Dateline NBC - Bryan Kohberger's bombshell plea. A double prosecution in Kentucky. Plus, a verdict for Sean Combs.

Episode Date: July 3, 2025

In Idaho, Bryan Kohberger faces a judge and the families of the students he murdered as he pleads guilty. In Kentucky, the prosecution calls more than a dozen witnesses in the case of a murdered mom of five. A verdict in Sean Combs's trial and new charges in the Kouri Richins case. Plus, in New Mexico, a new public alert system for the missing.Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com

Good morning. It's time for Dateline's morning meeting. We're getting a live shot from Franny who is at the courthouse. Our producers are catching up on breaking crime news. The defense begins their case on Monday. Recently Bob McDonald's was still in the charred kitchen. Welcome to Dateline True Crime Weekly. I'm Blane Alexander filling in today for Andrea Canning, who's on vacation.

It's July 3rd, and here's what's on our docket. In a Kentucky courthouse, prosecutors lay out their case against the man they say killed Crystal Rogers, a mother of five, and the case against a second man who they say helped cover it up. She overheard Steve and Joseph Lawson talking about moving a body at Brooks Family's farm. In Dateline Roundup, big news from Utah in the case of Corey Richins, the children's book author who was accused of fatally poisoning her husband.

She is now facing more than two dozen new charges. And we've got a verdict in the racketeering trial of music mogul Sean Diddy Combs. I'm going to interrupt you just closely here because we are getting the verdict coming in right now. And you might be familiar with the Amber Alert for missing children, but what about the Turquoise Alert? Officials are hoping it will help save lives. There is no wait time in New Mexico to make a report about somebody. You should report your missing loved one right away.

But before all that, we're off to Idaho, where a case that has gripped and horrified the nation came to a dramatic and unexpected conclusion this week. Five weeks from now, reporters, family members, and public spectators were set to flock to Boise, Idaho, to attend the trial of Brian Koberger, the man accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students back in 2022. The courthouse was reserved and lawyers on both sides were preparing to present their cases. But all of that changed earlier this week when news broke that Coburger had agreed to plead guilty to four first degree murder counts and an additional charge of felony burglary, all in exchange for taking the death penalty off the table.

Coburger appeared in court on Wednesday for a change of plea hearing. Keith Morrison and Dateline producer Shane Bishop were watching that and they're here now to tell us what happened. Keith and Shane, you two have been on this story from the very beginning. You've broken news on this story. So I am so glad to talk to you about this latest huge development in this case. Welcome. Thank you very much for asking us, for having us here. It was pretty big. I was initially kind of surprised, but then not so much after about a half an hour of thinking about it. What did you think, Shane? Were you surprised? I wasn't. I felt like the judge was always moving this case toward a

plea deal in subtle ways. Well, I want to talk more about that. But first, let's talk about how this hearing unfolded on Wednesday. Both of you watched the live streamed plea hearing. We saw Coburger sitting there at the defense table. What was his demeanor? What was he looking like? Well, I saw a young man sitting there, perfectly erect in his chair, wearing a shirt and tie, not the suit jacket that he'd worn in the past. This time he sat, he paid attention. At one point, early on, he wanted to stand up to address the judge. And Mr. Coburger, just to make it easier, you don't need to stand when you speak to

me. I appreciate the sign of respect, but for convenience, you can remain seated. All right? But he was just, he was being Mr. Correct. Yeah, I can see he had a fresh haircut. I noticed the lack of suit jacket as well. And he looked like the teaching assistant at the college, which he was. Right? I think there were a couple of things that stood out to me that were especially chilling. One, hearing Brian Koberger's voice, hearing him repeatedly say yes when the charges were read out. And then let me ask you, did you kill and murder Madison Mogan, a human being?

Yes. And did you do that willfully, unlawfully, deliberately, and with premeditation and malice of forethought? Yes. Did you honor about that same date, kill and murder, Kaley Goncalves, a human being? Yes. And did you on that same date, kill and murder,

Zana Curnodle, a human being? Yes. Did you kill and murder, Ethan Chapin, a human being? Yes. He seemed almost a jump of the chance to say it, to get that word in there as quick as he could. To me, it was like, here is the well-versed criminology student, knowing how this is going to work,

knowing what his answers would have to be or should be, and wanting to be able to supply them boom, boom, quickly and easily. Now, as he was going through this, guys, what was the reaction inside the courtroom? It, Well, you know, from what I could see, it just seemed like a very quiet, well-ordered room where, you know, nobody was going to speak out of turn. Nobody wanted this to go sideways. The only time that there was anything that was other than what seemed to be very carefully

planned ahead of time was when the prosecutor completed his recitation of the facts of the case. He became somewhat emotional. On November 13th, 2022, excuse me, Mr. Koberger entered the residence of the 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. He did that with the intent to kill and that he then killed Maddie Mogin, Kayleigh Consleigh Gonzales, Ethan Chapin, and Santa Cruz. Thank you. Thank you. And I understand that there were some family members who were almost sobbing during portions of this as well.

It's not an easy story to hear, and for a family member especially. You know, I want to step back and just talk quickly about how this plea deal came about. I mean, we're so close to the start of the trial. Why now? Well, my belief is that the defense was out of moves. In June, there was a closed door hearing where the defense tried to argue that they should

be allowed to present alternate perpetrator evidence during the trial. The judge heard their proffer and decided that. Basically there was nothing to it. So with that gone and. Coburgers i think very weak alibi defense that he was stargazing and turn his phone off during the time of the exact time of the murders. I think the defense was out of moves i I'm curious why the prosecutors would take this. What was the benefit to them? Well, let me say one thing.

One thing that really blew my mind was when the judge said he was going to call in 10,000 prospective jurors. I mean, that is a mind-boggling number in a jury pool. I think it's often in the state's interest to reach a plea. First, you get a guaranteed life sentence. The guy is not going to be a danger to anybody else. Secondly, Dylan and Bethany don't have to testify. And thirdly, I mean, this saves millions, if not tens of millions of dollars for the county and the state. Let's talk about the victim's families because one thing when the news broke on Monday, almost immediately thereafter, we saw this Facebook statement from the Gonzalves family, essentially saying we are beyond furious at the state of Idaho. They have failed us. Steve Gonzalves,

the father of Kayleigh Gonzalves, actually spent the hearing outside of the courthouse. He refused to go inside. He did speak, however. he spoke to some reporters. Let's listen to that. Why do you want this to go to trial? Because then my peers, this community will decide that he's guilty. One man shouldn't decide what forp's souls are worth. You said they made a deal with the devil? Yeah, they did. On the other hand, there were some families who were actually almost relieved by this plea deal, right? Even Chapin's parents were completely behind it. Madison Mogan's family put out a statement saying they were behind it and ready to move on. I believe it was Zana Curnotel's aunt who said she was not good with it as the Gonsalva's family expressed they were not good with it.

And we say this all the time, you don't know how you would feel about something unless you're in that position. So I could certainly understand how families could be split on either side. I think one thing is certain that this case has generated a tremendous amount of public interest. A lot of people have questions and really were looking to watch this trial and hoping to have some of those questions answered. The question that remains unanswered, of course, is why and why he chose...

The investigators believed it was Maddie Mogin who was the target and the other ones in some way became collateral damage. Well, I think one of the big things is everybody wants to know where the knife went. Our sources tell us he probably dumped it in the river down in Lewiston the next day. As for why, I mean, I've talked to people throughout the last two and a half years about motive. And someone once told me he wanted to make pretty girls ugly. And I think that's probably the best explanation you're going to get from somebody who's not a forensic psychologist. That's the suggestion. And I think it makes some sense whether it's

actually correct or true or not. I don't know. We'll ever know. And finally, let's talk about sentencing happening later this month. I mean, a couple of changes there. One, Brian Coburger will not be wearing regular street clothes. He'll be appearing in jail attire. But what can we expect to see during the sentencing hearing? appearing in jail attire. But what can we expect to see during the sentencing hearing? Michael S. Lauer, Jr. I think the sentencing hearing, there will be so much emotion as the victims' families are all by law able to speak. Michael S. Lauer, Jr. The question I have in my mind is whether Brian Colberg's parents will make a statement on what they might have to say.

Michael S. Lauer, Jr. Or will he say anything? Danielle Pletka Well, Shane and Keith, like I said, nobody knows this case better than the two of you. So I really appreciate you two joining us to break it down today. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks, Blayne. Up next, the jury hears chilling testimony at the trial of two men accused of being involved in the murder of Kentucky mom, Crystal Rogers. We've got all the details. For our next story, we're heading back to a Kentucky courthouse where the state's trial of the decade is underway. Ten years ago this week, Crystal Rogers disappeared almost without a trace.

Her car was found abandoned on the Bluegrass Parkway and her body was never located. After an eight year investigation, Brooks Hauck, Crystal's former boyfriend, was charged with her murder and his employee, Joseph Lawson, with conspiracy to commit murder and tampering with evidence. Both men have pleaded not guilty and are now standing trial together. This week, the prosecution called more than a dozen witnesses, each with their own piece of the puzzle about what may have happened to Crystal the night she disappeared. Dateline producer Marissa Meyer has been in the courtroom and joins us now to talk about what we

have learned so far. Marissa, welcome to the podcast. Thank you. I'm glad to be here, Blaine. We've heard from dozens of witnesses. Just kind of tell us about some of the ones that have stood out to you so far. Sure. Well, we heard from one witness, Crystal's friend. She spoke with and saw Crystal on the day she disappeared. She said on the stand that the night that she ended up going missing, Brooks had planned this like kid-free date night. And Marissa, according to the prosecution, that date night never actually happened, right? Instead, they went to Brooks' family farm where the prosecution believes Crystal died.

What else did we learn here? She also gave some insight into the relationship between Brooks and Crystal. She talked about how sometimes Brooks could say things about Crystal's appearance and how Brooks' mother, Rosemary, didn't seem to approve of the relationship. Brooks' mother, Rosemary, she came up in the testimony of another witness as well, right? Who was that witness and what did he have to say about her? Yes, so that witness was Danny Singleton and he was a former employee of Brooks. He'd worked for Brooks for about 15 years and Danny said he spoke to Rosemary two weeks before Crystal

disappeared and she asked him if he could find someone to get rid of Crystal. The prosecution in their opening statement called Rosemary Hauck a co-conspirator, but she has never actually been charged with anything. In fact, on cross-examination, the defense really went after Singleton's credibility, pointing out that he had been arrested for perjury related to this case. What does that stem from? Yeah, the defense got Danny to admit that he lied about his whereabouts the night of July 3rd when Crystal disappeared. And Danny had told investigators that he was at a bar,

but on the stand, he admitted he was doing drugs. And he said he lied when we first talked to investigators because he didn't want to get arrested. For doing drugs. Yes. But Danny held firm under cross-examination that now he is telling the truth. In this trial, he says he is telling the truth. Well, you know, we've heard from a lot of witnesses. Someone else we heard from, Marissa, was the ex-girlfriend of Joseph Lawson's father, Steve. Now, just a quick reminder to our listeners,

Steve was convicted for his role in Crystal's murder a few weeks ago. Like Joseph, Steve Lawson had been charged with conspiracy and tampering with evidence. So what did we learn from her testimony, the ex-girlfriend's testimony? This is a woman named Heather Snelling. She said she overheard Steve and Joseph Lawson talking about moving a body at Brooks Family's farm using a skid steer, which I had never heard of, but a skid steer is a piece of equipment that I guess usually is a bucket in front and it's used for digging and moving things and landscape

and construction, that kind of thing. On Cross, the defense went through the interviews she'd done with law enforcement and they were pointing out she never brought up what she says she overheard. Another striking piece of testimony about Joseph Lawson came on Monday from another former employee of Brooks. That's right. This came from Charlie Gurdley, and he'd also testified at Steve Lawson's trial as well. Gurdley said Joseph Lawson once talked with him about Crystal. And according to Girdley, Joseph said he would bury her with a skid steer

and nobody would ever find her. Charlie said also the day Crystal went missing, he saw Brooks give Joseph Lawson Crystal's car keys. But there was also this really dramatic moment when Charlie said, Joseph said he would pull her teeth and the hogs would do the rest. Oh, wow. And assuming pull her teeth meaning get rid of a way to identify her with her dental records. Wow. Oh my gosh. So how did the defense try to counter Gertlie's testimony on cross? They did what they've been doing with other witnesses. They really questioned Charlie's

credibility and they pointed out that he was a drug user and that his story had changed significantly over the years. And Charlie himself admitted that one time when he was being questioned by state police investigators, he'd been awake for five to six days, high on drugs too. Wow. And the defense also pointed out that even as late as 2023, Charlie told investigators Brooks had never talked to him about Crystal. And Charlie had said at that point that Brooks was not involved at all. And the defense insinuated that investigators really led Charlie into telling them a story that neatly fit into what their

theory of the crime is. Okay. Well, the prosecution has now arrested its case. So what do we know so far about the defense here? So the defense has started. It seems like overall, they're trying to paint this picture that the facts and the proof in this case were replaced by assumptions and theories and that witnesses were really manipulated and they said even bullied into fitting a certain narrative of this crime. Well, Marissa, we know that you're going to stay all over it as always, and we really appreciate you talking with us today. Thanks so much.

Thank you so much, Blaine. Up next, it's time for Dateline Roundup. Children's book author and accused killer Corey Richins faces new charges. The murder trial of former Major League Baseball player Dan Serafini winds down with his wife on the stand. And after 13 and a half hours of deliberations, a verdict in the trial of music mogul Sean Diddy Combs. Plus, New Mexico's secretary of Indian affairs joins us to talk about a new law that she thinks will be a game changer in the search for missing Indigenous people. Welcome back.

To kick off this week's Roundup, we've got big news and a story that we've been covering in our daily podcast on trial. After seven weeks of testimony, 34 witnesses, and more than 13 hours of deliberations, the jury came back Wednesday morning with a verdict in the federal trial of music mogul Sean Combs. I'm going to interrupt you just closely here at Misty because we are getting the verdict coming in right now. This is coming in real time. He faced a life sentence on the most serious charges.

Just after 10, 15 a.m., Combs held the hand of one of his defense attorneys as the verdict was read out, guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, not guilty on two counts of sex trafficking, and one count of racketeering conspiracy, the charges that could have seen him face decades behind bars. After the jury was excused, Combs sank to his knees, resting his head on a chair as if praying. His family in the courtroom clapped and cheered.

Outside the courthouse, the civil attorney representing Cassie Ventura, Combs' ex-girlfriend and one of the main prosecution witnesses, spoke to the press. We're pleased that he's finally been held responsible for two federal crimes, something that he's never faced in his life. A few hours later,

the judge denied Combs request for bail and ordered him to remain in custody until his sentencing. According to the prosecution, Combs could face at least four to five years in prison based on sentencing guidelines.

We'll keep you posted as we learn more. If you want to hear more in-depth coverage of the case, remember to check out our podcast on trial. All right. And for the rest of this week's headlines, I'm joined by Dateline Digital producer Veronica Mazaga. And we're starting with the case out of Utah. Veronica, thanks so much for being here with us today.

Thanks for having me. Well, Veronica, a flurry of new charges have been filed against Utah mom, Corey Richens. Just a reminder for our listeners, she's the woman accused of poisoning her husband with a lethal dose of fentanyl and then writing a children's book about grief. She has pleaded not guilty to her murder charge, but just this week, she was hit with 26 new charges? What's that about? Yeah, they were all pertaining to financial crimes that prosecutors alleged took place

in the months leading up to her husband's death. These charges stem from the homicide investigation and include mortgage fraud, communications fraud, forgery, issuing a bad check, money laundering, and a pattern of unlawful activity. And these charges come more than two years after she was charged with her husband's death. And just two days before the statute of limitations was set to expire on some of these charges. Richen's murder trial is scheduled for February, 2026,

but there's been no trial date yet set for these new charges. Well, watch and see what happens there. And finally, we are checking into the trial of former MLB pitcher Dan Serafini. He's the man accused of shooting his in-laws at their home in Lake Tahoe, killing his father-in-law, Gary Spore, and seriously wounding his mother-in-law, Wendy Wood. Erin Spore, Dan Serafini's wife, continued her testimony on the stand. What were the main takeaways from her testimony? She defended her husband, Dan, but when it came to Samantha Scott, she called her deceitful.

And when asked if Samantha Scott could be trusted, Erin answered, quote, absolutely not. And just a reminder, Samantha Scott is the woman who says she actually drove Serafini to Lake Tahoe the day of the attack and has taken a plea for her role in the shooting. Yes. She also admitted on the stand that she became Serafini's lover. Well, the defense then projected four photos, two of Samantha Scott during the trial and two of Erin.

They asked Erin to comment on whether she thought that Samantha Scott was trying to be her. What was that? Yeah. So she said that it appeared that she was, and she also said that the similarities in their appearances were, quote, creepy. So she was saying that essentially she thought that Samantha was trying to become her in a way? Pretty much, I guess, and taking her spot, if you will, since she became Dan's lover as well. Interesting. Okay. Well, jurors will be receiving their instructions this week, with closing arguments scheduled for next week, July 8th. So, of course, we will be following that trial as it winds down and the jury begins deliberations.

Veronica, thanks so much for joining me this week. Thank you. against deliberations. Veronica, thanks so much for joining me this week. Thank you. 21 years ago, 16 year old Tiffany Reed vanished from her small town of Shiprock, New Mexico, located on the Navajo reservation. She has never been found.

Her family blames the local police for not acting more quickly. Tiffany's big sister spoke with Josh Mangowitz for his most recent episode of Dateline Missing in America. They asked if my sister had taken off from home before, and my mom said, yeah, she has. And they just basically ran with that and said, OK, well, maybe she just ran away from home.

So if she's not back in 72 hours, then you can report her missing. You must have thought about that delay a lot in the last 20 years. I have. Tiffany is one of nearly 200 missing indigenous people in the state of New Mexico. This week, the state became the fourth in the nation to introduce an alert system designed to get more attention more quickly for indigenous people who go missing.

It's called the Turquoise Alert System. My next guest, Josette Monette, is New Mexico's Cabinet Secretary of Indian Affairs. And she's joining us now to tell us more about this new alert system. Secretary Monette, welcome, and thank you so much for joining us today. Hi, thank you so much for having me today. You once said, too many Native American families have faced crisis and the heartbreak of a loved

one disappearing without the swift response they deserve. Why do you believe that's the case? Well, we know from various studies that there has been a large portion of Native American people that have gone missing and not always having a quick response. And so that was kind of my thought is that this hopefully will help get to bridging some of that gap of having an alert system specifically for Native American people, even when they might go missing. In your experience, have you found that these cases have not been prioritized in the same way as other missing people? I can't speak for any individual law enforcement or a family member, and you know, I've been lucky enough that this hasn't been something I've experienced personally.

What we do know in Indian country are there are jurisdictional questions for what is federal land, what's state land, and who has the jurisdiction over that. So those sometimes do become issues. One of the gaps that we were trying to cover, in particular what the Turquoise still learned, is we know that the Amber Alert covers younger children, the silver alert covers a larger age group, but most missing indigenous people fall between like 18 to 46 and there was no alert system for that age group. And so one of the things with the Turquoise Alert is trying to ensure that there's an alert system in place for that age group of missing and murdered indigenous people.

Just walk me through how this would work. It does function very much like an amber alert or a silver alert based on, you know, what the criteria is for a person who has gone missing due to involuntary or unexplained or suspicious circumstances. We're talking about road signs, radio alerts, TV alerts, different ways to get that information out immediately to the public, right? Correct. Turquoise, the name Turquoise, that was not chosen by mistake.

That's very intentional. Tell our listeners why that was chosen as this alert. We actually had a staff member at the Indiana Affairs Department who was kind of, was creative in her thinking and you know turquoise means a lot to New Mexico and leads a lot to Native people in the southwest. It's a powerful stone. She kind of had this creative thought of you know you have silver and you have amber so like a stone or kind of a material of sorts and she's like what if we use turquoise solar to kind of represent Native people here in

New Mexico and I was like oh that's a great ideaquoise solar to kind of represent native people here in New Mexico? And I was like, oh, that's a great idea. So we ran with it. We thought it was great. You know, in Tiffany Reed's case, her family has said that police told them to wait 72 hours to file a missing persons report. And they say that even after all of that, police then waited four days, according to the family, to put Tiffany's information into a national database

for missing people. Now, police wouldn't comment to our Dateline team on what they say happened, citing an open and active investigation. So I guess my question to you is, had this law been in effect back in 2004 when she originally went missing, do you think that this would have made a difference in her case? I can't really say for sure whether or not it would have. I can say that my hope is that having this alert system moving forward does help prevent some of those things.

You should report your missing loved one right away. Secretary Monette, thank you so much for your time. Thanks for joining us today to talk about this very important system. We appreciate it. Thank you. much for your time. Thanks for joining us today to talk about this very important system. We appreciate it. Thank you. I appreciate it. That's it for this episode of Dateline True Crime Weekly. To get ad-free listening for all of our podcasts, subscribe to Dateline Premium.

And if you want to learn more about missing persons cases, don't forget to check out Josh's new season of the Dateline Missing in America podcast. Episodes 1 through 4, including his report on the Tiffany Reed case, are out now wherever you get your podcasts. And remember to listen closely because you could be the key to solving a mystery. And reminder, there's no Dateline this Friday, but don't worry, friends. You can watch our When Sparks Fly marathon on the Dateline 24 seven channel Friday through Monday. Except of course, when you take a break, Saturday at nine, eight central to watch a classic two hour Keith mystery on NBC.

Thanks so much for listening. Dateline True Crime Weekly is produced by Franny Kelly and Katie Ferguson. Our associate producers are Carson Cummins and Caroline Casey. Our senior producer is Carson Cummins and Caroline Casey. Our senior producer is Liz Brown-Kuriloff. Veronica Mazekka is our digital producer. Production and fact-checking help by Terry Dickerson.

Rick Kwan is our sound designer. Original music by Jesse Magentie. Bryson Barnes is the head of audio production. Paul Ryan is executive producer, and Liz Cole is senior executive producer of Dateline. Thanks everybody. Have a great time.