Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe - Why is momentum conserved?

Episode Date: July 19, 2022

Daniel and Jorge talk about why the Universe seems to follow rules, and celebrate the birthday of the woman who revealed the this deep truth.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an IHeart podcast. Why are TSA rules so confusing? You got a hood of you. I'll take it off. I'm Manny. I'm Noah. This is Devin. And we're best friends and journalists with a new podcast called No Such Thing, where we get to the bottom of questions like that.

Why are you screaming? I can't expect what to do. Now, if the rule was the same, go off on me. I deserve it. You know, lock him up. Listen to No Such Thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. No such thing.

I'm Dr. Joy Hardin-Bradford, host of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast. I know how overwhelming it can feel if flying makes you anxious. In session 418 of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast, Dr. Angela Neal-Barnett and I discuss flight anxiety. What is not a norm is to allow it to prevent you from doing the things that you want to do. The things that you were meant to do. to listen to therapy for black girls on the iHeart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcast every case that is a cold case that has dna right now in a backlog will be identified

in our lifetime on the new podcast america's crime lab every case has a story to tell and the dna holds the truth he never thought he was going to get caught and i just looked at my computer screen i was just like gotcha this technology's already solving so many cases Listen to America's Crime Lab on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, it's Honey German, and I'm back with season two of my podcast. Grazias, come again. We got you when it comes to the latest in music and entertainment with interviews with some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities. You didn't have to audition?

No, I didn't audition. I haven't audition in like over 25 years. Oh, wow. That's a real G-talk right there. Oh, yeah. We'll talk about all that's viral and trending with a little bit of cheese, and a whole lot of laughs. And of course,

the great bevras you've come to expect. Listen to the new season of Dacias Come Again on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. Oh, I sure hope so. I don't want to get some sort of fine. What makes you want to be? worried about it. Well, I've heard some people who use podcast to fall asleep. Well, I don't know. That sounds

pretty harmless. How is that violating the laws of physics? Well, isn't there something about how bodies in motion stay in motion? I see where you're going with this. That could be a problem if the podcast puts bodies at rest that used to be in motion. Yeah, yeah, that might be a problem like if they're driving or something. Maybe they should get in bed and get comfortable before they, you know, put on a podcast. Then they can just continue being at rest. Then they might be asleep before we get to the main topic of the podcast. Maybe we just put a bunch of people to sleep. Wake up, wake up.

What, what? I put you to sleep. You're the physicist. I take naps wherever I can find them. Tunis and the creator of PhD comics. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor at UC Irvine, and I try to stay in motion.

Is that hard as a physicist? Don't you sit in your couch or your desk all the time and just think up solutions to the questions about the universe? Yeah, but I find that as I get older, a body at rest tends to stay at rest. So it gets harder and harder to get out of that couch. I think a body at rest also tends to get bigger, unfortunately, with our age.

That's true. And we would gravitationally attract more physicists onto the couch. That's right. We expand space time around our waist. It's a weird law of the universe, the no-diet theorem. The law of general snackativity. But anyways, welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge, Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.

In which we put your mind into motion to understand the fundamental nature of the universe around us, or at least to ask the deep questions about how. it works and try to observe the patterns, the trends, the symmetries, the conservation laws, the fundamental rules that seem to be organizing our universe. On this podcast, we ask all of those big questions and we don't shy away from trying to find answers. Yeah, because the universe is full of things to ask questions about, lots of questions that we still haven't figured out despite hundreds and maybe thousands of years of science and observing the universe. And we try to talk about it and to increase the gravity, I guess, in your brain, right?

like information causes gravity to increase right that's true yeah eventually our goal is to turn your brain into a black hole oh no no no we want stuff to get out too that's true that would be undermining the fundamental purpose of our podcast that's right it wouldn't go viral if turn into a black hole but we do want your brain to absorb information or to feel like you are part of this centuries or maybe even millennial long progress towards understanding the universe. When people look back on the path of theoretical physics in 100 years or a thousand years, we'll wonder how far along that path we are. Have we just gotten started? Are we around the corner from revealing the deepest secrets of the universe? Only time will tell.

Yeah, because it's amazing that the universe is even understandable, right? Like we look at it. It seems kind of chaotic, but the closer we look, we start to notice patterns and trends that seem to sort of govern how it works and what's going to happen. It is amazing that the universe can be described by sets of physical laws that don't seem to change in time. We take that for granted. I can do an experiment and measure something about the universe like the gravitational constant. And then I can do that same experiment in 50 years and get the same number. Why is that, right? Why do repeated experiments get the same answer? That's not something we know. It's just something we've seen. It's just something we basically assume as one of the foundational principles of

science. We don't know why it's true, but we certainly do rely on it. You don't even have to get that fancy to see how the universe has these laws, right? You can just toss an apple in the air over and over, and it will always sort of come back to your head. But you could also do it while being fancy. You can wear a tuxedo and toss an apple into the air. Nothing stopping you from getting fancy. Are you anti-fancy now? I guess you could be tossing a can of caviar instead of an apple, too?

I mean, personally, I'm always wearing a tuxedo while doing these podcasts. I thought we had a dress code on this podcast. What are you wearing? I'm wearing a pajama with a tuxedo printed on it. Oh, man. Standards are sliding everywhere, folks. That's right. We don't have a dress code law here in the podcast. That's right. And you're also allowed to wear whatever you like when you're listening to this podcast.

So if you've been dutifully getting your tuxedo dry cleaned before you listen to this podcast, you can now just wear pajama pants. I'm pretty sure nobody was wearing a tuxedo while listening to us. Unless maybe they're like a waiter maybe at a fancy restaurant. You know, tunes out the customers by listening to our podcast. I hope that we have a pretty broad variety of what folks are wearing, you know, all the way from athletic gear to tuxedos with tails and top hats. I'd just like to imagine we're sampling all of the human experience. The same way, we are trying to explore the entire range of physical phenomena out there in the universe. Yeah, but it is interesting that the universe has lost, right?

Like, you can imagine maybe a universe without loss. Is that even sort of like a possible to a physicist? It's possible to imagine that that universe exists, but it's hard to understand how you would understand. understand it. You know, the idea that there are laws and then we can reveal them through experiment and then we can try to simplify them and use them to predict the future. It's pretty basic to our notion of understanding. It's sort of like goes to the heart of storytelling. Even well before like what we call modern science, indigenous cultures just learning about their environment as they experience it are telling stories. You know, like you take this tree

bark, you make a tea out of it, you drink it, you feel better. And it's a story and it's sort of fundamental to the way I think humans think. Yeah, that is science as well, right? Absolutely. It's accumulation of knowledge through experience, yeah. Well, it's a good thing that the universe does seem to have laws because it allows us to kind of predict what's going on and to build things, to make our lives better, and to have a little bit of context about where we sit in the universe and why we're here. That's right. And the patterns and trends that we notice in the universe, they give us a lot of clues as to the fundamental nature of the universe. Though we assume the universe has laws, we don't make a lot of assumptions for what those laws are.

So we'd like to look around and notice like, what are the patterns that happen in the universe? What are those laws that it seems to follow in? What do those laws mean? And why do we have those laws and not other laws? Yeah. And probably one of the most important laws, or at least the most useful laws that we found in understanding the universe and predicting what's going to happen is the idea that momentum is conserved.

That's a law, right? That's like written in the statute of the universe. that is still a law a lot of things that you learned about in grade school that you thought were conserved in the universe are not mass energy energy plus mass all of this stuff you thought that stuff was conserved in the universe it turns out it's not but conservation of momentum still holds as far as we know oh interesting some laws have been repealed like they made it all the way up to the supreme port of the universe and they got shot down yeah well like newtonian physics some of these laws turned out to be almost true True in many, many cases, but not fundamentally true, not actually written in stone at the foundation of the universe, just sort of like mostly working in the scenarios we had tested them in so far, which is a cool testament to like how science progresses. You find a pattern, it seems to be true everywhere,

and then 100 years later, people find exceptions, exceptions that reveal a deeper truth. So when you say that momentum is conserved, it's still a lot, it just means that it hasn't been repealed yet, kind of, right? Like, as far as we know, that's the one that's the one that's, still true. Yeah, that's why we say it's still a law as of the date of this podcast. But you know, in a thousand years when people are listening to this episode, they'll laugh into their hands at our naivete. Right before they fall asleep. But there is something really deep and fundamental that

we're doing when we find these conservation laws. You know, we are looking around to try to figure out like what is important in the universe. What's a meaningful thing? Like when we think, oh, maybe energy is conserved in the universe. We just look around. We notice that. We say like, okay, you have a bunch of energy in this configuration. You let the universe do its thing. And you notice, oh, there's the same amount of total energy. That suggests that maybe energy is like important. It's fundamental. It's interesting. More important than like, you know, the number of ice cream cones in the universe, which changes a lot with time. There's billions of years when there was no ice cream and then a brief flash of ice cream. And who knows whether there'll be ice cream in the future. But nobody expects the number of

ice cream cones to be concerned because nobody thinks that that's an important thing in the universe. So if something is conserved, that suggests that it's probably important somehow to the universe. Well, Daniel, I think ice cream is important. I don't know about you, but it's an important part of my diet for sure. Well, if only the things that are important to you, we're also important to the universe. I think ice cream is pretty important to a lot of people. It's still around. It survived several laws trying to ban. But if ice cream was conserved, then you could ask questions like, well, where did this ice cream come from? Or where does the ice cream go when you eat it, right?

It turns into something else, which is not ice cream. So that suggests that what's conserved is not ice cream, but like some larger category of thing. Anyway, it's the same thing with energy and with momentum. We discover whether these things are conserved by the universe. And then we get to ask, what does that mean about the nature of the universe? Right, because I guess asking these questions, is how we understand the universe, right? Like, it's one thing to notice trends in it, but it's another to sort of understand why the

universe has these trends and like why do certain things they conserve and others don't. You know, what does it mean about the universe? Can we find some fundamental principle that tells us about all these conservation laws, where they come from? The wonderful thing about science is that every answer leads to more questions. You know, question number one could be what's conserved in the universe? Question number two is then, all right, well, why these things and not other things? always leads to more questions which reveal a deeper truth of the universe.

That's the joy of science that the questions never do end. Well, let's reveal some deeper truths today. So today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question. Why is momentum conserved? Okay, so Daniel, do you're saying that energy is not conserved in the universe? We have a podcast discussing that. But momentum is conserved. Does that mean momentum is more important than energy?

That's a good question. Yeah, I would say that momentum conservation tells us something fundamental about the nature of the universe and the nature of space, which we'll get into. The fact that energy is not conserved actually also tells us something about the universe and the nature of time. I think both of those facts that momentum is conserved and that energy is not do tell us something deep about the nature of the universe. But yeah, I think momentum fundamentally is more important. If you had like a competition between quantities and physics, I would vote for momentum over energy. who would win in a fight momentum or energy well momentum is a vector also right so it has multiple components it would definitely defeat energy which is just a scale it's just a number so momentum is a

bigger army I see yeah also momentum has more momentum going for you know that's important in a fight yeah it's momentous right but only in the moment Daniel maybe they should have called it importum instead of momentum yeah I'm not sure rename me it would help there but this is a fascinating question Like, why is momentum conserved? Because as you were saying earlier, this is something you learn, you know, early on, like high school, middle school, maybe even before. Like the idea that if something is in motion, it stays in motion. And if something's at rest, it will stay in rest unless something changes. And I think that when people learn about these conservation laws, the one that's most intuitive is the one that's actually least true, you know, conservation of mass.

It sort of feels like it should make sense. Like you have a chemical reaction. You start out with a bunch of little Lego brick chemical atoms and molecules. And all you're doing is rearranging them. So, of course, you should end up with the same amount of stuff at the end. That's the one that seems to make the most sense to people. And I think that's a revealing example because it makes sense because you think of like stuff as being basic and fundamental to the universe.

It's can't be like created or destroyed. And you hear that a lot in science fiction. Of course, now we know that it's not. And you can destroy mass and turn it into energy. And you can turn energy into mass and all that kind of stuff. But, you know, the idea that a conservation law tells you about what's important in the universe is sort of underlying all of this. And I remember learning about conservation momentum and wondering, like, well, what does that mean is conserved? It's like, what does that mean about the nature of the universe?

Well, in the case of mass, I mean, you just kind of have to figure that all mass is really energy, right? And so then you're just, it's like it's embedded in the question of is energy conserved in the universe, which it generally is, just to be clear, but we've recently found that something. time energy is not conserved. Yeah, it's a nice idea to generalize the conservation of mass into the conservation of energy and say mass is just one form of energy. So when it disappears in the energy, that's okay because it's not true that mass is the fundamental stuff in the universe. Energy is, right? But then as you say, we discover actually the universe doesn't really care if energy is conserved. It can just go away and we can just sort of increase it. So dig into that podcast if you're curious about that. But what that tells us is that energy is not like the

element of the universe. It's more like ice cream cones. It's just like something we came up with that makes sense to us or is important to us. It's not deeply true. It's not a deep feature of the universe. It's not the chocolate ice cream of the universe. Are we saying momentum as a vanilla ice cream

of the universe? First of all, ice cream is not important to the universe only to you and to humans. But I guess we would be saying that momentum is the dark chocolate of the universe and energy is the white chocolate. Well, chocolate aside, this is an interesting question. Why is momentum conserved?

Because we all feel like it's true and it does seem to be true so far. But the question is, why does it get conserved in the universe? So as usual, we were wondering how many people out there think they have an answer to this interesting and deep question about how everything works. And thank you to our volunteers who are willing to answer deep, difficult questions of physics without any chance to prepare so that we can get a sense. for what people out there are thinking. If you'd like to participate, please, you are very welcome. Write to us to Questions at Danielanhorpe.com. So Daniel asked this question on the internet.

Why is momentum conserved? And here is what people had to say. I'm not really sure that momentum is preserved. Because momentum is mass and velocity, a product of mass and velocity. And velocity is relative. So if velocity is relative, I don't know how it could be preserved. because if somebody else measures it, it's going to be a different velocity.

I always just took that kind of as a given and never really questioned why. Why is just because they tell us it's always conserved. But it's related to a closed system of matter and energy. None of that matter or energy is created or loss. It's just converted one way or the other. And since momentum is, in a way, a function of your mass and your energy, then it's just always there. It can't be bled off

into another dimension or something as far as I know. Well, I guess the reason that momentum is conserved is because of Newton said so and Einstein said so maybe both of them. I think all that we've been able to observe so far indicates that momentum is conserved in terms of interactions that we've measured, those kinds of things. In terms of a conceptual reason behind why momentum should be something that is conserved, I don't know if there's any good explanation for that. I'm thinking about a collision right now between, let's say, two objects and why is conserved, so an energy to another.

object is transferred to the other one. So it's concerned because nothing, the energy, it's constant, nothing, it's wasted, everything, it's transferred or transformed. Momentum may be described as mass times velocity. It may further be described as the second law of thermodynamics, or is it Newton's second law of motion? I forget. College was a long time ago.

However, the question of why is it preserved, I think, is something nobody knows yet. I think it just all has to do with the way energy is transferred. So if I were to be pushing something, for me to be pushing that thing so it moves, I need to be adding energy to the system. I need to be pushing it and adding a force and therefore transferring energy from me into it. But just due to the way Newton's laws work, it too has to be pushing back on me. All right. What do you think of the answers? I like the because Newton said so and Einstein agreed. They're like the council of physics

and they decide what's true. Oh, maybe my kids should try that the next time their parents tell them no. But Newton said so and Einstein agreed. But you should go to bed. Two out of two seminal physicists agreed. As if physicists have any voice in anything relevant at all, yeah. Do you think physics in general is sort of done by polling? Right? Like there is a little bit of sense that in science it's about what the majority thinks is true, right? That's true.

The consensus view is important, although, you know, one person against the world doesn't have to be wrong. And in some cases, like one seminal physicist can persuade a lot of folks. You know, if you say, well, Einstein thought this or Murray-Gell-Mond said that, or Feynman put it this way, that can be pretty persuasive. But I guess in general, none of the answers questioned that idea that momentum is conserved, right? Nobody said, like, who said momentum is conserved. Yeah, though some people thought that we don't know the answer, that we have no idea why momentum is conserved. Sort of like, why is the speed of light what it is?

We don't know. We just measure it. Some people put it in that category. I think they've been listening to our podcast and reading our books too much. You know, sometimes the answer is we have no idea. You think they've become persuaded that physics actually doesn't really know very. much about the universe. Uh-oh.

Mission accomplished. Uh-oh. We spoiled the ice cream. It just means there's more ice cream of discovery left to eat for everybody. Well, let's just recap it for people. So momentum conservation means that momentum is conserved. Like momentum is defined as what? Mass times your velocity.

Yeah, so momentum for slow-moving objects is just mass times velocity. And when we say momentum is conserved, we mean that if you have the momentum of a bunch of stuff, and then you let it do its thing, follow the laws of physics, bang into each other, bounce off of stuff, or just float through space. And then later on, you add up the momentum again, you should get the same number. And interestingly, momentum is actually three different quantities. There's momentum in X, momentum in Y, momentum in Z, because we live in three dimensional space. And those are all independently conserved. So momentum conservation is kind of three laws in one. Oh, it's a deal. Yeah, exactly. For those of you who do,

like classical mechanics or freshman physics, you know that makes it very powerful because you get three equations to constrain your answer rather than just one from conservation of energy. Right. But you were saying that it's only for slow moving things, like it's different for other things? It turns out in relativity, the definition of momentum is different from just mass times velocity. There's this boost factor. We call it the gamma factor or the Lorentz factor, which is one for slow moving objects and approaches infinity as things get towards a speed of light. So the real equation for momentum is mass times velocity times this gamma factor. We never notice because the gamma factor is close to one so you can ignore it for stuff that's less than, you know, like half the speed of light or a third of the speed of light.

But it becomes important as you get near the speed of light. Oh, I see. You have to adjust it because nothing can go faster than the speed of light because it has to have a limit. Like you can't have momentum that's greater than the speed of light. You have to adjust it in order to get conservation momentum. Like the quantity that is conserved is not mass times velocity. It's mass times velocity times gamma. And you notice this as you get to very high velocities in order to have conservation

before and after some interaction, for example, you have to use gamma mass velocity, not just mass and velocity. And this is actually the source of a lot of misunderstanding about relativistic physics. People used to define gamma times mass as this weird relativistic mass and say things like your mass gets really large as you go towards. high speeds because they wanted to redefine momentum to be relativistic mass times velocity. Anyway, we're going to do a whole podcast about that question about whether your mass actually does get larger as you approach the speed of light. Short answer is no, it doesn't. Right, right.

Well, I think at least for slow moving objects, it does kind of match what people's intuition is about momentum, right? Like mass times velocity, if you have something large, even if it's moving slow, it has a lot of momentum and it's hard to stop. But even something is small and has a lot of velocity, it's also hard to stop, right? Like a bullet is pretty hard to stop if it's coming towards you. It's sort of like it's a sense of how hard it is to stop in a way. Yeah. And Newton's law force equals mass times acceleration says exactly that. Another way to write Newton's law instead of mass times acceleration is the change in momentum. So Newton's law is force is the change in momentum. If you want to change something's momentum by a lot, it takes a big force. You want to

change something's momentum by a little bit, takes a smaller force. And said in other way, something with a lot of momentum takes more force to stop. Something without a lot of momentum doesn't take much force to stop. Right. And the idea that it's conserved means that it's like it goes somewhere, right? Or like if I try to stop a train and may be able to stop it, but that momentum has to go somewhere. That's right. If you throw a tennis ball, for example, in front of a train, it will push that tennis ball really, really fast and slow down the train a little bit. So the total momentum is the same. The momentum can flow, as you say, from one object to another, but the total momentum has to stay the same before and after every physics process.

Right. And the weird thing is like, like it's not like somebody's like overseeing this transaction, right? Like it just happens, right? When things interact, somehow momentum is concerned, but it's not like momentum actually flowed from one thing to do. They just pushed on each other and somehow momentum was conserved. Wow. What a touch on like deep questions of philosophy. Does the universe like calculate what's happening and follow some laws like it's some big computer following a program or does it just happen and we're observing it and trying to tell our own mathematical stories about it? We don't really know. What we notice is that it does happen and it does tell us something about the nature of the universe. But yeah, we don't really

know sort of like how it happens. All right. Well, we know it's conserved momentum. And so let's ask the question why it's conserved. And let's get into that. And we'll get into the person who actually made this big breakthrough. But first, let's take a quick break. Imagine that you're on an airplane, and all of a sudden you hear this. Attention passengers. The pilot is having an emergency, and we need someone, anyone, to land this plane. Think you could do it?

It turns out that nearly 50% of men think that they could land the plane with the help of air traffic control. And they're saying like, okay, pull this, until this. Do this, pull that, turn this. It's just, I can do it my eyes close. I'm Mani. I'm Noah. This is Devin.

And on our new show, no such thing, we get to the bottom of questions like these. Join us as we talk to the leading expert on overconfidence. Those who lack expertise lack the expertise they need to recognize that they lack expertise. And then, as we try the whole thing out for real. Wait, what? Oh, that's the run right. I'm looking at this thing. Listen to No Such Thing on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Your entire identity has been fabricated. Your beloved brother goes missing without a trace. You discover the depths of your mother's illness, the way it has echoed and reverberated throughout your life, impacting your very legacy. Hi, I'm Danny Shapiro. And these are just a few of the profound and powerful stories. on our 12th season of Family Secrets. With over 37 million downloads, we continue to be moved and inspired

by our guests and their courageously told stories. I can't wait to share 10 powerful new episodes with you, stories of tangled up identities, concealed truths, and the way in which family secrets almost always need to be told. I hope you'll join me and my extraordinary guests for this new season of Family Secrets. Listen to Family Secrets Season 12 on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I had this, like, overwhelming sensation that I had to call it right then.

And I just hit call, said, you know, hey, I'm Jacob Schick. I'm the CEO of One Tribe Foundation, and I just wanted to call on and let her know there's a lot of people battling some of the very same things you're battling. And there is help out there. The Good Stuff Podcast, Season 2, takes a deep look into One Tribe Foundation, a nonprofit fighting, suicide in the veteran community. September is National Suicide Prevention Month, so join host Jacob and Ashley Schick as they bring you to the front lines of one tribe's mission.

I was married to a combat army veteran, and he actually took his own life to suicide. One tribe saved my life twice. There's a lot of love that flows through this place, and it's sincere. Now it's a personal mission. I don't have to go to any more funerals, you know. I got blown up on a React mission. I ended up having amputation below the knee of my right leg

and a traumatic brain injury because I landed on my head. Welcome to Season 2 of the Good Stuff. Listen to the Good Stuff podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hola, it's Honey German, and my podcast, Grasas Come Again, is back. This season, we're going even deeper into the world of music and entertainment, with raw and honest conversations with some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities. You didn't have to audition? No, I didn't audition.

I haven't auditioned in, like, over 25 years. Oh, wow. That's a real G-talk right there. Oh, yeah. We've got some of the biggest actors, musicians, content creators, and culture shifters sharing their real stories of failure and success. You were destined to be a start. We talk all about what's viral and trending with a little bit of chisement, a lot of laughs,

and those amazing vibras you've come to expect. And of course, we'll explore deeper topics dealing with identity, struggles, and all the issues affecting our Latin community. You feel like you get a little whitewash because you have to do the... code switching? I won't say whitewash because at the end of the day, you know, I'm me.

Yeah. But the whole pretending and coat, you know, it takes a toll on you. Listen to the new season of Grasas Come Again as part of My Cultura podcast network on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.

All right. We're talking about ice cream, it seems, Daniel. Are you hungry? Do you need something? dessert right now. That's for two reasons. One is because we record this podcast around lunchtime. And the other reason is that today is the birthday of the person who solved this riddle and made one of the most important contributions in physics. That's right. Yeah. The person who discovered

basically the answer to the question that we're asking today, why is momentum conserved? So we talked about why that momentum is conserved, what momentum is. And it seems to be conserved in the universe. And so, Daniel, I guess, what's the answer? Why is momentum conserved? It has something to do with symmetries. That's right. So, Emmy Nuther, a mathematician who just dabbled in physics about 100 years ago, she turns 140 today, the day we were recording this podcast.

She discovered that there's a really deep connection between these conservation laws and symmetries of the universe. So patterns that we see in the universe are connected to these symmetries. So what do we mean by symmetries? This is a case where we're using the totally normal definition of a symmetry. We don't have it like imbuted with any special confusing meaning. It just means that like you change something and there's no impact. Like you could take a ball and rotate it and doesn't change the ball at all. It still behaves the same way.

It still looks the same way. It's an example of a symmetry. Or you can take a road, which is a straight line and shift it by 100 meters. And if it's a straight line, it doesn't change it at all. Or it's the same road. These kinds of symmetries turn out. to be really important in the nature of the universe and are connected to these conservation laws. Right, right. But let's maybe take a step back, right? Because I think the history of this

is that we knew that momentum was conserved. And at the same time, we were discovering something about the universe that it is sort of symmetric in these weird and interesting ways. And so maybe before we make that connection, maybe step us through like what exactly is a symmetry in the universe. So there are lots of cool symmetries in the universe. One of them, is that space seems to be the same everywhere. Like the nature of this universe we find ourselves in doesn't change based on where you are. If you do an experiment to measure something fundamental about the universe,

it doesn't matter where in the universe you measure it. Or said another way, if you shifted the whole universe over by 10 meters, no one would be able to notice, right? The universe is the same no matter sort of where it is. Right, right. Yeah, that's a pretty cool idea. But I think maybe I wonder what confuses people a lot sometimes is that the name symmetry is a little bit different than what you just described, right?

I think the most people, the word symmetry kind of means like it's the mirror opposite or like if I have a pattern and a piece of paper and then I have the mirror image of the pattern right next to it, then we would say the whole drawing is sort of symmetric because it's the same left or right. And that's an example of what we consider a discrete symmetry, right? You can flip the whole image and it looks the same. A continuous symmetry is like take a piece of paper and draw a circle. That circle is the same no matter how much you rotate it. And there's an infinite number of ways you could rotate it and not change the circle, right? Or if you had an infinite sheet of paper and you drew a picture, it wouldn't really matter where you drew that picture. You could draw it here or draw it there.

It would be the same because the paper is infinite. Right. But I guess maybe I wonder like a more, a better word would have been like, you know, consistency. your constancy of things, right? Because I think the reason you guys use symmetry, the word symmetry is that it has to do with the equations of motion of the universe, right? Like if you apply like a mirror transformation

or some kind of transformation to the equations, then it should stay the same. Yeah, so to totally generalize the word symmetry, what mathematicians mean by it is that you make some kind of transformation to the universe and then that doesn't change whatever it is you're interested in. And so in the case of physics, we make some sort of transformation to the universe

like we shift it to the left 100 feet or we rotate it around some angle. And then the thing we're interested in are, are the laws of physics the same? As you said, like the equations of motion. When you predict that Jorge's apple flies through the air and lands in his hand the same way, if you put your axis over here or if you said, you know, zero is over there. Or if you did the problem upside down, when you get the same answer. If so, then there's a symmetry to the problem. Or even like if I move to Earth a few light years to the right, it should still be the same, right?

Yeah, if you knew the whole universe, right, a few light ears to the right, nobody could do an experiment to determine that that's the case that that's happened because no place in space is different, right? The rules should be the same everywhere. Right. So when you hear the word symmetry in physics, really maybe in your head you should be thinking like a constancy in the universe or like an invariability or something that doesn't change when you move it or rotate it or flip it, right? Right. I like that there's no word in physics that you're not up for redefining and improving. You know, science is a constant project, and so we're always striving to improve. But there is a bit of confusion there because if you call it like an invariability, it comes close to another word we use, which is invariance, which actually means something quite different, right? Invariance means no matter who's measuring it, you always get the same answer.

An example of an invariant is like the speed of light. Everybody measures the speed of light to be the same quantity, no matter where you are or how fast you're traveling. Momentum is conserved, we say, but it's not invariant. Because, for example, you are standing still, you measure your velocity to be zero. I'm moving past you. I measure your velocity to be non-zero. So I measure you to have momentum.

You measure yourself to have no momentum. Momentum is not the same for all observers, though it's always conserved. I will see your momentum is conserved. You will see your momentum is conserved. But it's not invariant. So invariant means something different in physics. Yeah, I mean, I'm not saying you should not use the word symmetry. I'm just saying that it might be helpful for people to kind of understand what's going on.

If when they hear the word symmetry, they should sort of be thinking more about like that things are the same no matter if you move them over here or you do you throw the apple over here or over there or upside down. Or if you rotate the whole universe 90 degrees, it should still fall down back to my head. Exactly. And those are a few examples of symmetries, right? Like if you shift the whole universe over, your experiment should work the same way. you know and that's true if space is not different in different places in the universe if it were different right if space was like different over there and over here if you had different laws of physics over there and over here you'll be able to tell sort of like where the universe is

relative to those like different parts of space that would be fascinating but it seems to us so far like space is the same everywhere and that's a pretty deep symmetry right it tells you something about the nature of the universe itself that the experiments are the same everywhere you go And the same seems to be true for rotating. Like, there's no up or down in the universe. You could rotate the whole universe and you wouldn't be able to notice that it had been rotated. Whoa. In the sense that you mean that, you know, the laws of physics don't change and your experiments get the same results.

Right. But I wonder if that's sort of dependent on space time, right? Like, do you depend, does that depend on flat space time or, you know, would that still be the same around close to a black hole or something where space time is sort of bent or distorted? Yeah, it's a good question. You know, so you might ask, like, I do an experiment here, and I notice my apple falls. What if I move Jorge near a black hole? Wouldn't this apple fall differently? Yeah, wouldn't you like that, right? No, then who would eat all the ice cream? You know, I need somebody else to eat it so I don't gain too much weight and become a black hole myself. It would all fall into the black hole. All right, so we can throw you into a black hole as long as we send a continuous stream of ice cream scoops as well. Let's keep it as a thought experiment. No, that's a good question. And, you know, essentially the issue there is that the black hole is sort of part of your experiment.

And so underlying space itself isn't changed, but the sort of laboratory of the experiment you're doing includes a black hole in one scenario and doesn't in the other scenario. That's why you get different outcomes because you're sort of doing a different experiment. I see. So the theory still works no matter what's happening with space time. Yeah. Although if it's not true that space is the same everywhere, then the theory doesn't hold.

You know, for example, what if space was not like continuous and infinite? What if it had a boundary? As you've mentioned on several podcasts, there was like an edge to it, then, you know, the laws of physics would be different at the edge because space would be different at the edge. Different things would have to happen. So maybe the laws of physics would be different at the edge. We don't actually know, right, is there a boundary to space and does it go on forever? Another possible way that it could not be true is like if space is not continuous,

If it's like pixelized or like a crystal, then it might not have a continuous symmetry. You might be like location is a symmetry up to a certain value. You know, if you take like certain steps in space, you get the same answer. But if you take like a half step, maybe you get a different answer because you're sort of like caught between two parts of the crystal. Yeah. If it's quantum, then it maybe wouldn't be symmetric. But I guess to sort of generalize it though as far as we know, it's it is symmetric. the laws of physics throughout all of space time, as far as we know?

As far as we know, it's symmetric to translations, shifts, and symmetric to rotations. And with a couple of exceptions, it is symmetric to shifts in time. Like if you do an experiment today, you do experiment in 100 years, then you should get the same answer because the laws of physics we think don't change in time. Those are three really basic symmetries that we've discovered in physics. Right. Translation, rotation, and time. And that even applies to like, moving backwards in time, right? It does, yeah.

In the sense that if you're comparing two experiments done at two different points in time, one of them can be further back, but I guess always one of them is further back, right? It's not about time travel necessarily. All right, well, so that's the idea of symmetry in the universe. We noticed that the equations of the universe have these symmetries in them,

but I guess we didn't know that they were connected to the idea of conservation of momentum, right? That's right. All right, so those are kind of like the three main symmetries that we've noticed about the equations of the universe and those are kind of like the more intuitive one but there are sort of deeper also symmetries kind of at the quantum level, right?

Yeah, we've talked on the podcast a few times about other kinds of symmetries we've noticed in the universe and these are not things that are easy to grasp in your mind because they're not things you see but these are like properties of quantum fields and it turns out that you can like rotate different quantum fields sort of into each other.

You can like swap in different colors of quarks turn red to green and green to blue and blue to red. Nothing changes in the universe, right? So we've noticed these kinds of symmetries on the sort of like quantum level that are very similar to these symmetries mathematically. Like they involve rotations, but not in a physical rotation. You're not like spinning anything. You're just sort of like changing labels on quantum stuff. But these are just as important and reveal also something really deeply true about the universe. we wouldn't have discovered the Higgs boson if we hadn't noticed these symmetries.

And again, these are like symmetries or kind of invariant things you can do to the equations that you're like, hey, wow, that's something strange about the equations. They're asymmetric. They work no matter what you do to it. Yeah. It just doesn't seem to matter in these cases which gauge you choose. For those of you who know like electrodynamics, you know that there's sort of like an overall gauge you can choose in electrodynamics and doesn't change the answers at all.

just like an arbitrary choice, just sort of like where you choose your potential energy to be zero in classical mechanics problems. It doesn't change the answer. It's just a choice. So there's a symmetry there to the problem. You can change these things and nothing changes in how you predict the laws of physics. And that's in the same sense. You can like change these things and how we describe these quantum fields and doesn't make any difference for our predictions for how particles should interact with each other. Right, right. And I think we had a whole podcast about this, about this idea that, you know, the word gauge here, it's sort of related. related to the idea of measuring something or like having a reference, you know, length or something.

Yeah, it actually comes from trains because back in the day, people were building railroads all across the United States and they were building them of different gauges. And people thought like, okay, it's just sort of an arbitrary choice of train gauge. So then when physicists were like making arbitrary choices in their theories, they were trying to find a word that captured that like sort of sense of arbitrariness, as you say, like to set a scale. So they chose the word gauge because physicists love trains. I don't know why, like in thought experiments, right?

Yeah, well, it's Europe. It's full of trains, right? Yeah, I suppose it was before the era of the car that these things took over. Yes, that's right. You would just call them Uber's today or lifts. All right, well, so that's kind of where we were in the history of physics. Like, we knew that momentum was conserved.

Like, we could see it with simple experiments. It seemed to work with Newtonian physics. But at the same time, we had these more complex equations of the universe, and we noticed kind of these special symmetries, mathematical symmetries about them. But I guess people hadn't put the two together, right, to make the connection. That's right.

We had noticed these properties of the universe that things seem to be concerned. And we also noticed mathematically that there were symmetries to our equations. Until we got a very special physicist on the scene. And so let's talk about her and how she put the two together and answered the question.

Basically, why is momentum conserved? But first, let's take another quick break. Imagine that you're on an airplane and all of a sudden you hear this. Attention passengers, the pilot is having an emergency and we need someone, anyone, to land this plane. Think you could do it? It turns out that nearly 50% of men think that they could land the plane with the help of air traffic control. And they're saying like, okay, pull this, until this. Do this, pull that, turn this.

It's just... I can do it my eyes close. I'm Mani. I'm Noah. This is Devin. And on our new show, No Such Thing, we get to the bottom of questions like these. Join us as we talk to the leading expert on overconfidence. Those who lack expertise lack the expertise they need to recognize that they lack expertise.

And then, as we try the whole thing out for real. Wait, what? Oh, that's the runway. I'm looking at this thing. Listen to No Such Thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I had this, like, overwhelming sensation that I had to call it right then. And I just hit call.

Said, you know, hey, I'm Jacob Schick. I'm the CEO of One Tribe Foundation. And I just wanted to call on and let her know there's a lot of people battling some of the very same things you're battling. And there is help out there. The Good Stuff Podcast Season 2 takes a deep look into One Tribe Foundation, a non-profit fighting suicide in the veteran community. September is National Suicide Prevention Month.

So join host Jacob and Ashley Schick. as they bring you to the front lines of One Tribe's mission. I was married to a combat army veteran, and he actually took his own life to suicide. One Tribe saved my life twice. There's a lot of love that flows through this place, and it's sincere. Now it's a personal mission.

Don't have to go to any more funerals, you know. I got blown up on a React mission. I ended up having amputation below the knee of my right leg and a traumatic brain injury because I landed on my head. Welcome to Season 2 of the Good Stuff. Listen to the Good Stuff podcast on the Iheart Radio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcast. Hola, it's HoneyGerman.

And my podcast, Grasasas Come Again, is back. This season we're going even deeper into the world of music and entertainment with raw and honest conversations with some of your favorite Latin artists and celebrities. You didn't have to audition? No, I didn't audition. I haven't audition in like over 25 years. Oh, wow. That's a real G-talk right there.

Oh, yeah. We've got some of the biggest actors, musicians, content creators, and culture shifters sharing their real stories of failure and success. I feel like this is my destiny. You were destined to be a start. We talk all about what's viral and trending with a little bit of chisement, a lot of laughs, and those amazing Vibras you've come to expect.

And of course, we'll explore deeper topics dealing with identity, struggles, and all the issues affecting our Latin community. You feel like you get a little whitewash because you have to do the code switching? I won't say whitewash because at the end of the day, you know what I'm me? Yeah. But the whole,

pretending and cold, you know, it takes a toll on. Listen to the new season of Grasasas Come Again as part of My Cultura Podcast Network on the IHart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Hey, sis, what if I could promise you you never had to listen to a condescending finance, bro, tell you how to manage your money again. Welcome to Brown Ambition. This is the hard part when you pay down those credit cards. If you haven't gotten to the bottom of why you were racking up credit or turning to credit cards,

you may just recreate the same problem. year from now. When you do feel like you are bleeding from these high interest rates, I would start shopping for a debt consolidation loan, starting with your local credit union, shopping around online, looking for some online lenders because they tend to have fewer fees and be more affordable. Listen, I am not here to judge. It is so expensive in these streets. I 100% can see how in just a few months you can have this much credit card debt when it weighs on you. It's really easy to just like stick your head in the sand. It's nice and dark in the sand. Even if it's scary. it's not going to go away just because you're avoiding it.

And in fact, it may get even worse. For more judgment-free money advice, listen to Brown Ambition on the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. All right, we're asking the question, why is momentum conserved? And we know it has something to do with symmetries, but nobody had put the two and two together until Phyllis's name Nother. That's right. She's a mathematician, Emmy Nuther, and she was an expert in abstract algebra and really kind of a genius. And she sort of got pulled into a question in physics just very briefly and wrote like, you know, one paper on it and then moved back to a real interest in math. But this one paper is basically now the foundations of all of theoretical physics.

Her like, you know, side hustle turned out to be, you know, the most important thing anybody's ever done. Oh, man. Does it feel like, you know, you guys, like the entire field of physics was stuck? And then they just like, you know, one mathematician had to take like a five minute break from their important word and come and save all of you. Yeah. And it's even more tragic than that because due to the fact that she was a woman, she wasn't even really allowed to participate in academia and in research, even in mathematics, not necessarily just in physics. And then when the history of all this stuff was written, she was largely sidelined. So people, a lot of people have never heard of Amy Neutherland. even though she's, like, more influential than Einstein. Whoa. All right. Well, maybe take us back. So she was around in the 1900s, right?

She was born before the 1900s. Yeah, she was born in 1882. And, you know, the end of that century had, like, important mathematical work by, like, Riemann and Minkowski, laying really the foundations for relativity that Einstein would later pull together in the early 1900s and teach us a whole new way to think about space and time. So she was around during. a sort of very exciting time when mathematics was really informing physics and she came from a wealthy family and had academic background she had professors in her family but because she was a woman she was not even allowed to enroll in university like it's just not a thing that women

could do back then right this is like before mary curie became the first woman in france to get a phd you know it's just like not something that women were allowed to do it's mind-boggling now But it was sort of the way things were back then. Yeah, it's pretty tragic. And she was born in Germany or? Yeah, she's German. She was born in Bavaria. And she wanted to study in Göttingen.

And they just didn't allow it until 1903, when they finally allowed women to enroll. She'd been sitting in on lectures, of course, for a while, not officially enrolled. But then she was allowed to enroll. And then in 1907, she was only the second woman ever to earn a Ph.D. in mathematics. Wow. Wow. In the world, right? Basically. Yeah, in the world. And, you know, there are famous folks out there.

Hilbert, Klein, Minkowski, Schwarzschild, all these folks knew her. And they all knew and said that she was smarter than they were. Wow. These are like, you know, seminal, you know, mathematicians and physics. Yeah, absolutely. And yet there were a lot of institutional barriers. For eight years after she got her PhD, she was doing teaching and research and she was not being paid. She was just sort of like volunteering.

Nobody would hire her. her because she was a woman, even though she was making important contributions. It's, you know, it's really ridiculous. Yeah, that's pretty tragic, pretty crazy. And she actually had to sort of practice physics and teach it for free kind of right, because they wouldn't hire her. Yeah, exactly. Despite her like glowing recommendations from seminal folks in the field, she's rejected from position after position just because she was a woman, Hilbert, who's a famous mathematician, he wanted her to teach because she was also a great teacher, but they refused to give her the position. So what he did was he signed up to teach the class and then he hired her basically to be his TA and then he just never showed up

so she talked the class. I don't know if that's noble or lazy. I can't tell or both. Somehow both. I'm not sure, but you know, she came from a wealthy background so she was able to just keep working even though she didn't have a salary. And after World War I, she finally was able to get an academic position, but they wouldn't pay her. So they're like finally letting her in the door, but like, yeah, but we're drawing the line at providing you any funding or any money for your work. like unequal pay. That's the ultimate inequality. And around the time that Einstein was developing general relativity, people were trying to understand like what did it mean. You know, Einstein had these equations and it took decades for people to like really understand what it means. And one of the

questions about general relativity was like, what does it mean for energy conservation? People thought energy was conserved back then. But in general relativity, they're like, hold on a second. It's not clear if energy is conserved in general relativity, what's going on? People knew that Nuther was an expert in algebra and in mathematics, a lot of which was really important underlying general relativity. So they asked her to look at this question. Right. Because I think at this point in the history of physics, like we were at the point where basically Newtonian physics were being upturned, right? Like we had relied on Newtonian physics all that time. People thought there were the thing. That told us that momentum was

conserved. But now they had this whole new sort of class of physics, this whole new sort of level of quantum and relativity. And so people were like, wait a minute, what's going on? Is momentum still still conserved according to these new sort of equations, right? That's kind of where we were. That's where we were. People are like, well, we think general relativity makes a lot of sense. There's a lot to like about it. But now we get to ask new questions about it. Like, why does it seem that in general relativity, energy is not necessarily conserved under what conditions? Would it be conserved? What does that mean? This is like a big question about the nature of these new mathematical and physical discoveries. And so she looked into it and she figured out something really interesting

and very deep about the nature of the universe. Wow. She took a little coffee break and she came and figured everything out for everybody. I know all these folks who were like paid and had full professorships, you know, and this is their job. They like asked the volunteer mathematician who they excluded from academic positions to come and solve their problem. And she did.

And then she went back into mathematics. Right. That's wild. And it's interesting too because she was surrounded by all these like famous mathematicians, right? She worked with them, Hilbert, Schwarzschild. I mean, these are big names. even not just in math, but also in physics, like, you know, the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole, right?

Absolutely. All these folks knew her and had great respect for her. And it's a little sad that in the telling of these stories later on, she was mostly omitted from it. Even though she made this really seminal contribution, which we'll talk about in just a moment, history has largely forgotten about her. Like, I think if you ask people who made the most important contributions to physics in the last century, you'd get Einstein, you might get Schrodinger. But, like, Nother is up there. Maybe even more. important than Einstein, and yet almost nobody knows about her. Wow, up there with Einstein. All right, well, let's get into what exactly she did. Like, what was the breakthrough that she had? What was the connection that she made? So it sounds very simple, but the connection she made was that any symmetry you have in your equations will generate a conservation law. What that means is that any

conservation you see in the universe, any time you see something being conserved, you don't understand it. What it means is that it comes from some symmetry. right there's always some symmetry which produces a conservation law so for example conservation of momentum comes from the fact that space is the same everywhere if you shift your experiment from here to over there you don't get a different answer that's why momentum is concerned can you maybe go a little bit into more detail like why is that why is it that having the equations be the same here or there result or gives us conservation of momentum well remember that what we're talking about is that physics doesn't change right so you shift

your whole experiment from here to there, you get the same equations of motion. And the equations of motion, if you know anything about like Hamiltonian or Lagrangian mechanics, these equations only depend on the derivatives of your position, how your position changes with time, not the actual value of the position. Right. And so if you take your position and you add a constant to it, you know, X goes to X plus A, then the derivatives don't change because when you take the derivative A disappears. The equations of motions you get when you shift your position don't change because the equations of motion only depend on the derivative.

And the derivative of your position is your velocity, which is closely connected to your momentum. That's sort of like a sketch for why the symmetry in position gives you conservation of momentum because the equations of motion only depend on the derivative of the position, not the position themselves. I think what you're saying is that the equations of motion of the universe, basically don't have position in them. They just have velocities in them. Yeah. Another way to think about it is that they only have relative positions. You shift everything over and nothing changes. So only changes in

position are important. That's what the equations of motion are about. And changes the position is velocity. And velocity is basically momentum. Right. But I guess the question then is, why does the fact that it's the same here or there? Why does that mean that, you know, objects in motion stay in motion and objects at rest stay in rest? It might seem weird to connect these two quantities, momentum, right, and position. But, you know, there's another great advance in the early part of this century that connected momentum and position that told us that there was a close relationship between these two quantities. And that's quantum mechanics, which like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle tells you that momentum and position are closely

related to each other because one is basically like the Fourier transform of the other one. And so these two quantities are like really coupled together. And so the fact that you can shift your experiment over by 10 meters or by light ear, and it doesn't change the answer, tells you something about the relationship between momentum and position. And so that's sort of where it originates. Is that how to pull it all? No. Let's try this maybe. Let's assume that the equations of the universe were not symmetric, right? Like let's say that, you know, you didn't have these equations. How would that translate to momentum not being concerned? All right. So if the equations of motion of the universe depended on position, right? Not just changes of position. Like if F equals

MA here and F equals 3MA in Mars, not in Mars, but like near than in the neighborhood of Mars, like let's say the equations the universe change from here to there, how would that affect whether or not a ball of ice cream right through at Mars is going to change velocity? If you're a particle and you're moving through a universe where the rules are changing as you move, right? then your trajectory might change because the rules are the things that govern your trajectory that tell your trajectory how it moves. So if over here in our part of the universe, it requires a force to change your momentum, but over there it doesn't, right, then your momentum might change without anybody applying a force to it in that part of the universe. And so your

momentum might be changed just by the fact of moving from here to there, where the rules are different. Right. But what if nothing interacts with my ice cream ball from here to there? why would it change, or how could it change velocity? Do you know what I mean? How could the momentum change? Or maybe like, are you saying like maybe the definition of momentum would change? You're assuming implicitly there that you need to interact with somebody to change its momentum, which is assuming conservation of momentum.

But in this example, we're talking about a universe where the rules are different from one place to another. And so you don't have conservation and momentum. And so it would break pretty basic fundamental things, like that things could change momentum without anything interacting with it, that wouldn't break. Well, let's say like here on Earth or in our neighborhood, it's F equals MA, but near Mars, it's F equals three MA, right? Like if I apply a force, I need three times the amount of force to get something to accelerate.

Would that break the laws of conservation momentum or not? Yeah, absolutely it would because remember force is a change of momentum. And so what you're talking about is having a different change in momentum over here and over there. So you'd have to have some like gradual change in the law. between here and there, and then the same acceleration would require a different force here and over there. And so that would be a different change in momentum. So absolutely. What are you saying? Are you saying the ball would slow down or the ball would speed up? In that case, it would slow down because effectively you'd be increasing its mass to like 3M without changing its momentum. So its

velocity would drop. Are you saying because there's no force, then because we'd sort of change the mass kind of, then the velocity would change. Yeah. It gets pretty hard to do these calculations because your intuition really assumes that these things are concerned. Right. But I guess what I'm trying to do is get a, you know, kind of an intuitive sense of what you mean when you say like symmetries equals conservation of something. I think maybe an intuitive way to understand it is to think about just the relative sense of these quantities. You know, like we know that no place in the universe is different from any other place. We also know that the only important thing is not your position, but your relative. velocity, right? Those two really are saying the same thing, that what matters is not where

you are in the universe, but your velocity relative to that stuff. So momentum is important and not position. That's why momentum is conserved and not like location. I think that's the most intuitive way to think about it, you know, that underlying you, there's no fixed grid where somebody's measuring your position is just about how you're moving relative to stuff that's important, not your location. So one way to say that is, well, you can move your experiment somewhere else and get the same answer. Another way to say that is actually the important thing is motion, not position, and that's conservation and momentum. I think maybe you're telling me that you sort of have to go into the math to really understand that connection. Like it sort of comes

from the math, but it's kind of hard to really see it from an intuitive point of view, because maybe we are so ingrained in this idea of conservation. We can't think of things not being conserved. Yeah, I used to think I had intuitive understanding of it until you asked me a bunch of questions about it, and now I'm not so sure. I've destroyed the conservation of knowledge in your brain. But it is very simple mathematically and very deep and fascinating. You can take this example that translations in space lead to conservation momentum and apply to lots of other things and it also holds. That's why Nother's theorem is so powerful.

It doesn't just explain conservation and momentum. It also explains other conservation laws that we see in the universe. For example, you can apply the same thing to rotation, right? We don't care about that orientation. of anything in the universe because there's no up or down. There's no preferred direction. The same way there's no preferred location. That's why we have conservation of angular momentum because rotation is not fundamental,

but relative rotations are. Rotational velocity is important. And so we have conservation of angular momentum because the universe can be rotated through an arbitrary angle and nothing changes. Right. I think what you're saying is that she sort of drew that connection between these mathematical symmetries and these sort of, physical ideas of conservation of things, like things overall, if you look at them at a system,

they don't change. And she said, hey, that's because you have these symmetries in these equations. Like they're sort of one and the same. Exactly. Not just a symmetry in the equation, a symmetry in the universe, right? Conservation momentum tells you that space is the same everywhere. That's a big conclusion, right? If momentum really is conserved everywhere in the universe, it tells you there's no different place in space. Every place in space is the same. It's not just the equations it's like the universe man the universe man oh so what exactly is the theorem like how do you how do you verbalize that theorem the theorem is that every continuous symmetry of the lagrangian which describes the motion and interaction of particles leads to a conservation law so continuous symmetry

like translation in space or rotation in space or shifting in time the original question she was trying to ask is, is energy conserved in general relativity? And if not, why not? And so this was her answer. Her answer was, if space doesn't change with time, if the laws of the universe don't change in time, then energy is conserved. If the laws of the universe do change in time, then energy is not conserved. Sort of blew everybody's minds when she discovered that. Whoa. So she sort of made a bridge between the new physics and the old physics, right? Or she provided kind of the answer that said, hey, they're all sort of one and the same. Yeah, she helped us understand why these conservation laws appear and under what conditions

they do. And of course, for decades afterwards, people were like, well, obviously energy is conserved in the universe. And so therefore, the rules of physics must be the same as a function of time. Now, of course, we know the universe is expanding. And that means that energy is not conserved because space is changing with time, right? So, you know, there's theorem is still teaching us things about the nature of the universe. The fact that the universe is expanding means that energy is not conserved.

And we know why. Because it sort of breaks her theorem, or it's outside of her theorem. Yeah, because there isn't a symmetry with time, which is why we don't have energy conservation. If the universe was symmetric in time, if space was the same size and not expanding, then we would have energy conservation. So we know why we don't have energy conservation, just the same way we know why we do have momentum conservation. All right. Well, I think that sort of answers the main question of the episode, which is why is momentum conserved? And it seems like the answer is that it's sort of like baked into the equations of the universe.

Like it's because the equations of the universe don't change no matter where you put it. Yeah. It's because space is the same everywhere in the universe. That's why momentum is conserved. Well, it's everywhere. It's the same everywhere in the universe, but not everywhere in time. Like it's changing, but it's changing everywhere at the same time, I think is what you're saying. Space is expanding.

It is changing. But the rules of the universe are the same at every location. in space, yeah. There's no different parts of space. There's no like vanilla space and chocolate space and strawberry space. It's all the same space. That's all the same swirl. Exactly. You only get one option and that's one kind of space swirl in this universe. I see. But if we do maybe find out sometime in the future that space is different like at the borders or at the edges or maybe in the next universe over, then maybe momentum wouldn't be concerned. Yeah, exactly. Maybe momentum will be dethroned the way.

energy was. Or at least, you know, not dethrone, but just like, hey, it would confirm Nothor's Theorem actually in a way, right? Yeah. And if you're interested in other weird quantum applications of Nother's theorem, check out our episode about Gage Symmetry, which relies heavily on this idea and which promised to have a whole episode diving into Nothor's theorem. So here it is. But Nothor's theorem also explains why we have like conserved electric charges in the universe. It comes from an internal quantum symmetry. And also to other weird conservation laws in particle physics come from symmetries we see in the equations of particle physics and are powered by Nuther's theorem. Well, I feel like there are two big lessons here. One is that sometimes

even the things that seem intuitive in the universe have a deep sort of mathematical root in how the universe works. And that you should always ask mathematicians for help with your physics problems. Yeah. They're like the 911 of the physics world. We've been trying for centuries. Can you guys, you know, take a break and help us out. Yeah, well, that part of history is really rich with fascinating mathematics that was developed for decades just out of pure interest in mathematics. And then, oh, it turns out to be really helpful and solve important problems in physics. Yeah. And I guess the other interesting thing is here is that, you know, I mean, no, there was someone who was sort of outside of academia, right?

Kind of unjustly so, ingestly so, she's excluded. But she still made this amazing contribution. Like, you know, these breakthroughs can come from anywhere. Yeah, exactly. And we really should have much more diversity in physics. mathematics and in academia because we need all sorts to solve the tough problems that are facing us. So happy birthday, Amy Nother, and thank you for all your contributions. Yeah, for sure. Thank you. Let's all have a scoop of space swirl ice cream and to celebrate her birthday.

Yeah. And expand the space around our waste loads a little bit. And blow our minds with what it all means. All right. Well, I think that answers a question and it tells us some pretty deep things about the universe. We hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us. See you next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of IHeartRadio. For more podcasts from IHeartRadio, visit the IHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

Why are TSA rules so confusing? You got a hood of you. I'm take it off. I'm Manny. I'm Noah. This is Devin. And we're best friends and journalists with a new podcast called No Such Thing, where we get to the bottom of questions like that.

Why are you screaming at me? I can't expect what to do. Now, if the rule was the same, go off on me. I deserve it. You know, lock him up. Listen to No Such Thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get, your podcast.

No such thing. I'm Dr. Joy Hardin-Bradford, host of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast. I know how overwhelming it can feel if flying makes you anxious. In session 418 of the Therapy for Black Girls podcast, Dr. Angela Nealbarnett and I discuss flight anxiety. What is not a norm is to allow it to prevent you from doing the things that you want to do, the things that you were meant to do. Listen to therapy for Black girls on the I-Hawks. our radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

It's important that we just reassure people that they're not alone, and there is help out there. The Good Stuff podcast, season two, takes a deep look into One Tribe Foundation, a non-profit fighting suicide in the veteran community. September is National Suicide Prevention Month, so join host Jacob and Ashley Schick as they bring you to the front lines of One Tribe's mission. One Tribe, save my life twice. Welcome to Season 2 of the Good Stuff. Listen to the Good Stuff podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast.

This is an IHeart podcast.