Dan Wootton Outspoken - TERRORISM COMES TO LONDON CLASSROOM AS TEEN YELLS ALLAHU AKBAR DURING STABBING

Episode Date: February 11, 2026

BREAKING TODAY: Islamist terror comes to Britain’s classrooms, as a teenager stabbed a 12 and 13-year-old at school in North London while shouting "Allahu Akbar" in a deranged ideological attack now being probed by terror police. But the cops, the MSM and even our Prime Minister want to gaslight us into believing this is a story about knife crime not Islamism. Meanwhile, in Canada overnight it’s another trans gunman shooting up a school, this time leaving at least nine dead in British Columbia, yet the MSM are calling the killer a female in a dress or a gun person. In his Digest Dan will argue why we must stop protecting dangerous ideologies ahead of protecting our children. Then the Superstar Panel weighs in: Co-host of Reclaim the Media’s Fox and Father, Father Calvin Robinson, and Emma Kenny, host of Emma Kenny True Crime on YouTube, who is also currently on a hit tour all over the UK. PLUS: The real Zack Polanski exposed, as it turned out the Tit Whisperer was a Lib Dem weirdo before going all in with the Islamist Greens. AND: Simon Jordan vs Eni Aluko on Talk Sport breaks the internet, but what happened off camera during their explosive ad break row. We’ll tell you. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: Shock new claims that King Charles is shielding Andrew from proper police investigation, as Andrew Lownie issues a bombshell new report about bodies being buried on royal estates. We’ll have all the latest with royal YouTube sensation P-Dina. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Witten. This is outspoken episode number 424. And breaking today, Islamist terror comes to Britain's classrooms as a teenager is stabbed. And it looks like it's by another student at the North London School, or at least a former student, while he was shouting Alu Akbar in a deranged ideological attack now being probed by terror police. But the cops, the MSM, and even our Prime Minister want to gaslight us into believing this is a story about knife crime, not Islamism. The suspect was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and remained in custody for questioning by our officers. This is a fast-moving and developing investigation, but we're not currently looking for anyone else in relation to this incident. Counter-terrorism police were put in charge of a double school stabbing in northwest London this afternoon. A 12-year-old and a 13-year-old were attacked at the secondary school in Brent. They are in serious conditions.

My thoughts, and I'm sure the thoughts of the whole house, with the two children stabbed at Kingsbury High School in Brent, and my heart goes out to everyone affected by this appalling attack. And when you have a 13-year-old child allegedly shouting, Alu Akbar while stabbing two other kids in school, yeah. If you can't, if that isn't your wake-up call, something is going horribly wrong.

Meanwhile, in Canada overnight, it's another transgunman shooting up a school, this time leaving at least nine dead in British Columbia. But the MSM are calling the killer a female in a dress or a gun person. Royal Canadian Mounted Police say a female suspect is among the dead with what is believed to be a self-inflicted injury. That includes the deceased gun person.

Okay. And then separately, do you know the gun person's relationship? Gun person, good Lord, in my digest next, why we must stop protecting dangerous ideologies ahead of protecting our children. Then my superstar panel, Way and co-host of Reclaim the Media's Fox and Father Father Calvin Robinson, and Emma Kenny, host of Emma Kenny True Crime on YouTube

who is also currently on a hit tour of the United Kingdom. Also coming up on the show today, the real Zach Polanski exposed, as it turned out, the tit whisperer was a Lib Demo before going all in with the Islamist Greens. Simon Jordan versus any aloko.

It rups on talk sport. But what happened off camera during their explosive ad break row? We'll tell you. And also breaking today new major news on the British Royal Family in the past few moments before coming to air,

Thames Valley Police have released what is a potentially devastating statement in regards to their investigation into Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. The police say, we have engaged in discussions with special Crown prosecutors from the CPS. We will provide

updates as and when they are available, but at this stage it would be inappropriate to discuss further specifics of this work. Now, that is a very odd statement from the police, because what they do not confirm at this point is that an investigation has formally been opened into Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. But my reading of this statement is that there is trouble to come for the royal family and that it is very likely that Andrew will end up facing charges. Because for the police in a matter of days to go from simply being passed this information from the Epstein files by the Republic organisation to directly dealing with prosecutors, suggest to me we are in a new domain.

And we are in a new domain where it is likely that Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, will face trial. Now, as I say, this statement just in from the Thames Valley Police, who say they have now spoken to prosecutors, we have engaged in discussions with specialist crime prosecutors from the CPS. We will provide updates as and when they are available. But at this stage, it would be inappropriate to discuss further specifics of this work. And just a reminder, that it's almost like the Al Capone story, isn't it? You know, they got him finally on tax. Are they finally going to get Andrew on misconduct and public office?

Because this investigation, or what seems to be an investigation by the police, is actually nothing to do with the girls and the sex trafficking and the claims of underage abuse. It is all to do with the sensitive information, confidential information, in government information that Andrew appears to pass on to Jeffrey Epstein. So lots of breaking news coming in today. We also have a news statement from police on this potential terrorist attack at a school in North London.

We will get to that very quickly. And of course, there's more bombshell revelations on the royal family to come on our Royal Uncanceled After Show as well. That is after the main show with Royal YouTube Sensation P. Dining. You can sign up to watch at www. outspoken. I'm also going head to head with my superstar panel today over who is going to be the worst Britain in the world. Here are our nominees.

You get to vote right now in the live chat on YouTube. I've gone for Enioloku for allowing herself to be humiliated by Simon Jordan on Talksport over DEI when she's actually just really crap at her job. I'm going to play you those videos later in the show. Emma Kenny has gone for the tip whiz for himself. Zach Polanski, who says he makes my skin. crawl and freaks me out. Me too, Emma. Me too. And Father Calvin Robinson has gone for Matthew

Doyle for campaigning for a friend charged with possessing indecent images of children. Now, here's the Labour peer who has been forced to effectively stand down from Labour, slippery Stama admitting today, oh, I was lied to again. This seems to be a bit of a theme, doesn't it? Labor embracing pedophile enablers and Mr Stama, former head of the DPP, say, oh, they misled me. What do you think? Keep your comments coming in. Keep your votes coming in. Lots of breaking news.

So now, let's go. So I have been wondering today if the sequel to adolescence on Netflix will have the main character, you know, that murdering working class young white lad updated to a 13-year-old Islamist invading his old school. by climbing the fence before getting into a classroom and stabbing two pupils. I mean, of course it won't, because a young Islamist doesn't fit slippery Stama's narrative like a working-class white lad killing girls after being radicalised by Andrew Tate online. Problem is, only one of those scenarios has actually gone down in our disunited kingdom over the past 24 hours.

As soon as the news broke here and outspoken this time yesterday, I knew he weren't being told the full story. But first, also breaking today, two boys aged 12 and 13, have been hospitalized after being stabbed by a teenage boy at Kingsbury High School in Brent, North London. Now, rather than being immediately told the truth about what had really gone on, the police and the authorities worked with the MSM to gaslight us. First, though, to North London, the scene of the stabbing at the school, and let's listen to the police. Armed and local officers were on scene within 13 minutes of the 999 call. On arrival, we were made aware that a 12-year-old boy had also been stabbed, and the boys have been taken to hospital.

We await an update on how they are that we understand. their conditions to be serious. The thoughts of everyone at the Met are with them and their loved ones and we want to thank the doctors and nurses who are providing the boys with urgent care. The suspect, who we believe to be 13, left the scene following the stabbing. After urgent inquiries, our officers arrested him and also recovered a weapon which we believed to have been used in the stabbing. The suspect was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and remained in custody for questioning by our officers. This is a fast-moving and developing investigation, but we're not currently looking for anyone else

in relation to this incident. At this very early stage, we're keeping an open mind as to any motivation behind this attack. However, due to the surrounding circumstances, the investigation is now being led by officers from counterterrorism policing London who are working closely with our local officers in response to this incident. There wasn't a mention of an Islamist motivation us at it on the British Bashing Corporation or Wokai TV either. Another arrested. This school is at the centre of a major investigation tonight. Officers were called to reports that a 13-year-old boy had suffered knife wounds

at around 1240 this afternoon on the scene. They learned another victim. him, a 12-year-old boy, was nearby. An immediate search was launched for their suspect, a teenager himself. Pupils at the school were kept in the playground as officers scoured the site and surrounding areas. Of course, that was only a power of the story. Police were put in charge of a double school stabbing in northwest London this afternoon. A 12-year-old and a 13-year-old were attacked at the secondary school in Brent.

They are in serious conditions. Police quickly worked out the suspect was another 13-year-old. and by this evening he was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. It is not currently being investigated as a terrorist incident. Hmm, that's funny, because according to the Daily Mail, the teenager pulled out a knife, stabbed the 13-year-old boy in the neck and back, while shouting Alu Akbar.

And that is the real reason I believe counter-terror police were leading the investigation. It's just appalling that our young people are no longer safe from this extreme ideology in their classroom. And the eyewitness reports of what went down are terrifying. Simon Therodoo, a martial arts teacher who has a child at the school, claimed the attacker managed to get his way in by climbing over a wall. It is understood the school had security staff on the main gate, which was often locked for the majority of the day. The attacker is then believed to have entered a classroom with a weapon. Apparently one, of the two pupils saw what was going on and pulled the fire alarm to get help.

That boy is a hero. He did something. He didn't just let it happen. More children could have been hurt. The attack is believed to have taken place in a science classroom with terrified pupils seen banging on the windows and calling for help. Mr. Therodeo called it an American-style attack and said he was not surprised there had been an incident because most of the kids these days are carrying knives. He also claimed the suspect may have previously been excluded. Another parent of a year-eight pupil who did not wish to be named claimed they had been told that a former pupil had carried out the attack. Shalish Sater, a delivery driver who as a parent of a pupil at the school, said children were in tears after the attack. He said his son had heard that someone stabbed a boy in the neck with a fork and he was bleeding.

My son said a guy came out holding his neck with blood all over his white shirt. People are saying the person came from outside the school. my son said he was faking that he was from the school by wearing a jumper or a jacket from the school. Now two victims, the 12 and 13 year old, remain in hospital today, but their condition while serious is not believed to be life-threatening, thank God. But next time we probably won't be so lucky, which is why we must now have this national conversation rather than move the topic onto whatever else suits the PC agenda.

Tommy Robinson corrected the son's coverage today when they reported teen suspect yelled as he slashed two pupils in classroom. Tommy helpfully added, he yelled Allah fucking Abda. Adrian Hilton juxtaposed these two quotes from the police. The suspect is alleged to have shouted al-Awabha, meaning God is greatest in Arabic. we are keeping an open mind as to any motivation behind this attack. Dr. Philip Casali of the New Culture Forum made it clear that the Home Secretary's thoughts and prayers in this instance are not enough. And the British Zionist, Eve Barlow, made the point, do you think it's normal for a 13-year-old child to scream Alu Akbar and stab two fellow Jewish school kids in London?

Because that's what happened today. So when you reject the notion that children in Gaza can be responsible for acts of terrorism, you are willfully ignoring the cult they are raised in. Now, I should add that so far there is nothing to confirm that the two children who were stabbed are Jewish. But I think Julia Hartley-Brewa got the tone of this conversation right on Talk TV. They're not tackling these things. They're not tackling the rise in anti-Semitism.

Because it's all a bit awkward, because we might have to admit that we've imported a problem and we've encouraged a problem. And when you have a 13-year-old child allegedly shouting Alu Akbar while stabbing two other kids in school, yeah. If you can't, if that isn't your wake-up call, something is going horribly wrong and we need to deal with it.

The grooming gangs weren't enough of a wake-up call for you. I don't know what is. Yet in PMQs today, our failed Prime Minister, Slippery Stama, did all he could to offsue skate. Can I start by saying this? my thoughts, and I'm sure the thoughts of the whole house with the two children stabbed at Kingsbury High School in Brent.

And my heart goes out to everyone affected by this appalling attack. We thank the police for their rapid response. It's important now that we give them the space to pursue their investigation. You know what he means by that right? Give the police the space. He means shut up. He means nothing to see here. Don't talk about this.

don't be disturbed about this. And when there actually was a question, two stama later in PMQ's about the terrorist attack, you're not going to believe what happened. Well, actually, you are. You absolutely will believe what happened. The Prime Minister was asked not about the Islamist threat, but the threat posed by knives themselves.

Watch. I thank the Prime Minister for raising the stabbing at Kingsbury High School yesterday. It is absolutely right that we allow the police to get on with their job of investigating this terrible atrocity and indeed the police are out there now providing reassurance to parents and people in the community. And indeed I'm sure I speak for the whole House when our thoughts and prayers are with the victims, their families and also those that witness this atrocity.

But will the Prime Minister now look at what needs to be done to combat knife crime across the country. It is absolutely wrong that people are carrying knives in the first place when they don't need to, and indeed they're drawn into this terrible atrocity. We owe it to the victims to ensure this happens. Madam Minister, can I thank him for raising this case, and it's one of the most powerful and important things that we do as MPs in this place, particularly when there's such awful cases. And he's absolutely right, we must do everything we can to reduce knife crime. initiatives and steps we've taken to remove the accessibility of knives where they can be bought.

We need to do much more work with our schools and young people to ensure that people don't carry knives and we need to work with the police and law enforcement to make sure that these incidents are investigated as quickly and as effectively as possible. And I think that's an shared endeavour across the house. Now 24 hours later, we have finally just heard from the police with their sanitised version of what went down. So they confirm that the pupil arrested as a 13-year-old former student of the school. They say he was a British national,

but of course give no other indication about his ethnic heritage or his religion. They say he went into a first-floor classroom at Kingsbury High School in Brent Northwest London before spraying a substance to, a pupil. They do not tell us what substance that is. According to Chief and Tenant Helen Flanagan, having entered the school, he proceeded out to a first-floor classroom, he entered the classroom, and we believe he sprayed a substance towards a pupil as he

entered the door. The suspect has then attacked another pupil, a 13-year-old in that classroom, stabbing him, and then the suspect has left running down the hallway of the school. As he is leaving, He then attacked another victim, a 12-year-old stabbing him before running off and away from the school. Even though counter-terror police are leading the investigation, apparently the police say it has not yet been declared a terror incident. Well, to me, it's terrorism. But there's so much we don't know. And this is what I hate. And we'll probably never find out, given the guy's only 13.

Was he shouting Alu Akbar? What is his religion? Where is he from? I'm sick of this and I am sick of the constant cover-ups from our police that the mainstream media get away with because they do not want to have this conversation at all. I think this is when we need a figure like Aunt Middleton in charge. After learning of the details of the attack, he vowed there is only one option to rid this from London and our schools with good old-school English discipline, respect, family structure, pride, honour, values and moral, something I will implement the moment I take London office. I will be the foot soldier mayor that is on the streets of London daily. I have vowed for my first term in office to not leave the city unless on official business for London. No family holidays, no jollies up on the expense of the taxpayer and I will donate my monthly mayoral wage to our children, women and military veterans charities dictated by you the public.

I will turn up to every fatal knife crime incident within my jurisdiction no matter how many or what time of day? At the top of my manifesto are zero tolerance policies, accountability policies and deterrent policies along with British English cultural preservation and restoration. I'm putting in place such a huge plan to make London the leading city in the world because we have heard nothing,

nothing from Sidney Khan on this, of course. And that is because most of our political and media class want to feign ignorance when it comes to the threat of Islam. Like that scumbag, Piers Morgan. And I'll tell you this. I kicked my former leader out of my party. Her former leader, Liz Truss, broke the economy

and has descended into a bonkers conspiracy theories. I kicked her out of parliament. She's too weak to kick her out of their party. That obviously wasn't Piers Morgan, but he responded on X by writing to Megan Kelly, or maybe it's because I'm in England and no, it's not been taken over by radical Muslims, only for her to reply,

hey, Grock, what was the most popular name given to newborn children in Britain last year? We all know it's Muhammad. And the stories about how our young children, especially girls, are being put at threat by the invaders, and also constant, people are being able to move on too quickly. Case in point. The Afghan migrant, Ahmadine,

Mulakil, who has been found guilty of raping a 12-year-old schoolgirl in Nun Eaton just months after arriving in Britain. Watch. In his room at his temporary accommodation while seeking asylum, police finally tracked down the man responsible for raping a 12-year-old girl. What's your name? Ahmed Mulakil had attacked her in Nuniton four months after arriving in the UK on a small boat. He first spotted her while out with his friend Muhammad Kabir swinging on a zip wire in a playground.

I think it would be obvious to anyone that we are dealing with a child, you're dealing with a 12-year-old victim who's been raped multiple times. Shortly before the attack, Muller Kill was recorded on a doorbell camera asking her age. She's been blurred and her voice distorted to protect her identity. How old are you? 19. 19. You see your education?

I did it? Prosecutors said it was clear he didn't believe her, but he lured her to a secluded area where he raped, sexually assaulted, and took indecent pictures with her. Mullerkill claimed that the girl had been a willing participant and denied forcing her, but she said that she told him to get off her and had been ignored.

People who found her later described her as petrified, frantic and crying. Are we just going to keep accepting this? And then yesterday, another one. Tarak Mia 20 of Selvington, remanded in custody charged with rape and sexual offences relating to three girls in West Sussex. As Leo Kerspomoned, it never ends. But this is the problem when we put protecting dangerous ideologies ahead of protecting our children. And there's another appalling example in Canada overnight, where a secondary school in the town of Tumblr Ridge became victim to a deranged 18-year-old shooter who opened fire, slaughtering at least nine people, including his own family members, at a home close to the school.

But Royal Canadian Mountain Police described the shooter as a female in a dress with brown hair and the MSM went along with it. Royal Canadian Mounted Police say a female suspect is among the dead with what is believed to be a self-inflicted injury. He was even referred to by officials as a gun person. That includes the deceased gun person.

Okay. And then separately, do you know the gun person's relationship to... But of course this was all to cover up the fact that you guessed it, it was another trans killer, a biological male. Because as Julia Hartley Brewer put it bluntly today, these aren't women's crimes, we know that. Watch. Oh, I'll tell you what they're hiding today. Tell you what they're hiding today.

Mainstream media, the sex of the person who has killed 10 people and injured 25 others, a mass shooting at a school in Canada today. A female wearing a dress with brown hair is how the perpetrator, the gun person, the gun person was described before they turned the gun on themselves. They weren't a female. They were a man. They is a man. He is a man. He is a boy who identifies as if he's a girl. Still a boy. This is a male crime. But you wouldn't know that from watching the BBC, ITV, Sky News, or reading their websites today.

No, most of the newspapers as well. Still talking about either we don't know the identity, or no confirmed gender, or they're still talking about a female killer. I'm sorry, these are not women's crimes. She's right. And now our MSM is also allowing slippery stammer to get away with the most appalling behaviour

in relation to Epstein and Mandelson and another paedophile enabler who's part of the party or at least was Matthew Doyle, his senior advisor, despite a new poll revealing 52% of Brits' belief he should resign just 19% saying that two-tier care should stay in office. Yet in PMQ's today,

when he was quizzed by Kemi Badernock, Stama was allowed to keep, harking back to the Tory regime, which I know was bad, but nothing compared to this scandal of the century. Just last week, he told us that he had full confidence in his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. On Sunday, he sacked Morgan McSweeney. Last week, he resigned. Last week, Mr Speaker, he was defending the cabinet secretary.

Now he is sacking him. What changed? Prime Minister. In January, she said she had full confidence, 100% confident, she said, be no more defections from her party. 48 hours later, the shadow Foreign Minister defected.

Eight days after that, the former Home Secretary defected. The only question now is, who's next? She needs to wake up. Her party is dying. Mr Speaker, the Prime Minister is demonstrating stratospheric levels of delusion if he thinks the problem is on this side of the house. And you didn't, he didn't. Rather than deal with the true corruption and the true perversion

within his paedophilic party, Stama instead looked the other way. He called Robert Jennerick a racist. He raised party gate for God's sake. and he even advocated for Liz Truss to be booted from the Tories for what he described as conspiracy theories. Mr Speaker, I'm going to take no lectures from the Tories in standards in public life.

She defended Partygate for months and months and months. And even now she says it was overblown. The Shadow Foreign Secretary broke the ministerial code by bullying. Boris Johnson kept her. The leader of the opposition promoted her. She sits on her front bench. Her former Shadow Justice Assembly complained about not seeing enough white faces in Birmingham, and she was too weak to sack him for racism.

And I'll tell you this. I kicked my former leader out of my party. Her former leader, Liz Truss, broke the economy and has descended into a bonkers conspiracy theories. I kicked her out of parliament. She's too weak to kick her out of their party. This is nuts. Do not let that evil man off the hook. Now, the superstar panel.

Emma Kenny, I mean, you are a mom. You are a mom. And now it even feels like parents cannot feel safe, sending their children to school in the United Kingdom because of the threat of terror, because of the threat of a 13-year-old young Islamist entering the classroom, screaming Alu Akba and stabbing young pupils. I mean, how is this not a bigger story, Emma?

Because I think that people are still afraid of calling things out that any person with any common sense can see is playing out in front of their eyes. The reality is that no one imagines for one minute that the vast majority of Muslims in the UK are thinking that what's happened today is acceptable. They don't. But what we do know is that there is a group of radicalised individuals who see killing themselves as a level of martyrdom as giving them direct entry, shall we say, to their paradise. When you have that kind of leverage and you have individuals who are struggling with the mental health or they're finding belonging and they're searching for purpose

and people are going to manipulate them and use them to become essentially weapons, people like me, parents, are going to make choices such as I'm doing to not, send their children to school, to withhold them from school, because as you know, if it's not safe, then I'm not taking a risk with my children's lives. And it's very challenging because, like I said, it's the emperor's clothes. You know what's happening. You're seeing it play out in front of your eyes, and yet you're denied being allowed that perception and perspective without being called names that make people afraid of telling the truth. Totally. We are constantly gaslit. I mean, Father Calvin Robinson, I am just being sent as we come to air more and more information.

about what actually went down yesterday, you're not going to believe this one, father. The teenager was caught at a mosque. He was discovered at a mosque. And yet they're still not saying this is linked. So let me just tell you what the detective chief inspector, Helen Flanagan, has just admitted to the police. Sorry, to the public at this press conference.

She said police were called by a member of the public at approximately 4.50 p.m. over concerns of a child that had been seen at a mosque in northwest London. At this point, we do not believe the suspect to have any particular connection to that mosque. And at this stage, we think that it may have been coincidental that he ended up in that area. And all of those at the mosque have been incredibly supportive of this investigation. Asked if he had left the mosque by the time he had been arrested. She said, I don't know the full details of exactly where he was. was arrested in terms of location, but he was in the vicinity of the mosque.

But Father Calvin, I guess just like him chanting Alu Akpa during the attack, this is just another coincidence. I mean, she's literally wanting us to believe that. Wait, are the police saying they don't know exactly the way to be arrested him? Is that what I just heard? Yeah, but he was in the vicinity of the mosque. I mean, this is what I'm talking about. It is cover-up after cover-up. They never tell us the truth. It is. And absolutely. The truth is he was arrested in this mosque. Where's the statement from the Imam of that mosque? Where's the statement from the mosque that he is a member of? Where's the statement

from the Muslim Council of Britain? Where's the statement from the Muslim Brotherhood? Where's the statement from five pillars? Where are all these statements from the so-called Muslim community that isn't Islamist, that isn't extremists, that aren't radicals? This is the grave problem here in that it's Islam itself that is the issue. It is contradictory. to our way of life. It does not blend well with Christian values. It is demonic. It is evil. It's wrong. And it's resulting in, unfortunately, the killing of young British people. And this is the latest in a long, long line. But they won't address it because it is Islam that is the issue. And I'm not saying all Muslims are terrorists. I'm saying the vast majority of terrorists come from

Islam. Because Islam is bad. It needs banning. And every single time, they know this because every single time they try to cover up the fact that, A, they shouted, Alan wants a snack bar. B, that he was caught in a mosque. C, that he is Muslim or Mohammedan. They cover these things up because they know that they've imported so many of them to our country. And it's an ideology that is hostile to us, to our way of life, to our faith, to our culture,

to us as a people that results in the rape and murder of young British boys and girls. And what was the spray? You know, what was the spray that he fired off in this classroom? All of this stuff matters. Then at the same time, Emma Kenny, we see this appalling attack on a school in British Columbia. and it's one of your lot, apparently, Emma, it's a woman. It's a woman.

Oh, that's odd, isn't it? I'm not very used to young teenage females entering their school and shooting up nine fellow pupils. But it's just you. I mean, yeah, he's got a penis and, you know, born a man and all of that. But the MSM are saying this is now a female crime. Yeah, this is just gravely unhelpful for. stop because there is not one person sitting at home thinking, oh, at the end of the day,

trans people are really likely to become school shooters. That's ridiculous. But the truth is, people who have certain mental health issues. And back when I trained, we actually used to call it gender dysphoria. So we used to consider it to be a mental health issue when somebody really struggled with their body and wanted to, shall we say, try to live looking like the opposite gender, the one they felt more comfortable with. Nowadays, we're not allowed to use that terminology to some degree, you're almost seen as being negative to people if you dare to suggest that maybe there is something on a mental health level going on for that person that makes them feel absolutely rejective of the body that they were born into. And with respect, when it comes down to school shooters,

we know they're pretty exclusively male because with respect, violence is far more within male traits. It's the way that boys are, it's the way that men are in comparison to the female species. The idea that we're going to start saying somebody in a dress, therefore they're female, or, actually suggesting that somebody with female traits is going to go ahead and do those things. It doesn't play out criminally. It doesn't play out emotionally. It doesn't play out socially. And it certainly doesn't play out on a mental health level. So again, it's what Calvin said a moment ago. We're talking about the exact same trajectory.

We're talking about being told to not say what's real, to not speak the truth. Because people are fearful that the ideology has gone so far that it's impossible to reclaim that space that's been taken. And the reality is that's the very time you have to start doing it. Now is the time for us to start rewinding and engaging with people so that those people who are so unwell get the help they need. Those people who, for example, are being radicalised online are getting all the help they need. But instead, we're just told to, be quiet. Don't say anything. Don't offend. And if you do, the consequences could be grave for you.

And let's be honest, in the UK now, those consequences can involve things like prison time. So that's very upsetting for people who just want to speak the truth. Father Calvin, what's your take on another trans shooter? I mean, it's almost like an epidemic over there. Yeah, I've never heard of a gun person. What's a gun person? I consider myself of a gun person, I'm a person that likes guns.

I think they're saying gunman, right? Someone who has shot a gun. It's cowardice, it's deceit, and it's sniveling behavior that we need less of that. I wish the mainstream media would just report the news. instead of trying to shape it and trying to shape our hearts and minds, just tell us the facts. Trust us, the public, enough to make our own minds up for ourselves. But you're absolutely right. Over here in America, there's an increasing number of trans shooters.

People with mental health should not be allowed guns. People with mental health issues should not be allowed guns. If you have a serious problem, if you're having some kind of mental crisis, you shouldn't be trusted with firearms. That's common sense. And I think for the most part, it's taken as common sense. However, the trans community has a special exception from that because they're not always seen as mentally ill. They're seen as something to be affirmed and promoted.

Well, actually, it's not the case. It's not good for them. It's clearly not good for the other people. Breaking right now, the net closing on Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor. In an extraordinary development that will rock the British royal family to its core, Thames Valley Police having the past hour confirmed that they are now in direct communication. with British prosecutors, which suggests an official investigation into Andrew is underway, and he could, well, now, end up, well, potentially in a jail cell.

That's where this is heading. Now, what's going to be very ironic and upsetting to a lot of people in regards to this is that it's a bit like Al Capone. They're not really getting Andrew, at this point at least, on the claims of sex trafficking and underage six or any of the Virginia Dufre allegations. This is rather about misconduct and public office. This is about the fact that he was forwarding sensitive government information, classified government information to Jeffrey Epstein,

the world's most notorious paedophile. And it's going to be very difficult for Andrew to deny this, just like it's going to be very difficult for Peter Mandelson, the former UK ambassador to the USA to do the same thing. But let me take you through this, developing story because as Tom Sykes has just published on the Royalist substack, this is now a major update on the police case against Andrew. He poses the question, could his Majesty's brother end up in his Majesty's prison? Don't bet against it. His reporting is

that Thames Valley Police are stepping up their investigation of ex-Prince Andrew and have called in specialist investigators. Now, I want to take you through this full statement. from the Thames Valley Police because I want to be completely transparent with you in terms of what we know. And I will also be honest that this statement is odd. It's a little bit weird. The police clearly aren't at the point where they are ready to quite blow the whistle yet on the fact that they are investigating, Andrew, because of course if they are, there will be questions about why has his house not been searched? Why has he not been arrested? But this is a long statement from Thames Valley Police Assistant Chief Constable, Oliver Wright. Let me take you through it. We can confirm.

today, the 11th of February, that Thames Valley Police is leading the ongoing assessment of allegations relating to misconduct in public office. This specifically relates to documents within the United States Department of Justice's Epstein files. As part of this assessment, we have engaged in discussions with specialist crown prosecutors from the CPS. We will provide updates as and when they are available, but at this stage it would be inappropriate to discuss further specifics of this work. During an assessment phase, information is evaluated to determine whether a criminal offence is suspected and whether a full investigation is required. Allegations of misconduct in public office involve particular complexities, and therefore an assessment

must be conducted carefully and thoroughly. While we cannot provide timescales over the when a decision as to whether a criminal investigation will be opened, we can assure you that Thames Valley Police is making progress as quickly as possible. And Tom Sykes's reading of this is that documents have revealed the disgraced former Prince passed on an email containing at least four documents in 2010 while acting as a UK global trade envoy. He forwarded the attachments within minutes of receiving them on November the 30th, 20th, while he was visiting Epstein at his New York apartment. Under official guidance, envoys have a duty of confidentiality

over sensitive, commercial or political information relating to official visits. And of course, this new statement from the police comes after King Charles effectively gave the police carte Blanche to go for his brother. But this was something he was forced into after a long time with the Buckingham Palace spokesmen saying the king has made clear in words and through unprecedented actions his profound concern and allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr. Mountbatten Windsor's conduct. While the specific claims in question are for Mr. Mountbatten Windsor to address,

if we are approached by Thames Valley Police, we stand ready to support them as you would expect. As was previously stated, Their Majesty's thoughts and sympathies have been and remain with the victims of any and all forms of abuse. But things aren't going to get easier for King Charles now. Andrew Launy, the author of Entitled, the bombshell biography of Andrew, which started this whole new train in motion, has suggested that he needs to abdicate

that the only way out of this for the monarch is to hand over the reins to Prince William. who is clean in all of this, who is not engaged in any cover-up. This is what Mr. Launey had to say to Jeremy Kyle on talk, watch. You talked earlier above an hour, could this lead to the end of the king's reign? And you said, yes, many people texting me this morning

saying the only way out of this for the monarchy is for King Charles to abdicate and pass the throne to William and start a new era. Is the future King William implicated at all? Do you feel I'm not, I mean, could he be held responsible with an overview of the monarchy, or would that be a clean break in your mind? I think that would be a clean break.

I think that we're moving towards that position just because of the cack-handed way that they've dealt with it. I don't think William knew. I certainly don't think he can be blamed for anything. I think he's tried to interfere. Clearly there's a hierarchy there, and he can only do so much. it's Charles and I'm afraid the former queen who really have the questions to answer

and also you said yesterday let's not forget the images of King Charles years ago with three million pounds in plastic bags from donors across the Middle East that's a fact right it's a fact yes I mean I think there are questions I'm afraid for the King and his dealings in the Middle East and to support Dumfrey's house

William you know seems to be clean and I do think we are moving to a position where the easiest thing would be for of the king to abdicate. So this is a story moving at a pace which is really difficult to keep up with. Father Calvin Robinson and Emma Kenny with me now. Father Calvin, it's quite extraordinary to think we're in a situation where the Thames Valley Police are already engaging with the Crown Prosecution Service.

I think this is only heading in one direction, Father Calvin. Do you? I can't see how the CPS come back and say, don't investigate. No, this is all very, very serious. From my own reading of the Epstein Files, it seems that it's alleged that Prince Andrew tortured a girl and forced someone else to murder this girl. That's a serious allegation that needs a proper investigation. And it seems that Royal AIDS were on the island with Prince Andrew.

protection detail. And so there are people that can be questioned other than Prince Andrew himself. And of course the ties to his brother, the king, are too close. And we obviously we know that the queen, the late queen, God rest her soul, has tried to cover this up and pay off the investigation as well to protect her own sons. But it's gone beyond all of that now that King Charles needs to step aside. Otherwise the entire monarchy itself is at risk. it seems that seeing that Prince Andrew may have said to Geoffrey Epstein

we're all in this together or we're in this together is damning and so whatever investigation drags down Prince Andrew is probably going to drag down his brother King Charles at this point

unless he managed to step aside and give the throne over to his son but I don't think he's going to want to do that he's waited his entire life for this role I don't think he's going to give it up very easily no indeed look there's lots to pick up on there and I do want to respond specifically to some of those claims about Queen Elizabeth the second.

I have a slightly different take. But first, in terms of the darkness of what you're suggesting, Father Calvin, you're absolutely right. There are murder claims in the Epstein files. Surely they should be investigated. But Emma, Andrew Lowney, who we just saw there, suggesting that Charles may have to abdicate, has also gone public now with claims

that there could even be bodies buried within royal estates. Now, it's a huge, allegation, but again, I've got to stay open-minded to all of this, given the horrors of what we're seen in the Epstein files. But before I get you to Wayne, I just want to show you what he told the Mike Graham show. Stories of, for example, two girls who may have been killed in rough sex, buried on a golf course. I understand. Sorry, police have approached the FBI about a story connected with Prince Andrew. There is, this body's been found on Royal Estates. So this is getting a dark

and darker. I mean, Emma, look, we've got to be careful, okay? Because these are huge allegations. But what's your view on just how serious this is now getting and how implicated King Charles could be? First of all, I'm glad it's getting serious because I think the public have had enough of people in powerful positions

being able to do whatever they want and getting away with it. Secondly, I think the classic term headswell role probably is directed at Andrew right now because they're going to want somebody who has to take the rap so that the public is satisfied to some degree that some kind of work has happened around the criminality potential. The bigger thing for me, though, is this is just more of the same. And I think that most human beings, we go through our life with that myth of security, the belief that most people are good, because we need it just to survive.

Actually, in positions of power where there's great wealth, where there's great opportunity, where you can have whatever you want. Imagine having a mindset where you just want to push the boundaries a little bit more and a little bit more and then somebody is agreeing that that boundary can be pushed and providing you with opportunities

to push those boundaries. Of course you end up in scenarios where there was horrific, horrendous things happen. When it comes down to our media, for example, films like hostile, etc., are made not because they're the stuff of imagination, that the stuff of reality. If somebody can think of it,

it will have happened, it will be. So I'm not surprised. The work I have done, the work I still do, it is always in this dark field. And whilst I think that most human beings are good to the most degree, there are some deplorable individuals. And more than that, there are deplorable individuals surrounded by people who will agree to give them whatever they want if the price is right. Absolutely. Absolutely. And the thing is, it's not everyone. And you can tell who it is and isn't in these moments, okay? because let's just remember, there are allegations, and again, they are allegations that a former British Prime Minister engaged in some type of threesome, possibly involving Epstein, possibly involving Andrew. Now, compare and contrast that with Gordon Brown, a man whose politics

I have always disagreed with, but who I think is a moral man. Because when it comes to this story, he is now urging the police to interview Andrew, not just over the misconduct in public office claims, but over the suggestion that he may have sex traffic through UK airports. So don't you think, I mean, you can start to tell who are the people who are complicit in this based on their reaction. And I think you can say, Gordon Brown, look, someone who I absolutely disagree with politically, don't think he did a good job as prime minister, but I don't think he's caught up in this. And I think he's absolutely right that the police should investigate. I've been saying all along, if you're innocent, you have nothing to hide. I mean, think about the police

investigation into me. It was based on total, spurious lies from people who hated me and wanted to destroy me. But I went through the investigation and I cleared my goddamn name. Andrew has to do the same. I've been saying that for years. 100%. And I also think it's very indicative of the kind of characteristics that certain individuals have within the media, for example, with big platforms. You've said nothing about things like this. They've said nothing about, shall we say, what's going on in Iran up the moment? They've said absolutely nothing about the horrific grooming that's gone on where white working class girls, for the most part, were affected. They just keep stum.

All they care about is, yes, they're platforms, but also the power that they are entitled to because of the willingness to either agree with what's happening in those horrible situations or that they back to. people who are involved in those horrible situations. I think the silence is complicity. I genuinely do. And I think that that is one of the most devastating things in our society right now, that these terrible, horrific, horrendous things, some of which that I have had the great privilege of working with victims-wise, that those individuals who've had power and opportunity have remained silent and allowed these things to play out. And when you think about Andrew, I don't think it will bring the monarchy down. I think for bizarre reasons, it's a bit like the BBC. You know, we don't need it, but we just keep having it traditionally.

But I do think that it would be very wise to think about a new generation. And I definitely think that William and Kay would be that new generation. I think there are a whole world away from, shall we say, the more tainted area of the Royals. Yeah, absolutely. I agree with that. And I do want to come back to that. But just before I do, Father Calvin, I just want to take you through what Gordon Brown has written today.

It's in the new statesman. I actually think it's astonishing. I don't think we can underestimate quite how significant is a. former Prime Minister going public to call on the police to investigate a former prince, the brother of the king, for sex trafficking, but that is exactly what he's done. He says police need to interview Andrew as part of a new probe into Epstein and his Leiter Express private jet. He said that women were moved from one Epstein plane to another at an airport in Essex. With evidence of incomplete flight logs,

that showed unnamed passengers were labelled as female, and names of male passengers were also unknown. So these are Mr Brown's words. In short, British authorities had little or no idea who was being trafficked through our country, and for whom other than Epstein. I have been told privately that the investigations related to the former Prince Andrew did not properly check vital evidence of flights. I have asked the police to look at this as part of the new inquiry. The Stanssted revelations alone require them to interview Andrew.

Separately, a line of emails concerns the logistics of registering traffic girls for English as a foreign language courses as a route to obtaining US visas. We need to know if and to what extent this was also happening in the UK. But again, Father Calvin, I think there are so many revelations at the moment. that it's easy sometimes to just forget about the significance of what's really going on here. This is a former Prime Minister suggesting that the police did not check vital evidence that could prove that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor was involved in the trafficking of young women to this country. Young women who he potentially had sex with at palaces paid for by us. Now, you know I'm a monarchist.

you know I'm a royalist, but we can't keep shoving this under the carpet for another day. Or the royal family won't survive. It's sick. It's beyond sick. It's the darkest of evil. What's been happening to these young children. And if the prince has anything to do with it, he needs to go down. And when we say heads must roll, I think actually in the biblical sense, we need to bring back hanging for paedophiles. But I don't think Gordon Brown is completely clear his name too.

You know, there have been implications of sexual abuse from him in the Epstein. files and not to forget Peter Mandelson, the Prince of Darkness, was working for him as well as Tony Blair. And Jeffrey Epstein had a heads up that our gold was going to be sold from underneath our feet before we even knew. And so there's the financial side as well as the sexual side of corruption. They're all. They're all corrupt. All of them need to be investigated. Every single one of them. It's disgusting that they've been getting away with this. And I think it's good that it's finally being exposed because we can see the rumors and the scandalous, gossip that we'd heard for decades about the pedophilic liberal elite is actually true.

And so now we need to put an end to it. We need to invest all of them and put an end to it. Oh yeah, totally. And look, we were all just called conspiracy theorists, weren't we? You know, or derided with a term like Q and on. No, satanic pedophiles are running the world. Just read the gondab emails. And actually, you're right, Emma, we have William and Catherine, who are sitting there, who have wanted to go harder on this for a long time.

time. I'm not at the stage of calling for the king to abdicate. I'm really not, but I absolutely understand why they need to have their position strengthened. And this is where I do want to provide a defence to Queen Elizabeth the Second. Because what I am seeing at the moment, Emma Kenny, is a lot of people in King Charles's orbit trying to throw Catherine and William under the bus, which is lunacy. I mean, literally they have been calling on you to do this for years, Charles. So I don't know what that's about, but also throwing Queen Elizabeth II under the bus. But Emma, it just doesn't work with the facts. And remember, I was covering the royal family very closely during this whole period.

And what happened, and it's, you know, for some people it's a bit inside baseball, but it really does matter, is that the guy who was running the royal family for the queen was called Christopher Gite. And then Prince Charles and then Prince Andrew were involved in a cooking. to see Christopher Guy removed from his position to wrestle control of the British royal family which they successfully did.

Charles was running the show for this entire period. Can we just remember the late queen, Elizabeth II, was in her 90s, Emma. And she was secretly suffering from a very aggressive form of cancer which she wanted to hide from the public. So I really don't think it is fair at this point to start saying,

oh, it was the late queen's fault. Can I also remind everyone she stripped Andrew, her beloved son, the son she loved the most, of all of his titles. She banned him from attending Sandrine in him at Christmas, for example. It was actually only once Charles took the throne that all of a sudden, Andrew was back there at Christmas, all of a sudden, Fergie was back there at Christmas, all of a sudden, Andrew was at royal events. So I just don't like the rewriting of history.

For me, Queen Elizabeth II was our greatest monarch of all time. and I don't think it's fair to blame her in this. That's all I'm saying. Well, I agree, because first of all, she's dead, so she has no right of reply. And secondly, when it comes down to it, she works until her death because she clearly didn't trust either of them to do anything positive for the country at the time. The reason that she literally died on the throne in such a state, you know, health-wise, is because of the fact that she felt that she had to carry on

because she knew what she was doing and that she was going to be the best monarch that she could be. And I look now and I think to myself, if you're going to start throwing shade at her, well, where is your evidence? Yes, she did pay people off. But the reason that she did that is because she was trying to preserve the monarchy's reputation. So she felt that maybe if things could be done quietly, that doesn't mean that I validate doing those kind of things. But equally, I have an understanding of it. She wanted the monarchy to continue. She wanted the reputation to be kept.

And that was a deep problem for her. Like I said, for me, if people really wanted to save the monarchy, it would let William and Kate take over because I genuinely think that they're a new breed. They look amazing. They come across well. They seem to want justice and that's something that we definitely need in the UK. Like I said, one of the biggest problems for me at the moment is just watching that there's all this darkness out there. There's all this evidence out there. And yet still I really struggle with the fact that people don't take it that seriously. I feel like people have been so drenched with this information, so made to feel that there is just a normalcy that this goes on, that people aren't reacting as

strongly as they need to react. When Calvin starts talking about his reaction, that cerebral visual reaction to things like child abuse and molestation, that's where I go. Because as a typical well-adjusted adult, your main need is to protect children, to protect them at all costs. And right now, it feels like people are just hearing this information. It's just going straight over the heads. And we need to stop that. We need to listen. We need to hear. We need to change. We need to move forward. Otherwise, what will be next? That's the big question. Totally. We can. We can't let them get away with it, although even more extraordinary perhaps, is the fact that Sarah Ferguson, Fergie, you know, the former Duchess of York, already planning her comeback.

And I knew she would do this because every single time she thinks she can get away with it. And she's now telling friends, I need to get back to work, I need money. I just want to take you through this exclusive reporting in the Daily Mail today, which reports glow trotting Sarah Ferguson's plotting an astonishing comeback to public life very much without her beleaguered ex-husband, Andrew Mount Burge. Baton, Windsor. The former Duchess of Yorker can be revealed as lying low while she gets her head together, having recently spent a few days with friends in the French Alps, oh, life is tough, isn't it, before moving on to the United Arab Emirates. She has also been spending time

with her youngest daughter, Eugenie, who has been in the region for work. However, far from issuing a public mayor culper over continuing revelations regarding her friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Ferguson understood to already be scouting around for a new Piati to represent her as she plans her return to the UK. Sources say she has openly told friends I need to get back to work, I need money. Fascinatingly, she has also made it clear that this future does not include her ex-husband, despite once describing them as the happiest divorce couple in the world. She has now said to have told a friend, when I come back, I'm going to have to put some distance between myself and Andrew. It is understood she will not join him at his new home on the King's Sandrianum

estate and is planning to remain in the Windsor area. Her friends believe she is kidding herself if she thinks she can pick up where she left off and return to any kind of normal life. Emails between the ex-Tuchess and Epstein show her repeatedly chasing him for money to pay off her debts, as well as practical support over a considerable period of time. They contain evidence she remained in close contact with him after he was released from prison for sex offences against children, even taking her two daughters Eugenie and Betris to have lunch with him five days after her release. Sarah now said to be deeply concerned about her two daughters, who have been dragged into the scandal by their parents.

wish she'd thought of that at the time, don't you? A source said Sarah is upset that their names have apparently been taken off the guest list for red carpet and charity events. Oh, good Lord. They just have no idea about the seriousness of this. Regarding her return to the UK, another source said, I don't know whether Sarah is just deluded or desperate. She is 66 and has no home and no discernible income.

The public is disgusted by what they have read. And how would she pay a new PR team to rescue her reputation? She is said to be looking to bounce back in typical Fergie style. I'm just not sure the public will buy it. I mean, Father Calvin, we're not going to buy it this time, are we? You literally were joking with Jeffrey Epstein about Eugenie being off on a shagging party. You took your two young teenagers to see the Pido five days after he was released from prison. You sent him lots of pictures of Beatrice and Eugenie.

I don't think there is a way back for Fergie this time, Father Calvin, do you? No, I think there's, we live in different worlds. I honestly think, you know, I think what Emma was saying was right in that this is going above most people's heads because we've been desensitized to it. But it's the darkest evil that you can imagine harming the innocence, you know, young girls. And what's happened to them has been disgusting. But these people, the elite, they live in a different paradigm entirely. The fact that Fergie would be emailing Epstein, not just sending pictures of her daughters, but having conversations about her daughters having sex, which is, you know, shagging around, which is just debauched. But also her and Beatrice may have offended Epstein.

There's an email from Sarah Ferguson. I hope we haven't offended you. After he'd been convicted, it's like these people don't see Peter Philly as wrong. They clearly, it's part of their norm. That's the scariest thing about all of this. The rich and powerful, the elite, it's just ordinary to them.

There's nothing dark about it. That's why we need to drain the swamp quite literally. Do we need an elite? What do we have an elite for? No, we don't. We don't. I mean, the entire elite class needs to fall. And if they don't fall after the release of the Epstein emails, I don't think they ever will.

Emma, I just wanted to show you a moment on Pear's Morgan uncensored last night, though, because I do find it really ironic that his show is titled That. Yet he invited Lady Victoria Harvey on to humiliate her, to yell at her, to sort of engage in a circus, didn't actually want to hear her point because she, has been made to almost be the walking, talking personification of Andrew. Now, we know she's defended her for a lot, him for a long time. I really like Lady Victoria Harvey. I've had her on this show. That doesn't mean I agree with her on everything. I've debated her on Andrew lots. But I really don't understand the point of why you have a show called Unsensed, you invite a guest

on. And then when she's saying things you don't like, you literally cut her microphone. She was just left like, you know, he didn't want to hear it. Anyway, I'll get your reaction, but I want to show you what happened first. ...appeared down a conspiracy rabbit hole that is frankly repulsive. I've always been right about my conspiracies. You know, you were wrong about COVID and you were wrong about the vaccine years. You don't give a damn about these girls. You don't give a damn about these victims.

You think it's fine to smear all of them. You admit it. You proudly admit it. And I think it's shameful. We now know from these documents just how disgusting this scandal is. And yet still you come on shows like this. and you're still in total denial. For reasons are completely battling.

Can we talk about the quality of girls? So Anushka de Georgia as an example. You know what she did? Like this is the caliber of person we're talking about. Anushka to Georgia. Actually, I'm not going to let you smear them. I'm sorry. She was the girl that set up Tom Parker Bowls.

No, I'm not going to let you do it. No, no, she did it. She did that long story. I'm not letting you do it. I'm not letting you smear these victims anymore. I'm just not going to let you do it. Just cut her off. Olly Dougmore.

Now, Emma, Kenny, I'm pretty certain that you would disagree with Lady Victoria Harvey pretty strongly on this stuff. But is it right to invite her on the show, to platform her, so to speak, and then to cut off her microphone, given... Not when you have the title of the show that he has. You know, it's got a title that specifically suggests that you wouldn't be censored. So I'm really not somebody who likes that kind of irony. Also, what I would say, and why I understand sometimes the mindsets of those individuals who do live in, I have literally worked with children who've been sexually molested by their dad. And I've had to watch the mother reject the claims.

And the mother genuinely rejects the claims, not because she believes that the child is some kind of deviant liar. They just believe that the child has got it wrong, and they know their husband and the husband would never do A, B or C. So I have literally witnessed people who even when you show them the evidence, you show them the evidence from the police, from the hospital, from the CPS, when they decide to go to court with them. it just does not register because they absolutely believe the relationship they had with that person

is a relationship that no one else has in comparison. Therefore, they have a trust level with them, which means that no matter, everybody else is shouting about the reality of it and the trust that's been broken, they are sticking with that person. So I think that she represents something important to hear, which is somebody that can be provided with all the evidence in the world who will still stand by somebody who is guilty. That is a very common feature in our society. And it's by listening to them and seeing how that delusings, works and then helping them to break that delusion, shall we say, that actually we gain ground, momentum and change. And so cutting her off is stupid, it's childish, it's bullying, but I was blocked by Pearce Morgan for once daring to suggest that he was being disrespectful to someone.

That's all it took. One tweet, and that was it. I was vetoed. And I think that really marks the man. It's as simple as that. Yeah, it really does. It really does. I think if you haven't been blocked by here's Morgan, there's something wrong with you at this point. Now it's time to reveal what a slimy political cavalian we have in Zach Polansky. You know he is the tit whisperer, right? This is the dude who now runs the Green Party, but actually is just the ultimate grifter. He's always wanted to be famous and he's just been able to really follow whichever political train he thinks is going to get him there faster. Of course, the expose behind his nickname saw him promise a woman who was actually posing undercover for the Sun newspaper

that his bizarre form of hypnotism could see her breasts enlarged. But I'm actually more concerned about his political ideology actually, rather than his bizarre hypnotism claims. because I think what a lot of people have forgotten is that he is the ultimate flip-flopper who was part of the liberal Democrats until he joined the Greens simply because he got chummy with the ex-leader of the party Natalie Bennett and decided refugees in Nut Zero were now his obsession. But I just want to show you the tit whisperer as a Lib Dem because I think Think this is the real Zach Polanski. And no one, not even those on the hard left, should be sucked in.

This was the tit-wist for making a tit of himself at the Liberal Democratic Conference less than 10 years ago. Watch. Boom! Boom! Boom! I'm disturbed from the TV as my best mate and flatmate is shouting to me. He shouts, Zach, can you turn it down, please? I know you want to enjoy the full drama of Lib Dem conference, but the bass in Paddy Ashdown's voice, it's making a whole room shake.

Whoops. Well, part of the answer is soup. And when Nick told the nation, our party will come back, our party will win again, it will take patience, resilience and grits. We said their qualities, we eat for breakfast. What have you done today to make you feel proud? What did we do in five years of government to make us proud Liberal Democrat conference? And let's stay proud to be Liberal Democrats.

Listen, baby! But actually, no. I'm going to become a green. Watch. When Farage says jump, Labor might say how high. But the Greens will never dance to the tune of a Trump-loving, tax-evoiding, science-distance science-distance. NHS dismantling corporate stooge. But who is the real, Zach Polanski?

I thought we saw him on addition of question time at the end of last year with a compassionate facade slipped when he revealed the reason he really wants to collapse our borders. Watch. Most people in this audience and watching this at home will have had an experience of a care worker. One in five care workers are foreign nationals. Now, I don't know about you,

but I don't particularly want to wipe someone's bum And I'm very grateful for the people who do this work, this really important work, whether it's in the care sector, whether it's in the NHS. But of course, the left forgives him for thinking that he'd rather immigrants do the peasant jobs, because of course, that's what they think too. But it might also be to do with him keeping the identity politics machine well and truly alive for reminding everyone that he's gay. So I went on my first date with my boyfriend who went to a prat, I think, near Warren Street.

Where do you go and what do you do to have fun? I love going out dancing. In fact, I'll just turn heaven just two nights again. Oh, God. Where are you? They will try and divide and distract us. They will say that a threat is on a small boat or a dinghy. But we know a real threat is flying above our head at climate just above the climate crisis.

To my superstar panel, Father Calvin Robinson and Emma Kenny, Emma, this dude's not for real. is he? He has completely managed to succour the Greens, but you saw him there at the Lib Dem conference. That's the real Zach Polanski, isn't it? He's just a grifter, don't you think? He just wants to be famous. Oh, he definitely wants to be famous. But there again, most politicians want to be famous these days. I think that's part of the attraction. I think that when you've got a desire for power, then fame is something that absolutely gives you that opportunity. Also, it's not necessarily been the most challenging scenario to end up heading the Greens. And what really concerns me is that his policies are terrible. For example, he just talked then about the private jets above the food banks. Well, yes, because the billionaires

are leaving. Of course they are, because they know what to do with their money. And we're getting instead, people coming on small boats who are actually going to cost a taxpayer for the next hundred years. The reality is that that man is somebody that goes where he thinks the popular vote will be in this point he's going for those liberals who don't have to worry about money and also for individuals who are heavily on welfare and also for the very very hard left and the immigrants who are coming over here ideally those who might have arrived illegally all of that is why he's getting that kind of populism at the moment and he makes my skin crawl and I feel really bad saying that because I think that's the first time I've ever said anything personal in that way about somebody

on any kind of platform but that's how I feel it literally puts me on the hat of my neck just standing up going, no, this does not make sense. And he is not somebody I trust. I don't trust him. You see, that's the thing. I don't need to know who he is or what he's doing. When he speaks, it feels inauthentic and I don't trust him. He scares me.

Well, I mean, you shouldn't trust him. He took 200 quid, telling a woman that his hypnotism would be better than a boob job. I mean, no one should trust this guy. But Father Calvin, I think Emma makes a really good point about the real Zach Polanski. And actually, I know you can just try and dismiss him as a joke. And he is such a joke like figuring in a lot of those videos. But there's something sinister about his popularity. And to me, Father Calvin, there's something sinister in the fact that he's a gay Jew

who has fully gone neck deep in the Islamist madness because he knows that's where the votes are. Interesting, isn't it? Just like Mamdani in New York. is supposed to be Mohammedan but of course was mingling and cohorting with the Jewish cohort over here. And likewise, we all thought Zelensky was some kind of actor. And it seems that he has been in the Epstein Files and that there was some kind of coordinating going on behind the scenes to put a person in place to play a role in order to mess up an economy in order for the elite to make more money.

And I see similar things happening here. I don't trust this guy. Zach Polanski seems fake. You see, you know, God gave us gifts of conscience and instinct so that we can discern things. And we can't always articulate why. We can't tangibly point out why, but we can trust in our gut that I don't like that guy. There's something about him. I don't trust.

I, you know, like Emma says, he gets your heckles up. It's true. There's something about him that I cannot articulate that I dislike strongly. And that's a gift from God that we should trust, we should lean on. And I've said this time and time again, because we're convinced in the modern world to ignore that instinct. And how many times have you heard stories from women who have been abused and they say, well, I would have walked out, I would have clutched my handbag, but I didn't want to seem racist, or I didn't want to this or that, or I had a gut feeling, but I didn't want to seem like I was a man hater.

Like, we should trust our gut. And my gut tells me that he's not a good guy. I think your gut is right, Father Calvin Robinson, I think your gut is very much right on that. Now, it is the battle that has blown up all across the internet over the past 24 hours. Have you seen it? Talk Sport, host, ex-Chrystal Palace, chairman, Michelle Jubri's fiancé, Simon Jordan, very accomplished footballing broadcaster in his own right, versus Annie Aluku, who I think has to be one of the most annoying people I've ever seen on television,

don't think she's a good broadcaster at all. And it all kicked off between the pair on Talk Sport, and we're going to get into that in just one moment. but first I've got to show you what went down during the ad break, because this footage has been leaked online, and it shows that things got even more heated between these two off air rather than on air. Now, as you can imagine, and as is very predictable these days, Simon Jordan has been highly criticised there for being too aggressive towards Aluko. And the Daily Mail even commissioned an expert lip reader to reveal what Jordan said to a luco during that furious ad break bust up. Jeremy Freeman telling Daily Mail sport that he had said, but nobody cares.

Drop this. It's definitely you. I know it. I know. Now, it's not clear what Aluco said in response. But Simon Jordan has now hit back at the claims that he was being overaggressive saying, what I said to any in the break was you were foolish to have a go at Ian Wright. For whatever reason, he's a national treasure. You're silly to have done that. You shouldn't have done it. You shouldn't

have left it alone. It's your own fault. You brought this on upon yourself where you were having a fluid exchange and it wasn't hostile. It wasn't aggressive. And I do think this is one of the most frustrating things. Amongst the woke mob these days, like, as a man, you're apparently meant to be of equal standing, but as soon as someone like Simon Jordan has an actual intellectually engaged and robust conversation with a loco, he's a terrible sexist who's bullying her in some way. And I actually think what Simon Jordan said about all of this is right, because remember, it was any herself. who kicked all of this off on a podcast where her victim mentality suggested

that the reason she wasn't given the opportunity to broadcast at the Women's World Cup final was in some way connected to racism or DEI. Watch. At the women's lioness is final. I'm sat in the stands.

I wasn't on ITV for the final. Farrow Williams was sat next to me. Farrow Williams has 170,000. for England. The two broadcasters that had the rights, ITV, BBC. On BBC, you've got Ellen White, Steph Horton, Nedamanura. No offence to Neddemonanora. Nothing against him. I don't know whether he played for England or not. You're on the main panel for the final for England women. Let's go over to ITV. I'm in the stands with 105 caps, so you've got two women, two hundred ninety caps, something ridiculous.

ITV and it's Ian Wright, Emma Hayes and Kazkani. So out of six spots, who have gone to men, meanwhile you've got 290 sitting in the stands. I've just told you I've never done a final. And I'm going to, I'm probably going to struggle to think of any woman female pundit who's done a men's major final. As a pundit.

As a pundit. I'm not talking about presenters because it's a, people like to conflate the two. It's a different role. It's like comparing a forward and a defender. It's different jobs. I'm talking about as a pundit. So something's not right there. Anya locoo. I'm not a football guy. But I can promise you I know exactly why you haven't

got these big gigs because you have the most annoying voice I've ever heard on the television. Okay? You're not a good broadcaster. There's nothing likable about you. People don't engage with you. It's absolutely nothing to do with the colour of your skin. And that's why I believe she was so stupid to enter the line to stand and go head to head with Simon Jordan on his own talk sports show. Watch. As far as expertise is concerned, when I listen to her as a pundit and the times that I've listened to her,

I don't think that she's particularly enlightening or illuminating or engaging or charismatic or sometimes comes across particularly likable. But that's my view. And some people will have the same view about me. And my view of pundit is when I listen to a pundit, whoever that pundit might be, whatever they may be, whether it's male, female, black, white, yellow, green. It's do I learn something for them? Do they engage me? Do I find them interesting and entertaining?

And do they merit my attention? And that's my response to the reasons why I was saying the thing I said. He's sin rabies agent. Yeah, you know, it's an opinion, isn't it? Which we're all entitled to. I put value on opinions, right? You have to because there's, you know, everybody has them, right? So I'm not going to listen to a mob on X

who've never, never, ever, ever put themselves in any situation to do anything close to what I've done in my career. I listen to the professionals, right? I listen to the people who've hired me for the last 11 years around the world, the biggest broadcasters in the world. By default, if I'm working with the people who are considered the brilliant broadcasters, then if I'm in the same team as them, next to them,

then by default, I'm considered also a brilliant broadcaster. So I take everything you're saying, but the reality is I've been good enough for 11 years, right? And as I said, I'm the person that will go and seek out feedback for someone to go, I think you're struggling. It's never happened.

Well, she wasn't listening at all, was she? Because as Simon Jordan then said, the language she was using was so full of entitlement. It would sink the Titanic. See, the language that you use, and it is, to me, it's steeped in a sense of entitlement. I mean, the sheer weight of the entitlement

that you seem to believe that you have would re-sync the Titanic. I think you've been quite fortuitous. I think because of initiatives, like DEI, they've allowed people to be put into positions in the men's game that I don't think they've merited, and now that sort of seeds an attitude that you become a stalwart in the women's game.

And I listen to your observations about Ian, and Ian Wright is in the Ian Wright business, has always been, I've known Ian for 25 years, and I have my own views on him. Ian is not, in any shape or form obligated to provide any support structure for you or to give you a sense of entitlement and your position now as a broadcaster

will be determined by the value of you and the fact that people potentially aren't booking you now should give you pause to thought about why they might not be. Hold on. The reason people aren't booking me is because I've taken myself out the firing line. My last conversation with ITV was I'm taking a break from broadcasting.

So you weren't disappointed then because that's what you just said a minute ago you were disappointed. Disappointed about what? You just said that the conversation with ITV, you left that conversation and you were disappointed. So I'm assuming that the conversation about you not being a mainstay broadcast of them was in part put forward to them. No, no, no. So there's two conversations with ITV. So there's a conversation after the men's euros, which was the end of my contract.

I asked about, you know, are we going to renew as is normal? And they said, no, you know, we're sort of cutting budgets and we're prioritising Ian Wright and Karen Carney. That was a conversation back in the summer of 2024. I was off screen for nine months. We agreed that I would then do the euros. That was after the comments about Ian Wright. We had a conversation. And at that point, I'd already decided I'm taking a break from this environment.

This is no longer something that I think is serving. So what's all this about then? Indeed. What's it about if you just want to quit? But Simon Jordan said she is guilty of playing the race cut. And I think he's right. Watch. But you just said, you think any.

is guilty on occasion of playing certain cards. I do. Is one of those cards, the racism card? I think so, yes. I think to suggest that questioning the validity of DEI and saying that's a racist thought, I think, is wrong. A court has said it's a racist thing. How, listen, I think questioning DEI as a policy

and quotas as a policy over merits is not a racist thought. I think it's an ideology. If you keep saying to somebody who is highly qualified for the job... That's not what I'm saying. No, let me finish. If you keep saying to someone that's highly qualified for the job

that they're only there because they're black, not only are you accusing the employer... No, you question the policy, not the individual. If you question the policy of DEI as a helpful and progressive thought process. Well, I believe in it. If you think quotas are a good way to go. Where does the quota stop? It isn't a quota.

DEI is not a quota, it's not... It's a policy. It's an underpin currency. Well, look at the FA's policy. The FA have already told us that they're tasking a certain percentage. So DEI is dressed up in a perspective that underpin it has to be some form of outcome, and that will be steeped in quotas. It's not obligatory in any way, shape or form.

No, but if you're not, you must. But if you look at, again, environmental and societal and societal and governance, if you look at the fact that DEI centers in that, and what is the purpose of DEI, is the purpose of DEI to allow an equal playing field, or is it to drive merit to the surface, or is it to create an outcome? Because equity is a very dangerous commodity because it's about acknowledging the past and overlaying it at a time when those things are not relevant anymore.

People of society. Now, one of the most interesting statistics is young white men in this country are the most disadvantaged. But no one's interested in that DEI perspective. I don't say no one's interested. Well, they're not really. Well, they're only interested. And if we start talking about it,

it goes back to what's happening in other ethnicities. Well, look, look, I came on here to talk about... Anyway, let's come up on. But, but... No, you're not interested. You don't want to talk about it, do you? As for her future in sports broadcasting, Eni Maloko was clear as mud.

Do you still wish to have a future in sports broadcasting? Do you want that? I think in the UK, I think, you know, to all the points that have been made, it's a very toxic space for me. And I'm fighting now to just... to even have an opinion because there is a feeling that like, I can't say anything, right, without the sort of instant backlash that comes with the fact that people have already decided they don't like you.

Oh, good Lord. Good Lord. Father Calvin Robinson, Emma Kenny, my superstar panel with me. I don't know what to say? It's like there's a reason they don't like you. you know, oh, Father Calvin, when he began? I really enjoyed that. That was a good little debate.

That was like the whole day as that was. Simon gave her a masterclass. He really did. And laid it all out in first principles. This is what it is. This is what people, I think people don't like about it. This is what I don't like about it. You're welcome to have a difference of opinion.

But she did what the work always do and trying to bring it back down to her own personal perspective being, her opinion being fact and her emotive position being more important than everyone else's. I do think she's the diversity higher. I don't think she's particularly very good at broadcasting. I don't like listening to her. I don't like really seeing her face. I find her quite mony.

Like she looks to me like a child who hasn't been disciplined and is used to getting their own way. That sense of entitlement is seeping out of her paws. And it's in her words too. The fact that because she's a black woman, she feels she has a special privilege that she's somehow earned through her immutable characteristics, which of course she has no control over.

the fact that she's disappointed that four of the six presenters were women. Like that's not enough. That right there is woke. That's feminism 101. Like, no, Ian Wright should be gone too. I should have his place. Why? Why should you? Hean Wright is a household name, loved throughout the country

and I'm sure some people have disliked him too. But the point being that, why should you be chosen over him because you're black and because you're a woman? Like, I don't get that. That is woke. It is DAI. And I think that's the only reason she's on television. And I think the law cases that she's throwing around to people who use that language shows that she cannot take any criticism.

She's not used to it. She thinks she's above it. That's problematic. She's got a bit of a God complex going on that isn't going to get her very far in this industry. You know, there are people that dislike me. They're people that dislike you. And we have to deal with that. But if there are more people that like us, then they'll watch our content and they'll

tune in and will be continued to be invited on to things. With her, I don't think she's actually acknowledged that if people don't like her. And if there are more people that dislike her than like her, she won't be invited on anymore. And she's making it worse for herself. Yeah, Emma, from a sort of psychological perspective, does she have some type of victim complex going on? I guess that I'm going to kind of be an unusual on the fence position here. And the reason for that is this. I think she made some really good points about how she arrives at this idea about herself.

So first of all, she didn't hire herself. She was hired. Then she's talked about the fact that she asked how good she was and she was reinforced with positivity. So over 11 years, she's built up a belief system that she's got good contact. She does a good job, that a reputation precedes her, and that's why she gets booked again. And with respect in that interview, she was taken to task, and she took it pretty well. I've got to say, it was a bit of a character assassination, and that's okay, because that's what we should be allowed to do to each other, have an argument with each other, debate each other,

but she did take it pretty effectively. And I think she's talking about an important story here, which may be the subtext of this. Yes, there might be entitlement. Yes, certainly, we know there are quotas, whether people admit. that or otherwise. But the bigger issue is this and you know this time. You and I know this. We both have been on ITV for a long period of time in our lives. And with respect, you get those people who go around stroking people's egos, telling them they're amazing, bolstering them up, making them feel safe, making them feel secure. And then the moment that they go on a podcast

and they say what they think and it isn't light, the rug is pulled from under them. And that's what's happened to her. So there is a part of me that goes, yeah, I agree with the points to some degree. And there's a part of me that goes, I actually feel really sorry for her. Because I know who did this to her. I know who's made her feel that way. And now I know that support has been taken away from her. So with the respect, I kind of wish her well in the future. I really do.

Look, where I do think the point that you're making is really interesting, Emma, is in regards to, I don't know if either of you saw it, but it was the sun front page today. And it was about Robin Windsor, the former professional dancer on Strictly. who was sacked brutally by Strictly Wright, Emma, and it was just because they wanted to refresh the show, that that was it. But it was one of those decisions that was made by the Strictly Come Dancing team

without any thought to what this would do to Robin Windsor and his mental health. And Emma, he killed himself. I mean, welcome to the world of the media. That's the reality. You are literally completely replaced. It doesn't matter what impact that has on you. No one cares your last week's news.

It's simple as that. That's how it's been for such a long time, your last week's news. And we know that, we've been there, and it takes a certain sense of metal, self-determination, psychological, well-being and adjustment that you have to work on to actually survive it. And you know, people don't realise that for some individuals, they build their self-worth entirely on their positions, and particularly in the celebrity world. And when that position is taken away, is taken away from you. It is catastrophic for those individuals. You and I both know because we've

worked with people who've been the absolute victims of celebritydom and particularly those who are in the celebrity world because they get immediately famous on reality TV shows. This is something that we see time and time again and we will see time and time again because the truth is it's so vicious and you are spat out without any consideration for who you are or what this impact or whether you'll be able to even pay your mortgage. Let's be honest, that's another thing. Financially you're 100%. 100%. And I mean, they included Robin Windsor's

effectively his suicide notes, I guess. And this was all in an inquest, right? The BBC had to be interviewed and the woman from the BBC basically admitted, yep, we just got rid of him. And Father Calvin, I was just thinking about last night, actually, the way that we were disposed of from GB News without a second thought

to what state we were in, or checking in on us or, you know. And, you know, so I do agree, TV companies are brutal, right? That I agree with. But, I don't know, I think you also can't just assume, and I think she does assume

because she's a black woman that she's going to keep getting these gigs. But Father Calvin, do you want to have the final word? Yeah, I just think that you're right on that, and I've shared a similar opinion, but I think Emma's also writing that it's partly not her fault because she's been affirmed and encouraged and people have probably been afraid of addressing her weaknesses because they don't want to be accused of racist and people have been

promoting her because she's a woman who happens to be black and these are things they can use for their quotas so she's been a tool of their agenda unfortunately for so long that she's started to believe the hype and I think that's why she seems so entitled and that's why she's stuck in this victimhood complex because she's believed that she is amazing and that's why she's there whereas I don't think that's why she was ever there and she's not stacking up to the reputation that she thinks she's earned. Exactly, because let's be honest, if she were to go out independently, like we've all done, I don't think she'd have a following. And that is the problem. If you're just given a gig for DEI reasons rather than because of your talent or rather than because of your following,

it is going to be hard when those mainstream media companies sack you. Because, I mean, we've done okay. It's been tough, right? But we've done okay. And Emma actually, I've got to lot to talk about your tour, which is all over the UK at the moment. I mean, Emma, your true crime channel is just flying. But this is an opportunity for people to see you in the flesh, right? How can people get tickets? Oh, you can just go to emma Kenny.com. To be honest, I think I've gone completely insane because I've got my killer couple show and I'm doing my murderous minds now and I'm like, I'm not actually sure who I am anymore and I don't really know how I'm going to do it. But the really thing about crime, not the actual action of crime for people who follow

it. people in the world. It's as simple as that. So they just come and have a lovely time and I'm sure that I could just stand on stage and babble and they'd be lovely to me. So I'm very, very joyful and grateful for that. Well, I was speaking to our mutual friend. You need to do a tour. Also, can I just just for everybody listening right now, the amount of times I text this man and I'm like, you need to do a stage show. So do you. Need to do a stage show. And it drives me mad that it's not not actually got onto it yet. Because genuinely, out there in the world where people don't cancel you, they come to your show.

You meet the reality of our world, not what you see on screen, not what you see on social media, and it's so powerfully refreshing. So please do what I say. No, very important point. We did a one off live gig once. I saw friends from that.

We made such good connections. It was a great time. I'd love to do a live tour. But Dan Woodson on tour will be amazing. Let's have a live place. We need to talk. We need to talk. Well, look, first, I was speaking to our mutual friend,

well, all of our mutual friend actually, Bernie Spofford, And Emma, we are coming to one of the dates. So we're going to get one of the dates in because I'm going to see how you do it first and be inspired by that. But thank you both so much, emacenny.com for tickets to that. And of course, Father Calvin, thank you as ever co-host of Reclaim the Media's Fox and Father. Brilliant to have you both. Although, do you just want to quickly stick around and you'll see who's one union jackass in just one moment?

But first to your feedback, Jackie Gummer says, what amazes me is how a serving MP can claim he has no knowledge of who. he's employed, I'd call that BS. That's in regards to slippery stammer. Mandy Kumar says the poor kids in that school where the stabbing took place must have been petrified and the parents in total panic and anger. And in terms of the Canadian shooting, Phil my pants saying, what gets me with the shooting in Canada is the police rolling up with the pride flag splashed across their cars. They've helped promote this situation sick. Okay, quick reminder. So I nominated any Aluko to be uni and Jackass. Emma Kenny, nominated Zach Polanski and Father Calvin Robinson nominated Matthew Doyle. The results are in.

Okay. Father Sees in third place with 19%. I'm the runner up with 29% but Emma Kenny is victorious. Today's union jackass with 52% of the vote. Zach Polanski, the tit whisper. Congratulations, Emma. Congratulations. You're the winner today. And by the way, it is a Wednesday, but we have a special edition of the show on Friday, which I'm going to tell you about tomorrow. So we're actually going to kick off our poll right now to find out the worst Britain in the world this week. So that is going to see Zach Polanski go head to head with the Union Jackass winners from Monday and Tuesday, who are, of course, King Charles and David Lammy. So that's going to be quite a result. Britain also nominated by Father Calvin Robinson is Kemmy Badenot for another good performance at PMQ's

for taking down slippery Stama. Okay, we're moving across to Substack now for the Royal Uncanceled Aftershow with P Diner. Please do join us there at www. outspoken. But I will be back with you tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. Pacific. Hit subscribe if you're watching on YouTube. Do subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcast or Spotify.

And most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you. Thank you.