Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe - Listener Questions about aliens, black holes and white holes!
Episode Date: August 2, 2022Daniel and Jorge answer questions from listeners like you! Send your questions to questions@danielandjorge.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is an I-Heart podcast.
It's important that we just reassure people that they're not alone, and there is help out there.
The Good Stuff podcast, Season 2, takes a deep look into One Tribe Foundation, a nonprofit fighting suicide in the veteran community.
September is National Suicide Prevention Month, so join host Jacob and Ashley Schick as they bring you to the front lines of One Tribe's mission.
One Tribe saved my life twice.
Welcome to Season 2 of The Good Stuff.
Listen to the Good Stuff podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Every case that is a cold case that has DNA.
Right now in a backlog will be identified in our lifetime.
On the new podcast, America's Crime Lab, every case has a story to tell.
And the DNA holds the truth.
He never thought he was going to get caught.
And I just looked at my computer screen.
I was just like, ah, gotcha.
This technology is already solving so many cases.
Listen to America's Crime Lab on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, host of the Psychology Podcast.
Here's a clip from an upcoming conversation about how to be a better you.
When you think about emotion regulation, you're not going to choose an adaptive strategy,
which is more effortful to use unless you think there's a good outcome.
Avoidance is easier.
Ignoring is easier.
Denials is easier.
Complex problem solving.
takes effort.
Listen to the psychology podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
From tips for healthy living to the latest medical breakthroughs, WebMD's Health Discovered podcast
keeps you up to date on today's most important health issues.
Through in-depth conversations with experts from across the health care community,
WebMD reveals how today's health news will impact your life tomorrow.
It's not that people don't know that exercise is healthy.
It's just that people don't know why it's healthy.
and we're struggling to try to help people help themselves and each other.
Listen to WebMD Health Discovered on the IHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, Daniel, I've got a tough question for you.
Oh, goody. That's what I live for.
All right. Well, you might regret that, but here it is.
Is physics real or pretend?
Boom. Oh, my gosh. Wow, I don't even know how to,
begin to answer that. What? You don't have an answer? You mean it could all just be made up?
Well, you know, physics tries to describe the universe, but it might all just be like a
convenient mathematical story in our head. Yes, math is pretty convenient, I think. I guess my next
question is then, are physicists real? Or are you also made up? I'm not sure. I mean, I'm definitely
making it up as I go. Well, at least you're keeping it real. Or pretending to.
Hi, I'm Jorge, I'm a cartoonist, and the co-author of Frequently Asked Questions about the universe.
Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor at UC Irvine, or at least I pretend to be.
Do you have to dress up also? Is it like Halloween? Do you have a professor costume?
you put on every morning?
Yeah, I'm wearing my professor costume right now.
T-shirt, jeans, and sandals.
Right, right.
I guess socks are not part of the costume ever.
No, I believe strongly in the toe liberation movement.
Toes should be able to breathe.
You're a big TLM fan, activist.
I'm not sure how we got started talking about my toes already on the podcast.
Well, toes stands for a theory of everything, right?
Yes, exactly.
And you want to let your theories breathe.
Yeah.
So they don't smell.
You know, nobody wants a stinky theory.
Hey, I'll take any working theory.
I don't care what it smells like.
Oh, really?
You might regret saying that also.
Welcome to the stinky cheese theory of the universe.
We are pretty cheesy, Daniel.
But anyways, welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Horhe, Explain the Universe,
a production of I-Hard Radio.
In which we explore the real universe that may actually be out there.
All those crazy quantum particles frothing and bubbling and waving and interfering and weaving together
to make an incredible experience for me and for you,
one chock full of bizarre effects and strange mysteries.
Mysteries that we hope to be able to unravel with the little brain made up of its own quantum particles.
The universe trying to understand itself.
And here we are a tiny little part of the universe trying to explain the rest of it to you.
Yeah, it is a mysterious universe.
It's huge.
It's full of incredible and sometimes unbelievable things where you go, what?
Is that for real or is that just made up by physicists?
And physics is just sort of like.
a never-ending stream of moments like that, where we're like, how could that be possible?
How could it be that the universe is actually this way?
Think about when people discovered that, wow, the universe might be describable by physical
laws.
Maybe it's all like clockwork, like deterministic.
That must have been an incredible moment to feel like our brains could describe the
universe in a way that predicts its future.
And then the rug was pulled out from under that big idea.
When we discovered the universe, maybe not predictable, maybe not deterministic.
and even crazier, more bonkers realization.
It kind of sounds to me, Daniel, like, physicists keep getting it wrong.
Like, if you got it right the first time, you wouldn't need to have your mind blown so many times,
but you just keep striking out, it seems.
Physics is definitely wrong.
The goal is to make it less and less wrong over time, right?
Is to make it writer and writer as we go.
We hope to be asymptotically approaching the truth, but, you know, we may never get there.
We may never find a theory that we say, hmm, this is it.
It works, it's satisfying, it's simple, we're done.
Sounds like a great motto for your department.
Just trying to get it less wrong.
I think that's a pretty good goal, right?
To be the least wrong.
We're trying to be humble also, right?
There's some humility is important in academia.
Right, right? Because it's so rare, right?
Like, it never happens.
It's pretend.
Well, it's one of my favorite qualities actually in my collaborators.
I work with some of the smartest people on the planet,
but the ones who are most fun to work with all the ones that still have some humility.
that know that anybody can make mistakes.
Nice. And it is an interesting universe in which to guess how it might all be working.
And the way we do that is by asking questions about the universe.
We wonder how it all works, why things are the way they are, and how did it all come to be?
Yeah, an important part of figuring out how the universe works is asking,
why is it this way and not some other way?
Why does the universe follow this law?
Why doesn't it follow this other law, which would seem to make much more sense to us?
It's a deep part of being human to ask these questions about the universe to try to understand what the rules are and what our place is in those rules.
Yeah, because we are all part of the universe and as humans we seem to be born, I guess, with a question asking gene.
Do you think it's embedded in our genetic instructions, Daniel, this sort of propensity, this tendency to ask questions about the universe, about the things around this?
I don't know.
It makes me wonder about the nature of intelligence and whether asking questions and curiosity is all tied up with intelligence.
Whether it's an evolutionary trait, you know, whether curiosity didn't kill the cat.
It fed the cat because the cat was wondering like, hmm, is that thing tasty and crunched on it?
And sometimes the answer is yes.
Maybe it killed the curious cats, but then it saved like the curious monkeys.
You know, maybe it's a double-edged sword curiosity.
Save some species, but some of them didn't quite make it, right?
Because we don't have intelligent cats running around.
That's true.
Cats are pretty intelligent, you know, not as intelligent as dogs.
But you can definitely identify curiosity in.
other species, right? You can tell when your dog is curious about something or even a rat
can sniffing around trying to understand what something is. Of course, we'll never know what it's
like to be a rat or a cat or a bat, just like we'll never know what it's like to be another
person. But it does feel like being curious is part of being alive. We might not be able to answer
that question until we meet aliens and discover whether or not they are also curious about the
universe. Right. And whether they have alien cats who don't ask questions. And also, Daniel,
Did you just say cats are dumber than dogs?
Cats definitely dumber than dogs.
Absolutely.
You just lost half of our audience right now.
Cat lovers are pretty fierce.
I love cats.
Cats are wonderful.
They're great pets.
Well, let me ask you this.
Can cats learn?
Can cats be trained?
Pretty sure that you can, right?
It's certainly possible to teach your cat stuff.
I think dogs definitely show a larger capacity for learning.
So I think they're more intelligent.
I'm not an expert in this stuff.
So if you feel strongly about cats,
being intelligent, please write to Jorge and tell him all about it.
Yes, my email is Daniel at danielandhorpea.com.
Well, regardless of whether cats are smarter or dumber than dogs, humans definitely are
pretty smart and we've been asking questions about the universe since we were cavemen and
women and cave children because we have questions about the universe, right?
It's sort of a fascinating thing that we all wonder about.
How does it all work?
Yeah, and that's all that science is.
It's just a bunch of folks asking questions.
It's people for whom the questions were the most important thing in life.
And every little piece of science that comes out, every time you read a news article about like the life cycle of nukes or how plants grow or why rocks look a certain color, that's because one person decided that was the most important question in the universe, when they had to devote years of their life to understanding.
So these questions really do drive knowledge forward.
Yeah, and it sounds like somebody needs to write that article.
Are cats smarter than dogs?
Sounds like great clickbait.
But it's not just scientists that ask questions.
It's everyday people.
you that are listening to this podcast and sometimes our listeners send us their questions and
sometimes we even answer it on the podcast that's right we want to hear about your questions about
the universe maybe something we said on the podcast that you didn't understand or a follow-up question
to something we discussed or something you read about in the news or just something you've been
thinking about as you stare up at the night sky you have questions about the universe we have answers
please write to us to questions at danielanhorpe.com we answer every message
and we will answer yours.
So today on the podcast, we'll be tackling.
Listener questions.
Number 29.
The Is it Real or Pretend Edition?
Is that the real title or is that just a pretend title?
Well, if you're a cat, then that's a real title.
If you're a dog, then, you know, you can make up whatever you like.
What?
Now you're giving dogs extra rights.
Oh, man, you're a real cat oppressor here.
You know, I used to be a cat person because we had cats for many, many years.
Then I had kids, and my kids are allergic to cats.
And the kids wanted to get a dog.
So now I find myself a dog person.
So still love cats, but presently have a dog in the family.
I see.
You have to pick aside, you know, your kids or cats.
You chose their kids.
I think that was the right choice.
I mean, also in parenting, I'm just trying to get it less and less wrong every year.
Yeah.
Yeah, aim high.
But we do have some awesome questions here today.
And there does seem to be a sort of theme about things being real or pretend.
There's a lot of sort of if scenarios here.
Like what happens to this happens?
And that's an important part of doing science.
You know, considering hypotheticals, testing your ideas by considering what might happen in this scenario.
What might happen in that scenario?
It's a great way to do physics.
You know, somebody tells you about how something works.
Don't just digest it and go, mm-hmm.
Think about the consequences.
What about this scenario?
How does that fit with this other idea I learned?
That's the way you can weave all these ideas together into a complete and holistic.
understanding of the universe, which, of course, is the goal of physics.
Yeah, because that's kind of what science is, right?
It's like you never stop asking questions.
Even if you find an answer, you can get to look for the other questions.
It's a very annoying habit.
Yeah, but it means you always have something to do.
And even if you think you understand something in one circumstance, like you think you know
what your dog will do if you feed it a treat, you might wonder, hmm, what will my dog do
if the treat is inside a box where it can't smell it, but it can see the treat.
These questions help you understand more deeply what's going on inside your dog's head.
Yeah, I guess, are you saying dogs are physicists also?
Or physicists' dogs?
Where is this analogy going?
Launching a whole new podcast called The Physics of Dogs.
Oh, man.
You can be the dog physicist.
Coming to the Discovery Channel next season.
We're going to take a bite out of black holes.
Give me a real treat.
All right, well, we have some awesome questions here today.
Some of them about aliens.
some of them about black holes going too fast,
and also some about giant space collisions
that are maybe mind-blowing or hard to imagine.
So our first question comes from Avani, who is six years old.
Hello, my name's Avani.
I'm really six.
My question is our aliens really pretend.
All right.
Sorry, Avani, I said you're six, but you're nearly six,
which is even more impressive that you're asking these questions.
It's a great question.
I love this question.
Such a basic question, but also such a deep philosophical question.
Yeah, Avani wants to know, are aliens real or pretend?
Boy, I feel like we could have a whole podcast series just on that question.
I know.
There's so many wrinkles there, like, is anything real?
Is it all just pretend?
You know, like, what do you even mean?
What does it mean to pretend?
What does it mean to be an alien?
You can go down a real rabbit hole here.
Yeah, a big part of doing physics is coming up with pretend scenario.
and asking like, well, could that be real?
How do we know?
Often before we see things out there,
we do come up with the idea for what might be out there.
So, you know, before the Higgs particle was observed,
was it real or was it pretend?
It was just an idea in our minds until we found it.
And have you figured that out yet?
We pretend to, yeah, absolutely.
But, you know, actually my daughter,
I think when she was around five or six,
she asked me almost the same question,
like aliens were real or not?
I guess when you're at that age, you get a lot of, like,
stories about aliens or movies about aliens or shows about aliens and you're like and you're probably in your little brain you're thinking is this for real or is this just like you know dragons and
unicorns yeah i think it comes from seeing fictionalized portrayals of stuff but you know you might ask like well why are aliens in fiction
why do we tell stories about aliens why are they in the movies why are they on the brains right they're on the
brains because we wonder if they are real because we think about them as a way to explore this question of
are we alone in the universe right so it's an important part of doing science is coming up with
these pretend scenarios oh boy i thought you were going to say it's because they're real
like there's some kind of conspiracy going on here i want them to be real obviously like i would love
to talk to aliens about physics and learn all sorts of things about how to look at the universe
from a different perspective but of course we don't know if they're real i guess is that the basic
answer that you would give avani is that we don't know if aliens are real or pretend yeah we don't know
Currently, they are just pretend.
But why do we pretend?
We pretend because we hope that they are real.
And to discover them, we need to pretend that they are real.
We need to think about what they might be like in order to know how to look for them.
We need to imagine different scenarios for how they might communicate, how they might live, how they might think,
so that we are prepared to discover them.
So we know where to look and how to look for them.
Yeah.
So I guess they're pretend.
Like the things you see on TV right now, everything you see about aliens is pretend.
somebody just made that up, but we actually don't know if they are real or not,
meaning that they could be real.
Yeah, they could be real.
Aliens are pretend the same way string theory is pretend.
Like it's a hypothetical.
It's a possible scenario.
We don't know if it describes our actual universe.
We play around with it to see, like, does this make sense?
Could it be real?
And so there's two steps in the question there, right?
Like, could this be real?
Is it allowed by the laws of the universe?
Does it explain the kind of things we see?
So we can ask questions like, how else could you make life and could life evolve in other places in the universe?
Is that consistent with our understanding?
Then, of course, there's the second totally separate question, which is, are they actually real?
We might live in a universe where aliens are possible, but don't exist.
Could be that the universe allows for life to start in other places, but that it just didn't.
Well, maybe for somebody like Avani, you can step us through like, why do we think that aliens could be real?
We've only been to one planet Earth with life in it.
What makes us think that there could be other planets with aliens in them?
It's a great question.
And I think an important thing to remember is that something we've been learning over the last few hundred years is that where we are in the universe doesn't seem to be very special.
Like we're just in one little spot in one galaxy among billions and billions, maybe trillions, maybe an infinite number of galaxies.
So there's a huge universe out there.
and nothing about where we are seems to be very special so far.
Like the kind of star we have is not that unusual a star, and there's billions of stars.
The kind of planet we have, we recently discovered that there are lots of these kinds of planets.
Planets made out of rock not too far, not too close to the sun, that water is everywhere in the universe.
It's not too complicated.
And so we can imagine ways for life to have started on other planets.
In fact, it seems like there may have been.
many, many opportunities for this to happen. We don't think that the chemicals that we find here
on Earth are unique or special. And so it's not that hard to imagine life starting in other
places or maybe even many, many other places in the universe. Right. I think the idea is that
there are a lot of planets out there and a lot of planets out there are sort of like the Earth.
They sort of maybe even look a lot like the Earth with water and like a nice atmosphere,
nice clouds in the sky. And so those are the kinds of planets that at least what we know about,
of life, there could be other living things in those planets.
There could be. And here we're just talking about life as we know it.
You know, conditions similar to Earth that might make life in a way that's similar on
Earth. And, you know, an important part of pretend, though, is thinking about different aliens.
Rarely in movies, you see aliens looking exactly like humans because we think that probably
some aspects of life here on Earth are basically random.
That just evolution happened to follow this path and it could have followed another path.
We don't really know like what are the spectrum of possible options.
What else could have evolved and have been intelligent?
It's hard to think outside of this box because we're just so used to life on Earth.
And it's possible that life on other planets looks a little bit different from life on our
planet or could be fundamentally radically mind-blowingly different in ways that are hard for
us to even imagine.
Right.
But I guess even though there are a lot of planets out there and a lot of them that look like
the Earth, we sort of don't know if what makes.
you know, living things happen in a planet like that is special or whether that's common too.
Like there might be a bazillion planets like the Earth out there, but maybe like our planet is
the only one where things just happen to come alive. That's a possibility, right?
That's definitely a possibility because there's a gap in our understanding. I said earlier that we
think the chemistry of Earth is probably not unique. But what we don't understand is how you get
from like the chemistry of Earth to life on Earth. How do you go from a primordial soup of like
building blocks of life to actual life, self-reproducing objects that can build complexity.
We do not understand that step.
Like, we don't understand how it happened here precisely, which means that we can't say
how likely it is to happen somewhere else.
And our ignorance ranges from like, oh, it can be pretty common.
You get it like half the time.
If you have a primordial soup and it sits around for a few million years sloshing on alien
shores, that 50% of time you get life.
You know, arguments in favor of that are that it didn't take that long on Earth for
life to start. We think, you know, less than a billion years after the Earth began, we think there
might have been like a little microbe. In the other hand, it could be super duper rare. It could be that
it takes trillions and trillions of planets for it to happen one time. We could be the only life
in the entire universe because it's just so rare. We just don't understand the mechanism for that
so we don't have any idea how rare or how common that crucial step is. Right. And I guess if I'm a six
year old or nearly six year old like avani i might be wondering right now like how can we not know if there are
aliens out there like can we just look at them or go to them or see them from earth yeah we do know
something right if they were aliens everywhere if they were aliens on mars and on venus and building
civilizations around jupiter then we would have seen them so we know the universe is not like overwhelmed
with life it's not like brimming with life even if they were like really fancy aliens the one star over
we might have seen messages from them.
We might have heard from them already.
So in our little vicinity, it seems like, you know,
there isn't any other life that we have found yet.
There are still some places in the solar system we haven't looked.
And there are lots of ways for alien life to be like kind of nearby,
but not that close and us to not have seen it.
But so far, our neighborhood seems sort of abandoned except for us.
Right.
At least for now, right?
Like it could also be that there were aliens here or around a long time ago,
but they're not anymore.
Or it could be that there will be aliens.
in our neighborhood in the future, just not right now.
Yeah, the universe is a very long trajectory.
Our life cycles and the whole history of humanity on Earth is just a blip in the cosmic
history.
So it might be that aliens lived around a nearby star for a billion years and then died out
and we just missed them or that they might arise in two billion years and last for a trillion
years, but we're just a little bit too early.
So there's lots of ways for us to not see aliens.
All right.
Well, then I think the answer for Avani is that the universe is so big.
that aliens are probably real, but so far we just have to pretend that they're pretend
because we haven't seen any or talked to any yet so far.
Yeah, and that pretending about aliens is an important way of actually discovering them,
of thinking about what they might be like.
Yeah, it's part of using your imagination, which is a big part of using your curiosity,
which is a big part of science.
And maybe, Vani, you'll grow up and be the one to discover aliens.
All right, well, let's get to our other questions here about fast-moving,
black holes and also white hole collisions.
But first, let's take a quick break.
Hola, it's Honey German.
And my podcast, Grasias Come Again, is back.
This season, we're going even deeper
into the world of music and entertainment
with raw and honest conversations
with some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities.
You didn't have to audition?
No, I didn't audition.
I haven't audition in, like, over 25 years.
Oh, wow.
That's a real G-talk right there.
Oh, yeah.
We've got some of the biggest actors, musicians, content creators, and culture shifters
sharing their real stories of failure and success.
You were destined to be a start.
We talk all about what's viral and trending with a little bit of chisement, a lot of laughs,
and those amazing vibras you've come to expect.
And of course, we'll explore deeper topics dealing with identity, struggles,
and all the issues affecting our Latin community.
You feel like you get a little whitewash because you have to do the code switching?
I won't say white watch because at the end of the day, you know, I'm me.
Yeah.
But the whole pretending and cold, you know, it takes a toll on you.
Listen to the new season of Grasas Has Come Again as part of my Cultura podcast network on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Your entire identity has been fabricated.
Your beloved brother goes missing without a trace.
You discover the depths of your mother's illness, the way it has echoed and reverberated throughout your life, impacting your very,
Legacy. Hi, I'm Danny Shapiro, and these are just a few of the profound and powerful stories
I'll be mining on our 12th season of Family Secrets. With over 37 million downloads,
we continue to be moved and inspired by our guests and their courageously told stories.
I can't wait to share 10 powerful new episodes with you, stories of tangled up identities,
concealed truths, and the way in which family secrets almost always need to be told.
I hope you'll join me and my extraordinary guests for this new season of family secrets.
Listen to Family Secrets Season 12 on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, sis, what if I could promise you you never had to listen to a condescending finance bro?
Tell you how to manage your money again.
Welcome to Brown Ambition. This is the hard part when you pay down those credit cards.
haven't gotten to the bottom of why you were racking up credit or turning to credit cards,
you may just recreate the same problem a year from now.
When you do feel like you are bleeding from these high interest rates,
I would start shopping for a debt consolidation loan, starting with your local credit union,
shopping around online, looking for some online lenders because they tend to have fewer fees
and be more affordable.
Listen, I am not here to judge.
It is so expensive in these streets.
I 100% can see how in just a few months,
You can have this much credit card debt and it weighs on you.
It's really easy to just, like, stick your head in the sand.
It's nice and dark in the sand.
Even if it's scary, it's not going to go away just because you're avoiding it.
And in fact, it may get even worse.
For more judgment-free money advice, listen to Brown Ambition on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
I had this, like, overwhelming sensation that I had to call it right then.
And I just hit call, said, you know, hey, I'm Jacob Schick.
I'm the CEO of One Tribe Foundation.
And I just wanted to call on and let her know.
So there's a lot of people battling some of the very same things you're battling.
And there is help out there.
The Good Stuff podcast, Season 2, takes a deep look into One Tribe Foundation, a non-profit
fighting suicide in the veteran community.
September is National Suicide Prevention Month, so join host Jacob and Ashley Schick as they
bring you to the front lines of One Tribe's mission.
I was married to a combat army veteran, and he actually took his own life to suicide.
One Tribe saved my life twice.
There's a lot of love that flows through this place, and it's sincere.
year. Now it's a personal mission. Don't have to go to any more funerals, you know.
I got blown up on a React mission. I ended up having amputation below the knee of my right leg
and a traumatic brain injury because I landed on my head. Welcome to Season 2 of the Good
Stuff. Listen to the Good Stuff podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
you get your podcast.
All right, we are answering listeners.
our questions here today. And Daniel, are we for real answering them or just pretending to answer them?
I'm not sure I know the difference anymore. Your life is a blur. You're doing fiction. You're doing
physics. What is real, man? I'm really pretending to do my best. All right. Well, we have our second
question here of the day. And this one comes from Jeff. And he's wondering what happens when heavy
things go really fast. Hi, Daniel and Jorge. My name is Jeff. And I've got a question for you about
high-energy photons, black holes, and relativity. I've heard that if you can get enough energy
in a small enough volume, a black hole can form, right? If you had a laser that could shoot
ultra-high-energy photons, those photons can become black holes. But what would an observer
moving close to the speed of light relative to that laser see? As those photons in that reference
frame would have less energy, they shouldn't observe these photons becoming black holes. It sounds
kind of paradoxical. I'm sure I'm missing a subtle point somewhere, but if you could help shine a
light on it. That would be appreciated. All right. That is a pretty mind-blowing question. I'm going to
pretend that I understood it. But I think what he's asking, Jeff is asking, is that black holes form
because when you have enough energy in one spot. And so if you take a little rock and you get it
going really fast, doesn't it get a lot of kinetic energy? And if it has enough kinetic energy,
doesn't at some point become a black hole because of its kinetic energy? Yes. It's a really good
question about like whether observers in different frames moving at different speeds all see a black
hole made at the same time like do they agree about whether something is a black hole or not and it's
a great question because energy is relative right like if i'm holding a rock i see it having no
velocity so it has no kinetic energy whereas if you're running by at 75% of the speed of light because
you're really fast you measured that rock to have a lot of velocity relative to you and so a lot of
energy relative to you. So you see that rock is having more energy. So in principle, you could
say, oh, that rock has enough energy to form a black hole. And I could say, no, it doesn't have
enough energy to form a black hole. But, you know, one of us would have to be right because either
it's a black hole or it's not. Right. Because velocity is relative, right? It depends on how
you measure it. And so does that mean then that kinetic energy is also relative? Like, it doesn't
really exist? Kinetic energy is definitely relative. And there's an important difference between things
being conserved and things being invariant, right? Like something's invariant if everybody
measures it and gets the same answer. Like everybody measures the speed of light to be the speed
of light no matter what frame you're in, how fast you're going, et cetera. Not everybody measures
velocity to be the same number. If you're moving relative to me, then you have a different
measurement of my velocity and so a different measurement of my energy, right? Now in your frame,
energy is conserved and in my frame energy is conserved, but we actually measure different amounts of
energy. So energy is conserved that is in flat space, right? But it's not invariant. So different
people measure different amounts of energy. Yes, it's relative. So I think that's the paradox that
Jeff pointed to is that you're there holding a rock. To you, the rock has no energy, right? It's
just sitting there in the palm of your hand. But for me that I'm going at 75% of the speed of
light zooming past you, I'm seeing you, from my point of view, I'm seeing you and the rock have
a ton of energy, right? Because you have mass and you're moving really fast relative to me.
So I'm thinking, oh, my goodness, there's so much energy there.
Well, first of all, I can't believe Daniel's moving that fast.
But there's so much energy there that black hole should be forming there.
I mean, it would be a really short moment there.
It would be like, wow, oh, already gone.
I wouldn't wonder about it too long.
It's a really fun question.
And it gives us an opportunity to understand a little bit more about general relativity.
The short answer is that, remember, a black hole is curvature of space
and that it forms when you have enough energy density in a certain location.
but it's not that simple exactly.
It's not just like more energy density means more curvature
and eventually you hit a threshold and you get a black hole.
It's more complicated than just like a certain amount of energy density.
It's not just like one number that controls the solution to Einstein's equations.
Einstein's equations are a big, complicated nightmare.
And different pieces of it feed in slightly differently.
It's not just like you measure the energy density.
This is this thing called the stress energy tensor.
And kinetic energy feeds in different.
from potential energy, which feeds in differently from other kinds of energy.
So it all sort of dances together and to get a solution.
Well, I guess maybe the basic question is, does kinetic energy bend space also?
Like if I have a rock moving really fast, is that kinetic energy bending the space around the rock as it's moving?
Or even if I just have a like a photon, which has sort of momentum, right?
Kinetic energy is that photon bending space also?
It can, right?
It does contribute, right?
It's not like the universe just ignores kinetic energy.
It does contribute to the effects on space, right?
But it's not trivial.
It's not like you can just add up all the energy and say,
here you have enough to have a black hole.
Einstein's equations, remember, are very complicated.
So it's not easy to say, here's this configuration.
Now we know exactly what happens.
And in fact, it's really a nightmare to solve Einstein's equations for anything with kinetic energy.
I mean, it's a nightmare to solve it in almost any circumstances.
We've only ever solved Einstein's equations under a few very specific, very similar.
situations like a huge amount of mass at rest or the universe filled homogeneously with
matter.
We haven't even solved it for simple things like two objects orbiting each other, right? That's
too complicated for us to figure out. And so to solve these problems, what we typically do is
we use a trick. We say, well, this problem is too hard to solve. We don't know how to solve
the problem of I have a rock moving past me with a lot of kinetic energy. I can't solve
that one. But can I solve a different problem that I know has the same answer?
So one thing we know about general relativity is that it is invariant.
Everybody should agree about what happens, about whether there's a black hole regardless
of your coordinates, how you choose your reference frame, how you organize space time, right?
Where you put your axes shouldn't matter.
Everybody should agree about whether or not there is a black hole.
So that's the short answer.
Jorge and I can't disagree about whether the rock forms into a black hole.
It's not like he could see a form of black hole and I don't.
We have to agree.
We know that the equations of general relativity are invariant.
So we say, well, let's solve the problem in the easier case where I'm just holding the rock
and I can ask the question, does it have enough mass to form a black hole?
Yes or no?
And then we say, well, Jorge must see the same answer.
We don't know how to solve the equations for Jorge, but we know what the answer has to be.
Meaning that because you don't see a black hole in the rock in the palm of your hand,
then I shouldn't see a black hole when I'm moving past you at 75% of the speed of light.
You're saying we should all come out with the same observation.
Exactly. And if we were better at math and we knew how to solve that problem in the case of an object moving really, really fast, then we would get the same answer.
We know that that's true because we know that general relativity is invariant, that no matter what frame you solve it in, you do get the same answer.
We just can't work through the details of that math right now because we don't know how to solve those equations in every possible scenario.
So typically we just say, well, let's solve it in an easier case and then argue that the answer must be the same in this other case.
sounds like a pretend argument but i guess is why do you why does it have to be that way you know
like why couldn't you see no black hole but to me it looks like you are holding a black hole
you know like it maybe somehow um it sort of looks like it nothing can escape there but to you
it does seem like something can escape from your the palm of your hand why couldn't that be true
well remember what the condition for a black hole is we're talking about an event horizon talking
about our region in space where nothing can ever leave so it'd be a paradox
If you see an event horizon, but I don't, right, that means that I could see a photon leave this rock and strike you, but you're saying that no photon could ever leave that rock and strike you, right? Those two things are in contradiction with each other. And remember that there's lots of relativity in relativity, right? People can disagree about the order of events, for example. But, you know, whether two things strike each other, for example, whether that photon reaches Jorge or not are things that all observers do have.
have to agree on. All right. So then what's kind of the answer here? If we both have to see a black
hole not forming in the palm of your hand, then does that mean that my velocity is irrelevant?
Like kinetic energy doesn't go into really the formation of a black hole? Because I feel like
that's kind of what you're saying is that me moving fast is irrelevant and therefore it can't
affect whether or not a black hole forms or not. That's right. And that sort of makes sense.
You know, if I'm sitting here holding a rock and you're running by me a mile away, how
could you're running by me make my rock implode into a black hole, right? It doesn't even make
sense. And then whether or not a black hole existed would depend on like everybody else's
speed in the universe. It shouldn't make sense, right? Your intuition tells you that it's either
a black hole or it's not. And no matter how fast Jorge runs, he can't turn my rock into a black
hole. Well, I hate to run. So yeah, that wouldn't happen anyways. I think what you're saying is that,
you know, the formulas that say what makes a black hole or what turns into a black hole,
somehow sort of cancel out the effects of kinetic energy
because you said earlier that kinetic energy does bend space
so you would think that it would help form a black hole
but the equations of the black hole are such that
it actually sort of ignores the kinetic energy.
Yeah, it all gets woven in a very complicated way
that frankly we don't even really understand how to solve in an exact way.
We have like numerical solutions to this stuff
but most of the solutions to general relativity
are done using these kind of assumptions like that everything is invariant
that you get the same answer in every frame.
So let's find the one where it's easiest.
And we do this all the time in physics.
You want to solve a problem where like a ball is rolling down a plane,
then you choose axes that make that simple,
you know, where your x-axis is like aligned along the plane
rather than with the ground because it makes the math simpler.
So we're always doing this kind of thing where we transform the problem
to be a simpler one that has the same answer.
Cool.
All right.
Well, it sounds like you're waving your hands with some math here a little bit,
but it sounds like the answer is that to answer Jeff's question is
that fast-moving objects do have extra energy because of their kinetic energy,
depending on who measures it,
but that kinetic energy can't affect the formation of whether or not it forms a black hole.
Exactly.
And Jeff actually asked his question in terms of photons,
but the same kind of principles apply.
Either you have enough energy to form a black hole or you don't,
and it's the same in every frame.
Well, we have one more question here today,
and it's about what happens when white holes collide with black holes.
And I'm guessing it's not just that they form a gray hole.
We'll get into the real answer here and not the pretend one.
But first, let's take another quick break.
Hola, it's Honey German, and my podcast, Grasias Come Again, is back.
This season, we're going even deeper into the world of music and entertainment,
with raw and honest conversations with some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities.
You didn't have to audition?
No, I didn't audition.
I haven't auditioned in, like, over 25 years.
Oh, wow.
That's some real G-talk right there.
Oh, yeah.
We've got some of the biggest actors, musicians,
content creators, and culture shifters
sharing their real stories of failure and success.
You were destined to be a start.
We talk all about what's viral and trending
with a little bit of chisement, a lot of laughs,
and those amazing vivas you've come to expect.
And of course, we'll explore deeper topics
dealing with identity, struggles,
and all the issues affecting our Latin community.
I feel like you get a little whitewash because you have to do the code switching.
I won't say whitewash because at the end of the day, you know, I'm me.
Yeah.
But the whole pretending and code, you know, it takes a toll on you.
Listen to the new season of Grasas Has Come Again as part of My Cultura Podcast Network on the IHartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
A foot washed up a shoe with some bones in it.
They had no idea who it was.
Most everything was burned up pretty good from the fire that not a whole lot was salvageable.
These are the coldest of cold cases, but everything is about to change.
Every case that is a cold case that has DNA right now in a backlog will be identified in our lifetime.
A small lab in Texas is cracking the code on DNA.
Using new scientific tools, they're finding clues in evidence so tiny you might just miss it.
He never thought he was going to get caught, and I just looked at my computer screen.
I was just like, ah, gotcha.
On America's Crime Lab, we'll learn about victims and survivors,
and you'll meet the team behind the scenes at Othrum,
the Houston Lab that takes on the most hopeless cases,
to finally solve the unsolvable.
Listen to America's Crime Lab on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Your entire identity has been fabricated.
Your beloved brother goes missing without a trace.
You discover the depths of your mother.
illness, the way it has echoed and reverberated throughout your life, impacting your very legacy.
Hi, I'm Danny Shapiro.
And these are just a few of the profound and powerful stories I'll be mining on our 12th season of
Family Secrets. With over 37 million downloads, we continue to be moved and inspired by our
guests and their courageously told stories. I can't wait to share 10 powerful new episodes
with you. Stories of tangled up identities, concealed truths, and the way in which family secrets
almost always need to be told. I hope you'll join me and my extraordinary guests for this new
season of family secrets. Listen to Family Secrets Season 12 on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, sis, what if I could promise you you never had to listen to a
condescending finance, bro, tell you how to manage your money again. Welcome to Brown Ambition.
This is the hard part when you pay down those credit cards.
If you haven't gotten to the bottom of why you were racking up credit or turning to credit cards,
you may just recreate the same problem a year from now.
When you do feel like you are bleeding from these high interest rates,
I would start shopping for a debt consolidation loan,
starting with your local credit union, shopping around online,
looking for some online lenders because they tend to have fewer fees and be more affordable.
Listen, I am not here to judge.
It is so expensive in these streets.
100% can see how in just a few months you can have this much credit card debt when it weighs on you.
It's really easy to just like stick your head in the sand. It's nice and dark in the sand.
Even if it's scary, it's not going to go away just because you're avoiding it.
And in fact, it may get even worse.
For more judgment-free money advice, listen to Brown Ambition on the Iheart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
All right, we were answering listener questions, and I feel like I've got in my mind blown twice already.
First of all, that there's a nearly six-year-old kid thinking about aliens in the universe.
That's amazing.
That's awesome.
And also that black holes don't depend on how fast you're moving.
Yep, black holes are mind-blowing, and they're really fun hypothetical questions to think about them.
Make sure that you understand how they work and what the rules are and how it all comes together.
It's really useful to think about crazy hypotheticals.
All right, well, we have one more question here.
This one comes from Carson.
Hi, Dano and Jorge. Carson here.
I have a question about black holes and white holes.
Could you please explain what would happen if the two were to collide?
And thanks for answering all my questions.
All right.
Awesome question.
Carson, that is a great question because I also wonder that about this myself.
Carson's question is, what happens if I take a black hole and I make it crash or collide with a white hole?
It is a wonderful question.
I really love this.
When I first got this question, I thought, whoa, I've never even thought about that.
How have I never considered what might happen in this scenario?
So I had to go off and think about it a little bit.
And I also reached out to a quantum gravity expert who will chime in a little bit later on.
You couldn't just pretend that you came up with that information.
I can't pretend to be a quantum gravity expert as hard as I try.
Well, what happens when a white hole collects with a black hole?
That's a great question.
And so let's step through this.
What is exactly a white hole?
So a white hole is a really weird theoretical object, and it's one of these things where it's not even really well defined what it is.
There's sort of like a few white hole kind of ideas out there that all sort of fall in this general category.
So the answer to the question depends a little bit on what a white hole is.
And there's sort of like three different ideas that might be worth thinking about for what a white hole is.
I guess first of all, is this a real thing that physicists feel that really exists?
Or is this just like it's possible in the equations, but we don't really have sort of dug into it to get the sense of whether or not it can't exist in the universe.
Are you asking me if white holes are real or pretend?
Yeah.
Well, I'm asking if the theory is real or pretend.
So white holes do exist in the theory.
We don't know if white holes are real in our universe.
And as you'll hear about some of the parts of the theory are a little bit speculative and a little bit fuzzy.
So we're not sure whether white holes.
Nobody's ever seen a white hole.
but there are parts of the theory that suggests that they might be real.
And if that sounds pretty speculative, remember that until a few decades ago,
black holes were in the same category.
They were the kind of thing that were in the theory.
And a lot of people thought, well, that would never actually happen in reality.
And now we're pretty sure black holes are real, that they are out there.
The white holes might be real or they might just be pretend.
We're not sure.
But that's where we are with white holes is that we're like three decades behind black holes.
Because I feel like black holes, we thought they were maybe real or maybe not.
then we sort of saw evidence of their presence and then only until very recently do we have actual
pictures of them. We're still in the maybe they're not real phase, right? We're never 100%
sure with black holes because the only way we know they are real is by looking at the stuff
that's nearby them. And black holes are sort of like the only thing that fits that bill.
Until recently, now we have some like alternative theories for like what might be going on inside
black holes. So maybe they're not actually GR black holes. And we'll talk about that actually
in a minute. But yeah, white holes are behind.
black holes. Black holes we thought of, you know, in the early part of the 1900s and then discovered
indirectly 50 years later. White holes weren't really thought about it until like the 60s or 70s
when people were understanding the nature of general relativity a little bit more deeply. So yeah,
they're about 50 years behind black holes. All right. So you were saying there are three kinds of
white hole ideas or possibilities. What are they? So the simplest one to think about is the end point
of a wormhole. A wormhole is like a connection between two points in.
space where you can like enter in one spot and come out somewhere else and this is
possible because general relativity tells us not just the space can do things like wiggle
or bend in the presence of mass it can also be like connected in weird ways you can like
stitch it together to say this point in space over here is actually also next to that
point in space meaning instead of just being able to go like up down left right side to
side to adjacent points now one of those adjacent points is actually like some
somewhere else in space, but also at the same time adjacent to this point in space.
So these wormholes can sometimes be like a black hole linked to a white hole.
We fall into the black hole and you get spat out the white hole on the other side.
Take the almost like the opposite of a black hole.
Yes. So conceptually a white hole is the opposite of a black hole.
Where a black hole has an event horizon where nothing can escape,
a white hole has an event horizon where nothing can enter.
It's like you arrange the shape of space in such a black hole has an event horizon where nothing can escape.
in such a way that nothing can ever cross that event horizon going in.
The way in a black hole, nothing can ever cross the event horizon going out.
For a white hole, it's like the opposite.
I guess meaning like if you shoot a photon at a white hole, it'll just bounce back.
You will never reach the event horizon, exactly.
And maybe turn around and come back?
Well, the answer to that depends a little bit on the form of the white hole that you're talking about.
In some theories, it'll fall forever towards the event horizon but never actually cross it.
All right, well, what's the second kind of white hole?
So the second kind of white hole is sort of like a pure GR white hole.
It comes from looking at the solutions to Einstein's equations.
Say you have like a big mass of stuff, so much stuff that you could get a black hole, right?
That's a solution to the equations.
Turns out that general relativity has this symmetry in it, that every solution to general relativity
also works backwards in time.
General relativity doesn't seem to prefer one direction in time, like the description going
forward and description going backwards, both are solutions to Einstein's equation.
So what that means is that like if you have a mass of stuff that can give you a black hole
where nothing can ever escape the event horizon, then it also can give you a white hole.
And like the opposite solution, the time reversed solution of a black hole is also a solution
to the equations.
So I put a big blob of stuff in the universe.
It can give you a black hole where space is bent so everything falls in, crosses the event
horizon and never leaves, but it could also give you a white hole, the opposite structure of
space that nothing can ever enter the event horizon.
Wait, what?
It would be because you have a lot of stuff, but would it be random if it turns to a white
hole or a black hole?
Like it'd be like a flip of a coin?
We don't really understand whether these solutions are physical, right?
This is like a solution to the equation, but we don't really understand, like, does that
mean these things can actually exist?
We've never seen one.
It's sort of like when you're solving an equation in math and you have like an
x squared equals nine, x could be three or x could be minus three, right?
And sometimes that makes sense and sometimes it just doesn't, right?
Sometimes that's like a non-physical solution.
So you just ignore it.
We don't know if this is like a physical solution or a non-physical solution.
One problem with this time reverse scenario is that requires the black hole or
the white hole to be eternal for it to always be there.
For the time reversal solution to exist, it has to like exist all the way back to
negative infinity.
Otherwise, the symmetry would be broken, right?
The black hole is formed at some moment by a collapsing star, for example.
That's how many black holes are formed.
Then the solution doesn't work backwards in time anymore.
That would require the start of like uncollapse somehow.
So it's like the opposite of a black hole mathematically, but we don't know if that could be physically possible.
We don't know if that could be physically possible.
And it requires this weird thing called an eternal black hole, which we also don't know if it's physically possible at all.
So it's sort of like, you know, it's a thing.
theoretical playground. It's like, here's something the math does and it has a cool name and weird
physical effects, but we don't really know if that's real or if it could appear in our universe.
And there's no physical way we know of to like create this thing, this backwards in time,
eternal black hole. All right. And then there's one last kind of white hole here that has to do
with quantum physics. Yeah, one issue is that we think that general relativity is not complete, right?
It can't really describe the universe as we know it. We don't think that singularities are real.
We think that the infinity predicted by general relativity is like a failure of the theory
and that if things get actually that compact, quantum effects takeover.
But we don't have like a quantum theory of gravity.
We don't know how gravity interacts with quantum mechanics.
But we did talk on the program once about a possibility, possibility that maybe black holes
don't actually have singularities at their heart.
Maybe the curvature of space creates time dilation.
So like time moves really, really slowly.
And what we're seeing is a star collapsing in super.
super slow motion and it's going to collapse to some point and then it's going to bounce back and
explode again. And it just hasn't happened yet because the black holes are in super slow motion.
So this is the idea of a dark star, like the quantum version of a collapsing black hole that's going
eventually bounce back. It just hasn't happened yet. Right. I remember we talked about this is that like
it's the idea that maybe even black holes don't exist. Like maybe black holes aren't real. Like you
never get to the actual black hole. You only have super dense.
star that is never going to collapse to a singularity. It's going to explode before it collapses.
And you're saying, I think, that that explosion, when it finally collapses maybe a long time
from now, you can call that a white hole. Exactly. This would be a transition from a black hole
to a white hole. Because at that moment, things would spray out. So you'd have this incredible
source of energy and incredible source of radiation. And the curvature of space would be
inverted so much so that it would effectively be a white hole. So I reached out to one of the authors of
that paper, Francesca Vidotti. She wrote it together actually with Carlo Rovelli, who's been a guest
on our podcast and is an excellent science writer, to ask her about what would happen if a black
hole hit a white hole, the kind that she thinks about these quantum gravity white holes.
All right, and here's the audio of Professor Francesca Vidotti talking about quantum gravity.
Okay, so we have to divide this question into two pieces, because it really depends whether
we are talking about microscopic of macroscopic black holes.
So let's imagine it's possible to have two macroscopic object, one a black hole,
and one is a white hole.
And let's imagine that they are turning around the other,
very much like the black hole binaries, that we are now proving with the gravitational
waste telescopes like Lisa and so on.
So in that case, what I would expect is just to have a merging between these two objects
that is quite similar to what I would observe for the merging of two black holes.
Then probably, I'm not sure what the calculation would give exactly,
but we have a prediction for the ringdown phase.
So after the two black holes merges, there is a specific wave form that we're observing gravitational
waves. There could be differences for a black and a white hole merging, but I expected something
very similar. And the reason why I expect something similar is because in the moment in which
a white hole gets perturbed by another object like a black hole, then very quickly the white hole
turns back into a black hole.
So basically, the two objects that would be merging would be just two black holes.
A completely different story is the case of two microscopic black and white holes.
First of all, it's more complicated to create such a situation
because being microscopic, well, it's not so easy maybe to create a bounded pair
that would merge, like in the microscopic case.
And the other complication is that in the moment in which you have microscopic objects
is not so clear the distinction between the black and the white one,
in the sense that you can have objects that are so small
that are basically at a Planck scale.
At the Planck scale, those objects behave like quantum objects.
They are kind of quantum particle that have at the same time a black
and the white nature, like particles that could be in a superposition of spin up or spin down
or if you want like the Schrodinger cat that could be alive and at the same time. So those objects
can be black and white at the same time. So what you are merging are in fact a gray hole and
another gray hole together. All right. Thank you, Professor Francesca Bidoti. It sounds like she's
saying there are two scenarios here that can happen when a white hole or a theoretical white hole hits
a probably real black hole. Yeah, exactly. And one of them is actually the joke that you made, right? You
might actually get a gray hole. Really? Oh, I should get the Nobel Prize then. The idea is if
they're macroscopic, they're like big classical objects, then they spiral in together. Then when
they touch, the black hole will convert the white hole into another black hole and you'll get like
a really big black hole. Basically, the black hole eats the white hole and becomes a super black hole.
What? The black hole wins, basically. The black hole wins, exactly. And, and, you'll get like a really big black hole. And
And if they're microscopic, if they're super duper tiny, because, you know, there's nothing stopping
you from having a tiny black hole or a tiny white hole, then they're quantum objects, then
quantum effects take over and they can be in this weird superposition where like each one
can be like 50% chance of being a black hole or 50% chance of being a white hole, which is crazy.
And that's what she's calling a gray hole.
Whoa.
Wait, so it kind of depends on the sizes of these white and black holes.
If they're really big, she said, then the black hole would win, I guess.
But why does it have to win?
Why can't it just kind of smush together?
Why does the black hole win?
Because white holes are fragile objects.
They're like not as stable as black holes in her conception of them.
So basically a black hole is still collapsing star.
It's like sucking all matter in.
It doesn't really matter what you throw in there.
Another star, another black hole, even a white hole.
Really?
Like what if I take a really, really, really big white hole and a tiny little black hole,
couldn't the white hole overwhelm the tiny little black hole?
or would the tiny little black hole still win?
If we're in the macroscopic region where we're ignoring quantum effects,
then she's saying the black hole would win,
that it would convert a white hole into another black hole.
Well, no matter like how big or small each of them are.
Yeah, as long as you're above quantum properties, yeah.
And then the other scenario is if we're tiny enough,
the quantum effects take over.
And again, this is speculative because she's using a theory of quantum gravity,
which we don't know if it's true or not.
It's just like something we're thinking about.
In that scenario, you get even stranger quantum effects
whether they'd be in a weird superposition of being a black hole or a white hole.
Interesting.
And this is if the white hole and the black hole are really tiny.
Small enough that quantum effects dominate.
You know, we're talking about like particle size black holes and white holes.
All right.
Well, I guess that answers the question then for Carson.
Basically, Jorge was right.
If the black hole and the white hole are small enough,
then you get a little tiny gray hole.
But if they're big, then the black hole always wins.
And the whole thing turns into a giant black hole.
Exactly.
So it's not really much of a collision, I guess.
It's more like the black hole will always eat the white hole.
That's the prediction, at least, according to the quantum gravity expert.
All right.
Well, thank you, Carson, for that great question.
And thank you to all of our listeners who send in their questions.
We love to answer them here on the podcast.
We'd like you to think about the way the universe works, the way it might work, the way we pretend that it could work,
and then to ask the questions about whether or not they are real.
So if you have a question, feel free to send them to us.
We might answer it here on the podcast, or Daniel's dog will answer the question.
Apparently, it's a pretty smart dog.
He can be pretty rough sometimes with his answers.
Well, we hope you enjoyed that.
Thanks for joining us.
See you next time.
Do we really need another podcast with a condescending finance brof trying to tell us how to spend our own money?
No, thank you. Instead, check out Brown Ambition. Each week, I, your host, Mandy Money, gives you real talk, real advice with a heavy dose of I feel uses.
Like on Fridays when I take your questions for the BAQA. Whether you're trying to invest for your future,
navigate a toxic workplace. I got you. Listen to Brown Ambition on the IHeart Radio app, Apple
podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. From tips for healthy living to the latest medical
breakthroughs, WebMD's Health Discovered podcast keeps you up to date on today's most important
health issues. Through in-depth conversations with experts from across the health care community,
WebMD reveals how today's health news will impact your life tomorrow. It's not that people don't
know that exercise is healthy. It's just that people don't know why it's healthy. And we're struggling
to try to help people help themselves and each other. Listen to WebMD Health Discovered on the IHeart
Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Every case that is a cold case that has DNA. Right now in a
backlog will be identified in our lifetime. On the new podcast, America's Crime Lab, every case has a
story to tell. And the DNA holds the truth. He never thought he was going to get caught. And I just
looked at my computer screen. I was just like,
ah, gotcha. This technology's
already solving so
many cases. Listen
to America's Crime Lab on the IHeart Radio
app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you
get your podcasts.
This is an IHeart podcast.
