchy, he was tweaking.
So I'm not sure what they've put in the green room or if his diet is having an impact on him. I mean it looks like his intestines have been vacuum packed
from the inside out since he lost all that weight, doesn't look very well. But yeah I don't know if
it was just the the drubbing he was getting from Piers Morgan that was making him so energetic and
jittery damn but there we go. We'll leave that one there. As far as the content of the conversation though,
and this may be a point of disagreement, but I spoke about this in my show this week, allow
me to say Bob Villain is absolutely grotesque for a number of reasons and calling for death
to the IDF, whether it's individual soldiers or as an entity, I think is wrong because they're engaged in a defensive
war of trying to vaporize every jihadist that would like to see them destroyed. And I think
I would like it if our government held the same standard regarding the grooming gangs and Islamic
terrorists. Unfortunately, it doesn't. However, I happen to have noticed that whether it's talk,
whether it's GB News, whether it's Piers Morgan,
whether it's Danny Kruger on Newsnight,
the main objections to Bob Villain's comments,
the preoccupation has been his comments about the IDF
and his not at all veiled allusions to Zionists
who control his music contract,
or who now no longer, because they've dropped him.
I think it's actually much more odious that he thinks he has stolen our country from the white English and is gloating about
it. Like, I think that parliamentarians and the British media should be way more concerned
about that, that he thinks that his music and his political activism is part of a hostile
force that has dispossessed the English of their own nation with the assistance of the
state, by the way, than any offense
caused to the IDF.
And it's mainly because I think Israel and the IDF can kind of take care of themselves.
Like, I understand that our government is meant to consider them an ally and is throwing
them under the bus in order to pander to the Islamo-leftist bloc that it's imported into
this country and made itself reliant on.
But whether or not Glastonbury attend attendance or even the British government approve of Israel's
actions against Hamas, Hezbollah and Iranian proxies, they're going to do it anyway because
they're going to defend their people. But our government doesn't defend our people, our media
doesn't defend our people, and our own conservative politicians aren't defending our people. Instead,
they're more offended about Israel than about the English. And I think they should be paying
more attention to that, frankly.
Do you know what? I actually totally agree with you. I did make this point earlier this
week that I was shocked that no one was concerned about this moment on stage. And I know this
is the moment you're referring to, but in case people have missed it, It is worth taking a look. Connor, I completely agree. It's like, what? That's totally morally acceptable, is it? But of course, we know that organisations
like the BBC and Glastonbury now propagate anti-white racism on a constant basis. It's
almost like it doesn't matter to them anymore.
Yeah, I found it very conspicuous that the record label found his views on Israel and
Zionists, he means Jews, it's just gross, so odious that they had to deprive him of his record
contract and as a talent representation.
I found it interesting, of course, that the US State Department, who are now our
great allies and are very concerned about the impact of mass migration on Britain,
saw fit to cancel his visa and they're seeing fit to actually cancel
newly granted citizenship to
American citizens on the grounds that they are anti-Semitic, which is, I mean, that's just going
to be a massive benefit to the U.S. They don't want a bunch of terror supporters, even if they
are naturalized citizens in the country. However, for a very long time, the talent agency was happy
for him to have put that song out in 2021,
where he's saying we've got gamons on the run and we've stolen the country from the English,
but it's his offences against Israel which is a line too far.
I don't think he should be doing either, just to be clear, but...
Okay, let's put it this way.
I don't think Bob Villain is a very learned scholar on the history of Middle Eastern conflict.
I don't think he has a very well-informed opinion on how
to settle this over 1,000 year ethnic and religious dispute
between Muslims and Jews in the region.
I don't think he knows how to run a Palestinian state.
If he gave them another one, obviously, they're just
elected the terrorist government.
I think it's all just window dressing for anti-white racism.
I think the flying of Lebanese and Palestinian flags to support Hezbollah and Hamas by the useful idiot white middle-class
attendees of Glastonbury is all just essentially a promise to say, well, if October 7th were
to happen again at Glastonbury, as it happened at the Nova Festival in Raim, we wouldn't
shed a tear because in the background alongside the Palestine flag, was the slur against the British population that this country was built
on the backs of immigrants, as if we were just unsettled wilderness before the wind
rush showed up. I think Palestine is the proxy issue for the Islamo-left, the Islamists using
the left as their useful idiots and the Trojan horse, but it's the main issue because it
converges on we hate white people, we hate
the West and we would like to see atrocities committed against you.
And yes, the anti-Semitism is gross, but I think hatred of the English and the stealing
of their country from them is just disgusting.
Yeah, absolutely it is.
And it is quite gross for me to see Morgan licking Jones' ass, you know, oh, I have so much respect for you.
Why? Why would you have any respect for that man? Although I would still argue in this
encounter he did own him because Jones was just so nervous. Watch.
They were allied, many of them, to the Bosnian Serbs who had huge amounts of sympathy for.
They said it wasn't a genocide. Is it a genocide?
I believe it was. OK, do you think the Rohingya...
Is that a genocide in Burma? They haven't exterminated...
The Vashma, the Rohingya, is that a genocide?
I prefer to wait.
Oh, sorry. You're all right.
I'm getting excited. You're getting nervous, aren't you?
Very excited. But, look, let's just conclude
with things we agree about. OK. Right?
Is your position now about Bob Villain,
given what we just watched, that when he's
charged death to every single IDF soldier,
you would condemn that?
I don't support Ken.
I don't want any soldiers to be killed.
The way to stop that is to stop IDF soldiers committing
genocide.
And just to clarify, in light of what we've just seen,
would you now withdraw your defense
that he was only talking about?
Well, his statement... His statement was obviously not correct.
He didn't say that. But as I said...
Did you wish you hadn't defended him now?
Well, I wouldn't have defended him on the basis of his statement.
Well, you said he was only specifically talking about the
entity, not people. Well, that's what he said, Peter.
But obviously... But that's what people...
Yeah, but he lied to you, didn't he? Well, the statement's not true.
He lied to everybody. I'll say, Peter, he's less extreme than most of your guests.
That's a different argument. No, it isn't.
Because you don't show... I take them on.
Have you watched my show? Yes, and you don't show...
Have you watched me taking on the Israeli guests recently?
You treat those Israeli guests as having respectable views.
You always have. Have you watched them in the last few months?
In the first month... Have you watched the show? I don't think you've been watching the show, have you watched him in the last few months? In the first month, have you watched the show? Do you support it? I don't think you've been watching the show, have you?
I don't normally.
Why don't you ask Israeli Twitter or Zionist Twitter
what they think of what I've been doing on the show?
All the way through.
You would know exactly how I've been treating
the pro-Israel government guests.
In the first month.
And you wouldn't be saying this.
In the first month.
You haven't watched, have you?
Be honest.
I've watched many of your guests who are pro-Israel.
Did you watch the interview?
Who were treated with. Oh God, I'm sorry, I just, ever watched of it, be honest. I've watched many of your guests who were pro-israeli. Did you watch the interview?
Oh, God, I'm sorry.
I just can't deal with any more of that.
But it was nice to see Owen Jones owned.
Do you know what I'm also loving this week?
The re-emergence of Carol Vorderman,
the woman who took so much pride in electing Keir Starmer.
She thought that she was single-handedly behind this.
And Granny just looks broken now. Martin just looks utterly devastated now. And it's beautiful
to watch. This is her first appearance on Channel 5 News. I think it will be a very bad look for
Keir Starmer because he's blaming someone else. Dani Street said that it was a personal massacre.
We obviously saw her vividly distressed. I understand that, but obviously the political Rima Mill
goes into heightened mode, doesn't it?
Hopefully she stays.
I don't mind Rachel Reeves at all.
But I think Starmer is not a great Prime Minister.
I don't think he's a great leader.
He would, however, say, actually, he's done a pretty good job.
He got it through, didn't he, in the end?
It might have been 11th hour, but he got this bill through.
And he's making half a billion savings annually.
At what cost? I mean, you know, when people voted, and I was very much involved in this,
the Tories Stop Vote tactical voting website, millions of people came to us,
voted tactically, Labour got in with a shallow but huge majority.
We know all of that, That's all historic now. But they keep, they keep inflicting wounds on themselves. And I don't
understand why. I really don't.
I think Anna Dolman said it's quite beautiful to watch, isn't it?
Well, I don't think I would describe Carol Valdemar as beautiful these days, Dan. She
looks like she's having a permanent reaction to bee stings. She looks like Macaulay Culkin's
corpse at the end of My Girl. I think she'd probably sue her plastic surgeon for defamation.
In terms of the Owen Jones clip, yeah, Piers Morgan did have him on the ropes there, but
still Piers for some reason wants Owen Jones' respect. When Owen Jones argued that he was being a shill for Zionists,
you know, whatever, let's say, not surveilled allegation is happening there, Piers was adamant
that, you know, oh, I know, I shouted at Natasha Hausdorff and didn't let her get a word out,
so therefore I'm okay by your standards. Piers, why do you want to be respected by Owen Jones?
He denied the ethnic and religious composition
and the scale of the grooming gangs for absolute ages.
He is completely indifferent to the violent crimes
and consequences of mass migration,
yet preoccupies himself entirely with the supposed plight
of the people of Gaza.
And if it is a genocide, you know,
you should probably tell the people of Gaza that considering there are more births happening there.
Mason. Not to mention, by the way, by the way, Connor, Owen's treatment of women at the Guardian
and the Observer forcing a lot of good women out of their jobs because he doesn't know what a woman actually is.
And look, I think totally Pez and Owen are just on the wrong side of the argument
about what is now an obvious decline in society in the UK.
Two examples of this Connor that I wanted to show you.
And I'll just set it up by reading out two posts from men I respect.
First, Paul Embry, who said, we are living in a radically different
society to the one most of us grew up in, one in which gangs of thieves operate in broad daylight
and while on camera yet knowing that most onlookers won't intervene and the justice system
will never apprehend them. Colin Brazier added, we have allowed a culture of permissive lawlessness
to take hold in many of our once great cities,
those who choose not to intervene, I include myself, coward that I am, often fail to foresee
where this ends. Bikes and phones and shoplifting today, but tomorrow much, much worse.
And I'll just talk you through the video that they were referring to Connor. So we can watch this together and I'll just explain.
But if you live in London, this is actually totally commonplace.
This type of thing is totally commonplace.
So you see people going about their business, entering a coffee shop.
They've just done their shopping.
And what is taking place right behind them
is I mean, if we can listen to it actually as well, because you hear the sound, which
is really important because they are drilling, drilling that bike, they are putting it over
their shoulder and you see everyone just sort of has a cursory glance behind, but knows
that number one, if they tried to
intervene the police wouldn't get there in the first place in the first
place number two if they did intervene there's a serious risk that they could
be stabbed so instead this sort of crime which is dismissed as petty crime but I
think it's actually much more than that just now runs alongside our day-to-day lives in big cities in the
United Kingdom. It is truly shocking.
And number three, if you are caught intervening, you would be accused of racism, of course,
because they're just poor, belighted asylum seekers trying to take redistributed resources
from a state that has done nothing but punish them for the sins of colonialism, etc, etc.
All the ideology that the police have imbibed in anti-racist policing that are more likely to make law-abiding people
the targets of punishment for complaining about the issue than the actual criminals doing it themselves.
Quick anecdotes on this.
I mean, for years around the southwest, thinking Reading and Swindon back when I used to work at Lotus Eats,
I would see all the time just bike frames hitched up to the railings or the sort of bike lock
things on the side of the street because they've had the handlebars, the seat and the wheels
nicked and then just the frame is left by the side. And then you must wonder, oh, where
are all these Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eats drivers that are out of asylum hotels
getting their fresh new bikes on? because you can't see any on the
Dingy's that they've been bringing over so they must have been
Knicking them somehow and my friend actually just had his bike his motorbike stolen from a bike lockup as in a cycling lockup in
His apartment building while he was on holiday get this the Kent police rang him up and just said oh
We've actually caught the two people that have done it. So we've got your bike, we've got the thieves. Would you mind if we kept it for forensics
just to make sure we can convict them? He went, Oh, of course, go right ahead. So he
comes back from his holiday and 10 days later they bring him up and say, Oh, do you want
to come and collect your bike then it was done after a day and it's just been sitting
in storage. And he goes, well, why didn't you call me earlier? Oh, we didn't have your
number. And he goes, well, that was funny because you called me before, but fine. Okay.
And they said, right, if you come and pick it up call me earlier? Oh, we didn't have your number. And he goes, well, that was funny because you called me before, but fine. Okay. And they said, right,
if you come and pick it up and then pay your fee,
we'll give it back to you.
And he's like, sorry, what?
They asked him for 500 quid storage fee
because he decided to do the right thing
and let them take fingerprints from the thieves
that they caught stealing his bike.
And they said he can't get it back without paying the fee.
So now they've crushed it.
And he just told them, next time you're worse than the thieves I'm not going to report any crime in future. And no wonder
it seems that bike thefts are going down despite us seeing that we can see they're going up
because nobody bothers reporting.
No one reports crimes. No one reports crime. Oh my God, Conor, that story completely matches
up. I don't know if you saw this, but I'll show you. It completely
matches up with Sadiq Khan, London's failed mayor, who this week in his version of PMQs
with Susan Hall actually criticised the very good folk who are part of this organisation
and include Tom Harwood of GB News, who have been going around the tubes in London,
attempting to clean graffiti off the walls,
even though TfL have a £775 million contract to do so,
he criticised those people, Connor,
because he said that it means that the criminals might get off. Watch.
We've got frustrated commuters because they can see everybody cheating the system. They're
sitting there surrounded by graffiti on many occasions. And I must say, you will have seen
the fantastic video from Looking for Growth with people that have actually tried to
clean up the underground because they don't want to be surrounded by it. None of us want to be
sitting there paying our fares in a filthy carriage with graffiti all around so heads up to them.
What are you going to actually do about this to make certainly commuters feel better about it?
Well firstly by condoning that behaviour she's allowing criminals to get away with it because what TfL does the
enforcement teams the police is photograph the tags to ensure there's
prosecution so on the one hand the members rightly asking us to ensure
there's more prosecutions on the other hand by encouraging people to clean up
graffiti at least to fewer prosecutions because action can't be taken because
the evidence literally has been washed away
uh
I mean, oh kind of he makes me rage
He literally makes me rage because it's like number one you're lying. Of course you're lying
number two as if that graffiti has been there for weeks and for months and for years and if you
Genuinely believe that the police are going around getting evidence and random tube carriages, you have no idea about the state of your city.
But it's so typical, isn't it?
The people in the wrong, Connor, the people in the wrong are the Tom Howards of this world
who are going to clean up the graffiti on their day off.
It's extraordinary.
Yeah, I can tell Sadiq Khan exactly who's doing it because it's exactly who's usually
responsible for all of the thefts, the petty and violent crime, the fair bumping in his
country and it's usually the first and second generation immigrant miscreants that are living
in social housing, wearing balaclavas, riding around on bikes and treating the city as if
it's their own personal post-apocalyptic war zone. If you stop people
from bumping the barriers, if you just use the CCTV you've already got to see these sort of
anti-social behaviour people clambering on the tube, particularly the Bakerloo line, then you
would just catch them outright and it shouldn't have to take to vigilante cleaning gangs to take
into the tube to get rid of it for us to have a nice functioning public transport system.
rid of it for us to have a nice functioning public transport system. Developing today, growing question marks around the influence of major celebrities on culture
after Lily Allen is criticised, quite rightly too, for singing and joking and laughing about forgetting how many abortions she's
had, oh she thinks it's four or five by the way, and Charlize Theron long considered one
of the world's most accomplished actors boasting about the fact that she has slept with a 26
year old in a truly gross new episode of the sex podcast Call Her Daddy.
Now we're getting an analysis from Conor Thomson about all of this in just one moment, plus
fascinating insight from Megyn Kelly. Now you'll remember Megyn and Charlize are forever
linked because Charlize played the character of Megan in the blockbuster film
Bombshell, which was all about the end of Roger Ailes at Fox News. But first, take a listen to
what Charlize actually said in this truly cringe. Any sex tip for the girls? I am the last person
to ask. I'm like sounding very cocky
here, but I think it's because I found this freedom in my 40s where I'm like, Oh my God,
so I just want to say this in perspective. I've probably had three one nights dance
in my entire life. Okay. But I did just recently fuck a 26 year old and it was really fucking
amazing. Fuck yes. And I've never done that.
And I was like, oh, this is great.
You should be the ones who are like, fuck you.
Like I'm going to have an orgasm.
And yet I, my whole life was so concerned about.
Same.
The same?
Same.
Okay.
Oh my God.
So my advice would be this, don't fucking do that.
For two reasons.
You're going to have better orgasms.
And guess what?
Your man's going gonna like that.
And this is an actress who had scaled the peaks of her career.
What on earth does she think she's doing?
Well, Megyn Kelly has a fascinating theory which actually involves the prospect of
Charlize Theron actually being lesbian. Watch.
I think I just found my next parody.
She played me in a movie and I can play her in one too.
What's going on there?
I, I, I got to tell you, Supergear, I, I, I have to tell you something.
I kind of call bullshit because I believe that Charlize Theron probably prefers women. That's my belief. Okay? I'm
entitled to my opinion and there's no reason to get into the details as to why I believe
it, but I believe it. And I don't think that she's telling the truth about the 26-year-old.
I think this is the way, in the same way I told the audience this story about how Doug
and I have a friend, a lot of our gay friends thought that this friend was gay and we never knew whether he was gay or not, but this guy
who was the suspected gay man would constantly make inappropriate like weird comments about
my girlfriend looks amazing naked.
And Doug would always be like, straight men don't talk about their girlfriends like that.
That's like a gay man's idea of how a straight man would talk about his girlfriend. And I feel like this is an overcompensation where she's like, I fucked it.
I'm sorry to repeat it. It's vulgar. The other girl's vulgar. And they're both really shockingly
inappropriate. I think in the clip, it was very off putting, but my theory is it's an overcompensation.
Will Barron Well, look, it's very rare for me to disagree with Megyn Kelly. And I certainly don't in this case, because if we're talking over compensation, oh my
God, Charlize went mad during this podcast.
With women, it's always like something must be wrong with her.
She can't keep a man.
She must be a real bitch.
What a bitch.
I love that I don't have to run everything by a guy. I'm having the kind of s*** I never
had in my 20s or in my 30s. We should be the ones that are like, f*** you. Like, I'm going
to have an orgasm. But I did just recently f*** a 26 year old and it was really f***ing
amazing.
Conor Thomson, what does this interview say about society? Can I just remind you in 2004, Charlize Theron, who was
already considered one of the most beautiful women in the world, considered one of the
most talented actresses in Hollywood, won an Oscar. She's got an Academy Award. She's
now appearing on a tacky 20 something sex podcast, boasting about her orgasms with a
26 year old. What does this say about our culture?
Well, I think this is connected to a couple of years ago, Dan, when
Charlize Theron was complaining, where have all the good men gone?
I can't find anyone that wants to date me because I am attractive, very
successful, very wealthy and usually women and they're more than entitled
to usually like to date across and up in
terms of status.
So they like a man who earns more than them, who usually has higher education qualifications
than them so that they can take care of them, and that they can kind of show them off to
other women.
It's almost like biologically, evolutionarily baked in.
It's like the hardware.
And so the problem is for a lot of women where
they've become very educated and they've kind of become the men that they wanted to marry in terms
of getting high-flying jobs, especially with diversity, equity and inclusion policies and
girl boss feminism putting them to the top of the corporate ladder, they're finding that there's a
slimmer number of men that they are willing to date and, especially as they get older, and if
they've been a bit more promiscuous than their mothers and grandmothers would have been, the men themselves, if they're high status, they don't want to date
them with all that baggage. Especially because if you are what you continually do, then if you're
only ever having lots and lots of promiscuous one-night stands, you're not ready to get married and
be a mum by the time that you decide you want to settle down, you haven't got that habit built in.
And I think what Charlize Theron is doing is particularly pernicious because it's a
kind of female covert competition strategy. There's an old thing where if you're an attractive
woman and you go to a hairdresser, and they've found this in a couple of studies, the hairdresser
will cut your hair shorter than you actually want it. And it's because lots of women, whereas
men sort of use banter and insults and sports to compete overtly, lots of women, whereas men sort of use banter and insults and sports to compete
overtly, lots of women compete covertly for status. And this is why, for example, divorce
is a kind of social contagion. If one woman's miserable, then she'll convince her friend
groups to get divorced. What Charlize Theron is doing here is she's basically, as far as
the conventional fulfilled, meaningful, loving, feminine life goes, she's failed.
She's got two adopted children, one of them is trans, I wonder how that happened, and
she is apparently having all these wonderful hookups and one-night stands, but only a few
years ago complained that she wasn't settling down and having a functional relationship.
What she's doing is she's making her misery contagious so she has company. She's trying
to ruin young women's lives so that her poor choices cannot be judged
and so her own conscience can be quiet. Well, I'm sorry for all the fame and beauty and
wealth and accolades she has. She looks like a fundamentally miserable and immoral person
and I think women would do well to not listen to her.
I mean, how is she any different now after that podcast, Connor, to Lily Phillips or
Bonnie Blue? The only difference is that Lily Phillips
and Bonnie Blue make their living by engaging in a widespread child exploitation human trafficking
trade which is porn and only fans which should be banned. But Charlize Theron is shouting from the
rooftops the ideology that allowed Lily Phillips and Bonnie Blue to convince themselves that this
was a good thing to do and that even after they've been filmed sleeping with hundreds or thousands
of strangers and subjected to all sorts of degrading acts, then look down the camera
of whatever documentary maker they're talking to and say, yeah, this was really empowering
and I chose this for myself and you should too. This is a noxious cultural climate that
is trying to convince women not to have
nice wholesome relationships with the good men who would hope to love and marry them
and have kids with them. And it's just going to drive lots of people to be very lonely
and very miserable and very dependent on the state in future.
Speaking of very lonely and miserable people, and trust me, I know from personal experience,
Lily Allen on her BBC podcast. So I
always have to keep reminding people this is funded by us to
the British license fee taxpayer, which shocks me has
made, I think one of the most grim revelations and boasts
about abortion I have ever seen in the public square. And even
prompted this response from Tommy Robinson, who wrote watch
as singer in inverted comments, Lily Allen, laughs as she describes that she can't remember how many abortions she's had during an interview on a BBC podcast. The interviewer laughing along saying she's had about five to absolutely vile.
And it is Connor.
Let's look at this.
vile and it is Connor let's look at this I have an IUD now I think I'm on my third maybe fourth and I just remember before that was a complete disaster
area like I was just yeah I'd get pregnant all the time all the time
you farts are like me in those days oh yeah you know I said today to someone I was like I actually don't know
if Lily's had an abortion. I didn't know. Okay. See why didn't we talk about that? Abortions.
I've had a few but then again I can't remember exactly how many. Really? Yeah. Why didn't
this come up in last week's episode?
We were just talking about abortions.
Because I was just letting you run with it.
Reveal everything.
I can't remember.
Yeah, I think maybe like, I want to say five, four or five.
Yeah, I've had about five too.
I'm so happy I can say that and you can say it and no one came to shoot us down.
Connor Tomlinson.
You shouldn't be that proud of having killed a child.
I just, my, so Mary Harrington in her excellent book has written that there is no stronger statement in favor of the sort of cult of absolute autonomy and
freedom from consequences than killing your unborn child at any stage
for any time and then shouting it and celebrating it as Michelle Wolf infamously did in America.
And I think what's happening now is they're about, and I think Stella Crease is actually
right on this, we're about five years behind America because America has had this all before.
I remember when Hillary Clinton was in the New York State
Senate, and they passed the abortion up till birth bill.
And they lit up the 9-11 memorial
bright pink, which is actually something that Aldous Huxley
put in Brave New World almost 100 years before, by the way,
to celebrate the fact that abortions
and sexual licentiousness was part of that dystopia.
So what ended up happening from that
is that a subset of very demented
progressive women for whom abortion is the sacrament that they must continue to cement
the gains of the sexual revolution made abortion the number one issue and they became so vocal
about the horrible things they were doing to their own children that the rest of the American public,
even if they were a bit squishy on the issue and content with the President Clinton's settlement of
safe, legal and rare despite its contradictions. They went, that's gross, we're willing to
vote for Trump and we're happy with the restrictions he's placing on it. And now Planned Parenthood
has been defunded for at least a year. In Britain, we've just passed abortion up to
birth for any reason, as long as it's committed by pill, by post, by the mother. And obviously
Stella Carisi wanted to go even further and have it on demand by doctors
and even remove sex selective abortions from that prohibition.
I think the more extreme the abortion lobby get
and the more vocal they get about abortion being a virtue in their mind,
literally that the worst kind of vice is celebrated,
I think you're going to get an even more vocal contingent
in British politics
that speaks up for the inviolable dignity of the innocent unborn children. And hopefully,
despite this grotesque period where they're being murdered in their quarter of a millions
every year, we can put a stop to this.
Conor, on a much nicer note, you got married this time last week. How did it go?
Everything that could have gone wrong didn't go wrong, Dan. We haven't we haven't we haven't put up any photos yet just
because our photographer is I know I've been looking I've been
looking when you're back. I know you've got a couple of weeks
off now. But when you're back, we'll share some of the pictures
hopefully but but it was everything you expected.
Absolutely. Yeah, they should be available. I'm keeping my misses out of the public eye,
but it was basically a gathering of, I mean, if someone would have chucked a grenade into that
church, the entire British far right would have just been eliminated in one fell swoop. And it
seems they all enjoyed drinking lots of booze at my expense.
So did you have, did you have a drink? Cause I know you were, you were on the fence.
So I didn't, however, we were given, and I would like to call my friends out here, we
were given a free bottle of champagne because we were the first wedding for the venue. They
weren't expecting it, but it went off brilliantly. We were given it by the owner as a sort of
congratulatory present. And before either my or my wife got a look in, Mr. James Orr decided
to walk straight past the table, pluck it up and then sit down on a table with some of our mutual friends, including
Liz Trust, and start pouring it all out. So I really hope they enjoyed that champagne
because I have no idea how it tastes.
Oh, well, I cannot wait to see the pictures. Connor Thomas and have a brilliant couple
of weeks and we'll speak to you when you are back from your travels. Thank you so much.
And of course, before we go today, we are revealing the worst Britain in the world this
week.
This is when we take your four Union jackasses from across the week and put them head to
head.
A reminder on Monday, it was Bob Villain for that revolting Glastonbury performance.
On Tuesday, it was Femi Oluwali for repeating the words of that revolting Glastonbury performance on Tuesday it was Femi Oluwali for repeating the words of that
revolting Glastonbury performance on Wednesday it was Carol Vorderman because she's an apologist
still for Starmer even though she knows he's really bad and for her blubbering wreck performance in
PMQs which she has subsequently lied about Rachel from accounts on Thursday lots of comments from
you about this trail
hiker one said, heard you want your career back? Ha ha, you can't have that
in reference to that revolting rap from Bob villain. Greg McFarland 1140 said,
I know it should be knob villain, but when I see Femi water Wally, I have to
click. So he went for Femi over villain. Darkness alone said this
is hands down the hardest vote yet why can't we multi-vote I'm honestly stuck for choice
but SPRU3RS said it's got to be Carol Warneman because I have no idea why I'm so attracted
to her she's a granny call me Carol and Richard Allen said Rachael from accounts needs to
sit down
Stfu, we know what that means and have a long think about what she's doing to people like me
Disabled people. Okay, your votes are in and I'm gonna be honest with you. It was a two-horse race this week So a tie the third between Femi Oluwali and Carol Vorderman with 4% of the vote. The runner up, sobbing Rachel from
accounts with 26% of the vote. But the worst Briton in the world this week with a whopping 66% of the
vote, Bob Villain for that revolting Glastonbury appearance. Great choices. Now, we're not quite
dumb this Friday because coming up in the uncancelled
after show on Substack, the royal family's position on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
is hardening after shocking beyond the grave revelations about how the late queen really felt
about the Sussexes, we'll reveal why King Charles has given permission to Prince William the
opportunity to do something really dramatic. that's with our royal mastermind Angela
Levin. So at this stage we come off YouTube and Rumble we move to Substack please do subscribe
www.outspoken.live I hope you have the most incredible weekend I've got lots going on actually
I'll tell you about it on Monday and we will be back live then 5pm UK time midday eastern 9am
pacific remember to hit subscribe if you're watching
on YouTube or Rumble, turn on the notification bell and most importantly I promise to keep
fighting for you.