Dark Downeast - The Murder of Yasheeka "Mouda" Grant (Connecticut)

Episode Date: April 24, 2025

What started with a call to police for a domestic disturbance ended with a four-day manhunt in search of a suspected killer. When that suspect, the victim’s husband, was finally apprehended, it seemed on the surface like an open-and-shut case. All signs pointed to a domestic violence homicide triggered by the dissolution of an already tumultuous and violent marriage.But then the case went to trial and the accused killer told his side of the story for the first time… And the prosecution took major issue with all of it.If you are experiencing domestic violence, free, confidential support is available. Visit thehotline.org or call 1-(800)-799-SAFE.View source material and photos for this episode at: darkdowneast.com/yasheekamoudagrantDark Down East is an audiochuck production. Connect with us on social media:Instagram: @audiochuckTwitter: @audiochuckFacebook: /audiochuckllcTikTok: @audiochuck

What started with a call to police for a domestic disturbance ended with a four-day manhunt in search of a suspected killer. When that suspect, the victim's husband, was finally apprehended, it seemed on the surface like an open-and-shut case. All signs pointed to a domestic violence homicide triggered by the dissolution of an already tumultuous and violent marriage. But then the case went to trial, and the accused killer told his side of the story for the first time, and the prosecution took major issue with all of it.

I'm Kylie Lowe, and this is the case of Yoshika Muda Grant on Dark Down East. This episode contains descriptions of domestic violence. If you are experiencing domestic violence, free confidential support is available. It was around 10 p.m. on April 7, 2017, when a dispatcher answered a 911 call originating from New Britain, Connecticut. According to reporting by Sandra Gomez-Acevez for the Hartford Current, the anonymous caller was hearing concerning noises coming from an apartment upstairs. The caller said there was a lot of ruckus, fighting, yelling, and sounds they described as bodies being tossed around. Police responded to the apartment complex at 48 North Mountain Road in New Britain by 10.05 p.m.

Multiple knocks on the door of a second floor unit went unanswered, and the door was locked so officers made the judgment call to enter the apartment by force. Once inside, things escalated quickly. On the floor in one of the bedrooms was the body of a woman laying face down in a pool of blood. There were signs of a struggle all around her, with a blood-like substance on the bed,

and she was only wearing one shoe. The victim was identified as 33-year-old Yoshika Miles, and she was pronounced dead at the scene. Glancing around the residence, police could see signs of a family living there. Toys and diapers were all over the place and photos of two smiling kids, one who looked to be a toddler and another school-aged child adorned the walls.

Police quickly searched the apartment for any children, but found none at the scene. Piecing together what appeared to be a deadly domestic disturbance, police attempted to locate the children as well as Yeshika's spouse, 36-year-old Patrick Miles. Yeshika's older child was safe and accounted for somewhere else,

but the two-year-old daughter she and Patrick shared was nowhere to be found, and neither was Patrick. Police called for an amber alert to be issued for neither was Patrick. Police called for an Amber Alert to be issued for Yashica's daughter. It warned that the child was with someone that police considered dangerous and that this person should be approached with extreme caution.

Thankfully, the Amber Alert worked. The quick communication of the missing child reached a member of her family who called police around 4 a.m. on the morning of April 8th. It was Patrick's sister, and she told police that he showed up at her place in New York totally unannounced and handed off the toddler asking her to take care of the child before taking off.

According to Don Stechems reporting for the Hartford Courant, Patrick's sister didn't mention anything about Yoshika or the murder at the time. Yoshika's daughter was safe and so the Amber Alert was canceled. But Patrick was still MIA as the homicide investigation back at the apartment began to unfold. With a search warrant in hand, New Britain police, along with the Connecticut State Police Major Crimes Unit processed the crime scene. According to court records, police located bullet fragments and at least two 9mm shell casings in the bedroom, which aligned with autopsy findings. Yoshika had been shot three times, once in the temple, once in her face, and once in the shoulder.

A warrant was issued for the arrest of Patrick Miles, and he was described as a potential suspect in the fatal shooting of his wife. A quick note, although most, if not all, previous media coverage uses the name Yashica Miles when talking about this case, Yashica's family chose to remember her by a nickname and her family surname,

Yoshika Muda Grant. That's the name they used for her obituary, so that's what we chose to title this episode, and what I'll be using going forward. Court records and incident reports show that Yoshika's relationship with Patrick had been tumultuous and even violent for years. Don Stecham and Christine Dempsey report for the Hartford Courant that during the winter of 2014, before they were married, Yeshika and Patrick were living together and had a six-week-old baby. On Christmas Eve of that year, Patrick allegedly hit Yeshika in the face while the baby rested in her arms. Yeshika called police to report the incident, but when officers arrived, Patrick was gone and Yoshika wasn't willing to tell officers what happened.

According to a report by officer Ethan Roberge, police intended to seek an arrest warrant for the alleged domestic violence assault, but a prosecutor said one couldn't be issued unless Yashica gave a written statement of the incident. Yashica told the officer that she felt like she overreacted by calling the police. The officer told Yashica about domestic violence laws in Connecticut and reminded her how serious DV is, and she said she understood. No charges were filed. Fast forward several months later, on July 20, 2015, Yashica found a Vernon, Connecticut police officer on the street and told him that her boyfriend had just beaten her while she was holding their baby.

Police located Patrick and tried to stop him, but a report indicates that he sped off in a car going somewhere near 110 miles per hour down Interstate 84. Police gave chase, but Patrick got away. Five days after that alleged assault and Patrick's escape, he and Yashica got married in Indiana. Patrick was still wanted for the assault. About a week after they said, I do, Patrick turned himself in to the Hartford Correctional Center to serve a sentence for an unrelated crime. However, once he was in custody, Vernon police charged him with crimes associated with that July 20th assault and police chase.

A Superior Court judge issued a protective order as a result of those charges, and Patrick was not to have any contact with Yeshika or their young daughter. However, he was apparently unable to abide by the order. Patrick called Yeshika 53 times from jail and approved her as a visitor in violation of the protective order. Now Yeshika visited Patrick nine times during his three-week incarceration, and six of the visits were after the protection order was in place. Records show that Patrick and Yoshika talked on the phone for about 12 hours total after

the protection order was in place, and Patrick had asked to talk to their daughter, too. Patrick was charged with 17 counts of violating a protective order. All but two of those charges were dropped by the time Patrick went to court on March 23, 2017. He was ultimately convicted of breach of peace and a single count of violating the order. He was sentenced to four years in prison suspended after two years of probation. That was just two and a half weeks before Yoshika's murder. They were still legally married at the time of her death, but conversations found by investigators on Yoshika's cell phone showed that she was planning to end things with

Patrick once and for all, and they'd talked about it as recently as the day she was killed. A search warrant affidavit obtained by NBC Connecticut indicates that though the apartment where Yoshika's body was found was once the home she shared with Patrick, she had already moved out not too long before she was killed. As the investigation revealed, Yoshika had only stopped into the apartment that evening to pick up some of her stuff that she'd left behind. Witnesses told investigators that on top of the documented domestic violence by Patrick against Yoshika,

there were accusations and evidence of infidelity. Yoshika was ready to be done with all of it and determined to move onward and upwards with her kids and without Patrick. She was pursuing a higher education at Capital Community College. One comment from a classmate on Yeshica's memorial page reads, God knows you would have been a kick-ass nurse. In a story by Catalina Trevino for NBC Connecticut, Yeshica's mother, Adrienne,

spoke candidly about Yeshica's own past run-ins with the law, but said she was finding a new path forward when Adrienne believes Patrick couldn't or wouldn't follow her down that path of self-improvement. Adrienne and others close to Yeshica also believed that Patrick was jealous of many things in Yeshica's life. When their relationship decayed and while Patrick was seeing other people, Yashica started seeing someone else too, a woman she previously dated named Kai. According to Kai, she too had become a victim of Patrick's threats and attempted violence in the months prior to Yashica's murder.

Kai later testified that she and Yashica dated from about June 2011 until July 2012. But even after they broke off their romantic relationship, their friendship remained. It wasn't until late 2016 that the spark rekindled between them. Patrick was angry that Yashica was seeing Kai. Sometime in late 2016 or early 2017, Kai was standing outside a funeral in Hartford when she says Patrick pulled up in, quote, a Pepsi Blue

BMW 2-door, driving really fast. He almost hit the curb, and he jumped out of the car saying, let me talk to you, let me talk to you, end quote. Kai said she refused to talk to Patrick, and he drove off, but then came back some time later while she and her siblings were still standing outside talking. Kai didn't see Patrick walking up to her, but when he was just inches away, he allegedly pulled out a gun from his jacket and said to her twice something like, I told you I wasn't no punk. Some court records state that Kai did not report

the incident to police. However, other sources say she did tell police, but Yeshika asked her not to use Patrick's name. Kai said there was another incident too, this one on March 26th, 2017. Kai claimed that Patrick barged into her apartment unannounced and found her with Yashica in bed. He yelled derogatory terms at the women as he approached them. Yashica was able to call 911 and Patrick laughed. This all happened just days before Yashica's murder. Four days after police discovered the murder scene in New Britain, they were still trying to track down Yeshika's husband, Patrick Miles. In the meantime, police had interviewed a known associate

of his, a guy named Daniel Thomas. Daniel explained that he and Patrick were together when Patrick picked up his and Yeshica's daughter on the day of the murder, April 7. Patrick was driving a gray Chevrolet Malibu that actually belonged to Daniel's mother, which he apparently borrowed or had access to from time to time. Daniel said that he and Patrick hung out for a few hours before Patrick and his daughter went home. The next time he talked to Patrick was later that night, after he heard that Yeshika was dead. In Daniel's version, his phone rang with a call from Patrick, and Patrick asked Daniel what was going on. Daniel told him that people were saying, quote, that you killed your girl, end quote.

Patrick allegedly replied something like, for real, that's what they're saying, and alluded that he probably wasn't going to see his daughter. Daniel asked Patrick what was happening, and according to Daniel, Patrick responded with something like, I don't want to tell you. I don't know. I snapped. I don't know what happened after that. And quote, I took the sucka way out.

End quote. Daniel said that the next morning he got a text from Patrick asking him to Google quote, how much time I'm a get, end quote. Patrick's cell phone records later obtained by police showed that he deleted that text message, along with another message containing just one word, mistake. At that point, Daniel told Patrick he'd better park the Chevy Malibu somewhere and take the license plate off so his mother, who owned the car, wouldn't get wrapped up in any criminal investigation.

Patrick asked Daniel to come get the car in Brooklyn, and he agreed. He said he picked up Patrick, and together they dropped the Chevy off at Daniel's mother's house, and then Daniel took Patrick's cell phone. Daniel disclosed that he kept Patrick's cell phone because at one time, he was a drug runner for Patrick, and Patrick wanted him to keep the phone to tie up any loose ends relating to drug deals. Daniel told police that Patrick called him on April 10th before he was apprehended, and talked about how he saw no way out of the situation and wanted to die by suicide.

Now, police had obtained video surveillance footage from an intersection near Yashica's apartment on the night of her murder. It showed a gray Chevy Malibu driving through that intersection around 10 p.m. In New York, where Patrick's sister lived and where he dropped off his daughter, additional security cameras picked up the Chevy Malibu

in various locations between 1 and 2.30 a.m. on April 8. By day four of Patrick on the Lamb, information garnered from the early investigation pointed authorities to an undisclosed address on Memorial Avenue in West Springfield, Massachusetts. Officers from the Massachusetts State Police Violent Fugitive Apprehension Section and West Springfield Police staked out the house on the night of Tuesday, April 11th. According to reporting by Connor Berry for Mass Live, authorities arrested Patrick just after midnight on April 12th. He had two cell phones in his possession when he was taken into custody and police

figured out that he had been swapping SIM cards between the two phones to avoid being found. Upon Patrick's arrest, he was advised of his right to remain silent, pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, which is the precedent-setting case that would ultimately require law enforcement officers to inform suspects of their constitutional Fifth Amendment right to an attorney and to remain silent before custodial interrogation. Patrick chose to exercise those rights and did not speak to police after that. The fact that Patrick was out of state violated the terms of his probation and so he would first be arraigned in Massachusetts as a fugitive from justice, and then be returned to Connecticut to face murder charges for the shooting death of his wife. On April 26, Patrick was arraigned in New Britain's Superior Court on charges of murder,

criminal possession of a firearm, and criminal use of a weapon. He was held on $2.5 million bond. Patrick and his attorney indicated that they would not waive his right to a probable He was held on $2.5 million bond. Patrick and his attorney indicated that they would not waive his right to a probable cause hearing, which meant prosecutors had to show there was enough evidence to justify moving forward with the case to trial. A probable cause hearing isn't required in Connecticut, but can be requested and usually is when a defendant believes the evidence might be insufficient, or as Don Stecham points out in Reporting for the Heart for Current, if there's reason to believe the evidence is tainted in some way.

It took months to get this probable cause hearing scheduled, well past the required timeframe, due in part to both sides needing more time to look at everything the investigation had uncovered. However, at the end of August 2017, Patrick and his attorney changed their minds for reasons unknown before the hearing could even happen. They wanted to go straight ahead to a jury trial for the murder charge and withdrew their request for a probable cause hearing. There's basically zero source material covering the trial of Patrick Miles or any pretrial

hearings or anything relating to the case of Yashica Grant covered in news media between the end of 2017 and when the trial concluded in December 2019. For reasons you'll soon hear, I can't get my hands on really any documents pertaining to this case. However, parts of the trial, including witness testimony, opening and closing statements by attorneys, and evidence presented to the jury, are part of other court opinions. There was no direct physical or forensic evidence against Patrick. At the time of Patrick's trial, there were no eyewitnesses, no DNA, and nothing to

conclusively prove Patrick killed Yoshika. But as prosecutor Brett Salafia was prepared to show the jury, what the case did have was an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence, relying on motive, means, and opportunity. Patrick's associate, Daniel Thomas, who at the time of his testimony was incarcerated for the sale of narcotics, spoke about the conversations and interactions he had with Patrick in the days following Yashica's death. He testified to those alleged incriminating text messages from Patrick about how much time he would get and his alleged comments that he snapped and the series of events involving his mother's Chevy Malibu.

Another prosecution witness, Yeshika's former girlfriend, Kai, testified to Patrick's alleged threats towards her and the incident when Yeshika called 911 after Patrick stormed into their room shouting derogatory things at them. The prosecution also presented evidence that Patrick was trying to get Yeshika to reconsider ending their relationship. Cell phone records show that Yeshika and Patrick were texting on the very day she was shot. Patrick had asked Yeshika to give him one more chance. Yeshika's mother Adrienne took the stand for the prosecution too, telling the jury how Patrick was abusive towards Yashica during their relationship.

And as Adrienne recalled, less than a month before Yashica's death, Patrick said that he was going to kill her. According to the prosecution, the motive here was jealousy. Yashica was moving on with someone else and Patrick couldn't handle it. Security footage placed the car Patrick was known to drive near the scene of the murder and other key locations identified by the investigation on the same timeline as the murder, which in the prosecution's view, demonstrated Patrick's opportunity. As for means, that came down to some assumptions based on Patrick's criminal history.

The jury heard undisputed evidence that Patrick was known to sell illegal drugs, and he was often in possession of large quantities of cash and narcotics. He had previously been arrested for drug sales, criminal mischief, and interfering with police. Previous court decisions have ruled that, quote, We allow a fact finder to infer a connection between drugs and firearms when a defendant distributes quantities of illegal drugs because firearms are viewed as a tool of the trade for drug dealers, end quote. So it was reasonable for the jury to make the assumption that Patrick had access to a firearm. When it came time for Patrick's rebuttal to the case against him, the defense decided

what better person to explain his side of the story than Patrick himself, and so Patrick testified in his own defense. It's something you don't see very often, and when Patrick took the stand, he told a story that police and prosecutors had never heard before. Patrick Miles told the jury that someone else killed his wife during a robbery gone wrong, and he fled that day not because he was guilty, but because he was afraid. Patrick was transparent with the jury, testifying that he was a convicted felon and he sold illegal drugs.

He also admitted that on the day of Ishika's murder, he drove to Hartford with his young daughter in the car to buy weed. He said he did not drive the Chevy Malibu that he used to pick up his daughter from school, the same car that was at the center of the investigation. Instead, Patrick testified that he drove a blue Acura that he had access to because it had a hidden compartment under the seat he referred to as a stash box. According to his testimony, Patrick got back to the North Mountain Road apartment in New Britain he once shared with his wife around 9 p.m. on the night of April 7th, 2017. He said he saw Yoshika's truck parked in the lot and noticed that the door to the apartment was left open.

When he got inside, he realized that a large amount of cash and drugs were missing, an estimated $83,000 and 600 grams of heroin. Patrick said he placed his daughter on the couch while he searched the apartment in a panic and that's when he found Yeshika dead on the bedroom floor. Patrick said that out of fear, he grabbed their daughter and ran out the door, hopping back into the blue Acura and heading towards New York

to get the little girl to safety. It was when he was en route to New York when Patrick claimed he got a call from Daniel, and Patrick learned from Daniel that people were saying Patrick killed his own wife. Patrick also learned about the Amber Alert describing him as armed and dangerous. He testified that he was afraid to contact police at that point because he knew or assumed he was a suspect in Yeshika's murder.

Patrick told the jury that he dropped his daughter off at his sister's house and then asked Daniel to pick him up in Brooklyn. That part of their testimony aligns. But where they diverge, according to Patrick, was the part about who was driving which vehicle. Patrick said that Daniel arrived driving the Chevy Malibu. Patrick testified that Daniel then drove him to a girlfriend's house in New London, and that's where he stayed for two days before Daniel gave him another ride to Massachusetts, again in the Malibu. That's where Patrick was arrested about a day and a half later.

So as it is described in court documents, Patrick had raised a third-party culpability defense. He suggested that his associate and admitted former drug runner Daniel Thomas also had motive, means, and opportunity to kill Yeshika. As the Defense counsel pointed out, Daniel had possession of Patrick's cell phone in the days Patrick was on the run and was supposedly driving the Chevy Malibu that was seen on surveillance video leaving the scene of the murder. The defense suggested that Daniel was motivated by the money and drugs he knew were in the apartment and that Yoshika was collateral damage during the robbery.

The problem with Patrick's testimony and his version of what happened was that he placed himself at the scene of the murder within an hour of the 911 call reporting sounds of fighting and bodies being tossed around. He claimed Yoshika was dead when he got there, but that doesn't align with the 911 call either. His story also doesn't account for why the Chevy Malibu was seen on traffic cameras in New York along the same timeline that he admits he drove there to drop his daughter off to a family member. Patrick also did not make any known attempts to get help for Yashica,

which the prosecution found suspicious. But the biggest problem the prosecution had with Patrick's story was that they'd never heard it before and they weren't about to let the jury forget that fact. During closing arguments, the prosecution went in on Patrick's version of events. The prosecutor kept pointing out that the first time anyone was hearing of this alleged robbery gone wrong theory was during the trial, and Patrick's delay in telling investigators

in the eye of the prosecution was another sign of his guilt. I'm going to read excerpts from the prosecutor's closing statements because it's important to hear them word for word to have context for what comes after the trial. Quote, Now the defendant told you today his fear was the reason for taking the child to New York. Considering your common sense, would it be reasonable to tell your close family about the event? I submit to you that the first time we're hearing anything about this sequence of events

or the basis was this morning through the defendant's testimony." The prosecutor continued, "...this fear reaction and the actions that the defendant testified to you today that he took. Does that fit your common sense view of how a parent would behave in the wake of the violent death of his spouse? Or would that parent be taking every step possible to comfort, to shield his daughter from what had just happened?

And to try very hard, if there were an alternative theory, and I submit to you that there isn't, to make sure that that theory was properly investigated, but the defendant didn't do that." The prosecutor continued to emphasize that it was the first time that morning anyone heard about the trip to New London and the large sum of money that was missing. The prosecutor suggested common sense would indicate that kind of information would be important to direct the investigation into what happened to Yoshika had it actually been communicated closer

to the time of the crime. But Patrick didn't share that information. And so the investigation did not follow that direction because that's not where the evidence led. As the prosecutor put it, Patrick couldn't have it both ways. He couldn't say police should have investigated a robbery angle, but not tell them that a robbery occurred. Another verbatim excerpt from the prosecutor's closing statements, quote,

if the police had information closer to the time of this incident, that this was a robbery involving a very large quantity, essentially more than most people's annual income was on this kitchen table, if you're to believe that, the police probably would have changed the tactics that they used to investigate this crime. We'll never know because they didn't know that, because the first time you heard about it was this morning." End quote. Now, the defense attorney raised a similar argument over delay in statements to police during their closing argument, questioning the credibility of Kai, Yeshika's former

girlfriend who testified that Patrick had threatened her with a gun, and yet she apparently didn't tell police about the incident until four months later. The prosecutor said during rebuttal statements that that's just how the timing happened with the interview and besides the delay of Patrick telling his version of events was much longer. After the jury was excused, the defense counsel objected to the prosecution's use of Patrick's silence as demonstration of guilt.

He had a constitutional right to remain silent after all. However, the trial court overruled the objections. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury found Patrick guilty of murder. The other charges were decided by the judge, and he was found guilty of criminal possession of a firearm. He was also convicted of two counts of violation of probation. Patrick was sentenced on December 4, 2019, to 55 years in prison for murder, with a concurrent 10-year sentence for criminal possession of a firearm.

After the guilty verdict, Patrick's defense counsel filed a motion for a new trial, claiming in part that Patrick's constitutional rights had been violated when the prosecutor commented on his post-Miranda silence and focused on the fact that his exculpatory story was told for the first time at trial. The trial court denied the motion, finding that the statements the prosecution made weren't specifically about the post-arrest silence, but about the pre-arrest silence, which is allowed. Patrick appealed this decision, doubling down on his claims that he was denied a fair trial

based on the prosecutor's commentary. This time, the state conceded that the prosecutor's rebuttal statement about the much bigger delay in disclosing the missing money was improper because the context referred to both pre and post arrest Miranda silence. However, the state still argued that the comment was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and the other comments didn't violate any of Patrick's rights because they were in reference to his silence before he was read his Miranda rights. The state argued that the comments focused on what Patrick could have told police before he was arrested.

The Connecticut Supreme Court officially released their opinion in regards to Patrick's appeal on September 2, 2022. The decision considered several factors Patrick and his attorney had raised. First, the state's highest court found that the evidence submitted at trial was sufficient to find Patrick guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. From the opinion directly, which uses only the first letter of Yoshika's name, quote, "...although there was no direct evidence linking the defendant to Y's murder, the cumulative impact of the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support a reasonable inference that it was the defendant who murdered Y with a firearm."

End quote. The second and perhaps most critical issue under review was the prosecutor's comments about Patrick's silence. The court found that the prosecutor's references were ambiguous and referred generally to Patrick's delay in telling his side of the story. However, the court also found that the prosecutor improperly commented on Patrick's post-Miranda silence among the more ambiguous statements.

Let me walk you through this because it feels a little bit like mental gymnastics to decipher which statements by the prosecutor refer to which parts of Patrick's silence. So comments about Patrick's behavior in the four-day period before he was arrested were allowed. This was pre-Miranda. The prosecution was allowed to raise questions about whether an innocent person would flee and not tell family or police everything they knew or believed to be true about the murder so that it could be fully and properly investigated.

However, that's not all the prosecutor was talking about. When the prosecutor referenced Patrick's testimony saying, today, this morning, and the first time Patrick told his story, this could have been seen by the jury to reference post-Miranda silence. Furthermore, the rebuttal comments were found to be in reference to post-Miranda silence. The Connecticut Supreme Court opinion concluded that the prosecution's remarks were fundamentally unfair and in violation of Patrick's 14th Amendment right

to due process. The court also had to consider if the statements were harmless errors, meaning the jury would have reached the same verdict, even if the prosecutor didn't make those statements. The state had argued that their errors were harmless, particularly the rebuttal comment they admitted to improperly making, but the court found that the prosecution didn't fulfill its burden to demonstrate the comments were harmless.

So with that, in a 7-0 ruling, the court reversed Patrick's conviction and remanded the case for a new trial. Following the state's Supreme Court decision, Patrick filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the prosecutorial misconduct was intentional, serious, and engaged for the purpose of preventing his acquittal. The motion argued that dismissal of the charges was necessary to protect Patrick from double jeopardy and to quote-unquote sanction the prosecution for misconduct.

Now, double jeopardy does not apply when a defendant is retried after they have successfully appealed their convictions to be set aside for a new trial. However, double jeopardy can bar retrial when prosecutorial misconduct in the first trial was found to be deliberate in an attempt to prevent an acquittal. The court didn't see this as being the case, though, and so after oral arguments on June 15, 2023, the motion was denied. I mentioned before that I was unable to obtain most records associated with this case, and that's because the convictions were overturned and so everything from the first trial basically

gets impounded again. It remains to be seen how the prosecution and defense will change in their approach to telling each of their stories to a new jury, if at all. According to Connecticut Judicial Branch records at the time of this episode's recording, Patrick's second trial for Yashica's murder is currently awaiting scheduling.

second trial for Yoshika's murder is currently awaiting scheduling. In October of 2018, Yoshika's life was remembered as part of the Silent No More Candlelight Vigil hosted by the Prudence Crandall Center in New Britain. The Prudence Crandall Center has been providing services and support to survivors of domestic violence in Connecticut for over 50 years. It is one of the only programs in the country that offers a full spectrum of shelter, housing, and support services to provide a long-term solution for the challenges faced by those experiencing domestic violence. The lives of over 10,000 adults and children are impacted by PCC each year. Lisa Backus covered the Silent No More event for the Herald, speaking to survivors of domestic

violence who shared their stories of courage and strength in the face of trauma. The night was one of hope and reflection, as well as awareness that domestic violence can infiltrate any home or relationship. In 2017, the year Yoshika was murdered, 18 people lost their lives to intimate partner domestic homicides in Connecticut. Yashica's husband had not yet faced a judge and jury by the time of the vigil, but her name was among those remembered with flickering flames of candlelight. A candle was lit in honor of Yashica, Muda to her friends and family, the woman who was

born and raised in Hartford and attended Hartford Public Schools. The flame burned brightly, just as she did, so ambitious, spontaneous, and independent. She was an adoring mother and a caring, supportive sister. She was a real fashionista, according to her family, and loved wearing juicy couture. Yeshika's mother Adrienneenne, said the words a child always deserves to hear from a parent. She was so proud of Yeshika and her drive to pursue bigger, better opportunities

for herself and for her children. That's the Yeshika we need to remember while justice is caught in suspension. Justice is caught in suspension. Thank you for listening to Dark Down East. You can find all source material for this case at darkdowneast.com. Be sure to follow the show on Instagram at darkdowneast. This platform is for the families and friends

who have lost their loved ones and for those who are still searching for answers. I'm not about to let those names or their stories get lost with time. I'm Kylie Lowe, and this is Dark Down East. Dark Down East is a production of Kylie Media and AudioChuck. So, what do you think, Chuck? Do you approve? Dark Down East is a production of Kylie Media and AudioChuck. So what do you think Chuck? Do you approve?

Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo