Dark Downeast - The Murder of Michelle Gardner-Quinn (Vermont)
Episode Date: October 8, 2026Why talk about a case that was solved years ago? Because the answer to who did it isn’t the only thing that matters.One night in October 2006, a college student needed to borrow a phone. She happene...d to ask a stranger with violent intentions. What makes that even harder to sit with is what investigators learned about this man afterward. There were red flags everywhere, allegations that reached back years, but none of it stopped him from being there that night.This young woman’s story did not end with what happened to her. The work she cared about continues through the people who love her. Twenty years later, her legacy is still very much alive.To support Michelle’s Earth Foundation and the environmental work carried forward in her name, visit michellesearth.org to donate.View source material and photos for this episode at: https://darkdowneast.com/michellegardnerquinnDark Downeast is an Audiochuck and Kylie Media production hosted by Kylie Low.Follow @darkdowneast on Instagram, Facebook, and TikTokTo suggest a case visit darkdowneast.com/submit-caseDid you know you can listen to Dark Downeast ad-free? Join the Crime Junkie Fan Club! Visit https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/fanclub/ to view the current membership options and policies. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Why talk about a case that was solved years ago?
Because the answer to who did it isn't the only thing that matters.
One night in October 2006, a college student needed to borrow a phone.
She happened to ask a stranger with violent intentions.
What makes that even harder to sit with is what investigators learned about this man afterward.
There were red flags everywhere, allegations that reached back years,
but none of it stopped him from being there that night.
That's part of why this story still matters, yes,
but the other part is even more important.
This young woman's story did not end with what happened to her.
The work she cared about continues.
The people who love her carry it forward,
and 20 years later, her legacy is still very much alive.
I'm Kylie Lowe, and this is the case of Michelle Gardner Quinn.
on Dark Down East
If you've never stepped foot on the campus
of a classic New England University in the fall,
let me take you there.
Brick buildings sit against a backdrop of maples
turning red and gold,
leaves skitter across the walkways,
and the evenings dim a little earlier every day.
By October, students are fully back
and downtown has its rhythm again.
The bars, coffee shops,
and late night hangouts along main street,
fill back up after the quiet of summer.
There's a special kind of warmth to it,
despite the chill in the air that comes on faster
than anyone ever plans for.
Speaking from experience,
as someone who went to a New England university
and walked the downtown streets of my college town
in the mid-2000s,
there's a sense of security knowing that you're in a place
with a bunch of other students,
and for the most part, an agreement
that you're all there for the same reason,
to go to class, study, sleep,
and then have a good time with your friends.
That was Burlington, Vermont in the first week of October 2006,
which was also Parents Weekend at the University of Vermont.
According to Associated Press reporting in the Times Argus,
John Charles and Diane Quinn had traveled up from Virginia
to spend time with their 21-year-old daughter, Michelle Gardner Quinn.
Michelle was a recent transfer to UVM,
and in a lot of ways Burlington seemed like the place she had been working toward.
John Rydell reports for the University of Vermont's The View
that she had attended several colleges before landing there
and she had built an education for herself that stretched well beyond a traditional campus
studying and working in places like South Africa, Brazil, and Costa Rica along the way.
By the fall of 2006, her focus had centered on environmental studies.
Michelle had already interned with a climate change program
and she transferred to UVM specifically because she wanted to study the environment in a place where that work was taken seriously.
She had only been on campus for about six weeks, but the people around her said she was happy there
and very intentional about what she wanted from the experience.
On Saturday, October 7, 2006, Michelle and her parents had plans for dinner.
Maybe they would have been catching up on those first few weeks of school, the visions she had for her studies,
the new friends she was making, but Michelle never made it to dinner. At first, there were any number
of benign explanations you could imagine, but as Saturday wore on, no one close to Michelle was hearing
from her. They didn't waste any time. Her parents reported her missing that very night,
and police began working backward through the hours before she disappeared. Michelle had gone out
in downtown Burlington to celebrate her friend Dorsey's 21st birthday. They'd gone out for dinner
and a small group together and then moved on to several bars downtown as the night continued.
Sometime after 1.30 that Saturday morning, Michelle broke away from the group with plans to meet
another friend near the ski rack on Main Street. She made it to the area, but the meetup
never quite came together, and then her phone died. So she borrowed a phone from a stranger.
According to an Associated Press Report by John Curran published in the Rutland Herald,
Michelle called her friend Tommy and asked him to help find Dorsey,
whose phone was on vibrate inside her jacket and she wasn't answering.
At one point, Tommy called Michelle back on the borrowed phone.
The stranger answered before handing it to Michelle,
making a comment about the brunette standing beside him.
Tommy spoke with Michelle again,
still trying to coordinate where everyone could meet,
but neither Tommy nor Dorsey saw her again that night.
The man who lent Michelle his phone didn't stay a strange,
to the case for long. He was 36-year-old Brian Rooney. He acknowledged meeting Michelle and letting
her use his phone, but told police he and Michelle eventually parted ways and he didn't know
what happened to her after that. Michelle was believed to have been heading back in the direction
of campus, an early reporting placed her last known whereabouts near Maine and South Union
streets, not far from UVM. As the hours became days, Michelle's absence became harder to explain
away. Her photograph began appearing on flyers around Burlington. UvM sent email alerts across campus asking
students and staff for information. Search dogs were brought in. Helicopters joined the effort.
The FBI eventually became involved and the Vermont National Guard assisted as the search
expanded beyond the university and Burlington Police. Four days into the search,
investigators remained guarded about exactly what they thought had happened to Michelle. But the
longer she was missing, the horder it was to reconcile with the person everyone knew her to be.
Michelle grew up in Arlington, Virginia, in a family that seems to have encouraged curiosity about
the world well beyond her own backyard. Michelle's professors saw her family as an important
influence on her sense of service and education. She spent her middle and high school years at
H.B. Woodlawn in Arlington, a school that encouraged students to take real ownership of their
education and interests. That independence seems to have suited Michelle. She was someone who kept
seeking out experiences, causes, and places that mattered to her. Friends who knew Michelle,
going all the way back to elementary school, told reporter Brett Zongler that she was encouraging
and easy to be around. Her older brother described her as sharp, compassionate, and worldly.
Michelle's path through college wasn't especially linear. She attended Goucher College and American
University, before eventually transferring to UVM. And along the way, she seemed to keep refining
what she wanted from her education. At Goucher, she played on the women's soccer team and earned a place
on the Capital Athletic Conference's all-academic team. Outside of school, she hiked and skied,
loved photography, and sang in choir. She spoke Spanish and some Portuguese. And she kept going
places. In Brazil, Michelle helped with a survey involving giant river otters. In Costa Rica,
she lived with rural farmers working in the fields and wrote about sugarcane. A longtime friend of
Michelle's family, Gail Fendley, told me that the initiative behind much of that travel came
directly from Michelle. She figured out what she wanted to do, handled the logistics those trips
required, and worked summer jobs along the way to fund it all. It was a lot of the way. It was a
wasn't a parent pushing her into those experiences or mapping out those trips for her, Michelle was
actively building them for herself. She was intentional. She was always putting herself somewhere
unfamiliar, learning directly from the people and environment around her, and trying to connect
what she was studying to something useful in the real world. That included service work in New
Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Gail was covering the aftermath through her work in television
news and sometimes brought one of her children along to volunteer, Michelle joined Gail's son
Ian on at least two of those trips, helping with the difficult cleanup work left behind by the storm.
Even the smaller things Michelle chose to do followed a similar pattern. One summer, she volunteered
pulling invasive plants in a park in northern Virginia, the kind of environmental work that
isn't glamorous, but makes a tangible difference when enough people do it. Her reasons for choosing
UVM were practical too.
Gail said the Intervale Center in Burlington was part of the appeal.
Michelle spent time at its food hub, helping prepare food for distribution to local schools and
older residents.
She had barely arrived in Vermont before she was already finding a way to participate in
the kind of community-based environmental work she cared about.
Just a few days before she disappeared, Michelle wrote an essay for a project called This I Believe,
titled A Reverence for All Life.
She wrote about the hours she spent as a child outside digging in the dirt, studying insects,
and paying attention to the small changes that came with each season.
What began as a fascination with the natural world had grown into something much larger by the time she reached college,
a concern about biodiversity, climate change, and the responsibility people have to the environment around them.
And now, at UVM, those interests were beginning to line up with each other, the travel, the
environmental work, the desire to learn by doing, and the sense that whatever career came next
should mean something beyond herself.
In a very real sense, Michelle's life was coming together.
To willingly walk away from all of that was simply an impossible explanation for her
absence. Detective Andrew Frisbee began canvassing businesses along Michelle's likely route
through downtown Burlington, looking for any camera that might have caught her after she left the
ski rack area. One of those cameras was mounted outside Perry Winkle's Fine Jewelry on Main Street.
Police and store employees went through the footage, and there she was. At around 2.15 Saturday
morning, the camera captured Michelle walking along Main Street beside Browell.
Ryan Rooney. The footage itself didn't show anything that looked obviously alarming.
Michelle and Brian appeared to be walking side by side, headed in the general direction of the UVM
campus. There was no visible indication that she was being forced or physically restrained.
But the video did something critical for the investigation. It anchored the timeline in a way
witness memories alone couldn't. From there, police could compare that fixed time and location
against Brian's account of when they separated
and where he said he went next.
Police continued questioning Brian over the days that followed.
He said that after lending Michelle his phone,
the two eventually went their separate ways.
His account was that Michelle left to find a cab
back toward her dorm while he went to retrieve his own vehicle.
He repeatedly denied knowing what happened to Michelle
after they separated.
But deny it all he wanted
as the search approached the one-week mark,
authorities were describing Brian
as a significant focus of the investigation.
After six painful days without Michelle,
what had begun in Burlington
was about to move outside the college town
to a rocky stretch of land in Richmond.
On Friday, October 13th, around noon,
two men were working in the Richmond area
when their route brought them near Huntington Gorge,
so they decided to take a look at the water.
According to Gordon Dritchellows reporting for the Rutland Herald,
the men parked and followed a footpath overlooking the rocks and water below.
One of the men noticed something down among the leaves and debris
that he thought might be trash.
The other looked more closely and saw what appeared to be a shoe suspended in the moss.
He reached down and pulled at the shoe.
That was when he realized there was a body beneath it.
The men called 911 bringing a large law enforcement press.
presence to the scene, investigators separated the two men to take statements about exactly what they
had seen and touched. One man's shoes were photographed as part of the effort to distinguish anything
he may have introduced to the scene from evidence that was already there. The body was down in a rocky
depression near the gorge, partially obscured by leaves and debris. Because of the steep terrain,
investigators set up a rope system so they could work safely around the area while documenting and
collecting what they found. The remains were identified as Michelle Gardner-Quinn.
Investigators documented evidence of a violent assault, and the medical examination later determined
that Michelle died from blunt-forced trauma to the head and compression of the neck. Other findings
indicated that she had also been sexually assaulted. The search for Michelle was over, and her
family and the wider Burlington community were left to absorb the laws. For investigators, the focus
shifted immediately to the evidence, and whether Brian's story held up against it.
As the investigation into Michelle's murder continued, a more complete picture of Brian Rooney
was beginning to emerge. Some of what investigators were learning about this guy brought forward
alarming allegations that reached back years and opened entirely separate investigations.
But importantly, not every warning about Brian was surfacing for.
the first time. In 2000, six years before Michelle ever met him, Brian's then-wife had gone to court
and obtained a temporary restraining order against him. According to Lewis Porter's reporting
for the Rutland Herald, she alleged that she was afraid of Brian, that he had repeatedly
drugged her before sexually assaulting her, and that he had threatened to kill her. That restraining
order was not a criminal conviction, but it meant that long before Michelle
needed to borrow his phone on Main Street, at least one woman had already formally documented
serious concerns about Brian's behavior. As police dug further into Brian's history, the allegations
kept mounting. James Jardine reports that in Caledonia County, authorities developed charges involving
a girl who had been under 16 when Brian allegedly assaulted her in the 1990s. One allegation was that
he used a chemical-soaked rag to render her unconscious.
A different case was developing in Chittenden County involving a former girlfriend.
She accused Brian of repeatedly sexually assaulting her between 2002 and 2005.
Investigators also accused him of later trying to find someone willing to kill her
after their relationship ended.
That case included another allegation that Brian used chemicals to incapacitate a woman before
sexual contact.
Carla Ocaso reports for the Times Argus that searches connected to those investigations
turned up photographs and videos that appeared to show alleged sexual assault of unconscious people.
Some of that material was linked to the Chittenden County investigation.
Now, there's no responsible way to say that a different response to the claims made in a
restraining order application back in 2000 would have prevented Michelle's murder.
We can't know that.
And according to reporting by Lewis Porter for the Rutland Herald,
allegations in a restraining order did not automatically trigger a police investigation.
That was intentional.
The system was designed so someone seeking protection from abuse
could describe what had happened without worrying that doing so
would automatically set a criminal prosecution in motion,
something advocates feared could discourage victims from coming forward at all.
But it all changes the way he,
you look at the randomness of the encounter between Michelle and Brian that night.
Michelle had no reason to know anything about the man whose phone she borrowed.
Other people, however, had already raised alarms about him.
While those separate cases were developing, forensic work in Michelle's homicide was moving forward
too.
Testing on evidence recovered during Michelle's autopsy produced a DNA profile matching Brian.
The statistical result.
was enormous. Analysts put the chance of an unrelated person sharing that DNA profile at roughly
one in 240 quadrillion. Investigators also learned that Brian's home was only a few miles from
Huntington Gorge and that he knew the area where Michelle had been found. Still, he continued to
deny knowing what happened to her after the two separated, though it seems no one was buying the story
he was trying to sell.
By the time police were ready to charge Brian in Michelle's death,
he was already being held without bail on the unrelated sexual assault charges.
And then on October 25th, authorities announced an aggravated murder charge against Brian Rooney,
stemming from allegations that he killed Michelle while committing a sexual assault.
The case against him now had a physical link to Michelle,
his confirmed presence with her during her final known movements,
and his familiarity with the area where her body was found.
And the separate cases unfolding around him had added something else.
A deeply troubling history, investigators had only begun uncovering
after Michelle was already gone.
Even as investigators were building the case against Brian,
Michelle's family and friends were building something very different around her name.
Michelle had a particularly close group of friends from Arlington,
people she had grown up with through school, soccer, and years of friendship.
Her family friend, Gail Fenley, told me that the close-knit group,
which included her son and Michelle's sister,
began gathering after Michelle's death,
and they were looking for something constructive they could create in her memory.
According to Gail, Michelle's This I Believe essay gave those friends a starting point.
days before her own life was stolen, Michelle had put her beliefs into her own words.
They didn't have to guess what she cared about or what kind of work she hoped to do.
Within months of losing Michelle, they turned her values into Michelle's Earth Foundation,
which formerly registered as a non-profit in January 2007.
The Foundation centered its early work on helping young people engage with environmental issues
and supporting conservation and encouraging people to care for.
for the places where they lived.
By the spring of 2007,
the Foundation was already raising money
and organizing projects in communities connected to Michelle.
One of the Foundation's first major projects
returned to a place Michelle herself had volunteered, New Orleans.
After Hurricane Katrina,
Michelle's Earth organized volunteers
to test soil in damaged neighborhoods
and plant sunflowers in areas with elevated lead levels,
something I didn't know until speaking with Michelle.
Michelle's friends, sunflowers can mitigate lead and other heavy metals from contaminated soil.
The project gave people mourning Michelle something tangible to do while continuing the
environmental and community work she had already begun there. This was all happening while
Brian's murder case was still working its way toward trial. Even as prosecutors prepared to tell
a jury about the worst thing that happened to Michelle Gardner Quinn, her family and friends were
making sure that wasn't the final word on who she was.
By the fall of 2007, nearly a year had passed since Brian was charged with Michelle's murder,
and his attorneys were challenging some of the evidence prosecutors intended to put in front of a jury.
One major fight centered on Brian's own words.
Between Michelle's disappearance and Brian's arrest, investigators had spoken with him again and again.
more than 20 statements or conversations were eventually examined in court.
His defense argued that some of those interviews had crossed a line,
with investigators continuing to question him even after he had repeatedly raised the issue of wanting an attorney.
A four-day suppression hearing was held in January 2008.
Judge Michael Cooper Smith ultimately allowed the vast majority of Brian's statements into evidence,
suppressing only a portion of one lengthy October 11th interview after the four-hour and 20-minute mark.
There was another problem looming over the case before a jury was ever selected.
Almost everyone in the Burlington area seemed to know about it.
The coverage had been extensive from the beginning,
but one incident in particular gave the defense reason to argue that Brian couldn't receive a fair trial locally.
In November 2006, an FBI agent who had participated in the investigation
wrote an anonymous article about the case, using some pretty strong language to describe
the man investigators believed was responsible.
Brian's attorney asked the court to dismiss the murder charge over that publicity.
The judge refused, but later imposed a gag order restricting people involved in the case
from speaking publicly about it.
Eventually, the defense asked for some.
something less dramatic than dismissal,
just move the trial somewhere else.
The judge agreed with that one.
On March 31st, 2008,
the case was transferred from Burlington to Rutland
in hopes of finding jurors
who had not been as immersed in the coverage.
Jury selection began on May 13th,
and the trial opened the following day.
Prosecutors laid out a relatively straightforward theory.
Brian encountered Michelle after her phone died,
the two left downtown together,
he sexually assaulted her, and he killed her.
The first witnesses brought the jury back to Michelle's final night.
Her mother and friends testified about parents' weekend,
the birthday celebration downtown,
the attempts to reconnect after the group became separated,
and the stranger who lent Michelle his phone.
Then jurors were taken through the discovery at Huntington Gorge,
the processing of the scene, and the medical evidence.
Vermont chief medical examiner Dr. Stephen Shapiro,
testified that Michelle died from compression of her neck and multiple blunt force injuries to her head.
He also testified that the evidence was consistent with sexual assault. But the most important
physical evidence in the state's case was the DNA profile connecting Brian to Michelle. The match
itself was extraordinarily strong. However, what the defense focused on instead was how little
material the Vermont Forensic Laboratory had to work with, about 0.24 nanograms of DNA.
The state called scientists from the Vermont Forensic Laboratory to explain the testing process
and defend the reliability of the result. Lab director Eric Buell acknowledged that the testing
kit's recommended input was higher than the amount available in Michelle's case, but testified
that the kit had successfully produced profiles from samples containing less than one nanogram
before. The defense pushed hard in the other direction. Brian's attorney highlighted the tiny quantity
of DNA and pointed to mistakes and irregularities the laboratory had made while handling evidence
in other cases. He argued that jurors should not simply hear an enormous match statistic and assume
the underlying testing was beyond question. On cross-examination, Dr. Shapiro also acknowledged
the limits of what the autopsy alone could establish about the sexual context.
between Michelle and Brian.
Then there were Brian's own statements.
Jurors heard portions of the recorded conversations
investigators had fought to preserve before trial.
One of the most striking came after Brian's arrest
while he was being held and recorded on video.
At one point, he said, quote,
if I did it, I deserve to die, end quote.
But the Fuller statement was less clean
than that single line might suggest.
asked, Brian also said he didn't know what had happened and claimed he couldn't remember that night.
Brian chose not to testify at all, but his mother and stepfather testified that they saw him
asleep on their couch later that morning. The defense also introduced prior testimony from a bartender
who said Brian already had cuts on his hands before he ever encountered Michelle, challenging the
suggestion that those injuries necessarily came from a struggle with her.
In closing, prosecutors urged the jury not to evaluate each piece of evidence in isolation.
Their argument was that Michelle's final known movements, Brian's DNA, his familiarity with Huntington Gorge, and the statements he made afterward, all pointed in the same direction when viewed together.
The defense framed the case very differently.
Brian's attorney argued that the state could tell jurors what happened before Michelle and Brian walked past the surveillance.
camera, and it could tell them what investigators found days later at Huntington Gorge,
but the most important stretch in between was still missing. There was no witness to what happened
after they left Main Street, no murder weapon, and little physical evidence beyond the DNA
tying Brian to the violent encounter prosecutors described. By the time both sides rested,
the case was not really about whether Brian and Michelle had crossed paths. That much was established.
The question was whether the combination of Michelle's final known movements,
Brian's DNA, his statements, his connection to the area where Michelle was found,
and the medical evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt,
that he was the person who killed her.
Twelve jurors in Rutland had everything they were going to get.
It was time for them to decide what they believed.
The jury began deliberating shortly before 1130 that morning.
A little more than six hours later, they came back.
with a verdict, guilty of aggravated murder.
There was no special verdict form explaining which piece of evidence carried the most weight
or how the jurors worked through the defense challenges,
but their decision meant they were convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Brian had sexually
assaulted Michelle and killed her in the course of that crime.
Brian was sentenced in October 2008.
Under the aggravated murder statute, Brian faced a mandatory life,
term with no eligibility for parole. Once Brian received that mandatory life sentence,
authorities dropped the remaining unrelated sexual assault cases pending in Caledonia and Chittenden counties.
Pursuing those cases further wouldn't make his prison sentence any more severe.
He continued to maintain his innocence and appealed both the conviction and sentence.
Through his attorneys, he argued that the Vermont Forensic Laboratory's internal validation studies
should have been disclosed before trial
because they could have been used
to challenge the DNA evidence.
They also challenged the mandatory
life without parole sentence,
arguing that Vermont law
allowed the same underlying conduct
to be prosecuted under another murder statute
carrying a lesser possible punishment.
But the Vermont Supreme Court
rejected both arguments.
On February 4, 2011,
the court affirmed
Bryan's conviction and sentence.
With that ruling,
the central legal questions in Michelle's case were settled.
And by then, the impact of Michelle's murder
had already stretched far beyond the courtroom.
At UVM, her death forced a much broader conversation
about student safety and violence against women.
University president Daniel Mark Fogel told Tom Weaver of the view
that the school needed to take a hard look
at how students were oriented to campus life,
how safety was handled,
and what responsibility the university had to address violence against women as a community issue.
That response eventually included a president's commission on social change and a campaign called Think Care Act,
which was designed to make students more aware of resources for students dealing with sexual violence, substance misuse, or bias-related incidents.
There were also practical changes.
By the first anniversary of Michelle's death, UVM has,
arranged for students to use their campus ID accounts to pay for rides with local taxi companies.
A campus-wide emergency notification system was also being rolled out, developed in part in response
to Michelle's murder, and in part after the mass shooting at Virginia Tech earlier that year.
Students themselves were pulled into the process too, identifying poorly lit areas and other
spots around campus that could be made safer.
The university marked the first anniversary of Michelle's death with a series of,
of remembrance events, including a candlelight walk that retraced the route from downtown toward UVM,
along with a memorial hike that benefited the environmental fund created for Michelle.
While the university community was trying to learn from what had happened,
Michelle's family and friends were continuing to build something else in her name,
something rooted not in the crime, but in the life she had been trying to create.
Outside the courthouse, on the day the guilty verdict was read,
Michelle's parents and sister stood together as Diane Quinn spoke briefly about her daughter.
Michelle had been gone for nearly 20 months at that point,
but her presence could still be felt in the work already being done in her name.
Michelle's Earth Foundation had grown into something meant to last.
One tradition continues today at H.B. Woodlawn, the school Michelle attended in Arlington.
Every year, a graduating student is recognized for environmental work
and for reflecting some of the qualities Michelle brought to her own life.
Michelle's childhood friend, Heather Spence, who is also on the board of the foundation,
now returns to their old school to present the award
and introduce another generation of students to Michelle.
Over the years, the foundation's work has reached much farther.
One project, initiated by a member of the founding group,
helped plant thousands of trees in Lebanon through the American University of Beiru.
The New Orleans work continued, and the Foundation has encouraged people to take on less visible
environmental work close to home, from removing invasive plants to cleaning waterways and simply
taking care of the communities around them.
Today, the Foundation is also supporting Heather's International Marine Conservation Work
using underwater sound to study coral reefs.
Researchers listen to reef ecosystems,
including the effects of boat traffic and tourism,
and use that information to inform conservation.
The work also trains citizen scientists
and gives local communities tools to participate
in protecting their own coastal ecosystems.
Heather told me she thinks Michelle would love knowing
that work is happening around the world in her name.
The motto that we have at Michelle's Earth is small actions, big changes.
What I do matters.
I personally can make a positive change.
Each one of us has the power to make a positive change that is meaningful.
There may be no better example of that philosophy than what the foundation is doing in Vermont for the 20th anniversary.
The Intervale Center was part of Michelle's life before her death.
Gail said its work was actually one reason Michelle chose UVM.
That relationship continued after Michelle died.
A red dogwood was planted there in her memory and remains at the Intervale today.
Now Michelle's Earth Foundation is returning to that connection in a new way.
The Foundation has committed to purchasing 20 trees from the Intervale
for planting in Michelle's memory this coming spring,
and they're hoping to plant more.
Michelle's legacy is not just for the people who personally met her and knew her.
She's touched a lot of people directly,
but her impact goes beyond that.
And so I think that anyone who feels a connection with her and her story can get involved.
And there are more ways to get involved with her legacy.
If you feel called to support her story,
support Michelle's Earth Foundation and help add another tree to the Intervale Project,
or support the other environmental work being carried forward in her name,
you can do so at michelsoirth.org.
Obviously donations help, but also maybe somebody could donate their time towards something.
Maybe somebody wants to do it on their own, or if they're not sure what to do,
they can get in touch with Michelle's Earth.
We're real people who care about Michelle's legacy.
We're all in this together.
Just days before she disappeared, Michelle began an essay with a sentence that feels as fitting now as it did then.
I believe in upholding reverence for all life.
Twenty years later, the people who loved her are still finding ways to put that belief into practice.
She was really just like full of life.
She had like an energy and a presence and opinions and motivation wanting to
make a difference.
And it's hard thinking back on these times too,
but it feels good knowing that people still remember her.
People still are so passionate about the friendships
that they had with her that they're still talking about her
and remembering what she stood for.
Thank you for listening to Dark Down East.
You can find all source material for this case at Darkdowneast.com.
Be sure to follow the show on Instagram at Darkdowneast.
Down East. This platform is for the families and friends who have lost their loved ones and for those
who are still searching for answers. I'm not about to let those names or their stories get lost with time.
I'm Kylie Lowe, and this is Dark Down East.
Dark Down East is a production of Kylie Media and Audio Check. I think Chuck would approve.
