Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe - Can planets share an orbit?

Episode Date: December 19, 2023

Daniel and Jorge talk about whether two planets could share an orbit around a star, or whether there would be too much gravitational squabbling.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an IHeart podcast. Why are TSA rules so confusing? You got a hood of you. I'll take it off. I'm Manny. I'm Noah. This is Devin. And we're best friends and journalists with a new podcast called No Such Thing, where we get to the bottom of questions like that.

Why are you screaming? I can't expect what to do. Now, if the rule was the same, go off on me. I deserve it. You know, lock him up. Listen to No Such Thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. No such thing.

I'm Dr. Joy Hardin-Bradford, host of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast. I know how overwhelming it can feel if flying makes you anxious. In session 418 of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast, Dr. Angela Neal-Barnett and I discuss flight anxiety. What is not a norm is to allow it to prevent you from doing the things that you want to do. The things that you were meant to do. to listen to therapy for black girls on the iHeart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcast do we really need another podcast with a condescending finance brof trying to tell us how to

spend our own money no thank you instead check out brown ambition each week i your host mandy money gives you real talk real advice with a heavy dose of i feel uses like on fridays when i take your questions for the b a qa whether you're trying to invest for your future navigate a toxic workplace I got you. Listen to Brown Ambition on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. Hi, it's Honey German, and I'm back with season two of my podcast. Graziez, come again. We got you when it comes to the latest in music and entertainment with interviews with

some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities. You didn't have to audition? No, I didn't audition. I haven't auditioned in like over 25 years. Oh, wow. That's a real G-talk right there. Oh, yeah. We'll talk about all that's viral and trending,

with a little bit of cheesement and a whole lot of laughs. And of course, the great bevras you've come to expect. Listen to the new season of Dacius Come Again on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Hey, Jorge, did you share a room with siblings when you were a kid? I did. I shared a room with my brother. Oh, and was that like a couple? cozy and fun for the two of you, or did you get on each other's nerves?

It was pretty fun. We get along pretty good. How about you? I shared a room with two brothers, and there was not a whole lot of coziness there. We got on each other's nerves a lot. Yikes. Sounds intense. Yeah, I remember after one argument my mom telling us, if we couldn't get along, we'd have to live outside in tents. Whoa, sounds intense. But is that why you like camping so much? Because you did end up outside in a tent? Is that where your love of the stars came from? Is this your origin story?

It's all because of your brother, your nemesis or nemesi. It's how I extracted something beautiful from a difficult story. Sounds like a hallmark movie now. How you overcame, sibling rivalry. Depends on whether it ends well or not. I guess it only ends when one of you dies. Hi, I'm Jorge McCartunist and the author of Oliver's Great Big Universe. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor at UC Irvine, and I've been totally

eclipsed by my younger brother. Oh, boy. Is he a more shiny star or something? He's taller than me. He's a professor at a fancier university than I am. What else is there? But does he have a podcast? There you go. I don't know if he wants a podcast. But yeah, that's a good point. I'm going to bring that up at Thanksgiving. Thanks. You know, it's super hard to do a podcast, or at least to start one. There's a high bar for putting things on the internet.

They don't just let anyone post things on the internet, you know. I guess we'll find out if he listens to the podcast, if he responds to this. Oh, boy. Well, in case you're listening, hello, Daniel's brother. It sounds like we should have you on the podcast and break it down. Oprah style. He's been on the podcast once before when we talked about artificial intelligence because he's a machine learning professor.

Oh, I thought you were going to say he's a machine. That too. But anyways, welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge, Explain the Universe, a production of our hard radio. In which we try not to eclipse your knowledge of the universe, we try to shine a light on it. We think everybody should be cozy with the physics of the universe, snuggling up to a deep understanding of what's going on out there,

how it all works, how it started, and what story it tells us about where we live and where we will live in the future. That's right. We try to be your big brother in terms of telling you how the universe works and what we've learned from our mistakes and our discoveries

so that you can navigate this fantastic universe with a little bit more ease and a little bit more confidence. I'm not sure Big Brother has the connotations we're looking for. You know, it's a little bit overwellian, isn't it? Not necessarily. Isn't there like a Big Brother program where you mentor kids?

That's a positive thing too. Yeah, there you go. We're not telling you what to think or what not to think. We're just teaching you about the universe. That's right. And there is a lot to know about the universe and to discover and to find out because it is pretty interesting, pretty complex, pretty vast and also microscopic in the way that it reveals its secrets. And one surefire way to figure out how the universe works is to ask basic questions about it, to look up at the night sky and ask, why does this do this and why does this not do that? How can we see this happening and not some other thing happening?

What are the rules of the universe that allow us to have huge planets like Jupiter, but not other situations like planets shaped like a pretzel? Yeah, because I guess you can look around and wonder, like, are we a result of the rules of the universe or are we like an exception to the rules of the universe? Well, we definitely are results of the rules of the universe if you believe the universe has rules and it follows them. But there might be weird outcomes and there might be standard outcomes like it. It could be that our solar system is very unusual as an example of things in the galaxy. or it could be that we're totally vanilla. Yeah, because as humans here on planet Earth, we only really have one view of one planet

that we can study up close so far. And so it makes you wonder if other planets are the same or if humans could have lived in other planets. Good things have been different in our history. That's true. And there are other planets nearby that we can study, though not quite as up close, to try to get more insight into what a planet can be like, what are the various possibilities, how planets can turn out.

And do they get it? along as siblings? Or have any siblings been kicked out of the solar system and are living intense by the asteroid belt? That's right. We talked recently about those really fun theories that there was once an ice giant in the outer solar system that was ejected during a period of chaos. Whoa. So you think it just couldn't get along with the other planets? I'm wondering who the parent is in this analogy. Like, is it really the sun's fault that it didn't work out? Yeah. And how responsible is it to kick your children outside and live outside? Yeah. yeah somebody should call it universal child services but one thing we do notice about our solar system

is that the planets all seem to have their own orbits jupiter's got an orbit earth has an orbit mars has an orbit it's sort of like everybody's got their own room they all have their own lane you mean yeah exactly like there's no other earth on the other side of our orbit right or didn't scientists think for a while there maybe there was it sounds like a pretty cool science fiction story right a second Earth on the other side of the sun. Planet X. Wasn't it called Planet X? I think Planet X is an idea for a 10th or now ninth planet that might be out there tugging on distant planets,

but would necessarily share an orbit with ours. But it's technically, is it possible that there's like a, I know the Earth on the other side of the sun, we just have never seen it because it's on the other side of the sun? We wouldn't be able to see it directly from Earth, but of course we've had probes go all over the solar system. We would have seen it and we would have noticed its gravitational effects on Mars and Venus and other stuff in the solar system.

So I guess each planet does have its own orbit, its own lane. In our solar system, each planet mostly does have its own lane. But of course, the question is, why is that? And is that typical? So today on the podcast, we'll be tackling the question. Why don't planet share an orbit? Is it because they couldn't get along? Yeah.

And are we the little, the younger sibling? or are we the more accomplished sibling? I think the younger sibling is often motivated to eclipse the older siblings. Boy, it sounds like a lot to impact there in your family. I'm nothing but proud of my younger brother. Let's stick to physics, maybe. But yeah, it's an interesting question.

I guess the implied fact is that no planets in our solar system share in orbit, meaning they're not going around the sun at the same distance. Yeah, although you could quibble about that in the case of Jupiter, there is some stuff in Jupiter's orbit, not another planet, but it does share its orbit with some other chunks. And I guess the other implied fact is that all the orbits don't overlap, I guess, right?

Because most of the orbits are pretty much circular, right? They're not like ellipses that kind of overlap with each other. You mean like if they intersect? Yeah, like they intersect or if you look at them from the top, there may be like the two ellipsoids are overlapped. Yeah, I think two ellipsoids that overlap and have different periods would eventually collide. So I don't think you could have that situation for very long. But it's true that most of the orbits are pretty much circular, right?

They're all a little bit eccentric. None of them are exactly circular. Kind of like you and your brothers. You're all a little eccentric as well. I think a little is kind of generous there. We're all quite eccentric, actually. You're all professors or something. Exactly.

How does that happen? But in the case of the solar system, none of the orbits are perfectly circular. They're all at least a little bit eccentric. But yeah, none of them are overlapping. They basically all have their own lanes. So the question is, why don't two planets have the same orbit? So as usually, we're wondering how many people out there have thought about this question. Thanks very much to our group of volunteers.

We'd love if you joined them. Write me to questions at danielanhorpe.com and I'll send the questions on over. So think about it for a second. Why do you think no two planets share an orbit? Here's what people had to say. I think planets don't share orbits because the center of gravity would have to be, absolutely stationary or it oscillate and shake itself out of sync. But I think they actually do.

It's just very unlikely because it'd be a major coincidence. So I'm under the impression that planets by definition are celestial objects orbiting stars that have cleared their orbital path of competing debris like asteroids and that as a planet forms, its gravity gets stronger and it sucks up other objects in that orbital path. And that's one of the reasons that objects like series are not considered true planets because they share their orbit with a number of other large asteroids and other competing debris. Pl planets don't share orbits because of the way clusters get together. If there is a clump of matter, very close to a clump of a matter, they will make a planet and the things that are

far apart, they will make another planet. All right. Some interesting answers. Some people think it's maybe unlikely because it would be a big coincidence. Gravity just doesn't work that way, that it can't pull things together into two planets. Oh, interesting. But I guess, you know, thinking about it, like the asteroid belt has a whole bunch of mini planets and they're all kind of in the same orbit. Yeah, absolutely. I guess we'll dig into that.

So first of all, Daniel, let's maybe start with the basics. What is a planet or what do you define as a planet? So a planet famously has a fairly legalistic definition of what it is. And remember, this is just astronomers giving names to things. Like, there's stuff out there in the universe. The rocks don't care whether you call them a rock or an asteroid or a planetismal. They're still out there doing the physics. This is just humans applying like our framework of categorization to the stuff.

And different humans on a different planet or aliens, whatever, might come up with a totally different categorization. It's mostly historical. It doesn't really reflect deep underlying physics. But it's language and we should all agree what the meanings and words are. And so in the case of a planet, there are three requirements. One, that it's mostly spherical. This is basically, is it big enough?

Because anything that's big enough is going to be mostly a sphere due to gravity. Requirement number two is that it orbits the sun and not some other object like a planet. Otherwise, the moon would be a candidate for a planet. And then the last one is that it's cleared its path of planetismals and other big objects. Basically, that of all the stuff in its lane, it's gathered up all the bits into one object. Well, it sounds like by definition then a planet cannot share an orbit because a planet in your definition is something that is by itself in an orbit. Exactly. So technically speaking, like the legal answer is no because then it wouldn't be a planet. But really we're asking like, could you have two Jupiters on opposite sides of the sun orbiting in the same orbit?

That would be really fascinating. Now, astronomers from this committee would say, well, technically those aren't planets. And we say like, well, we don't really care. It's fascinating that they're doing this. thing, whether or not you call them planets. Meaning if there was another Earth orbiting in our orbit just on the other side of the sun, we wouldn't be like, that's not a planet. We would still call it a planet and you'd just be forced to change the definition of a planet.

Yeah, maybe. Or we'd have T-shirts saying like, Earth isn't a planet or Earth is a planet or I'm on Team Earth or whatever and be a whole ridiculous battle really just over names. You know, where do you draw the dotted line? But I guess maybe the question is like, why is that part of the definition? Why is it important for astronomers that a planet? quote unquote has its own orbit. It's a good question, and I don't think the answer is just scientific.

I think it's historical. You know, we try to sometimes reverse engineer these definitions to reflect the decisions we've been making historically. We've been calling these things planets, and we sort of want to have a definition that aligns with the decisions we've already made, even if they aren't the decisions we would have made if we knew better at the time. You know, early on, when we started talking about planets, we didn't understand everything that was out there in the solar system,

all the smaller rocks that were invisible to us. We didn't realize that there was like a full spectrum from tiny rocks to planetismals to dwarf planets to real planets. But I guess maybe the idea that this is part of the definition maybe tells me that there are things out there that are spherical that orbit the sun, but that don't have cleared its path of planetesimals that are maybe as big as some of the things we do call planets.

Is that true? Well, basically that's Pluto, right? Pluto got rejected as a planet because it was judged to have not sufficiently clear the neighborhood around its orbit of other stuff. Basically, if you look in Pluto's orbit, you find other pretty big rocks that are roughly the size of Pluto. Pluto is just one of an example of, we call them dwarf planets that far out in the solar system.

They have not gathered together sufficiently to say there's one really dominant object and nothing else out there. Wait, wait, wait, wait. this was the rule that they kicked Pluto out because of? You mean, it's not because of its size. I always thought it was because of its size. It's sort of indirectly because of its size. I mean, if everything else out there in Pluto's orbit was just dust and tiny grains,

then they would have said, okay, it's a planet. But because there are chunks of rock out there that are sort of too big to ignore, then you say Pluto hasn't really cleared its orbit. I mean, really technically speaking, nothing has cleared its orbit because, you know, there's dust and all sorts of other rocks in, Earth's orbit, certainly, right? It's not like it's perfectly empty space in Earth's orbit. So you can ask like, well, what does it mean to clear its orbit? Even that definition gets a little bit fuzzy, but that's the reason why Pluto was demoted. Whoa, I'm a little bit outraged. I feel like this is

such a weird technicality to have kicked Pluto for. Well, this is the problem with creating categories, right? You're always going to find something on the edge of the category, and then you're going to have to try to crisply define the category. And then you discover the category is just artificial. You're just really drawing dotted lines between a smooth spectrum of stuff. Like remember when we talked about space centaurs, the things that are kind of comets and kind of asteroids and what you discover is really the two things are part of a larger community and you've drawn a dotted line between comets and asteroids and it doesn't really make sense to distinguish between them. This is just a problem of humans creating categories that don't

really work. But there was sort of like a vote or there was a lot of discussion about Pluto. So what is it about not having anything in its path that is so important to scientists to kick out, you know, change science books basically for everybody? You know, why is that important, whether or not it has little chunks of rocks in its path or not? I think it's just sociological. Like we look at Earth and Jupiter and Mars and Venus and we say this is one kind of thing. And Pluto is sort of a different kind of thing because it's different in this way. It's just one example of many big chunks of rock out there. They're in the Pluto orbit.

So I think there is a distinction to be made between these two different categories of objects. Then again, it's sort of fuzzy. Meaning, like, the fact that it has chunks in its path is maybe the only thing that sits it apart from the others. Like, none of the other things that we call planets have things in its bath. And so they're using it as an excuse to kick Pluto out. Exactly. And when we talk about the history of the formation of the solar system, you see that it's sort of like one step. You know, the solar system, you have the planetary disk and the gas.

others into rocks and those become planetimals. And then in some cases, they form big planets. In other cases, they just stay a big spread of planetismals. They don't really form planets. So in that sense, planets really are sort of like the next step in the formation of an object in the solar system. And you've got to respect that or reflect it or at least, you know, describe it. You know, I guess it would make sense if there were a lot of Pluto-like planets that look like Pluto or the size of Pluto but didn't clear its path.

And then maybe I could see like, okay, if you let Pluto in, you have to let all these other things in. But is that the case or is Pluto just like a lone border case? Well, Pluto is maybe the thing closest to the edge, but there are a lot of things out there. You know, there aren't a lot of these dwarf planets that you might call planets. You know, Series, for example, is a dwarf planet, but it's part of the asteroid belt. And there's lots of other stuff in the asteroid belt. You can't say that series really is a planet because it didn't gather together all the other bits. So I think that is true that once you open the door to Pluto, you have to let in lots of other folks.

I don't know why that's a problem. Like, let's have a solar system with hundreds of planets. That sounds awesome to be. Big party. Yeah. More savings to fight with. But there is something of a distinction here between objects that are basically alone in their orbit and objects that are not.

And I do think it's really interesting to wonder, like, could you have two planet-like objects orbiting the sun in the same orbit? Why don't we see that in our solar system? Is that something you might see in other solar systems, et cetera? I see. You want to sort of pivot to the question of, like, what would happen if two planets, did share in orbit or two large objects like the Earth share it in orbit. Could that situation be stable? Why don't we see it? Could that form at all? I think those are

really interesting sort of physics questions instead of like category legalistic questions. That sounds like something siblings would argue about for no good reason. All right, well, let's dig into these interesting questions. But first, let's take a quick break. Hi, I'm Kurt Brown-Oller. And I am Scotty Landis. And we're, We host Bananas, the Weird News Podcasts with wonderful guests like Whitney Cummings. And tackle the truly tough questions. Why is cool mom an insult, but mom is fine? No.

I always say, Kurt's a fun dad. Fun dad and cool mom. That's cool for me. We also dig into important life stuff. Like why our last names would make the worst hyphen ever. My last name is Cummings. I have sympathy for nobody. Yeah, mine's brown oler, but with an H.

so it looks like brown holer. Okay, that's, okay, yours might be worse. We can never get married. Yeah. Listen to this episode with Whitney Cummings and check out new episodes of bananas every Tuesday on the exactly right network. Listen to bananas on the IHeart radio app,

Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Imagine that you're on an airplane and all of a sudden you hear this. Attention passengers. The pilot is having an. emergency and we need someone, anyone to land this plane. Think you could do it? It turns out that nearly 50% of men think that they could land the plane with the help of air traffic control. And they're saying like, okay, pull this,

do this, pull that, turn this. It's just, I can do it my eyes close. I'm Manny. I'm Noah. This is Devin. And on our new show, no such thing, we get to the bottom of questions like these. Join us as we talk to the leading expert on overconfidence. Those who lack, expertise, lack the expertise they need to recognize that they lack expertise. And then, as we try the whole thing out for real, wait, what? Oh, that's the run right. I'm looking at this thing. Listen to no such thing on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Welcome to Pretty Private with Ebene, the podcast where silence is broken and stories are set free. I'm Ebeney, and every Tuesday I'll be sharing all new anonymous stories that would challenge your perceptions and give you new insight on the people around you. On Pretty Private, we'll explore the untold experiences of women of color who faced it all, childhood trauma, addiction, abuse, incarceration, grief, mental health struggles, and more, and found the shrimp to make it to the other side. My dad was shot and killed in his house. Yes, he was a drug dealer. Yes, he was a confidential informant, but he wasn't shot on a street corner. He wasn't shot in the middle of a drug deal. He was shot in his house, unarmed.

Pretty Private isn't just a podcast. It's your personal guide for turning storylines into lifelines. Every Tuesday, make sure you listen to Pretty Private from the Black Effect Podcast Network. Tune in on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Your entire identity has been fabricated. Your beloved brother goes missing without a trace. You discover the depths of your mother's illness, the way it has echoed and reverberated throughout your life,

impacting your very legacy. Hi, I'm Danny Shapiro. And these are just a few of the profound and powerful stories I'll be mining on our 12th season of Family Secrets. With over 37 million downloads, We continue to be moved and inspired by our guests and their courageously told stories. I can't wait to share 10 powerful new episodes with you, stories of tangled up identities, concealed truths,

and the way in which family secrets almost always need to be told. I hope you'll join me and my extraordinary guests for this new season of Family Secrets. Listen to Family Secrets Season 12 on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. All right. All right. We're asking the question here today. Why don't planets share an orbit? And we just went through a defined print to find out that astronomers call a planet something that doesn't share an orbit. So technically planets cannot share an orbit. But now we're going to pivot a little bit and ask the question, well, what would happen if something like something like the Earth, share in an orbit with another big thing like the Earth. Well, first of all, it would get kicked out of the planet category, right? Yeah, that's right. If you built an Earth-sized Death Star and put it in orbit on the other side of the sun,

then Earth would no longer be a planet? Would you say maybe the Moon is still something that we haven't cleared? Well, but the Moon is orbiting the Earth, right? Oh, I see what you mean. Does the Moon disqualify the Earth because we haven't absorbed it into the Earth? Oh, yeah, these are complicated legal questions. That sounds like we need a lawyer. Is your brother a lawyer also?

No. An accomplished lawyer? Probably. He's arguing in front of the astronomy Supreme Court right now. Yeah. No, he just prerogative machine to do it for him. But yeah, so I guess we're asking more of a physics question, not a technical definition question. Like, could you have two giant Earth or two Jupiter's kind of circling each other, maybe

opposite sides of the sun or maybe not. I don't know. That's kind of the question now, right? Yeah, I think that's the interesting physics question. You know, is that possible? Is there some law of physics that prevents that from happening, either to stop it from forming or to break it up if it did somehow randomly land that way? Because I guess the question is, have we seen that?

We haven't seen that in our solar system, or have we? Maybe Pluto has an anti-pluto out there. So we don't have examples of Earth-sized objects with other Earth-sized objects in their orbits, but we do have in our solar system some sort of edge cases, like Jupiter has a whole collection of asteroids that are not in the asteroid belt per se, the one that you think about between Mars and Jupiter, but are actually in its orbit. There's two different groups of asteroids that are orbiting with Jupiter. Wait, wait, wait, like on the opposite side of Jupiter from the sun, there's a whole bunch of debris. So not on the opposite side of

Jupiter. It's a sort of 30 degrees trailing and 30 degrees ahead of it, because there are several stable points around Jupiter where you can balance the gravity of Jupiter and the gravity of the Sun so they cancel out. These are called the Lagrange points. And in the fourth and fifth Lagrange points in front of Jupiter and behind Jupiter in its orbit, there's a whole collection of asteroids that are just sort of hanging out there. Well, does that mean Jupiter is not a planet? I know. Exactly. Right. Like has Jupiter really cleared its orbit? Well, it's so much bigger than these rocks that I guess you can say so. But like if I were Pluto's lawyers, I would have raised that example.

Right, right? Why didn't anybody raise that example? Was nobody advocating for Pluto? Or for science books in general? And not confusing the entire human population? I'm not going to make the mistake of trying to defend any of these definitions. Because to me, they're all just arbitrary and they all break down under some scenario. And this is an example.

You know, and Earth even has one of these. Earth has an object like this that's in its orbit, that orbits in one of the it's Lagrange points. It's a pretty big rock. Wait, what? Really? How big is it? It's not that big. It's like five kilometers in diameter. We've only known about it since like 1986 when it was first spotted. It's got this terrible name. I won't even try to pronounce, but it's spelled C-R-U-I-T-H-N-E. Maybe you can pronounce it. Maybe, yeah. But not on air, apparently. Anyway, it's a sort of feature of gravity. You know, there are places you can be where you can be in a stable orbit. Like the James Webb Space Telescope is in one of these Lagrange points relative to the Earth and the Sun.

Well, I think what you mean by stable orbit points, meaning that it has the same location relative to the Earth and it goes around the sun at the same rate. Like it takes the same amount of time to go around the sun. That's what you mean by like being in a stable position. Well, there's two different things there. One is being in the same orbit and that means following the same path, taking the same amount of time to go around the sun. The second thing is whether you're stable and stability means like if you get a little push do you return back to the path you were on or does that cause like a cascade where it creates a bigger push and then a bigger push and then a bigger push and then

you fall away. Sort of the way like a pencil balanced on its tip is unstable. A tiny little push and it will fall over but like a ball in the bottom of a glass is stable. You give it a little push gravity restores it back to where it was. So some configurations are stable meaning that that gravity will push them back to that configuration if they get pushed by a little rock or hit by the solar wind or whatever. And if you have two objects like the Sun and the Earth, there are five points

they're called the Grange points that are stable. Three of them are in your orbit and two of them are not. Right, meaning three of them are in the same circle that the Earth traces around the Sun and two of them are like one of them a little bit further from the circle and the other one closer to the Sun. And if you're at those positions

going at the right speed, then you're going to trace a circle kind of along with earth. Exactly. The simplest one to understand is that there's a point between the earth and the sun where the gravity cancels up because the sun is pulling in one way and the earth is pulling another way. And if you're just the right point, it's not halfway between the earth and the sun because the sun is obviously more massive and has more gravity. But there is a point there where the earth and the sun gravity balances out. And if you're right there, there's effectively no gravity and you could just move with the same period, though not the same velocity as the earth and

stay there. Meaning, like, you'll go around the sun in exactly a year, just like the Earth. Exactly. That's what it means to kind of share in orbit. In that case, you would have a different radius, so you'd have the same period, but it wouldn't really be the same orbit. But there are three of these points that are actually in the same orbit, meaning you're following the same path. One of them is on the other side of the sun from the Earth, as you said, and that's very intuitive, right? And because you're like exactly balancing the Earth. And so you could just be like constantly 180 degrees out of phase with the Earth. And then there are two points, 30 degrees, degrees behind and 30 degrees ahead of the Earth that also have this special gravitational

balance where the Sun and the Earth effectively neutralize each other's gravity. And does it depend on how big you are or how heavy you are? So the location of some of these points do depend on the mass ratios, but the other ones are just geometric. So Jupiter has them, Earth has them. All the planets have these Lagrange points. And that's why, for example, Jupiter has this collection of asteroids behind it and ahead of it because they're hanging out at one of these Lagrange points.

Okay. So I think what we're trying to say here is that each planet has an orbit and each orbit sort of has these spots where you could maybe put in another planet and it would still be stable and both of them would keep going around the sun. Like it's possible. It's possible. One tiny little wrinkle there is that some of these Lagrange points are stable. Some of them are unstable.

They're all locations where the gravity balances out and if you're exactly at the right spot, you can stay there forever. But some of them are unstable, meaning if you deviate a time, tiny little bit. It's like a pencil leaning over on the table. It's going to fall over and you're not going to return. Whereas some of them are stable, meaning that if you deviate a little bit, you'll come back. So the fourth and fifth, the grange points, the one ahead and behind you in the orbit are actually stable locations. So yeah, in principle, you could have another Earth that's not on the other side of the sun, but just like 30 degrees behind us in our orbit. And it could be there

and be stable gravitationally. But didn't you say it sort of depends on the mass? Like, and you can imagine if I put a James Webb telescope, it'll be stable there or maybe a small asteroid or five kilometer rock. But if I put a whole Earth, wouldn't it just destabilize the whole thing? Or wouldn't it be totally a different point? If you put another Earth there, it would be stable. Like the situation is symmetric and they could both survive there. There are mass limitations. Like if you put a star there that's much more massive than the Earth, it's like a limit of like 25 times the mass of the Earth. Then you break some of the assumptions that doesn't work anymore. But you you could put a pretty massive planet there and it would be stable.

Interesting. But then now the question is, why isn't there something there? Because I'm sure at the beginning of the solar system, there are asteroids everywhere. There are rocks everywhere. Why didn't those two points start to gather things and why don't we have a little twin Earth? The answer to that is that we don't really know. I mean, we think that in the formation of a solar system, it's possible for it to happen. Remember the story we told earlier.

We start from a big cloud of gas and dust and leftover bits from other solar systems that have died. and that collapses most of it into the star, but like 1% of it stays in this protoplanetary disk, a bunch of heavy metals and gas and dust and ice that is moving too fast to fall into the stars. The star gobbles up mostly gas and leaves behind this protoplanetary disk. And then gravity does its thing.

It starts from little seeding locations there, little dots of heavy metal or little gravitational spots that have over densities, starts to cluster together other stuff and you get these string of rocks. So now instead of having like a disk, give a bunch of rings, rings of these rocks of various sizes, which then gather together and form stuff. And so one option is that, you know, it forms into a planet. There's like one dominant thing

that pulls that all together into a planet. Another option is that it just sort of stays a ring of rocks because of tidal forces from neighboring planets that prevent it from gathering together. But there's nothing that says in physics that you couldn't have two objects coalescing. You know, the two things couldn't have pulled together sort of in each other's Lagrange points and ended up being what looks like two planets, although, you know, the astronomers would have said neither of them are planets. Well, I feel like maybe we skipped a step there. So you're saying like the early solar system was a flat disk and then the stuff that was orbiting the sun or the new sun kind of arranged itself into rings, sort of like maybe Saturn's rings. So you can imagine the sun in the middle, a bunch of rings, just like.

Like Saturn has rings of rocks, and then those rings eventually collapse into planets. Now, what's the process for that? Like, what causes a ring of rocks to suddenly collapse into a giant ball on one specific spot? Well, that's gravity also. You know, you have one spot along the ring that's denser than another. And so it's going to pull on stuff nearby. Stuff that's ahead of it, it's going to pull closer. The stuff that's behind it, it's going to pull closer.

And then as it gathers more stuff, it's going to have more gravity. it's going to be able to reach further along that ring and essentially grab that stuff together. But I can see that for gathering the things around it. But what about the things that were on like on the opposite side of the ring? I think the answer is that we aren't 100% sure how that happens. We don't know, for example, if you can really form stuff on the other side of the solar system that stays there. Like for example, Jupiter's asteroids, did those form there? Is that an example of exactly what you're talking about, stuff forming along that same ring and not getting absorbed into the planet?

basically resisting because it's in a Lagrange point and its gravity is totally balanced? Or is that stuff that like came later? Did Jupiter actually clear its own path? We use up all the stuff in the ring and then later on stuff fell into Jupiter's Lagrange points. We just don't know the answer to that. If stuff really can form stably at the same time as a planet. That's what you're asking, right? Well, I think I'm asking like once we had a ring of rocks, sort of like Saturn has rings,

Is it the case that each ring could only collapse into one planet because of the math, basically? Like the math doesn't let you make more than one big planet because anything else would be unstable. No, the math would let you. Imagine a perfectly symmetric ring and then imagine like 10 or 12 or 50 tiny points perfectly spaced around that ring that are a little bit heavier. Those would gather up all the stuff around them. You'd end up with like 10 or 12 or 50 or whatever, identically sized objects in an orbit around the sun. and mathematically, there's nothing preventing that from happening. I think the reason why it's not likely to happen is that it requires a lot of symmetry and balance

for that arrangement to get set up. It's much more likely that one of them is bigger and one of them is smaller and then the bigger one is the bigger one eats the smaller one. But I feel like he told me that before that there's only like two stable spots around and stable orbit where other things can be. You know, if I form four mini planets along the Earth's orbit, that wouldn't like some of them be unstable? It gets much more complicated as soon as you add more than two objects. But no, you could have that stable arrangement. You could have like a thousand planets in a stable orbit around the sun,

as long as they're perfectly equally spaced and equal mass. That's also allowed. Earlier, we were just talking about two planets around the sun. But if you allow them for more than two planets, there's a lot more configurations you could have, but they're also much more unstable. Like, they need to be perfectly balanced in mass. In fact, I found some guy on the web who's done a bunch of simulations

of like crazy solar systems. Did you say some guy on the web? Yeah, some guy on the web. Wait, what? This is, okay. I found some guy in the web who posted a blog about simulations he had done about crazy solar systems where you have like 60 Jupiters in orbit around the sun and it's stable. Like, if you arrange them perfectly, 60 Jupiters can stay in orbit around the sun if you set them up perfectly.

I see, I see. But how do you know he's right? I mean, no offense. but if I told you that some guy in the internet told me something would you assume it's true? No, but this one makes sense. I mean, just from symmetry arguments,

a ring could collapse into a bunch of objects as long as it does it symmetrically, then it's still stable. Every one of those objects is the same as any other object so it feels the same gravity from all the other ones. They all cancel out, essentially. But I wonder how true that is. I don't know.

I mean, not that I don't trust your guy on the internet, it. But at some point, maybe like if you have four things going around the sun, maybe the angles and the way they interact with each other, and depending on how big they are, maybe it would make it unstable. I think it's a pretty simple extension of the argument for why you don't feel gravity from anything that orbits the sun at like the same radius as you or larger. Or for example, as you dig into the earth, you're not feeling gravity from layers of the earth that are larger than you because they all add up to cancel out. There are fewer that are closer to you and more that further and they all balance out. It's basically the same argument as like gravitational shell

argument. If you have a whole string of Earths in orbit with you, all of their gravity will cancel out. All right. Well, it sounds like we have a big mystery, which is that it sounds like it's possible for two planets to share an orbit. Definitions notwithstanding, but we don't really see that in our solar system or maybe in other solar systems out there in space. So let's dig a little bit more into that mystery. But first, let's take a quick break. Hi, I'm Kurt Brown-Oller. And I am Scotty Landis, and we host Bananas, the Weird News podcast with wonderful guests like Whitney Cummings. And tackle the truly tough questions.

Why is cool mom an insult, but mom is fine? No. I always say, Kurt's a fun dad. Fun dad and cool mom. That's cool for me. We also dig into important life stuff. Like, why our last names would make. make the worst hyphen ever.

My last name is Cummings. I have sympathy for nobody. Yeah, mine's brown-olar, but with an H. So it looks like brown-holer. Okay, that's, okay, yours might be worse. We can never get married. Yeah. Listen to this episode with Whitney Cummings

and check out new episodes of bananas every Tuesday on the exactly right network. Listen to bananas on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to Pretty Private with Ebeney, the podcast where silence is broken and stories are set free. I'm Ebeney, and every Tuesday I'll be sharing all new anonymous stories that would challenge your perceptions and give you new insight on the people around you. On Pretty Private, we'll explore the untold experiences of women of color who faced it all, childhood trauma, addiction, abuse, incarceration, grief, mental health struggles, and more. and found the shrimp to make it to the other side.

My dad was shot and killed in his house. Yes, he was a drug dealer. Yes, he was a confidential informant, but he wasn't shot on the street corner. He wasn't shot in the middle of a drug deal. He was shot in his house, unarmed. Pretty Private isn't just a podcast. It's your personal guide for turning storylines into lifelines.

Every Tuesday, make sure you listen to Pretty Private from the Black Effect Podcast Network. Tune in on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Imagine that you're on an airplane and all of a sudden you hear this. Attention passengers. The pilot is having an emergency and we need someone, anyone, to land this plane. Think you could do it? It turns out that nearly 50% of men think that they could land the plane with the help of air traffic control.

And they're saying like, okay, pull this. Let's do this, pull that, turn this. It's just... I can do it in my eyes closed. I'm Mani. I'm Noah. This is Devin. And on our new show, No Such Thing,

we get to the bottom of questions like these. Join us as we talk to the leading expert on overconfidence. Those who lack expertise lack the expertise they need to recognize that they lack expertise. And then, as we try the whole thing out for real. Wait, what? Oh, that's the run right. I'm looking at this thing.

See? Listen to no such thing. on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hola, it's HoneyGerman. And my podcast, Grasias Come Again, is back. This season, we're going even deeper into the world of music and entertainment

with raw and honest conversations with some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities. You didn't have to audition? No, I didn't audition. I haven't audition in, like, over 25 years. Oh, wow. That's a real G-talk right there. Oh, yeah.

We've got some of the biggest actors, musicians, content creators and culture shifters sharing their real stories of failure and success. You were destined to be a start. We talk all about what's viral and trending with a little bit of chisement, a lot of laughs, and those amazing vivas you've come to expect.

And of course, we'll explore deeper topics dealing with identity, struggles, and all the issues affecting our Latin community. You feel like you get a little whitewash because you have to do the code switching? I won't say whitewash because at the end of the day, You know, I'm me. Yeah.

But the whole pretending and cold, you know, it takes a toll on you. Listen to the new season of Grasas Come Again as part of My Cultura Podcast Network on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. All right, we're asking the question, why can't planet share? What's going on? Why are they so selfish? It's the parents' fault. It's always the parents' fault.

But, yeah, planets like to be loners. They don't like to share an orbit. And we sort of know that mostly from what we can see, right? Because it sounds like theoretically it is possible to have like to Earth orbiting or maybe for Earth orbiting the same circle around the sun. But we just don't see that. And so the question is like, why not? Yeah.

I think that mathematically it's possible if you set up a solar system that way, you're like a solar system builder and you bring in two Jupiters and you align them perfectly. You could build a solar system like that, which would be stable and last a long time. You know, the other question is would a solar system like that form naturally? And I think there the answer is that it's most likely for things to collapse into one big planet or for things to not really collapse at all like Pluto or the asteroid belt because of tidal forces or they're just too distant gravity. And for things to collapse into two really big or three big objects would require a sort of a perfect symmetry where they like divide up the mass budget into two or three portions and each of them gather it up themselves.

I think that just requires a lot of balance for it to happen. Like it basically a big coincidence you're saying. But I guess maybe paint the scenario for us. So we have initially around the young sun sort of a ring of rocks. Let's say like there's a ring of rocks around where Earth goes around the sun in the Earth's orbit. and maybe there's a little bit more rocks in one spot and so that one starts to gather more things but there's a whole bunch of things all around the circle

does that mean like the things on the other side of the orbit somehow speed up in order to catch up to the earth or slow down what causes those things to slow down or speed up and if they did wouldn't they change orbits no you're right something on the other side of the earth like perfectly opposed to the earth feels no gravitational tug right the earth cannot pull that thing into itself because it's at a La Grange point, right? So something that's there will stay there.

But that's a really tiny spot, the actual exact Lagrange point. Anything slightly ahead of it or slightly behind it will feel a gravitational tug from the Earth and eventually the Earth will pull it into itself. But it has to go all the way around the circle, meaning like it speeds up in the orbit, but if it speeds up, wouldn't it change orbits? Yeah, that's possible also. The Earth could tug it Not so that it ends up in the Earth, but that it falls into another orbit or falls into the sun, right? And remember that this is a very simplified way of thinking about the solar system, just one planet and the sun and one rock. In reality, there's lots of other things going on there. So lots of chaotic tugs from Jupiter and Mars as it passes by.

So all sorts of stuff disrupting this pile of rocks, some of them falling out of this orbit and landing on Venus or landing on Mars or some of them ending up on Earth. That's why Earth has rocks from all over the solar system that are landing on it. not just things from our orbit. Oh, I see. You're saying like maybe the picture I had of how planets form is not quite correct. Like, you know, maybe to go from the equivalent of Saturn's rings around the sun to a planet, it doesn't mean like a ring of rocks is going to collapse into a planet. Like Earth might be made out of the rocks from different rings.

Absolutely it is. And other planets might be made from rocks from other rings. Absolutely, yeah. The Earth is not just made from rocks from one specific range of radii. Definitely stuff has contributed from the inner solar system and from further out. Absolutely. This is a big mix. Oh, I see.

So like the history of the solar system is that it formed into a disc, then rings. Then it was a free-for-all where all the siblings were fighting over who gets which toys and which rocks. And then whoever was left victorious, whoever was bigger one. Exactly. Yeah. And whoever couldn't get along is sleeping outside in a tent. And that's mostly the story. And to understand whether that's the story of the solar system, we look around to see if there's like weird stuff happening.

You know, we'd love to have seen two planets in the same orbit so we could try to understand how that happened. There are some really fascinating and interesting counter examples to this that we see even in our own solar system like the moons of Saturn. But do you mean what's going on with the moons of Saturn? So Saturn's got lots of moons. And there's two in particular that swap orbits. So there's the moon Janus. and then there's the moon epimetheus, and these two swap orbits every four years. Like Janus is on the outside and epimetheus is on the inside, which has a short orbit,

and it comes really close to Janus and tugs on it, and the gravitational interaction means that they end up swapping. So now genus is on the inside, and epimetheus is on the outside. Well, do they swap orbits, or it's just that they both have really complicated orbits that overlap each other? Well, there's two different radii. And for four years, one of them has the inner one, and the other one has the outer one, and then they swap. So you could think about it two ways.

Like one is they have different lanes and they're changing lanes. Or you could think about it in the more general sense, like each moon does four laps on the outer one and then four laps on the inner one, and they're perfectly synced to never be on top of each other. And the reason they change lanes is both from the way they interact with each other or just the way they interact with Saturn. The way they interact with each other.

like the one in the inner lane catches up to the one on the outer lane and tugs on it, pulling it in and the gravitational interaction pushes the one from the inner lane out. Well, meaning sort of like a younger sibling who's motivated to catch up to its older sibling and then overtakes it for four years.

What else motivates younger siblings if not that? I mean, that's basically it, right? Wait, are you trying to take credit for your brother's accomplishments? Is this what this is all about? That's right. Is this why, this whole episode? just for you to take some of your brother's glory?

My entire life is just nothing but setting the stage to take credit from my younger brother. I see. Right, right. Okay, you're trying to overtake him and steer his orbit. Yeah, the whole thing is a 50-year long con, man. The whole thing is a 50-year therapy session, I feel like. Oh, in the end, you know, you're defined by the circumstances in which you're born, just like Saturn and Janus and Epimetheus, doomed to do. this dance forever. But it's really fascinating to see this like every four years. And it's a funny story because when these moons were discovered, they didn't realize there were actually two moons there

basically in the same orbit. They saw one. And then somebody else was looking at that moon and realizing, huh, this doesn't look like the same moon that was previously reported, but it's in the right orbit, what's going on? And it took people a while to figure out actually there's two moons here that are swapping orbits. Whoa. And does the swapping happen like really fast or over years as well. The swapping happens pretty fast. I mean, it's every four years it happens, but the swap itself doesn't take years. And could something like that happen elsewhere or is this like a super duper bizarre circumstance? It's a pretty bizarre circumstance. You need exactly the right radii and exactly the right masses. We also don't know how long it can go on for. You know, it's pretty chaotic. And so it seems like

something else passing nearby gives just the right tug and one of these things just plummets into Jupiter. But it's an example of how really weird or rare stuff can happen in the solar system. And it might mean that even if two big planets forming in the same orbit seems unlikely because you need just the right balance, it might happen. It might happen in other solar systems. It might happen more than we even expect. Well, it sounds like it might happen just from how random and chaotic the, you know, young solar system is, right? Like, you know, maybe you wouldn't get two planets from the same ring of rocks, but maybe, you know, you could get the Earth and then something like Mars drifts into our orbit or something or we swap orbits with Mars just like these two moons

that's totally possible right it's totally possible and some people think that something like that might have been a cause for the collision actually between the proto moon and the proto earth remember the theory of the moon's formation is that there were two proto planets that slammed into each other that formed the earth and the moon and it could have been like two planets that formed separately and then got too close to each other or maybe they were in one each other's Lagrange points for a while but it wasn't stable and then they ended up colliding. And it sounds like it could still happen maybe in our solar system, like, you know, those meteors that are orbiting with Jupiter ahead and behind it,

those could kind of maybe cluster together into something that might look like a planet, couldn't they? Yeah, eventually they might unionize and work together and form their own planet. And then they could protest Jupiter and they could get Jupiter demoted from being a planet. Or Pluto upgraded. You never know once you start an astronomical lawsuit, what happens, right? Yeah, it might be like a planetary conspiracy. piracy and they all get

you know sued together maybe we just get rid of this whole name for a planet we just there's stuff out there man let's just call them yeah rocks big floating rocks unless they're made out of gas oh no there's big planets the size of small planets

just call them balls if it's circular and it's not there in space just call them space balls I know and they even require these things to be spherical and none of them actually are spherical right even the earth is not technically spherical Oh, boy. It's a lawsuit waiting to happen. Well, how about out there beyond our solar system? You know, now we can see with our telescopes really far away distant stars and distant planets.

Have we seen two planets share in orbit out there in the wider universe? We have not yet seen it. And we've looked. You know, we are pretty good at seeing planets around stars in other solar systems in some scenarios. And we can tell because those planets like orbit the star and eclipse it, or they, tug on the star and we can tell about the change in the light from the star. And so it's looking for the wobble in the star and dips in its brightness that give us clues. And from those dips or from those wobbles, we can get a sense for like the period of the planet. And so far we've never seen like two wobbles or dips with the same period that would indicate like co-orbiting planets. So so far we haven't seen anything like that. I feel like maybe there's something

else going on here. Maybe something that physicists haven't thought about because it seems possible. it seems sort of not impossible and given so many planets and asteroids and things out there floating in space in our solar system and also all of the trillions of solar systems we can see out there that we haven't seen one it seems like there's something going on there's a conspiracy

remember that we've looked at only several thousand stars to see if there are planets around them and there's billions and billions of stars in the galaxy that might mean that it's unlikely and not that common but it doesn't mean it doesn't happen In fact, there are astronomers that used a radio array in Chile to look at a planetary system that's still forming. There's a young star like 370 light years from Earth. And it's not done making its planets.

Like they see exoplanets forming around it, but it's still got a really big disk of protoplanetary stuff. And when they studied this system, they found a big blob of dust in one of the Lagrange points near that exoplanet. So that might be like a co-planet that's forming. Or it could be that whatever this conspiracy is, you know, breaks that up before it can happen. Like maybe it's not as stable as you think it is or something. That's what you're saying, right? Maybe it's technically possible, but it just requires such ridiculous balance between all the factors that it's never practically achieved in the universe.

All right. Well, it sounds like maybe the answer to the question of why don't you have two planets sharing in orbit? The answer is sort of like, we don't know. It seems possible, but we just haven't seen it yet. Yeah, it seems possible it might just require very, very special. set of circumstances that we just haven't had a chance to see yet. But as you look deeper into the universe, everything that's possible, everything that's weird, I think eventually you will see.

Like two brothers that get along. Statistically, it might happen. Two brothers that are professors at exactly the same level of prestigious university. There you go. Make it all depends on their intent. All right. Well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us.

See you next time. For more science and curiosity, come find us on social media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discord, Insta, and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from IHeartRadio, visit the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. TSA rules so confusing. You got a hood of you. I'll take it all! I'm Manny. I'm Noah.

This is Devin. And we're best friends and journalists with a new podcast called No Such Thing, where we get to the bottom of questions like that. Why are you screaming? I can't expect what to do. Now, if the rule was the same, go off on me. I deserve it. You know, lock him up. Listen to No Such Thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your

podcast. No such thing. Dr. Joy Harton-Bradford, host of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast. I know how overwhelming it can feel if flying makes you anxious. In session 418 of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast, Dr. Angela Neil Barnett and I discuss flight anxiety. What is not a norm is to allow it to prevent you from doing the things that you want to do, the things that you were meant to do. Listen to Therapy for Black Girls on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

I'm Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, host of the psychology podcast. Here's a clip from an upcoming conversation about how to be a better you. When you think about emotion regulation, we're not going to choose an adaptive strategy which is more effortful to use unless you think there's a good outcome. Avoidance is easier. Ignoring is easier. Denials easier. Complex problem solving takes effort. Listen to the psychology podcast on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. is an iHeart podcast.