Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe - Where is all the missing matter?
Episode Date: October 5, 2023Daniel and Jorge talk about the effort to track down all the quarks in the Universe.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is an I-Heart podcast.
Hi, it's Honey German, and I'm back with season two of my podcast.
Grazias, come again.
We got you when it comes to the latest in music and entertainment
with interviews with some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities.
You didn't have to audition?
No, I didn't audition.
I haven't audition in, like, over 25 years.
Oh, wow.
That's a real G-talk right there.
Oh, yeah.
We'll talk about all that's viral and trending,
with a little bit of cheesement and a whole lot of laughs.
And of course, the great bevras you've come to expect.
Listen to the new season of Dacias Come Again on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
I'm Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, host of the psychology podcast.
Here's a clip from an upcoming conversation about how to be a better you.
When you think about emotion regulation, you're not going to choose an adaptive strategy which is more effortful to use unless you think there's a good outcome.
Avoidance is easier. Ignoring is easier. Denials easier. Complex problem solving takes effort.
Listen to the psychology podcast on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Let's start with a quick puzzle. The answer is Ken Jennings' appearance on The Puzzler with A.J. Jacobs.
The question is, what is the most entertaining listening experience in podcast land?
Jeopardy Truthers believe in...
I guess they would be conspiracy theorists.
That's right.
They gave you the answers and you still blew it.
The Puzzler.
Listen on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
It's important that we just reassure people that they're not alone and there is help out there.
The Good Stuff Podcast Season 2 takes a deep look into One Tribe Foundation, a non-profit fighting suicide in the veteran community.
September is National Suicide Prevention Month, so join host Jacob and Ashley Schick as they bring you to the front lines of One Tribe's mission.
One Tribe, save my life twice.
Welcome to Season 2 of the Good Stuff.
Listen to the Good Stuff podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
Hey, Daniel, I think we've been using too much toilet humor.
mean all those obvious dark matter jokes we make yeah you know i'm sure it makes all the nine-year-old
to giggle in the audience but i don't think we want to undercut our educational message all right
that's a good point let's try that all right well so what are we talking about today today we're
talking about hot gas well uh that didn't last very long
Hi, I'm Horham, a cartoonist, and the author of Oliver's Great Big Universe.
Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor at UC Irvine, and I'm often full of hot air.
Aren't all physicists full of hot air?
I'm just talking about the weather here in Southern California. I don't know what you mean.
What do you mean? The weather is inside of you?
I'm breathing in the atmosphere, literally.
I guess if you were breathing out cold there, that would be bad news.
Because we all know physicists aren't very cool.
I'm trying to make physics hot is what I'm doing.
But any news, welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Horhe
Explain the Universe, a production of IHeart Radio.
In which we try to marinate in all of the wonders and mysteries of the universe.
We think that everything that's out there should make sense to you,
can make sense to you, will make sense to you.
If you just think about it, ask enough questions,
and listen to this podcast long enough.
That's why we try to breathe in the universe and breathe it out
and think about all of the hot and cold stuff out there.
in the universe, even the things in toilets.
I thought we're avoiding the toilet jokes.
Well, that wasn't a joke.
I mean, there is physics in toilets, isn't there?
That's true.
You once challenged our listeners to record their toilet spinning to see if they flush
differently in Australia.
Oh, did they do it?
I haven't gotten any ditty yet, so we're still waiting for the results of those experiments.
But that is serious toilet science.
Yeah, there you go.
But in the non-toilet realm of the universe, we are very curious about how everything works
out there and more specifically what's out there and where is it all can we figure out what in the
end the universe is made out of and where it's all distributed yeah because that is a fundamental
human quest to figure out what's going on out there what is this universe we're in what's in it
who else is in it and what is it made out of and where have they been dropping all their trash
wait what well you mentioned who else is in it makes it sound like you know we're trying to figure
out where all their stuff is like did they lose their keys where did that box go this
kind of stuff.
I was just wondering, you know, so we can say hi, not find their keys.
The first thing we want to do when we talk to the aliens is ask them where they left
their stuff.
Is this your trash?
Did you leave this over here?
Please pick that up.
Although if they leave their keys to their spaceship lying around, I'm not going to return
that one.
That one's staying with me.
Well, on this podcast, we are often talking about one of the deepest mysteries in modern
physics, which is where the dark matter is.
We know that most of the stuff in the universe.
is an invisible kind of matter that we've only recently discovered and have very little concrete
information about what it is. So we're used to the concept of not understanding everything
that's out there in the universe, but it might surprise you to learn that even the kind of stuff
that we're used to, the hydrogen, the helium, the kind of matter we're made out of, is still
something of a mystery. Wait, what? So then how do we know how much of it there is out there?
We have a bunch of really clever ways of figuring out how much normal matter there should be out there
the universe but it's tricky to actually find all of it i see we know how much there should be
but we just haven't found it is that what you're saying that's basically it episode done all right
well thank you for joining us um i can go uh do something else now well maybe the aliens have stolen
all that missing matter whoa that's a pretty serious allegation i mean you're just you know
puning the the goodwill of the aliens and their legality well maybe instead of making a big mess
they've been a little bit too aggressive about cleaning up after themselves.
Maybe it's the physicist who stole all the matter on the planet Earth with the wrench.
In the end, it's not about understanding the universe.
It's about figuring out who to blame for it.
Or who do think for it, right?
Also, right?
Maybe it's good that we live in this universe.
I would think so.
But anyways, it is a big question about where all the matter in the universe is that we think should be there and where it all went.
So today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question.
Where is all the missing matter?
I guess this is kind of a surprising question
because I didn't know there was missing matter.
Did this happen recently?
For a long time ago, I mean...
You're making it sound like an Agatha Christie novel,
like the case of the missing matter.
Like, we put all this hydrogen over here,
and we came back and it was gone.
Yeah, yeah.
There was a blackout, the lights went out.
There were some screams.
and suddenly there was a missing matter.
And we're all trapped on an island with a limited number of suspects.
That's right.
No, it's been a long-standing mystery.
It's gotten a little bit less play and less attention than the grander mystery of dark matter.
But it's still a very important question in understanding how galaxies form
and how the universe looks the way that it does and where all this stuff is.
Now, you're saying that this is actually called, or it's called in physics, the missing barion problem.
Yeah, that's right, because the kind of matter that we are made out of is made of
protons and neutrons, and those are things called baryons.
Berion is anything made out of three quarks, and protons and neutrons are made out of three quarks.
So the kind of matter that we are made out of me and you and stars and galaxies and all the dust,
all the visible matter that's out there, we call that baryonic matter.
And so scientists have been trying to understand, like, where are all the baryons in the universe?
Are there as many as we think there should be?
And when they couldn't find them, they call it the missing baryon problem.
sounds very mysterious and you also kind of make it sound like it's somebody else's problem
hey it's all about pre-signment to blame right right yeah like if you say like yeah it's a problem
i think you're basically saying it's somebody else's problem mistakes were made right that's right
yeah things went missing grant funding misallocated i don't know so as usual we were wondering
how many people out there knew or know that there is missing barionic matter out there in the universe
So thanks very much to everybody who participates in this segment of the podcast.
We would love to hear your voice among the course of listeners.
So please don't be shy.
Write to me to questions at danielanhorpe.com.
So think about it for a second.
Do you know where the missing barionic matter in the universe could be?
What is the missing barion problem?
I have never heard of the missing barion problem.
But it might be something like the way that we had predicted that the Higgs boson existed.
and we hadn't experimentally verified it.
So maybe there is a baryon, some form of baryon particle
that we mathematically know must exist, but have it found.
I don't know what the missing baryon is, but I hope someone finds it.
This is a term I've actually heard of before.
If I remember correctly, it has to do with the fact that there is an unexplained difference
between the matter that existed right after the Big Bang and the matter that exists today.
The barion sounds like some sort of barrier to an atom.
So I suppose if it's missing,
then it would be some sort of other force that we cannot explain
that is holding something like an atom together.
All right.
Our interviews here didn't give us a lot of clues.
This has not gotten a lot of press compared to dark matter,
out of which there have been like dozens and dozens.
of books written and it's all sorts of podcasts or whatever.
It's a famous problem in physics.
But the missing barion problem is sort of like its second cousin that doesn't get top billing.
It sounds like maybe it's a branding problem, you know, like dark matter.
Where's the dark matter in the universe?
That sounds mysterious and intriguing.
Where is it barionic matter in the universe?
It's like, I'm not a fan of Barry what.
They should have called it the dark barons or something.
Yeah.
Or some other name, right?
Shining matter.
Super matter.
Well, you know, dark means a lot of different things.
As you know, dark can mean mysterious, unknown, not yet understood.
It can mean literally dark, like does not emit light.
And it's confusing because there are things out there that are dark and are made of matter,
but are not dark matter, right?
Like a lump of charcoal is pretty dark, but it's not dark matter.
You might think that physicists name things very confusingly.
The missing physics name committee.
So there's a bunch of matter that's missing that we think should be there,
but it's missing. That's what we'll be talking about here today. And so let's break it down.
Daniel, what is baryonic matter? So baryonic matter is our kind of matter. Hydrogen, helium,
all of the elements are built out of baryons because again, a baryon is a particle made of three corks.
Remember corks are these little particles that we think are probably fundamental, maybe fundamental,
but they interact with the strong nuclear force. And the way they form stable objects is either you get a
pair of corks like cork anti-cork that can make a pie on or you can get three of them together
to cancel out a red quark a green cork and a blue cork and that gives you a color neutral object like
a proton or a neutron that has no overall strong force okay so a barantic matter is matter made
out of corks basically right that's the basic definition of it like the things that we're made
out of which are protons and neutrons but it sounds like there are other things besides
protons and neutrons you can make out of quarks yeah you can make all kinds of things
out of corks. You can make other hadrons. There's other combinations of corks that you can use
to make other hadrons. Like you could put three strange corks together or you can make up, a down,
and a strange, et cetera. There's lots of different barions you can make out of three quarks. You can also
make combinations out of pairs of corks. It's a huge zoo of particles made out of cork pairs. The only
stable one is the proton. The proton by itself, we think, will last for a long, long time. And the neutron
is stable when combined with a proton inside a nucleus. So that's why protons and neutrons
are the most common kind of baryon out there. So today we're talking about which kind specifically,
all of them, or mostly protons and neutrons? Mostly protons and neutrons, because that's what
we expect the baryons out there to be made out of. If you have other baryons out there, they
typically decay down to protons and neutrons. Really, though, we're trying to account for all
the quarks in the end. We don't really care if they're in protons or in helium or in hydrogen.
just want to know how much of our kind of matter cork-based matter is there and how much of the other
stuff is there and can we figure out where all the corks went so you're saying barry on matter
barry on which kind of matter it settles in yeah that's right and it's a fascinating situation
to be in because we have all these really clever ways of knowing how many corks there should be in
the universe that seems sort of crazy like how could you possibly have an idea of how many quirks there
the universe they're here they're there they're everywhere how could you possibly count them well i mean
that's kind of basically what you're asking right is you're asking where are all the quarks in the
universe right exactly we are asking that but we're asking in two ways one way is using information
from the very early universe which tells us how many quarks there should be and then another way
is more direct is going out there and actually looking for them and saying can we find all the quarks
that our early universe theories predict are out there and that's where the discrepancy comes from
So I think you're saying that we could have just titled the episode,
Where Are All the Missing Quarks?
Yeah, where are all the missing quarks, exactly.
But in physics, it's called the missing baryon problem,
and it makes up the kind of matter that we're familiar with, right?
We think that dark matter is not made of corks.
It's made of something else entirely.
So this little sliver of the universe that we think is about 5% of all the energy density of the universe,
barionic matter, stuff made out of corks.
That's the thing we're still trying to understand after all these years.
Is there an important distinction between asking where all the baryonic matter is and asking where all the corks are?
Like are there quarks that are not in baryonic matter or is it all the same term?
There are no corks that are not in some kind of particle because quarks can't be by themselves.
So they always form either mesons, which are cork quark pairs or baryons, which are triplets of quarks.
Barionic matter technically probably also includes the electrons.
So if you have, for example, a hydrogen atom that's a proton and an electron, that you could call baryonic matter because it's based on the baryon, the proton, that technically includes the electron.
So baryonic matter is probably more accurate description because it includes the electrons also that bind with the protons.
Wait, so there's electrons missing too?
Well, electrons are part of the 5% of the universe made out of normal matter, basically quarks and leptons.
Okay, so then there's a certain amount of quarks and electrons in the universe that we think.
should be there and you're saying we have an idea of how much there should be there based on our
measurements of the origin of the universe yeah we have all these really clever ways of looking at
details from the early universe and using that to figure out essentially how many quarks there
should be today in order to build stuff up we should be able to predict how much hydrogen and how
much helium and all sorts of stuff there are from our pictures of the early universe and there's
two totally separate ways to predict how much baryonic matter there should be left over to
today. One of them comes from the cosmic microwave background radiation, this very early light from
about 380,000 years after the Big Bang. And another comes from the ratio of the elements, how much
hydrogen, how much helium, how much deuterium there is in the universe. Both of those are very
sensitive to the cork density in the early universe. And so can tell us how many quarks there
should be. Meaning like we maybe start with a guess and see that makes the universe make sense
as we see it today.
And then you adjust that until you get an amount
that you think makes what we see
in the cosmic microwave background
and in the amount of stuff we see makes sense.
Yeah, I don't know that we have to start with a guess.
It's more like there's information
in the cosmic microwave background radiation
that tells us exactly how many baryons there should be.
And also by measuring the ratios of the elements,
how much hydrogen, how much helium,
we can use that to make a calculation
of how many baryons there should be.
So we don't have to guess,
we can just like extract it directly from these measurements.
Well, maybe break it down for people.
How does the ratio of hydrogen and helium tell us how many quarks the universe started with?
So in the very early universe, things were super duper dense and hot, right?
The basic story of the universe is things were very, very hot and dense.
We don't know how we got to that state.
That's sort of a big question mark.
But we're very certain the things were very hot and dense and very compressed.
And then the universe expanded.
And as it expands, it cools.
So you start out with like crazy high energy.
and then things cool further and those quarks form protons and neutrons, et cetera.
And then as things cool even further, those protons and neutrons start to form bonds.
So you make, for example, deuterium, which is a combination of protons and neutrons.
The deuterium can then fuse into helium.
So what's happening is the universe is cooling and things are sort of like settling into place.
You're like baking bits and pieces of the universe.
After about 20 minutes, things are then too cold to make any more helium or make any more deuterium.
So you sort of ran out of time to make deuterium.
So in the very early universe, you had this little window to make deuterium and to make helium,
and the rest of everything is just hydrogen.
And the amount of deuterium and helium you get depends very, very sensitively on the density of quarks.
Like you have more quarks floating around in that window, you get more deuterium.
You have fewer corks, you get less deuterium.
So if you measure the hydrogen, deuterium, helium ratios now, you can tell the cork density back in that first little
window in the first 20 minutes of the universe.
And how do you measure that ratio right now?
Like, can we go out there into space and gather hydrogen and helium?
How do we determine that?
Yeah, you can actually just fill up a glass of water from your tap because one out of like
every 6,000 atoms of hydrogen is actually an isotope of hydrogen called Deuterium.
It has a little neutrons stuck to it.
And that Deuterium is pretty stable.
So the amount we made back then is still the amount we make now.
There's like basically no other natural significant sources.
of deuterium.
So the universe is kind of locked into this deuterium ratio.
When you fill a glass of water at the tap,
one out of six thousand atoms of those waters
has a hydrogen in it that's actually deuterium.
How do you measure that?
You can just put it through like a mass spectrometer
to measure the weight of the atoms.
And you'll see this little peak of some water
that's a little heavier.
But how do I know that's just not the water in my town
that has that level deuterium?
Or even like in our solar system
or even galactic neighborhood,
How do you extrapolate my tap water to the entire universe?
You're right.
You've unraveled this entire science.
No, we obviously don't just base it on the tap water in your house or in anybody else's house.
We make measurements all over the place.
We can make measurements in the rest of the solar system by looking at like vibrational modes
because Deuterium has slightly different energy levels than normal hydrogen.
So you can see evidence for this all over the universe.
And so we see a pretty well-known mixture of Deuterium inside hydrogen.
All right.
So then that tells us how much quark,
matter there should be in the universe, and how much is that amount? That's about 5% of the energy
density of the universe. And this is a number that's easy to misunderstand. What we mean by that
is like, take a big chunk of the universe, like a cubic light ear, and add up all the energy
inside of it, all of the photons, all the dark matter, all the normal matter, all the dark
energy, all of that stuff. And the normal matter should account for 5% of the energy density
of that chunk. So we're not saying anything about the size of the universe or the total number.
saying like what's the ratio. 5% of all the energy in any given chunk of space should be due
to baryonic matter. According to what we know of the Big Bang and the cosmic microwave
background, but it seems that some of that matter is missing. Somebody took it or destroyed it or
I don't know, ate it. And so let's get into that mystery and who we can blame for that in
more detail. But first, let's take a quick break.
The OGs of Uncensored Motherhood are back and badder than ever.
I'm Erica.
And I'm Mila.
And we're the host of the Good Mom's Bad Choices podcast, brought to you by the Black Effect Podcast Network every Wednesday.
Historically, men talk too much.
And women have quietly listened.
And all that stops here.
If you like witty women, then this is your tribes.
With guests like Corinne Steffens.
I've never seen so many women protect predatory men.
And then me too happened.
And then everybody else wanted to get pissed off because the white said it was okay.
Problem.
My oldest daughter, her first day in ninth grade, and I called to ask how I was going.
She was like, oh, dad, all they were doing was talking about your thing in class.
I ruined my baby's first day of high school.
And slumflower.
What turns me on is when a man sends me money.
Like, I feel the moisture between my legs when a man sends me money.
I'm like, oh, my God, it's go time.
You actually sent it?
Listen to the Good Mom's Bad Choices podcast every Wednesday on the Black Effect Podcast Network.
the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you go to find your podcast.
I'm Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, host of the Psychology Podcast.
Here's a clip from an upcoming conversation about exploring human potential.
I was going to schools to try to teach kids these skills, and I get eye rolling from teachers
or I get students who would be like, it's easier to punch someone in the face.
When you think about emotion regulation, like you're not going to choose an adaptive strategy,
which is more effortful to use.
unless you think there's a good outcome as a result of it,
if it's going to be beneficial to you.
Because it's easy to say, like, go blank yourself, right?
It's easy.
It's easy to just drink the extra beer.
It's easy to ignore, to suppress,
seeing a colleague who's bothering you and just, like, walk the other way.
Avoidance is easier.
Ignoring is easier.
Denial is easier.
Drinking is easier.
Yelling, screaming is easy.
Complex problem solving, meditating, you know, takes effort.
Listen to the psychology podcast on the iHeartner.
Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Adventure should never come with a pause button.
Remember the Movie Pass era?
Where you could watch all the movies you wanted for just $9?
It made zero cents, and I could not stop thinking about it.
I'm Bridget Todd, host of the tech podcast, there are no girls on the internet.
On this new season, I'm talking to the innovators who are left out of the tech headlines.
Like the visionary behind a movie pass, Black founder Stacey Spikes, who was pushed out of
movie pass, the company that he founded. His story is wild that it's currently the subject of a juicy
new HBO documentary. We dive into how culture connects us. When you go to France, or you go to
England, or you go to Hong Kong, those kids are wearing Jordans, they're wearing Kobe's shirt,
they're watching Black Panther. And the challenges of being a Black founder.
Close your eyes and tell me what a tech founder looks like. They're not going to describe someone who
looks like me and they're not going to describe someone who looks like you.
I created There Are No Girls on the Internet because the future belongs to all of us.
So listen to There Are No Girls on the Internet on the IHurt Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
you get your podcasts.
And here's Heather with the weather.
Well, it's beautiful out there, sunny and 75, almost a little chilly in the shade.
Now, let's get a read on the inside of your car.
It is hot.
You've only been parked a short time and it's already 99 degrees in there.
Let's not leave children in the back seat while.
running errands. It only takes a few minutes for their body temperatures to rise, and that could
be fatal. Cars get hot, fast, and can be deadly. Never leave a child in a car. A message from
Nitsa and the ad council. We're talking about some missing matter in the universe. There's a certain
amount of quark matter in the universe that we think should be there, approximately 5% of the energy
and matter in the universe should be quark matter, but, Daniel, it sounds like that's not what we're
seeing. Yeah, that's right. We have not yet figured out where that 5% of matter is. And if you're
skeptical about that 5% calculation, know that we have other ways to calculate this number that
are totally independent, right? The description we gave you about the Deuterium fraction of the
universe, that's called Big Bang nucleosynthesis. It's understanding how much of various elements
were made in the very early universe. We have other measurements from the cosmic microwave background
radiation, which come from much later in the universe, like 380,000 years that are completely
independent, totally separate measurements. There we see the early universe plasma sloshing around
in a way that's sensitive to the number of barions and the amount of dark matter and the number
of photons. And that's a very, very precise measurement, much more precise even than the Big Bang
nucleosynthesis. And it agrees. It's about 5% of the energy density should be barions.
But I wonder, are they really that independent? I mean, don't they
both depend on our model of the universe and or at least our model of the Big Bang?
Absolutely. Yeah, there are a lot of assumptions in common, but there are independent
measurements. Like they have different sources. You know, one is measuring the fraction of
deuterium in the universe. The other one is like looking at these very cold photons in the
night sky. They also come from a different age in the universe. So they're absolutely,
they're not completely independent, but they're very useful cross checks, right? We would be
surprised and confused if those two numbers didn't agree with each other. Right. All right.
So then those measurements are telling us there's missing matter, how much quark matter in the universe is missing.
So like most of it.
Like 5% of the universe is missing?
More like 80% of the universe.
If you look around for quark matter, you can find loss of it, right?
Like I made a quark matter, you're made a cork matter, all right?
Your lunch was made a cork matter, the earth, the sun is made out of quark matter.
All this stuff is pretty easy.
Add up all the galaxies and the stars and the gas that glows in the universe.
and then add the harder bits, right?
Some of the stuff that's out there in the universe like we were talking about earlier is matter
that is dark, but it's not dark matter.
You know, things like black holes or things like big massive planets that are not glowing.
These things are harder to spot and harder to account for.
But people have done a sort of census of all of this stuff.
Where is all the stuff that we know about?
How much is there?
And how does it add up?
And together it comes to, you know, about 15, 20% of what we expect.
15 to 20% of the 5% that we think should be there.
Exactly.
So most of the barionic matter in the universe is not in the stars and in the galaxies and in the gas or in black holes or in planets or we think in big chunks of rock floating out there in the universe.
And again, we're not talking about dark matter, right?
We know dark matter is out there and it's another mysterious thing.
We're just talking about the missing quarks.
We just can't find as many quarks as we expect.
I wonder if then you just need to lower your expectations, Daniel.
Like maybe your expectation is wrong.
Maybe that's the real problem.
Yeah, but we have these two fairly independent measurements that tell us that the universe should be 5%.
And this all fits in very nicely with our model of the universe, how it expands and how structure has formed.
You know, we have all these ideas for how the universe comes together from the hot gas to forming these very cold galaxies later on.
And all these things are very sensitive to the dark energy, dark matter, and normal matter fraction of the.
universe. So this is a number we feel pretty confident in 5%. And it gives us enough confidence
that we want to go out there and look for these missing variants. We're pretty sure they exist.
We just hadn't seen them yet. Well, just so you know, that is an option in life. You can just
lower your expectations. And then you can take a vacation. Well, I want to encourage all of our
listeners in the opposite direction to keep pushing forward until your questions are answered. Don't
give up. All right. Well, let's keep going then. So there is a certain amount of quirk matter in universe
We think should be there, but we can't seem to account for it.
Like we do some accounting of what we can see and what we think is there, and it's not enough.
So where could it be?
And how are you going to find it?
So one obvious place to look is between the galaxies.
Like we know there's a lot of quark matter in galaxies.
We can see it.
There's gas, this dust, this stars, is all that stuff.
But we also know that there should be a lot of matter between the galaxies, that there should be these huge filaments of gas and dark matter as well between the galaxies.
Because remember, the universe is not just like all these little dots of stars and dots of galaxies.
It's more like a big cosmic web.
Because as the universe cooled down, it was this hot, dense plasma.
You had these little dense spots that gathered together more stuff.
The universe is expanding.
And then those dense spots see the formation of structure, right?
They seed those galaxies.
But they don't become isolated.
You still have these strands between them.
And so the place to look, the place that our simulations predict,
there should be a lot of quark matter that's sort of hard to spot is between the galaxies.
Because they can't be in the galaxies?
Because you think you can see everything in a galaxy?
We think we know how much matter there is in a galaxy.
Yeah, we can see all the luminous stuff that's there.
All the gas and all the stars and the dark matter.
And the motion of those stars tells us a lot about the gravitational profile of the galaxy.
Remember, as the galaxy spins, we can tell how much gravitational force.
there is on those stars by looking at the rotation velocity of the stars.
That's how we deduce the existence of dark matter in the first place.
We're pretty sure we understand the density profiles of galaxies, which is why outside of galaxies
is a good target.
So you're saying that maybe 80 to 85% of the missing quark matter in the universe might be
in between galaxies where we can't see them or what?
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Most of the corks in the universe are not in galaxies.
Like you might imagine that, you know, matter.
forms in the Big Bang and then things cool and clump together and form galaxies. And that's part of
the story, but it turns out it's not most of the story that this galaxy formation process
is kind of inefficient, that most of the normal matter in the universe didn't participate it
or hasn't yet. Because I guess the stuff that does clump together is kind of the fancy stuff
that everyone pays attention to, right? The stars and the planets. Yeah, it's got the most glitter
and glam.
Okay, so then, and now is that confirmed?
Like, if you look for things in between galaxies, do you find all of this missing quark matter?
So there's several steps here.
The first thing is to look for hydrogen.
So, like, are there huge amounts of hydrogen between the galaxies?
And you can imagine the galaxies is sort of like in these gravitational wells.
You have a blob of dark matter, which is gathered together the normal matter to form stars
and galaxies.
And you can think about, like, gravitational filaments, like feeding into these wells,
sort of the way rivers feed into a lake and gas flowing into these galaxies.
And we know that gas is flowing into these galaxies.
We can see like the impact of gas flowing into these galaxies.
Sometimes it even affects star formation in those galaxies.
But this gas can be tricky to see because it's very, very dilute.
Remember, this huge space between galaxies, millions and millions of light years.
And so seeing these things is tricky.
One way that we have seen them, though, is using quasars.
What do you mean?
How do those help us see?
the hydrogen between galaxies.
They basically light it up for us in this really cool way.
Remember, a quasar is like a black hole at the center of a galaxy
that's actively feeding us like gobbling up a lot of stuff
and emitting a huge amount of radiation.
Now, it's confusing for people sometimes
when you say a black hole is emitting a lot of radiation.
The black hole itself is not emitting the radiation,
but if there's a very intense disk of matter near the black hole,
it's going to be very hot because of all the gravitational tidal forces,
glowing, and a lot of that radiation,
gets funneled up because of the magnetic field of the black hole and you get these extraordinarily
powerful beams of light that sort of like pencil rays through the universe some of them hit the earth
so if there's this very powerful beam of light that passes all the way through the universe it's also
going to pass through some of these filaments of gas and when it does so it changes the spectrum of
light because that gas likes to absorb some light so if there's hydrogen there's going to absorb
the light that likes to interact with hydrogen it's sort of deleted from the spectrum so by
looking at the spectrum of light from these quasars, we can tell how much hydrogen there is between
us and the source of the light. You mean like all of this quark matter that's floating out there
between galaxies, acts kind of like a filter. So you have something bright, like a quasar shining
just directly at us, and it filters through this gas. You can sort of tell how much of the gas
there is. Exactly. And it's even more detailed and powerful than that, because the hydrogen
between us and this distant quasar is all going to be moving a different velocity.
relative to us. Like the further away it is, the faster it's going to be moving away from us.
It's going to be redshifted. And that actually changes the frequency of light that it interacts with.
And so if you look at the spectrum of life from a quasar, you don't just see one dip that tells you how much hydrogen there is.
You see a lot of dips. You see a forest of these dips. Each one corresponding to absorption of hydrogen at a different redshift.
And so not only does it tell you how much hydrogen there is between you and the quasar, it's like a 1D map that
tells you where that hydrogen was between you and the quasar. You can use these quasars to sort of
like x-ray the universe and tell you where the hydrogen is. Whoa. But how often do we get
signals like this? How many quasars are pointed directly at us? Yeah, not as many as we'd like,
of course, lots of them, because there's lots of galaxies out there and in the early universe,
quasars were very active. It's a whole other mystery like why did quasars mostly get formed in the
early universe and not so much now. But there are a lot of very distant, very bright quasars that
sort of like shine these lights through the universe and we'd like to see more of them.
It's tricky, but there's enough that we could have an estimate for how much hydrogen gas
there is in these filaments between galaxies.
And so these quasars basically like illuminate the hidden matter between galaxies.
They do.
They illuminate the hydrogen, right?
That's when you have a proton and an electron together because that's what's going to
interact with these photons.
The neutral hydrogen will do this.
So when you look at this information from the quasars, you can add it all up and you can
guess how much neutral hydrogen gas there.
is between galaxies and that brings you to about half of the 5% that we expected so just stars and
galaxies and all that stuff gives you like 15% add in the neutral hydrogen between galaxies and you're up to about
50% that we can account for that we can account for exactly wait you're saying it's not missing then
that we know where it is well even this very clever technique only brings us to 50% the other half is still
not explained so only half of that 5% is missing then yeah so like 15% of it
is stars and galaxies and black holes and the obvious easy stuff.
Another like 35% turns out to be this neutral hydrogen between galaxies.
And until very recently, we had no explanation for the other 50%.
That part was still missing.
Could it be some other kinds of gases in between galaxies?
So the crucial thing is that these quasar method will tell us about neutral hydrogen.
Because, you know, the photons passing through these filaments will excite neutral
hydrogen has these very particular energy levels. The rest of it, a popular theory is that it's a low
density plasma, that it's ionized. It's not like a proton and electron hanging out in a hydrogen atom.
It might just be like a bunch of protons and a bunch of electrons that are too hot to settle down
into a hydrogen atom. They're like flying around free and they wouldn't interact with the quasars
in the same way. And people argue about whether it's warm or whether it's hot. And so they gave
this stuff the name warm, hot, intergalactic medium, W-H-I-N.
or WIM.
Interesting acronym there.
So you're saying that light doesn't interact with quark matter unless there's an electron
attached to it.
And that's because light only interacts with electrons?
Light will interact with any charged particle.
But this particular signature that we can see relies on a feature of neutral hydrogen.
So photons will interact with protons, when electrons and scatter and do all sorts of stuff.
But this particular method only lets us see the neutral hydrogen.
Why doesn't it let us see the protons?
Well, what happens when the life from the quasar hits a proton or hits an electron is it just basically gives it a boost.
It makes it glow a little bit, but it's hard to know how to interpret that.
We can't see very well the glow from these protons and these electrons because they're very, very hot.
So we think they might emit some x-rays or some UV rays, but it's very hard to detect those here on Earth.
So we wouldn't see it in the signature from the quasars.
Exactly, because these free protons and these free electrons can interact with any kind of photon.
photon. So they generally would just like overall reduce the signature from the quasars. Neutral hydrogen,
because it's a bound state of the proton and the electron, is very rigid about which photons
it will interact with. And so it makes this very particular measurable signature on the quasars.
A free proton or free electron can interact with any kind of photon. And so it doesn't create this
like obvious signature in the quasar beam. We need another method to see these protons and electrons.
I see. The light from the quasar is maybe getting absorbed by these free quarks.
floating out there, but it would just look like it's a little dimmer to us, which we can tell
if it's because of that, or maybe because the quasar is not as bright as we thought it is.
All right, well, let's get into some of the ways that we maybe could measure this missing
quark matter and what it all means about our understanding of the universe.
But first, let's take another quick break.
The OGs of Uncensored Motherhood are back and badder than ever.
I'm Erica.
And I'm Mila.
And we're the host of the Good Mom's Bad Choices podcast, brought to you by the Black Effect Podcast Network every Wednesday.
Historically, men talk too much.
And women have quietly listened.
And all that stops here.
If you like witty women, then this is your tribes.
With guests like Corinne Steffens.
I'd never seen so many women protect predatory men.
And then me too happened.
And then everybody else wanted to get pissed off because the white said it was okay.
Problem.
My oldest daughter, her first day in ninth grade, and I called to ask how I was going.
She was like, oh, dad, all they were doing was talking.
I'm talking about your thing in class.
I ruined my baby's first day of high school.
And slumflower.
What turns me on is when a man sends me money.
Like, I feel the moisture between my legs when a man sends me money.
I'm like, oh my God, it's go time.
You actually sent it?
Listen to the Good Mom's Bad Choices podcast every Wednesday on the Black Effect
Podcast Network.
The I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you go to find your podcast.
I'm Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, host of the Psychology Podcast.
Here's a clip from an upcoming conversation about exploring human potential.
I was going to schools to try to teach kids these skills and I get eye rolling from teachers
or I get students who would be like, it's easier to punch someone in the face.
When you think about emotion regulation, like you're not going to choose an adaptive strategy
which is more effortful to use unless you think there's a good outcome as a result of it
if it's going to be beneficial to you.
Because it's easy to say like go you, go blank yourself, right?
It's easy.
It's easy to just drink the extra beer.
It's easy to ignore, to suppress, seeing a colleague who's bothering you and just, like,
walk the other way.
Avoidance is easier.
Ignoring is easier.
Denial is easier.
Drinking is easier.
Yelling, screaming is easy.
Complex problem solving, meditating, you know, takes effort.
Listen to the psychology podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
And here's Heather with the weather.
Well, it's beautiful out there.
There, sunny and 75, almost a little chilly in the shade.
Now, let's get a read on the inside of your car.
It is hot.
You've only been parked a short time, and it's already 99 degrees in there.
Let's not leave children in the back seat while running errands.
It only takes a few minutes for their body temperatures to rise, and that could be fatal.
Cars get hot, fast, and can be deadly.
Never leave a child in a car.
A message from Nitsa and the ad council.
Adventure should never come with a pause button.
Remember the Movie Pass era, where you could watch all the movies you wanted for just $9?
It made zero cents and I could not stop thinking about it.
I'm Bridget Todd, host of the tech podcast, there are no girls on the internet.
On this new season, I'm talking to the innovators who are left out of the tech headlines.
Like the visionary behind a movie pass, Black founder Stacey Spikes,
who was pushed out of Movie Pass, the company that he founded.
His story is wild and it's currently the subject of a juicy new HBO documentary.
We dive into how culture connects us.
When you go to France, or you go to England, or you go to Hong Kong, those kids are wearing Jordans, they're wearing Kobe's shirt, they're watching Black Panther.
And the challenges of being a Black founder.
Close your eyes and tell me what a tech founder looks like.
They're not going to describe someone who looks like me and they're not going to describe someone who looks like you.
I created There Are No Girls on the Internet because the future belongs to all of us.
So listen to There are no girls on the internet on the IHurt Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
All right, we are slowly piecing together this problem, this missing matter in the universe.
Apparently, there's a lot of quark matter that we think should be there, but it's not, although I feel like we've already accounted for 50% of it.
We started with only being able to count 15% of it, but now we're up to 50% of it.
but now we're up to 50% of it.
Yeah, and I guess 50% is like on the edge of a passing grade.
So you might be tempted to call it a day and move on.
But, you know, some of us are curious.
We want to know where is the other half of all the matter in the universe.
Don't some of these measurements have like a plus or minus 50% uncertainty or error on them anyway?
I guess that's one way to resolve the mystery.
Just be like, well, let's just inflate the air.
And it's no longer a mystery.
There you go.
Yeah, there are big uncertainties on some of these measurements.
but they're smaller than the discrepancy.
That's how you know when you have an interesting scientific puzzle
that you think you have measured things well
and yet you still can't explain that things are not adding up.
The error is smaller than the size of the effect you're looking for.
All right.
So now we've accounted for 50% of the quirk matter in the universe.
There's still 50% missing.
How are we looking for it?
So we're using all sorts of clever techniques to look for this stuff, the whim.
And this stuff is hard to see because even though it can be pretty hot,
we're talking about like a million Kelvin, right?
10 to the 6, 10 to the 7 Kelvin. It's also very, very dilute. It's like one atom per cubic meter.
It's like a billionth of a billionth of the density of our atmosphere. So this stuff is not very
easy to see, especially if it's very far away. And so we're looking for a way to excite it.
We're looking for something that's going to pass through it and get interacted with it in a
characteristic way that can tell us about the density of this plasma. And one really cool way is to
use another cosmic mystery. These things called
fast radio bursts. Something out there in the universe is generating these very intense pulses of
radio waves. Remember, radio waves are just photons with very, very long frequency. We call it radio
waves. If it's in a certain frequency regime, we call them x-rays in another frequency regime
and visible light in another. It's all just photons of different energies. But these very, very bright
pulses of radio waves are created somewhere out there in the universe, passing through all the matter
between us and them. And as we study them here on Earth, we can look at the details of those
radio waves as a way to sort of like x-ray this whim, this warm, hot intergalactic medium.
So how do these bursts of radio waves tell us about this plasma that might be hiding all of the
missing chord matter? Yeah. So you had the basic idea earlier when you're saying like, wouldn't
photons interact with this whim? They're protons, their electrons, their charged particles. And you're
absolutely right. They do. But you need the right kind of photon in order to tell you what you
to know. As light passes through matter, it slows down. Like the speed of light through a vacuum
is the famous speed that we all know, but light passing through glass or through air will move
slower than light through a vacuum. And that effect actually depends on the energy of the photon.
So longer wavelengths of light are slowed more than shorter wavelengths of light. So if you
start with the pulse of light of several frequencies and then you measure the arrival time
of that light here on Earth, you can actually measure the density of stuff between you and
and the pulse because the higher the density the more the difference in the arrival times between
the long wavelengths and the short wavelengths i see but don't you need to know what that burst
looked like before it went through the filter of this plasma between galaxies how do we know that if
these are of unknown origin you're right we do need to know something but essentially all we need to
know is that they were all produced at the same moment or very very close to the same time we don't
need to know like something about the spectrum because what we're looking for is just the difference in a
arrival times. If you shoot a long wavelength and a short wavelength photon at me at the same
time, then I can tell you the density of matter between us by looking at the difference in the
arrival times between the short and the long wavelength photon, because the long wavelength
photon will be slowed down more by higher density material. So I don't need to know anything else.
I just need to know that there's like a pulse created and these two photons were made at basically
the same moment. And that's what these fast radio bursts do. We don't know what's actually making them.
That's a big mystery still, but we suspect that they're being made in a very short amount of time,
like a one millisecond pulse.
But how do you know they weren't made at different times?
Yeah, we're not exactly sure.
That's an assumption.
When they arrive here on Earth, they're spread out over a few seconds or sometimes tens of seconds.
But because of the enormous amount of energy overall, we suspect that it was a very fast event,
though we still don't understand it.
I think I know what you're saying.
You're saying, like if there's a burst of radio waves, like a bright flash of light that we see that was made out there in the universe,
and we measure that burst of light when it gets here on Earth at different frequencies,
you're saying like the bursts at one frequency is going to arrive earlier than the burst from
another frequency.
And that difference in the arrival time tells you like, oh, there must have been some
quark matter in plasma form between us and that burst that absorb or slow down some of that
second frequency.
Exactly.
This effect is called dispersion, you know, wavelength dependent effect on that.
the speed of light essentially. And by measuring this dispersion, you can infer the density of the
plasma between you and the source. But you're right. We're making some assumptions about the nature
of the source. We're assuming essentially that the length of time over which those radio waves
were produced is negligible compared to the length of time over which they arrive.
You also have to know where that burst came from, don't you? Yeah, you do. You have to know the
direction. And so we've been seeing these fast radio bursts over the last few decades. They were
discovered sort of accidentally. We have a whole fun podcast.
episode about that, but only recently have we been able to locate them to tell where in the sky
they come from. And to do that, you need larger instruments or you need coordination between
various instruments so you can tell about their arrival time at various parts on Earth. But in the last
couple of decades, they've been able to do that and gather enough information to estimate the mass
of the whim from these fast radio bursts. At least the part of that quark plasma that's hiding
that we can tell we're using this, you know, method. Yeah, exactly. And, and
You always want to have like multiple ways to measure things, especially if it's very uncertain.
And if you're talking about half of all the stuff in the universe or the normal matter.
So there actually is a second completely independent way to measure this whim to see where it is and how much stuff there is.
And this one is more sensitive to the electrons in the whim.
Remember, we think the whim is a plasma.
It's protons and its electrons and those are separated.
And the electrons themselves can get like jazzed up by interacting with the old caution.
cosmic microwave background light in a way that some people could see and can use that to estimate where the whim is and how much there is.
And so using these measurements, what is our estimate of where all this missing quark matter up to?
So it comes out to pretty close to 100%.
So the current idea is that this whim fills in the gap.
That when you add in the whim and the neutral hydrogen between galaxies and then all the stuff inside the galaxies,
it all adds up to explain the amount of barionic matter we predicted from the CMB and from Big Bang
nucleosynthesis. So it all sort of like clicks into place amazingly.
So then we think we found all the missing matter then.
We have cracked the case of the missing matter in the universe, which is like sort of exciting
and also sort of disappointing.
So wait, using these radio bursts, we think we've seen all of the missing matter?
Yeah, the current thinking is that this whim is that missing piece, that 50% that we couldn't
account for after we figured out the neutral hydrogen component is probably all the whim,
which means that like half of all the corks in the universe are in the whim.
Are in hot gas in the middle of nowhere, basically.
Yeah, the universe is half hot gas.
It's incredible.
Sort of like the U.S., I guess.
So the population lives in the middle of nowhere.
Yeah, exactly.
And so if you want to like make a ranked list of all the stuff that's out there in the universe,
it's mostly, you know, stuff that's very susceptible to toilet humor.
It's dark matter is a lot of the universe.
And then of the 5% that makes up our kind of stuff,
half of it is hot gas floating out there in the universe between galaxies.
Well, it's only toilet humor if your head is in the toilet.
Maybe it's gutter humor then.
But, you know, it's exciting to have these confirmation to be like,
wow, we do really understand what's going on out there in the universe.
These incredible calculations from the early universe that make these predictions,
but how many baryons should be floating out there,
billions of years later are kind of accurate.
And we've been able to like x-ray and pinpoint
the universe using all these clever techniques
to figure out where the stuff actually is.
And it tells us this amazing story
that galaxies are not the most important thing in the universe.
They're not even the most important part of the normal matter.
There are these massive halos of gas
surrounding the galaxies and in between the galaxies.
So that's super exciting.
But it's also kind of a letdown,
because when you do these kind of calculations,
What you're hoping for is some great new discovery, right?
The way we discovered dark matter by finding a discrepancy in our calculations.
This could have been the discovery of something else, totally weird and new.
Wait, you're disappointed that you solved the problem?
You wanted more problems.
Yes, I wanted more problems, exactly.
You wanted more of a job.
It would be fascinating, right?
Like, finding out that it's the whim is cool.
It makes sense.
But it would have been more exciting if it was some new kind of matter,
something else that we didn't expect, quarks forming some new kind of stuff that we hadn't
anticipated, or maybe discovering something was wrong in our early universe calculations.
That would have been, I think, a bigger discovery because we would have learned more about the
universe.
Well, maybe that's why this problem didn't get a lot of press because you guys sold it as like,
eh, we found it, whatever.
It's not that exciting.
And now you're complaining that it doesn't get any press.
Well, here we are trying to get some more attention, right?
So I'm out here trumpeting.
the case of the missing matter and its whimsical solution.
Well, I think maybe the other reason is that it's not really a problem anymore, it sounds like.
Yeah, unfortunately, we've mostly figured it out.
I mean, fortunately or unfortunately,
fortunately because it means our theories of physics are mostly working
and our techniques are clever and effective.
Unfortunately, because it means now we've got to move on to something else.
So maybe you just need to rename it, right?
It's no longer the missing barion problem.
It's just the found variant fact.
Yeah, the once missing burial.
The Beron's formerly known as missing.
All right.
Well, another interesting reminder that the universe keeps surprising us,
even in, I guess, not so surprising ways.
It's surprising that you can sort of make these models
and figure out where everything should be and where it needs to be.
Yeah, asking questions in several different ways,
trying to do calculations from this and from that.
Piecing it all together is a great way to figure out what's actually out there in the universe
and sometimes actually leads you to an answer.
Well, I kind of wish we had read the last chapter
this mystery. I've saved this a lot of time here. This was decades of work and lots of careful
energy and like lots of people's PhD Theses, you know, we're like taking tiny steps in this
direction. So yeah, you can summarize it all in about five seconds, but you know, it was a journey.
And also it's kind of a still work in progress, I imagine. I mean, you have some measurements,
but you can always refine those and or somebody might find something that disprove those measurements,
right? Yeah, precisely. Now we fold these things into our models of galaxy formation.
because we have a better understanding of the density and the temperature of this whim.
We can make sure that it describes the kinds of galaxies that we see, the sizes of galaxies,
the rate of galaxy formation, how often galaxies merge.
It all gets folded into a more precise description of our universe,
which we hope will reveal more discrepancies and more surprises in the future.
And more toilet humor.
Inevitable.
All right, well, it's time to flush, I guess.
We hope you enjoyed that.
Thanks for joining us.
See you next time.
Thanks for listening and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of IHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from IHeartRadio, visit the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Let's start with a quick puzzle.
The answer is Ken Jennings' appearance on The Puzzler with A.J. Jacobs.
The question is, what is the most entertaining listening experience in podcast land?
Jeopardy-truthers believe in...
I guess they would be Kenspiracy theorists.
That's right.
They give you the answers, and you still blew it.
The Puzzler. Listen on the I-Heart Radio
app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi, it's Honey German, and I'm back with season two of my podcast.
Grazias, come again.
We got you when it comes to the latest in music and entertainment with interviews with
some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities.
You didn't have to audition?
No, I didn't audition.
I haven't audition in, like, over 25 years.
Oh, wow.
That's a real G-talk right there.
Oh, yeah.
We'll talk about all that's viral and trending,
with a little bit of cheesement and a whole lot of life.
And of course, the great bibras you've come to expect.
Listen to the new season of Dacia's Come Again on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
It's important that we just reassure people that they're not alone and there is help out there.
The Good Stuff Podcast Season 2 takes a deep look into One Tribe Foundation, a non-profit fighting suicide in the veteran community.
September is National Suicide Prevention Month, so join host Jacob and Ashley Schick as they bring you to the front lines.
of One Tribe's mission.
One Tribe saved my life twice.
Welcome to Season 2 of the Good Stuff.
Listen to the Good Stuff podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.
This is an IHeart podcast.
