Dateline NBC - Talking Dateline: Heartless

Episode Date: October 14, 2026

Keith Morrison sits down with Josh Mankiewicz to discuss his latest episode, “Heartless.”When 53-year-old Talina Galloway went missing from her Oklahoma home in March 2020, her friends knew someth...ing was awry. Police began looking into her disappearance, as did a group of online sleuths who called themselves “Talina’s Army.” Eventually, the investigation led police to Talina’s body and to her killer, who was all too close to home. Josh and Keith discuss the ways armchair detectives can help and hurt investigations, as well as the sci-fi subculture that formed a major part of Talina’s life. Then, Josh answers your questions from social media. Listen to the full episode of “Heartless”: https://swap.fm/l/dl_heartlessHave a question for Talking Dateline? Send us a DM @DatelineNBC or leave a voicemail at (212) 413-5252. Your question could be featured in an upcoming episode. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Hello, everybody. I'm Keith Morrison, and this is Talking Date Line. Today I'm joined by Josh Makowitz to discuss his episode, which is called Heartless. Interesting title for this one. It's about the disappearance of a woman in rural Oklahoma, the armchair detectives that brought attention to her case, and the killer who is too close to home. But before we get into all of that, if you haven't listened to the episode yet, you can find it right below this one, or stream it right now on Peacock, and then come back and we'll talk. We'll have more from Josh's interview with Talina's Killer and later your questions from social media.
Starting point is 00:00:43 All right. Let's talk deadline. So this was an interesting way to get into a story, Josh Mikowitz. You got it through our digital team, when you were doing the missing in America? Yes. I got a call several years ago when Tolina was missing. before she'd been found by a friend of mine who knew Tolena, I think, through work. And she said, this woman I know is suddenly missing and nobody can find her.
Starting point is 00:01:14 And maybe this is something that you guys could work on. So I said it to Veronica, who's in our Dateline episode, who runs the Missing America franchise for us. And so we did one of the first stories on that case. We were sort of one of the first places where Talina's case got some national play. Now, I be the first to admit, I don't think that our missing an America thing did anything except generate a lot of tips. I do not think it played any role in solving the case. But it did sort of begin to get the case out there. Was that what prompted the armchair detectives on social media to get involved?
Starting point is 00:02:01 Well, it's impossible to say sort of what prompts. I mean, what got everybody interested in the Karen Reed case? What got everybody interested in the Lindsay Clancy case? There's a sort of a spot or a sort of a match strikes on the internet, and suddenly there's this wildfire of interest. And there was some of that in the case of Talina Galloway. You know, people who had never heard her name before didn't know who she was, had never been to Oklahoma, suddenly were super invested in finding out where she was. And we sort of talked to one of the leaders of that group, Jess. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:02:45 It's very interesting about these kinds of groups that formed, sometimes spontaneously, sometimes intentionally. The police occasionally like to work with them. these police officers didn't seem necessarily all that enthusiastic. They were sort of ahead of them most of the time, I think. It's hard to say. I mean, obviously, I wasn't privy to every conversation or any of the conversations between sort of the amateur sleuths and the sheriff's investigators who were working in this case.
Starting point is 00:03:13 Those investigators, the sheriff's department, they solved it. They got to the bottom of it. And, you know, were they helped along at some point by, by the amateur sleuth, maybe. But this is certainly mostly almost all their work. You know, the problem, as they say in this episode, is that when you get all these tips from elsewhere, generated by people on the Internet who unquestionably sort of, you know, mean well,
Starting point is 00:03:43 and in some cases come up with legitimate, interesting, worthy to explore avenues of investigation, that can slow things down, particularly if as an investigator you already think you know what's going on. Yeah. But those tips can't be discounted. I mean, our Missing in America story generated a tip that Tolena had been seen here in the distant suburbs of Los Angeles. Well, not true, but they have to check it out.
Starting point is 00:04:13 And so that I think investigators feel like that kind of thing slows them down. But there's no question that, like, sometimes it leads to something. I think it definitely slows them down in many cases. I've only encountered one, which was a case where the person wasn't missing. She was already dead, and they were trying to figure out who she was. It was a missing, it was a Jane Doe case. And in that case, the detectives actively sought out and were happy to accept the help of this online group of sleuths. And it made a big difference.
Starting point is 00:04:47 But again, if somebody is missing, they're trying to solve a murder. It's a different situation. The one I always come back to is the Kristen Smart case in which, you know, Chris Lambert, who was a, you know, podcaster, not an investigator, didn't know the smart family, never investigated, you know, crimes or anything like that, sort of took it upon himself to begin investigating this and then generated a tremendous amount of information that kind of helped kickstart the case. And there's other cases around the country where sort of amateur slews or podcasters, you know, made a big deal. And there's also cases in which Amherst just lost and, you know, sort of got in the way. Generally, law enforcement, happy to have tips. I think there's a point at which they sort of feel like, you know, hey, enough, stay in your lane. It's also a change from the way it was, you know, when I started certainly was just about seven eons ago.
Starting point is 00:05:44 But where the officers did not want anybody interfering and they didn't want anybody even talk. to them about it. They're doing their own investigation and stay out of it, please. Cops were working with oil lamps, weren't they when you started? I think that's about right. Driving around in their horseless carriages. I don't think people trying to solve crimes at home, whether their disappearances or murders. I don't think that's going away. I think the Internet makes that much more possible than it was just a few years ago. It makes it inevitable.
Starting point is 00:06:18 And it can create a community of sort of like-minded people who want to get to the bottom of it, which is exactly what happened in this case, and just did a tremendous amount of work. And, you know, I mean, at one point, investigators told her to sort of slow down because Corey, their suspect, was reading the Where is Tolina, Justice for Tolena web page and thinking, I'm under suspicion, which. from those people, she absolutely was. I think the cops wanted her to feel like, no, no, you're not under suspicion. It's still safe to talk with us. And so they sort of asked Jess to, like, can you, can you just hold down a little bit? And the cops really clearly wanted to keep Corey talking, because every time they spoke with her, they were, the sheriff's investigators were learning a little bit more. her past is pretty fascinating. What kind of character emerged in your mind from that, that investigation of her past?
Starting point is 00:07:23 Corey's past kind of murky, not a whole lot known in detail about sort of where she came from and what led to that. But you spoke to her ex-husband. Yes. His story, the story he told police too about what they should be looking for, was. telling. That's, right. That's, you know, that's not a story you tell somebody sort of on the spur of the moment. I mean, Alec, her ex-husband, calls police and when he hears Talene is missing, and he's like, look, a couple things. One, you're not looking for a live person or a body. You're looking for body parts. And second, you're looking for ricin, which is this, I mean, I don't know if exotic is the right word for it, but highly unusual out of the mainstream poison that is used in. in, you know, like by terrorists and in assassinations and stuff.
Starting point is 00:08:19 And his story is Corey was making ricin when they lived together in Wisconsin, and she told him that she broke into the neighbor's house and spread ricin to kill them. She said, I'm making ricin to deal with our enemies, she said. That's how he quotes her. Now, the interesting thing about this is that the people living next door to Corey and Alec in Wisconsin, hardly meet the standard of being an enemy. I mean, I'm not sure they actually had any dispute with them. Corey may have believed that they were the source of the township sort of saying,
Starting point is 00:09:00 you have too many animals, you have to do something about them. You know, you're making a lot of noise, and they smell bad, and neighbors are complaining. But the Zieglers, who I spoke with at length, they say, no, that wasn't us. That was one of the other neighbors who made that. everybody was upset about that. This really is killing an ant with a cannon. I mean, ricin is a pretty strong response. Yeah, you get in a pretty small dispute with your neighbors, and the next thing you know, you're spreading a poison that's used, you know, to assassinate foreign leaders and things. That's kind of crazy. Now, by now, six years have passed. It's pretty
Starting point is 00:09:37 clear the Zieglers didn't suffer any ill effects from that, ricin, because it turns out it was incompetently made. Thank God for that. I mean, can you imagine? But because by the time that everybody realizes that was ricin, it's like six years later and Mrs. Eagler can barely find any of it still in her house, which is a good thing because they would have been killed very quickly if the ricin had been made properly. And of course, the recipe for ricin is on, was found on Corey's computer and one of the search warrants, but that's just a coincidence. Of course it's a coincidence. Because everybody looks for things like rice and then it's normal. And when we come back, we're going to have a listen to a bit of a conversation that
Starting point is 00:10:21 Josh had with Corey. You'll get an impression of just what this woman is like. You fully expect it in the early part of this story that this strange group, this, in fact, the defense is going after this possibility that this people involved in this strange group of, what would you call them? the what's the name? The Gorians. The Gorians.
Starting point is 00:10:51 Yeah. You know, there was a series of novels made into a movie. How many people are in that lifestyle? I don't know. It appears to involve consenting adults. And it appears to involve master-slave relationships between men and women. It is, I'm not. not going to say a secret society. It's just sort of something that people don't talk about,
Starting point is 00:11:22 except to other members of the group. It's a subculture. People might not understand. Well, I mean, normally, homicide investigations have a nasty habit of pulling back the covers on everybody's secrets, whether or not they are related to the crime itself, right? No secrets in a murder investigation. Right. Simple as that. You're having an affair. You're embezzles money. You, you know, you're a tax evader. Like, all this stuff is going to come out because investigators don't know which is going to be the part that actually plays into this. However, very quickly, it became clear to them that they sort of weren't getting any leads in that. Like, whatever, whatever was going on, it didn't really directly have anything to do
Starting point is 00:12:14 with Talina's lifestyle, which she and her husband had practiced. And then, and then he had died of a stroke a couple of years earlier. So did it involve other people who were in that lifestyle? Possibly. I mean, they certainly looked at that guy, Marty, also known as Wolfie. Oh, yeah. Coring points at him as the main suspect. Investigators clearly looked pretty hard at him.
Starting point is 00:12:40 Here's why they thought that Marty Wolfie was not a good suspect. He was in terrible physical shape. You can see that in the interrogation video. He had a drug problem. He died of an overdose. It's doubtful to investigators anyway and to others involved in this, that he would have had the physical strength to move Tolena around in that freezer, that he would have been able to physically inflict the blow.
Starting point is 00:13:15 on her, but also, you know, when investigators are talking with witnesses or people who may be persons of interest, they're watching very carefully to see what they say, how they say it, what they admit to, what they hold back. And in that part of sort of the investigation, Marty came across as truthful, even admitting some things he'd done that maybe were not completely legal, like breaking it to Talina's house. house and taking a chainsaw, which he later ended up confessing to and bringing back. Marty came across to investigators as truthful and helpful. Corey came across to investigators as shading the truth, changing her story, not telling the truth
Starting point is 00:14:04 all the time, and also lying about little things, which always makes investigators sort of sit up a little more in the saddle. Did it surprise you that she was prepared to talk to them as much? much as she was and that she was prepared to sit down for an interview with you. You know, when you talk with Corey, like when you see Corey in this story early on talking about her friend Tolina who was missing, like her affect is not that of a guilty person who has been caught. She is exactly talking the way an innocent person would react. Right. If a friend of theirs were missing, which is sort of what made that interview work and why we put it sort of
Starting point is 00:14:42 all the way through. You also got the impression. again, in the first hour particularly, that you'd be hearing more about the relationship between Talina and Corey, and that there was, you know, in the aftermath of their marriages, they got together as two women, and there was some sort of romantic attachment, which might get stronger. So I want to play a little bit of your Q&A with her. When you asked her about that very question, I thought that was pretty interesting stuff. Here it is. Two of you were just friends and roommates. Just friends.
Starting point is 00:15:16 There was no other kind of romantic relationship there. None ever whatsoever. In fact, when Talina's husband died, she really disavowed interest for a long time in anything romantic or sexual. And when I finished my relationship with my ex, I took vows of celibacy. I was really not interested in any future relationship either.
Starting point is 00:15:39 It's been suggested that you wanted more out of that relationship than Tolena did. Which is, I guess it's not unusual or unfounded for these people to think that, given Talena's lifestyle. Not true. No, not on any level. There are people out there in the community
Starting point is 00:16:06 who knew that there was nothing between us other than a very strong platonic friendship. Right. I'm not asking whether there was anything between you. I wouldn't be afraid to admit if there was, but there was nothing sexual between us. And you were not interested in that? Not interested at all. You know, there were a couple of different schools of thought about motive in this case,
Starting point is 00:16:34 and that plays into one of them. There are people involved in this who thought, think Corey wanted some kind of relationship and Tolena didn't. I will say that we, beyond the sort of, you know, anecdotal musings of people who are telling his friends, we have no reason to believe that that is true. We have no reason to doubt Corey's word on that particular issue. Second, there are people who believe that this was about money because if she got Talina out of the way, she'd be able to use her credit cards and, you know, get to her bank account. there was all the stuff in the house that she could sell.
Starting point is 00:17:14 And Corey was very accomplished at selling stuff online. And then there is a school of thought, which includes the prosecutor in this case, that there was some kind of fight between the two of them. And Tolena was going to kick Corey out of the house. And Corey didn't really have anywhere to go. And so she killed Talina sort of out of anger and to prevent herself from being put out of the street. I'm not pretending to know which one of those it was. But I will say that the Corey wanted more of a relationship than Tolena did appears to be the one with the sort of least foundation.
Starting point is 00:17:49 But it's interesting that there would be so many possible motives, and yet they didn't really zero in on anything and say, that's it. That's why this happened. And it's such a terrible thing that happened. You've got to, you naturally want to feel as if there is some very strong motive behind it. Well, you do. And all of us, I suspect you as well, sort of tend to approach. murder cases looking for a motive that we can sort of understand within our own ethical framework, right? Like, why would somebody do that? Like, because it doesn't make any sense to me that it was
Starting point is 00:18:22 for this reason or that reason or, you know, right? So, you know, that's usually a mistake, because the only frame of reference that matters in a murder is the one of the murderer. It doesn't matter what you and I would do in that situation. It matters what they would do in that situation. You know, and some people, you know, had sort of, you know, lived lives without consequence. You know, if you've gotten away with a lot of things in the past, even if it's not murder, you might think, well, I can get away with this too. You know, the verdict in Wisconsin suggests that Corey, you know, believed that she had already gotten away with attempted murder. And so, you know, maybe there's nothing to fear. And it may very well be that she sort of thought,
Starting point is 00:19:09 you know, these rural sheriff's investigators and this DA that actually, you know, represents multiple counties, they're not going to figure this out. Well, they did. That's a pretty common thought. The criminal who thinks that they're a little smarter than the people who are smarter than anyone else, yes. Yeah. Well, you know, this case never made it to a courtroom.
Starting point is 00:19:32 Right. Corey, you know, Corey pled no contest. Yeah. Original first-degree murder charges was reduced to first-degree manslaughter. I think Corey's defense team did a pretty good job here. I don't think there's any question about that. I mean, her attorney, Rachel, that's kind of person you would hire if you were in real trouble. No question about that.
Starting point is 00:19:50 This is a circumstantial case. Now, as we've discussed before, circumstantial evidence can frequently be the strongest evidence there is. Right. It leads you carefully down a nice road toward an inevitable conclusion. Right. So there was a circumstantial case, but I thought a pretty good one. Corey pled no contest. This is different from what you've heard many times here on Dateline and elsewhere, which is something called an Alford play in which in an Alford play, you acknowledge that the evidence will convict you.
Starting point is 00:20:19 But you don't admit that you did it, yeah. Right, but you do it without an admission of guilt. And in this case, you also don't admit guilt, but you're not admitting that the evidence will convict you. You're just saying we do not contest the charges. In the end, it doesn't make very much difference to her because she's gone to prison for, you know, effectively. effectively the rest of her life. I mean, even if you only serve a small portion of that, she's not a spring chicken particularly. No, she's not a young woman, right? Yeah. Well, we are going to take a break, and when we come back, we will address some of your questions
Starting point is 00:20:52 from social media for Mr. Mankowitz here. Well, hello, everybody, and we're back, and Josh now is going to answer your questions about this episode. So let's do it. Josh, there are several questions. It seems to be a popular episode. I can't imagine why. Glad to hear that. John Kavanaugh on Facebook asks, What's the accent on Rachel to Lena's best friend?
Starting point is 00:21:29 She's from Great Britain. Sounds it. She said that a lot of people in that part of Oklahoma couldn't place her accent. Yeah. S. Floyd on X says. I'm guessing if authorities were to dig deeper into Corey's past, they might find other instances similar to this one. Under pressure, she doesn't act like a beginner. Well, S, if I may call you that.
Starting point is 00:21:57 Indeed. That is something that both Talina's friends and law enforcement thought about. because there is kind of a zero to 60 element of this. Like if you believe in Corey's guilt, and I mean, she now has two separate verdicts, then you've got to believe that she sort of never committed any crimes before making an exotic homemade poison and trying to kill the Zieglers and then, you know, beating Talina to death as she,
Starting point is 00:22:35 as she slept, although she has not been charged with anything else. And I am unaware of her even being investigated for anything else. So, I mean, at the moment, this is all there is. It is awfully, as you say, zero to 60, though. You're right. It does make people wonder, is the correct answer to that. The Tippin, 2026 on X, asks, why isn't this person wearing prison garb in the interview with Josh? because although she was in custody at the time, they usually have access to regular clothing because of court appearances.
Starting point is 00:23:13 So that wardrobe's usually there. Sometimes their attorneys supply them with clothing, which I think might have happened in this case. Let's go to CMO an X who asks, did anyone check marketing system for ricin? They did, and the results were negative. Also, they checked Tolina and the results were negative. Marty's death officially went down as a drug overdose, and given his history and his physical condition, that is 100% plausible. Gotcha. Patricia Ann Watkins on Facebook asks, I would like to know who the other person was.
Starting point is 00:23:51 And this is a very good question. Who the other person was seen dumping the freezer? The former private detective said she saw two people in the truck. This is a very interesting part of the story. Janeline, the private detective, the ex-private detective, is an observant person. And her story certainly rang true, I thought. Law enforcement was not quite as persuaded as maybe you were, Patricia, or maybe I was. Law enforcement thinks there was no second person that she just got it wrong.
Starting point is 00:24:33 and or that she heard somebody talking on a cell phone and mistook that for a conversation between two people who were at the scene. There's also a theory, this is not a law enforcement theory, but there's also a theory put forth by some people, Talina's friends and other people who have sort of looked at the case, that one of those people that she saw, was Corey. And the other one was like some homeless person who maybe was hired for, you know, 50 bucks to help move this freezer, but who did not know what it was they were moving or why or what was inside. But the short answer to your question is law enforcement is not convinced that there was a second person. And if there was a second person, that person has never been located or identified.
Starting point is 00:25:33 And by the way, Corey argues that, of course, neither one of those people is her, that that's Marty and somebody else, somebody that Marty brought along to do it. Marty's description, I think, doesn't match with what Janeline saw. But again, you know, I mean, I witness accounts are not always 100% reliable. Well, I believe you've answered all the questions, Josh. I mean, you can answer some more, except I have none for you. Oh, that's too bad. I like it when you ask me questions.
Starting point is 00:26:08 That's it for Talking Dateline this week. Remember, if you have questions about our stories, you can always DM us, your audio or your video on social media at Dateline NBC. Or you can leave us a voicemail. That number is 212, 4135252 for a chance to be featured right here on our podcast. You answer that number, don't you? Isn't that your desk number? That's my voice, yeah. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:26:31 It's my AI voice and answers that number. Oh. Actually, that's not true. Not true at all. Don't believe that. And please don't forget to check out Lester's brand new podcast series before and after. He talks to people whose lives are transformed in a single moment. In this latest episode, he talks to Brittany Griner, the WNBA player who was detained for six months in a Russian prison.
Starting point is 00:26:55 He goes in the side of my bag and pulls out a bait pen. And as soon as I saw that, my whole... My whole soul drops down to my feet. You can get that episode now, wherever you get your podcasts. And to get early access to future episodes, ad-free, just subscribe to Dateline premium. And, of course, you can watch the video version of Talking Dateline on YouTube, Peacock, or the NBC News app. And we will see you Fridays on Dateline on NBC. Always look forward to that.
Starting point is 00:27:25 So take care of yourselves and see you later. See you.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.