Dateline NBC - Talking Dateline: Center of the Storm

Episode Date: June 25, 2025

Blayne Alexander sits down with Andrea Canning to talk about her latest episode, “Center of the Storm.”  The 2024 trial of Karen Read garnered national attention as she fought allegations that in 2022, she drunkenly backed her SUV into her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, and left him to die in the snow. After the jury was unable to reach a verdict, the judge declared a mistrial.This year, Read went back on trial and a new jury did deliver a verdict. Andrea tells Blayne what it was like at the courthouse when the verdict was read. She also discusses her interview with Michael Proctor, the former state trooper who the defense accused of having framed Read as part of a coverup. Plus, Andrea shares two podcast-exclusive clips: the first from her interview with Proctor, and the second from her interview with one of John O’Keefe’s family members after the verdict.

Hi, everyone. I am Blaine Alexander and today we are Talking Dateline. I am joined by the one and only Andrea Canning. Hi, Andrea. Hey, Blaine. So this episode is called Center of the Storm. If you haven't seen it, you can find it in the Dateline podcast feed. So make sure to go there and listen to it or stream it on Peacock and then come right back here. Here's a quick recap. Karen Reed was accused of killing her boyfriend, John O'Keefe, a Boston police officer, by drunkenly backing her car into him on a snowy January night

in 2022. But Reed and her many supporters argued that's not true. They said that she was framed as part of a police cover-up and that O'Keefe was actually killed by his fellow officers at a house party. Andrea's latest episode on the case takes us through the retrial after Reed's first trial in 2024 ended in a hung jury. Andrea shares how the jury finally reached a verdict this time around, and she also talks to the former state trooper right at the heart of this case, the man Karen Reed has accused of coordinating the cover-up, Michael Proctor.

For this Talking Dateline episode, Andrea's got two extra clips that didn't make it into the show. One from her interview with Proctor and a second clip from her interview with one of John O'Keefe's family members after the verdict. All right, Andrea, so let's talk Dateline. Let's do it. So I have to say that in my brief time at Dateline, I've gotten texted about a lot of stories, but there are none that people have reached out to me more about than Karen Reed. I think people who aren't even interested in true crime or court cases are really, really

fascinated by this story. So I'm very excited to talk to you about this today. Yeah, I know. It's been a wild one as far as just people wanting to give you their input. I don't think I've ever been on a story with this many opinions and this many armchair detectives. I posted just a clip on Instagram, on my personal Instagram, a video I took. I had so many comments and it was like, one was for her, the next one was against, then the next one was for her, the next one was... It wasn't even lopsided of one feeling or the other. It was so divided, split right down the middle, it felt like.

Like politics almost. Like, you're a Republican or you're a Democrat. You support Karen Reed or you don't support Karen Reed. People are digging in, right? They want to tell you why they think she's innocent or who's bad in this story. They all have their opinions about the players as well. So after all this time, we're talking about three years, two trials, finally there's a verdict in this case.

And I mean, this was a tremendous new story when the verdict was reached. I'm curious, you were there, you were in Massachusetts when the jury came back. What was it like out there? First what happened, it was so strange. They said that there was a verdict. And we're like, oh my gosh, there's a verdict. Okay. And then, nope, there's not a verdict. And we're like, oh my gosh, there's a verdict. Okay, and then, nope, there's not a verdict.

So the jury had knocked on the door saying verdict and then changed their minds. Oh. So I thought, okay, like I guess this isn't happening today. And then not too long after we hear there is a verdict. Wow. We left this room that we were in. We went down the hall in the courthouse,

sat down on the bench. And there were some people, some Karen Reed supporters who were in the courthouse, just like a few of them. And these people started crying in front of us, just the few people, they were crying, they were freaking out. And then we decided to high tail it outside. So we went out the front doors where everyone was waiting. And by the way, in the courthouse, it was like the courthouse was shaking. It was so loud outside. I mean, when the verdict came in, the cheers were so loud because there were so many people

and they were all for Karen Reed outside. And to be clear, these are just random people. These, we're not talking about family people with any stake in this. We're talking about just people who are- Just Karen Reed supporters, dressed in pink. And so we, you know, we went outside and then you could feel that energy of these people waiting for Karen Reed, you know, to come outside. And when she came out, it was like they just erupted in cheers. And even

before that, they were chanting things like, you know, lock up Michael Proctor and they were, they were cheering Auntie Bev has to go, the judge. Wow. So they were just, you know, everything was about Karen, Karen, Karen for them. And she, she came out, they all cheered. And then she, she spoke into, there were many, many microphones. And it was so loud that the audio was picked up of course for the news, but you couldn't hear a word of what she was saying because it was

just so loud. And I mean, with the exception maybe of like the OJ case, you know, like I don't, I can't really think of a case that has had this much attention, this many people show up, you know, get this heated about it, this divided, you know, it definitely had like shades of OJ, I think. That's what's so unbelievable about this, because yes, even as you're describing it, I was thinking OJ, that everyone had a feeling one way or the other, people were angry,

people were upset, people were cheering or whatever. I mean, I think the other one is the other case that you're kind of in the middle of, right in the middle of covering, which is the Diddy trial, right? I mean, that one is everybody's watching, everybody has a thought, everybody's following along. And it's just interesting that we're in this time

of criminal cases really being followed super closely like this and being so polarizing. Yeah, people are just seem to be getting more and more into these cases, you know, where they feel they can dig in or where they feel there's wrongdoing or maybe the person's famous in Diddy's case, you know, it could be different reasons, but definitely getting all in on these cases.

The interesting thing about Karen Reed though, I mean, Diddy obviously was a massive celebrity, is a massive celebrity. So people can understandably be interested in that. Karen Reed was not a celebrity before, but this case has kind of catapulted her to that status, right? I know, I know. It's like her name, you know.

I mean how many people at this point now have not heard the name Karen Reed, right? It's everywhere. She's also received money from supporters. Yeah. I mean, she has made no bones about it. She needs money and she still needs money. So she's still paying off the legal bill. As far as I understand, she has a civil trial coming up. Yeah. We had a clip in the show about somebody who gave her like a gift certificate or whatever to go buy suits, you know, for like, yeah, yeah, a suit. Yeah. I actually had wondered that. She always seemed so like

impeccably dressed and I'm like, how's she affording all that? Maybe that maybe she already owned these clothes or, but then you find out that there's people supporting her in more ways than one. We also heard from a juror in this NBC Boston's Sue O'Connell interviewed a juror to kind of hear her feelings about the public's reaction to the verdict. It's always interesting to hear from jurors. So let's listen to some of that sound. Talk to me about the reaction when the verdict was read and the crowd outside screamed and cheered.

To be honest with you, I don't remember what happened in that courtroom at that moment. Because once I heard the people outside, I just closed my eyes and I started crying and I left the courtroom without looking to anyone. I did not expect to hear it because through the whole trial, we didn't hear anything on the jury room. We did not saw many people outside because we come from the back of the courthouse. So we would see someone walk away with a pink shirt hidden there, but that was it.

Never hear chanting or comments or laughing or yelling or booing, nothing. And this particular to me, when I heard that people screaming out of happiness, at the same time I was seeing John Lucas' family crying out of sadness, and that broke my heart. So that moment, I kind of understood how big this case was and how we're making someone happen and we're making a lot of other people sad too. So I don't remember what happened in courtroom that moment.

I just closed my eyes and cried. Yeah. I mean, that really sticks out. We're making some people happy and then we're making some people sad. And that's really, she just boiled it down in that one sentence. And that must have been just such a weird feeling to know that your decision, you know, set that off, that wave of cheers and excitement and commotion outside. And that like realizing the magnitude of the moment that it brought her to tears.

I thought that was so interesting. Just kind of there had to have been obviously as a juror, you're kind of just focused on the facts. And that's the moment when all of the outside world comes rushing in. So I could, I could see how that would be emotional, I guess. After the break, Andrea has an extra clip from her interview with former trooper, Michael Proctor. Let's, let's talk about the trial itself. I'm curious, and I'm sure a lot of people are curious,

for those who watched the first, the second, what are some of the big differences that kind of stood out? The second trial seemed to focus more on, to me, it seemed science, data, you know, it had a different prosecutor. He seemed to take a more analytical approach, I would say, versus the first one. They definitely in the first trial leaned more into the conspiracy, the framing. Michael Proctor testified. They had him read the texts. But I mean, they still did that though in number two.

Alan Jackson in his closing said, don't let Michael Proctor win. Michael Proctor, the former trooper is the bogeyman. So even though Michael Proctor did not testify and was not called by either, was not called by the prosecution, was not called by the defense, this is the lead investigator, which is so rare, right? They still went after him hard in the closing. It shows how much he just hangs over this entire case. We're going to get to your interview, by the way, with Michael Proctor. Before that, though, I mean, when we talk about differences between the first trial and the second, some of them were differences for journalists,

right? I mean, for instance, Sue Simpson, our intrepid producer who was waiting in line to get in the last time, it was a different kind of a different scenario this time around to get inside the courthouse. Yeah, this time they did lottery. So the first time Sue was in her lawn chair that she uses for soccer games, showing up at midnight and sitting there all night. And then this time they did the lottery. So she was lucky.

She kept in the beginning, she was not winning the lottery and then she started, she got on a roll. She's winning. And she kept winning. And so she was able to keep getting into the courtroom. So she was able to observe very small courtroom. People are really packed in there. That's why they had to do a lottery because there were so many people and not just media, old school reporters and whatnot. They also had the social media influencers like Turtle Boy, podcast people. And speaking of Turtle Boy, we didn't really hear from him as much this time around.

Yeah. I saw him. I was standing right near him when the verdict came in. He was very happy. Another thing that we noticed, of course, in the second trial is that Dateline entered the chat. Yes. They played some interview clips from Dateline, right?

Dennis Murphy, before we switched correspondents, he did the interview with Karen. So that showed up in the courtroom, some clips from his interview. They were trying to show some inconsistencies with Karen and her interviews. And also I think there probably was a little bit of, look, she's telling her story everywhere but the courtroom. She's telling every single media person, but not like in front of the jury. So I'm sure there was some of that as well, you know, with the prosecution trying to point that out.

Was that always going to be the call that she didn't take the stand? I mean, you know, Blaine that very often defendants don't take the stand, right? Because then, you know, in her case, her own words could be used against her from these interviews. It's a gamble because they had this theory that she was framed and they were sticking to it and they wanted the jury really, I think, to focus on that and not on her and getting up there on the stand and possibly, who knows what could happen on cross examination. It's always friendly from your own attorney. And then when you get on cross, things can get dicey for a defendant. Speaking of hearing from people,

we heard from Michael Proctor. And I have to say that, you know, I watch these episodes cold, even though I know that we're working on them and everything, but it's kind of fun when doing the talking date lens to just watch it as a viewer. And when I saw him in the preview, I said, oh my God, we talked to Michael Proctor.

Andrea got my, like, I mean, I really was watching this, like, wow, I can't believe it. First we talked to his wife, Elizabeth, though. That's who we heard from. Tell me what that was like. She was pretty candid in kind of how she reacted to finding out about those text messages. When she first found out about them,

she didn't know what was in them exactly. He just said that they were embarrassing. And then she said it was, you know, started picking up steam a little bit where she's hearing this, she's hearing that. It started to get worrisome. And then I believe she didn't know what was actually in them until the trial. That's when she first heard the exact contents. Nicole Sade Like when he went on the stand? Yeah. Wow. And so she said that she did listen to that. And so it's tough for her because she's the wife, right?

She hasn't done anything wrong and she's caught up in this firestorm and such a charged case. And he lost his job over this. And he lost his job. She was with him when they got the call. It was pretty much immediate after the mistrial that they called and said that you're losing your job. It's been very hard on her. She says she knows who her real friends are now.

That's a plus. The people who have stuck by them. And he's trying to get his job back. I think it's going to be more difficult now given the verdict. I mean, look, I don't know if he was ever going to get it back, but like, it just seems like maybe now it's even harder. It was a fascinating interview. We actually have some extra sound from Michael Proctor from your

conversation with him. So let's listen to that. When people ask me about the case, you know, I tell them, don't even bother looking at the evidence, the evidence or the facts or the data. Look at it from a common sense perspective. The defense wants you to believe in their blogger, wants you to believe that I coordinated this grand

conspiracy with multiple units on the state police, Canton Police Department, Canton Fire, Canton Paramedics, a dozen or so civilian witnesses and a dog. And not one person has said over three years, this is what happened. I'm not going down for this because the truth is Karen Reid backed into John O'Keefe with her vehicle. There's no conspiracy. How does the future look for Michael Proctor? Time will tell. Like I said, we're appealing my

wrongful termination. I still want to be a trooper. I still know that I can do some good on the state police. So we're fighting and that's step one. That's the number one thing for me right now. I mean, I'm really glad that we were able to hear his perspective on all this. I agree. And, you know, it's always at Dateline, we just want everybody's side. It doesn't mean we're on anyone's side. We want to hear your side. And, you know, people, why did you put him on there?

You know, you get all kinds of messages on social media. Yeah. Like all kinds of, you know of critics of an interview. And it really is, that's Dateline's way. We always will be that way. And that's what I love about our show is that we don't just do one side. Of course. It's fair journalism.

That's what it's called, right? Yeah. I mean, when we get back, Andrea is going to share a podcast exclusive clip from her latest interview with one of John O'Keefe's relatives. It's a very complex case. And we don't want to forget John O'Keefe and the center of it. Absolutely.

This was a man who gave his life to public service. This is a man who when his sister and brother-in-law died, he stepped up, he moved out of the city to raise his niece and nephew. This is a man who had a lot of good qualities that his life was cut short. And I think something that you did a great job of in this episode is reminding the viewer of who he was, right? And not letting him get lost because that's something that his family member, Beth, said she felt and the family felt happened in all of this.

There was so much, you know, talk about everyone almost, but John O'Keefe himself. Let's talk about Beth for a second. You did a second interview with Beth, and you'd already spoken with her for the first episode, but this one was different, because it was right after the verdict. I wonder if you can just kind of set the scene. How was she holding up?

It was very raw at that moment. Tears, you know, she came over to where we were, you know, to interview and my heart just went out to her. And that's not me, again, taking sides of anyone, but just feeling sympathy for someone who's in pain at that moment. Because Beth and her family believe what they believe. And so for them, this is a loss, right? This didn't go the way they wanted. And they feel like just some serious injustice. So to talk to somebody that quickly after a verdict that went so wrong for them

it was painful. Of course. I could imagine. We have a little extra clip from your interview with her. Let's take a listen to that and then talk about it. What's going through your body as you hear those words being read in the courtroom? You know, I think it's, I don't, you know, honestly, I don't even know what happened at that moment. You know, I wasn't in court. I was down the street watching. And I think I, it was just a kind of a numb sensation of, you know, how, you know, what made them come to this conclusion where it's so different than what we know.

This has had such a domino effect, these accusations. It did, you know. It's impacted more than just, you know, my family. It's impacted other families. It's impacted our friends. You know, lives have changed, not for the better, because of this situation and because of the actions that one person took on January 29th, 2022. Yeah. I mean, to the O'Keeffe family and extended family, there's no doubt in their minds that

Karen Reid hit John O'Keeffe. Just like on the other side of this, there's zero doubt in Karen Reid's supporters' minds that she did not hit John O'Keefe. So we're just seeing a case through very different lenses from all these different people. And there's even shades, right? It's not even just she hit him or she didn't hit him. There's people like in the middle too, who can't really make heads or tails of this. So it's a tricky one

It's a tricky tricky. It is a fascinating story. It's a fascinating case one that has really just gripped Everyone across the country and you did a great job of covering it and bringing us this episode. So thank you, Andrea Thanks Blaine great to talk Dateline with you and that's it for talking Dateline this week Remember if you have any questions for us about stories or talk Dateline with you. And that's it for Talking Dateline this week. Remember, if you have any questions for us about stories or about Dateline, you can always reach us 24-7 on social media at DatelineNBC. Plus, there's an all-new season of Josh Mankiewicz's podcast Missing in America out now. That series takes a deep dive into the country's most perplexing, unsolved missing persons cases.

Make sure to catch a new episode every Tuesday, wherever you get your podcasts. And of course, we'll see you on Fridays on Dateline on NBC.