Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe - Is Cold Fusion impossible?
Episode Date: March 12, 2026Daniel and Kelly talk about the challenges of hot fusion and the frustrated potential of cold fusion. And Keanu Reeves.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is an I-Hart podcast.
Guaranteed Human.
I'm Clayton Eckerd.
In 2022, I was the lead of ABC's The Bachelor.
But here's the thing.
Bachelor fans hated him.
If I could press a button and rewind it all I would.
That's when his life took a disturbing turn.
A one-night stand would end in a courtroom.
The media is here.
This case has gone viral.
The dating contract.
Agree to date me, but I'm also suing.
This is unlike anything I've ever seen before.
I'm Stephanie Young.
Listen to Love Trapped on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Next Monday, our 2026 IHeart Podcast Awards are happening live at South by Southwest.
It's the biggest night in podcasting.
We'll honor the very best in podcasting from the past year and celebrate the most innovative talent and creators in the industry.
And the winner is creativity, knowledge, and passion.
will all be on full display.
Thank you so much.
IHeart Radio.
Thank you to all the other nominees.
You guys are awesome.
Watch live next Monday at 8 p.m. Eastern, 5 p.m. Pacific free at Veeps.com or the Veeps app.
Ego Woda is your host for the 2026 IHeart Podcast Awards, live at South by Southwest.
Hello?
Is anybody there?
Raised by a single mom, Ego may have a few father-related issues.
Are we supposed to talk about your dad?
Her podcast, Thanks, Dad, is full of funny, heartfelt conversations with actors, including fellow
S&L alums, comedians, musicians, and more about life and their wonderfully complicated relationships with their fathers.
I think and hope that's a good thing.
Get to know Ego.
Follow Thanks Dad with Ego Wodom and start listening on the free IHeart Radio app today.
Hey, I'm Jay Chetty, host of the On Purpose podcast.
My latest episode is with Hillary Duff, singer, actress, and multi-platinum artist.
You desire in family like this picture and that's not reality.
My sister and I don't speak.
It's definitely a very painful part of my life.
And I hope it's not forever, but it's for right now.
Listen to On Purpose with Jay Chetty on the Iheart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
What if mind control is real?
If you could control the behavior of anybody around you, what kind of life would you have?
Can you hypnotically persuade someone to buy a car?
When you look at your car, you're going to become overwhelmed with such good feelings.
Can you hypnotize someone into sleeping with you?
I gave her some suggestions to be sexually aroused.
Can you get someone to join your cult?
NLP was used on me to access my subconscious.
Mind Games, a new podcast exploring NLP,
aka neurolinguistic programming.
Is it a self-help miracle, a shady hypnosis scam, or both?
Listen to Mind Games on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Energy is everything.
powers our lives, propels our cars, runs our massive data centers.
Our growing thirst for energy influences politics, it alters the climate,
it sparks conflicts, and it constrains the future of our civilization.
Energy is also very personal.
Our bodies are made of vibrating particles, which themselves are pulses of energy in quantum fields,
so everything is energy.
And for decades now, physics has been promising to unleash the energy source of the stars.
Fusion, the thing that makes our sun glow, but brought down to Earth and mastered for our empire.
So exciting and so just around the corner. It's been 20 years away for about 80 years now.
So if hot fusion isn't just around the corner, is there another way? What if we don't need to
replicate the conditions inside the sun? What if we could do it all at room temperature?
What is the physics of cold fusion? Is it all just shes?
charlatans and nonsense, or is there real science there? And if not, why is DARPA funding it?
We'll dig into all of that today on Daniel and Kelly's extraordinary universe.
Winnersmith, I study parasites and space. And in Virginia right now, it is so cold that your fingers
fuse to anything you touch that is slightly wet.
Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and my wife's favorite piece of physics is a terrible
movie called Cold Fusion, starring Keanu Reeves wearing a University of Chicago sweatshirt.
Oh, you know, my favorite movie is Keanu Reeves wearing anything because he's such a cutie.
That movie is so bad and so full of plot holes, but Keanu Reeves is great and he looks
great in that shirt. And hey, if he makes physicists look good on the screen, I'm all for it.
Oh, yeah, I've never seen that particular movie, but I like that movie.
Okay, all right, I'll skip that one. But, yeah, so today we're talking about Cold Fusion, which I'm
excited about because I was under the impression and I'll lay it out there now. My impression is that
Cold Fusion is an absolutely never going to work almost on the edge of conspiracy theory kind
of thing. And that is my preconceived notion. And when I was looking at your outline, I was like,
oh, maybe, maybe I'm going to be wrong. This will be an interesting conversation. And then I was
like, you know what? I don't want to ruin it. I'm not going to do my homework. I'm not going to
look at this outline anymore. And so I stopped looking at the outline. And so here's what I want to know
from you today, Daniel. There are lots of different routes that people talk about for how we might
make fusion work. If you had to put your money on one route for how fusion might eventually pan out
as a way to run toasters, for example, which route would you guess is the most likely to work?
And I'm going to guess it's not cold fusion. Oh, no. How much of my money am I being forced to
invest in fusion in this terrible scenario? All of it. Oh, my gosh. I think cold fusion is.
is a dark horse there, and I would not invest all of my family resources in it. So I'd have to go for
some variant of hot fusion. I think eventually we will make some kind of magnetized fusion work.
Something like the Tokomax or Eater. Eventually, I think we will figure that out.
So you're betting against the many, many, many, many lasers all at once.
I am betting against. I love those, and they're really fun. And I want to flip that switch one time.
I imagine there's like some really big, heavy red lever you get to pull and it's really satisfying.
And then they go zap and I want to do that.
But I don't think that that's the most likely way to make energy, yeah.
Wouldn't it be disappointing if it was just like a normal light switch or something?
Or a touchscreen button.
You know, I'm all about the tactile buttons.
You know, it's got to give that haptic response, you know?
Yeah, no, I want it to be a big red button that says lasers and you slam your hand down on it or something.
All right, well, today we're not here to talk about Kelly's fantasies of pushing big red buttons, though I share that with you.
Have you ever visited CERN in the control room that have a big red emergency button?
And it's so tempting when you're on shift, you want to press it.
And then in the visitors lounge, they have a mock-up of it that you can actually press that, like, turns lights and makes sounds, and it's so fun.
That's awesome.
But no, I haven't.
My daughter's been to CERN, but I have not yet.
You should come some time.
Anyway, we're not talking about pressing red buttons today.
we are talking about trying to achieve cheap and plentiful energy here on Earth via fusion, specifically cold fusion.
Is it just a Ponzi scheme? Is it real? Could it ever actually work?
That was the question we posed to our listeners who volunteer for this audience participation segment of the podcast.
So think about it for a moment. Do you think cold fusion is impossible?
Here's what people had to say.
Couldn't you select cold fusion as a power source?
in Sim City? Well, then
there you go. I guess it's possible.
And to Daniel's credit,
you also then get alien invasions.
So everybody wins. I guess
except for the Sims.
Cold fusion's
a lie
because of
physics.
It's a thing
that we know
because we can't do
fusion here.
I wouldn't know.
No, I don't think it's impossible.
Only is a plot device in a subpar movie.
Nothing is impossible.
I say so because I have a deep faith in humanity's ability to grow and progress using the scientific method.
I know there was a kerfuffle about this before, but Ken Saabe.
I loosely remember hearing that cold fusion might be possible inside a giant gold donut.
Cold fusion is absolutely possible if you stick your tongue to a flagpole in the dead of winter.
I don't believe we should say impossible to anything.
Someone someday will figure out how to overcome that hurdle.
It probably is, but I'm ever the optimist.
If cold brewing coffee is possible, so is cold fusion.
I would say never say never.
I think hot fusion requires high temperatures the same way my golf game requires a very
large number of strokes. If I were better at it, I would need fewer attempts, which is kind of the
equivalent of lower temperatures. I suspect that cold fusion is impossible because in order to fuse,
the particles have to be moving very quickly, meaning high energy, which means probably hot.
I liked only as a plot device in a subpar movie.
Does that mean reality as a subpar movie?
Oh, I mean, it's a pretty, pretty sub sub-sub-sub-par movie, if so.
These were great answers.
I love that there are people out there who believe, you know, the optimism.
Somebody someday will figure this out.
It frustrates me that Cold Fusion has been sort of polluted by a few scam artists and bad experiences that the public had.
So it's seen as a totally disreputable line of research, even though there are some possibilities there, as we'll talk about later.
Are we going to talk about those scam artists at some point?
Oh, yes, we are.
We're going to dig into the conspiracies.
Okay, good, because I think I've heard about those scam artists mostly, and that's the news that's gotten to me.
All right, so let's start at the beginning.
What is fusion?
Yeah, so fusion is the opposite of fission, right?
So fission, what happens in most nuclear reactors that we have really mastered and produces
huge amounts of reliable, stable energy for humans on Earth, is when you take heavy nuclei
and you split them up, like uranium splits up into smaller, lighter nuclei, and produces energy.
Fusion is the opposite. That's when you take two light nuclei, like hydrogen, the lightest possible thing,
just protons, and you squeeze them together to make something heavy like helium, and then you can fuse helium
together to make something even heavier. So fusion is when you stick stuff together. And the interesting
thing is that when you stick stuff together, it releases energy, as long as that stuff is lighter than iron.
If it's heavier than iron, then when you break it apart, it releases energy.
Basically, moving your nuclei closer to iron always releases energy.
Fun, Kelly fact.
I memorized the words fusion and fission, like their definitions in reverse initially.
And then I was so worried I was going to get it wrong that there was like a solid year there
where I would do everything I could to avoid needing to say the words fusion or fission for fear of getting it wrong.
And then I finally got it straight in my head.
But now I'm going to be worried that I'm going to get it mixed up again.
Anyway, it's an episode on fusion, so I'm pretty safe if I say fusion.
All right.
Well, should we have a buzzer if you ever get it wrong?
No, no.
So most of the time, fusion is hard to do because protons are positively charged and they don't
like to be near each other.
Like, they repel each other very strongly, right?
Electromagnetism is a powerful, powerful force.
And so making this happen is not easy.
And yet it happens a lot.
our star is an enormous ball of fusion. People say it's an enormous ball of fire. That's kind of
misleading because fire is combustion, which requires oxygen and atmosphere. The sun is not
burning in that sense. The sun is fusing. Well, actually. Well, well, actually. I mean,
here, accuracy is our game, right? That's right. I love when people write in and send us well,
actually, emails. Like, I sincerely, unironically love that. Please do it. Same, yes. Yes. So we want to
drive for total accuracy here. And so what's happening in the sun is that the sun is mostly protons,
right? Mostly hydrogen ions. And those are fusing to make helium. And it's not quite as direct as like
two protons make one helium atom because helium also needs neutrons to be stable. Because if you just
had two protons in the helium nucleus, it wouldn't be stable. Those protons would bust each other
apart because of the strong columbic repulsion there. And so you need neutrons to like buffer them a little
bit. So to make one helium nucleus, you need four hydrogen protons. You start with four protons,
two of them convert into neutrons, and you end up with helium four, which is two protons and two
neutrons. So that's the biggest process in the sun, hydrogen burning. And does that release a lot of
energy? That does release a lot of energy. It comes out in terms of gamma rays and there's neutrinos also.
This is why the sun is like such a bright source, not just of light, but also of neutrinos. And
neutrinos are super cool because the sun is mostly transparent to neutrinos. So you make a neutrino
infusion. It flies out of the sun. If you have a neutrino detector, you're seeing that neutrino from
inside the sun. The sun is opaque to photons. So it makes photons when it fuses, but those photons are
absorbed and they just sort of heat up the sun. And then the reason the sun is bright in the sky,
like why we see photons from the sun. It's not because you're seeing photons from the fusion.
You're seeing photons because the sun is hot. And it's like a black box.
body and it glows. So here's another well actually moment for you. There's this bit of pop side that says
like it takes a photon 60,000 years to get from the center of the sun to the surface, which is like,
I don't even know what they're trying to calculate there. Photons don't go from the center of the sun
to the surface. They just like heat up the sun and then the sun is hot. So it glows the way that like
iron in a furnace glows, right? Everything that's made of charged particles and has a temperature
glows. So there's your well actually moment.
Oh, we've got to have a button for that too, or at least a little, like, ticker thing to keep track.
Well, actually...
Okay, and so when I first started hearing about this, I felt a little confused about how you go from that fact to running a toaster.
And so could you, like, make the little jump there for us?
Oh, yeah. So fusion releases that energy, right, in terms of photons or neutrons or gamma rays, all sorts of stuff.
And then you've got to capture it.
So if you wanted to build a device that would power your toaster, you need to capture that energy and turn it into electricity, right? And so this is actually a big puzzle for fusion, for like even hot fusion. Even if we got like fusion to work and some of the technologies we're going to talk about later, people have not spent a lot of time or enough time thinking about exactly how to transform that gamma ray or that neutron into Kelly's toast.
This is important.
Yeah.
Yeah, so that's a hard problem. We'll get to that in just a minute. First, we have to understand
the difference between the fusion reaction that happens in the sun and the fusion reactions that we're
trying to do here on Earth, which are slightly different. And the reason is that fusion is really
hard to make happen. Like, in order to get two protons to fuse together, you have to squeeze
them really hard because they don't want to be together. So essentially, fusion requires high
density and high temperature. You've got to get those protons going really fast and you need a lot of
them near each other. And even still, in the sun, fusion is rare. It's not like fusion is happening
all the time. Fusion is not like a fire which will rapidly consume all of its fuel. Even in the sun
with very high temperatures and very high density, fusion is rare, which is why the sun is going to last for
billions and billions of years, right? It doesn't just like all burn up in an afternoon. And the rate of
fusion is very non-linear with temperature. So the hotter the star is, the easier it is for it to make
fusion happen, the denser and the hotter it is. And so bigger stars, which are hotter and denser at
their core, have much more fusion happening at their core. So like twice the temperature doesn't mean
twice the fusion. It's like four times the fusion. It's something nonlinear. And so this is why really
big stars burn up much faster than really small stars, because really small stars just have a little
itty bit of fusion. They're barely fusing, whereas big stars have a much larger fraction of
their fuel actually turning into fusion. I guess I'd assumed, I mean, I knew that, but I guess
I still assumed that fusion in our sun wasn't rare. I guess I still assumed it was happening pretty
darn off. No, if you're a proton in the center of the sun, you can go for billions of years
without fusing with anybody. Whoa. Lonely. I know, exactly. It's like Daniel wandering around
a party and nobody will talk to him. Oh, I would talk to you, Daniel. I don't. I don't. I
I bet there's lots of people wanting to talk to Daniel at parties.
And this is a self-sustaining process, right?
Because the heat from fusion keeps the sun hot, keeps the core hot.
And this is what we call ignition.
When the conditions created by fusion make it favorable for fusion.
And this is exactly what we want to achieve here on Earth, right?
We want to have fusion not just like once or twice, but we want fusion to happen often enough
that the heat produced by fusion, heats.
up the whole system and then makes fusion more likely, and then it just runs on its own. That's
what we call ignition. Sort of like the way at a campfire, you don't have to burn every individual
stick one at a time, right? One stick sets the next one on fire, which sets the next one on fire.
It's a chain reaction. What is the other word that they're trying to achieve? Break even?
Break even, yeah, exactly. It costs energy to get this thing going, right? You've got to heat this
thing up. You've got to start it. And so you've got to put in a huge amount of energy to warm this
plasma up to create these conditions. And so what they want is that you get more energy out than
you put in, obviously. Otherwise, why are you even building this reactor? Okay, so we've hit ignition,
but hitting break-even is much harder. So that's a little complicated. We'll talk about it in a minute.
There's two ways to do fusion. There's the lasers and the magnets. And the lasers claim to have
achieve ignition, which is cool. Magnetized fusion, which has like the plasma has not yet achieved
ignition. But neither of them have achieved break-even where they're generating more energy than they
put in. And there's always some like accounting fuzziness there, like which energy do you count?
Do you count just the energy that directly landed on the fuel? Or do you count like all the energy
needed to run the whole system? We'll get there. But here on Earth, we're not trying to replicate
exactly the same reaction that happens in the sun because that requires really high density and
really high temperatures. And so here on Earth, we try to fuse deuterium and tritium, which are
particular isotopes of hydrogen. So deuterium is a proton plus a neutron, and tritium is a proton
plus two neutrons. And so these are advantageous because fusion can happen at a lower temperature
for deuterium and tritium than they can for just like pure protons. So those are the ones that
we're trying to achieve here on Earth. And you led an absolutely fascinating episode on whether or not
we have enough Deuterium and Tridium on Earth to be able to power the whole Earth using Fusion.
So listeners should go back and listen to that again, because I remember thinking that that was
like totally fascinating and all kinds of stuff that I didn't know before.
So I'm going to hit the Daniel is awesome button.
Daniel is awesome.
And I love that we're making a bunch of work for our amazing audio engineer because I think
every time we've mentioned a button, our audio engineer probably is going to come up
with a different button sound. Thanks, Matt. Very cool. And so to answer the question you asked earlier,
like, how do we use this energy and actually turn it into toast? Well, depends a lot on the fuel
that we're using. Like, for example, if you have helium-3, then your fusion doesn't produce neutrons.
And so the output of the reaction depends on exactly the fusion you're making. The reactions we're
making in like magnetized fusion do tend to produce a lot of neutrons. And so people are working on,
like how do you take these neutrons and turn them into electricity?
And the idea is to have like a lithium blanket, like to wrap your reactor in lithium.
And because what happens when you hit the lithium blanket with these high-speed neutrons
is it turns lithium into tritium, which is fuel for your reactor,
plus a bunch of photons, which are basically heat, which then you can use to heat up steam
and turn a turbine and create electricity for your toast.
Oh, yay.
And I hope there's avocado on that toast.
Yes, and maybe we can even grow those avocados using heat lamps powered by the fusion.
And when we get back, we're going to go into more detail about how exactly we are trying to do hot fusion back here on Earth.
I'm Clayton Eckerd, and in 2022, I was the lead of ABC's The Bachelor.
Unfortunately, it didn't go according to plan.
he became the first bachelor to ever have his final rose rejected.
The internet turned on him.
If I could press a button and rewind it all I would.
But what happened to Clayton after the show made even bigger headlines.
It began as a one-night stand and ended in a courtroom,
with Clayton at the center of a very strange paternity scandal.
The media is here.
This case has gone viral.
The dating contract.
Agree to date me, but I'm also suing you.
Please search warrant.
This is unlike anything I've ever seen before.
I'm Stephanie Young.
This is Love Trapped.
This season, an epic battle of He Said She Said,
and the search for accountability in a sea of lies.
Listen to Love Trapped on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Next Monday, our 2026 IHeart Podcast Awards are happening live at South by Southwest.
It's just the biggest night in podcasting.
We'll honor the very best in podcasting from the
past year and celebrate the most innovative talent and creators in the industry.
And the winner is...
Creativity, knowledge, and passion will all be on full display.
Thank you so much. IHeart Radio. Thank you to all the other nominees. You guys are awesome.
Watch live next Monday at 8 p.m. Eastern, 5 p.m. Pacific, free at Veeps.com or the Veeps app.
Ego Woda is your host for the 2026 IHeart Podcast Awards, live at South by Southwest.
Hello, is anybody there? Raised by a single mom.
Ego may have a few father-related issues.
Are we supposed to talk about your dad?
Her podcast, Thanks Dad, is full of funny, heartfelt conversations with actors,
including fellow S&L alums, comedians, musicians, and more about life and their wonderfully
complicated relationships with their fathers.
I think and hope that's a good thing.
Get to know Ego.
Follow Thanks Dad with Ego Wodom and start listening on the free IHeart Radio app today.
Hey, I'm Jay Chetty, host of the On Purpose podcast.
My latest episode is with Hillary Duff, singer, actress, and multi-platinner Martin.
Hillary opens up about complicated family dynamics, motherhood, and releasing our first record in over 10 years.
We talk about what it's taken to grow up in the entertainment industry and stay grounded through every chapter.
It's a raw and honest conversation about identity, evolution, and building a life that truly matters.
You desire in family like this picture, and that's not reality a lot of the times for people.
My sister and I don't speak.
It's definitely a very painful part of my life.
And I hope it's not forever, but it's for right now.
Listen to On Purpose with Jay Chetty on the Iheart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
What if mind control is real?
If you could control the behavior of anybody around you, what kind of life would you have?
Can you hypnotically persuade someone to buy a car?
When you look at your car, you're going to become overwhelmed with such good feelings.
feelings. Can you hypnotize someone into sleeping with you? I gave her some suggestions to be sexually
aroused. Can you get someone to join your cult? NLP was used on me to access my subconscious.
NLP, aka neurolinguistic programming, is a blend of hypnosis, linguistics, and psychology. Fans say
it's like finally getting a user manual for your brain. It's about engineering consciousness.
Mind games is the story of NLP. It's crazy cast of disciples and the
a fake doctor who invented it at a new age commune and sold it to guys in suits.
He stood trial for murder and got acquitted.
The biggest mind game of all, NLP, might actually work.
This is wild.
Listen to mind games on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
And we're back.
And we are talking about ways that we do hot fusion because we don't have the benefit of being
as hot as the sun here on Earth.
And actually, that's probably great because I really like being.
alive. And so Daniel, how do we try doing fusion here on the earth? So one strategy for the hot form of fusion
is to try to replicate the sun as much as possible, right? So unfortunately, we don't have the sun's
massive gravity, which self-contains the fusion reaction over there in the center of the solar system.
So instead, we try to use magnets. Essentially, the strategy is make a little magnetic bottle,
try to contain the reaction because the reaction would be so hot that like any other device
you put it in would melt it. So you need so.
some way to hold it together kind of without touching it. And so a magnetic bottle is very cool.
And a magnetic bottle works because the plasma you need for fusion is charged, right? You take a gas,
you heat it up, it becomes charged particles. And now you have another way to control those
particles because you can push and pull on them with electromagnetic fields. So if you build
magnetic fields in such a way that charged particles are always bent, sort of the way they are
at a supercollider, then they just zoom around in a circle.
And so the magnetic fields of a tokamac create these helical paths that keep the plasma from hitting the walls.
Instead, they spiral around.
And so you get this donut-shaped chamber where the plasma zooms around really high temperature, but it's also contained.
And so it maintains its density.
I kind of love the idea that, like, I still think about magnets as like a thing that kids play with, you know, like a kid's toy.
But it does also end up being in the case that, like, if you can create the most amazing magnet.
on Earth, you can probably create the cleanest power source that would like save the planet.
And I think that's kind of awesome.
Yeah.
If you could build super powerful magnets, not only could you make fusion much easier, but
particle physics would be much easier.
We are like limited by the strength of our magnets.
If our magnets were a thousand times stronger, then we wouldn't need huge tunnels, right?
And so you would learn so much about the universe if you invented amazing magnets.
So, yeah, somebody get on that.
Yeah.
Remember the most powerful magnets on Earth?
are the explosive kind.
Oh, that's right.
The ones where they, like, blow them up.
Yeah, that won't work for regular fusion power.
That's not going to help my avocado toast.
But the theme here is somehow you've got to get your protons to fuse.
And the way you do is by getting them close together, which is hard to do.
And so the strategy for magnetic fusion is squeeze them, get them hot and get them dense.
And that's hard to do here on Earth.
And so we do by squeezing our plasma with magnetic fields.
And the goal here is to get the plasma to last a long time.
time. If you can get it stable and you can get it zooming around, then those protons will
bounce into each other because they have lots of opportunities. And then eventually they will fuse
and that will produce energy and you'll reach ignition and then it'll be hot and other protons
will fuse and Kelly will get her toast. Okay. So you told me that fusion doesn't even happen
that often in the sun, that you could have a proton live for like a billion years without
fusing. And so now I'm feeling way more negative about our prospects for fusion here on Earth because
that seems crazy. And so our plasma
needs to be like hotter
and more dense than the sun to have
a chance for this to work?
Those are hot. Those are long odds.
No, it doesn't have to be hotter or denser
than the sun because remember we're going for an easier
kind of fusion. Deuterior and tritium fusion
can be colder. That's right. That's right. Yeah,
exactly. But the challenge here really
is keeping the plasma going because
plasma is a bunch of really hot particles and they're
going really, really fast and
it's unstable. Like, yes, you
have magnetic fields, but these things,
are a gas with magnetic charges and like gases already have turbulence in them. Now you add
electric and magnetic fields internal to them and the magnetic fields are trying to control the
particles. A little instability very rapidly turns into a big instability. And so getting a
tocomac to build a plasma and keep it going has been the big challenge. The record I've seen
is 22 minutes is the longest they've ever had a stable plasma, which is amazing because I actually
did plasma research one of my first experience.
back when I was in college.
And back then, it was like less than a minute.
So to see that progress is encouraging.
Yeah, that's awesome.
And this is basically the leading form of fusion research.
There's a huge project called Eater, which is being built in France, which plans for its first plasma in the mid-2030s, eventually a power plant in the mid-2050s.
It's costing like billions and billions.
So the planet is make it work, demonstrate it actually can produce energy, and then somehow figure out how to shrink the costs.
But there's also a lot of exciting private companies jumping into this area.
This company called Commonwealth Fusion, and folks are trying exciting ways to sort of bring the scale down, you know, lasers plus plasma, all sorts of crazy ideas, which are a lot of fun.
So there's a possibility that like a fusion startup might crack this problem before the sort of big government project.
I'm rooting for them.
Go Commonwealth Fusion.
The other approach for getting protons together is not to go for time, but to go for ink,
increase density. So this is the laser approach and it's called inertial confinement. Rather than
getting the conditions you need for plasma and having them last for long enough that the protons fuse,
just go for like really high density very, very briefly. And the idea here is you have like a little
pellet of fuel and you zap it on all sides with a laser which explodes the outside of it and implodes
the inside, right? So it's like a little compression wave that shoots down towards the core of this
little pellet. And then it's dense enough. Remember, fusion really depends on the density and the
temperature. So now fusion happens really fast in the core after like 30 nanoseconds of compression.
It goes from like the density of water to like a hundred times the density of lead. And the fusion
happens faster than this pellet can blow itself apart. It's really incredible. Wow. And then that
would just happen over and over and over again and you would collect. It happens once, right? You zap this
pellet, you get a little burst of fusion, and then it's done. So in that sense, they've achieved
ignition that, like, the pellet has used itself up, but then you've got to start all over again
with a new pellet, right? And so this is the real challenge, is that, like, you need, like, a production
chain of all of these pellets. You have to account for the energy you spent building these pellets
in your accounting of, like, are we getting output? And you got to start over and over again. So it's
like a series of these little mini reactions. Yeah. So, like, if you were going to have a power plant,
you'd have to like over and over again be like,
p p p p p pfoo!
And collecting that sounds like it would be complicated.
That's actually what the laser sounds like.
Have you been there?
It's incredible, Kelly.
No, I'm just really smart.
So the current leading edge here is the National Ignition Facility.
It has 192 lasers.
And it's been doing really, really well.
And this year in 26, they reached a gain of 4.13,
which means the energy that came out relative to the energy that they put in.
but there's a couple of big asterisks there.
Asterisk number one is that's not energy they capture.
That's just like theoretically energy produced.
Some of which would be hard to capture and some of which easier to capture.
So they're definitely not getting all of it.
There's going to be some efficiency factor in front of the energy that comes out.
And they don't really account for all the energy they put in.
They account for all the energy that landed on the target and was absorbed.
Right?
Not all the energy they spent producing.
that energy, some of which landed on the target. So it's like you have a tiny pixie cup and you
emptied a swimming pool on top of it and then you only counted the water that landed in the cup.
It's like, all right, yeah, but the energy required to run the lasers is like more than
a hundred times the energy that's delivered on the target. So, you know, there's some nice
accounting here and I'm all for salesmanship and science, but also, let's be clear, they're not
producing energy. All right. We're not, we're not ready to make our toast using this method yet.
Exactly. And so both of these are trying to do the same thing, which is squeeze protons together.
How do you get protons close enough that they will fuse? So either magnets or initial confinement
with lasers, both of those are trying to do the same thing. And both of those require a lot of
heat, right? And so naturally people have wondered for a long time, is it possible to do fusion
without that heat? Can we have some other way to squeeze protons together at room temperature?
And that's the promise. That's the dream of cold fusion. And cold fusion is not just a silly movie
starring Keanu Reeves or a scam from the 80s. It's a real area of research. And there are
some possibilities here. Oh, man. I imagine if you are studying Cold Fusion, you probably get a lot of
a lot of people who are skeptical. Okay, all right. So let's let's dig into.
to the science here. Okay, so...
It's true cold fusion gets a lot of flack, and I've heard it described as
con fusion instead of cold fusion, but...
Con fusion?
Yeah, exactly.
All right, so I'm guessing we're not talking about deuterium and tritium anymore.
No, we're not. We're just talking about wasting of protons closer together at room
temperature. So one idea is to use muons. So the idea is that if you take a hydrogen atom
and you take off the electron and you replace it with a muon,
then the orbit of the muon is going to be smaller than the electrons orbit.
And that means essentially the atom is closer,
and so you can get these things closer together.
So protons with muons around them are electrically neutral,
so they get close to each other,
and the muons are close to the protons,
and so that can effectively get the protons closer together.
And you'd still get the same amount of power out?
You still get the same amount of power out.
And the reason that muons get closer to the protons than the electrons
is that muons are much higher mass.
They're like 200 times the mass of the electron,
and the radius of the lowest energy level depends on the mass.
Don't think about these things in terms of orbits,
because orbits are misleading.
You know, this is a quantum object in the lowest stationary state,
but still there's a distribution of expected radii there,
and it depends on the mass of the particle.
So muons get much closer to the protons because they are heavier.
And this is actually something that's pretty well established,
like you can make muonic hydrogen.
You can squeeze these things together.
In the 70s and 80s, they did these experiments,
and you get fusion, and you get energy out.
So why not do that?
Well, it's hot.
Wouldn't that make everything work better?
Well, the problem is, if you make this hot,
then the muons are no longer bound to the protons, right?
You get plasma, and then you're back to the same situation.
So that actually only works at lower temperature.
temperature when the muons are low energy and they're bound to the protons, right?
Okay.
So you might be wondering, why are we all eating muon toast right now?
Why am I not listening to this podcast powered by muonic fusion?
This, Daniel says they've made this work.
And the answer is the same as sort of laser fusion.
It works, but it doesn't produce energy because it costs a lot of energy to make muon's.
Mules are not something you can find around the way you can find protons.
Protons are just hydrogen.
Hydrogen is the most abundant thing in the universe.
It's literally all around us.
It's not hard to find hydrogen.
And so making a hydrogen source is not hard.
Although, as we said earlier, for like magnetic fusion, you actually need tritium,
which is harder to find.
Anyway, muons are not everywhere.
You've got to make them.
And you've got to build these muonic hydrogen essentially one at a time and put them together.
And so nobody's cracked that puzzle.
Like how do we make enough muonic hydrogen cheap enough so we can actually recoup some of this energy
and make money?
And there are companies, there's a company called Acceleron Fusion that's working on making high efficiency muon sources and dense fusion cells.
And they've claimed like hundreds of hours of continuous fusion in their prototypes, but they still haven't cracked the puzzle of making it produce more energy than it costs to build the fuel.
Wow.
Because if you're spending a lot of money and energy making the fuel, then you're not actually producing energy.
You're losing it.
Okay. So definitely not conspiracy theory, but not.
making toast efficiently.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah.
And this is like not a huge research effort, but there are definitely people working on this.
It's the kind of thing where like one big breakthrough could really change the game for sure.
So, you know, Cold Fusion is a legitimate area of research, especially in the muonic direction.
Okay, but this isn't the end of the outline.
So I'm guessing that means there's other ways to do Cold Fusion.
Oh, yes, there are.
So let's take a break.
And when we come back, let's talk a little bit more about the history of Cold Fusion and how it
got its bad name.
I'm Clayton Eckerd, and in 2022, I was the lead of ABC's The Bachelor.
Unfortunately, it didn't go according to plan.
He became the first Bachelor to ever have his final rose rejected.
The internet turned on him.
If I could press a button and rewind it all I would.
But what happened to Clayton after the show made even bigger headlines.
It began as a one-night stand and ended in a courtroom with Clayton at the center of a very strange paternity scandal.
The media is here.
This case has gone viral.
The dating contract.
Agree to date me, but I'm also suing you.
Please search warrant.
This is unlike anything I've ever seen before.
I'm Stephanie Young.
This is love trapped.
This season, an epic battle of He Said She Said, and the search for accountability in a sea of life.
Listen to Love Trapped on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Next Monday, our 2026 IHeart Podcast Awards are happening live at South by Southwest.
It's the biggest night in podcasting.
We'll honor the very best in podcasting from the past year and celebrate the most innovative
talent and creators in the industry.
And the winner is creativity, knowledge, and passion will all be on full display.
Thank you so much.
IHeart Radio.
Thank you to all the other nominees.
You guys are awesome.
Watch live next Monday at 8 p.m. Eastern, 5 p.m. Pacific free at Veeps.
Or the Veeps app.
Ego Woda is your host for the 2026 IHeart Podcast Awards, live at South by Southwest.
Hello, is anybody there?
Raised by a single mom, Ego may have a few father-related issues.
Are we supposed to talk about your dad?
Her podcast, Thanks, Dad, is full of funny, heartfelt conversations with actors,
including fellow S&L alums, comedians, musicians, and more about live.
and their wonderfully complicated relationships with their fathers.
I think and hope that's a good thing.
Get to know Ego.
Follow Thanks, Dad, with Ego Wodom, and start listening on the free IHeart Radio app today.
Hey, I'm Jay Chetty, host of the On Purpose podcast.
My latest episode is with Hilary Duff, singer, actress, and multi-platinum artist.
Hillary opens up about complicated family dynamics, motherhood,
and releasing our first record in over 10 years.
We talk about what it's taken to grow up in the entertainment industry
and stay grounded through every chapter.
It's a raw and honest conversation about identity, evolution, and building a life that truly matters.
You desire in family like this picture, and that's not reality a lot of the times for people.
My sister and I don't speak.
It's definitely a very painful part of my life, and I hope it's not forever, but it's for right now.
Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the Iheart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts.
What if mind control is real?
If you could control the behavior of anybody around you, what kind of life would you have?
Can you hypnotically persuade someone to buy a car?
When you look at your car, you're going to become overwhelmed with such good feelings.
Can you hypnotize someone into sleeping with you?
I gave her some suggestions to be sexually aroused.
Can you get someone to join your cult?
NLP was used on me to access my subconscious.
NLP, aka neurolinguistic programming, is a blend of hypnosis, linguistics, and psychology.
Fans say it's like finally getting a user manual for your brain.
It's about engineering consciousness.
Mind games is the story of NLP.
It's crazy cast of disciples and the fake doctor who invented it at a new age commune and sold it to guys in suits.
He stood trial for murder and got acquitted.
The biggest mind game of all?
NLP might actually work.
This is wild.
Listen to Mind Games on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Okay, and we're back.
And as we mentioned at the top of the show, Kelly thought Cold Fusion was like conspiracy-level bad science, which now she feels real.
Well, and she being me.
Now I feel really bad about it because it turns out there are actually people studying Cold Fusion and now I feel like a jerk.
So Daniel, how did it?
cold fusion end up getting such a bad name?
Well, there's a famous
1989 experiment
that claimed to have
achieved energy production,
and they didn't use muons.
They used another approach, which is, again,
a legitimate concept, and this is
using palladium. So palladium
is just an element, and it forms a crystal,
and it has this really weird property
that it will absorb hydrogen
very happily, like a lot of
hydrogen. If you have, like,
a cubic centimeter of palladium, it can
absorb 900 times that volume of hydrogen into that crystal.
Wow.
It, like, loves packing in the hydrogen, which is weird, and chemistry nerves would be like,
yay, cool, this is fascinating.
But from a physics point of view, this is important because this brings protons together,
right?
It, like, holds them together.
The whole goal of fusion is, like, bring protons together in some way.
They either make them hot so they overcome the columbic barrier or compress them with
inertial confinement fusion, or make them neutral and bring them close.
with muons. Palladium says, hey, I can bring protons together, no problem. So for like more than
a hundred years, people have thought this might be a way to achieve fusion at room temperatures.
Just jam a bunch of protons into your palladium crystal and see what happens. And there's actually
an experiment in the 1920s. Panette and Peters claimed to have achieved fusion, cold fusion,
using palladium. Later, they had to retract these results because they couldn't be repeated.
But there's like a history of overblown cold fusion claims that go back more than a century.
What, who are Peneff and Peters?
Were they like serious physicists?
Or were they just like, do you got to tell me more than that?
Were they just dinguses who didn't like collect their data well?
Or were they trying to like trick everybody?
These were real Austrian scientists.
And I think they were doing careful work.
Later, they retracted their own report because they realized they didn't understand the background of what they were measuring from the air.
They were turning hydrogen to helium, right?
And they weren't measuring the heat output.
They were just measuring the helium.
And they mismeasured essentially how much helium there was in the air.
And so it turns out the air was just naturally occurring helium they were measuring.
So like pretty big oops, but not scam artists as far as I know.
Okay, all right.
Good on them for retracting their own paper.
We all make mistakes sometimes.
Sorry, Paneth and Peters.
And then a few years later, a Swedish scientist, John Tranberg, was trying to use palladium also.
and he applied for a patent based on his efforts,
but because of Paneth and Peter's retraction,
nobody was going to believe in Cold Fusion.
And so his patent application was denied.
Oh.
Yeah.
Well, but had he actually made his measurements correctly?
Or should his patent application have been denied
because there was no good science to back it up?
Well, it turns out he was doing work,
which is very similar to the work that was done in 1989,
where Cold Fusion became famous.
So this is the work of Fleischman and Palm.
And they used a palladium electrode and deuterium. And the idea is to do electrolysis of heavy water.
So you have the palladium lattice and deuterium. And deuterium is just that isotope of hydrogen, right?
And so you force the hydrogen into the palladium lattice. And then you put it under a current. So that's
why it's an electrode. And it makes these very high densities. And maybe that deuterium can overcome
that columbic barrier. That's the idea. So this is what Pons and Flashman did in 1980.
They had this heavy water, which means water with deuterium in it, so that deuterium is there to be absorbed into the lattice.
And then they run the current.
And what they claim was to see huge spikes in the heat produced.
So unlike Panethan Peters, they weren't measuring the helium.
They were looking for the heat.
And they calculated like how much heat could potentially be produced by any chemical reaction they're aware of.
And this was much more heat than anything they could expect from chemistry.
So they're like, wow, look at this.
We have an experiment.
which is fusing and producing heat, and yet it's running at room temperature.
Okay, well, so if it's, if it couldn't be explained by chemistry,
I guess they're saying that then it's explained by physics.
Yeah.
But aren't physics, isn't physics and chemistry like, you know, you're like, it's kind of
the same thing, isn't it, you know?
Yeah, I see what you mean.
By chemistry, I mean like any non-fusion process, right?
Okay, okay.
Because you expect you have like heavy water here, you have electricity, you got some
stuff is going to happen and you can get heat produced.
but we're talking about heat that could not be produced by anything other than fusion.
Okay.
So these guys went out with the story and the University of Utah where they were working.
It was very excited and they put out a press release and it got a lot of coverage.
And for a moment, everybody thought, oh, wow, maybe Cold Fusion has been achieved.
And so other labs in the United States very quickly went to replicate these results because,
as we talked about it in our episode about how science works, it's not just like peer review
where you read the article and say, does this make any sense?
But the gold standard for science really is replication.
Can other people independently in a different laboratory with like slightly different
assumptions and different details and like different temperatures in the outside and you're
in New Jersey instead of in Utah, if this is real physics, it should happen everywhere.
But no replication attempts succeeded.
There are a couple where people are like, oh, wait, maybe, no.
And so nobody could reproduce these results.
But of course, this is still a big deal.
Cold fusion is like a very exciting.
exciting and the claims were very strong. So the Department of Energy put together a whole panel
to review this in detail like what is going on. They studied this for a long time and they found
that like on one hand, nobody could reproduce these results. Like all the experiments that tried
to reproduce the setup and the conditions exactly, none of them saw these heat flashes. And the guys
who worked on the theory couldn't get the calculations to support what these guys were claiming.
Like even in theory, you shouldn't get enough fusion to produce really any significant heat in this setup.
And so the whole thing sort of fell apart.
And it was a tragedy because they got a lot of press.
And so a lot of the public thought, wow, this is the wave of the future.
And then we discovered, oh, it turns out it's not real.
So in the earlier case, it sounds like it was a measurement error.
They didn't measure something that they should have.
But here it sounds like they are measuring something that didn't exist, like heat that nobody else is finding,
but surely they must have expected that people were going to try this and then would also not find the heat.
And so what happened?
Did they not account for the lighter that someone was holding underneath the device?
Like what's going on here?
It's a good question.
The answer comes down to chemistry is really hard.
And effectively, they didn't correctly calculate how much heat could be produced by non-fusion chemistry effects.
And it turns out there's more heat that can be produced by chemistry in this situation than they expected.
And this led to them to underestimate the basically chemistry contribution and to attribute the rest of this to fusion.
Well, if the answer is chemistry is really hard, then they have my sympathy.
So, all right, these poor guys.
Yeah, exactly.
On the other hand, check your work before you release a huge result.
Yeah, exactly.
And, you know, they never saw like the smoking gun of fusion.
They saw heat produced, but they also should have seen like neutrons produced, but they didn't.
So it's not like they had a unique setup and it was doing cold fusion and nobody else could replicate it because of some detail of their experiment.
It just didn't even coherently make sense.
And digging into it later, people discovered like the way they calibrated their device and the way they were calculating what they expected from non-fusion sources was just wrong.
And so that's too bad.
But, you know, there was still a lot of excitement about this.
And though Pons and Fleshmen didn't have any more support in the United States, there was
excitement around the world.
And these guys got like $10 million piles of money from the government in France or in Japan to go do their research and follow up, which I think is great.
Like, you know, at the time, maybe there were some other way you could do it.
Maybe they were on the right track.
Like, this definitely is a prospect.
But unfortunately, they never achieved any results that were useful at all.
Bomber.
Yeah.
All right.
But there are some people who.
still had the guts to push forward, even though the field had sort of gotten a bad name at that point?
There are still people working on this stuff. Google recently had a $10 million multi-year project
to test some of these things. They're like, let's do this rigorously. Let's really calibrate our
calorimeters. Let's really understand the chemistry. And in 2019, they published a paper in nature saying
there was no evidence of cold fusion, but they did improve their experimental techniques and they were
able to understand how you would measure it if it was there. And so it showed that like you can do
careful science here, although there's still a lot of challenges. There's still work happening in
Japan and in Italy. There's private companies working on this kind of stuff, other people exploring.
So there are definitely people working on this. And just last year, I saw a call from DARPA for
grant proposals about cold fusion. Oh, great. You know, like DARPA is famous for being out there and
like funding crazy things. So there's definitely like active interest.
and people are working on it, and if you have a good idea, there's money for it. But there's also the
dark side of Cold Fusion, you know, which is the conspiracy theories. There is some segment of folks
out there pushing a story that Pons and Fleischmen did achieve Cold Fusion, that it was real.
And it was for some reasons that never made sense to me covered up by the government. I think the
story is like the Hot Fusion folks were getting a lot of money, and the Cold Fusion would threaten
that and so the hot fusion people had a conflict of interest and they were criticizing cold fusion because
it challenged the mainstream narrative about hot fusion, et cetera, et cetera. And therefore it was pushed aside.
And if you're working on cold fusion, nobody would take you seriously. And you know, the real
story is like, no, there was money for cold fusion. There is money for cold fusion. If you have an
idea, people are interested. There's private money. There's government money. There's definitely people
looking into it. And Pons and Fleischman's work was analyzed. They tried to replicate it. They tried
understand it. It was given a fair shake. And yet there's still this, you know, conspiracy,
this like whole documentaries out there about like how the results were real and they were ignored
by mainstream physics. And it's just this like extension of anti-science conspiracy theory nonsense.
But, you know, it's pushed by your usual set of grifters.
Okay. Well, that's too bad. It's too bad. And so, you know, mainstream science is skeptical
about this. Like nobody's ever done this in an effective way. But also people are skeptical about
magnetic fusion and inertial confinement fusion, right?
Like, neither of these have shown that they actually will produce energy in any realistic way.
And there's money for both directions.
There's definitely more money for hot fusion than there is for cold fusion because I think
it's shown more promise.
And there's like at least a theory of how it would work.
People are still struggling to understand on the cold fusion side how in principle you
even would make this work.
Like, it's more than just the engineering challenges.
It's like, could you even produce enough energy in theory if you overcame all the
engineering challenges. And so there's definitely some obstacles there for Cold Fusion. But I would say
it's not impossible, right? It's a dark horse, but it's still possible and there are opportunities there.
And people are following up on them and they're getting money for it. So hooray. And so if you want to
make Keanu Reeves look good and make the premise of that movie sound maybe more realistic,
then, hey, invest in Cold Fusion or make it work yourself. You could change the world.
Daniel Keanu Reeves is doing a fine job looking good on his own. He doesn't need anyone's help.
Because, you know, the promise of cold fusion is amazing.
If we could achieve cold fusion, then it might be possible to have really small, very safe reactors.
You know, you wouldn't have to have a bunch of lasers or a bunch of hot gas.
You could have miniaturize them.
You could have, like, fusion inside your toaster, not just getting electricity from the grid from some massive power plant.
You could have, like, tiny little fusion reactors and everything.
Instead of batteries, you could have fusion reactors.
That would be awesome.
You know, your phone could have a fusion reactor in it and basically burn forever.
That would be incredible.
But we're still far from that.
Yeah, that's right.
This is a serious science show.
Yes, that would be amazing.
And I am excited that people are working on a lot of this stuff from a lot of different angles,
because you never know what's going to end up being the angle that works.
And so it's good to have a lot of different brains working in a lot of different ways.
Yeah, exactly.
And we benefit from a diversity of curiosity and a diversity of optimism.
And so get out there, people, solve this problem for us.
Kelly needs her toast.
I do.
I do.
and I'd like it to be made in a clean way.
All right, thanks everyone for coming along
on this latest journey of curiosity.
Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe
is produced by IHeart Radio.
We would love to hear from you.
We really would.
We want to know what questions you have
about this extraordinary universe.
We want to know your thoughts on recent shows,
suggestions for future shows.
If you contact us, we will get back to you.
We really mean it.
We answer every message.
Email us at Questions at Danielandkelly.org.
Or you can find us on social media.
We have accounts on X, Instagram, Blue Sky,
and on all of those platforms,
you can find us at D and K Universe.
Don't be shy. Write to us.
I'm Clayton Eckerd.
In 2022, I was the lead of ABC's The Bachelor.
But here's the thing.
Bachelor fans hated him.
If I could press a button and rewind it all I would.
That's when his life took a disturbing turn.
A one-night stand would end in a courtroom.
The media is here.
This case has gone viral.
The dating contract.
Agree to date me, but I'm also suing you.
This is unlike anything I've ever seen before.
I'm Stephanie Young.
Listen to Love Trapped on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Next Monday, our 2026 IHeart Podcast Awards are happening live in South by Southwest.
Since the biggest night in podcasting.
We'll honor the very best in podcasting from the past year
and celebrate the most innovative talent and creators in the industry.
And the winner is...
Creativity, knowledge, and passion will all be on full display.
Thank you so much.
Iheart Radio.
Thank you to all the other nominees.
You guys are awesome.
Watch live next Monday at 8 p.m. Eastern, 5 p.m. Pacific, free at veeps.
Atveps.com or the VEPS app.
Ego Woda is your host for the 2026 IHart Podcast Awards.
Live at South by Southwest.
Hello, is anybody there?
Raised by a single mom,
Ego may have a few father-related issues.
Are we supposed to talk about your dad?
Her podcast, Thanks Dad, is full of funny, heartfelt conversations with actors,
including fellow S&L alums, comedians, musicians, and more about life
and their wonderfully complicated relationships with their fathers.
I think and hope that's a good thing.
Get to know Ego.
Follow Thanks, Dad, with Ego Wodom, and start listening on the free IHeart Radio app today.
Hey, I'm Jay Chetty, host of the On Purpose podcast.
my latest episode is with Hilary Duff,
singer, actress, and multi-platinam artist.
You desire in family like this picture,
and that's not reality.
My sister and I don't speak.
It's definitely a very painful part of my life,
and I hope it's not forever, but it's for right now.
Listen to On Purpose with Jay Chetty
on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
What if mind control is real?
If you could control the behavior of anybody around you, what kind of life would you have?
Can you hypnotically persuade someone to buy a car?
When you look at your car, you're going to become overwhelmed with such good feelings.
Can you hypnotize someone into sleeping with you?
I gave her some suggestions to be sexually aroused.
Can you get someone to join your cult?
NLP was used on me to access my subconscious.
Mind Games, a new podcast exploring NLP, aka neurolinguistic programming.
Is it a self-help miracle?
a shady hypnosis scam or both listen to mind games on the iHeart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts
this is an iHeart podcast guaranteed human
