Dateline Originals - Deadly Engagement - Ep. 6: A Command Performance
Episode Date: November 13, 2025Former lovers are reunited in court as Denita Smith’s accused killer goes to trial. This episode originally published on October 2, 2025. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.co...m for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Danita Smith had been in her grave more than three years by the time her accused killer
finally went on trial. During that time, investigators had heard several versions of a similar
story. In all of them, Danita was murdered in the last act. Other than that, the stories of
Shannon Crawley and Jermere Stroud diverged. Each said the other was to blame.
Who pulled the trigger?
That depends on who you ask.
There were multiple theories,
but little physical evidence
explaining exactly what had happened.
It's all circumstantial.
Yeah, all circumstance.
That, of course, worked to Shannon Crawley's advantage.
My DNA is nowhere at the scene of the crime.
Nowhere. There's no fingerprints.
That detail alone made some people very nervous.
She was a convincing speaker.
and she was alleging some part of domestic violence.
And if there was anyone on the jury that had any experience with domestic violence, would it be believable?
She didn't look the part.
I mean, she tells a credible story.
On top of that, prosecutors worried what a jury would think of their key witness,
the two-timing cop, whose behavior felt like a catalyst for all of this.
How would he perform on the stand and under pressure?
With his facial expressions, the way he would say things, eye contact or lack thereof, the way he would shift,
I would tell him he comes across squirrelly sometimes.
As a result, there was talk of a deal.
If the case went to trial, Shannon risked a life sentence.
A guilty plea to a lesser charge might allow the 30-year-old mother of two
to emerge from state prison in time to dance at her children's weddings.
The prosecutor left that decision up to Danita's mom, Sharon Smith.
Shana was offered a plea deal at one point.
Uh-huh.
Were you consulted about that?
Uh-huh.
What did you say?
No.
Don't let her off.
Uh-uh.
In fact, my words were my daughter didn't get to plea for her life that morning, so no.
No plea.
Actually, it didn't matter
because Shannon decided she'd rather take her chances in front of a jury.
The truth is the truth, and I know I did not shoot and kill anyone.
In this episode, you'll hear from people who witnessed the courtroom drama as it unfolded in February 2010.
The whole trial was basically us saying that Shannon Crawley committed this murder,
and the defense saying, Jamir Stride, did this murder.
You'll hear what Shannon Crawley and Jermere Stroud said under oath
while seated just feet from one another.
And one of the things that popped to my head was that maybe she had done something.
I didn't know what he had done, and I didn't know what he was going to do to me.
You'll hear how those in the courtroom responded to one piece of evidence
that some had thought unimpeachable.
Everybody laughed.
Everybody laughed.
The jury laughed.
It was so bad that her defense attorney had to bring up how bad it was.
And we will take you to the trial's final seconds for the dramatic moment when jurors announced their verdict.
I just remember sitting down, they had the doors of the courtroom locked, and I remember sitting down my hands on my face.
I'm Josh Mancoitz, and this is Deadly Engagement, a podcast from Dateline.
Episode 6. A Command Performance
On the morning of February 10th, 2010,
12 jurors and four alternates assembled in the Durham County Courthouse
for the first day of Shannon Crawley's murder trial.
In the front row, a few feet away from them sat Danita Smith's family,
each wearing a pin with Danita's picture on it.
To their left, on an elevated perch,
was a distinguished white-haired man, Judge Ronald Stevens.
And I was there from gavel to gavel.
That's the voice of John McCann,
who covered the trial for the Durham Herald son.
We're talking about a murder here,
so the tone was definitely, you know, somber.
Shannon's family here,
and, you know, you got Danita's people on the other.
other side. So it was, you know, tense is a good word for it.
Shortly before noon, prosecutor David Sachs rose and walked to the center of the
blonde wood-paneled courtroom to begin his opening statement. He told the jury how one of the
seven deadly sins was at the heart of this case. That sin, he said, was envy because
Shannon Crawley envied Danita's life.
She envied Danita's future, and she wanted Danita's man.
You can always kind of guess maybe what snapped in her mind
or what happened in her head to make her want to do this.
That's prosecutor David Sachs.
For whatever reason, she couldn't handle this situation between Jermere and Danita.
And to resort to this, just to me speaks of desperation.
And whether that's against Danita,
or against Jemir or both,
whatever way she just couldn't handle it.
The prosecutor called De Nita's mom Sharon Smith
as his first witness.
Clasping a large photograph of her late daughter,
Sharon told the jury who Denita was
and what she'd planned to do with the life
that was so suddenly cut short.
Yes, it was a tragedy.
And yes, I lost my daughter.
but my daughter still lives on.
I knew what she stood for.
I knew what her drive, her energy.
I knew that she was going places.
Next, several former NCCU students took the stand
to talk about Danita and the day she died.
Danita's best friend Edith Kearns was one of them.
It was scary.
It was unreal because that's not something that I was expecting to be called about or participate in.
And when you testify, Shannon Crawley's sitting right there.
Yes.
You had to look at this woman.
Yes.
Yes.
What did you see?
What did you think?
I felt sad.
I felt.
angry because I was looking at the face of the person who hurt my friend, and I just saw
like a cold stare. It almost seemed like no emotion was behind it. And that's what I saw
when I looked at her. On the second day of the trial, the prosecution moved into the meat of its
case. The next witness was Michael Hedgepeth. He's the apartment complex maintenance man who says
he encountered a woman fitting Shannon Crawley's description, driving a burgundy SUV in the area,
shortly after he heard a gunshot.
Now, look, y'all later the stage, though, she heard as soon and she's, like, upset and shaking and stuff like that, so.
Okay, we'll have some one out as soon as possible.
Though Hedgepeth testified how he remembered the woman in the SUV was sobbing when he saw her,
He also said on the stand that he could not identify Shannon Crawley
as the woman he'd seen, either at the time or right then in the courtroom.
You certainly want any piece of evidence you can get.
And so I would have loved for him to say, yes, that's her.
That's the lady I saw, you know, leave it.
Prosecutor David Sachs again.
But what we liked was the stuff that he did remember.
He was very positive about the vehicle.
He said, yep, that's the vehicle that I saw.
And he remembers her wearing some kind of uniform kind of shirt.
After the state's forensic pathologist told the jury about her autopsy of Danita Smith's body
and the bullet recovered from her skull, the prosecutor called his key witness to the stand.
And that was Jermere Stroud.
I kind of thought selfishly DeNita had some personal things going on.
Wearing a tan jacket, a white shirt, and a salmon-colored tie,
Jermere Stroud placed his hand on a Bible
and swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Even if his mortifying truth was that he cheated on his fiancé
and that his cheating led directly to her murder.
And one of the things that popped in my head based on
My recent interactions with Shannon was that maybe she had done something.
Jermere did well. He did about as I expected.
Prosecutor David Sacks again.
Go back to that word I had used before, Squirley.
You know, he kind of comes up.
So part of it was I knew what to expect.
I mean, this was really kind of a command performance for Jermere,
because although he's not on trial there,
his sort of reputation and maybe his job and career on trial.
That's true. I think that's true. I think that's true.
I do know that he was under a lot of pressure and a lot of stress.
It's possible, but I don't recall the amount of times I called.
He did a lot better than I thought he was going to do.
That's lead detective, Sean Pate.
He knew how important it was.
We talked to him.
There is no trying to save face here.
The story is out.
There's no way you come out looking good.
They already think bad of you anyway.
Everybody already thinks you're a scoundrel who cheated on his fiancé.
Leva actually told him there's no way that their opinion can get any worse.
just do what's right
and take the hit.
Take the hit.
The prosecutor rounded out his case
with a parade of investigators,
Detective Pate, chief among them.
Pate told the court
how Shannon had lied
from day one of his investigation
about never having been to Durham,
about never having owned a gun,
and about her shifting descriptions
of Jermere Stroud.
At first, he was someone she described as incapable of violence in that initial police interview.
By the time of their last interview, Shannon described Jermere as someone who repeatedly threatened to kill Shannon and her children.
What was that like?
It's not as nerve-wracking as I really thought it was going to be because at that point,
I had asked and answered the questions so many times.
The prosecutor's final witness was Shepard.
Charlotte Detective Pam Zencon, you'll remember she investigated the alleged rape in which Shannon accused Jermere.
Mr. Stroud, this is Detective ZenCon with Charlott-Megrook Police Department.
Detective Zincan told the court she'd been on the rape investigation from the beginning.
She'd talked with Shannon at the hospital soon after it was reported, and she later interviewed Jermere multiple times.
Hello?
Hi, Jermere.
Hi.
Hey, this is Detective Zen Khan.
Pam, Zen Khan. How are you doing?
According to Zen Khan, both Jermere's work records and his cell phone records supported his alibi for that night.
Then, under further questioning, she related how the day after the alleged rape, Shannon had asked her if investigators had found the knife she claimed Jermere had used when raping her.
When the detective told Shannon
the knife had not been found
she said Shannon suggested the cops
search Jermere's trash can
and before police could go looking for the knife
she said
Jermere Stroud had called to tell her
he just found a knife in his trash can
What kind of blade was it?
Can you describe the blade?
It was, I don't know, it was a little.
He's like a foreign bleed.
When the knife is found in his garbage can that Shannon puts us onto the day after, she's raped.
I don't know that Jemir really had to say anything else.
I mean, it seemed obvious not only who was stalking whom, but who was trying to frame her at that point.
The prosecutor rested his case after that bit of testimony, perhaps with the intention of allowing the knife story to marinate in jurors' minds overnight.
Even so, Prosecutor Sacks was far from done.
The next day, Shannon Crawley was set to take the stand in her own defense.
And Sacks had a surprise waiting for her.
On day 10 of Shepard,
Shannon Crawley's murder trial, defense attorney C. Scott Holmes presented his case.
After questioning three witnesses who said they had heard Shannon complain about being harassed by Jermere Stroud,
Holmes called his star witness and his best hope for an acquittal, his client, Shannon Crawley.
She presented herself well. She's a good-looking lady. And when she spoke, she spoke to the jury.
That's Durham Detective Sean Pate.
When she was answering a question from a prosecutor or defense attorney,
she looked toward the jury and spoke with them, open.
Demurely dressed in a white cable-knit pullover.
Shannon told the story she had first told Detective Pate three years earlier,
the one that began on January 3rd, the day before Danita Smith's murder.
That was the day she said.
said Jermere Stroud entered her home uninvited and demanded Shannon take a ride with him.
I did not know where we were going at the time.
Though that road trip lasted several hours and included stops at an apartment complex and
an office park in Durham, Shannon told the court, Jermere never told her what that drive was all
about. Later that day at around midnight, Shannon said Jermere King's.
to her house again. Again, he entered uninvited and insisted they once again rehash what had gone
wrong with their love affair. We talked all in about five in the morning, so. He said that he
again wanted me to go with him, and he said, I'll make it real simple. You give your children
die, you die from your children. According to Shannon, it was under that threat of death for her and her kids.
that she once again drove with Jermere Stroud to Durham.
It was on this trip, she said,
that Jermere Stroud got out of her car
and ran up the stairs of one of the apartment buildings.
And I heard him arguing, him yelling at someone.
I couldn't really hear what was going on.
Then I heard a woman arguing back.
It was then, Shannon said that she heard a gunshot.
Seconds later, he was running out past me from the breezeway
and was shoving the gun down in his waist.
Did it seem odd or strange to you when he started climbing behind the backseat?
Yes.
The vehicle when you were leaving?
Yes.
Okay.
What were you thinking then?
I didn't know what he had done, and I didn't know what he was going to do to me.
When she testified, how'd you think she did?
I think she did okay.
That's Shannon's mom, Anne Crawley.
Did you look at the jury?
I mean, could you tell whether the testimony was working?
Yeah, you know, you look, you don't, you can't tell.
I believe she thought that she could sell it.
I was worried that she could sell it.
And that's Detective Sean Pate.
She had an answer for almost every question.
There were same answers we've heard before.
And they had to be.
Otherwise, they would be pointed out.
So the story that Shannon told about Jermere threatened her life,
That's the story she told in court.
Exactly.
Under cross-examination,
Shannon mentioned, almost as an aside,
that Jermere had called her
while she was out on bond and awaiting trial.
You called, I know.
It was only a brief exchange.
But in that moment,
the prosecutor looked like a robin, eyeing a worm.
The defense had elected not to use the record,
Shannon had made. Now, by testifying that Jermere had called her, Shannon had opened the door for
the prosecutor to play those recordings for the jury. Did you believe any of those tapes were
legitimate? Not after I heard them. Prosecutor David Sacks. You end up playing those tapes at trial,
even though they're a defense exhibit. Yes. Because, because why, they show her to be deceptive.
Yes, I believe they do. I believe they do.
Remember, these are tapes that, if considered credible,
would have been the smoking gun that implicated Jermere and exonerated Shannon.
If I got a shot, man, that's life for it.
What about me?
I know, but you've got a better shot to me.
I already live.
For the sake of comparison, this is how Jermere Stroud sounded on the stand.
And one of the things that popped to my head was that maybe she had done something.
Now, I've heard Jamir speak.
I've heard him testify, that ain't Jamir.
For newspaper reporter John McCann, the airy whisper coming from that boombox
made the voice he'd heard from Jermere days earlier seem as rich and resonant as a professional announcer.
I don't know who it was in those statements.
It wasn't Jemir.
It just had the whole appearance or the whole sound.
that she just made this up.
And it just came across like that.
It just came across like a production.
A very bad one I might add.
McCann was not the only one in court who thought so.
Spectators in the gallery laughed.
Jurors giggled.
It was precisely the opposite reaction Shannon Crawley
must have been hoping for.
Everybody laughed.
Everybody laughed.
That is Danita's mom Sharon.
Even Shannon's attorney said,
that sounds like Michael Jackson, a high-pitched voice.
Jermere does not have a high-pitched voice.
The only people in the courtroom
who seemed to think the male voice on Shannon's recordings
sounded like Jermere Stroud were all named Crawley.
Shannon's parents said they could not understand what it was
that others found so amusing about a cop confess.
messing to murder.
The hardest thing for me is that knowing my child
and knowing that no one believes her,
that's difficult.
It's difficult to accept.
Why doesn't that sound like Jermere on the tapes?
He whispered.
I don't think he's dumb.
He whispered.
He's disguising his voice.
He disguised his voice, yes.
In closing arguments, Shannon's defense attorney
asked jurors to put themselves in
Shannon Crawley's shoes, a single mom who'd fallen into an abusive relationship with a
conniving and manipulative man. It's important, I think, to try to see the world from the eyes
of Shannon on the days that led up to and the day that this happened. Holmes argued the
prosecution's case against Shannon Crawley was the result of a rush to judgment. Police
he said, did not do enough to investigate Jermere Stroud.
They did not check his hands for gunshot residue on the day of the murder.
They did not search his car or his home.
When Prosecutor David Sacks delivered his closing argument,
he said only that Shannon had the motive, the means, and the opportunity
to murder to Nita Smith.
The defendant ends up coming up behind her and shaking her about.
The motive, he said, was jealousy.
The means was that 38-caliber pistols Shannon had purchased from a co-worker two months before the murder.
Shannon clearly had the opportunity, since even she admitted being at Danita Smith's apartment complex, on the morning she died.
And even though the maintenance man, Michael Hedgepeth, could not say Shannon Crawley was the woman he'd spoken with moments after hearing a gunshot,
Sacks reminded the jury
Hedgebeth had remembered the burgundy SUV.
He had remembered that the woman wore
a grayish-green uniform shirt
with red in the patch on the sleeve.
That description had matched a shirt later found
in Shannon Crawley's closet.
Then Sacks recounted the times
Shannon had lied to police.
The claim that she'd never been to Durham,
never owned a firearm.
The lie she'd told about being late to work that morning
because she'd taken one of her children to a doctor's appointment.
The prosecutor could have stopped there,
except he couldn't resist circling back one last time
to the evidence Shannon herself had brought to this case,
those audio recordings she had made.
The ones that had made the jurors snicker.
You heard Jemir testify, and you heard the tapes.
Does anybody really believe that that's Jumir talking on these tapes?
Does anybody truly believe that that makes any kind of sense
that somebody who did the things that she's saying Jumir did
would call and say those kinds of things
basically just confess and admit to killing Deneta?
No.
For the prosecutor, those tapes more than anything else
revealed what he said was an essential truth.
about Shannon Crawley.
What do you expect me to say, Jemere?
They're so comical, they're obviously phony,
and I think it goes to show what was going on.
This wasn't something that we intercepted on it.
She brought to us saying,
this shows that I'm telling you the truth,
and I wanted them to hear it
because hoping and believing
they would have the same reaction I did
when they hear it, that it was comical and obviously phony.
A little after 3 p.m. on a Friday afternoon,
the jury got the case,
All rise.
They deliberated for two hours before the judge sent them home
with instructions not to discuss the case,
avoid all news reports about it,
and to be back on Monday morning.
For Shannon Crawley and her family,
it was the beginning of an agonizing weekend
of wondering if it would be the last they would spend together.
It was clear once jurors gathered to deliberate on Monday, February 22, 2010,
that most of them had spent the weekend thinking about the case.
Late in the morning, they sent a note to the judge, asking to review several pieces of evidence.
Shannon's cell phone records, photos of Shannon's home and SUV.
and they also wanted to hear more of Shannon's audio recordings,
the ones she had purportedly recorded while talking with Jermere Stroud on the phone.
You know I already got it with part of one.
I think I can't do it again.
I'm sure you can.
Someone like you, I'm sure.
Although only one of the recordings had been played during the trial,
the judge granted the jury's request over the objection of Shannon's defense.
attorney. So after they retook their seats in the jury box, prosecutor David Sacks played the five
audio tapes Shannon had turned over to him years earlier. Tapes she had once believed would be
the evidence that would set her free. What about Thursday? I mean, I heard you arguing. What was that
about? Me? What about me? She didn't even know me. I didn't know her.
So that was the argument?
It sounded like she was more in charge of the conversation.
And why is the other party whispering?
Detective Sean Pate was in court when those recordings were played.
You think Shannon faked those tapes?
I have no doubt.
Everybody in that room thought it.
She faked the tapes, and it didn't help her.
Not at all.
In fact, it sounds like it probably heard her.
That's what I was going to say.
It really hurts worse when you have to go to the point you start faking of it.
that. After breaking for lunch, the jury returned to the deliberation room and then sent word
that they had reached a verdict. Once the jury had filed back into the courtroom and taken their
seats, Judge Stevens accepted their verdict form without fanfare or ceremony. Shannon, wearing black on
this day, remained seated. She did turn to the gallery, apparently looking for her
mom's face.
I think my heart stopped.
Shannon's mom, Ann.
Before the verdict came, she turned around and she mouth, I love you.
And you said the same thing.
Yeah.
Did you have a sense of how it was going to go?
No.
I felt that she would be found not guilty.
I believe that.
We, the jury, return the unanimous verdict as follows.
Guilty of course to be murder.
In her chair, Shannon Crawley.
swayed slightly, as if rocked by the words.
She said nothing to her attorney.
And when deputies led her from the courtroom,
she looked straight ahead.
How'd she look when that verdict came down?
Like all the life just drained out of her.
Like she's seen a ghost.
In that instant,
Danita's mom, Sharon, realized a solemn truth
one the families of murder victims can only learn the hard way.
You get any satisfaction watching her led away to prison?
No, because it's not burning the needle back.
I thought I would feel different.
I didn't.
All right, we're going to be in recess for 15 minutes.
During the short break, the judge thanked the jury for their service and dismissed them.
then Shannon was returned to the courtroom for formal sentencing
it was then that Sharon Smith was allowed to speak directly
to the woman now convicted of murdering her daughter
you too
my baby away from me
and it wasn't your place to do that
because you didn't give her to me
and right now
I hope you rock hell
you too
when offered a chance to speak Shannon Crawley said nothing then before announcing her sentence
judge Stevens had this to say about the man at the center of this hurricane of passion and madness
a man who was not present in the courtroom that day the judge said quote
Jermere Stroud caused a perfect storm to happen
and then walked away from it, unquote.
With that said, the judge sentenced Shannon Crawley
to life without parole.
Moments later, the Crawley family spoke with reporters
in a crowded hallway outside the courtroom.
And now my daughter, who is the perfect victim?
The perfect victim for someone like Jimmy.
distraught, has now been convicted for a murder he committed.
The greatest crimes, it is said, are crimes of injustice.
Crimes where, in the eyes of the beholder, at least, the guilty are excused and the innocent
punished.
In this case, there was plenty of pain to go around.
I mean, one mom's not going to see their child ever again.
And this other mom loses her child, too.
Detective Sean Pate.
In Shannon's case, her family lost a daughter as well, and two kids lost the mom.
So while I was pleased for Danita's family, you know, I still looked at Shannon's family and I felt their pain as well.
Murders don't happen in a vacuum.
They don't.
There's always a big ripple effect.
One selfish act destroyed two families.
And the guilty party in this morality play, a jury had said it was Shannon.
And what about Jermere?
If the Smiths and the crawlies agree on anything, it's probably that both families would be whole today,
if not for the man they had in common, Jermere Stroud.
The judge said Jermere created the perfect storm of the dance for this to happen.
Right, right, right, that's right.
And I remember having that thought, thinking, yes, but.
Prosecutor David Sacks.
I agree with the judge that, yes, I think he did create the storming.
He created the circumstances that led to Dana's death.
But he's not responsible.
At the end, it comes down to the person who pulls that trigger.
True enough, perhaps, in the eyes of the law.
For Sharon Smith, there is still a cosmic account, one yet to be squared.
I do know that my belief is that Jumeir is going to pay for this one day,
and he's probably paying for it now, but he's going to pay for it.
Call it karma or conscience, or the universal law of what goes around comes around.
The idea is that the culpable must somehow bear the burden of their choices.
Well, I'm not going to put it and say he'll be judged.
Danita Smith's friend, Edith Kearns.
What I do believe is that when situations like that happen,
your conscience or your mind and your heart, you're dealing with these things.
So I feel like that's something that's always going to be on the inside
and that, you know, he will be dealing with.
And so I can imagine that's a difficult burden to bear.
Jermere Stroud now lives in another state and is the married father of two.
He declined to speak with us.
for this podcast.
Had she lived,
Danita Smith would now be
in her mid-forties.
Who knows what kind of career
she might have had,
what kind of mother
she might have become.
Her mother, Sharon,
has made peace with all of that
and moved on with her life.
It's what she says
Danita would have wanted her to do.
Danita wouldn't want me
to be sitting
and being bitter
or sad.
Danita's not with me physically,
but she's with me spiritually.
I don't have to worry about Shannon.
I have to worry about your mirror.
Because when I lay down at night,
I get a peaceful sleep.
I don't know if they do.
This podcast is a production of Dateline and NBC News.
Tim Beecham is the producer.
Marshall Housefeld, Brian Drew, Deb Brown, and Billy Ray are audio editors.
Kimberly Flores Gainer is associate producer.
Adam Gorffane is co-executive producer.
Paul Ryan is executive producer.
And Liz Cole is senior executive producer.
From NBC News Audio, sound mixing by Rich Cutler.
Bryson Barnes is head of audio production.
