David Senra - Brian Armstrong, Coinbase
Episode Date: March 1, 2026Brian Armstrong is the co-founder and CEO of Coinbase, the publicly traded cryptocurrency exchange and one of the most recognized names in the digital asset industry. Armstrong founded Coinbase in 20...12 alongside Fred Ehrsam, launching out of Y Combinator with a simple but ambitious goal: to make Bitcoin easy to buy, sell, and store for everyday people. At a time when acquiring cryptocurrency required navigating technically complex and often unreliable platforms, Coinbase offered a clean, accessible interface that brought mainstream users into the space for the first time. Under Armstrong's leadership, Coinbase grew from a consumer-focused Bitcoin wallet into a sprawling financial infrastructure company serving retail investors, institutional clients, and developers. The company expanded to include a professional trading platform, a self-custody wallet, a layer-2 blockchain called Base, and a suite of developer APIs. In April 2021, Coinbase became the first major cryptocurrency exchange to go public in the United States, listing directly on Nasdaq in a landmark moment for the broader crypto industry. Armstrong has been one of the most vocal advocates for bringing cryptocurrency into the mainstream, pushing for clear regulatory frameworks that he believes are essential to unlocking the full potential of a crypto-based global economy. He has been equally focused on building a company culture centered entirely on that mission, encouraging employees to leave outside politics at the door and concentrate on the work. Beyond Coinbase, Armstrong co-founded NewLimit, a longevity biotech company focused on extending human healthspan through epigenetic reprogramming. He writes and speaks regularly about the future of money, decentralized finance, and the long-term potential of a crypto-based global economy — positioning himself not just as a company builder, but as a champion for a more open financial system. Join newsletter: https://www.davidsenra.com/newsletter Episode show notes: https://davidsenra.com/episode/brian-armstrong Made possible by Ramp: https://ramp.com HubSpot: https://hubspot.com Chapters (00:00:00) Crypto Power in DC (00:00:25) Market Structure Clarity (00:01:39) SEC Lawfare Origins (00:05:49) Suing the Regulator (00:09:09) Winning the SEC Case (00:11:11) Long Term Founder Mindset (00:12:20) Autism and Focus (00:15:04) Mission First Company Culture (00:21:10) Rebuilding From Scratch (00:23:05) Follow Your Nose (00:25:20) From Side Hustles to Coinbase (00:30:07) Argentina and Bitcoin Spark (00:32:33) Airbnb to Coinbase Nights (00:36:25) Finding a Co-founder (00:37:35) YC Without a Co-founder (00:38:41) Finding the Perfect Partner (00:40:18) Losing Money Per Trade (00:41:23) Support Backlog Chaos (00:43:29) Banking and Compliance Gauntlet (00:47:47) Raising Fast to Survive (00:51:36) Mission Values and Inspiration (00:57:54) Hiring for Spikes (01:02:14) Centralized vs Decentralized (01:05:51) From Bitcoin Wedge to Super App (01:07:59) How Coinbase Runs Today (01:11:00) Decision Speed and Risk (01:12:43) Internal Venture Bets (01:14:46) Funding Ideas Internally (01:15:18) Coinbase Marketing Experiments (01:16:56) Internet Native Shareholder Updates (01:21:58) Media Diet and Going Direct (01:26:47) Building a New Industry (01:31:44) Starting New Limit Longevity (01:36:17) CEO Stress and Routines (01:40:59) AI Agents at Coinbase (01:44:35) Base App Explained (01:46:47) Other Bets and SEZs (01:49:21) Closing Thanks Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
How much of your job is building political power as an advocate for like the crypto industry?
Yeah, I mean, I don't have to go, but I think it's worth it for the business.
I don't mind going.
I like doing, in some ways, I like doing it.
There's some pretty interesting people there.
So I'd go about once a quarter, maybe once or twice a quarter recently because we're right at the crux of this key moment for market structure legislation.
But I'd say over the last few years, yeah, about once a quarter.
What's the key moment for the market structure?
Well, the crypto industry has been working for a long time on getting in the Senate and a whole bunch of people have been.
trying to get this piece of legislation passed.
In the House, it was called the Clarity Act.
In the Senate, they're drafting their own version of it.
But it's essentially clarifying this question about which of these crypto assets are commodities versus securities.
And, you know, someone might say, well, why does it matter?
It matters because in the United States, we have two different federal regulators.
The CFTC and the SEC regulates commodities.
The SEC regulates securities.
And so it turns out in the past this ambiguity about where crypto assets set,
sit between the two federal regulators, that lack of clarity was really weaponized. And by Gary Gensler,
the former SEC chair and Elizabeth Warren and some people like that who tried to, in my view,
unlawfully kill the industry in the United States. So in other countries where we operate, like in the
UK or in Singapore, they only have one federal regulator for financial services. So they actually don't
care whether these commodities or securities. It's a totally parochial issue in the United States
that's kind of like this turf war between two federal agencies in the past. So anyway, we just decided
we need to get legislation passed by Congress to clarify once and for all which of them go in which bucket
so that a future Gerriganzler couldn't come in and try to kill the industry.
So what was the lawfare they were trying to do?
Well, okay, so long story, but, you know, essentially this was around like the 2020,
2021 timeframe, Coinbase, we decided we wanted to become a public company.
We had been operating for about nine years at that point.
And we went in and went through the normal process with the SEC.
You have to describe your entire company, how it works.
You know, how do we decide which assets to list, which do we not list?
At that time, we wanted there to be a path to have crypto securities be traded.
Simply to think of it as a security is like a way to raise money for a company that you want to start.
A commodity is something that's decentralized, kind of like oil or gold or copper or something like that, right?
So Bitcoin is decentralized.
Nobody controls that everyone pretty much agrees Bitcoin is a commodity.
But there were people issuing tokens which were raising money for different projects they were doing,
that were in various stages of decentralization.
So was it a commodity?
Was it a security?
And then Gary Gensler, the SEC here at that time, my understanding is that, you know,
he and Elizabeth Warren essentially decided they wanted to use this to curtail the crypto industry.
And if you want to know why.
Why?
Well, okay.
So Elizabeth Warren is, you know, in my view, she's a socialist.
She believes the government should be running all financial services.
and she had essentially found a way to bypass Congress and have a lot of influence over financial institutions, like big banks.
How would she get that influence?
Well, she would appoint regulators that could essentially go in and pressure the banks to do things that Congress had not necessarily authorized.
So under the Constitution, you know, only Congress is allowed to make laws.
But the regulator is given some discretion about how they implement those laws.
So you can imagine, let's say you're a bank and you have your bank regulator and they come in,
they can choose to lose your paperwork and not approve something for 90 days or two years or five years.
Or you can have a good relationship with them and they can approve things.
So let's say they come in and they start to ask you, hey, are you guys serving crypto companies?
And you say, well, yes.
And they say, well, you know, that's not illegal per se, but we're going to have a lot of questions about that in the next exam that we
do of your bank. We have deep concerns about the risk that this might introduce. You know,
suddenly everyone inside the bank's getting the message real loud and clear, like, ooh, maybe
they don't like us doing this. Now, is it illegal? No. But the bank's regulators, if they say
jump, you sometimes won't say how high, right? And this was the kind of extrajudicial pressure
that Elizabeth Warren was able to create on banks. She did it, by the way, in a bunch of other
industries, too. Like, she got them to stop giving loans to like oil and gas and, and, um,
you know, firearms industry and some things that she, it's like her own political agenda, basically.
So she got kind of her hooks into these banks, had a lot of influence over them.
Suddenly crypto comes along, which is a new system operating outside of that.
And she didn't like it too much.
And so she asked, my understanding, this is kind of what other people in the Congress told me,
is that she asked Gary Gans where to go hard on crypto and try to really curtail it in the United States.
And that's what he did.
He created a bunch of lawfare, essentially.
Like, we'd go into meet with him.
We did maybe 30 times we met with the SEC after becoming a public company where they allowed us to become a public company.
And, you know, we'd say, hey, we're here.
We'll tell you anything you'd like to know.
Just tell us what are the rules?
We're trying to build this industry in America.
You tell us the rules.
We follow the rules.
That's how it's supposed to work.
And they would say, we're not going to give you any advice.
Go talk to your lawyer.
And then the next day, like, an enforcement action would arrive.
And we'd say, well, how, what, can you show us in the law?
What you think we've done that's wrong?
Like, no, we're not going to do that.
Like, you need to comply, like basically delist all these assets or we're going to sue you.
And so at a certain point, we just said, okay, let's go to the courts and find out.
Who initiated the legal action, them, are you?
It was actually both.
They created an enforcement action and initiated a lawsuit against us.
We actually sued them proactively because they had violated another part of the law called
the Administrative Procedures Act, where they're required actually by law to engage with the industry to promulgate rules.
And they had failed to do that.
Wait, how many companies sue their regulator?
Very few.
So this actually gets into like one of the big themes of, you know, I don't know, like me as a CEO.
Like I want to try to always do the right thing and I have a very long-term perspective.
Like I'm trying to create an important outcome here in the world, which is around increasing economic freedom in the world.
So, you know, in the short term, I knew this is going to hurt our company.
A lot of public market investors, they just, you know, this company is suing its regulator.
I'll just wait and see.
I'm not going to buy that stock, you know.
Actually, a lot of people I talked to at that time, they were like, do not sue the SEC.
Like, this is a bad idea.
But I actually talked to a couple other financial services CEOs who had sued the SEC and won.
And so I knew it was possible.
You know, it's a little bit like, you remember when SpaceX was trying to get that contract with the government?
NASA.
Yeah.
And they didn't think it was fair, how it was awarded and they sued and they won.
Like, Palantir had to do something similar.
So you don't want to do these things haphazardly or, you know, but you, you know, but you,
You do, there are moments where you have to stand up and sue the regulator or the government
and they'll, to actually get the right outcome.
Okay.
So when you're deliberating on whether to do this or not.
Yeah.
What's the time frame?
Is this a couple days, a few weeks?
Like how fast do you have to make this decision?
Well, I would say that was probably over a period of like three or four months.
We could tell the temperature was rising where they were like, you're about to get sued.
And we, you know, we were like, well, what have we done that's wrong?
You haven't published any rules that we can actually adhere to.
And we knew the temperature was rising.
and then we sued them and they sued us.
And yeah, we made a call.
Yeah, the reason I asked is because it's a great story
in one of the biographies of Elon
when you just mentioned this.
Yeah.
And in that case, it's even crazier
because you're almost like suing your customer
because Elon wanted money from NASA.
Yeah.
And they wind up, there was all kinds of, you know,
essentially corruption where it's just like,
I can't remember the amount,
it was a $250 million or whatever the case was.
And they gave it to this other guy's company
even though, and essentially to save this guy
who used to be either a former astronaut
or like working for NASA.
And he's like, well, his company who got a business
if we don't give them the money.
And Elon's like, this is insane.
That can't be the way we're making decisions.
Yeah, yeah.
And so they tell the story where he's sitting there and they're like,
what are we going to do, Elon?
He closes his eyes.
And he's staking for a little bit.
He's like, we have to sit there.
And they wind up, you know, winning.
Founder mode, I guess, you know?
Well, you just said, like, mission driven.
Like, this is what's very fascinating about you where it's just like,
well, I have a mission that I'm on.
And so if you're looking at your decisions through that lens,
it kind of simplifies, like, what you're doing.
Yeah.
And I have a long-term perspective on it, too.
Like, if it's going to be short-term paying for a few years while we're going through this,
but it allows the industry to actually be built in the United States and help create more economic
freedom, which is the mission of the company, then I'm fine with that.
You know, I feel like personally, I'm well off.
Like, I'm in this at this.
I don't have to work a day of my life.
I'm doing this because I actually want to achieve the outcome at this point.
And so it wouldn't have helped me achieve the outcome if we'd let this regulator unlawfully
kill the whole industry in the United States.
That would have just been a setback from my point of view.
This happened after your republic?
Yeah.
So you accumulated resources.
Your company has a lot more resources.
If this would have occurred before, would you have had the money to fight it?
Probably not.
In fact, a lot of startups did die as a result of that lawfare.
I mean, he didn't just sue us.
He sued a whole bunch of crypto companies, and a lot of them unfolded.
So in many ways, he actually did a lot for the economic development of places like the UAE
and the Bahamas and places like that because a lot of the industry moved offshore,
but it was incredibly damaging to America.
I think this whole amount we spent on legal and all of that was.
maybe in the 50 to 100 million range as a result of that lawfare.
On that one thing.
Yeah.
But the damage to the stock was probably, I don't know, 10, 20 billion, maybe more.
You know, it was a massive downward pressure on the stock for a period of a couple years.
Oh, and I should mention we won that case.
It was so we didn't pay a single dollar in fines.
We didn't have to change a single thing about the company.
The judge, actually, the SEC withdrew it under this new administration.
and several judges actually published opinion saying that the SEC behaved in an arbitrary and capricious manner.
So I have a nice little thing in my office commemorating that, winning our case suing the SEC.
That's incredible.
One of the things I love most about the conversations I have with Brian Armstrong is how focused he is on making the best possible product he can for his customers.
Obsess over customers is a maxim that is repeated by Jeff Bezos, and you definitely see that with Brian.
It also is the same trait that I see in my friend Kareem, who is the co-founder and CTO of Ramp.
Ramp is the presenting sponsor of this podcast, and Kareem is one of the greatest technical minds working in finance today.
Kareem is obsessed with crafting a high-quality product and using the latest technology to constantly create better experiences for his customers.
Ramp has one of the most talented technical teams in finance, and they use rapid, relentless iteration to make their product better every day.
In the last year, Ramp has shipped over 300.
new features. Ramp is completely committed to using AI to make a better experience for their customers
and automate as much of your business's finances as possible. Many of the fastest growing and most
innovative companies in the world are running their business on Ramp. Make sure you go to Ramp.com
to learn how that can help your business save time and money today. Let AI chase your receipts and
close your books so you can use your time and energy building great things for your customers.
Get started today by going to Ramp.com.
Where did you get this long-term perspective from?
I think it was from trying a bunch of short-term things
and then realizing that I started some companies like in college
and I realized that everything is difficult, right?
And it doesn't even if you're running like a sandwich shop or something.
Like it's difficult.
Like you have to find people who, you know,
employees don't show up on time and the food and the vendors
and the margin compression because there's like a million other sandwich shops.
And so if you're going to do something,
you might as well, it's going to take you like a decade or two or three, like to really start to
have an impact. You might as well pick something that you care about. It's like the really big thing.
You know, it always bothers me a little bit when I talk to entrepreneurs and they tell me the thing
that they're working on. And I'm like, okay, what do you really want to do? Like, well, my big thing is
I really want to do this. In their mind, it's like a little too ambitious. It's a little too difficult.
They need more capital. Part of me is thinking like, man, you just go for that now because it's
going to, you could spend the next two decades of your life working on this thing you're just talking
about now and might as well work on the thing that will actually have a major impact if it's actually
if it works. So are you optimizing for impact? I think so. Yeah. I mean, I think early on in my,
like I was kind of shy and introverted as a kid and I was like a little on the autism spectrum
and stuff. So I think I was just trying. You keep saying that. We've talked enough. You're not
autistic to me. Well, I mask it. Well, there's like a whole masking thing.
Let's talk about this.
Yeah.
How do you mask your autism?
Do you are you just saying you're autistic?
Because it's like...
Because trendy and cool enough.
No, it's actually like, you know, that's a good way to get a venture check is like to be on the spectrum.
I mean, we're not raising money, but...
I introverted for sure, but I'm introverted too.
Yeah.
I hate when people in the comments think I'm autistic because I read all the time.
I'm like, I'm not autistic, man.
I think I'm somewhere on the spectrum.
You know, I've taken some online tests and things like that.
And there are things like where, you know, have...
difficulty like reading people's faces and emotion sometimes and you know i kind of can get
overstimulated by like loud sounds and lights and you know so there's kind of classic signs like that but
it's not debilitating at all and i actually find it to be like it is it's a strength in a sense that
like i can just endlessly like focus on um interesting work almost like for 12 hours a day i just
find it to be, I wouldn't say like effortless. It depends, depends on what kind of work I'm doing.
Like if I'm, if I have to just do a bunch of like 12 hours of people management, hard conversations,
like that's pretty taxing. But if I'm just like writing code or reading things on my computer
or just like digesting cool content on the internet, I can just do that endlessly. So there is like
any, I wouldn't say you have to be autistic to have that. But there's certain things like that.
I just find it endlessly fascinating. Well, you definitely have the ability to sit with like a
non-consensus opinion for a long period of time.
Yes.
So that's the other thing, which I don't know if this is an autism spectrum thing, but
it, yeah, I think more some people are like a little more concerned with social
cohesion or what other people think.
And so there is a part of me that's just like, if I see something that's just wrong and
not in line with what I want to accomplish long term around, you know,
civilizational progress and these things, it's, I don't, I don't care being disliked.
I don't really care that much about being disliked for it.
And I know that it'll piss people off.
So there are a handful of things like this that I've done in Coinbase, which I think
people consistently remarked to me like, wow, that was really unique.
And to me, it didn't seem that unique.
But like this mission first blog post I put out where we said the company is going to be
apolitical during, you know, 2021, all that madness or suing your regulator, right?
These are things which most people probably wouldn't do because they're they're afraid of
being disliked.
And it's not that I like being disliked.
It actually causes me a fair amount of stress too.
But I don't let that stop me from doing what I think is the right.
thing. So I recently reread that blog post. Can you remember the context of what you were thinking when
you were writing it? Because you look back now and a lot of people are like, of course, like, you would
just focus on the mission of the company. What is the point of having a company if you don't have a
mission? Right. You read it today, it's like fairly innocuous. Right. But back then, I remember
the response. People were going crazy. Yeah, it's really funny. If you go look at it now,
it's like, what's the big deal? I mean, it's kind of a boring blog post in some ways, right? But yeah, at that time,
I feel like there was this mass hysteria or something that had like taken over the country.
I mean, the George Floyd thing had happened.
People were COVID had happened.
So people were isolated.
They weren't getting in person as much with folks and feeling a sense of, hey, we're all
the same team.
We trust each other.
And, you know, increasingly at these town halls that we would host as a company,
usually people would ask questions about like our products and our competitors and regulators.
And then we increasingly would be getting these questions about social issues happening.
in the world. In this case, like police brutality with George Floyd, but all kinds of things like,
you know, Middle East or whatever, gun control, you know. And it became almost like, I realized there was
this element within the company that really wanted to get in front of the company with a microphone
and like see if they could make the executive team squirm somehow. And, you know, we had this culture
of this open mic thing, but I realized that later, we actually don't really do that. We just have
people pre-submit questions. And if we think, we take hard questions, but if they're like,
like just way off topic or someone's pet issue, we just don't, we don't entertain that.
It's, we don't allow one person to kind of derail 3,000 other people.
So it was in that context that the company was going through this and somebody at a town hall
asked the question like, are we going to support Black Lives Matter at Coinbase?
I basically said, I don't know if about, know enough about it, but I'll look into it, like,
move on to the next question.
And they kind of held the mic and they said, like, that's not good enough.
I need to know if we at this company are going to stand for this or not.
And I said, I don't know.
I haven't looked into it, right?
And this erupted in Slack and basically 300 employees did a walkout in protest.
If you remember at this time, like every company in America was posting pro-BLM statements.
So I never had a walkout of employees at the company before.
I didn't even know what that meant.
They all just kind of closed their laptop in a remote environment, I guess.
Okay, so wait, are these, are these, this is not in person?
This is all remote during COVID.
Okay.
So the walkout has closed my laptop.
Yeah, but we were like, going from my bedroom to my living room now.
Yeah, yeah.
And I was like, okay, this is weird.
I mean, as a CEO, I'd never had, I felt like I had the confidence of the company or whatever.
And now people are saying they don't, they refuse to work at this company based on my comment.
And I found this very confusing, actually, maybe a little of that autism spectrum.
I was like, I'm confused.
Like, this company has nothing to do with police brutality or anything.
You know, what is going on here?
And we kind of got in the room as an executive team.
And I asked them a few questions like, hey, people are very sensitive in this moment.
They need to feel reassured about where their leaders stand.
And I was like, what does BLM even stand for?
You know, I don't, and like, we went and looked into that.
Later, I found out, by the way, that they support defunding the police and like all these other things.
It was not a very simple answer.
And so, you know, I didn't really know what to do.
So after about 48 hours or so, we put out a statement and we said, okay, I guess we support equality for all people.
these things and people came back to work. But I felt something was deeply wrong. I felt like I had
compromised something about myself and I didn't understand what was happening. And so I started to go
talk to a bunch of employees in the company and read a bunch of these books like Jonathan Heights's
book and others. Which is the Jonathan Height book? Something of the American mind, the codling of the
American mind, I think. He was talking, it basically talks about how in these college campuses,
there's like these training activists in these college campuses and it's now spilling into the
workforce and they feel that their job is not to like join a company and advance its mission.
They felt like their job was to join a company and hold it, hold truth to power and hold it
to account for these broader societal issues and actually reform the company as an activist.
I essentially started drafting this blog post and I said, I don't, we're not going to do that here.
You know, like we're not going to be a company that just tries to jump into whatever the current
hot social issue is and make a bunch of feel good statements without actually doing anything.
we already have an important mission, which is increasing economic freedom, and it takes decades
of work to try to make an impact on something that big.
So let's stick to the thing that we think is important in the world.
And outside of work, people can do whatever they want.
You can go protest.
You can be left or right or whatever.
But just inside the workplace, we're not going to be political.
Unless it has to do with our mission, crypto and economic freedom, then we'll be very political
and engaging for litigation and things like that.
So I knew it was going to piss some people off.
And I actually some people when they read the draft post before I sent it, they said like,
do not post this.
They like begged me not to post it.
People inside your company?
You send it to like other founders?
Inside the company.
Okay.
Yeah.
Did you send it to anybody outside Coinbase?
I might have sent it to the board or someone like that.
I'm not sure if I send it to anybody out.
I think I might have told a few my friends what I was up to, but they didn't read the post.
Okay.
Yeah.
And yeah.
And so I decided to do it anyway, and I knew people were getting upset.
And so we put out this, we said, anybody who's not okay with this new direction.
You know, I basically, I had failed to create alignment in the company about where we were going.
And I was kind of walking on eggshells around whenever people had asked me this.
So people were confused about where we stood.
And there was maybe like, it felt like 50% of the company was against this.
But I think in reality, it was like one, it's a very vocal one percent minority.
And there was other people who were sympathetic to that cause.
Anyway, we put out the post and I said, anybody who's not aligned with this new direction,
we'll give you a good severance package.
you can fill out this form and accept it by Friday or something.
And 5% of the company took the exit package.
We were having bets beforehand.
We didn't know.
We thought maybe 50% of the company would resign or something.
It felt like that was...
What would have happened at that time if 50% resigned?
We would have built it all back, you know?
And this is actually a very important point because I think that there's a big difference
between like a founder and a presider of a company, right?
Like I know that I could build it back because I started it when it was a very important.
just me on a laptop, right? And I was there when it was 10 people and 100 people and a thousand
people. And if we need to go from 2000 to 1,000, that's not a big deal to me. You know, I could go back
to being on my laptop again if I had to, right? And there's actually, there's this great Lee Kuan
U speech that he gave. He was the founder of Singapore, you know, and I guess he was dealing with a
strike that was happening, I think, from the air traffic controllers or the airline or something like
that. But there's this great speech if you Google Lee Kuan U iron in veins. You know, which what I'm
talking about? And he basically, he says, like, in this speech, it kind of gives me chills every time
where he's like, I know, I sat across the table from them and they were threatening to like shut
down the airline and everything. And he said, get back to work. And, you know, and like, I will not
allow you to bring this country down. And if you don't do it, I'm prepared to rebuild it all
from scratch again. And he said, anyone who rules Singapore, you know, has to look at me and know that
I have iron in my veins. Like, I will rebuild it all from scratch, right? And so I was watching, like,
videos like that. And I was like, this is what I need to do as a leader. Like, it was very, it was very
inspiring. So there are moments like that, that you have to stand up and say, we're going to
this direction. And if you're not on board with it, it's okay. You can leave. But we're going this way.
that's leadership.
There's two interesting things
that popped out
in what you just said.
I want to go to the long term.
Again, you have this long term
orientation.
You mentioned multiple times
in the blog post.
You're like,
we're trying to change,
literally change the world
and that's going to take
multiple decades.
I want to go to that one second.
But I like how you said,
I was confused.
Like, what is it going on here?
So your first instinct
when you're confused,
you start reading books,
you start talking to people.
What do you do to try to,
to like, to essentially
alleviate the confusion?
Because you're like,
oh, I don't know what's going on.
I'm going to read
Jonathan Hatespart,
for example.
Yeah, all the above. I mean, I read books, and books are amazing. I think sometimes you can take reading, like, you know, as you know, it's like read for eight hours to get that one part. Oh, that's the key insight, you know. So actually calling people, I think it's faster if you have access to them, especially. Earlier in my career, I didn't have access. But now I feel like I can get access to more people. And it's often just a shortcut. Like, if you know the right person to call who's been thinking about that or working on that for 10 years, they can explain to you in 30 seconds what you need. Oh my gosh. Like that's the connection.
of course. So yeah, that's exactly what I do. And I just am following my instinct a lot of the time.
Like a lot of your job as CEO is, you know, your day can just get infinitely scheduled and you're just like trying to hire the right people and go talk to investors and build, you know, go to product reviews and stuff.
But once in a while, you just need to follow your nose. If you're like, something's bothering me. You know, it's like, I've been, you're kind of always ingesting information. And once in a while, you're just like, something feels like really off over here. Like this team doesn't, this team is.
rudderless like going in no direction or I don't trust what's going on with over here like
you know in this policy thing and you can just go digging you know and occasionally you find
things and you can add a lot of value when you say follow your nose is this intuition yeah it's
it's intuition's pattern matching um I mean a lot of times you're just absorbing information like
in documents people are writing up and slack channels and reports and like a lot of information is
being ingested and once in a while you start to you're like that's the third time I've heard
something weird about that. Like, I need to go dig into it.
It was actually surprised. One of my favorite conversations I've had so far for the show
was with Toby Lucke. Yeah. Me and you talked about him at lunch. And, like, I always say he's like
your favorite founder's favorite founder. Like the amount of people that really admire the way he thinks
and the way he's building his company. And you would think like this German engineer,
you know, it's going to be all data driven. And like he just talked about like visualization and
like affirmations. Affirmation. Yeah, exactly. All intuition. It was actually surprising. It was one of
most fascinating things on this conversation. So explain the difference you thought about when you
were starting the companies before Coinbase, because you had this long-term orientation, almost
from the beginning of Coinbase, but you lacked that in the other businesses that you were starting
before that? It was really just by trying enough projects that either didn't work at all or were
base hits that I realized everything was difficult. And I think, so my mentality in college and coming
out of college, I knew that I wanted to be an entrepreneur. I was trying different ideas. My view was
okay, if I can get something to be paying me, you know, I don't know, $100,000 a year
passively, that would be incredible because I could somehow free up all my time. And then I don't
know what. I'd be able to, I'd be able to be like passive income, you know, wealthy. And I could
then go build something else. Or I don't know. I didn't really have a plan after that.
What year was this? Oh, I mean, this was like, graduated in 2005.
Were you reading Tim Ferriss? Yes, so Tim Ferriss had a big thing on this. Yes. There was
the four-hour work week, like that whole thing. I was kind of thinking about it even before that,
but the four-hour work was definitely that. The first company I really started in college was
this tutoring company because I had been tutoring high school kids while I was in college to make
extra money. And like working at the library, you got paid, I forget, it was like $7 or $8 an hour.
But if you were tutoring high school kids, you could make like $60 an hour. I was like,
this is crazy. So I was tutoring kids for a while. And then I realized I could match.
my other college students with other high school kids.
And so I built, I built like this simple web app,
which was like a tutor finding, tutor matching service
called University Tutor.
And I was basically building this in college
with like another friend of mine, roommate.
I didn't think about it from first principles.
I wasn't like, I wasn't particularly passionate
about tutoring or education.
I was just trying to make some passive income, essentially,
and scale it, right?
And so it would have never occurred to me at that moment
to, I didn't have the wherewithal to zoom out
all to zoom out and say, you know what, we need to become an interplanetary species. I should make
rockets or, you know, like, I was like, what are you talking about? Like, I've never, you know,
I'm just trying to make, like, go from $60 an hour to like have 10 of my friends be hired by their,
you know, get jobs too. So, you know, I went through that process. The tutoring company is its own
little story. And then, you know, I tried a couple of other ideas like that after college, too.
Like I had a couple of like, I got like these rental houses in Houston and I was like refurbishing
them and I was trying to build like a little real estate investment thing. I was doing a bunch of
stuff. And at some point, actually, I remember I read this book by Seth Godin called The Dip. I don't
know if you've ever seen that book. Yeah, I read it a long time ago. Yeah, it's actually like pretty simple
book. I don't know if it would do anything for me today. But at the time when I read it, it was a pretty
powerful idea. And he basically was just saying, you know, there's a big dip between being a beginner
and like the top of your field where you make, you know, the top 1%. And like, most people quit in the
middle because it's not fun after you're a beginner. There's just like 10,000 hours and all these
kind of things. And I remember thinking, do I really want to be doing real estate in like 10, 20 years?
I was like, no, do I care enough about education or, you know, I was like, I don't think that either.
So I was, I literally had like a piece of paper. I was right. What are the things I am passionate
enough about where I would do it for the next 20 years, even if even if I saw a little or no success?
And the only thing I could think of was like tech entrepreneurship.
That was like the only thing I could really think of.
And so that was a very clarifying decision where I decided, I need to move to Silicon Valley
because that's where tech entrepreneurship happens.
I need to shut down all the other stuff I'm doing because those are just little short-term games.
I sold off to all these little rental properties.
And, you know, within a few years of that decision, moving to Silicon Valley, Coinbase had been founded.
And I think within seven years of that decision, Coinbase had a billion dollar value.
It was like a huge direction and change in my life.
I was just like, I know what's the big thing is long term,
and I'm going to just go all in on it,
and all the decisions led to that.
At the time you started Coinbase, did you think,
if it succeeds, this is something
I'm going to dedicate a few decades of my life
to doing even at that point?
I remember I did think that, yeah,
because I tried a couple of these other ideas
that were kind of, they were difficult,
and I wasn't actually passionate about it.
And so a lot of entrepreneurship,
you're just like moving from one set,
back to the next with enthusiasm, whatever. There's that Winston Churchill quote. So I was like,
okay, if I'm, I realized how hard it was to do those businesses. So I was like, the next thing I try,
I need to make sure it's something that I'm like, I'm really into for the, for lifetime, right?
And I had been reading a lot of books like like Milton Friedman about economics and like Ein Rand and stuff.
And I was like, okay, I was getting kind of into these like free market, like libertarian ideas.
And I was also living in Argentina for a year. That was a whole piece of the story.
where I got to see like a hyperinflation country.
Why'd you go to Argentina?
Well, women?
No.
No, sadly no.
But it was, I needed some adventure.
I didn't know what I wanted to do with my life.
And so I just, I had never traveled alone.
And so I basically just went abroad and, like,
tried to put myself outside my comfort zone.
I had never been in the military.
I'd never, like, traveled abroad by myself.
I was kind of just reading a bunch of books and, like,
I mean, I need to go travel the world and, like, see, find my,
find what I'm trying to do with my life.
And...
You're going to Buenos Aires?
Yeah.
It's beautiful.
Yeah.
Argentina is a beautiful country.
Yeah.
It's...
Well, it's...
I learned from an economics point of view, like...
I meant the physical beauty.
Well, so it ties together because, you know, my understanding is actually around the year
1900 or so, like more than 100 years ago.
I think in 1908, it was like one of the top ten economies in the whole world.
It was called the Paris of South America.
Yeah.
It was like the first Latin American country that had a train station.
You can see it in these historic buildings.
They had like massive wealth, right, from beef and copper and all these things.
And then over a period of like 100 years of bad economic policy of essentially like socialist policies of them, the government like stealing wealth from the people while claiming to help them.
It's now like the hundredth richest economy in the world.
It's one from like top 10 to 100th.
And so I was down there kind of reading, you know, Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman and seeing how hyperinflation had like decimated this entire country and everyone was.
pessimistic about the future.
And these once grand government buildings were just in these like states of decay, you know,
with like cracks and ivy and graffiti on it and stuff.
And, you know, this was like around that moment where I was like, okay, the next thing I do,
and needs to be something I'm passionate about for the long term.
And within a year or two of that, I read the Bitcoin white paper.
That captivated my attention.
And then I think this is around.
So Bitcoin White Paper published end of 2000.
Yeah.
And I think I—
You read it—
December 2010.
Okay.
Yeah.
I had just come back from Argentina, so I was in the Bay Area deciding I wanted to be in tech
entrepreneurship.
I read the Bitcoin white paper December 2010.
I had gotten a job at Airbnb, actually, and I was seeing how money movement was happening
with them all in these different countries.
And that's when I started working on the prototype for Coinbase, nights and weekends.
So, wait, how did they move money to all these different countries back then, then?
Legacy payment rails.
In the U.S. and Europe, it was a little simpler.
You could use bank transfers,
and so they were accepting payments in,
then they had to pay out to the hosts.
In many of the countries where they operated, like in Latin America,
there would be some local cash pickup service
that you could, kind of like a Western Union,
but it was different ones in different countries.
And they typically had very high fees, like 7 to 12%.
I remember we were trying to send payouts into,
I think it was Ecuador or one of these.
countries. And we were reading the, like, there's like a little oligopoly of like two,
two companies that do this and that, you know, in the region. And we were like, how much money
shows up on the other side? Like, what are your fees? And we were reading through their documentation.
We're like, we have no idea how it's basically like a borderline corrupt thing. And we basically
just decided to send $100 and we found somebody there local, like how much money showed up on
the other side. Like, you know, just to like give us some rough sense so we could tell the customer
or how much their payout was going to be.
I mean, it gave me such a visceral sense of, like,
how broken the global financial system is.
It's like each country is its own little proprietary set of oligopolis.
And imagine it's like the internet worked like this, right?
It's like, oh, I want to load a webpage from, you know, another country.
And they're like, you pay a high exchange fee and it comes in like a different language,
you know, and you have to wait seven days or whatever.
I realized due to a couple of these experiences, like the Argentine experience with hyperinflation,
the Airbnb experience and reading some of these books that the world would benefit from a global
financial system that was fast, cheap, permissionless, decentralized.
So there was no small group of people who could be corrupt or put their fingers on the dials
to manipulate it.
And so that was what I was thinking about as I read the Bitcoin white paper for the first time.
Okay, so you have, you're building like your personal philosophy about like economics and
what's important there.
You know that you want to dedicate yourself to tech entrepreneurship as far as what your career is because you're going to be passionate about that.
You want to do something for a long term.
And then you're also seeing this real-life problem of trying to send money into all these disparate, you know, economies and countries.
Yes.
And then you start working on Corn Bay's nights and weekends.
Yeah.
Great summary, by the way.
Yeah, so.
I kind of do that for a living.
Yeah.
So this is where a little bit of that hustle and drive came in because, you know, I was working long hours at Airbus.
They were like rocket ship company.
I was learning a lot, really amazing team.
But I really wanted to build something new for my next company.
I still wanted to be an entrepreneur.
And so I'd work until like 7 p.m. at Airbnb, come home, eat little dinner.
And then from like 8.30 to midnight or something like five days a week, I would work on my startup.
And, you know, you always have to be very careful.
You have to do it on your own separate laptop.
Don't do it on company time or company property.
Make sure it's separate.
But, you know, I used my own laptop.
And sometimes on Sundays I'd work, you know, as well.
Right.
I'd sort of take one day off.
But I was just grinding.
And I was like, okay, well, I didn't know where to start.
So you kind of just have to start with anything, right?
So first I went and talked to a friend of mine I went to college with.
We built this little Android app for a Bitcoin wallet.
I realized once we shipped out, we had done it the wrong way.
I tried to recruit him to leave Google and be co-founded with me.
He wasn't ready to do that.
So I started working on another prototype that was more of a cloud-based Bitcoin wallet,
which eventually became Coinbase.
And I had to re-implement a whole Bitcoin node in Ruby just to try to get it to hook up to my database,
you know, and all these things.
So I was just doing this, like, nights and weekends,
while occasionally trying to find a co-founder, you know,
and going on these co-founder dates.
Why did you think you needed a co-founder?
Well, the main reason was that I had read a lot of Paul Graham essays from Ycombinator,
and, you know, I was, I really wanted to get accepted into Y Combinator.
It was like the top incubator.
It still is in Silicon Valley.
And Paul had these great essays.
And one of them had talked about how, you know, if you look at Hewlett and Packard and, you know, Larry and Sergey, and, you know, there are exceptions.
But more often than not, like, great founders, like, building a company is just so difficult.
It helps to have people with some complementary skill sets.
So just to improve my chances of, like, getting to Y Combinator, if nothing else and the company eventually succeeding, I was trying to find the right.
person. Yeah, it's interesting because I feel like there's always, even if you have co-founders,
it's like one, it's actually one founder. Like you can start out with two or three or four.
And I know YC is like, you need a co-founder and like that's like something that's repeated. But if you
read the history of entrepreneurship, it's like, you start out with three or four or five, there's
always one. Like there's a one person that's going that's actually driving the company.
Well, you know, long, like it's like Wozniak and Jobs, right? Like jobs was clearly the one that had
more impact over a long period of time, but there probably wouldn't have been an Apple without
laws in the early days.
Yeah.
You know, you never know exactly.
And, you know, like I will say in our, in my case, like, I tried to find a co-founder
for about like a year and a half and failed in.
So I eventually got the app live and got into Y Combinator.
And there's a whole story there.
Did you get into Y Combinator as a solo founder?
So this is another interesting story.
But I actually applied with this guy who Ben Reeve, who had created blockchain.
info, which is now blogging.com.
And we sort of, he had never heard of white commenter, but I convinced him to fly from the UK.
We met, had a coffee.
And then we went into the interview, which, by the way, is a bad idea.
You should really co-found with people you've known for a long time.
So anyway, that, we got accepted somehow under that premise.
I don't think we mentioned probably that we didn't know each other that longer.
It didn't come up in the interview or something.
We didn't hide anything.
But anyway, it became clear within like three months that it was not going to work.
And so with the help of YC, I kind of went, you know, I had a hard conversation with him about that.
And I went through the program solo.
Anyway, long story short, we went through YCOMA, raised the seed round at the end of it.
And I, you know, I was lucky enough to have Fred Urson reach out to me.
And he became the first person who I really started working with on it unofficially.
And then it just started going really well, very complimentary skill sets.
and I asked him to co-found.
And so he became the co-founder of Coinbase.
And I actually don't think Coinbase would have succeeded without Fred.
Like if you look at the subsequent three, four, or five years, there was a lot of near-death experiences, and he was just an absolute killer.
And so it was that pairing that allowed us to really get to product market fit and, like, off the launch pad into orbit, if you will.
Brad Jacobs has started eight separate billion-dollar companies.
He said, I've come to know a lot of extremely successful people in my life, and they all have
one thing in common.
They think differently than most people.
All of them, to a person, have rearranged their brains to prevail at achieving big goals
in turbulent environments where conventional thinking often fails.
What Brad noticed is that great business leaders are pattern spotters, but you can't spot
patterns if you can't see all of your data.
Most businesses only use 20% of their data.
Why?
Because 80% of customer intelligence is invisible.
It's hidden in emails, transcripts, and conversations.
That's where HubSpot comes in.
With HubSpot, all of your data comes together so you can see the patterns that matter.
This is important because when you know more, you grow more.
And that is a pattern that never fails.
Visit HubSpot.com today.
That is HubSpot.com.
There were some funny stories from the early days of coin years I've heard.
Like Fred identified that you guys were losing money on every single Bitcoin transaction.
Yes, that is true.
How did that happen?
I mean, the simple version of it is that I was a computer science major.
And I studied economics and computer science.
Fred studied the same thing.
But he had gone into work in finance after college.
He went to go work at Goldman Sachs as an FX trader.
And I was working as a software engineer slash entrepreneur, failing entrepreneur.
So I had more of like that engineering brain.
He had more like that finance trader brain.
And so when he came in and started to analyze all of the flow of funds on every trade,
he was able to map that out and due to like certain time risks and things, things.
He actually was correct that he'd map that out.
And it was just a set of conditions which I was not as familiar with.
So that was a great example of just him adding value in the first probably three weeks we worked together.
But that wasn't like a near-death experience.
No, that one wasn't near-death.
It was just getting the right business model and fee structure.
What was it?
An example of a near-death experience?
Well, okay, so an example of the near-death experience was I think we had raised maybe the series A or something like that.
Yeah.
And we had found product market fit.
So there were a lot of people using the site every day.
And, you know, we were having this huge back.
of customer support inquiries.
Like, it would be like every night from like 9 p.m. to midnight,
we would just try to answer support queries because we hadn't, we didn't have a customer
support team.
And, well, we were slowly trying to build it, I should say.
Anyway, so we had like a thousand, two thousand, five thousand, ten thousand backlog of these
customer support tickets.
And people were getting very angry about all this.
Because you can respond.
Yeah.
I was one of those people.
Okay.
You were early early on Coinbase.
Okay. Well, apologies for the lack of customer support response.
To the point where I was like looking up, like I had a bunch of Bitcoin on there.
I was like, there was an issue.
And I was like, what is the address?
Like, I'm going to have to fly to San Francisco because these people won't respond to my email.
Well, this is exactly what happened is people started showing up at the office.
And we didn't really even have the address published.
But there was a photo of the office.
And you could see in the background a couple of these buildings.
And some people found that and they started showing up the office at all these odd hours.
And I remember some friend.
Back there, they had to be weirdos.
Like, the people that were into crypto back then were not your normal people.
I don't know.
I mean, it was once in a while, Fred would actually go answer the door holding like a golf club.
And, you know, like, usually it was somebody who was like, man, why didn't my crypto hit my wall?
And then we were like, sometimes we'd write people like a physical check and like, okay, you need to leave the office.
Anyway, that was the first time I had really experienced having tens of thousands of people angry at you at the same time.
Because back then, it was the only place where you could buy Bitcoin with a credit.
card, right? Like you could use... Yeah, or a bank transfer.
Our bank transfer, right?
Once we managed to get that bank partnership set up and an easy way to buy sell in the
U.S., I mean, we had instant product market fit, and it was just like trying to keep up
with the demand.
Were you the first crypto company to do that?
In the U.S.
Yeah.
In the U.S.
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
How did you get the bank partnership?
So that's its own whole story.
I mean, by the way, there was other near-death experiences around cyber events and things like that
we can talk about if you want.
Yeah.
On the bank side, yeah.
So, okay, there's another.
story where we, okay, believe it or not, the first version of the Coinbase app, actually,
you couldn't buy or sell Bitcoin. I thought we were making a wallet for payments on the
internet. And so you could store Bitcoin, you could make Bitcoin payments. And this prototype went
out. And I remember like a couple hundred people signed up off of Reddit or something like
that. But the app was not retaining users, right? And what they teach you in Y Combinator is like,
go talk to customers, get feedback, and then build the product and talk to customers and build
the product and just do that on repeat. And don't get distracted by any other bullshit, like going to
conferences or whatever. So I remember I emailed like three of these people had signed up and I was
like, hey, I built this app. Can I get up the phone with you? And in the first few conversations,
I was like, I noticed you didn't come back to the app. And the guy was like, yeah, I mean,
the app was pretty cool. But like, I just don't have any Bitcoin. And I remember something kind
clicked in my head. And I was like, well, if there was like a buy button in the app,
Would you have bought it here?
And it sounds like ridiculous in hindsight,
but at the time this was like market research, right?
And he's like, yeah, probably.
And so I was like, okay, we got to make a simple way
for people to just buy it here.
It's not like you go to a separate exchange
and then put it in your wallet
for actually daily utility or something.
And so then I was like, okay,
we've got to make it possible to get bank transfers hooked up,
kind of like PayPal or debit cards.
And I remember calling like these different banks
and saying, hey, I want to get integrated into the bank network
in the ACH, it's called ACH in the U.S.
And these banks were either like, what the heck are you talking about?
Like, I've never heard of this thing.
It sounds like a scam.
Or some of them who had heard about Bitcoin, I remember like hung up on me.
You know, they were like, they're like, we do not work with Bitcoin companies.
Like, bam, like slamming the phone down, right?
And so I went to the partners at Y Combinator.
Actually, one of them was like Sam Altman at the time.
He was running Y Combinator and like Gary Tan was there.
He was helping me.
and these Paul Bukai and these various folks.
And I remember they said, well, why don't you go talk to Silicon Valley Bank?
Like, we help, Silicon Valley Bank opens bank counts for lots of Y Combinator companies.
We have a good relationship there.
So they kind of warmly introduced me to the right person.
And they were kind of like, these guys are probably crazy, but we like to help Y Combinator.
So let's see what we can do.
And they ran it through their compliance team.
And their compliance team came back and said, we think you might be what's called a money transmitter,
which means you need to have a license in the United States.
and I remember getting on the phone with them
and they were like, well, we can't open this account for you
unless you can prove to us that you're not a money transmitter
or you have to get a money transmission license.
And the money transmission license I researched was like,
it was like it was going to cost $5 or $10 million and take about three or four years.
And I'd only raised about $600K right now.
So I was like, that's not good.
But they also said, well, if you have some legal argument
that you're not a money transmitter,
maybe we would allow you to get started.
And I remember going to a couple law firms, and one of them agreed.
He's like, there are some arguments that you could make, that you're not a money transmitter.
It's a little bit of a gray area.
And he was like, I'll write you a legal opinion saying subject to the following terms that you may not be a money transmitter,
but it's going to cost $30,000 for this like five-page piece of paper.
And I thought, at the time, I thought this was crazy.
You know, we'd raised like $600,000.
I was like $30,000 for a piece of paper, you know.
But I was talking with my advisors at Y Combinator, and they were like, well, if this allows you to get the bank account open and you can start to test your product idea, like, do it, you know?
So I paid this guy the 30 grand.
We got the account open.
I wrote all the code myself to do like ACH integrations and you have to FTP these files to the bank and it's like this kind of antiquated system.
And it launched and it had product market fit.
And it just was then it was like, instead of pushing a boulder uphill every day, it was like the boulder was rolling down the hill and you're just chasing it as fast as you could.
So you could buy Bitcoin through ACH through a bank transfer?
Yeah.
Could you use credit cards back then or no?
No, I think debit card came a year or two after that.
Yeah.
Okay, so even that with just the bank transfer?
Yeah.
Flooded with customers.
Yeah.
And started to get some very anxious calls from the bank at certain points, too, because
as they were like, you guys have raised $600,000 and they were like, every day there's like $550,000, you know,
because we debit these customers.
customer accounts to get the money, but we had to pre-buy the Bitcoin. And so we had this cash flow
issue where like we were basically using our entire balance every day just to service the current
demand. And they, and I remember the guy from the bank called me kind of frantic. He's like,
if you just have one error, like your whole, you're insolvent. And by the way, they're they might
be on the hook for it too. We might be like negative a million dollars and just be insolvent.
And then the bank's on the hook for it. And I remember the guy told me on the phone, he's like,
you need to go raise money like right now and get more money in your account or like we're not
going to be able to continue to serve you on this ACH network transfers.
Like you were in this tiny little sandbox, but now you're suddenly growing like a weed.
And I remember we took this graph of like the daily buys.
It was just up and we didn't even have a pitch deck or anything.
And we just went out in like a week raised the next round and got like $25 million deposited
in the account with a graph.
Yeah.
Because we ordinarily I wouldn't recommend that.
But we were sleep deprived.
and it was, that's all we had time to do.
So we just went and we, yeah, we showed them a few pieces of data and we're like,
this is an up and the right graph of demand and the bank's going to close our account in like two weeks
if we don't get some money.
That $25 million was from A16 and Ribbitt?
The Series A was from Union Square Ventures and Ribbet.
Okay.
Yeah.
And then A16 and Z was the B.
Okay.
So who was doing the graph then?
Was it Union Square and Ribbet?
That was, yeah.
Union Square Ventures and the Ribbet?
Was it Mickey?
Yeah.
You know him?
Yeah, so it's the time with them.
I like him a lot.
He's great.
Yep.
That sounds like something he would do.
Yeah.
Well, he was a Bitcoin believer for a long time before.
Why?
Because he came.
He spent the first 36 or 37 years of his life living in South America.
Yep.
Venezuela.
Yeah, exactly.
The people who had seen hyperinflation countries kind of got it right away.
The people who had only spent time in the United States were like, why would anyone
use a new kind of money?
So from your perspective as a founder, you thought your product at that point was a
wallet and an exchange to buy Bitcoin.
Yeah.
And how long did you think that was going to be the totality of the business?
Were you already thinking about product extension back then or no?
First, I knew there was a lot of ways to die along the way, so I was just trying to get the simple thing working.
I mean, we had hackers trying to break into our systems.
We had like engineers quitting because it was like just overwhelming and there was too much stuff.
They were getting page in the middle of the night, like three times every night, trying to keep the website up.
these banks might just turn us off and we go out.
So there was all kinds of just, I was just trying to survive like the next few months often.
You know, in the back of my mind, I knew that if we could get this thing to scale just on the first product,
there's all kinds of things that this could disrupt.
I mean, that's what I got excited about when I first read the Bitcoin white paper.
It was like, this could be a new kind of financial system for the world that's global and fair,
decentralized, more free market oriented.
anybody with a cell phone could have access to good financial services,
participate in global economy,
like the government couldn't erode all their wealth, fee, inflation,
like what happened in Argentina.
So I knew that there was high potential for this eventually,
but, like, there wasn't too much time to think about that.
We were just, there was a lot of sleep deprivation and long hours
and just trying to survive to the next three months.
And how long did that period last?
Is this a couple of years?
Yeah, I mean, I'd say, like,
like four or five years in, I got to, we were at a place where I felt like I could take,
and I could take a week off and not the place wouldn't blow up or something.
Who's influencing your thinking in terms of like the kind of company that you want to build
and the way you want to build it back then?
There was a book called PayPal Wars, which talked about the early days of PayPal.
And it's actually pretty remarkable.
You go back and look at what, you know, Peter Thiel and Elon, Max Leibchen, all these guys were
doing, David Sachs, they actually had many similar ideas to Bitcoin.
They were trying to create a decentralized form of money that could be permissionless global
on the internet.
Because of the history of the company and how it got acquired by eBay and a lot of the people
left, it ended up being more just like a checkout alternative with credit cards and stuff.
But actually, having worked at Airbnb, that actually gave me a good picture into what was
possible as well because in college, you know, I went to school at Rice University in Houston,
amazing school.
I loved it.
But it didn't really have a startup environment.
It wasn't like Stanford or something.
And so I had never really seen a successful startup from the inside.
I had tried doing my own startup, which didn't go super well.
And inside Airbnb, it was like, it was like some magic was happening.
Like they'd caught lightning in a bottle and thing was growing like wildfire.
They were the way that they hired people and had this really high bar for excellence and
design, the way they did decision making.
Like a lot of things I got to see working there.
And then I kind of said, okay, before in my mind, I had it kind of put.
on a pedestal. I was like, wow, there's some crazy geniuses that are doing all this kind of stuff.
And there's something amazing about working with getting in the room just so you can see how people
work. And it doesn't mean that they're not geniuses. I think those guys are brilliant. It means,
like, I got to see it and it demystified it and it made it feel possible that I could try to do
something a little bit similar, right? And so there's a couple of companies like that. I mean,
nowadays I would say, you know, certainly like the level of ambition, like that Elon has and
these things are very inspiring. I've tried to take bits in, like, you know,
parts from Google, Amazon.
I've sort of been a student of lots of these companies and tried to take the best.
Anything from history?
Yeah.
I mean, I really like the Wright brothers.
They're cool.
Have you ever done an episode on it?
Episode 228.
You remember that?
Wow.
Okay.
The book by David McCullough.
Yeah.
I think that's the one I read too.
Incredible.
Incredible.
Yeah.
I love these kind of just like big problems like that that humanity, you know, you know,
you know that it's kind of crazy, but it's possible.
And someone's going to do it, maybe the next 100 years.
And there's a few things like that.
Like longevity, we can talk about that, like in the biotech space.
You know, fusion energy.
The Wright brothers is...
The Wright brothers is crazy because that was like a centuries-old problem.
Yeah.
Like humans have been trying to figure out how to fly for centuries
before these two brothers in Dayton, Ohio, if I remember correctly,
that essentially saw a century-old problem with the modest profits.
of a bicycle shop.
Yeah.
And what was fascinating about them
is like most of their,
I mean, they had a ton of competitors
that had more credentials,
more financial backing.
And I think in David McCullough's book,
if I remember correctly,
like they solved human-powered flight
with like $1,500.
Yeah.
It was some really tiny amount of money.
And there was people funded
with like 200 X as much money.
But yeah, I mean,
I get very passionate about like going after,
what are the big ideas like that
that people could go after?
And I think it's actually worth
everybody writing.
of some of those down periodically, and then see which one grabs you and you think you have
something unique to contribute and just, like, go for it. Those are the big, exciting ideas.
So going back to where we were in the story, you're like, okay, I just need to not die.
Yeah. I have something working as if I just don't die, I can figure out other products or, you know,
a way to go to the business in the future. Were you thinking of any other, like, any other
specific way about, like, I want to build a company this way?
Well, there was a few things I was thinking about.
I mean, one was articulating a mission, right, that could be bigger, writing down the values
of the company, which we can talk about.
Actually, we didn't do this maybe until we were a couple hundred people because this all
happened organically in the beginning, it was just who we were hiring and the culture sort
of formed organically.
But after we got a little bigger, we started to think about, right, let's formalize it.
I wasn't going to be able to be in every single interview indefinitely, right?
So, okay, the values, the mission.
When did you arrive at the mission?
I don't remember the exact year, but it was at least a few years in.
We started to really think about it.
And, you know, for me, it was not just like getting people to use crypto or something.
It was like, well, why do we want that?
And it was because it was enabling everybody to own their own wealth in a way that couldn't
be taken from them, go try to attempt more ambitious things in life.
It was kind of like a foundation, like basic,
property rights is what they'd call it in economics, right?
And if you had sound money, basic property rights, low friction to try new things in the world
that might benefit people and actually be able to keep the upside of it, you'd have more
people trying attempting this.
That very much appealed to me.
We sort of take this for granted in the United States that, you know, usually like the
money is just not going to get taken out of your bank account or something like that.
But in many places of the world, that's not true, right?
There's people like where the government will actually do seizures.
Cyprus actually did this recently in the past where they like took a bunch of money
out of everyone's bank accounts to like cover debt.
There's refugees that have to flee borders in various times in history where the all
their wealth gets confiscated.
There is so much bureaucracy and corruption in places like Argentina to even start a company.
It's like it's a huge black market and there's just, yeah.
So and by the way, people.
and they can't get access to loans or anything like that.
Like, you know, one of the major ways people build wealth in the United States is you buy a home,
you get a mortgage.
Only wealthy people can really buy real estate in Argentina because you can't get a mortgage
and you have to pay cash.
So there's all kinds of ways that this is just pernicious and it, it like decelerates progress, essentially.
So I was trying to think of a pithy way to articulate that and I wrote down, you know,
this increased economic creative in the world mission.
And, you know, it's a little wonky.
sometimes people don't know what exactly it means and they have to go read about it.
But it does encompass what we're trying to do.
And I think crypto is the best technology to increase economic freedom.
How are you recruiting talent back then?
And were you sitting in on every single interview?
Yeah.
So, I mean, the very early days, it was just like me, like going to meetups and trying to get anybody interested and come an interview.
It was like cold messaging people off LinkedIn.
It was reaching out to people who had worked with in various contacts.
Why did it have to be outbound at that point?
Well, first of all, crypto was like a very niche thing.
Like, we were not a hot company at Y Combinator.
We went to the demo day that they do where we raised like the 600K seed round.
And but there was lots of companies that raised like multi-million dollar rounds and beyond.
Like we were kind of middle of the pack somewhere, maybe a little below in terms of how hot the company was.
So the only people we managed to actually convince to invest or to join the company were people,
people who had already gotten excited about crypto for some reason. And then they met us and they're like,
okay, this is semi-legit at least. Like they've gone through Y Combinator. They have this product that's
working. They've had some early investors like Union Square Ventures. And so we got some of these,
like the first five or 10 people who joined were like crypto zealots who just thought we might be a
good company to bet on. As the company got bigger, you know, we hired recruiting teams and the whole
thing. We were competing with big tech in San Francisco, which was, you know, during the zero
interest rate phenomenon. It was like fiercely competitive. We eventually
broadened open to other offices, hired some remote workers. Hiring is its own whole topic.
Yeah, well, I'm curious. Like, have you found any other, I talked to my friend Kareem,
founder of Ramp about this, Daniel, I founder, Spotify. They both think about it in the same
exact way where they hire for spikes. Yeah. One of the benefits of being a founder-led company,
you know, big companies try to manage the middle. They don't want the high highs or the low lows.
And Daniel and Kareem are both like, no, I want the best, the person.
that is the best in the world that this one tiny little thing, and that's all I want them to do,
and I'll deal with their usually excessive or extreme personality traits on the other side of that.
Yeah, I totally agree with that.
I mean, we were looking at people's past work, and not necessarily like their resume or, you know,
if they just, if they showed up in the interview and it was like, wow, I learned something,
I left the interview with more energy than I went in.
They're like a very efficient communicator.
And then they can point to things that they've done, which are like real outliers of success.
We're like, oh, that's awesome.
Or maybe we've seen their work previously.
These are people who we would hire.
I mean, there's many examples of this.
Like, you know, you talk about some of their personality quirks.
And like, Bologiosk, St.in of Austin is like this genius guy who was our CTO for a while.
And he, he like did so many amazing things.
And he's like very eccentric.
Actually, the very first hire at Coinbase was this guy, Olaf Carlson, Wee, outside of Fred and I,
as the co-founder.
And we were trying to hire this customer,
someone to come in to run customer support
because of the backlog I mentioned.
And I remember it came down,
there was two finalists.
One of them was this guy
who had run a team at Google AdSense.
And on paper, he was like,
his guy who worked at Google.
He'd run a big team of like 20 or 30 people.
I was like, very credentialed.
But you just, in the interview,
it was just like, it was kind of low energy
and like not exciting for some reason,
even though on paper he was like super qualified.
And Olaf came in.
And his prior job was he was a lumberjack.
Literally. He had just graduated college. He had written his, he wrote his thesis in college on Bitcoin, and then he did this kind of like walkabout sort of spirit quest thing where he went for like a summer and he was a lumberjack. So he came in and he looked like super disheveled and, you know, he, like, threw on some like ill-fitting suit he'd bought like on the way to the interview or something because he only owned like lumberjack clothing. But the guy was just like super bright, super passionate, super young, super hungry. And we're like, like,
like, screw it.
Like, let's just give this guy a shot.
Like, it's, it's going to be, it was just exciting to, like, talk to him about crypto.
And he crushed it.
So he, by the way, he went on and founded, like, a, he's like a billionaire.
He's created, like, a crypto venture fund.
So, like, these were the kinds of bets that we wanted to make.
They were people who were entrepreneurial.
We've had a lot of good success with that.
I know Toby talked about that recently on the podcast, too.
And they were people that were just, like, high agency, smart, get shit done.
and even if they were totally unqualified in paper.
And those were some of our best hires.
So I was reading a ton of the Bitcoin subreddit back then.
Yeah.
Like around this time.
And am I wrong?
Weren't you getting like a lot of shit because, you know, everybody's like, this is decentralized?
And you're like, well, no, I'm like actually trying to build like a real business here.
Like, did you have an issue getting talented people to work for you?
Like, because you were kind of, this is, you might be autistic.
You might be right.
because now you're interested in this weird Bitcoin thing way before other people are.
And then not like that, you're like bucking the trend in this weird subculture too.
Yeah, I mean, so people did often ask that.
They're like, well, isn't the whole point of Bitcoin to be decentralized?
And I was like, yeah, it uses a decentralized protocol.
We just want to make it easy for people to access it.
So you can choose to use our company, but you could use any company.
Like, as opposed to, let's say, Visa.
Like, the only way to access the Visa network is through one company, Visa.
you know, but like email is a better analogy.
Email is a decentralized protocol, but you can use Gmail or Outlook or whatever.
So at least there's like choice.
But even going beyond that, because for years we heard that as a criticism, so we said,
all right, let's make a self-custodial wallet too.
Like if you want a custody your own crypto and not have to trust us at all, we're going
to put out a wallet for that.
And so we have a successful product now too on our self-custodial wallet.
I think both are important.
The centralized product gives people a lot of ease of use.
Like if you forget your password, your money's not gone.
that kind of stuff. And it also allowed a lot of big institutions. Like most of the money in the
world is that like something like 80 or 90 percent of it's all tied up in financial institutions.
It's not retail people. And so when we went and met with institutions and were like self-custodial
wallet, they're like, that sounds super scary. We're not going to do that. So they wanted these
kind of enterprise-grade custody solutions. And we've been very successful building those kind of
things for like banks. That decision was based on the response to the market or is that a decision you made
before and then brought that decision to the market.
The one around institution specifically was based on conversations with them.
Yeah.
And the retail customer, though, I would say that was made prior to customer.
That was like my intuition.
So we've got to make this simple and easy to use and trusted.
And the average person is not going to know how to run like a self-custodial wallet on their
laptop.
The tech has gotten better and better where like account recovery and these things are now
possible.
But at the time, it was very scary.
Like, if you lost, many people that had this happen, sadly,
like if they lost their password or something,
trying to custody their own Bitcoin, it was gone.
There's many, many, many, many, salp stories about that.
Yeah, it's funny, because there's, like, a parallel here
when Steve Jobs had that observation.
He's like, well, the first things we're making an Apple,
they're for hobbyists.
But he's like, if the amount of people
that want to, like, put together their own computer,
it's like if, as opposed to the ones that want to go to the store,
like if you just treat it, he called it, like, the appliance.
He's, like, want to make a personal computer
as like appliance.
It's like that market is a thousand times bigger.
Yeah.
And why it being millions of times bigger actually?
Yeah.
But his idea was like, the easier I make it, the bigger the market gets.
I think that's right.
And it's fine.
Like a lot of these products start off with hobbyists who love the tech for the tech's sake
and they want to take it apart.
But ultimately what crypto is going to do is just going to update the financial system
so people have better financial services.
Many people are going to use it without even knowing they're using crypto.
They're just going to say, I don't know.
I just want to send money to my family abroad or whatever.
And instead of paying 11 people.
percent at Western Union, I just wanted to arrive instantly for free or whatever.
And like, they're going to use stable coins for that, right?
Or if they want to get a loan and it's just using defy, it's like cheaper, lower rate,
and they can get approved in 30 seconds.
It's like that's easier than calling a bank and filling out all these forms, right?
So Quarindase's app actually has evolved.
I mean, fast forwarding to modern day, like we are now, you can trade any type of asset,
not just crypto assets, you can trade stocks and commodities and prediction markets.
And then you can get a loan.
You have a Coinbase card.
You can spend, we're just trying to build better financial services now.
And actually, like, that's where you start to get into like multi-trillion dollar market.
Yeah, you call it the what, the Everything Act?
The Everything Exchange.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And a super app.
Maybe that's, yeah, you can find the two.
Okay.
This is not like a plan from the beginning.
Like, Bezos had the Everything Store.
That was the code name of Amazon in D.E. Shaw, like in the hedge fund that spun out.
So he kind of had that master plan at the beginning, even though he started with books.
Yeah.
But that was not the case with...
Coinbase, correct?
I felt like more and more of the economy was going to run on Bitcoin because it was just
faster, cheaper, more global.
I couldn't have foreseen all of the things that happened.
I didn't foresee stable coins.
I didn't foresee prediction markets.
I just knew that we had a foothold with something everybody really, like Bitcoin turned out
to be the best performing asset class of the last decade.
And so a lot of people wanted to buy it and hold it.
We were the easiest way to do that.
That was a wedge into the market to start to then update all kinds of financial services.
And that's how you thought about it.
I didn't have a complete picture of that from day one.
I think that would be intellectually dishonest for me to say that I knew exactly how that was going to play out.
But I knew that the potential of it went way beyond just like buying Bitcoin or something.
I was like, this could power the global economy because it's just better than like having certain countries printing their own money or like super high fees in each country.
Like we need a we need a native financial layer to the internet that's truly global and decentralized and like a bigger and bigger share of GDP could run on that over time.
I knew it was massive.
I just didn't know exactly how it would play out.
Hey, real quick, I've started a newsletter for this podcast that you might find.
Interesting, the newsletter shares five of my favorite quotes from each episode along with behind-the-scenes photos with the guest.
The first of these newsletters goes out next week.
I'll share my five favorite quotes from the Daniel Eck episode, along with some of the photos with Daniel and I.
To sign up, just go to davidcenter.com forward slash newsletter.
That's davidsonor.com forward slash newsletter.
So how do you think about running the company now?
How is it organized?
Well, there's lots of ways you can answer that question.
So I have a really amazing president and CEO, Emily Choi.
She really is an amazing operator.
It allows me to focus on a lot of the managing the product groups.
I'd say I'm pretty product-focused CEO.
She's operationally focused.
And it's an amazing combo of skill sets.
I actually think a lot of enterprise value can get generated when you pair
like a technical founder with a great operator, right?
Because if you have just an operator,
they can make the company very, very efficient.
You know, this sort of stereotypically, everyone's different, right?
But if you imagine like only an operational leader,
the company will run very efficiently,
but they won't, they'll miss their next wave of innovation or something, right?
And if you have only a founder, sometimes they blow the place up
because they're like every,
they're always trying to do some crazy new thing, right?
And so I think there's a really healthy balance of those two things.
And there are other companies where, like,
traditionally like Zuckerberg and Cheryl or Samberg,
or whatever kind of classic thing you want to look at.
I'd say even at Google, probably Eric Schmidt and Larry kind of played that role, right?
And with Sergei.
So there's examples like that in history.
I think, anyway, it's generated a lot of value for Coinbase to have Emily and I both there.
And you get the most energy when you're working on product.
Yeah.
And I don't mind going and doing some policy, you know, try to get legislation passed.
You don't mind it?
Yeah.
There was times where I felt like, man, it's like draining to like go to D.C.
and I have to commute with all these politicians.
I actually don't mind it now in a weird way.
There's so many interesting people in D.C.
There's like big, big personalities.
Okay, hold.
We got to go into that.
Because you said that earlier,
and I was like, I got to ask him about this.
Yeah, yeah.
That is shocking to me.
Yeah.
That you find them interesting.
Well, here's one thing I learned about my motivation
is that I can get excited about anything
that helps advance the mission of the company forward, right?
Like, there's times where,
if you look at what I'm actually doing,
it's like really not fun like grind stuff.
It's just like review 300 resumes or something.
Or there was a moment where we like,
we didn't have the right finance leader
and I was like going to all these meetings
with accountants and stuff.
And I was like, I took a class in college on accounting,
but I'm like not an accountant by any stretch of the imagination.
And, you know, I was like,
if this is what is necessary at this moment
to get the financial statements to a state
where we can close this round or whatever,
it's generating value in the company.
So I try to derive my sense of motivation.
from that. And a lot of times the thing I'm doing is like, actually like the gnarliest problem
in the company. It's like, oh, these two teams are super pissed at each other and both the leaders
are threatening to quit and, you know, or I have to go shut down this whole thing and like we're
going to lay people off or whatever. Like usually it's the worst thing you're trying to cycle.
You don't want to wake up and do. But I find a sense of, it's not, I'm not a masochist about it.
Like a lot of times it's draining, but I derive a sense of fulfillment from it of like,
okay, this is moving the ball forward.
At least I did something useful today.
I like that idea.
Like, you're essentially searching for bottlenecks in the company.
Yeah, like that's a great.
Actually, Elon frames what is the limiting factor at any given time?
And go dive deep on that.
That is a very great principle.
I'd say the last thing is just, we try to push down decision making in the org, right?
It's hard to do, but that's like make clear DRIs of each of these different things.
And just try to amp up the pace of execution, right?
I'm just, it's hard to do as the company gets bigger because you have more stakeholders and all this,
but it's like, okay, single decision maker, push it down and just give people short timeframes,
like knock out a decision, unblock this, go, go, go, and I try to be a little bit of like,
the pace car for that and provide risk tolerance to the organization when needed.
Like, let's say somebody comes and says, hey, I think we should try this thing.
And it's kind of a crazy idea, but if it worked, it'd be amazing.
like it'd be like a 20x outcome, but it has like a 20% chance of success,
which you should take that bet all day long.
But most companies are risk-averse.
They won't do something that has a 20% chance of success.
And I'm like, go for it.
If it fails, it's on me, you know?
And I try to just give people like air cover for those things.
So that's a little bit of like the decision-making, how we do that.
What other elements of the company you think are like a reflection of your personality's the founder?
I mean, just the fact that we have like, you know,
five product groups,
like that's probably a little bit of the reflection of my,
like I always want to build new things,
almost to a fault.
And I actually,
we have a lot of good systems in place
to be rigorous about,
okay, let's,
resource allocation is very important
that you don't want to get too spread too thin.
But I,
I keep having like ambition
to go build new things and new categories.
In the age of AI,
that actually might be like more valuable.
How so?
What do you think?
Because if you have lower costs to try it.
Yeah, if you have all these ideas,
and usually you be constrained, you know, by time or resources or actual physical people
to go and implement all these ideas coming out of your head.
Yeah.
And now you have, you know, on-tap, on-demand, intelligent, like, coworkers.
Yeah.
That's true.
The cost to get a V-1 running is now much, much lower.
Yeah.
And we are seeing that internally.
Now, to take some, see something through through is still, you know, intense amounts of work.
But, yeah, we think a lot about resource allocation where you can have, like, a two- or three-person team
try these ideas internally.
And then only if it starts to work and hits key milestones,
like then do you do the Series A, you know, internally.
So we try to treat it a little bit like venture capital.
And the hard part...
Is this the language you use inside the country?
Yeah.
Really?
Yeah.
Like, one of the key things we did actually was that twice a year,
any employees can come pitch and say,
hey, I think we should be doing this,
and I have the team to go do it.
And in most companies, you have to get your boss to say yes,
your boss is boss, your boss's boss,
all the way up with the CEO.
So you have to get like five yeses in a row, which is basically a committee.
And if one person says no, it won't happen, which means the company's risk averse.
What we've tried to set up internally is we call these next bets.
But you can come in and pitch.
So each of the product group leaders has their own budget.
You know, I'm there.
CFO's there.
Like Emily, maybe one or two like really talented young engineers.
And if you get any one of us to say yes and fund it out of your budget, you're greenlit.
So it's kind of like coming in and pitching at like 10 venture capitalists.
She almost inverted it.
Yeah. So you'll need to get one yes if someone wants to fund it out of their budget, which is, yeah. And there's actually been examples where I voted no on something and it turned out to be a massive success. And an example of that is like USDC, which is the stable coin. I actually embarrassed to admit I voted no on that idea. Luckily, somebody else funded it out of their budget. And it's, I think in 25, we did like 800 million revenue off it or something. It was, so it tells you, you know, sometimes good ideas can come from anywhere. It's like, actually, actually,
actually, you know, reading about Steve Jobs and Wozniak, that Wazniak, whatever, he went to his employer, HP, and told him, hey, I think we should make a personal computer. They said no. They said no. I always have a little bit of...
So I always have a little bit of that fear in the back of my mind of like, there's brilliant young engineers inside Coinbase. I want to make sure they can come pitching. Somebody even is not me, funds it.
How much time do you spend on Coinbase marketing?
Are you interested in at all?
You guys are doing very unique things around marketing.
Yeah.
Thanks for noticing that.
I wish I could take more credit for that.
I actually think it's the team entirely.
You know, they come and show me the things that they're doing.
And I definitely, the only thing I'm doing is I'm trying to give them air cover to try crazy stuff.
And basically, whenever they show me something like, that's awesome, like run with it, you know?
And whereas I think most organizations would be like a little too cautious or hesitant.
But yeah, what they're doing with like putting QR codes in the Super Bowl or they just did this karaoke thing at the Super Bowl or I don't know.
They're trying more ambitious ideas, which I like.
It's also a lot of marketing now is it's actually more like content on the internet than like your typical brand ad running on TV.
And, you know, just like a very simple thing actually was I remember we were putting our,
earnings calls, you know, as a public company, you put out your earnings, they're usually kind of
dry and boring, like these analysts tune in, listen to these calls. You're on like a conference call.
It was using this, like, really ancient technology and this ancient vendor that we were
using. And I remember I was always so bored on these earnings calls. I was like, man,
how do we spice these things up, just do something more interesting? And I remember some of the
people on the finance team work up like, Brian, just like, stay on script. It's supposed to be
boring. Like, just report the numbers. Like, that's all we're doing here. And we're
I was like, no, like this is a marketing moment.
We're supposed to be selling some stock, right?
Let's go out and tell the story, you know, of the company.
And so anyway, just in like this recent earnings, we put together like a pitch deck,
kind of like we were going and pitching when we were a private company.
And I was like, I want to, I want to just like run through the deck and like make a video
of me.
And then we put it on the website and one of the guys on our marketing team paired it.
Have you seen those videos, like vertical video where I saw this?
Like the guy's running through the game collecting coins.
So they realized on short form that you can have somebody speaking,
but then if you put something,
somebody like playing a video game or whatever the case is,
are going through a maze,
their attention goes through the roof.
Yeah.
And so that's like we have these like young internet native marketing people.
They're not like, you know,
people who made ads for Coca-Cola or something.
They're just like people who live their whole life on the internet
and like meme,
meme culture and all this kind of stuff, right?
And I mean, somebody could reasonably say, well, Brian, are you trying to turn the company into a meme stock or something?
And I'm like, no, not really.
I think we're building something very serious and important as like an institution that's going to stand a test of time.
But we do need to get the word out in the way that people actually consume content today.
And frankly, I think our shareholder letter is brilliant.
I get a lot of good feedback on it from like the biggest funds at Fidelity and all these kind of folks.
So I'm glad we're putting out of shareholder letter.
but 99% of people
aren't going to read our shareholder letter.
They're going to see some clip
on social media about the company
and that's kind of how they're ingesting
their information.
So how do we speak in an internet native way?
And that is marketing.
Everything is marketing.
Yeah, content.
I mean, everything's...
I like that you had this.
I'm going to do...
I have to do the calls anyways.
Like, why don't you actually make them interesting?
You said, you know, you have to get attention.
People have to pay attention to, like, what we're doing
or they're not going to...
It kind of serves the mission, too.
There's a great maxim from David Ogrevy
about this. He says you can't save souls in an empty church.
Yeah.
It's like you're going to save their soul.
You got to get their attention first.
You got to get them in the door first.
Yeah.
Well said.
How do you compose your shareholder letters?
Because I'm going through this right now.
I just reread Warren Buff's shareholder letters since the last one is out.
But that was the best marketing that he ever did.
And the amount, every year, each year took them about seven months of him.
And I think her name's Carol, Loomis, going back and forth.
And you read them, they're technically about a public company, but they're fascinating.
He's essentially, he thought about it as like he's just teaching.
How do you compose your shareholder letters?
Yeah, so that's a great point.
Actually, Bezos did that too, right?
He's got some bangers.
Buffett.
Bezos says, see, Buffett's different because it's like 70 years or whatever.
Bezos, I think, did it for 21 years.
He distilled it on to Maxim's, his last shareholder letter was like, differentiation is survival.
Yeah.
But I think those are probably the best.
technology company shareholder letters that I've ever seen.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, I think that those guys are putting in a level of craft into those, like,
and, you know, probably it was a product of their time.
I think the way people consume this has changed as we talked about.
Our shareholder letters are good.
I think they're, like, really just reporting the numbers primarily right now.
So they're kind of written for analysts, whereas I think the Bezos and the Buffett one
might have been written for more like teaching people about business.
I think Bezos was teaching his very interesting philosophy.
Yeah.
And searching, essentially using that, it's almost like a tuning fork to like, I'm putting this out,
and the right shareholders for me and this weird strategy I have will respond to this information.
Yeah.
I wonder if you could do the same, though.
It's a great point.
I hadn't thought about it.
I mean, we could put more of like, I don't know, my philosophy in it.
I think what I want to try is actually going through, for me the medium of just talking
through a deck and, like, getting me talking about it can be a little bit easier.
There is something powerful about forcing yourself to sit down and really distill it to like
in writing, which can be clarifying.
So, wait, think about that.
You said, do you prefer being prompted?
Like, when you said, it's better if I said, like, we put a deck, but let me just film,
just film me going through the deck.
Yeah.
Like, I don't want to just like read, I'm not reading the deck, but I want to tell you,
it'll help me clarify from my thinking, like, okay, here's the mission of the company,
what are we building?
We're just building better financial services with crypto.
How do we measure our progress on that?
Here's our key metrics.
You know, it's growing trading volume market share and it's like the transaction volume and
the assets on the platform.
We have a whole theory about how we're growing that as the most trusted brand.
And then, okay, you can also just go through a bunch of objections people commonly would
bring up, right?
And like, okay, let's have a slide and address that and that and that.
And then you can take submitted questions too and you can kind of riff on those.
I think that that's a good format for us to play with.
But you bring, I hadn't really thought about the Buffett and the,
Bezos analogy on the shareholder letters. Those guys went deep. That was actually, that was very
atypical. Yeah, I would argue that the Buffet shareholders is the most successful example of content
marketing in history. If you think about what it did for his reputation, the fact that then he got
access to proprietary deal flow as a result of that. So if you don't feel people are reading the
shareholder letters, how do you think they're consuming information about public companies then?
Well, I think there are a number of analysts that are reading the show letters. I don't want to say there's
None. But I think most people like retail investors, even people who aren't specifically tracking
public company stocks, like in that level of detail, they're consuming podcasts. They're probably listening
to your podcast. They're reading social media like X. They're reading blog posts, substack.
I think some of them still read traditional media, but that's dwindling, especially amongst people
under, say, 65 or something. Every company is a media company now. You should be publishing your
own content, direct to your own blog, social media. Some companies have their own podcast.
I don't, you never should be going like through, I really don't like this idea of putting
information out as a company through a traditional journalist who's going to bring their
own bias and filter to it. You know how many founders have been telling me that recently?
Yeah. Why do you arrive at that conclusion? Well, part of it was just having, I mean, we talked about
the mission first blog post. You know, one of the
the formative experiences, I would say as a CEO, was that after that happened, several
traditional media organizations wrote just very negative and false stories about us. And it just
made me really appreciate how they're not doing journalism, like, in the traditional sense of the
word that I think of it, which is to go report the facts and investigate things which need uncovering
in the world, which is a very important thing. They're actually more like political propaganda
and if it doesn't fit their narrative, then they're, they'll put out stories which are fake,
misleading.
I shouldn't have been surprised.
There's like a long history of this going back to like, you know, yellow journalism and
Joseph Polzitzer.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
Because people give me shit because I don't read the news at all.
Yeah.
Like I just read old books and then talk to founders now.
Like that's essentially my entire media diet.
And then LLED, like talking to LMs.
Yeah.
And they're like, you're not informed.
I was like, have you read William Randolph first biography?
Did you read Joseph?
Like who invented yellow journalism?
or just read, anything that's happening now,
derive from those two,
especially in America,
those are the two most influential and powerful, you know, people media.
And they literally changed the way that newspapers
and the written text came out
to make it intentionally more salacious and more exaggerated.
Yeah, what did Hurst say,
like, you provide the photos, I'll provide the war or something?
Yeah, and so anyway, I think most people have become aware of this now,
like the trust in traditional media is kind of at all time lows.
So, you know, luckily things have moved on.
I, you know, anyway, I think it's social media has its own challenges too about misinformation
and whatnot, but at least like you can just go direct and put out whatever you want to say
and people like it or don't.
It's fine.
And then, you know, I think it's good to talk to new media as well.
And anyway, that was a formative experience.
And I actually think it was very liberating in a way.
I actually, I think everybody at some point in their life should get the,
New York Times to write a hit piece on them because you stop fearing it and you start realizing,
okay, I'm just going to do whatever I think is the right thing to do now because there's not
like some terrible thing that could happen to me anymore. Like it doesn't matter. Like once they
try to, once they try to do it and it doesn't do anything, you realize, oh, okay, I'm not trying
to optimize for optics here or doing something that looks like, that looks good. Why don't I actually
just do the thing that I think is good regardless of how people perceive it? And that's very liberating.
I hope more people experience that.
When did you go through that?
It happened in many small ways as Coinbase was growing.
Like, we'd see articles come out that was like, what?
That's not right.
What are they talking about?
And they wouldn't post a correction.
Sometimes you get these calls from journalists.
They were like, I'm posting this in four hours.
Like, will you comments?
And we were like, what?
This is totally false information.
What are you talking about?
So it was just this kind of annoying tax that was always happening on the company.
But what really, I think, radicalized me on it was post that mission first blog post, like several organizations.
But the New York Times in particular, I remember they basically put a team of people I was later told by insiders.
They're like, go just go dig up dirt on this company and write negative articles about them.
They had the headline written before they even had found anything.
And they wrote articles kind of implying that we were like racist and we were like, you know, underpaying certain minorities and things.
It was false information.
And, you know, that's just like, this basically was like piss me off.
And I was like, okay, I don't really want to, they're not engaging in good faith.
These are, they're so biased, they don't even realize it, and they have some political agenda.
It's not really, it's not really journalism.
It's like a political propaganda company or something.
So that was frustrating.
And, yeah, it shifted my point of view to go direct.
You had a unique experience because you're building a company, but you're also starting
at the very beginning of an industry.
I think like the, I was thinking about you earlier today.
I was like, the analogy is kind of, that sticks in my mind.
It's like the early American automobile founders.
It's like, I have to learn how to build a car company, but we're building.
building an industry simultaneously.
Or like, if you start a software company today,
like you're not building the software industry,
the software's been around.
What was that experience like?
It's a really good point.
I mean, Henry Ford, you probably know about it, right?
It's like when the cars came out and then people were like freaked out about,
your cars are going to scare the horses, you know?
And like some, wasn't there some law that I remember Mark Andreessen told me about this
where like when automobiles first came out in cities,
there was somebody passed a law.
You had to like run in front of the car with a flag.
Yes.
So as not to scare the horses.
So, yeah, inherently, if you are,
crypto is a brand new industry.
It's updating all financial services.
And it's like that Gandhi quote, you know,
like first they ignore you and they laugh at you and they fight you.
And then they confront you at Davos and wave their finger on.
And then you win.
So we're at stage three.
They're now, there's a little bit of fighting happening.
But actually, honestly,
most of the big banks and financial institutions are embracing crypto.
And like five of the, you know,
G-Sib banks in the world, the largest banks are working with us now on crypto integrations.
If you look at their LinkedIn posts, they're all hiring crypto and people, product managers and
engineers.
So it's working.
And we want to work with all of them.
This is like a little blip on the policy radar that's just a little negotiation happening.
Peter Thiel says you have to be contrarian, but right to be an entrepreneur.
So you have to be comfortable looking stupid for like a long time.
When I was calling those banks and saying, hey, we want to, we're a crypto company,
we want to do this.
And they would hang up on me.
Or, you know, I'd go pitch the 30th Vist venture investor.
and get a no, or the, you know, the thousands of employee we tried to hire or whatever.
Like, we're willing to be misunderstood for a long time, and then you slowly start to have
these breakthroughs.
And a lot of the best, you know, if you look at like Uber, you know, they were fighting for
a decade to just be like, yeah, it's actually better and safer than a cab.
And entrenched interests were fighting them, right?
Or Airbnb with the hotels, you know, self-driving cars.
Like, everything that's truly innovative and breakthrough is going to.
to upset an entrenched incumbent, eventually intersect with the government, and just piss off some
segment of the population who kind of are like, how dare you question the status quo, you know?
And the Wright brothers, I mean, when they came out with the airplane, nobody believed that
for like for years. I mean, you, you know, you read the biography. They went to the United States
government and were like, we've created flight, you know, they'd be celebrated and they were like
They had to go to Europe. Yeah, they went to Europe. They were doing these demonstrations on like this
guys field in Ohio and almost there'd be like three people watching them. Yeah. It didn't wasn't there was
famous quote from the war department. They said we see no military application for the airplane
and 40 years later at one World War II. And it was if I remember I haven't read the book in probably
six years. I should reread it again to do another episode on it. But I think it was like the French
government was their first yeah the first person to actually buy it for the military. Yeah. So
that's the nature of innovation is like you have to be willing to be misunderstood. And then the key part
you have to also be right, which is you can't just be throwing out crazy ideas, which are wrong.
Yeah, but for them, so they're creating an industry and a company.
Yeah.
But they actually didn't create the most successful company.
That's true.
In that industry where you did.
It's true.
Well, I think Orville and Wilbur were more like...
Well, Wilbur died prematurely.
I think from like, I forgot consumption or maybe tuberculosis.
I forgot what it was.
They died like 45.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They lived for a lot longer.
But there was, basically, they created the industry and one of the first few companies,
but then they were overtaken in a way that you have not been.
Yeah, so not to torture this analogy too much,
but I think of Wilver and Orbel as kind of like inventors.
The equivalent in this case would be like Satoshi Nakamoto or someone like that.
Brilliant, you know, whoever they are,
there's an interesting documentary coming out on this soon.
You know, whoever those people are,
they're probably like innovators, scientists.
I don't consider myself really a scientist.
I'm more of like an engineer and an entrepreneur.
So I recognized early what was happening with the invention of Bitcoin.
But I didn't invent Bitcoin myself.
You know, I did not discover flight like the Wright brothers.
So I always had a lot of respect for people that are like, you know, Edison and these people, right?
Like, because they're actually on the frontier making scientific breakthroughs.
Who knows?
Maybe this would happen at some point.
But I don't think I'm going to be the person to make a scientific breakthrough.
What I am going to do is have an instinct or an instinct or invest.
knows that like something interesting is happening here and it's created an opportunity and I can go
commercialize it with a really successful company. Yeah, I mean, Edison was obsessed with
commercialization though. He said that he didn't want to invent anything that didn't sell and that
sale is proof of utility. He has a great line on that. So you have your mission of coin base,
but you said your natural inclination is to work on multiple things. You started another company.
Yeah. You want to talk about this? Yeah, sure. So I mean, broadly, I want to, I want to
accelerate civilizational progress in the world. That's kind of my personal mission. So I think
economic freedom is foundational to that with crypto. When Coinbase went public and I got some
liquidity from that, I was also just thinking like, okay, what are the other big problems in the world,
like in hard tech, not just software that might require more capital that I could try to help with.
And I started thinking, you know, so the big ones that in my mind were like AI and crypto are
probably the two biggest right now. Then of course there's fusion energy, brain machine interfaces,
space.
And I felt like, okay, there's good teams working on all of these, and I'm not sure what
unique I have to add.
The other biggest one I thought of was longevity.
Like, how do we start to reprogram our own biology to enhance what it means to be human
at some point?
So I started hosting these dinners.
I didn't see teams working on that that I thought were credible.
In fact, you know, the longevity spaces had like a lot of snake oil type stuff.
It's like pretty, you know, attracting some unsavory characters, a little bit like crypto.
For centuries.
Yeah.
For centuries.
For sure.
I reached out a couple of friends of mine who had done,
they were biotech CEOs or PhDs and started to host some dinners.
And this is a good way just to learn, too, is like try to see if you can convene
some of the top people in the room and just go around the table and ask them,
what's the most interesting thing on the horizon that's underfunded or underinvested?
And we hosted a couple of these dinners.
I was lucky enough to do this with a friend of mine, Blake Byers,
who eventually co-founded this company with.
And one of the topics they told us about was epigenesis,
genetic reprogramming, which is the ability to reprogram cells, and you can restore function
they had when they were younger.
There were some early breakthroughs that had happened in different labs.
One example of this was Shinya Yamanaka who won the Nobel Prize for reprogramming,
skin cells into stem cells.
I think you got that in 2005, if I'm not mistaken.
And so I started to feel a little bit about epigenetic reprogramming, like I did about
Bitcoin when I first read about the Bitcoin white paper.
And I was like, hey, how deep does this rabbit hole go?
you can actually reprogram cells.
Turns out our cells are much more plastic than people realized, you know,
what could be possible with that?
And so through a series of these dinners, I met,
we met the other co-founder Jacob Kimmel and Greg Johnson
and created this company.
It's called New Limit, and it's a longevity company
searching for novel therapies that can reprogram your cells
to restore function they had when they were younger.
So it's been going about three or four years now.
We've demonstrated successfully reprogramming human cells
for the first time to restore function.
It's a discovery platform that's testing tens of thousands, eventually millions of hypotheses
in high throughput screens across lots of different cell types.
It's using AI to prioritize those screens.
And the first drug can that's going to go into clinical trials probably next year.
So it's gone faster than I thought, actually.
I committed 100 million of my own money to it to help it get off the ground.
And it subsequently raised more money from others as well.
And I thought it was going to be like a pure research thing for maybe five, six years or
who knows. It turned out the scientific progress happened a bit faster, we thought, and we're ready
to go to clinical trials now with the first drug candidate. Hopefully there'll be three, four,
five drug candidates over the next five years. Do you think you'll continue to start more companies?
I do, yeah. I mean, both within Coinbase, like, there's lots of these product groups, and I think it's
fun. Like, that's the most fun thing in the world is building companies that try to have a positive
impacts in the world, try to be useful. And I'm getting slowly better at it, you know, over the decades, hopefully.
learning a lot of painful lessons along the way.
And so, yeah, I don't want to get distracted and have too many things.
Each one of these is really difficult.
But I do think over the coming decades, I'll hopefully all start more companies.
Do you think Coinbase is the last company you'll be CEO of?
That's a tough question.
Let me tell you why you think about it.
Let me tell you why I asked.
Because I was shocked when I was talking to Toby.
Yeah.
He's like, he says something.
I think it was on the episode that if AI, like the advancements of AI weren't happening
right now, he thinks he wouldn't be the CEO of Shopify anymore.
Yeah, I was surprised to hear him say that, too.
I heard him say that.
I don't feel the same way he does about that.
I think, I mean, AI is changing everything about how we work and lots of things in financial
services.
We haven't talked about that.
We need to talk about this.
Sure, yeah.
Let's go there next.
Yeah, yeah.
So let me forget.
I want to continue to being Coinbase CEO for a long time.
Do you like being CEO?
Yeah.
I always clarify, I find it very fulfilling, which means that it's something.
Sometimes very stressful.
Sometimes it's super fun.
Sometimes I just get my ass kicked.
Like, and I'm, you know, I'm like, oh, man, that was a rough day.
Right.
You're just going, you're just going and doing like the hardest things that get escalated to you because nobody else in the company.
You know, so.
But that's what creates fulfillment, right?
It's a little bit like playing a video game or something.
Like it needs to be a really hard level.
It's a little outside your comfort zone for you to feel like, whoa, okay, I beat like, I was right at the limit of my ability.
When you're having these very stressful times in your life based on work, what do you do to like decompress or to like take time away?
I think it's a very important topic because a lot of founders, like the other founders that were in my YC batch that I went through, I saw many of them like burn out within three, three, four years.
They would either, it manifested in lots of different ways.
Some of them would gain a bunch of weight.
Some of them would lose a bunch of weight.
One of them, like had, like, had hair falling out.
I was like bald before starting coming to go.
But like they were like literally clums of hair were falling out because of the stress.
Some of them got like addicted to prescription drugs.
Like all.
So dealing with stress as a founder is actually a very important topic because you need to eventually.
You can burn the candle at both ends for a period of years, but eventually you'll burn out.
And you need to make it sustainable to have the impact you want to have over a period of many decades, hopefully.
And so yeah, the kinds of things that I baked in as.
is a routine. And there were, I'd say every couple years, I felt like I hit a patch of burnout,
right? And I had to change something up. So I either have to like delegate more, stop doing
some piece of what I was doing, having fewer direct reports, and then have a routine
around like sleep, exercise and nutrition, basically. And some form of like, you can call it
meditation or prayer, whatever you want, but in the evening you can go in the sauna, right? Or in the
morning, you can just sit there and meditate for one minute or whatever it is. And I have a pretty
strict routine when I'm in work mode around like sleep, exercise, what I eat, and then just like wind
down time in the evening. And then, you know, on the weekends, I mix it up and I'm like not so strict
about things. But I even just wear the same thing every day, right? So I'm pretty rigorous about
that. And I mean, I basically just in this routine of get enough sleep, wake up,
lift heavy things and do zone two cardio and like meditate for a few minutes and then get after it
what's your wind down time at night though it's basically like you know wine and love making
no it's been don't look at screens would be the main the main thing right like you're if you're
if you if you if you're looking at work stuff on your laptop or your phone and like even something
you just glance at for a second it can like piss you off and then if I try to just go right to sleep after
you're working, I have like stressful dreams about work and I just don't get well, well rested.
So there does have to be like, I think, a period of time to how long is this wind down time?
Oh, like an hour.
Okay.
Yeah.
Before bed.
Yeah.
Okay.
Yeah.
And you can read, watch stuff, sauna, whatever.
Yeah.
Before we go to how AI changing the way you're working inside Coinbase.
Yeah.
Question for, I was thinking about was, what's the distribution of time between Coinbase and
your other company? Well, Cornbase is my full-time job, so it's like 99%. Yeah. I mean,
if you looked at how you're spending time between the two companies. Yeah. Well, when New Limit was just
getting started, I was spending more time with them, like 5, 10% of my time. But, and, you know, I'll jump in
whatever needed. But I'm primarily an investor and a board member there. And I'm helping with some
of the operational pieces and helping them raise money and things like that. But yeah, Jacob Kimmel is the
president operating that company day to day, and he's crushing it. He's incredibly talented
CEO and business person. I talked to, well, sorry, I should say scientist and business person.
Yeah. I talked to Palmer lucky about this because that's something I asked him. It's like, we have
three companies. He's like, no, I really have like one. He's like 99% of my time is on Andoril.
Yeah. And then he said it's something fascinating. He just like wakes up every day and tries to think
of like the highest leverage thing he can do for that company. Yeah. Even if it's stuff he doesn't
want to do, which is very interesting.
That's exactly right.
It's like, it's so easy to get caught up in just doing short-term things, but you have to
start your day usually with the thing that sucks.
It's the most important thing, and usually it sucks.
Yeah.
So how is AI changing the way that you're working in going based?
Well, lots of ways.
So some of it is similar to other companies, and some is different.
The parts that's similar is like more and more of code is being written by these agents,
more than 50% now.
Customer support inquiries, I think, is about 60% answered by agents now.
Are you building your own tools or you're using other people's tools?
Both.
We're using vendors.
We have a lot of custom models internally as well.
We're testing in different use cases.
For instance, around like compliance automation, we're building a lot of stuff in-house.
Design, totally, you can really quickly, rapidly prototype stuff and get it out there.
We're even using it within our finance function and, like, you know, I'll do FPNA and build models and things.
like that. So it's widely, even like decision making in the company, the key was getting a lot of
our data ingested, like all the Google Docs and the Slack messages and the GitHub commits and the
Salesforce. And now, like, you can ask it really great questions. Like, what should I be more aware of as
CEO? And it's like, did you know this team is not aligned on the strategy? I was like, actually,
I didn't know that. So this is something you build yourself. There's a team internally working on this.
And there's a couple of vendors. So there's one called Libra chat that's open source.
you can connect all your internal data to.
There's other vendors out there, like Glean and SlackBod and different.
We're testing three of them or so right now.
Gemini is doing a bunch of stuff like Google.
So we're testing all of them to see which ones employees gravitate towards, basically.
That's, I would say, current best practice amongst a lot of tech companies, not super unique to crypto.
The thing that's more unique to crypto is that these AI agents are increasingly needing to do payments to get work done,
and we're giving them all stable coin wallets.
So you can imagine, like, in the traditional financial world, like you and I can go get a credit card or something where we have to be identified as a human.
But if you're an agent trying to get work done, you either have to bug your human every time to like, will you approve this purchase?
Or if you want to increasingly these agents, you can tell them to go do this like overnight or the next two, you know, the next hours, week, whatever, and get work done.
Like they might need to spin up AWS resources or get through a paywall on the internet to read some research paper or, you know, buy a domain name or whatever, spin up a market.
marketing program, like if you really want to treat them like almost like their own digital
employees, they need to have like a corporate card kind of thing. And traditional corporate cards
can't be issued to non-human entities. And so we're giving them stable coin wallets. They're doing
a lot of machine to machine payments. This is all very new in the last few months, but it's been
getting a lot of traction. So that's pretty exciting. We build a couple of tools that allow any
agent to get a stable coin wallet inside it. How are you using them personally?
on?
AI agents?
Any kind of tools?
Well, I've been using
Claude and Codex
a little bit
just to like
learn the current development
tools.
I've been spinning that up
locally on my laptop
just to make sure
understand the current
best tools
that developers are using.
Toby actually writes
a lot of code
still in production.
Did you see the treat
today?
Yeah, yeah.
I dabble,
but I do not
write that much code
in production.
I have to admire him
for that.
As a CEO,
the main thing I use
it for is research.
essentially of just like, okay, help me understand this and this, how this works, and then
draft this for me. And internally with these data report repositories now connected in, I can use
it for decision making. And we actually, like, we use a decision making framework.
And there's a row now for the AI agent to write in their input. And it's like kind of nice to
compare it to the other people on the team. Those are the primary ways that I'll use it today.
I'm still a little confused. Tell me about the base app. Yeah. I watched the press
I've talked to you about it.
I'm still confused.
Okay, well, the simple way to think of it is the base app is the self-custodial version of Coinbase.
We launched a new version of it recently, which frankly, it was kind of polarizing.
Like, we put it out, and it was trying to do something kind of novel on the social front.
And I don't think it quite worked.
We got, like, a bunch of feedback from the community about that.
Was this the tap thing thing?
Well, you could double tap to buy any post.
Yeah.
I understand that, but then each post almost like had like its own market cap.
But then what happens?
Well, it was interesting.
So every post had its own coin,
and also every creator had its own coin.
It was optional for the creator.
But what happened is if you bought a post,
some of the economics would flow back to the creator.
And we thought maybe each post would have like this up and down,
like it would have residual zero value.
It turned out like many of the posts had a couple thousand dollars of value
or something at the terminal end of it.
And people were thinking of it as a way to,
I guess, reward and thank the creator, but they also own some of the creator coin.
Long way of saying, I think something is going to work in this space around, they call it social
phi or like, you know, these kind of social media tokens. I don't think that the tokenomics has not
quite been figured out yet where it needs, for the people, you know, investing in them, it needs to have
some sort of like durability to like the you know they have to believe okay david senra is going to
continue to make great content into the future and he's relatively undiscovered now but he's going to be
much bigger and it's kind of like you know a company or something and they would want to own
your creator token and there'd be some value and maybe like a revenue stream would accrue to
them over time depending on your ad revenue or you'd have to come up with something like that
that i think it's a little bit more durable in the current incarnation it wasn't quite there
in my view so we tried it as an experiment didn't quite work
The app has since pivoted to really just be more focused on trading and being a self-custodial version of the Coinbase app.
So we're starting with that for now.
But I do think something in the social token space will eventually work.
What else has been on your mind outside of Coinbase?
And is it New Limit?
Yeah.
New Limit.
Yeah.
Well, you know, there's another project that I invested in and helped get off the crown called Research Hub, which is trying to accelerate scientific research.
and they're trying to find novel ways to be able to raise, like, the funding problems in science
are like a whole thing and replication is an issue. I can talk about that if you want.
I think, you know, I'm making, through my family office, I'm making various investments in, like,
companies that I think are doing innovative stuff on the frontier. I think sometimes about
what are the other big ideas that could really unlock progress, right?
One other idea I'm interested in is actually like special economic zones in the U.S. or or elsewhere, where there's such a there's such a morass of red tape, both federally and state and local, to try to innovate sometimes that it's hard to get off the ground, right?
Like that money transmitter license thing is an example that I mentioned where you need to like, you needed like five or ten million dollars just to get the licenses.
And I sometimes entrepreneurs can find a creative way around these things in the early days.
But for instance, look at like, I don't know, nuclear energy, right?
It's basically impossible to get like a nuclear power plant.
I shouldn't say impossible.
It's very difficult right now.
And if you had these special economic zones, like actually China has been very successful
with this.
They have like Shenjin is a special economic zone essentially, right?
Or like Hong Kong or in the UAE they have these.
And there's been examples of these around the world.
They've been unlocked a ton of value.
My ideal world, you'd have like 10 plots of land, like take federal land in the U.S.
and designate them as special zones.
So you could have one that's, hey, this is, in this sandbox, you can iterate on nuclear
reactor design in this one little area.
You know, we're going, okay, maybe something bad will happen, but it's contained in this,
in this area.
We need to be on our front foot and, like, innovate there.
Or have another one for, for biotech, like accelerated trials, or another one for crypto,
or another one for drones.
They're just like drones flying all over within this zone, you know, outside of traditional
FAA rules and, like, allow people.
people to really innovate and build startups. And if they get a product working through that rapid
innovation in a regularatory sandbox, they can then go apply for the license federally and then
serve the rest of the U.S. market. But the problem is it's such a high barrier to entry to even
try to get started in some of these markets with these new technologies. Anyway, I think special
economic zones could be cool. I might work on that at some point. I love the idea of just lowering
the barrier, barrier to entry to innovation and entrepreneurship. Brian, this is awesome, man. Thanks for
taking the time to it. Thank you. I appreciate it. I hope you enjoyed this episode. Please remember
to subscribe wherever you're listening and leave a review and make sure you listen to my other podcast
founders for almost a decade. I've obsessively read over 400 biographies of history's greatest
entrepreneurs searching for ideas that you can use in your work. Most of the guests you hear on this show
first found me through founders.
