Dhru Purohit Show - The Biggest Drivers of Cancer and How to Minimize Your Risk Today with Dr. Jason Fung
Episode Date: October 17, 2022This episode is brought to you by InsideTracker and Colima Salt. Our understanding of cancer is slowly undergoing a revolution, allowing for the development of more effective treatments. For the first... time ever, the death rate from cancer is showing a steady decline, but the “war on cancer” has hardly been won. On today’s mini-episode, Dhru sits down with Dr. Jason Fung to talk about a revolutionary new understanding of cancer—what it is, how it manifests, and why it is so challenging to treat. They discuss the “seed and soil” analogy of cancer and how the seed of cancer may exist in all of us, but the power to change the soil is in our hands. They also talk about how hyperinsulinemia may enable the development of cancer, and how we can build soil that offers cancer a hostile environment as opposed to a fertile one. Dr. Fung is a physician, author, and researcher. His groundbreaking science-based books about diabetes and obesity, The Diabetes Code, The Obesity Code, and The Complete Guide to Fasting, have sold over one million copies and challenged the conventional wisdom that diabetics should be treated with insulin. His latest book is The Cancer Code: A Revolutionary New Understanding of a Medical Mystery. Dr. Fung is also the cofounder of The Fasting Method, a program to help people lose weight and reverse type 2 diabetes naturally with fasting. His work on fasting has been cited by CNN, Time, The Atlantic, Forbes, the Toronto Star, and many other media outlets. In this episode we dive into: -What is cancer? -The “seed and soil” analogy of cancer -The biggest drivers of cancer -What feeds cancer cells -What you can do today to minimize your risk of cancer Listen to the full episode here. For more on Dr. Fung, follow him on Instagram @DrJasonFung, Twitter @DrJasonFung, and through his website thefastingmethod.com. Get his book, The Cancer Code: A Revolutionary New Understanding of a Medical Mystery, here. This episode is brought to you by InsideTracker and Colima Salt. InsideTracker provides detailed nutrition and lifestyle guidance based on your individual needs. Right now, they’re offering my podcast community 20% off. Just go to insidetracker.com/DHRU to get your discount and try it out for yourself. Right now, you can get a bag of Ava Jane’s Kitchen Colima Sea Salt for free—just pay for shipping and handling. Just head on over to dhrusalt.com and try Colima Sea Salt for free today! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi everyone, Drew Prode here. Today's mini episode, we're talking all things cancer. Specifically, we have New York Times bestselling author Dr. Jason Fung talking to us about a revolutionary new understanding of this medical mystery we call cancer. And he breaks this down in his book, The Cancer Code, and we're going to get a lot of the top gems in today's mini episodes. Specifically, we're going to go into like, what actually is cancer? I know that's a basic question, but we have to ask the most basic questions if we're going to
and think differently about this approach.
What is the seed and soil analogy of cancer and how does it change our current model
and approach to dealing and even treating cancer?
Jason also goes into the interview and talks about the biggest drivers of cancer today
based on the latest research and what feeds cancer cells.
There's something that's in our diet, especially here in America, that we know through
the latest science and research that's out there, that it feeds and accelerates the growth of
cancer sales. And lastly, we're going to talk about what you can do today to minimize your
risk of cancer. Cancer is one of the most scariest diseases that's out there. You know, so many
people worry about it. So many people have it in their family or have had past friends or family
members who have had it. If you've suffered from that or if you're curious about the topic,
today's mini episode is absolutely for you. I hope you can walk away today with a better understanding
of cancer from Dr.
Jason Fung. I want to pull a quote from your book to start off the conversation, which is you say,
and you start off in the book, you say the most pressing question in cancer research is the most
elusive question, what is cancer? So can we start off there? Because it's still a question that
we're asking today, which is what exactly is cancer? Yeah, and that's sort of the most important
thing is to understand a disease, you really have to understand what it is, like what causes it,
what the disease is. And really, of the common diseases, cancer stands virtually alone because
we had no idea what this disease actually is. So you look at other diseases like COVID or, you know,
infections. So we've identified viruses. We've identified bacteria. We've, you know, figured out fungi,
and so these are external invaders for heart disease and stuff.
These are, you know, blockages in our blood vessels which starve the heart or the brain of blood,
so you get heart attacks or strokes.
So we sort of understand what the disease is, how it develops, and that kind of thing.
But for cancer, this is sort of a very, very strange disease.
So it's unlike any other disease we've ever faced.
It's not a vascular disease, like heart disease.
it's not an external invasion like bacteria or viruses.
You know, it's not a, you know, stones and stuff.
There's all these other diseases, but what is this strange disease?
And it's not that it's one of these sort of rare diseases.
It's unfortunately extremely common.
So the lifetime risk of cancer is somewhere around 1 in 10,
and it's going to, you know, affect everybody's life in that if you don't get it,
you will know people who will get it.
Almost everybody does.
But we don't know what this is.
And this is the whole sort of discussion in the book is what is this disease?
Because it's a disease where you have a normal cell, which is part of your own body,
because it's derived from your own body.
And for some reason, this normal cell breaks off and becomes cancerous to the point where it can kill you.
And it kills, of course, many, many people.
It's the second biggest killer of people.
So our concept of what this disease actually is has been changing.
So, you know, it's changed throughout history.
But really, even in the last sort of 10 years, there's been this massive change in the way that we look at this disease.
And this is what I call the paradigm of cancer.
That is, you know, I'm not arguing about, oh, this is how to treat cancer.
We've done lots of studies on, you know, use this drug and this drug and these drugs in combination with surgery and chemotherapy and radiation.
You put them in this sort of regimen and you can treat cancer.
And I'm not disputing any of that.
But in the end, it doesn't help you answer the question of what is it.
So if you want to understand what it is, then you have to start sort of from the beginning, go through it and say, what is this disease?
And that's where we've really made a lot of progress within the last sort of 15.
20 years. And most people haven't even really appreciated that. And that's what I wanted to bring
forward is that sort of recent research and bring it to the people so they at least understand
what this disease is that that is affecting so many people. This episode is brought to you by
Inside Tracker. You know, I'm turning 40 this year and I can honestly say I've never felt better.
So many people have this fear about getting older because they think it has to come with
chronic disease and a deteriorating mental and physical health.
If that were the case, I'd be worried about getting older too, but it doesn't have to be that way.
It's possible to get older and stay young at the same time, but sometimes we need a little bit of help knowing exactly how to do it.
That's why I'm super excited to tell you guys about Inside Trackers, new inner age that allows you to test how your inner age compares to your chronological age and gives you a longevity-focused plan with science back recommendations to help you make sure your best days are still ahead of you.
Right now, InsideTracker is offering my podcast community 25% off.
Just go to insidetracker.com slash drew.
That's insidetracker.com slash drew for 25% off today.
This episode is brought to you by Ava James Kitchen, makers of 100% microplastic free.
Yes, you heard that right.
Microplastic free, Colima Cecil.
Something I've been loving recently and a super easy way to upgrade your meal
at home. I love adding a pinch of the sea salt to my salmon, my eggs, my sauteed vegetables,
and even my daily big fat salad. It brings out all the delicious flavors and it adds a nice,
salty crunch. You know, when it comes to quality, Ava Jane's kitchen, Colima Sea Salt is tough
to beat. It's loaded with over 80 trace minerals, 100% free of ocean-borne microplastics, which are
a bigger and bigger issue every single year. And its coarse texture tastes amazing,
sprinkled on top of whatever I'm cooking up in my kitchen.
So treat your body right and treat your taste buds right to a super pure, high quality and mouth-watering sea salt that you can feel good about.
Right now, you can get a bag of Ava Jane's Kitchen Colima Sea Salt for free.
Just pay for shipping and handling.
Just head over to Drewsalt.com.
That's D-H-R-U-S-A-L-T dot com, Drewsalt.com, to try out the world famous Ava Jane Kitchens, Colima C-Sysalt.
for free today, just cover shipping.
That's drew salt.com.
I think this is a perfect opportunity to jump into,
you've sort of set the stage for this kind of central point that comes into.
Okay, so now that we understand this in part of paradigm three,
you use this sort of seed and soil, you know, analogy.
And I'd love to set that up just to make sure that we get to that while I have you here.
Yeah, so that's exactly right.
So if we understand now, this is an evolution.
process, which goes back towards our origins, then you have to say, what drives evolution?
And it's not just genetic. So if you think about evolution, Darwinian evolution, which is the
survival of the fittest, for example. So what he had observed was that in the Galapagos Islands,
it had these birds. And if they had these short beaks, which were really ideal for eating nuts,
and there are birds that these had these long beaks that were really good for eating fruit.
And in the areas where there's a lot of nuts,
you found a lot of these short beaked animals
and where the areas you had a lot of fruit.
You had a lot of these long beaked animals.
And what he said was that's not a coincidence.
What happens is that the environment selects the genes
that are most successful.
So if you have a lot of nuts,
you select for the genes that's a selective pressure
which favors the survival of those genes
that produce the short thick beak
and the areas that have a lot of fruit have exert a selective pressure on the genes that give you the long, narrow beats, right?
That makes sense. It's just sort of basic evolution. And cancer does sort of the same thing.
So if it's an evolutionary process towards this sort of original being caused by chronic damage to the cell, then it's not the genetics, which is the important part, but it's the environment.
right? And that is the seed of cancer is there. But if you don't provide that environment that,
you know, selects for this sort of survivalist, cancerous sort of, you know, story, then you're not
going to get cancer. So what you have to do then is to say, this is not just a genetic disease,
because for years we've been sort of thinking about it as a genetic disease. So we think,
well, it's just sort of pre-programmed into us. But it's not.
because the rates of cancer depend on your environment more than it does on your genes.
That is, if you look at, say, breast cancer, breast cancer, if you go from Japan, a Japanese woman in Japan,
when you move that person to San Francisco, their rate of breast cancer like doubles or triples within a couple generations.
It's not the environment. It's the environment.
But that's fantastic because then if you can figure out what point.
part of the environment is what's selecting for the damage. So, you know, in some cases, we know
it's smoking, it's tobacco, it's viruses, right? In many cases, we don't know breast cancer,
colon cancer, what's damage, prostate cancer? We don't know. If we can figure out what part of the
environment is driving this evolutionary process, then that's how we're going to reduce the risk
of cancer. And so the question is, what is it in our environment? So they've studied this question
for a long time. So back in 1981, they did a study where they're going to estimate the risks.
So we do something called a population attribution factor, which is what percentage, a certain risk
factor will contribute to cancer. So tobacco smoke is the biggest, 35%. So tobacco is responsible
roughly for 35% of cancer overall.
But number two was the diet at around 30%.
Right.
So really like very, very close to tobacco and dwarfing almost everything else.
So all the stuff like the pesticides and the chemicals and stuff,
that's like one or two percent, radiation, one or two percent.
But cancer was caused in large part due to one tobacco, which we know about,
And two, the diet.
The question is...
Which never really got that.
Like, people didn't get that, you know?
Like, they didn't get that.
And so they were looking for what part of the diet.
That was what the tricky part was.
So if it's diet, then what part of the diet is causing cancer, right?
So they looked at fiber wasn't the case.
They looked at dietary fat.
It wasn't the case.
They looked at vitamin deficiencies.
We've done so many studies like vitamin A, vitamin B, folic acid, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E,
you know, omega-3 fatty acid, selenium.
We've tested all of those in multi-million dollars trials, and it wasn't deficiency of vitamins that was causing cancer.
And the answer came somewhere around 2000, what part of the diet was the most important?
And we didn't know this really until about 2003.
And it turns out that it was obesity,
was the biggest, biggest driver of cancer.
And probably more specifically is that it was the hyperinsulinemia.
That is too much insulin, which is very typical of obesity,
is probably what's driving cancer in those cases.
The reason I say we didn't know is because,
so I went to medical school in the mid-1990.
and we never talked about this stuff.
But in 2003, a very large study came out,
which showed that obesity actually raises the risk of all kinds of cancer.
So now the WHO classifies 13 different types of cancer as obesity-related,
including breast cancer and colorectal cancer,
which are after lung cancer, sort of the most common cancers.
So really, really important causes.
And this is what's important is now, you know,
what we're doing is we have to go,
pass again. So this paradigm, which gets us to evolution, which gets us to the seed and the soil,
which is this sort of evolutionary ecological, ecology being the study of how the environment
interacts with an individual, how you can change that environment in order to prevent cancer.
And that's sort of what's sort of exciting about this is that now hopefully we can start
to understand and then make some changes that are going to minimize our risk of
developing these types of cancers and, you know, hopefully preventing them in the future.
Yeah. And I mean, and even question basic premises. You know, I was on the Mayo Clinic website.
I've been in preparation of this interview, you know, there's like a myths and there's like a
myths in fact section on cancer and diet. And like one of the questions inside there was
sugar, you know, somebody saying, you know, does consuming less sugar have any impact on cancer?
right? And it was like there's no research, there's no evidence at all that consuming less
sugar has anything to do with cancer. And again, Mayo Clinic, well established place. They're doing
the best they can based on the research and the evidence that's out there right now. And part of the
thing that you're bringing in is that highlighting, especially with your previous books, that we're
really talking about, you know, insulin resistance and what that relates to diabetes, especially
type two diabetes, is, well, if we know that obesity,
through this big study that you were talking about plays a major factor.
And then what is it as part of that also contributes obesity and how do cancer cells get their
energy?
Then of course we're going to want to pay attention to the level of sugars as one example that we're
having inside of our diet because that's going to cause a whole chain of effects that
ultimately supports the growth of cancer.
Yeah, exactly.
And so one of the, so Dr. Lou Cantley, who's a very prominent researcher, cancer researcher, you know, he was one of the ones who sort of uncovered the link between sort of what sugar does, which is, you know, it contributes to this high insulin state.
And insulin, other than being a metabolic hormone, is actually a very, very potent growth factor.
So it tells cells to grow.
And if you're going to tell cells to grow, then you're going to tip the scales towards, you know,
increasing growth of cancer cells, for example.
So, you know, here's a guy who's sort of like one of the most prominent cancer researchers,
and he's like, sugar scares me.
You know, that's what he says in one of his articles he's written.
It's like, okay, well, that's all I need to know, right?
Totally.
And also, too, on the basic premise of, like, what is chemo?
therapy, right? Yeah. Could you explain like that link on that? Like how do they get these well-intentioned
poisons into cancer cells? Can you explain that to like our audience through, you know, like exactly
like what goes into chemotherapy that takes advantage of exactly that that we're talking about? Yeah. So yeah,
exactly. So when you look at the cancer cells, you can do something called a pet test, which is a positron emission test.
And it basically looks at how avidly cells take up glucose.
So when you do these tests, things that light up are eating a lot of glucose,
and those are what are identified as cancer.
So they're taking in, you know, like five or ten times the amount of glucose,
which is a type of sugar compared to normal cells.
So it's like, okay, when you look on these sophisticated sort of scans,
you can see the cancer cells basically devouring sugar like there's no tomorrow and it's like,
well, you know, if I had cancer, I certainly wouldn't be trying to eat too much of the stuff
because you know that the one place in the body that loves it 10 times more than the next guy
is the thing, right?
And then you have certain chemotherapies which take advantage of this.
They try and get in, you know, by because they're, you know, they mimic the sugar and that's
how they do it on the positron emission tomography testing, for example. They mimic the sugar so that
the cancer takes it up and then it lights it up. And then people are trying to use that to sort of
target the cancers as well. But interesting, you know, it's an interesting story of how this
sort of this new paradigm explains so much more about the phenomenon of cancer and how, you know,
what implications it has for screening and this sort of evolution of and this is sort of the promise of this cancer paradigm 3.0 is that if you now understand that what is happening now is that the cell is evolving away from normal cells evolving into a foreign species because and people always think oh that's so weird right but that's the way the body actually looks at the cancer cells so when our immune system looks at a cell
It has a way to tell between self and non-self.
That is, the immune system is a very powerful weapon.
You don't want to use it on its own cells.
That's like friendly fire, right?
Automidium type behavior.
Exactly.
And it's very, very bad if that happens.
So your body has these ways to distinguish between your own cells and everybody else.
So bacteria, viruses, it will try and kill it.
And when it sees a cancer, it will try and kill it.
That's just the way. That's what happened. So it has evolved this cell. So say you take a lung cell,
this lung cell, which was originally your own cell, has evolved into basically a new species that is
foreign. That's why Frankenstein in your own body. Exactly. And that's the reason that instead of
trying to the third paradigm, which is like, okay, now we have these cells that were originally
part of us, but they've basically broken away and they've become their own sort of, you know,
invader. Now you say, well, instead of trying to just get indiscriminate killing,
which was paradigm one, or genetic targeting, which was paradigm two, now what we're going to do
is enhance the immune system to identify it. So basically, you have these sleeper cells,
like, you know, you have terrorists, sleeper cells of terrorists in your city, and now what you're
trying to do is uncover them so that you can get your police and your SWAT teams in there
to kill these sort of domestic terrorists. That's what we're doing with immunotherapy.
So these new drugs, these checkin inhibitors are basically uncovering. So there are certain
ways that these cancer cells hide and they're basically trying to uncover them. Right.
And this is the new paradigm. What we're going to do is trying to uncover these sleeper cells,
these hidden sleeper cells so that they can be identified, targeted,
we can direct the immune system.
So something like those new drugs you're talking about the, you know,
those checkpoint inhibitors, then you get CAR-T,
where you're actually going to take the cancer
and then engineer sort of a swap team that is going to identify and kill them, right?
That's a new therapy based on this immunotherapy,
but it's based more specifically on this new paradigm of looking at a cancer,
as a new foreign species.
And it's very, very interesting because, you know, it's, it's, the promise is, is sort of immense.
Like, we're not there yet.
And, you know, I hope that there's a lot more to come.
But it's a totally new way of targeting cancer and treating it based on a whole new paradigm.
And that's what gives me hope for the future that there's more going to be able to be applied.
Because you can apply these lessons of evolution.
biology and say, well, you know, what can I do to change the environment, for example, because
that's evolution.
That's biology.
So things like losing weight and, you know, intermittent fasting, which is another way to
lose weight, you know, trying to reverse your type two diabetes, type two diabetics, of
course, get much higher rates of cancer because it's also hyperinsuliniaic.
So getting reversing the type two diabetes, that's going to likely reduce your risk, you know,
other things like chemo preventative agents. So there's not a lot. They've been studying stuff to try and
prevent cancer, but there's not a lot. So the only things that might work, that pharman gets a lot of
research, which is a diabetes drug may be useful. And then green tea, probably a very small effect,
but there's some data from, you know, from Japan where they do drink a lot of green tea,
that some of the compounds in that are maybe, may be effective. So, hey, maybe that's a great, you know,
great thing to do.
Drinking green tea is probably good anyway.
And really the two central themes that I got out of your book
after really going to that history is one,
the future is hopeful in a way that is really understanding
more of that central question,
coming back to how we start off the podcast,
which is what the heck is cancer?
So we're better shaped for what we're developing
in terms of treatments and drugs in the future
because we're more,
we have a we have the most robust answer that's actually getting to the source and the root of
what is cancer and the second component is exactly kind of what you were just talking about which is
what are the things that you can do today to both enhance you know whether it's some of the work
of like walter longo or other people that are out there that are showing that fasting could
support right targeted fasting especially before chemotherapy can support and enhance the the potency
of these drugs, if somebody actively has cancer, cutting off the source of the supply of food,
which is significantly reducing the amount of glucose so that we're not in this place of
hyperinsulinemia. And if you don't have cancer right now and this is something that you're
paying attention to in the future, what would be your biggest recommendations? You know,
somebody who's healthy, who's listening to this podcast right now, and they're like, wow,
this is all super fascinating. I've never understood this before, but now I get it. It's almost like
you just gave us a masterclass on cancer. What are the one or two things to do today besides
not smoking that will help us be the most resilient to potentially avoid this disease in the future
or greatly minimize our risk? Yeah. And so you get back to those sort of attributable risk,
which is number one is tobacco smoke.
So, of course, that's probably the single most important thing, and still is, is to not smoke.
And then two is the diet, so avoiding hyperinsulinemia, which is that sort of what I talk about more in the obesity code and the type two diabetes code is that insulin is this hormone, which tends to make us gain weight and also causes insulin resistance.
And too much insulin is a bad, is a very potent growth factor.
so that's going to
so if you're,
you know,
you want to avoid things
that are going to raise insulin,
which is eating a very diet
that is very high in refined carbohydrates,
for example,
sugar is probably something you should best take,
you know,
in small amounts.
And then this other idea is that
you really should be having a regular period of fasting
every day.
That's really sort of basic.
It's the word breakfast.
breakfast. It's the meal that breaks your fast because really you're supposed to be eating at say
dinner time, which is say six o'clock and eating at breakfast time, which is maybe eight o'clock.
So you're getting somewhere between 12 and 14 hours of fasting every single day. That's what's
supposed to happen. That's buried in the word breakfast, right? Break fast. That is what's supposed
to happen every day. That's not what happens to most of us in 2020. Because if you look at sort of
societal norms and stuff, instead of having three meals and then no snacks, we sort of grazed
throughout the day believing that it's actually healthy for us. I don't think it is because every
time you are eating, you're stimulating your insulin, which is giving growth signals to the
cells, including the cancer cells, which love insulin. You know, you look at a breast cancer cell,
for example, it has like five or six times a number of insulin receptors compared to a normal breast cell.
they love this stuff.
They love incant.
They love glucose.
So therefore, you want to lower it.
So eating sort of whole unprocessed foods is important.
That's probably the most important thing.
Not eating all the time is the second, probably the second most important thing.
And, you know, maintaining a normal weight as best as you can.
I mean, that's not always the easiest thing to do.
But if you are overweight, then try to lose that weight.
If you are type 2 diabetic, try to reverse that type 2 diabetes.
And that's the two, you know, the tobacco and the diet are so overwhelmingly more important than everything else.
Like you could also, you know, look at the viruses, for example, you can get the, you know, try to avoid the hepatitis B and hepatitis C, which cause cancer and human papillomavirus.
But those are sort of givens.
But the diet and the tobacco are sort of in a class of their own.
everything else is like 2% and they're at like 30, 35%.
And, you know, I think I just want to say from somebody from the outsider's been an observer
of your work and consuming it and just super appreciative, the cigarette is piece is easy,
you know, tough to break, but actually there's really a lot of really interesting stuff
that's coming out of Johns Hopkins and other places of using psychedelics to help break cigarette
succession, you know, maybe those things will incorporate and we'll figure out new ways
to help people. I think it's about 15% of adult population smokes here in the United States. So
it's gone down massively and cancer rates have gone down for that. The diet, sometimes people
listening here, if they're not familiar with your work, can think, okay, you should talk about
eating healthy. But really you're talking about getting out of this central paradigm, to use the
word, where we're eating sugar in all its other forms. So people who are listening are like,
I don't really have a lot of sugar in my diet, you know, maybe a little bit in my coffee,
some birthday cake here and there, one of my parties. But,
You know, how often are you eating those meals of refined starches that are a regular part of our daily
life, the big bowls of rice or ultra-processed foods or breads or other things like that,
that fine, you know, have those things every so often as, you know, parts of your diet.
But when they become the norm, now you understand why so much of America is in that
pre-diabetic state where they think they might be eating healthy because they're just a little
bit overweight, but actually their diet is constantly spiking their blood sugar, which leads to all
these problems with insulin that you're talking about. So you're not just talking about eating
healthy, let's be a little bit more mindful, you're talking about really actually leaning in
and getting your blood sugar under control. Yeah, exactly. And, you know, one of the ways,
I mean, a lot of people talk about diets and there's all these different opinions on
diets, but what people hadn't focused on really at all, I think, until a few years ago,
was this meal timing that is, is eating all the time really the same as eating, you know, a few
times? And I think the answer is no, because the point is that you need to let your body sort
of digest, let your insulin levels fall so that you don't get all these problems with the
insulin resistance and so on because insulin is not intrinsically bad, but it is a hormone that
goes up when you eat. So if you eat constantly, is that a bad thing? And that's not been talked
about a lot. And that's what I've really focused on is that I think it's actually highly
detrimental to be eating constantly. It's just not the way that you're supposed to be doing it.
And we've never done it. Which was a little bit of the trend of some of the advice,
especially in like the 90s and 2000s, eat six meals a day, you know,
raised throughout the day. And really, you know, we're backing away from that largely through the work that people like yourself are doing and just educating, well, let's actually look. Is this actually helpful or could it be harmful? And it's looking like it's not supportive of our overall health goals inside the body. Yeah. I mean, I think the whole idea was sort of silly that you should eat, eat, eat to lose weight. And it's like, well, how's that going to work exactly?
If you're eating all the time, how are you expecting to lose weight?
And you know, of course, that if you eat a little bit and then stop, that doesn't suppress your appetite.
It increases it.
That's what an appetizer is.
It's a small portion of food to make you more hungry, not less hungry, more hungry, right?
So if you're going to eat small portions of food, you're going to stimulate your appetite, then you're going to stop.
Right?
It's like when you start urinating, you just want to finish, right?
When you start eating, you just want to finish.
If you were to go pee and you just stop and start and stop and start, it's like, why would
you want to do that?
Like, that's the dumbest thing ever, right?
So it's like you're going to make yourself hungry by taking a little appetizing portion
of food.
And then you're going to stop, right?
It's like, oh, well, that's not really useful.
And then you're going to do it again and again and again, six times a day.
Well, why would you want to do that?
That's ridiculous because it's never been done before.
Because prior to like 1977, nobody did that.
So why would you even think that it's a good thing to do?
Like, why would you even come up with that?
And the answer is that there was no real scientific evidence that actually helpful.
It was just sort of made up.
People just thought it might be good and they just said it.
And that's it.
Sure.
Well, you know, there's that old saying that I don't know who discovered water,
but it probably wasn't a fish.
Sometimes we're so in the cultural norms of the way that things have been done
that it actually takes a lot of courage,
especially for somebody in your position,
to step back and say,
wait,
does any of this make sense?
Let's start with the basics and let's question the premise
and then go from there.
If not,
we're in this rat race where today still in the U.S.,
unfortunately,
number one reason for bankruptcy is medical bills.
Cancer rates are continuing to go up.
Quality of life is not increasing.
Out of 90% of our insurance dollars that we pay in,
young people, old people, everybody,
out of all the insurance dollars that we pay in,
90% of it is used in the last six to eight months
of somebody's life to try to keep them alive
through these expensive treatments.
A lot of them well-intentioned, a lot of them well-intentioned
that are there.
Some may be coming from business perspectives,
but it's not a winning race.
We have to step back and we have to question the basic idea.
And that's exactly Dr. Fung, what you do inside this book.
And I want to thank you for really putting together some strong material.
I hope progressive medical schools out there start to make it required reading.
Because, you know, as we all know on this podcast, is that it can take 12, 17, 20 years for what's the latest literature to end up becoming part of the practice that's out there.
So kudos to you for writing an incredible book.
book.
