Dan Wootton Outspoken - TOMMY ROBINSON CALLS OUT THE ISLAMIFICATION OF REFORM UK & KING CHARLES FOR BACKING QURAN

Episode Date: August 12, 2025

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No spin, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooten. This is outspoken episode number 290. And breaking right now, Tommy Robinson has called out the Islamization of Reform UK after Nigel Farage's party has recruited a practicing Muslim to run to replace Sidic Khan as London's mayor instead of SAS hero and Middleton. And you're a Muslim too, aren't you? I am. Are you practicing Muslim? I am.

Interesting. The Swedish Democrats, when I started activism on 1%, they're now on 24%, yeah. They're not got Muslim leaders, right? Because they've got to tackle the Islamisation. The UKMSM, including GB News and Talk TV, is ignoring this subject. But Connor Tomlinson has gone viral in America after this apparent spelling out the problem to Tim Paul. Winston Marshall's podcast, he said, if politically we alienate Islam, by 2050 we will lose. I saw that, yeah.

Like, sorry, Nigel, what parts of Islamic theology do you want to incorporate into your party platform? So, I'll investigate this taboo issue in my digest next. And then Conor Tomlinson is here with me live. We'll also look at the growing anger amongst the British public for King Charles's links to Islam. He's an Islamophile and he has contempt for the British people. And he protects Islam. Also, coming up on the show today, The Macrons launched a bizarre investigation into Candace Owens after she claimed Brigitte is a man,

and it includes the fact Nigel Farage was a guest at her wedding, so what is really going on there? And feminist comedian, and I use that term very loosely, Kate Smith-Waith, Brame's Oasis for her embarrassing flop at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. But isn't the reality that she's actually just really unfunny? We'll look into that one, too. then in the uncancelled after show on substate the MSM and Royal Rota have been completely suckered by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's ludicrous Netflix spin but I will give you the real story about why the failure to renew an exclusive deal with the streaming giant paves the way for financial disaster for the duplicitous duo

then our Royal Mastermind Angela Levin provides her insight you can sign up to watch at www. outspoken. At the end of the show so do stay with us will also reveal today's greatest Britain And Union Jackass. And Prince Harry is one of those nominated by Lee Cohen, actually, for his charity and Netflix flops. Also nominated Nicola Sturgeon, scheming Sturgeon by warning shout with her cringe interviews and forgetful memory. She left a legacy of shameful mistakes in Scotland, but still happy to do her rounds in rural libraries to flog her memoirs. And the aforementioned Kate Smithwaite, nominated by Mick Cass for blaming Oasis for her empty comedy show, failing to realize that it may be her quote unquote comedy which is the problem let me know your

comments throughout the show especially on whether you're concerned about the islam links to reform but now let's go there is an elephant in the room when it comes to reform uk britain's likely next government that no one in the british msm is prepared to tackle for fair of being accused of or even worse, racism. And that is, of course, the Islamization of Nigel Farage's party, which he has proudly trumpeted, even though it runs in direct contrast to his new SMP, Sarah Pochin, who had the balls to say this on Talk TV in the past 24 hours. To this country, and it is the culture of Islam, who have absolutely no regard for the value of women. These men coming in on these boats, 800 to 1,000 a week, 26,000 this year alone have a totally different view, a medieval view.

So what is really going on with reform and this medieval to use Sarah Pochin's words religion? Well, I want to fairly investigate today. What we do know as a fact is that the SAS hero TV star Ant Middleton, who had been lined up by reform. UK to run against Sadiq Khan, or at least run against Labour's replacement for Sadiq Khan as London Mayor, is now out. He will run as an independent instead, and has already secured the endorsement of Tommy Robinson right here on outspoken last week. Meanwhile, Tim Shipman of the establishment spectator has revealed that reform is lining up Laila Cunningham to be their candidate to succeed Khan. The former Tory, and remember she was the tour of

up until very, very recently, revealed this morning on G.B. News that she is indeed a practicing Muslim. They've never had a woman mayor of London. No, I will support anyone who can beat City Khan. And you're a Muslim too, aren't you? I am. Are you practicing Muslim?

I am. Interesting. Thank you so much. Thank you. Now, look, does that matter? That's the question. Nigel Farage, who has always been desperate to shut down a far-right label, says absolutely not.

his recruitment of a Muslim chairman in Zia Yusuf was strategic and despite the bloke being an absolute monster of a human being with a very shady past Yusuf has been given full power in the party even after he quit in a half that's because Farage now argues that winning the Muslim vote is now a political necessity in the UK We have a Muslim population in Britain growing by about 75% every 10 years

Right, that's just where we are. If we politically alienate the whole of Islam, we will lose. We'll lose. So how does one include them? We will lose. And to appease that Muslim vote and the Islamists who control much of the narrative of the MSM today, Farage has gone much further. Even ruling out mass deportations altogether and saying he has no issue with the growing scourge of anti-white racism in Britain. It's a political impossibility to deport hundreds of thousands of people.

We simply can't do it. At the moment, it's a political impossibility. But is it your ambition? No. I'm not going to get dragged down the route of mass deportations or anything like that. I mean, people are always going to come and go, and we are a country that's engaged in international trade, and we have relationships around the world through the Commonwealth, etc. But yeah, we have to aim at a balanced migration policy.

But net zero still means hundreds of thousands of people coming into Britain, immigrants coming into Britain. Isn't that too many? No, it may well be, but we have to start somewhere. Trump says in America that he wants mass deportations. We're talking about hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants are in Britain at the moment. Some estimates say the number could even be in, you know, a million plus. So do you support deporting all of those people? It's impossible to do.

Literally impossible to do. In terms of the atmosphere in Britain, are you concerned that there is a rising level of anti-white hatred? I'm just concerned about a deeply divided society. But increasingly, Farage appears to be at war with his own party and his own base. Because while he has dismissed, while he's dismissed, as you can see there, the idea of mass deportations and remigration as an obsession of the so-called online rights. So, too, has his deputy Richard Tite, his MPs, And let's be honest, there's not many of them after he booted Rupert Lover been to extreme.

With our increasingly ignoring his moderate message, as Pochin herself made clearer at yesterday's Reform Women's Press Conference. A reform government will stop this betrayal of our women and girls. We will deport every illegal immigrant that sets foot on our shores. We will deport all illegal immigrants

housed in hotels up and down this country. We will do everything we can to ensure that those dispersed in the HMOs are found and deported. We will deport all foreign national offenders in our prisons, ensuring that when they do get out, they are not free to walk on our streets. We will instruct our police to respond to every inappropriate sexual behaviour call by migrants against our women and girls. We will empower our immigration enforcement division to detain them, to deport them,

to raid town centre businesses along the way. And of course, we have to, and reform will leave the ECHR and put an end to the lucrative merry-go-go-round of human rights, based appeals. We will stop this madness. It is a matter of national security and only a reform government will protect women. Thank you. Then you throw Tommy Robinson into the mix, who post-his release from HMP Woodhill has reversed his quiet support of Reform UK by openly

criticising the party's appeasement of Islam and actively backing Ben Habib's rival at Barnes UK party. He posts about this, what happens when we shy away from conversations about forced demographic change, the erosion of British culture and the takeover of Islam? What happens when politicians fail to bring about real change and legislate for the British people? What happens when you shame, persecute, prosecute, silence and denigrate patriotic Brits for the crime of loving their country and knowing the problems we face. You get this. Autistic. brainwashed by neo-Nazis and their sick ideology, planned a terror attack at a mosque after converting to Islam to gain access.

Notepads containing swastikas were also recovered before officers later found a copy of Hitler's book, Mankhamf, knives and ingredients for explosive substances at his house. And in his most explosive interview ever, with me here on outspoken last Friday, Tommy also spelled out new issues of how reformed. is becoming increasingly intertwined with Islam. The country's primed and ready for populist revolution politically, and we get a party that betray and go back on everything. And not just that.

How are you going to tackle the Islamisation of this country? Some people don't want to hear this. We have a Muslim chairman of your party. Do you think Marie Le Pen would have a Muslim chairman of her party in France? Do you think Gert Wilders would? Do you think any of the leading, do you think the AFD, alternative for Deutschland, who want remigration, who won 21% of the vote,

do you think they would? The Swedish Democrats, when I started activism, won 1% and now on 24%, yeah? They're not gotten Muslim leaders, right? Because they've got to tackle the Islamisation, and they've got to do things to do that, and at the minute, there was a fancy dinner for Reform a few months ago. It was before, whilst I was in jail,

and I knew someone, a businessman that was talking to, that was going to that meal. It was 25,000 pound a ticket. Do you know the whole head table of Reform's meal with Nigel Frudge, Pakistani Muslims? So I'm sorry, I'm sorry, but didn't they just take a million pounds yesterday from a World Economic Forum, Muslim? Yeah? It's like, you can't Nigel flip-flop for arch.

He changes on everything. But this is not an issue you would dare here. The cut and controlled GB News or Talk TV and its anti-Tommy presenters like Camilla Tom and A, who's still going on about how he's a white supremacist, even daring to touch. let alone right-wing publications, or shall I say so-called right-wing publications like The Daily Telegraph and The Sun, which have long decided that the idea that Islam is not compatible with our way of life is just not a commercially palatable message for them. So, it has been left to our far braver American friends to talk about the Islamification of Reform UK, as Connor Tomlinson

did beautifully while appearing on the independent US broadcast Timcast in a segment that has now gone. You have reform. Reform are topping the polls. That's Nigel Farage's party. Nigel Farage, about two days ago gave an interview saying, I am to the left of the country on immigration. Nigel Farage. Yeah, I know. Most Americans don't know this. Nigel Farage has spent the last year betraying his base, entirely betraying them. He has said mass deportations are an impossibility. We're not going to do them.

Even after Trump won on them. He turned around and said there are clips of this you'll be able to get, you have Winston Marshall on a few weeks ago. On Winston Marshall's podcast, he said, If politically we alienate Islam, by 2050, we will lose. I saw that, yeah. Sorry, Nigel, what parts of Islamic theology do you want to incorporate into your party platform? What is winning?

Now, it turns out that his party is a company. He's got two directors. One is Nigel Farage. One is his former party chairman called Zia Yusuf. Zia Yusuf gave probably about £200,000 in political donations when the party was about to win the election. He's been Nigel's vizier ever since. He's kind of like Jafar from Aladdin. He left the party.

he insulted the party two days later he was brought back in as the head of UK Doge and he is now personally appointing loads of Muslim candidates to this party which is topping the polls because it's meant to be the anti-immigration party so we genuinely have nobody to vote for the Overton window

is moving so fast in so many directions as slippery Stama drives the UK into the ground and I think for a populist party of the right like Reform UK to simply pretend there is no issue with an Islam takeover of our disunited kingdom appears naive at best, deeply irresponsible, and unpatriotic at worst.

And Connor Thominson is here now to elaborate. Connor, that clip from your Timcast interview has gone viral, but it's very telling that this is simply a discussion that isn't had in the mainstream media in the UK. Reforms links to Islam are just considered off limits. Unfortunately, Dan, it's because for decades the broadcast media have since 1997 and the Ronnie Me Trust introduced the Muslim Brotherhood's term Islamophobia into British discourse. The term was invented by the Muslim Brotherhood, by the way, to give Islam protection equivalent to gay rights activists and Jews after the Holocaust with phrases like anti-semitism and homophobia. Ever since that word has been introduced into British discourse,

British broadcasters and politicians have kind of bought the Muslim line that there is one great Muslim race, and so criticism of Islam is racism, and therefore you haven't been able to touch it with the barge pole. Despite its increased innocuous, seemingly, but actually quite noxious presence in our politics that I've discussed time and time again with things like the 700 strong Muslim network in the home office, many members of whom have gone to school with ISIS members and find it funny. One of them was recently prosecuted for taking bribes to overturn rejected asylum applications from Muslim countries like Bangladesh. Another one rejected a Christian asylum seeker because she fabricated government documents and said that even though she was

fleeing forced conversion, her country of origin was hospitable to Christians. As a clear ethnic and religious loyalty by Muslims in positions of power, in the intelligence services, in the civil service, in the government and in Parliament, that we are just not allowed to criticise. Otherwise, you're painted as a bogeyman like Tommy Robinson was for multiple decades. And now, even the lads at Trigonometry are realizing, hey, he was right about a lot of this stuff. So it's pretty unfortunate, actually, that Reform UK have, when the public themselves have decided 53% of them think that Islam is not compatible with British values, that reformed the UK have decided to go for a carrot-and-stick electoral approach.

Let's be fair with this, in thinking that they need to appoint moderate Muslims as their kind of vanguard to try and win over the Muslim vote, while also every time they upset their base, coming out with something a little bit more right-wing to try and quell them. Perfect example of this is, as you played with Nigel Farage denouncing mass deportations last year, well, at the most recent crime press conference, he said, no, we're sending sending every single Afghan back. After a lot of pressure has been put on him by who were previously disregarded as the very online right to enact the policy of mass deportations, which overwhelmingly 99% of their supporters support after reforms internal staff waived

the smelling salts of social media under Farage's very liberal nose. They've now come out and said, yeah, we will actually deport every single illegal migrant. And so actually down, I think what's going to happen is they're going to put themselves in a very difficult corner where they've now been appointing Muslim donors, former Muslim chairman and head of UK Doge, possibly later Cunningham as their mayoral candidate, but they're not going to be able to back off from the fact that the patriotic white British host majority are skeptical and are outright hostile towards Islam at this point. What do you make of the fact that the candidate who seems to have been handpicked to run for London mayor is a practicing Muslim, as she revealed on GB News this

morning doesn't matter? It of course matters and it matters for the reason of not being able to have a guaranteed shared moral framework with the party that you choose to represent you. I wouldn't I didn't like when Rishi Sunak celebrated Diwali in Ten Downing Street because if you run Hinduism and its principles out through politics, you get India and I don't want to live in India. I want to live in England in the same way that if you run Islam and its most doctrine, trinal and devout interpretations out, as seen in Sharia law, you don't get England, you get Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Iran. Take your pick of all of these undesirable countries that are punitive to women, as the women press conference that reform convened pointed out, but also

just inhospitable to how an Englishman and a Christian would like to live his life. And so I'll go through the incompatibilities of Islam and English Christianity in the moment, but the problem reform now have is that their entire voter base are wondering who gets the rug pulled out from under them. Is this a clever ploy, as Magid Noirz said on Winston Marshall's podcast, for reform to win the moderate Muslim vote because they think it's necessary because in certain areas, including London across the country, the ethno-religious enclaves that have been imported into this country will only vote for someone who looks like them and shares their same religion. And as soon as these Muslim leaders get in, we find out that they've just been lying the entire

time. They're not actually practicing Muslims. They're about as Muslim as a hand sandwich as someone once said to me about Zia Yusuf, who has knowledge of the matter. And they just don't want to announce this because they'll be killed for apostasy. And suddenly, they do everything we want them to do. Or is the rug going to be pulled out from the white British host majority who are not going to be represented by someone who, when it comes to time to dismantle the Home Office Islamic network, goes, well, as a Muslim, I feel quite uncomfortable doing that. I feel quite uncomfortable shutting the doors to Muslim countries with an immigration red list. And so a bit like a vegan at a barbecue, one person will change the entire way that everyone else eats. One Muslim in the

party, multiple Muslims in the party, will suddenly soften reform stance towards Islam, just as criticism begins to build towards it. And the reasons that Islam is totally incompatible with the way that we live down is the practice of cousin marriage, which is ubiquitous across the Muslim world between 40 and 90%, still up to 90% in some areas of Bradford in this country, which entrenches this clannish morality, this Asabaya, which means that they don't see people outside of the family, clan, and Islamic faith, as worthy of equal moral consideration. This is why the grooming gangs and their families said nothing,

according to the head of the Ramadan Foundation in 2016, about their brothers, cousins, fathers and sons' crimes, because they, quote, didn't want to be seen as siding with the white enemy. In Sharia law, women's testimony is only worth one third of that of a man, there is no such thing as marital rape, so it's a bit difficult to be platforming, practicing Muslims while also concerning yourself with immigration and migrant sex crime being a threat to women and children. Frankly, if you play all these principles out, England will become unrecognisable, culturally and demographically disfigured. And that is just not what people are

voting for when they vote for Reform UK. And don't we have a right to talk to these candidates about their religion, whereas it seems to be off limits? I'll give you an example from just this month. Zia Yusuf did a big feature interview with the Financial Times. And now this is a guy, he's got the mouth from the south, right? He doesn't shut up for one day. He's constantly PRing himself, making it very clear he wants to be the next chancellor and is currently lobbying to run in the next by-election that comes up, although I will tell you there were some reformed donors who are very opposed to that. But in this interview, in the F.T. Connor, he's asked about is Muslim faith. Specifically whether he is a practicing Muslim. He refused to elaborate on the details

of his religious practice. A relevant excerpt from the article states, although Yusuf describes himself as a Muslim, when I ask if he is practicing, he says his faith is quite personal and he would prefer not to say. Now, this is the tactic, Connor, you will notice, was also used by Humza useless when he was the first minister of Scotland. I'm not going to talk about it. It's irrelevant. I'm not going to go into the details. Now that he's no longer the First Minister of Scotland, we know he's an extremist, this guy. So why is Zia Yusuf not prepared to speak about his faith? Because let me tell you, Connor, as a gay man, I want to know if Zia Yusuf believes I should be thrown off the top of a building. And I'm sure there's a lot of

women who would want to know how he views the female role in modern British life given his religion. Yeah, well in the Hadiths it says that the people of lot, people who enjoy the company of people of the same sex, should be killed. So yeah, I imagine it's quite pertinent to you, Dan. I think one of the reasons why Zia Yusuf might not want to say this, and again, I would like to just say that I think Zia Yusuf is a moral disgrace given he was happier to see Rupert Lowe sit in prison on false charges than be able to criticize Nigel Farage, because he was a threat to the throne that Zia Yusuf clearly coverts. But I wonder actually if Zia Yusuf is staying quiet about his so-called Muslim faith, because he's not actually

that devout and practising a Muslim. But by saying this, one, it sabotages what reform thinks is an electoral strategy. I actually think it's a major electoral reliability, like it wasn't 10 years ago, back when Farage quit UKIP, because he said that Tommy Robinson was involved and was obsessed with Muslims. Actually, turns out the British public themselves are quite sceptical of Islam, and so you'd actually win more votes by promising to clamp down hard on this alien ideology that has taken root in our country. But also, I wonder if Zia Yusuf has as a high-profile man of Muslim heritage, genuine security concerns because apostasy is punishable by death. So I kind of don't blame him for being evasive about it, but this

creates two problems. One, again, reform have talked themselves into a corner by touting him as a patriotic British Muslim, when frankly, you cannot be British, culturally at least, and a Muslim, because the two traditions are completely incompatible. And two, well, I must say, that I don't think they're going to win over as many Muslims as they think. And so by alienating their core voters and also trying to snap up a constituency that are more likely to vote for Jezbollah or the Fruit and Nut Party, depending on what Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn call it, I think they've actually lost more voters than they potentially will have gained, especially as the issue becomes a lot more salient. And thirdly, if I may, reform shouldn't be in the position where they're answering these questions in the first place. There's always the concern about Tikir, which is the principle in his last.

that Muslims can just lie to advance the cause of Islam if they're in a land of unbelievers. It's very different to Judaism and Christianity where it says that, you know, obey the law of the land, whereas keep your religion, do not renounce it, and privately practice where you can. And so even if Yusuf himself is not a devout Muslim and is not practicing Tikia, so to speak, the fact that people are questioning this shows how disastrous a strategy it was to make Muslim candidates your faces of your party. What about King Charles and his increasing links with Islam?

Why has the mainstream media also decided that this is a topic of limits as the British public get angrier and angrier about what they see as a betrayal from the head of the Church of England? Tommy Robinson has also weighed in on this after a post from Radio Genoa, writing, I guess he's thanking them for their rapes across the nation, or maybe he's thanking them for all of the terrorism. That is in response to this video. Watch. Garan says God does not burden any soul with more than it can bear. We hope that you have a blessed and fulfilling Ramadan.

Peace be upon you all. Rabadan Mubarak. As Muslims across the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth observe the beginning of the holiest of months in the Islamic calendar, the month of Ramadan, I just wanted to convey my heartfelt best wishes to you all and to tell you just how much my wife and I are thinking of you at this special time of year.

This would have been a joyous time. Mosques would be filling with life. Muslim families would be coming together to share food and prayers. And many of them would be inviting their neighbours and friends, of all faiths and none, to join them. My wife and I can only offer you all our kindest and most special wishes and stress just how greatly the contribution of Muslims to the life of the United Kingdom is appreciated. and valued, embodying the Ramadan spirit of charity and selflessness. As the Quran says, God does not burden any soul with more than it can bear.

We hope that you have a blessed and fulfilling Ramadan. The Quran says a lot else, King Charles, a lot else. And you maybe need to start thinking about that. What's interesting, though, is that the MSN position on this, is that if you're a Brit questioning King Charles's position, you're some sort of extremists. It's the same type of way

that they treated Brexiteats. You know, you're a bit stupid, you're a bit nutty because look at this post from politics, Joe. We know what the undertones was here when they posted this woman outside an asylum hotel protest in London, describing the king as Islamophile,

and they look down their nose at this woman, where indeed I look at this woman and I think actually, your wear, the vast majority of the population is at. Watch this. I am very, very upset with King Charles, who is not like his mother. He's the absolute opposite. He's an Islamophile, and he has contempt for the British people. And he protects Islam, never once said happy East or whatever.

But yeah, anything, anything in the Muslim culture, you know, he's immediately there. I mean, he did give the Christmas message. Yeah, not when he's the one, though, did he? So, you know, but he did for the various Muslim festivals, amply, and then I can't remember he made a comment. I mean, it's just, it's just, he has complete contempt for his people. Now, the main three media obviously have contempt for that woman, and her views. But I don't. And I preface this as always by saying, I find it really difficult

because everyone knows right. I'm a monarchist. I'm a royalist. But when it comes to now King Charles, I've also been very public about the fact, including just a year before the death of the late Queen Elizabeth II, that if Charles continued as monarch to weigh in against hot-buss and political issues, including at the time Boris Johnson's Rwanda scheme and now as King Donald Trump's rhetoric about illegal immigration, which he refuses to call illegal immigration, he calls it a regular immigration, then the monarchy could be in trouble. And the left is circling, by the way. I'll come to that in just one moment, but first I want to bring in Connor Thomas and Connor was very obvious that politics Joe thought here that they were doing what happened so much after Brexit, right?

Oh, let's find one of these stupid Brexit voters and try and make them say something stupid because it helps our cause. But indeed, I watch that woman outside the migrant hotel. And I think, goodness me, you're saying what my viewers are saying. There is serious concern about King Charles' ties to Islam and his position on the Islam faith as the head of the Church of England that the mainstream media in this country, to be Frank Conner, is covering up. Quite. And even the politics Joe tried to fact-check her with the edits there saying King Charles put out an Easter message. What they forgot to mention is that he crowbarred a mention of Islam into the Easter message, no mention of Christianity, of course, in his Ramadan

message where he was stumbling through those Quran verses there. He said, or at least wrote on the royal website. Quote, the love he showed when he walked the earth reflected the Jewish ethic of caring for the stranger and those in need, a deep human instinct echoed in Islam and other religious traditions, and in the hearts of all who seek the good of others. Now, I would like to read a couple of Quran verses, if I may, and I hope this still gets you monetized on YouTube, Dan, given the idea that Islam is so welcoming of outsiders. I think they have a word for them. It's called Kaffir. It means unbelievers. So, In the Quran, it says, when you meet the unbelievers in battle, smite at their necks.

Also, the punishment of those who wage war against Allah and his messenger and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides or exile for the land. So, you know, they're very detailed about what they would quite like to do to atheists, Christians, Jews, people like yourself, Dan. And so for Prince Charles to, King Charles, sorry, to meet with Muslim leaders to exult Islam at every. opportunity to have in February invited chief rabbis, but also imams, to Buckingham Palace, I think it was. Yeah, it was to sign these reconciliation accords to foster interfaith dialogue. Strange, isn't it, how the Christians themselves were not present. And he invited a chap called Carrier Sim. He's the head imam at the Leeds Mosque. He's also on Hope Not Hate Charitable Trust Board. And when 7-7 happened, yeah, when 7-7 happened, he was the one who was quoted in the Guardian saying,

Muslims are the main victim. So a deeply subversive and odious human being. King Charles thinks he's a legitimate voice for the future of religious freedoms in Britain. Remember, by the way, that he took the oath as the defender, wanted to state the oath, as the defender of the faiths. And it seems that the one faith he has omitted from defence there is Britain's historic and established one, Christianity. Well, the thing is, Connor, what's so interesting, of course, is that what he doesn't realize, or at least what he seems not to realize, is that if he continues going down this path, then there will be no kingdom to defend.

I mean, during the state dinner with Emmanuel Macron, when he said that there was no border at all between France and the United Kingdom, well, that surely also means that there's no British royal family. Well, there's no borders in a caliphate, Dan, and perhaps he's hoping to be appointed the head of one. There's two potential options here, and one is represented by, I think, what King Charles himself is,

but also the sort of man that David Cameron was when he's leaving the Conservative Party and pledging to Muslim communities to pack the party full of Muslims, not just to fend off accusations that Theresa May once repeated that the party was the nasty party and that they were too pale, male and stale and needed to do something about it, but because David Cameron is an Arabist, someone who fancies himself a bit of a Lawrence of Arabia and romanticises the House of Saud and other Emirates nations in the Gulf region as great civilizations whose history should be revered and respected along with the British Empire. I think this is completely disconnected from the underlying Islamic ethos that has acted as a

limiting force on those civilisation's ability to achieve peace and prosperity. The actual reason that the Emirates and the Saudis and the like have become more sensible in recent years is because they're trending more towards a sort of ethnocultural worship rather than being devoutly Islamic, which is why they've liberalized. things for women in Saudi Arabia and normalized relations with Israel. I think King Charles is probably an Arabist. The alternative is, in considering his affiliation with the World Economic Forum and his obsession with green issues, he falls along the lines of what politics Joe does, or the delusional

alliance between the Green Party and the Islamists who are more concerned with Gaza than Great Britain. And that is that he thinks everyone from everywhere has a universal human nature that beneath all these artificial layers of cultural difference, economic outcomes, and just geographical space, that everyone is identical. And so, if you elevate to foreign cultures, if you revere and respect them, if you foster good relations with them, everyone can suddenly become sort of holding hands in a John Lennon's imagined utopia, rather than you allowing the Trojan Horse of Islam to move through your very real borders and actually undermine all of the

liberal human rights doctrines for sexuality and transgenderism and feminism that you hold and revere so dearly. And so what he could also be doing at the same time is undermining all of the givens upon which his liberalism rests and not understanding that Islam is not just one among many religions on a global civilizational buffet, but actually a completely parallel and incompatible moral system that has dark designs for the future of the UK. Very well put. I think there's something else that King Charles really doesn't realize at the moment, Connor, as he cozies up constantly to the woke left and to the Islamists, is that it's these groups that actually want to finish the royal family. And scheming Sturgeon, the former First Minister of Scotland,

who's on her book tour, actually said the quiet bit out loud today this morning in an interview on BBC breakfast. I found it hugely significant. actually, because remember, she never went down this path when she was in power. But now out and out, saying with the Queen gone, the monarchy is going to be finished too. Watch. One thing I'm absolutely certain about, based on all my experience of speaking to her, I would say this about the Royal Family more widely, is that if when Scotland votes to become independent,

they will respect that because I think they respect. the decisions that people take. So, yeah, look, as I said at the outset of this section, I'm a Republican, but I had such incredible respect for the Queen, a remarkable woman. Just finally on the Royals, one paragraph really stuck out to me. Having had the opportunity to observe the Royal Family up close, I have little doubt that history will look back on the day of her death,

Queen Elizabeth the death, as the beginning of its end. I think I also say, I think, you know, however long the span of that might be, so I'm not saying that will be 10, it could be 100 years. I just, there's part in, you know, time will tell whether I'm right or wrong here. There was such a mystique around the queen. Literally when you, there's a picture on the screen there,

if you were in a room and the queen walked in, even if you weren't looking at it, you could feel her presence. And that sounds a bit strange to say, but there was a mystique around, partly, you know, she reigned for much of her time before social media and for 24-hour news. And while, you know, I'm not crazy, criticising the rest of the royal family. I've got respect for them too. There's not that.

And I think without that, I think over time, perhaps the absurdities of monarchy will start to come to the fore much more without the personality of the queen to keep it going. So that's my prediction. But time will tell when I'm right about that. So I thought that was a very significant intervention, Connor, from a leader so recently out of power, out and out, banging the Republican drum. And I know you can say, well, look, she's a separatist. You know, there's a whole load of reasons why she might do that. But again, Charles has to stop being so naive. These enemies, and, you know, I would put someone like Nicholas Sturgeon on the side of the Islamists want the end of the British monarchy. Yeah, I don't think you're exaggerating there, Dan,

given she was the handmaiden of Hamza useless, is very short tenure. Exactly. in office. He sort of flopped like he's attempt to riding a scooter there. I think as far as Nicola Sturgeon goes, you can probably build her a padded cell out of all the unsold copies of those books that she's peddling. Unfortunately, she'll probably have to share it with the trans

man. However, mental though she's fine with that. She's cool with that, you know? Yeah, yeah, yeah. One with face tattoos, I'm sure, who hasn't, who has a meat and two veg intact. However, mental as though she is, I do think she has a point in the Queen is a world historical figure.

And she did embody lots of the good qualities about Britain, particularly following the, during the 20th century, the sort of times of change. She served as a constant kind of reference point for Britain as it was going through a series of undesirable changes thanks to the post-war, Tony Blair, and even Boris governments. And to have her gone almost completely derasinates all of our institutions from what we had before. I mean, you know, I was born in 1997. I don't know of Britain different than the UK, spelled Y-O-O-K-A-Y. It's sort of incoherent, multicultural mess that we've currently inherited. But the older generations, and particularly the Queen, did. And now with Charles in charge, happily stewarding this Blairite Revolution,

pushing Britain further towards the careening cliff face that we're approaching civilizationally as we fall into predictions of civil unrest, I do think the monarchy has lost a lot of its legitimacy. And that's a great shame because there's nothing more than the great egalitarian levelers like Nicola Sturgeon, Keir Stama, or the entire civil service would like, than to abolish the one final, traditional, hierarchical institution that cannot be infiltrated by some jumped up, appointed, midwitted, middle-class civil servant who shoots up the career ladder like it's a lift on diversity quotas. I think the only way to spare the monarchy at this point is, yes, a sufficient government. government that comes in and shows some muscularity around British culture that sacks the civil service and that challenges the Blair

Wright settlement and basically forces the King's hand to sign via either orders and counsel, at least in his speech, often these radical proposals. Otherwise, if he doesn't do as the will of the people do, he himself will look even more precariously illegitima. And so they might be able

to force the King's hand and his position of weakness to get through all of the things that we want done, even though he himself would be very unhappy to see deportations go through. I guess one of the issues, Connor, is that this is probably going to be a short reign, given the King's incurable cancer. However, Prince William has shown even less affinity to the Church of England than his father,

which was always something that worried the late Queen Elizabeth II. Do you have more hope for William? Not regarding the Church of England, I mean, I don't think the Church of England actually knows it's the current established church of the country at this point, Dan. And among my generation, and I suppose I've been slightly emblematic of this, Zuma's Catholic Zumers are outnumbering Anglicans 2 to 1, and that gap is only going to grow as more Anglican boomers die off and more Catholics have lots more children. We're sort of in a demographic arms race with the Muslims to keep our country intact. I think what might end up happening is you either get that the first atheist king and the Church of England disestablishes itself or a successor to Charles gravitates towards a different denomination as emblematic of a growing religious revival, particularly Christianity, among Gen Z. I don't know what William's private observance is like. I doubt he will be the one to do this, but perhaps one of his children may help spearhead at least culturally a Christian revival in the world. this country, even if the Church of England, Henry the 8th's personal divorce court, becomes,

disestablish as the official church. Breaking right now, Candice Owens has hit back at Brigitte Macron, the French First Lady, who she says is actually a man, after the French first couple launched an extraordinary investigation into her background, leaked to their financial times, which included details, as I think, mundane as the fact that Nigel Farage attended her wedding to her English husband. Here's the post on X. This morning we received an email from the Financial Times. Brigitte Macron admits she hired an investigator to look into my relationship with Russia. They discovered I retweeted A. G. Dujan twice. How is this not mental illness?

Emmanuel Macron is being absolutely humiliating. Now, as the FT pointed out, the investigations did not find evidence that Candace had met with Russian officials or state media personalities or had direct personal or business links to Russia. Once the Becoming Brigitte series was released, Russian state-controlled outlets reported on it, which I guess you'd expect. And then the huge bombshell, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, was reported to have been a guest of honour at her wedding. Well, Candace tackled this new Financial Times article head on during her YouTube show, Watch. Anyways, they then published the article. They give me, of course, as they always do, just a couple of hours to respond. And they moved to publish the article. The headline here is insane, okay? We really need to appreciate how insane this headline is.

McCrones, yes, the president of France, you guys, the leader of France, a state leader. McCrowns hired investigators to research U.S. influencer Candice Owens. I will be printing this out. I will get a hard copy of this, actually. And I'm going to frame that because that is just what? The headline's crazy. line is crazy. But she did go into those Russian claims. They did not find evidence that Owens had met Russian officials or state media personalities or had direct personal or business links to

Russia. But Owens has interacted on social media with Alexander Dugan, a Russian nationalist and a philosopher, the investigation found, with the two reposting each other's posts multiple times. We have to slow that down because this is a level of clinical insanity that is it's rare to reach. This is actually aspirational in many ways. RT, which is a massive publication, maybe the biggest publication in Russia, their evidence is that a political figure in America has been discussed or tweeted about on RT 30 times in the span of seven years. And Candace is. not backing down on the so-called conspiracy. Because we've all been wondering,

what on earth would move a sitting leader of a country to embark on this lawsuit? You have to be mad. And Tom Clare acknowledges, in this article, the very reason that they made this extraordinary effort to sue. They are pioneering this. It's never been done in the history of mankind. And here's what he says.

He says, quote, their decision to sue was driven in part by the Macron's desire to understand why an American conservative podcaster had taken an interest in them. Okay, like that's, this is it. You're just going, it doesn't make sense to me than an American podcaster would be interested. So you're filing a lawsuit because you're completely paranoid and you just don't think this is organic. Again, we arrive at this like Blake lively situation where people do not believe in organic.

traffic and it really shows you how much control they have over the state media that they just they're shocked that somebody on the outside got interested in this case it's super interesting so they're like it must be of course Russian collusion and remember Candace is standing by her story welcoming the fact that the macrons are suing her in a US court she wants Brigitte to have to take the stand and they are are now saying that their proof is that they realized I spoke in Paris one time and that the niece of Marine Le Pen also spoke at that event. So that's evidence of something, obviously. People in politics speaking together, what's next? CPAC. She spoke at CPAC. Also other people spoke at CPAC.

So there's a connection here. Then they kind of move in this email to strenuously connect me to Russia somehow, which we're going to get into in a second. But this is my favorite part. they say, reform UK leader Nigel Farage was reported to have been a guest of honor at Candace's wedding to George Farber. No follow up there. I don't even understand why Nigel Farage is getting thrown into this. Yeah, did also include the part that my husband is in English? Now, Conor Tonnenson, this is what the left does, right? If they deep down find you a threat, Russia. Russian collusion. It's a hoax. It's the new Russia hoax.

I mean, whatever you think about Candace's campaign against Bridget Macron, who she is convinced is a man, whatever you think of that, so-called conspiracy, I struggle to see how there is any obvious link to Russia. Yeah, this is the typical smear, Dan. One would have thought that being affiliated with Russia for the Western leftists for the 20th century was a absolute boon, of course. They couldn't get enough of Stalin. But as soon as the Berlin Wall fell and Vladimir Putin installed himself as a revolving door dictator of the place, then any affiliation with Russia as an immediate reputation death sentence, or at least it was until they kept crying wolf around Donald Trump. And now the magic spell just. doesn't work. It's weird that they're also playing sort of seven degrees of separation with Candace Owens here. It's almost like the schizzo post diagram from It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, where they said, oh, she once breathed in the same air on the same flight as this person. So she's basically caught cooties, and she's an agent of another state. I'm sure they're going to find Kevin Bacon attended her wedding at some point. It's almost very much like if I were,

so hope not hate to written a piece about me, and someone came to my wedding a month or so ago, And so now they're in cahoots with hope not hate, absolutely demented. But this is how desperate they've gotten. And it's strange that they've gotten this desperate, I'm going to be honest, because I will reserve judgment on Candace's repeated claims that Brigitte Macron is a man. However, according to the leftist doctrine, why would that be defamatory? Because would that be implying that somehow being transgender is a bad thing? would it be implying that being transgender would not make someone a real woman,

which would be awfully transphobic, according to work morality? And if the defamatory claim is not that somehow Bridget Macron is a man, if the defamatory claim is that Bridget McCron met Emmanuel, while as his teacher, and had an inappropriate relationship with him, well, according to French intellectual history, they've been a bit soft on the age of consent. So that wouldn't even look that damaging to the French people, I don't think. So it's weird that, one, if all of this is untrue, they would pursue the defamation claim in the first place,

especially when they're pursuing an American podcaster who's protected by the First Amendment. Exactly, in America and pursue it in America. And as you say, there's this hardly a couple that have helped themselves. I mean, the relationship was pedophilic at worst, grooming at best, given she was his teacher. He was a young teenager. and then in recent months, we've even seen her beat him up on a plane. So as you say, it's quite hard to see exactly where the damage comes from,

although I do know Megan Kelly has said there are potential issues with this claim in a US court, and she's obviously an expert on this. The Nigel Farage link is very bizarre in this, though, because are they sort of trying to make out that Nigel Farage, is some type of Russian stooge. I mean, Candice and Nigel Farage have had a friendship dating back. I mean, I think these pictures, right, are on Candice's own Facebook page and were taken in 2018. So what's that eight years ago? I mean, it's been very open that these two have a friendship via Candice's now husband, George Farmer, and also that they have appeared on each

other's respective shows as well. So where do you think that Nigel Farge? Farage Link came into this, that he's some type of Russian stooge too. Is that what they're trying to say? Oh, almost undoubtedly. It's very weird again for the Macron to even amplify this case if there's nothing to it because I don't think they'd want to go to discovery if there is something to it. And if there's nothing to it, then why are you a world leader giving airtime to an American podcaster who you shouldn't be paying attention to because you've got all sorts of critics foreign and domestic? As far as the Nigel Farage thing goes, it's the same Russian agent, Trump playbook. We've seen the Liberal Democrats any time that they want to get up and talk more about Ukraine than the collapse of our own country

insinuate that Nigel Farrahad is somehow in the pay of Vladimir Putin just because he isn't that interested in continuing to arm Ukraine and fund it's corrupt bureaucrats with billions in our tax money until the heat death of the universe. And it's because, even though I don't know whether or not Nigel and Candice speak frequently, Candice's recent comments on the Israel-Palestine situation could perhaps be regarded as a liability by reform, considering they're walking a very thin tightrope on that issue as to not piss off either camp. But I do know, and I hope he doesn't mind me saying this, that I ran into George Farmer at one of the parties in the inauguration back in January, and I was asking his thoughts on reform. This is just after Elon Musk had come out in support of them and Nick Candy

and become their treasurer, and he was very bullish on Farage. And so he is still a supporter of the party, and so perhaps they're trying to render Farmer and Farage radioactive, especially because the Macron's, well, they never like that Farad led the charge on Brexit, and they also want to damage the reputations of not just Marine Le Pen, who they've helped the French judiciary in persecuting, but also all of the British and Eurosceptic parties who would like lower migration and to punish the elites that have betrayed the European populations for decades. So yeah, just a classic political smear and hit job, but I think by drawing more attention to the story in the first

place, it's backfired for the Macron's. Yeah, I think it is worth pointing out to Conner that George Farmer is on the board of GB News, Nigel Farage, obviously the star presenter of GB News. There are lots of links there, although I would say knowing Candace's politics on these issues, I find it very hard to believe that she would agree with the left would tilt that Nigel Farage is going down, but maybe sometimes personal friendship comes before those things. Candace, by the way, has claimed victory over the Macron's this afternoon, with a new post-on-X writing, despite hiring former federal prosecutors to investigate me, the Macron's came up empty. The article concludes that their expense of private investigation determined that I had no direct

personal or business links to Russia, and that tweeting Russian people is still legal. And this is where I really question the Macron's strategy, Connor, because surely this is a PR war. And what they maybe fail to realize is that Candace wants this war. She's hugely independently wealthy. So there's no financial repercussions for her. They can't financially ruin her by taking this case into a US court. And her overwhelming desire is to prove,

that the world is run by very sexually degenerate people like the Macron's. Well, the burden of proof is pretty low. I think the bar's in hell in that regard. If you only just look at Jeffrey Epstein, his island, and his list of clients, which conspicuously has still not yet been released. I'm sure someone has a little dossier waiting for us somewhere. Well, and she's one of the MAGA people who have spoken out very much against Donald Trump on this too. So I think she's pretty consistent on these issues. Yeah, quite.

And I think actually Trump's handling of this is a pretty good analogy as well as how the macrons have mishandled this entire scenario. I don't think that our older, established, quite sclerotic political class understand the power of social media. Or at least when they feel the contours of its power, they get so afraid that their first instinct is to use the blunt instrument of censorship via the European digital service. Act, via the Online Safety Act, via the various pieces of misinformation legislation that Australia and your home country of New Zealand have been passing, Dan, to try and muzzle their critics and their opponents, but all it invites is a Streisand effect, where the people they're censoring look to be more credible than the censors. And so, by engaging in the dialectic of trying to tackle Candace Owens with legal action and trying to explain, they lose.

And so it would have been much wiser, not that I'm looking to give Emmanuel Macron, an ideological enemy of mine political advice, but it would be much more sensible to have never tried to engage in lawfare against the French journalist that initially Candace got her tips from, or Candice herself, in the first place. Indeed. And look, what these people fail to recognise is that the whole media world is changing. I don't agree with Candace on Israel. for example, but who cares? I agree with her on a lot. She is a superstar of this independent media world and the Macron's thinking that they were going to get Donald Trump to phone her up, which he did, and sort of just move on from this story. It was so naive. Because unlike folk in the

mainstream media, the brilliant thing about this independent space is that we have no one secretly pulling our strings, no secret bosses who say, well, we're not going to pay yourself. Valerie, if you continue to keep talking about this. That environment is over. And what I very much respect Candace Owens for here is that she's saying, Macron, see you in court. There's not even a chance, not even a chance that she's going to fold to this couple. Now, isn't it hilarious that Oasis has been able to ride the anti-woke wave here in the United Kingdom this summer without any criticism whatsoever. And by the way, even though I have my own personal issues with Liam Gallagher dating back many years, I like Noel a lot. I'm fully behind this. I was

a massive Oasis fan in the 90s. Indeed, did you see Noel Gallagher actually get a little bit political, taking the piss, I think, out of, was it, atheist lesbians at Oasis's gig in Edinburgh a few nights ago? Watch. Many lesbian atheists. Get short hands me. What kind of a culture of you? What kind of a culture of you? Come on.

Displace. His next song is for all the atheist lesbians. Well, of course, one of those left-wing atheist lesbians. Indeed, I actually don't know. She's the latter, too. She's certainly the first. Is a comedian. I mean, I always say this is someone who actually should be taken to the trade descriptions act,

because I do not understand. understand how Kate Smirthwaite, one of the most deranged feminists in all the world, oh yeah, describes herself as a comedian, but she does. And at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival, she decided that the fact her gig had completely flopped, even though, by the way, lots of other lefty comedians had huge gigs on the day, was wait for it because of Oasis. Watch. I'm here at the Banshee Labyrinth, still in costume,

25 minutes after my show should have started, and this is the Oasis effect. So I did a couple of hours fliring as I usually would. That would usually get me a good crowd, and I could tell it wasn't working. Big groups of people in Oasis shirts coming past, no interest in hearing about my show or anybody else's show that was out there advertising my children's show this morning,

also cancelled due to zero audience members. showing up. And I'm also aware of performers losing their accommodation because landlords have suddenly realized that they can make more money by renting the space out to Oasis fans. I think it's absolutely heartbreaking to be canceling shows. The first time I've done this in 10 years at the Edinburgh Fringe, literally pulled the show because no one showed up. I think the Fringe Society should have seen this coming and done more about it. And I think a band like Oasis should be more considerate of their fellow performers when they decide where and when to put their shows on. As one of my favorite guests on G.B. News, even though you despised every moment you had to spend in my company.

You did it for the 100 quid, right? And I think that shows a certain type of desperation, which I respect. But seriously, Kate, you've got to change career. I'm actually trying to give you a genuine piece of advice. You're not a bad, hard left flame thrower, but you are as funny. as cancer. And that is the reason that no one has attended your gigs, nothing to do with Oasis genuinely. As Tommy Robinson put it, when someone wrote on X, nobody turned up to lefty feminist comedian Kate Smithway's gig and she blamed Oasis. Oh well, Kate, don't look back in anger. It was Basil the Great who posted that. He said, as if the sort of person that watches Oasis watches this joke, Connor Tomlinson of Tomlinson talks on YouTube.

This was quite a stretch from Ms. Smithwaite. Blamey no aces for the failure of her Edinburgh comedy show. Quay, I'm very confused as what her costume was. She looks like she's playing a transsexual version of Michael Douglasson falling down. I was going to ask if she was transitioning. Yeah, but from what to what? I'm actually quite confused at this point. I think she's the living embodiment of the infamous quote from televangelist Pat Robertson

that feminism only exists to promote women to kill their children, leave their husbands and practice witchcraft and become hideously ugly because, yeah, Kate Smirthwaite, she looks like the receptionist in Monsters Inc. It's just dreadful.

I remember Leo Curse once after, I think it was an altercation on your show on Gb News, Dan, described Kate as a verbal mustard gas and you say she's about as funny as cancer while a joke stink about as bad as her armpit hair, which she proudly displays.

The only funny thing Kate Smirthwaite's ever done is attempt to argue with Milo Unopolis on the BBC and get absolutely hysterical and eviscerated. Thank you for showing me that nauseating image. I wanted dinner later on, but I'm not going to have it now. Sorry if you're eating dinner. Yeah, don't.

If you're watching Dan's show, it turns out. Look, literally, Kate Smithway, she is, honestly, when ideology is your main output, when you are just reciting, received wisdom and unexamined talking points, when you are a perpetual victim, When you grift off the fact that you are offended and you try and look for oppression bogey men under every single bed, it turns out that your ability to write jokes suffers severely.

And the age of woke so-called comedy where these figures are astroturfed because they recite the politically correct opinions that the establishment gatekeepers want them to hold is coming very much to an end. And this is why the independent media space is actually elevating far better comedians like Leo Kirsts, like Nick. Dickson over and above, demented feminists like Smithwhite. Yes, and by the way, if you want a funny right-wing female comedian, the Intel lady is brilliant. She's the one that does the excellent impression of Angela Raina. And I actually laugh out loud when I'm watching her videos. The only funny thing about Kate Smirthwaite, though, is seeing her get so wound up when

her TV appearances go terribly wrong, which inevitably they always do. my team put together this hilarious compilation watch. Women's spaces on the fact that there are boys and girls' toilets and schools and girls don't have access to single-sex facilities on the basis that we are changing. This is what happens. Maybe Kate Chig then spend some time in Afghanistan and see how she gets on over there with her views. Oh, okay. So you're literally like sort of threatening me now. I mean, that's, that's not really, really obnoxious. Like, because I've not said Afghanistan is wonderful. I've said we should be supporting the women of Afghanistan. And, you know, you think any form of masculinity is toxic. Oh, do I? As Emma is saying, actually, how fascinating. Perhaps you'd like to argue the case.

Of course it is. Even the way that you're behaving right now is nothing short. of aggression, is it? Well, I don't think Lauren... Okay, so sorry. I'm so aggressive. As you've been shouting over me, the words shot in the head, shot in the head. I don't know how to be... A woman, I've been sent a video

today. I've been sent... That's about the most aggressive I'm aware of. Really have a right to be treated respectfully? We are, unfortunately, running out of time. But Peter, I just want to get one final thought from you. Are there words that are used to describe men that offend you? Not particularly. And if there are some I don't like, I certainly wouldn't want them banned.

But it goes, you know, it always goes back to that old adage. Sticks and stones may break my bones. But there will always be something to offend a feminist. Peter Lord. No, that's just a bit of nauseous. You have to give me a chance to make you care out. That is ridiculous. That, no, hang on, I won't do your show again if you don't let me respond.

She wasn't allowed to respond. Connor, that's where she's funny. Actually, that's where she's funny when you wind her up. I don't think Peter Lloyd actually knows how many men were made right-wing by that clip. Like, I remember going to universities, like, 2017, and this was the SJW cringe compilation era, where you'd have the likes of Myeliannopoulos, Stephen Crowder, Carl Benjamin, Tucker Carlson, and Peter Lloyd trashing all of the social justice warriors and demented woke precursors on mainstream media and on podcasts. And just the schadenfreude you got from seeing these woke skulls,

moralists who have absolutely no credibility because they're wretched, hideous and quite thick, actually, get their ass handed to them was a joy to behold. And that's what made a hell of a lot of men actually get involved in politics out of purely a desire to repudiate these people. One of the funniest things, though, is Dan, it's always kind of nostalgic to watch the old GV News debates. It's a shame that Offcom gives people like Smithway a career, pays them to go on and make jokes that are more terrible than apparently her internet connection was in those clips. And I find often these panel debates kind of unwatchable because the quality of leftist commentator is, honestly, it gives me...

Well, it's given Matthew Stadlin a career, hasn't it? Oh, yeah, and Benjamin Butworth and all the other wretched idiots. But, but it is kind of funny that she tacitly admitted that Afghanistan is an ungovernable hellhole that hates women and that she wouldn't want to go there. Whereas if you pressed her on this, especially probably now, after the Afghan importation scandal, she's also very keen on importing all the men from Afghanistan who do all the oppressing. So, The contradictions in her worldview are, they're the size of chasms. And so that means that the more you just let her talk, the more that she repudiates her own credibility

and the credibility of her co-ideologs. And it's, you're right. It quite is a funny sight to behold. It really is. By the way, Matthew Stadlin, he's arranging today, no less. Today, I've just seen about an appearance on TV news, which he still goes on because the bloke is so desperate for money and every other news outlet has said no thanks, including all. or the lefty ones.

He's just posted, St. Lee Anderson called me a limp-risted liberal on TV. No skin off my nose, but it's really important that reform don't win the next election. Oh, why? Because Lee called you a limp-risted liberal. Very bizarre, Connor. Stadlin is very much like Fraser Nelson in that when someone who is a bit sharp comes back at him with stats that he finds inconvenient, like myself, he's very keen to block them because he doesn't want you replying or, quote, retweeting him.

mediating him to the very few crazy people who still exist in an echo chamber and take him seriously. As far as GB News goes, look, there's still some very good hosts over there. It's a shame that most of the panelists are not very impressive. But I am continually frustrated by the fact that they keep bringing on that Fatima woman who has gone an Iranian state-funded TV after October the 7th. Like, sorry, you won't let certain young right-wingers on because you think that they're an off-com threat. I was once told that I was considered a legal liability by one of the producers, because I said, I predicted that the Indian trade deal would cause more Indian migration.

Who could have thought? But this woman can go on a jihadist state TV network and then go straight on GB News and be consulted as a credible voice on why we should open our borders and become a caliphate and destroy our own country. No, thank you very much. That's not up for debate. Stop paying people who hate us. Indeed. And of course, they continue to ban Tommy Robinson as well. don't they? So very, very interesting. Conner Tomlinson, host of the brilliant Tomlinson talks,

which is now back on YouTube and highly recommended by me. Do subscribe. Such a great channel. And I so appreciate having you here. We will speak next week. Connor, thank you so much. And now we're going to reveal Greatest Britain Union Jackass in just one moment. But first to your comments, thank you for your super chats, Rusty Nuts, Billy, and also Stevie Leeds, who says of the whole King Charles thing. Maybe we could turn Buckingham Palace into a hotel for the new arrivals instead of being forced to have HMOs with eight illegals living next door to Alice. Good point, I think. Let's see if you want that. Charles. Lili, this is on the whole reform, as armification says, if you have had a serious look at Nigel's political career and his

life too, he is a massive snake. And that partly is a danger to our country more so than we have had Advance UK is the only way. On a similar note, Jenny Hodgkinson says, cancelled my reformed mentorship will join Advance because she can't stand Sarah Pochin. John Power, I remember Farage saying we have to embrace this son by 2050 or we lose it all. He never said why or what we will lose. And John Patrick Smith says, and this is back on King Charles. I am a monarchist or was, but he shows contempt for his own people and covered up by the grubby MSM who are probably looking for honours in doing so. Okay. Union, Jackass time. Now the worst Britain in the world. Today, your nominees. Prince Harry put forward by

Lee Cohen for his charity and Netflix flops. Scheminging Sturgeon nominated by Morning Shout for her cringe interviews and forgetful memory. And the aforementioned Kate Smirthwaite nominated by Real Mick Cass for blaming Oasis for her empty comedy show failing to realize that it may be her quote unquote comedy, which is the problem. Okay. And the results are in. Kate Smith in third place with 13% of the vote. I imagine that's because most of you have no idea who this lunatic is. The runner-up with 31% of the vote, Prince Harry. But today's Union Jackass, with 56% of the vote,

scheming sturgeon as she continues her book tour, pledging that she wants to end the British monarchy and so much more. Today's Greatest Britain, nominated by Jackie Clinch, Dame Andrea Jenkins, The mayor of Lincolnshire for standing up for women's safety, and I believe this nomination was made in light of an interview with Christian Guru Merti on Channel 4 News last night where lots of people say that it was, you know, some type of disastrous performance for Andrew-Chang, because I actually completely disagree.

It's impossible. It's just impossible to be interviewed by Channel 4 News. But that's what I find hilarious. Reform UK will not come on this show. They're too scared to come on this show, but they'll go and sit down with Channel 4 News. It says it all. Okay, coming up on the uncanceled after show, where we move to Substack.

The MSM and Royal Rota have been completely suckered by Prince Harry and Megan Mark was ludicrous Netflix spin, but I will give you the real story about why the failure to renew an exclusive deal with the streaming giant paves the way for financial disaster for the duplicitous duo. Then our Royal Mastermind, Angela Levin, provides her insight.

She is standing by over at www. outspoken.live. Please come and join me on Substack. Okay, we're back tomorrow though. 5pm UK time, If you're watching on YouTube or Rumble, and most importantly, I promise to keep