Dan Wootton Outspoken - TAX CHEAT ANGELA RAYNER WILL BE UK PM WITHIN MONTHS AS COUP TO DEPOSE KEIR STARMER EXPOSED

Episode Date: December 8, 2025

BREAKING RIGHT NOW: Slippery Starmer knows his time in Downing Street will end within months, as Red Rayner – the tax cheat imbecile – launches an audacious coup with the backing of the hard leftists who run Labour, meaning we will have a hard left Prime Minister in 2026. Meanwhile, free speech in the UK is dead under the watch of our cretinous leader, who is more interested in throwing money at corrupt Zelensky than helping his own citizens, including Joey Barton, who received a longer suspended jail sentence than the paedo Huw Edwards today for tweets. No wonder the Trump administration is in despair. In his Digest Dan exposes the plot to usher in Red Rayner into Number 10 Downing Street as Labour moves to turn the Disunited Kingdom into a Communist and Islamist hellscape. Then powerful analysis on the Superstar Panel from Sadiq Khan’s worst nightmare, Conservative London leader and Restore Britain’s Susan Hall, and independent YouTube sensation Lauren the Insider. PLUS: The Church of England goes to war with Tommy Robinson for putting the Christ back into Christmas. AND: Rupert Lowe exposes Reform UK to Tucker Carlson. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Meghan Markle lies about contacting her father following the amputation of his left leg below the knee, prompting fury from his son and daughter over her egregious attempt to turn estranged Thomas’s life and death battle into a PR win. We’ll team up with the Royal News Network for all the latest. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

You and Santa? Best rappers out there. But Rees wants to know, what about the best unwrapping moment? Reese's peanut butter cups put your unwrapping skills to the test. And with three cups of creamy peanut butter and smooth chocolate per pack, you get your practice in. Experiencing that sweet and salty satisfaction again and again and again. Santa gets cookies. You get Rees.

Nothing else is Rees. No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wharton. This is outspoken episode number 377. And breaking right now, Slippery Stama knows that his time in Downing Street will end within months as Red Rainer, the tax cheat imbecile, launches an audacious coup with the backing of the hard leftists who run Labour, meaning we will have a communist prime minister by 2026. I mean I spoke to someone this weekend who you would say is definitely a prominent Starmorite if you are very loyal to Stammer and still at the current point and they have said they're now ready to come out but they want to come out and it'd be the knockout blow they're abiding their time essentially. Serve at the highest level of government was a privilege not for the title or the office but for the chance to change the lives of the people I grew up with and live alongside. And she is going to be changing our lives for the worst very soon.

Mark my words, because all we got today from Stama in terms of a fight back was this. My dad was an apprentice. He went to night school. He was a toolmaker, a skilled toolmaker. But being an apprentice, it was an equally good thing to do. That's what my dad did. And he was a highly skilled engineer and toolmaker. Oh, shut up.

Seriously, shut up, man. Meanwhile, free speech in the UK is dead under the watch of this retinous creep who is more interested in throwing money and hugs at corrupt Zelensky than helping his own citizens, including Joey Barton, who received the same suspended jail sentence today as the actual pedo, Hugh Edwards, for tweets. No wonder the Trump administration is in despair. that neither a fine alone nor a community order can be justified and that the custody threshold is crossed. Similarly, a British woman was dragged out of her bath by 11 police officers after she referred in a private text message to a man who allegedly violently assaulted her as, quote,

a faggot. The plot to usher Red Rainer into No. 10 Downing Street as Labour moves to turn the disunited kingdom into a communist and Islamist housecape in my digest next. Then, powerful analysis on the superstar panel from Sadiq Khan's worst nightmare, Conservative London leader and Restore Britain's Susan Hall and the independent YouTube sensation, Lauren the insider. Also coming up on the show today, the Church of England goes to war with Tommy Robinson for putting the Christ back into Christmas. Rupert Lowe exposes Reform UK to Tucker Carlson and our pathetic home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, gives in to Prince Harry on security,

allowing the delusional Duke to plot a rival court to his brother, Prince William. Then in the uncanceled after show over on substack, Megan Markle lies about contacting her father following the amputation of his left leg below the knee, prompting fury from his son and daughter over her egregious attempt to turn a strange Thomas' life and death battle into a PR win. This is so disgusting. I've got all the proof on it and we'll team up with the Royal News Network over on Substack. That's www. outspoken.com. It's also the first union jackass greatest Britain of the week. You can actually vote right now on the YouTube live chat for the worst

Britain in the world today. Here are your nominees chosen by you. Angela Rainer nominated by the Grift Report because she is set to reject a job offer from the PM and a joint ticket with streeting to plot a solo bid for number 10. dare, he says. We'll reveal all in the digest shortly. Baroness Jackie Smith, nominated by Sharon Scott 668, who says the sour puss who has the audacity to do media rounds this morning denying the government is delaying the grooming gang inquiry. And Femi Olawoli, the Virgin Loser, nominated by Matt Cass 48, who says he's desperate and no longer employed to be a racist TV loon, but his latest interview as Zach Polanski is as desperate as it is poor. And I'm actually going to be playing you some

of that in the digest too, honestly. It's worth it because it exposes Polanski, the tit whisperer, for who he really is. So lots coming up. Keep your comments. Coming in throughout the show. I'll read out the best at the end. But now, let's go. Slippery Stama will be deposed as the Prime Minister of the Disaster. united kingdom within months, and he will go down as the most unpopular leader in our history. What's coming, though, is an inevitable move to communism and Islamism under Red Angela Rainer, a disgraced tax cheat imbecile as the desperate left make their last throw of the dice. It's happening because they have nothing left, and that means we're all going to have to deal

with the consequences. Even Stammer knows the game is up, though. Just look at the McLaren staff behind our Prime Minister today who were literally falling asleep in despair, horrified as they watched this uninspiring globalist puppet ramp on about the father, who he actually hated, by the way. Seriously, like, can we all just remember Stama hated his dad?

he's admitted it. And he doesn't seem to realize that the toolmaker shtick became a national punchline months ago. My dad was an apprentice. He went to night school. He was a toolmaker, a skilled toolmaker. But being an apprentice, it was an equally good thing to do. That's what my dad did.

And he was a highly skilled engineer and toolmaker. And then he welcomed his Ukrainian bumpin with the sort of hug You could have never imagined him giving to Donald Trump. Indeed, I couldn't actually imagine him giving this type of hug to his poor estranged wife. Let alone any patriotic Brit who wants this goddamn money pit of a corrupt war to end. But of course, this was just a temporary reprieve for Stama, a photo op, because the coup against him is now in full force. I don't think he even cares.

He knows the game is up. These are the conversations lay before. are now having amongst themselves. All the time. Is there any other conversation in town? When does he go and who replaces him? That's it. I mean, I spoke to someone this weekend

who you would say is definitely a prominent Starmorite if you are very loyal to Stammer and still at the current point and they have said they're now ready to come out but they want to come out and it'd be the knockout blow. They're all biding their time essentially and what you'll get is more and more we've seen Barry Garden and have become more confident over recent weeks

and he's saying he has to go. We've had the usual suspects of the socialist campaign group. We had Carl Turner last night, who isn't a usual suspect, who's maneuvered from... Yeah, who's very much against the end of jury trials to now going, the operation is bad. Even Stama's closest allies are turning.

We saw confirmation there, and we also have confirmation today from the establishment Times newspaper that revealed the influential think tank that ran Slippery Stalmers' leadership campaign, canvassing party members on candidates to replace him. The Times reports it is the clear a sign yet that the Labour Party is preparing for a change of Prime Minister.

Labor Together, the campaign group once run by Morgan McSweeney, Starmes Chief of Staff this weekend asked activists for their views on contenders for the leadership. A survey sent to local Labour Party seen by the Times prompted members to name the politicians who stood the best chance of leading Labour to electoral victory at the next election. compared with Stama and to rank those that they would be likely to vote for in a leadership election.

Now, eight senior Labour politicians were named. There were the five Cabinet Ministers, West Streetene, Shabana MacMood, Bridget Philipson, Ed Miliband, and Darren Jones. But Labor Together also listed Angela Raina, the former Deputy Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, and Lucy Powell recently deposed from the Cabinet but now Deputy Leader of the Labour Party. And guess who? Guess who is going to be ushered in by the Labour Hard Left to number 10, Downing Street? Well, it's this woman. A literal tax cheat who will make our country a laughing stock

and bring further economic catastrophe. But the left has now decided that she is their woman, given the only other choice is Ed Miliband, who remains a favourite with the dwindling bunch of madmen and women who are crazy enough to remain left. Labour Party members. By the way, isn't it appalling that what should have been a total resignation from public life, Angela Raina should never, ever even be an MP again after her tax evasion, but it was actually the start of a comeback. Watch.

When I made my maiden speech over a decade ago, I said it was the honour of my life to represent Ashton Underline in this house. And alongside South, serving in this historic Labour government, it is still the honour of my life. I promise then to bring determination, commitment and my socialist values to this House while representing them and I intend to continue doing so. My title may have changed, but the strength and the character of the people of my constituency have not. But I've always believed in the highest standards of my neighbourhoods. of transparency and accountability.

And it is what the public expects and is the price we pay for the privilege of service. To serve at the highest level of government was a privilege, not for the title or the office, but for the chance to change the lives of the people I grew up with and live alongside. She was shaking like a leaf because she knows that she shouldn't be there.

But Rainer's comeback has now included rejecting a pact with West Streeting to serve as his deputy prime minister or an offer by Stama to return to cabinet as education secretary. Yes, that's right. Our Ange, our Angie, lovely Angie, who thinks all Tories are scum, is able to plot until her heart is content as she plans to pounce after Labour's inevitable wipeout in the May local elections, with her entering Downing Street in the autumn of 2026. As the mail on Sunday reported, Sir Kerr Stama is so concerned about a leadership challenge from Angela Rainer that he has offered her the education secretary's job. Allies of Miss Rainer say the PM is desperately trying to persuade the former deputy who resigned in September to return to his cabinet in a bid to shore up his position. Kare's aides are said to have privately suggested she could be handed back her old job of housing secretary or even given the education brief currently held by Bridget Philipson in a reshuffle next year.

The revelation comes after it emerged that allies of House Secretary West Treaty oppressing Ms Raina to sign up to a joint ticket for the Labour leadership, dubbed Wangela. That's not going to catch on, with the offer of a return to the Deputy PM position if she threw her support behind him. But sources said Ms Rainer is resisting both approaches and is instead preparing her own bid for number 10 after what will likely be catastrophic local election results for Labour in May. Ms Rainer's supporters believe she will be cleared by an HMRC inquiry which it is claimed will find she made an inadvertent error over the stamp duty payment on her 800,000 pound department.

Oh, just an inadvertent error, Angie, to the tune of 40,000 quid, right? Ms Rainer said to be furious at Downing Street for not doing more to back her. During the tax controversy, in contrast to the support given to Rachel Reeves, after the Daily Mail revealed she had broken the law by renting out her home without the correct license. In that case, the PM said there was no need for her. action over the Chancellor's inadvertent error. Now, the mad left are actually killing each other, okay, killing each other. And it is in a large part because of the tip whisperer, the even more mad tit whisperer, the leader of the Green Party who is out flanking Labor on the left and I think

will soon hit the top of the polls as Labor support plummets. Even, by the way, as Zach Polanski appears to advocate for political violence alongside that other utter lunatic, Femiola Wally. Watch. I know a friend of mine who lives in a town where he and his wife are the only people who aren't white on that street. And as a result of the riots, he now travels around with a certain item in his car to make sure that he can protect himself. Because as a result of those riots, knowing that if you stepped outside, somebody could come at you simply because of the color of, your skin when you're watching black people get jumped in parks, an Asian man being pulled out of his car and hull, for Nigel Farage and his party to fully embrace those people,

Lee Anderson to say, those people aren't far right, they're just fed up, and Nigel Farage to go on stage with somebody called for asylum seekers to be burned alive. They have said, we are on the side of the rioters. So if they get into power, given the clear racism within that party, anybody who isn't snow white is on the chopping block. This is, for me, a survival issue for a lot of ethnic minority people. Oh, shut up, Femmy, you utter loser and liar. I mean, he was clearly suggesting there, right, that it was okay for non-whites to arm themselves.

And the fact the MSM is not scrutinizing Polansky at all, while continuing deranged attempts to destroy Nigel Farage tells you all you need to know. This is how... And can ask a nuanced question, so first of all, acknowledging all of that. I mean, it's grim and it's worrying. And when Lee Anderson says these people are fed up,

there's no excuse for racism. People are fed up and to be able to balance the nuance between the causes of austerity, the lack of communities, the lack of integration that is often a result of the fact that there is no physical community spaces for people to integrate into. How do we find a way of navigating this conversation that doesn't for a second give an inch to this idea that people are fed up and that's why they're racist, but also does recognize that, I would argue, people are fed up and that is fueling racism, which are two different points.

So I was thinking, all right, people are going with Nigel Farage. Maybe these people are all racist. And then it took me, especially throughout the course of the Brexit campaign, visiting areas of the country that voted for Brexit and realizing that it was primarily around poverty. People were desperate for change and the two main parties were simply were not offering that change. I do understand the concept of people being desperate. I do understand the people of losing faith in Kier Stalmer and the Tories because I have no faith in them either. but I'm not voting for Arge I'm joining the Green Party

I do want different but different doesn't mean racist Oh good look You know Zach Polanski You know his real name isn't even Zach Or Polanski His name is David Dave He's a total fake

But he is a threat And the fact the MSM is not scrutinizing Dave I think tells you everything you need to know Meanwhile the world looks on an abject horror at what is happening here in the United Kingdom with the White House warning of civilization erasure. Thanks to the suicidal empathy of European leaders like Stama and Elon Musk posting this meme, which I think we all know, is the truth, right? Look at this. Free speech has not been banned in the UK, and we will arrest anyone who says it has. The White House Undersecretary

of State Sarah Rogers posted, I'm travelling in Europe on a diplomatic passport. So I thought I'd take this opportunity to say a few things, ordinary Europeans, but then critically, look, she added, and Brits can't. Watch. I got off my European train and checked into my European hotel and noticed that a member of European Parliament called Helmut Bronzetter tweeted, quote, there's no censorship in Europe. Everyone has to follow our rules. Well, I'm traveling here on a diplomatic passport, So I thought I'd take this opportunity to say a few things that ordinary Europeans can't by revisiting some remarks for which people in Europe and also the UK have been investigated or arrested or jailed by their governments over the past few years. So as I tweeted a few moments ago, a German woman notoriously received a harsher jail sentence than a convicted rapist after the woman called the rapist, quote, a disgraceful pig.

This was after he participated along with several other disgraceful pigs in the gang rape of a 15-year-old. girl in a public park. Similarly, a British woman was dragged out of her bath by 11 police officers after she referred in a private text message to a man who allegedly violently assaulted her as, quote, a faggot. And while Stama might lie that the UK has had free speech for a very long time, what explains this kangaroo court, and to be frank, totally dystopian sentencing of Joey Barton today, who received the same jail sentence as Hugh Edwards. Six months, suspended for 18 months, meaning he won't actually go behind bars like Edwards. But remember, Hugh Edwards, notorious BBC paedophile, Joey Barton wrote some mean tweets about the broadcaster Jeremy Vine and TV football

punants, Lucy Waugh, and Annie Aluko. You've actually got to watch this sentencing to believe, to Leave it. Given the gravity, persistence and impact of this offending, I have no doubt that neither a fine alone nor a community order can be justified and that the custody threshold is crossed. There will be concurrent terms of imprisonment for each of these associated offences, the sentences for each reflecting your overall offending and recognizing the principle of totality. However, applying the imposition guideline and carrying out the required balancing exercise, I'm satisfied that it's not necessary for those custodial terms to be served immediately. In light of the steps you have taken, I am persuaded that there is some prospect of rehabilitation that an immediate custodial sentence is not required to protect either the public or the victims

and that a suspended sentence order may, may itself operate as a deterrent against any future offending by you. For each of these offences, I impose a suspended sentence order of 18 months duration. On counts 2 and 4, the racially aggravated offences, there will be custodial terms of 6 months, and on count 6, 8, 9 and 10, custodial terms of 4. months, all such terms to run concurrently, and all suspended for a period of 18 months. If during that 18-month period you commit any further offence, whether or not of the same type, you will be brought back before the Court, and it is likely that you will be required to serve some or all of that total six-month period. That, of course, is not an end of the

matter. For the next 12 months, you will be subject to a rehabilitation activity requirement of up to 20 days, and you are required to complete 200 hours of unpaid work in the community. Can you believe that? That was the judge sentencing Joey Barton for some spicy posts on X, treating him like an axe murderer treating him like, well, let's be honest, worse than a paedophile, worse than Hugh Edwards, who can I just remind everyone, didn't have his sentencing broadcast to the whole country. And let's be honest, any of us who are now concerned about mass immigration are being branded a danger to children, shocking, horrifying, new reporting, from the Daily Telegraph today, revealing a former Royal Marine, has been banned from working

with children after he protested against illegal migrants. Free speech campaigners said spurious safeguarding concerns were increasingly being deployed to silence people with patriotic views in a scandalous abuse of the system. One campaign group has identified more than a dozen cases in which laws intended to keep children safe from harm from adults are being used to crack down on right-wing views. Concerns have intensified over the treatment of Jamie Michael. He is an army war veteran who has been barred from coaching his daughter's football team. That's because the bloke from South Wales was charged with inciting racial hatred after describing some migrants as scumbags and psychopaths in a 12-minute video

posted on Facebook following the murders of three children in Southport, the Southport massacre I call it. He was cleared by a jury after just 17 minutes, but his local safeguarding board, which is responsible by law for protecting vulnerable children, has ruled that he is not suitable to work with youngsters. This is sick. This is chilling. This is Stammer's Britain. And he might well be gone soon. But trust me, under Angela Rainer, Red Rainer, our problems are just beginning. Now the superstar panel. And it is so brilliant you have Susan Hall, of the London Conservatives and Lauren Lund Farrow of Lauren the Insider on YouTube with me today.

Lauren, let's kick off with Angela Rainer because this coup attempt now is so brazen and so public, the game is almost up for slippery stammer. But the nightmare continues, the Christmas nightmare, just when you think it can't get worse, it can get worse. And Angela Rainer as well, the £40,000 that she avoided paying in tax, I just want to point out, a junior nurse, the starting salary, would be £28,000. They make out like this isn't a lot of money, like, oh, it was a mistake. People go to work 365 days a year in some cases to earn that money. They have second jobs.

These people do not care about us. They don't care about equality. They don't care about normal people. They live in a bubble with their very dangerous think tanks that are not in tune with the people. These are the very people that don't give a damn about our children safeguarding. We've got no movement on the grooming gang inquiry.

This has been since the summer. These people are just giving word salad. They care about their egos and their bank accounts. Susan Hall, can you believe that Angela Rainer, a tax cheat, a proven tax cheat, has been rehabilitated within weeks to the point where Labor bigwigs have now decided that she is going to replace Stammer? What does that say about the corruption, not just of this party, but of our entire system? Well, unfortunately, Dan, I can believe it, because if you,

look at the front bench, if you look at the cabinet, show me any one of them that would be capable of running the country. They're all absolutely horrific. If you look at, you've got Miliband, who's an eco nut, who's costing us all a complete fortune. You've got, I mean, David Lammy is nothing but an embarrassment. And because Angela Rainer is exactly the same. She's a complete and utter embarrassment. And we wonder why the things, that they've put in place are damaging businesses. Well, not one of the cabinet has ever run a business. They don't know how business works. And I know lots of people say, oh, the Conservatives are just for business. If you don't look after the money, you cannot look after those that need

money. Those that are disabled, those that are genuine claimants. As it is, money is going out the door quicker than they can get it in. The few of us are working, and that will become less and less, having to pay for a ballooning welfare bill. I mean, the whole thing is a complete an utter mess. And if we end up with Rainer, we're in even more trouble, as you quite rightly said, as both of you

have said. She hasn't got clue how things work. I know, I think you're right. And it's terrifying. It's happening. It's absolutely terrifying. I thought for quite some time that the plot was for Shabana Mahmood to become the first Muslim

Prime Minister. But a decision has been made now by the left of the Labour Party that Rainer is their woman and her resistance to go back into the cabinet is the reason behind that. Now Lauren, of course, at the same time today, Stama's giving that big hug to Zelensky, you know, his boy Zelensky, while Joey Barton is being sentenced in the most dystopian manner, Lauren, for having sent a few inappropriate in the opinion of the deep state. I mean, I thought they were funny tweets. And his sentence is the same as Hugh Edwards, the paedophile. And no one seems to have a problem with this. There's no outrage about this in the mainstream media. We have no

free speech. We have no free speech, but also the mainstream media, you know, we talk about Hugh Edwards. Fine, they did out the story. But how long have the mainstream media covered for people that committed crimes like Hugh Edwards. Let's talk about that. They are so unbelievably toxic. And then Joey Barton, they want to make an example of him. You know, obviously the court is televised. And this is a very clear warning that if you do not fall in line with the deep state,

if you air an opinion that falls outside the narrative, this will happen to you. I mean, Dan, at this point, it is a miracle I've not been arrested. because, you know, you express any form of opinion and you've got the deep state trying to, you know, find a new Lucy Connolly or trying to, you know, make examples of people. And this is bullying. This is harassment of patriots. We are being mugged, muzzled, sorry, and gagged. It's unbelievable in 2025 this is happening. I mean, Susan Hall, that sentencing of Joey Barrow. Martin was extreme. I mean, he didn't post anything that I think could even be considered legal. Be offended, sure. I mean, that is, I thought, our right to free speech. And that judge in Liverpool sitting there today acting as if the bloke's an axed murderer, I have no trust in

the judicial system. Well, sadly, neither do I anymore. I mean, it's almost like sometimes I feel I'm sitting outside the whole thing, watching it play out, because it is so bad. We are all left absolutely speechless because it is so bad. And I wonder what it's going to take for many of us to say, hang on a minute, we've had enough now. And what will we do at that point? Because it literally is getting worse. Every week it seems to be getting worse and worse. I wouldn't mind the police have got enough to do looking for proper.

criminals. But then when they find one, a paedophile goes to court and you should rightly said gets the same sort of sentence as somebody tweeting. I mean, I'm looking into paedophiles because that's what the rape gangs are. Let's face it, there are all these poor kids are underage. Everybody seems to be ignoring that because that's not important. Let's go and look for the people that say nasty things. And we should all accept that you're going to be offended at times. It's up to you if you take offence people should be allowed to say what

they think and I you know you can't incite violence but you should be allowed to say something that other people would think offensive. Totally. I think we're going into a very very serious situation. Absolutely and the thing is Joey Barton did not incite violence he did not do that

and so be offended be as offended as you like but I would say to the people in the mainstream media who have sat back and seen this deep state persecution of Joey Barton and said nothing in the same way they said nothing about Tommy Robinson and the same way they said nothing about Katie Hopkins

and yes I am looking at you at GB News and talk TV be afraid, be very afraid because it's Joey Barton today it's you tomorrow it's you tomorrow honestly this is the pathway heading down developing today a growing Church of England plot to take on Tommy Robinson after the activist decided to put the Christ back into Christmas

with a special event this weekend. And my God, the pushback from the establishment here is pretty sick. Look at this from Theo Hobson. And the spectator, Tommy Robinson wants to put the Christ back into Christmas. No thanks. And now, the Guardian reports that the Church of England is to challenge Tommy Robinson's put Christ back into Christmas message. Church leaders are responding to the far-right appropriation of Christian symbols with outsiders welcome messages. Now, I'm sorry, one of the

reasons why we desperately need this from Tommy Robinson is because I want to show you the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, who, as Jason Jones put it, nearly crashes out the most of the most moment he realizes he has to sing, Christ is born the newborn king, during a Christmas carol event in London that was full with anything other than patriotism. Watch this. It's just hilarious. He was utterly, utterly miserable. Because, of course, Khan has a vision of London, which is fully Islamist. And that's why I believe Tommy Robinson is right to propose this Christian event.

Here's the announcement. This is... Will you be in line? London for the biggest carol service this country's seen. And do you know what? This is the first year. We shouldn't have to put this on. There should be a Christmas carol service. There should be a massive Christmas event put on by our government. Did you see Poland's this year? Did you see Poland's Christmas market switch on? All the lights all lit in the colours of their country, the celebration, everyone in their capital city coming out for it. We want that. Yeah? Well, this is the first year.

We're going to organise it within four weeks. Unite the kids. kingdom, put the Christ back into Christmas. Let's start focusing on our days. This is the first year. Wait through next year, the year after. We're going to do it every year. People will end up travelling from around the globe to our Christmas event. Guaranteed, yeah. This is the first year. Please come along. It's not a protest. It's not against anything. It's literally a celebration of Christ, a celebration of Christmas, a celebration of Christianity. Music, gospel bands, musicians, opera singers. We are going to have it all. It's going to be a beautiful. few hours. Now imagine if you were running the Church of England and you thought, oh, that's

a threat. That's a threat. Patriots coming together to celebrate Christ at Christmas. That's a threat. I know what we're going to do. We're going to advertise and market against that. And we're going to leak the fact that we're marketing and challenging that patriotism. We're going to leak it to the hard left guardian newspaper. That is exactly what the Church of England, King Charles's Church of England did over the weekend. Here's the reportage from The Guardian. The Church of England is to launch a poster campaign aimed at challenging the anti-migrant message of Tommy Robinson,

whose Unite the Kingdom Movement has urged its supporters to join a Carol's event next weekend to put the Christ back into Christmas. The posters which will go on display at bus stops say Christ has always been in Christmas and outsiders welcome. They will also be available for local churches to download and display over the festive period. The Church of England's decision to challenge Robinson's extreme right-wing stance comes amid growing unease among church leaders about the rise of Christian nationalism and the appropriation of Christian symbols to bolster the views of his supporters.

At a March organised by Unite the Kingdom in September, there was a significant presence of Christian symbols, including wooden crosses, and flags bearing Christian slogans as well as chance of Christ as king and calls to defend God, faith, family homeland. I thought that'd be celebrating this. What's going on here? Robinson announced next weekend's Carol event at an undisclosed outdoor venue in central London it would mark the beginning of a new Christian revival in the UK

a moment to reclaim and celebrate our heritage, cultural and Christian identity some Christian activists are planning a counter event to protest at the far right views of those organizing the Carol service. Wow. Wow. Well, one of those who is going to have a prominent position at Tommy Robinson's event is Bishop Karen Diewar. He was furious today and this is how he responded. Today I am issuing a rebuke, a clear and unflinching rebuke

to the leadership of the Church of England. Because what we are witnessing right now is nothing less than institutional apostasy dressed up as moral virtue and sold to the British public as courage. The Guardian's recent coverage of the church's new put Christ back into Christmas counter-campaign reveals a church leadership more terrified of controversy than of compromise, more afraid of human opinion than they are of the judgment of Almighty God. let us be absolutely clear the Church of England is not defending the gospel

it is defending its public image of course it is and no one gives a damn by the way including the Church of England no one gives a damn about the hard lift who continue to stalk and violently harass Tommy Robinson on a regular basis including at the weekend This is the shittiest furs. The shittest verb I've ever met.

Look, look, look. Shit mob. Aps. Look, look. Ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Hit me. Hit me. Hit me.

He's turned up a balaclabra on. You've all got, you've all got Balaclava's on. Let's go. Wankers. To my superstar panel, Susan Hall and Lauren Lund Farrow. Now, Lauren, obviously, you've got your insider chat. but you also have contributed to Tommy Robinson's Urban Scoop in the past. What's your reaction to the Church of England launching a left-wing campaign

as a result of Tommy and his group saying, let's put the Christ back into Christmas. They're threatened by that. I'm going to be presenting for Urban Scoop on the day. Oh, incredible. And I cannot wait because this is going to be an amazing event. But only, only in England would the church that our king is head of that he can't really bear to talk about religion and Christianity, it seems, but only would we be in a position where if we are proud of our flag, if we are Christians, if we want to sing carols and if we, not that this event is aligned with the migrant crisis, but if you stand against wanting unvetted migrants, you know, all of a sudden, you are the worst possible person in the eyes of the mainstream media,

the government and the King's Church. This is absolutely insane. You would not see them do this to a mosque. You wouldn't see them do it to a woman in a headscarf. You wouldn't see them do it to a Muslim. And yet again, we see Christianity being weaponised and distorted by the deep state, by the Church of England. They've got money for posters, the Church of England. I'd say they'd be good to put that money into safeguarding because we know the abuse runs deep in the Church of England. And that's not me being a conspiracy theorist. That's just what the facts tell you. And it is sad that this is King Charles's Church, isn't it, Lauren? Because of course there has been a lot of concern, even since he took the throne, that he has seemingly been more interested in promoting Islamic ideology

than Christian theology. Yeah, I mean, I think it's very obvious that religion, our religion, our country's religion, Christianity, is not a priority for King Charles. He has tried to dilute his association with the Church of England, in my opinion, at every possible opportunity. Even when he took the vows, he asked for it to be, as Bishop Kai told us, defender of the faiths, what are you on about? Your head of the Church of England? Faith, that there's no S. We don't need an S on that. Now, of course, you can have other religions. You know, we're not saying you can't. But when we are in a position where the head of the Church of England, And that church is bullying patriots who, let's break this down.

Patriots want a little candle and to sing Little Donkey with an English flag. And now we're going to all be branded as dangerous far rights. This is disgusting. Susan Hall, I describe you as Sadiq Khan's worst enemy. And this went viral, the clip of him having to sing a Christmas carol. Because we all know Kahn, and we know that he found this deeply, deeply uncomfortable. You see the type of joy and frenzy he has when he's embracing an event like the Notting Hill Carnival or embracing something connected to Ramadan. But when it comes to Christmas in London, right down to the sort of depleted Christmas tree in Trafalgar Square,

He seems to just be going through the motions, Susan. Right. I'll say two different things here. First of all, last week, last Thursday, was the Far Brigade Carol Concert. I went and I was actually very near him, which I'm sure he wasn't happy about. But he did sing the carols then. And to be fair, he didn't look uncomfortable. So I feel I have to be fair on that. With regard to Christianity in this country, and I'm a Christian,

And I was very upset when the king very first said he was defender of all faith, but I thought, fair enough. To welcome people from different places, so we like to be inclusive. The problem is, by being so inclusive, this is my view anyway, by being so inclusive, maybe other religions haven't felt that warmth towards us. And we almost apologise now, or some people do, for Christianity. We're not allowed flags. In the city hall, I took a flag and was told I wasn't allowed to take a flag in. Then I took a mug with the union jack on it or the union flag.

And I was reminded that I wasn't allowed to do that. So I wore a scarf the following time with the flag on it. And there's nothing there to stop you wearing clothes. So I think I'll get a Jerry Harry Pallywell dress. Can I just interrupt on that, though, because that is absolutely. insane. That is absolutely insane. And a lot of people won't believe this. But are you saying that I think it was this moment potentially or another moment? But are you saying that in Sadiq Khan's London council chambers, city hall for people outside of London, that's what it's known as, you are not

able to waive our national flag or even have our national flag on a mug. That's right. Because There are certain rules that you can't use. I know, I know, which is why I ended up wearing a flag with a scarf with the Bible. I didn't realize that. Yeah. But what rule does it break? Oh, it breaks a rule that you can't use any, you can't take anything in and hold it up in the chamber. All of us have had different mugs over the time.

I had one with Thatcher on it for many years and nobody said anything about that. But they've now decided that that. was bad enough, but the union flag is bad. So that's why I wore a scarf because there's no rules to say what you can and can't wear. But I do think it's a shame. Christianity is not celebrated as I think it should be. The tree this year is certainly not decorated as I would wish. And yet we have all of the other celebrations in Trafalgar Square. And you're quite right. he looks very happy to be at all of those. I just think it's wrong.

We are a Christian country. And even by saying that we're told off at times. So I'm afraid I do agree with you and Lauren. I think we've got to start shouting out for our flag, for our beliefs, for our Christianity. Now, whether this thing on Saturday will cause problems because of the involvement of Tommy Robinson, I don't know. I hope there is no trouble at it because then the accusations of far right will get even louder,

which is unacceptable. If the establishment don't like anything, they either call you racist or far right. Yeah, they do. They do. I can't imagine there's going to be any trouble unless it's caused by the hard left, if I'm honest, because it was the hard left and the Antifa mob that were trying to cause trouble at the actual Unite the Kingdom event, that, like, Lauren and I both covered, and there were no issues whatsoever.

But Lauren, I just want you to pick up on what Susan's just saying about the flag in Sadiq Khan's City Hall. Did you know that? I didn't know that. It's nuts. It's really scary. This is, we are living under a dictatorship, you know, whether it be Sadie Kahn or Kirstama. This is incredibly dangerous. And more people need to wake up to this.

And just on the point as well of the Carroll Service, my bet is that the mainstream media will run it two ways. They will obviously, I believe the police could potentially plant someone. Just my opinion, can't get in trouble for that. I'm allowed to use my brain. You know, a lefty to cause some issues. Or I think they will focus in on, oh, no one turned up. It was a disaster. actually, this is a last-minute carol service to put the Christ back into Christmas.

That's what it is. But the same mainstream media that want to tell you there weren't three million patriots and there were only 110,000, which is just utterly laughable, those will be the angles that I think they will go for because they can't bear to see people united. And this is what we're up against. We're up against not being able to have your flag or your mug. with the flag on.

It's utterly, utterly nightmarish. Rupert Lowe, the leader of Restore Britain, has just had a major international crossover moment, revealing to hundreds of thousands of patriots around the world concerned about the future of the West that Nigel Farage and Reform UK might not. be the answer. This was after Rupert Lowe was booked to appear alongside Tucker Carlson, one of the biggest independent broadcasters in the world, certainly one of the most

controversial. He interviewed three men during his stay in London, the other two being George Galloway and Pearce Morgan. Interestingly, I'm told Nigel Farage was given an opportunity to sit down with the American firebrand, but said no, in part because he's a little bit terrified about just how radioactive Tucker is at the moment. But for Rupert Lowe, it was a no-brainer. It was a no-brainer. Because of course, so many of us in the United Kingdom believe that this man is the flag bearer for the right, that this man is our Donald Trump. We've just got to give him the right vehicle, but many Americans don't really know about what went down in terms of, you'll remember, Zia Yusuf, who was then chairman of Reform UK reporting Rupert to the police for

hurty words. But as Welk by Wolf responded after the interview, do not underestimate the impact of Rupert Lowe telling Maga via Taka Karsun the truth about Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf. This will be a turning point in the Americans' misguided view of her. who Farage and Reform are. A lot of Americans are inquiring about the real Farage. And I do know that is true. Certainly earlier this year, after Elon Musk spoke out against Nigel Farage in relation to his view on Tommy Robinson,

there was a real calling in the White House. It's got a little bit closer in recent weeks because there's so much fury about our Prime Minister's at Prestama. But there's also intrigue about Rupert Lowe, especially after he posted last week. I get told by this person and that person to be careful about what I say, to moderate, to sanitise, to soften, to appease, I honestly don't give his shit anymore. I'm going to tell the truth. I think the country would be in a much better place if more MPs did the same. Tommy Robinson saw that post and simply replied,

Best MP in our lifetime. Here was the truth. dramatic moment where Rupert Lowe revealed to the world what really went down in terms of Reform UK and that terrible police investigation against him, based on falsehoods, by the way. Watch. Guns away? Well, I was, that was because reform, for some extraordinary reason, politically assassinated me and made some false witness statements that, that I had, um, Mohammed Zia Rudin Yusuf said that I had threatened him

in a meeting which was palpable rubbish and that I stood over him and I was threatened to hit him well I'm 68 and he's 38 so that's a bad idea to start with and it just didn't happen like that so you know at the end of the day we had a debate about Great Yarmouth and my branch office in Great Yarmouth no more in the WhatsApp chain proved it

but he gave this witness statement and then Lee Anderson gave a witness the statement to say that I was going around Parliament saying I was a very fine shot and I was going to shoot Zia Yusuf. Well, as a result of which the Metropolitan Police arrived mob-handed and took my guns away, and it took me about five months to get them back. So, look, and they also suggested I had early-onset dementia, which was, again, pretty unpleasant thing to do. Do they have any evidence? I don't think I've got early-onset dementia. Not that I'm aware, But I obviously, you know, those people who do have it, it's a pretty horrific thing to have. Oh, of course it is.

And if I did have it, and they'd said that, it would have been even more unpleasant. So, you know, I hope I haven't got it. I hope I haven't got it, Tucker. Anyway, so we, again, fortunately, I'm able to fund the legal costs required. I was able to go on the attack. And I think, you know, what they did was just morally and in every other way wrong. To my superstar panel now, Susan Hall is, of course, a senior conservative, but also a member of Rupert Lowe's Restore Britain, which is a cross-party political movement, and YouTube sensation, Lauren, the insider. Lauren, this was a big moment. This was a big moment, wasn't it? Because Americans have not been aware for some time of some of the intricacies, the nuances of what has happened in the divided British right.

but Rupert Lowe just blew the lid off that and there's a whole load of Americans now saying what the hell, Nigel Frasch, what the hell you took his guns away? You reported him for hurty words. You accused him of having dementia. Yeah. I mean, A, this is an amazing opportunity for Rupert Lowe

and we love Rupert Lowe. This man, he understands us. He is our voice. What I love so much about this is you put someone like Farage, and you've got so many people don't, you know, donating to reform behind him. And it just doesn't work because they are controlled opposition. They are deep state.

You have to absolutely remove them from the equation because these are the tactics that go on behind the scenes. It's disgusting what they've done to Rupert Lowe. And how gutter is this, this kind of behaviour? And I can say very confidently, we don't even know the full story. This is a minute amount that Rupert Lowe is telling us. You know, what he has been subjected to, he's had his name smeared through the mud

when he's been in the mainstream media and when he hasn't, they've just censored him. So speaking to Tucker opens this to a huge audience and actually can start to explain the intricacies to people in America. because Farage is nothing but a pantomime man on a stage that is being funded by people with very, very deep pockets. Susan Hall, you must like Rupert Lowe

because you took a bit of a risk, didn't you, by joining his Restore Britain movement? You were the first senior conservative to do so, although I note, Susan, there is now movement from the party in your direction. Some people even suggesting, let's whisper it, Susan. You know, Rupert Lowe might be a future leader of the conservative movement, if not the conservative party. So I presume you thought he was right to do this interview with Taka Carlson?

Did, I like Rupert a lot. I could never understand why they got rid of him so quickly, unless it's because he is an incredible character. I mean, you both know him well. He really is entertaining. He's a threat. He's a threat. He's a threat. I was just going to say, I wonder if that's what it is,

because he's a character, he says he's going to tell the truth. And by God, we need that with politicians. I'm sorry, as a politician, you should always tell the truth. And so I thoroughly applaud him for that. Sometimes he'll say things that may not be politically correct. Good on him. I mean, we all follow the rules far too much. I think things are changing. In the past, certainly as a conservative, I was always nervous

at being called racist, which happened constantly, being called far right. The minute I was selected to stand against Adiq Khan, I got both those accusations straight away. And it came, you know, from the mayor's office. And it's unacceptable. But I think these days, things are changing. And Rupert Lowe is certainly a character. He has his own thoughts. And please God, he will always tell the truth. I believe he will. I joined Restore only because it was on the guarantee that if he ever became a political party of his own or anything, I'd walk away. I am a conservative and I always will be. But he comes up with some very good ideas. His work on the grooming gangs, I applaud,

and he's asked me to be a witness when the investigation goes through in February, which, of course, I will. And thank God, people are beginning to take this seriously now. It cannot come up in the news and then disappear again. We've got to be like Rockwilers and just not let go until something occurs with this. 100%. It is really interesting to see the way Susan Rupert is able to work across party lines. I just want to show you this picture, which Reform UK will not be enjoying today. Basil the Great Post.

Lovely to see Rupert Lowe and Reform Sarah Pochin working together in the Digital ID debate in Westminster today, we can accomplish more working together, keep up the good work. But of course, Reform UK will hate that. And Sarah Poachan, you'll know, is sort of on the outer at the moment because do you remember she made that comment in the talk TV interview, which I thought was completely reasonable, but it was taken out of context. it was about the number of non-white faces in advertising. And rather than back her, Susan, and saying, I understand what you were trying to say.

Maybe you expressed it inartfully. Farage really publicly scolded her and made her feel like a naughty schoolgirl who was on the outer. Well, I imagine she'll be the next one to be pushed out. I don't know. I mean, more people should have come out and got her to explain thoroughly what she meant by that because any of us that are in front of cameras know that bits of your of what you say

can be taken out and taken out of context. And this is why politicians sometimes sound so reserved. It's because you have to be so careful because especially if you're on the right of politics, people are unforgiving. They don't stop to think, though, that isn't what she or he meant. Whereas if you're on the left, it would appear you can say whatever you like. I mean, you can call your opponent's scum and look to be coming back as the next prime minister. I mean, the left do exactly what they want. We've all seen it in the last 18 months

and throw stones constantly at any of us that are on the right. Absolutely. And that is why we need people like you, Susan Hall, who are prepared to put your money where your mouth is. Sadiq Khan's worst nightmare in London. I absolutely love it, Susan Hall of Restore Britain. Thank you so much. But Lauren, the insider, we'll be staying with us now because we have major royal news.

Breaking today, Prince Harry is planning to set up a rival royal court to Prince William, his own brother, after lobbying the hard left Labour government and specifically the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, to review his security protection. This is something the bloke has been banging on about for years, and it comes with serious implications for the British royal family. Here's the revelation in today's son. Prince Harry has won a home office review of the decision to strip him of 24-hour armed protection on visits to the UK. The U-turn could pave the way for a reunion between the king and grand-concourt.

kids Archie and Lilibet who live in the US. Charles last saw them in June 22 during Queen Elizabeth the 2nd's Platinum Jubilee celebrations, but Harry has since said it's not safe for them to visit Britain. The Duke of Sussex blamed an establishment stitch up because he's a paranoid and droid after losing a high court fight this year to reinstate his taxpayer-funded privilege. But the son can reveal the home office has now ordered a threat assessment for the first time since Harry stepped down as a working Royal in 2020. The Royal and VIP Executive Committee, otherwise known as Ravec, has now instructed its Risk Management Board to reassess his threat level for the first time in nearly six years. It has understood the process is already underway, with evidence taken from

police, government and Harry's team. A decision is expected next month from the government body, which is oversees by the Home Office. If it rules he requires armed protection, then taxpayers would pay for it whenever he is in the UK. But here's the disturbing revelation from Tom Sykes of the Royalist substead today. He knows Harry's real plans, and it is to create a rival court to William after years of battling and lobbying, effectively, allowing him to rebuild a former UK base. Here's what he's reported. Prince Harry could beef up his UK operation, which would enable him to be in direct competition with his brother's court after his dream of having automatic. state-funded police, security in England, moved to step closer.

Lauren, the insider. Would the home office really have done this without the specific say-so of King Charles? No. And this is, Dan, do you remember in the summer I came on to your show and we talked about the pap shots, the leaked pap shots of Harry's AIDS and King Charles's AIDS at the ROSL club. And I said, this is a club that Charles is the patron of. The paper would never be allowed to run this because of certain privacy laws. And so this, this is when I knew Charles is pulling the strings. And if that is when they were willing to show us conversations

happening in public, when did it start? I would take a wild guess months and months and months before. And we've seen Harry go to Ukraine twice this year. Why would you go to Ukraine if you're worried about your security into a war-torn country? Absolutely ridiculous. We've seen the government use Princess Anne and the Duchess of Edinburgh to go. So I think there is a targeted strategy going on behind the scenes with the government, with King Charles and with Prince Harry because nothing is adding up. Prince Harry came into the country in September. He landed and it was a fake Royal Tour. It was a bulletproof narrative. We saw all of the photographers like PA, Getty images there to provide the public with highly curated glossy images, very different from the normal

pap shots. We then saw this fake Royal Tour roll out and all of a sudden, the mainstream media were sycophantic about Harry, the return, homecoming. None of it made sense and none of it made sense because Prince Harry has either sued or is suing the majority of the mainstream media. So they wouldn't just write about him positively. And that's why I said in the summer, this is coming from the top. And so my professional opinion is that Harry has been advised to be seen to be going through the official channels because Shabana Mahmood came into her role in September and then in October we see Harry put an official request in for this to be reviewed. And now two months later we're told, oh, it's underway. They've spoken to police. They've done this.

Now the home office, this is the same home office that are telling us on their official X account about they won't deport certain people, they won't do this, they won't do that. This is the same home office that have still not got a chair for the grooming gang inquiry, and that was announced in June. We are in January next year. Next month, sorry, is January. We still have no chair for this. So to me, I believe the palace, they've underestimated the public,

and they've underestimated the fact that we have eyes. We have ears and we have brains and we're connecting dots and we can see right through this. Lauren, this does also, though, blow open once again and lots of people don't like talking about this, but I do cover it because for me it's just about covering the truth. Of course, I'm a monarchist, I'm a royalist, but I do also cover the truth. So for people who don't like that, sure, block your ears. But it does blow open these divisions between King Charles and Prince William. Because this is an absolute nightmare for William, who is trying to do his own modernization project, who is trying to think of the repercussions of taking on the British monarchy in an age where actually it's really challenging for a whole load of reasons.

And the last thing William wants, Lauren. In fact, the last thing he needs, I mean, he needs Harry here, he needs Megan here, like a hole in the goddamn head. And Harry believes that he can set up a rival court here and do the sort of touchy-feely royal work that he believes William isn't doing. And Charles, by if you are correct, seemingly nodding this through, is really actually not supporting his eldest son, the heir to the throne, who I believe he should be backing.

He doesn't need, William doesn't need competition on home soil. protective over Prince William and Catherine Princess of Wales because I love the monarchy but what I don't love is the lack of transparency with some of them and I feel that we see Prince William and Catherine constantly doing their best and they really do choose charities that connect with people and I think the monarchy under them is going to be incredible but I don't believe the palace let them do as much as they actually want to. to do because every time they do something, we love them. We want to see more of them. It completely

overshadows King Charles and Queen Camilla. And that's no criticism to Princess Catherine or Prince William. It's just the fact that we love them. We want to see more of them. But Harry seems to go out of his way every single time to try and rile Prince William. And so let's go back to this point as well. When Harry's security was the appeal was denied in May, where did Harry choose to do an exclusive interview with? He chose the BBC. The same BBC that Prince William had gone on camera and on record discussing how they had contributed to their mother's death, that if Panorama hadn't have happened, Diana would still be here. Princess Diana. would still be here because the way the BBC behaved is so abhorrent. It is inhumane and it led to

a spiral for Princess Diana. She felt vulnerable. She couldn't trust anyone. And it is so unbelievably upsetting that both of them don't have their mother here because of that. And so when Harry, you know, I'm always very mindful that we can read into every single. thing that Harry does and this and that. But I like to look at the facts. And this to me was a very clear, targeted message to Ryle William. Harry goes out of his way to do this to William day in, day out. And then we've got the palace, evidently not letting Prince William do as much as he wants to do, in my opinion, because I know for a fact that when Harry landed in the UK in September, the other royals, there was a, no press, don't do too much of this, let's keep them out.

And remember we said on this show, Dan, let the narrative breathe. And so we're all sat going, what is going on? Why are people, you know, have the mainstream media been seeing how Harry has trashed our royal family? Have they seen the same things as us? And that is all done by design. 100%. But Lauren, speaking of. media and PR catastrophes involving the British Royal Family, we have to come to this provable lie

from the worst woman in the world, Megan Markle, over the weekend, who briefed to all of the mainstream media, and Lauren, she did this. Do you remember those beautiful pictures that came out on Friday night of Catherine and William and George and Louis and Charlotte arriving at the together at Christmas carol's service at Westminster Abbey. It is the biggest night for that family of the year. At that exact moment, Lauren, and do not tell me that that was just a coincidence. At that exact moment, Megan Markle's team, in other words, Megan Markle, via a paid PR, briefed to every single Regie media outlet, every single mainstream media outlet,

including the despicable son, by the way, who just was suckered by it under the headline family first, that she was in communication with her father, Thomas Markle, for the first time, Lauren, in seven years after he had his left leg amputated in a Filipino hospital. Now, I smelt a rat very early, and I'm in touch with members of the family, as you know. And I was like, is this true? Has Thomas heard? And by Saturday afternoon, I was able to blow up this narrative that the mainstream. media was running with. There was no contact. Thomas had not heard anything. No one at the hospital

had heard a single thing, Lauren. So number one, it was a leak designed to destroy Catherine's big night. To some extent, it worked. That was the first thing. But the second thing was, this was a leak designed to make us think Megan Markle isn't the most terrible daughter in the world. Because of course, she loved her daddy. She loved him so much before she met Prince Harry. And at the moment, she's punting a flop Netflix series, which is about Christmas, and she claims it's all a celebration of family. Yet her dad's in a hospital in the Philippines begging to have communication with her, and she hadn't said a thing to him. Now, we then get to the point, Lauren, where her team say, oh no, no, no, no, she hadn't called at this point. she'd sent an email to an email address, Lauren, that has been dormant for five years

while Thomas Michael was in intensive care. And anyone who knows even the basics about intensive care knows that if you're an 81-year-old man in intensive care, you have no access to your phone. So we'll get to how this unraveled in the days to come. But first and foremost, was this just a stunt on Friday night that Megan thought would sort of fool us. I think 100% in my professional opinion, she went out of her way to try and dominate and to just take everything away from Catherine Princess of Wales that she could. And this is what makes me so cross. I've always said as well that PRs with Megan don't work

and they don't work with Megan because Megan doesn't listen. And so this is a disaster in briefing gone wrong. Megan, evidently, I don't need to know what's going on inside Megan's house with the PR. I can see the proof's in the pudding. Megan micromanages everything within an inch of her life. So you get such a disjointed leak coming out. And so in her mind, I think she would have gone, well, I have. I can say that because I did reach out. There was no, she didn't want to reach out. This is because she's in damage limitation mode. with the fact that she wants to ruin Catherine's big night. And that is disgusting.

But we see it time and time again with Megan, don't we don't? I mean, she has no end to the depth she will go to to try and ruin things for Prince William and Catherine Princess of Wales. And that's why, as well, when the palace don't protect Catherine, that's why we get so irate as well. Because I don't feel like there's a level of protection. There for her, you know, the mainstream media are so awful that they don't question these things. They just go, oh yeah, is that it, right, fine.

We'll write that then, shall we? They don't care about facts. They just want clicks and money. It's disgraceful because it was completely not true. And of course, Thomas's other two children are disgusted, completely disgusted. This is what Thomas Michael Jr., who remember is in. the Philippines with his father had to say. Knowing my father's phone number, right?

It hasn't changed for 15 years. It's the same phone number, right? You have not reached out. And Samantha Markle, good friend of mine, Megan's half-sister, but Thomas's daughter, posted, while talk is cheap, so you can believe it, She and Harry put that on a private jet and into the best medical care in the United States.

Until then, it's just PR bullshit. Exactly unless they prove intent with action and put them in the best possible medical care. There's no other way to slice this apple. Talk wouldn't help anything right now. When he heals a little bit, he should be on a plane into one of the best hospitals in the United States. Let's see Harry and Meg step up to the plate. and she then said planes come in handy for a lot of things and that's a meme that says GFY Meg

go fuck yourself Meg and she added and if bitch face I guess that's what it is uh tries to see dad she will be searched for recording devices and wires don't you think you can get near dad for a photo op for Netflix or anyone else let's just clear that up front blocked at the pass And I actually think she's totally fair enough to point that out, Lauren, because what Samantha and Thomas Markle Jr. don't want is for their father to be used now for another PR stunt by Megan Markle. So I think Samantha certainly is open to Thomas having a conversation with his other daughter. I mean, she doesn't want to deprive him of that, but she wants to ensure that Megan is not going to use this for publicity purposes. But of course, over the weekend, It was actually Megan's team who then decided to brief that they didn't want Megan to call the phone because they thought the conversation could be hacked or recorded by Thomas Markle.

And they even went on to claim, Lauren, that the mail on Sunday, via its reporter Caroline Graham, who is also friends with Thomas Markle, that they were puppeteering the whole thing. What planet does Megan live on? And this is the problem. She is taking advice from people who have nothing to do with this. This is a family issue. And what she's, they're coming from the point of view that, oh, the other side could take the call, do this and get in there before us. This is awful. This man is lying in hospital.

This should not be played out publicly. But we see it being played out publicly. because Megan is trying to dominate the narrative. She's trying to go into damage limitation mode. She has a Netflix series that's come out or a spinoff show that's obviously the last bit. Netflix are probably delighted and all sleeping well now it's over. But it's all about family.

It's all about Christmas. And so it is a PR disaster that her father is in intensive care has tragically lost his leg. And she's not speaking to him. And so this is what they do. they go, no, no, no, no. She did reach out absolutely. And then, well, she didn't reach out. It was an old email. And Dan, we're living in a time where if Megan Markle had for any reason lost her father's number, she could get hold of it. Oh, of course she could. Just call them up. You know how to do that. Just call them up. But instead, what she's doing is playing silly buggers with this back and forth briefing going on.

because once the Sunday Times ran their lies from her side, of course, the Daily Mail then responded. We'll get to that in one second. But we then got this ludicrous briefing from Meghan Markle's AIDS that she was sitting there, Lauren, phoning up the hospitals in the Philippines. Where's my dad? Where's my dad? Now, we know that's not true.

We know that's not true because everyone knows which hospital Thomas Markle is in. She doesn't need to call all of these hospitals. We know which hospital he is in. So again, this was batshit bonkers briefing, but let me take you through it to the Daily Telegraph that wrote, the Duchess's aides have now made clear that if he is willing to share a different address or if the mail on Sunday will share contact information for Mr. Michael, she will reach out. Now, that's interesting, isn't the term, reach out?

It's not saying that she's going to phone him. Maybe she'll send a text message, I guess. It is understood that the tabloid has so far not answered requests to send her a number or email address for her father or inform them of which hospital he is currently receiving treatment in. Mr Markle is also reportedly not in possession of his phone and sources suggested even with the correct number it would be extraordinarily impossible for Megan to leave a voicemail in light of Prince Harry's experience with phone hacking. But the Daily Mail hit back Lauren, a spokesperson for DMG media which owns the mail on Sunday said our journalist Caroline Graham has had a close

relationship with Mr. Markle since 2018. He contacted Ms Graham when he was taken ill and asked her to travel to the Philippines to be with him. Nothing has been published without his specific consent and that of his son. Ms. Graham has confirmed to the Duchess of Sussex's representative that Mr. Markle does not have an active email address, but that his phone number, which the Duchess has previously used for him, remains unchanged. Ms. Graham has made clear that if she can do anything to facilitate contact between Mr. Markle and his daughter to have a conversation, then she would be happy to do so. That remains the case. Any suggestion we have puppeteered Mr. Markle is entirely false and strongly denied.

Lauren, who's right there? Do you know what I think? I think Megan Markle's team are advising her that if she does get in contact, that obviously the text or the email could end up in the public domain, it would not surprise me to see something so nauseating, so fake and so highly curated by Megan, like we've seen before when it ends up in the public domain. On the fact of the Daily Mail,

you know, that journalist has had a very close relationship with Thomas Markle, the fact that it's now being said that they've been puppeteering things and orchestrating things. I read that piece yesterday. I really don't believe that journalist has done that. I think there is a genuine friendship the journalist has spoken about him being a father figure to her,

him being there when she lost a parent. This journalist is in very regular contact with Thomas Markle and I don't believe it's a transactional friendship. It does read very much like that there is a private friendship there and he is a father figure to her. Of course, Megan will absolutely hate that. Now, Lauren, GB News was covering this story on Saturday, and it all went disastrously wrong.

Let's watch this. Hello, can someone come in? I've just broken my feet. I'm not joking. Hello? Hello, welcome to G.B. News, the weekend. I'm Dawn Nes. Now, if you are in search of some holiday, son. No, actually, no, sorry, that's not what we're doing. And okay, welcome back to the weekend with me, Dawn Nesom. Now, Megan Markle has allegedly reached out to her father after reports he had his leg amputated following surgery in the Philippines.

Megan has been estranged from her dad, Thomas Markle, since her 2018 wedding after he was caught staging paparazzi photos in the run-up to the big day. Well, joining me now is role commentator and author, Ingrid Seward. Ingrid, good to see you. Thank you very much for joining me. Ingrid, what do you make of this story? Well, I don't think Megan had any choice except to reach out, which I suppose in English is get in touch with her father. It would have looked terrible if she hadn't.

Poor Ingrid Stewart there of Majesty magazine, Lauren. She's like, what is going on? That clip is amazing. I watched it about five times over the weekend. I couldn't believe it. I just don't understand. Why does Dawn Neeson use a completely different voice to present with? She's completely different when she's fumbling around with her mic.

And then you see her sit down and go really deep like this. It's just ridiculous. Yes, it does say a lot about GB News, doesn't it, Lauren? Also, Lauren, oh my God, I haven't seen this yet. So can we watch this together for the first time? I have recorded a new episode of the Disruptors podcast with the brilliant Rob Moore. It's actually my third appearance on his podcast. And that's a bit of an honour, actually, because not many people get, you know, the multiple call-ups.

So I hope this episode doesn't tank. It has just dropped on YouTube on Rob Moore's Disruptors page. Of course, after this episode of outspoken, please go and watch it. But I haven't watched the trailer yet. Could we watch it together, Lauren? And let's hope I haven't made a fool of myself. Okay, let's watch. Media, I remain cancelled by the mainstream media.

To me, that's great now. No spin, no bias, no censorship. In that journey, are you saying a lot of the news wasn't properly reported? We're not being told the whole truth. Is it that bad, though? No, I think it's actually worse. I have been mugged twice in Sadiq Khan's London. Slippery Stama currently has unbridled power.

He is more unpopular than any Prime Minister in history ever. What you think about Gary Neville saying that the problem is middle-aged white men. It's also his fault. Sorry, Gary! I'm a free speech absolutist. We've got to have these conversations. But you're not scared? That's not democracy. And what do you think of Tommy Robinson?

Well, I mean... What do you really think about the digital idea? is the start of a social credit system. In your 20 years of journalism, what's been the most shocking thing you've discovered? The most shocking thing that I discovered was that... Is that enough of a tease, Lauren? Would you watch that?

Yes, definitely. I think as well done, well, it's good to remind viewers as well that you've been in really unique positions. Not only have you edited newspapers and been at the very, very top of the chain. But you've presented other news channels and you've been in the industry a long time. And so you are able to cut through all of the BS

and actually deliver people the news that they deserve. And you are steadfast and unwavering in your commitment to do that. So I will definitely be watching this interview. Thank you, Lauren. It is available now, the end of freedom on Rob Moore, disruptors YouTube. channel. And of course, Lauren, the Insider, has lots of other great content available

to, including a brand new look into what's going on between King Charles and the Church of England in regards to this Tommy Robinson event next weekend, which Lauren will be covering for Urban Scoop. So Lauren, the insider, always love having you. Thank you so much for being here today. And we will reveal today's Greatest Britain Union Jackass in just one moment. But first I want to get to your comments because we've had a lot of them coming in throughout the show today. Thank you for that. Nick Monk 1098 says Joey Barton should apply for political asylum in the US. The more high-profile people who do this, like Graham Linehan, the better.

Very good idea. Douglas Alderton says, nice to see Lauren and Susan on your show. They talk sense against animal abuse, said Susan is brilliant at City Hall Conservatives. Alice are all of her colleagues. I love the way City Can stutters and avoids eye content. and his answers when he does answer is, I don't have the figures or the paperwork on me. Joy Cutner says,

why does Stamaha Zelensky so tightly? Will he be giving Zelensky another two billion pound check like he did earlier this year? Yoda says, right, they're getting away with it because you were fucking letting them get away with it. Stand up for your country. Yes, Yoda. I love that passion.

Absolutely, you're completely right. M.B. Electrical Services says, we are living in some sort of Truman show world. I'm convinced of it. Nothing at all is as it appears very odd. And Susie Perry says Tucker Carlson's show is brilliant. He's such a free thinker and he's friends with Mark Stein, who is my favourite independent commentator. Mark Stein is an absolutely brilliant man. As you know, I'm a big, big friend and ally of his. Okay, a reminder of your union jackass nominees, Angela Rainer, nominated by the Griffith report because she has set to reject a job offer from the PM and launch and a joint ticket with Streeting to plot a solo bid for Number 10 Downing Street.

Jackie Smith, nominated by Sharon Scott 668 for being a sour puss who had the audacity to deny the government is delaying the grooming gang inquiry. And Fermiola Wally, nominated by Matt Cass 48 for being desperate, unemployed, and a Zach Polanski supporter. Okay. Your results are in. In third position with 8% of the vote, Baroness Jackie Smith, the runner-up with 16% of the vote, Femi Ola Wally. But your overwhelming choice for the worst Britain in the world today with 77% of the vote, it is Angela Rainer. And I've got someone very special to celebrate as Greatest Britain today. She actually has a lot to do with this show. She's a big, huge help. to me behind the scenes and she's a big part of getting outspoken to air every day. So I hope you'll

take this moment for me to pay tribute to the woman who has been by my side as my gorgeous little sister now for 40 years. Yes, Ash Witten, Ashley Ruth Witten, she will kill me for revealing that her real middle name is Ruth, turn 40 today. And, as As you can see, we have been so close for our entire life. We're a very, very tight family. And yeah, we've gone through it all. But never, ever, ever has our love and support for each other wavered. And certainly, from a personal perspective, there is no one in my life who has my back more than my sister Ash. and especially when I was going through the mill and being taken through the mill

through my cancellation campaign Ash was just a steadfast rock for me she's my biggest defender in the world and my God I need that sometimes and I am just so proud of her and I'm so proud to see her become the mum she is today too to my niece Ivy Dan and that was my first meeting with Ivy

down after being locked out of New Zealand by that awful Jacinda Ardern for all of those years. But I won't get political when I am paying tribute to my sister. So, Ash, I love you so much. Have an incredible 40th birthday. Thank you for everything you do for us here on Outspoken. Okay, coming up in the uncanncled after show, we're going to team up with the Royal News Network because as you've probably noticed, there is so much Royal News today. We're going to get into it all, including Prince Harry making a dig.

At the British Royal Family, by comparing them to Downton Abbey, Prince William, King Charles, furious about that. You can join the conversation over on Substack, www. www. outspoken.org. We will be back with you live, though, tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9am Pacific. Hit subscribe right now on YouTube. Turn on the notification bell to be alerted to our new episodes. We're also now available as a podcast too, so you can find us on Spotify, on Apple Podcasts. Wherever you get your podcast, actually, all I ask is that you rate our podcast.

and review. Most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.