Dan Wootton Outspoken - TOMMY ROBINSON LASHES OUT AT MSM AFTER NOT GUILTY VERDICT COVER UP AMID GB NEWS WITCH HUNT

Episode Date: November 4, 2025

BREAKING TODAY: Tommy Robinson found NOT GUILTY as a judge tears apart the deep state case against the political activist and Unite the Kingdom hero, in a ruling that should be dominating the headlines as it involves police malpractice, a witch hunt against independent journalists and the astonishing fact the world’s richest man Elon Musk has had to intervene financially once again to try and protect free speech in our Disunited Kingdom. But the MSM coverage has been typically distorted and disgusting today, with Tommy ambushing a regime journalist in heated scenes outside the court about the lack of honesty regarding the judge’s damning verdict. And sadly the increasingly corrupted GB News was the worst, refusing to engage with our Lauren Lunn Farrow about their ban on Tommy, before physically abusing Outspoken’s producer. Meanwhile, the MSM remain focussed on branding anyone racist and hate mongering for speaking out about the knife attack slaughter on ten innocents on a train on Saturday night, which clearly could have been prevented by the police. Everything you need to know about Tommy Robinson’s verdict in Dan’s Digest. Then analysis from the Superstar Panel: Pro freedom campaigner and legal expert Elizabeth Fox, and social commentator Leilani Dowding. PLUS: The Ofcommunists come for Kevin O’Sullivan and Talk in the latest free speech row to hit Britain, as the British Bashing Corporation is exposed for doctoring a Donald Trump speech in a hammer blow to the reputation of the UK’s corrupted state broadcaster. AND: Fuming Ricky Gervais attacks London’s failed Mayor Sadiq Khan in an extraordinary new advertising row. We’ll show you his sweary video. THEN IN THE UNCANCELLED AFTERSHOW: King Charles has lashed out at Prince William behind-the-scenes for risking leaving the British public with a King Harry and Queen Meghan. I’ll reveal the details of this astonishing row which has been revealed in a bombshell new royal book. Sign up to watch live or on demand and totally ad free at https://www.outspoken.live LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day: https://youtube.com/@danwoottonoutspoken?si=-2BhmEbBSN1fyESS?sub_confirmation=1 ---------- Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts: Apple — https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/dan-wootton-outspoken/id1762436723 Spotify — https://open.spotify.com/show/19Ltoneek2MSPL10CpSA1J?si=8f6d84e2db56448c ---------- Follow Dan on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@outspokendan Follow Dan on Twitter: https://x.com/danwootton Follow Dan on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/danwootton/ Follow Dan on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danwootton/?hl=en #DanWootton#DanWoottonOutspoken#news#outspoken#uknews Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Paramount Woose. Check out the big stars, big series, and blockbuster movies. Streaming on Paramount Plus. Cue the music. Like NCIS, Tony, and Ziva. We'd like to make up for own rules. Tulsa King. We want to take out the competition.

The substance. This balance is not working. And the naked gun. That was awesome. Now that's a mountain of entertainment. No spit, no bias, no censorship. I'm Dan Wooden. This is Outspoken episode number 353. And breaking today, Tommy Robinson, found not guilty as a judge tears apart the deep state case against the political activist and Unite the Kingdom Hero in a ruling that should be dominating the MSM headlines as it involves police malpractice, a witch hunt against independent journalists, and the astonishing fact that the world's richest man, Elon Musk, has had to intervene financially once again. to try and protect free speech in our disunited kingdom.

The outcome has been found that the police discriminated against me based on my belief and my political beliefs. Now, my grievance now, well, not my grievance. First of all, thank you Elon Musk. Thank you Elon Musk, because if it wasn't for Elon Musk, why is it took an American businessman to fight for our justice here and our fight against terrorism charges for journalists? Now over there in a minute, it's going to come the journalists,

the mainstream media. Go back now. If you want to see if you can trust the media, go back now and read the medias, read what they said about this trial. When I was on trial, read what they said, read the headlines, read the news that they give out, and then read the judge's judgment. Big time, because the MSM coverage today has been typically distorted and disgusting. With Tommy actually, ambushing a regime journalist in heated scenes outside the court about the lack of honesty regarding the judge's damning verdict. So can I ask who you're a point for? I am not about to report on your not guilty verdict in this environment.

No, I'm not on about that. I'm on about when you sat on trial, because you sat on the trial, you kept rolling your eyes all the time, like that, you sat on the trial, none, not one single journalist who sat on that trial. Stop pushing me. Not one single journalist who sat on that trial reported one single thing that the judge found them. Why not? Why not? I just can't report on your not guilty verdict if this is the environment.

No, you're not listening. The environment I was put under. We sat on a trial, yeah, where all you mainstream media, you sat and listened to the evidence, which is what made his verdict on today, and listen to what the judge has made. I don't care, shut up, man. And sadly, the increasingly corrupted G.B. News was the worst,

refusing to engage with our Lauren Lund Farrow about their ban on Tommy before physically abusing outspoken's producer. Hi, you're live on the number one independent news channel. Dan Weren't outspoken! Just wondered why you're here when you went to... Oh my gosh, running like cowards, look. I just wondered, you won't feature Tommy, so why are you covering it?

Why won't you feature Tommy Robinson on GB News? He's not here. Oh, no, I know, but you don't feature him, Ben Habib or Rupert Lowe. Who are they? It's not a decision for me to make, I'm sorry. Okay, and so are you giving full narrative coverage today? It's interesting, man. Thank you.

Meanwhile, the MSM remains focused on branding anyone racist or hate-mongering for daring to speak out about the knife attack slaughter on 10 innocents on a train on Saturday night, which clearly could have been prevented by the police. The threat to Britain is not hardworking people coming here to build lives. It is race-baiting white people who want to stir fear for profit online. friend text from abroad this morning, he tweets 41 minutes ago. What has happened to your country? Three words, he says. Mass uncontrolled immigration. That's what's happened. I mean, for goodness sake, for goodness sake, this is absurd. Everything you need to know about Tommy Robinson's

verdict and the MSM complicity in my digest next. Then analysis from my superstar panel. They are back. Pro freedom campaigner and legal expert Elizabeth Fox and social commentator Lalani Dowdine. Also coming up on the show today, the off-communists come for Kevin O'Sullivan and talk in the latest free speech route to hit Britain, as the British bashing corporation has been exposed for Drina Donald Trump's speech in a hammer blow to the reputation of the UK's corrupted state broadcaster. And fuming Ricky Javis attacks London's failed, Mersadie Kahn in an extraordinary new advertising row. We're going to show you his sweary video. Then in the uncanceled after show on substate, King Charles has lashed out at Prince William behind the scenes for risking leaving the

British public with a... I can't even deal with this prospect. King Harry and Queen Meghan, I'm going to explain the details of this astonishing row which has been revealed in a bombshell new royal book. That is over at www.outspoken.live. We'll also be revealing a brand new greatest Britain and Union Jackass before the end of the show. Here are your nominees for the worst Britain in the world today. Rachel Reeves, nominated by its only Me 44, for her pre-budget speech that has seen the footsie crashing by 22 billion. John Swinney, nominated by Project Rights, who says the Scottish First Minister for putting the feelings of men in bad wigs over the safeguarding of little girls. And Tim Davy, the BBC Director General, nominated by

Scott Fly 23, who says, I remember watching Davy speak at the BBC, a catalyst for building trust meeting in Solford in May of this year. It was like they were panicking that nobody had trust in the BBC anymore. It seems things may have gotten a little bit worse. And don't worry, we are going to be covering that developing scandal crisis at the BBC. Shame for the BBC. Why the BBC should just be shut down forever later in the show. So, let's go. It was a show trial. Or being totally honest, a deep state witch hunt that disgraced Britain. But because Tommy Robinson, the enemy of the regime media was at the heart of it, there has been virtual silence in the MSM about the shocking circumstances of a law-abiding citizen-journalist being pulled over at the border last August for

absolutely no reason, demanding, demanded to hand over his phone and pin number, even though said phone is filled with confidential evidence about the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs and the police complicity. And when he refused, finding himself on trial for goddamn terrorism. It's terrorism, terrorism. At a time when our police are still trying to tell us that the Huntington train attack where 10 innocent Brits were slaughtered in a stabbing rampage isn't terror. To make it make sense. But despite the government and cops believing this was finally the moment that they could forever more brand Tommy a terrorist. The judge Sam Goosey had other ideas, making clear the prosecution's case was politically motivated. As Ezra Levant,

the brilliant Ezra Levant of Rebel News reported from inside the court, the missing information from the police meant their claims lacked credibility, according to the judge. Tommy was targeted according to the judge because of what he stood for, his political views, and there was was no evidence at all to suspect terrorism. Watch as Tommy's acquittal was announced, first in the jubilant independent media, including here on outspoken, then to a disappointed MSM. Court, the judge says in light of my findings, the decision to stop you was not lawful. The judge tells Tommy to stand, says he is acquitted, the public gallery chairs, the rage, the rage, media look very glum. So breaking right now, Tommy Robinson not guilty on terror charges.

The state's case against him, the police's case against him, has completely collapsed. Ezra Levant here for Rebels. I'm standing outside Westminster Magistrate's court. Huge news today. Tommy Robinson acquitted of charges under the Terrorism Act. The judge blistering in his criticism of the police saying they lacked credibility in their testimony could not be The far-right activist Tommy Robinson is cleared of a terror-related offence after being accused of not giving police access to his phone. Breaking news to bring you now, just hearing that Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has been found not guilty of a terror offence over refusing to give police access to his phone during a border stop. He Robinson addressing some of his supporters just behind me as he's talking to crowds after this. this verdict that he was found not guilty under this terrorism offence

when he was stopped at the Channel Tunnel. But of course, GB News didn't try and speak to Tommy themselves. He's banned, and I'm going to get to that very shortly. But remember, there is an astonishing fact here that the world's richest man Elon Musk has had to intervene financially once again to try and protect free speech in our disunited kingdom. He posted after the not guilty verdict to Tommy directly.

Thank you for raising the flag. of England, whilst so many cowards, coward. And in France UK leader, Ben Habib, the only major political leader to weigh in, writing, of course, the court throughout the case against Tommy Robinson. There was no case to answer. He is not a terrorist. He was politically targeted, again, a politicised criminal justice system. And what was interesting is that upon leaving court, Tommy wasn't relieved or upset.

He was furious. furious at the latest ordeal he's been put through by a British government intent on locking him up. Now, it's been found that the police discriminated against me based on my belief and my political beliefs. Now, my grievance now, well, not my grievance. First of all, thank you Elon Musk. Thank you Elon Musk, because if it wasn't for Elon Musk, why is it took an American businessman to fight for our justice here and our fight against terrorism charges for journalists? Now, over there in a minute, it's going to come the journalists, the mainstream media.

Go back now, if you want to see if you can trust the media, go back now and read the medias, read what they said about this trial. When I was on trial, read what they said, read the headlines, read the news that they gave out, and then read the judge's judgment, right? Because all those journalists sat on that trial, they knew the police acted unlawfully, they knew they acted illegally, they admitted it in court, and none of the journalists told you that. None of them, they were hoping they had another bent judge that would rule against me, and then knew the public would know nothing. That judge's verdict is a slam down against the police. An absolute, read what he says, read what he says, read about their evidence, it was corrupt, it was unlawful. For me, I'm frustrated still, I should be happy, I'm not happy, because I shouldn't be put through this time and time again. I walked out of this court last year, it cost a £53,000 with a not guilty.

I've just walked out again, this is nearly £100,000 have been spent on this case. What for? And my main thing is the mainstream media sat through this whole trial. They knew all the unlawful practices in this trial, and yet they didn't report one of them. They hid it from you. They hid it from you. I'm so glad that judge has given such a powerful judgment now. That says it how it was.

I was targeted because of my political beliefs. To say that out loud, on behalf of the government, counterterrorism targeted me to try and get access to my phone as a journalist. Where's the outrage from the mainstream media in this? They were trying to get my access to my work that I do and my invent. investigations that I do as a journalist. That is a corrupt state. That's what it is. It's frustrating.

I should be happy. I'm not, I should be happy, shouldn't I? Congratulations. And what was most shocking to him is that even today, the MSM did not report accurately on the case. I'm a trial, yeah? Listening to that verdict, not one single journalist who sat on my trial

reported any of the unlawful stuff. Not one of you journalists. So you sat there. Who was you reporting for it? I'm about to report on your not guilty verdict. I'll go ahead and do that. No, but can I ask you who you're reporting for? Who you're reporting for?

Can I ask who you're appoint for? This is a normal environment for me. This is what you do to me. So can I ask who you're appoint for? I am not about to report on your not guilty verdict in this environment. No, I'm not on about that. I'm on about when you sat on trial, because you sat on the trial, you kept rolling your eyes all the time, like that.

you sat on the trial, not one single journalist who sat on that trial. Not question me. Not one single journalist who sat on that trial reported one single thing that the judge found them. Why not? Why not? I just can't report on your not guilty verdict if this is the environment. No, you're not listening. No, you're not listening. The environment I was put under, we sat on a trial, yeah, where all you mainstream media, you sat and listened to the evidence, which is what made his verdict on today, and listen to what the judge has... Can you please stop?

I don't care, shut up, man. Just sush. Right, so how... There's a fucking woman in me. I'm not doing it, mate. It doesn't matter. How come not one of you reported any of the stuff the judge found today?

During the trial, I'm going to talk about, you made it about a car, you made it about money, you made it about me, you made it about far right. As I've said, I am here about to report on your not guilty verdict. Now, what's astonishing is that she wouldn't even tell Tommy Robinson and who she was reporting for. Well, our Lauren Lund Farrow

has done some digging, and it appears to be this woman, Helen Hoddenett. Not surprisingly, a reporter for the hard-left LBC who was previously with the British Bashing Corporation. But it's just so depressing that other journalists are too committed to their boss's hatred to reveal the very real threat to free speech that could end up curtailing them in the end too.

Obviously not. one of the single facts that come out today. I actually don't think you know what my reporting included, so I don't think you can accurately accuse me. I did. I searched internet after my trial, and I found that not one person found that, because the police officer admitted he acted unlawfully. The police officer admitted he detained me after 34 seconds.

Not one of you reported it. I'm confused, why not? And I'm frustrated by it, if I'm honest. I'm frustrated by the mainstream media's reporting on this case. Do you not accurately make that accusation of me? Okay. Who did you report? As I say, I'm going to try and report your not guilty verdict. But I cannot do that if you put me in this situation.

When you sat in court for two days, why didn't you report what happened in court to your audiences? Why didn't you report what happened in court to your audiences? Why didn't report the truth for what happened in court? Because all you report, they didn't report about cars and money. Why didn't you report about all the stuff to judge was barrow? Because that all happened in court. You didn't report any of you. You have no accurate information about what my report.

Yes, I do. Okay, you didn't. Four seconds. I did. No, you didn't. I did. No, you didn't. Who do you report for? Look, this is a very intimidating environment that you're putting me in. Why is it intimidating? I'm asking questions. This is what I get everywhere I go.

Surrounded by everyone acting calmly. Of cameras, they're all journalists. The same thing happens to Tommy every time. You have me physically. No, I'd say. And you're not accurate. So, you know, none of you report. None of you report.

anything that happens. So you're going to have to report that verdict now. It's anating environment that you're going to be under. Right, Dan. Let's go see your girls. Dan. So there we just had it. I don't know how much of that you got. Oh, we got it all. We got it all. But my former employer, Gibi News, continues to disgrace itself with its ban on Tommy Robinson, but not just Tommy Robinson, Ben Habib, Rupert Lowe, Katie Hopkins, many more Patriots. And today they didn't even bother to show up.

to listen to the judge's full verdict, prompting Lauren Lund Farrow to track them down. Inside court, and I've spotted G.B. News, and I'd like to ask them actually why they're even bothering to report when they won't let Tommy on their channel. So I'm just going to go over and see if they've got anything to say. Because this is the system we live in. People think these channels can be trusted, and they can't. Hi, you're live on the number one independent news channel. Dan, weren't outspoken? Just wondered why you're here when you're here when you're Oh, my gosh, running like cowards. Look.

I just wondered, you won't feature Tommy, so why are you covering it? Sorry, you won't feature Ben Habib, Rupert Lowe, or Tommy Robinson. No, but I just want to ask you, why are you censoring people's news? Well, there you have it. More propaganda puppets, Dan. They won't say anything. And that is why. Outspoken, we'll tell you Patriots the truth.

And we are outside court. And, I mean, this is just unbelievable, isn't it? These Muppets pose as journalists and can't answer a simple question. They were terrified. I'm terrified of a woman in a boat, for goodness sake. But I just think it's really shocking that their journalists didn't even bother to get to court on time. Professor Norman Fenton, who was inside the courtroom, posted on X, I couldn't believe when I saw an accredited journalist walk in 30 minutes after

the judge was reading out his ruling, even more shocking that it was the GB News reporter. Now, Lauren eventually found that late-comer, too. Are you ITV or GB News? GB News. Okay, and so you're reporting today, why weren't you feature Tommy Robinson on GB News?

He's not here. Oh, no, I know, but you don't feature him, Ben Habib or Rupert Lowe. It's not a decision for me to make, I'm sorry. Okay, and so are you giving full narrative coverage today. It's interesting, man. Thank you.

Thank you. Are you giving full narrative coverage today on Tommy Robinson? We're covering the court case. No, but are you giving full narrative a full breakdown of exactly what was said inside the courtroom? We're giving the coverage. Okay, well, there we have it. Now, something really disgusting happened after that. The G.B. News camera woman decided to attack my producer.

physically, punching him in the ribs after the verdict was announced, and calling him a fucking prick. Another clear descent into the gutter by the people's channel. That's what they call themselves. Tommy also called out their star presenter Nigel Farage after the verdict for this comment. Tommy Robinson's been right about many things. He's just not the company that I choose to keep. And even after that, we got, oh, Robinson's been arrested using terrorism. terrorism laws, isn't it? And then we discover, no, actually, he wasn't arrested in London. He was arrested at the port of Dover, and it's something to do with a passport issue. And, you know, listen, he has had some things very right over the years.

It's just, he's not for me. Tommy asked, will we, we will please now correct this, Nigel Farage question mark? Now that I've been found not guilty, can you now accept that I was targeted for my political beliefs, like the judge found? you should have spoken up but didn't instead you lied why he also wondered what happens to the counterterrorism officers who unlawfully targeted me but even though it is a winter day Tommy understands this is just a temporary reprieve in an ongoing war as he told our Lauren on the way to court but when we were in there Tommy as well we saw the censorship of key details from the mainstream media the mainstream media didn't report anything which is why

so important we had our own media there. They reported what they took from what happened in court and then the headlines they went with was insane. The police admitted it was unlawful. They admitted it in the dock. So I just hope today I walk in there. I get not guilty. It restores a bit of our faith, but also tells the public and tells the country that the police have been

unlawfully used, or the government have been using the police as a weapon to harass and persecute us. I mean, today we will see you know, are the Fabians at large or, as citizens, you know, will we all get a fair trial if we face the same thing as you?

The Fabians are at large. There is no fair trial in Great Britain. So just don't confuse yourself. This may be a decision where it's not worth them exposing themselves enough because it's a three-month sentence. They may not be worth it enough for them, so we'll see, but the Fabians are at large.

They want you behind bars or gone. They want everyone who speaks out against them behind bars or gone. Correct. They want to me. They want every citizen. and journalists gone. They're trying to work out in our way how they can rein the citizen journalism back in.

They're trying to work down now. They're looking at what's happening, thinking, how do we stop this? How do we stop it? They'll bring in laws. They'll bring in more things to control the new media. It's a battle of the new media

against the old media. The old media lie and work on behalf of the government and the new media work on behalf of the people. But nothing can stop the truth, Tommy, and there are millions of people. Let's hope the truth comes out today. I walk out of here in a couple of hours. Definitely.

But it's not over. Tommy added after the verdict, let me remind you all that I have another trial in October 2026. That is even more insane than this case. I face 10 years in prison for the next defence. It's all law fair. It's targeted harassment. Even if you win, then the process is the punishment we fight on. We do have to celebrate the wins, though. And I have to say, boy, oh boy, the Patriots at court out. did themselves today. You could be deemed as a right-wing terrorist for carrying this flag. How do you feel about that? Frackham, this is our country. Yes. Yes, it is.

And what do you think of Kirstama? Kirstama is just a fucking wanker. Well, you're just a fucking wanker. And to be honest, I think that gentleman sums up the mood of the nation, really. And as Tommy walked away exhausted but a free man, he had this message for outspoken viewers.

Tommy, what's your message for outspoken viewers? That what they, although we won today, they banned citizen journalists in our court case today. They prevented citizen journalists reporting on today's case. That's true. So Dan, the fight continues. Oh, yes, it does. The fight absolutely continues.

Now, the superstar panel. Social commentator, Lelani Dahl. and legal expert and freedom fighter, Elizabeth Fox, both with me. So, Lelani, the verdict is a good one, but what I think is most disturbing is the fact that this complete witch hunt was allowed to get to this point, the government backed it, the police backed it, the MSM never questioned it. Yeah, absolutely. And like Tommy says, the process is.

the punishment, Dan. I'm not surprised he's frustrated. I heard the news and I was absolutely ecstatic. I was so pleased. I was so pleased for him. But you know what? I also read the headlines and I didn't see what he just said there. And without you guys and this channel and that brilliant reporter Lauren, you know, speaking up, we wouldn't know. I didn't know that the judge had said that the police acted unlawfully. I didn't know the list of, you know, everything that the judge has said that he went off there. And this. is crazy to me because the mainstream media really aren't reporting it. So the only way we're going to see, you know, what the judge said is if we go trawling through and looking for the

smaller independent journalists and on channels like these where we can hear exactly what the judge has said. Obviously, Lizzie, you know all about lawfare and process being the punishment in terms of what still continues to be unleashed against your husband, Lawrence Fox. You've spent some time recently with Tommy. Is this taking a toll? Absolutely, it's taken a toll. And you can see from when he came out from his sentence last time, the effect it's had on him, his mannerisms, his energy.

It's horrific. But what is really, really, really good is that, we have had acknowledgement today by a judge that this was politically motivated. And the mainstream media, like Lailani just said, she wasn't aware about the unlawful behaviour from the police. She wasn't aware about the political motivation because it's not reported. And, you know, imagine being Tommy, imagine being him and being so frustrated and wanting people to know the truth. yet everything that gets reported is a lie, well, twisted, but also isn't actually what's happening within the courtroom.

It's not actually what has been done to him. He's being made out to be the villain in the mainstream media, but actually, in this case, the police were wrong. You know, he's an independent journalist. He has the right to say no to access to his mobile phone and, you know, to his resources. He has the right to say that. Totally.

And the thing is, the judge totally tore to pieces, the police and the prosecution, which, remember, is the government case. But the shocking thing is, Llan, we're not seeing that in the mainstream media reporting of this. They just want to move on. They report the verdict. They don't make a big deal out of it.

They move on. Whereas you know, if Tommy Robinson had been found guilty, would be leading every single bulletin in the country. And then we come to GB News, Lulani, and they don't even bother to show up for the start of the judge's remarks. They don't even bother to show up. And of course, they don't even try and attempt to speak to Tommy

because Tommy remains on their band list. Well, this is it, isn't it? It's not really the people's channel, is it, if they can't report exactly what's going on? And I think judges' remarks are so important. They absolutely should have been covered, especially the way the judge laid into the entire system. That should have been covered. That should have been part of the headlines.

You know, police act unlawfully. And I understand exactly why he was upset at that lady. She kept on, you know, repeating, well, you know, I'm going to try and talk about and report your not guilty verdict. But that's not enough just reporting not guilty. It's not enough just to say he was found not guilty without reporting how unlawfully the police behaved and how this was politically motivated. It's just not enough. And for Gia being used to just, you know, as you said, well, he's banned, isn't he? He's banned just like Ben Habib, Rupert Lowe, Katie Hopkins.

They won't actually speak to those people themselves and hear it from the horse's mouth. you know, because they have to kind of keep their little narrative together. Of course, and the cost, Stan, the costs you know, the amount he's had to pay. And, you know, if he didn't have Elon Musk. The Elon Musk

and the amount of crowdfunding to be able to fight this, which is what we're seeing from a lot of the other people that have been politically locked up. You know, Wayno Walk, for example, he's been let out of jail, but he's not allowed to speak and he doesn't have the money to get a great solicitor to fight these conditions.

You know, he's not allowed to do interviews. So the fact that this is all going on, the fact that citizen journalists were banned from the courtroom, it still shows a lot about, you know, the corruption that's going on here. Absolutely. And where we are at, I mean, I find it chilling. I find it terrifying. It, of course, is not the last case either. There's more for him to fight.

And for the deep state, they can just say, well, on to the next. We lost to this one, but on to the next. But I think, Lizzie, one of the shocking things is to see the fact that Nigel Farage brought into the mainstream media narrative to use this terror charge as a reason not to support Tommy Robinson. I feel like saying to Nigel, Nigel, be careful. Remember, they want to stop you. as well. They want to stop you being prime minister. So what if it's you next, Nigel, who stopped at the border and your phone is demanded? And look, this type of lawfare is

commonplace. We've seen it happen with Marine Le Pen in France. And so it's so sad to me, Lizzie, that the right cannot unite about issues which are so fundamentally important because they're too worried about preserving their own power and appeasing the weak and wet mainstream media. That's 100% what it is. The obsession with not associating with Tommy, whether you agree with him politically or not, you have to understand he's a human being. He has been mentally, emotionally, financially affected by this. And this could be any one of us at any point.

It could be Nigel. It could be another journalist. It could be the journalist that was standing there that was making out she was intimidated and that he was, you know, she was the victim and he was making her feel uncomfortable. It could be her, it could be anyone, but they don't realise it. They don't realise that they are pushing him away

and they are not wanting to associate because they don't think it looks good for their image. And yet at any point, the system could turn on them. And it always does. It inevitably always does, which is why people have to be so, so careful. In the United Kingdom, we're actually meant to just turn the other cheek now after atrocities. So because the slaughtering of 10 British innocents on a train on Saturday

night at this point hasn't resulted in a fatality, just look the other way. Just accept the police saying, oh, this guy was British born. No doubt very soon we're going to hear its mental health issues. Oh, and by the way, we're not meant to say anything anyway because we worry about the contempt of court, draconian contempt of court laws. Then, of course, we have all the usual suspects on the mainstream media saying that if we raise any questions about this Peterborough madman who was on the loose for 24 hours committing what at least is an accused knife crime after knife crime, if we even raise any of that, you know what, we're just trying to sew division, we're just trying to sow hate, or maybe we're racist. But unfortunately, I think we need to

keep reminding people of what this man was doing in Peterborough in the hours before he was able to get on that train and start stabbing people at random. Watch. This is all right. about information control and narrative control, as Al-Lani Downing put it, stabbing 10 people, not terrorism, stabbing three people, not terrorism, not handing your pin to strangers, terrorism. With pin numbers, you can access all passwords and have free reign to financial apps as well. Christine Hamilton is on to this one too, and the fact that the authorities are of course going to hide behind mental health, writing, of course he ruddy did. You have to be mental to knife innocent

strangers on a train, but no and two authorities is the really scary bit. What exactly were these authorities doing to keep better track of this madman? Were they aware of the picks from the day before of him carrying a huge knife in a barbers shop? Was that reported? Carrying a vicious knife in public should mean prison. End of. But again, what I have found so shocking is the way that the left are so determined to shut down discussion of this, actually claiming, like Benjamin Butterworth did on the GB News sofa last night, that the spreading of fear in regards to these barbaric acts are actually worse than the axe themselves. Watch. Well, they may be more fearful, but I think that is because we now have a lot of people, a lot of opportunists who want to whip

up fear and fear monger. If you actually look at the evidence, take London, for example, the last year has had the lowest homicide record in London on record. London now has one of the lowest violent crime rates of any major city in the world. Violent crime has been falling in Britain since the 1990s. Crime in this country that is similar to the horrendous one we witnessed at the weekend has been falling and yet people are more scared. And what we saw in recent days was people trying to whip up fear and anger and division. And that does nothing for public safety. We've seen film after film after video after video on social media.

That's the whole point. Well, those people were being stabbed, killed, murder, detached, whatever. That is real. And it's happening on our streets. But the question... Carol speaking generally there, obviously, not about this election. Of course. No, but I mean, let's talk about what happened on Saturday.

It's an active case, Carol, I've got to be honest with you. I know it is. No, I'm not going to talk about the case, I'm going to say that 4 million people take train journeys every day, more people take tube journeys every day, and now they're going to be terrified to get on a train. And what, let's put some facts in here, instead of you're whipping up fear, how many people, there are 27 per 1 million train journeys in this country, there are 27 crimes. Now, that won't be any comfort to the people affected by 27 crimes, but some perspective is really important.

And I think it is dangerous that people now have the currency of fear and hate and division and that is scaring people. Oh my God, I'm actually boiling with rage. I'm boiling with rage. He thinks that's what's dangerous? Mate, has the name Wayne Broadhurst

exited your leftist mouth? Because what about the danger that he felt as he was stabbed to death walking his dog just last week in West London, allegedly by an Afghan immigrant who is now going to face trial, who had arrived illegally in this country on the back of a lorry. That is the danger. And what really annoyed me there, too, was the absolute terror that the presenter Patrick Christie's felt because it's like, oh my God, I'm going to get in trouble because there's an active court case.

No, no, there are ways to talk about this. Of course there are. And we must, because the cone of silence and the veil of secrecy doesn't work. But Benjamin just kept on pushing this despicable narrative. The threat to Britain is not hardworking people coming here to build lives.

It is race-baiting white people race-baiting white people who want to stir fear for profit online. think that the bigger danger to Britain, instead of Pakistani paedophiles, who've been parts of the rape gangs, instead of people who've been, you know, the son of Libyan asylum seekers, who blew himself up in Manchester Arena, instead of the Sudanese bloke, who stabbed a woman to death in the net, you think that the bigger threat and fear for Britain is people talking about it? Right-wing people on X. The problem isn't, I'm not say it's worse than

the people who commit the crimes. What is worse is the people that try to generalise, that millions of decent hardworking people that come here to try and fear mongrel because what that does, that means that when people leave their houses or go on trains or get public transport, they're creating an unnecessary level of fear. They are making them fear their Asian and their Muslim neighbors. That is wrong.

I mean, I don't think. Tell that to the partner of Wayne Broadhurst seriously. Tell that to the LNER hero, who is still fighting for his life in hospital today. Lewis Goodell on LBC was even more despicable. A friend text from abroad this morning, he tweets 41 minutes ago, what has happened to your country? Three words, he says. Mass uncontrolled immigration, that's what's happened.

I mean, for goodness sake, for goodness sake, this is absurd. We've just heard from the police that the two suspects are British nationals. They're both born in the United Kingdom. That's not immigration, that's people who are here. And these people basically just use it. hoping for even tragedies to fit their narrative. It's appalling. People who have got

huge social media followings and so instead of just waiting for the police to say what they've got to say and the appropriate conclusions can be drawn. Astounding. The rising simply, the legitimisation of just base, reflexive racism in this country.

Day after day after day after day is worrying, is disturbing and disgusting. And then they turn around these people, then they turn around these people and go Oh, tensions are rising. Well, who rose the tensions? Who inflamed the tensions? No, no, no, no, no.

No, you are disgusting, Lewis Goodall. Lelani, Dowding, I mean, the intellectual dishonesty of that, because the reality is, and we're going to talk about it, okay? A lot of these people who are committing the crimes are second-generation immigrants, but they are not British. Axel Ruda-Kabana, the people who committed the 7-7 atrocities, there is a real issue with that. And to just dismiss it and say, oh, no, no, no, well, they're British.

Of course they're not, because we know with Axel Ruda-Kabana, for example, that he was obsessed with the Rwandan genocide. That was what his parents had fled from. So that is clearly a part of this conversation, and it has to be. Dan, we have to talk about all of this, and we must not be afraid to, and we have to be angry. We have to be angry because if you're not angry, where does it stop? You cannot.

Benjamin Butterworth drives me insane that he's unwatchable. Louis Goodall is unwatchable. The fact that they even bring these people on there to say, well, let's, you know, you can't talk about it because it's stirring up hatred. It has to be talked about. We have to talk about it right from where the police aren't doing their jobs, like in this case, where he walks in with a knife and he's not caught, he should have already been in custody.

They can bloody find you if you write a tweet or offensive tweet that they don't like. They can find you. They didn't get this guy. There were chances. Now, maybe it's because the police, when they have arrested people for just carrying a knife without stabbing them,

people like policemen like Lawn Castle who got fired for going after an assailings. being a bit rough with a guy who had a knife, right? Then you have in 2024, the guy in Golders Green walking around with a knife, got arrested, no jail. Then you have the guy in Kensington who pled guilty to assault, pled guilty to possessing an offensive weapon in public because he attacked a man with the, you know, not a smart idea of burning a Quran, but he still attacked a man with a knife, pled guilty to it in court, pled guilty to possession of an offence, weapon in public. And you know what? He walked away on a suspended sentence. So then the police think, well, why waste our time going after somebody who's holding a knife who hasn't killed anyone yet? So the whole thing never even gets prevented because they're not going after knife crime.

They've just stopped caring. And then Benjamin Buttonworth, he decides that, you know, that's, it's okay. It doesn't matter. Only a handful of people are being stabbed to death or stabbed. Oh, exactly. And if we talk about it, we're the problem. And by the way, can I just absolutely stress something very, very important, Lizzie? This is not about colour for me. This is about faith and it's about Islamism. And we had a stark example of that yesterday. And again, I feel like this has been missing far, far too much in the news. So let me just take you through the story very quickly. A gym instructor who called himself an Anglo-Jahadi, there he is, has been found guilty of planning a bomb and chemical attack on a major shopping centre. Muslim convert, Jordan

Richardson, just 21, was arrested on December 19th, carrying around a recipe for mustard gas in his rucksack, as well as plans to shoot, stab and throw grenades at a crowd, Leeds Crown Court was told. He also had a link to an ISIS bomb making video used by the Manchester Arena bomber showing how to prepare the high explosive TATP. Richardson had previously suggested an attack on the Meadow Hill shopping center near Sheffield, one of the largest in the country. He converted to Islam the day after Ramadan in April last year and his interest in the religion developed into a focus on extremism,

Catherine Robinson prosecuting said. Richardson had Instagram accounts in his own name, but later adopted the moniker Abu Bakir al-Aziz, and the username Anglo-Jahadi. In online messages, he said he wanted to conduct jihad and kill infidels and called himself a terrorist. In one, he wrote, Insula, I pray to be a jihad and to be martyred for Allah. In October last year, Richardson said he wanted to get married and studied to become a high school teacher in order to radicalize children. His backup plan was to travel abroad to fight jihad, and he wrote that he had contacted a Syrian. fighter on telegram and talked about traveling to destinations, including Iraq, Kurdistan, Syria,

and Palestine. And so for me, Lizzie, this absolute scumbag, Jordan Richardson, I want him locked up, I want the key thrown away, and I just stress again, this is nothing to do with colour or ethnicity. It is to do with a very, very dangerous faith. By the way, a faith that wants to push me off the top of buildings and wants you two locked up with everything covered apart from your eyes? Well, first of all, I have to make a correction. I don't believe it is a faith. It's an ideology, a very dangerous ideology. Very good point. I agree with you that he absolutely should be in prison and he's a danger to society. That is as simple as that. And thank God that they actually got him, caught him,

and before he actually caused fatalities or loss of life. Because this ideology is dangerous and it is like a virus spreading in our country. And we're not allowed to talk about it. We're told that we're some sort of phobic if we do mention it. You know, we're allowed. And the whole thing about Benjamin Butterworth saying that people talking about it or people sharing things online, sharing truth online and sharing information and evidence online are more dangerous. I'm sorry, but we need to know. We need to be aware in order to be vigilant, in order to keep ourselves safe, we need to be aware.

We need to know what's going on. I don't want to get on public transport if somebody's going to be carrying a weapon. you know, I don't go out of my house and arm myself. I don't think I have to, but we are living in those times. Well, that's another debate, isn't it? I mean, Lilani, are you pro this movement that we've seen people like Alex Phillips and Samantha Markle and Sophie Kekoren and Charlotte Gill back for women at least to be able to carry pepper spray in the United Kingdom?

Yeah, absolutely I am. I actually did a little post a couple of days ago. after this happens, I've been, I've had a few things by my door window that I, my door that I will take out with me in my handbag, um, fab gel. I've got deep heat for those aching muscles of mine. Yes, obviously. You know, I've tried. Yeah. You know, you never know one of my aches. So I'm trying them out on a pumpkin actually. And, you know, I thought, I actually was almost brought to tears because I thought, these are great if someone just grabbed me. But if somebody was trying to come at me with a weapon, I'd have to be too close to that weapon to be able to use them effectively.

The, you know, the nozzle doesn't go far enough or, you know, anyway, going back to me, yes, I do think. And a train, like a contained carriage, pepper spray could have made. such a difference and yes we're sitting ducks that's the problem at the moment we are sitting ducks and trust me our enemies are armed you know the enemies within this country are armed yes you know what else you know as you were saying about this like you know this guy converted the uae foreign minister eight years ago said there will be a time um when we see more radical extremists and terrorists coming out of europe because of the lack of decision making trying to be politically correct or assuming they know the Middle East and Islam.

Now, this is the UAE that does not allow extremism that punishes crime. So you can go to the UAE and you can feel safe because they don't allow extremism and they punish crime. And they ban the Muslim Brotherhood. They ban the Muslim Brotherhood. Do we? Do we? Hell no.

It is a joke. It is a joke. I know. When are we going to learn? When are we going to learn? I mean, you hope we would. Obviously, Nigel Raj has said that if there is a reformed UK government, which I think there will be one of the first things he will do is ban the Muslim-Muslim-Brusan brotherhood.

That's a start. But what about the next four years? My God. Breaking right now, a major new free speech trial as the state censor, the of communists, now comes for Kevin O'Sullivan. the new star host at Talk following the axing of Mike Graham and the channel itself. And this is so ironic for me because I remember talk jumping on the bandwagon,

including Mr. O'Sullivan, by the way, who is a friend of mine, when myself and Lawrence Fox were brought down by the off-communists. Well, I also knew it was only going to be a matter of time before they came for the other free speech station, and that is why we have to fight against this. Now, Talk TV made an interesting argument. Here's the headline.

Being a shock jock doesn't excuse you from impartiality rules. That was the argument they used. And it was all in relation to this video from a few months back when Kelvin O'Sullivan, I think quite rightly actually, criticized Slippery Stama for a total lack of democracy for canceling local elections knowing that he was going to have his ass handed to him. Watch. Reform leader Nigel Farage is fuming after the Labour government cancelled 13 of 21 local elections in May. Is two-tier-kir running scared because he knows his socialist losers are going to get a hammering?

034449,000. The answer is yes, by the way. If there's one thing, lefties hate, it's democracy. This attack on democracy, the Labour government running scared because they know they're going to get thrashed, humiliated by Reform UK. They've got 29 local elections coming up, boroughs and cities around the country. And what's Kirstama's approach to the fact they're going to get a shalacking? Cancel, 13 of them. That's an assault on democracy. It's disgusting. Yes, and he's completely right.

It was an assault on democracy. It was disgusting. But listen to this. A complaint was made. The off-communist state censor have now found against talk. And Kevin O'Sullivan, here is the reporting from Press Gazette. Offcom has ruled against talk presenter Kevin O'Sullivan on due impartiality, despite News UK's defense of his right to share his own views as a shock jock.

O'Sullivan, who presents the political asylum from 7pm to 10pm on weekdays on talk via radio, TV, simulcast and YouTube, spent a chunk of the programme on the 30th of January saying the upcoming local elections were cancelled because Prime Ministerial Stormor was scared of being humiliated by Reform UK. And guess what, he said. They've cancelled 13 of them. If there's one thing left, he's hate, it's democracy. Talk owner news UK argued radio presenters like O'Sullivan, a former Sunday Mirror TV. columnists benefit from the wide understanding of the shock jock, who expresses highly partisan personal views. NewsU.K. added that O'Sullivan characterizes himself as an unambiguously acerbic and opinionated middle-aged man. He has as notorious for his contrarian views as he is

popular with the talk audience and that the political asylum lets him deliver his own very personal tongue-in-cheek and often hyperbolic response to stories in the news. The broadcaster also described the editorial approach to the program as deliberately disrespectful. However, Offcom, which had received a complaint about the program, concerned that Kevin O'Sullivan's comments were misleading, found that other viewpoints should have been included because he was discussing a matter of political controversy and current public policy. This put the program in breach of the due impartiality rules of the broadcasting code. Whenever the government's viewpoint was mentioned,

offcom said it was brief and dismissed or denigrated by O'Sullivan and other contributors to the program such as Talk International Editor Isabel Oakshot. For example, Offcom cited O'Sullivan's comments that Starmo was relying on some old drivel about, oh well, the borders are changing, so we'll have to do these. No, no, no, no, no. He is terrified of how bad it is going to look when Labor lose all of these seats. A clip of Reform MP, Nigel Farage showed him saying both Labor and the Conservatives agreed. They are terrified of the rise of reform, while Oakshot described the postponant as a brazen attempt to deny people their democratic voice and said, I am sure it is because of the rise of the Reform Party.

Offcom noted that although O'Sullivan was soliciting callers, the only one whose views was included in the program agreed with him. News UK told Offcom it regretted that on this occasion a wider range of voices and perspective was not achieved and that it was discussing with its production team what other means might have been employed to ensure further representation of alternative views. Lalani Dowding, when I hear about this man, I just think, thank God I'm out. Thank God I'm out of that system, that mainstream media system, that off-com regulated system. Thank God they don't regulate this show.

Although Tommy Robinson said earlier today, he believes the government is going to start coming for independent platforms like this. Because what they're basically saying, Nalani, and remember, this could be hugely significant for talk. You know, they could be fined, they could potentially even lose their license. And what it definitely is is the start of a witch hunt. It is a start of a witch hunt to try and shut down Kevin O'Sullivan because they've really, realize that he's now one of the big stars of that station. And what they're basically saying is that on a story like that, which in my view is unambiguous, you know, the cancellation of those local elections was clearly anti-democratic.

What they're saying is that to legally broadcast in this country, Kevin O'Sullivan needed to have some boring, crappy labour shill on defending Slipri Stama's indefensible behavior. It's mad. it is mad dan and this is the thing we're seeing again and again that if you don't follow the government narrative they'll try and force you into following and i am i am certain they're going to come after um you know shows on youtube because they're terrified of people having opinions that don't go with their narratives i mean if you look into mike graham's um you know departure i think you'll find

people behind it i don't think that was an organic thing just like it was not organic when you lost your jobs at G.B. News, just like it was not organic when Mark Stein lost his job at GB News. There's a pack of people out to get everyone. And it was only a matter of time before they came for the talk TV presenters. And everyone, every single person should have stood behind Mark Stein, you, Lawrence, Father Calvin Robinson, across the board. But they didn't because they thought that if they just feed the cross,

crocodile and they might keep the crocodile happy. It won't come for them. But take note, it will come for everyone. And you have to stand up for it. And, you know, just going back to what we were saying about Nigel Farage, he thinks, you know, that won't happen to him. He got debanked years after Tommy and Katie Hopkins got debanked. And we all backed him. We all backed him because it was the right thing to do. And we need that support from him. You know, and everyone should be speaking up about against this off-com decision, but they're not. You know, none of the GB News lot are, because obviously this is talk. And what's so interesting to me about this one, Lizzie, is I mean, Kevin O'Sullivan, and I am friends with Kiv, you know, I like the guy. I've

known him for years. But he was absolutely vicious about myself and Lawrence after what happened to us at GB News because he used it for commercial advantage on talk. They described G.B. News as a hate channel. They were part of the campaign to cancel us. They even held a champagne. reception backstage when we both lost our jobs. Now, that was the wrong decision for talk because ideologically, they should have understood that free speech is more important than some petty intramedia rivalry. I said it before. Whether you like somebody, whether you disagree with them, at the end of the day, we are all human. We are all, it will affect all of us. Free speech is so important for all of us.

It's not just going to affect you and your job, Dan, or Lawrence or Calvin, Mark Stein. If they want to come for you, they will come for you, regardless of who you are and what talk TV or what platform you work for. That is what's going to happen. And I find it really hypocritical as well. That whole off-com report, the mainstream media, all we get for. fed, typically, from the British broadcasting, bashing, whatever it is, you call it, Dan. The British Bashing Corporation. Yeah, that's it. And I'm going to come to them in one moment. And many other media outlets, I have to say, all we get fed is what they wish to plant in our

minds. And it's so hypocritical because normally when I don't watch the news, I haven't for years, but whenever I see things on social media, it's, they have the same. people on, the same people spouting the same perspective and it's all the same narrative. With no balance. I mean, how can they come for Kevin O'Sullivan

for that reasoning when they have never once come for James O'Brien on LBC who every single day unleashes his one-sided vitriol against people who consider to be on the right,

Lizzie. This is also This should show those that kind of were joyous when it happened to yourselves and Lawrence and celebrated with champagne receptions and things. This should show them that this is the work of the universe. It's called karma. And, you know, you shouldn't, you should not be for something happening to somebody that in the same respect could happen to yourself. Totally. Free speech is we have to. It is so important that we stand up and fight for free speech.

we have to keep hold of it. Totally. Totally agree. Totally agree. But I mean, what is also shocking to me, too, is the way that the mainstream media will just cover stories up, right? That do not fit their narrative.

And I think we've seen the most shocking example of it over the past 24 hours. After this major daily telegraph investigation, blowing the whistle on bias at the BBC, showed how they had disgracefully and totally dishonestly. Actually, I'm going to go further. I think criminally faked this Donald Trump speech just before the election.

Watch. We're going to walk down to the Capitol, and I'll be there with you, and we fight. We fight like hell. We're going to walk down to the Capitol. And we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. Lulani, I mean, to me, this is criminal. To me, the BBC should be shut down.

I mean, this is a international scandal, yet I watched the mainstream bulletins last night. It was hardgoing, and you'll feel for me, Lizzie, but I watched because I want to see how they cover big news. Not a word. Not a word on the British Bashing Corporation, not a word on Wokai TV news, not a word on sly news, because they all look after each other.

So they're just going to ignore this, Lelani. It's sick. It's sick. It's so disgraceful. This is supposed to be our public, you know, this is meant to be for us, all the British people to see what's going on around the world, right? And they've just completely faked it. What he said, those two clips that were spliced together were actually 54 minutes apart.

54 minutes apart and you put them together to make it have a completely and utterly different meaning. Now, apparently, to take it further, they actually in the documentary showed the proud boys, a group in America, marching with flags, but they made it look as though that happened after Trump's speech when really it happened beforehand. You know, what he actually said was so different from what they spliced together and try to, to portray, and I think it absolutely is criminal. And how can people have trust? And it was before the election, too, Lalani.

Yes, to sway people's minds. And I just want to say this, Dan, I do not have a TV license. I stopped it four years ago. I put updates on my Twitter all the time about the letters that they send me. No one's ever come round. I've got four

years of letters, and I'm just showing everyone every single time. Because defund it. Stop paying for your license. We should not be paying for this filth. How are they going to put us all in jail for it? Just before I bring you in Lizzie, I want to show you a couple of the main stars of the BBC who have gaslit us for so long into trying to make us think that you can trust the BBC for truth. Now obviously none of us knew that, but it's been propaganda, which a lot of people believe. And it's worth just taking a look at who the second.

person was back in this message watch the more you try to drown out reality the harder will work to verify the facts and with our expertise you have nowhere to hide we will find your slight of hand and expose them so no matter how hard it gets we'll never give up. We'll be watching. We'll be ready because it's the pursuit of truth that gives us our calling. Truth! The fight for truth is on. Okay and do you remember this guy? Do you remember this guy who was also wheeled out? One note of caution always be careful. It's important to check all the sources. They might not be giving you the full picture, or they might have made, you know, an innocent mistake. So you need to be careful, only use those sources that you trust.

Are they likely to have accurate information on the story? How much checking do you need to do? Depends on the type of source, but it's usually a good idea to check the information with at least two different sources. That's our policy. So we have truth and accuracy, two of the BBC's... Basic news values. The audience need to trust you, and that depends on you being accurate. They're important values, and they'll help you become not just a reporter, but a trusted school reporter.

One more important bit of advice. To protect people under the age of 18, you must only use their first names in reports. Never use surnames, okay? That's a good policy. Protecting people under 18, Pido Hugh. Have fun. Oh, sorry. Sorry. He had me at full picture and protect under 18. I mean, he certainly gave us the full picture, didn't he?

Yeah, I mean, it's hilarious, isn't it? I mean, obviously it's chilling too. But, you know, putting a paedophile up to try and lecture us about why we've got to trust the BBC for truthful reporting. Verifying the facts. That was the bit that stuck out from that video for me. They're not verifying any facts. All they're verifying is the manipulation of the facts. They just manipulate the truth. I actually feel sorry for people that watch the mainstream media. Genuinely, I do, because they are misinformed, they are lied to, and, you know, they're being made,

they're being manipulated and made to think a certain narrative and swayed to keep that narrative going. And it's brainwashing, it's conditioning, it's dangerous. And, yeah, I'm just so glad that you have your platform, Dan, and there are other independent media out there. And the lovely lady that you had at Tommy's... Yes, Lauren, the insider. Yeah, she's brilliant.

And again, just going back to the Tommy, him drawing people to read the judgment. Go and read the judgment. If you want the truth, It is out there. You can find it. It's not that hard to find and to look for. They will always try, you know, censor us or bury it a little bit, but it is out there.

Exactly. Read primary sources as much as you can. Although, unfortunately, like when it comes to the off-communist document about, you know, talk and Kevin O'Sullivan, reading the primary document actually just made me even angrier. But, Dan, Dan, you know when they went. You know when they actually went to the BBC for comment about their doctoring? They said they wouldn't comment because they don't comment on leaked documents. I mean, what kind of a get-out is that? You know, they can't even comment on their own, like, lies.

It's crazy. I know. I know. I know. It is not. It's like, also, you're a news organisation. You've been caught red-handed and we pay you. Okay, so you can't just stay silent on this.

Ricky Jervais is possibly the greatest celebrity in the United Kingdom. I mean, I think he's such a talent, and I always have the office is probably my favorite comedy of all time. And what's been great over the years is seeing Ricky Jervase not necessarily become a political activist, but certainly a social activist. And I put him in the same category as J.K. Rowling. someone who is uncancellable. So when it came to Netflix, right, and the whole issue of the trans debate, he just said it.

He said it because he knows he doesn't need this deal. He's got more money than he could ever possibly spend. And there's a power in that. And Ricky Javees has decided to use that power now to take on the ludicrous censorship of London's failed mayor, Sadie Khan. So he has this vodka brand, and the ads that he runs in London's Tube are what you might call a little bit un-PC, something that the woke mob don't enjoy. Look at that. Welcome to London. Don't forget your stab-face. And of course, that doesn't fit the Kahn narrative. So TFL, an organisation which is run by Kahn, even though they continue to deny this, keeps on seemingly pulling the advertiser.

down. Ricky DeVease isn't having it anymore. He's mad as hell and he's not going to hide it. And I am here for it. Watch. Right. I am fucking sick and tired of the powers that be banning my fucking billboards and adverts

for Dutch barns. Sometimes there's just nothing wrong with them, right? One that was meant for the tube station just had me having a drink and it just said, one day you'll be underground for good. That was it. They went, no, can't have that. Because it might make people think, oh, because life's short, we should drink to excess.

Who's fucking thinking that? Oh my God. Cowardly fucking cunts. Do you think it's my attitude? But you can't win. Because, right, you're not allowed to say alcohol's good for you, or it does this, or it makes you feel confident, or it makes you feel attractive. Which is fine. I went the other way.

There was one advert. reading from my laptop from government websites just saying about all the dangers of alcohol they went no we don't like we don't like that do you know why because they don't like the truth either because that puts off other advertisers you know fuck me honestly so this is what we're going to do fuck them okay i'm going to sell directly to you go to the website right sign up for our mailing list as well and you can win a year's supply of dutch barn also we saved on So save donkeys, fuck censors, Dutch barn. I just love him saying that with all of his BAFTAs and Golden Globes and Evie's lined up behind him.

But Lalani Dowling, there is something quite wonderful, I think, about the increasing activism, you know, of Ricky Javis. Oh, do you know, I love him. He's so good. Apparently these pick these, these, these, I need to stress, by the way, Lalani, apparently. these ads were like CGI generated so it was like this is what they or AI generated I mean sorry this is what they

would look like on the tube but he wasn't allowed to put them up do you see what I mean yeah do you know what they're brilliant and I'm crying it's like took the words right out my mouth cowardly fucking cuts it makes me laugh so much sorry I can't stop laughing because I haven't seen that video

it's so funny okay Oh, sorry, I've got to compose by yourself. He just speaks like me. You come in, Lizzie. You come in. Can I just say, I absolutely, like, I am a happily married lady, okay? And in a non-romantic, weird way, I absolutely love Ricky Javis. I love him because he's authentic.

He does not care, and he will say it how it is. And he actually reminded me of you, Lani, in that video, because of the C word. He said it was such a... Yes, Lulani, you've been dropping sea bombs left right and centre at our dear leader, at our dear K. Stama. We need more people like Ricky Javis to see how. And J.K. Rowling.

They, when we look back in years and years and years to come, they are heroes for standing up and for speaking up. It's ridiculous that he's not allowed to have that. What happens at the times when you paid for an advert and it just got put up? 100%. And you know what, Dan, Dan, he's so clever. Those ads were so clever.

And you know what? The timing, though, of that one about the underground where it said, you know, welcome to London, make sure you remember your stab best. I mean, that was literally a couple of days before a mass stabbing. And they're saying, no, you can't have that because it's, you know, it doesn't represent. Well, actually, it doesn't just represent London. It represents the whole of the UK now. And I just love that he's prepared to, you know, to say how he feels and even though they're banned, you know what, it doesn't matter because it's got out there far more, far more people have now seen those mock-ups than they probably would of if they were on the trains because, you know, it would have just been the people down in London on the tubes. It's global. It's across all of the UK. I've seen them up in Staffordshire. Everyone's seen them in America. Ricky Jervais is a genius.

And I hope people do go and buy direct from him. Because you know what, good on him. And he saves donkeys, which is a very good thing. I know. I love that about him. And what is so interesting to me, right, is the difference in terms of how woke celebrities on the left with very hard left views are treated by big advertisers, right? Because it's not that I want them to be cancelled, but the hypocrisy is so fascinating to me, right? because you would never see a big brand, a big supermarket brand, now hire J.K. Rowling or Ricky Javis or Katie Hopkins to back one of their products, even though it would actually be very popular with the British people.

But do you remember Dawn French was very much criticised for this video in regards to the Israeli Gaza conflict earlier in the year, watch? Hmm, complicated, no, but nuanced. But, you know, bottom line is no. Yeah, but you know, they did a bad thing to us. I mean, I don't know, but no. But we want my land and we don't know, not with history and you know, you know, No. Those people, not even people, are they really? Really?

No. So that was October the 7th, of course, which she was completely belittling. And lots of people said, well, we wouldn't want to see her in the M&S Christmas ad. Now, for me, it's not that I want anyone to be cancelled, but I would be very surprised if a mainstream family brand like M&S, then decided, oh, we want someone like that, you know, someone who has expressed, I think, those revolting views. I'd be surprised if they would want them in their Christmas ad, you know, which is meant to be for everyone and about bringing everyone together. But the MNS Christmas ad

has just been unveiled. We're going to watch it together. And I have to say, I do like me some MNS food at Christmas time, but they've stuck with her. They've gone with Dawn French. So let's watch along to this ad together. I'm in home for Christmas. Yeah. Like a way to see. Mama!

Oh, how long have we been here? Oh, I know. Oh, hang on, Frenchie. And... Ah! Here we go. I'm coming catapes! Sorry!

Ow! Oh, fairies, yes please. We're closed. Really? We're open! Oh, look at these lovely prawny things. They're LNS Black Tiger Porn Piala Bites. Don't help yourself a tooth light.

Now that's, you have. Ooh, fish chips and peas. In a salt and meaning a matter. Oh, the... Do you have any fondue? No, twinkle. But I do have this delicious... Um...

Pocomoneu patte by Tom Kerridge! Well, it's gone mad. This is not just food. This is M&S Christmas food. Okay, so first day I love Christmas. Secondly, I like the look of that food. But it is odd to me. It's odd to me that you put someone who seemed to be denigrating Jews

and what happened on October 7th in an ad line. like that. It does feel off to me, but what do you think, Lizzie? Well, first of all, I think that it's ridiculous that people get cancelled, first and foremost, for their opinions. But second of all, I agree with you with regards to what she said, and it is a little bit like, okay, however, she is okay to say that and do that, because that's kind of the narrative that we have seen up and down the country with the protests and that's been shared over the media. So the majority of people like Dawn French,

the majority of famous people that I've seen do videos like that have said pretty much what she said. So it seems to be the narrative that's okay to say. So you're not going to get in trouble for that and you're still going to be able to work for M&S. I don't I don't think it's right that people get cancelled, like I said, but I do also think that if it's okay for her to say that, it should also be okay for somebody who's a public figure or famous to say the opposite to what she said and not be cancelled for it and not,

you know, lose their livelihood for it. I've said it before on here. You know, my husband went on question time and said that Britain is a warm, welcoming and tolerant country, which is the truth. And lost all of his acting work. You know, it is so wrong, isn't it, Lulani? And that is the thing. It's like, I would love there to be overall tolerance, right, for all of our political views. But there is such a rank hypocrisy about the fact that Dawn French can spread her anti-Israeli or some would say anti-Jew hate. I don't know how you want to phrase it. But that she can spread that, end up in the nice M&S ad, but you just know that's never going to be the case for Lawrence Fox or J.K. Rowling or now Ricketts your face.

Well, I think that's it, isn't it? It's the hypocrisy that annoys everybody and upsets everybody. And I think when she first came out with it, we had the discussion about how, you know, maybe she shouldn't be cancelled. It was a wrong thing to do, but, you know, don't necessarily cancel her because we will stand up for everybody's views. You know, if she wants that opinion, let her have that opinion. If somebody, you know, some might want to start throwing around anti-Semitism, the same way they might start saying, you know, someone else is Islamophobic, right? So there's two different sides.

There's two different opinions. Only one side is going to get cancelled because the whole thing is her, it's hypocritical. And then you have, you know, if you were against, you know, the men in women's bathrooms and women's spaces and those kind of men, then you'd probably get cancelled from an ad like that because that would be going against the narrative. So there's certain things that are okay, there's certain things that are not.

And again, it's the people like us that kind of say, look, we want everybody to be able to have the ability to say and express themselves, you know, as long as they're not inciting violence and, you know, asking for death to anybody, then, you know, we want you to be able to have the opinion. But again, those people would be, I feel like she would be cheering on Lawrence and cheering on anybody that cancelled

if it doesn't kind of go along with it. Always. It is, it is, it is, it is that massive rank hypocrisy of, of the elite class. But look, a fascinating discussion. So brilliant to have you both. And of course, you can find Lalani Daldine on X for her brilliant social commentary. And likewise, Elizabeth Fox, who. posts on X under the name California Fris. So that is what you need to search to find her.

Thank you both so much. Love having you always. Hope to see you soon. Thank you both. And we are going to reveal today's greatest Britain Union jackass in just one moment. First to your feedback. And thank you for the superchats. By the way, Abbottis says, congratulations Tommy Robinson for the not guilty verdict. Care the traitor, Starma, would have used this to arrest all of us for supporting a terrorist while stabbers aren't known as terrorists. What a wank of that PM. truly is. And Charlotte Brown says, Tommy, Tommy Robinson, keep being you. Salarian Unlimited says, and the MSM keep referring to his previous misbehavior, as though he is living and breathing that today and the ultimate insult of being branded far right instead

of just right. Jackie Gummer says, I'm glad the whole world is watching what damned fools they look today. And Raymond Steele says, fuck the mainstream, outspoken kicks ass. Yes, Raymond, thank you so much. And thank you for all of your support today. Of course, we do have a whole other special episode that we did record this morning live from the Tommy Robinson verdict, and I do recommend you check that out. Now, your nominees for the worst Britain in the world today. Our Union Jackass, Rachel Reeves, nominated by its Only Me 44 for her pre-budget speech, which has seen the footsie crashing. John Swinney, nominated by Protect Rights for putting the failings of men in weeks over the safeguarding of girls, and Tim Davy, nominated by Scott Fly 23 for

the BBC's despicable doctoring of that Donald Trump speech. There's only one winner today though. This is an overwhelming one. With 7% of the vote in third place, John Swinney, the runner up with 10% of the vote, Tim Davy. But today's worst Britain in the world, because you just know she's going to put up her taxes. I couldn't despise her anymore. Rachel from accounts. And today's greatest Britain is Tommy Robinson, nominated by Sarah Booth, for proving he was not just innocent, but correct, unlike the cops. And she says also the outspoken coverage of Perp. Thank you so much.

Plus, an honorary mention to the man with the flag for summing up so perfectly what we all think of Star. And if you did miss that, as I say, go and check out our special live episode, Tommy Robinson, not guilty. Now, we're moving over to Substack now for the Uncanceled After Show, and King Charles has lashed out at Prince William behind the scenes for risking and even the British public with the King Harry and Megan Markle, I'll reveal the details of this astonishing rail,

which has been revealed in a bombshell new royal book. So at this stage, we come off YouTube, we're going to move over to substack www.org. W.W.compan.com. Do remember to sign up for Outspoken as a podcast as well. We're available on Spotify as a video podcast or Apple podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. Please do rate and review.

That really helps us in the algorithm. And I would be personally grateful. I will be back with you live tomorrow. 5pm UK time, midday Eastern, 9 a.m. hit subscribe right now on YouTube, turn on the notification bell to be alerted to our new episodes and most importantly, I promise to keep fighting for you.