Danny Jones Podcast - #326 - Navy Admiral Warns Unknown Objects are HUNTING Our Nuclear Submarines | Tim Gallaudet
Episode Date: August 25, 2025Watch every episode ad-free & uncensored on Patreon: https://patreon.com/dannyjones Tim Gallaudet is an oceanographer, retired Rear Admiral in the United States Navy & Director of NOAA. He claims to ...have seen footage of UFO's and unidentified submerged objects (USO) while on active duty in the U.S. Navy. SPONSORS https://cornbreadhemp.com/danny - Use coed DANNY for 30% off your first order. https://morning.ver.so/danny - Use code DANNY to save 15% on your first order. https://whiterabbitenergy.com/?ref=DJP - Use code DJP for 20% off EPISODE LINKS https://www.timgallaudet.com https://x.com/GallaudetTim FOLLOW DANNY JONES https://www.instagram.com/dannyjones https://twitter.com/jonesdanny OUTLINE 00:00 - Tim's Navy experience 04:14 - How much of the ocean is unexplored 05:57 - NOAA Research program 17:08 - Diving with sharks 27:56 - How fisheries are regulated 39:08 - Non-human intelligence in the ocean 42:17 - The moon landing & Room 237 49:52 - Wall Street Journal is lying about UFOs 01:00:10 - Nuclear submarine UFO encounters 01:11:41 - Navy sailor leaks UFO footage 01:27:01 - DARPA's underwater drone fleet 01:33:31 - Diego Garcia: Area 51 of the ocean 01:39:31 - New search for Atlantis 01:52:53 - Learning the remote viewing protocol 02:02:11 - Psychic abilities in non-human species 02:16:16 - Why future humans will live underwater 02:23:32 - What Tim REALLY knows about UFOs Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Your favorite local grocery stores like Kroger, Ralphs, Fred Meyer, and more are now delivering on Uber Eats.
Get 40% off your order of fresh quality ingredients.
Whether you just got home to an empty fridge or suddenly got a craving to whip up something new,
you can get everything you need delivered in as little as 25 minutes.
Get 40% off your order with code Kroger 2026.
Plus members get $0 delivery fees.
Order now on Uber Eats.
Orders of $30 or more save up to $25 and $4.30.26 yet for details.
Choice Hotels get you more of what you value.
Here's a little tune to help you remember.
Same drive, different day.
Don't you wish you were getting away?
Pack your bags and come on through.
Texas, Ohio, Alaska, we're up there too.
Comfort in.
It's calling your name.
Save on the stay.
Oh, and free waffles are yours to claim.
Well, I hope you like my little song.
Book Direct at choiceotails.com.
You come from a background of underwater naval stuff.
So for people that don't know who you are,
I want you to give me like a background into like what your military and naval background is.
Sure.
So I was an oceanographer in the Navy.
I did that for 32 years.
Have three degrees in oceanography, master's, bachelor's, PhD.
And my specialty was to be an oceanographer.
And with that involves in the Navy is providing information and predictions about the ocean,
the atmosphere, space, and even the sea floor.
And all that information is used by naval forces.
We were chatting about Navy SEALs before.
I worked at the Navy SEAL headquarters.
Seals use environmental information like nobody else because they live and die by it.
If they're in the water, let's say they're a submarine or seal delivery vehicle,
a mini-sub, currents, wave heights, temperature.
All those missions are limited by temperature.
Everyone hipes out after those missions.
They're long-duration missions.
The subs flooded.
environmental information for the Navy. I served on aircraft carriers, hydrographic ships, amphibious assault
ships, and in the Pentagon directing all that kind of activity. So, but you grew up in Southern California
kind of like just by the ocean, always, always around this type of, was it San Diego you were around?
No, I grew up in L.A. And I did live in San Diego a lot of my career. But like you, we'd go to the
beach every summer and vacation there. And so just, I was a swimmer too. So, so. I was a swimmer, too.
So like to body surf.
Not a good surfer, but tried.
And it bodyboarded too.
And I just loved being in the waves.
And that's when I knew.
I want to work on the sea and study it.
So the first thing you did once you got into the military was what again?
So I went to the Naval Academy.
Naval Academy.
Yeah.
That's what it was.
Okay.
And then you were working with Navy SEALs doing some SEAL training stuff?
Actually, so backing up.
I didn't really go into the Navy because I,
I thought I wanted to be a naval officer.
I wanted to be an oceanographer, and I wanted to get a Ph.D. in oceanography.
There's this institution in La Jolla called Scripps.
And as a swimmer, I'd go down there every year as a high schooler,
and we compete in their annual roughwater swim.
And it was very popular, one of the biggest rough water swims in the country.
And it was across the La Jolla Cove was Scripps Pier.
And I thought, what's that place?
And I did some research, and I realized these people study the ocean,
and there's so much we don't know about the ocean,
I thought, that's it, I'm going to do that.
I want to go there and get a degree.
And then I realized the Naval Academy
had one scholarship available every year
to go get a master's degree at Scripps.
And I did some more research and thought,
that's what I want to do.
I get that scholarship from the academy,
and then after that I'd figure out what was next.
And that's what I did.
So after you get the scholarship on within oceanography,
how did that lead into all of this other stuff
with like Navy submarines and Navy SEALs and then eventually into this UAP research.
Yeah.
Well, first thing first is that that was my career choice.
So it's a specialty in the Navy, Navy Oceanography Officer, and there's only about 400 less
or so in the Navy, and they do all these things, and they work with seals, they work with
submarine community, they work on a lot of aviation capable ships to predict weather, and then
And they also work with intelligence agencies to map the sea floor and do other things.
I can't talk about.
But a big part of intelligence collection for undersea warfare, this community, the Navy does.
And so that was my career path is to jump around and do things in that specialty.
So I started on aircraft carriers, I mentioned.
Two combat tours, by the way, which were exciting and we could talk about.
Wow.
We were supporting ground forces and flying strikes into Iraq and Afghanistan.
So our ship was relatively safe.
I wasn't in combat per se, even though I think Saddam Hussein might have lobbed a few missiles in our way.
But we had a good air defense capability.
But ultimately, those were pretty exciting tours for sure.
Is it true we've only mapped like 5% of the seafloor?
So we have mapped 25% of the seaflobally.
Yeah.
But that means 75% is not mapped.
That's a lot of ocean floor.
We don't even know what it's like.
I was looking on Instagram yesterday.
someone posted an image of the Pacific Ocean, you can literally look at the Earth from one angle and see no land. It's just all ocean. That's right. Yes. Literally half of the year. I've sailed across that a lot of times and it is a long haul. Yes. It's pretty crazy when you think about it. This is this is a water world. Oh yeah. Right? There's way more water than land. 70% of the ocean is covered by water. But the key statistic is, so that's the seafloor, the volume of the ocean. We've barely explored 10.000.
10% of it. So 90% of the volume of the oceans never been explored with a remotely operated
vehicle or a diver or even a drone, ocean drones. So that's a lot of the ocean that we know
nothing about. That's insane. So we've studied more of the moon than we have of our own oceans.
Oh yeah. Pretty much. Yeah, we mapped the surface of the moon and Mars to a higher resolution
on the sea floor, which is beyond me. And that was kind of my campaign as a oceanographer is trying
to get us funded certainly when I led NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
So they're the top ocean agency, and I was always trying to get us to get funding like NASA did.
NASA always still is just, they have a lot of appeal, and I'm not going to criticize NASA,
but you'd think we'd want to dedicate it as much funding or to explore our own world and
understand it.
And so, yeah, that's something I've been, it's kind of a theme in my career.
Yeah, no, I've always used NOAA to change.
check like wind patterns and swell patterns and stuff to check surf. But like other than that,
what kind of stuff does Noah do? Oh, well, on the ocean related things, there's a couple really
important services they provide. One is for all seaports and coastal areas, they run an operational
ocean forecast system. So it's currents, it's tide levels and temperatures and wind, of course.
And that's really important for pilots to go in and out of port. And our
Seaports contribute almost 25% of our GDP is material going in and out of seaports.
And then that's also tourism and recreation on the coast.
You know this?
So they're providing rip current forecasts and weather too, of course.
And that saves lives.
It's crazy that 100 people a year die from rip currents.
That's crazy.
Is that nuts or what?
That is nuts.
I get caught in rip currents every time I surf.
Yeah.
But if you're on board, it's easy, obviously.
rather than you're swimming when you're swimming.
And so another thing Noah does I'm really a fan of is in the ocean.
It's this program to explore the oceans, the ocean exploration and research program.
And what they do is they have a dedicated ship with a deep diving remotely operated vehicle
with cameras and sonar and robotic arms to take samples.
And they're all over the world every year exploring places we don't know anything about.
And the same office funds, other explorers with their ships.
So right now, Bob Ballard, the guy who discovered Titanic, a friend of mine,
had been on his ship.
He is in this area of the Pacific called Iron Bottom Sound off of the Solomon Islands,
where in World War II, 1942 specifically, we were fighting major battles against the Japanese,
and we were getting our butts kicked.
And so some of a lot of the U.S. fleet and Australian ships are down there.
And he's characterizing all that with the ROV.
and it's really interesting stuff for iron bottom sound yeah how deep is it i don't know uh it's well
their rov is rated to 6 000 meters so it's less than 6 000 meters um not sure exactly but
but deeper than a diver go have you ever um sail on any nuclear submarines like like um any of the
columbia class or the ohio class subs uh actually i i was on an ohio class but it was more of a
training cruise when I was a midshipman. And then I was on LA, Los Angeles, attack submarine,
both nuclear as a training cruise as well. And then actually I went up to- Oh, the Columbia class are
the new ones. The Ohio ones are the old ones. That's right. That's right. So I don't even know if
they're done building the Columbia class ones. I don't think they are. I just saw, we saw a report a
couple months ago that they were spending like, it was like two and a half billion dollars per sub and
they were doing like a few dozen of them. Yeah, that's a big hefty bill. Yeah. Yes. But I did go up
in the Arctic for when I was a one-star admiral.
Often when you're at that level, they'll go all around the Navy because you need to,
you're the Navy spokesman when you become an admiral.
And so you really, it's important to learn about all that you're doing to support the Navy.
And I had a team of scientists and sailors up in the Arctic supporting the submarine exercise
where they built a camp and some subs punched through the ice cap.
And I got to go on one of those submarines.
Really?
The USS Hampton.
Yeah.
It was quite an experience.
This is interesting because those camps right there, they have to set them up in one day.
And I mean, it gets down to 40 below.
And if your skin is exposed to 40 below for just a few seconds, you could get frostbite.
It's real dangerous stuff.
Steve, find a photo of one of those submarines punching through the ice in the And Arctic.
When you got in that same.
I actually have a selfie of me.
Do you really?
I can get that to you.
Oh, really?
Yeah.
Please do.
So when you get on that submarine, where do you leave from?
And how long does it take to get to the Arctic?
Well, I had the easy one because I flew up to this.
I flew up there to Ukiivik.
It used to be called Barrow.
And, yeah, that's what we saw.
Isn't that great?
It's some badass stuff for sure.
And that's what, and it's important now because Russia is challenging us everywhere they can.
And China, too.
And China's sending ships up there.
So we have to, it's important for us to have a presence and a capability.
And that's what the purpose of the exercise was is to,
have the submarine practice.
Actually, there was a British sub up there too.
And they were doing tactics and maneuvers against each other, testing out various procedures
and their sonar equipment, trying to find each other, basically.
It's the training we do just to stay ahead.
Yeah.
And the amount of what I learned in the last probably year or two was that these subs carry
like up to 50, maybe.
40 or 50 nuclear warheads on them, all of them.
Oh, I forgot the number, but that's about right.
There's a large amount because they're, they're all mirved.
So they all have like four, four or six nuclear warheads on each missile.
And there's like at least, at least two dozen of these rockets that are on each one of these subs.
Yeah, that's right.
And the ocean.
So those are the ballistic missile subs, not the attack subs.
They're different.
The subs I was on, what's an attack sub?
What's the difference?
So attack sub carries toward.
torpedoes and vertical launched.
Some I think they have, no.
Some have Tomahawk missiles, I believe, but primarily torpedoes with a main mission to do undersea warfare, attack and kill other submarines.
And ships.
And ships.
Right.
And then there's other submarines that basically have on the top of them, they're just lined with warhead, missiles with warheads on them.
And they're, they launch them from underwater and then they go into the atmosphere and then the Mervs come out and they hit their predetermined.
program targets, right? Yeah, big Cold War mission, but still one today too.
Yeah, Annie Jameson did this book last year. She led out called Nuclear War.
I saw the show. Oh, you watched that. I watched it part it. It's terrifying.
Absolutely terrifying. And she shows there's a graphic of all the submarine highways around the
world. And there's Russian and Chinese submarines that are patrolling off of our coasts in
Florida, California. Right here, here it is. So Russian are the Russian, the Russian
Navy are the dark black
dashes and the Chinese like the light dots
and the undersea cables are the
lines but that's insane
if you look at all those submarine highways
right off the coast of California
right off the coast of Florida
and North Carolina
and
that's insane
how do they not like run into each other there's so many of them
yes that's a
well there's I mean
the Caribbean is littered
with nuclear subs
Well, it's, our submarines are really good. And I've seen video, for example, of our subs under adversary submarine and the periscopes up and they're videoing their propellers of the adversary. And I can't, this was a while ago, but I better not. And that, but you could say, you could expect who it was. It was in late 80s. And the, the submarine, they didn't know we were doing that.
that. So we've gone, there's a great book out there. I recommend people read if they are into
this topic called Blind Man's Bluff. And it's- I had that book sitting on my nightstand right now.
You should read it. I want to read it. And the interesting thing about that book. So it's basically
the whole cat and mouse game of the Cold War under with submarines and tapping into undersea cables
using divers that deploy from submarines. What? Yes, yes. While they're deep, while the submarines are
underwater? Well, it's some
during the terminals, at the
terminals where the sun undersea cables
make landfall,
if you will. There's
shallow areas before it.
That's where the Russians and we
were tapping
undersea cables to basically spy
on the communications. How deep are we talking?
So I don't recall
the exact depth, but these are depths divers
could do. Okay. So probably
less than 200 feet. Okay. And
some of the missions I think were more
extreme. Ultimately, we were both doing it to each other. But, and I'll just say this. So that book was,
I think, released in the 90s and a lot of that information I think has been declassified for those
ops in that time. But to say that we don't do that today would be, I think, myopic.
If you're like me and can use some extra peace of mind, then it might be time to try cornbread hemp's
CBD gummies. Sometimes I just don't want to be blitzed. And cornbreads gummies are a backdoor to
relief without the mental effects. I take cornbread gummies when I feel stressed or I take their
sleep gummies when I can't sleep and all I do is just wait for the beautiful calmness to wash over my
body. It's quite a comforting experience. Cornbread hemp uses the best part of the hemp plant,
the flour for the purest potent CBD. They curate effects that specifically help with stress and
discomfort and I find the result to be remarkably effective. They also have formulas specifically for
sleeplessness too. There's no fillers or junk. It's just
Full spectrum goodness.
They've made CBD their specialty.
My favorite flavor is berry, but they have several flavors,
including capsules if you don't want the sugar.
Their products are third-party tested and USDA organic to ensure safety and purity.
If you ever experience stress like I have,
then you might want to check out cornbread CBD.
You can thank me later.
And for a limited time, they're offering you lucky listeners 30% off your first order.
Don't miss out on this.
Just go to cornbread hemp.com slash Danny and use my
promo code Danny at checkout.
That's cornbread hemp.com slash
Danny and use the code D-A-N-N-Y to get 30% off your first order.
And thank you to cornbread hemp for sponsoring this episode.
There was a spot in the Gulf or I forget where it was exactly.
It was down south from here, maybe 100 miles, 50 to 100 miles offshore where these people
were free diving, these cables, like giant cables that are underwater in the
golf and there's all kinds of fish. Oh yeah. And like Goliath grouper and stuff on them. Yeah,
yeah. They like structure. Have you ever done on an oil rig? I have not, but it looks absolutely
terrifying. I can get no, no. It's just, it's like you said, it's like those cables. There's all these
giant pelagic fish, sharks, tuna, permit. It's really, it's awesome. I have friends that go up to like
the northern panhandle and they, they'll fish up there and they'll catch all kinds of like tuna and like sailfish and all
kinds of crazy stuff off of those oil rigs.
But I don't think those guys have the balls to jump in the water.
Oh, no, it's not that heavy.
It's not a hard dive at all.
Really?
In fact, I should have brought my wife on this podcast because she was a Navy diver.
Uh-huh.
And so she's done the really hard diving, recovering aircraft.
Really?
Yes, yes.
This is heavy lifting out from the ocean.
And that's what salvaged divers do.
And so she had two tours like that.
I had a guy on here a couple of years ago who worked for the Department of Transportation
and he was at the diver that was in charge of inspecting all the bridges around Florida.
Wow. Okay.
So he had to dive every single bridge that exists in the state and inspect all the piling,
the structural integrity of all of them.
I don't know how often he had to do each one.
But he said, I asked him out of all the bridges what was the scariest one.
And he said it was the one that was like two miles away from here in John's Pass in Madeira Beach.
Oh, wow.
Very narrow pass.
But it's so narrow.
so deep and there's so much crazy like rubble and structures underneath the deepest part of it he's like
first of all there's like ungodly amounts of bull sharks second of all like the water's moving so
fast it's crazy he's like you could easily like get snagged on some rebar back down there and be and drown
that's scary diving when you have all these obstructions and a current swift moving current and
what was the visibility poor too very low so that's and bull sharks low visibility bad combination yes
In fact, not near here.
On the other side of Florida, I went with my daughter to go free dive with sharks.
And that particular day, there happened to be about 18 bull sharks.
But if it's out in the Gulf, so it's super 100 foot of disability.
Yeah.
And they have a big.
You mean the Atlantic on the other side?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Golf stream, gotcha.
And so when they put a bay crate down and the visibility is 100 feet, they're not interested in you.
They're like dogs on a scent and they'll stay away.
from you. And it's a pretty awesome dive to go do that and see sharks up so close. But
yeah, you don't want to mess with bull sharks when the visibility's bad because then they get
confused. But that was a fun day because we, at one point, a hammerhead came swimming through
and he saw all these bulls around him and he just got out of dodge. Yeah. Yeah, it's gotten so bad.
The sharks have gotten so bad in Florida that you can go out there and all these, all the
spear fishermen have to do is just start popping their bands.
Oh, yeah.
And the sharks just appear everywhere.
It's really crazy.
Where do you surf?
I surf all around, mainly on the East Coast, like between Daytona Beach and Sebastian.
Oh, okay, okay.
Sometimes a little bit down, a little bit farther south, like Fort Pierce, but, and then obviously here in, when was it?
It was like September, October of last year.
We had the hurricane, so we got like some really good waves for the hurricane swells.
but um but yeah no the um the sharks have been have been out of control here lately and i think it has a lot to do
with the spear fishermen yeah well they'll bait sharks in they'll bait bull sharks in just so they
can like shoot big cobia off the top of them or whatever and it's like these people are nuts
these people have like you do not want to be in the water no exactly no it's crazy and then you know
in uh new sumerna beach which is a really popular beach in right south of detona there are an
It's the shark attack capital of the world.
Really?
Yeah.
But they're like little spinner sharks and black tip sharks like yay big.
You'll have to go to the hospital.
You'll get a pretty severe like laceration to your leg or your foot.
Oh gosh.
Some guy just got his hand bitten like in half two days ago.
But, you know, they're not like great whites or tiger sharks or anything like that.
So I was telling Steve, when I was at Noah, we had a lot of great scientists doing neat things.
And I found some scientists in La Jolla, fisheries biologists.
and they share with me some video of them
and every year for 20 years
they'd been going to Guadalupe Island, Mexico,
up Baja, to document
these white sharks there.
And what they do is
they would photo ID them
diving in steel cages.
And the science was cool
because basically the line between
a white shark's top
and underbelly,
which is white,
is kind of jagged
and it's unique to each individual.
So the pattern along that border
is sort of like zebra striped.
You can identify individuals.
And so, because everyone's different.
It's kind of like someone's eye for face or recognition.
And so they were documenting new individuals every time.
Anyways, they were diving with great white sharks, and I saw the video, and I thought,
oh, my God, I got to do this.
And, of course, I submit a request or I asked the lawyers to review it,
and they all wagged their finger at me and said, no, no, no.
You know, you going down there for five days to dive with white sharks?
That's going to look really bad.
those are bad optics for ethics, government ethics.
Really?
Oh, yeah.
So the way the environment is now, okay, if I were to do that,
anybody, I work for Trump.
So you can be sure every Democrat in the Senate would say I was waste, fraud,
and abuse of government money to go down and boondoggle to go diving for five days.
Oh, Jesus.
Which is legitimate.
This is, this is, you got to.
There's $21 trillion missing from the Pentagon.
What's a shark dive?
Good point.
Okay.
I would have been doing good science. You're right. But ultimately, you always got to see, well, I had to always see why, if you will, just make sure I didn't misstep. Ultimately, after I left, my wife being former Navy diver, she said, let's go do it. And we signed up and did it, got in November of 2021. And it was, I remember thinking this. So our plan was to leave Ensenada. It takes a whole day to get out to Guadalupe, three days in the water with sharks, and then one day back. And I thought three days doing the same thing. We've done. We've done. We've done.
I've dived all over the world on different reefs, and I thought, I might get bored after this.
And then, of course, the moment we get in the water with these animals, it was just I wanted, and didn't want a leaf.
It was just so interesting to see these giant bus-sized creatures that have all the reputation and drama associated with them in their native habitat.
Right.
And just doing what they do, and it being so close to touch almost.
And so now I told people this, now I know why bungee jumpers and adrenaline junkies do what they do.
Because I could not wait to get back in the water.
I don't know to leave.
I was going to be there all day if I could.
And I still would.
White sharks up close and personal.
Yeah.
I'm less afraid of white sharks than I am of bulls and tigers because I don't think white sharks, unless it was a really hungry, hungry white shark.
It would want to eat and consume a human.
But I think there's been plenty of evidence of tiger sharks just devouring human beings.
Yeah.
And it's an interesting thing, no, because like any interaction, you really have to understand the animal's behavior and the situation and environment.
So, for example, I like that we're talking about this.
My wife and I.
We'll talk about UFOs, but we'll get there eventually, folks.
My wife and I went to Fiji recently, and this is so interesting.
like a lot of places in the wild,
there's a resident female tiger shark there.
And the way they've built up the dive location is
they've built a little wall under on the seafloor
and the divers will have you all sit and kneel on the sand behind it.
And then the professional divers, the guides,
they have a big steel box with tuna and fishheads.
And they'll get out there,
all in chain mail, which is really interesting to see a guy in full diving steel, and then they'll
start feeding the animal. And just this sure enough, like clockwork, like ringing a dinner bell,
this big mama tiger shark would swim along and come there and eat her tuna and then leave.
And so she made a couple's passes. We got all these really close pictures. And of course,
the divers were all good. They got these big steel prongs making sure the tiger didn't get too
close to us. But ultimately, it's a chance to go witness a tiger like that where you could almost
touch it, which is pretty awesome. It's pretty awesome. There's also a lady in Hawaii who does this.
I think there's a Netflix documentary that just came out about her. Her name's Ocean Ramsey.
I know about her. Yeah. I think that's pretty reckless. It's pretty reckless. It's and it paints a
false narrative of what those animals really are. Oh, yeah. Because all those sharks that she's diving
with are A, very accustomed to seeing humans everywhere, and B, they're very well fed.
Yeah, that's the only thing that keeps her alive.
Those, those are beasts.
Those are man-eating beasts.
Like, that, I don't know, I don't know, you know, how to reiterate that strongly enough for people that are seeing these things where she's like, you know, she's, you know, kudos to her for, like, for doing what she's doing and being able to promote.
Promoting ocean conservation.
Yeah, everything she's, that she's doing good is great.
but like
the fact like coming in all kumbaya
like oh she's
today she has this tummy ache
we're going to just if she's coming at you
just pet her on the nose and she will turn the other way
like that's not
that's not characterizing that animal or that species
no no no
she's not characterizing them accurately
right they don't have feelings like that
no there was a video that came out actually
I think it was a year ago maybe a year and a half ago
of a dude literally getting
alive by a shark in Egypt.
Yeah.
You saw that one?
I have, yes.
Oh, God.
You have to respect the ocean.
Terrifying, man.
It is scary.
And there was videos of that shark
swimming around that pier right before it happened.
There was guys like on the dock.
I guess what they were doing was there were they were dumping sheep carcasses right off shore there.
Yeah.
And this guy, you know, she's not been swimming there.
Oh, yeah.
This happened in a, well, something similar in Israel.
Did you hear about that?
No.
Yeah, there was an area where I guess the, the residents or the tourists had been
kind of giving fish to local sharks in that region.
It sort of had been a thing for years.
And I don't know if you know about the place in Hawaii
where they do this with mantar rays,
and instead it's just using lights to attract plankton.
Do you know about that?
No.
Yeah, the big island, it's really neat.
They have a hotel had a bunch of lights
to light the water up.
And every night it would draw a plankton,
and that attracted some mantar rays.
And now it's a daily event,
and they bring divers in to see it.
I've been there,
and it's pretty amazing.
But it's almost artificial.
It's kind of like that tiger shark
where they've almost domesticated these animals.
We got to see mantas in the wild in Palau,
and that was totally different.
That was going out and trying to find them,
and then if you're really lucky,
and we got lucky, we found them.
But, yeah, Israel had something similar,
and a guy, they basically found half of him.
He had, yeah.
And he was just, I think he was a tourist,
or he was a local, but he'd just been at the beach,
and it was just not a good day.
So those aren't good things to do to start mixing humans and sharks in that way.
Right.
So Ocean Ramsey is not communicating the right message in that respect.
Right, right.
How much of a hand have you had in, like, regulating fisheries, if any?
Oh, well, a lot.
So when I was in charge of NOAA, they have under that agency, the National Weather Service,
the National Ocean Service, and then this National Marine Fisheries Service.
And that's their job to basically do the science.
And this is interesting, you fish.
So now you probably mostly are governed by the laws of the state of Florida because you do it locally.
But out in federal waters, that's what NOAA owns.
And they do the science to estimate any given stocks abundance and distributions.
And then with that, they set the catch limits to make sure the stock's not over fish.
So it's a very good service.
Our fisheries were decimated in the 80s because we had no real effective rules.
And so with good and sensible rules, you're going to keep the stocks around for both the commercial and recreational fishermen.
So that port I was telling you about right down the street from here in Madeira Beach is the number one grouper capital of the world.
Oh, man.
Next time I come, let's go diving.
Yeah, we should.
Spear fishing.
I don't know about that.
Oh, good point.
It's been a while for me.
I haven't gone spearfishing in years.
But if I do it, I want to make sure the water's clear.
Right now, it's not clear.
Okay.
In the winter time, it gets nice.
In the winter time here, we should do it.
But what I was getting to is we, a couple years ago, probably like, this is probably
2015, 2014, I started interviewing a couple of the fishermen that were working at the docks
down there.
And I come to find out these dudes are like heroin addicts, the deck hands.
What?
The deck hands.
Oh, yeah.
Okay.
And we started like following them around, like seeing how they live, see their lifestyle.
And they were all very disgruntled about the.
I have Q system. Oh, right. And we didn't even know that. We were just kind of like falling these guys
around seeing what they were doing. They were just like complete junky drug addicts like crazy people.
And we started digging more and more into it. And we started to learn about this whole crazy
underbelly of this fishing world that is here in my backyard that I never knew existed. And so we went to
the fish house where all the boats come in and they weigh their fish. And I like learned the whole
history of this and it's fascinating how like in 2007 before 2007 here it was a free-for-all so like
basically red snapper you could get a three million the allotment was like three million pounds
all the fishermen would go out catch catch as much as they can come in weigh the fish and then
see where you're at maybe you run out maybe you hit that three million quota limit in like
October right so you have to stop fishing you can't catch anymore right stop for this year so in 2007
and the federal government came in, and they created a monopoly with it.
And they basically said boat owners, based on your previous catch history, we are going to give
you X amount of quota every single year.
So some guys got upwards of 200,000 pounds a year, some guys got 100,000 pounds a year,
50,000 pounds a year, whatever it was.
These boat owners got the best retirement plan known to man.
Oh, yeah.
Right?
So what did they do?
They started selling them.
All right.
And now you don't even have to own a boat.
you can just buy and sell this stuff and play with it like stock this quota people will lease it out to fishermen to boat owners and then by the time that deckhand gets paid there's like not much left for him and i interviewed some guys that are like a part of the that operate fisheries up in like the northeast and they were saying when they were down here talking to me they're like it is not like this where we're from that's right they were explaining what's happening here is like carnie ride operators just you know exploiting these guys that are like they're addicted to
freaking heroin. They're coming back from a fishing trip, blowing their five grand they made on drugs
and prostitutes, and then going back out in a boat when they run out of money and sea having
because they have no drugs. So they're offshore for 10, 12 days. And they're, they're freaking
detoxing offshore while they're catching fish. They come back, rinse and repeat the same cycle.
And the dudes up in the northeast are like, this is not like this up there. Like we take care
of our people. Like we protect our community. We take care of the ocean and our fish. And it's like a lifestyle.
something to be proud of.
And it's like the opposite here.
Yeah, I'm impressed because I've been following fisheries for a while.
And you characterized this really well.
I didn't have enough run time at NOAA, only three and a half years or so to address things like that in our fisheries.
And I don't even know if I would have had any success based on the structure of the federal government,
being NOAA fisheries and what we could do.
But that's a problem.
You're right about that.
And I do respect the way the culture up there in New England.
Yeah. The fisheries culture is one that I admire greatly all around the country, really Alaska too.
Yeah. Oh, yeah, Alaska definitely. Yeah, big time, right? Like, how could that not be? Like, that's such a cool thing to do. You know what I mean? Like to say that you do that. No, I haven't. I want to go out.
You've probably heard that chocolate can cause breakouts. But what if the right kind of chocolate could actually improve the quality of your skin? Clinical studies show that cocoa flavinols, the powerful antioxidants and high quality cocoa, can significantly improve.
skin hydration, elasticity, and even reduce the appearance of wrinkles. In one study, participants
who consumed flavanol-rich cocoa daily for 12 weeks had visibly smoother skin and twice their
resistance to UV damage compared to placebo, meaning fewer fine lines, more glow and actual
protection from the inside out. But you'd have to eat so much chocolate to get those actual
benefits that the sugar and calories would cancel them out, or worse, lead to breakouts.
Not to mention the heavy metals like lead in cadmium found in many cocoa products.
This is why I drink morning being by Verso.
It's a rich chocolate blend with all the proven benefits of cocoa without the junk.
Every batch is third party tested for heavy metals, so you're getting pure high flavanol cocoa you can actually feel good about.
And instead of caffeine, it uses thobrameen, a natural compound in cocoa that delivers all day energy without over-stimulating your nervous system.
Plus, the ingredients are shown to support muscle growth and performance, improve metabolism, and provide micronutrients from superfoods, and a lot of
electrolytes to rehydrate and fuel your body. And since taking morning being, I've changed my
morning routine into something that supports my metabolism, energy, and my skin. If you're looking
to improve your health with something that's actually backed by research, click the link below
or head on over to v-r.s-o-s-o-d-d-danny and use my code, Danny, D-A-N-N-Y, for 15% off your first order.
Again, head on over to v-r.s-o-slash-danny and use code Danny for 15% of your first order.
And thank you, Verso, for sponsoring this episode.
We could talk for a while.
I have a good story there.
So being here I was, I oversaw NOAA Fisheries.
And so there's these things called Fishery Management Councils.
They're independent of the government.
I, as the administrator, would name members of the council.
But they would have certain expertise.
And for every region, they would work with NOAA to set the catch limits.
And so you have a sort of third party helping make sure this wasn't the government going in, heavy-handed.
And so it's a good system.
And ultimately, though, a guy we named someone to go to the North Pacific Council.
And when I went to Alaska, he owned a fishing lodge up there off Juneau, and he invited me to go fishing with him.
And I was excited.
Wow.
Because I knew that I was assured to get, you know, 100 pounds salmon and barn door-sized halibut.
And I go up there, and it's this beautiful area of the Lynn Canal, the snowcap peaks all around us.
and we went for eight hours and I didn't catch a thing.
No.
No, I mean, and he was trying.
He was trying.
We were dipping for salmon.
We were, we were trawling.
I mean, we were trawling for salmon, dipping for the halibut.
And I actually caught an arrow-tooth flounder, which is this really raggedy-looking thing with teeth all over.
So imagine a flounder with teeth.
It's a really bizarre creature.
Yeah.
But I couldn't even keep it.
So anyways, because it was too, I had to throw it back because it wasn't big enough.
Anyways, it was one of the greatest days on the water ever because humpback whales were spouting and sounding all around us. It was glorious. Do you see those tridents that I have laying around here? I saw that one, yeah. You know who Manny Pug is? You ever heard of Manny Pug? I know that name. The Shark Man. Find a photo of him, Steve. I'm sure you've seen him. He used to be on Jackass, but he... Oh, yes, okay. He was the got the long hair who like handles all the... Yeah, him. There you go. He's a legend around here. He lives in Miami. But he made those. He, um, he made those. He, um, he was. He, um, he was the guy.
did a trip with the jackass guys to or the wild the show was called wild boys and they went to
Alaska and they were looking for uh orcas and basically they found a pot of a giant pot of orcas
and he's like take me to the front of the pod and then i'll jump in what and he jumped in the water
in Alaska zero visibility in the water and then he didn't see the orcas until it was like from here
to like that tv good god right up to him the guy's maniac uh knowing the way orcas treat why
sharks. I don't think I would have done that. But ultimately, that's cool. I actually did the same.
I didn't get in the water, but we saw two pods killer whales on a separate excursion on that trip.
They're magnificent. Well, there's actually no recorded accounts of orcas attacking and killing
humans other than inside of a fish tank at SeaWorld. That's right. Yeah, I know about that.
Crazy, right? There's tons of footage of like orcas approaching human beings and like, just like, you know,
checking them out and minding their own business. That's very interesting. They don't, they don't mess
So people. Why is that? Yeah. It's really interesting.
Even though you probably heard about the orcas attacking those sailboats off the, off of Spain.
Yes. I saw the footage of that. I saw the footage of that. So I don't think what were those boats doing? They were doing something, right? They were, um, I don't know. They were fucking with the environment somehow, right? Like they were doing something sketchy. And they might have been like netting. I don't forget what it was where it was. It was all the
coast of Spain.
Yeah, yeah.
Steve, maybe you can find it.
I forget what it was going on.
Is it this guy?
Yeah, I think that's it, right?
Click on it.
Two years ago.
Read with the description of it says.
Incredible video.
Just click on it.
Oh, these are just random.
This is just like a...
I thought they were just day sailors or tourists.
Oh, maybe you're right.
Yeah, I would have remembered if it was something...
Weird.
Using sonar.
Right.
Yeah.
So we have a lot to learn.
is the answer there.
Well, they're definitely super intelligent.
Yeah.
Yeah.
The way they just, the way they treat white sharks is in terms of just sometimes they'll just,
they'll play with them and maybe they'll just eat their liver and not.
Right.
Very interesting.
Just the dominance there is impressive.
Yeah, I've seen some videos of them attacking white sharks and I've heard about how they eat the liver.
It's so strange.
Yeah, they, I mean, if you want to talk about non-human intelligence, that is a,
a prime example of it. Well, this is great. Because I have given talks about this. So people,
when we get into that topic of aliens, non-human intelligence, all you need to do is go scuba dive
coral reef. There is such a diversity of non-human intelligence there. And I don't know if you
have met Avi Loeb. He's the, he's a great guy. And I like the way he thinks. He says,
hey, here you are, here we are. The universe is 14 billion years old. The Earth is,
4.6 billion years old.
And why would, if life has evolved here, so we know it's a property of the universe, why
wouldn't intelligent life have evolved elsewhere?
And we see it here, all sorts of non-human intelligence on a coral reef and elsewhere.
I mean, diving in the Galapagos for one, and that's remarkable.
So why not elsewhere?
And I think that's something that resonates to me, that argument.
It makes a lot of sense.
In fact, he likes to say, why would it be extraordinary to say there's intelligence?
life elsewhere. It'd be extraordinary
if it weren't. Right.
Yeah, also, the deeper
you get in our ocean is the more
alien. Oh my God. The things look.
So I love this because
this ocean expiration program
at NOAA, that's what they do. They go down
with a 6,000 meter rated
ROV and they're
constantly exploring and looking for new
species and they're finding them. We are finding new species
every year and they're
just bizarre. I mean, they are absolutely
alien looking. I mean, honestly,
Hollywood hasn't dreamed up stuff as weird as what we see in the sea.
Yeah.
Yeah.
How deep do those vents get, those thermal vents?
How deep are those?
Well, they're over, at least, well, some are 4,000 meters or more.
They're different ones.
Right.
But ultimately, that life on some of those is very weird because they're chemosynthetic.
And so they're not like us.
They're not, they're using, I forgot the different chemicals, but they're not necessarily
oxygen breathing, they derive their energy differently. And that's a good sign of how weird it
must be on other planets too. Yeah. And also, if you want to talk about other planets, I think most
of the planets that we're aware of that exist in like a Goldilocks zone that are able to inhabit
life are water worlds. So far, you know, I don't think we've been able to characterize the exoplanets
that are outside the solar system. But we do know that the moons of, I think,
I think there's Europa and Celadus for Saturn and Jupiter.
I forgot which one's which.
Oh, the moon.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
They're both ice covered, and they have liquid underneath.
And so NASA has actually been funding our ocean exploration program, NOAAs, for that purpose to develop the engineering method,
to basically put a deep-diving ROV on a probe that can land on the surface, drill through the ice, and then go explore the under the ice oceans.
of those two.
Yeah, interesting, huh?
Wow, that is fascinating.
Yeah, and we're making so many rapid advances in commercial space,
and you look how easy it is to get in a space now with what SpaceX has provided.
Yeah.
That we might see that in our lifetime.
I want to know why we haven't gone back to the moon.
That's interesting.
Well, obviously, you could see it's hard,
and I think it's mostly because the government is big and slow,
and we've just burned ourselves the bureaucracy,
and I'm pretty much happy with some of the things the current president's doing.
But they keep pushing it back every single year.
Well, but again, I think commercial space industry is going to, it's going to, they're going to do it.
And in fact, we already had, we had, I forgot what was the company that just put a probe on the moon.
This is, this is going to happen.
It's going to explode in the next decade of commercial companies going out there.
China's doing it, by the way.
So to the moon?
Yeah.
Yeah.
So hopefully we can get this Artemis program.
on step.
Yeah, but it's frustrating for those of us who want to see more space exploration.
Yeah, it definitely, it's definitely strange.
It's like the only, the Apollo program is the only technological program ever developed by any country or company that has not grown at all or not grown exponentially since it was conceived of.
Yeah, that's a odd thing.
Look at every other thing.
look at every other technological advancement in the history of man,
like whether it be war tech or consumer tech.
It's all, if you compare it to what it was in the 70s,
it's all like, look at the phone.
Yeah.
So did you ever have anyone on your show who said that the whole moon mission was a fabrication?
Yeah.
Archibrella, I've had them on.
That's it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So are you convinced?
I think if I had a gun to my head, I would say it was.
it was it was faked we do i don't know i think i think it's complicated i think that it's possible
that also if they did make it if they did go i think they probably had a backup plan like a back
like backup footage of it or like even if they did go maybe they weren't able to get the cameras
and the film through the radiation belt right it could have been destroyed by the radiation so it's
like we went but how do we prove it well we let's get the soundstage and let's record some stuff
and make it look like we went.
Yeah.
You know, there's just so many questions.
And like the way, like, I have people come on here all the time and tell me completely
obscene, like crazy outlandish things that they come with evidence for it.
And it seems compelling and reasonable.
And then I'll have somebody come in and then completely show me how that's all,
you know, complete bullshit and, and preposterous with counter evidence.
But the moon one is one that I haven't seen.
any plausible counter evidence or hard evidence to refute what, like the skeptics say.
Okay.
So, like, until I can get an Apollo astronaut on here to, like, debate him, I don't know.
I'm still up in the air with it. I don't know.
It's funny because I lean towards it happened.
But the more I get into this UAP topic and the government cover up, the more I'm inclined to believe almost anything in terms of the government fabricating a story.
Right.
Because there's all this national interest for doing it.
so. We wouldn't want the Russians to make us think that we weren't ahead of them.
There's a ton of reason to do that. And the more I watch the government and having played
in it at the high level I was at Noah, I see how that spin doctoring occurs every day.
Right. And it's a fine line between what is promoting American greatness versus what's lying
about what we're really doing. Sure. There's big questions, man. I mean, it's for one thing,
there's so much stigma attached to questioning the mood landing. You're automatically.
a fool if you if you're un-American completely yeah and uh the other thing about it is
that time smack dab in the middle of the cold war when the american government when jfk was
killed when we were doing mk ultra experiments with drugs on people to to do mind control and
watergate i mean you name it we were doing more the the u.s government and intelligence agencies
were we're doing more deception and lying to the american people than ever before in recorded history
very good point and the moon landing happened right in the middle of it
So is that the only thing that they did that was legit?
I mean, there's a pretty strong record of lying to the public right there.
Yeah.
You just brought up.
Totally.
Yeah.
Wow.
So, yeah.
I mean, I don't know.
I would love to.
And then the other day, I watched this crazy documentary called Room 237, I think it's called.
It's a documentary all about the hidden Easter eggs inside of the shining.
movie.
What?
Because,
okay,
so this is crazy.
So we're addicts of that movie,
by the way,
my family.
Oh, really?
So Room 237 is a documentary
about the Shining,
and Stanley Kubrick
allegedly implemented some hidden messages
in that movie.
So these people that made this documentary,
I think for sure,
they're making connections that don't exist.
They're going way too far with it.
But there are maybe 25 to 30
percent of the things in that documentary that I think are totally legit.
For instance, there's this shot. So room 237 basically in that in that movie, that's what they
call the moon room. So all this stuff happens in that room that doesn't happen anywhere else. It's
237, which was in the 70s and the 70s and 80s, we thought it was exactly 237,000 miles to the moon.
Since then, we've gotten, we've developed better sensing equipment to figure out it's like 900 more
miles than that. We were like a thousand miles off.
And then there's
also a thing like the manager of the hotel
looks just like John F. Kennedy in that movie.
There's weird
sort of inconsistencies with the continuity
in that movie where there's like obvious things where the carpet
pattern changes from one shot to the other
and other things disappear.
And like he's arguing with his wife about don't you know
about contracts? Don't you know about secrecy?
I can't you like he's
fighting with his wife but living these two separate lives.
And what they're speculating is
Stanley Kubrick's using this as like he's using that movie to like sort of like tell people what really happened.
And there's also a famous photo that you can find if you dig hard enough, Steve.
I was showing this to Rogan the other day of Stanley Kubrick on the set of 2001 of Space Odyssey, walking between the soundstages and the Europe and Jolly West is behind him, walking behind him.
Jolly West is.
Jolly West is the CIA.
guy who was a part of MK Ultra.
Oh, right. He was, he was, I think he was a psychologist, a CIA psychologist.
I could be wrong, but he was doing, he was doing stuff with drugs. He was basically,
oh, yes. He was, he was a part of the whole M.K. Ultra thing. Find out what his actual
title was. I don't want to mess it up. But he was there for M.K. Ultra and he was there,
he was the guy who interviewed Jack Ruby. Oh, right. Right before he had the psychotic break.
So, Jolly West is a very scary.
person who was involved in a lot of the most like deceptive things that ever happened.
No, that's not it, Steve.
Jamie found it in five minutes, Steve.
Come on.
You can do it.
So anyways, we got off on a crazy tangent about the moon landing.
Well, and I bring it up because of what's happened recently.
And we kind of, I know we were vaulting ahead on UAP and we could talk about why I care.
Right.
But ultimately, that's what's just recently.
You probably read those two Wall Street.
journal articles. I did. And total fabrication. And I know this 100% certainty. I actually wrote
one op-ed in The Hill about it with Chris Mellon. I saw that. And I had another one in draft.
The Hill rejected it. I'm trying to get it actually. So explain to people who aren't familiar.
What was the premise of that Wall Street Journal article that came out? There's two of them.
Okay. And they both basically are trying to debunk that UFOs are real. That ultimately the first one
talked about the fact that we were doing advanced technology developments and to cover it,
we were planning false narratives out there about their, about UFOs, about that actually,
and we were tricking our own Air Force officers and believing it was a real program and they'd go
to jail if they ever admitted it, being UFO retrieval program.
And the article basically said it was just a hoax, a prank.
and that was the first one.
The second one was regarded some of the materials, crash retrieved materials,
and ultimately they mischaracterized an article by Leslie Keane and Ralph Blumenthal about that.
And both of them at a high level were trying to discredit any validity with both the UAP programs,
the legacy program, of retrieving materials.
And that was it.
Both of them were doing that.
And if you look at the details, there were so many errors in these.
It was all false reporting.
We tore it apart.
Chris Mellon and I, the first one.
The second one, in fact, was the same.
And I wrote a letter to the editor and started Chris Mellon, and she disregarded us.
She never answered.
And the key thing about this is, and I don't like disparaging individuals, but it's, I guess,
a key thing about this is is the former aerod director, Sean Kirkpatrick, was the primary source for
these. And he's, he has a history of, of, um, discrediting whistleblowers. And, uh, and,
and that's just true. He's, he's done that. So of others. And, uh, and the thing it was most kind
of telling for me is that after I testified, uh, to the House Oversight Committee,
November of 24 about what I knew and you could go look at my statement and my observations
and experience with the Theater Roosevelt Strike Group and the videos that were subsequently released
that and I talked about that and also talked about visiting Arrow and how they were they were
discrediting other whistleblowers during my meeting with them they actually here was the crazy
thing and this is still out there they said the Nimitz tick-tack event was actually a US tech
demo and there's a lot of reasons I think
I think that's a, that's a lot of BS.
Really?
Oh, yeah, because first of all...
I was kind of thought it was U.S. Secret Tech, black budget stuff.
There's a lot of people saying this, but here's my point.
First of all, I know the four witnesses.
I've talked to two of them, Dave Fraver and Alex Dietrich.
And this is beyond...
The acceleration was beyond anything they've seen.
You know, Dave Fraver's great.
I like him, Navy Pilot.
I work with these guys.
He said, I don't know what that was, but I want to fly it, you know.
And of course, but ultimately, so he couldn't imagine anything that we had like that with the instantaneous acceleration that would have obliterated any material or person pilot.
And the second thing is this.
That was 2004.
If we had some capability like that in terms of transportation or movement, we would have used it on the battlefield in Iraq and Afghanistan to save lives.
And if we didn't, and if that was U.S. tech, then there's some real irresponsible.
actors out there. So I really, that's why I highly doubt it was. Yeah. But that's what the
Arrow Office was throwing at me. And actually, I visited them after Sean Kirkpatrick left. But
the point being here is that in the Wall Street Journal articles that Sean primarily was a primary
source, after my testimony, he made a statement. And you could see it on Twitter, I think he was
published, where he said this about me. He said, well, Mr. Gallaudet's obviously,
bitter that when he came to Arrow, I wouldn't give him a job. And I know that that's because
he was prone to conspiracy theories without evidence. And I verify that when I asked some of his bosses.
Okay. Let me kind of set the record straight. That was his statement. Public statement, he wrote it.
I never went there when he was there. I went there months after he left. And I didn't go there
looking for a job. I actually went there on request of the Navy liaison, a friend of mine in the
Pentagon for years. He asked me to visit. And so there's that. First, and why would I, now,
if you recall, I was an undersecretary in the Department of Commerce. That's higher than the four-star
service chiefs. So for me to go groveling for a GS-14 job at Arrow is a little bit absurd.
And then lastly, when he says, oh, I check with my, he checked with my bosses to prove that I was prone to conspiracy theories.
So in the last 15 years, my bosses have been two, two star admirals, four four star admirals, and the Commerce Secretary.
And I'm in communication with all of them except for the secretary.
And if Sean went to them, they would have told me.
So he basically, those are outright lies about me.
Here I am.
I'm just out to serve here and try to.
So what, why did he do that? Why is he doing this? Of course, this is what you do when you want to
cover up something. You tell a false narrative. It's what we do when we spy on other countries.
We don't admit that we're spying on other countries, possibly with covert ops in their
territorial seas, but we do it all the time. We know we do. So that's the nature of
of classification and compartmental programs is we never acknowledge them. And we'll often
say they don't exist outright. And so that's just part of the UAP cover up. And I'm convinced that
they've decided and they believe they're right. So I'm not going to throw, I'm not going to throw
shade on their intentions. I think they believe it's a national security interest to keep
UAP information and materials classified, classified. Where I think a little differently, I think, yes,
let's keep the tech classified. But so much is out there now and with the Schumer or with the
UAP Disclosure Act, the genie's out of the bottle. And the American people, they have a right
to know the nature of reality. And the fact that we're not alone, we're being visited. It's scary to
admit that as a government because we can't control our airspace or water space. But it's the nature
of reality now. And more and more people, people like you are helping tell the story.
And there's a story out there that American people should know. And we just have to be careful
about how we communicate it. And I believe what's in this UAP Disclosure Act, through a
process of control disclosure, does that in the right way.
Yeah. Well, I mean, going to that Wall Street Journal article, one of the things about it,
it is so bad, like the excuses they gave in that article, for example, like the Maastrum
Air Force Base thing that they were saying it was an EMP that they were testing.
That was so artificial. It couldn't be done.
Right. Yeah. And Jesse Michaels did a beautiful video on this. The people, I recommend people check
out. He pointed out like all the people behind the scenes working on this and like there was a lady who was a
source for this article who was quite literally. He looked up her LinkedIn. She worked for Booz Allen
Hamilton in the Department of Psychological Warfare. Yeah. Oh yeah. And she was the source for this article.
So what like and there was a lot of other really shady people that were that were working for this
article. One of the guys who was one of the main sources on this topic for the Wall Street Journal was super
you, I forget his name.
But, and then, like, also saying that all this UFO stuff with all these people in history, like, you know, going back to Bob Lazar all the way up to David Grush was, like, was hazing rituals.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So if these are hazing rituals and these people are going through all this psychological trauma, I think there's, like, a big class action lawsuit, like, that's coming down the pike.
I don't think they thought this through.
No, it seems to.
Yeah.
Because there's all these legal issues with it, if it were true.
And it's so obviously, it's so obviously false.
Yeah.
It's very.
In fact, you're right. I thought it was pretty inept. And but also there's some key people who've been following this issue for some time.
One, for example, is Kirk McConnell who had been on several Senate committees. He's a senior staffer for the Intelligence Committee and the Armed Services Committees in the Senate.
And he'd been involved with this topic for years. We've been at a classified level.
37 years, by the way. And he hasn't heard of this whole hazing thing once.
Right. So it's just obviously false. And it was, again, it was made for the average American to potentially just basically cast a little doubt and stigma on the issue.
And a lot of average Americans don't think this through. And so they see a Wall Street Journal publication and think, well, okay, there you go. UFOs are a hoax.
Right. Hey, guys, if you're not already subscribed, please hammer the subscribe button below and hit the like button on the video. Back to the show.
Yeah, no, there's so, I mean, to be one of those officers that are working on those ICBM bases, like Malstrom Air Force Base, you have to be like the top of the top as far as like being a mentally sane, stable human being.
That's absolutely screened for.
Yeah.
In fact, because there's all these reasons for nuclear security, you wouldn't want someone who's unstable.
That's another great point. Jesse's fantastic on this. He does his homework.
But so and then there's the people who've written about it.
So I think you probably know about Robert Hastings.
Of course, yeah.
UFOs and nukes.
That's right.
Great book.
I read it.
I'm basically, I stay in touch with him every week.
And we communicated about shared interests.
And here he's done it.
You go, you read the book.
And he did the research.
And the Wall Street Journal did not.
Right.
Yeah.
And that has been always one of my biggest fascinations.
because if these things are sighted all around our nuclear sites on land,
what the hell are they doing with the submarines underwater
that are loaded to the gills with nukes and are all throughout the oceans?
Yeah.
So like if I'm one of these guys who spends months on a nuclear submarine in the ocean,
I'm sure these guys have to have some incredible stories,
some of them do.
But I've never heard one.
I've never heard one story.
There's a reason for that.
So first off, it's interesting.
Let's just look at the data.
A lot of these events have happened around nuclear powered aircraft carriers, right?
Theater Roosevelt.
Nimitz.
So that's a lot of activity there.
And I have had one report from an officer who was on a boomer, ballistic missile submarine,
in the North Atlantic who observed a contact.
I've shared this before, but really quickly.
It had the characteristics of basically a Russian torpedo in terms of closing fast and at a high-rate speed and coming at the submarine.
And in an area, they wouldn't have expected it.
So they did all the procedures to avoid it.
They turned around.
They dove deep to nearly crush depth.
And when the object got close to them, it stopped.
And it kind of went around to their stern and followed them for a while and then rapidly exited the area.
and he's not sure what to make of that,
but there shouldn't have been anything there
because it was in the North Atlantic during a 40-foot seas.
And so that's when there's high ambient noise.
Wow.
They never, nothing could detect them.
Those subs are quiet.
And when there's really high ambient noise, they're undetectable.
So that couldn't have been a Russian torpedo or high-speed submersible
that hadn't even been built yet.
So there's nothing he could explain it.
But I've not heard a lot of other reports from submariners because that is such a classified area.
It's nuclear security and it's undersea security.
Those are the most highly classified programs in the government.
So I've not been able to crack into them.
I was tangentially read into some of that.
And so I know about that, but nothing regarding UAP.
But if anything about UAP in the water is that data resides.
anywhere, it's in those programs, and they are locked tight. Yeah, there's this guy who Jesse also
interviewed Harold Mungrum. Yeah, yeah. Who said to him, the Office of Naval Intelligence has
more data on this stuff than anybody. Well, right. And he referred to the, I believe,
the national, more than the Air Force. Yeah. National underwater reconnaissance office.
Yes. Yes. So that's it. And I know about them. But again, I've not been able to see that
information. He's very, he's very credible and his, his daughter also served, I think, in the Bush
administration and the Reagan administration. And her name is Pippa, and she's, she's terrific, too.
He, he was right on. In fact, that's interesting. I've been working on this whole topic of the
the nuke detonations that brought down some UFOs. And that's what Harold had also talked about.
Right. Yes. And there's a lot of data there too. So, like, if you're, so, I mean, also a weird thing about
being one of those guys on the submarines is like you can't really see it.
All you're relying on radar or how does that work?
Well,
what are those kinds of tools do they have?
Sonar.
So how accurate can you get with something?
Like how much can you find out about an object that's around a submarine but with just the
tools that they have available to them?
It's difficult.
And you don't want to go active.
So active is how you can really characterize how large it is and potentially even its shape.
But that's going to reveal your locations.
That's something submarines generally don't do.
Going active.
Using active sonar, meaning pinging, sending out a transducer.
So they're making themselves their location available to other subs.
And you can use that.
I did my PhD work on this.
You can use an active sonar signal, bounce it off an object, and it comes back.
And you can use that, just like radar.
Same principle of sound instead of EM energy to characterize an object.
It's shape, if it's moving, if it's in its structure.
and we have high frequency sonars that do this really well.
In fact, we use them to map the seafloor and characterize shipwrecks.
Munoa does. It's great work.
But again, some Marines generally don't want to do that because that reveals their location.
So they normally are staying passive.
And it's very difficult to characterize an object passive because of your only measure or you're only hearing the sound they admit,
which is either from engineering or flow noise around the hull of the vessel or vehicle.
That incident you were just explaining to me where they thought it was a Russian torpedo.
Did they go active there?
No, no.
Whoa.
So they were just listening and they, again, they dived.
They dove super deep, though.
Yeah.
And they thought they were getting chased.
Dangerously so.
They were convinced they were going to get hit.
They were doing all the things to prepare for getting hit and doing the damage control necessary.
Yeah.
Because they never seen anything like this.
And they had trained for Russian torpedo attacks.
This was everything like it.
So he called me up after I went public on this information because he said, I just got to tell you about this experience.
So we stay in touch.
There was another one I think I shared about it also where someone has called me up and said,
hey, I was one of these acoustic intelligence specialists.
And we were on one of these ships that does this.
They look for enemy submarines by doing two things.
they they they sent out a it's a high it's a high energy active pulse and then they they listen
and low frequency it's low frequency active they call it so high energy low frequency pulse long range
and it'll always get a bounce off a submarine and and that's how you find them and then what you do is you
listen passively to characterize the type of contact so every type of adversary platform whether it be a
Russian submarine or Chinese submarine, we know their signature.
We know how, and it's by the, by the hall, the actual hall number.
We know, we know they sound like each, the screws, the engineering equipment, the flow
noise.
Wow.
It's pretty good.
It's kind of like your, your fingerprints, acoustically.
It's some, again, that's some of the most classified information out there.
Because we can't, if we reveal that, we reveal our sources, the people who found this
information, and that would get them killed.
But this is how we, that's how we, in the field, know, ah, that's a, that's the Russian whatever.
And so that's what we've done.
The whole core was built on that.
Some of blind man's bluff is about that.
Oh, really?
But ultimately, this guy shared with me that he was out there in Japan in the, I forgot the 2000s,
and they found twice a really loud hit when they went active, and they switched on to passive.
And this is what they do.
Every time they'll get a passive hit and they know, okay, it was either exercise they did on one of our subs,
or they're out there listening for Chinese,
ah, it's one of theirs.
And they had nothing.
There's no passive hit.
But they had a super loud active hit.
What does that mean?
What does that mean?
It means there was something big in the water, moving,
because it wasn't there later,
and it had no engineering components making noise.
What the fuck is that?
And then it was gone.
It was in the water calm.
So whales don't do this, by the way.
They're soft.
They don't reflect sound pulses at that kind of,
amplitude or that source level. So it's a, again, these are people who had anomalous observations
and experiences and after I testified, they just wanted to call me and say, hey, I saw this.
In fact, not underwater, but very cool. After my last testimony, it probably one of the neatest
encounters or eyewitness encounters I have was this. I went and gave a talk. I always say yes
to anybody, any university who wants me to talk about this topic because that's how we're going to,
that's how we're going to turn the tide.
It's the next generation who are not so stigmatized about this.
So any university, I go, I went to Yale.
They have a UFO society.
And I give a talk and this guy comes down.
He's getting his graduate degree and he goes, hey, I want to tell you a story.
Okay.
He said, I was a Navy air crew on S.H60 Seahawk helicopter flying off the Dwightie Eisenhower in 2021.
And he said, you know, a lot of the guys had filmed on four looking information.
infrared UAP.
In fact, they had a folder on their secret
drive and they called it
range foulers.
And this is a funny term because
it's, so the term
in the Navy for anything not right,
like a fouled anchor,
then you use that for everything.
Okay, foul the range, right?
Like a fouled anchor.
And what's fouling the range?
UFOs.
So they had this whole file
on all these UFO videos they had taken.
And they kind of use that name as a sort of joke
but ultimately they were keeping track of the stuff.
And so everybody knew about it, but it was no one talked about it in the ready room.
The skipper said, hey, we're not, we all know it exists.
We're just going to live with it.
No one really is asking us to report it.
And so, but then there was a point in 2021 where the Joint Chiefs, based on pressure from Congress,
directed everyone to start reporting.
So that's what they started doing, collecting the videos, sharing them with the intelligence officer,
with DIA.
And he said, one night, he was getting.
there was going to be a drill to do a man overboard,
and that's where they normally off a helicopter,
you don't launch a boat.
You launch a helicopter.
It's a lot safer and easier.
Really?
Yeah, you don't launch a boat off a helicopter.
Because the flight deck is something like 60 feet off the water line.
It's time to refresh your yard
during spring backyard days at the Home Depot.
Get low prices guaranteed on propane grills,
starting at $179, like the next grill three-burner gas grill,
or get $50 off the select Weber Spirit Grill
and bring big flavor to your backyard.
Then set the scene with Hampton Bay string lights
that bring it all together.
Shop spring backyard days for seven days at the Home Depot.
Now through May 6th.
Exclusion supplies to homedipo.com slash price match for details.
Kayak gets my flight, hotel, and rental car right,
so I can tune out travel advice that's just plain wrong.
Bro, Skycoin, way better than points.
Never fly during a Scorpio.
full move. Just tell the manager
you'll sue. Instant room upgrade.
Stop taking bad travel advice.
Start comparing hundreds of sites with
kayak and get your trip right.
Kayak, got that right.
So that's the MO.
You launch a helicopter
to recover the man overboard.
So this was his job. He was a crew chief
and he thought that was going to be an exercise.
Well, he got woken up one night and they didn't say it was
an exercise. He thought, oh my God, it's a real
world event. What had happened is
he's waiting to get the plane ready.
And one of the pilots had some NVGs, and he asked him, what's going on?
He goes, put these on.
Night vision goggles.
Yeah, night vision goggles.
Look up there.
And he saw flying over the character, really just slowly moving laterally, a metallic sphere about the size of a smart car.
Just moving slowly, like the Mosul orb like that.
But at night, and everyone was tracking it.
Basically, it was in the middle of the strike group.
And everybody was basically saying, what the heck is that?
So they launched the helo to get video of it.
And his crew chief has taken video of this thing, and it's just moving slowly.
There's no signs of propulsion or flight control surfaces, just a sphere.
And then after a time, it did what all these UFOs do.
It just accelerated instantaneously and went over the horizon.
Wow.
And he said, not only did that happen a lot, he said that the guys and these other squadron that embarked on the Gerald Ford, the other carrier,
that deployed after them,
happened all the time too.
So the Navy is sitting on a trove
of UFO data, videos.
Just as you said,
O&I is,
I mean, these are all sources coming to me
saying it's all there,
and it's all real.
There's also a video that I saw,
I don't remember off what boat,
what ship it was,
but there was a video of like this orb hovering above the waves
and you could hear people talking about it in the background.
Oh, yeah,
and then this splash.
Oh, it's splashed down, it splashed down, or whatever.
It, like, disappeared.
So let me tell you about that.
Okay.
This is great because the petty officer on bridge, on the bridge of that ship, the USS Omaha.
Omaha, okay.
He's come out, actually.
Oh, really?
Yeah, his name is a senior chief petty officer, Alex Wiggins.
And he came to me.
So after my, at one point, I think maybe the Sean Ryan show I was on or something.
And he basically wanted to make that report to me.
He was on the bridge then.
And what's interesting is I know how it is on a bridge.
And the procedure is,
that's like a code word it wasn't just they weren't saying hey it's splashing the water if an object
is seen to enter the water typically it's because it crashed an aircraft or possibly a decoy or
something that's sort of a code that is a code word using the navy that something is an encounter
the water and so that's why they said splash like that is that is a term that the logkeeper
put in the log right so it's official it's not just oh it's splash it's actually an official term
And so when that happened, and now it's why it was so weird because it wasn't a helicopter, it was hovering, but you didn't see blades.
It was spherical, and it went into the water.
What's up with that?
That's it.
That's it right there.
Give us some volume.
Oh, yeah, they're on the Omaha.
These are people, these are my people.
I stood many hours of Bridgewatch.
Oh, look, he's filming the screen.
Whoever made this video, they're filming another monitor.
Yeah, yeah, that's right.
Did they get in trouble for that?
So far, not that I know of.
Helo Asap.
Heelow Asap?
Yeah, they wanted to go interrogate the target.
Keep going, bro.
You're making chance we could probably bring that 35 rubles.
Is this boat moving right now?
Yes, she was underway.
Okay.
We have 31 knots sustained wind, top side.
31. That's pretty windy. That's windy.
Splashed. Mark bearing and range.
Yep, they're following their standard procedures. Good job, guys.
That's wise. So I have been on the bridges of several ships, hours, hundreds, thousands of hours of bridge watch.
So those are folks I supervised. And that petty officer who was on the watch there, he called me, talked to me about that experience.
He said, we were seeing them all the time. He said, really?
He said, sir, this is so frequent off SoCal, we're desensitized to it.
What?
Yes, seriously.
And so you might have seen Jeremy Corbell had released video from the USS Jackson,
same petty officer who gave it to him because he came to me and he actually shared me on Signal that video.
And I said, and Jeremy, of course, said, I love to talk to him and I asked him, are you okay with that?
And he said, sure.
So he shared.
Is this guy still active?
He's still active duty.
Yeah.
I'm a little surprised, but that he's not.
He hasn't been outed.
No.
They don't know that he's the one that's.
Well, he did it.
As a private citizen, I know he talked to the Navy lawyers.
Yeah.
Which are probably a lot looser than the Air Force lawyers.
So either way, he got it cleared.
And I know.
I think that's really significant.
I need to have a talk with him about that.
But a terrific guy, and he's one of many sailors right now,
former or still active duty that are seeing these things.
And yeah, and that's what I've been trying to do.
What do these guys think they are?
Do you talk to him about it?
We're like, what do you think about it?
What do you guys talk about it on the flight deck?
Like what is the...
It's like everybody in the public.
It's a range of ideas, and some people are really care,
but that one crew chief who came to me after he left the Navy,
he was, he said, this really affected him.
Because normally he'd heard talk of it, but he'd never seen it.
And when he saw it, he realized, like I did,
when I saw the video of the GoFast, when it was still classified,
I immediately knew that's not ours.
That's not our adversary tech, because I know adversary tech.
I've been read in all that stuff.
And we're not alone.
There's something, I don't know what they're doing.
Don't know their intent, especially with nukes.
That's pretty scary.
But we're being a monitor.
I'm skeptical of the go fast in the gimbal videos.
Oh, no.
No, I'm not at all.
Really?
No, I mean, I saw the go fast.
I mean, that's, by the way, if you look at the go fast, yeah, yeah, it wasn't going that fast.
Okay, it was just, it's just a relative.
But the point of.
The reason is the plane is flying really fast in one direction.
Yeah.
And there's something flying the opposite direction.
And with the parallax of the.
ocean behind it, it's totally plausible. It would look like it was going a thousand miles per hour.
Yeah, but it's it, it wasn't, so it was nicknamed the go fast. That wasn't what was anomalous about it.
So Ryan Graves, have you had him on your show? I have. He's great. I've talked to him a few times.
He was out there. They were seeing these things all the time. And in that one instance, it wasn't just one. It was in a
formation. So what do you, how do you explain that? I've talked about some things. I'll, I'll talk to you
about it after we do the show of some other reasons why I'm really skeptical about those videos.
Really? Yeah. Okay. Okay.
Well, I don't really, I'm in like the Tic Tac.
Well, here, I got something to share with you.
So everyone wants to kind of dive into any given video.
But what you really need to think about is the whole collective body of evidence.
I'm reading a book now by Jacques Filet, who you should have on your show.
I'd love to.
He's terrific.
Can't get a hold of him.
Oh, okay.
He's in high demand.
I'm not pushing it.
Well, I just had a great exchange with him recently.
Really?
Yeah, I'm on a group with him.
And I'll ask him if he's going to be in this area ever.
And so ultimately, he wrote this book, The Invisible College.
It was it 69 or something?
75.
I forgot which.
I'm losing track because his body of work is so huge.
And he just compiles thousands of these.
eyewitness accounts and they're so bizarre.
And so, okay, I don't know.
First, those are two things.
The GoFest and Gimble, they look pretty odd.
These are pilots seeing these things, talking about them.
They are in that airspace everyday training.
If it looks unusual to them then, they're probably right in terms of being, can't characterize
it, don't know what it is.
Those things are out there in the airspace all the time.
Now, people say, oh, that was a U.S. tech demo, just like the Ticktack.
Now, in my, so in my experience here, what happened for me is I was under Fleet Forces Command, the four-star Admiral in Norfolk, and I supervised all the weatherguessers and oceanographers in the Navy, and they were on the ship weather forecasting, the Roosevelt.
So I had some authority and responsibility for what was going on there.
And I get this email from the ops officer at Fleet Forces Command, he's overseeing the training exercise that Roosevelt was in, and he sends it to every subordinate commander.
me, the strike group commander at the time, other strike group commanders, other commands like the Navy
Safety Center who reported to him. And the title of it was all caps, urgent safety of flight issue.
And attached was the GoFast video. And this is over the Navy secret network in 2015,
before it was declassified. And he said basically, if any of you know what these are, tell me
ASAP. We're having numerous near mid-air collisions. Remember, Ryan talked about a section of aircraft
being split, which is absolutely crazy from a safety standpoint. Aircraft, you don't want aircraft
to be within a mile of you. And so he said, tell me ASAP, inferring, and he said, we might
have to shut down the exercise if this still happens. This keeps occurring. The implication was,
if this is some crazy U.S. tech demo, and I don't know about it, the two-star in charge of the exercise, or
the two-star supporting the four-star in charge of the exercise.
He said, I need to know now because there's, when aircraft carriers train deploy like this,
it's very compressed.
Every pilot has to get certified to land on a flight deck.
Every ship has to check a box about what they're doing.
Can they do underway refueling?
Can they perform these weapons launches and, et cetera?
So there's all these evolutions you have to be able to prove you can do before you go deploy.
So there's no time to mess around.
And the four star that I worked for every week he'd hold meetings with all his subordinates.
I was one.
And all they talked about was the training cycle, where we were, anything interfering with it.
It was the number one job of that four star, train forces to deploy.
So when you have something effing with a training event, that's big deal.
And what happened is that video and that email the next day it was wiped from my computer.
And he never talked about that UFO encounter.
So what was going on there?
Well, it was obviously classified.
Was it a classified U.S. tech demo?
I really doubt it because, again, you get the four-star and all those one-stars and all these forces, these ships, getting ready to deploy.
We don't do tech demos in training ranges.
We do that in instrumented test ranges where we can gather all the data and say, that worked, that didn't.
And so, I don't know.
The premise of the Tick-TAC and the GoFAST being tech demos in training ranges, that just doesn't fly with me.
I don't know.
Now, there is this possibly that's been floated out there.
Maybe they did do that, that they wanted that kind of real world sort of simulation.
But, you know, in all my years in the Navy, we didn't just, I never saw that happen.
How much collaboration does the Navy have with private contractors?
A ton.
Really?
They build our ships.
So if Lockheed or one of these corporations wanted to tell us.
some of their black tech that nobody knows anything about, not even the generals.
China Lake. That's what they do. They have an instrumented range there. Yeah, and I've been there.
What's China Lake? Oh, it's something. I forgot the exact term of it. It's something like the Navy
weapons and training. Okay. Ask Steve to look it up. Okay. So it's like a, it's just like a testing ground
where there's no, that's right. That's what those places are for. And that's where we do it with those
contractors. It seems like from some of the stories of some of these whistleblowers, there you go.
It is.
It's a beautiful part of the country, by the way, the high desert.
It seems like, you know, some of the whistleblowers we've been seeing over the last couple of years have been alluding to this, this shadowy private Navy or private military that is essentially commandeered, reverse engineered, somehow advanced technology that they've been able to continuously develop and test.
without anybody in the U.S. military or government, for that matter, knowing about or having access to.
Like when you, like, for example, like the Michael Herrera stuff or some of these other people that Jesse Michaels has talked to with like crazy psionic type stuff, stuff that you don't need like hear about in stranger things or something like this.
So I think private contractor possession and R&D of UAP materials has happened.
I think that was really, we all know generally that that's how the legacy program was able to continue and not be held accountable to Congress.
Now, I don't know the ins and outs, and this is all information I have second or third hand.
And I'll just, actually, my primary source is someone who's researched this thoroughly and has connections in the right way.
And I believe in him and his authority.
I want to say I believe in him. I trust him.
And so what he says, I hold is true.
and that's Carl Nell.
Oh, yeah.
In fact, I think you ought to have him on the show.
He's brilliant, a great guy, and he's with me, a leading advocate on the UAP Disclosure Act.
So he's touched these programs closer than me, and recall he was the Army's point of lead for the UAP Task Force.
Another guy you might want to have on after his book comes out is Jay Stratton.
So he led the UAP Task Force.
These are questions they know better than me.
I'm sure.
And they all say words to the effect of, yes.
I don't know about Pentagon money going to it.
I'm not sure about that.
I don't know.
But they probably have a better grip on that.
Yeah.
I think it's probably just a mixture of everything.
I think some of this stuff is probably stuff we have no clue what it is.
Some of it could be foreign stuff.
Some of it could be black budget stuff.
Have you seen those Lockheed Cormorots?
No, what's that?
You haven't seen the Lockheed Cormorant?
Oh, Steve, oh.
Pause that search for Jolly West and look for the Lockheed Cormoron.
It's this crazy looking.
It looks like a Cormorant flying through the air, but it's an undersea sub.
It's like a drone.
There it is.
Wow.
Is it operational?
That's a good question.
I don't know.
Unknown.
Hmm.
Okay.
Well, interestingly, here's fun fact.
So in my family history.
Yeah.
The original immigrant came from France in the late 1700s, or early 1700s, and his son, our grandson, fought in the Battle of Trenton and in the Revolutionary War, 1776.
And then that was Peter Wallace Gallaudet.
Wow.
Yeah, became the, I'm going somewhere with this, became the personal secretary to George Washington when he became president.
and then his uncle was the engraver of the first continental dollar and then also a Galadette,
Elisha.
And down the lineage, there was a guy, a Galadette who founded an aircraft company that at the time,
I forgot his first name, Edson Gallaudet, I think.
Yes.
He had this Gallaudet aircraft company.
And there was a point maybe 1917 where his aircraft called the Gallaudet Bullet was the fastest aircraft in the world.
and then down the road that company was sold and merged and ultimately became Lockheed Martin.
No way.
Yeah, so I have a personal history there.
Holy cow.
Pretty weird, huh?
Yeah.
That's a pretty wild story, man.
So you got some stock or what?
No, I wish.
We lost that inheritance long time ago, so no.
Gallaudet's a badass name, too.
You know, it's a small family.
There's not many of us in the country.
And it's like a strong Gallaudet.
It's like a really cool, like.
Well, it's like any of names like that.
It originally was French and had a T and an E on the end.
You know how it is when they came over.
They made it easier for people to pronounce.
Right, right.
And ultimately, yeah, we're happy with it.
How about that?
Yeah, no, like these Cormoron drones, like these underwater drones are fascinating.
You know, and I'm just like curious to know.
Oh, I had the biggest underwater drone fleet in the Navy.
You?
Yes.
Yeah, that over 120 and there's more.
What do they look like?
So there's, this is kind of my, this is my business right now.
I'm a tech consultant for underwater, mostly ocean technology, but space too.
Okay.
And I've advised a whole bunch of ocean drone companies, surface, undersea, and there's a whole range of types.
The types I owned were oceanographic.
So they were long endurance.
They're called gliders.
So they don't, they have a thing called buoyancy propulsion where they use an air bladder to change.
basically the buoyancy so it goes up and down and you throw some wings on it there you uh whoa
that thing's spooky so that's that's an article i wrote that's pretty cool that is the manta a DARPA
developed ocean drone yeah DARPA developed ocean drone that's right yeah that is a badass looking
drone i again i don't think it's operational but i'd like it to be so wow yeah but uh and the
other pieces is a paper article i wrote on ocean drones
at revelers. We're turning into the aliens ourselves. I know exactly right. That's the interesting
conversion. We're not, are we the origins of all these NHIs and we're just seeing our relatives? I think we are.
I think so. That's my favorite hypothesis out of all of them is the time traveler one. I think that's the
most compelling one. I know it's hard. I know there's a lot of a lot of people to try to debunk it and there's a
lot of questionable holes in it. But goddamn, you know, just with like the history of of human beings and
evolution and like the way we're going is like dropping sperm counts dropping testosterone fertility
rate dropping off cliff and uh are you familiar with michael masters his extra tempestrial
hypothesis like if you look at all the abduction accounts of taking sperm and eggs from people
if there was some sort of cataclysm in the future they would want to come back in time to
replenish their population in the future with sperms and eggs of people in the past
and god damn that's interesting i i heck yeah and i i tell you my
My wife and I, we both are into this topic together, and it's an interesting journey we've been on.
And I can tell you how it started, but quickly, we would have thought two years ago, this is all a bunch of BS,
you know, abductions and all this. But man, now that we've met abductees, and we've read John Mack's book, by the way, which is really heavy.
And the communion by Whitley Streber, we've met him. And then they're documenting all, so when Whitley wrote the book, he got all these letters.
and they're all housed by people who said they had the same experience.
And they're all housed at this place called the Archive of the Impossible at Rice University.
And the director of that is Jeffrey Krippel, Dr. Krippel, who's another interesting guy you might want to have on your show.
Great guy.
Actually, let's follow up after this.
All these people I recommend it, I'm personally in touch with.
And if I say, you should go on Danny's show, they'll probably go on your show.
Beautiful.
Yes.
Yeah, Jeffrey's amazing.
I love him.
Yeah.
So back to your drones. I want to see your drones. You're a consultant for tech companies that are developing these underwater drones. Are these them?
Look for ocean glider, Steve.
Ocean glider. Okay. What is the purpose of these drones? What's their function?
It's oceanography. So long endurance sensing of the ocean. And it's really relevant. So I had 120 these, a big fleet, always out. That's one right there.
Oh, cool. Like torpedoes.
Yeah, that's what they look like.
And see that big antenna at the end, what they do is they do it basically a zigzag up and down the water column.
So change the buoyancy.
You have two wings, so that allows forward propulsion with the seawater hydrodynamics.
And once they make a down and up profile, the antenna pops on the surface and sends the signal up by SACCOM
and all gets fed into our ocean models, which are used by surface forces doing air.
undersea warfare or anti-submarine warfare.
So you have to know, just like weather and its impacts on radar and visual satellite communication imaging, the ocean has weather.
Yes.
And so, you know, this is your surfers.
So currents, sea state, salinity differences all affect the speed of sound.
So there are areas of the ocean that are...
See, these are all China ones.
Can you find his?
Yeah. Can you find the American one?
God.
It's a
look at naval oceanographic
What's the name of your company again?
Look at the naval oceanographic office.
Okay.
Naval oceanographic office.
Yeah.
And that's funny.
Ultimately, there's a story there.
So when I had that fleet of ocean drones
and we had brought the head of the Navy
Chief Naval Operation John Richardson to see them all
and he said,
great, you should be doing this.
We need to do more autonomy.
A short time after that,
the 2015 or so,
You might have heard the news.
Maybe it was 2016 when China seized one of our ocean drones.
Do you remember that?
I do remember that.
Yes.
And Trump even tweeted about it.
Yes.
I forgot what he just tweeted and said.
But that got the news, right?
And what happened was interesting.
The, I never got, that's good.
There you go.
That's exactly what we're talking about.
And so I never got a call saying by anybody in my chain of command, what are you doing?
Why did you put your drone out there?
They wanted us to be doing that.
So they actually screwed up.
And we used that to basically highlight all their negative and malign activity in the Pacific.
And so we got a lot of good press out of that.
And they quickly returned it to us.
And what we think is that it was a lower level commander of a ship who saw its surface and thought, oh, we should get this.
This will be a prize.
The leadership of the Communist Party will be so pleased.
And of course, it was an international incident and made them look really bad.
So they, so I, it was designed that way.
No, I, what I'm saying is I think they screwed up.
I don't think, they made China look bad, not us.
Right, but we, we intended for them.
Not really.
Oh, no.
So it was just doing its job.
I see.
We didn't throw it out.
Now, partially because it was in the South China Sea.
And that's an area that we want to know the ocean really well, because if China, Taiwan is going to get invaded, we're going to have to put our submarine forces and special.
operations forces there to keep that block, keep that, that, um, that, um, that, um, that, um, that,
Diego Garcia. Yes, of course. What, what is that place all about? The place looks crazy.
Well, it's, it's a, pull up a photo with Diego Garcia. It's where we, it's a strategic base, right?
In the middle of the Indian Ocean. I've heard, I've heard people call it the area 51 of the Indian Ocean.
I don't know anything about that. So, so, sure, Tim. No, no, I'll be honest with you. I, I, I, I'll be
honest with you because if there was something I couldn't say I'd tell you okay I would I'd be on
yeah but uh it's it's it's a strategic asset I think we based long range bombers there
uh at different times and in fact if I recall yeah so I find like a real like a satellite photo of it
there you go look at that crazy so they pull submarines inside there like it's like it's a perfect
little like a circular island that you can like park ships inside of so they're safe
So those are called atolls.
Atolls, right.
And they're formed when, let's say, an island or a kind of volcanic formed island starts to subside geologically.
And the fringing reef around that island continues to build up over time.
It takes millennia.
We did all the nuclear tests at atolls, right?
We did.
Bikini atoll.
That's right.
Yeah.
And they're perfect because it's like a safe haven from the ocean.
That's right.
These are great bases, of course.
It's why the Japanese seized them all in the Pacific.
Right.
The outset of World War II.
They had a lot of value, and then we went and retook them.
So, they're, yeah, this is a very valuable asset.
What a crazy place to be stationed, too.
Yeah, I have a good buddy.
He's in my book, actually, because he's a mentor of mine.
His name was Admiral Tim McGee, and he was stationed there for a while.
And a surfer like you, and surfed a lot there during that tour.
On the atoll?
Yeah.
Wow.
I don't know if you ever.
been a Guam?
No.
Especially when you got a typhoon out there.
Guam can have some good stuff.
Oh, yeah?
Yeah, for sure.
I've seen it.
Dang, man.
Yeah, the Pacific Islands, for sure.
And great, great scuba diving.
Oh, I bet.
I bet it's probably incredible there.
So,
you mentioned also this dude,
Victor.
Vascovo.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
What's this guy's story?
I heard you're, like, working with him
to do some sort of mapping
of some stuff?
Yeah, great guy.
So I got to know him because he and I signed an agreement.
When I was at Noah, he had this expedition going on
where he, as a private equity investor,
he had basically bought a ship
and got a firm called Triton submersibles
to build a subject.
It was full ocean depth rated.
And he decided, here's a backstory of Victor.
He's a mountain climber.
started out as a mountain climber.
I was also a naval intelligence officer in the reserves.
And he just really enjoyed climbing.
And he eventually scaled all the seven highest peaks on the continents.
And then there's a thing called the Explorers Grand Slam,
where if you do the seven highest peaks and ski to the North Pole and the South Pole,
that's what you get.
So Victor did that.
And that wasn't enough.
An ambitious fella.
Yeah.
Actually, he's a very soft-spoken guy.
He's a total gentleman.
He's not full of himself anyway, but he can do things.
And then so he said, there's more to do here.
And he realized that all the deepest trenches around the world, ocean trenches, had never been dived in.
Only one.
That was Challenger Deep in the Pacific, the deepest one.
And a Navy lieutenant named Don Walsh did it in 1960 with a Frenchman named Jean Picard in a submersible called Trieste.
and then James Cameron tried it again in 2012.
This Marianas Trench?
Yeah.
Okay.
Yes.
And the name of that specific deep part of it is called the Challenger Deep.
And how deep is it?
It's 35,000.
So that's seven miles.
Seven miles deep.
Is that the deepest part of the ocean?
Yes.
It's crazy.
How we know of.
I think we have a pretty good beat on, on, we have the general,
understanding of the pathometry of the sea floor around the world. We just don't have very precise
measurements in all of it. But we have mapped that area quite a bit. And in fact, the coolest
thing is that when we signed our agreement, we put our scientists on his ship. And to do an accurate
depth measurement that deep, you actually have to measure it quite a bit and put down sensors
to calculate the sound speed profile all the way up, all seven miles. Because you know, you
We need to know how the sonar refracts all the way down to get a true estimate of its vertical depth.
It's a tricky calculation.
And so we put enough data in there to make the most precise measurement of that deep spot ever.
Wow.
And then he went and mapped the illusion trench for the first time ever, never been mapped.
Where's the illusion trench?
It's up near the Aleutian Islands in Alaska.
Okay.
And that's U.S. exclusive economic zone.
It's important information to have.
and that was part of our whole national plan to map the U.S. EEZ exclusive economic zone.
That's something I put forward as a recommendation and the Trump administration said, do it.
And so we put together this whole national plan to do it.
And they're still being followed.
So that's why we have mapped at least 25% of the seafloor in our EEZ.
It wasn't even 20% when we started.
But anyways, Victor helped us with that.
And a great guy, now what he's doing is he's realized the cheapest way to map the ocean,
and all that 75% that's not been mapped,
is to use autonomous ships and make a fleet of them to do it.
And actually, he wants, well, it's probably better to have them be minimally manned with one crew.
And so he's building this plan to deploy that.
And I'm an advisor with him on this.
And we stay in touch in different topics.
We actually have a special project I can't talk about to go somewhere that your podcast has talked about.
I'll just say that, an ancient site underwater.
an ancient site underwater that I've talked about.
Yeah.
With man-made stuff underwater?
We're going to go map it and put an ROV on it.
Okay.
And try to date it and confirm its existence.
And I'll leave you at that.
There was a story that came out I heard recently.
Who told me this?
That there's, I don't know if this was like special information that shouldn't talk about publicly.
but I heard that oh no there was an article there was an article in the Jerusalem post actually
about uh they're they're making some sort of a movie about a discovery off the coast of Spain they
think it could be Atlantis I saw that was it Spain I think it was off the coast of Spain yeah I read
about that and I don't think it's right why not well and and this is if you do if you read that's it
Yeah.
If you read
Cadiz.
Plato's
dialogues,
where all that information,
he puts out a lot of information
on the very specific
location of it.
And so I don't think
it was that close to Spain.
No,
no,
according to what Plato wrote,
it was most likely,
what is that chain of islands?
What's the chain of islands
called?
It's off the coast.
It's kind of off.
the coast of Spain. It's like
in the Atlantic, Aesors,
the Aesors.
My buddy Randall Carlson
who talks a lot about this stuff.
He's been trying to put together an expedition
to go out to the Aesors for a while.
It's a fascinating looking place. That would be
a fun place to scuba dive. Yeah.
But
yeah, the problem
with the Atlantis stuff
is that are you familiar
with the chain of transmission?
No. With Atlantis? No.
It's insane.
Steve, I don't know if you ever saved this photo,
but we famously,
we've gone over this many times.
The train and transmission with Plato is,
it starts with,
uh,
it basically,
from the time Plato wrote about it,
he was told about it from somebody like a hundred years before that.
I think it was Pliny the younger.
That's right.
And then Pliny the elder was like 100 years before that.
And then,
Apparently, the gap between Solon and the person Solon got it from was like a thousand years or something like this.
So it's like a thousand years of verbal, basically transmission, never written down once until Plato.
And then, you know, an oral history going back 1,500 years is crazy.
Oh, there we go.
beautiful so okay number one the destruction of atlantis nine thousand years before so long um so the oral
history of a thousand years written down by the egyptians eight this is confusing eight thousand years
before so long it was written down so there's a thousand year gap between when when alanus was
allegedly destroyed from the crtias and when uh it was first written about so um
no actual writing of this from Egypt.
The priest,
the priest re's records years past,
then tells it by memory to Solon without consulting any written records.
Solon tells his relative Dropides.
Dropides tells it to his son,
Cretius the elder.
At age 90,
tells Cretius the younger.
And then the younger tells Socrates 50 years later
and then Plato writes it down.
so this is like so it's basically uh uh like eight like seven thousand years of just oral transmission
of the stories before he writes about it um you know which is like maybe but uh it's really it's really
fascinating and plato was known for he was not a historical writer he was a philosophical writer and he
wrote about hypothetical war games and, you know, things like the, the allegory of the cave. And
he was, he was, he was, he was writing about, you know, hypothetical thought experiments,
things like this, you know. Well, yes. And not to discredit, not to say that there,
there absolutely could be some, you know, remnants of a lost underwater city or civilization.
Just the way, like, the way that the climate has changed over millennia, you know,
since before the younger dries, the Pleistocene and like, the.
the lowering of the sea level, it's very, very likely that there could be ancient cities that are under the oceans.
100%. And actually, have you ever heard of the Silurian hypothesis?
I think so.
Steve, check it out.
S-I-L-U-R-I-N.
I believe it's this idea that the Earth is so old that there would have been enough time for an advanced civilization to exist a millions of years ago.
and that there'd be no sign of it in the geological record because of a millennia of all the geologic and volcanic and cataphysmic processes that occur here.
So if you just do the math, like Avi's done, there could be intelligent technology civilizations that have already formed here and become extinct.
Right, totally.
And why not?
So I don't, I think ultimately I want to see some data on Atlantis and.
I have a few leads, and I'll just leave it at that.
But then there's even the idea going farther back.
And maybe you've had some folks on your shows that have found, for example, metals and objects that were in parts of the geologic strata that they never should have been.
You know, I forgot the exact examples of that.
But there are a few out there.
Very odd.
Yeah.
This is the core idea is the hypothesis questions of a civilization.
cable of industrial activity could have risen and fallen on earth before humans and if so how we might find evidence of it
that's the problem is there's no toasters in the desert we can't find any ancient toasters but we do have the
megalithic blocks we do have the great pyramids so i this is our discussion before yeah you look at
you go if you've been in the louvre or have you been in egypt i've never been to the louvre have you been to the
louv so you've seen the the egyptian uh carvings stone carvings and it's just as you said you're
earlier they didn't have the tools to do that right had did did georgiani on your show talk about his
hypothesis for example of ancient stone structures and and atlantis specifically uh he's got a lot of
crazy hypotheses i don't know how you say that that's that's that's right one of his is is that
the pyramids are like time travelers going back and like creating this stuff to like try to communicate
with us i get lost in some of this stuff yeah yeah he's interesting but i you're
I did like his Atlantis, I guess, explanation.
And then he in this show...
He remind me what it was.
He thought that the Atlanteans had developed a form of collective consciousness.
And when you start looking at Psi phenomena, and you extend it to a civilization, his thought was that large stone structures.
could be carved and transported with a collective conscious mental, like, sci psychokinesis
and mass effect.
And when you, and I'm just starting to look at this whole thing because it's coming out now
as we talk about NHI and UAP and like levitation.
Yeah.
Okay.
100%.
And the actual carving in the stones.
I mean, you've, you've had on guests who have said that they did not have the Egyptians
and others before.
was the Schobeckley teppy yeah yeah that's they didn't what do they have to do that they did not
have the metals to do that this is the most fascinating stuff to me have you seen these no these are
this is a 3d print obviously of a real granite vase that was found underneath the step pyramid
granite granite one of the hardest stones known to man and there's multiple there's one over there
that's another 3d print i have a friend of mine who bought a bunch of these on the antiquities market
And they were confirmed, created 4,000 years ago, between 4,000 and 5,000 years ago, when conventional
Egyptologists say the Egyptians were carving stuff using flint chisels and pounding stones.
That's all they had.
That's right.
And now you have granite, the hardest stone on the earth.
They took these vases that are made of granite and they measured them in a light scanner
at a huge aerospace company.
Might have been Rolls-Royce.
Yeah, what was the precision in terms of the...
It was a...
They were...
They were...
...simetry.
...perfectly symmetrical, and the deviation...
Yeah.
The biggest deviation was, like, less than the width of a human hair.
Yeah.
And...
That looks machined.
Oh, 100%.
Especially when you consider the fact that these handles are built into it.
Wow.
Yeah.
The handles are part of the whole entire piece of granite, right?
And you look inside the actual vases, and you can see little tiny lined machine marks.
in etched in the granite like it was like it was a built on a CNC machine.
Oh wow.
But they know like we like people have at like there's been people that are studying this right now
who I'm currently talking to that are talking to all the biggest grain granite manufacturers.
People in China who are contracted to use CNC machines to print stuff on computers.
And they say there's no way they could do recreate something like this with granite.
With granite.
Wow.
So how do they do that 5,000 years ago?
That's right.
If it was 5,000 years ago.
It might be way
older.
We don't,
I don't think there's any way
to carbon data.
But,
you know,
there's so many questions,
man.
It just doesn't line up.
I mean,
just the idea that this,
we're on this linear timeline
and that,
you know,
we started as cavemen,
you know,
100,000 years ago
and it was a linear progression
ever since then is,
is,
is,
I think that's been
debunked big time,
especially.
There's just so much evidence
contrary to that.
I do.
I think we have to reexamine
many of our theories,
And this is a big reason why I've come out on this UAP topic.
It's just, again, like Avi said, it's not extraordinary to think that technology or advanced civilizations from somewhere are visiting us or have evolved elsewhere.
And it's extraordinary.
I think they wouldn't be because of the size of the universe.
But nonetheless, the mainstream media and mainstream science refused to open the door to that possibility.
They'll entertain it a bit, but they don't, they won't, there's only a few journalists, not a few, there's not many journalists.
They're out there that'll embrace this topic.
And they'll kind of treat it as something novelty and then they'll move on to the more mundane everyday things that are in the world.
And I think I've always, I don't have an agenda here.
I just want to know the truth.
Right.
This is one of the most frustrating topics to talk about because it is by design.
The whole topic and the whole narrative combined with the way the internet works is the perfect deception,
cauldron pot of disinfo and accurate info.
So it's designed so you will never find the truth.
You're constantly going to be a dog chasing its tail with this stuff.
Well, true.
And when you add in the fact that you also have people like me online trying to talk about it and you have people that just do this stuff because they make money doing it.
it, right? They want to sell books. There's people doing it, you know, people that aren't actually
objectively looking at stuff like Jesse Michaels is. He's one of the greatest. But he's doing great
work. But you have other people that are just like latching on to like specific narratives and just
pushing that because it gets them more followers. It makes them more money. Then you have to add in all
the dis info, all the intelligence agents, all the freaking media people that are paid off like the
Wall Street Journal that are being told by people, you know, in intelligence, whether or not
something's right or wrong, like signing off on an article, like before it gets published,
that's crazy. Yeah. Yeah, that's right. I think there's just a lot of very disingenuous
and unethical activities going on in this whole world. And I, in this space. And so I'm trying
to counter that or avoid it or get beyond that. It's difficult. It's definitely difficult. But here's
one for you. So as we, my wife and I, Karen, pursued this.
this topic, have you had any remote viewers on your show?
I had a few.
You have.
I saw that.
Well, it turns out my wife is taking a course.
And one of the original remote viewers is Paul Smith.
And he was in the Army, and he did this work, I believe, for the CIA.
And he has a book out.
It's basically the guide to remote viewing.
And this has been really interesting.
Okay, so how does it work?
Well, I don't know, but it works.
because if you read his book and some of the work by Joe McMonigle,
he's also, any of his interviews are really terrific because he lays it out there.
And so my wife's been taking these courses and it's very deliberate methodical how they do that at the course.
And she's basically gotten what they call hits.
She's had the instructor.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, we're talking, what they do is they'll have a scene and they'll give her coordinates.
and they have a clear image.
They have a picture from it.
And then they teach her a protocol on how to basically channel,
or for lack of a better word, where that is.
What's there?
And she's done this probably seven or eight times,
and almost every time she's gotten it right.
And it's been these complex either buildings, landscapes,
and she has described them, you can't make it up.
And so it's been fun to watch because everybody has the ability.
And when they teach you the protocol about how to, it's non-local communication and information transfer,
which is nothing unusual if you accept the fact that quantum mechanics and physics is real.
That's non-local communication and information transfer that our minds have the same ability.
And in fact, there was a guy named Alexander Wendt who wrote a book about this called Social Science and the Quantum Mind, I believe it's called.
And he looks into this idea that we are, we're basically wave functions.
Like if you study quantum mechanics and the fact that an observer will collapse the wave function to the observer effect.
That's right.
And that that's what we are really.
Yeah.
Have you heard Georgiani's theory on this?
No, tell me.
He's got this theory that reconciles that with the simulation.
Oh, that's another one.
Okay.
Yeah.
So there's this guy named Claude Shannon, who was the one who developed the idea of transmitting data, like bits, binary bits.
And that was after the touring computer in the 40s, after we first developed computers.
And then there's this other guy named Rolf Landauer who came up with a theory that data on a hard drive has mass.
Yeah.
So the way he reconciles, the way he explains that is using like the two laws of thermodynamics.
One of them that energy can never be created or destroyed, only transferred.
And the other one is entropy always goes up in a closed system in our universe disorder.
It always increases.
Hence like the heat death of the universe.
So if you take those laws, that entropy always goes up and that energy and mass are interconvertible and energy is never created or
destroyed, it's only transferred.
If you have a blank hard drive, it's going to be all ones or all zeros before you encode
data, before you store data on it.
Then it becomes high entropy disorder of chaos, a chaotic mass of ones and zeros on that
hard drive, right?
So what happens if you erase 100 terabytes off of this hard drive?
It goes from chaos, ones and zeros, to all zeros, all ones.
The entropy goes down.
which according to the law
of the thermodynamics
it can't happen
that has to be transferred
out of the hard drive
so if you do have
all the data on the hard drive
it would be theoretically
according to Landauer
and you could
and you could weigh it
and if we had tools
to weigh those hard drives
he thinks that all the hard drives
across the face of the earth
right now and all the server farms
all the data on every single hard drive
would be like a kilogram right now
oh boy
But like every year the data storage goes up 25%.
Now if you add in exponential growth, like reaching the technological singularity, how much that's going to grow is going to be.
We don't know what that's going to be.
But if you keep it stable at 25% growth every year, he theorized in like 304 years, we're going to have the mass of the moon on the surface of the earth in data stored on hard drives.
Right.
So and then so here's the crazy way.
Here's where it gets crazy.
If you crack open a hard drive when it has all this data stored on it, you can't see anything.
There's no, you can't see the mass.
You can't see the data, right?
So if the stuff on the hard drive is actually mass and if you can weigh it and it actually, you know, is mass and it's electromagneticly indetectable, he says, what other kind of mass do we know of that is not detectable electromagnetically?
Dark matter.
because we looked at the spins of the galaxies.
We looked like the center of the galaxy.
The spin is the same as the outer rim of the galaxy
when it should be faster on the inside.
So they're saying that dark matter has mass.
That's flattening the spin rate of all these galaxies.
So he's saying if dark matter is the same thing
as mass on a hard drive,
that means mass, energy, and information are all interconvertible,
not just mass and energy.
Yeah.
So that means dark matter is a computational cloud.
And our consciousness, we're using consciousness as a fundamental way to interact with that,
the same way you use a computer screen to interact with a hard drive.
So I was just talking to my wife about this.
And he thinks that reconciles perfectly with parapsychology and stuff like ESP.
That's right.
And in fact, I forgot the researcher.
Karen told me, and I don't remember, there's a paper out there.
There's probably many about,
weighing someone's brain before they die and after they die.
And it weighs less after they die.
And this isn't anything about the fluids and whatever.
It's energy and mass or equivalent,
and you have energy as a conscious entity.
And somehow that energy gets transferred somewhere
and you can measure it in the mass equivalent.
Wow.
Yes.
And we haven't gotten to this.
part yet, but I'm 100% certain that human consciousness survives physical death.
Welcome to Sephora. I'm looking for a perfume that's not too perfuming. I got you.
Serum moisturizer or moisturizer syrup. Let's get into layering. My concealers making me look worse.
Sounds like the wrong shade. Let's get you matched. There's only one store that really gets what you're
going for. Get beauty from people who get beauty.
Only at Sephora.
Hi, I, let's get you a basket.
Walmart business is in the business of saving you time, money, and hassle.
Whether your business started in a garage or is a garage.
Walmart business has the tools to help you get where you're going.
Tools like free shipping, multi-user accounts, and just about any item your company needs.
Even a double filtration cyclone dust collector.
Yep, even that.
Sweet.
Walmart business.
It's the Walmart you love.
for your business. Learn more at business.womart.com. Terms apply. I don't have any doubt in my mind.
And I know this for a lot of reasons and that have all sort of just a big series of events and things I've read.
And again, there's so much in other religions that embrace this. And so this is again like UAP.
people think this is so fantastic in the mainstream media and the mainstream science world
where almost every civilization has embraced it yeah and we're only now coming back to that
yeah there's a there's a and this is all being studied bigelow studied it and then there's the
university of virginia's division of perceptual studies doffs i think that's the right name of it
this is what they do they they have scientists they're dedicated to studying this
this whole phenomena, which is really fascinating. And again, I have actual proof. And I know,
I know we had a life experience that caused us to look at, come into contact with a number of
mediums and they are all so accurate that you can't make it up. You can't accidentally arrive
at the things they know. In fact, I know several of them and they're very, and they're not charlatans,
not doing this to make money. They have a gift. They could connect to that. And there's a
weird interplay, again, with N.H.I. And I don't know how that fits, but it's, it's, and in fact,
Jacques Valet and the Invisible College talks about this parapsychological, paranormal element of UAP.
Yeah.
I don't understand it all yet, but I, I know what I've seen. And, uh, yes.
There's definitely something there. And the, the simulation aspect to it, if you, if you look at the
observer effect and you say that, you know, when the wave,
function collapse only when you collapses and you see things only when you're when you're observing
them do they actually happen i mean that makes perfect sense in a video game because it's conserving
processing power when you're in one room in a video game the outside of it is not being rendered
until you actually go there right and that also works perfectly with shell drake's morphic resonance
right if one problem is solved in one part of the world like if one person breaks a world record in
france some they're going to be five more people breaking that same world record in the next
couple years somewhere else i like what that guy says in fact i because because he explains
monarch butterfly migrations over generations do you know about that so if you look at monarch
butterflies how they migrate from mexico to the u.s i've seen it firsthand in in new orleans and it's
spectacular but ultimately these animals they they do they don't learn it uh from an experience
They don't ride the bus with their parents one day and then next after their parents passed.
They've learned it and they do it.
No, these animals die before they've complete a full cycle of going one way and coming back.
So they, in the only way that would explain how they know.
And then there's also things like whale migrations or whatnot over the whole half of the planet,
that there's this resonance of consciousness,
somehow. And I know that's touchy-feely and there's not, you need, we need more data to explain it.
But it's the first step, I think, at explaining phenomena like that.
Yeah. Same with bird migrations, too. Yeah. Yeah.
I have a friend who, you have a friend. I won't say his name. One friend. He was telling me
this funny story yesterday. And he's a, like a very wealthy guy who is not really into like any kind of like,
woo-woo spiritual stuff at all, right?
He's all about his business and,
and, uh,
doesn't want to waste time doing anything.
And he recently did DMT in his backyard by himself.
And he was telling me he's like, Danny, he was like,
I was sitting in my backyard and I tried this DMT stuff.
And I noticed this tree that I never even knew was in my backyard.
I'd never even thought about this tree, never even looked at it once or ever had one thought
about this tree.
And he's like, it started communicating to me
and telling me that it was in pain.
What? Really?
And he's like, it was struck by lightning, I guess,
like during that hurricane that happened a couple months ago.
Yeah.
And this is so weird coming from this guy.
This is the opposite guy I would ever expect.
And he was telling me this sober, obviously.
This was like a day later.
And he's like, dude, it was so convincing.
He's like, I'm hiring people to come out
and try to bring this tree back to life.
Oh my gosh.
And he's like, I'm going to go.
go talk to it again tonight.
That is a great story.
But like,
I think of all the stories you just said.
I think that's real.
I think it's totally real.
You have to think living things.
Living things, I,
why if we have consciousness and,
and you know damn well,
other mammals do,
if you have a dog or a cat,
they are absolutely conscious.
Yeah.
Right.
Why wouldn't other living things have some degree of that?
And I mean,
I,
I fully can't grasp how,
how that, what that is.
Yeah.
But, and you probably seen the studies where they'll put in, like, an arboretum or what,
or a greenhouse, a bunch of plants, and they'll play, like, heavy metal.
And another one time they'll play it, like, classical music, and they'll start thriving under the classical music.
Right.
And they'll start wilting under, you know, there's something there.
Totally.
Yeah.
That's an interesting story.
My wife's a big animal and plant lover.
So she is just going to love that story.
Hopefully it won't start taking DMT
But maybe that'll be good
Hey man, there's worse drugs you do
That's right
Yeah, no
I think
You know, especially too
Like animals like cats and dogs
You know, there's always like
I think they can they can sense stuff
You know?
Oh
Like they can send stuff that we don't know
What it is like energy
Like you know
Like you ever go into a house or whatever
And just be like ooh something
Like somebody was murdered in that house before
Whatever
Like when you know you're being washed
Yeah
That too
Or so
animals, dogs, this is interesting. There's that. And then there's other stuff too,
maybe related. So everybody knows dogs sometimes know when earthquakes can occur. You know what
that? I've heard this. Oh, I know it to be true. I lived in Southern California. I've been
through a lot of earthquakes. Really? Oh yeah. And then I have friends, neighbors. Oh, yeah.
The dog was freaking out. So now there's a physical explanation for this. And this goes to,
and this reminds me of the UAP thing because it's ignoring mainstream science, ignoring really
relevant research pursuits.
Okay, so when I've been working with this company and they use what they call space weather,
which is ultimately ionospheric variability.
The ionosphere has charged particles.
You see evidence of that in the auroras.
and so
and what happens
and they call the space weather
that as I said
that when before an earthquake
as two big seismic plates
start building pressure
there's a lot of
there's a lot of metal in those plates
and what it does is it induces a charge
and it is coupled from the lower
atmosphere all the way up to the top of the atmosphere
and you can take space weather measurements
of what they call total electron count
and before an earth
a big earthquake, like the Kobe or the Japanese earthquake.
What was it called?
Oh, Fukushima?
Tohuka.
Yeah, I know.
Tohoku, I think it was tooku.
Oh, oh, yeah, yeah.
That giant signature in the ionosphere right before that.
In fact, this company, they're called precursor SPC.
Yes.
They, three, four earthquakes in 2024 all above 7.0 magnitude,
they predicted between three and four days in advance by just looking at space weather
signatures. So this is and so I've been trying to get the US Geological Survey to
take interest and actually maybe do earthquake early warning. They refused to look at it.
What? It's yeah it's this earthquakes kill as many people and cause as much damage as a
world war, but they're the typical bureaucrats. All they are is seismologists and that's the
only way they've known how to study earthquakes. They refuse to look at a nurse system approach,
which is what meteorologists have done for several decades. We started
to couple the ocean and the atmosphere and the land and the ice caps and that produces a better
predictive model. But now these bureaucrats are just, oh, no, we're going to do it this way.
Have you heard of this NASA physicist by the name of Friedman Freund?
Let me get there. But ultimately, that's what I think dogs are tapping into, this, this,
this, this, this, electromagnetic potential that increases. And they have a, they have a, they're more
sensitive to it. Well, I think they have senses that. And whales migrate. Yeah. And they are using the
magnetic lines in the earth. Right. That's what is a hypothesis out there. So yeah, a lot of living things are
more sensitive to parts of the Earth system than we are by far. I always think about like what kind
of things are existing around us right now that we have no idea or there. You know, like we didn't,
if we didn't have the sense of smell, if we have, Wi-Fi. Right. Wi-Fi. Yeah. Perfect.
If we didn't have the, haven't evolved the sense of smell to detect things like prey or, you know, whether your building is on fire or whatever it is, we would never know if somebody, you know, farted next to you and you were sitting in somebody's fart, right?
So how many other things are like that out there that we don't have the organs to detect?
That's right.
That's right.
Like sharks.
They do that, right?
They have these, what do they call?
There's a word, there's a name for them.
Oh, yeah.
After an Italian, like Lorenzini.
Yeah, I forget what it is.
But they can detect electrical pulses in the water when animals.
That's why they say to punch it in the face if it tries to attack it out here.
Because they have all these senses up there.
It screws up its whole.
That's right.
That's right.
Yeah, they have that.
We don't.
Yeah.
And I wonder like what kind of freaking senses do other animals have that we don't.
Like even dolphins, you know, John Lilly.
was doing that study on dolphins that was funded by NASA
where he was like looking at their brains.
He was trying to figure out how to communicate with dolphins
like telepathically.
Right, right.
Yeah, that's interesting because we know
we're beginning to understand
and I don't know if anybody on your show
has talked about these telepathy tapes.
Yeah.
Do you know what that?
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
And so why wouldn't other living things
have the same ability to communicate like that?
And in fact, how do they,
this is interesting if you look at how how complex the social behaviors of a variety of animals are
and and and they don't talk i mean they may make calls but uh like birds but it's interesting
how animals can can communicate without visible or oral even wave i know whales vocalize but uh is
it's interesting i think there's there's something there too yes and i think it is
I think humans possibly had a stronger connection to whatever that is, like in the past.
That's what Georgiani says.
Yes.
I told you that, the collective consciousness, psychokinesis.
Yeah, I think this is kind of like a different.
This is kind of, my thing about this is that I think before we had ubiquitous technology and the ability to offload our memory on the devices.
and you know, we're just constantly existing in this technological civilization.
I think that we probably had to have had a stronger antenna to connect to whatever that is,
whatever telepathy is, whatever psychokinesis is.
I feel like those abilities were stronger with us before we developed all this technology.
And that sort of ability has atrophied as technologies.
has risen. I think you're right. I think people dependent upon that, certainly in the distant past.
And there's a study out there somewhere. I think anybody who's a twin knows this. I've talked to
twins. They sometimes can communicate with their sibling, their twin sibling, without talking.
And it's hard, but I've heard this so often. It's not a one-off. And so there's something
similar there that we all maybe have that innate ability but it's yeah it's atrophied and distracted
technology going back to your earthquake uh what you were saying about the earthquakes um there's this
guy named friedman freund i don't know if you've heard of him he's a NASA physicist no and he did this
talk he's done ted talks before and he's also had a conversation with christopher dunn who's the guy
who wrote the uh geiza power plant book and his new book's called the tesla connection yeah
so what friedman freeman freon figured out which i think is directly connected to what you were
is you can detect earthquakes using these things called earthquake lights.
So what he's saying, what he's showing is like igneous rock deep beneath the earth, deep beneath the earth.
Easy for you to say.
When it rubs against each other, when those rocks grind under the earth, like deep, deep in the earth, it creates, it sort of like creates this electron, these electrons.
Yeah, same thing.
that light up and create these lights that shoot up out of the ground.
And people mistake them for UFOs.
Oh.
But it's like, if you can find images of earthquake lights, apparently it always happens in Marfa, Texas.
Oh, right.
So Marfa, Texas is like synonymous, is like famous for having these earthquake lights.
I've heard of the Marfa lights.
Yeah.
I didn't know that that was due to seismic activity.
Yes.
Oh, it is.
Yeah.
Okay.
According to Friedman Freund.
And he did an experiment where they took granite, right?
and they took it and they grinded it against the other,
and they smashed granite together,
and they were putting electrodes on either end of the granite rods,
and they were measuring electrons.
Yeah.
It was creating electricity.
A current.
Electrocurrent, yes.
That's the exact same thing.
He's talking about that location under the surface.
So it's throughout, it's in the strata, up to the surface,
up to the top of the atmosphere.
So, however you want to detect it, you can detect it.
Yeah.
We're talking tons of,
metals that are all pressuring. Look up Friedman Freund. And then so, so Chris Dunn interviewed him for
his book, the Tesla, Giza, the Tesla connection. And what Chris Dunn's new hypothesis is, is that
the great pyramid is on the Giza Plateau, which he believes is seismically active or whatever.
He, like, I guess there's a lot of igneous rock that moves around underneath the pyramids.
And he thinks that it, that, that, the great pyramid is a solid state. These are just photos of
him, Steve. A solid state electron
harvester. Oh.
So he thinks... That's interesting. Yeah.
He thinks that all of the stones
and all of the, all of the
limestone and the granite is harvesting
the electrons from deep underneath the earth.
Channeling them. Channeling them into that
pyramid and using it
to conduct electricity. He thinks it was like a free
energy machine. Wow.
Yeah. That's a big machine.
Yeah. Have you been there?
Oh, yeah. I've never been there. No. I can't
wait to go. That is a phenomenal
When you see something so massive and it's, yes.
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
And the physics are pretty well proven.
In fact, for this big, the space weather element of this phenomena, the Europeans, the European Space Agency did a study.
They called it Inspire, and I forgot what the acronym stands for, but it was about these ionospheric precursors that are observable before earthquakes.
So we have studies out there.
and then you got our government that's just sitting on,
you know what,
rather than being innovative.
Again, people just not looking at things with clear eyes
and taking some action on it.
So back to this underwater stuff,
if you were, if the leader of the free world
was to go to you and say,
we need to figure out a way
to ensure the survival of our species
in the case of a thermonuclear war
or a cosmic cataclysm,
and we need to do it underwater,
or maybe not,
maybe they don't even say that.
Would you think or suggest that underwater
would be the best case scenario for something like that?
It would be a top contender.
I mean, underwater or under the land.
And I don't know.
It could be either,
but we'd have to, we couldn't live in the surface
because of the radiation.
So we'd have to find a way.
I think the water's a good buffer for that.
It would be a much easier underground, right?
I don't know about that.
I guess, depending on the, yeah, very deep in the ocean, it's hard to get to.
But interestingly, I'm working with a company called Deep
that is building under sea habitats.
And so this is not just theoretical.
They're building these mostly for tourism,
dive tourism and recreation.
but this is something that can be done.
We have the engineering behind it.
People have proven it.
Funny thing about the space program.
I got to meet Scott Carpenter, who was one of the Mercury astronauts.
And he happens to be the only one that I know of that also was an aquanaut.
So he lived in Sea Lab for a while off the La Jolla Coast Line in California and set some human undersea endurance record.
and I asked him about that
and I said,
how do you compare space exploration
and ocean exploration?
And he told me that they don't compare.
Space is all glorious and shiny
and it's very quick.
You open a space mission in just a few days,
but when you're underwater,
it's cold and dark and everything breaks.
And I laugh because he made it sound like space was a cakewalk
and the ocean was the real challenge.
Yeah.
And what's funny about that is that
if you remember Kennedy's speech at Rice
when he challenged America to go into space,
he talked about,
we do these things,
not because they're easy,
but because they're hard.
So he was saying,
space is hard,
but we're going to do it.
And I got the astronauts to tell me,
yeah, but the ocean's a lot harder.
However,
I'm seeing a lot of ocean innovators
like this deep company
that's making it happen.
Victor made it happen in his submersible.
He dived all the five deep trenches.
Right.
And that was just extraordinary.
Not like the ocean gate disaster,
that submersible,
which collapsed because of,
they didn't do the right engineering.
In fact, Victor and I know two of the people that were on that sob.
Really?
Yeah, yeah.
There was Pierre Narjaleigh.
Victor knows him well.
I met him.
And then there was Hamish Harding Explorer, went into space with Victor.
I met him at the Explorers Club.
And it was just so disappointing because Victor had warned them.
That engineering of that is not proven.
They never did a test in a tank.
like Victor did. There's only one tank in the world that can pressure depth of full ocean depth.
Really? Yeah. It's in Russia. But Victor did it because he knew he had to do that to ensure he was safe to go down.
So it's like a, it's like a big pool that they can like, they can increase the pressure? It's a tank. It's a tank. Yeah, it's all enclosed.
They increase the pressure. They simulate seven miles down. And they did it. And they prove that the pressure hall of the smersible could withstand that pressure.
Do they do this with full size like battle subs? Well, I don't know. I don't know. I think they
They're small.
Submarines, yeah, submersibles that do that are smaller.
Submarines don't go down more than a few hundred feet.
Oh, really?
No, no.
They don't need.
What's the deepest difficulty or something go?
It's classified.
But it's several hundred feet.
Several hundred feet.
And ultimately, though, because that's all we really need to operate.
Why would you go deeper when the targets you care about are no deeper than you are?
There are other subs and ships.
We need to get windows on those subs too
so they can see the UFOs flying around.
That's right.
The USOs.
All right.
I'm going to do something about that.
We need to, yeah.
Or get some sort of technology
where you can make the metal transparent
or something, translucent.
Yeah.
I want to.
In fact, I've been,
I know the science advisor to the president,
Michael Kratios,
and I've asked him,
and I'm going to ask him again,
every year to the Office of Science
and Technology Policy in the White House
puts out an annual research
and development priorities,
memorandum. And I've seen it. I've contributed to it. I always put ocean things on it when I was at NOAA.
But I've asked him to start considering UAP and USO research so that if he puts it in the memo,
that means all the federal agencies that do stuff in either in the atmosphere or ocean have to start
studying them. So if I were to get him to do that, that means Noah would have to start researching
USOs as well as ONI and my old organization, the Naval Oceanographic Office.
Do you think that there's actual like underwater bases that these crafts are going to?
So I saw you had Richard Dolan on who is a friend of mine and I like him a great deal.
He's incredible.
Yeah.
That book is awesome.
He said there's like 600 like witness accounts.
Oh, I've read through most of it.
Yeah.
The one from the 1700s, the ship.
Yeah.
Was insane.
I saw you talk to him about that.
Yeah.
And yes.
So, well, I don't know.
But we know that.
they're in the water a lot and they come from the water, go into the water, we just saw the
Omaha, where do they go? They have to, they, so that if we know that, and by the way, we don't
know much about the ocean. So if we're seething them come from the ocean and go in and we only
explore 10% of the ocean volume and 25% of the seafloor, there's a pretty good bet that more
research into explore the ocean might teach us a whole lot more about USOs and UAP.
And where do you think if you were them would be the best place to hide your base?
Well.
In Antarctica?
Well, all these places that people aren't.
Yes, exactly.
Right.
But the weird thing is that this big hotspot is off SoCal.
You might know that is weird.
Yeah.
Like Catalina Island.
It's highly populated.
What's going on there?
And in fact, I have a friend who is, I have a friend.
One.
You too.
Yes, exactly.
And he, actually, his daughter is going to the Naval Academy on the swim
team with my daughter. And so we're proud of them. And he was a Naval Academy graduate in my wife's
class and became an F-14 and F-18 pilot and just retired. And so a credible guy and knows about
military capabilities. And his wife has seen them over to the Catalina Channel repeatedly
in broad daylight. Yeah. And so this is what's happened. So many people are coming to me.
credible people, average citizens, former military personnel, all with their stories. And I've had
dozens of this. So it's happening more than you think. So when you were in front of Congress and they
were asking you all these questions and you were saying stuff like, yeah, I have this answer,
but I can't tell you unless we're in a private setting or in a skiff or whatever,
what do you know? If I can't tell them, I wouldn't tell you. But it's really like can you, do you know
shit that like can put all these questions to rest no so i wasn't involved with any ufo uap
programs i was not read in okay so the reason i talk about this now is i had my eyewitness account
of the go fast video and ryan and i had people supporting ryan squadron who was seeing these all the
time and i'm i'm a navy retired admiral and people like fravor and alex dittrick and
Ryan Irk speaking out and this petty officer Alex Wiggins.
And I just felt these courageous folks deserve top cover.
Right.
They deserve someone like me, a retired admiral, because no one else is.
I don't know why.
But to say this is credible, this is a real thing.
It deserves attention and research.
So the stuff that you were telling them, I guess I imagine that you did eventually tell them what they were asking you in a private setting.
This stuff was secondhand accounts that were told explained to you by other people.
Yes, yes. And these are people I trust. In fact, as I told you, I knew people who touched the legacy program. I know them. And many of them are out already. Eric Davis, Hal put off. Joe, Jay Stratton was not in the legacy program, but he led the UAP Task Force. So he's seen a ton of UAP information that's not been declassified. And I trust him. Lou Elizondo. I trust him too. So these have all been in the mix, Carl Nell. And we're all saying the same thing.
There's a lot of information that's being withheld from the public.
Some of it should be released and the full story.
And what's stopping all this from being released?
It's the classification issue is we're too afraid.
What are people scared of?
Well, it's the government not really thinking it's good policy to say we can't protect our citizens, our airspace, our water space.
That's a tough one to overcome.
Sure.
I understand that.
I'm not sure how they resolve that.
myself. Again, I'm here from the standpoint that the American people were government by the people
for the people, that they deserve to know the nature of reality. The government knows it. They should
disclose some of that to our taxpayers. And what is to stop like any of these people who have
this top secret information like from just coming out and saying it? Like other than losing your
career. Jail. Jail time. You could go to jail? Oh, yeah. These is all, these are all,
but wouldn't that just confirm it? If you came out, if I came out tomorrow and I was part of some
deep, deep access program. What we're talking about is, and I'm, I've signed these myself,
you get read into a program and it's, and you have a nondisclosure form that says,
I acknowledge that if I divulge any of the information in this program, and it's a pre-wequisite
before getting into the program. So you might not even know you're getting read into a UAP program.
It might be, hey, you're a, we think you, we want to have you.
you know about this because of your responsibilities and we think you have a need to know.
So first before you get read in, sign this and it says, I won't do anything or I can go to jail.
Sure. Okay. Yeah. And actually, yes. But the problem with that is in public, in the public's eye,
if you do come out and say some crazy stuff that this is, I'm claiming this is true. And then you get
thrown into jail, people are going to say, oh my God, it's true. They threw them in jail.
Yeah. If it was bullshit, why would they put them in jail? Well, so the good thing here is these,
I don't think, I don't know if they've been passed yet, but maybe there are, I know that, uh,
Burchett has introduced some whistleblower protection legislation to get around that. And I've
heard some of that's been subverted too. Yeah. Like some of the whistleblower protection groups or,
or fundraisers that people have been putting together are just like, like intelligence operations just to like,
like, like a fly trap for whistleblowers. I'm pretty sure of it. Yeah. Yeah. Crazy man. I know it.
It's never a dull moment with UFOs.
You have a hard out.
You got to be out of here by four?
I do.
Okay, cool.
It's 355.
Tell people about your, you have a book and some other stuff that you can.
Yeah.
Hey, so a lot of what I'm doing now, I don't know if you can show this or not.
I got my book cover finally for proved.
Oh, beautiful.
Hold that up like this.
Yeah.
A little bit higher.
There you go.
Holding fast and heavy seas.
Leadership for turbulent.
times. Yes. Well, what happened is as an agency leader coming from the military, I had a lot of
our scientists come up to me and say, hey, I have a tricky situation. You were a leader.
I don't know a lot about leadership because I haven't been trained on it. What are your ideas?
What are your thoughts on leadership? And this happened to me almost every day. And so what I did
is I really just answered that question in my book. I go through what I learned about leadership in the
Navy. And that's what you do. I love the service because it's, it's officers lead and that's
their job. And you learn, many people learn how to do it well because they have great mentors.
And I go through all the people that showed me the ropes on, on how to be an effective
servant leader. And it's a good story. Everyone wants to be a better leader, whether you're a dad
or a business manager. It's about positively influencing people you care about. And so,
So then I go into this agency called NOAA, Science Agency, and it was a challenging time because, and I'm a fan of a lot of what President Trump is doing right now, but he's not an easy guy to work for and inspire a federal workforce. You can see this right now under. And but I think I did that pretty well because we succeeded in a lot of fronts. I talked about our partnership with Victor and ocean mapping and there were many others. And so I just go through that in this book to talk about and teach how
a lead during challenging situations. And it was a lot of fun too. I had some great friends.
And we did some fun things. And so there's a good amount of humor because there's a sea
story behind every year. Oh, it's amazing. Yes. Is there going to be, is it available on Amazon?
There's fishing involved. Oh, hell yeah. And a lot of scuba diving. Amen. Okay. Amen.
We'll link it all below. Great. As well as social media. What's it? What are you on social media? Your name?
Oh, LinkedIn. Tim Gallaudet. Facebook and stuff.
and X, but I'll have, and it's Kohler books is publishing it.
I'm just waiting for the DoD Pentagon Review, the security review that everybody else has to go through like Lou and Jay.
And when that's done, it's going to go hopefully in the fall.
Fantastic, man.
Thanks again for your time, man.
This has been fascinating.
Oh, look, he finally found it.
Steve, you're the man.
It only took an hour.
No, I had a day for my email.
Which one is he?
So the very back, that's Jolly West.
Wow.
Yep, he was the guy who was the head guy of MK Ultra
And the guy who basically drove Jack Ruby
Insane after he killed Oswald
So a lot of unethical
What was he doing on the set of 2001 Space Odyssey
That's all I want to know
That's right
Interesting, I learned a lot
Thanks, Ben
Thank you Danny
Hey, it's 3.59
Do you have five minutes to answer some Patreon questions?
Yeah, let's do it
All right, that's the end of the podcast
Good night, everybody
Stitch Fix
Shopping is hard
Let's talk about it.
I don't have time to shop for clothes.
I have to buy everything in three sizes to find one that fits.
They know me at the post office.
Workout wear is my only wear.
Stitch Fix makes shopping easy.
Just show your size, style, and budget.
And your stylist since personalized looks right to your door.
No subscription required plus free shipping and returns.
Oh, wow. That was easy.
Stitchfix. Online personal styling for everyone.
Take your style quiz today at stitchfix.com.
When you buy LG,
You get so much more than just an appliance.
You get more done, more cost savings, more peace of mind, and more control,
because LG appliances are designed to do more, like washers and dryers with AI tech to take out the guesswork,
refrigerators that fit in tight spaces and keep food fresher, longer,
or ranges with precise induction cooking and easy cleanup built in,
all with the style you want and reliability you can count on.
So you can get more from your home every day.
LG appliances, so much more.
Make life easier with LG.
See the latest models and savings now at LG.com.
